NIO on July 26 gave updates on some of its most important technological developments, including the world’s first five-nanometer chip for automated driving, its in-house developed operating system for vehicles, and a voice assistant powered by its large language model.
Why it matters: NIO’s fullest disclosure yet of its technological roadmap reflects how the Chinese electric vehicle maker spends its research and development money, and how it has made a strategic bet on artificial intelligence, hoping to redesign all aspects of its vehicles including self-driving and the so-called digital cockpit.
Details: Speaking at the firm’s annual Tech Day event in Shanghai, NIO founder and chief executive William Li unveiled new details of what he called the world’s first five-nanometer (5nm) processor for autonomous driving, said to offer cameras with top-notch image signal processing (ISP) functions.
Context: Only a few global chip powerhouses, such as Qualcomm and Ambarella, have announced the production of their chips using a 5nm process node with manufacturing partners such as Samsung. Tesla reportedly plans to produce its next-generation full self-driving (FSD) computer on 4/5nm processes with TSMC.
READ MORE: Chinese EV makers Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto expand bets on self-produced chips: report
]]>China- and US-based self-driving car startups Pony.ai and WeRide are ready for initial public offerings in the US, multiple media outlets have reported. The IPOs, which the firms have been eyeing for over two years, could happen as early as within the next two months.
Why it matters: Autonomous vehicle (AV) startups are generally facing pressure to lower their valuation targets as public stock markets have rapidly decelerated their interest in the space over the past few years.
Details: Fremont- and Guangzhou-based Pony.ai will go public as early as September, as some institutional investors have committed to purchasing shares in the looming IPO, financial media outlet Jiemian reported on Tuesday, without giving further details (in Chinese). WeRide is planning to sell its shares publicly in the US by the end of August, according to IFR, a Reuters publication.
Context: Pony.ai reportedly suspended a public listing plan in New York at a target valuation of $12 billion in mid-2021 due to regulatory uncertainties. The Toyota-backed company said early the next year that it was valued at $8.5 billion after closing its first round of Series D financing, TechCrunch reported.
Chinese electric vehicle maker Zeekr on July 19 introduced a new iteration of its 009 multi-purpose vehicle (MPV), including a new variant that significantly lowers the starting price of the luxury minivan and aims to capture a growing customer base of affluent Chinese families.
The refreshed 009 is the latest example of how Chinese automakers are attempting to build their luxury credentials and change the perception of premium cars both domestically and globally. The Geely-affiliated company expects to set “a new benchmark” for MPVs after the Toyota Alphard, it said. The revamped 009 boasts improved performance and range, as well as a number of intriguing features with Chinese characteristics, such as a series of in-car guided meditations.
“Chinese middle- to upper-class customers are replacing their large SUVs [sports utility vehicles] with MPVs that are becoming easier to maneuver and steer,” Jason Lin, a Zeekr vice president, said in an interview with TechNode (our translation). Like peers Xpeng Motors and Li Auto, New York-listed Zeekr sees big growth potential for the booming segment thanks to innovations in vehicle capabilities.
China’s MPV sales grew 16% to roughly 1.09 million last year and accounted for 5% of total passenger car sales, figures from the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) showed. Jefferies forecast the segment to grow 20% year-on-year to 1.3 million units this year, of which 32% could be electric, up by 10% from last year. The Zeekr 009 competes with other all-electrics including the Xpeng X9 and Li Auto’s Mega, more popular plug-in hybrid models such as the Denza D9, and the gas-powered Toyota Alphard and General Motors’ GL8 Century.
The redesigned 009 comes to market with more variants in the hope of meeting a diverse range of customer needs, as both six- and seven-seat configurations are now available in different drivetrain and battery options with a price range of RMB 439,000-469,000 ($60,363-$64,488). The six-seat, dual-motor versions help to distance the revamped 009 from its predecessors, offering the fastest acceleration to 100km/h (62 mph) among MPVs – in 3.9 seconds – and a charging speed from 10% to 80% in as little as 11.5 minutes, making it suited for business travel.
And yet, Zeekr expects the new single-motor, seven-seat variants, with a center aisle to facilitate easy entry and exit from the van’s rear, to extend its reach to cover wealthy Chinese families, especially multi-generational households, at a more affordable price tag. Around 55% of existing 009 sales come from business clients, although private owners could ultimately provide a larger market, according to Lin.
While CATL’s Qilin battery enables the same charging speed as the higher-end variants, the new entry-level 009 has a longer driving range of 740 kilometers (460 miles) between charges. That range could be further improved to 900 km with a larger battery pack to ease consumer anxiety over charging infrastructure at an additional cost of RMB 50,000, although it takes 30 minutes for the battery to charge from 10% to 80%. It has a slower sprint time of 0 to 100 km/h in 7.9 seconds compared with its siblings, but is still comparable to the Toyota Alphard, which costs RMB 890,000 in China.
Although the remodeled Zeekr 009 claims to present a prestigious option for Chinese families using a range of high-quality interior materials and top-notch components, the company is also pushing hard to offer customized features with local characteristics to differentiate its vehicles from competitors. For instance, it offers a special chill mode with the car’s seats, lights, and music tailored to create an in-car environment for guided meditation, allowing owners to take a basic course with a series of video classes.
Other special modes include “Baby Sleeping”, for when younger family members take a nap, which automatically adjusts the air-conditioning and lights and turns down the volume of voice prompts. Some of the more traditional, upscale features that come standard with the car are air suspension that eliminates bumps for superior handling and ride quality, as well as Qualcomm’s latest-gen Snapdragon 8295 chips that enable the infotainment system with silky smooth transitions and fast responsiveness.
The all-new 009, set to be delivered on Monday, comes less than two years after the initial launch of Zeekr’s second model and follows an update in January, when two 2024 versions went on sale at a starting price of RMB 500,000. Zeekr is also selling the right-hand drive version of the luxury van in Hong Kong at HK$ 755,000 ($96,716) and aiming for delivery in the city in the fourth quarter of this year. The company launched a special Grand edition, targeting competition with the Rolls-Royce Cullinan in April.
]]>Autotech startup Nullmax said on Tuesday that its latest generation of autonomous driving hardware and software package, allowing cars to navigate complex urban environments autonomously with features such as lane changing, will cost users as little as “several thousand RMB.”
Why it matters: Shanghai and Fremont-based Nullmax is among the few players in the self-driving vehicle space claiming that cars will be able to function by themselves in urban scenarios without maps and lidar. Instead, the company said artificial intelligence models can be used to enable cars to navigate from points A to B.
Details: Xu told a press conference that his company is advocating a “pure vision” and “end-to-end” approach, as Tesla has been doing and many are following its lead, which involves deep neural networks, using cameras only to perform autonomous driving functions (our translation).
Context: Chinese EV startups led by NIO, Xpeng Motors, and Li Auto have been ramping up efforts to transition from “rule-based” designs to an “end-to-end” autonomous driving method. Meanwhile, traditional car manufacturers are tapping into the power of AI by working with tech giants such as Huawei and NVIDIA, as well as startup unicorns like Horizon Robotics and Momenta.
READ MORE: Former Tesla engineer shares thoughts on end-to-end autonomous driving at WAIC 2024
Editor’s note: ‘Landing AI’ is a series of special reports focusing on the field of Artificial Intelligence curated by TechNode. By investigating the development of AI landing in China and the behind-the-scenes stories of the industry, we’re going to dive deeper into everything that’s possible under the new wave of AI.
]]>The Chinese government on July 12 announced it had given Xiaomi a production license to independently assemble electric vehicles, meaning the smartphone maker has cleared the official hurdles required to scale up its production independently, without needing its traditional car manufacturer ally BAIC.
Why it matters: The green light from Chinese regulators will pave the way for a smooth production ramp-up for Xiaomi, which has raised its delivery target to 120,000 from 72,000 units for this year and hopes to reach a wider customer group with upcoming models.
Details: Xiaomi is now on the list of “all-electric passenger car manufacturers,” according to the registration filings released for public review by China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) on July 12 (our translation).
Context: Xiaomi reached the 10,000-unit milestone in June, its third delivery month, bringing the year-to-date delivery volume of its answer to Tesla’s Model 3 to nearly 26,000 units.
READ MORE: “China’s Apple” Xiaomi takes aim at Tesla with debut EV launch, as millions watch online
]]>Chinese automakers will over time become a dominant force worldwide despite the US and Europe imposing extra duties on their electric vehicles, consultants AlixPartners said on Wednesday, highlighting that China’s vehicle makers are on track to grab over 30% of the global market by 2030.
Chinese brands’ market share in Europe is unlikely to reach the previously anticipated percentage of 15% by 2030, as forecasted a year ago, instead doubling from 6% to 12%, but stronger growth is expected in other regions. Chinese brands could claim market shares 31% and 28% in Southeast Asia and Latin America respectively by the end of the decade, up from the 19% in each estimated last year, figures from the consultancy’s annual Global Automotive Outlook showed.
Many Chinese auto majors have pivoted their focus to overseas markets beyond the EU in recent months, taking advantage of fewer regulatory barriers in, for example, Southeast Asia and the Middle East. Geely subsidiary Zeekr plans to expand its footprint from 25 to more than 50 global markets by the end of this year, despite retaining “very big ambitions” for Europe, executives told investors last month. Great Wall Motor is shutting down its European headquarters in Munich, Germany, but says it still has plans to set up a factory in the region.
“Chinese automakers will definitely lose some competitive edge in EVs as they move to implement localized manufacturing and sales operations in Europe,” Stephen Dyer, a co-leader for AlixPartners’s Greater China business and head of its Asia automotive practice, told reporters on Wednesday in Shanghai. “However, they still have cost advantages over foreign competitors thanks to a shortened vehicle development time, a much lower labor cost, along with an intense corporate culture,” Dyer added, speaking in Mandarin Chinese (our translation).
An employee from a Chinese EV maker works as many as 140 hours in a month when a new car is launched, compared with only 20 hours worked by a counterpart at a global auto major, AlixPartners told clients in its latest outlook. Meanwhile, the average vehicle development time for a Chinese EV model has been cut in half to 20 months compared with legacy brands, mainly by reducing the number of physical tests and sending out software updates to fix problems.
The European Union’s additional tariffs on Chinese-made EVs are forcing Chinese majors to set up their own assembly operations on the continent. BYD on July 4 opened its first overseas passenger car factory in Thailand while planning to invest $1 billion in another one in Turkey and to establish a $30 million battery plant in Hungary. Chery in April reached a joint venture deal with Spain’s EV Motors to produce cars at a former Nissan plant in Barcelona later this year, Reuters reported. At least 12 new regional plants are being planned by Chinese car manufacturers, Dyer said.
“What we see is we’ve had a brand premium that is comparable to or even slightly more than global automakers in some overseas markets, such as Southeast Asia,” Wang Hui, a vice president of Changan Automobile, told this year’s China Auto Forum in Shanghai on Friday (our translation). The state-controlled automaker last October announced plans to build a $241.7 million plant in Rayong, Thailand, aiming to commence operations later this year with a capacity of 100,000 EVs annually.
Wang added that Chinese firms should take a long-term mindset of “being humble and cautious” while making efforts to increase tax revenue and boost job growth for the local economies in where they operate.
READ MORE: EU anti-subsidy EV probe: What Chinese automakers have done in Europe and what’s next
]]>A former Tesla engineer, now head of autonomous driving at China’s Chery, on July 4 shared her outlook on Chinese automakers’ future capacity to scale autonomous driving technology, as Tesla leads the way with its mass data and sophisticated artificial intelligence models.
Domestic companies are roughly 1.5 to 2 years behind Tesla in developing “end-to-end neural network” technology for autonomous driving. The recent release of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) software v12 marked “a great leap forward” in applicability and user experience (our translation) according to Gu Junli, chief executive of Chery-affiliated ZDrive.ai, and a former senior staff machine learning engineer at Tesla, speaking at this year’s World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai.
Gu said she expects Chinese players to partially replace modules of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) with data-driven, rather than rule-based, neural networks by 2025. This shift comes as car companies ramp up efforts to collect fresh, multiformat data to improve models with more computing power. However, there would not be a single large neural net, where the core capability of Tesla’s latest software is built, for production cars until 2026-2027 in China, Gu added. Tesla in April announced its FSD users had traveled a cumulative 1.2 billion miles.
Recent figures from the community-run FSD Community tracker show Tesla’s remarkable progress in refining its autonomous driving features. The latest FSD v12.3.6 version can drive 372 miles (599 kilometers) between critical disengagements, compared with just a few miles it reportedly achieved two years ago, according to crowdsourced data released by the website in May. Tesla chief executive Elon Musk later forecasted on X “a major improvement in MPI (miles per intervention)” with the release of the FSD v12.5 in late June.
“This means the system has met the requirements for most users on normal daily commutes,” said Gu.
Several Chinese early movers are working to achieve a partial end-to-end pipeline for enabling their advanced driving features, hoping to gradually transition to fully end-to-end algorithms. On July 5, Li Auto revealed details about what it called “China’s first single one model” behind its Navigation on ADAS (NOA) functions. The Chinese electric vehicle startup claimed this model would use raw sensor input to generate vehicle motion plans. However, unlike Tesla’s solution of “basically photons in and controls out,” as described by Musk, it still relies on pre-defined, explicitly coded rules to produce control actions as output.
Meanwhile, other peers, such as Xpeng Motors and Huawei, have been taking partial end-to-end approaches, using separate neural networks for multiple tasks such as perception, planning, and action, while many are still struggling to improve results. According to a recent survey compiled by China’s Gaogong Industry Institute, Chinese users typically take the controls at least 1-2 times per 100 kilometers (62 miles) as their cars’ ADAS functions do not react appropriately in urban scenarios. Tesla may find issues in localizing its ADAS software due to China’s complicated traffic conditions, said Xpeng’s head of autonomous driving, TechNode reported.
Gu mentioned Chery’s plan to launch the advanced city NOA function for some premium models in the first quarter of next year, while its single deep learning network could go live in 2026. The Chinese auto major, which sold nearly 1.9 million cars last year, plans to integrate Level 2 ADAS systems into as many as 500,000 new cars sold this year, including 150,000 units for overseas markets. Based in the eastern Chinese city of Wuhu, Chery had a relatively late start in autonomous driving, with ZDrive.ai being set up early last year.
Despite Tesla’s leading position with its training wheels finally taken off, Gu envisioned that Chinese companies would contribute to a wider and more personalized adoption of self-driving technology worldwide. State-owned Chery in April reached a joint venture deal with Spain’s EV Motors to produce cars at a former Nissan plant in Barcelona later this year, Reuters reported. Meanwhile, customers from some overseas markets could access Xpeng’s XNGP ADAS capabilities as early as next year, president Brian Gu told investors during an earnings call in May.
READ MORE: Chinese companies take on Tesla’s Full Self-Driving with non-lidar approach, end-to-end AI
]]>Chinese carmakers Geely, NIO, and Huawei-backed Aito on Monday reported record deliveries of electric vehicles for June as the country’s EV segment recovery gathers momentum. Meanwhile, Huawei and Li Auto are emerging as the leaders among the newer players, despite BYD and Tesla still enjoying a near-duopoly position in the world’s largest EV market.
Why it matters: The rally, which contrasts with overall flat sales in the market, comes amid a temporary cooling-off period for the industry-wide price war on electric autos in the country. It also reflects companies’ sprints to make deliveries by the end of the first half of 2024. A new wave of consolidation and some reshuffling is also speeding up within the sector, with fewer smaller players staying in the game and some legacy giants falling behind.
Details: Li Auto topped the ranking among young EV makers by delivering 47,774 cars to customers in June, up 36.4% from a month earlier, as sales of its most affordable extended-range hybrid crossover the L6 started to ramp up after its April launch. Chief executive Li Xiang also attributed the sales recovery to improved efficiency, as the company restructured its sales and delivery teams recently following a failed launch of its first all-electric model, the Mega, in March.
Context: China’s retail passenger EV sales volume is expected to reach 864,000 units in June, representing a 30% growth from the same month last year and a 6% rise from May, while overall car sales declined 8% year-on-year, the CPCA estimated on Wednesday.
READ MORE: China’s EV sales recovery picks up pace in May, helped by promotions
]]>As Tesla’s most advanced driver assistance software (ADAS) is becoming an immediate threat due to its impending arrival in China, major Chinese electric vehicle makers and auto tech companies are hurrying to pivot their strategies towards a more pragmatic yet challenging approach to developing similar offerings. Although Tesla’s rivals have for years been looking to cut out expensive components and master the newest artificial intelligence models, the game seems to be different this time.
Both NIO and Xpeng Motors are now embracing the so-called computer vision approach, championed by Tesla, hoping their upcoming models will achieve human-like downtown driving in cities via the use of fitted cameras and radar, rather than more expensive laser sensor units. Sinpro.ai, a supplier to NIO of ultra-high-resolution four-dimensional (4D) imaging radar, said it is prepared for delivery later this year with an annual capacity of 800,000 units. Tesla has reportedly replaced radar sensors on some models after years of attempting to remove them.
“It will be a difficult task for Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) software to deal with scenarios in China where it is common that a large number of electric scooters are usually ahead in the same lane with motor vehicles,” Li Liyun, vice president of autonomous driving at Xpeng, wrote on June 27 on Chinese Twitter-like microblogging platform Weibo. Xpeng is planning to remove lidar from its upcoming sedan, scheduled for launch later this year, local media has reported.
Xpeng and NIO are also following Tesla’s suit by transitioning to an “end-to-end” autonomous driving method after using modular-based neural networks that are heavily reliant on explicit coding. Meanwhile, more traditional automakers are turning to domestic tech companies for help, such as Huawei and DJI, to catch up with the latest AI trend. Despite big challenges pressuring the industry, some early movers have the potential to compete with the US pioneer, Liu Guanghao, partner at Shanghai-based venture capital firm Befor Capital, told TechNode.
READ MORE: China opens door wider to Tesla as local giants disrupt the EV sector with AI-defined vehicles
A break from previous strategies of using expensive chips and sensors to enable ADAS capabilities, the latest approach centers on reducing the cost of components in hopes of making more room for further price cuts. Many now have their eyes on the use of radar, ditched by Tesla in 2021 due to limitations in identifying stationary objects with low image resolution, as some parts makers now said it is coming close to lidar in terms of performance – but at a lower price tag.
“There is more overlap between lidar and our sixth-generation radar systems as we significantly improve the resolution,” Juergen Brandl, Head of Market China, Business Area Autonomous Mobility at Continental Group, told TechNode. “Radar could soon see through [objects] but lidar has some problems with the distance especially in difficult situations like fog and rain.” The German firm’s newest front-facing radar boasts a detection distance of 280 and 140 meters (174 and 87 miles) for vehicles and slow-walking pedestrians, respectively.
Advanced radar solutions like this also create three-dimensional point cloud datasets like lidars, helping automakers and developers move towards fully end-to-end models with raw data collection from multiple sensors to train their self-driving systems. “We can play a big role in the development of Level 2 plus ADAS systems in China,” Brandl said, adding that the company’s product is below the price of a lidar unit with “very good“ output in terms of point cloud data.
Some disagree however, saying the technology is still at an early stage. Production of Continental’s latest-gen radar started early this year and the company began delivering the world’s first 4D radar in 2021, which detects an object’s vertical information in addition to distance, direction, and relative velocity, generating more dense point clouds than a contentional radar. Meanwhile, major Chinese lidar makers have consistently enhanced the performance of their products and lowered the prices to just over RMB 1,000 ($137.6) per unit in recent years.
The key is whether 3D/4D radar could prove to be a more “cost competitive” option compared with lidar, said Liu. “I believe both [radar and lidar] have their special advantages and disadvantages,” Brandl said. ”I think time or the market will tell whether we need both of them or one solution only.”
Either way, prospects for early players are bright. Momenta, a self-driving car company backed by General Motors and Toyota, expects the bill of materials, or total cost of components, for the City NOA (Navigation on ADAS) function to be slashed to RMB 4,000-5,000 from the current RMB 7,000-10,000 in the next two years. The intent is to survive an unprecedented price war in China that has been ongoing for more than a year.
Chinese carmakers used to brag about their coverage of cities where their assisted driving software is said to enable cars to handle on-ramp to off-ramp driving, automatic highway lane changing, and congested streets. However, many are now pivoting their focus to provide a more human-like driving experience and a full end-to-end AI model is now seen as key to winning the battle.
Described by Tesla chief executive Elon Musk as “basically photons in and controls out,” such end-to-end neural networks play an integral role in a vehicle’s decision-making process, taking raw sensor data as input and producing control actions as output. This contrasts with the conventional approaches that see each functionality, from perception to planning and action, developed individually using rule-based designs, which are often inadequate in addressing the vast number of scenarios that occur on the road, a team of researchers said in a recent report.
The result is that people still feel their cars pilot themselves inhumanly even when kitted out with some of the most cutting-edge ADAS on the market, partly because human driving behavior tends to be consistent rather than discrete. It is very difficult for the current AV (autonomous vehicle) stack to make coherent, long-term decisions, said Wu Xinzhou, Nvidia’s vice president of automotive at its annual developer conference GTC in March.
Recent surveys have shown automakers that customers are generally dissatisfied with existing ADAS functions. Nearly half of respondents take the controls 1-2 times per 100 kilometers (62 miles) as the city NOA functions do not react appropriately, while others make more frequent interventions, according to a recent survey compiled by China’s Gaogong Industry Institute. “When the driver has to interfere pretty often, then you cannot say this is autonomous driving,” said Brandl.
Xpeng is aiming for less than one intervention per 1,000 kilometers in major traffic areas in China, CEO He Xiaopeng announced early this year, without giving a timeframe. This was followed by a new software update for its XNGP ADAS in May enhanced by the first end-to-end AI model for production vehicles in China, according to the EV maker. NIO reshuffled its autonomous driving department recently, rolling up its perception as well as planning and control teams into a single group with a focus on new AI models, Chinese media outlet LatePost reported on June 19.
It requires huge amounts of data, for example, millions of video clips, to train AI systems, as well as deep pockets and access to AI chips. Musk told investors in April that his company will increase the number of Nvidia’s flagship AI processors it uses from 35,000 to 85,000 by the end of this year. He wrote in a post on X earlier that month that the investment in training computers, gigantic data pipelines, and video storage will be well over $10 billion cumulatively this year.
Such major investment and effort is not something all companies can handle however. “It would be so hard for most traditional automakers to do this by themselves. The best way is to pick a supplier,” Liu said.
The entry of Tesla’s FSD into China may feel like a new challenge therefore, but it may also coincide with a new era of partnerships around self-driving technologies.
]]>China’s Great Wall Motor is poised for its big entry into Southeast Asia, as the automaker said on Monday it would begin manufacturing its cars in Malaysia and Indonesia as early as July, in addition to its planned entry into Vietnam, local media reported.
Why it matters: The news comes as Malaysia surpassed Thailand to become the second biggest car market in the region after Indonesia in the first three months of this year, according to sales figures released by industry groups and compiled by Nikkei. This makes it another attractive market for Chinese car manufacturers given its growing economy and large population.
Details: Great Wall Motor will start operating a pure assembly plant with Malaysia’s EP Manufacturing in Malacca in July at the earliest, Cheng Jinkui, president of the company’s ASEAN operations, told the Business Times.
Context: Chinese automakers are ramping up their investments in emerging EV markets overseas, especially in regions such as Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America, at a time when competition remains intense at home and the US and Europe are imposing punitive tariffs on China-made EV imports.
Chinese automaker Dongfeng Motor will introduce the first global model from its premium electric vehicle brand Voyah as early as the third quarter of this year, in what will be a direct challenge to Tesla’s best-selling crossover the Model Y, local media has reported.
The 100% electric compact sports utility vehicle (SUV) will feature Huawei’s vision-based approach to automated driving functions on urban streets. It will also be produced in a joint plant set up with Nissan, as fierce competition has put downward pressure on the Japanese firm, a regulatory filing has shown.
Why it matters: Stellantis and Nissan’s Chinese manufacturing partner expects the model to appeal to young families and drive sales in the country’s already crowded mainstream luxury EV segment, company sources told National Business Daily (in Chinese) on Tuesday.
Details: Sources added only full-electric variants will be on offer for the Zhiyin (知音), which loosely translates as “bosom buddies” in Chinese. This is in line with a filing that was published last month by China’s top industry regulator, which shows the car has six variants with battery options using two types of cathodes – more energy-dense nickel cobalt manganese (NCM) and cheaper lithium iron phosphate (LFP).
Context: Nissan’s China joint venture with state-owned Dongfeng reported sales of 723,139 cars in the country last year, representing a 21.5% plunge from a year ago. The companies last November announced plans to export vehicles from China in 2025. The Japanese carmaker was also reportedly considering a 30% cut of its annual car output in China, along with peer Honda.
The European Union announced on Wednesday it has taken a case-by-case approach to deciding how much tariffs could increase on Chinese electric vehicles. In a move that surprised many industry professionals, the preliminary duties set to hit Chinese EV imports will rise from the general 10% basis on all of them to between 27% and 48%, with SAIC and those deemed incompliant with EU standards facing the hardest hit. The tariff hikes are relatively moderate for the likes of BYD and Geely, which have either committed to growing deep roots within the EU or have already done so in the past.
Broadly speaking, the additional duties are still in line with what many analysts had expected, despite the possibility of a massive but temporary plunge in China’s EV exports to Europe. Chinese battery EVs are priced in general around 80-100% higher in Europe than in their domestic market, creating room for price adjustments, said Jefferies analysts led by Johnson Wan. There could be very limited benefit for major European players, as the high-volume EV segment would remain intensely competitive with subdued margins, said Patrick Hummel, Head of European Autos Research at UBS.
Although Bernstein analysts expect the provisional tariffs to be a serious turn-off to smaller Chinese brands, prompting them to focus on other export markets, bigger Chinese players are likely to step up their localization efforts. Paul Gong, UBS’s head of China Autos Research, also wrote in a note to clients, “Localization of production may become an increasingly appealing option over longer run compared to direct shipping from China for exporters to take shelter from trade conflicts and geopolitical tensions.”
Below, we take a look at what the key Chinese players have been doing in Europe and their respective prospects in a continent home to some of the world’s most important automakers.
China’s top EV maker is widely considered the least affected by the newly announced tariffs, with the strength to still break even on an import model thanks to its significant cost advantage versus peers. BYD’s EVs would still be priced lower than the similar models launched by European rivals, even if the company raises prices by 17.4% to fully pass on the additional tariff to customers, although the measure could effectively prevent its dominance in destination markets.
The leading Chinese player would also have a 25% cost advantage over European counterparts even after localizing the production of its popular sedan in the region, according to UBS’s previous findings. Set to be the first major Chinese automaker with a production base in Europe, BYD expects its Hungary plant to begin operation before 2026, with an annual capacity of 150,000 units. Although exports to Europe only account for a single digit percentage of its total sales, it aims to “be in a leading position” in the regional market by 2030.
China’s biggest car manufacturer got relatively unfavorable treatment, and analysts expect the measures will significantly curb its competitiveness in Europe. The European Commission will impose tariffs of nearly 50% on EVs from the Chinese state-owned automaker, along with those deemed to be the least compliant with the nine-month anti-subsidy investigation announced last September. The company, which owns the iconic MG brand of British origin, said earlier it had “fully cooperated” with the investigation and hinted that the EU regulators misused their investigative powers in order to view sensitive business information related to its supply chain.
SAIC responded on Thursday by saying, “As SAIC MG’s sales in Europe continue to grow, we are planning to introduce China’s new energy vehicle (NEV) technologies and green factories to the continent” (our translation). The firm also called for more cooperation between China and the EU. China’s top car exporter to Europe, with shipments of nearly 243,000 units to the region last year, revealed plans last July to build a manufacturing facility plant on the continent.
Volvo parent Geely was among the three Chinese companies selected for further scrutiny and saw a relatively moderate tariff increase of 20%, another individually calculated duty rate. The impact is likely to be very marginal to China’s third biggest car exporter, thanks to its ownership of Volvo and the currently limited scale of its own brands in the region. Geely’s EV brand Zeekr said on Tuesday it is looking to establish a presence in six to eight European countries by year-end.
Chery, as well as its state-controlled peers such as Dongfeng and Chang’an, faces an extra 21% charge in a category for those cooperating with the probe but not sampled. Jaguar Land Rover’s Chinese manufacturing partner in April reached a joint venture deal with Spain’s EV Motors to produce cars at a former Nissan plant in Barcelona later this year, Reuters reported previously. Meanwhile, Dongfeng’s Voyah brand, previously planning to enter Germany, France, and Italy, has for now been selling EVs mainly in Nordic countries.
Like their bigger peers, Chinese EV makers NIO, Xpeng Motors, and Leapmotor are also set for extra charges of 21%. NIO, which currently sells four models from more than €60,000 ($64,361) in Europe, higher than most domestic competitors, said on Wednesday its commitment to the regional market remains unwavering and it will continue to explore new opportunities within the EU despite protectionism.
The company is still looking to introduce its lower-priced vehicles, including an upcoming third brand codenamed Firefly, in Europe, but the plan is now being adjusted based on the current situation. Delivery of the first model, a well-designed boutique car, will begin in the first half of 2025 in China at a price cheaper than the BMW Mini, CEO William Li recently told investors during an earnings call.
Zhejiang-based Leapmotor, which has Stellantis as its largest shareholder, is also making pivots. Chief executive Carlos Tavares said on Thursday the European auto giant will shift the output of some Leapmotor products to Europe due to the tariff hikes, having reportedly explored the potential of building EVs jointly in Italy. A similar scenario could unfold for Xpeng Motors and its European ally Volkswagen. President Brian Gu last September revealed plans to enter Germany, Britain, and France, with Italy also being included earlier this year.
]]>Li Auto is on track to offer its new level 3 automated driving system within the next 12 months, which would enable hands-free, eyes-off driving under certain conditions, as it transitions towards “end-to-end neural network” architecture, according to chief executive Li Xiang.
Why it matters: The comments mark an increase in competition between Tesla and Chinese automakers over the adoption of autonomous driving. The US automaker is reportedly looking to roll out the latest version of its “Full Self-driving-Driving” software in China, its second-largest market.
READ MORE: China opens door wider to Tesla as local giants disrupt the EV sector with AI-defined vehicles
Details: Li Auto will roll out a new version of its NOA software in the third quarter of 2024. This version still requires the driver to be in full control but will not rely on a high-definition map. The company announced that it will launch its city NOA function to users in 100 major Chinese cities in November.
Context: Automakers in China, including Li Auto, have either been applying for mapping licenses or working with map services in order to collect large amounts of highly detailed geographical data, which helps autonomous vehicles (AVs) make better decisions when performing driving tasks. However, many of them, such as Huawei and Xpeng Motors, are now looking for alternatives due to cost and complexity reasons.
READ MORE: Li Auto accelerates assisted driving tech competition amid launch of first battery EV
]]>China’s major southern city of Guangzhou unveiled its action plan on May 31 to boost the development of the so-called “low-altitude economy,” vowing to become China’s first city to commercialize aircraft for passenger transport in low-altitude airspace over the next three years, and it is not alone. Nearly 30 Chinese major city and provincial governments have brought similar initiatives into their work plans for this year as of writing, according to public records.
Chinese regional authorities are responding to Beijing’s call to establish a number of strategic emerging industries as some traditional economic pillars of the country are in recession. Beijing also wants to replicate its success story of electric vehicles from land to sky, as part of its ambition to become a global leader in technological innovations. Among various aircraft from drones to traditional helicopters, flying cars are likely to be a bright spot, and southern China could offer what it takes for that to happen, industry experts said.
Although there is no official definition of what constitutes a “low-altitude economy,” it usually refers to various businesses centered around civil-manned and unmanned aerial vehicles below 3,000 meters in altitude, including manufacturing, flight operations, and services for agriculture, logistics, and tourism.
The idea was first mooted by China’s State Council with an outline for establishing “a national comprehensive transportation network” back in February 2021 and was later listed as one of the strategic emerging industries at the central economic work conference in December.
Compared with China’s traditional general aviation sector, which includes military and commercial flights, a low-altitude economy is characterized by the elements of vertical take-off and landing, green energies, and intelligent piloting, said Burt Guo, CEO of Aerofugia Technology, a subsidiary of Geely.
Electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft (eVTOL), also known as flying cars, are considered the most promising application, garnering particular attention from investors and entrepreneurs, due to their potential for both passenger and cargo delivery at a presumably lower cost than helicopters. That is not the only reason, though. China is looking to leverage the capabilities that already exist within its EV industry, from supply chain to charging infrastructure, bringing the global competition for emerging technologies from the ground into the air.
“So is it almost like EVs in the air?” “Yes, you get the point,” Guo said when asked by Zheng Junfeng, an anchor of Chinese state television news services CGTN, at the recent BEYOND EXPO 2024 tech event last month in Macao. Guo added that eVTOL could share around 70%-80% of the materials and components with EVs, with the rest being sourced from the suppliers for traditional aircraft, while there is always room for collaboration with its parent company in fields such as manufacturing and charging.
“It’s kind of an ecosystem for new energy transportation,” Guo said. Geely led a €50 million ($55 million) funding round into Volocopter in 2019 and the German air taxi startup set up a joint venture with Aerofugia two years later.
It also represents a more cost-effective solution for urban transportation compared with subways and bypasses. Each parking garage and building rooftop in the city could be “ideal” for flying vehicles to park and refuel, according to Jian Dan, executive vice general manager of Civil Aviation Investment Fund, led by the parent of Beijing International Airport Co Ltd (our translation). “It is totally different from helicopters,” Guo echoed, saying the landing space would be “considerably smaller” than what a traditional helicopter uses.
Although consulting firm McKinsey in 2020 estimated it would cost $200,000-$400,000 to build a takeoff and landing area along with two spots for parking or vehicle maintenance, Jian believed the smallest location of such kind could be as cheap as “several thousand RMB.” Guo said a flying car would cost 30% of a helicopter, even as the technology is still in the early stages, and in the end, the cost of a trip by eVTOL could plunge to roughly two to three times that of a taxi.
Although the industry is growing at a faster pace, it could take at least three to five years before flying vehicles get commercialized, mainly because most players are still navigating technological challenges and regulatory hurdles, experts said. The International Air Transport Association (IATA) expects 5% carbon emission reductions globally by 2030 through the use of sustainable aviation fuels, innovative new propulsion technologies, and other efficiency improvements.
Electric planes are definitely the future of aviation, but the technology is not ready yet, and the battery is one of the key issues, Zhou Lisha, CEO of Chinese battery startup Montavista, told the audience at the BEYOND EXPO 2024. “Companies have to prove every inch of their aircraft is safe, and one of the tests is to make sure the batteries won’t catch fire, because you can’t stop or pull to the side of the road when something goes wrong,” said Zhou.
For that reason, governments are implementing highly stringent rules and safety standards for electric and autonomous aircraft. China has set a goal for businesses to mass produce lithium-ion batteries that meet aviation safety standards with an energy density of 400 watt-hours per kilogram (Wh/kg), as part of a development plan through 2035 released by four top government bodies late last year. For comparison, CATL’s latest Qilin battery reportedly has an energy density of 255 Wh/kg.
Operating air taxis in low-altitude urban airspace may also encounter many conflicts with high-rise buildings within a volatile electromagnetic environment. There has to be new telecommunication infrastructure facilities and a new air traffic control system to support the operation of those unmanned aircraft, according to Jian. “It is definitely not feasible for those machines to communicate with air traffic control via radio,” Jian said at this year’s BEYOND EXPO.
The Chinese government is jumping in to offer some help. Guangzhou said it will keep “close connections” with eVTOL makers and provide “necessary assistance” to them, when it comes to issues related to research and development, and airworthiness certification, among others. The capital city of southern Guangdong province also plans to build at least five eVTOL airport terminals, known as vertiports, as well as 100 takeoff and landing spots by 2027.
Headquartered in Guangzhou, US-listed Ehang said in October it received an airworthiness “type certificate” from the Civil Aviation Administration of China, CNBC reported, while Xpeng AeroHT, an affiliate of local EV maker Xpeng Motors, followed suit by submitting its application in March. AutoFlight, another Shanghai-based startup, reportedly hit a milestone early this year when its five-seater Prosperity aircraft completed a low-altitude flight between the southern cities of Shenzhen and Zhuhai in the Guangdong province.
Guo expects the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) to be the first region in the country where its flying vehicles will be available. “If you take a taxi from here (Macao) to Shenzhen it takes one to two hours. That will be only around 15 minutes if you use a flying vehicle,” Guo said.
READ MORE: Beyond Expo | Self-flying cars are closer to being realized than self-driving cars: Geely executive
]]>Major Chinese automakers reported higher electric vehicle sales for May than in April, boosted by new government subsidies and the continued use of discounts to lure cost-conscious shoppers. Notably, NIO and Geely’s Zeekr were among the top-performing companies in the market, reporting their best-ever monthly deliveries.
Why it matters: The latest sales figures marked a swift turnaround for Chinese auto majors as they have been mostly grappling with weak consumer sentiment and intensifying competition in recent months.
Details: Both NIO and Zeekr witnessed triple-digit growth year-on-year in May, with monthly deliveries reaching a record high.
Context: Retail sales of new energy passenger vehicles, which include all-electrics and plug-in hybrids, increased 27% year-on-year and 2% month-on-month to roughly 574,000 units during May 1-26 in China, when passenger car sales fell slightly to 1.2 million units, the CPCA figures showed.
BYD on Tuesday unveiled its latest-generation plug-in hybrid platform DM-i 5.0. The company said the technology gives its newest models a driving range of 2,100 kilometers (1,305 miles) at a starting price of only RMB 99,800 ($13,772), an advance that will likely accelerate China’s transition from fossil fuels to green vehicles.
Why it matters: The launch comes after figures from the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) show that new energy vehicles (NEVs), most of which are battery electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrids, represented more than half of China’s personal vehicle market in the first half of April.
Details: BYD said its fifth-gen dual-mode (DM) hybrid technology features an integrated system that covers all aspects of thermal and energy management, comprising cooling modules for front-end body parts, batteries, and in-car infotainment software.
Context: A growing number of automakers in China are pivoting their efforts to develop PHEV models, as BEVs remain on a slow growth trajectory. Sales of PHEVs, which include extended-range hybrids (EREVs) in China, surged 64.2% year-on-year in April, compared with the 12.1% growth rate achieved by BEVs, CPCA figures showed.
China’s Gotion High-tech on May 17 unveiled a Tesla-like yet cheaper cylindrical battery as well as a more common prismatic battery with ultra-fast charging among its latest products.
Additionally, the Volkswagen-invested battery maker announced its participation in the global race to make all-solid-state batteries, as China looks to catch up with rivals in producing an alternative battery success story. Speaking to reporters during its annual technology conference, Gotion’s management stated that the company would continue its global expansion despite uncertain geopolitical conditions.
Gotion is aiming to begin mass production of its new larger-format 4695 cylindrical battery – which is 46 millimeters in diameter and 95 millimeters in length – in the fourth quarter of this year. Shipment will then begin first to overseas markets, said Cheng Qian, president of the firm’s Asia-Pacific business unit.
The nickel cobalt manganese (NCM) battery cell targets producers of luxury vehicle models that look to provide their owners with an unbeatable driving range and charging speed. It has an energy density of 285 watt-hours per kilogram (Wh/kg), charges from 10% to 70% in nine minutes, and maintains at least 70% capacity for 2,500 cycles at room temperature, said Gotion.
A vertical integration strategy is behind the battery’s cost advantage over rivals, according to Gotion. The Chinese battery maker has reduced dependency on external sources for raw materials including for its cathodes and anodes, ensuring relatively stable production in eastern China’s Anhui province. It also handled 300,000 tons of old batteries last year in an effort to make the most of recyclable metals including nickel and cobalt.
Gotion also announced it has begun making at scale its so-called “G-Current” battery, which could provide a 5C charge rate and allow it to recharge from a low state of charge to 80% in less than 10 minutes. The prismatic rectangular batteries will be available to customers for various battery chemistries including NCM and cheaper lithium iron phosphate (LFP).
The G-Current is expected to meet surging demand for ultra-fast charging in the Chinese market, not just for battery-powered EV owners but for those driving plug-in hybrids. At least “several” gigawatt hours (GWh) of the capacity will come into force later this year for batteries supplied to clients with their PHEV models, Cao Yong, vice president of Gotion’s Engineering R&D Institute, told reporters (our translation).
The company also gave updates about an LFP product containing manganese. It plans to supply two international clients as early as the third quarter of this year with the product, with more than a dozen carmakers testing the LFP. A 140 kilowatt-hour (kWh) battery pack, first unveiled to the public last year, could power an EV for more than 1,000 kilometers (621 miles) on a single charge.
Gotion is hoping to start trial production of all-solid-state batteries by 2027 and is aiming for volume production by 2030, it was revealed, with the company publicly sharing its progress in the key emerging technology for the first time. The prototype battery cell has 30 Amp-Hours (Ah) of capacity and an energy density of 350 Wh/kg. The pack is set to reach 280 Wh/kg at a systemic level, giving it a driving range of 1,000 kilometers (621 miles) on a single charge.
Like its Japanese rivals, China’s fifth largest EV battery maker by shipment is matching sulfide-based solid electrolytes, which theoretically gives the battery a high ionic conductivity, with silicon-based anodes, a non-toxic and promising active material, according to Pan Ruijun, a technical lead at Gotion. The company said the 3000-charge battery maintains thermal stability at 200°C above operating temperature.
Pan expects Chinese companies to shape the future of solid-state batteries globally, not only because the government is ramping up support for their development, but also because China is a major source of key raw materials. Japan is by far the leading force in this innovation, with Toyota aiming for deployment as early as 2027. Chinese auto and battery majors such as GAC are playing catch up.
Gotion management also defended the company’s strategic supply of the American market, saying tariffs on Chinese battery imports would have little impact on the company’s US business operations.
The Chinese battery maker plans local battery production, geared towards energy storage (one of its major exports to the US), in 2026, said Chen Ruilin, vice president of international business. The Biden Administration has said it would increase the tariff rate for Chinese non-EV lithium-ion batteries from 7.5% to 25% in 2026. Gotion’s raw material factory in Michigan is set to begin operation by the end of this year, and it is aiming for volume production of battery cells at a $2 billion plant in Illinois by the middle of 2025, according to Chen.
Gotion, headquartered in the eastern city of Hefei, has ambitiously proposed a plan to have 100 GWh of capacity in each of its major overseas markets, namely the Americas, Europe and Africa, and the Asia-Pacific region, by 2030. It already makes batteries in Thailand, as well as at one of its European factories. The Illinois plant is expected to begin production this year, according to the state governor’s office.
]]>The first electric vehicle model of NIO’s lower-priced, family-oriented sub-brand Onvo finally made its debut in Shanghai on Wednesday, the International Day of Families, after three years of development. The coupe-style sports utility vehicle was surrounded at its unveiling by not only hundreds of journalists but also Chinese parents who took their children to the event, and who the company hopes will form the very first owners of the long-anticipated car.
The Chinese EV maker on Wednesday began taking reservations for the Onvo L60 at a pre-sale price tag of RMB 219,900 ($30,471), cheaper by RMB 30,000 than the entry-level Tesla Model Y but with a longer driving range and a roomier interior space, among other advantages. The SUV, scheduled for launch in September, is expected to be priced at under RMB 200,000, and come with NIO’s Battery-as-a-Service (BaaS) program, in which customers buy a car and pay for a battery rental service, similar to the company’s scheme for NIO branded cars.
Confident in the strong competitiveness of its offering and a large customer base in China, NIO management said it has “high expectations” for Onvo, which is short for “on voyage” in English. Its Chinese name Ledao translates as “path to happiness.” Speaking to reporters after the debut on Thursday, William Li, founder, chairman, and chief executive of NIO, shared additional details about NIO’s ongoing partnerships for battery swapping with some of China’s most established car manufacturers, including Geely, Changan, and GAC.
NIO’s first mainstream crossover, with a similar shape to its more premium siblings, competes with Tesla’s Model Y, the world’s top-selling electric SUV, from nearly every perspective. The entry-level L60 comes with a driving range of 555 kilometers (345 miles), a bit longer than that of the rear-wheel-drive Model Y (554 km), while the other two variants travel more than 730 km and 1,000 km on a single charge, respectively.
The company also said that the L60’s outstanding wind resistance, measured by a drag coefficient of 0.229, increases its effective range, while a 900-volt electrical system reduces energy loss to heat, giving it a longer range. The total energy consumption of the car is 12.1 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per 100 kilometers, compared with the 12.5 kWh achieved by the Model Y, according to NIO.
Li said that NIO will make a “pretty decent” gross margin from the L60, by focusing on core values that matter to Chinese families, rather than producing a vehicle with a dazzling array of unnecessary specs, a move that keeps the car’s overall costs under control. Cost savings also come from NIO and Onvo sharing research and development costs, among other synergies.
The Onvo L60 embraces the vision-based approach advocated by Tesla, which uses cameras and artificial intelligence and gets rid of lidar sensors for autonomous driving. It also uses a smaller and more affordable lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery pack from BYD, according to Reuters.
NIO also provided details about its extensive power infrastructure network, which is claimed to be the largest of its kind in China with more than 2,415 battery swapping stations as of Wednesday. It has long been a loss-making effort for the company but is now emerging as an attractive option for charging availability and cost reduction for a growing list of Chinese auto giants.
Onvo owners will only be able to use the company’s newer swap stations (the third- and fourth-generation ones) and will share the facilities with NIO’s partners. Each of the newer swap stations, which can hold more than 20 battery packs of different sizes, can offer more than 400 swaps per day, with each pack being used roughly up to 20 times. Li mentioned the company’s plan to charge partners a service fee of roughly RMB 20-30 per swap. NIO itself completed nearly 70,000 battery swaps per day as of May 8.
Meanwhile, NIO owners can “refuel” their vehicles at any swap shop, giving them more charging availability and a premium user experience. The company said it is on track to build 1,000 battery swap facilities on its own this year and expand the network for NIO and Onvo from the 2,316 stations available as of the end of last year, while its partners are also set to provide additional resources.
Li added that he envisaged there being six to seven EV battery sizes at most over the long term, with partners set to use batteries of the same kind as Onvo. NIO currently uses batteries in four sizes with an energy density ranging from 70 to 150 kWh.
READ MORE: Drive I/O | Big bets on battery swaps
]]>Chinese electric vehicle giant BYD will finally roll out its first electric pickup truck, named the Shark, in Mexico on Tuesday, marking its entry into the growing segment and firing the starting gun on a new race with established rivals from Ford to Tesla on the global stage.
The Shark is set to be a high-end offering and is the latest model in the company’s expanding Ocean family of EVs, which target younger and tech-savvy consumers compared with its Dynasty family. It also shares the company’s latest EV platform with the Bao 5, a luxury off-road sports utility vehicle under its Formula Leopard marque, or Fangchengbao in Chinese pinyin. Holding a dominant position in the home market, BYD is ramping up efforts to pursue global opportunities, and the launch of the Shark will be the latest attempt by a Chinese automaker to push upmarket and create a global brand.
With the BYD Shark framed by some as a serious threat to the Ford F-150 Lightning, below are some of the most important details about the pickup ahead of its official launch at 10:30 a.m. (UTC -6) today.
#1 The Shark will share the latest DMO (dual-mode off-road) plug-in hybrid EV platform with the dual-motor Bao 5 SUV, which uses a 1.5/2.0-liter high-performance petrol engine and delivers a combined output of more than 500 kW. BYD will also likely use high-quality materials and modern equipment in the truck to provide a high-spec cabin similar to that of its sibling, featuring the likes of advanced LED displays for infotainment and a large-sized head-up display unit to provide real-time information to drivers.
#2 It also seems inevitable that a range of BYD’s in-house technologies will be incorporated into this strategically important model, including “blade batteries,” which boast improved thermal stability and strong resistance to collisions, as well as the DiSus, an electric-powered body control suspension system. In addition to featuring an adjustable suspension system powered by artificial intelligence algorithms, the Shark will also be able to power other vehicles as well as electronic devices with its bidirectional charging capability, which could be a useful and attractive function for camping expeditions.
#3 Both PHEV and all-electric Sharks are expected to be available to global consumers, in line with BYD’s other international offerings. The PHEV will likely have a driving range of 1,200 kilometers (746 miles) on a full charge and full tank of gas and could be charged from 30% to 80% in just a few minutes, if the performance of the Bao 5 is repeated for the pickup, as seems likely. It may also provide low energy consumption similar to the Bao 5 which reports an impressive fuel consumption of 7.8L/100 km.
#4 The BYD Shark will probably focus on the overseas markets for the foreseeable future, as there have been restrictions on commercial vehicles including pickups in China. Some local governments have prohibited pickup trucks from being driven in their downtown areas, including Beijing, Hangzhou, and Chengdu. Nevertheless, the new model will be produced at BYD’s Chinese plants, at least for now. The company is looking for a location in Mexico to build a factory, BYD Americas chief executive Stella Li told Reuters early this year.
#5 BYD’s first pickup truck will compete against the Ford F-150 Lightning, the Tesla Cybertruck, as well as the Great Wall P series, at an expected price tag of around RMB 300,000 ($41,460). Rival Great Wall Motor was the top-selling brand of pickup truck in China in 2023, posting sales of 143,851 units globally and accounting for roughly half of the domestic market in the category last year. Ford reported a 6.8% growth in the US in the first quarter of 2024, thanks to strong demand for its pickup trucks.
]]>An increasing number of automakers are looking to make their vehicles compatible with the battery swapping standard NIO is pushing for in China, as GAC Group said on Wednesday it will partner with NIO to expand swapping infrastructure for electric vehicles across the country.
Why it matters: The collaboration highlights increasing efforts by carmakers, along with various stakeholders such as battery suppliers and energy firms, to tackle the issue of range anxiety – fear of an EV running out of power – which has hindered greater EV adoption. The move is also expected to allow NIO to cut expenses further as it opens the money-losing power network to other automakers.
Details: According to a Wednesday release, the two automakers plan to develop a standardized battery module that would facilitate the roll-out of swap station-compatible passenger EVs from both sides.
Context: Guangzhou-headquartered GAC is the latest Chinese automaker to announce that its EV owners will have access to NIO’s nationwide infrastructure network, following deals with Changan, Geely, JAC, and Chery, as well as the company’s link-ups with state-owned utilities Wenergy Group and China’s Southern Power Grid.
READ MORE: Drive I/O | Big bets on battery swap
]]>Sales of Chinese electric vehicle makers Li Auto and Huawei-backed Aito dropped sharply in April as rivals Zeekr and NIO managed to post major improvements, in the latest indication of how competition in the country could be impacted by price cuts and new model launches.
Why it matters: The latest sales figures in April showed the world’s largest EV market is slowly recovering from a sales slump due to an economic downturn and inclement weather early this year. Some potential EV buyers are still waiting on the sidelines for possible stimulus measures and for new cars shown at this year’s Beijing Auto Show to make it to market, experts say.
READ MORE: Global carmakers take on Chinese giants in EV showdown at Beijing Auto Show 2024
Details: GAC’s Aion, Li Auto, and Huawei-backed Aito – which are among the biggest Chinese EV makers – all reported double-digit declines in EV deliveries in April from a month earlier. Huawei saw sales of Aito-branded EVs fall 21% last month, with monthly deliveries of the redesigned M7 falling to 10,896 units from its peak of nearly 30,000 units. Aion and Li Auto delivered 28,113 and 25,787 EVs in April, 13.6% and 11% fewer than a month earlier, respectively.
Context: China’s new energy vehicle sales in April are expected to be on par with March at roughly 720,000 units, partly because wait-and-see sentiment has grown among Chinese customers, the China Passenger Car Association said in an April 25 post.
READ MORE: Explainer: How a new round of price cuts are reshaping China’s EV market
]]>Tesla claimed on its Chinese app on Monday that it would be rolling out its full self-driving (FSD) system “very soon” rather than the previously stated “a bit later” (our translation). The development comes as the US automaker reportedly received tentative approval from Chinese authorities to deploy its advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) in the world’s most competitive electric vehicle market following a surprise visit to Beijing by chief executive Elon Musk.
Local customers have expressed mixed views about the potentially game-changing technology finally coming to their country, although many Tesla owners and loyal fans welcomed the long-overdue launch on social media. The technology may not yet work well in Chinese urban driving scenarios, despite costing RMB 64,000 ($8,838); most competitors such as Xiaomi promise to offer similar functions free of charge, Li Yang, a Model 3 owner in Shanghai, told TechNode on Tuesday.
Major Chinese EV players Huawei and Xpeng Motors, who specialize in autonomous driving, have responded in a relaxed way to what is seen by many as a major win for their US rival.
“We are confident that Huawei’s intelligent driving system is the best in the world,” Richard Yu, Chief Executive of Huawei’s Consumer Business Group, said at a press event last week as the company introduced the redesigned Aito M5 crossover. Aware of Tesla’s release last month of the no-longer-in-beta FSD software, Yu said the company has closely studied its competitor’s technology by taking test rides in San Francisco, among other US cities.
A long-awaited battle: Experts told TechNode that the US and China have been in a neck-and-neck race to develop “end-to-end neural network” technology, seen by experts as the biggest difference between Tesla’s FSD v12 software and earlier versions.
A booming segment: Analysts expect Tesla’s imminent launch of the FSD software in China to not only help restore Beijing’s image among foreign investors in general, but also help China extend its lead in the adoption of driver-assist technologies worldwide, and enhance its reputation as a rising powerhouse of next generation cars.
Context: Tesla’s China breakthrough comes after US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken on April 25 called on China to provide a level playing field for American businesses during his second visit to China in less than a year, Reuters reported.
Global carmakers from Volkswagen to Toyota are introducing new models at the Beijing Auto Show 2024 with the help of Chinese tech companies in an effort to defend market share amid a major shift to electric vehicles led by local car giants.
The biannual trade event, which on Thursday witnessed a return to pre-pandemic attendance levels after a brief pause in 2022, also represents another landmark moment for the Chinese EV sector where domestic players are once again on the offensive with an array of new models. A similar event in Shanghai a year ago reportedly prompted the industry’s legacy players to either increase their efforts or rethink their brands in order to adapt to the changes.
Below, TechNode provides a summary of some of the biggest releases from both international and Chinese automakers, including BYD, GAC, Geely, Honda, Toyota, and Volkswagen. There are also some notable updates from younger players such as Xiaomi, NIO, and Xpeng, which might give a clue as to where the most competitive EV market in the world is heading.
China’s biggest EV maker on Thursday unveiled a higher-end variant of its Qin vehicle, the top-selling compact sedan in the country last year. The new car is scheduled for launch in the second quarter with an expected price tag of RMB 120,000 ($16,560). The Qin L measures 4.8 meters in length and spans a 2,790-millimeter-long wheelbase, placing it between the Qin Plus and the Han in terms of size. It features the company’s next-generation plug-in hybrid platform DM-i 5.0, which could suggest an improvement in range and fuel efficiency. The company also introduced the Seal 06, a plug-in hybrid EV under the Ocean lineup which is about the same size as the Qin L but loaded with more stylish design language to attract younger customers.
Aion, the third best-selling EV brand in China last year after BYD and Tesla, showcased its first global model, replete with modern technologies and angular styling, as its state-owned parent beefs up its strategy to woo customers worldwide. GAC said its all-new Aion V, scheduled for launch in July, will maintain a driving range of over 750 kilometers (466 miles) even when the mercury dips to -30 degrees Celsius, and offers a large interior space comparable to the likes of the BMW X5. The all-electric sports utility vehicle, which incorporates traditional Chinese dragons into its design, can navigate varied urban environments worldwide with features such as lane switching by utilizing advanced artificial intelligence algorithms to process sensor data instead of high-precision maps, the company said.
Volvo’s parent showed its ambition to become a disruptive force in the global automotive industry with the debut of what it described as the world’s first production model with two sliding doors and front swivel seats. Geely has taken a radical approach to how EVs are put together, giving the 4.7 meter-long Zeekr Mix an extended wheelbase of three meters achieved through a more compact electric motor, shorter front overhangs, and repositioning of the air conditioning system, among other components. This, along with the front seats that can rotate 270 degrees, would allow kids to play or families to dine together in a 1.5 square meter interior flat space. The five-seater multi-purpose vehicle, offering a 1.5 meter width opening area for passengers, targets three-generation Chinese families, especially those with elders and pregnant mothers.
Japan’s Honda on Thursday began selling its second all-electric model with time-limited discounts in China in the company’s latest effort to boost sales. The move comes after entrenched rivals such as BYD and Tesla recently rolled out more price cuts amid slowing growth. The e:NP2 SUV has a driving range of 545 km at a price tag of RMB 159,800, providing buyers with a RMB 30,000 reduction compared to its original plan, according to Li Jin, a deputy general manager of Honda’s China joint venture with GAC. Honda also debuted the Ye, a new series of all-electrics with technologies sourced from Huawei and iFlyTek among other Chinese tech firms, as part of its plan to sell only EVs in China by 2035.
Toyota said on Thursday it will integrate lidar sensors into its two upcoming models under the “Beyond Zero” (bZ) all-electric series, as the world’s top-selling automaker looks to provide consumers with the same level of assisted driving technology as Huawei and Xiaomi. The bZ3x and the bZ3c compact crossovers will be able to automatically change lanes, and enter and exit Chinese highways when they go on sale within the next 12 months. Toyota also announced it is exploring the uses of generative AI in collaboration with Tencent, as Chinese consumers expect their future vehicles to be more capable and personalized. This follows reports that the Japanese giant is using Huawei components to enable autonomous driving functions on its China-made EVs.
Germany’s biggest carmaker participated in Auto Beijing 2024 with major global debuts including the ID.Code concept – which offers a glimpse into its upcoming, China-specific all-electric lineup ID.UX – as well as the Audi Q6L e-tron, the first production model based on its PPE electric platform. The coupe-styled ID.Code will be equipped for highly autonomous driving and come with a sophisticated AI assistant with contributions from local designers, as Volkswagen plans to introduce the first model under the new series later this year. In addition to partnerships with Xpeng and Horizon Robotics, the automaker confirmed it is working with Chinese tech giants including DJI, as its latest Tiguan L SUV now features an advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) sourced from the drone maker.
Xiaomi was the center of attention on Thursday when the Chinese smartphone giant said it had secured 75,723 reservations with non-refundable deposits for the SU7, its first EV, with a competitive price range between RMB 215,900 and RMB 299,900. Chief executive Lei Jun expects monthly delivery to exceed 10,000 units in June and the company is set to reach a milestone with 100,000 EV deliveries by this year, which would be a record speed for any Chinese EV brand. The 55-year-old entrepreneur is an icon in the Chinese tech and auto industries, with his visits to rivals’ booths becoming one of the hottest topics at this year’s Beijing Auto show.
Xpeng Motors could take on its major frenemy with the mainstream brand MONA, short for ‘Made of New AI,’ CEO He Xiaopeng told reporters during a press conference.
Meanwhile, one of NIO‘s new affordable brands, called ONVO, is scheduled for launch in the second quarter of this year. The luxury EV maker on Thursday launched a redesigned version of its ET7 sedan with a starting price of RMB 428,000, which is RMB 20,000 lower than its original version launched three years ago.
READ MORE: Huawei, Xiaomi, and Geely’s new EVs have details leaked on Chinese government site
]]>Chinese electric vehicle brand Zeekr has grabbed the spotlight again after unveiling one of the finest luxury vans Chinese consumers can buy. The company says it is seeking to end the dominance of multinationals in the Chinese market, where dealers charge significant markups for similar offerings.
“This is among our top missions,” said Andy An, chairman of Geely Auto Group and chief executive of Zeekr, at a press event on April 19, calling the status quo “irrational” (our translation). An added that Chinese car brands now offer best-in-class luxury and safety as the market makes a transition to smart EVs. Dubbed “a royal suite” on wheels and a fully-electric answer to the Rolls-Royce Cullinan, the Zeekr 009 Grand costs only a fraction of the models that comprise BMW’s luxury lineup and costs less than the Toyota Alphard, one of its key competitors, at a price tag of only RMB 789,000 ($108,961).
The launch comes as Geely’s EV unit sees strong and continuous demand for its products on its home turf and is set to embark on a major push into global markets. The latest sales figures show that the Zeekr 001 has overtaken Tesla’s Model 3 as the best-selling battery-powered sedan in the Chinese premium car segment, as the company maintains its annual delivery target of 230,000 units for this year.
The Zeekr 009 Grand boasts a combination of sophisticated craftsmanship and cutting-edge technologies and is geared towards the demands of Chinese celebrities and business leaders. Among the mesmerizing features include “curtain” glass that presents as pitch-black in less than two seconds and a single-click mode that deletes users’ travel history and contact data, designed to provide security and privacy.
Zeekr is also upgrading its “giga-casting” technology, a technical term from Tesla that describes a process to diecast almost all vehicle underbody parts as one to improve car body stiffness. With the two rear seats coupled with die-cast vehicle frames in a C-shape formation, safety tests have concluded that the van’s interior remains intact following a rear-end collision by a 2.3-ton trailer at 50 kilometers per hour (31 mph), according to a video clip presented by the company.
With only one variant, the 009 Grand has a driving range of 702 kilometers (436 miles) based on City Light Test Cycle (CLTC) standards, despite having more powerful motors than its original version.
The Chinese automaker says its four-seater outperforms the Rolls-Royce Cullinan in on-road performance with the adoption of artificial intelligence algorithms and adaptive dampers and air springs to smooth the ride, technology also embraced by BYD and Huawei. While Chinese carmakers from Li Auto to Great Wall Motor are carving out this increasingly important niche market, Zeekr said its special-edition 009 is winning customers over with its craftsmanship and quality materials, rather than with a more superficial luxurious design.
Zeekr is emerging as one of the few Chinese EV makers bucking the trend of turning to plug-in hybrids in the middle of a bumpy transition to new energy vehicles (NEV), while aiming for strong growth despite an overall sluggish EV demand sentiment. The company just delivered more than 4,900 Zeekr 001 shooting brakes in the first two weeks of April, compared with roughly 2,100 units of Tesla’s Model 3 during the same period, according to figures compiled by Sun Shaojun, founder of Chinese consumer behavior research agency CarFans.
Earlier figures also indicated sustained growth momentum as the revamped 001 pocketed roughly 30,000 non-refundable orders within 30 days of its launch on Feb. 27. BYD, Huawei-backed Aito, and Zeekr outperformed other brands in terms of new orders in the last week of March, Jefferies analysts said in an April 9 note. The companies have benefited from a spillover effect, as Xiaomi’s Porsche-alike sedan becomes a phenomenon, garnering huge attention for the smartphone giant as well as more established rivals.
An told reporters during an interview that the long-term picture of the ongoing EV transition remains positive, with Zeekr maintaining a delivery target of 230,000 vehicles for 2024, almost double the nearly 119,000 units it achieved last year. It plans to enter dozens of countries in the Middle East, Latin America, and Southeast Asia this year, having started exports to Europe, the Gulf Bay area, and parts of Asia late last year. “In our view, Geely is at full steam for the EV race and overseas expansion with competitive NEV product offerings and an established global footprint,” Jefferies analysts said on March 27.
READ MORE:Interview: Zeekr executives on the 001 FR supercar, autonomous driving, and overseas plans
]]>Chinese automaker GAC Group said on April 12 that it had broken through several obstacles regarding the durability and safety of “all-solid-state” batteries, and expected its future rollout of the technology to offer drivers a range of over 620 miles per charge by 2026.
GAC, which made the announcement at its annual Tech Day, is among the few Chinese automakers to have offered specific plans in the race to market for next-generation advanced electric vehicle batteries. Toyota’s long-time partner has opted for a solid electrolyte system that sets it apart from the Japanese giant, by far the world’s leading holder of solid-state battery patents, according to Nikkei’s study.
Why it matters: The development is the latest example of liquid-state lithium-ion pack leader China ramping up efforts to master the technology, as global auto giants expect solid-state batteries to give them an edge over competitors in the EV transition.
Details: GAC claims its batteries offer better safety compared with not only liquid-based batteries but also solid-state alternatives, while achieving an energy density of 400 watt-hours per kilogram (Wh/kg), a roughly 60% rise compared with CATL’s highly advanced Qilin battery. It features a hybrid solid-state electrolyte based on both oxides and sulfides, among other materials.
Context: Experts say there is little agreement for now on which solid-state battery technologies will win out, and the timeline for their mass production and deployment remains uncertain. TrendForce generally projects that solid-state batteries may enter mass production between 2030 and 2035, with an energy density of 500 Wh/kg, offering a driving range two to three times greater than existing offerings.
China’s commerce minister Wang Wentao talked with the heads of major car manufacturers including BYD and Geely on April 7 in Paris, as the companies scramble for solutions to an ongoing probe by the European Commission that could result in substantial tariffs on their imports of electric vehicles into the EU.
Why it matters: The meeting comes as the EU prepares to publish its findings on whether Chinese automakers have benefited unfairly from state subsidies. Brussels could raise tariffs from the current 10% to at least 25% according to an estimate by European environmental lobby group Transport & Environment (T&E).
Details: At a roundtable discussion with the business leaders, Wang stressed the importance of Chinese automakers expanding overseas markets “in an orderly fashion” and embracing competition, according to a Twitter post by the China Chamber of Commerce to the EU (CCCEU)
Context: France has backed the Commission investigation, according to Reuters, and has recently changed subsidy rules in a way that effectively excludes Chinese EV models.
Major Chinese car manufacturers, including SAIC and BAIC, saw double-digit declines in annual profits as the industry was hurt by slowing growth in new fossil fuel car sales and aggressive price cuts for their electric vehicles amid rising competition from the likes of BYD and Tesla.
Why it matters: The latest financial results coincide with the rising momentum of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) sales in China. BYD, Geely, and Li Auto, all with a broad PHEV lineup, are among the few that reported both revenue growth and margin improvements, while traditional automakers and battery electric vehicle startups have been put under pressure to sacrifice profits for growth.
Details: China’s biggest car manufacturer SAIC reported revenue of RMB 744.7 billion ($102.9 billion) in 2023, an increase of just 0.1% from the same period last year, with net profit declining 12.5% year-over-year. Sales of its joint ventures with Volkswagen and General Motors last year fell 8% and 14.5% to roughly 1.2 million and 1 million units, respectively.
Context: Beijing is planning to unveil new measures to boost the performance of FAW, Dongfeng, and Changan, three automakers directly under the leadership of China’s State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC), by giving them more leeway and independence in EV operations. Local government-owned businesses, including SAIC, BAIC, and GAC, are also expected to benefit from the policy in the coming months.
]]>Major Chinese automakers, including Geely and Changan, have strategically introduced big discounts to their car prices or new variants of existing models despite posting a pickup in March deliveries, in a defensive move after Xiaomi’s first car reached nearly 90,000 pre-orders in just 24 hours.
Xiaomi’s smash hit: The initial success of Xiaomi’s first EV, rolled out on March 28 with a lower-than-expected price tag, is having a knock-on effect on most other automakers which are being forced to take immediate action in order to hold on to their market shares.
March sales, discounts: Sales of Geely’s new energy vehicles (NEVs) rose 65% year-on-year and 34% month-on-month to 44,791 units in March, of which roughly 13,000 were Zeekr-branded battery EVs, partly driven by the strong sales of its refreshed 001 sports wagons, delivery of which began on March 1.
READ MORE: Explainer: How a new round of price cuts are reshaping China’s EV market
Context: The March sales figures – which showed a rebound from the annual Chinese New Year holiday slump – also indicated a stronger growth momentum for PHEVs than BEVs with a growing number of carmakers pivoting to more affordable PHEVs as they look to expand NEV sales in China’s vast majority of underdeveloped regions.
Hundreds of people flocked to a Xiaomi store in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou in the late hours of Thursday evening to be among the first to take a look at what many deem to be the electronics brand’s more affordable alternative to a Porsche, as the brand announced a lower than expected starting price for its debut electric vehicle. That’s what TechNode observed during a livestream broadcast by a Chinese electric car blogger on social media app WeChat that attracted more than 200,000 viewers within an hour.
Xiaomi has already enjoyed a debut win after securing a record 50,000 pre-orders in just a few minutes following its SU7 EV launch event. The official livestream racked up nearly 43 million views on microblogging platform Weibo, underscoring the overwhelming interest among tech-savvy Chinese consumers in the company’s first car. Those making a reservation were asked to pay a RMB 5,000 ($692) deposit as part of the process, with the tech giant expressing its thanks to customers who did so in a brief statement on the microblogging platform Weibo (in Chinese).
The all-electric sports sedan is selling at a lower than expected starting price of RMB 215,900 ($29,881), roughly $4,100 cheaper than the popular Tesla Model 3, while touting better performance from driving range to acceleration. The dual-motor all-wheel drive version competes with the Porsche Taycan with a top speed of 265 kilometers (165 miles) per hour at a price tag of only RMB 299,900.
Xiaomi’s car launch contrasts markedly with Apple’s surprise retreat from the EV landscape, after the iPhone maker reportedly scrapped its decade-long effort to make a car recently. “We will provide every user, including those with Apple devices, a smart and connected life experience everywhere, creating seamless integration in their homes, cars, and beyond,” Xiaomi chief executive Lei Jun said during the press conference (our translation).
Lei, the 55-year-old serial entrepreneur dubbed “China’s Steve Jobs”, tried to lure users away from traditional carmakers during the two-hour event by showcasing how Xiaomi’s ecosystem would provide universal connection and integration between different devices, including phones, cars, and gadgets at home.
Xiaomi essentially promised potential buyers that their devices would be all tied together with a click, swipe, or a simple voice command. The car’s air conditioning will cool the interior down on a hot summer’s day once the owner tells a home speaker what temperature they want before even leaving the house, according to one example given. In another, the car’s dashboard could become a centralized command station for home accessories which will be activated as the driver approaches home.
Although rival Huawei has touted similar efforts with its EV partners, Xiaomi claimed last November that more than 655 million devices have been connected to its IoT (Internet of Things) platform, from televisions to fitness bands, making it the biggest network of its kind worldwide. “This is a trump card from Xiaomi,” said Lei when discussing the linking of the brand’s new EV with its IoT network.
Meanwhile, Lei mentioned Xiaomi’s plans to be “among the top-tier players” in autonomous driving, a field where Tesla already stands out as a pioneer globally and Huawei is establishing its name at home. The company said its EVs are already capable of traveling more than 300 km on average autonomously on Chinese highways before human drivers take over and will be able to complete most trips by themselves on urban streets across China by August.
Xiaomi is moving towards two distinct approaches by working on both a camera-based computer vision system and another advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) that relies on more sensors including lidar. The company said it will exclusively employ Nvidia’s cutting-edge chips for both systems and bring the software development completely in-house to ensure timely over-the-air updates across all its car variants.
“In China, Tesla vehicles will not be as good as the SU7 when it comes to intelligent driving capabilities,” said Lei, adding that customers who placed their orders before the end of this year will get the software free of charge. Tesla currently charges Chinese buyers RMB 64,000 for future access to its full self-driving (FSD) package, despite it remaining unavailable in the country. Still, it is faced with competitors from BYD to Geely which also look to offer customers highly automated features with their premium EVs.
READ MORE: Key takeaways from Xiaomi’s EV pre-launch: A top offering facing a tough test
]]>China’s Zeekr and Xpeng Motors will begin delivering their electric vehicles to Thailand later this year while eyeing expansion to other Southeast Asian countries, as they seek further overseas growth amid slowing opportunities at home.
Why it matters: The news comes after Chinese car brands’ combined market share reportedly swelled by six points to 11% in Thailand in 2023, thanks to growing demand driven by favorable subsidies and tax breaks for EV purchases.
Debut in Bangkok: Xpeng named on Monday three major dealer groups to sell and service its EVs for Southeast Asia: Neo Mobility Asia for Thailand, Premium Automobiles for Singapore, and Bermaz Auto for Malaysia.
Local production ramp-up: Chinese automakers are making deeper inroads in Thailand by setting up plants in the country, as the Thai authorities required the firms to offset imports with local production at a ratio of 1:2 starting from 2026, in order to qualify for government subsidies.
Hong Kong will provide a subsidy of up to HK$ 200 million ($25.6 million) to China’s Hozon Auto, which could alleviate the financial pressure on the electric vehicle startup and facilitate its expansion in overseas markets.
Why it matters: Hozon Auto is the latest mainland-headquartered company to establish a base in Hong Kong as China hopes to create a high-tech megalopolis in its southern Greater Bay Area to rival California’s Silicon Valley.
Details: In addition to providing a $25.6 million subsidy, the Hong Kong government will also “provide assistance” (our translation) for a $200 million cornerstone investment for Shanghai-based Hozon, the company said on Wednesday in a statement, without giving further details.
Context: In December, Hozon forged a partnership with local dealership DCH Motors to begin selling Neta-branded EVs in Hong Kong in 2024 and began trial production at its first overseas car plant in Thailand, which has an output of up to 20,000 EVs annually.
China will stick to its plan of becoming an electric vehicle powerhouse on the world stage despite recent signs of weakness in the industry, and will fine-tune policies to deal with challenges including slowdowns and overcapacity, government officials said over the weekend.
EV skepticism: The comments came after a slew of international carmakers, including Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz, and Ford, moved to either cut production of electric models or delay their electrification goals as global demand growth fell short of their lofty expectations. Meanwhile, 2024 kicked off with a new round of price cuts in the Chinese auto market, putting loss-making EV makers under further pressure.
New measures: China will announce comprehensive measures in the coming days to boost domestic demand, facilitate consolidation in the industry, and broaden mass adoption for battery cars, according to several vice ministers who attended the forum.
READ MORE: EV charging problems deepen as Chinese consumer confidence wavers: McKinsey
Rising PHEV usage: China expects the rising adoption of plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEV) to offset the slowing growth of battery EVs in the short to medium term. BYD reported sales of roughly 1.57 and 1.44 million BEVs and PHEVs respectively last year, prompting a growing number of Chinese carmakers to follow suit in producing more of the battery EV alternatives.
READ MORE: Chinese EV makers’ February sales hit by holiday, cold snaps
]]>Details of new electric vehicle models from Chinese auto and tech majors including Huawei, Xiaomi, and Geely have been leaked online via an official regulatory process. Some are expected to make their debut at the upcoming Beijing Motor Show next month, positioned to compete with models from dominant rivals such as BYD and Tesla, and potentially stirring up a new price war in the world’s biggest auto market.
The companies expect the upcoming models, now making a splash online, to become bestselling or otherwise strategically important cars for their brands. Below are highlights from the registration filings released for public review by China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) on Tuesday, giving critical details of the models ahead of their official launches.
The S9 will be the first model under the new premium Stelato brand launched in partnership between Huawei and China’s BAIC and the largest sedan model of all Huawei-enabled EVs to date. The car measures 5.1 meters in length and 1.5 meters in height with a wheelbase of nearly 3.1 meters, offering passengers a spacious and comfortable interior in an effort to draw in affluent Chinese consumers.
The all-electric executive sedan will be available in single and dual-motor variants producing 308 and 524 horsepower respectively, and will include innovative elements such as a camera-based digital rear-view mirror system as an optional add-on, according to the filings. Analysts expect the car to be launched in June for between RMB 300,000 and RMB 500,000 ($41,730-$69,550). Shares in partner BAIC Bluepark surged 32% on the mainland Chinese stock market on the news over the week.
China’s Geely is raising its bet on the small but growing segment of multi-purpose vehicles with its upcoming roll-out of the Zeek Mix, an all-electric five-seater van, after the launch of its larger and more business-oriented Zeekr 009 nearly two years ago. The pictures published by MIIT show a mid-size MPV with a rounded exterior and low center of gravity as well as an optionalLIDAR unit mounted on the car’s roof for automated driving.
It is slightly shorter than the Zeekr 007 sedan at nearly 4.7 meters in length, likely making it easier to maneuver and attractive to parents, while offering a larger interior with a 3,008-millimeter-long wheelbase. The single-motor car has a 422-horsepower electric powertrain – higher than the plug-in hybrid Denza D9 from BYD, currently a top-seller in the market, but less powerful than bigger offerings such as the Xpeng X9 and the Li Auto Mega.
Xiaomi on Wednesday received Chinese government approval for a new variant of its first EV, the long-anticipated SU7, equipped with lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries sourced from CATL and roughly 110 kilograms heavier than the one powered by BYD’s iron-based batteries. Speculation has circulated that the new power option could be CATL’s Shenxing batteries, which have boasted of a high energy density for a longer driving range and an 800-volt electrical system for faster charging compared with existing offerings.
China’s industry regulator had previously uncovered details about another entry-level SU7 and the more premium SU7 Pro/Max, which the company claimed could accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h (62 mph) in 2.78 seconds and would be more aerodynamic than rivals’ offerings including Tesla’s Model S. Chief executive Lei Jun said on Friday that the smartphone maker will begin deliveries immediately on March 28, when pricing of the sports sedan will be finally announced.
READ MORE: Explainer: How a new round of price cuts are reshaping China’s EV market
]]>Huawei and Chinese automaker BAIC are aiming for monthly sales of their first joint electric vehicle model under a new brand to exceed 10,000 units, as they also set their sights on markets in Asia and Europe, Chinese media has reported.
Why it matters: The launch of the new car brand with BAIC, named Stelato and scheduled to be unveiled in April at this year’s Beijing Motor Show, would be another test for Huawei as the smartphone maker has been looking to grow its automotive business after being hit by US sanctions.
Details: Huawei and BAIC Bluepark, a mainland-listed subsidiary of the state-owned automaker, expect monthly sales of the first model under the new Stelato brand to achieve more than 10,000 units, according to an internal memo seen by Yicai (in Chinese).
Context: More Chinese automakers, such as state-owned Changan and Dongfeng, are joining Huawei’s expanding “Harmony Intelligent Mobility Alliance” in hopes of re-creating their brand images with Huawei’s smart cockpit and automated driving technologies, and leveraging its sales network.
Chinese electric vehicle makers are taking a ferocious price war to a new level as BYD and its peers kicked off 2024 with dozens of redesigned models that boast improved specifications at lower price tags.
For conventional carmakers, the situation is different from previous stages of the battle, as their Chinese counterparts claimed for the first time that “electric is cheaper than gas,” meaning their EVs now reach or even surpass price parity with similar combustion engine models. This milestone was supposed to take place as early as 2026, according to forecasts from BloombergNEF. Its ahead-of-schedule arrival is ushering a new phase for China’s car industry.
The world’s biggest EV market is being reshaped by a seemingly endless price war that has been going on for a year, and 2024 will likely be a defining moment for those faced with flagging sales, persistent losses, and cash flow pressure, analysts say. The following explainer looks at the causes and implications associated with the recent price cuts by automakers in China, as well as what we might expect in the future.
Among the key reasons for the price reductions is the plunging cost of raw materials for EV batteries, as the spot price of battery-grade lithium carbonate fell from more than RMB 500,000 ($69,450) per ton to just over RMB 100,000 throughout the last year. Jefferies analysts calculated that Chinese EV makers saw their gross profit margin recover by 2.3% in the third quarter of 2023 with average lithium prices falling by RMB 200,000.
A vertically integrated supply chain stretching from batteries to chips has also granted EV leaders BYD and Tesla the ability to achieve economies of scale and innovate products rapidly. BYD, which has had strong “pricing power” especially in the price segment between RMB 100,000 and RMB 200,000, will embrace a proactive approach to competition, chairman Wang Chuanfu told investors during an earnings call last March (our translation).
Analysts expect the downward trend in lithium prices to continue, as vast amounts of capital were poured into new mines in China following the price rise in 2022, resulting in a severely imbalanced market. Lithium prices could come in as low as RMB 90,000 a ton in the fourth quarter of this year, creating more room for most companies to make price adjustments, Jefferies strategists said in a Jan. 10 note. Meanwhile, EV makers such as Xpeng Motors are likely to improve vehicle margins “to some extent” thanks to innovations in fields such as automated driving.
On the other hand, however, Chinese EV makers have been under pressure to boost sales volumes as they grapple with a clear capacity glut and slowing growth against the backdrop of weak momentum and insufficient demand.
Only 20 out of 77 car manufacturers in China ran at more than 60% of their maximum operating capacity last year with numbers from the rest coming in under industry-competitive levels, according to public records. Tina Zhou, chief executive of auto parts trading platform Gasgoo, commented on social media on Dec. 17, citing this overcapacity as a major reason for the industry-wide price war over the past year. In January, the Chinese government said it would take “forceful measures to prevent superfluous projects” related to EV manufacturing, Reuters reported.
Although China’s leadership in EV is seen as a bright spot in a faltering global economy and amid a domestic economic downturn, experts have painted a picture of a resilient but slowing market, flagging more price cuts to come as sluggish consumption abounds. Bernstein expects China’s EV sales growth to be “still impressive” but slower at 25% for 2024 compared to 35% last year, with a combined total of approximately 185 new EV models set to go on sale this year.
“Consumers are getting spoiled by deep discounts and believe they will eventually negotiate a better price even for those new cars coming to the market,” Bernstein analysts wrote in a Jan. 10 note.
The unprecedented battle for the world’s biggest and most competitive EV market has pressured international auto majors from Ford to Toyota to scale back their operations since last year, with their market share (Tesla excluded) declining from 51.6% to 38.3% during 2021-2023. Citic Securities on Feb. 22 forecast (in Chinese) that number to drop to below 20% over the long term, with only German luxury carmakers able to maintain their presence.
Meanwhile, a new wave of consolidation and some reshuffling is underway among Chinese EV makers as repeated price cuts allow the bigger ones to grab more market share and put their smaller rivals under financial pressure. The top 10 players could together claim a combined 85% of the market in 2024, driving smaller players out of business, Changan Automobile chairman Zhu Huarong, a delegate of the National People’s Congress, told Chinese reporters on Tuesday on the sidelines of the Two Sessions meetings in Beijing.
Not everyone agrees. NIO founder and chief executive William Li told TechNode during a media event in December that the company is preparing for a long drawn-out fight, while UBS envisioned China could be big enough to allow 10-12 domestic carmakers to sell significant volumes with different success stories by 2030 in the best-case scenario.
Either way, it could be an almighty battle – it will be thrilling to see who emerges victorious.
]]>Sales of major Chinese electric vehicle makers including BYD and Geely fell by nearly half in February from a month prior, hit by the week-long Chinese New Year holiday and a prolonged cold snap, as well as ongoing economic uncertainty.
Why it matters: The slump largely reflects the increasingly fragile position of smaller EV makers, already struggling to maintain reasonable sales volumes while larger rivals compete for market share with new models on offer for lower prices.
Details: BYD on March 1 reported its lowest sales since June 2022, with 122,311 vehicles sold last month, a 39.2% fall from January. New energy vehicle (NEV) sales of rival Geely, including battery EVs and plug-in hybrids, dropped 49% month-on-month to 33,508 units.
Context: Analysts expected NEV sales to bounce back in March following recent price cuts by China’s major automakers, as store traffic returns to pre-Lunar New Year levels, according to a March 1 note from Jefferies, citing a Chinese dealership.
Chinese electric vehicle maker Zeekr began selling a redesigned version of its best-selling 001 on Tuesday with a slew of performance features including an extended driving range and faster charging speed at a cost of RMB 269,000 ($37,364).
Geely Automobile’s Zeekr is strengthening its offerings with an enhanced advanced driver assistance system, or ADAS, which will enable hands-free driving functions on Chinese motorways, in the face of competition from Tesla and home rivals such as Xpeng, Huawei, and Xiaomi.
Why it matters: The new 001 is the latest example of how Chinese automakers are stepping up a months-long price war by offering ever-increasing high-tech, luxury-style features for the same price or less, as the world’s largest EV market consolidates.
Range boost: At a press event at Zeekr’s headquarters in Hangzhou, company officials emphasized how the all-new 001 beats rivals with its large battery packs and high-voltage architecture, providing more range and allowing for faster charging.
Self-driving improvement: Zeekr integrated the revamp with roof-top lidar as standard, along with high-definition cameras and ultrasonic radar sensors around its perimeter, allowing the vehicle to spot objects 200 meters away, a combination intended to avoid complex situations and possible collisions.
Market outlook: Management expects the all-new Zeekr 001 to contribute at least half of its sales in 2024, with monthly deliveries reaching 10,000 units per month, Jason Lin, a vice president, told reporters on Tuesday. The company will commence delivery on Friday with a goal to deliver 230,000 EVs this year, nearly a 100% increase from last year, Reuters reported.
READ MORE: Geely to sell its Zeekr electric cars directly to customers
]]>Geely is taking strides towards becoming a global auto leader as it finally lists an iconic sports car brand after a months-long delay.
Lotus Technology, the electric vehicle division of Lotus, majority-owned by Geely after a financing deal in 2017, began trading its shares on Nasdaq on Friday. The brand appeared under the ticker LOT, achieved via a merger with a so-called blank-check company.
Despite China being Lotus’ largest single market, international markets are set to make a greater contribution to revenue growth and margin expansion, Feng Qingfeng, chief executive of Lotus Group and senior vice president of Geely Holding Group, told a Friday media call.
Once a legend in the racing world with its lightweight and aerodynamic vehicles, UK-founded Lotus was for years fraught with financial trouble due in part to a mismatch between high investment costs and low-volume output.
The $880 million infusion of capital from the deal is expected to fund Geely’s ambitious plan to fully electrify the illustrious 75-year-old racing brand by 2027 and boost its business beyond the super-luxury price segment globally.
Around the time Emira – the last Lotus model with an internal combustion engine – was released in mid-2021, Geely set its sights on the booming global luxury EV market set to enjoy double-digit growth over the decade, according to Oliver Wyman, adviser on the deal.
China’s second-biggest automaker by sales is set to expand in the US and South Korea in the second half of this year with the introduction of Coventry-designed, Wuhan-manufactured Lotus EVs featuring German engineering and Tesla-like automated driving features.
Sales of the Eletre, an $115,000 sports utility vehicle and first of the new-age Lotus products, will begin in the US as early as September, followed by the delivery of the similarly-priced Emeya sedan next year, said Feng. Last July, Feng told the Financial Times that Lotus might use an existing plant owned by Geely-backed Volvo Cars in South Carolina, or possibly open an additional new US factory.
The management on Friday did not give any update on the plan but expressed “full confidence” in its expansion, with its regional retail network set to be expanded to 80 showrooms from 47 in North America by 2025, despite rising US-China tensions. Global markets will account for roughly 60% of Lotus’ total sales by 2025, while China is set to contribute the remaining 40%, according to Feng.
Taken public via a special purpose acquisition company on Friday, the UK-originated and Chinese-backed EV maker now has a market value of roughly $7 billion, less than a sixth of arch-rival Porsche. Yet, Lotus has set an ambitious goal of selling 150,000 EVs annually in 2028, up from 21,500 units last year, including a small number of gasoline-powered cars.
The new phase brings different challenges. In addition to economic uncertainty worldwide, consumer sentiment for EVs is weak overall, especially in Europe, where Lotus is set to operate 105 retail stores by 2025. These challenges are compounded by policy and geopolitical risks for Chinese-backed EV makers selling abroad.
Meanwhile, EV sales in China appear to be shifting into a slower gear this year after years of accelerating growth. EVs now account for only 7-8% of new car sales in the segment priced from $80,000, lower than the “low teens” growth rate baseline estimated by the company, Feng acknowledged. Yet he continued to tout “strong growth potential” in the world’s biggest auto market.
Management believes that a clear sales and marketing message derived from its decades of storied racing history will enable Lotus to stand out from rivals and bring it into closer competition with Volkswagen’s Porsche, which delivered over 40,600 electric Taycans worldwide last year.
Meanwhile, Lotus Tech expects economies of scale from increased volume and competitive labor costs to bring its gross margin to at least 21% in 2025, up from 4.7% as of last June. The company has bet on a strategy similar to that of Porsche, which expanded into more affordable lifestyle luxury, from a pure focus on state-of-the-art sports cars.
With a proven track record of turning around loss-making Volvo in just three years after its 2010 takeover, Geely has shown it can be adept at cross-border moves. The question now is, will it be successful this time?
]]>Chinese electric vehicle maker Human Horizons will suspend production for at least six months and furlough its employees in an attempt to keep the company going as it looks for new funding, local media has reported.
Why it matters: Human Horizons, which has been selling premium EVs under the HiPhi brand since late 2020, is the latest Chinese EV startup to scramble for cash as it tries to continue operations, as competition intensifies and growth slows in the hotly contested market.
Details: The austerity measures were announced at a staff meeting on Sunday and immediately went into effect, people familiar with the matter told financial media outlet Caixin (in Chinese).
Context: The firm’s financial woes have been signposted for some time. It recently closed two showrooms and has been searching for new financing after Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Investment withdrew its intention to set up a joint venture in a $5.6 billion deal.
NIO Capital, a venture capital firm founded by Willliam Li, chief executive of the namesake electric vehicle maker, has raised a new China-focused fund of more than RMB 3 billion ($416.8 million), despite a global market lull and domestic economic challenges.
Why it matters: The fundraising milestone will allow NIO Capital to further explore the “transformative potential of innovative technologies in the automotive and energy sectors,” said Ian Zhu, a managing partner at NIO Capital, in a Monday announcement.
Details: The deal shows the strength of NIO Capital’s ties with its limited partners, which include venture capital investment guidance funds set up by Chinese regional governments, national funds, family offices, and listed companies, according to the announcement, which did not provide further details.
Context: The deal comes as global private investment remains soft due to interest rate hikes and economic headwinds.
The Chinese electric vehicle segment briefly lost momentum in January as a majority of automakers reported a significant sales drop on Thursday during the traditional low season, a contrast to December when big promotions and exciting discounts gave a short-term sales boost at year-end.
Why it matters: The decline was especially marked for BYD, which accounted for nearly a third of the country’s green energy vehicle sales last year. The biggest Chinese EV maker maintained its leading position with sales of more than 201,000 units last month, although that number represented a 41% decrease compared to December.
Ups: Geely posted its best-ever month with sales of 65,826 fully electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles last month, roughly 5,400 units more than in December and nearly six times greater than what Volvo’s parent achieved a year ago. This growth was partly due to strong sales of its Galaxy and Lynk & Co brands, which sold 19,223 and 28,176 units over the month, respectively.
Downs: On the other hand, China’s US-listed EV trio are the ones under pressure by reporting their lowest monthly deliveries since June, as they engage in a relentless price war with larger tech and auto forces. Both Li Auto and NIO slashed prices on current lineups last month as they prepare to launch revamped models in March, potentially causing some customers to postpone purchases.
Context: China’s sales of new energy vehicles, mainly all-electrics and plug-in hybrids, increased 92% year-on-year from Jan.1-28 partly due to the year-ago low base effect marked by a wave of Covid cases after Beijing dismantled pandemic controls in December 2022. However, that number was 24% down compared with December when most automakers made a year-end sales push, figures from the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) showed.
]]>CATL and Didi said on Jan. 28 that they have signed a partnership to build battery swap stations for commercial fleets to recharge their electric vehicles, in a sign of China’s urgent need to set up a gold standard for EV infrastructure.
Why it matters: The news reflects how major players are rushing to build alliances and expand their presence in the hope of getting a larger say as the Chinese central government is pushing for industry-wide standards to drive EV adoption and reduce the strain on the grid.
Details: CATL and Didi will set up a joint venture for a fast and large-scale roll-out of a battery-swapping network for ride-hailing services in China, according to a joint announcement, which did not reveal detailed plans for the swap network or the size and structure of the JV.
Context: NIO is for now the dominant player in the field, operating more than 2,300 battery swap stations in China as of December. The EV maker plans to add at least 1,000 more this year and has partnered with big names including Geely, Changan, and Chery.
BYD and FAW Group are aiming to invest in DJI’s automotive business unit – one of the few Chinese companies capable of developing partially automated driving software – as part of the latest effort by traditional automakers to catch up with rivals such as Tesla, local media has reported.
Why it matters: The news comes at a time when a growing number of automakers and suppliers are expanding their alliances in hopes of accelerating progress in and sharing the cost of making partially automated driving passenger cars. In China, the technology is being popularized by the likes of Tesla, Huawei, and Xpeng Motors.
Details: BYD and FAW, a manufacturing partner of Volkswagen and Toyota in China, recently conveyed their message to DJI Automotive, the car business unit of the namesake drone maker, 36Kr first reported on Wednesday (in Chinese). Citing people with knowledge of the matter, the report did not put a figure on the planned investment.
Context: Shenzhen-headquartered DJI separated its car business into an independent company in late 2022 and became open to external funding with a target valuation of $1.5 billion, Chinese media outlet Leiphone reported in August.
READ MORE: BYD’s Denza launches cheaper driver assistance system with Nvidia amid rising competition
]]>Huawei and Dongfeng Motor, a Chinese manufacturing partner of Stellantis, are in an ongoing collaboration to develop smart electric vehicles, the companies have announced. This adds to a string of such deals by technology giant Huawei as it accelerates its entry into the auto market.
The partnership could help Voyah, a subsidiary of state-owned automaker Dongfeng, increase sales and expand its presence in the red-hot EV market where a wave of consolidation and reshuffling is underway, according to David Zhang, a visiting professor at Huanghe Science and Technology University.
Why it matters: The alliance is the latest example of Huawei’s multifold endeavor to expand into EVs. It has pushed two initiatives to enhance cooperation with carmakers in particular.
Details: According to Zhang, Huawei will adopt the HI approach with Dongfeng, mainly selling the carmaker components and software, and will probably not go into as much depth as it did with Seres.
Context: Huawei has been working on the spin-off of its automotive business unit for several months. The company in November announced plans to establish a joint venture with Changan, stating that other existing partners such as Seres have been invited to invest in the new entity.
China’s SAIC Motor Corp will spend $1.4 billion building 12 fossil liquefied natural gas (LNG)-powered ships to export cars, as Chinese electric vehicles spread overseas and the European Union tightens its climate and trading policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Why it matters: The move is the latest example of how EU regulations are pushing Chinese automakers to make changes to the way they operate, and adds to the challenges they face in expanding to overseas markets with their EVs.
Details: China’s biggest automaker said on Wednesday that the SAIC Anji Sincerity has begun its maiden trade voyage from Shanghai to Europe. The ship spans 200 meters (656 feet) in length and boasts capacity for 7,600 cars, making it the world’s largest ro-ro vehicle transport vessel partly powered by sustainable fuel.
Context: SAIC is not the only Chinese carmaker to build its own fleet and set its sights on going global. Its move takes place as China recorded exports of 5.2 million cars last year, meaning a 57.4% annual growth rate, and is set to dethrone Japan to become the world’s largest car exporter.
BYD has signed an agreement with Spain’s Grenergy to provide renewable energy power facilities using its blade-shaped batteries for a $1.4 billion energy storage operation in Chile’s Atacama Desert, which the companies claim to be the largest of its kind globally.
Why it matters: The deal is the latest in BYD’s efforts to scale up its energy storage business and lead in areas beyond electric vehicles, venturing into the booming renewable energy sector, as global EV sales are reportedly poised for slower growth due to lower state subsidies this year.
Details: BYD will provide Grenergy with a total of 2,136 large-scale energy storage systems powered by 1.1 gigawatt-hours (GWh) worth of its so-called blade battery, which boasts efficient space utilization and high thermal stability in a thin and lengthy form, according to a statement.
Context: BYD had captured around 11.5% of the global energy storage system market with shipments of 14 GWh worth of batteries in 2022, industry tracker SNE Research said in an annual summary dated March 2, 2023. This places it ahead of South Korea’s LG Energy Solution and Samsung SDI, but significantly behind leader CATL, which controlled more than 40% of the market.
Just as German majors once did in the gasoline-powered vehicle segment, Chinese carmakers are beginning to jointly build a reputation for luxury in the electric vehicle segment in their home country, according to Paul Gong, head of China autos research at UBS.
Why it matters: The comments point to a dramatic shake-up in the world’s biggest auto market as once-dominant foreign car brands lose ground while Chinese counterparts such as BYD and Li Auto have risen over the past year, often in step with each other.
Details: China’s new cohort of EV makers have tended to sell pricier than average cars packed with high-tech features, inspiring their more established counterparts to improve their offerings and resulting in a positive net effect on all of the companies’ profiles, Gong said, pointing to “synergies” similar to those of the German majors in the fossil-fuel car era.
Context: Having struggled to cope with the ferocious competition of repeated price cuts, Chinese car brands such as the established BYD and new entrant Xiaomi have sometimes turned to collaborations to generate buzz and support on social media.
Geely on Jan. 5 launched the first battery electric sedan under its mainstream luxury marque Galaxy, which the Chinese automaker hopes will take the crown from the likes of the BYD Han to become China’s best-selling model in the mainstream sedan segment.
“We are aiming to see the Galaxy E8 take pole position as a top-seller against the backdrop of increasing competition in the Chinese mainstream car segment,” Jerry Gan, chief executive of Geely Automobile Group, said in an interview after the launch event (our translation). The company did not provide specific sales targets, citing fluctuations in the market.
Volvo’s parent is looking to carve out a significant piece of China’s increasingly crowded medium-to high-end car segment. Approximately 65% of the new EV models debuted at November’s Guangzhou Auto show were priced between RMB 200,000 and RMB 300,000, including the Galaxy E8, its sibling Zeekr 007, and BYD’s Sea Lion, Jefferies analysts wrote in a research note dated Nov. 28.
BYD’s Han was 2023’s most popular electric sedan in the price segment with sales of more than 200,000 units. Geely posted sales of 83,497 vehicles under its Galaxy marque as of December, after deliveries began last June. It began deliveries of the E8 on Jan. 5 and has two other plug-in hybrid models for sale in the lineup, the L7 crossover and the L6 sedan, priced from RMB 138,700 and RMB 115,800, respectively.
Below are five key factors that Geely hopes will carry the Galaxy E8 sedan to success:
Pricing: The Galaxy E8, a five-meter-long flagship sedan, starts at RMB 175,800 ($24,612), which is RMB 34,000 below the base price of the BYD Han EV, and RMB 6,000 lower than the smaller, hybrid Toyota Camry. Its all-wheel drive version is priced at RMB 228,800 and additionally features an 800-volt system for fast charging and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h (62 mph) in 3.49 seconds.
Smart cabin: Like its homegrown rivals, Geely has packed the luxury-styled but affordably priced sedan with technologies such as Qualcomm’s latest five-nanometer cockpit processor 8295, as well as a massive 45-inch wide 8K dashboard screen made by Chinese display manufacturer BOE. This makes the E8 probably the cheapest model that enables users to play hit gaming titles such as Asphalt in-car. By comparison, the 2025 Toyota Camry hybrid, which started pre-sales at RMB 181,800 in China on Jan. 1, is powered by Qualcomm’s previous 8155P processor.
Performance: The single-motor E8 has a power output of 200 kW and is equipped with a 62-kilowatt-hour battery pack, offering a driving range of 550 kilometers (342 miles), while the entry-level BYD Han is fitted with a 60.5 kWh battery and a 150 kW motor. The top-end version of the E8 boasts 800-volt fast charging that potentially adds 180 km on a five-minute charge; for comparison, all the variants of the more premium Zeekr 007 offer an additional 610 km from a 15-minute fast charging session.
Exterior: The capacious midsize sedan comes with a “ripples of light” design element, featuring an aesthetic front end with a 1.1 square foot illuminated graphics area comprising 158 micro-lights that can be programmed to display “over 100 different light shows,” according to Geely. It also has an aerodynamic design with frameless doors and concealed door handles, on a 2,925-millimeter-long wheelbase, making it slightly larger than the BYD Han.
Satellite assistance: The E8 is one of the incoming models that could provide satellite call services in areas with no cellular or WiFi signal. Geely said it will launch a further 11 telecommunication satellites into low orbit in February, following the successful launch of its first nine satellites more than a year ago, geared towards offering high-precision navigation for its self-driving cars, reported Reuters.
]]>Top Chinese automakers BYD and Geely on Monday reported record sales of electric vehicles in 2023 on the back of year-end momentum from their home turf and strong shipments to overseas markets, as China’s booming industry ramped up its push for global expansion.
Why it matters: The latest sales figures come at a time when China is set to surpass Japan to become the world’s largest car exporter, according to estimates by the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) as reported by Nikkei, buoyed by a growing demand for green energy vehicles worldwide.
Details: BYD posted record sales at more than 3.02 million EVs in 2023, marking 62% growth from a year ago and putting the Chinese carmaker in pole position to retain its title of the biggest-selling EV brand in the country. In particular, exports surged 334% to 242,765 units compared with the previous year, with the company now having established its footprint in more than 70 countries.
Context: CAAM expected car sales in China to reach the threshold of 30 million units for the first time in 2023 and that number will be further increased to 31 million in 2024, Caixin reported. NEV sales are set to total 9.4 million units in 2023, up 37% from a year earlier. The growth rate could slow to 22% in 2024, however, as the domestic EV market is maturing.
]]>Xiaomi held its most significant media event of the year in Beijing on Thursday: the debut of its first electric car. With a size comparable to the BMW 5 Series and a shape similar to the Porsche Taycan, the four-door sedan boasts some of the Chinese car market’s highest specifications, as cut-throat competition from maturing rivals rises.
The sleek, gadget-full all-electric sedan is aiming to become a top choice for China’s increasingly tech-savvy consumers, and certainly aroused widespread curiosity judging by the more than 46 million people who logged on for the three-hour-long unveiling on the country’s Twitter-like site Weibo. Yet from journalists and insiders alike, the reaction was mixed.
From the event, TechNode has selected some of the car’s highlights.
The high-performance SU7 can sprint from 0 to 100 km/h (62 mph) in 2.78 seconds, as it climbs to a top speed of 265 km/h. It is claimed to be the world’s most aerodynamic production car with a drag coefficient (Cd) of 0.195. By comparison, the Taycan Turo can hit 260 km/h and Tesla’s Model S has a Cd of 0.208. It also comes just a month after rival Huawei launched the Luxeed S7 sedan at 0.203Cd.
Xiaomi said it uses two 9,100-ton mega casting press machines to produce the front and rear underbody pieces, giving the car a torsional stiffness of 51,000 Nm/degree, nearly twice the number of the Ford F-150 Raptor and higher than any other car on the road. The technology, first adopted by Tesla, has since been embraced by Chinese EV makers from Geely-affiliated Zeekr to Huawei-backed Aito.
Xiaomi’s chief executive Lei Jun presented aspects of the company’s self-driving initiative for public viewing, highlighting that the premium version of the SU7 will incorporate two Nvidia Drive Orin processing chips plus a laser sensor unit on the car’s roof to carry out certain partially autonomous driving functions. Xiaomi also showed a short video of the car drawing into a tight garage space autonomously.
The Chinese tech company has set a goal for its advanced driver assistance software to be available to drivers in 100 major Chinese cities by the end of the next year, according to Lei. Huawei and Xpeng Motors are for now the leaders of this booming market, with established carmakers from BYD to Great Wall Motor trying to catch up.
The SU7 will be the latest Chinese car model powered by Qualcomm’s smart cockpit computing platform SA8295, after the Zeekr 001 FR and its sibling Jiyue 01, and its infotainment system will turn on in just 1.5 seconds. It is also integrated seamlessly into the Xiaomi ecosystem with the adoption of the company’s self-developed operating system, the HyperOS, which takes only 30 minutes or so to carry out important updates, according to the company.
CEO Lei said the SU7 would create the same smooth experience that anybody with a Mi Phone is used to, as various apps are pushed from their phones to a 16.1-inch in-car dashboard once they sit in the car. Other devices, from tablets to home appliances, also seamlessly work with the vehicle, an integration trend led by auto and tech majors such as Huawei, Geely, and NIO.
Xiaomi will have to pick an appropriate price tag, given it starts with a somewhat broad, unclear positioning, said You Xi, a seasoned economic and financial writer and co-founder of Chinese online media platform Communication Planet. “It remains challenging for the company to extend its brand into EVs,” You added, citing similar offerings from multiple competitors among his reasons (our translation).
The smartphone giant plans to introduce two variants of the SU7 to “contemporary elites with taste in lifestyle and technology” in China over the next few months, said Lei. Some experts have predicted the premium version of the car, with an estimated driving range of 800 kilometers (497 miles), could cost consumers at least RMB 300,000 ($41,124).
]]>Chinese EV maker NIO on Dec. 23 unveiled a long-wheelbase executive sedan model, the ET9, with a price range of $112,160. The model boasts its own self-driving chip, marking the first utilization of the five nanometer process technology in China’s auto industry.
The four-door executive flagship, equipped with proprietary technologies such as a sophisticated yet lightweight chassis system and a superfast-charging battery pack, reflects NIO’s commitment to redefining the upper premium vehicle market, William Li, the company’s founder, chairman, and chief executive, told press at the annual NIO Day event on Dec. 23. Li further referred to the target segment as ”a spiritual home base“ for international luxury carmakers (our translation).
With a pre-sale starting price of roughly RMB 800,000 ($112,160), NIO’s answer to the Porsche Panamera could serve as a low-volume halo car and is scheduled for delivery in the first quarter of 2025. Larger rivals from BYD to Geely have also launched similarly-priced offerings, indicating their aspirations to upscale and grab a slice of the luxury market.
Here are some of the key specifications of the ET9 presented by NIO at the company’s annual gathering held in the northwestern Chinese city of Xi’an.
Design highlights: Different from old-money cars that Western brands typically offer, the NIO ET9 features a sleek and contemporary look with high ground clearance, large 23-inch wheels, and cutting-edge gadgets such as laser sensors on the roof and sides for an all-round view of the car’s surroundings.
Autonomous driving: The ET9 will be powered by NIO’s first self-developed system on chip (SoC), the Shenji NX9031, for partially automated driving. NIO stated it will be the first Chinese automaker to use chips with five-nanometer process technology, providing its vehicles a computing power comparable to the combined total of that created by four industry-leading processors.
Large cylindrical battery: The ET9 will incorporate NIO’s in-house developed, 46105-type cylindrical lithium-ion battery cells. This implies a size of 46 millimeters in diameter and 105 mm in length with a cylindrical shape, a technology also embraced by Tesla in the hopes of increasing ranges and lowering costs.
Smart chassis: NIO also launched an intelligent chassis suspension system which the company claimed would provide a refined driving experience featuring a steer-by-wire system, rear-wheel steering, and adjustable suspension altogether for the first time in a mass-produced consumer car.
Huawei is doubling down on electric vehicles with plans to run as many as 800 showrooms in China next year dedicated to the joint car brands that it has launched with manufacturing partners, aiming to become a more visible player in the world’s biggest auto market.
Why it matters: The new shops, expected to present a broader portfolio with larger spaces compared to Huawei’s current policy of showcasing vehicles in its regular appliance stores, will allow Huawei to display models and arrange test drives for more potential buyers. They will also be part of a branding overhaul to enhance Huawei’s brand image as a major car tech company.
Details: In what could be the tech giant’s fastest period of growth in its history, Huawei is planning to operate 800 car showrooms next year and increase that number to 1,000 in 2025, people familiar with the matter told Chinese media outlet 36Kr.
Context: Sources added that a retail and distribution network of 800 shops next year will be comparable to that of Huawei’s major rival Li Auto, which operates nearly 400 direct-sales stores and 320 maintenance centers as of November.
Xiaomi said on Tuesday that it had sacked three employees for “spreading rumors” about plans for its electric vehicle business, as the company also said it was planning legal action over photos of its first car model leaked online by two media outlets. For months, multiple reports have circulated on Chinese social media featuring unauthorized confidential information about the smartphone maker’s EV business.
Why it matters: The news comes as Xiaomi, known for its low-cost pricing advantage in the smartphone market, has captured growing attention from Chinese netizens due to speculation of an imminent launch of its inaugural EV model, potentially heightening competition in the already low-margin sector.
Details: The three employees were found by the company to have spread inaccurate information without permission during conferences hosted by brokerages and investment firms, severely misleading the markets and disrupting operations at Xiaomi’s EV division, the company said in a post on the Chinese Twitter-like platform Weibo.
Context: A research note recently circulated on the Chinese internet and obtained by financial news agency Jiemian published what it said was “key information” regarding Xiaomi’s first EV, naming some of the suppliers for components such as the head-up display.
Chinese EV brand Zeekr on Thursday announced the launch of a fast-charging, affordable, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery capable of running 500 kilometers (310 miles) on a 10-minute charge, becoming the latest automaker to seek more self-reliance and better cost control over the critical EV component.
Claiming to be the world’s first LFP battery with an 800-volt electrical system for fast charging, the so-called Gold Brick battery features a faster recharging speed than some of the most advanced offerings from established battery suppliers such as CATL and BYD. CATL’s latest Shenxing battery adds 400 km on a 10-minute charge.
The decision by Zeekr to make its own EV batteries is one of the clearest examples of the Geely-owned brand’s determination to have greater control over its EVs’ core technologies, Chief Executive Andy An told a press conference in the eastern city of Quzhou on Thursday.
Here’s what Zeekr’s management said about the battery and its production plan:
Gold Brick battery: The blade-shaped LFP battery will be first equipped for the entry-level version of the Zeekr 007, the brand’s first battery electric sedan with a pre-sale price of RMB 224,900 ($31,059), offering a driving range of 688 km on a single charge.
Quzhou production base: The Quzhou factory, which also produces NMC batteries for other Geely-owned marques such as Smart and Galaxy, will have an annual capacity of 24 gigawatt-hours (GWh) next year. This will allow the automaker to achieve an annual production run rate of 840,000 EVs.
Context: Geely is the latest in a range of Chinese automakers from GAC to Changan that has turned to making its own electric vehicle batteries in order to lower production costs and gain control over its supply chain. An original equipment manufacturer (OEM) could recover its investment and make a profit if it produces more than 15 GWh worth of batteries, McKinsey & Company has estimated.
Volkswagen’s software unit Cariad and Chinese auto tech startup Horizon Robotics expect to recruit 300 employees by the end of this month for a newly established joint venture called Carizon, in an effort to meet growing local demand for advanced driving technology.
Why it matters: The hiring spree marks the German auto major’s latest effort to develop its own in-vehicle software following an announcement last year of a $2.3 billion investment deal for a 60% stake in the JV in partnership with Horizon.
Details: The two companies have not officially provided details of the recruitment plan, but Horizon’s co-founder and technology chief Huang Chang, leading a team of more than 100 engineers, has reportedly joined the JV.
Context: VW has made a series of moves to step up the pace of its software development for the Chinese market, including a $700 million deal for a 5% stake in Chinese EV maker Xpeng Motors unveiled in July.
Tesla is preparing for a major expansion of the Gigafactory Shanghai, its core electric vehicle production facility in China, in a move that looks set to enable the US automaker to bring out its long-rumored budget compact hatchback, local media has reported.
The company is also said to be readying to supply Chinese clients with its large-scale utility batteries known as Megapacks from next year, having begun searching for a head of local sales. The availability of the Megapack in China will step up the pace of Tesla’s entry into the country’s energy storage market.
Why it matters: The news comes after Tesla CEO Elon Musk had dinner with Chinese president Xi Jinping, alongside other American company executives, on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit in San Francisco on Nov. 15.
Details: The so-called phase-three expansion could facilitate the production of Tesla’s upcoming car, dubbed the “Model 2” or “Model Q” with a price tag as low as RMB 150,000 ($21,800), people with knowledge of the matter told LatePost on Wednesday.
Context: Tesla sold 771,171 China-made EVs in the first 10 months of the year, up 39% from a year ago, of which 308,816 were overseas exports, according to figures compiled by the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA). The annual growth rate saw a drop compared to 50.3% last year.
Major Chinese electric vehicle makers from BYD to Xpeng Motors have collectively posted strong delivery figures in November as they attempt to hit their annual targets and as competition shows no signs of subsiding in the world’s biggest auto market.
Why it matters: Jefferies analysts wrote in a Dec. 1 note that they estimated sales of China’s new energy vehicles (NEVs), mostly all-electrics and plug-in hybrids, to reach 1 million units in November with a solid month-on-month growth rate of 10% from a high base.
Details: BYD on Dec. 1 revealed monthly sales figures of its premium Fangchengbao and Yangwang marques for the first time following their launches earlier this year, announcing it handed over 626 and 408 units to customers, respectively. Delivery of the RMB 1 million ($150,000) Yangwang U8 and the Bao 5, with a price range of RMB 289,800 to RMB 352,800, began in late September and November separately. Overall, the EV giant outsold its October figures by 70 units in November.
Context: China’s NEV sales were partly boosted by the opening of the annual Auto Guangzhou show on Nov. 17 with dozens of debuts of all-new cars, as major players try to enhance their presence among a crowded field.
More Chinese automakers are planning to adopt NIO’s battery swap technology as two giants join the program – Changan and Geely. NIO on Wednesday said it will partner with Geely to develop a common standard for electric vehicle battery packs and create a sprawling network of swap stations for both consumer cars and commercial fleets, just a week after Changan said it had become NIO’s first ally in a similar effort.
The move could give a further boost to NIO’s long-term plan to split its money-losing recharging infrastructure unit into a standalone business with financing from outside investors, two people with knowledge of the matter told TechNode on Wednesday. Meanwhile, Geely and NIO will explore the possibility of establishing a shared battery swap network in overseas markets, said one of the people, without elaborating further.
NIO and Geely declined to comment when contacted by TechNode on Thursday, referring instead to the announcement published by the two companies.
Car industry experts foresee the acceleration of the Chinese EV industry’s migration to a more unified standard for battery specifications and swap techniques originated by NIO. Still, the EV maker and its bigger allies could face a bumpy road despite their eagerness for a unified swapping standard until a number of business and technical hurdles are cleared.
It is clear that Chinese authorities are behind the move given that Changan is state-owned and given Geely’s position as the poster child for the Chinese privately-owned car industry, said Lei Xing, former chief editor at China Auto Review. Xing expects no real progress to be made within the next 12-18 months given the challenges in achieving a clear consensus for designing new batteries compatible with their recharging networks.
A market-wide standardization may also not happen without government intervention. It’s one thing to require a certain plug type, and quite another to force standardization of batteries and chassis configuration, said Daniel J. Kollar, head of automotive and supply chain at business development consultancy Intralink Group.
“This could have major effects on several design aspects and possibly even lead to certain limits on innovation and supplier choice,” Kollar added.
NIO may also find the need for considerable back and forth with its partners in order to get its swap technology closer to becoming the industry standard. It’s going to be NIO dictating its intellectual property to swapping partners, but Geely and Changan may want to have a say as well, said Tu T. Le, founder of business intelligence firm Sino Auto Insights.
“There’s a lot that needs to be settled still,” Le added, citing Geely running its own swapping system as one reason. Volvo’s parent began operating its first battery swap station for commercial fleets in the southwestern municipality of Chongqing in late 2020, with plans to run 300 more by the end of this year.
Although it is too early to predict where NIO’s power business may end up, it is possible that a new entity jointly invested in by NIO and multiple other carmakers could be in play – something akin to what Huawei recently announced for its vehicle business unit, according to Xing. “This would ease the financial pressure on NIO and make them de facto outside investors of the startup.”
The partnership would probably shoulder some of the investment burden for NIO with cash injections, although it may not help them sell cars, Le said. The increase in adoption of swapping will likely result in short-term improvements to their bottom line, but the big question is if it will result in more vehicle sales.
The Shanghai-headquartered EV maker has built up a nationwide network of more than 2,100 swap stations, each reportedly costing more than RMB 3 million ($420,000) on average. That number is expected to surpass 2,300 by year-end. It delivered 126,067 vehicles for the first ten months of this year, in line with the industry’s average growth rate but lagging behind rivals such as Li Auto.
“It’s hard to see how this is going to change NIO’s fortunes in the long run to a significant degree without added help from their new partners – either via providing a boost to their marketing reach or supporting the development of mid-market solutions,” said Kollar.
]]>Huawei is spinning off its automotive business unit, enabling Changan Automobile and other manufacturing partners to invest, in a move aimed at turning the loss-making car division into a profitable operation amid fierce competition.
Why it matters: The reorganization is a rare move for Huawei – a company under 100% ownership of founder Ren Zhengfei and its staff since 2003, according to its official website – as the Chinese telecommunication giant puts a date of 2025 on its target of profitability for its as-yet loss-making auto business.
Details: The new joint venture will focus on areas already covered by Huawei’s Intelligent Automotive Solution (IAS) business unit, including the development of intelligent driving software, digital cockpit systems, and digital platforms, among others, according to a regulatory filing published by Shenzhen-listed Changan dated on Monday.
Context: Huawei, state-owned Changan and Chinese battery maker CATL announced a partnership to establish EV brand Avatr back in late 2020. The companies have sold roughly 20,000 units of the Avatr 11 battery electric crossover since delivery began last December, launching their second premium model with a starting price of RMB 300,800 ($41,240) earlier this month.
READ MORE: Xpeng and Huawei-backed EV maker set new delivery records as demand grows for self-driving tech
]]>A Tesla car owner who protested against the company during the Auto Shanghai show in early 2021 has been forced to apologize for damaging the US car company’s reputation by alleging that Tesla sold defective cars, Chinese media outlets reported on Wednesday.
Why it matters: The verdict marks the latest victory for Tesla in China after it faced mounting numbers of car owner complaints over various quality issues including unintended acceleration and brake failure in the past two years.
Details: A local court on Nov. 9 ordered a woman surnamed Li from the northwestern city of Xi’an to apologize to Tesla and pay the company RMB 2,000 in damages in addition to bearing the cost of vehicle appraisal totaling RMB 20,000 ($2,800). The public apology should remain on social media platform Weibo for at least 15 days, the court ruled.
Context: Tesla in May launched a recall involving over 1.1 million EVs in China following an investigation by Chinese regulators that showed Tesla owners could hit the accelerator pedal rather than the brake by mistake when its regenerative braking system was switched on by default. Beijing said the recall was intended to reduce the chance of accidents.
GAC Group and Changan Automobile, two of China’s biggest automakers by sales volume, detailed their respective timelines to manufacture solid-state batteries on Nov. 17, entering a global competition to bring the potentially transformative technology to play in electric vehicles (EVs).
The moves resonate in an industry that has long attempted to commercialize the technology, widely seen as a next-generation energy storage device because of its superior performance and safety compared with the current batch of liquid-state electrolyte lithium-ion batteries. Several international carmakers have bet on solid-state batteries, with leading promoter Toyota reportedly projecting adoption by 2027.
The news also indicates a growing trend among automakers of developing their own batteries, parts that comprise at least 40% of overall vehicle costs, to establish a self-sufficient supply chain. “Few companies have so far profited from making new energy vehicles [mostly battery EVs and plug-in hybrid EVs in China],” said Changan president Wang Jun during a press conference, citing a goal of achieving “sustainable, high-quality development” (our translation).
Here’s what the two automakers said on Nov. 17 during the ongoing Auto Guangzhou show in southern China’s Guangdong province.
GAC: The Guangzhou-headquartered automaker is hoping to see an EV in production with its own in-house developed solid-state batteries as early as 2026. For now, the batteries have achieved a cell-level energy density of 400 watt-hours per kilogram (Wh/kg) and have proven effective under extreme conditions, according to an announcement. By comparison, the maximum energy density of CATL’s latest Qilin battery is 255 Wh/kg (per pack level).
Changan: China’s fifth largest automaker’s plans include commercializing its first solid-state batteries by 2027 at a cell-level energy density of up to 500 Wh/kg, while large-scale vehicle application is scheduled for 2030 with the launch of several new battery products, said president Wang.
Context: Established automakers worldwide have been rushing to get solid-state batteries commercially ready for their green energy cars, which is intended to give them an upper hand as they navigate increasing competition in the global EV market.
As automakers continue their struggle amid an unrelenting price war in China, both established brands and startups are showcasing their latest products at the Auto Guangzhou 2023 show in a bid to take pole position ahead of what promises to be another year of tight competition.
Traditionally one of the country’s largest car shows, this year’s Auto Guangzhou offers a glimpse of how intense competition in China has been, and how successful it has been at flushing out weaker foreign marques as domestic rivals fall over one another in a mad rush to crack the market.
“Joint car manufacturers are faced with unprecedented challenges against the backdrop of the current situation,” said Wen Dali, a deputy general manager of GAC-Toyota, a joint venture between the Japanese automaker and its Chinese partner (our translation). More than 20% of the JV’s new car sales over the next three years in China are set to be new energy vehicles, mostly battery-run electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid EVs (PHEVs), Wen added at a press event on Friday.
Here’s a quick roundup of some of the highlights from the Guangzhou International Automobile Exhibition, which kicked off on Friday in the capital of China’s Guangdong province.
The BYD Ocean family of electric cars on Friday welcomed a new sibling and its latest answer to the Tesla Model Y, the Sea Lion 07, crafted by Wolfgang Josef Egger, BYD’s design chief and a former head designer at Audi Group.
The mid-size crossover boasts distinctive design elements with its muscular fenders, bold air inlets, and clean character lines on all four corners, while the high shoulder lines and the dual, through-type waistlines give the vehicle a sporty vibe. The features are intended to make the car look unique from miles away, Fan Jihan, a deputy director of BYD said on Friday during the show.
Slightly larger than Tesla’s Model Y at 4.8 meters in length and with a 2,900-millimeter-long wheelbase, the top-end all-electric car is expected to have a driving range of more than 700 kilometers (435 miles), compared with the 688 km claimed by the long-range version of its US rival. Scheduled for official launch later this year, it will be equipped with BYD’s latest advanced driver assistance system (ADAS), according to the company.
This year’s Auto Guangzhou saw the debut of the long-awaited Zeekr 007, the first electric sedan under the premium marque of auto major Geely.
The latest model from Stefan Sielaff, formerly a head of design at Bentley, the 4.9-meter-long all-electric vehicle comes with 1,711 high-intensity lamp beads powered by 75 automotive chips. This enables the car’s LED headlights to display a dazzling, customized lighting sequence with animation about 90 inches wide, showcasing some of the most advanced lighting technology by a Chinese carmaker.
Meanwhile, the Zeekr 007 features an 800-volt battery system, which offers a driving range of up to 870 km on a full charge and can travel another 610 km on 15 minutes’ extra charge. Zeeker claims it to be the quickest accelerating road car of the same class ever made, going from 0 to 100 km/h (62 mph) in 2.84 seconds, while also being one of the earliest models to use Qualcomm’s latest 5-nanometer cockpit chip 8295.
The company aims to begin delivering the car in January at a lower-than-expected pre-sale starting price of RMB 224,900 ($31,059).
Xpeng on Friday was on its home court when it unveiled details of its first flagship multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) the X9, which the Guangzhou-headquartered electric vehicle maker expects will stand out from existing offerings with superior comfort and top-notch performance.
With a competitive pre-sale starting price of RMB 388,000 ($53,544), the seven-seater has a claimed interior space of 7.7 square meters, which makes it 12% bigger than the Toyota Alphard, a worldwide top-seller in the chauffeur-driven luxury people mover category, according to chief executive He Xiaopeng.
The family van is also said to have the best third-row seats on the market that can be adjusted for recline to a desired angle of nearly 180 degrees and folded down flat to increase cargo capacity. Meanwhile, the luggage compartment offers space for seven suitcases.
The Xpeng X9 is claimed to be the world’s first MPV equipped with rear-wheel steering as a standard configuration, which reduces the car’s turning diameter to an industry record of 10.8 meters (35.4 feet), making it easy to maneuver.
Li Auto has finally made available the details of its long-anticipated MPV, the Mega, with an exterior echoing the bullet-style look of China’s high-speed trains. The seven-seater van boasts the world’s fastest charging speed among electric vehicles of all kinds, capable of traveling up to 500 km on 12 minutes of charge powered by CATL’s next-iteration Qilin batteries.
It has a drag coefficient (Cd) of 0.215, which the company claimed is the lowest Cd rating for an MPV, while it will consume 15.9 kilowatts (kWh) of electricity for every 100 km of travel, also among the lowest in the industry.
The company, which has delivered more than 500,000 plug-in hybrid SUVs as of September, confirmed plans to build 300 supercharging stations in China by year-end. Pre-sales of the Mega started on Friday with a price tag of around RMB 600,000 ($82,800) and delivery scheduled for February 2024.
READ MORE: Chinese carmakers showed up big time at Auto Shanghai 2023
]]>Images of what could be Xiaomi’s first electric vehicle model have leaked online ahead of the car’s expected launch next year. The photos from the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology show a large sedan with styling similar to the Porsche Taycan, adorned with a Xiaomi logo.
Why it matters: Automakers are required by Chinese regulators to apply for registration before officially selling vehicles in the country, and the government ministry’s post indicates that the debut of the first Xiaomi car is approaching.
Details: The Xiaomi SU7 is around five meters long and spans a 3,000-millimeter-long wheelbase, making it bigger than many mid-size sedans such as Tesla’s Model 3. It has a total mass of 2,430 kg and a curb weight of 1,980 kg, based on the registration details revealed by the MIIT on Wednesday.
Context: Xiaomi and Huawei are among the Chinese technology giants with the potential to become major players in the EV space with advanced intelligent capabilities and a broad sales network, which remain difficult for many carmakers to replicate, Morgan Stanley analyst Tim Hsiao commented on an earnings call held by Xpeng Motors on Wednesday.
READ MORE: Five things to know about Xiaomi’s new electric car company
]]>Huawei on Thursday revealed its first electric sedan under the new Luxeed marque in collaboration with automaker Chery, saying it will compete with Tesla and Mercedes Benz’s premium offerings at a price comparable to the cheapest models of its international rivals.
“After some deliberation, we will make all versions of the Luxeed S7 available for purchase despite making a loss,” Richard Yu, the chief executive of Huawei’s consumer business group, told the media during a press conference in Shenzhen (our translation). This will allow more customers to try Huawei’s smart vehicle technology at an affordable price, said Yu.
The aggressive pricing strategy unveiled at the Luxeed S7’s launch marks the latest push by the Chinese technology giant to crack the world’s biggest and most competitive electric vehicle market. Huawei hopes it will be a new revenue source to offset the negative impact of US restrictions on its smartphone business.
Here’s what we know about the newly-launched Luxeed S7 sedan:
Pricing: The sedan comes at a minimum price of RMB 258,000 ($35,381), RMB 2,000 lower than Tesla’s entry-level Model 3 in China. Pre-sale started on Thursday and the official launch is scheduled for Nov. 28.
Automated driving: The Huawei-Chery electric sedan is the first model to use the tech giant’s latest proprietary Harmony operating system. Its autonomous valet parking feature enables the car to park itself in lots and then return to a designated spot using a remote-control assisted function.
The premium versions of the Luxeed S7 will include Huawei’s laser sensor units and its Advanced Driving System (ADS) that uses deep learning networks and computer vision algorithms, including one called the General Obstacle Detection network, for navigating its surroundings.
Huawei has claimed its partially autonomous driving technology will be accessible on major city roads across China by the end of the year, potentially ahead of rivals including Xpeng Motors.
Main specs: Yu specifically identified Tesla’s Model S as Huawei’s major competitor, claiming that Huawei and Chery’s full-size luxury sedan outperformed its rival’s in terms of range, energy efficiency, and luxury.
The top-end Luxeed S7 will have a driving range of more than 800 kilometers (497 miles) and be capable of driving another 400 km on 15 minutes of supercharging using Huawei’s facilities. By comparison, the dual-motor Tesla Model S has a 715 km range and can add 347 km in 15 minutes.
The car also impresses with high energy efficiency, consuming an estimated 12.4 kWh per 100 km, compared with 13.2 kWh and 17.5 kWh achieved by the rear-drive Model 3 and the dual-motor Model S respectively. “This is far ahead of our rivals,” said Yu, using a phrase that has become a Huawei-related buzzword on the Chinese internet.
The S7 slightly beats out the Model S with a drag coefficient of 0.203. Meanwhile, it offers a 0 to 100 km/h (62mph) acceleration of 3.3 seconds, just under the 3.1 seconds reported by the Model S performance version but faster than the Porsche Taycan 4S, according to Yu.
Interior: The sleek, aerodynamically favorable sedan boasts of a larger cabin space than its major luxury competitors with an interior length of 1,910 mm. The Mercedes E300L and the Tesla Model S measure 1,898mm and 1,816mm in interior length respectively, according to figures cited by Huawei during the press conference.
The S7 also comes with a sporty design concept for the inside, featuring a wide dashboard, a 12.3-inch smart screen, as well as an oval-shaped steering wheel, allowing drivers to see the whole display, rather than having to view it through the steering wheel.
In addition, it has adopted so-called zero gravity seat technology for the front passenger seat. This allows the human body to take on a neutral spinal posture, reducing the amount of stress placed on bones and joints, while the backs of the rear seats are heated, ventilated, and 27/32° adjustable.
READ MORE: Huawei-backed Aito now has 50,000 orders for its redesigned M7 model
]]>Xpeng Motors said on Nov. 3 that it will offer some existing owners of its P5 sedan discounts on new purchases after hundreds of customers accused it of failing to deliver promised advanced driver assistance features, which were supposed to be available across the country.
Why it matters: The complaints, which went viral on Chinese social media last week, mounted after Xpeng on Oct. 24 unveiled plans to roll out its latest advanced driver assistance system (ADAS), the XNGP, nationwide by next year. The company said it will be applicable to existing models including the G6, G9, and P7i, without mentioning the P5.
Details: Xpeng said in a statement issued on Nov. 3 that it will offer an RMB 20,000 ($2,747) coupon for people who have subscribed to Xpilot, its previous generation driver-assist software, along with their purchases of the premium version of the P5 sedan. The benefit could be used for a new purchase of one of Xpeng’s most popular models, including the G6, G9, P7i, or its upcoming X9 van.
Context: Xpeng began delivery of the P5 electric sedan back in October 2021, with its premium versions featuring two lidar sensors to facilitate more reliable automated driving functions at a price range of between RMB 199,900 and RMB 223,900 ($27,453-$30,749). It sold 19,618 units of the car over the last 12 months, according to figures from the auto services portal Dongchedi.
Chinese electric vehicle makers Xpeng Motors and Aito on Wednesday posted record-breaking figures for monthly deliveries, as the pace of adoption of self-driving technology accelerates among local customers despite slowing growth in China’s electric vehicle segment as a whole.
Strong orders for Huawei, Xpeng, and DJI’s city NOA (Navigation on ADAS) products mark the start of the commercialization of smart driving, Jefferies analysts wrote in an Oct. 24 note. They added that Chinese automakers are becoming more willing to “test the waters” with chips by Huawei on some of their vehicles.
Why it matters: The latest figures highlight a brutal price war that has been continuing for months in the market, and the struggle automakers are facing in having to choose between lower prices or losing market share.
Riding the self-driving boom: Xpeng Motors handed over 20,002 electric cars to customers in October, crossing the 20,000 unit milestone, nearly a threefold increase from a year ago and 31% growth from September.
EV startups: Li Auto also accomplished a delivery milestone last month, distributing 40,422 vehicles, making its year-to-date deliveries 284,647 units, the highest among the country’s nascent EV startups. The company has upped its goal to 50,000 units for the remaining two months of the year, CEO Li Xiang said on Wednesday on the Chinese Twitter-like platform Weibo.
Established majors: BYD’s growth momentum continued to some extent in October as the company saw sales surpassing 301,000 vehicles with a mild 5.2% rise from a month earlier. Analysts expect China’s biggest EV maker to achieve its annual goal of selling 3 million cars this year, as the company on Monday launched a wagon version of its popular Song SUV and readied to sell its long-anticipated Bao 5 off-roader.
Context: Retail sales of new energy passenger vehicles, including all-electrics and plug-in hybrids, are expected to reach 750,000 units in October, up 34.6% year-on-year and 0.9% month-on-month, according to estimates from the China Passenger Car Association. The past two months, known as “Golden September, Silver October,” are traditionally peak seasons for auto sales in China.
]]>Chinese automaker Geely on Oct. 27 unveiled its biggest bet ever on intelligent vehicles with the launch of the first Jiyue-branded model, which the company says is capable of driving itself on busy urban streets in partnership with search engine Baidu.
The automaker stated its vehicle relies heavily on a camera-based approach to capture detailed visual information and then respond appropriately, removing expensive laser sensors from its hardware suite to keep costs down. Tesla is reportedly a rare advocate for using the so-called vision-only approach, while most other brands opt for multiple sensors to mitigate safety concerns of their self-driving technologies.
“I believe we provide users a better self-driving experience [than existing players] in most major Chinese cities,” Luo Gang, Jiyue’s chief operating officer, told reporters during an interview, adding that the Jiyue 01 outperforms Tesla’s offerings in digital services such as its AI assistant (our translation). Tesla’s full self-driving (FSD) function is currently unavailable in China.
The Jiyue 01, a battery sports utility vehicle, comes in two versions with a price range between RMB 249,900 and RMB 339,900 ($34,148-$46,446), slightly lower than its pre-sale price and differing based on acceleration, driving range, and number of electric motors, among other specifications. Customers are also encouraged to pay RMB 19,900, a 60% cut from its sticker price, for all the premium functions of its self-driving software.
Here are some of the news and highlights from the launch event held in Shanghai by Jiyue, formerly known as Jidu before Geely and Baidu set up a new venture in August.
Self-driving tech: Jiyue said its advanced driver-assistance system, the Robo Drive Max, is already available to drivers in Shanghai, Hangzhou, and Shenzhen, meaning the cars can navigate complex urban streets in the three big cities with autonomous features such as overtaking, lane changing, and on-ramp/off-ramp driving. The firm is targeting nationwide availability for the software by 2024, which would mean it matched rival Xpeng.
Smart cabin: The Jiyue 01 also boasts the most advanced voice recognition software on the market for in-car services, which can respond intelligently in milliseconds without losing its connection, as the company deploys artificial intelligence models and moves data analytics from cloud computers to the vehicle. The system is also set to evolve and become more alert to the needs of its owners, powered by Baidu’s ChatGPT-like chatbot, Ernie Bot.
READ MORE: Baidu’s EV firm Jidu aims to take on Tesla
]]>Xpeng Motors teased how it sees the future of electric vehicles on Tuesday with the debut of its first multi-purpose vehicle model and a new timeline for the expansion of its self-driving software, as it faces an unprecedented offensive from major rivals like Huawei in a hotly competitive battleground.
Chief executive He Xiaopeng also revealed that the company has made significant progress in bringing flying cars closer to reality, while showcasing a working prototype of its humanoid robot, in a move reminiscent of Tesla’s introduction of its Optimus bot last September.
Here are the key highlights from Xpeng’s annual 1024 Tech Day event.
Navigating within a sharp and narrow turn at low speed on the stage at Tuesday’s event, Xpeng’s X9 is claimed to be the world’s first multi-purpose vehicle model equipped with rear-wheel steering as a standard configuration. This would allow the seven-seater, three-row van to handle “just like” a regular-sized sports utility vehicle, said He (our translation).
Xpeng’s next-generation smart cabin system, the XOS, will also be available first to the owners of the X9, which is set to be formally launched at the upcoming Guangzhou Motor Show on Nov. 17. Powered by Qualcomm’s five-nanometer 8295 processor, the in-car software will offer a split screen mode, allowing drivers and passengers to run different applications simultaneously side-by-side for efficient multitasking.
Marking Xpeng’s entry into the Chinese MPV segment, the all-electric X9 will have to compete with an increasing number of similar offerings by established makers including BYD’s Denza brand, Great Wall Motor, and Dongfeng’s Voyah marque. Huawei-backed Aito and Li Auto are also set to launch their first MPVs later this year, targeting China’s growing three-generation families with larger interior car spaces.
Xpeng has also begun its switch to a more affordable hardware suite by removing some sensors from its incoming X9 model, betting more on cameras and artificial intelligence for its XNGP advanced driver assistance system, according to He.
The Chinese automaker has updated its self-driving technology with what it described as some of the most advanced occupancy networks in the industry, comprising a deep neural network that reconstructs barriers and vehicles and predicts occupancy in a three-dimensional space for collision avoidance.
A similar move has allowed Tesla to remove several ultrasonic sensors from its vehicles while enabling high-definition spatial positioning, longer range visibility, and the ability to differentiate between objects with its Full Self-Driving Beta software, which was announced by the US automaker last October.
CEO He said Xpeng will deploy its XNGP system for urban traffic roads in 50 cities by December and make the functions available to drivers across China and Europe by 2024. It is competing with Huawei, which has quickly emerged as a rising player in the industry and previously announced a nationwide roll-out of similar features by year-end, while rivals BYD and Li Auto are playing catch-up.
Experimenting with different approaches around flying cars, Xpeng also showcased two prototype aircrafts, or electric vertical takeoff and landing vehicles (eVTOLs). One of them boasts a two-in-one design that can fold up its wings and other components into the vehicle body, although He acknowledged that there are still some safety issues to be addressed.
The 46-year-old serial entrepreneur sees greater potential for the commercial adoption of the other prototype, which is built on a modular system allowing the separation of the flight and automobile components. This model has a spacious interior with five seats while on the road and is powered by an extended-range hybrid engine, which can also recharge its aircraft component as it drives; up in the sky, the model is capable of carrying two passengers in an all-electric mode.
Xpeng further surprised the audience on Tuesday as its humanoid robotic prototype, the PX5, made its first public appearance. The company showcased the robot’s ability to navigate different terrain and pick up hand-held objects such as pens in a video. He envisions a near future where such AI machines could help look around in its factories or even mingle with customers at showrooms, hopefully by this time next year, he added.
NIO may consider bidding for two manufacturing plants in the eastern Chinese city of Hefei put up for sale by partner Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Group Co (JAC) on Oct. 20, reportedly in an effort to exercise more control over its production process.
Why it matters: Acquiring existing plants is one of the easiest ways for electric vehicle companies to obtain a production license in China, as NIO rival Li Auto did previously. The move could be a big positive for NIO in improving operational efficiency over the long term, a person with knowledge of the matter told the Chinese financial media outlet National Business Daily (NBD) on Oct. 20.
Details: State-owned JAC said on Oct. 20 that it plans to look for buyers publicly for part of its assets under its third factory and its Xinqiao plant for a combined value of approximately RMB 4.5 billion ($610 million).
Context: JAC, also a manufacturing partner for Volkswagen in China, completed construction of the so-called first advanced manufacturing base, or the F1 plant, with NIO in the Shushan district of Hefei in late 2017. The facility, which had an initial annual production capacity of 120,000 vehicles, was built after the two companies reached an outsourcing agreement in mid-2016.
READ MORE: Visiting the NIO plant in Hefei, China’s rising EV capital
]]>China’s Changan Automobile on Tuesday signed an agreement with Thailand’s Board of Investment in Beijing to build a $241.7 million electric vehicle factory in the country’s coastal Rayong province, the latest development by Chinese automakers to expand their reach in the global car market.
Changan’s move to Thailand: The announcement was made during the two-day Belt and Road Initiative Summit which ended Wednesday as the Chinese government celebrates the 10th anniversary of its massive global transportation and infrastructure project in an effort to consolidate relations with Asian, African, and Latin American countries.
Thailand, an emerging battlefield: Thailand, a premier trade ally of China, has been promoting the adoption of green energy vehicles, currently offering each EV with a subsidy of up to 150,000 Baht along with other incentives such as import tax reductions. It is positioning itself as a regional hub for EV manufacturing and has attracted investment from some of China’s biggest automakers.
Chinese electric vehicle maker Leapmotor said on Monday that it swung to a positive gross margin of 1.2% in the third quarter that ended Sept. 30 on the back of strong revenue growth, with the chief executive predicting a record performance for the remainder of the year.
Why it matters: The quarterly results come as the Zhejiang-based and Hong Kong-listed automaker has continued its solid growth momentum in the highly competitive home market and recently announced an ambitious global strategy that covers major regional markets from Europe to Asia Pacific.
Details: Leapmotor on Monday posted a positive gross margin of 1.2% in the third quarter for the first time and “ahead of schedule,” compared with the negative margin of 8.9% it posted over the same period of last year and the negative 5.2% it achieved as of June. It initially aimed to achieve a positive margin by the end of this year.
Context: Leapmotor followed the suit of BYD and Li Auto earlier than most Chinese EV startups, betting on both pure EVs and plug-in hybrid EVs (PHEVs) with the launches of the extended-range C11 and C01 earlier this year.
Chinese carmaker Guangzhou Automobile Group (GAC) is strengthening its alliance with ride-hailing platform Didi, investing up to $75 million into the latter’s autonomous driving unit. The move is expected to help GAC enhance its self-driving technological capabilities and sustain its sound growth momentum in the Chinese electric vehicle segment, according to an industry veteran.
The deal, nearly clinched over three years ago, has recently been revived by the two companies as the impact from Beijing’s extended crackdown on Didi has waned, a person with direct knowledge of the matter told TechNode on Friday. It also comes against the backdrop of Didi’s renewed efforts to solidify its position as China’s biggest ride-hailing service with new incentives, putting smaller rivals under pressure.
Self-driving push: Autonomous driving has proven to be among the most capital-intensive startup businesses on the current tech landscape, and the extended collaboration with Didi would allow GAC to share its costs and risks of making robocars, said Liu Guanghao, partner at Shanghai-based venture capital firm Befor Capital.
EV sales boost: The investment would also help GAC’s core carmaking business achieve sustained growth, especially in the Chinese commercial fleet segment, where its EV brand Aion has established a significant presence over the years, according to Liu. “Carmakers need more sales in order to survive in this highly competitive market,” he said.
Context: GAC Capital, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the automaker, as well as state-owned Guangzhou Development District Investment Group, will invest the same amount of up to $149 million totally in Didi’s self-driving unit. GAC is set to inject no more than $75 million in the funding round, according to a Friday announcement (in Chinese).
China’s Didi has recently set new growth targets in the three years to 2025, with new incentives for drivers and riders, in its latest move to recapture lost market share in the country’s ride-hailing sector, LatePost reported Monday.
Why it matters: The move comes after Didi received a permit in January to resume new user registration and downloads through Chinese app stores for its ride-hailing service, marking an official end to a long-running regulatory crackdown on the company.
Details: Didi recently informed investors that it is aiming for a 45% year-on-year growth in daily orders in 2023 and expects to keep the pace between 10% and 15% over the next two years, individuals familiar with the matter told Chinese media outlet LatePost.
Context: Didi has been scaling back its efforts in developing cash-bleeding, emerging new businesses, and refocusing on its core business over the last two years after the Chinese government launched a cybersecurity probe into the company in July 2021.
READ MORE: Didi app ban ignites race for ride-hailing market share
]]>Aito, a Chinese electric vehicle brand backed by Huawei, has received more than 50,000 non-refundable orders for its redesigned M7 in less than a month. The orders follow the Sept. 12 public launch of the sports utility vehicle, which features Huawei’s Harmony operating system and assisted driving technologies.
Why it matters: The latest sales figures, as revealed by a senior executive at Huawei, show tentative signs of a bounce-back for Aito from a months-long slump and could be a boost to the confidence of Huawei’s car manufacturing partners.
Details: The revamped M7 crossover has racked up more than 50,000 pre-orders with non-refundable deposits of RMB 5,000 ($685) as of Friday, Richard Yu, the chief executive of Huawei’s consumer business group, said in a post on Chinese social media app WeChat.
Context: Huawei on Sept. 12 unveiled the redesigned version of the M7 SUV, featuring Huawei’s Harmony operating system at a starting price of RMB 249,800 ($34,299), which is around RMB 70,000 lower than the initial version launched a year earlier.
Chinese premium electric vehicle brand Denza on Tuesday revealed a cheaper version of its advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) in collaboration with US chipmaker Nvidia, as the BYD affiliate ramps up efforts to compete against leading self-driving players such as Xpeng Motors and Huawei.
Denza is also eyeing overseas expansion, having established its presence in the China market with year-to-date deliveries of nearly 80,000 EVs as of August. The company expects overseas sales to begin as early as next year, including in Australia, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Europe.
Why it matters: The companies said the launch of the affordable assisted driving technology could reduce the barrier to a transition to intelligent mobility. The system facilitates Denza’s vehicles to navigate most highways in China as well as some busy urban streets in major domestic cities.
Details: The new autonomous driving system will enable on-ramp to off-ramp driving, as well as automatic lane changing on Chinese highways, for Denza’s flagship N7 SUV. It has a price tag of RMB 15,000 ($2,053) and is powered by Nvidia’s DRIVE Orin processor, which can handle up to 84 TOPS. The N7 SUVs that feature the technology will have two lidar sensors removed to reduce costs.
Context: Several Chinese auto and tech companies have announced ambitious plans for the adoption of assisted driving technologies for urban driving, akin to Tesla’s full self-driving (FSD) function that has yet to be made available in the country.
READ MORE: Baidu and Huawei take on global giants with new in-car software offerings at Auto Shanghai 2023
]]>Nio took a giant leap into the smartphone arena on Thursday with the much-anticipated launch of its Nio Phone, the first handset designed by a Chinese automaker. The new device is hitting the market at a price comparable to the latest flagship offerings by Apple and Huawei.
Having developed its own phone from the ground up, the electric vehicle maker expects to create an ecosystem across vehicles, devices, and services, which will provide a seamless experience for Nio users. The handset offers the purest form of the Android experience without any pre-installed apps or banner ads, chief executive William Li said during a press event in Shanghai on Thursday.
Some of the standout features Nio highlights are a master remote control for vehicles with options to control everything from windows to seats, as well as seamless streaming of videos, music, and meetings from smartphone to car infotainment screen. Here’s what impressed us most about Nio’s first Android phone.
Nio said the phone offers remote control for in-car devices which differs from most competitors by using Ultra Wideband (UWB) technology, an emerging wireless communication protocol that enables precise, speedy, and secure location tracking.
During a hands-on session where TechNode was present, a Nio ES8 SUV “greeted” the phone by turning its lights on when a Nio employee approached and automatically unlocked shortly before he reached for the door handle without taking out his phone. The smartphone also serves as a central hub to remotely operate the car’s air conditioning among other options at the touch of a single button.
The short-range, high-bandwidth digital radio technology allows fast data transmission with increased security compared with other wireless standards such as NFC and Bluetooth, which are often absent from existing phone models produced by domestic makers such as Huawei and Xiaomi, according to Nio staff. The first initiative of this kind was announced by Geely-backed rival Meizu a month earlier.
Several global automakers are also investing in the technology in collaboration with Apple. The US smartphone maker has reportedly been allowing BMW’s iX owners to unlock their cars using select iPhones or wearables since 2021, although most carmakers are currently unable to leverage the technology with Apple’s devices, Nio CEO William Li previously told Chinese reporters.
TechNode reporters also played the hit racing game title Asphalt on the in-car display with a Microsoft Xbox wireless controller. It offered a smooth experience which did not freeze or crash, as it runs in the smartphone’s background enabled with 5G services and a Qualcomm semiconductor.
Nio’s in-car experience also allows users to stream videos on Bilibili, follow turn-by-turn navigation on Amap, or transition to live meetings on Dingtalk from their phones through the car’s infotainment screen. Huawei earlier announced a similar Super Terminal feature, while Geely claimed such capabilities with the recent launch of its new Meizu flagship series and operating system, Flyeme Auto.
It is worth pointing out that the feature is different from screen mirroring, as it actually creates a “doppelganger” of the Nio Phone on the in-car dashboard so that users can use the smartphone and the in-car system simultaneously yet separately.
With its first self-branded device, Nio is one of the few Chinese automakers capable of integrating users’ smartphones with their car’s infotainment system at the operating system level. Such integration for Aito and Geely was enabled by their respective smartphone partners Huawei and Meizu.
The Nio Phone is powered by a Qualcomm high-end Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor, the same as existing flagship offerings such as Xiaomi’s Mi 13, Oppo’s Reno 11 Pro, and the Meizu 20. It also comes with a 6.81-inch 2K+E6 Samsung screen, providing a resolution of 3,200 x 1,440 pixels, a 120Hz refresh rate, and a peak brightness of 1,800nits.
The device features a triple-camera system that includes three 50MP cameras and has a large battery of 5,200mAh, supporting 50 W wireless charging and 10 W reverse charging. An entry-level version weighs 212 grams and measures 165.19 x 75.54 x 8.9mm.
The Nio Phone’s three versions come in seven colors, and are priced between RMB 6,499 and RMB 7,499 ($890-$1,027). Shipment is scheduled for Sept. 28. For comparison, Huawei’s latest Mate 60 Pro flagship phone costs from RMB 6,499, while Apple on Sept. 15 began selling its iPhone 15 series with a starting price of RMB 5,999 in China.
]]>Well, it’s here. In June, the rumors were there’d be a 5G Huawei phone towards the end of the year. It hit the shelves two or three months earlier than expected.
In my previous article, I argued that Huawei’s handset would be more of a domestic play, and I stand by that argument. While I did argue Huawei and SMIC creating a 7nm chip was no surprise, what has been produced has nevertheless surprised some, including myself.
So what is good about this chip? How will Huawei and SMIC progress from here? And what does it mean for others in the industry?
Let’s start with the positives from a Chinese point of view. Although not 100% confirmed, as we are not sure who else could possibly fabricate this chip for Huawei, SMIC has seemingly produced a true 7nm density chip without EUV. (Some still speculate that SMIC isn’t responsible.) Despite what many believe this was always possible – TSMC did it back in 2018 and SMIC did it by itself earlier in 2023 with a bitcoin mining chip. So no surprises here. When it comes to using DUV equipment to create 7nm density designs SMIC now seems to be on a par with the rest of the world. What the yield looks like is unknown, I can’t believe it is as low as 10%, and also it cannot be as good as an EUV process. I can only speculate that it is good enough and will improve as SMIC gets more customers for this process. With government subsidies, the economics of low yields mean less to SMIC than they might to other foundries.
The other positive is its RF front-end. While Huawei was always a leading modem designer, it previously relied on US suppliers like Skyworks and Qorvo for the RF front-end. This is no longer the case with the Kirin 9000S. It’s impressive that a completely self-developed front-end works at 5G speeds, even if the OS still says 4G.
Nevertheless, there are a few negatives. Despite the rhetoric, this is not a completely indigenous Chinese chip. It is based on Arm IP, it uses SK Hynix memory, it was presumably designed somehow using US EDA tools (I would like to know if it wasn’t), and the fabrication process used foreign equipment from the likes of ASML, AMAT, LAM, TEL, KLA, etc.
Sanctions to date haven’t stopped China’s equipment imports. In fact, they are higher than ever on this front rather than finding ways around sanctions. China hasn’t really needed to do anything. The equipment that can be used for 28nm can be repurposed for 7nm, and perhaps 5nm in a couple of years. While this is a positive for China, it does mean that it is still reliant; products from the likes of SMEE are still far behind. SMIC is keeping quiet. It won’t want to have any stricter sanctions placed on it, but really, the only way to truly stop it would be to limit or ban all sales into China for all such equipment. This is unlikely to happen.
The use of SK Hynix memory is also interesting. This must have come from old stockpiles as SK Hynix was not aware of any recent sales to sanctioned Huawei. This answers the question as to whether domestic DRAM or NAND is ready for such applications yet, and it seems the answer is no, as Huawei opted for SK Hynix memory which was first announced in 2020. We don’t know how much is stockpiled, so it could be possible that future versions of the chip will be forced to change to domestic suppliers.
The popular opinion in Chinese society is that China has broken US sanctions, Huawei and SMIC have saved China, and the Huawei phone deserves all the praise it can get. In one sense this is true. It performs like a leading edge chip from a couple of years ago and is easily good enough for any application today. I myself use a phone more than two years old.
There are others outside of China that completely dismiss this chip as a low-yield propaganda project. The likes of MediaTek announced its own equivalent chip using TSMC’s 3nm process almost at the same time as Huawei’s announcement. Huawei itself used to use TSMC’s 5nm process before sanctions, so in fact, sanctions have caused Huawei to go backward.
The truth is in between of course. This is a serious chip, but not surprising. We know 7nm chips can be created using multi-patterning on the ASML 1980i series of DUV lithography machines, and this unsurprisingly is what SMIC has done. We know Huawei subsidiary HiSilicon is great at designing handset chips, and this is what they’ve done extremely well here.
Threats and restrictions remain, however, sanctions could get tighter. SMIC could be punished for supplying Huawei.; it does have a considerable foreign business that could be threatened for example. Could Huawei itself be sued in any way for using SK Hynix chips or perhaps illegally using US tools? If SMIC produced a chip where its customer could not prove it was using properly licensed tools, this could also be an issue for SMIC. I know from my own experience that not having a proper license for EDA tools in China can be quite common. This in turn could restrict any sales outside of China. Even if all this is fine, selling outside of China will still be difficult. This is an expensive $1,000 phone with no Google services installed and a chip performing to the standards of two years ago. The average consumer is not going to want to install Google services manually themselves, let alone fork out $1,000 for doing so. Patriotic marketing does not translate outside of China.
Finally, this new device may mean hard times in the Chinese market for Huawei’s competitors and other chip companies. As Huawei’s sales dropped in recent years, Oppo, Vivo, Xiaomi, and Apple, all took a piece of the pie. This in turn led to more sales for Qualcomm and MediaTek who supply these other handset companies. Will Huawei’s sales rise to eat into that of other Chinese handset companies or Apple’s? If Apple sales in China remain strong then Huawei’s phone will only serve to take market share away from other Chinese brands and hurt Qualcomm and MediaTek as well in the process.
]]>Chinese electric vehicle battery maker Gotion High-Tech announced on Sept. 16 that it has begun production at its first European plant in Gottingen, Germany, and expects to begin supplying local markets next month. The move represents a major overseas market milestone for the firm, which counts Volkswagen as its largest shareholder with a 24.77% stake.
Why it matters: The move has made Gotion the second Chinese battery supplier after CATL to set up an overseas production base in Europe, which could help strengthen the development of a local battery supply chain on the continent.
Details: Gotion has operationalized its first production line at the Gottingen factory and received a large number of orders from local clients, with plans to begin supplying local markets in October, Peter Willemsen, chief operating officer of Gotion Global said in a statement. The Chinese enterprise took over the plant from German auto supplier Bosch in 2021.
Context: The world’s ninth largest battery maker by shipments, Gotion is already facilitating the establishment of a battery plant scheduled for operation in 2025 with Volkswagen in Salzgitter, a city close to Wolfsburg where its major shareholder is headquartered.
China’s Great Wall Motor (GWM) will bring its next-generation in-car operating system to market next year, and stick to the ambitious goal of rolling out its semi-autonomous driving function nationwide by the end of 2024, according to a press event held on Tuesday.
The company is undertaking a targeted push to create a scalable and unified software platform for future vehicle models across multiple different brands, a concept that has become mainstream in the years since Tesla entered the market. A significant increase in the number of software updates, aimed at improving the driving experience, is expected from next year, vice president Nicole Wu told TechNode at the event, held in the northern city of Baoding, where the company is headquartered.
China’s third biggest private automaker by sales volume, GWM had a relatively early start in autonomous driving and in-car technologies. It began testing self-driving cars with the creation of a dedicated division called Haomo.ai in 2019 and became the second Chinese automaker after Xpeng Motors to build a supercomputing center, this January. Now, the company has set up a new artificial intelligence research lab to bring generative AI tools into play in future car models.
Here are some of the highlights of TechNode’s interview with GWM executives, including vice president Nicole Wu, senior director Jiang Haipeng, director She Shidong, and Yang Jifeng, head of the AI lab.
GWM will roll out an app store and implement it across all brands, as part of its upcoming in-car operating system, Coffee OS 3.0, scheduled for release in the first half of 2024. The store will give users access to common third-party services and infotainment apps fine-tuned for car-friendly usage, as more customers expect a smartphone-like experience in the car.
By working with smartphone makers such as Huawei and Xiaomi, the new system will allow drivers to use a handset while operating their vehicle. She Shidong added that owners will be able to play video games and watch movies in their cars by connecting gaming consoles, augmented-reality glasses or other devices, with the car dashboard using wireless or bluetooth connections.
By making constant updates of driving and infotainment features possible, the Coffee OS 3.0 is intended to take the in-car experience to a new level. Wu envisions each new GWM model getting a major software update every two to three months. Tesla and Nio released 2.8 and 1.3 software updates per month on average respectively in China during the first half of 2022, according to figures from domestic consultancy Ways.
GWM has maintained its goal of launching Navigate on HPilot (NOH), a function similar to Tesla’s full self-driving (FSD) technology, to drivers in 100 cities around China by 2024. The software will first be available to owners of its Blue Mountain flagship SUVs in Beijing and Shanghai by next March, according to Jiang.
This will enable vehicles to change lanes, overtake, and make turns automatically on Chinese city streets without high-precision maps. Jiang added that a set of common middleware plays an important part in creating a platform for assisted driving software that is updateable and scalable at a reasonable cost.
Chinese auto and tech companies have been competing for a leading position in this space at a time when Tesla’s FSD function has yet to become available in the country. Xpeng’s XNGP advanced driver assistance system is set to be available in 50 major cities by the end of this year, while Li Auto’s EVs will be capable of traveling on fixed routes by themselves after training for weeks in 100 cities.
GWM is also looking to greatly expand its in-car system capabilities through the integration of emerging technologies such as generative AI tools. Its first aim is to use AI to anticipate user preferences and create high-quality infotainment content in some new car models in the fourth quarter of this year.
The company’s newly established AI Lab has been exploring the use of large language models in GWM vehicles. Yang expects significant improvement with the upcoming Coffee OS 3.0, especially in voice recognition and natural language understanding, expecting that the latest operating system will be able to give detailed, relevant responses to users’ queries using AI.
Rival players are all developing ChatGPT-like virtual assistants for use in future car models. Geely is scheduled to launch its RMB 128,000 ($17,600) Galaxy L6 SUV on Saturday with a proprietary AI model that can read children’s picture books. Both GWM and Geely-affiliated Ecarx earlier partnered with Baidu to develop AI assistants based on the latter’s GPT-style large language models.
]]>Lynk & Co, a brand jointly owned by China’s Geely and Volvo Car, launched the 08, its long-anticipated plug-in hybrid crossover on Sept. 8. The automaker says the car has a starting price of RMB 208,800 ($28,815) and is powered by an in-house designed seven-nanometer (nm) chip, claimed by the company to be China’s first.
The compact sports utility vehicle is the first model under Lynk & Co which is exclusively plug-in hybrid. This marks a significant shift for Geely and Volvo as they make a determined move away from the internal combustion engine.
Having grappled with slowing growth in an increasingly competitive market, Lynk & Co expects the mid-sized 08 to be a high-volume model in the mainstream luxury SUV segment, competing against rival offerings including BYD’s Tang, Li Auto’s L7, and the Aito M5.
Why it matters: The Lynk & Co 08 is equipped with two SE1000 automotive chips, which is the first high-performance seven-nanometer semiconductor for cars designed by a Chinese company. The car can perform over 16 trillion operations per second (TOPS), Geely said in a statement. This is twice the number of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon SA8155P, the US tech giant’s flagship automotive cockpit platform.
Details: The Lynk & Co 08 uses a 1.5-liter four-cylinder engine along with a large 39.8-kilowatt-hour battery pack, providing a maximum driving range of 205 kilometers (127 miles) in all-electric mode and 1,400 km on a full tank plus full charge. Delivery is scheduled the begin later this month.
Context: Lynk & Co reported a modest 6% year-on-year growth in sales for the first half of this year, while its peer Zeekr, a premium electric vehicle brand launched by Geely in early 2021, posted a remarkable 124% annual growth over the same period. Seven-year-old Lynk & Co, which formerly focused on China’s gas-powered vehicle segment, sold 180,127 vehicles last year, representing an 18.3% decline from a year ago.
BYD’s most credible competitor to the Tesla Model 3 would have a 25% cost advantage over models produced by European automakers even if it were manufactured locally in the continent, UBS said on Tuesday, taking costs resulting from protectionism into account.
Why it matters: The findings demonstrate the growing competitiveness of Chinese automakers led by BYD in making centralized, unified, and up-to-date car systems with highly integrated components and self-run supply chains, UBS analyst Paul Gong told reporters in Shanghai on Tuesday.
Details: New research from UBS’s evidence lab that took apart the Seal electric car, BYD’s closest peer to the Tesla Model 3, reveals that the medium-sized sedan is 15% more cost-efficient than locally made offerings by the US automaker at its Shanghai facility.
Context: BYD began deliveries of the Seal battery sedan, its closest competitor to Tesla’s Model 3, at a starting price of RMB 209,800 last July, followed by the launch of a cheaper version from RMB 189,800 in May.
Chinese EV maker Zeekr made a splash on Sept. 1 when it launched its first high-performance, track-focused vehicle – one which it hopes will establish new benchmarks in the field and compete with established brands such as Porsche and Tesla.
The 001 FR, which Zeekr is calling the world’s best-performance electric vehicle, uses four silicon-carbine motors for sophisticated torque vectoring, producing a powerful 1,265 brake horsepower, compared with 887 hp of the Porsche 918 Spyder.
The high-performance brake, completely redesigned from the original 001, can, the company claims, accelerate from 0-100 km/h (0-62 mph) in 2.07 seconds, faster than the 2.1-second acceleration to 60 mph of the Tesla Model S Plaid. The new model promises to be an everyday supercar, with a rapid battery charge from 10% to 80% in 15 minutes.
The debut comes at a time when Chinese manufacturers are rushing to launch premium offerings with eye-catching performance specs in a quest to upscale and compete in the global luxury EV segment.
Zeekr has not released pricing details for the 001 FR, but has said the car will be made available in limited supply of up to 99 units a month from October. This will bring it into competition with another high-end rival, as BYD begins deliveries of its RMB 1 million ($150,000) electric SUV later this month.
“Global luxury brands have ruled the performance car segment throughout the era of internal combustion engines … but Chinese electric vehicles are now capable of competing head-to-head against European top-tier supercars,” Andy An, chairman of Geely Auto Group and CEO of Zeekr told reporters in an interview after the launch.
TechNode also spoke to Chen Qi, vice president of Zeekr and a former Huawei executive, about the company’s approach to autonomous driving as it looks to expand overseas. Geely’s premium EV subsidiary is establishing its footprint in Europe as part of its goal to deliver 140,000 units this year while looking to sell shares publicly in the US.
Below are highlights from a group interview after the launch, which have been translated, condensed, and edited for clarity:
An: The Zeekr 001 FR comes with a comprehensive list of high-performance equipment among which are extremely rare parts mostly needed and reserved for professional race cars.
For example, more than 70% of Brembo’s carbon-ceramic brake systems are provided to today’s top-tier race cars, with less than 20,000 units available for road cars annually. We are individually crafting the 001 FR to ensure the highest standards of quality are attained, which together with other factors restricts the sports car’s output capacity to less than 100 units a month.
Our customers have reacted remarkably well: the first 99 units of the 001 FR were sold out in 15 seconds after reservations opened [on Sept. 1] and the number exceeded our annual production capacity 20 minutes after that. I think this is because the 001 FR represents the state of the art as a sports wagon, which could improve sales and help establish Zeekr’s image as a technology-driven company.
Chen: Zeekr has pursued a dual strategy of initiating in-house development as well as outsourcing to catch up with rivals in self-driving technologies. We are pushing forward a new program to bring autonomous driving for urban scenarios with future models using Nvidia’s semiconductor chips.
Meanwhile, it requires a relatively long period of testing and validation for existing Zeekr models to navigate Chinese urban roads with Mobileye’s advanced driver-assist technology. Mobileye has been an early mover in creating its digital maps to enable self-driving cars and we will use its assisted driving systems mainly in the European market.
Automakers are deploying assisted driving technology on a city-by-city basis because more effort is needed to enhance the neural network’s generalization ability in various practical driving scenarios. [Editor’s note: Transformer is a new deep neural network architecture first mentioned in a 2017 Google paper and later used by Tesla to convert location data gathered by cameras into three-dimensional space for motion planning and control. Many assisted driving software have since been written using the transformer algorithm.]
We are accelerating efforts to roll out driver assistance software, first applicable on major Chinese highways, and we will then let our cars navigate complex urban streets automatically.
An: Zeekr will venture into the capital markets. But it is not the top priority for our management at the moment. There is no update on Zeekr’s listing plan following approval from the Chinese regulator. We will keep an eye on investor sentiment before taking a chance to go public.
Zeekr has set an annual delivery target of 650,000 units by 2025 as one of the top three luxury EV makers worldwide since its inception and remains confident under pressure. We’ve made significant progress in a comprehensive way, including building a substantial cost advantage over competitors other than Tesla, and will reach the goal with the launch of a new model later this year, followed by two all-new ones in 2024 and 2025.
An: Zeekr started exports to Europe with 500 Zeekr 001 cars last month and will begin vehicle delivery first in Sweden and the Netherlands as early as September and in several other European countries next year. We are also preparing to enter regional markets including Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America, but will keep our focus on Europe at the moment.
We expect to see a significant contribution to sales from overseas markets in the future. Chinese electric vehicles are gaining momentum in the global auto industry and we will make use of this to go upscale and expand globally.
READ MORE: Experts bullish on Chinese automakers’ global push as SAIC seeks EU foothold
]]>Tesla has released the long-anticipated, redesigned Model 3 with a sharper appearance and a range of new features in China, although at RMB 259,900 ($35,809), its starting price is higher than expected, according to a poll published on Friday on the Chinese Twitter-like social media platform Weibo.
Why it matters: The US automaker’s pricing strategy for the revamped sedan had attracted enormous attention from Chinese customers prior to its announcement, due to the car’s significant success in the electric vehicle market and Tesla’s recent policy of price cuts in the country.
Details: In a poll conducted on social media site Weibo on Friday, more than 15,000 out of roughly 21,000 respondents said that they would not consider buying the newly-designed Model 3 due to “insufficient budget or an overly expensive price tag” (our translation).
Context: Tesla initially began selling locally-made Model 3s in China at a starting price of RMB 355,800 in late 2019. The company shipped 412,805 units of the vehicle from its Shanghai facility during 2020-2022, making it the best-selling premium electric sedan in the world’s biggest EV market, according to figures from the China Passenger Car Association.
READ MORE: China EV price war: Xpeng, Huawei-backed Aito join Tesla in cutting prices
]]>Xpeng Motors chief executive He Xiaopeng said on Monday that he anticipates annual sales for an upcoming model, co-developed with Didi Chuxing under a new brand, to reach 100,000 units, in an unexpected partnership between the electric vehicle maker and the ride-hailing platform.
Why it matters: The move marks Xpeng Motors’ latest effort to expand its product lineup and extend its brand reach into the fleet market. The alliance is expected to help Xpeng significantly reduce costs and generate economies of scale in the production of highly autonomous cars, said He.
Details: Speaking to Chinese reporters during a media briefing, CEO He expressed confidence in the forthcoming A-class sedan, scheduled for production next year. He believes the model will enhance Xpeng’s performance, but does not specify a timeframe for his annual sales volume goal. The company delivered 41,435 EVs for the first half of this year with six namesake-branded models on sale.
Context: The news comes a month after Guangzhou-based Xpeng announced a collaboration with Volkswagen to jointly launch two VW-branded B-class EVs in 2026. B-class vehicles are normally larger than A-class vehicles and have larger engines.
READ MORE: What to expect from Volkswagen and Xpeng’s new partnership
]]>Li Auto’s chief executive Li Xiang launched a series of business startup courses on Chinese audio content platform Dedao on Monday. With this move, the entrepreneur is aiming to tap a wider customer base and showcase his firm’s thought leadership, local media reported.
Why it matters: During a livestream, Li mentioned that the target audience for his newly-launched online product development program significantly overlaps with Li Auto’s intended user base. He expects the marketing initiative to help the automaker further expand its influence in the electric vehicle market, media outlet Jiemian reported.
Details: The program consists of 16 audio-based online courses, each lasting approximately 12 minutes, and aims to educate the audience about the fundamentals of product management, including the methodology for designing successful products, crafting powerful pricing strategies, and increasing operational efficiency and profitability.
Context: Li Auto delivered 139,117 units of plug-in hybrid crossovers in the first half of 2023, surpassing last year’s total of 133,246 units.
BYD on Wednesday officially unveiled its newest premium marque with a performance-oriented plug-in hybrid off-roader. The Chinese automaker expects the new brand to signify personality and luxury, and is betting on it to help attract more of the country’s affluent middle-class buyers.
With the launch of the Bao 5, BYD’s reply to makers of top-tier luxury off-roaders, China’s biggest electric vehicle maker is seeking to “redefine” a market segment that has been ruled by internal combustion engine cars (our translation), Chairman Wang Chuanfu declared during a press conference at BYD’s headquarters in Shenzhen on Wednesday.
The name of the new brand, FangChengBao, translates literally to Formula Leopard. BYD said the new lineup responds to emerging and future demands for off-road travel with an edgy design, strong performance, and sophisticated personalized features.
The architecture: The Bao 5, the first model under BYD’s new luxury lineup, is a large sports utility vehicle based on tailor-made PHEV architecture that is expected to underpin future EV performance.
Other details: The seven-seater SUV has a straightforward, boxy design with a lot of hard lines and angles. The car radiates a high-definition car-width strip of light in a rectangle ahead, and boasts luxury interiors including a high-quality stereo system provided by French audio engineering brand Devialet.
Context: BYD first revealed its plans to develop a premium marque that “specializes in professional and personalized identities” last November. The company already operates two luxury brands, Yangwang and Denza, with price ranges between RMB 800,000 and RMB 1.5 million, and between RMB 300,000 and RMB 500,000, respectively.
BYD said on Wednesday it has produced a total of 5 million electric vehicles, a landmark that comes almost three decades after the company was launched in 1995. Chairman Wang Chuanfu choked up at a press conference in Shenzhen, wiping away tears as he called on domestic rivals to strive for leadership in the global market.
Why it matters: The milestone reflects the accelerated shift towards green energy vehicles in the world’s biggest auto market, where Chinese manufacturers are revving up to compete with global automakers.
Details: During the 50-minute press conference, Wang detailed the ups and downs of China’s largest electric carmaker, including how its plug-in hybrid technology was initially met with skepticism before becoming a mainstream vehicle segment.
Context: The combined market share of domestic automakers rose by 5.8% year-on-year to 53.2% in July in the Chinese passenger vehicle market, according to figures published by the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) on Tuesday.
Xingji Meizu, a smartphone company controlled by Geely founder Eric Li, has decided to discontinue its chip development business for cost-saving reasons. The move is expected to result in layoffs of dozens of staff members, including some fresh graduates, local media outlet Meiren Auto reported on Tuesday.
Why it matters: Xingji Meizu is the latest company to abandon its pursuit of critical and emerging technologies in the Chinese auto and tech industries, reflecting the challenges of a faltering economy and intensifying competition.
Details: In a statement sent to financial media publication CLS on Tuesday, Xingji Meizu said the company is closing down its in-house chip design program in the face of global economic uncertainties, and will instead sharpen its focus on product innovation and user experience.
Context: Geely’s other affiliates have reported progress in semiconductor technology. The most recent example is the Lynk & Co 08 SUV featuring an in-car operating system built upon a supercomputing platform provided by Ecarx, another auto tech firm founded by Shen Ziyu and Geely’s Eric Li.
Chinese battery manufacturer CATL has imposed restrictions on working hours for some positions within its facilities since the end of last year, according to an August 4 report by Chinese news magazine China Entrepreneur, as demand from the country’s booming EV sector starts to stall. Since November last year, CATL has been cutting salaries, curtailing night shifts, and enforcing an eight-hour workday structure for select positions, an employee at CATL’s production base in Sichuan province told the outlet.
Why it matters: CATL has been actively expanding its battery production capacity in recent years, with the battery giant operating more than 10 production bases across nine Chinese provinces. However, the Chinese EV market has been experiencing a slowdown in the pace of battery demand growth leading to overproduction concerns at the Ningde headquartered firm.
Details: Prior to CATL’s recent moves, a number of workers at the company’s battery plants were reportedly on duty 11 hours a day to earn higher performance-based salaries, amid strong demand for batteries in the electric vehicle (EV) market.
Context: The largest battery maker in China is experiencing a decline in domestic market share, amid both excessive battery capacity and fierce competition from other domestic battery manufacturers.
In July, more than 10 Chinese automakers reported deliveries of over 10,000 units of their electric vehicles, signaling a significant shift in China’s car market as newer entrants and previously smaller brands continue to increase their sales. Notably, Nio saw remarkable growth, nearly doubling its figures from the previous month, while Xpeng Motors surpassed the 10,000 threshold following months of lackluster performance.
Why it matters: The latest ranking of the best-selling EV brands in China reflects the changing landscape in the world’s biggest car market. Although BYD and Tesla are still miles ahead of their competitors, local rivals are capturing market share with new product launches and aggressive price cuts as the sector’s intense battle shows no signs of abating.
Bright spot: On Tuesday, Nio announced that it had exceeded the monthly delivery threshold of 20,000 vehicles for the first time in its nine-year history. The firm’s July deliveries reached 20,462 units, nearly doubling its figures from a month earlier.
Other results: While BYD maintained its dominant position in July with a new sales record, GAC’s EV arm Aion made progress with its new premium marque, Hyper. Aion sold 45,025 units during the month, with 2,011 of them being the Hyper GT coupe, which it began selling on July 3.
Context: In addition to Chinese automakers, several global auto majors also revealed some details of their July sales in China.
Chinese EV giant BYD is taking on a record 30,000 fresh graduates this year, with research personnel accounting for 80% of the total intake, in a move intended to shore up its research and development department, a company representative has confirmed.
Why it matters: The hiring drive comes as BYD looks to retain its dominance in the Chinese electric vehicle market as rivals continue to offer a competitive challenge. The move contrasts sharply with general hiring trends as China faces soaring youth joblessness.
Details: Around 31,800 fresh graduates have come on board at BYD since the start of 2023, more than 61% of whom have a master’s or doctorate degree, and over 80% of whom will work in R&D projects. State-owned newspaper People’s Daily was the first to report the story on July 29.
Context: BYD has been expanding its R&D team for several years with the number of engineers hired by the company growing 31.5% year-on-year to around 40,400 in 2021. That number increased 72.6% year-on-year to nearly 70,000 as of last year. The company had around 570,000 employees in 2022, of which around 75% were production workers, financial media outlet Caixin reported.
In a historic development, Volkswagen said on Wednesday it will make electric vehicles in a joint effort with Chinese EV startup Xpeng via a $700 million investment plan. The news sent Xpeng stock rocketing as much as 40% during trading on Nasdaq.
The move is expected to create a win-win situation that will help the two automakers secure their market shares in a brutally competitive market. However, analysts expect big challenges for the partnership.
Both Volkswagen and Xpeng are in a relatively weak market position when it comes to EVs and face sluggish sales in the world’s largest EV market. Also, cultural clashes and different mindsets could potentially lead to friction in the partnership.
TechNode spoke to various analysts on the ground about what lies ahead. While some saw the collaboration as being beneficial to both automakers, most saw challenges in the unprecedented deal between a German auto giant and a rising Chinese EV maker.
The Volkswagen-Xpeng partnership makes perfect sense as they complement each other’s strengths, according to Yale Zhang, managing director of Shanghai-based consultancy AutoForesight. “Xpeng’s vehicle platform is state-of-the-art compared with rivals, while Volkswagen definitely needs a helping hand in making intelligent EVs,” Zhang said.
Elliot Richards, a correspondent at the Fully Charged Show, believes Volkswagen knows how to build good quality affordable cars and has an advantage in terms of economy of scale, while Xpeng has top-of-the-line software stacks with a more lively, fun, and risk-taking brand image. He expects the collaboration to help both “efficiently grow together” in China by pooling their resources.
Volkswagen could accelerate the launch of new EV models with the latest tech in the Chinese market through the alliance, predicts David Zhang, a visiting professor at Huanghe Science and Technology University. Volkswagen has had a relatively late start in electrification and its ID series lacks competitiveness in China, despite a decent performance in Europe, added Zhang.
Daniel J. Kollar, head of Automotive & Mobility Practice at business development consultancy Intralink Group, said the problem is that neither has been able to effectively differentiate themselves in the market, so it is unclear whether teaming up will allow them to change that. Both foreign and younger Chinese original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) are having a rough time lately, experiencing trouble with penetrating the mid-tier and entry-level markets and gaining the trust of average Chinese consumers, Kollar added.
Meanwhile, cultural fit will remain a challenge in this collaboration. Pitting a rigid process-oriented culture from Germany against a fast and furious startup culture in China, has the potential for problems, according to Lei Xing, former chief editor at China Auto Review. As Xing put it, “Is VW willing to sacrifice certain things for speed?”
Tu T. Le, founder of business intelligence firm Sino Auto Insights, also expects culture clashes as VW’s careful checks and balances are challenged by Xpeng’s much faster pace. “Volkswagen will have to let go of its want to centrally control everything and do its best to learn from Xpeng if it truly wants success,” according to Le.
There might also be wounded pride on Volkswagen’s part, as global carmakers that used to enjoy the upper hand are now acquiring technologies from newcomers, rather than licensing to them, AutoForesight’s Zhang stated. “This could become an invisible barrier and lead to tension in day-to-day collaboration,” he added.
Experts have voiced concern about the sales prospects of the two automakers given a relatively late launch date of two new models.
“By virtue of the investment, VW is hopeful that its EV sales can be turned around with these two new products, but the 2026 launch dates could be too little too late,” said Le. His comments were echoed by Xing: “The tie-up does nothing to guarantee the success of VW badged EVs with Xpeng tech ‘inside.’ Also for the time being, at least until 2026, it does nothing to influence the market performance of Volkswagen and Xpeng as each controls their own destiny.”
Meanwhile, they do not foresee the tie-up with Volkswagen as having a significant impact on Xpeng’s sales and presence in the market, although licensing its technologies is potentially a recurring revenue stream for Xpeng.
Volkswagen will likely have to shell out a huge amount of money as a transfer fee for accessing Xpeng’s technology, which has been a common practice in such collaborations, said David Zhang. “Chinese auto manufacturers used to pay tens of thousands of RMB per unit to their foreign counterparts for localizing a vehicle model that came from abroad.”
Zhang added that the collaboration with Volkswagen could be a significant endorsement of Xpeng to boost its credibility in the European market. Aware of Xpeng’s recent momentum following the launch of its G6 crossover last month, Le also believes the cooperation with VW could help it more in Europe than in China. “Xpeng is still two or three successful products away from becoming a sales leader in the Chinese market,” added Le.
Kollar sees the Volkswagen-Xpeng partnership as the latest sign that the Chinese market is now ready for consolidation, which means more young, domestic EV makers are either going to go bust or be acquired. The best way for foreign OEMs to regain their previous standing and catch up in the EV sector is to become an acquirer of some of the promising players, Kollar predicts.
The tie-up ushers in a new era where foreign legacy automakers now depend upon Chinese EV makers for their technologies and speed to market, noted Lei. In this context, Volkswagen can be seen as playing a “pioneering” role yet again, having been one of the first major foreign car brands to enter China, and has now opened the floodgates for similar deals involving other foreign legacy automakers and local firms in the future. The German giant on Wednesday also announced an extended partnership between its Audi brand and China’s SAIC.
Global brands are recognizing that Chinese EV companies have progressed to the point that foreign companies have something to learn from them, said Stephen Dyer, a co-leader for AlixPartners’s Greater China business. “We can expect to see more Chinese auto players become part of the global community of strategic collaboration going forward.”
Richards added that, “They now need their local partnerships more than ever, but the shoe is on the other foot.”
READ MORE: Experts bullish on Chinese automakers’ global push as SAIC seeks EU foothold
]]>Chinese EV maker Nio will roll out a single-motor version of its first mass-market Alps model, as part of a lineup scheduled for delivery in the second half of next year, Chinese media outlet 36Kr reported.
Why it matters: The plan to produce a more affordable single-motor car marks a rare shift for Nio, which has so far insisted on a dual motor on all its offerings to date, as this is responsible for Nio’s impressive acceleration and premium performance.
Details: The upcoming sedan under Nio’s mass market Alps marque will come with the company’s self-developed electric powertrain featuring a next-generation induction motor, the 36Kr report said, citing people familiar with the matter.
Context: Nio’s chief executive William Li on June 9 told investors that the company is on track to launch the first model under the Alps marque in the second half of 2024.
A Chinese joint venture between Volkswagen Group and SAIC Group will start building its own plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in a move to follow the growing adoption of PHEVs in the world’s biggest car market, Chinese media outlet Caixin has reported.
Why it matters: The move marks Volkswagen’s efforts to become more localized and step up its introduction of new electric vehicle (EV) models in China, where it is losing ground to electric rivals such as BYD and Tesla. Its premium brand Audi is also looking to develop EVs with the purchase of partner SAIC’s electric vehicle platform.
Details: According to the July 22 report by Caixin, SAIC-Volkswagen has yet to reveal detailed plans on any specifications or launch information for the new model.
Context: SAIC-Volkswagen currently has two PHEV models on sale, namely the popular Tiguan sports utility vehicle and the mid-sized Passat sedan, with a starting price of RMB 261,050 and RMB 233,150 ($36,268 and $32,392), respectively, according to its official website.
Nio announced on Thursday that it has updated its battery leasing program to allow drivers to replace their battery packs with a higher energy density one daily rather than after months or years, as was previously the case.
The Chinese EV maker also reaffirmed an earlier commitment to expanding its battery swapping and supercharging network, as a way to showcase what it sees as the superior experience offered to Nio owners, including easy access to recharging ports.
Why it matters: The daily package may present new challenges for Nio, given its already large and dispersed power infrastructure deployment across China. Despite this, it is expected to draw in revenue as it offers greater convenience to users and lowers the purchase prices of Nio’s EVs, senior company executives told reporters at a press briefing in Beijing. Nio has recently experienced cashflow pressure amid slowing sales.
Details: Customers who currently have a 70/75 kilowatt-hour (kWh) battery pack for their Nio EVs may now swap the battery for a so-called “long-range” one (100kWh) for an extra fee of RMB 50 ($7) per day and will be able to return it to any Nio swap station in China.
Context: Nio owns and operates one of the largest recharging networks in China with 1,564 swap stations and 16,745 public chargers as of Thursday. It has swapped over 25 million EV battery packs, meaning a Nio car is starting up with a replenished battery pack every 1.6 seconds, said Qin.
READ MORE: Nio bets big on battery swap stations amid growing EV price war
]]>China’s battery giant CATL is considering a bid for exploration rights to two domestic lithium mines in the southwestern Sichuan province. The electric vehicle battery maker recently established a new mining subsidiary to comply with the bidding process, a local media outlet has reported.
Why it matters: CATL’s interest in two new lithium mines signals its intention to further integrate upstream resources amid already-volatile battery supply chains.
Details: CATL set up a new mining company called Maerkang Times Mining (our translation) through a subsidiary, with a registered capital of RMB 300 million ($42 million), according to the Chinese enterprise database Tianyancha.
Context: China’s surging adoption of EVs has in turn created more business moves in the mining space.
Audi is considering buying authorization for an electric platform directly from a Chinese electric vehicle company in order to enhance the competitiveness of its electric cars, according to a July 9 report by German media Automobilwoche.
Why it matters: The news has attracted 7.2 million views on China’s Weibo as of writing. BYD, Geely, and Xpeng Motors, with years of experience making cars on their dedicated EV architectures, are seen as among the most likely options by Chinese netizens.
Audi and Chinese electric platform: The Automobilwoche report did not specify which Chinese companies Audi was in talks with. And yet the plan has already been approved by Volkswagen Group CEO Oliver Blume and will be confirmed by Audi’s board this week, according to a Tuesday report by Automotive News Europe.
Context: Audi began selling its Q4 e-tron crossover with partner FAW with a price range between RMB 300,000 and RMB 380,000 ($41,729-$52,857) in China last May. It is built upon Volkswagen’s MEB open vehicle platform, as are Audi’s Q5 e-tron seven-seater and Volkswagen’s ID.6 SUV.
As Chinese automakers begin to beat overseas rivals on their home turf for the first time, analysts at AlixPartners, a global consultancy, expect their international push to net them a 30% global market share by 2030.
Among the biggest Chinese car manufacturers, SAIC and BYD have announced plans to build their first regional facilities in Europe and South America for easier access to booming EV markets through local production. Chinese EVs have already made big in-roads into the reputational market for stylish designs, high-tech features, and low cost.
Established global carmakers, no matter where they are operating, can only maintain their competitive positions by learning from the Chinese industry, Stephen Dyer, a co-leader for AlixPartners’s Greater China business, told reporters on Wednesday in Shanghai. “Those that ignore this future disruptive force do so at their own peril,” he said.
AlixPartners sees recent moves by Chinese automakers as a way to further boost sales volumes and reduce risks from volatile exchange rates and potential logistics issues in overseas operations. China overtook Japan as the world’s top vehicle exporter in the first quarter of 2023 and is extending its international presence from under-developed regions to more developed ones such as Europe.
A major threat to western original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) could emerge by 2030 in the shape of Chinese carmakers. AlixPartners expects the latter’s global car sales to grow in market share from 16% in 2022 to 30% in 2030. In Europe, market share could grow from 2% to 15% over the same period, while Latin America and Southeast Asia show even greater potential with Chinese carmakers expected to have an estimated 19% market share in each by 2030, up from just 1% last year.
Dyer said he is convinced that Chinese brands could achieve success in the highly competitive European market, by employing the same “winning formula” they have been crafting at home. “Chinese automakers will have a chance to win favor, especially from younger European buyers, with their in-car technologies,” added Dyer, speaking in Mandarin Chinese (our translation).
AlixPartners suggests global automakers may need to rethink their emphasis on traditional vehicle attributes such as durability and handling, adapting fast as Chinese-style competition comes to their markets.
Chinese brands have made a mark by providing feature-rich offerings at affordable prices, responding to local consumers’ preferences for stylish design, engaging interiors, and advanced technologies while accepting “good enough” reliability and performance, said Dyer.
READ MORE: Chinese carmakers showed up big time at Auto Shanghai 2023
Nearly 60% of Chinese-brand vehicles sold in 2022 and priced between RMB 80,000 and RMB 120,000 ($11,040-$16,560) were equipped with advanced driver assistance systems, considered a standard feature on higher-end models, compared with only 15% sold by foreign brands, according to AlixPartners’ analysis.
China’s homegrown makers, especially the younger ones, take a less cautious approach to vehicle development with an aggressive appetite for risk, using digital simulations to reduce the amount of physical testing for fast development and delivery to the market. Traditional overseas carmakers normally complete two years of extreme winter and summer testing, while Chinese brands often carry these out simultaneously in different parts of the world, according to Dyer.
AlixPartners estimates that Chinese brands will secure a combined 51% share of China’s auto market this year, taking gas-powered vehicles and EVs into the equation, versus 49% by their foreign counterparts. This would mark the first time that Chinese automakers would have overtaken their more established foreign rivals in the market.
Having become leading forces in the world’s biggest EV market, brands such as BYD, SAIC, and Chery are upping their efforts to expand overseas by announcing the establishment of new plants near their local customers.
SAIC said on Tuesday that it has been searching for a site for the carmaker’s first EV manufacturing facility in Europe in a move the company said would help secure a stable business environment over the long term, Chinese media outlet Caixin reported. Volkswagen’s Chinese partner expects sales to almost double to 200,000 units this year.
On the same day, BYD unveiled its plan to establish a $620.2 million industrial complex in Brazil, which will include three plants for the production of EVs and key components and is scheduled for operation as early as mid-2024. This would be the first production hub outside Asia for the Warren Buffett-backed EV giant. BYD is also reportedly closing a deal to take over a German factory from Ford.
Another giant Chery is mulling several facilities in the UK and Southeast Asia, while GAC and Great Wall Motor have similar plans in Thailand and Vietnam, respectively.
]]>Note: This article was first published on TechNode China (in Chinese).
China has been making strides in vehicle electrification for some time, with an eye to digitizing its entire automotive industry. As a key part of this shift, Chinese EV makers are currently competing to produce the most comprehensive assisted driving systems, endeavoring to turn their offerings into key selling points as the market matures.
Here, TechNode takes a look at the assisted driving software of three leading players in the Chinese EV sector.
The Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS) is the standout feature of Xpeng’s new model, the G6. The car has possibly the most advanced autonomous driving technology in China: with its 31 smart sensors, the G6 outperforms its competitors. Dual forward-facing LiDAR sensors, millimeter-wave radar, cameras, and ultrasonic radar throughout give the vehicle the tools to sense and see all around its body.
In urban settings, the City NGP (Navigation Guided Pilot) smart navigation-assisted driving tool enables seamless travel along accessible city roads. Once a user inputs a destination and activates the tool, the vehicle maintains its position within its chosen lane, performs necessary lane changes or overtaking maneuvers, merges on and off roads, navigates around stationary vehicles or obstacles, recognizes and passes through traffic light intersections, circumvents loop roads, steers clear of construction zones, and evades pedestrians and non-motorized vehicles, on its way from inputted A to B.
The G6 comes with Lane Centering Control (LCC), a Lidar-based adaptive cruise and lane-centering feature that also enables the car to maintain optimal cruising speed. Linked to Xpeng’s advanced XNet neural network, the system processes 4D information on dynamic targets, including size, distance, position, and speed of vehicles and two-wheelers, as well as 3D information on static targets: lane lines and road edges from above.
Compared to Xpeng’s first-generation visual perception architecture, the XNet employs neural networks to replace manual post-processing, enabling end-to-end algorithm optimization. It boasts enhanced 360-degree perception, covering more than eight lateral lanes, demonstrating superior performance, and improving lane change success rates. Uniquely, this vehicle relies on vision-based recognition and display capabilities, becoming the first in the industry to not rely on mapping. It includes detailed rendering and visual representation of traffic participants and road infrastructure surrounding the vehicle. Drivers can see lane markings and nearby vehicles on the in-car map. XNet also recognizes and displays traversable areas, traffic lights and turn signals, setting a new industry standard.
On highways, the system can efficiently execute autonomous lane changes, lane selection, and overtaking maneuvers by assessing the surrounding environment and required driving tasks, such as avoiding traffic restrictions and adhering to speed limits. It also provides seamless on and off-ramp transitions while switching between high-speed driving modes, ensuring improved straight-line stability and enhanced cornering.
By putting strategic effort into smart software and electric power, Li Auto has made huge strides in smart space (SS) R&D, smart driving, and high-voltage fully electric platforms. With its own large model called Mind GPT, Li Auto will soon begin testing its City NOA smart driving system.
Li Auto’s smart driving system doesn’t depend on high-precision maps, as it utilizes a bird’s eye view (BEV) large model to perceive and comprehend road structure information in real time. The BEV large model has undergone extensive training, enabling it to generate stable road structure data on most roads and intersections in real time. Neural Prior Net (NPN) refers to a set of neural network parameters which are difficult for humans to directly interpret when dealing with complex intersection patterns. The large model effectively deciphers these patterns. Compared to high-precision maps, NPN replaces human rules with network models for better understanding and use of environmental information.
For complicated intersections, it’s essential to conduct advanced intersection NPN feature extraction. On a vehicle’s second approach to an intersection, the previously extracted NPN features are retrieved and combined with the BEV feature layer from the vehicle’s large-scale perception model, resulting in what the company says is an optimal perception outcome. In addition, the “AI driver” must comprehend the traffic light regulations at the intersection, posing another challenge on urban streets. The prevailing method involves devising a rule-based algorithm to interpret traffic lights and road use intentions. Li Auto prefers to rely on a large model to address this issue.
To navigate complex urban roads, Li Auto trained a Traffic Intention Net (TIN) to do away with the need for software to interpret pre-set human traffic regulations or even know the exact position of a traffic light. The system will input video footage into the TIN network model, and it will directly indicate the appropriate vehicle maneuver – turn left or right, go straight, or stop and wait. By analyzing the reactions of a large number of human drivers to signal changes at intersections, the performance of the TIN model is highly refined. To ensure the “AI driver” emulates human drivers’ judgment and driving patterns, Li Auto trained the AI with a huge amount of real driver behavior data, making NOA’s decision-making and planning more human-like, while maintaining safety and adherence to traffic regulations.
NOA is designed to accommodate more than 95% of commuting situations for car owners. While using NOA for commuting, each model will receive continual updates and training. In the latter half of the year, Li Auto plans to introduce the NOA commuting feature and expand urban NOA coverage, with the goal of allowing early adopters to commute using NOA’s navigation-assisted driving.
The M5 smart drive edition released by Huawei’s automotive brand Aito sees the debut of the telecom giant’s second generation autonomous driving system ADS 2.0, which offers a comprehensive fusion perception system made up of various sensors working together to provide 360 degree coverage. This fusion perception system consists of 1 LiDAR, 3 millimeter-wave radars, 11 camera sets, and 12 ultrasonic radars, allowing for distance detection of up to 200 meters. The Aito M5 employs network technology based on fused BEV perception capabilities that can identify objects outside the standard obstacle whitelist. Paired with a road topology inference network, the Aito M5 is designed to drive efficiently with or without a map, equipped to see, understand, and navigate regardless.
The Aito M5 can handle changing light conditions in tunnels and minimize the impact of nighttime glare. It can accurately identify pedestrians, vehicles, and obstacles with ease. On urban roads, the car actively maneuvers around obstructions caused by other vehicles and the company claims it can deal with pedestrians carelessly opening car doors or unexpected cyclists emerging from a blind spot. Even in the most challenging conditions, such as intense glare at night, the Aito M5 can brake at speeds of up to 50 km/h.
With assisted driving capabilities, the M5 can merge onto and off highway ramps with a 98.86% success rate. The reliable long-distance piloting system has an average Miles Per Intervention (MPI) of up to 114 km, rivaling experienced drivers.
The Huawei ADS 2.0 package comes with 19 features as-standard, such as high-speed Lane Centering Control (LCC), urban LCC, and high-speed Navigation-based Cruise Assist (NCA). Additionally, the optional advanced package offers urban NCA, Automated Valet Parking Assist (AVP), and enhanced LCC for urban areas.
Huawei’s Aito is the first car brand to achieve high-speed urban smart driving capabilities without relying on high-precision maps, bringing the assisted driving experience significantly closer to the L3 level of autonomy. According to Huawei’s roadmap, its mapless functionality will be introduced in 15 cities, including Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen, during the third quarter of 2023. By the fourth quarter, coverage will encompass 45 cities.
The race to launch assisted driving in the Chinese market is well underway. As time goes on, we can expect more car companies and self-driving solution providers to join. China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) plans to introduce an updated standard system guide for smart, network-connected vehicles, which will accompany the competition as it intensifies further.
]]>Denza, a luxury car subsidiary of Chinese electric vehicle maker BYD, released its first SUV model N7 on Monday, priced from RMB 301,800 ($41,705). The company said it has received more than 24,000 pre-orders since its public unveiling on April 18.
The N7 is also the first model equipped with BYD’s assisted driving technology and will be capable of navigating on complex urban roads in China early next year, general manager Zhao Chaojiang said during the press conference.
Why it matters: BYD’s latest launch shows its intention to elevate the brand and secure a foothold in the premium market. The budget-friendly automaker is hoping its sub-brand Denza will become a luxury marque, and the launch of the N7 is a crucial step towards achieving this goal.
Intelligent driving: The top-end version of the N7 features a hardware suite of 33 high-precision sensors, including two 8-megapixel cameras and two lidar sensors, and is powered by Nvidia’s Drive Orin processor which offers 254 trillion operations per second (or TOPS). By comparison, Xpeng’s G6 features 31 sensors and Nvidia’s dual Orin chips.
Other details: The N7 has a driving range of 702 kilometers (436 miles) and can be refueled with an additional 350 km of range in 15 minutes by BYD’s proprietary dual charging technology. For comparison, Xpeng’s G6 can travel 300 km on a 10-minute charge.
Context: BYD and partner Daimler first unveiled the Denza brand in early 2012 two years after the set-up of a joint venture to develop EVs for Chinese consumers. Denza in late 2019 began selling the X, a seven-seater SUV with a starting price of RMB 289,800, which was discontinued two years later.
Chinese electric vehicle makers Nio, Xpeng Motors, and Zeekr on July 1 reported significant volume gains in June after months-long dips amid intensifying competition. Nio’s aggressive price cuts and Xpeng launching new models have spurred each to improved numbers.
Although BYD remains the dominant player in China, Aion, Li Auto, and Great Wall Motor are emerging as rivals with enhanced technologies and competitive prices, with the sector’s intense competition showing no signs of easing anytime soon.
Why it matters: Jefferies analysts forecast an 8% monthly growth in the wholesale volume of new energy vehicles to around 774,000 units in June and a 20% sequential increase in foot traffic in the industry.
Major improvements: Li Auto crossed another monthly delivery threshold, reporting delivery of 32,575 plug-in hybrid crossovers to customers in June, up from the 28,277 units a month earlier. The automaker’s year-to-date deliveries of 139,117 units have already surpassed its total unit sales from 2022. Chief executive Li Xiang previously stated he expects that number to get to more than 40,000 units later this year.
Other results: BYD sold 253,046 EVs in June (of which 11,058 were Denza-branded multi-purpose vehicles), a new record compared to the 240,220 it achieved in May. The company had projected monthly sales of its D9 premium vans to reach 15,000 units and is set to begin sales of its second model, the N7 crossover, on Monday.
Context: UBS analysts expect Chinese carmakers to continue market share gains as foreign rivals see a shrinking demand for internal combustion engine vehicles. Chinese EV makers “are acting fast in terms of new model launches, with a better understanding of consumer’s needs,” wrote UBS analysts led by Paul Gong on June 19.
]]>Chinese EV maker Xpeng on Thursday revealed the prices of its G6 sports utility vehicles at a competitive starting price of RMB 209,900 ($28,956), more than 20% cheaper than Tesla’s Model Y in China. The automaker is under growing pressure from investors to drive up sales with the new model after the months-long slump.
Why it matters: Speaking to reporters during an interview on Thursday, Xpeng’s CEO He Xiaopeng said that the G6, which has a similar size and appearance to Tesla’s Model Y, has the potential to achieve monthly deliveries of over 10,000 units.
Details: The long-anticipated G6 five-seater is almost the same size as the Model Y. The new model measures around 4.75 meters in length, and 1.92 meters in width, and spans a 2.89-meter-long wheelbase.
Context: Xpeng reported year-to-date deliveries of 32,815 vehicles as of May, a nearly 40% reduction from the same period a year earlier.
Chinese automaker GAC Group on Monday showcased an electric, unmanned flying car prototype, a product it says can move both on the ground and through the air, in a futuristic plan to take its urban mobility to another dimension.
Why it matters: The debut makes GAC the latest Chinese automaker to promise riders flying taxis, a still immature technology, after the Toyota manufacturing partner began recruiting for a number of aircraft research and development engineering roles a year ago.
Details: The prototype, dubbed Gove, is being built on a modular system in which the flight and automobile components can be separated, meaning passengers could drive away the concept once it lands.
Context: Several Chinese automakers have been working on electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOLs) air taxis, but none have yet received approval for commercial use from local regulators.
Update: Xpeng Aeroht said on Tuesday that it would not sell its fifth-generation flying car, the Xpeng X2, which was previously referred to in this article as the Traveler X2, but has plans to sell the next generation of its aircraft as early as 2025.
]]>China’s government on Wednesday announced a detailed plan to provide a full exemption of electric vehicles from purchase taxes in the next two years, an exemption that will be gradually rescinded from 2026. Beijing is also planning a pilot scheme to regulate passenger cars with partially and highly autonomous functions for potential large-scale operation, according to a deputy minister.
Why it matters: Industry players have responded positively to Beijing’s recent efforts to stabilize the EV market, where competition has heated up significantly in recent months.
Analysts’ take: Bernstein analysts have voiced cautious optimism about the prospects for the world’s biggest EV market, as consumer confidence and credit impulses could be supportive of auto demand in the next few months after a slow recovery in car sales early this year.
Details: EV buyers will be entitled to a 10% purchase tax exemption, or a credit of up to RMB 30,000 ($4,178) until the end of 2025. From 2026 to 2027, they will be taxed by 5% of the purchase price of their EVs, and the reduction amount will not exceed RMB 15,000 per vehicle, according to a government filing published Wednesday.
L3 deployment: Meanwhile, the central government is planning a pilot scheme to officially lift the barriers to entry of passenger cars with semi-autonomous functions, or with the so-called Level 3 automation, said Xin Guobin, deputy minister of industry and information technology.
Li Auto on June 17 unveiled details of its first purely battery-powered electric vehicle with an expected price tag of over RMB 500,000 ($69,955), claiming its supercharging facilities could give up to 400 kilometers (249 miles) of charge in less than 10 minutes.
The company also announced plans to release an automated driving function that it says will allow commuting drivers to relax their grip in urban traffic later this year, aiming to attract tech-savvy Chinese customers.
Why it matters: Li Auto is catching up with rivals in deploying advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) at a faster pace than expected, which could be a key differentiator in the driving experience for the company, according to a June 18 note written by Jefferies analysts.
First BEV: Named Mega, Li Auto’s long-anticipated first all-electric is a multi-purpose vehicle with a price range of RMB 500,000 and above, vice president Liu Jie said at a corporate event on June 17.
Driver assistance software: Li Auto also revealed plans to begin internal testing of its automated driving function for complex urban scenarios, called city NOA (standing for Navigate On Autopilot), with a cohort of selected owners in Beijing and Shanghai later this month.
Second plant: The accelerated move to BEVs also comes as Beijing-based Li Auto recently received a green light to open its second plant in the nation’s capital, according to a document (in Chinese) released by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology on June 16.
US electric vehicle startup Fisker is planning to enter the Chinese market. The company has announced plans to establish its first regional delivery center in Shanghai, with deliveries scheduled to begin in early 2024, its China board member Daniel Foa told Chinese media outlet Yicai on Tuesday.
Why it matters: EV newcomer Fisker is trying to enter China at a time when some traditional global auto majors are struggling to maintain their market share in the country due to their slow transition to EVs. The move also highlights Fisker’s ambition to succeed in the world’s biggest auto market, following in the tracks of its US peer Tesla.
Details: Foa declined to comment on whether Fisker would deploy a direct sales model in China, as it has been doing in the US and Europe, or sell its vehicles through franchised dealers when interviewed by local media outlet Yicai.
Context: Fisker currently has two models on sale, the Ocean and the Pear crossovers, with starting prices of $37,499 and $29,900, respectively. It started making the Ocean sports utility vehicles with contract manufacturer Magna Steyr in Austria late last year and began delivery in Denmark in May, while rushing to hand the model over to US customers on Friday.
Note: This article was first published on TechNode China (in Chinese).
Chinese EV maker Nio announced on June 12 that it would be cutting prices by RMB 30,000 ($4,200) across all lineups and discontinuing its free battery swapping service, an unusual decision from an automaker that has repeatedly refused to enter China’s EV price war.
Among the leading Chinese EV startups (Li Auto, Xpeng, and Nio), Nio is currently facing increasing market pressure. As Chinese EV makers head into a critical competitive period, Nio has to adapt and strategize to secure a larger market share for itself. After all, maintaining a substantial scale is essential for newcomers to survive in the automotive industry. The second half of 2023 and early 2024 is a critical period for young EV makers to secure a healthy market share, as more new models are launched and more traditional major auto companies enter the competition.
Nio has announced a price reduction of RMB 30,000 ($4,200) across all its new vehicle lineups, as well as adjustments to the rights of first-time buyers for newly purchased cars. Alongside these changes, the company has discontinued its free battery swap policy, replacing it with a paid service effective immediately. According to Nio’s announcement, starting from June 12, 2023, the first owner will receive a 6-year or 150,000 km warranty for the entire vehicle, and a 10-year unlimited mileage warranty for the main electrical systems (battery, motor, and control), among other benefits. The free battery swap service will no longer be included as a basic car benefit; instead, users may opt for a pay-per-use system when using Nio’s battery swapping service. Nio also mentioned plans to introduce flexible charging and swapping service packages for its customers.
In essence, Nio is separating its battery swap service from the vehicle price, leading to a lower overall purchase cost. Instead of a straight price cut like Tesla’s previous approach, Nio is offering a reduced package, by removing perks such as lifetime free battery swaps, extended vehicle warranties, etc. From August 1, Nio will charge new customers for battery swaps at an average cost of about RMB 80 to RMB 100 ($11.2 to $14) per swap. Theoretically, this change should have a positive impact on the company’s financial results.
Nio’s CEO, William Li, disclosed that the company had been internally discussing this change for quite some time. He revealed that they had been taking into account the opinions and suggestions of various users, using the Nio App. Despite the numerous factors involved, the discussions continued, right up to the morning when the news was finally announced. The decision-makers believed that it was the most appropriate time to implement the adjustment. Li recognized the impossibility of pleasing everyone and acknowledged that there may still be some aspects that were not fully considered.
This drastic price change decision represents Nio’s response to mounting pressure. The pressure stems from multiple sources, and we will explore it from three aspects:
The first aspect to consider is the product’s competitive edge. Back when new players first entered the EV market, there were fewer EV offerings, and the available models were not as diverse as they are today. However, as the market has matured and charging infrastructure has improved, an increasing number of models have been introduced. This competitive landscape now includes Li Auto and Xpeng, as well as traditional foreign manufacturers and established local Chinese automakers, all of whom have expanded their product lines. Additionally, numerous enterprises and companies from other industries, such as smartphone manufacturer Xiaomi and technology giant Baidu, are now venturing into the EV sector.
When it comes to competition within its product line, Nio is set to face numerous rivals, particularly in the next one or two years. EVs have a shorter update cycle, and amidst the challenging economic climate, overall consumer demand is unlikely to grow significantly. In such a situation, securing customers is crucial for market dominance. For Nio, adjusting its models’ prices will significantly boost its products’ market competitiveness. From a practical standpoint, the quality of Nio’s vehicles is not in question; they are widely regarded as top-notch products. Strategically implementing price adjustments at this crucial juncture is undoubtedly a means to capture a larger market share for the company.
Additionally, regarding charging infrastructure and policy changes, Xin Guobin, the Vice Minister of China’s Industry and Information Technology, stated that it is essential to guide social capital toward rational investments while avoiding blind expansion and disorderly development. He emphasized promoting the standardization of battery-swapping technology, including the size, interface, and communication protocols involved. Such policy shifts could potentially affect Nio’s future charging and swapping operations, although the extent of the impact remains uncertain. However, leveraging price adjustments might serve as a strategic move to alleviate some pressure on the company’s battery-swap operations, preemptively addressing any potential criticism that may arise.
On June 1 of this year, Nio reduced its battery swapping benefits: originally, customers without a home charging station could enjoy six free battery swaps per month, but this was decreased to four. After only 12 days, the benefits were reduced again, indicating that the once-celebrated battery-swapping feature had become a source of operational pressure. Some users wondered if Nio’s fees for battery swaps were too high compared to supercharging, and whether the prices would be adjusted. In response, Nio’s Vice President, Shen Fei, addressed the issue via Weibo, acknowledging the concerns as valid and promising prompt changes. Soon after, Nio changed accordingly and said the fees for battery swaps will be determined by duration, while the cost of charging will be based on electricity usage. With this change in strategy, Nio’s swap stations should be able to operate more efficiently in the future, potentially leading to a positive impact on the company’s financial performance.
Besides, it is evident that the mounting pressure from sales has compelled Nio to implement this price adjustment. Before the price reduction, Nio had faced two consecutive months of weak sales, with 6,658 and 6,615 units sold in April and May, falling short of the 10,000-unit benchmark. On June 9, Nio announced its first quarter financial results, which displayed a considerable decline in several key metrics: revenue grew by only 7.7% year-over-year to RMB 10.676 billion ($1.5 billion), falling below the anticipated RMB 11.7 billion ($1.64 billion); net loss widened by 166% year-over-year to RMB 4.74 billion ($0.67 billion), marking 19 consecutive quarters of losses since the company’s IPO; the gross margin and automotive business’ gross profit margin decreased to 1.5% and 5.1%, respectively.
Li Xiang, Li Auto’s CEO, expressed his perspective on the Chinese social media platform Weibo. He said, “For an auto company to be healthy and sustainable, attaining a revenue scale of RMB 100 billion and a product gross margin of 15% to 25% is essential, as demonstrated by sales leaders BYD and Tesla.” In that sense, Nio has to adjust its pricing strategy to increase sales and revenue scale. Only then can the cost per vehicle be reduced. In the intensely competitive EV market, Nio’s price reduction is a strategic move for survival.
]]>Nio announced aggressive price cuts on Monday. The unusual decision from the premium EV maker, which has previously refused to join the ongoing China EV price war, has drawn mixed reactions from experts, with some speculating on a significant sales recovery for the electric vehicle maker while others remain concerned about worsening margin pressures.
The Chinese EV maker on Monday decided to cut prices by RMB 30,000 ($4,199) across all its vehicle lineups, reversing its previous decision to keep pricing stable as part of “the DNA” of the premium brand. For instance, the base version of Nio’s ET5 sedan, once expected to be a high-volume model, now costs RMB 298,000 ($41,630) after the price cut, and RMB 228,000 if a customer chooses the company’s battery leasing plan, with a monthly battery lease fee of RMB 980.
Nio’s share price surged 8.7% on the news on Monday. But at the same time, the company’s gross margin hit a historic low of 1.5% in the last quarter, and the price reduction could further impact this figure. The company’s changing attitude toward price cuts comes at a time when it has faced a persistent delivery decline this year.
Whether Nio’s lower-priced ES6 and ET5 cars prove to be popular could be the key to its very survival, as pressures mount on the smaller Chinese players in an increasingly competitive EV market. Nio’s deliveries in the first quarter fell by 22.5% to 31,041 vehicles from the fourth quarter last year; it also gave a weaker outlook for the second quarter: up to 25,000 units.
“Nio is playing a double sword game, and the outcome remains unknown,” said Yale Zhang, managing director of Shanghai-based consultancy AutoForesight.
Nio’s recent price cuts could drive sales, especially in lower-tier Chinese cities where battery swap facilities remain inaccessible, according to Sun Shaojun, founder of consumer behavior research agency CarFans (our translation).
Sun expects the move, coinciding with the end of free battery swaps, to help Nio control costs and improve recharging network efficiency. Nio’s public chargers often lie idle as owners use the free swap service instead, Sun told TechNode on Monday.
Lei Xing, an auto industry analyst and former chief editor at China Auto Review, saw Nio’s decision as “a long overdue change” to better adapt to the environment, and the first step in a series of potential measures to save costs and improve efficiency. Xing added that Nio should also eliminate under-performing models from its overly large lineup.
In a market where most major EV makers are offering big price cuts in recent months, some experts are skeptical about the sustainability of Nio’s sale-boosting move.
Nio is anxious to reverse its declining sales trend and prevent further loss of market share from competitors such as Li Auto and some bigger players, AutoForesight’s Zhang said when contacted by TechNode. The price cuts will further damage Nio’s gross margins, as well as its ability to maintain its premium brand reputation long-term, added Zhang.
Xing thinks the price cut will help Nio deliver 180,000 vehicles this year, its current best-case scenario. Even this figure will fall short of an earlier prediction by the company: double last year’s unit sales of 122,486 cars.
“We believe there is an opportunity for us to still achieve deliveries of 20,000 units per month,” Nio chief executive William Li told analysts during an earnings call on June 9. “We need to make sure we can find a better way to meet user needs and expand their demands.”
]]>Volkswagen has made headlines in China following an incident on Monday in which a VW electric vehicle crashed into a motorway toll station and caught fire in Hangzhou, resulting in the death of four people, according to a report in financial media outlet Caixin.
Why it matters: Video clips that show firefighters working near the burning car have drawn social media attention, with comments voicing concerns about EV safety that may cast a shadow over VW vehicles sold in China.
Details: A passenger vehicle hit a barrier at a Hangzhou toll station in the eastern Chinese city early on Monday, catching fire immediately, and killing the four men in the vehicle, the city’s traffic police confirmed in a post on Chinese microblogging platform Weibo.
Context: China requires EV battery systems to be designed so as not to catch fire or explode for at least 30 minutes after a crash at 50 kilometers per hour (31mph) or under, an expert from the China Automotive Engineering Research Institute Co., Ltd told Caixin.
Chinese EV makers saw a flat month overall in May, with 0% growth in the market from April. However, some EV makers are squeezing out growth more than others. BYD, Aion, and Li Auto managed to report monthly growth of around 10% to 14%, while Nio saw delivery figures sink to its lowest level in 12 months. Xpeng Motors and Zeekr look on track for a modest recovery.
Why it matters: Total sales in China of new energy vehicles, including all-electrics and plug-in hybrids, were relatively flat in May despite an outstanding performance by major Chinese electric vehicle makers, highlighting the growing advantage of domestic players over foreign counterparts amid rising competition.
Strong growth: BYD reported a record high in monthly vehicle sales at 240,220 units, up 108.9% from a year ago and 14.2% from April. This was buoyed by price cuts from dealerships and the launches of multiple cheaper models, including the new Han and Tang models with smaller batteries and the entry-level Seagull. Its premium brand Denza also posted impressive results of 11,005 vehicles delivered.
Under pressure: Nio on Thursday revealed that its monthly delivery figures have fallen for four months in a row to 6,155 units in May, as fierce competition and an aging product lineup continue to weigh on the Shanghai-based EV maker. On May 24, the company began handing over its all-new ES6 crossovers to customers and said mass delivery of its redesigned ET5 sedans would begin later this month.
Chinese electric vehicle battery maker CALB is reportedly withdrawing job offers to fresh college graduates who signed contracts late last year to join the company full-time this summer, Caixin reported. The company attributed the move to “changing market conditions” as it attempts to address customer demand.
Why it matters: The decision by Hong Kong-listed CALB, China’s third-biggest battery maker by volume, reflects growing pressure in the world’s biggest auto market as fierce competition and concerns of a slowdown have seeped into the EV supply chain.
Details: At least five “class of 2023” graduates who signed employment contracts with CALB were told the battery maker had rescinded its offers, according to Caixin. Having signed up in October 2022, the students were due to start work in July, but have now instead received a payment of RMB 3,000 ($424) in compensation.
Context: CALB’s shares slipped 6.8% to HKD 17.1 on Monday following a 4.28% fall on May 26, taking its market capitalization to HKD 30.3 billion ( $3.9 billion), down more than 50% from last October, when the company went public in a HKD 10.1 billion deal in Hong Kong.
Nio on Wednesday launched a new version of the ES6, the brand‘s top-selling SUV. The EV maker has priced the new vehicle from RMB 368,000 ($52,027) and said it offers a driving range of 930 kilometers (578 miles) with its new 150 kWh solid-state battery pack.
Why it matters: First launched in 2018, the ES6 has long been Nio’s top seller and performed strongly in China’s electric SUV category. The new version of the ES6 has the potential to become a high-volume car for the luxury automaker, which has faced slow growth as more established automakers enter the EV sector.
Details: The new ES6 with a 75 kWh battery pack is on sale for RMB 368,000 ($52,027) and offers a 490 kilometer driving range. The 100 kWh battery pack version is priced at RMB 426,000, offering a 625 kilometer driving range. Delivery began immediately after the launch on Wednesday night.
Context: The five-seater ES6 has been Nio’s most popular vehicle model since it was first introduced in December 2018 and was the top-selling electric SUV in 2020, according to figures from the China Passenger Car Association. Nio has delivered more than 120,000 units of the original ES6 as of writing.
Chinese battery maker Gotion High-Tech on Friday unveiled an “affordable,” iron-based electric vehicle battery called Astroinno, saying it offers a more than 1,000 kilometer (620 mile) range on a single charge without using expensive materials such as cobalt and nickel.
Why it matters: The battery, which uses a manganese-based cathode, is a potential offering to a group of automakers for their mainstream models. The new battery could mean a higher energy density than conventional lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) batteries and come at a lower cost than ones which rely mostly on nickel and cobalt.
Details: The Astroinno battery has a cell-level energy density of 240 watt-hours per kilogram (Wh/kg) and reaches 190 Wh/kg at a system level. By comparison, larger rival CATL’s latest Qilin battery reaches around 255 Wh/kg systematically, while giant maker BYD is working to increase the energy density of its blade battery to 180 Wh/kg from 150 Wh/kg before 2025.
Context: Gotion said on May 10 that it had signed a new contract to be Volkswagen’s primary supplier of cobalt-free, unified LFP battery cells outside China, catering to all of its EV series. It has yet to reveal how many batteries it plans to make for Volkswagen’s vehicles under the contract.
Correction: an earlier version of this article included Volkswagen as a potential automaker that might use the Astroinno battery. Volkswagen has since reached out and said the current cooperation between Volkswagen and Gotion is focused only on unified cell, and no other type of battery is involved.
]]>The Chinese government has approved an action plan to push for the buildup of charging infrastructure across the country, a move Beijing says will step up the adoption of electric vehicles especially in the country’s vast rural regions, state broadcaster CCTV has reported.
Why it matters: The plan could pave the way for a sales boost of green energy cars in Chinese lower-tier cities and rural areas where EV penetration has so far remained low, according to Cui Dongshu, secretary general of the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA).
Details: The plan will adopt a “forward-thinking and moderately progressive” (our translation) strategy to scale up the number of charging stations for EVs across the country, state broadcaster CCTV reported on May 5, citing a meeting of China’s top executive body, the State Council.
Context: China’s EV market has seen slower growth this year, after being partly disrupted by a major price war amid fierce competition and Beijing’s scrapping subsidies for EV purchases in December.
Traditional Chinese automakers GAC and Geely, along with market leader BYD, have reported impressive electric vehicle delivery figures in April, taking market share away from young competitors such as Nio and Xpeng.
Why it matters: April deliveries show the growing importance of traditional auto manufacturers in the Chinese EV market, putting additional pressure on EV upstarts, especially Nio and Xpeng.
Details: BYD has maintained its dominant position as sales nearly doubled to 210,295 vehicles in April from a year earlier. In particular, it sold 10,526 units of the Denza D9, a multi-purpose vehicle under its premium brand Denza, surpassing the threshold of 10,000 units for a second month.
Context: Established Chinese automakers commanded 67% of the country’s passenger EV market in March, a 6% increase from a year ago, according to figures published by the China Passenger Car Association. For “new forces,” which refers to younger EV startups, market share declined by 6.7% annually to 10.4%. In addition, Tesla took a 14.1% market share in China.
Speed is key if Continental and its auto clients are to have any hope of defending their market share in China, given the competition they face. Auto suppliers might be used to providing very specific solutions for single customers in Europe, “but in China this is not a good idea,” said Frank Petznick, Executive Vice President of the Autonomous Mobility Business Area at Continental AG.
While foreign auto executives express nervousness about the rise of their Chinese rivals, Continental’s global mobility head says he is not surprised. He says he has been “pretty aware of” of the pace of China’s progress in electric vehicle technology for a long time.
Offering products ranging from tires to dashboard displays, Continental is now growing its business in high-performance computers for automated driving, with GAC’s Hyper GT luxury coupe one of its early adopters. Speaking on April 19 on the sidelines of the Auto Shanghai show, Petznick told TechNode that companies must be lean, localized, and standardized in developing technology for the world’s biggest and most vibrant auto market.
Having lived in China for a decade before the Covid-19 outbreak, he also gave a broader perspective on the Chinese autonomous car industry and competition between global Tier-1 suppliers and local tech companies. The German auto parts giant is pushing to develop advanced electric and connected solutions not only for the China operations of multinational car majors but also for local manufacturers with global ambition.
READ MORE: Baidu and Huawei take on global giants with new in-car software offerings at Auto Shanghai 2023
Below are Petznick’s comments on the rapidly changing Chinese auto industry. The text has been condensed and edited for clarity.
The Chinese market is working completely differently from Europe, and much faster. In order to be prepared for the market, we need local companies that can put pressure on us to speed up and become more dynamic in the market. That’s why we decided to form a joint venture with Horizon Robotics two years ago. We wanted to make a Chinese joint venture that would be closer to the local market.
Global automakers underestimated China’s speed [with regard to EV transition] over the last three years, but now they are getting super nervous because they have seen what’s going on. EV companies in China have a higher demand for autonomous driving. They integrate the entire technology into their cars and can sell to local young people who just want to buy fancy cars.
A lot of the cost of ADAS [Advanced Driver Assistance System] comes from developing specific software, and what Continental can do very well is integration. We figure out what is a common part, roll out standard components in a fast and cost-competitive way, and then add specific functions to make a difference. I think this is the key [to success] in China, but many Western companies have not understood that yet.
We are working closely with our Chinese customers and developing systems in China and for China. Global automakers in China also want to use local solutions because they are afraid of being too slow and too late. The other thing is that many Chinese brands are going global very fast. It means we could also help some of our Chinese customers use a more global approach.
Every Chinese brand now has a global ambition, though new OEMs [original equipment manufacturers] are much faster at going global than traditional ones. Since the border opened [late last year], we have seen a growing number of Chinese OEMs coming to our headquarters in Frankfurt and Hanover to talk about having a global setup. In the meantime, we have the same discussions when we come here.
We have different solutions for different regions, but the software and functions are the same. We would like to help the global OEMs develop in China and help local OEMs develop in the global world. This is what we are trying to do: bridge the two.
There are some very good startup players in the US, but I believe robotaxis will become real in China before the rest of the world. There are still many difficulties in getting approval for vehicles with close to Level 3 driving capabilities. Some cities have allowed this, others have not. It’s very scattered.
I see significantly faster development in terms of the infrastructure and the regulations needed in China. That’s why I think China could be the world’s first robotaxi-friendly country. The rest of the world could focus more on commercial trucks, which are more of a highway thing and not as complicated as robotaxis in the cities.
We are developing software basically for all levels of autonomous driving by using a lot of the expertise from our partners. The competition is very tough. You always see companies jumping forward and others catching up, but the good news is that if you can survive in this market, you can survive anywhere in the world.
Tech companies such as Huawei and Baidu are going to be Tier-1 suppliers, while we are shifting to be more on the tech side. We need to be more agile and have a more local mindset in order to be fast enough.
We have launched a couple of products, such as a full-fledged smart camera based on processors from a Chinese partner. We are also making high-performance computers where ADAS will also be a part of it. We will be going into series production with the partners we have now. You will see these cars on the road very soon.
I don’t think we have to turn ourselves into a new Baidu. This would be going too far over to the other side. Chinese tech firms are trying to be more Tier-1 and we are trying to be more like a tech company. We are basically learning from each other. We have discussed globally that we have to become a tech player, and in the China context, we need to do that tomorrow.
]]>BYD on Thursday reported strong revenue growth in its first quarter, with net profit up 410% from last year despite concerns about slowing demand following a Covid-hit 2022. The EV giant’s profit growth is slowing, however, and was down 43.5% from the previous quarter due to an ongoing national price war and a rush of purchases before subsidies were ended late last year.
Why it matters: BYD’s figures reflected a broader trend of growing competition and shrinking profits for automakers in China, as car brands were hit by the phasing-out of electric vehicle subsidies and a price war started by Tesla’s price cuts. BYD continues to lead the sector however, with a 35% share of the country’s electric vehicle market.
Details: China’s biggest electric car maker said on Thursday it made RMB 4.1 billion ($597 million) from January through March, representing an impressive surge of 410.9% year-on-year, but a 43.5% drop from the previous quarter.
Context: China’s auto industry has faced downward pressure as general passenger car sales declined 4.5% from last year to 4.9 million units in the first quarter of this year.
As China’s car industry quickly embraces new energy vehicles, the country’s tech giants and startups are competing head-on with established global auto parts manufacturers to help automakers develop unique in-car software experiences and assistant driving features.
Tech majors like Huawei and Baidu are positioning themselves as automotive suppliers by providing comprehensive software systems along with a full range of electronic components for the smart, connected, and electric vehicles of the future. Meanwhile, global tier-1 suppliers Bosch and Continental are localizing more of their tech capabilities to adapt to the fast-changing Chinese market.
Here’s a roundup of some of the upcoming automotive tech that debuted at this year’s auto show in Shanghai.
Two years after setting up a dedicated unit to develop self-driving tech for consumer cars, Baidu made a strong commitment to automakers by declaring itself their “best partner” in smart, electric vehicles in China in a statement made on April 16 ahead of this year’s show.
Low-cost deployment is one of its major selling points. The search engine giant launched the Apollo City Driving Max on April 16, claiming it is by far its most powerful advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS). The AI giant also claims that the new system is the only pure vision-based approach for automated driving on Chinese urban roads, meaning it operates without the use of pricier lidar sensors.
Baidu also introduced its new high-definition mapping technology at a relatively lower cost than rivals, adopting a crowdsourced approach to compile map data to help EVs get around by themselves. “This is unique to Baidu,” said corporate vice president Rob Chu. The company expects such efforts to pay off in the long run, allowing it to form consistent and reliable partnerships with auto manufacturers.
Huawei has had a bumpy ride after making a splash at Auto Shanghai 2021 with the public debut of its assisted driving technology, as two of its major manufacturing partners – BAIC’s Arcfox and lesser-known Seres – have both found themselves facing lackluster sales.
On April 16, the technology giant unveiled the second generation of its Advanced Driving System, which was designed to let vehicles navigate not only on highways but also around complex city streets like Tesla’s full self-driving beta software. Huawei’s consumer business head Richard Yu made the announcement in Shanghai, claiming that the Chinese telecom firm has surpassed Tesla in handling on- and off-ramps among other traffic scenarios, according to its testing results.
The system will be released to users in at least 45 Chinese cities by the end of this year, where high-definition mapping services are currently unavailable to them.The system was built upon multiple sensors and cameras to reduce the reliance on mapping. A high-end version of the Aito M5 electric crossover is the first model to adopt the technology, while the Avatr 11, co-developed by Huawei and its partners Changan and CATL, and the Arcfox Alpha S will also adopt the system.
German auto supplier Bosch debuted its fourth-generation computing platform for in-car entertainment at the Shanghai auto show, highlighting the ongoing trend of cars relying on software to differentiate themselves in a crowded marketplace.
Entirely developed by its Chinese team, the information domain computer has undergone four upgrades over the past two years, facilitating automakers’ fast and customized development of in-car applications, according to Dr. Markus Heyn, chairman of Bosch’s mobility solutions business sector. This also enables vehicle owners a seamless and smart cockpit experience both in the vehicle and on the cloud.
Heyn said he was personally impressed by the wide range of new brands and electric vehicles that are on display at this year’s Auto Shanghai. “I am extremely proud that Bosch is a part of this rapidly growing and evolving industry and serves as a global partner for our customers in China,” added Heyn. Chinese original equipment manufacturers (OEM) accounted for nearly 60% of the mobility solutions business sector of the engineering group’s total sales in China last year.
Continental on Wednesday showcased for the first time a high-performance computer that is capable of assisted driving and body control, giving carmakers a more agile process of software development. More than 30 new vehicle models will be using Continental’s supercomputing solution by 2024, the company said, with GAC’s EV unit Aion becoming one of its early adopters.
The German auto parts maker sees standardization as a strength in keeping up with China’s fast transition towards smart EVs. The company set up a joint venture with local startup Horizon Robotics back in late 2021.
“A lot of the cost in ADAS is coming from developing specific software. We figure out what is a common part and roll out standard components in a fast and cost-competitive way, and then we add some specific functions to make a difference,” said Frank Petznick, head of the autonomous mobility business area at Continental. “I think this is the key [to success] in China and many Western companies have not understood that yet.”
This year’s Auto Shanghai also reflected the rise of domestic suppliers. Horizon Robotics is one of the Chinese suppliers helping auto companies to secure their supply chain and reduce costs. Horizon said on Tuesday that it will team up with Chinese EV leader BYD to develop software and hardware systems for automated driving to use in the latter’s cars.
Multiple BYD cars will be manufactured later this year based on Horizon’s Journey 5, which is made specifically for computing in connected and intelligent vehicles. The move marks “a significant achievement” in the two companies’ strategic collaboration since 2021, according to Dr. Yu Kai, founder and CEO of Horizon Robotics.
Backed by a list of auto majors including Volkswagen, Horizon already supplies tech to automakers including Geely and Li Auto. The company also announced a partnership with EV maker Hozon Auto on Tuesday to build assisted driving platforms set to hit the market as early as 2024.
]]>The biennial Auto Shanghai Show is traditionally a time for global automakers to flex their muscles and woo Chinese consumers. Yet this year’s edition, China’s first major auto exposition since the country reopened after Covid, has been very much dominated by local manufacturers.
The growing presence of Chinese brands reflected the mounting pressure on traditional global carmakers and also new makers such as Tesla, a notable absence at this year’s event. The US electric car pioneer launched one of its biggest-ever price cut campaigns this January, sparking a price war in China’s competitive EV market.
Below, TechNode highlights new releases and updates from major Chinese EV makers at the Auto Shanghai Show 2023, including BYD, Geely, Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto, which all displayed an impressive portfolio of electric vehicle models.
As China’s best-selling new energy vehicle brand, BYD came to the exposition with a wide range of updates covering all major price points, from budget-friendly compact cars to luxury off-road sports vehicles, as well as everyday SUVs.
BYD’s main brand focused on three car models. The first one is the Song L concept car, a pure electric sports SUV equipped with an electric rear spoiler and BYD’s e-platform, and DiSus electric body control technology. BYD said it will be launched within the year but did not specify the exact model that will be made available or a launch time. The Song L may be a new supplement to BYD’s best-selling Song Plus SUV.
The brand also showcased the Chaser 07, a medium-sized plug-in sedan that is a new model in the Ocean family. It will be priced at RMB 200,000 to RMB 250,000 ($31,000-$39,000) and will be launched in the third quarter of this year. It is BYD’s effort to attract young car owners with an everyday hybrid.
At the same time, BYD also announced the start of pre-sales of its entry-level mini car Seagull, which is priced at a budget-friendly RMB 78,800 to RMB 95,800 ($12,200-$14,800), and has two driving ranges of 305 km or 405 km. The car is equipped with four safety airbags, an ESP electronic vehicle stability system, and a fast charging capability of 30kW or 40kW.
BYD’s luxury car brand Yangwang unveiled new versions of its U8 and U9 models at the auto show on Tuesday.
The U8, a new energy off-road vehicle with 1100 horsepower and the ability to accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in 3.6 seconds, has officially started pre-sales and comes in two versions: the luxury edition and the off-road player edition. The official pre-sale price for the luxury edition is nearly RMB 1.1 million($170,000) and the model is expected to be delivered in September. The off-road player edition will be delivered later, with no specific timeframe announced yet. This high-end off-road vehicle will use BYD’s independently developed core technologies, E4 technology and DiSus (Yunnian) intelligent hydraulic body control system.
Meanwhile, Yangwang also unveiled a new look for its luxury sports car the U9, which now features a rear wing design that was not present in the version unveiled in January this year. The delivery time and specific price of the U9 have not yet been announced.
Zeekr X, the first SUV model launched by the Geely-affiliated brand Zeekr, made its public debut during this year‘s Auto Shanghai. The vehicle is aimed at attracting the country’s growing young and affluent population with a price tag of RMB 189,800 ($27,590). This is lower than what one of the firm’s executives projected early this year, considered a reaction to a months-long price war first launched by Tesla and now engaged in by dozens of automakers.
Zeekr also announced detailed plans to expand into Europe. Regional CEO Spiros Fotinos announced on Tuesday that the company will open proprietary showrooms and begin delivering the X along with its 001 sedans in the Netherlands and Sweden later this year. The brand is expected to enter most western European countries by 2026, Fotinos added.
Geely on Tuesday also focused on the Lynk & Co 08, the first model equipped with its in-house produced in-car software co-developed with Meizu after the carmaker completed its acquisition of the Chinese smartphone maker last July. The plug-in hybrid will have a maximum driving range of 1,400 km and a power output of up to 400 kW, with vehicle delivery scheduled during the second half of this year, according to Lin Jie, a senior vice president at Geely Auto.
Volvo’s parent expects its Flyme digital cockpit system not only to offer a connected and seamless experience to users across devices with its latest crossover but also to provide additional computing power to existing vehicle models from Meizu smartphones. The mainstream luxury brand, jointly unveiled to the public by Geely and Volvo in 2016, plans to innovate its current dealership model by opening direct sales stores in major Chinese cities, Lin told the Economic Observer earlier this month.
Nio unveiled a new version of its popular ES6 sports utility vehicles, which the company boasts can hit a speed of 100 km/h (62 mph) within five seconds. The models also feature a supercomputer that can perform over 1,016 trillion operations per seconds (TOPS). Current Nio cars have a maximum driving range of 900 kilometers equipped with a 150 kilowatt-hour (kWh) battery pack. The EV maker has not yet revealed the driving range of the updated vehicles.
The five-seat crossover has been the company’s most popular vehicle model since it was first introduced in December 2018, with total deliveries of more than 120,000 units at the time of writing. Official release dates and pricing details have yet to be announced, though the EV maker has now begun taking orders for the latest version of its ET7 sedans priced from RMB 458,000, which was first launched in January 2021.
The G6 is Xpeng’s first offering built upon its latest SEPA vehicle architecture and is expected to be a key test of the company’s efforts to return to a leading position in the country’s crowded EV race. With an estimated price range of between RMB 200,000 and RMB 300,000, the midsize SUV is set to be a mainstream, high-volume model compared with its more premium-oriented G9 sibling.
The electric coupe SUV will be capable of traveling up to 300 kilometers (186 miles) on a 10-minute charge, empowered by an 800-volt silicon carbide power module. Meanwhile, the EV maker boasted of its assistant driving tech, claiming drivers will only need to control the car once per 1,000 kilometers in complex traffic environments with the latest version, which it will roll out later this year.
Li Auto shared further details regarding its all-electric strategy at this year’s Auto Shanghai Show, co-announcing with CATL that its upcoming battery vehicle will be the first in the market to install the latter’s next-iteration Qilin battery that could provide a 4C charge rate. Charging at a 4C rate normally means that the battery could be charged from 0 to 100% in just 15 minutes, according to Quantumscape, a Volkswagen-backed battery startup and a spinout company from Stanford University.
Set to go on sale later this year, Li Auto’s first battery EV will also be built upon an 800-volt architecture for a range of up to 400 km after 10 minutes of fast charging. Chief engineer Ma Donghui added that the company is rushing to build 300 supercharging stations on Chinese highways by year-end and expand the number to 3,000 in three years, by which time it will have a lineup of at least five battery EVs. Li Auto currently has three plug-in hybrid crossovers on sale.
On Monday, BYD unveiled DiSus (“Yunnian” in Chinese), an electric-powered body control suspension system that it claims is the first comprehensive Chinese solution for vertical vehicle dynamics. Overseas automakers have already mastered a similar technology for their internal combustion vehicles.
The Chinese electric vehicle pioneer plans to scale the technology to various models across its Dynasty and Ocean lineups, as well as premium sub-brands including Yangwang and Denza, as it expands its presence in the luxury car segment.
Why it matters: BYD Chairman Wang Chuanfu said that the company’s latest-iteration suspension system is set to “fill the gaps” China has in handling core functional capabilities such as driving dynamics and chassis control (our translation).
Fully-active body control: BYD said customers could expect an upgraded experience using the new DiSus system, as it keeps the body level and cabin stable on bumpy roads.
AI techniques and algorithms: Having historically provided few details about autonomous driving and in-car software, BYD said the body control technology will use a sensor suite and central processor, making the car adaptable to certain automated driving applications.
Context: Vehicle control technology of this kind is a mature feature in high-end foreign brands and has been almost completely dominated by global suppliers such as German’s Continental, analysts at Chinese brokerage Essence Securities wrote in a research note on Oct. 29 last year.
READ MORE: BYD’s super-luxury cars: four motors, 360° tank turns, and RMB 1 million-plus price tags
]]>Tesla is considering a massive expansion of its global production capacity for its long-rumored entry-level compact car, with its Shanghai factory potentially being lined up to deliver 1 million units of the new model annually, Chinese media outlet 36Kr reported.
Why it matters: Unofficially dubbed the “Model 2” or “Model Q” by Tesla observers online, the new car is expected to be priced as low as RMB 150,000 ($21,800) and is aiming to take more shares of the Chinese electric vehicle market.
Details: Citing several industry insiders, 36Kr reported on Tuesday that Tesla is targeting an annual capacity of 4 million units worldwide for the new budget model, adding that the plan is still in its early stages.
Context: Tesla on Wednesday revealed the latest part of its overall company plan, which included details for an unnamed compact vehicle model to come with a 53 kilowatt-hour (kWh) battery pack. The company said there would be a goal of selling 42 million units of the new model globally, without giving a timeframe.
Chinese electric vehicle makers posted a slight increase in monthly deliveries in March, boosted by industry-wide price cuts since early this year. However, the gains were minimal and uneven, bolstering the market’s view that competition will remain fierce, with dwindling margins amid weakened demand.
Why it matters: Retail sales of Chinese passenger EVs during March 1-26 rose slightly by 10% from last year and just 1% from a month earlier, according to figures from the China Passenger Car Association. Meanwhile, overall sales of Chinese passenger cars declined 1% year-on-year and 17% month-on-month. BYD and GAC’s Aion still lead in deliveries, while Li Auto continues to outperform EV startup rivals Nio and Xpeng.
Details: BYD said on April 2 that sales almost doubled from March last year to 207,080 units, reflecting its growing dominance in the country’s EV market. Notably, the giant manufacturer saw strong gains for its premium marque Denza, sales of which increased 42% month-on-month to 10,398 units.
Context: Ouyang from the Chinese Academy of Sciences suggested Chinese carmakers develop both all-electrics and plug-in hybrid EVs in the next ten years, as the latter is normally equipped with smaller battery packs and therefore less affected by the volatility of raw material prices.
Nio announced on Tuesday that it has begun deploying its latest generation battery swap facilities as part of an aggressive expansion plan to double its recharging network to more than 2,300 swap stations and 24,000 chargers across China this year.
The electric vehicle maker expects its expensive bet on power infrastructure to put it ahead of competitors amid a fierce price war, as most owners are turning to battery swapping as the main solution to refuel their EVs, senior Nio executives told TechNode.
“Many users can never have home chargers in China so they choose our vehicles for the battery swap technology,” senior vice president Shen Fei said on March 23 in Shanghai. “Rather than lowering vehicle prices, we prefer offering users an excellent recharging service and driving experience.”
Grappling with flat sales amid growing pressure from larger rivals, Nio is hoping the battery swapping stations can help achieve its annual delivery goal with greater service capacity. The move could also pave the way for the release of its mainstream sub-brand scheduled for 2024, according to executives.
Unlike many of its rivals, Nio has long preferred swapping over charging. Swapping stations give drivers a fully-charged battery pack in a few minutes compared to varying charging wait times, which can range anywhere from 30 minutes to several hours. But the former tends to come with a higher price tag to the provider, given the more complex infrastructure and equipment.
On Tuesday, Nio announced that its third generation power swap station could offer up to 408 swaps per day, an increase of 30% compared with the previous generation. Each swap takes less than five minutes, meaning 20% less time spent for users.
Shen said that 90% of the 1,000 swap stations in the pipeline this year would comprise the latest version, creating the possibility of serving different brands – both those under the Nio umbrella, including the forthcoming Alps sub-brand, and those of other carmakers if compatible. The latest swap facility features the potential to accommodate more vehicle models with wheelbases between 2.8 meters and 3.3 meters, an increase from the upper limit of 3.1 meters of the previous generation.
Meanwhile, Nio is pushing for more hybrid locations that will include a swap facility and a number of charging piles. Such an approach could almost double the service capacity of existing charging stations offered by competitors with a field of the same size and for the same grid capacity, allowing the station to offer both swapping and charging during peak hours and charge batteries for future swaps during off-peak hours, Shen added.
The company did not reveal how much it would cost to manufacture and operate the latest version of its swap station. “The value is more important than its cost,” said Shen.
For some Nio buyers, battery swapping (although a capital-intensive approach) is the reason they choose Nio over other EV brands since many have difficulties installing private chargers.
A Shanghai owner surnamed Dai picked Nio’s ET5 over Xpeng’s G9 late last year after finding he couldn’t set up a home charger in his residential area due to load safety considerations. Citing other reasons, such as vehicle design and customer service, Dai told TechNode he was also impressed by the fact that there are at least two Nio swap stations near his office.
Dai is among the Nio owners living in a so-called “power swap district,” a term coined by the company to describe areas where drivers have a swap facility within three kilometers of their residential or office buildings.
The EV maker said that at least 68% of Nio owners live in a “power swap district,” and the final goal is to push the proportion to 90% across the country. “Some of our users still have places 10 kilometers (6.2 miles) away from a swap station, and I believe we owe them one,” said Shen.
Nine-year-old Nio expects battery swaps to create a model for its luxury car business and underpin its goal of delivering 250,000 vehicles this year. One of the key focuses in 2023 for Nio will be the expansion of its infrastructure to Chinese lower-tier cities, as long as each city has a base of around 100-200 users, according to Shen.
READ MORE: Nio ramps up charging and battery swap network as execs remain bullish on 2023 growth
]]>CATL has signed an agreement with HGP Storage that will see the Chinese battery manufacturer supply the Dallas-based entity with around 450 megawatt-hours of lithium-ion batteries for a Texan energy storage operation, the company said on Monday.
Why it matters: The collaboration highlights CATL’s exploration of new avenues of growth in the energy storage sector. It is also the latest landmark for the Chinese electric vehicle battery giant as it expands overseas.
Details: Powered by CATL’s containerized liquid-cooling battery system, the facility will be able store up to 450 MWh of electricity in a single cycle and will begin operation in 2024.
Context: Energy storage is the second biggest revenue source for CATL, accounting for about 14% of its total revenue in 2022. The sector sustained strong growth momentum for CATL in 2022 as the company’s revenue from energy storage more than tripled to RMB 45 billion ($6.5 billion) from a year earlier.
Geely’s high-end car brand Lynk & Co will be the first sub-brand from Geely to incorporate an in-car operating system called Flyme Auto in its upcoming sports utility vehicle called the 08, the brands announced on March 24. Flyme is developed by Xingji Meizu, a company established by Geely’s founder after Geely acquired smartphone brand Meizu last July.
Why it matters: Lynk’s use of the Meizu operating system is the result of Geely’s long-term effort to develop more car technology in-house. The collaboration will be a test for both brands — Geely and Meizu — with the former focusing on building its software self-sufficiency and the latter looking to revive its diminishing smartphone business by testing its system on its new owner.
Details: The operating system, Flyme Auto, is built jointly by Meizu and Ecarx (an auto tech startup backed by Geely). It is an all-new digital cockpit and infotainment system based on the electronic architecture of Meizu.
Context: Geely made its first foray into the Chinese smartphone market in late 2021, hiring talent from domestic electronics companies such as ZTE and Xiaomi, and setting up a venture called Xingji Shidai in which chairman Li holds a 55% share. Xingji Shidai acquired the majority stake in Chinese phone maker Meizu last July, TechCrunch reported.
BYD is setting up separate divisions with corresponding executive appointments and dedicated operation teams for each brand under its diverse portfolio in a move to improve efficiency and boost internal competition, local media outlet 36Kr reported.
Why it matters: The move comes as BYD pursues a wider customer base, especially in the luxury car segment, rolling out several new brands and offerings. The firm is also seeking to maintain its leadership of the Chinese electric vehicle space amid rising competition.
Details: Early this year, BYD carried out a reorganization under which its Dynasty, Ocean, and Denza series would be run as separate units in terms of vehicle development and project management, 36Kr reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter.
Context: China’s top EV maker by sales volume has been quickly expanding its product offerings to a broader range of vehicle types than the affordable, down-to-earth offerings it has traditionally marketed.
Nio and Li Auto this week reaffirmed plans to stick to their pricing strategy, bucking an industry-wide trend of significant price cuts in China initiated by Tesla and followed by dozens of auto majors from Toyota to Volkswagen. The young electric vehicle makers are looking to protect their superior brand images and achieve profitable growth despite concerns of a slowdown in sales in the short run, according to industry observers.
Why it matters: The ongoing price war in the Chinese auto market has created an unhealthy situation, as it might cause a growing number of consumers to wait on the sidelines in anticipation of further price reductions, UBS analysts told investors in a Wednesday note.
No price cuts planned: Nio has no plans to cut prices for, or release affordable versions of, its flagship models to counter recent price cuts by competitors, Pu Yang, assistant vice president of sales operations, told Chinese reporters on Tuesday. A Nio spokesperson confirmed the report.
Protection against price cuts: Li Auto also made a related move on March 11 by offering a price guarantee on its EVs until the end of the month to reassure customers that no price cuts are on the horizon. CEO Li Xiang said on March 2 that the company would stand by its pricing strategy.
An all-out price war: China’s car price war was in full swing last week when state-owned manufacturer Dongfeng Motor slashed the prices of some models, such as the Citroen C6, by up to RMB 90,000, with the help of incentives from the government of the central Hubei province.
READ MORE: Chinese EV makers rush to offer big incentives as sales slide
]]>Hozon, a Chinese electric vehicle maker backed by CATL, broke ground at its first overseas car plant in Thailand on Friday, as the company eyes growing demand for green vehicles in Southeast Asia.
Why it matters: The move is the latest example of Chinese automakers looking to crack global markets and find new revenue sources while dealing with increased competition and weakening demand at home.
Details: Hozon announced on Friday that construction of the company’s first overseas factory, located on the northeast side of Bangkok and due to have an annual capacity of 20,000 vehicles, has started, with mass production set to begin in January 2024.
Context: Hozon began selling its third production model, the Neta V, in Thailand last August, marking its entry into the country’s growing EV market.
READ MORE: Meet the Chinese carmakers racing to get a larger share of the global market
]]>Two of Xpeng Motors’ vice presidents are stepping down after more than five years in their respective roles as the EV maker carries out a wider leadership restructuring, according to two people familiar with the matter.
Why it matters: The departures are Xpeng’s latest leadership reshuffle after it appointed Wang Fengying, a former executive at Great Wall Motor, as the company president on Jan. 30. Xpeng is undertaking a drastic reorganization in the hopes of turning its prospects around as falling sales add to its stresses in an increasingly competitive EV market.
Details: Liu Minghui, a long-standing vice president of powertrain engineering at Xpeng, stepped down last month after more than five years in the role and was replaced by Gu Jie, who recently joined the company from US auto supplier Delphi.
Context: Xpeng has made a series of moves over the past months as it hopes to drive sales back up amid growing competition from larger players. Soaring battery material prices have also weighed on the company’s profitability in the past year.
TechNode Chinese reporter Zheng Huimin contributed to the reporting of this story.
]]>Meituan will stop operating its own ride-hailing fleet and shift towards aggregated rideshare services in a strategy update that will cut costs and, it hopes, develop other growth avenues, local publication LatePost reported on Monday.
Why it matters: The decision marks a significant retreat for the Chinese food delivery titan, which has been competing against dominant ride-hailing company Didi for more than six years and could be a turning point for transport in the country’s evolving services sector.
Details: According to an internal letter obtained by LatePost on Monday, Meituan has decided to cull its proprietary ride-hailing operations in several major cities and will look to expand its aggregated services with third-party providers nationwide.
Context: Meituan announced its entry into the Chinese ride-hailing market back in early 2017 and operates a proprietary fleet of around 120,000 drivers in cities including Shanghai, Nanjing, and Chengdu as of last December.
Chinese automakers mostly saw a return to their growth trajectory in electric vehicle sales in February after taking measures to ride out a seasonal lull worsened by Beijing’s phase-out of EV purchase subsidies.
BYD, GAC’s Aion, and Nio saw strong recoveries, while Xpeng and Huawei-backed Aito continue to fall behind in the competition. However, sales are still down from the historic highs of the past year, and a tougher competitive environment could create more headwinds in the near term, according to executives.
Why it matters: The figures come as many automakers have said they face increasing pressure from competitors just as operation costs mount.
Strong recovery: BYD has continued its growth momentum in customer demand despite a slowdown in the overall Chinese EV market, reporting delivery of 193,655 vehicles in February, a jump of 119.4% from a year earlier and an increase of 28% from the previous month.
Back to normalcy: Li Auto’s February sales grew 97.5% year-on-year to 16,620 units, representing a mild increase of 9.8% from a month earlier. Nio and Hozon posted double-digit growth from a month ago with 12,157 and 10,073 vehicle deliveries, respectively.
Lackluster sales: Xpeng Motors is still struggling to get back on track after facing poor sales and criticism over its pricing strategy in 2022. Its vehicle deliveries totaled 6,010 in February, despite a recent price reduction. This is just 15.2% higher than January’s sales and 3.5% lower than a year ago.
Context: Sales of new energy passenger vehicles, which include all-electrics and plug-in hybrids, rose 9% year-on-year to around 546,000 units from Jan. 1 to Feb. 19, according to figures published by the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) on Wednesday.
Chinese automaker Changan has issued a formal complaint against Geely for allegedly copying its latest EV car design, sending the Hangzhou-based car company a cease-and-desist letter which surfaced online on Monday, amid fierce competition in the country’s dense electric vehicle market.
Why it matters: The dispute highlights an intensification of the battle for market share among automakers in China, where the country’s EV growth momentum has slowed amid post-Covid zero economic swings.
Details: In a letter issued on Feb. 27 by Baijus Law Firm, Changan accuses Geely of taking multiple design features from its vehicles for the latter’s prototype Galaxy Light EV.
Context: The legal spat came shortly after Geely unveiled the Galaxy Light sedan, a futuristic car with traditional Chinese aesthetic elements inspired by Hangzhou’s scenic West Lake area.
READ MORE: Local Chinese authorities unveil stimulus measures to spur EV sales
]]>Li Auto aims to double its China market share in high-end sports utility vehicles to 20% in 2023, encouraged by buoyant demand from the country’s emerging middle class, chief executive Li Xiang said on Monday.
The electric vehicle maker also reported a solid rise in fourth quarter revenue and an upbeat outlook for the current quarter. Despite intensifying competition and slowing demand in China’s EV market, Li Auto is on track to launch its first all-electric model later this year.
Why it matters: Li Auto has set an annual sales goal higher than analysts had anticipated and much more positive than those from the likes of Nio and Xpeng Motors. If achieved, it would make Li Auto the first Chinese automaker to capture a significant share of the country’s premium car segment, according to Sun Shaojun, founder of auto consumer service platform Che Fans.
Rosy 2023 outlook: If met, the market share goal would more than double last year’s share of 9.5% and equates to an annual sales volume of around 300,000 vehicles in the Chinese premium SUV segment, Li said during an earnings call. This is higher than the 270,000 units forecasted by Bernstein analysts.
All-electric lineup: Li Auto is on track to launch its first pure electric vehicle model, which will be equipped with Qualcomm’s latest five-nanometer cockpit chip 8295, Li told investors. He added that the company’s battery EV series will cost between RMB 200,000 and RMB 500,000.
Solid Q4 results: Li Auto’s revenue increased 66.2% year-on-year to more than RMB 17.7 billion in the fourth quarter of 2022, compared with estimates of RMB 17.6 billion, according to Bloomberg. Net income declined 10.5% annually to RMB 265 million but improved from a net loss of RMB 1.65 billion in the previous quarter.
Context: Nio and Xpeng have both set a delivery target of around 200,000 vehicles this year as China’s EV market shifts into a lower gear, partly due to the phasing-out of EV purchase subsidies by the central government last December.
Geely on Thursday revealed the L7, its first model in the new Galaxy electric vehicle lineup. The compact SUV enters the market as a direct competitor to BYD’s popular Song Plus model, with a similar size, driving range, and price tag.
Delivery of the L7 is scheduled to begin in the second quarter. Geely will release anywhere from one to seven models of the electrified, software-defined Galaxy lineup by 2025, targeting medium- to high-end buyers with a range including four plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and three all-electrics, Gan Jiayue, chief executive of Geely Automobile Group, said during a press event.
Why it matters: Geely aims to make the long-anticipated Galaxy L7 a high-volume, landmark model and wants to become China’s next answer to BYD and Tesla in the country’s crowded electric vehicle race.
Details: The L7 is a similar size to BYD’s Song Plus SUV, at 4.7 meters in length with a 2,785-millimeter-long wheelbase. The plug-in hybrid will have a driving range of about 1,370 kilometers (851 miles) on a full tank of fuel and a full charge, compared with BYD Song Plus’ 1,200 km range.
Context: Geely expects more than a third of its car sales to be either all-electric or hybrid vehicles this year, vowing to sell at least 600,000 electrified cars as part of a 1.65 million volume goal in 2023. The Zhejiang-based automaker posted total sales of roughly 1.4 million units last year, of which around 328,700 were electrified.
CATL is in talks with a number of Chinese automakers to offer big discounts on batteries using materials sourced from its proprietary mines. In return, the electric vehicle battery giant is requesting its clients place around 80% of their future orders with it in the next three years, several Chinese media outlets reported.
Why it matters: The move could intensify already fierce competition in the upstream value chain of the electric car industry and force smaller battery makers to follow suit in what could become a price war, experts said.
Details: CATL is in negotiation with several strategic clients, including Nio and Li Auto, to sign three-year contracts that would guarantee them a certain amount of EV batteries priced at RMB 200,000 per ton ($29,152) of lithium carbonate, the compound from which lithium is extracted. Chinese media outlet 36Kr was the first to report on the talks.
Context: Smaller Chinese battery makers have been feeling the strain in recent months, with CALB, a major supplier to state-owned automaker GAC, and Volkswagen-backed Gotion High-Tech being asked by clients to reduce prices by 10-15% for this year, TechNode has learned.
Baidu will launch its first electric vehicle model using its new conversational artificial intelligence (AI) technology, with the intention of providing a ChatGPT-like experience that enables natural conversation between owners and their vehicles, an executive from the company said on Tuesday.
Why it matters: This is the latest move by the Chinese technology giant to improve its core search engine business and drive widespread adoption of AI for a range of uses.
Details: Jidu Auto, the electric vehicle arm of Baidu, will be the first company to adopt AI technology at this level of sophistication for smart EVs, chief executive Xia Yiping told reporters at a corporate event in Beijing on Tuesday.
READ MORE: Baidu’s EV firm Jidu aims to take on Tesla
Context: Baidu said on Feb. 7 that it has been pushing internal testing of its ChatGPT-like chatbot tool called ERNIE Bot, or Wenxin Yiyan, and intends for it to make a public debut next month.
Chinese electric vehicle maker Li Auto released its cheapest ever car on Wednesday, a five-passenger compact sports utility vehicle that the company says has been developed to appeal to women and small families, and that it hopes will take on bigger rivals from BMW to Mercedes-Benz.
The company also launched a new, RMB 20,000 ($2,948)-cheaper version of the L8, its six-seater crossover, offering customers a de facto price cut in response to increased competition from carmakers such as Tesla.
Why it matters: Some industry observers have voiced bullish views on Li Auto as the company keeps expanding its portfolio with new vehicles aimed at meeting the needs of growing Chinese middle-class families.
Details: Li Auto on Thursday introduced the L7 extended-range SUV, the company’s first five-seater explicitly designed for Chinese nuclear families. It measures around 5 meters in length and spans a 3,005-millimeter-long wheelbase, bigger than many similar mid-size models.
Context: Beijing-headquartered Li Auto currently has three models of different sizes on sale, namely the full-size crossover L9, L8, and the L7, with a price range of around RMB 300,000 to RMB 400,000, in a segment traditionally dominated by global carmakers such as BMW and Mercedes-Benz.
Nio will expand its charging network by building at least 400 battery swap stations across China this year, alleviating a major concern among potential buyers that cars have insufficient driving range to travel between charging points, its president said on Monday.
Riding the wave of China’s speedy EV adoption, the electric vehicle maker also launched a special service campaign for owners during this year’s Lunar New Year holiday season, including unlimited free battery swapping and personalized customer service.
Why it matters: Nio’s recent moves to shore up its charging network and customer service capability are expected to further enhance its place in the Chinese luxury car segment, according to president Qin Lihong, who spoke to reporters in Beijing on Monday.
Charging infrastructure: In what Qin described as “a stress test” to check how Nio could “provide users with seamless services that were beyond their expectations” (our translation), Nio swapped nearly 1.25 million EV battery packs between Jan. 13 and Feb. 5 in China. For comparison, the company completed just over 800,000 swaps with a chain of 143 service stations between May 2018, when its first swap facility began operations, and mid-August 2020.
Unexpected services: In addition to existing, regular on-call valet charging and parking services it offers to car owners whose vehicles are running out of power, Nio provided a wide range of personalized, value-added services during the recent Lunar New Year holiday season.
Industry outlook: Nio remains optimistic that this year’s sale figures will exceed the roughly 184,000 units Lexus sold in 2022 in China. The auto upstart expects solid growth momentum for the country’s EV market despite a recent slump as China dropped its COVID-19 prevention measures.
READ MORE: China’s EV battle 2022: why BYD is leaving Tesla and Xpeng in the dust
]]>Major Chinese electric vehicle makers, from Aion to Nio, are joining the likes of Xpeng Motors in an industry-wide price war ignited by Tesla, offering generous sales incentives to boost demand after posting dismal delivery results for January.
Why it matters: Sales growth for new energy vehicles (NEVs) at the start of 2023 has reached a bottleneck after the central government fully scrapped subsidies for purchasing them at the end of December, the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) wrote in a post on Wednesday, quoting January sales figures. NEVs is a catchall phrase used in China that includes all-electric cars, plug-in hybrids, and hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles.
READ MORE: Local Chinese authorities unveil stimulus measures to spur EV sales
Flagging January sales: Retail sales of Chinese passenger electric vehicles fell by 1% year-on-year and 43% month-on-month to around 304,000 units from Jan. 1 to Jan. 27, according to figures published by the CPCA on Wednesday. The industry group has yet to publish figures for the full month, but reports by many Chinese EV makers are out, and they show a definite sales slump.
Nio’s big promotion: Nio on Wednesday began offering customers a package of discounts and special offers for its first-generation electric sports utility vehicles, including a more than RMB 10,000 ($1,483) allowance to cover the cost increase caused by the phasing-out of Beijing’s subsidy.
More price campaigns: State-owned automakers SAIC and GAC also announced they would slash prices on their vehicles this week in the hope of grabbing a share of sales during a traditionally slow season.
Multiple regional authorities in China are issuing stimulus measures in a bid to shore up demand for electric vehicles, ranging from cash subsidies to free parking lots, as China’s central government ends its massive decade-long EV support campaign.
Why it matters: The government measures come as sales in the world’s biggest EV market start to show signs of slowing down. The local subsidies underscore China’s continued support of green energy transport, despite the central authorities phasing out EV purchase subsidies altogether a month ago after more than a decade. In September, Beijing extended its 5% purchase tax exemption for EVs to the end of 2023.
READ MORE: Chinese EV makers rush to boost year-end sales as subsidies expire
Details: The Shanghai municipal government on Sunday announced the extension of its EV subsidy program launched last May in the wake of a months-long city-wide lockdown. Consumers will continue to receive rebates of RMB 10,000 ($1,482) per car for any trade-in of internal combustion vehicles for EVs until June. 30, as part of a stimulus package aimed at propping up the local economy, details of which were released on the government’s official website.
Context: Beijing began granting subsidies to EV buyers across China in 2010, deliberately trimming the purchase incentives starting in 2015 when it found that EVs with a range of over 400 kilometers (249 miles) were qualifying for subsidies of as much as RMB 54,000 per unit. The generous subsidies were cut by more than half to RMB 25,000 in March 2019, leaving China’s sales of new energy vehicles (NEVs), mainly all-electrics and plug-in hybrids, down 4% annually to 1.2 million that year.
Skirmishes have surrounded China’s speedy uptake of electric vehicles in the past year, with industry giant BYD reigning supreme but an increasingly large crowd of challengers looking to muscle in on the action. Once-promising startup Xpeng Motors and major automaker Great Wall Motor have been among those to falter in 2022 – and the war is far from over.
Industry observers link BYD’s success to China’s national shift towards electric vehicles, the company’s highly-integrated supply chain across key components, and a rising consumer preference for high-quality, cost-competitive automobiles as recession looms.
Xpeng’s recent setbacks, however, reflect structural weaknesses at the company, including limited competitiveness and low operational efficiency in a crowded marketplace. Now, the risk of falling behind the competition has become real for the Guangzhou-based company.
Even Tesla faces an eroding market share in a highly competitive field, thanks to an onslaught of new models from various domestic rivals. Meanwhile, foreign auto giants from Volkswagen to Ford have long lagged behind Chinese counterparts in transitioning to green energy.
Here, we look at the annual results of China’s EV leaders and attempt to explain the dynamics behind some of the biggest winners and losers of the past year.
Despite being a bright spot in a slowing auto market, China’s two-year run of huge growth in the EV sector hit unexpectedly fierce competition as it shifted into a lower gear in the second half of 2022.
BYD was the biggest winner of the year, with annual sales of 1.86 million electric cars. The company’s output was more than triple 2021’s figure of around 600,000 units, comfortably exceeding its goal of 1.5 million units.
Tesla was left a distant second. The company’s sales started to slow last year as concern grew about an underlying mismatch between supply and demand. In 2022, the US automaker delivered 439,770 China-made vehicles to local customers, a 37% increase from a year ago and significantly lower than its 50% growth target for overall sales volume.
Besides BYD and Tesla, multiple Chinese EV makers including Nio and Xpeng embarked on 2022 with optimism and ambitious sales targets. However, only a handful managed to hit their goals. Aion (the EV arm of state-owned automaker GAC) and Hozon kept their word by selling around 271,000 and 152,000 EVs respectively last year. Geely’s premium EV brand Zeekr also achieved its goal by delivering just over 71,000 vehicles.
China’s US-listed EV makers mostly underperformed. Nio played tough to secure around 80% of its 150,000-vehicle delivery goal, while Xpeng delivered just over 120,000 units of its 250,000 unit target.
In December, when most automakers struggled to protect their market shares by offering generous discounts as the Chinese government phased out EV subsidies, BYD went the opposite way by announcing a price rise of up to RMB 6,000 ($870) across its lineup. The move proved BYD’s role as “price maker” in the mass market, analysts at Jefferies wrote in a Dec. 1 report.
Analysts attributed BYD’s dominance partly to its success in ramping up manufacturing capacity and building a secure, integrated supply chain from batteries to chips. In 2022, when the company tripled its annual car capacity to around 3 million units at its eight manufacturing locations, according to public information gathered by investors, it also more than doubled its battery capacity to 285 gigawatt-hours (GWh), according to estimates by Founder Securities. A company spokesperson declined to comment on the capacity figures.
Also, the automaker has adopted a dual strategy of betting on both all-electrics and plug-in hybrid EVs (PHEVs) as range anxiety continues to be a top concern among local buyers. BYD offers nearly 70 models in major configurations and price categories. This helps the company stand out in a crowded market where many competitors pick a type and limit buyers’ options.
As China’s EV sales reported nearly 100% annual growth in 2022, Xpeng Motors and Great Wall Motor are among the most surprising names for whom sales growth dipped well below the industry average. The two companies sold 120,757 and 131,834 EV units last year, posting a flat increase of 23% and a 4% decline from a year earlier, respectively.
Multiple factors have put pressure on the two companies, including weaker consumer sentiment and interest rate hikes.
The sales slump at Great Wall Motor indicates a major setback in the company’s slow shift to EVs. In 2022, monthly sales of the company’s Haval H6, once China’s top-selling gas-powered crossover, fell 75% to around 20,000 units from historic highs, as it appeared to be outpaced by popular EV models produced by Tesla (Model Y) and BYD (Song Plus).
Ora, the company’s dedicated EV sub-brand, saw sales decline by 23% year-on-year to 103,996 units. Nevertheless, Great Wall Motor’s management has big plans for 2023 — promising to launch more than 10 EV models, including five new PHEVs under the Haval brand and two new models under the Ora marque.
Xpeng is facing a more complicated external environment, as well as the threat of increased pressure from rivals, said David Zhang, a school dean at Jiangxi New Energy Technology Institute. Not only are sales of big name rivals such as BYD and GAC’s Aion gaining momentum, but younger makers such as Hozon and Leapmotor are increasingly catching up. That’s the broader context behind Xpeng currently restructuring its business, according to Zhang.
Meanwhile, Xpeng is exposed to a potential demand mismatch risk in the short-term, as consumer confidence in vehicle intelligence technologies lags behind ambitious plans to bring self-driving cars to the market, analysts from Zheshang Securities told local media outlet Jiemian.
The Alibaba-backed EV maker has pledged to put more effort into overall car-making after reporting three consecutive months of dropping sales as of October and losses of RMB 6.78 billion ($1 million) for the first three quarters of 2022. It is also dealing with an aging product portfolio and implementing cost control measures to boost efficiency and drive sales, with chief executive He Xiaopeng promising to refocus on the core company after spending some time and energy on emerging businesses such as flying cars.
“We have high expectations for 2023. It’s a game of both competence and persistence. We have winning cards to play the game, and the evolution is making good progress,” a company spokeswoman said when contacted by TechNode.
In-house manufacturing of key components has become one of the biggest trends in China’s EV industry over the past year, as many automakers look for ways to reduce supply chain vulnerability amid persistent chip shortages and the surging cost of battery materials. Among them, BYD is widely seen as a role model for this vertical integration strategy: the automaker builds its own supply chain and performs most of the activities required to bring its vehicles to market.
Already the world’s second-biggest battery maker and a major domestic supplier of power semiconductors for automobiles, BYD is now looking to expand production capacity significantly and accelerate the development of new products. Founder Securities expects BYD’s capacity to increase to 445 GWh-worth of batteries to close the gap with dominant player CATL by the end of 2023. In November, the company abandoned an initial public offering plan for its semiconductor unit as it decided to focus instead on expanding the capacity of a local plant by 80% to reach 360,000 wafers in 2023.
Other major industry players, from state-owned GAC to US-listed Nio, have also been racing to develop battery and semiconductor technologies in-house to ensure a secure supply of the key components. Here are some recent moves and potential developments for the companies heading into 2023:
Analysts have warned about the prospects of a bumpier year for EV makers in 2023, and sure enough, the industry is already seeing some sharp movements. On Jan. 6, Tesla made a big splash by cutting the prices of its China-made vehicles by between 6% and 13.5%, a move that Sun Shaojun, a popular Chinese car blogger, described as kicking off an industry-wide battle for survival in the year ahead.
Sun added that many rivals would probably have to follow suit in the face of such a big promotion by an industry leader. Meanwhile, analysts at Bernstein expect competition to heat up with as many as 126 new battery EV models and 55 new plug-in hybrid models coming to market in 2023, a 40-50% increase on last year.
In anticipation of a post-Covid recession and in light of EV subsidies being scrapped, sales are expected to slow this year. Credit Suisse’s sales forecast of 9.4 million EV sales in China is one of the more bullish on Wall Street, while Bernstein more cautiously holds that 8 million units will be sold in the country this year.
And yet, long-term growth prospects remain buoyant, as demand shifts from policy-led to consumer-driven, Bernstein analysts wrote in a Jan. 5 report. UBS shared the sentiment, expecting the new energy vehicle (NEV) penetration rate, mainly for all-electrics and PHEVs, to grow by 10% this year to reach 37% of all new car sales.
2022 proved to be a big year for Chinese EVs. The central government achieved its goal of EV adoption approaching 25% of total car sales three years ahead of schedule, as industry sales nearly doubled to 6.8 million units. Still, pressure on margins is likely to persist in the near term for smaller companies, which have already been exposed to high battery material costs.
Looking ahead, China has cemented its growth momentum in the global EV race, but industry players should expect short-term sacrifices to hit their profits as they glimpse a bigger and brighter future.
]]>Xpeng Motors is aiming for profitability on an operating level by 2025, according to an internal speech from chief executive He Xiaopeng to employees. The electric vehicle maker will also focus on redeveloping business strategies, dealing with corporate restructuring issues, and bolstering corporate value in 2023.
Why it matters: He’s comments come on the heels of a turbulent year for Xpeng during which the company faced major setbacks, including a 23% sales drop in the second half of 2022 and an 80% plunge in market capitalization from a year ago.
Details: Xpeng expects to break even in 2025 with its earnings margin before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization reaching 17%, according to a report from 36Kr that cites comments made by He at an internal meeting on Wednesday.
Context: Xpeng reported an annual growth rate of 23% in vehicle sales in 2022, significantly lower than the industry average of around 90% and falling behind US-listed peers Li Auto and Nio, who posted year-on-year growth of 47% and 34%, respectively.
China’s electric vehicle price war has edged up a notch, with Xpeng Motors and Huawei-backed Aito now following Tesla in slashing prices on their lineups, responding to intensifying competition as Tesla’s China-made vehicles gain market share.
Why it matters: These latest price cuts could force more EV makers to follow suit, hitting profit margins that have already been squeezed by the recent sharp rise of battery raw material costs.
Details: According to a “new pricing scheme for the Chinese New Year” released by Xpeng on Tuesday, the starting price of its P7 sedan dropped RMB 30,000 or around 15% to RMB 209,900 from RMB 239,900 ($30,942 to $35,365). Xpeng’s newly-launched G9 crossovers were excluded from the cuts.
Context: Despite a backlash from many existing car owners, Tesla has achieved instant results on sales and regained growth momentum after it drastically cut prices on its China-made vehicles earlier this month.
READ MORE: Chinese EV makers rush to boost year-end sales as subsidies expire
]]>The latest member of BYD’s Ocean family of EVs has been inadvertently revealed in China by the country’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT), as the electric vehicle maker looks to extend its leadership in a competitive entry-level market segment.
Why it matters: The compact EV, called Seagull, will likely be the cheapest model in BYD’s lineup, and the Warren Buffett-backed automaker will face stiff competition in a segment dominated by standouts such as Wuling’s popular and inexpensive Hongguang Mini EV.
Details: The Seagull compact SUV will measure around 3.8 meters in length with a wheelbase of 2.5 meters, according to information released by MIIT on Jan. 11. This is shorter than the length of 4.1 meters and the wheelbase of 2.7 meters of BYD’s Dolphin hatchback, both under the company’s ocean-themed EV family.
Context: Budget-friendly, entry-level micro-EVs accounted for around one-third of passenger electric vehicle sales in China last year, according to figures from the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA). Competition in the sector has been heating up in recent years, and buyers are more price-conscious than those of luxury cars.
WM Motor, a Chinese electric vehicle maker backed by search engine giant Baidu, is set to be acquired by Apollo Future Mobility, a Hong Kong-listed firm backed by Hong Kong tycoon Li Ka-shing, for about $2 billion. The acquisition means the EV maker will go public in Hong Kong via a backdoor listing.
Why it matters: The $2 billion takeover is seen as a survival move for the Chinese EV maker, once a rival of Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto but now desperate for cash. The company has experienced significant setbacks, including sluggish sales, massive recalls, and lawsuits with Geely in the past few years.
Details: Apollo Future Mobility Group’s subsidiary Castle Riches Investments Limited will spend around $2 billion to buy 100% of WM Motor Global Investment Limited’s shares, according to a security filing (in Chinese) made on Thursday.
Context: Positioning itself as a luxury EV maker with plans to launch its first model in 2024, Apollo has been chaired by Ho King-fung, previously a JP Morgan analyst and a nephew of former Macau chief executive Edmund Ho Hau-wah, since 2016.
READ MORE: Struggling EV maker WM Motor reportedly seeks back-door listing
]]>Nio Capital plans to incubate a separate brand called Zhixing (our translation) that focuses on making luxury off-road EVs and could launch its first model at a price of around RMB 1 million ($150,000) in 2025, local media outlet LatePost reported.
Why it matters: The move could help Nio to enter a more expensive segment and extend its market reach by managing a growing portfolio of targeted brands. The Chinese electric vehicle maker already has a strong reputation among China’s upper middle class.
Details: Zhixing, an EV startup formed in early 2022, will raise a seed round of “dozens of millions of dollars” from Nio Capital, a venture capital firm founded by William Li, chief executive of the namesake automaker, LatePost reported on Monday citing unnamed sources.
Context: Experts say that there remains strong demand from wealthy individuals for luxury EVs in the coming years despite broader economic challenges, with several Chinese automakers venturing into the booming segment. Luxury cars priced above $80,000 will expand at a compound annual growth rate of 8% to 14% through 2031, while the markets for cars priced below $80,000 could remain relatively flat from a global standpoint, McKinsey & Company said in a report on July 8.
BYD showed off its first two luxury car models under its new Yangwang brand on Thursday. The U8, an off-roader, and the U9, a sports car, will each be priced at more than RMB 1 million ($150,000) and equipped with four electric motors that boast top-of-the-range performance in extreme conditions.
Why it matters: In the company’s latest move to enhance its leadership position as China’s top-selling EV maker, BYD has become one of the few domestic automakers to enter the uncharted waters of the super-luxury car segment where German auto majors have traditionally had a strong grip.
Details: The full-size U8 off-roader and the high-performance U9 sports car will come with an innovative electric drive system using four separate motors, one controlling each wheel, that allows the vehicles to do a tank turn – a 360-degree spin on its own axis.
Context: BYD revealed the name of its new luxury EV brand, Yangwang in Chinese pinyin, in November, saying the marque would feature the company’s most advanced technology and come with a target price range of between RMB 800,000 and RMB 1.5 million ($116,707 to $218,825).
BYD became the world’s best-selling electric vehicle brand in 2022, managing to sell a record 1.8 million units, more than triple its numbers from a year earlier. Other major automakers also reported improvement in December, according to the latest sales figures.
Why it matters: The figures show that BYD has had an iron grip on the market in the last year while smaller EV makers faced ups and downs. China’s EV sales in 2022 are set to finish lower than expected as the industry enters a slower period after authorities phased out EV purchase subsidies at the end of 2022.
Details: BYD said on Monday that it delivered around 235,200 vehicles in December, an increase of 150.5% from the same period a year earlier. That figure also brings BYD’s total sales for 2022 to more than 1.86 million units, up 208.6% compared to 2021 figures.
Context: Analysts expect industry sales to hit a plateau in 2023 after several years of strong growth as the Chinese government scraps subsidies for EV purchases.
China had a rough ride in 2022.
Throughout the year, the economy was plagued by the frequent resurgence of Covid and the related containment measures that disrupted daily activities. In the first three quarters, China’s GDP grew by 4.8%, 0.4%, and 3.9% from last year, falling far short of its own 5.5% annual growth goal.
The country’s tech industry was, of course, not immune to the overall sluggish economy. Chinese companies (many of which are in the tech sector) on the Hurun Global 500, a list that tracks the world’s most valuable companies, lost $2.9 trillion in 2022, more than half of their value from last year.
The e-commerce and content sectors, in particular, saw the most damage as consumers and advertisers cut spending. Industry leader Alibaba reported a steep drop in revenue growth, while budget retailer Pinduoduo saw rapid growth as people became more sensitive to prices. Content giant Tencent also reported quarterly revenue declines, and advertising revenue dropped significantly.
Meanwhile, green energy vehicle sales had been a rare growth point in China, and Chinese shopping platforms were rising rapidly in overseas markets despite challenges at home.
It might be too early to tell whether the country is nearing a turning point. After three years of battling the highly mutable and transmissible Covid-19, the Chinese government suddenly relaxed its Covid control policies in early December, exiting from its previously strict measures in less than a week. Such drastic change has resulted in rapid Covid infections across China, triggering drug shortages and causing many people to stay home to recover.
China’s earlier-than-expected reopening could bring an economic recovery in 2023. But the country might also need some time to learn to live with Covid after three years of strict controls.
Goldman Sachs expected China to reopen in the second quarter of 2023 in their annual China outlook report published in November and forecasted China’s GDP growth to “accelerate from 3.0% this year to 4.5% next year.” The first quarter after reopening might see negative growth, due to Covid case surges and people temporarily reducing travel, the report said. However, China might see accelerated growth once people adjust to the new reality, as experiences from other East Asian countries that have implemented strict Covid controls show.
In a year of lackluster consumer confidence, new energy vehicles (NEVs, including plug-in hybrids and electric vehicles) have been a rare bright spot in China. The country’s car buyers showed a strong preference for NEVs over traditional gas cars. The share of NEVs in the new car sales reached 36.2% in November, growing from last year’s 22.5% and surpassing China’s goal of 25% by 2025, three years ahead of schedule.
And no Chinese automaker had a better year than BYD. The local EV and battery maker climbed to a dominant position in the new energy vehicle segment. At the same time, China’s leading EV trio — Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto — faced various problems and lost some of their shine.
BYD managed to capture market share from other strong rivals this year. In a year, BYD grew its share of NEV sales from 19.5% to 31%, while Wuling’s went down from 14.4% to 8%, and Tesla China went down from 10.7% to 7.9%.
As of November, BYD more than doubled its sales from last year, selling more than 1.57 million NEVs this year in China, taking more than 31% of the market share, ranking first and way ahead of the trailing pack of automakers. Wuling, a state-owned mini EV maker, is second, selling more than 400,000, growing 7.1% from last year, and accounting for more than 8% of the market. Tesla’s China operation came in third, with more than 397,800 cars sold, a 59% annual growth, and a 7.9% market share. Li Auto, Xpeng, and Nio ranked 10th, 11th, and 12th, each taking less than 2.3% of the market, down about 1% from last year.
Other local automakers, such as Geely, GAC’s Aion, Chery, Changan, and Hozon, also had a good year and grew their market share, though the speed and scale of BYD’s growth were unrivaled. Hozon made it into the top ten EV brands by sales for the first time this year, squeezing out the state-owned joint venture SAIC. Geely also saw impressive market share growth, rising from 2.7% last year to 5.3% this year.
BYD has two main advantages: competitive pricing and an integrated supply chain. BYD’s popular models — BYD Song Plus and BYD Qin — have been frequent bestsellers in their categories in the last six months. Priced between RMB 150,000 and RMB 220,000 ($21,470 to $31,490), these models are known for affordability and fuel efficiency. Unlike many other automakers hit by supply chain crunch and price hikes of source materials, BYD was able to keep its competitive price as a major battery maker in its own right (and one that is reportedly set to supply its blade battery to Tesla). BYD is also expanding outside China, systematically entering Japan, Southeast Asia, and Western Europe, with more overseas pushes planned ahead.
However, such impressive growth could slow in 2023. Multiple automakers in China gave conservative outlooks for the first half of 2023, citing the end of EV purchase subsidies at the end of 2022. Many brands also cut prices and gave out promotions to attract buyers to place orders before the end of 2022, boosting their year-end sales and capitalizing on the last subsidy run. These moves are likely to overdraft 2023’s sales in advance.
In the economic downturn, budget retailer Pinduoduo outrivaled established platforms like Alibaba and JD. In the third quarter, Pinduoduo reported 65% growth in revenue and a whopping 388% growth in operating profit, contrasting with Alibaba’s relatively flat growth of 3% in revenue and 68% in operating profit, and JD’s 11.4% growth in revenue and 276% in operating profit. Alibaba fared worse than JD, seeing a steep drop in revenue growth, with yearly growth hitting below 10% for the first three quarters of 2022, a major departure from the 20% or 30% plus growth rates it has been accustomed to in the past few years.
Although Pinduoduo’s vice president of finance, Liu Jun, said at a third-quarter earnings call that the company was “unlikely to maintain” that level of profitability, the temporary strong growth still showed the broad appeal of a well-run budget retailer during lean times.
China’s year-end shopping festival Singles Day was also increasingly losing its appeal. Industry leaders Alibaba and JD didn’t release their overall sales data for the first time in a decade. Moreover, these established retailers were also facing serious threats from ByteDance’s Douyin as the short-video platform continues to see strong growth in live commerce.
In contrast to the slow growth back home, outside of China, competition has been heating up for Chinese overseas retail platforms. In March, Shein, the Chinese online fashion platform known for its ultra-cheap prices, managed to expand its market share of fast fashion sales in the US to 40%, continue to widen its lead over H&M’s 27%, Zara’s 17%, Forever 21’s 9% and Fashion Nova’s 6%, a report from Bloomberg Second Measure said. Shein became the largest fast-fashion retailer in the US in the second quarter of 2021 and grew its US sales more than 5.6 times between March 2020 and March 2022.
Seeing Shein’s success, Pinduoduo also launched an overseas retail platform Temu in September. The platform surpassed $1.5 million in average daily gross merchandise value (GMV) in its first month. Although the figure fell slightly short of internal expectations, the platform was spending heavily on ads to capture new customers, even becoming the most-downloaded shopping app in the US, surpassing Amazon, Walmart, and Shein. Nevertheless, it remains to be seen whether such growth is sustainable.
Since Chinese tech giants ZTE and Huawei began to be hit by US sanctions five years ago, the Chinese tech industry has wondered about the evolution of US sanctions. This fall, the multi-year effort hit a new level.
In October, the US announced a sweeping set of restrictions on semiconductor exports to China, aiming to cut China off from accessing high-end chips and the tools to make them. Instead of putting individual companies on blacklists, the new restrictions took aim at the entire Chinese semiconductor sector and related industries.
In particular, the Biden administration is trying to limit China’s ability to make advanced chips under 16nm or 14nm, DRAM memory chips of at least 18nm, and NAND flash memory chips of 128 layers or more. Meanwhile, the US is also pursuing chipmaking toolmakers in the Netherlands (ASML) and Japan (Tokyo Electron), pressuring them to stop selling China the tools to make high-end chips. There aren’t many ways around these curbs. Unless advanced chipmaking technology changes or undergoes a fundamental evolution, China’s dream of making its own advanced chips in the next few years might be limited.
The content and entertainment sectors have seen significant blows in the past year, not just in China, but also worldwide. According to the Hurun Global 500 list, media and entertainment companies suffered the most significant drop in value in 2022, followed by retail, software, and services, while the biggest gainers were in energy and insurance.
Major content platforms in China saw dwindling advertising dollars as companies cut marketing budgets to weather the economic downturn. Worse, whatever budget was left was increasingly going directly to e-commerce platforms such as Pinduodou and JD rather than content platforms like Tencent, Baidu, and Weibo.
Content giant Tencent saw yearly revenue decline by 3% and 2% in the second and third quarters, with advertising revenue down almost 18% in the second quarter. In late December, Tencent’s CEO Pony Ma said in an internal speech that the company could cut Tencent News, the company’s signature news website established in 2003, if the site can’t break even by itself.
Search engine giant Baidu also saw revenue decline by 5% in the second quarter, and a flat 1.9% growth in the third. Microblogging site Weibo saw heavy losses too, reporting 22% and 25% revenue declines in the second and the third quarter.
Gaming companies in China saw a few signs of easing conditions. In April, China began issuing gaming licenses again after an eight-month freeze. But heavy regulation on the sector in 2021 has continued to have ripple effects, and video game companies were projected to see a 2.5% annual revenue decline in 2022. Many smaller studios had to lay off staff or even shut down their companies while waiting for their new games to be approved by the authorities. The worst might be over, but the pain is still being felt throughout the industry.
Auto
E-commerce
Semiconductors
Content
]]>Xpeng Motors has intensified its restructuring efforts by setting up a new financial platform to control costs and streamline the company’s workflow, according to an internal memo obtained by Chinese media Dianchang (Powerhouse).
Why it matters: The cross-functional financial platform is the latest in a series of restructuring actions undertaken by Xpeng to get its business back on track, after it faced declining sales and slimming margins in recent months due to rising costs and competition.
Details: Xpeng has set up a number of financial units under the new scheme, including two teams to implement specific cost-saving measures with its sales and marketing operations and research and development units, according to the report.
Context: Xpeng has unveiled organizational changes that include setting up a number of committees for corporate strategy, product planning, and technology road mapping in the past few months, following criticism about the pricing and specs of its new premium crossover G9.
Nio said on Dec. 25 that it expects a continued slowdown in Chinese electric vehicle sales during the first half of 2023 as demand weakens after Beijing’s phasing out of EV purchase incentives and amid a post-pandemic downturn.
Why it matters: Nio is the latest automaker to share a grim view of the world’s biggest EV market, which has seen exponential growth in the past two years despite Covid-19 headwinds, rising battery prices, and chip shortages.
Details: Li added Nio could face near-term pressure on sales, but that there is certainty about the long-term sales potential for the company’s new car models as it will enter a production ramp-up phase in the first half of 2023.
Context: Nio reported deliveries of 106,671 vehicles, with four SUVs and two sedans on sale from January to November, up 31.8% from a year ago but falling short of its annual target of 150,000 vehicles. It plans to further expand its product family by launching three new models next year.
Although billions of dollars have been spent on pursuing breakthroughs in electric vehicle batteries, global automakers General Motors, Hyundai, and Honda believe there is still a long way to go to bring next-generation battery technologies to the market.
Speaking on Dec. 14 during an online conference held by SES, a New York-listed battery maker, executives from the world’s major automakers said they are still looking for a pathway to scaling lithium-metal batteries, which could offer higher energy density at a lower weight than existing batteries.
Backed by a list of big auto names that includes GM, Hyundai, and Honda, SES now expects its lithium-metal batteries to be mass-adopted first in drones for freight delivery services over the next three years, according to chief executive Hu Qichao. He added that the company would not introduce EV batteries until after 2025.
Lithium-metal batteries have pure metal lithium in the anode and come without the carbon materials that existing lithium-ion batteries use. Their adoption could allow automakers to develop EVs with a longer driving range and more cabin space.
Industry players are also racing to develop solid-state batteries with a lithium-metal anode, which has a solid electrolyte to enable charging and discharging and is viewed as being safer than those currently in use. SES’s products use liquid materials like today’s lithium-ion batteries and therefore have been considered “a bridge” between existing offerings and solid-state ones.
Other than the challenges in commercializing the newest battery technologies, representatives from the three automakers, SES, Canadian mining group Ivanhoe Mines, and Chinese lithium producer Tianqi Lithium talked about the ongoing US push for supply-chain decoupling from China at the Dec. 14 event.
The text below has been condensed and edited for clarity.
Timothy Grewe, director of electrification strategy, General Motors
We’re very excited about the lithium-metal battery and accelerating it into the marketplace. General Motors has a dedicated EV architecture that we call Ultium, and we specifically designed it to accept this new technology with minimum disruption in the manufacturing process.
We’re aggressively pursuing this technology and trying to accelerate it as fast as possible. We think we’ve proven the durability of SES’s battery samples with 150,000 miles demonstrated in the lab. The next step is: “How do we get it into people’s hands?”
As we expand into this light-duty, high-volume application, there’s going to be a natural localization. That’s true for anything that we do in a high-volume automotive business. And now we have some of these accelerants, such as the Inflation Reduction Act or some of the other moves by the miners to make the supply chain more local where people use products and we can develop the whole ecosystem.
One of the most important things in high-volume manufacturing is always securing a stable supply. That’s always high value to us and fundamental in our business model. How do we make sure we never get a production interruption? We have numerous processes and contracts to make sure that happens.
Yongjun Jang, global R&D master, Hyundai
To make a battery with higher energy density, lithium metal could be the next-generation material for the anode, and there are two different pathways within it: the liquid approach and the solid-state approach.
Lithium-metal batteries use high-concentrated liquid electrolytes, so it is necessary to induce stable redox reactions to prevent excessive depletion of the liquid electrolyte and the lithium-metal anode at the interface. On the other hand, all-solid-state batteries use solid electrolytes, and it is necessary for solid electrolytes to maintain continuous close contact with lithium metal and prevent short circuits of the battery.
For these reasons, both electrolytes are important factors in determining the long-term durability of higher energy density batteries. It becomes even more sensitive and important in large-format batteries than in smaller ones. We should solve these issues before the commercialization of these new batteries.
SES is developing lithium-metal battery technology rapidly with the manufacturing completeness of large-format, 50Ah high energy density battery cells. If the long-term stability of the battery is secured by applying artificial intelligence technology, it will greatly help automotive companies.
Yoshiya Joshua Fujiwara, expert engineer, Honda
Honda focuses on safe, reliable, and low-cost technology, such as all-solid-state battery technology with lithium-metal anode. We think that’s the holy grail of low-cost battery technology due to its high energy density. We hope to realize commercialization within this decade, before 2030.
The approach SES is making is a more hybrid-based, lithium-ion-like manufacturing process. Honda is working on both technologies simultaneously. We don’t know which one is a cheaper way at the moment, but all-solid-state technology is new compared with what SES is utilizing.
Localization is one of our principles. We have been operating facilities and building supply chains locally in the US since the beginning of the last century. Honda will do the same for electric vehicles, and we are focusing on the US and China, the two major markets where we need to establish our supply chain individually. In particular, it is urgent for us to establish a supply chain in North America due to the Inflation Reduction Act. We believe it is important for us to control and integrate our supply chain locally.
Alice Lei, senior analyst, Tianqi Lithium
As an upstream player in the battery supply chain, Tianqi focuses a lot on lithium-related material innovations, such as lithium sulfur and lithium metal. That’s why we invested in SES, as we are trying to work with downstream battery cell makers to ensure we know what kind of lithium materials they want. We are quite excited about introducing new battery technologies to the market, but it will take a lot of courage and time to commercialize a disruptive technology like full solid-state battery.
We believe that the globalized battery supply chain that has been built in the past decade will probably be changed to be more localized in the next few decades. The Inflation Reduction Act has clarified that most of the critical minerals and materials could be produced in the US and we think it’s a trend that Europe will probably have its own battery act in the future. Therefore, it is important to choose our next location of expansion to comply with the trend and deal with geopolitical tensions.
Hu Qichao, founder and CEO, SES
Regarding ramping up the supply chain for new technology, our lithium-metal battery shares a lot of the supply chain with the current lithium-ion batteries, such as the cathode and manufacturing process. However, there are different parts and the current supply chain for lithium anodes is very fragmented and insufficient.
So we are working with partners to make the process, from mining to the final anode, as simple, streamlined, optimized, and with as few players involved as possible. I think that could be a really key factor to ramp up the supply chain for lithium-metal batteries.
On geopolitical issues, we do recognize this manufacturing renaissance in North America where there is a lot of potential for battery manufacturing: abundant raw materials, fairly low-cost electricity, and access to well-trained labor and high technology. So we are preparing to build this entire supply chain in North America, for example, electrolyte, anode, and battery cell. This trend offers a lot of opportunities.
Robert Friedland, founder and executive co-chairman, Ivanhoe Mines
Every action begets an equal and opposite counterreaction. When you Balkanize the world economy, you stress the integrated world economy on the supply side. That means the critical raw materials we need to enable this energy revolution become even more important and that’s why we call this the revenge of the miners.
We’ve identified very important lithium resources in the US that can produce lithium metal quickly and efficiently. We’ve been looking at new ways to make lithium metal foil and the types of deposits that will enable us to actually do that. All of these instruments will be part of the orchestra that’s required for the US to have its own secure domestic supply chain for new battery technologies.
Lithium metal has the highest energy density on the anode side of the battery. So we will be a very low-cost lithium-metal producer and solve part of that problem. For the copper, nickel, and cobalt, that’s what we’ve been doing for the past decades. We intend to ensure that the entire supply chain can be audited, carefully studied, and done in a better and more responsible way.
]]>On Tuesday, Chinese electric-vehicle maker Nio announced that certain data related to its users and vehicle sales in China before August 2021 had been leaked and was being illegally sold by third parties on the internet.
Why it matters: Nio said in its statement that it deeply regrets the incident. The company also said it has set up a dedicated hotline and an email address to respond to the data leakage. Moreover, a Nio customer service representative told Chinese media CLS (in Chinese) that it will not take the initiative to seek out customers to compensate but will take responsibility for the losses incurred.
Details: The EV maker said in the Chinese version of the Tuesday statement that it received an email on Dec. 11 from hackers demanding $2.25 million worth of bitcoin in exchange for not disclosing Nio’s internal data.
Context: Automakers are facing increased threats from data breaches and their impacts — affecting customers’ lives and bruising companies’ reputations.
Chery, a Chinese automaker and a manufacturing partner of Jaguar’s Land Rover, will launch a new electric vehicle brand in March in the hope of getting a slice of the country’s growing premium EV segment, local media reported.
Why it matters: State-owned Chery is the latest automaker to partner with Huawei for an electric car manufacturing project, following similar moves by BAIC, Changan, and GAC. The new brand could give it the potential to challenge market leaders and help Huawei expand its in-car reach.
Details: The EV-only brand will target high-end car segments and will have a similar relationship to parent Chery as Zeekr has to Geely, sources told Chinese trade media Yiche on Monday.
Context: In September, Chery announced plans to make EVs in collaboration with Huawei under the latter’s Zhixuan (“smart choice”) model, by which the smartphone giant not only supplies key components but also allows partners to sell EVs through its retail sales channels. The companies said that one of the first two models would be priced above RMB 300,000 ($42,944).
Chinese EV makers Nio, Xpeng Motors, Zeekr, and Aito, as well as Tesla’s operation in China, are racing to get the last slice of the sales pie before the end of 2022, offering special promotions with the country scheduled to phase out subsidies for electric vehicles beginning next year.
Why it matters: Analysts have projected slower EV sales in the coming months after the phase-out but remain positive on the overall growth of the EV sector in China in 2023.
The end of subsidies: The Chinese government currently grants a small number of subsidies to EV buyers, with all-electrics and plug-in hybrids eligible for subsidies of RMB 12,600 ($1,836) and RMB 4,800 ($689) per unit, respectively. Beijing reduced the incentives gradually by 10%, 20%, and 30% from 2020 to 2022.
Tesla’s multiple discounts: Tesla China has offered various discounts on its vehicle lineups amid investors’ fears of a looming slowdown in demand, including an additional discount of RMB 6,000 and a rebate of RMB 4,000 on customers’ end-of-the-year orders.
Outlook for 2023: Some other automakers have announced the upcoming car price rises in advance, pushing customers to place their orders by the end of the year.
Context: Beijing’s various policy measures and a vast selection of offerings by automakers have allowed the Chinese EV industry to thrive even amid increased competition. EV buyers will still be exempt from a 5% purchase tax next year, the central government said in August.
Volkswagen faces a growing public backlash in China over malfunctioning software in its electric vehicle ID Series — including sudden black screens and frequent internet disconnection — after a group of Chinese drivers penned an open letter to complain. The German automaker responded to Chinese media outlet Jiemian, saying that it is investigating the cause of these issues and apologizing for the inconvenience.
Why it matters: The complaints lay bare the challenges established carmakers face in trying to transition to EV making and in particular in incorporating ever more complex driver assistance systems and other digital technology into their vehicles.
Details: Dozens of disgruntled car owners recently published an open letter demanding SAIC-Volkswagen stop selling its China-made ID Series EVs and issue a complete repair plan to eliminate safety risks in their vehicles, Jiemian reported on Dec. 4.
Context: Volkswagen reported sales of around 112,700 electric vehicles in China for the first nine months of 2022, representing an increase of 139% from a year earlier. The German carmaker expects to sell 3.3 million cars in China this year, a 14% cut from its previous target, Bloomberg reported on Nov. 22.
Chinese electric vehicle makers reported slower growth in deliveries in November and some even saw decreases as the market continues to be hit by a macroeconomic downturn. Nio and Li Auto posted record deliveries, but Xpeng continued its delivery slump. For other automakers, Aion, Hozon, and Huawei-backed Aito reported a monthly decline in vehicle deliveries in the month while Zeekr and Leapmotor started to show signs of slowing growth.
Why it matters: The latest figures reflect a slowdown of China’s electric vehicle market as consumer confidence is hit by fears of a potential recession while an ongoing rebound of Covid cases in the country impacts vehicle production.
Sales recovery:
Xpeng’s slump:
Monthly declines:
Slowing growth:
Chinese EV upstart Nio will continue its investment in battery and chips research and development and keep expanding into overseas markets, according to an internal speech (in Chinese) from the company’s chief executive William Li in which he also reaffirmed a goal to break even in 2024 despite challenging economic conditions.
Why it matters: Li’s comments come at a time when China’s electric vehicle sales start to slow amid potential recession worries, growing competition, and supply chain disruptions due to frequent Covid comebacks. As a result, EV startups like Nio are facing pressure from the market as their sales slow and costs rise.
In-house batteries and chips: Speaking to employees in Shanghai on Friday, Li highlighted the company’s strategy to enhance research and development across its batteries and semiconductor units. The chief executive said in-house battery and chip capability will be essential in lowering production costs and increasing vehicle margins.
Global push: Li also said that the company’s next-generation vehicles would be introduced to American customers, without providing a specific timeline, while a team of more than 700 employees in Europe is upping efforts to offer more test drives on the continent.
Cost control: The chief executive asked Nio’s nearly 30,000 employees to be more effective and control spending. The company nearly doubled its employees a year ago and now takes a more restrained approach in hiring.
Context: Nio booked a record loss of RMB 4.1 billion ($577.9 million) in the third quarter of 2022, a significant increase of 392.1% from a year ago, while the firm’s vehicle profit margin fell from 18.1% to 16.4% over three consecutive quarters this year.
Chinese battery makers Svolt, Sunwoda, and Ganfeng are rushing to raise funds as prices for key raw material lithium more than double in a year. The country’s regulators are also rolling out a set of new measures in the electric vehicle battery market, including a crackdown on illegal hoarding, as high lithium prices have threatened the profit margins of automakers and could further slow EV adoption in the country.
Why it matters: The spot price of battery-grade lithium carbonate was up 201% in a year, rising RMB 200,000 per ton to RMB 590,000, according to Nov. 11 figures from the metal research institute Shanghai Metals Market.
Funding rush: Svolt, Sunwoda, and Ganfeng are among the Chinese battery makers and material suppliers rushing to raise cash as wider EV adoptions open a window of opportunity to sell bonds and shares.
New rules: In a document released publicly on Nov. 18, two Chinese government agencies — the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and the State Administration for Market Regulation — asked local regulators to do more in their crackdown on illegal acts such as hoarding and price-gouging of battery raw materials.
Slimming margins: Rising costs for battery raw materials have hurt the profitability of Chinese EV makers. Nio’s vehicle profit margin declined from 18.1% to 16.4% over three consecutive quarters this year. Meanwhile, the number for Xpeng Motors fell from 12.2% to 9.1% in the first half of 2022.
Bosch said on Monday it is co-developing a new generation of its advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) with Chinese self-driving car company WeRide, aiming for delivery in late 2023. The system has also secured the first pilot customer, which the German auto parts maker has yet to disclose.
Why it matters: This is the latest example of German auto firms strengthening their in-car software offerings in the face of competition from Tesla and local peers like Huawei.
Partnership with WeRide: Delivery of Bosch’s advanced driving technology is scheduled for late 2023 to an undisclosed Chinese car manufacturer. The tech will be similar to Tesla’s Autopilot system and enable cars to operate on both Chinese motorways and busy urban streets.
An indispensable market: China has been leading the world in electric vehicle adoption and in-car technology development, said Xu Daquan, executive vice president of Bosch China, citing examples such as strong demand from local customers for automated driving software.
Cash-burning competition: Looking to generate revenue from intelligent and connected car services, industry players have placed their cash on future areas such as autonomous driving and digitalization.
Global automakers have brought strong electric vehicle offerings to China’s annual import fair, the 2022 China International Import Expo (CIIE). They include Volkswagen, BMW, Toyota, Honda, Ford, Hyundai, and GM.
These traditional automakers are accelerating new EV rollouts in China as they find themselves in danger of being left behind by Tesla and much younger local rivals amid the country’s surging adoption of intelligent and connected EVs.
Though the expo showcases companies in various industries, from consumer goods to medical devices to smart manufacturing suppliers, CIIE has become a major auto show. Automakers came to the expo with vehicle debuts, futuristic concepts, and cutting-edge car tech. Here’s a look at some of the key auto launches at this year’s CIIE, which ended Thursday.
Volkswagen brought its latest electric sedan concept, the ID. Aero (part of VW’s purely electric ID. lineup) to the 2022 CIIE. Built on a dedicated EV architecture known as MEB, the car has a driving range of 620 kilometers (385 miles), a battery pack of 77 kilowatt-hours (kWh), and is scheduled for delivery in China in the second half of 2023.
The low-slung car will also be equipped with an in-car connectivity system, which for the first time since the German auto giant’s entry into China in 1984 has been developed by Volkswagen’s local team. Volkswagen plans to expand its Chinese software team by 50% to 1,200 engineers by the end of next year, Chinese media outlet Jiemian reported, citing Sun Wei, the chief technology officer of Cariad China, the manufacturer’s software subsidiary.
BMW brought only electrified vehicles to this year’s expo, including the i4, the brand’s first all-electric sedan model that went on sale in China in February with a price range of RMB 449,900 – RMB 539,900 ($62,036 – $74,446). The carmaker also showcased the i7, the first-ever all-electric of the seven-series, the brand’s most luxurious and advanced product lineup.
The success of these luxury models is vital: China sales of the German car giant declined 11.5% year-on-year to 592,873 vehicles for the first nine months of this year, while that of its “born electric” i-series bucked the trend with an annual increase of 65%. Chief executive Oliver Zipse on Nov. 4 reaffirmed commitment to its China growth plans, aiming for more than 25% of its car sales to be all-electrics in the country by 2025.
This year, General Motors’s Durant Guild, the company’s new direct sales business, made its first global appearance to the public during the expo and introduced the Cadillac Celestiq, an ultra-luxury flagship electric sedan.
The low-volume electric fastback is priced at around $300,000 in its home market and will be available to well-heeled Chinese consumers via a direct sales and import vehicle platform. Production will begin in GM’s global technical center in Michigan next December.
Also making its local debut is the GMC Hummer sports utility vehicle, GM’s first all-electric Hummer. The US automaker expects such “halo cars” to create significant buzz around its Cadillac and lower-end Chevy brands and enhance its image as an innovative automaker, Julian Blissett, the head of GM in China, told Reuters in September.
CIIE 2022 also saw the local debut of the long-awaited Ford F-150 Lightning, an all-electric version of America’s best-selling pickup truck over the past four decades. The Detroit auto giant touted the full-size pickup truck as being able to accelerate from 0 to 96 km/h (60 mph) in under four seconds and power a home for up to three days of regular usage during a blackout.
Ford has ramped up its EV business in China following the establishment in September of Ford Electric Mach Technologies, a subsidiary dedicated exclusively to the research, development, and operation of intelligent battery-powered cars. Early in the month, the manufacturer slashed the prices of its Mach-E electric crossover lineups by nearly 10%, as it rushed to keep up with the rising competition.
Having continued to focus on the current generation of gasoline-electric hybrids, Japanese automakers are beginning to turn their attention to fully electrified cars.
Toyota showcased the bZ3, the second model under its new “Beyond Zero” (bZ) all-electric series, as well as the first result of its collaboration with its EV partner BYD, more than three years after the two companies forged an alliance for EV making. Scheduled for sale by year-end, the China-model bZ3 is equipped with BYD’s “blade batteries,” which the manufacturer boasts have made new achievements in both safety and power, and assembled at a joint plant operated by partner FAW Group in Tianjin. Pricing details remain unknown.
Honda showed its e:N2 concept EV for the first time at this year’s CIIE. It is the second model under Honda’s Chinese-market e:N lineup. The company began selling its first “e:N series” model, the e:NS1 SUV, at a starting price of RMB 175,000 ($24,609) in April and plans to expand the portfolio with the introduction of 10 new EV models over the next five years.
The Japanese carmaker has experienced a downward trend in China, with sales of passenger cars from its joint venture with partner GAC Group declining 28.3% year-on-year to around 56,000 units, according to figures published by the China Passenger Car Association on Wednesday.
Hyundai brought something new to Shanghai this time, and it wasn’t only about electric cars. The South Korean maker said it plans to introduce its NEXO hydrogen-powered SUV to the Chinese market later this year, adding that its first purpose-built fuel cell EV has now been certified for sale by regulators. The NEXO crossover is the top-selling FCEV with a global market share of nearly 60% and recorded sales of 8,449 units globally for the first nine months of this year, according to figures compiled by industry tracker SNE Research.
The automaker also showcased its first all-electric sedan, the Ioniq 6, for the first time in China, a vehicle it hopes will make an impact in a market segment dominated mainly by Tesla’s Model 3. The vehicle has a claimed driving range of 610 km (379 miles) and can charge from 10% to 80% in as little as 18 minutes with an 800-volt electrical system.
]]>Despite increasing calls in Europe for an economic decoupling from China amid rising geopolitical conflict, Volkswagen and BMW have committed to long-term development in China and will continue to invest in the world’s biggest car market, according to senior executives from the German automakers.
Why it matters: The remarks come as German Chancellor Olaf Scholz visited China on Nov. 4 with a group of top business leaders, including Volkswagen’s chief executive officer Oliver Blume.
Details: “China has established one of the world’s most comprehensive industrial bases and supply chains… and will remain one of our most strategically important markets,” Zipse said, adding that the German carmaker will stay “unwaveringly committed” to the Chinese market.
Context: China has been Germany’s biggest trading partner over the past six years, with bilateral trade reaching a combined 245 billion euros ($242 billion) in 2021, according to official statistics. China accounted for more than a third of Volkswagen and BMW’s annual sales last year.
Jidu Auto, the electric vehicle arm of Chinese search engine giant Baidu, is joining a long list of Chinese companies to take on Tesla by positioning the brand in the premium segment and highlighting its strength in autonomous driving tech.
In recent media appearances, Xia Yiping, chief executive of Jidu, stated that the new automaker can compete with Tesla by leveraging the data and algorithm prowess from its parent company.
A former tech lead of in-car connectivity at Fiat Chrysler, Xia noted that he believes the race among automakers to build intelligent vehicles has only just begun in China.
On Oct. 27, Jidu showcased a special version of its first consumer car Robo-01 that it made in partnership with Chinese automaker Geely. The company plans to launch the standard version next April, which Xia told TechNode could be “very competitive” on price (our translation). He also noted a short-term target of selling at least 10,000 vehicles monthly.
Below is the highlights from a group interview at the car launch event, which have been translated, condensed, and edited for clarity:
Is it too late for Jidu to enter the Chinese EV game as a new competitor?
The EV offerings from our competitors are far less diversified, especially regarding the intelligent and connected capabilities they can offer. The competition has just begun, which I believe will be more about the deployment of semiconductors, algorithms, and computing power rather than vehicle manufacturing, as time goes on, and that’s where our capabilities lie.
We are looking to be a serious player in the medium-to-high-end EV segment, especially in the price range of RMB 250,000 ($34,370) and above, and where in-car intelligent technology has been a major selling point. Our core users are young, educated, tech-savvy, and upper-middle class, and in that sense, there is a big competitive overlap between Jidu and Tesla.
If you compare Jidu’s Robo-01 with Tesla’s Model Y, I would say our vehicle provides a roomier and more luxurious interior, as well as a longer driving range.
Several competitors have already begun releasing advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) for city environments. What is your advantage and how do you ensure the reliability of vehicle software?
(Note: Rival Xpeng Motors on Sept. 19 released its so-called City Navigation Guided Pilot, a feature similar to Tesla’s Full Self-Driving that allows vehicles to navigate on both highways and city streets. Huawei’s partner Arcfox closely followed with the release of its Navigation Cruise Assist (NCA) software a week later.)
Jidu’s advanced driver assistance capabilities, including those for highways and urban streets, will be fully ready once we begin vehicle delivery to customers later next year. All the variants of Robo-01 will be equipped with lidar sensors and applicable to all Jidu’s intelligent functionality.
We are developing the most advanced electrical and electronic architecture, where we must ensure the complexity of future vehicle systems and fulfill the higher demand for network bandwidth and functional safety. We run algorithms on Baidu’s supercomputers, and I think that’s one of our advantages.
Auto intelligence is not just about software engineering. You need to fully understand when it comes to where the semiconductor industry is headed and how sensors can better enable autonomous driving, among other fields. Not everyone can do that, but that’s in our DNA.
Jidu will begin delivery of Robo-01 later next year. Can you share insights on production plans, retail networks, and charging infrastructure?
Robo-01 is built based on Geely’s SEA (Sustainable Experience Architecture) platform. In early October, we aligned the production plan of Robo-01 for next year with our manufacturing partner and made reservations for many key components ahead of time.
(Note: In September 2020, Geely launched a modular, open-source vehicle platform for EVs called the Sustainable Experience Architecture (SEA), which has been used to build its own EV sub-brands like Lynk & Co, Zeekr, and Polestar.)
We plan to sell our cars via a direct sales model in the early stages so that we can maintain control over our brand image. Jidu’s first flagship store is about to open in Shanghai and we plan to enter 46 domestic cities by 2023.
When it comes to charging networks, we are building a number of charging points along with our showrooms and service centers, but we will also collaborate with public EV charge point providers to expand our footprint.
]]>Aion and Zeekr, the electric vehicle subsidiaries of Chinese automakers GAC and Geely respectively, each broke their monthly records for vehicle deliveries in October, while US-listed EV trio Nio, Li Auto, and Xpeng Motors lagged behind their peers.
Why it matters: Although Tesla and BYD have long been the undisputed leaders in the Chinese EV market, GAC and Geely are among the traditional automakers leading the chase. The October delivery results also reflect the strong momentum of Huawei-backed EV maker Seres and the mounting troubles faced by Xpeng.
GAC: The state-owned automaker said on Tuesday that it delivered 30,063 Aion-branded vehicles in October, an increase of 149% from the same month last year. That number brings Aion’s total delivery numbers this year to 212,384 vehicles.
Geely: Zeekr made deliveries of 10,119 EVs in October, a record high for Geely’s premium EV brand. Year-to-date sales totaled almost 50,000 as of last month, with the brand close to reaching its goal of delivering 70,000 cars this year.
Seres: Huawei‘s manufacturing partner delivered 12,018 Aito-branded EVs last month, a 461% jump from a year earlier. October was also the third straight month that it has delivered over 10,000 units in a single month since the delivery of its first production car began in March.
Xpeng: Deliveries of the eight-year-old EV maker more than halved year-on-year to just 5,101 vehicles last month. Vehicle deliveries totaled 103,654 units from January to October, far from the company’s unofficial 2022 guidance of 250,000 vehicles set early this year.
Nio and Li Auto: The two other EV upstarts each reported October deliveries of more than 10,000 units, slightly lower than the previous month. Yet both have enjoyed a solid performance despite ongoing supply chain issues amid the post-pandemic rebound.
Hozon and Leapmotor: With three entry-level cars on sale, Zhejiang-based Hozon managed to exceed deliveries of 18,016 units in October, representing a 122% year-on-year rise, while Leapmotor deliveries dropped by more than a third to 7,026 units.
]]>BYD and Chinese state-owned carmaker GAC reported strong growth in revenue and profits in the third quarter, further expanding their lead among Chinese peers. Other Chinese automakers — state-owned SAIC, and Huawei partners Seres and Changan — have reported mixed results with slowing growth or stagnated earnings. Rising material costs and intense competition are among the factors contributing to the companies’ woes.
Why it matters: BYD reported significantly stronger profitability than its peers with a gross margin of 22.75% in the third quarter, followed by Changan’s 17.4%, SAIC’s 9.6%, and GAC’s 4.6%, while Huawei-backed Seres is still losing money.
BYD: The Shenzhen-based manufacturer reached an average of around RMB 10,000 profit per unit sold from July to September, a significant increase from RMB 6,400 in the previous quarter, according to estimates from Jefferies Financial Group. Net profits reached RMB 5.7 billion, a gain of 350% from the same quarter in 2021.
GAC: State-owned GAC also reported strong third-quarter results, with revenue up 51.6% year-on-year to RMB 31.5 billion and profit growth of 144%. Toyota’s Chinese partner is aiming for a delivery target of 250,000 Aion-branded EVs this year and has sold around 182,000 units as of September.
SAIC: On the opposite end of the spectrum was SAIC, which has seen its stock price fall 30% since 2022. Sales from China’s biggest automaker grew 12.9% year-on-year to RMB 205.2 billion in the third quarter, but profit fell 18.4% annually to RMB 5.74 billion.
Huawei partners: Results from Huawei’s EV partners were also less impressive. Seres saw losses widen 57.3% from a year earlier in the third quarter to RMB 947 million, partly due to rising costs of raw materials, having recorded a sharp growth in sales of its Aito-branded EVs.
Context: Early this year, more than a dozen Chinese automakers raised EV prices to offset the rising cost of electronic components and battery materials used in vehicles. However, Tesla went the other way by slashing as much as 9% of its car prices last week, with Huawei-backed Seres quickly following suit. Analysts from China Merchants Bank International expected general car sales to slow into 2023 in China, while EV makers are also facing growing competition given a challenging macro environment, according to an Oct. 24 report by Reuters.
]]>Aito, an electric vehicle brand backed by Huawei, has quietly cut the prices of its electric crossovers by RMB 8,000 (around $1,100), in what appears to be an immediate reaction by a Chinese firm to Tesla’s major price cuts aimed at boosting demand.
Why it matters: The move is the latest sign that a new price war has broken out in the world’s biggest auto market. Tesla on Monday offered a significant price reduction on its popular EVs, which analysts predict could force other automakers to follow suit.
Details: The price cut, which Aito has not officially announced, affects its two all-electric sports utility vehicles, the M7 and the M5, Chinese media outlet The Paper reported on Tuesday. Customers who have already paid a pre-order deposit have been told to pay the remainder of the requested sum with a reduction of RMB 8,000, the report said.
Context: Last December, Richard Yu, chief executive of Huawei’s consumer business group, announced the launch of the M5, Aito’s first car model equipped with Huawei’s HarmonyOS operating system and manufactured by Chinese automaker Seres.
]]>READ MORE: Chinese EV makers may face a price war in 2022: UBS
Aion, the electric vehicle unit of Chinese automaker GAC, said on Thursday that it has raised RMB 18.3 billion ($2.53 billion) in Series A from a group of strategic investors, the latest boost to the company’s ongoing transition into an electric automotive powerhouse.
Why it matters: The funding round gives the Guangzhou-based upstart a whopping valuation of RMB 103.3 billion, making it China’s biggest private, venture capital-backed EV maker. Aion also expects to gain more advantages in the EV supply chain with new backers ranging from battery resources to chip manufacturing firms.
Details: Among a group of 53 strategic investors in the latest financing round were Ganfeng Lithium, China’s biggest lithium compounds producer, and China Fortune-Tech Capital, an investment arm of top Chinese chipmaker SMIC, Aion said in a statement (in Chinese).
Context: Aion is China’s fifth biggest EV maker, with sales more than doubling annually to 182,321 cars in the first nine months of this year, which gave it a 4.8% market share, according to data from the China Passenger Car Association.
BYD, China’s biggest producer of electric vehicles and the world’s third biggest batteries supplier, is making a series of aggressive moves to carve out a slice of the global auto market led by European and American giants.
BYD is systematically entering the passenger EV markets of Southeast Asia and Western Europe, facing stiff competition from well-established local majors as well as younger rivals such as Tesla and Nio.
Experts say that Chinese carmakers have an edge due to their head start in EV technology and have enjoyed the advantage of a fully developed EV supply chain from battery cells to control units. Thus, the ongoing global shortage of critical components allows them to ensure relatively stable production and hand over vehicles to customers more quickly than many of their global competitors.
The Shenzhen-based firm is undoubtedly the poster child for China’s shift towards EVs. In April, it became the world’s first automaker to end the production of gasoline-powered cars. The Warren Buffett-backed company sold nearly 201,300 EVs in September, of which 7,736 passenger cars were exported. Consultant LMC Automotive estimates BYD’s annual sales could reach 1.9 million units in 2022, including 18,000 units from overseas operations. McKinsey & Co expects at least one Chinese carmaker to reach annual sales of up to 5 million vehicles by 2030, with more than a third of that figure coming from overseas markets.
Here are some notable moves made by the automaker as it expands overseas.
BYD announced big plans for the European region in September, with an initial goal of cracking the passenger EV market of nine European countries by the end of the year. Besides forging alliances with established car retailers, the automaker will supply an additional group of 100,000 EVs to German-based car rental giant SIXT over the next six years as it expands its presence into all major markets on the continent.
Norway
BYD made its first major attempt as a passenger carmaker in Europe back in July 2020 by showcasing several of its Tang electric sports utility vehicles with dealership partner RSA at an event in Oslo.
However, it was not until last August that the Chinese automaker officially started its expansion into the region by delivering the first batch to Norwegian customers, quickly followed by the celebration of handing over its 1,000th vehicle in December.
With a starting price of 599,900 Norwegian kroner ($56,670) and a maximum driving range of 528 kilometers (328 miles), the seven-seater luxury SUV is by far the top-selling vehicle model by Chinese carmakers in Norway. A total of 2,526 Tang SUVs have been registered in the country as of Oct. 19, compared with 1,251 SAIC MG Marvel Rs, 980 Nio ES8s, and 812 Xpeng Motor G3s, according to data provider Elbilstatistikk.no.
Rest of Western Europe
BYD began its push into the European passenger car market in September, announcing plans that its three popular EV models – Tang, Han, and the Atto 3 – will be available in eight other European countries in addition to Norway, by year-end. Those countries are Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Germany, France, and the UK. The introduction of its Seal sedan and Dolphin hatchback is also reportedly in the pipeline.
BYD’s Tang crossover and its premium Han sedan will cost 72,000 euros ($69,740), while the Atto 3, a compact five-seater SUV, will target a more mainstream segment with a pre-sale price of 38,000 euros. Delivery of the first batch was celebrated during this year’s Paris Motor Show, and the company has partnered with three European car retailers to expand in the region, the Automotive News reported on Oct.17.
BYD’s EV strategy for Asia is very different from its strategy for Europe. In the latter, it tried to pursue luxury status among relatively affluent buyers by launching top-end models. However, in the Asia region, the Chinese EV maker is offering more affordable options in a crowded market dominated by Japanese and Korean rivals. As a result, competition could get even more intense as BYD pursues this market.
Australia and New Zealand
Despite having sold its E6 electric taxis for at least two years in Australia, BYD made a big step into the country’s market with the launch of its Atto 3 in February and quickly expanded its reach to New Zealand five months later. The car has been selling in 12 showrooms across seven states in Australia in a partnership with EVDirect, a regional distributor for BYD.
Japan
Aware that Japan is moving slowly amid the global transition towards EVs, BYD is forging into the prominent market with a group of hit products, including its sports sedan Seal, hatchback Dolphin, and the Atto 3.
BYD Japan executive officer Atsuki Tofukuji said that all three models are priced between 3 million yen and 6 million yen ($20,028 – $40,058). The first deliveries of the Atto 3 are scheduled for early next year, and the company is targeting no earlier than the middle of 2023 for the other two models.
The Chinese carmaker has no near-term plan to start a manufacturing plant in the country but aims to set up 100 showrooms with partners in the next three years. Its electric buses have entered into service in several Japanese cities including Tokyo and Kyoto over the past few years and the company hopes its accumulative sales will surpass 4,000 units around 2028.
Thailand
Thailand is a strategically important market for BYD, where the Chinese automaker will establish its first fully-owned factory for passenger cars outside of China, hoping to not only meet local demand but also satisfy the needs of Southeast Asia in general.
The $491 million facility is scheduled to become operational in Rayong, Thailand, in 2024, with a production capacity of 150,000 vehicles annually. The automaker announced earlier this month that it would bring its Atto 3 to Thailand with local retailer RÊVER, which will build more than 30 dealership stores by year-end for its Chinese partner and more than triple that number next year. Vehicle launch happened on Oct. 10, and the company has not revealed expected time of delivery.
India
Positioned to surpass Japan as the world’s third-biggest economy in 2025, India holds great potential for BYD’s cars. Earlier this month, the company announced a goal of selling at least 15,000 Atto 3 SUVs in the country next year and taking around a 40% market share by 2030.
Since it started making buses with a local partner in 2013, the Chinese automaker has invested over $200 million in the world’s fourth-biggest car market, running a manufacturing plant with a partner with an annual production capacity of 15,000 vehicles. However, no investment plan has been set in the near term amid increased scrutiny by Indian regulators toward Chinese investments.
Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly cited BYD’s dealership numbers in Australia and Thailand. The story was updated on Oct. 21 to include BYD’s comments on the launch of its Atto 3 in Thailand.
]]>China’s electric vehicle market continued to trend upwards in September, with year-to-date sales already surpassing last year’s total of 3 million, according to the latest figures compiled by the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA). However, the growth rate of overall car sales in China hit its lowest point in the last two decades owing to an economic slowdown, the industry group said.
Why it matters: The industry-wide sales figures released Tuesday further indicate a broader recognition among Chinese consumers of locally-made EVs, as well as a rising trend of Chinese automakers growing their international business.
Details: Last month, domestic auto majors, such as BYD and Geely, enjoyed a 67% share collectively in the passenger car market, up 9.2% from a year earlier, while those numbers for both younger EV startups and Tesla declined to 14.6% and 12.7%, respectively. The share of the market for traditional overseas carmakers further narrowed by 3.3% from a year ago to only 5.7%, CPCA figures showed.
Context: The CPCA has maintained its sales projection of 6.5 million new energy vehicles (NEV) this year, with EVs expected to make up 28% of the country’s new car sales. The central government previously set a sales target of 25% of all new car sales to be NEVs by 2025.
Major Chinese EV makers – Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto – are all making moves in producing their own chips for vehicles, as the former two focus on AI chips for autonomous driving and the latter works on more basic semiconductor components, according to Chinese media outlet LatePost.
Why it matters: The move reflects a growing trend among Chinese EV automakers to bring some chip production in-house, as an ongoing global semiconductor shortage continues to hinder vehicle production.
Nio looks to autonomous driving and lidar chips:
Xpeng develops NPUs for autonomous driving chips:
Li Auto focuses on power semiconductor devices:
Context: Multiple Chinese automakers have been looking to move into chip manufacturing, having been hit by the ongoing chip shortage amid growing uncertainty caused by multiple supply challenges, including the US chip export ban to China.
Gotion High-Tech, a Chinese electric vehicle battery supplier for Volkswagen and other big auto names, will build its first major American factory in Michigan as the company gears up to meet growing demand in the US.
Why it matters: The investment is a big boost for Michigan, a state heavily focused on the automotive industry, and an encouraging signal following US president Biden’s executive order to pass the Inflation Reduction Act into law, which could make China-made EVs and components ineligible for federal tax credits.
Details: Gotion will build a $2.4 billion facility in Big Rapids, Northern Michigan, to produce up to 150,000 tons of lithium-ion battery cathode material and 50,000 tons of anode material annually, according to a Wednesday briefing from the governor’s office.
Context: Meanwhile, Michigan is also offering $236 million in economic incentives as Our Next Energy, a US EV battery startup backed by BMW, is set to invest $1.6 billion and create 2,100 jobs at a planned battery facility near Detroit.
Chinese electric vehicle maker Nio will invest 12 million Australian dollars ($7.8 million) to buy a 12% stake in Australian miner Greenwing Resources, the latest investment in overseas battery mineral resources by Chinese companies hoping to secure a reliable supply of materials.
Why it matters: The move also reflects growing concerns among Chinese automakers, who are moving upstream in the supply chain to secure critical battery materials amid rising supply constraints.
Details: The investment will give Blue Northstar, Nio’s wholly-owned subsidiary, a 12.2% stake in Greenwing Resources. More than 80% of the proceeds will be used to step up the mining firm’s efforts on its San Jorge Lithium Project in Catamarca province, Argentina, according to a Monday filing.
Context: The deal comes at a time when surging lithium prices have hit automakers hard as they struggle to secure the supply of the key EV battery component. Battery makers and material suppliers have also negotiated prices with automakers to pass the costs on to the latter, cutting vehicle margins.
Arcfox, an electric vehicle brand launched by Chinese automaker BAIC, said it had started providing car users with its long-awaited Navigation Cruise Assist (NCA) software, a semi-autonomous driving feature developed on Friday by Huawei.
Why it matters: The introduction of Huawei’s automated driving capabilities comes nearly a year later than expected. It will test whether the Chinese telecommunications giant can provide a competitive edge for partnered EV makers.
Details: Starting Sept. 23, the NCA assistant driving feature has been available to owners of the “HI (Huawei Inside)” version of the Arcfox-branded Alpha S sports utility vehicles in Shenzhen. It will later be expanded to Beijing and Shanghai, a company spokesperson told Chinese financial media outlet Caixin, without giving a timeframe.
Context: Chinese automakers have slowly increased the availability and capabilities of their intelligent driving systems, which are mostly built upon a high-definition map and subject to government approvals for using geographic data, Reuters reported.
As developers struggle to overcome a long list of challenges after years of research and with billions in cash burned, the autonomous vehicle sector is entering a new adjustment phase.
While some investors are rethinking their initial optimism for the autonomous vehicle sector, industry players argue that the technology is finally closing in on some kind of mass adoption. Qcraft and Cowarobot, two Chinese self-driving car companies, talked to TechNode about the challenges and bottlenecks for vehicle autonomy at the BEYOND Expo 2022 tech conference, held online at BEYOND Metaverse.
The text below has been condensed and edited for clarity.
I think the biggest issue affecting the large-scale adoption of self-driving cars is the difficulty in handling various unexpected and possibly dangerous situations – we call them corner cases. Once you operate self-driving cars in a broadly defined ODD, the number of corner cases will grow, which could be significantly complex to address.
(Note: Tech companies and car manufacturers typically define an Operational Design Domain (ODD) to indicate where their self-driving car systems can operate safely. Common ODD factors include but are not limited to the time of day, weather, and road features, according to definitions set by the Society of Automotive Engineers.)
2025 could be a very crucial year for the global self-driving space, as we’ve seen some top players quickly expand their robotaxi projects in the US. I expect a fully driverless ride-hailing service will be launched in San Francisco by 2025 or 2026, when the operator will be allowed to charge fares for rides on a large scale, and its revenue could go up relatively quickly. That could be an important milestone for the entire industry and boost the adoption of AVs here in China.
Looking ahead, I also expect more measures and support from the Chinese regulators that will help remove barriers to the deployment of robocars, such as the formal legalization of AVs on public roads and the publication of a government catalog specifically for AVs. Currently, the license plates for AV testing in China are only temporary, meaning full registration is unattainable for highly autonomous cars.
(Note: China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has developed a catalog of electric vehicles. The EVs listed are allowed to go on sale and are deemed eligible for subsidies. The Chinese authorities have not issued legislation that officially authorizes self-driving cars on the country’s roads.)
If you operate AVs on a very limited ODD, current algorithms in artificial intelligence can deal with traffic situations at the human performance level. And yet, you have to avoid many unexpected corner cases as well as those that are predictable but can’t be resolved at the moment, which means self-driving cars will be limited to fixed routes or a restricted area, and where the weather is stable.
In other words, Level 4 autonomy is now achievable when it comes to specialized uses such as shuttle buses, intra-city delivery, and public sanitation services. In such cases, massive data sets are essential for artificial intelligence innovations. The key question is: how to acquire a large enough amount of data over a long period, and at what cost?
(Note: Level 4 refers to a fully autonomous system where vehicles travel from point A to point B without requiring human intervention, according to the Society of Automotive Engineers.)
Autonomous driving has been a famously capital-intensive startup business at a time when many players were used to raising outside funds to train their AV systems on huge data sets while being unable to make profits in the near term. The industry, however, is facing investor slowdown, especially in the post-pandemic era this year, as venture capitalists are seeking out those who could provide real business value with the technology.
The trend is that fundraising will be a lot more challenging for highly autonomous driving companies, or more specifically robotaxi projects, as many investors are no longer patient and will look for something more certain with a greater focus on profitability and cash flow.
Having said that, I believe self-driving car operations for commercial use could help to improve investors’ confidence and extend their patience for the entire industry.
READ MORE: Drive I/O | Meet the Chinese self-driving car startup with Google roots
]]>CATL founder and chairman Zeng Yuqun detailed on Wednesday how his electric vehicle battery powerhouse could help reduce greenhouse gas emissions for Macau and potentially revolutionize many sectors, from public transportation to urban electricity, in the special Chinese administrative region.
On Wednesday, the BEYOND Expo 2022 opens online at a 3D metaverse space. As Asia’s largest and most influential tech event, the Expo will have more than 40 talks and panel discussions where leaders and experts across sectors dive deep into the topics of consumer tech, health tech, global investments, sustainability, and Web3.
Please find below the transcript of the opening day speech from Zeng Yuqun, founder chairman of CATL. The following transcript has been edited for clarity:
It is my great honor to participate in the opening ceremony of the BEYOND EXPO 2022 and share my thoughts on the future with you.
CATL is a new energy innovative technologies company. We are committed to taking electrochemical energy storage as well as renewable energy power generation as the core to replace stationary fossil energy, thus reducing dependence on thermal power generation in energy production; taking EV batteries as the core to replace mobile fossil energy such as petroleum; taking electrification and intellectualization as the core to promote the integrated innovation of market applications, providing sustainable, affordable and reliable new energy solutions for all walks of life.
The three topics of this year’s BEYOND: healthcare, sustainability, and consumer tech, are actually closely related to CATL and the new energy industry we are engaged in.
Life sciences are the eternal theme of human beings. Environmental degradation is putting unprecedented pressure on all human beings and our earth. Disasters caused by global warming have threatened the survival and health of human beings. Therefore, it is the responsibility of every citizen of the earth to spare no effort to reduce carbon emissions.
Last year, we supplied 40% of the world’s energy storage batteries, helping to greatly improve renewable energy consumption efficiency. In the first half of this year, our EV batteries accounted for 34.8% of the global market, providing electrification solutions for 57 countries and regions worldwide. Behind this data is a huge amount of carbon emissions reduction.
On average, the entire life cycle of a pure electric vehicle contributes about 14.1 tons of carbon emissions reduction. I believe that our batteries can facilitate the electrification of more sectors and make a greater contribution to global carbon neutrality.
High quality is the key to sustainable development. The new energy industry must work hard in two directions. One is that the products must be perfect so consumers can use them confidently; the other is that the batteries must be low carbon for consumers to protect the environment.
CATL has been making efforts in these two directions for a long time. Our extreme manufacturing has improved the defect rate of battery products from PPM to PPB level, reducing it from one in a million to one in a billion. Our Ningde production base has also become the only lighthouse factory in the battery industry recognized by the World Economic Forum. Our Yibin production base achieved carbon neutrality in 2021, becoming the world’s first zero-carbon battery factory.
We are also committed to sharing our high-quality, sustainable development experience with upstream and downstream partners to help reduce carbon emissions in the entire industry chain.
The third topic is consumer tech. As electric cars continue to penetrate the market, batteries as the core power source are becoming a typical consumer technology. Over the years, CATL has been committed to leveraging innovative technologies to solve consumers’ pain points regarding range, safety, low-temperature performance, and charging speed. With the continuous improvement of battery performance, more and more consumers have joined new trends championed by battery technologies.
For example, supported by our pioneering CTP (cell to pack) technology, Qilin battery has achieved the highest integration level globally, offering 1,000 km (621 miles) range and 4C fast charging. Many OEMs received inquiries from consumers about purchasing Qilin-powered models right after our Qilin battery was launched. The first model powered by Qilin batteries will be launched in the first quarter of next year. Friends in Macao are welcome to stay tuned.
Macao is a beautiful and vibrant city. What’s next? I think in the near future, Macao can take the lead in becoming a zero-carbon city, a global model of comprehensive electrification and carbon neutrality.
In the process of “electrifying” Macao, CATL intends to facilitate Macao in three aspects. The first is the electrification of transportation. In recent years, the Macao SAR government has actively responded to the country’s call to achieve the goal of peaking carbon emissions and achieving carbon neutrality, advocated green transportation, plus a strong awareness of environmental protection among Macao residents, all of which have provided favorable conditions for Macao’s electrification.
As an experienced player in this field, CATL has the world’s leading solutions for the electrification of various transportation facilities. For the urban characteristics of Macao, CATL’s EVOGO modular battery swapping solution has outstanding advantages. The battery can be adapted to different brands and models. It only takes one minute to swap a battery block.
Our battery swap station solution highlights high compatibility, need-based battery rental, and complementarity with charging services. There are up to 48 batteries in one station, which can fully meet the high-frequency demand for a battery swap. Not only that, our battery swap station can also become the city’s UPS, ensuring the uninterrupted supply of electricity in a certain region.
Secondly, Macao boasts a well-developed water transportation network, and the development of electric ships is at the right time. CATL is the first EV battery company that has passed the approval and inspection of the latest testing guideline of the China Classification Society “Inspection Guidelines for Battery Electric Ships.” Our batteries have been widely used in electric passenger vessels, sightseeing ships, governmental maritime vessels, scientific research ships, yachts, etc., and have accumulated many solutions. Once Macao realizes the electrification of water transportation, it will be able to bid farewell to diesel smell and noise.
Also, we are poised to support energy conservation and carbon emissions reduction in Macao’s electricity consumption. Macao’s commercial electricity accounts for about 80%, and most of the electricity is not supplied locally. Therefore, improving the efficiency of urban energy utilization is an inevitable requirement for carbon emissions reduction, and energy storage can play a huge role in power transmission and distribution, as well as power consumption.
Featuring long service life, a high level of integration, and substantial safety, our energy storage system EnerOne can achieve a service life of 10,000 cycles and is compatible with converters ranging from 600V to 1500V. It covers an area of only 1.69 square meters, which is especially suitable for the application of industrial and commercial energy storage. The energy storage system can facilitate frequency regulation and a peak load of the power grid while enabling large commercial facilities to reduce electricity costs effectively.
At present, there are more than 5 million new energy vehicles in the world equipped with CATL batteries. We will innovate to develop the aftermarket, have established the world’s largest after-sales service network, and have a large number of after-sales product solutions.
Dear leaders and friends, technology creates a better life, and electrification helps achieve energy freedom. I believe that electrifying Macao will help Macao become a zero-carbon garden that shines in the world. CATL will go all out to increase investment in innovation and use the most advanced new energy solutions with the lowest carbon emissions consumption to contribute to the high-quality and sustainable development of Macao and the world.
Thank you!
]]>BYD has begun building a new portion of an electric vehicle manufacturing facility to build car components in Shenzhen, as China’s top-selling electric vehicle maker gears up to meet growing demand.
Why it matters: This is the latest example of BYD aggressively expanding key components on the supply chain, such as batteries and chips, at a time when many of its rivals are struggling with industry-wide shortages.
Details: BYD said that construction of the RMB 20 billion ($2.87 billion) industrial park has started at the Shen-Shan Special Cooperation Zone on the city’s east side after receiving official approval, according to a report by the regional broadcaster Shenzhen Satellite TV on Wednesday.
Context: BYD has been working with local Chinese governments to establish multiple new manufacturing facilities to ensure the in-house supply of crucial parts, including batteries and chips for its EVs, as part of the major player’s plan to more than double its sales this year.
Huawei on Tuesday revealed its first all-electric sports utility vehicle, the Aito M5, in collaboration with Chinese automaker Seres. The new model will compete with Tesla’s Model Y and others in the world’s biggest electric vehicle market.
Why it matters: Huawei, along with Seres, has quickly expanded its vehicle offering with two plug-in hybrid crossovers and a full-electric version, just six months after delivering the first Aito-branded vehicle in March. The telecom giant’s moves in the space could pose a serious threat to major EV makers.
Details: The Aito M5 all-electric will have an estimated driving range of 620 kilometers (385 miles), surpassing its rivals. For example, Tesla’s Model Y has a 545km driving range, EVs from German automakers BMW and Audi offer around 550km between charges.
Context: Huawei broke its delivery record with more than 10,000 EVs to customers in August, bringing the company’s total delivery numbers for this year to 39,433 vehicles as of August. Meanwhile, sales of rivals such as Li Auto and Xpeng Motors slid last month due to cannibalization by new models and increased competition.
]]>READ MORE: Li Auto deliveries halve in August while Seres and Zeekr see growth
Chinese electric vehicle upstarts Li Auto and Xpeng saw declines in August, while Huawei’s auto partner Seres and Geely’s Zeekr saw strong growth. Among them, Li Auto reported a record decline in August deliveries, more than 50%, as the electric vehicle maker’s new crossovers cannibalized sales of its existing model. Seres deliveries up28% in August while Geely’s EV brand Zeekr grew more than 42%.
Why it matters: Li Auto’s shortfall took place when Seres and Zeekr saw growth, highlighting a more competitive EV landscape and a preference among Chinese consumers to gravitate towards the latest products, according to Tu Le, managing director of consultancy Sino Auto Insights.
Li Auto’s decline in August: Li Auto’s deliveries fell more than half in August to 4,571 crossover vehicles from a month earlier, extending a month-on-month decline of 21.3% in July.
Rise of Seres and Geely: Meanwhile, Seres and Geely have both seen healthy growth in August. Xpeng Motors’ deliveries also declined by 16.9% to 9,578 vehicles in August from a month earlier, while Nio saw deliveries grow 6.2% month-on-month to 10,677 vehicles. There is a major concern about demand for Xpeng’s current models, as buyers might wait for the introduction of its G9 crossover, scheduled for delivery by year-end, as well as a retrofitted P7 sedan set to be released next year.
Context: BYD maintained its leadership in the market by delivering 174,915 vehicles last month. Tesla is expected to have delivered more than 77,000 cars from its Shanghai facilities, according to estimates by the China Passenger Car Association on Sept. 1.
Large-scale commercial operation of highly autonomous vehicles (AVs) could become a reality “sooner than expected” in China, Baidu’s CEO Robin Li said on Thursday at the 2022 World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai.
“I think it would take a longer time to commercialize Level 3 autonomous vehicles, because there remain questions about who is liable in the case of accidents involving these vehicles,” Li said (our translation).
Level 4 vehicles, however, make it clear that the manufacturer or the owner, rather than the driver, is responsible in a crash, Li added.
Level 4 refers to a fully autonomous system where vehicles travel from point A to point B without requiring any human intervention. In Level 3, also called the semi-autonomous level, the driver is still required to take over the vehicle in emergencies, according to definitions set by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE).
After operating Apollo Go (Luobo Kuaipao, in Chinese), its autonomous ride-hailing service, for the last two years, Baidu said on Tuesday that it has offered more than 1 million public robotaxi rides in a dozen of major Chinese cities as of July. The search engine giant currently operates around 500 self-driving cars in China, with plans to expand that fleet to 3,000 vehicles in 30 cities by 2023.
Baidu may be a pioneer in autonomous cars, but rivals are catching up. Chinese automaker GAC Group plans to begin piloting autonomous ride-hailing vehicles along with human-operated taxis via its mobility platform OnTime in Guangzhou later this year, General Manager Feng Xingya told investors on Tuesday. The carmaker, which produces vehicles in tie-ups with Toyota and Honda in China, has been testing robotaxis with self-driving upstarts WeRide and Pony.ai.
Although excitement over self-driving vehicles has been wearing somewhat thin globally since last year as the technology gets stuck in the slow lane, China is ramping up efforts to support the sector. In August, the central government released its first national rules for commercial autonomous ride-hailing services, while Shenzhen became the first Chinese city to establish a defined legal landscape where legislators can impose a degree of liability for car crashes involving AVs.
Li called for more uniform policies with regards to driverless cars, such as a universal standard that allows companies to remove human safety drivers in more driving scenarios, as the industry continues to face multiple regulatory hurdles to mass deployment. “The window of opportunity is fleeting,” Li added. “More efforts need to be made to push forward legal reform and open the bottleneck on AVs.”
]]>BYD on Monday reported better-than-expected profits for the first half of 2022, buoyed by strong demand for its electric vehicles and a stable supply of much-needed car components when many peers are struggling with the economic slowdown and persistent supply-chain challenges.
Despite these rosy figures, the auto major saw its stock price slide after Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway reduced its stake in the company.
Why it matters: Analysts have pushed for significantly higher stock prices, given BYD’s all-around strength in the EV operations and battery business.
Details: On Monday, BYD reported a record half-year profit of RMB 3.6 billion ($521 million), hitting the upper end of its forecasts released in July of between RMB 2.8 billion and RMB 3.6 billion, as well as surpassing last year’s total of RMB 3.04 billion.
Context: BYD’s market share in the Chinese EV market reached 24.7% for the first six months of this year, representing an increase of 7.5 percentage points from last year, thanks to strong delivery numbers.
DeepWay, a Chinese autonomous driving startup backed by Baidu, said on Tuesday that it has raised RMB 460 million (around $67.2 million) in a Series A led by Qiming Venture Partners and joined by multiple veteran investment firms.
Why it matters: DeepWay brands itself as China’s first electric vehicle startup that designs autonomous trucks from scratch for freight delivery, rather than something based on an existing truck model with minor changes, which the company claims leads to more integrated self-driving tech and reduces production costs.
Details: Jointly founded by logistics service provider Shiqiao Group and tech giant Baidu in late 2020, the two-year-old firm is now valued at RMB 3 billion by the latest fundraising round, which was led by Qiming, Chinese tech media outlet QbitAI reported, citing company insiders.
Context: Several autonomous truck companies have gotten off the starting grid early in the self-driving race in China, but the progress towards fully autonomous freight driving has been slow.
CATL and BYD are facing the prospect of cutting electric vehicle battery production after authorities in China’s southwestern province of Sichuan extended the power cuts from six days to 11 days, local media reported.
Why it matters: The extended duration of electricity outages has forced multiple Chinese auto firms to idle production for a week and sparked concerns about worsening supply-chain disruptions to the industry following the country’s strict Covid-19 control measures.
Battery production taking a hit: On Aug.20, Sichuan province extended its six-day power cuts by five days and ordered all factories to remain shuttered until this Thursday, according to a notice issued by the provincial government and obtained by financial media outlet Yicai.
LCD production also taking a hit: Sichuan’s expansion of power cuts will also lead to a 20% decrease in large-sized LCD production for TVs worldwide, Li Yaqin, an analyst from Sigmaintell, told Yicai.
Context: Sichuan’s weeks-long power restrictions have had a spill-over impact on the Chinese auto industry, with Tesla and Volkswagen’s partner SAIC having difficulties getting enough supply from local parts makers. Sichuan-based automakers Changan and Seres have also idled production facilities since Aug. 15.
Ward Zhou contributed to the reporting of this story.
]]>Tesla and Chinese automaker SAIC are turning to the Shanghai government to help with new supply chain disruptions after Sichuan province cut down power supply for six days to cope with severe heatwaves, Chinese media outlets reported on Friday. The southwest province of Sichuan is home to many auto parts makers.
The power restrictions in Sichuan and Chongqing have also forced Tesla, Nio, and Xpeng to temporarily close multiple charging and swapping stations in the region, Chinese media outlet Jiemian reported, citing feedback from car owners.
Why it matters: Automakers in China were already reeling from an industry-wide chip shortage and surging battery material prices exacerbated by the country’s Covid restrictions and the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The worsening situation in auto parts’ supply chain could force them to scale back further production in the country, a major growth market for electric vehicles.
Details: In a widely circulated letter to Sichuan provincial government, Shanghai authorities asked Sichuan to ensure basic electricity demand to 16 local parts makers. On Monday, the provincial government of Sichuan began rationing electricity supply and asked factories to shut down for six days as unprecedented hot summer weather surged the region’s electricity demand.
Chinese ride-hailing service Xiangdao Chuxing announced on Monday that it has raised more than $150 million in Series B from investors, including self-driving car startup Momenta, and said it plans to prepare for a potential initial public offering.
Why it matters: The deal marks the latest example of a partnership between a self-driving vehicle developer and a ride-hailing company.
Details: Xiangdao said it raised more than RMB 1 billion ($150 million) in a funding round, with participation from SAIC, China’s biggest automaker and Volkswagen’s Chinese partner, self-driving car company Momenta, and private equity firm Gaoxing Investment. Xiangdao is valued at $1 billion.
Context: Xiangdao was founded by SAIC in Shanghai in 2018 and later raised RMB 300 million in Series A from external investors, including Alibaba and battery giant CATL in December 2020.
General Motors’ minicar joint venture in China, SAIC-GM-Wuling (SGMW), has launched Air EV, a fully electric, entry-level car in Indonesia. The automaker hopes to expand its footprint outside China amid strong global demand for electric vehicles.
Why it matters: The Air EV is the company’s first electric vehicle launched outside China and built on Global Small Electric Vehicle, a dedicated EV platform for global markets. The automaker expects to play a role in a market dominated by Japanese auto majors.
Details: Launched at this year’s Indonesia International Auto Show on Thursday, the Air EV comes in two battery pack options – 17.3 kilowatt per hour (kWh) and 26.7 kWh – delivering a driving range of about 200 and 300 kilometers, respectively.
Context: On July 6, Wuling announced plans to launch the Air EV in India. The automaker plans to export parts and assemble them at a manufacturing plant of MC Motor India, a subsidiary of Chinese automaker SAIC Motor.
BYD has started supplying electric vehicle batteries to Tesla’s factory in Germany, Chinese media outlet Sina Tech reported on Wednesday.
Why it matters: This is the latest development in the partnership between Tesla and BYD, two of the world’s biggest EV makers. It comes two months after a BYD executive confirmed to state broadcaster CGTN that the Chinese manufacturer would supply batteries to Tesla “very soon.”
Details: For the first time, BYD begins supplying its “blade battery” to Tesla’s gigafactory in Berlin, with the first batch of Model Y vehicles with BYD batteries expected to roll off assembly lines by early September, Sina Tech reported, citing people familiar with the matter.
Context: A growing number of Chinese automakers are preferring LFP battery chemistry to traditional cobalt- and nickel-based batteries due to lower costs, better safety, and improving energy density, a trend analysts expect to accelerate globally.
On Monday, Chinese officials published a set of draft rules that will allow self-driving companies to offer rides and charge fees for fully autonomous vehicles (AVs). The move is part of the country’s ongoing efforts to become a global leader in artificial intelligence. The same day, Baidu announced it was to launch a fully driverless robotaxi service in two major Chinese cities.
Why it matters: The release of China’s first guidelines for commercial robotaxi services could establish a state framework for the rollout of self-driving technology and increase the number of AVs on Chinese roads.
Details: Published by the Ministry of Transport on Monday, the draft regulation said that authorities would “encourage the deployment of autonomous buses on limited access highways, as well as allow paid taxi-hailing services using self-driving cars for low-traffic, controllable scenarios” (our translation).
Context: China first began allowing autonomous driving road tests on designated streets in April 2018 and then expanded the testing scope to general highways in early 2021.
In 2021, Chinese automakers sold more than 1.85 million units in the overseas market, hitting a significant milestone just two decades after China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001.
Beijing’s efforts to make China an auto superpower and the long-term strategy of betting on electric vehicles are starting to pay off. China made up almost 60% of the electric vehicles exported globally in 2021, with the annual shipment of passenger EVs nearly tripling to more than 310,000 units. Analysts expect this momentum to continue, with China on course to surpass Germany as the world’s second-biggest exporter of automobiles by volume this year, just behind Japan.
However, with European and American automakers catching up to China’s success in an increasingly crowded EV field, convincing global consumers to buy China-made vehicles continues to be an uphill battle. Chinese manufacturers, known for churning out cheap, humble cars for developing regions, are struggling to move upscale and compete head-to-head against long-established European car giants for a share of the premium segment in the latter’s home market.
A look at a few carmakers that have been ushering in a wave of EV adoption in China gives a sense of how the global auto landscape might be transformed in the next couple of years. As the world, particularly Europe, reaches a critical period in its energy transition, the localization of an entire EV industrial value chain will be vital for Chinese carmakers to become a global force that upends existing significant players, according to analysts.
State-owned brands SAIC and Chery are China’s most significant car exporters, with the pair jointly accounting for nearly half of the country’s vehicle sales to overseas markets in 2021.
Morris Garages (MG), the iconic British car brand acquired by SAIC in 2008, is currently the most significant contributor to SAIC’s success. Birmingham-based MG booked sales of over 470,000 vehicles globally last year, at least 10% of which were delivered in Europe.
Another SAIC’s sub-brand, Wuling, is also increasingly gaining popularity globally. Wuling produced the top-selling EV model in China last year, the Hongguang Mini EV. Wuling’s overseas shipments reached an all-time high of 146,000 vehicles to over 40 nations in 2021.
Anhui-based Chery is one of several Chinese carmakers that made early moves to explore global markets, exporting 10 sedans to Syria back in 2001, when China was just about to join the World Trade Organization. Having established a presence in more than 80 countries with 10 manufacturing plants and 1,500 dealership stores, the country’s top passenger car exporter mainly operates in Brazil and Russia, with sales of over 37,000 and 40,000 vehicles, respectively in the two countries last year.
Chery is also the Chinese manufacturing partner of Jaguar and Land Rover. It has plans to expand its reach in Europe and the US by selling its own-branded vehicles in the two regions, chairman Yin Tongyue said in May 2020. Although few details related to this move have been revealed thus far, the company expects its car exports to nearly double to 500,000 vehicles by 2025.
Great Wall Motor and Geely are the only two homegrown private automakers in China who ranked in the top 10 by export volume in 2021, with shipments of over 143,000 and 115,000 vehicles overseas, respectively. The two automakers are pioneers of Chinese assemblers’ overseas expansion in the era of gasoline-powered cars. They have been expanding their sales networks and manufacturing presence abroad significantly in the last two years, focusing on Europe and countries connected to China’s Belt and Road Initiative.
One of China’s top-selling SUV manufacturers, Baoding-based Great Wall Motor, posted significant growth overseas last year, with shipment volume rising 104% from 2020 and accounting for about 11% of the firm’s total sales, a result of its accelerating push into overseas markets. The Chinese automaker sped past several milestones in 2021 amid a rush of positive news, such as the acquisition of a former Daimler plant in Brazil last August, followed by the launch of its regional headquarters in Munich, Germany three months later.
Great Wall also saw its second overseas plant begin operations in Rayong, Thailand, in June 2021 with a capacity to build 80,000 vehicles annually, two years after the automaker started production of its popular Haval-branded crossovers locally in Russia. The company is on track to launch an electric compact car under its Ora marque, which targets young female buyers, and a plug-in hybrid SUV under its premium EV brand WEY in Europe this year, Reuters reported last September.
The export volume of Geely’s domestic plants increased by 58% year-on-year and accounted for 8.6% of its annual sales in 2021, compared with a growth rate of 25% and a 5.5% share of total sales in 2020. The company’s footprint now covers 28 countries, with entries into Laos, Egypt, and three other states last year.
Like SAIC, the Zhejiang-based automaker expanded in Europe through partnerships with locally-based players, launching a car brand called Lynk & Co in late 2016 and forming a joint venture with subsidiary Volvo to sell the vehicles globally a year later. Reporting deliveries of 25,167 Lynk-branded vehicles overseas in 18 months as of June, the automaker operates eight retail stores in Germany, Italy, Belgium, Sweden, and the Netherlands, with plans to enter France and Spain this year.
Chinese EV upstarts Nio and Xpeng are still a long way from catching up in overseas sales with traditional Chinese auto giants, but they have pioneered new approaches to going global. For example, the Chinese EV startups are opening direct stores and service centers in European countries to build a strong brand image with quality service, something that has never been done before by a Chinese car brand on the continent.
Located at Oslo’s center of commerce and culture and opening to the public last October, Nio’s first showroom in Norway is as much planting of the company’s flag as an entry into the European market. Called Nio Houses, the two-story, 2,100-square-meter location is not only built for potential customers, but also serves a range of functions with a café, a library, and a living room for car owners on site, hoping to win over wealthy local customers.
So far, the eight-year-old EV maker is seemingly on the right track with deliveries of 327 ES8 crossovers, priced above NOK 609,000 (around $69,300), in Norway in the first four months of this year, which means the brand has already surpassed last year’s total of roughly 200 cars. The company also has plans to enter Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Denmark with the same strategy later this year and to expand its footprint to 25 countries by 2025.
Xpeng has also aggressively pushed ahead in Europe’s booming EV market and currently operates three flagship showrooms – located in Denmark, Sweden, and the Netherlands – in addition to selling vehicles through local car dealerships in Norway since December 2020. The company delivered 486 units of its P7 sedan and G3 sports utility vehicle in Europe last year, while that number reached 426 units for the first four months of this year.
However, multiple supply chain disruptions, including semiconductor shortages and soaring battery material costs, are hitting the company’s growth trajectory. The Alibaba-backed EV maker stopped taking orders for its mainstream P5 sedan in Europe in late June, citing supply chain issues.
The world’s transition to clean energy and carbon neutrality – and China’s head start in EV production – has opened up new opportunities for Chinese carmakers to become globally competitive players in electric mobility. European Union countries reached a deal in June to completely phase out internal-combustion vehicles by 2035, a target that Japan and Canada have also set; the timetable for the UK is 2030.
Experts have urged Chinese automakers to invest more to build their own supply chain networks overseas along with parts suppliers and, therefore, better leverage their technology and expertise globally, rather than just offering direct exports.
There is no easy route to performing successfully on the global stage, but it would be wise to seize the chance when it comes – and China’s EV makers seem well poised to do so.
]]>On Tuesday, the self-driving car startup Pony.ai announced that it partnered with ride-hailing company Caocao to provide robotaxi services in Beijing.
Why it matters: Autonomous driving is still a long way from commercialization. The deployment of autonomous vehicles on a familiar ride-hailing app might help Pony.ai get closer to making money from its pilot projects.
Details: Starting from Wednesday, public passengers will have the option to choose Pony.ai’s custom-made test models of robotaxi from the Caocao app on their phones. However, the robotaxis fleet of 30 or so will be restricted to a designated area in southern Beijing. A safety driver behind the wheel is not required, but each car will have a monitor in a passenger seat.
Context: In April, Pony.ai and Baidu received permits from the Beijing city authorities to offer driverless rides in an area of 60 square kilometers (23 square miles) in the city’s southeast Yizhuang district. The local government allowed the two companies to charge fares last November.
Chinese electric vehicle makers Aion, Hozon, and Leapmotor, reported record deliveries in July, overshadowing the numbers reported by leading players Nio, Xpeng Motors, and Li Auto as the landscape in the world’s biggest EV market continues to evolve.
Why it matters: Nio, Xpeng Motors, and Li Auto are facing increased competition. Traditional brands and new challengers have recently introduced an avalanche of lower-priced models to the market thanks to improving battery technologies, vastly expanding consumer options.
Details: Aion, the EV arm of Chinese state-owned automaker GAC Group, saw monthly deliveries surge about 138% year-on-year to 25,033 vehicles in July, meaning the firm has put roughly 125,000 cars into customers’ hands through the first seven months of the year. GAC, Toyota’s manufacturing partner in China, has a broad EV portfolio under the Aion marque with a price range between RMB 163,800 and RMB 469,600 ($24,218 to $69,430).
READ MORE: BYD records over 162,000 deliveries in July
Context: Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto are also expanding their product range in a fight to keep their lead positions.
Chinese electric vehicle battery supplier Gotion High-Tech made its debut on the Swiss stock exchange on Thursday, wrapping up a listing that brings it closer to European investors and will supply a $685 million war chest to fund its global expansion.
Why it matters: The deal is the biggest offering of global depositary receipts (GDRs) by a Chinese company on the Zurich-based exchange since mid-2019, when China and Switzerland began implementing a stock connect scheme that allows companies traded in Shanghai and Shenzhen to list on the Swiss exchange.
Details: Gotion, a battery maker in which Volkswagen is the largest shareholder, raised $685 million in its overseas listing ahead of the start of trading in Switzerland on Thursday, selling 22.83 million GDRs at $30 each.
Context: Gotion sold the equivalent of 4.2 GWh of batteries in the first five months of this year, giving it a 2.7% market share in the global EV battery market, according to figures compiled by South Korean industry tracker SNE Research.
Chinese automaker BYD and other manufacturers are asking workers in Shenzhen facilities to work and live in the workplace until the end of this month, as the southern Chinese city sees new outbreaks of the omicron variant, local media reported. Chinese companies often keep employees in the so-called closed-loop system so they can produce even in cases of regional lockdowns.
Why it matters: It remains to be seen whether the latest wave of the Covid-19 pandemic will again strain automakers in China, but this news shows the continued impact of Covid control measures on auto supply chains.
Details: BYD is one of the dozens of companies operating its Shenzhen factories under a closed-loop system that requires employees not to leave the plants for one week starting on July 24, financial media outlet Yicai reported on Monday (in Chinese).
Context: Other large tech companies in Shenzhen are doing the “closed-loop” system, including Huawei, ZTE, and drone maker DJI. Foxconn, a manufacturing partner of brands like Apple and Samsung, said that its Shenzhen facilities are under “normal” operation, Reuters reported on Tuesday.
China’s year-long, once seemingly never-ending investigation into Didi finally reached a conclusion on Thursday, with authorities imposing a massive fine equivalent to $1.2 billion on the ride-hailing giant over alleged violations in cybersecurity, data security, and personal information protection.
The RMB 8.02 billion ($1.19 billion) penalty, which was set at 4% of Didi’s 2021 revenues, comes as Chinese policymakers have reportedly been mulling over whether to call an end to their crackdown on the country’s technology sector in the face of the country’s slowing economy.
While Didi will now be looking to move past the year-long investigation, the Chinese mobility behemoth will have to be much more cautious about how it operates and how it deals with regulators going forward. On Thursday, the country’s internet watchdog issued unusually harsh criticism, calling Didi’s breach of data privacy and national security rules “a serious offense with negative influences.” The company said later that day that it will continue carrying out a comprehensive rectification of its operations, without giving a timeframe.
Although the fine itself won’t hurt too much in Didi’s finances, the probe is undoubtedly another landmark case for the Chinese tech sector following Beijing’s antitrust crackdown on Alibaba a year ago. So how did we get here? Below is a look back at the bumpy road that Didi has traveled over the past 12 months.
June 30, 2021 – Didi goes public in the US
July 2, 2021 – Beijing officially launches an investigation into Didi
July 6, 2021 – US shareholders sue Didi
August 9, 2021 – SoftBank scales back China investment
September 3, 2021 – Speculation is rife over probe’s end goal
December 2, 2021 – Didi prepares to quit New York
March 11, 2022 – Regulators put the brakes on Hong Kong listing plan
June 11, 2022 – Didi delists from NYSE
July 21, 2022 – Didi fined for$1.2 billion
Chinese electric car maker Li Auto is under scrutiny over quality issues after a Chinese state media outlet reported over the weekend that a new L9 model broke its suspension during a test drive.
Li Auto announced on Monday that it has expanded its warranty terms to guarantee free repairs to the suspension parts on all L9 vehicles.
Why it matters: The incident could potentially hurt the brand’s public image and impact sales of L9, its highly-anticipated electric crossover.
Details: Li Auto confirmed on Monday to Chinese media that a spring buffer part on one front wheel of an L9 became faulty after it drove over a pothole of 20 centimeters (7.9 inches) at the speed of 90 kilometers per hour (56 mph) in the southwestern municipality of Chongqing a day earlier. The automaker didn’t clarify whether the 20-centimeter refers to the width or the depth of the hole.
Context: Li Auto launched the six-seater L9 plug-in hybrid SUV on June 22, with the seven-year-old automaker claiming it provides a state-of-the-art experience to drivers at less than half the price of German-made luxury cars.
Chinese automaker BYD reported an estimated profit between RMB 2.8 billion to RMB 3.6 billion ($410 million to $530 million) in the first half of 2022 on Thursday, with the potential to beat last year’s total profit of RMB 3.04 billion. The results pushed the company’s share prices up 3.89% on the Hong Kong stock exchange on Friday.
Why it matters: The performance of BYD contrasted sharply with many other traditional Chinese automakers, which reported significant drops in profit, reflecting BYD’s ability to navigate the ongoing supply-chain challenges and an economic downturn.
Details: BYD’s estimated figures of net profit in the first half more than doubled from last year’s RMB 1.17 billion. The company attributed these numbers to strong electric vehicle sales, according to a Thursday statement (in Chinese).
Context: This rally by Shenzhen-based BYD put its market value at about $133.2 billion on Friday, maintaining its position as the world‘s third-biggest automaker during the month, although some analysts now view it as greatly overvalued.
A Tesla service center in the eastern Chinese city of Suzhou was temporarily shut down after a fire broke out on-site, resulting in multiple vehicles being damaged, state media publication The Paper reported on Tuesday.
Why it matters: Damage from the incident was captured in a video that was widely shared on Chinese social media and will likely intensify concerns about the safety of electric vehicles, one of the existing barriers to wider EV adoption.
Details: Footage of the fire posted by multiple Chinese online users showed that a Tesla in-house body repair center in Suzhou, a neighboring city of Shanghai, was engulfed by flame and thick clouds of smoke on July 8.
Context: Tesla is not alone when it comes to such accidents. Last month, the Chinese Ministry of Emergency Management reported 640 fire incidents involving EVs in the first quarter of 2022, a 32% increase from a year earlier. Battery damage, collision, and hot weather conditions are some of the leading causes.
Chinese telecom giant Huawei is entering the ride-sharing market with the launch of a standalone car-hailing app “Petal Chuxing.” The company looks for ways to expand its car-related business and diversify revenue sources as sales of its smartphones slow.
Why it matters: Huawei’s foray into ride-hailing is a natural extension of the company’s ambition to become a key player in the automotive space as the autonomous ride-hailing service has the potential to make up a significant percentage of new car sales in the long run.
Details: Huawei launched a ride-sharing app called “Petal Chuxing,” based on its navigation app “Petal Maps,” which allows users to request rides from multiple ride-hailing providers, state media publication National Business Daily reported on Friday.
Context: Huawei first launched its proprietary mapping service for overseas users in October 2020, a year after US sanctions barred the company from including Google software and services on its devices. The service now has 28 million users from over 160 countries.
]]>READ MORE: Huawei begins selling EVs in stores, may offset sinking phone sales: CEO
China’s electric vehicle industry has experienced a strong recovery in June, recording over 140% growth in passenger EV sales amid the ongoing impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and supply chain challenges, data from the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) showed on Friday.
Why it matters: The growth was driven mainly by a strong comeback from BYD, Tesla, and other Chinese auto brands like Nio and Li Auto, after Shanghai and other cities lifted pandemic-related lockdowns, showing the impressive resilience of the Chinese EV space.
Details: The CPCA said on Friday that the wholesale volume of passenger EVs in China hit a record monthly high in June with a total sales of 571,000 vehicles, a whopping yearly 141.4% increase. In June, passenger car sales, including combustion engine cars and EVs, increased by 22.6% from last year to 1.94 million units.
Context: Forecasts for the Chinese EV market have remained bullish. Morgan Stanley raised its outlook for this year’s EV sales by 24% to 5.7 million vehicles in a research note on Li Auto on Friday, Chinese media outlet Sina Finance reported.
Aito, a Chinese electric vehicle brand backed by Huawei, received more than 10,000 pre-orders for the M7 in just two hours, after it was unveiled on Monday. The new model is the brand’s second production vehicle featuring Huawei’s HarmonyOS operating system for cars.
Why it matters: While reservations do not always translate into actual sales, the M7 has captured people’s attention, signaling that Huawei is turning into a serious rival to existing carmakers since entering the burgeoning EV space about one year ago.
Details: More than 10,000 people pre-ordered the Aito M7 sports utility vehicle in the first two hours after the car brand began accepting RMB 1,000 ($149) deposits on Monday afternoon, a company spokesman told TechNode on Tuesday.
Context: Huawei and its manufacturing partner Sokon have seen a steady increase in sales of the M5, their first vehicle under the Aito brand, shipping 7,021 crossovers in June, a 40% increase from a month earlier.
Chinese automakers have moved quickly in the first five months of 2022, securing a lion’s share of the country’s electric vehicle market. The country’s EV makers are likely to keep that momentum going for the rest of the year, according to management consultant firm AlixPartners.
Domestic auto brands have extended their lead over their foreign rivals in the EV segment this year, making up 85% of all new EV sales in the first five months of 2022, up from 80% in 2021 and 74% in 2020, official figures show. This number may remain unchanged by the end of the year as Chinese brands continue to launch more new EV models than their foreign counterparts, Stephen Dyer, co-leader of AlixPartners’ Greater China business, told TechNode on Thursday.
However, as more traditional global automakers prepare to launch new EVs in the next few years, this share will likely go down due to the increased availability of foreign EVs, Dyer said, predicting an increasingly competitive environment for less experienced automakers.
China’s growing EV industry is holding up better than that for combustion engine vehicles and will likely maintain an upward trend in the coming months, despite Covid-19-related lockdown measures and supply chain constraints. AlixPartners projects that there will have been 5.1 million EV sales in China by the of the year, representing a 45% increase year-on-year and accounting for 22% of total new car sales.
With that said, overall auto sales may fall by 11% year-on-year to 23.4 million units in 2022, as stringent Covid control measures disrupt offline sales, the firm said during an online briefing on Thursday. Meanwhile, supply chain issues will continue to be a headwind for Chinese automakers until 2024, when chip supply issues will largely be resolved, allowing China’s auto sales to return to normal growth rates, according to Dyer.
Chinese EV makers have been moving upmarket and squeezing most international competitors out of their home market. Major Chinese automaker BYD’s EV sales more than tripled to 507,314 units as of May this year, driving its market cap to nearly $130 billion and making it the third-largest automaker in the world in early June.
SAIC-GM-Wuling, a joint venture between General Motors, SAIC, and Wuling Motors, is by far the country’s second-biggest EV maker, with sales of 164,552 vehicles over the same period, mostly thanks to its affordable Hongguang Mini EVs. US-listed EV makers Li Auto and Nio last month launched their new electric crossovers with price tags starting from RMB 459,800 ($68,418) and RMB 468,000 respectively, aiming to take on luxury carmakers such as BMW and Mercedes-Benz.
Tesla and Volkswagen are the only two global automakers with a major presence in the Chinese EV race, selling around 172,000 and 54,000 vehicles respectively to local customers from January until May. In November, Volkswagen moved to replace its China head Stephan Wöellenstein, in part due to lower-than-expected EV sales, according to a Reuters report. The German automaker announced on June 17 that it has set up a regional China board with a new leadership team that includes Marcus Hafkemeyer, a former adviser at Huawei, as technology chief.
]]>Chinese auto chip startup Horizon Robotics on Monday announced that it has secured a new round of funding from state-owned automaker FAW Group, the latest example of local automakers upping their investment in the domestic semiconductor sector to cope with a prolonged global chip shortage.
Why it matters: The investment reflects Chinese automakers’ growing anxiety about the ongoing semiconductor constraints that have crippled them for more than a year and show no signs of abating amid recent Covid-19 outbreaks in the country.
New money influx: Horizon Robotics plans to use the proceeds to speed up the development of new auto chips for artificial intelligence computing and its software development, the company said in an announcement (in Chinese) on Monday. The funding amount remains undisclosed.
Persistent chip shortages: Last year, China only made 5% of the auto chips it consumed, according to figures published by US research company IC Insights and obtained by Caixin (in Chinese). Chinese automakers’ production has been hit by the low self-sufficiency in auto chips and an ongoing chip shortage, creating more demand for building more domestic auto chip firms to fill in the growing demand.
Context: China has for years been building an independent domestic chip supply chain, reporting a 33.3% year-on-year increase in domestic output of integrated circuits (ICs) last year, according to data released by China’s National Bureau of Statistics.
Two people were killed after a Nio testing car plummeted off the third floor of a parking garage at the company’s Shanghai headquarters on Wednesday. The electric vehicle maker claimed that its vehicle was not at fault in the accident.
Why it matters: If the vehicle was not at fault, the incident should not greatly impact Nio’s vehicle sales. However, it potentially delivers another blow to the company’s reputation following a high-profile accident involving a Nio car last year.
Details: Based on preliminary investigations by the local police, there is no indication that the deaths of the two testing workers were related to an issue with the vehicle, Nio said on Thursday in an announcement published on the Chinese Twitter-like platform Weibo. It was not immediately clear what caused the crash.
Context: Last year, Nio’s credibility took a hit when a 31-year-old Chinese entrepreneur died in a car crash while driving his Nio ES8 with the car’s driver-assistance functions activated. Nio notes in its user manual that the company’s technology currently requires active driver supervision and does not make the vehicle autonomous.
US-listed Chinese electric vehicle makers Xpeng Motors, Li Auto, and Nio are undergoing significant restructuring as rising costs of raw materials and supply chain disruptions cut into profit margins. Meanwhile, EV battery makers are upping their investment to increase production capacities as China continues an accelerated shift to EVs.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s premium series on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them.
Having enjoyed exponential growth over the past two years, Chinese electric vehicle startups are showing signs of contraction as supply chain constraints and rising raw material costs (partly worsened by the Covid-19 pandemic) continue to weigh on the industry.
Facing a serious slowdown in economic growth and a resurgence of Covid-19 outbreaks, the US-listed Chinese EV trio of Nio, Li Auto, and Xpeng Motors are undertaking thorough reorganizations, laying off workers, and shifting away from non-core projects to meet their growth targets. The companies have been handling these challenges relatively well, but the outlook going forward is a bit unclear.
Xpeng Motors: Xpeng is facing a significant setback in its global ambition. Several senior executives, including vice president of overseas sales He Liyang, recently left the Guangzhou-based automaker amid a comprehensive restructuring across the company meant to streamline operations and save expenses, Chinese media LatePost reported on May 26, citing people familiar with the matter. The departures come after the EV upstart experienced lackluster sales of merely 438 vehicles in Norway in 2021, while leader Tesla took a nearly 20% market share in the country as it delivered more than 20,000 EVs over the same period, according to official figures.
In an effort to pare back losses, the Alibaba-backed EV maker is trimming its sizable staff in several major divisions, including a software team developing intelligent cockpit solutions and its data management department. As part of the change, Zhao Hengyi, a tech lead on Xpeng’s in-car voice assistant, left his position in March. The company also cut some of its plans of cultivating some fresh graduates, with dozens of them recently having their job offers rescinded.
Xpeng has been known to spend cash more quickly compared with peers. It posted a record loss of RMB 1.7 billion ($268.3 million) in the first quarter of 2022, widening from RMB 1.29 billion in the previous quarter. Analysts had warned of more losses to come from April to June due to high material costs and recent Covid lockdowns in China. The company earned a gross margin of only 12.2% during the first three months of this year, far lower than the 22.6% and 14.6% posted by rivals Li Auto and Nio, respectively.
Li Auto: A relative latecomer in a competitive industry, Li Auto is also facing a critical juncture and has scaled down some of its recruitment plans as it anticipates tough times ahead, the LatePost report said. Eight-year-old Li Auto recently lowered its delivery target for this year by 15% to 170,000 vehicles and planned to recruit 2,000 fewer people than it had initially planned, as the company worried about sales performance in the face of an economic downturn.
In anticipation of it becoming harder to get capital as investor sentiment worsens, Li Auto is also downsizing. Since March, the company has cut 20% of its full-time employees in its enterprise system development team after a large hiring spree, while dismissing some workers in its camera research and development team, formerly set up by then technology chief Wang Kai, LatePost reported.
The Meituan-backed EV maker was hit harder than rivals by the recent wave of Covid-19 lockdowns in the country, seeing its April deliveries down 62% and its second production model delayed amid the current supply chain disruption. The cuts could help the automaker reduce costs and survive a looming recession, yet investors were disappointed when the automaker forecast an even lower revenue target and warned of a worse margin for the second quarter of 2022.
Nio: Once the front-runner in the field of Chinese EV startups, Nio is making a pivot to battery-making, with plans to develop and potentially manufacture its own battery packs. The move marks a revamp of company strategy that comes as soaring material costs and supply chain bottlenecks slowing its factory output. Speaking to analysts during an earnings call on June 9, chief executive William Li said that the company now operates a team of over 400 employees on battery technologies and plans to launch an 800-volt battery pack for fast charging in 2024.
A new $32.8 million research facility is also slated for construction near its Shanghai headquarters this summer, aimed at developing lithium-ion battery cells and packs. This is in line with the EV maker’s battery strategy of both in-house development and outsourcing, a move that Li believes will benefit Nio’s overall competitiveness and profit-making capability in the long term. The company has warned that battery price hikes will continue to weigh on its margins in the second quarter.
Meanwhile, the company is reorganizing its autonomous driving team, which is at the core of its long-term ambition to become China’s top luxury car brand, following the departure of a long-time vice president of engineering in April. A team of more than 400 engineers, who work on diverse technology domains including sensors, algorithms, and system integration, has been reassigned to other departments to flatten the management structure for communication and combine functions where appropriate, Chinese media 36Kr reported.
Despite automakers’ short-term adjustments, the long-term prospects for China’s EV market remain robust with strong consumer demand. In response, major battery makers have kicked off a fierce expansion race in the hope of scaling up supply to meet the demand and take a larger market share. Government-backed industry group the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) has maintained its forecast of 5.5 million passenger electric vehicle sales for this year in China despite the ongoing Covid-19 outbreaks across the country.
Here are some of the major players’ expansion plans:
CATL is moving to become more directly involved in lithium mining in order to make its own supply of the EV battery material, thanks to soaring prices. The Chinese battery giant recently won approval to build a new lithium plant with a mining claim on nearly 1,600 acres in the central province of Jiangxi, state media CLS reported on June 1, citing government documents. The new RMB 2 billion ($297 million) facility would be capable of producing 30,000 tons of battery-grade lithium carbonate annually and is scheduled to be in production in 2023.
BYD is making a similar move and is said to be on the verge of closing deals to acquire six lithium mines in Africa, which experts estimate could allow the company to produce about 1 million tons of lithium carbonate, which translates into at least 27.78 million EVs. A BYD executive confirmed that it will supply lithium-ion batteries to Tesla “very soon” earlier this month. There has also been speculation that Nio and Xiaomi are looking at sourcing batteries from the company as well.
Gotion High-Tech is the latest Chinese battery maker to expand its local production by partnering with prominent players like Volkswagen and Great Wall Motor. The battery supplier announced (in Chinese) on May 31 that two new facilities have been put into production with a combined capacity of 30 gigawatt-hours (GWh) each year. The company is on track to double its total capacity to 100 GWh by this year and expand that number to 300 GWh in 2025.
]]>On Tuesday, Li Auto announced the L9, a full-size, three-row sports utility vehicle, as part of its stated ambitious plan to achieve 1.6 million vehicle sales by 2025. The car’s starting price is less than half that of similar offerings from the likes of BMW and Mercedes-Benz.
Why it matters: With delivery planned to begin in August, the six-passenger L9 SUV will be the second production model from Li Auto and the Chinese EV maker appears to be confident that it might become a hit.
Details: The L9, a plug-in hybrid, is described by the company as the pinnacle of large luxury SUVs, with what it says is a spacious interior specifically for Chinese three-generation family households. The automaker said the model offers passengers more room than other luxury automaker offerings.
Context: Meituan-backed Li Auto has been at the forefront of the Chinese EV field with just one model on sale, recording deliveries of 90,491 Li One vehicles in 2021, a 177.4% increase from a year earlier. The sales number is close to the sales of all three of rival Nio’s models over the same period combined.
]]>READ MORE: Drive I/O | Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto face more challenges after a mixed 2021
Apple has launched a hiring program to bring on software engineers in China, helping more automakers use CarPlay software.
Why it matters: The tech giant sees potential in the country’s burgeoning transition to intelligent and electric vehicles (EVs). The move could improve Apple’s ability to target local business customers, provide software solutions tailored to Chinese consumer tastes, and add a major player to the Chinese connected car market.
Details: Apple is looking for an unspecified number of “Car Experience Partner Engineers” who can help advance Apple’s CarPlay software and services for auto partners as they look to integrate the mobile technology into their cars more easily, according to a job post on the company’s website.
Context: News of the hiring comes as Apple unveiled a forthcoming version of its CarPlay software on June 6, which the US tech giant said can be deeply integrated into car dashboards and provide a familiar but auto-specific interface for drivers, according to Reuters.
On Wednesday, Nio announced a new electric sport utility vehicle, the ES7, which the Chinese EV maker says boasts top-notch self-driving technology at a competitive price tag. The newly-launched model is expected to compete with similar vehicles from the likes of BMW and Mercedes-Benz.
Why it matters: Nio chief executive William Li hopes the latest model in a growing family of premium electric vehicles will grab a significant share of the Chinese luxury car segment and help the company challenge BMW as a market leader.
Details: Nio said that the ES7 will feature the necessary hardware for automated driving in all traffic scenarios, including 11 cameras, one lidar sensor, and an array of nearly 20 radar and ultrasonic sensors. The car will also offer customers three different battery options, with the smallest, at 75 kilowatt-hours (kWh), expected to be able to manage around 485 kilometers (301 miles) on one full charge.
Context: Nio’s growth has slowed considerably over the past year in comparison to competitors, and the challenges the Shanghai-headquartered EV maker faces are growing as its two major rivals Xpeng Motors and Li Auto are set to launch similar offerings to the ES7.
READ MORE: Drive I/O | Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto face more challenges after a mixed 2021
]]>Drone maker DJI is about to see its in-car system used on a mass-produced electric vehicle for the first time through a partnership with SAIC-GM-Wuling (SGMW), General Motors’ China joint venture with SAIC Motor and Liuzhou Wuling Automobile, a small Chinese automobile company. On Thursday, the automaker announced that it will launch an EV using DJI’s automated driving technology, making it the drone maker’s first major project in the competitive sector.
Why it matters: The launch marks a first milestone for the world’s largest maker of consumer drones in its push into the Chinese EV space and reflects the growing trend of traditional automakers partnering with tech companies to bring self-driving cars to market.
Details: The automaker said that it has worked hand-in-hand with DJI in developing intelligent vehicles since 2019, investing “several billions of RMB” in the project and having undergone 1 million kilometers (631,371 miles) of vehicle testing, in a statement (in Chinese) published Thursday on SGMW’s WeChat account.
Context: DJI first launched its auto unit in 2016 and operated with nearly 1,000 employees as of last year, as the Shenzhen drone unicorn steps up its efforts to enter China’s booming EV market.
BYD on Tuesday unseated Volkswagen and became the world’s third-biggest automaker by market capitalization. The milestone came at the same time when the Chinese automaker also announced plans to supply batteries to Tesla.
Why it matters: This is an unprecedented high for BYD, reflecting investors’ excitement around the Chinese automaker’s potential to be a dominant force as the auto industry makes the transition to EVs.
Details: BYD’s market capitalization as of Tuesday was $128.8 billion, as shares in the Shenzhen-listed automaker rose 6.4% to hit an intraday high of RMB 320.47 ($48) on Monday, according to market valuation data.
Context: BYD is among the biggest winners in China’s decade-long push into green energy vehicles and has maintained strong momentum despite coronavirus outbreaks and lockdowns. The company made sales of 507,314 vehicles for the first five months of 2022, up 348% compared with a year earlier.
Note: This article was first published on TechNode China (in Chinese).
Hillhouse Capital is a top investment institution whose investment moves are often regarded as trendsetting when related to US-listed Chinese firms. This year, the firm’s latest investment disclosure showed its new position: heavily selling Chinese EV trio Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto, reorienting several bets in e-commerce, and keeping investments in biotechnology with some adjustments.
The detailed investment moves can be found in a report filed by HHLR Advisors, the fund management arm of Hillhouse. HHLR Advisors filed its first-quarter 13F form on May 16, a quarterly report required to be filed by institutional investment managers overseeing at least $100 million in assets. It discloses their holdings and acts and is something of a cheat sheet for investors assessing their own positions.
In the first quarter, HHLR held 64 stocks in the US stock market, 13 fewer than the previous quarter. Hillhouse sold holdings of 17 well-known companies (including Airbnb, Amazon, and Coinbase) from their portfolio, adding four Chinese companies. The total holdings of the institution were $4.8 billion, down 26% from the previous month.
Half of Hillhouse Capital’s top 10 stocks are from US-listed Chinese firms: Beigene, JD.com, Legend Biotech, Vipshop, and iQiyi. Among the 64 stocks held by Hillhouse Capital in the first quarter of this year, 24 were Chinese firms, accounting for about 38% of the total amount.
Hillhouse Capital has reduced its holdings of Legend Biotech, ZTO Express, Li Auto, Mogu, and Huazhu Hotels Group since the first quarter of this year and cleared its holdings of Boss Zhipin, as well as Nio, Pinduoduo, and Xpeng.
The institution has also increased its holdings in Vipshop, JD.com, Ke Holdings, and Acm Research. Didi, Full Truck Alliance, Futu Holdings, and a number of EV firms were added to Hillhouse Capital’s portfolio in the first quarter. Its holdings in Sohu, Uxin, Yatsen Holding, and another 11 Chinese companies remain unchanged.
Hillhouse invested in Didi, Full Truck Alliance, and Ke Holdings before they went public, so, the invested shares of these companies, which were previously private investments, were converted into American Depositary Shares (ADS). Hillhouse Capital participated in Didi’s Series D+, two strategic rounds with Full Truck Alliance, and Ke Holdings’ Series D, according to enterprise database Qichacha.
Hillhouse heavily sold off its holdings of China’s electric vehicle trio Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto. Hillhouse sold all of its shares in Nio and Xpeng, only retained part of its shares in Li Auto, and reduced its holdings by more than half to 2.51 million shares compared to the fourth quarter of 2021.
In addition to Hillhouse Capital, Susquehanna International Group, The Goldman Sachs Group, and a number of other investment institutions also reduced their holdings (in Chinese) of the three EV makers’ stocks in the first quarter. Meanwhile, BlackRock, UBS, and other institutions that increased holdings in the trio saw their market positions shrink, with their books showing losses.
The increased amount of selling and the shrinking values are partly due to the EV companies’ stock performance. In the first quarter of this year, the stock prices of Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto fell by 33%, 45%, and 19%, respectively.
The trio is trading at a much lower price than their respective all-time highs, despite achieving fast growth, as they face a possible delisting from the US market and show no signs of turning a profit any time soon.
Last year, shipments from Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto increased (in Chinese) by 109.1%, 263%, and 177.4%, respectively. Annual revenue increased by 122.3%, 259.1%, and 185.6% respectively, compared to 2020. The cash flow and gross margins of the three companies also saw improvement in 2021, according to their financial results.
In the first quarter of this year, Nio delivered 25,769 new vehicles (in Chinese), a growth of 28.5% year-on-year. Xpeng sold 34,561 vehicles, 59.1% more than the same period last year. Li Auto delivered 31,716 vehicles, a yearly increase of 152.1%. Xpeng’s revenue grew 159% compared to the first quarter of last year to RMB 7.5 billion ($1.1 billion); its net loss was RMB 1.7 billion, a year-on-year increase of 116%. During the same period this year, Li Auto made RMB 9.6 billion in revenue (168% growth), while its net loss reduced by 97% to RMB 10.9 million.
This March, the three firms were added to a provisional list for possible delisting from the US stock markets by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In response to this, both Li Auto and Xpeng listed in Hong Kong late last year, while Nio moved a little slower but was ultimately listed in Hong Kong in March by way of introduction. Nio also debuted in the Singapore stock market, becoming the first automaker to list on three different stock markets.
Shi Jinman, Sealand Securities’ chief analyst, focusing on the auto industry, told TechNode that traditional automakers are profit-oriented, whereas newcomers often operate on losses to chase growth. Shi added that the three automakers referenced above can not compete with bigger traditional companies for now, but nonetheless offer some promise in a demanding market.
READ MORE: Drive I/O | Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto face more challenges after a mixed 2021
Another major adjustment in Hillhouse Capital’s holdings came in the e-commerce sector, making a variety of different decisions for its holdings in Pinduoduo, Mogu, JD.com, and Vipshop.
Data shows that HHLR started to build positions in Pinduoduo in 2018 when its stock price was at a low level of $16. At the end of 2020, Hillhouse Capital held over 10 million shares in the firm, making it the investment institution’s largest position at the time. In 2021, the number of active buyers on Pinduoduo surpassed those of Alibaba for three consecutive quarters, and its stock price rocketed to over $212 in the first quarter of 2021. Alibaba overtook Pinduoduo again in the fourth quarter of 2021, and Hillhouse Capital responded fast, reducing its holdings by about 91.8% in the younger firm. At this point, Hillhouse Capital had made about 10 times its initial investment in Pinduoduo. Now, as Pinduoduo’s rapid growth has slowed, its stock price has also fallen back to around $40, and Hillhouse Capital has made a clean exit.
By contrast, Mogu has proven to be a flop for the investment firm. Mogu started as a shopping guide provider but missed the social e-commerce trend started by Xiaohongshu and hasn’t been able to make a pivot to other more successful verticles. Although it had a short-lived revival thanks to livestream e-commerce, the firm’s stock price now hovers below $5. Hillhouse Capital pushed for the merger of Mogu and Meilishuo, but after Mogu went public in 2018, its market value fell by 60% within the six-month lockup period, showing a steep decline. Mogu’s current market value is just RMB 19.1 million, with Hillhouse Capital losing 99% of its investment. Hillhouse Capital has gone from Mogu’s largest shareholder to its third-largest, reducing its holdings by more than 91% in the first quarter. However, it is yet to complete a full exit.
In the third quarter of 2020, Hillhouse Capital took a position in JD.com when the firm’s strategy to focus more on China’s lower-tier cities paid off, with the number of annual active buyers increasing by more than 100 million (in Chinese) for two consecutive years. Yet, Hillhouse reduced its holdings in the firm in the following three quarters, before once again increasing its holdings by nearly 30% in the third quarter of 2021. JD’s number of active buyers continued to grow to 570 million in the fourth quarter of 2021, according to JD’s annual report. In the first quarter of this year, that number grew to 580.5 million, and Hillhouse’s latest position in JD.com is nearly double what it was in the fourth quarter of 2021.
Hillhouse Capital has simultaneously built its position in Alibaba and Vipshop since the first quarter of 2021 and followed the same strategy in the following two quarters. In the fourth quarter of 2021, Hillhouse sold 24,560 shares in Vipshop and cleared its holdings in Alibaba. According to its financial report, Vipshop performed poorly in the fourth quarter of 2021, with revenue of RMB 34.1 billion, a 5% year-on-year fall. Its net profit was RMB 1.4 billion, falling 41.7% compared to the same quarter last year. The firm had 49.3 million active users, losing 3.7 million users in 2021.
In the first quarter of this year, Vipshop’s revenue, profit, and user numbers continued to fall. Still, Hillhouse Capital’s holdings in Vipshop more than doubled from the fourth quarter of last year, making the firm one of Hillhouse Capital’s top 10 holdings for the first time.
JD and Vipshop represent Hillhouse Capital’s second and seventh largest positions, at $488 million and $199 million.
Li Chengdong, an indepent analyst focusing on e-commerce in China, wrote in an analysis published on NetEase News that Vipshop now has a mature operation model along with loyal users and notable suppliers. The firm has built barriers to competition in its sector and built a unique advantage, which explains Hillhouse Capital’s expanded bet on Vipshop.
Biotech has been Hillhouse Capital’s most outstanding bet and also one of the most important categories that the institution holds. In the last two years, biotech-related stocks have represented 40% of Hillhouse Capital’s holdings, with the market cap of biotech companies at one point becoming the top category, surpassing that of tech companies.
The pandemic has made biotech stocks hot trades for the past two years. Nowadays, biotech firms have gradually cooled and entered a more serious and competitive phase. Compared with the fourth quarter of last year, Hillhouse Capital’s positions in BridgeBioPharma, CytekBiosciences, GossamerBio, InstilBio, and MereoBiopharma have remained unchanged. However, the market caps on their positions have decreased by 23% to 39%.
Hillhouse Capital has also begun to adjust its holdings in medical tech firms, clearing its positions in Prometheus Bio, Rallybio, Regenxbio, and more, and reducing its holdings in Chinese firm Legend Biotech from 11.805 million shares to 6.9 million shares. Following this adjustment, Legend Biotech fell from the third-largest holding of Hillhouse Capital to the fifth-largest.
Hillhouse’s shares in the other two Chinese biomedical stocks, Beigene and I-Mab, remained unchanged, with their market caps ranking first and 11th among Hillhouse Capital’s holdings, respectively. In total, Hillhouse Capital owns more than 10% of the three biotech companies (Legend Biotech, Beigene, and I-Mab), according to Shanghai-based financial data firm Wind.
Founded in 2011, Beigene is one of the four leading drug developers invested by Hillhouse Capital that researches PD-1 cancer drugs. Hillhouse Capital’s investment has covered the whole life cycle of Beigene. According to Qichacha, Hillhouse participated in Beigene’s Series A, Series B, and two private placement rounds after the firm’s US and Hong Kong IPOs.
In December 2021, Beigene succeeded in listing in China, thus becoming the only innovative drug company listed on three different stock markets. From participating in the $74.5 million Series A financing in 2014 to participating in the $2.1 billion private placement in 2020, Hillhouse Capital has bet more than RMB 8 billion on Beigene.
The research and development of innovative drugs generally come with heavy a upfront investment, a long development cycle, and high risk. Financial results show that Beigene has been in the red for seven years since its listing in the US.
In the first quarter of 2022, Beigene’s revenue was RMB 1.9 billion, a 50% yearly decrease. Its net loss fell almost tenfold to RMB 2.9 billion compared to the same quarter last year. In the first quarter, sales of Beigene products increased by 146% yearly. Among them, global sales of Zebutinib, a medicine used to treat cancer, hit $104.3 million, a 372% growth compared to the first quarter of 2021.
Hillhouse Capital held a position of 5.5 million shares in Beigene on the US market until the first quarter of this year. As of May 25, the stock price of Beigene was $123. Given the market valuation of $103 billion disclosed in the F13 document, Hillhouse Capital has suffered a loss of about $360 million due to its position in Beigene.
As of May 25, Hillhouse Capital’s holdings in Legend Biotech represent a surplus of $18.7 million, and its holdings in I-Mab a loss of $40.9 million.
As many US-listed Chinese stocks trade at a lower price, Hillhouse Capital has bucked the trend to increase its holdings in such firms, demonstrating its optimistic view of China-related assets. Yet the gradual disappearance of traditional Chinese tech giants such as Alibaba in its top 20 positions shows the institution’s appetite for higher growth assets. Hillhouse’s continuous adjustments of certain stocks also reflect the significant changes in the structure of the Chinese e-commerce industry over the years.
Hillhouse Capital is noted for its precision and high return on investment, but no investment firm is entirely infallible. The firm’s track record is impressive, and its dealings potentially offer some valuable insight into oncoming market trends, but ordinary investors should always be wary of blindly following any institution when it comes to playing the stock market.
]]>China announced a broad campaign on Tuesday in which 26 automakers will create incentives for people in rural China to buy electric cars, in an attempt to revive flagging car sales after a wave of coronavirus lockdowns hit the country’s economy.
Why it matters: The move is Initiated by policymakers as part of a larger scheme to boost big-ticket purchases and battle the deepening economic fallout from the Covid-19 pandemic.
Details: A total of 26 auto firms, including BYD, state-owned SAIC, Volvo’s parent company Geely, and GAC’s EV subsidiary Aion, are joining a series of online promotional campaigns targeting car buyers in rural areas and lower-tier cities in at least 11 Chinese provinces.
Context: Beijing has pledged to mitigate the adverse effects of the Covid-19 outbreak on the auto industry, including cutting vehicle purchase taxes up to RMB 60 billion ($9 billion). In addition, multiple local governments have unveiled new cash subsidies and announced new vehicle quotas to stimulate car purchases.
Local Chinese governments are releasing economic stimulus packages to boost consumption, including measures targeted at boosting car sales, as Shanghai gradually emerges from a two-month Covid-19 lockdown.
Why it matters: The latest government measures, ranging from voucher programs to new quotas, could be a sign of recovery in China’s auto sector, which has seen production halted and raw material prices surged amid a spate of recent Covid-19 outbreaks across the country.
Details: Many Chinese cities have released a host of measures to help boost demand for cars as part of their economic stimulus package. The Shanghai municipal government on May 29 unveiled (in Chinese) 50 stimulus measures, which included giving out 40,000 new car plates and handing out cash incentives for gas car owners trading in for EVs.
Context: China’s central government has pledged to strengthen the current state subsidy to EV makers to encourage auto sales, as the latest wave of Covid-19 cases has disrupted auto parts supply chains and forced carmakers to drop their outlooks for the year.
Nio is building a new battery research and development center near its headquarters in Shanghai, intending to develop and use new types of battery cells in its electric vehicles (EVs), a Shanghai government filing showed on Monday.
Why it matters: Nio’s move is part of a growing trend among automakers attempting to develop their own batteries to secure an advantage in China’s fast-growing EV segment, which has been hit by supply chain bottlenecks in recent months.
Details: The facility will be approximately 22,090 square meters (roughly 237,775 square feet), and located in the city’s northwestern Jiading district. It will involve an investment of around RMB 219 million ($32.8 million), according to a filing (in Chinese) by the environmental assessment firm conducting a feasibility study for the project.
Context: Nio has been sourcing cells manufactured by Chinese battery supplier CATL and assembling them into battery packs at one of its factories in the eastern city of Nanjing since mid-2019, in addition to undertaking in-house production of electric motors.
READ MORE: Nio, Xpeng, Li Auto see dismal April deliveries as coronavirus lockdowns disrupt production
]]>Xpeng Motors released first-quarter earnings on Monday night, giving a second-quarter forecast that fell far below estimate. The company said it has made progress in ensuring the production against the backdrop of a global shortage of chip and battery supplies, but investors remained concerned that a prolonged supply crunch and China’s strict Covid-19 measures will hurt margins this quarter.
Why it matters: Xpeng is joining a long list of Chinese tech companies facing a challenging quarter with production cuts and profits squeezed. The company expects deliveries to fall between 31,000 and 34,000 units in the three months until June, compared to the 34,561 vehicle deliveries in the first quarter of 2022.
Details: On Monday, Xpeng reported revenue of RMB 7.45 billion ($1.2 billion) in the first quarter of 2022, up 152.6% from the same quarter last year. However, net loss more than doubled year-on-year to RMB 1.7 billion. The company’s share prices fell 5.5% on Monday.
Context: Earlier this month, rival EV maker Li Auto also delivered a gloomy revenue forecast for the second quarter, expecting up to RMB 7.04 billion, which is 36% lower than previous estimates, with the company citing supply chain issues related to Covid-19 lockdowns in China. Li Auto’s vehicle delivery plunged by 62% in April from the previous month to 4,167 vehicles, with Nio’s and Xpeng’s volumes nearly cut in half over the same period.
READ MORE: Nio, Xpeng, Li Auto see dismal April deliveries as coronavirus lockdowns disrupt production
]]>Top automakers such as Tesla and SAIC (Volkswagen’s partner in China) are slowly rolling towards a restart after weeks of shutdowns of their plants in Shanghai, China’s worst coronavirus outbreak site, in two years. Baidu and self-driving unicorn Pony.ai received permits to offer fully autonomous rides to the Beijing public in late April, the first service of its kind in the country. Domestic battery suppliers saw profits plunge in the first quarter amid rising raw material costs, thanks to a strong demand for electric vehicles (EVs) that utterly outstrips supply.
Shanghai’s Covid outbreak continues to weigh on auto production through May
Drive I/O is TechNode’s ongoing premium series on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode subscribers.
As Tesla and Volkswagen’s plants in Shanghai slowly resume production, China’s auto industry is struggling to regain the momentum lost during a citywide lockdown that has dealt a significant blow to local businesses over the past two months. Government officials said on May 13 that employees from 95% of the companies on a whitelist of 666 firms prioritized for business resumption are now getting back to work, with automakers and suppliers accounting for more than a third of the total.
China’s biggest automaker SAIC said on May 13 that its joint facilities with Volkswagen and General Motors have restarted production in mid-April in a single shift rather than their usual two shifts, with each plant assembling at least 2,000 vehicles every day. As a result, Tesla shipped out another 4,000 locally-made vehicles to Europe on May 15, four days after its first shipment of 4,767 cars set sail from the Port of Shanghai – the first to do so since the start of the sweeping lockdowns in the city, Chinese media reported.
Supply chain hurdles: Disruption related to labor and supply chains continues to impact auto firms, as many workers can’t return to their workplaces due to inflexible Covid-19 control restrictions in many parts of the city. Tesla’s Shanghai facility reportedly idled most of its production lines for a few days earlier this month due to insufficient supplies, when Aptiv, one of its key parts suppliers, halted shipments of some parts due to new Covid cases at its local plant.
Auto supplier giant Bosch has only experienced a partial recovery with output at around 30%-75% of its pre-pandemic levels at several manufacturing sites, a result of worker shortage and supply chain crunch, its China president Chen Yudong said at a May 11 press conference, while also calling for the easing of Covid restrictions.
The auto firms that have resumed operations represent only a fraction of the 20,000 parts suppliers, big and small, located in Shanghai and nearby regions, state-owned media outlet China Newsweek reported on May 11, citing several experts.
Weak Q2 guidance: Analysts expect output to slightly recover in May but believe a full recovery is still some way off, as the industry struggles with massive uncertainty caused by Covid lockdowns. Li Auto, which has a production base in the eastern city of Changzhou, was among the automakers hit hard by the lockdown, releasing poor second-quarter revenue guidance on May 11 due to a likely disruption to parts supplies.
And yet, there is still a chance to make up for lost sales in China during the rest of the year if automakers can ramp up car output, given that a growing number of consumers feel safer traveling alone than taking public transport, experts say. In April, Tesla maintained its forecast of at least 50% annual growth for vehicle deliveries this year, despite saying that production volume could take a hit of 8% in the second quarter due to a month-long production halt at its Shanghai facility. The China Passenger Car Association predicted that total passenger vehicle sales may face zero growth to remain at 20.1 million units this year, compared with 2021’s growth rate of 4.4%.
Driverless cars get a push from China’s capital
In a rare step, Beijing authorities announced on April 28 that Baidu and Pony.ai have been authorized to participate in the country’s first pilot program to provide driverless rides to the public in test vehicles. Following the move, Baidu and Pony.ai began by operating 10 and four autonomous vehicles, respectively. The vehicles operate without safety drivers on public roads in an area of 23 square miles in the city’s southeast Yizhuang district. However, each vehicle has a company employee overseeing the journey in a passenger seat, and the firms are not allowed to charge a fee for now.
Chinese self-driving car companies have faced a long and arduous reality check since a wave of early hype and hopes of scaling the technology. Now, regulators are giving the industry a boost by permitting the offering of autonomous services to the public in the country’s capital city – with no human safety driver at the wheel. Concurrently, the race to prove robotaxis are a viable business is intensifying among the top contenders.
AVs undergo reality check: Despite the milestone in Beijing, few of China’s self-driving car startups are making any money, and venture capitalists have been cooling on the companies over the past year, particularly those with little to show commercial prospects. Total investment activity for robotaxi companies fell by 22% annually to $8.4 billion in much of 2021, data compiled by startup data platform PitchBook and obtained by Reuters showed.
Major players are working hard to live up to their promises. WeRide became China’s first self-driving company by testing completely driverless cars in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou in July 2020. In January of this year, its fleet of 300 autonomous vehicles had logged 10 million kilometers after four years of testing. For Baidu, that number is more than double, and the tech giant said that it provided more than 320,000 autonomous rides in eight domestic cities as of last year, with plans to expand the service to 65 cities by 2025.
Chinese battery makers’ profits slump amid supply chain issues
Drops in Q1 profit: Despite being buoyed by strong demand for electric vehicles in the country, Chinese battery makers are facing a profit squeeze as the global supply chain continues to buckle under the pressure of rising costs, limited raw materials, and manufacturing disruption. On April 29, CATL reported a year-on-year profit tumble of 41% to RMB 977 million for the three months that ended in March, which came in far below expectations of a RMB 5 billion profit from multiple analysts. It was CATL’s first quarterly decline in net profit since 2020. Meanwhile, profits of the Volkswagen-backed Gotion declined 33%, while Sunwoda, a lesser-known supplier invested in by EV maker Li Auto, also saw a 26% decline in profits despite double-digit revenue growth.
Q2 easing expected: Margins for battery makers have been dragged down by surging raw material costs made worse by the Russia-Ukraine conflict and a global pandemic. An index for battery-grade lithium prices increased by 127% in the first quarter of this year, after a 280% surge in 2021, according to data provider Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. The costs of nickel and cobalt also exploded during the first three months of this year, which hit battery suppliers hard since many of them had negotiated quarterly price terms with automakers for the period up to last December.
Analysts estimate that the supply shortage of raw materials will slightly ease starting in the second quarter of 2022 as battery suppliers step up efforts to secure minerals and expand production capacity. Margins are also expected to improve as most battery makers increased the prices of their products in March by at least 15% for the second quarter, China Securities Journal reported on April 28, citing company sources. This rally in material costs has been reflected in the recent price increases for EVs, ranging from RMB 2,000 to RMB 30,000, although analysts expect that EV sales will maintain their growth momentum this year, boosted by inflated oil prices.
]]>Xpeng Motors and Li Auto recently rescinded some job offers given to fresh college graduates as a recent Covid-19 outbreak and strict lockdown controls put stress on Chinese businesses, local media reported on Thursday.
Why it matters: The cutbacks indicate that Chinese electric vehicle (EV) companies are adopting more conservative and selective hiring practices as they navigate a time of economic uncertainty. EV makers are also facing rising battery material costs and semiconductor shortages, putting pressure on their earnings.
Details: A college graduate surnamed Wang, who had received a written offer from Xpeng last year and was supposed to begin work this summer, has had his job offer rescinded, according to a Thursday report by Chinese video outlet Houlang.
Context: A broader hiring slowdown is on the way across sectors in China, as the country prioritizes strict pandemic control.
Correction: Xiaohongshu’s layoff number has been updated from an earlier version of this article.
]]>Qcraft, a Chinese autonomous driving startup, said at a Wednesday conference that it is partnering with ride-hailing firm T3 to bring self-driving vehicles onto the latter’s ride-share network in the eastern city of Suzhou. T3 users within the range of those vehicles’ routes will soon be able to select one for a ride.
Why it matters: The partnership is the latest example of driverless tech firms rushing to work with more consumer-facing companies as they aim to commercialize autonomous driving tech.
Details: Starting from July, Qcraft and T3 will begin offering rides to public passengers using self-driving cars within a restricted area in Suzhou, a neighboring city of Shanghai, where the companies are already testing the vehicles.
Context: Other Chinese self-driving car companies are racing to launch commercial autonomous ride-share services either by themselves or with partners.
On Wednesday, China’s ride-hailing giant Didi urged US investors to vote yes on delisting its shares from New York. Didi said it can’t pursue a new listing as it faces a cybersecurity review launched last July by Chinese regulators, which still has no clear end in sight.
Why it matters: The company said in a filing to the US’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that the completion of Beijing’s cybersecurity review is “a prerequisite” for seeking approval for another listing, which implies a further delay for Didi’s plan to list in Hong Kong instead.
Details: Didi will only be able to complete a cybersecurity review on the condition that the company removes itself from the New York Stock Exchange, according to the filing.
Context: Didi initially announced plans to delist from the US and seek a new Hong Kong listing back in December. But the company had halted the process when it failed to meet the requirements on data security compliance, a March statement confirmed.
Despite being hit by China’s latest wave of Covid-19 cases and struggling to ramp up production amid the country’s related lockdowns, Bosch continues to view China as a hugely important market and remains committed to the country in the long term, the company’s China president said on Tuesday.
Covid-19 lockdowns have “had no impact” (our translation) when it comes to business development decision-making for the Chinese market, Chen Yudong, the president of Bosch China, told reporters during a virtual conference. Chen added that the company plans to extend its hiring spree by opening up 4,000 positions in China this year, as part of its long-term efforts to meet strong local demand and drive innovation in key technologies.
Bosch China has been running its local manufacturing sites using the so-called closed-loop system where workers eat and sleep on-site at its facilities, as government and industry groups work hard to help businesses return to normal. However, the German group has so far only achieved a partial output recovery to around 30-75% of its pre-pandemic level, with that number varying among Bosch’s different products and factories, as a result of a shortage of workers and disrupted supply chains, according to Chen.
The world’s biggest auto parts supplier is now seeing “positive signs of recovery” as the pandemic begins to ease in China, although production will take time to fully recover, according to Chen. He called for more government measures to lift restrictions on auto firms in light of a long supply chain that requires collaboration and coordination across the industry.
China’s auto industry has been dealt a major blow over the past month, as operations in some of its most important locations have ground to a halt due to restriction measures aimed at curbing a nationwide Omicron outbreak. Total passenger vehicle output in April fell 41.1% to around 969,000 units compared to the same time last year, according to figures published by the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) on Tuesday. Sales of SAIC, China’s biggest auto manufacturer, were down 60% year-on-year to 166,600 units last month, while Tesla sold just 1,512 locally-made vehicles over the same period, down from 65,814 cars sold in March.
Some foreign businesses have scaled back plans to increase investment in China and have lowered their business forecasts for this year because of the country’s strict Covid-19 measures, CNBC reported on May 10, citing a survey released by the American Chamber of Commerce in China. Chen expected Bosch China to reach a “small” annual growth rate of less than 10% in sales for 2022 (our translation). The company reported revenue of RMB 128.6 billion ($19.1 billion) in China in 2021, up 9.6% from 2020.
Two of Bosch’s manufacturing facilities in Shanghai and the northeastern city of Changchun were temporarily closed early last month, according to a Reuters report. Production restarted a few days later, as the German parts maker was featured on an April 17 “whitelist” of 666 companies that were prioritized to resume operations by the Chinese government. Both SAIC and Tesla were also on that list, although the US electric vehicle giant was reportedly forced to suspend production for a second time as it was unable to secure enough components.
READ MORE: Automakers in China still face many hurdles as some resume production
]]>Nio and Li Auto’s vehicle deliveries halved in April compared to the previous month, while Xpeng saw a nearly 41% drop. These Chinese EV upstarts have cut production as China fights a new wave of widespread coronavirus outbreaks with frequent lockdown measures since late March.
Why it matters: The massive drop comes as a wave of omicron cases and strict lockdown measures have led to severe supply chain and logistical disruptions to automakers and parts suppliers in Shanghai and surrounding areas, a major auto manufacturing hub for the country.
Details: Li Auto took the biggest hit among the main Chinese electric vehicle (EV) makers, reporting a 62% monthly drop to 4,167 vehicle deliveries for April. Nio saw vehicle deliveries plunge nearly 50% to 5,074 units in April from a month earlier, while Xpeng’s volume dropped 41.6% to 9,002 over the same period.
Context: The China Passenger Car Association projected total passenger vehicle sales in China in April will plunge to 1.1 million units, a 31.9% drop compared to the same period last year, as the auto industry needs time to recover from the effects of the pandemic.
Huawei has lowered its forecast for its car deliveries in partnership with various automakers this year due to worsening supply chain issues impacting the country’s auto industry, according to senior executives.
Details: Speaking to analysts on Tuesday, Huawei’s rotating chairman Hu Houkun confirmed that the company has scaled back its expectations for car sales and is now seeking support and understanding from the auto industry as it “is susceptible to making mistakes” as a newcomer (our translation).
Context: Sales of the Aito M5 appear to have run into a brick wall, with just over 5,000 vehicles sold during the first quarter of 2022. The luxury crossover, powered by Huawei’s HarmonyOS operating system, was launched at a price of RMB 250,000 ($39,053), but the base model cost will be increased by RMB 10,000 starting from May 5. The companies behind the model blamed soaring raw material costs for the price hike.
BYD reported an impressive increase in sales in the first quarter while extended Covid-19 lockdowns in eastern and northern Chinese regions hit other automakers hard, according to the latest official figures released on Monday.
Why it matters: The sales figures highlight China’s accelerated shift from petrol and diesel engines to electric vehicles (EVs) and clean energy. It also showed the continued impact of supply chain disruption on the auto industry, worsened by the Russia-Ukraine war and Chinese authorities’ lockdown measures in controlling the coronavirus outbreaks.
Details: BYD’s sales jumped 179.8% year-on-year, reaching 291,378 vehicles in the first quarter of 2022, while FAW and BAIC saw their sales slide by more than 20% compared to a year ago, figures from the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) showed Monday.
Context: Industry experts are concerned about the Chinese automotive sector slipping into lower gear this year as supply chains face mounting strains such as the rising cost of raw materials and frequent lockdowns.
Although Nio, Xpeng Motors, and Li Auto recorded explosive growth in 2021, the US-listed share prices of the Chinese EV trio still trade much lower than their all-time highs. As the poster children of China’s electric vehicle revolution, the three automakers reported in March mixed results for 2021, with record revenue and significant losses.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s ongoing premium series on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode subscribers.
All three EV makers have seen doubled revenues and deliveries surge in their home market. And yet, having lost a total of nearly $10 billion in just 2021 alone, the US-listed EV trio is still struggling to make money. The share prices of Nio and Xpeng have slumped to under $30, falling over 60% from their respective highs two years ago, as they show no signs of turning a profit any time soon while facing risks of delisting from US exchanges.
Xpeng is expanding at a faster pace and higher cost than its competitors. In 2021, the company posted its biggest net loss in its eight years of operations, while revenue more than tripled to nearly RMB 21 billion ($3.3 billion). Li Auto has managed to make its business more efficient than its rivals, reporting a net loss of RMB 321.4 million last year, which is less than one-tenth of Nio’s and Xpeng’s losses. Nio’s sales growth slowed markedly last year, and yet the company earned the most among the three, thanks to its higher-margin luxury cars.
Strong growth: Xpeng stole a march on Nio in the Chinese EV space in 2021, with its deliveries jumping 263% year-on-year to 98,155 vehicles. Nio, meanwhile, delivered 91,429 vehicles with a 109.1% yearly growth rate, Li Auto delivered 90,491 vehicles. Although Xpeng delivered the most vehicles among the three EV companies, it earned the least due to a lower selling price of RMB 196,000 for its offerings, almost a half of Nio’s and Li Auto’s prices.
Heavy losses: With an aggressive expansion of its sales footprint and production capacity, Xpeng reported a record loss of RMB 4.86 billion last year, exceeding Nio’s RMB 4 billion for the first time over the past four financial years. Nio’s annual loss was 24.3% lower than a year ago, helped by growing sales, but the company expects to double its spending on research and development this year to ramp up the development of its self-driving technology. Li Auto once again proved to be better managed in terms of profitability. It increased net profit by 175% to RMB 295.5 million in the fourth quarter and kept annual losses far lower than competitors.
New models: All three companies promised to speed up the launch of new models to keep their businesses strong, despite an intensifying global supply chain crunch. Nio began deliveries of its first sedan ET7 to customers in the eastern city of Hefei on March 28, with deliveries of its second sedan ET5 expected to start in September. In addition, the company is rushing to launch ES7, a new medium-sized SUV featuring its latest assisted driving technology, in the third quarter. During the same period, Xpeng is expected to deliver its second SUV model G9, in the hopes of grabbing a share of the high-end market from its peers. Meanwhile, Li Auto, which currently only has one model, will launch its second SUV L9 by June of this year, chief executive Shen Yanan confirmed during its earnings call on Feb. 25.
New plants: All the three EV makers are expanding their manufacturing capacities aggressively as orders continue to grow faster than supply. Nio’s second factory, scheduled for completion in Hefei in the third quarter, has the potential to produce 300,000 vehicles a year, the same capacity as its first plant, according to CEO William Li during the company’s earnings call on March 25. Both Xpeng and Li Auto plan to have three plants in the country by the end of 2023 with a total capacity of at least 500,000 and 750,000 vehicles, respectively, executives told investors during their earnings call. However, production could be disrupted by various supply chain shortages in the short term, while Xpeng CEO He Xiaopeng expects this situation to improve starting the second half of this year.
Looking ahead, the Chinese EV trio is still under pressure to capture demand and drive profitable growth in the short term. They face severe production problems due to chip shortages, rising material prices, and the recent lockdowns in Shanghai and nearby regions. Still, the companies are plotting a path to profitability in the long term, with some analysts expressing optimism about the EV upstarts achieving these goals. The gross margins for Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto had improved to 18.4%, 12.5%, and 21.3% last year, respectively, and executives say that the companies could break even no later than 2024.
As the industry faces challenges with supply chain constraints, including rising battery prices and a chip crunch, the sequential improvement in Li Auto’s gross margin could be “more limited” in 2022, Bernstein analysts led by Eunice Lee wrote in a March 1 note. And yet, that number could reach 25% in the longer term, as production volumes ramp up and fixed costs decline, Lee added.
]]>The Shanghai factories of Tesla and SAIC started producing again on Tuesday following weeks of lockdown due to a wave of omicron infections that have put the country’s auto production in a deep freeze. However, further halts loom large, as many other auto parts makers struggle with getting government permits to restart operations.
Why it matters: China’s auto industry is still far from getting back to total production. This week’s resumption is limited, and the wider industry faces various challenges, such as supply chain shortages and a limited workforce.
Short-staffing: Although Tesla and Volkswagen partner SAIC got their employees back to work earlier this week, smaller auto parts makers on the government’s whitelist for business resumption are facing challenges in putting their workers on assembly lines.
Logistics disruption: Despite easing restrictions from Shanghai authorities, automakers are having trouble getting parts and materials as new lockdowns across the country continue to hit the auto supply chain.
New rules to resume production: Shanghai released a new guideline on April 16 to help companies prepare for resuming production.
Shanghai and Changchun, two of China’s major auto hubs, have been swamped by the highly contagious omicron variant of the coronavirus. The outbreaks, coupled with China’s strict epidemic control measures, have resulted in a huge blow to April auto sales. Now auto executives and analysts say that the impact could cripple the whole industry if the lockdowns remain unchanged.
“All Chinese car manufacturers will have to stop production in May, if there is no way for those in Shanghai and suppliers nearby to restart operations and production,” He Xiaopeng, chief executive of Xpeng Motors, said Thursday on his Weibo microblog (our translation).
The Xpeng leader is not the only boss to express deep concerns about the consequences of China’s current wave of lockdowns. Richard Yu, chief executive of Huawei’s consumer business group and smart car solution unit, said on Friday that technology and manufacturing businesses linked to suppliers in Shanghai could “stop altogether” in May if a solution is not found soon. “This is especially the case for the auto industry, and the economic loss could be huge,” Yu wrote on his WeChat Moments feed, according to a report by Chinese media Sina Tech (our translation).
Auto giants are already feeling the pain of lockdowns that began in Changchun early in March and were extended later that month to Shanghai. Auto sales in Shanghai and Changchun, the capital city of northeastern Jilin province, have ground to a halt. The Shanghai outbreak could lead to a sharp 20% drop in vehicle sales, the China Passenger Car Association said earlier this week.
Meanwhile, Volkswagen’s auto sales in China tumbled 23.9% year-on-year to 754,000 units for the first quarter, which the company’s China CEO Stephan Wöllenstein on Thursday attributed to lockdown measures and chip shortages.
Tesla has been forced to halt assembly lines in its Shanghai factory since late March. General Motors is eking out some limited output with partner SAIC in Shanghai by asking workers to sleep on factory floors, while multiple major auto suppliers such as Bosch and Aptiv have suspended production, Reuters reported.
China’s auto industry is now enveloped in a “perfect storm” with lockdowns added to the existing problems like semiconductor chip shortages and raw material disruptions due to the Russia-Ukraine war, said Stephen Dyer, a managing director at consulting firm AlixPartners.
“The bottom line is that unless China can stamp out COVID completely, this uncertainty will hover over the entire sector like a dark cloud,” said Tu Le, managing director of consultancy Sino Auto Insights.
Both Dyer and Le expressed confidence that the industry can be on a path toward recovery if lockdown measures loosen soon, but the industry will see major losses if lockdowns continue in the long run.
He Xiaopeng’s Thursday Weibo post noted that some of the related government officials are now “working hard to coordinate” reopening activities. Nio on Thursday also said that it is restarting operations in its plant in the eastern city of Hefei as the supply of key components improves slightly, without revealing details.
“The silver lining is that it is still only April so any lost production from late March can be made up via overtime in the rest of the year,” said Le from Sino Auto Insights. A similar sentiment is being expressed by AlixPartners’ Dyer, “If production halts are relatively short, it is possible for vehicle production and sales to quickly make up for production stoppages so that annual sales are less affected, as was the case in 2020.”
In addition, auto companies are now doing everything in their power to minimize damage and prepare for a rebound. SAIC-Volkswagen is reportedly (in Chinese) working 24 hours a day to track their shipments of components and is in contact with more than 500 suppliers to ensure supply. Volvo’s parent Geely has been assigning its employees to guard the highway junctions to transport goods from Shanghai with its own fleet, according to an April 11 report by Chinese media Caixin.
The immediate focus is on business recovery rather than profit. “Profit margins will be squeezed but their priorities right now should be to get production back online the second they get that thumbs up,” Le said.
]]>Top automakers Nio, Tesla, and Volkswagen, are temporarily closing their plants in China as a new omicron-led coronavirus outbreak spreads through the country. Following China’s covid zero policy, cities rush to implement lockdowns, creating broken links in the local supply chain.
Why it matters: The spread of the highly transmissible omicron variant is the latest hit to automakers in China after struggling for months to cope with raw material and parts shortages resulting from continued high demand and now worsened by the Russia-Ukraine war.
Details: Nio, Tesla, and Volkswagen have closed their assembly plants in China – without providing a targeted return-to-work date.
Context: China’s overall car production volume could slump by 20% with the current omicron outbreak, Cui Dongshu, Secretary General of the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA), said on Monday during an online conference, without giving a timeframe.
Struggling with a global shortage of semiconductors and a sharp increase in the cost of battery materials, an increasing number of Chinese automakers are raising prices for electric vehicles (EVs). Geely, BAIC, and Chery has become the latest companies to implement pricing changes, following BYD, Xpeng, Li Auto, and others.
Details: Chery Automobile, a manufacturing partner of Jaguar Land Rover, said Wednesday on its Weibo account that from April 7, price increases on its vehicles will range from RMB 2,900 to RMB 5,000 ($456 to $786), without giving a breakdown of the specific price increases for each of its models.
Context: A surge in the cost of battery raw materials such as nickel, driven by an ongoing supply chain crunch and the Russia-Ukraine war, has triggered a series of price hikes throughout the Chinese auto industry over the past few weeks.
READ MORE: Drive I/O | Chinese EV makers face price hikes as nickel prices soar, Didi to enter EV market
]]>Shares of Nio, Xpeng Motors, and Li Auto rose sharply on Friday after the three Chinese electric vehicle makers announced a solid set of delivery numbers for March.
Why it matters: The March deliveries reflect a strong recovery from the impact of the Lunar New Year holiday season on EV production and sales, which resulted in falling deliveries in February.
Details: Xpeng has remained the fastest-growing EV maker ahead of its two peers, beating its first-quarter delivery expectation, with shares closing up 5.8% on Friday, followed by Li Auto’s 5.5% and Nio’s 4.2%.
Context: During their fourth-quarter earnings calls in March, all three EV makers voiced concerns about the impact of supply chain issues on sales and production in the coming months.
Since last week, more than 10 Chinese electric car makers have raised prices for their EV models, prompted by the significant increase in raw material costs. Analysts say that the price hikes will not hurt vehicle sales in the short term due to an already high order backlog, but also predict that companies will change prices more often in the future to meet their sales targets.
Some of the biggest names in the EV market have led the price hike. In March, Tesla raised prices for two premium versions of its China-made Model Y electric crossover twice in less than a week. Chinese EV giant BYD on March 15 announced it was lifting prices for most of its vehicle lineups, after it upped prices two month previously to address government EV subsidy cuts. Among the 11 carmakers that raised their prices in recent weeks, EV startup Leapmotor enacted the biggest hike, increasing its list prices by as much as 15%, or RMB 30,000 ($4,710), while state-owned automaker SAIC introduced the lowest price rises on average, with a 1.2% hike, or RMB 2,000, according to data compiled by TechNode.
A major reason behind the rise in EV prices is the “very strong” growth in the Chinese market, making it harder for raw material suppliers to keep up with demand, Peter Li, a Credit Suisse analyst, said on Tuesday during the company’s Asian Investment Conference.
EV battery makers have been scrambling to secure supplies of key ingredients, such as lithium. In mid-January, the cost of battery-grade lithium carbonate was 569% higher compared to two years ago, according to figures from Benchmark Mineral Intelligence. Lead battery maker CATL raised its price by RMB 20,000, Chinese media Yicai reported Monday.
Major battery suppliers have now directly linked their pricing mechanisms to raw material price changes rather than adjusting their rates on an annual basis, due to the volatile commodity market. “That’s why we are seeing further battery price hikes in the second quarter,” Li said, adding that the trend will continue in the next two years, pushing potential price surges throughout the industry value chain from material suppliers to battery makers to car manufacturers.
Credit Suisse expect the lithium supply deficit to be expanded from 37,000 tonnes in 2021 to 101,000 tonnes this year, around 18% of global demand, and commodities prices to remain high at least until 2024, due to EVs’ growing popularity in China. Sales of new energy vehicle sales (NEVs) in China, mainly EVs and plug-in hybrids, skyrocketed 154% year on year to 3.52 million units in 2021, according to official figures.
Analysts anticipate the price hike won’t have a major impact on automakers’ deliveries in the short term, thanks to major players enjoying massive backlogs of orders in the market.
The waiting time for new orders of Tesla’s locally-made Model 3 sedan is now 20 to 24 weeks, compared with only six weeks last April, while the waiting time for Xpeng’s P7 is at least 12 weeks. BYD chairman Wang Chuanfu said in November that the company’s orders for its various models had reached an all-time high of 200,000 and it had to spend four months on average to deliver a vehicle, Chinese media reported.
In the longer term, Chinese EV makers could implement more flexible pricing strategies, lowering prices at the cost of their margins to ensure growth, if the current high demand for EVs slows down later this year. Some automakers are already preparing for more pricing adjustments, which means they could provide promotions or discounts to maintain their volume targets if demand starts to weaken during the second half of this year, Wang Bin, a Credit Suisse analyst, said at the investment conference.
EV makers could also change prices more frequently to attract new buyers, as the industry is transitioning towards a revenue model based on software subscription services rather than car sales, said Lu Shengyun, an independent adviser to entrepreneurs and CEOs. Passenger EV sales could grow by 84% year on year to 5.5 million vehicles this year, industry group the China Passenger Car Association said in January.
Electric vehicles “is a strategically important direction for automakers. They will sacrifice margin to offset the impact from rising material cost,” Wang added.
Ward Zhou contributed to the reporting of this story.
]]>Nickel prices climbed to an all-time high and could further increase the cost of electric vehicles (EV) and force automakers to cut earnings forecasts. Ride-hailing giant Didi became the latest Chinese tech company to enter consumer EV space; it plans to deliver an entry-level sedan next year. Shares of Nio closed flat in the company’s Hong Kong trading debut. Its listing follows the steps of Xpeng Motors and Li Auto. All hope to attract more investors in China amid growing financial market tensions between China and the US.
Soaring nickel prices cast shadow over Chinese EV players
Drive I/O is TechNode’s ongoing premium series on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode subscribers.
As the price of nickel jumped to an all-time high since early March, auto industry insiders expressed concerns that an escalating Russia–Ukraine conflict could disrupt supplies of the metal, a key component of EV batteries. While watchers have differing views about the impact on EV adoption, most expect battery prices to remain high and to weigh on the margins of Chinese EV makers for the rest of the year.
Nickel craze: Nickel markets had a wild ride early this month. On March 8, the price of three-month nickel on the London Metal Exchange (LME) more than doubled in a short period, reaching an all-time high of $101,365. The unusual surge prompted LME to halt trading for seven days, set new price limits, and adjust prices. When it reopened, the price dropped back down to around $80,000, yet still about 300% higher than the $20,000 price in late February.
Higher cost for EVs: Nickel’s price surge is magnifying the current supply chain woes that have dramatically pushed up automakers’ production costs. The global semiconductor shortage and a boom in the prices of other metals have been the principal factors.
Impact on EVs: Predictions vary among experts of how nickel’s price hikes could affect the EV supply chain and affordability for customers.
Didi’s first consumer EV could hit the roads in 2023
News: China’s red-hot EV market just added another competitor as struggling ride-hailing platform Didi reportedly plans to develop its first consumer car in-house. The compact EV could begin mass delivery as early as next June, according to a local media report on March 15. With an estimated price tag of RMB 150,000 ($23,580), the new model will be an entry-level compact sedan competing with existing offerings such as BYD’s popular Qin EV, the report said. The company is said to have more than 1,700 staff dedicated to the project at its Beijing headquarters. In addition, it is considering a deal to buy Zhijun Auto, a little-known EV manufacturer with a plant in central Jiangxi province.
Insights: The launch of a consumer car might create a new revenue stream for Didi as its core business falters. The project can also cover the high cost of developing autonomous driving technology, an initiative the company has undertaken since 2016. The move would also see the Chinese mobility giant lining itself up to compete with big auto names such as BYD, which is also its manufacturing partner.
Didi had a rocky start in its first attempt to produce an EV with BYD. The D1 was a purpose-built electric crossover for ride-hailing services developed by the two companies. It entered into production in late 2020, six months later than expected, the report said.
Didi’s ride-hailing volume reportedly declined to 20 million trips per day in January, a 20% plunge from daily figures in the first quarter of 2021. Over the same period, the company’s ride-hailing market share in China has shrunk from nearly 90% to 70% due to Beijing’s ongoing cybersecurity review of the company that began last July.
Nio shares debut in Hong Kong secondary listing
News: Chinese EV maker Nio made a weak debut in Hong Kong on March 10, closing down 0.69%. The listing took place after a long and winding journey. Already listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Nio has followed in the steps of rivals Xpeng Motors and Li Auto by tapping into Hong Kong’s capital markets. However, Nio did not sell new shares or raise money, and it chose to list by introduction. Xpeng and Li Auto, on the other hand, raised HK$14 billion and HK$11.8 billion, respectively, by selling shares in Hong Kong in the summer of 2021.
Insights: Nio explained the move by saying it hopes to attract more investors by enabling more listing locations and flexible trading hours. A Singapore listing may be another possibility. The Hong Kong locale does bring the Shanghai-based EV maker closer to mainland investors and provides the automaker insurance against the risk of delisting in the US. But Nio said it had “a sufficient pool of working capital,” according to financial media Caixin (our translation), and did not have an urgent need to raise additional funds.
Plagued by a shortage of semiconductor chips and batteries, among other supply-chain headaches, Nio has posted lackluster monthly sales volumes for several months. Sales of Nio’s existing three models have been slow. Its first sedan, the ET7, is scheduled for delivery later this month. The company hopes to catch up: It plans to begin delivering its second sedan, the ET5, in September and to launch a sports utility vehicle (SUV), its fourth, by year-end.
]]>In February, BYD overtook a Volkswagen’s joint venture in China (SAIC-Volkswagen) to become the second-largest passenger vehicles maker in the country, thanks to a surge in the company’s plug-in hybrid vehicles sales, industry data showed on Tuesday. Another Volkswagen Chinese joint venture, FAW-Volkswagen, kept its top seller position.
Why it matters: This marks the first time that sales of a Chinese automaker have overtaken that of a long-established Volkswagen joint venture, as homegrown private companies ride a wave of strong demand for electric vehicles.
Details: Last month, BYD’s passenger vehicles retail sales grew 340% from last year to 89,000 units. Retail sales of SAIC-Volkswagen dropped by 19% to around 80,000 vehicles compared to the same timeframe the previous year, according to figures published Tuesday by the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA).
Why BYD sold well: Industry analysts attributed BYD’s rising sales to stronger domestic demand for plug-in hybrid cars and the company’s capability to offer a wide range of plug-in hybrids.
Context: The Shenzhen-based BYD has also seen faster growth in electric vehicles sales, recording a more than sevenfold sales growth year-on-year in February with 88,283 deliveries, which were almost evenly split between all-electrics and plug-in hybrids.
The annual meetings of the National People’s Congress (NPC) and the advisory Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) being held this week are most important for the windows they provide into the government’s economic targets and policy priorities in the coming year.
But the so-called “two sessions” meetings also enable some top private enterprise executives who are members of the two bodies to present recommendations for policy directions publicly. This year, airing perspectives from tech industries were founders of Tencent, Baidu, NetEase, Xiaomi, and Geely. Their recommendations perhaps won’t be taken up by government authorities this year but might merit serious official consideration in future years.
READ MORE: China’s Two Sessions 2022: More 5G, rural e-commerce, semiconductors, and other tech priorities
In his ninth year as an NPC delegate, Pony Ma, founder and CEO of Tencent, urged more emphasis on the digitalization of pillar industries, standardized processes, and customized support for specialized high-tech enterprises. He also warned about the market risks inherent in the emerging sectors of the metaverse, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and Web 3.
With regulatory risks remaining a major concern for tech giants, the billionaire’s comments largely aligned with the government’s bigger picture initiatives ranging from digital transformation to the call for large enterprises to fulfill their social responsibilities and work toward carbon neutrality. Ma made no comments about online gaming, a key revenue source for his company and an area in which many other delegates advocated for harsher regulation.
Ma also called for the government to build a social emergency network for sending disaster warnings and coordinating rescue resources by learning from the flood relief experiences in Henan and Shanxi last year. He suggested mobilizing local groups like community volunteers, food and package delivery workers, and ride-hailing drivers to be trained for natural emergencies.
Robin Li, founder and CEO of Baidu, focused his remarks on autonomous driving and green computation. He urged the government to give more support so China can take the lead in commercializing fully autonomous driving. Specifically, he suggested government support for companies testing autonomous cars without safety drivers, preparing roads for automated cars, and building smart transportation infrastructure.
Li also proposed the creation of more green AI services as a way to achieve China’s goal of reaching carbon neutrality by 2060. China should optimize AI algorithms to minimize carbon emissions and develop big models that cut energy consumption. He also recommended public data centers set up ways to measure their carbon emissions.
According to NetEase founder and CEO Ding Lei, building a global intellectual property (IP) platform for exchanging cultural IP, digital video, and musical content should be a national priority. It’s an area that NetEase, the parent of popular music and video streamer NetEase Cloud Music, has already tapped this year with the launch of the beat trading platform BeatSoul in January.
Ding also called for more research on sodium-ion batteries as an alternative to the more popular lithium-ion ones to lower the price of batteries. In addition, recycling and rental services for lithium-ion batteries were also proposed as possible measures to address the issue.
Lei Jun, co-founder and chairman of Xiaomi, recommended the government improve consumer electronic waste recycling and set unified standards for monitoring carbon emissions of new energy vehicles (NEVs). Not coincidentally, the smartphone maker made plans to build its own electric vehicles last year.
Lei called to consolidate three core processes (trading of used products, reproducing, and scrap dismantling) into one recycling system. Government should pay more attention to safeguarding former owners’ privacy in the recycling process, Lei said, by setting up third-party organizations to erase personal data found in second-hand devices.
Lei urged the government to build high-voltage fast-charging stations for NEVs on a large scale. He also suggested the government build a national platform to help different companies jointly develop fast charging and other essential techs.
Li Shufu, founder and chairman of automaker Geely, proposed that battery-swapping stations be built across the country, so more people could adopt NEVs without worrying about finding charging stations.
Li called for regulators, industry groups, and market players to establish unified and generalized standards for swapping technologies. The government should green light rules to speed up approval for swap stations’ land use and cut red tape involved in getting permits to sell swappable electric vehicles (EVs), Li said.
Although Tesla CEO Elon Musk views battery swapping as an “unlikely” solution and many others worry about the technology’s scaling problems, Chinese companies are jumping into the market in the hope that the service can work at scale in the world’s biggest EV market. Separation of the battery from the vehicle, along with battery-leasing options offered by carmakers, could also reduce the upfront purchase price of EVs, which could increase competitiveness and boost adoption. Beijing showed its support for the technology by defining swap stations as complementary to charging facilities in its “new infrastructure” investment plan for 2020.
]]>Note: This article was first published on TechNode China (in Chinese).
Ever since Huawei announced its push into the Chinese electric vehicle (EV) space last year, the industry has been watching the telecom giant’s moves.
Huawei had some modest successes in the past year, first partnering with BAIC and Changan on their self-driving technologies. It also provided the powertrain system to a little-known Chinese automaker Seres, and its SF5 model debuted last April.
Now it looks like the tech giant has pinned its hopes on a new car model released in partnership with Seres. Last December, the two companies released Aito M5, the first EV model equipped with HarmonyOS, Huawei’s alternative to Google’s Android operating system. (Huawei developed Harmony after Washington banned Google from working with Huawei in 2019.)
On Feb. 18, TechNode China had a chance to test drive the Aito M5 in the southwestern city of Chongqing, home of the Seres’ factory. So how did Huawei do in EV tech? Here are our takeaways.
Aito M5 is the first luxury EV model manufactured by Seres. The hybrid sports utility vehicle claims to reach 1,242 km (772 miles) on a single charge and tank, with a price range from RMB 249,800 to RMB 319,800 ($39,518 to $50,592). By comparison, Chinese EV maker Li Auto’s plug-in hybrid crossover Li One, the best-selling medium-to-large size SUV in China last year, features a maximum range of 1,080 km and is priced from RMB 338,000.
The in-car version of the HarmonyOS shares a similar design language with Huawei’s smartphones along with some of the most frequently-used features. For example, we could activate most of the car’s functions by voice control. The car dashboard also has a shortcut bar for fast access to the most used features.
Aito M5 came with many apps, including a navigation map app, streaming services such as Tencent-backed Ximalaya FM, and Alibaba’s Youku. You can use Youku to watch videos or relax with music or audiobooks while driving when stuck in traffic. An alert system will also notify users of significant changes in road traffic.
Huawei’s ability to integrate its ecosystem with the car differentiates Huawei from other EV players. Huawei devices, smartphones, tablets, smartwatches can seamlessly work with the vehicle. Phone calls and messages could be synced on Huawei’s devices, including the car’s dashboard. That will probably become one of the biggest competitive advantages for rival EV players.
Huawei also brought a powerful in-car voice assistant called Xiaoyi to the car. The assistant is powered by Huawei’s in-house cloud infrastructure. During the test drive, the assistant provided accurate responses promptly. It recognized voice commands from riders in the front passenger seat and from the rear seats, opening windows and unlocking the doors for the respective speaker, for example. Huawei said Xiaoyi can control all the features in the vehicle.
Riders can even issue multiple commands to Xiaoyi without repeating the wake word (“Xiaoyixiaoyi” in Chinese). The assistant will continue to listen for another request after it completed the previous ones.
Huawei’s virtual assistant also serves as a voice guide. For example, Xiaoyi suggested turning on the in-car air purifying function when the car drove into a tunnel and encountered bad air quality. It also searched for a charging station and navigation when the vehicle battery ran low.
Speaking to a virtual voice assistant for those control functions within the car is well-developed in the industry. Major rivals such as Nio and Xpeng have similar offerings. Nio owners could start a conversation with a voice assistant using the three-syllable phrase “Hi, Nomi,” while Huawei’s wake word “Xiaoyixiaoyi” has four syllables. Alibaba-backed Xpeng in late 2020 said each of vehicle owners used its voice assistants effectively 25 times per day on average, compared with 13 times from part of Ford models, Chinese financial media Caixin reported.
The Aito M5 helps Huawei build a connection between an EV and its wide range of digital and smart home devices. That connection is taking shape as Huawei and its auto partner have introduced dashboard-based smart home management tools for users to integrate their homes into the vehicle.
Being able to sync all their Huawei devices means users can read and send text messages directly by voice command in the car, then continue listening to music and podcasts at home exactly where they left off from the in-car system. However, the integration may not work as seamlessly for non-Huawei users.
The Aito M5 showcases in-car technologies that Huawei offers: a dashboard that performs many of the same functions as Huawei smartphones and a network that allows remote connectivity to a plethora of its home appliances.
And yet, the Chinese telecom giant and its obscure manufacturing partner will need to build a reputation for building quality cars. The Aito M5 is entering a Chinese EV market crowded with established players, competing heads on with similarly-priced rivals, such as Tesla’s Model Y and Li Auto’s popular crossover Li One.
]]>Chinese EV maker Nio is taking a step into hardware by developing its own smartphones, Chinese media 36Kr reported. The move makes Nio the latest Chinese automaker to diversify operations in the hope of protecting its core EV business amid increased competition.
Why it matters: Nio’s pursuit of making smartphones comes as other Chinese tech companies are making plans to build EVs, looking to profit in the world’s biggest auto market embracing EVs.
Details: Nio recently hired Yin Shuijun, former president of the smartphone unit of Chinese mobile internet firm Meitu, to lead the new business in Shenzhen, Chinese media 36Kr reported Wednesday, citing people familiar with the matter.
Context: Nio is not alone in exploring new areas for expansion, as multiple Chinese tech companies are also looking to enter the EV space.
Chinese electric vehicle (EV) sales achieved a strong momentum over the past two years, reporting robust figures in January. They are expected to reach 5.5 million units this year. Tesla ended 2021 with a solid profit performance driven by both strong consumer demand in China and Europe, and cost improvement from expanded production in its Shanghai factory. Battery maker CATL retained its competitive lead, dominating the global EV market last year, followed by a group of smaller domestic competitors. BYD’s chip unit is racing the clock to complete an initial public offering in the mainland stock market, thanks to explosive growth in EV sales amid a worldwide chip shortage.
January EV sales signal a strong 2022
Drive I/O is TechNode’s ongoing premium series on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode subscribers.
News: China’s electric vehicle market remains buoyant despite the seasonal holiday slowdown and the looming impact of the recent subsidy reductions. January retail sales of new energy vehicles (NEVs), including all-electrics, plug-in hybrids, and hydrogen cars, totaled 347,000 units and a 132% yearly increase, according to figures published by the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA). However, this figure is a 27% decline from last December, as China auto sales in January and February tend to be affected by the Lunar New Year holiday (roughly the first two weeks of February this year) when consumers often delay purchases and automakers halt production, the industry group said.
Insights: The market was relatively flat during the first half of January due to a last-minute push by automakers to get their cars delivered in December. Yet sales recovered fairly quickly during the last two weeks of the month, said Cui Dongshu, secretary general of the CPCA. Cui remained positive about the impact of Beijing’s 30% subsidy cut on EVs, with CPCA affirming its previous forecast of 5.5 million vehicle passenger EV sales in China this year. Although multiple automakers have raised prices for their EVs just enough to offset the subsidy cut, Cui expects overall EV prices to maintain relatively stable, as automakers have been taking various measures such as diversifying sourcing of parts to reduce costs.
News link: TechNode
Tesla posts second profitable year as Shanghai factory reaches full capacity
News: Riding a wave of growing customer interest for green energy vehicles, Tesla on Jan. 26 posted a profit for the second year in a row. It ended 2021 with a net profit of $5.5 billion, a more than sixfold yearly increase. Annual deliveries also surged 87% in the year, marking the fastest pace of growth since 2019, thanks to strong sales in China and Europe. The US EV giant expects to achieve 50% annual growth in vehicle deliveries “over a multiyear horizon,” while warning that the ongoing global chip shortage could dent its production output “across all factories” this year.
Insights: Rising demand in China has been a key driver for Tesla’s growth. The total sales of Chinese-made vehicles reached 484,130 units last year, accounting for over half of its global deliveries, China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) data shows. The company’s Shanghai factory also plays a prominent role for its global expansion, becoming a “main export hub” with a shipment of around 163,000 vehicles last year to EU, Japan, among other regions, said Tesla’s financial chief Zachary Kirkhorn during its fourth-quarter earnings call.
Now, as EVs continue their current growth trajectory, Tesla has planned to invest RMB 1.2 billion ($188 million) to increase the production staff of the Gigafactory Shanghai by a quarter to about 19,000, Bloomberg reported in November citing sources. The Shanghai plant, which began deliveries in late 2019, was designed to produce up to 500,000 vehicles annually and has been regularly running at a capacity of 450,000 units per year.
News link: TechCrunch
Battery giant CATL’s dominance unabated in China’s EV boom
News: CATL’s dominance of the EV battery market has continued unabated. It retained its top spot as the world’s biggest battery vendor last year, thanks to an accelerated shift of consumers embracing EVs in China. The Chinese battery giant supplied 96.7 gigawatt-hours (GWh) equivalents of EV batteries in 2021, representing a 167% yearly increase. It commands a 32.6% global market share, according to data compiled by market tracker SNE Research. South Korea’s LG Energy Solution came in second with 60.2 GWh, while Chinese auto major BYD ran a distant fourth with 26.3 GWh. Smaller Chinese players Gotion High-Tech, CALB, AESC, and SVOLT all rank lower in the world’s top 10 battery makers and form a combined market share of around 8%.
Insights: This has been the fifth year CATL retained its position as the world’s biggest battery maker, buoyed by a rebound in EV demand in its home market in 2021. A total of 150 GWh of battery capacity were deployed into newly sold NEVs in China last year. That number is expected to grow by over 50% year on year to 230 GWh in 2022, according to a Jan.12 report published by Chinese brokerage Huaan Securities.
The battery maker is also quickly expanding its manufacturing capacity to meet a surging demand. In December, it kicked off production at its largest plant to date in Fuding, a city in the eastern Fujian province, with a designed capacity of 120 GWh per year.
News link: TechNode
BYD’s chip unit to list on Shenzhen stock market
News: The chip unit of Chinese automaker BYD is racing to go public with an offering that could raise as much as RMB 2 billion ($314.4 million), after getting a green light from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. The listing is expected in the next few months and it would become the first auto chipmaker to list in China. BYD Semiconductor became an independent subsidiary of the Chinese EV giant in April 2020 and mainly develops less advanced chips such as microcontrollers (MCUs) used for controlling simple functions in cars. The company has become China’s biggest MCU manufacturer with nearly two decades of chip-making experience, Chinese media Caixin reported last month, citing analysis from market research firm Omdia.
Insights: The imminent listing comes at a time when the Chinese EV industry has seen a strong rebound in demand, despite significant disruption due to the global chip shortage over the past year. BYD Semiconductor estimated its net profit will jump by up to 574% yearly to RMB 395 million in 2021. Revenues are projected to reach an upper limit of RMB 3.2 billion, an 122% increase from 2020. However, the company is still a tiny player in the global automotive MCU sector, which is dominated by Japan’s Renasas and six other chip powerhouses with a combined market share of 98%, according to figures from information services company IHS Markit.
And yet, investors have high expectations for the subsidiary. It has already raised RMB 2.8 billion from a list of big names including Xiaomi’s industry investment fund, Sequoia Capital China, and CICC Capital prior to the IPO filing. BYD’s stake will fall from 72% to 65% after the listing is completed.
News link: TechNode
]]>Hozon New Energy Automobile has raised more than RMB 2 billion ($316 million) in a recent round as part of its Series D, which could value the electric vehicle startup at around RMB 25 billion, Chinese media outlet LatePost reported Monday.
Why it matters: The investment reflects continued positive sentiment among private investors towards Chinese EV companies. China’s EV industry enjoyed exponential growth in 2021 and the outlook for the industry remains strong for the next few years.
Details: This latest round marks the close of Hozon’s Series D at RMB 8 billion. Investors include Chinese rail company CRRC Corp’s investment fund and the state-run Shenzhen Capital Group, LatePost reported, citing unnamed sources familiar with the matter.
Context: In October, Hozon announced it had closed an RMB 4 billion Series D1 led by China’s biggest cybersecurity firm, Qihoo 360. This was followed by another RMB 2 billion in new funding from companies, including battery giant CATL and automaker BAIC as part of its Series D in December, said LatePost.
]]>READ MORE: Drive I/O | Meet the newest upstarts likely to grab chunks of China’s EV market
Trunk Tech, a Chinese autonomous truck technology startup backed by EV maker Nio, raised an undisclosed amount in its Series B, the company announced Wednesday. The round was led by state-owned automaker BAIC, which is also partnering with ride-hailing giant Didi to get a fleet of self-driving taxis on public roads by 2025.
Why it matters: Trunk Tech is one of the most promising startups in the Chinese self-driving car space. The Beijing-based company has been backed by a list of prominent investors, and is among several players to test autonomous vehicle systems for hauling freight at domestic harbors.
Details: New investors in this latest fundraising round include private equity firm Pre-IPO Capital Ltd and Zhengzhou municipal investment fund, according to a statement published Wednesday (in Chinese).
Context: Chinese automobile and tech companies have been racing to develop and commercialize their own self-driving tech which they claim will increase road safety and improve fuel efficiency for traditional trucks.
Chinese ride-hailing platform Didi wants to lay off 20% of its staff, Chinese media LatePost reported on Monday night. Didi is showing stress signs after Beijing launched a cybersecurity review on the company last July.
Why it matters: Didi is trimming its workforce to reduce operating costs and better cope with intense competition in the ride-hailing market. Other ride-hailers started going after Didi’s market share in China after regulators ordered the removal of Didi’s apps from app stores to review the company for cybersecurity reasons. The review, launched in July, is still ongoing.
Read more: Didi app ban ignites race for ride-hailing market share
Details: Didi will lay off about 20% of its staff across major businesses, including ride-hailing service, package delivery, and bike rental, Chinese media LatePost reported Monday, citing people familiar with the matter. Didi has already begun laying off employees in its corporate research lab in mid-January.
Context: Didi’s domestic ride-hailing business took a hit due to Beijing’s investigation. The company posted a net loss of RMB 30.4 billion ($4.7 billion) in the third quarter of 2021, compared with a net income of RMB 665 million during the same quarter a year earlier. Its revenue decreased by 13% quarter-on-quarter to RMB 39 billion over the same period.
Chilye, a Chinese startup that develops high-voltage battery systems for electric vehicles (EVs), has raised around RMB 100 million ($15.7 million) from a group of investors led by Xiaomi, the latest move of the Chinese smartphone maker joining the EV race.
Why it matters: Leading automakers have been embracing high-voltage battery systems, a technology that enables fewer charging times when using fast chargers and a longer driving range with better energy efficiency and lighter car weight, according to Otmar Bitsche, a director at Porsche’s research unit.
Details: Apart from Xiaomi, other investors include private equity firm Yonghua Capital and state-backed Oriza Holdings, according to a Thursday statement (in Chinese).
Context: Xiaomi has set a target of mass-producing its first consumer EV model during the first half of 2024 and recently poached a senior executive from state-owned automaker BAIC Motor to lead its EV project.
58 Freight, one of Asia’s biggest logistics carriers, has gotten the green light from the Hong Kong stock exchange to proceed with its listing, the company’s updated prospectus shows.
Why it matters: 58 Freight operates in both the Chinese mainland and the Hong Kong market, known as Kuaigou Dache in the mainland and GoGoX in Hong Kong. GoGoX, formerly known as GoGoVan, is the largest logistics service provider in Hong Kong and merged with 58 Suyun, the freight business unit of Chinese online marketplace 58 Daojia, in August 2017.
Details: The company has received approval from the Hong Kong stock exchange for its initial public offering (IPO) with CICC, UBS, BOCOM International, and ABC International acting as underwriters on the deal, according to an updated prospectus released on Feb. 6.
Context: Lalamove initially weighed a $1 billion US IPO in June last year, but later shifted the listing plan to Hong Kong as the Chinese government tightens rules for technology companies listing overseas, Bloomberg reported.
CATL expects its annual profit to nearly triple in 2021 after a strong rebound in Chinese electric vehicle sales through the year, the country’s largest electric vehicle (EV) battery supplier said on Friday.
Why it matters: The outlook reflects the strong consumer demand and growing profitability of EVs, as Beijing pushes for EV adoption to make China a power in the auto industry.
Details: CATL expects to report a 2021 net profit attributable to shareholders of between RMB 14 billion and RMB 16 billion ($2.2 billion to $2.5 billion), an increase of up to 195.5% from RMB 5.6 billion a year earlier, according to a Thursday announcement (in Chinese).
Context: CATL maintained its market lead with 80.51 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of battery capacity supply in 2021, accounting for 52.1% of the Chinese EV battery market, according to figures recently published by the China Automotive Power Battery Industry Innovation Alliance.
READ MORE: Chinese EV makers may face a price war in 2022: UBS
]]>Baidu’s electric vehicle (EV) project Jidu Auto announced on Wednesday that it has raised nearly $400 million in Series A as the Chinese search engine giant accelerates the development of EVs with self-driving capabilities.
Why it matters: Jidu will use the proceeds on research and development as the company aims to unveil a concept car in April later this year and release its first production model in 2023, according to the announcement.
Details: Baidu and its manufacturing partner Geely both raised their stakes in Jidu by jointly investing almost $400 million in the venture. The two companies didn’t reveal the sharing ratio.
Context: Baidu and Geely linked up last January with a deal that would allow the tech giant to make its own consumer EVs with autonomous driving capabilities.
Geely is reportedly in advanced talks to acquire Meizu Technology, a domestic smartphone maker backed by e-commerce giant Alibaba, as the Chinese auto group aims to provide a mobile-driven in-car experience and pose a challenge in the smart mobility race.
Why it matters: The move comes against the backdrop of China’s big tech firms, like smartphone maker Xiaomi and search engine Baidu, pushing to develop vehicles with smart cabin systems and autonomous driving technologies, developments that pose major threats to traditional automakers like Geely.
Details: Hubei Xingji Shidai Technology Co Ltd, a smartphone venture launched and majority owned by Geely chairman Eric Li, has begun talks to buy Meizu, a small and relatively obscure smartphone player, Chinese media outlet 36Kr reported Friday, citing people with knowledge of the matter.
Context: Geely announced its entry into the competitive Chinese smartphone market by establishing Xingji Shidai with registered capital of RMB 715 million ($113 million) in the central city of Wuhan in September, Reuters reported. Geely chairman Eric Li owns a 55% stake in the venture, according to Chinese business research platform Tianyancha (in Chinese).
SES Holdings, a US startup with plans to open a Shanghai factory next year, is teaming up with Honda to boost the development of its novel lithium-metal batteries, with the Japanese automaker announcing investment in the battery company.
Why it matters: Honda is the third automaker to partner with SES on electric vehicle (EV) batteries. The deal is the latest in a string of moves by global auto majors to develop battery technologies that they hope will accelerate their shifts to electrification.
Details: SES signed a joint agreement with Honda to work with early stage prototypes of its lithium-metal battery, or “A-samples.” In addition, Honda plans to buy 2% of SES AI Corporation, a new entity that will be created by an SES partnership with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) to list in the US, according to an announcement by SES published Wednesday.
Context: Conventional lithium-ion batteries contain heavy liquid electrolytes, while solid lithium-metal batteries are lighter and therefore could offer increased range and faster charging than their lithium-ion counterparts, according to J.D. Power, a data and analytics company focused on the auto industry.
Xiaomi has hired Yu Liguo, a former senior executive at state-owned automaker BAIC Motor, to lead its autonomous electric vehicle (EV) project. The move brings a highly-experienced executive from the traditional auto industry to the 12-year-old smartphone maker.
Why it matters: The hire is the latest sign that Xiaomi is serious about venturing into the EV industry.
Details: Yu has come aboard as vice president of Xiaomi’s auto unit and a “political commissar” at its Beijing headquarters, according to an internal letter published Friday and obtained by Chinese media outlet 36Kr.
Context: The news comes just months after Li Tianyuan, a former exterior designer of BMW’s electric vehicle the iX, joined Xiaomi, an appointment that was made public via a group photo of the firm’s corporate executives posted by CEO Lei Jun last September.
Read more: Drive I/O | Chips, batteries, AV: Xiaomi’s most high-profile auto investments of the year
]]>Chinese automaker BYD said on Wednesday it is partnering with US autonomous driving startup Nuro to make electric robocars for goods delivery services.
Why it matters: The partnership is the latest example of Chinese automakers working with overseas tech companies to build autonomous vehicles.
Details: BYD is currently working with Nuro to design and develop the latter’s next-generation autonomous delivery robots, which will be equipped with components provided by the automaker such as electric motors and lithium-iron-phosphate blade batteries, according to a Thursday announcement.
Context: Nuro was co-founded in 2016 by Zhu Jiajun and Dave Ferguson, two former engineers at Google’s self-driving car project. The company announced in December 2020 that it had received first-of-its-kind approval by US regulators to operate and charge for its driverless delivery services, TechCrunch reported.
China’s electric vehicle (EV) sales soared in 2021, bucking the national trend of slowing auto sales. Local automakers have shown strong competitiveness against overseas counterparts. However, industry players may face new challenges: a looming price war among competitors will likely reduce profits, a UBS Securities analyst said on Tuesday.
Why it matters: There might be greater supply than demand in the Chinese EV market this year, since consumption could be reduced by slowing economic growth amid the recharged pandemic, Paul Gong, head of China auto research at UBS, told reporters on Tuesday.
Details: Still, the rise of domestic EV makers will be “the way of the future” in China, as local players have generally “achieved greater progress” in the development of products and technology than foreign auto majors, according to Gong (our translation).
Read more: Drive I/O | Auto China 2021: A banner year for Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto
Context: The number of passenger electric vehicles sold in China surged 169% year on year to nearly 2.99 million units in 2021, according to figures published Tuesday by the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA). That figure beat the estimated 2.4 million units the industry group made in June.
Zvision Technologies, a Chinese startup that makes lidar sensors for self-driving cars, announced a new investment from three Chinese automakers on Monday, including Xpeng Motors. The company becomes the latest startup to tap growing investor interest in the self-driving car space.
Why it matters: The investment is another sign of the increasing interest in lidar sensors, seen as a crucial building block for future vehicles by most auto and tech firms. Lidar is a key component for self-driving cars and uses laser light to sense surroundings.
Details: Zvision has raised “hundreds of millions of yuan” in a pre-Series C led by Xpeng Motors, according to a Monday announcement (in Chinese). Shang Qi Capital, a private equity firm owned by Chinese automaker SAIC, participated in the round.
Context: In September, Xpeng had begun delivering the world’s first Lidar-equipped production vehicle, the P5, which the company boasts can distinguish objects within a range of up to 150 meters and can run autonomously under a driver’s supervision on Chinese roads, the South China Morning Post reported.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s ongoing premium series on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode subscribers.
Huawei burrowed further into the auto industry with the launch of the first vehicle with its homegrown operating system. The Chinese government cut purchase subsidies on new energy vehicles (NEVs) by 30% this year, while scrapping ownership limits on foreign automakers’ investments in the auto industry. Chinese electric vehicle (EV) makers Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto celebrated record annual deliveries of nearly 100,000 cars in 2021. Alibaba’s head of autonomous driving lab quit the company after more than four years. Didi, soon to delist, shows a few signs of approaching break-even with its first post-IPO earnings report.
Huawei intensifies auto plans with launch of first vehicle with ‘seamless’ Harmony
News: Huawei on Dec. 23 unveiled the first EV model equipped with its HarmonyOS operating system with manufacturing partner Seres. Huawei boasts that this in-car software system offers users a seamless experience of smartphone and car features across devices. Priced from RMB 250,000 ($39,063), the Aito M5 sports utility vehicle runs on electricity or fuel and has a 1,242-km driving range, which compares with the 1,080 km offered by Li Auto’s popular plug-in hybrid crossover Li One. Huawei said that it will showcase the vehicle in 180 Huawei shops across 42 cities and deliveries should start around Feb. 20.
Insights: As US chip sanctions crippled its smartphone core business, Huawei is trying to diversify its operations by breaking into the Chinese automobile sector. The Chinese telecommunications giant last April started selling Seres vehicles through its sales network, but they did not sell well. From April through November, Seres achieved sales of only 7,080 SF5 EVs, which were equipped with Huawei powertrain system and in-car software, according to figures published by China Passenger Car Association. Huawei has also partnered with state-owned automakers BAIC and Changan to equip vehicles with its autonomous driving hardware and software. Yet some industry insiders are doubtful that the tech giant will eventually make its own cars.
News link: TechNode
Beijing sticks to plan to end EV subsidies in 2023
News: Chinese authorities on Dec. 31 unveiled long-awaited details about its national subsidy program for new energy vehicles (NEVs), such as all-electrics and plug-in hybrids. For 2022, beginning Jan. 1, subsidies to EV buyers will be cut 30% compared to 2021. According to a document released by the Ministry of Finance, the grants for EVs delivering driving ranges of at least 400 km (248 miles) will be cut by RMB 5,400 on an annual basis to RMB 18,000 ($2,824). Meanwhile, the subsidies this year for all-electrics with a driving range of 300 km to 400 km will be lowered to RMB 13,000, while those for plug-in hybrids will be cut to RMB 6,800. Beijing also reaffirmed its plan to eliminate subsidies entirely at the end of this year. Subsidies for purchases of new energy vehicles (NEVs) were already trimmed by 10% and 20% during 2020 and 2021, respectively.
Context: In reaction, several overseas automakers have raised prices for their EVs in China to offset the subsidy cuts. The prices of Tesla’s popular China-made Model 3 and Volkswagen’s ID series EVs have risen by RMB 10,000 and RMB 5,400, respectively. Newer local EV makers are taking a more active approach to reduce the impact of the subsidy cut. Nio on Jan. 1 announced moves to make up the difference between sticker prices and reduced subsidies of its vehicles for customers who had paid a deposit before the end of 2021 and who will get their vehicles delivered by Mar. 31. Cui Dongshu, secretary general of China Passenger Car Association (CPCA), forecasts that the trimmed government incentive program could still give a great boost to the EV adoption in the country, noting that the manufacturing cost of EVs and batteries are falling significantly. Cui estimated China’s NEV sales could more than double to around 6 million vehicles in 2022 from the previous year and therefore maintain leadership in the world EV race.
News link: Reuters
China lifts restrictions on foreign auto ownership
News: China now allows overseas automakers to operate wholly-owned ventures in the country’s passenger vehicle sector. As of Jan. 1, 2022, foreign firms are no longer limited to 50% ownership in their joint venture auto operations. The law had been in effect since 1994. In addition, foreign automakers can now set up more than two joint ventures that make the same type of vehicles. The new ownership rules were detailed in a Dec. 27 release from the Ministry of Commerce and the National Development and Reform Commission, China’s top economic planner.
Insights: The move has been perceived as a positive signal that would create a level playing field for domestic and foreign carmakers, Cui Dongshu, secretary-general of the China Passenger Car Association, told state broadcaster CGTN. Nonetheless, Cui said there would be no significant impact on the market from removing the limits since they were expected. German auto major BMW is expected to become the first internal-combustion vehicle maker to take advantage of the new JV rules. It plans to up its stake to 75% from 25% in its JV with Chinese partner Brilliance Automotive by the end of 2022. The Chinese government since 2018 has gradually ramped up efforts to fully liberalize the domestic auto industry, starting by scrapping limits on foreign ownership of EV makers as it aims to be a global leader in the sector. Tesla became the first foreign auto brand to enjoy the relaxed EV regulations when it set up its wholly-owned venture in Shanghai in May 2018.
News link: Global Times
China’s EV trio post record deliveries numbers in 2021
News: The US-listed Chinese EV trio of Li Auto, Nio, and Xpeng launched the new year by publishing record delivery numbers for 2021. Each noted that they had delivered nearly 100,000 vehicles in 2021, despite global chip shortages. All had doubled their deliveries from 2020. Xpeng Motors had stood out among its peers, delivering a record 98,155 vehicles last year, up 263% from its 2020 delivery count. It surpassed Nio, whose annual deliveries totaled 91,429 electric crossovers. Nio was hit by supply chain issues and changes to its manufacturing lines during the second half of last year. Meanwhile, Li Auto saw 2021 deliveries surge 178% year on year to 90,491 vehicles.
Context: Chinese automakers have been riding the wave of growing popularity of EVs in the country, boosted by a years-long national subsidy program and special license plates to EV buyers, among other policy measures. Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto, all once struggling to stay afloat and beset by lackluster sales, are the poster children of the revolution. The trio has laid out ambitious plans to expand their sales and service networks as they vie to grab market share from internal-combustion vehicle segments. Analysts surveyed by Seeking Alpha expected Nio’s annual revenue to increase by 74% this year, Forbes reported, while Citigroup forecast that Xpeng’s deliveries could almost double to 175,000 units in 2022.
News link: South China Morning Post
Alibaba’s head of autonomous driving quits
News: Alibaba has parted ways with Wang Gang, a renowned computer scientist who has served as head of the tech giant’s autonomous driving lab under its Damo Academy research division for three years, Chinese media reported on Jan. 5, citing people familiar with the matter. A former tenured professor at Nanyang Technological University, Wang joined Alibaba in early 2017 as the chief scientist for the company’s artificial intelligence lab and was tasked with improving speech recognition capabilities for its first smart speaker device, the AliGenie X1, launched later that year. Wang has begun working on a startup developing robot vacuum cleaners and has raised an unknown amount of funds, the sources added.
Insights: The move is noteworthy in many ways. For one, Chinese industry giants had hoovered up research talents and poured resources into exploring the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) over recent years. The rush is over given a slower-than-expected process of implementing AI in industries, as many top scientists give up the high salaries in the industry for academia, while others start up their own businesses. Wang’s departure comes after Li Lei, the director of ByteDance’s AI Lab, left the company to join the University of California Santa Barbara as a professor last August, following the resignation of ByteDance Vice President Ma Wei-Ying a year earlier, SCMP reported. Chinese tech powerhouses also struggle with executive turnover and layoffs, as Beijing’s regulatory clampdowns continue to weigh on the sector.
News link: TechNode
Didi’s first earnings report after IPO: $4.7 billion loss
News: On Dec. 30, Didi reported its first earnings as a public company. It wasn’t pretty: The company lost RMB 30.4 billion ($4.7 billion) on RMB 42.7 billion ($6.6 billion) in revenue during the September quarter of 2021. To compare, the company reported a profit of RMB 665 million on revenue of RMB 43.4 billion in the same quarter of 2020. Didi’s largest source of revenue is still its domestic ride-hailing business, which yielded RMB 39 billion, down 12.9% from the previous quarter. The company posted an 8% quarter-over-quarter decline to 2.36 billion in ride volume over the period.
Context: Still the largest ride-hailing service in China by ride volume and revenue, Didi has been at the forefront in Beijing’s wide crackdown on local tech companies. Did’s business has taken a hit from a suspension order that has kept its services off Chinese app stores since July. Having been listed in the US for less than six months, the Chinese mobility giant on Dec. 3 announced plans to take its shares off the New York stock market and instead pursue a listing in Hong Kong. Beijing has yet to announce the results of its cybersecurity investigation into Didi, and the company’s shares have fallen more than 60% from its IPO price.
News link: TechNode
]]>BYD delivered a record 593,745 new energy passenger vehicles in 2021, a segment that includes all-electrics and plug-in hybrids, as outlined in a report from the Chinese automaker on Monday. The figure represents a 231.6% increase from the 179,054 vehicle deliveries it made in 2020.
Why it matters: Analysts expect the blockbuster delivery numbers to bolster 2022 expectations for the firm as China’s overall electric vehicle (EV) market continues to recover from the pandemic.
Details: BYD’s new energy vehicles (NEVs) had a fairly even sales split between all-electrics and plug-in hybrids in 2021, with the two segments accounting for 54% and 46%, respectively, of its total passenger EV deliveries, according to the company’s report.
Context: China’s NEV market saw a strong rebound this year, with sales nearly tripling to 2.51 million passenger EVs for the first 11 months of 2021, according to figures (in Chinese) released by the China Passenger Car Association.
Despite their various fields and interests, members of the TechNode community agree: The theme for China tech 2021 was regulations.
Sometimes the regulations came in waves. Sometimes the rules were new, sometimes just newly enforced. There were so many rules that, like a chronic state of pandemic alertness, regulation fatigue set in by year’s end.
There were industry-rattling rules, like the bans on crypto mining and trading in May, soon followed by the data security review that forced Didi’s US delisting. And while we were still digesting that, there was the sweeping ban on the most profitable edtech services. Mostly, though, there were fines. Tech giants like Alibaba, Meituan, and Pinduoduo faced fines large (for anti-competitive practices) and small (for illegal information releases).
Next came the drastic limits imposed on minors’ playing hours, which could gnaw into game-makers’ profits and dent the world’s largest population of players. Meanwhile, even tech companies never previously enmeshed with virtual or augmented worlds claimed to be ready to soar into the metaverse in 2022. Already making great—frankly, surprising—advances in 2021 were several homegrown silicon chip designers and a handful of the slew of electric carmakers.
Insights is a series of explainers on developing stories in China tech, published in the subscriber-only TechNode Premium newsletter.
It’s normally exclusive to TechNode subscribers, but we’re making this issue free.
In the wake of news of tragic employee deaths and abusive working conditions, the grueling hours demanded by Big Tech got renewed official and unofficial attention in 2021 as well. It turns out that requiring employees to work six days a week, from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m–the so-called 996 workweek–violates labor laws, according to a statement the Supreme People’s Court issued in August.
Some of the biggest companies quickly declared that they were abolishing weekend work.
So are tech workers shouldering a lighter workload now? Is Big Tech assuming a kinder, more humane face? TechNode’s friends and contributors are once again united and …. skeptical. On the upside, at least the ten richest tech moguls, notably PInduoduo founder Colin Huang, got whacked in their pocketbooks this year.
Wishing you a 2022 minus 996.
This year’s most surprising development was Didi’s forced delisting, justified by vague references to national security. It’s still unclear on what basis the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) believes foreign listings may result in: (1) Chinese firms transferring onshore data overseas or (2) Chinese firms being compelled to hand over data to foreign entities. My best guess is CAC believes there’s a possibility sensitive data may be requested as part of an investigation under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Whether well-founded or ill-founded, this fear has led to an overhaul of foreign listings.
—Michael Norris, research and strategy lead, AgencyChina
The regulatory crackdown is a big one, although a long time coming. I think at this point we have become a bit desensitized to the news. I remember just how shocking the Ant Group fiasco was last year. Everyone was talking about it. Now, with everything going on in gaming, education, content, livestreaming, fintech, crypto and more, it seems like a drop in the bucket. During the latest crypto crackdown, I was surprised to see just how much mining was done in government facilities, or under government supervision, despite the May announcement to shut down the industry.
—Eliza Gkritsi, Asia mining reporter, CoinDesk
In the semiconductor space, it is how strong industry has aligned with the government. In almost every WeChat group I am in, engineers seem to be one hundred percent behind China’s self-sufficiency goals. Whereas before they may have gone along with such drives begrudgingly, there now seems to be a true desire to work together to achieve these goals. One example where this has been a success to some extent is the silicon IP (intellectual property) space where China—through self-development, tech transfer and other means—has become much more self-reliant in CPU, interface, and GPU IP.
—Stewart Randall, director of operations, Intralink
I expect China’s commercial space industry to achieve more encouraging results in 2022. As novelist Liu Cixin wrote in “The Three-Body Problem”: “The future of mankind is either to move towards interstellar civilization, or to indulge in the virtual world of VR all the year round.” Although metaverse hype swept the global tech industry in 2021, it was also fascinating that we witnessed the successful launch of NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope this past Christmas Day. Personally, I hope Chinese space companies accelerate the steps of mankind to spread themselves beyond earth.
—Lu Guanghao, director, Befor Capital
I hope industry players can work together to create a unified standard for intelligent driving functionalities when it comes to the names, definitions, and driving scenarios, among other things. In the past year, we have seen self-driving companies and electric vehicle makers hyped up automated driving technologies as a unique selling point of their products and services due to the surging demand from customers.
However, it takes users a great amount of additional time and effort to familiarize themselves with different vehicle systems. Also, as the technology is advancing, there are no industry-wide rules and safety requirements governing the development of automated driving capabilities.
—Liu Guoqing, founder and CEO of automotive software developer Minieye
My hope for 2022 is that our collective understanding of China’s regulatory activities steps up a gear. In 2021, too many were suckered by the temptation to ascribe a single, all-encompassing narrative to China’s regulatory thrusts. Early uncritical anchoring to a particular analytical frame left market participants blindsided by regulation that didn’t fit neatly within their mental model. If we are to have an analytical frame equipped to consider and make prudent investment decisions within the shifting sands of China’s regulatory landscape—particularly its views on competition and market irregularities—we must do better than “Well, it’s all about taking down Alibaba” or “Well, it’s all about taming the private sector” or “Well, it’s all about semiconductors” or “Well, it’s all about reducing inequality.”
—Michael Norris, research and strategy lead, AgencyChina
US efforts to decouple China from the global economy are meant to weaken and isolate China’s technology sectors to some extent, but technology really does not follow any political boundaries. For Chinese enterprises, a key initiative would be to better utilize the research and development resources from the rest of the world and be more engaged in the global innovation community.
Meanwhile, China will grow more innovative and more resilient in its long-term development of advanced technologies and the future looks very rosy for those startups in frontier sectors in the next several years. With the launch of the Beijing Stock Exchange in November, innovative Chinese startups will have more access to raise capital at home, while more Chinese-born scientists are expected to bring their expertise home from abroad.
—Lu Shengyun, former partner with Simon-Kucher & Partners
I fear VCs that have been surprisingly patient to date will want to see returns on their semiconductor investments here in China towards the end of 2022. A chip takes 18 months to two years to design and get to market, so if they are not seeing returns–if these chips do not sell, miss deadlines, or struggle with performance or with bugs–then we could see some semiconductor startups fail. There is a lot of competition out there: over 20,000 chip-related companies and now over 2,800 chip design companies in China. Many companies are on thin margins, if any at all.
—Stewart Randall, director of operations, Intralink
As we approach the one-year anniversary of the tragic deaths of two Pinduoduo employees in the same week, I don’t believe China’s tech giants have turned the page on excessive work hours. The collaborative “Worker Lives Matter” spreadsheet, originally published in October, suggests that overwork is commonplace and confirms Pinduoduo employees have the most grueling work hours among the tech giants.
—Michael Norris, research and strategy lead, AgencyChina
They certainly want to make it look that way, but to what extent it is an accurate depiction of reality, I don’t know. I am worried that better work-life balance might actually translate into layoffs.
—Eliza Gkritsi, Asia mining reporter, CoinDesk
Although the “996” work schedule has been banned, it does not seem that the workload on employees has been reduced. Therefore, this particular policy has meant a reduced salary (as no longer paid double on Sundays), and yet a similar total number of working hours. Hopefully, this is simply the “adjustment period” and the companies will adapt to a non-overtime work culture. But for now, there has not been a great shift.
—Capucine Cogne, China tech-watcher in Chengdu
As we’ve seen, the Chinese government brought two big policy shifts in the country’s tech space over the past year: strengthened policy support to build its own core technology, as well as the tightened regulation against internet giants. I believe “tech for good” will be the main theme in the industry for a while in the future.
—Lu Guanghao, director, Befor Capital
]]>Just a year ago, Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto faced a cloudy future. All three had burned through hundreds of millions of investors’ dollars and were beset by lackluster sales. Most observers thought they had yet to hit bottom. Not anymore.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s ongoing premium series on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode subscribers.
Despite the lingering impact of the pandemic on China’s automotive industry, 2021 has been a fantastic year for Tesla’s major Chinese challengers. The three companies all reached their 100,000-vehicle production milestones, racked up big war chests from new investors, and recently set records for their vehicle deliveries. Their cars are going mainstream in major domestic cities, according to Xpeng President Brian Gu, as internal-combustion vehicles and legacy automakers are increasingly being regarded as outdated.
The Chinese trio, all listed in the US, not yet profitable, but all poised for stronger growth in the coming year, have become the poster children for the country’s EV revolution. Despite a 20% cut in subsidies this year, the world’s biggest EV market in September witnessed an unexpected growth rebound, as the NEV (new energy vehicle) penetration rate surpassed 20% of all new car sales for the first time.
We round up the most significant milestones in the three companies’ turbulent histories this year and forecast what’s next for them in the coming year.
With deliveries beating those of BMW and Audi EV at a price tag comparable to those of German auto giants, Nio is literally the first Chinese automaker to have gained a foothold in the country’s premium vehicle segment. Formerly referred to by Deutsche Bank analysts as number one among the promising local EV makers, Nio was overtaken by its peers, as measured by deliveries, due to its relatively slower pace of growth this year.
Once maintaining a leadership position in the non-Tesla piece of the Chinese premium EV segment, Nio found itself in a bittersweet position over the past few months as rivals’ sales grew at a stunning speed. Li Auto and Xpeng in July recorded deliveries of 8,589 and 8,040 vehicles, respectively. Those numbers surpassed Nio’s monthly output for the first time ever. Nio produced only 7,931 for the month.
Then Nio’s monthly deliveries decreased to an even lower level of 3,667 vehicles in October. That number was less than half of both Li Auto’s and Xpeng’s for the month. The company blamed the drop on the restructuring of manufacturing lines in preparation for introducing new models. The most recent sales figure of 10,878 vehicles in November marked a strong rebound for Nio, despite an ongoing industry-wide chip shortage. Moreover, that figure lagged behind those of the other two US-listed EV makers by several thousand units.
More notably, Nio faced one of its worst public relations crises in China in August, when a 31-year-old driver was killed using Nio’s driver-assistance feature with his ES8 electric crossover. The incident not only put further dents into an already tough outlook for the regulatory environment and public confidence in China’s autonomous vehicle space: It also stoked criticism of Nio for overstating the capability of its technology and fragmented its once incredibly loyal fanbase. Details about the accident still have not been released.
Nonetheless, the Tencent-backed EV maker is ramping up efforts to regain its leading position in the market. It’s currently on track to deliver its first premium sedan model ET7, equipped with a Lidar sensor and Nvidia’s supercomputer, in March 2022. It also just launched a lower-priced new sedan model, ET5, as it aims to lift its sales in the country. At the same time, it is rushing to launch a mass-market EV sub-brand next year, targeting the most competitive and yet the biggest segment in China’s auto market.
Once chugging away in Nio’s tracks , Xpeng has raced ahead as China shifts from gasoline power to electric transportation. It is emerging as the new leader in the competitive mid- to high-end Chinese auto segments. The Alibaba-backed EV maker delivered a record-breaking 15,613 electric vehicles in November, bringing its annual deliveries to more than 82,155 vehicles. That figure surpassed Nio’s 80,940 deliveries in the year to date.
Xpeng’s strong performance comes at a time when the country has seen a major rebound in EV demand, signaling a tipping point for mass adoption. Sales of NEVs, comprising all-electrics and plug-in hybrids, are expected to more than double to 3.4 million units annually this year and could further increase by 47% to 5 million units in 2022, according to estimates made by the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) earlier this month.
To ride the wave of the EV recovery momentum, Xpeng has aggressively expanded its product lineup with the release of a premium sports utility vehicle (SUV) model and an affordable family sedan. The company boasts that both will offer the most advanced automated driving capabilities in China.
G9, Xpeng’s first luxury electric crossover, will be equipped with an 800V supercharging platform, which could boost driving range to 200 kilometers (124 miles) with only a five-minute charge. It also has advanced driver assistance software that will allow vehicles to cruise autonomously in gnarly urban traffic conditions. Aiming for a price range between RMB 300,000 and 400,000 ($47,100 and $62,800) according to Jefferies analysts, Xpeng’s G9 model is scheduled for delivery in the third quarter of 2022. It will then compete head-to-head against Tesla’s Model Y and Nio’s ES6, among other top-line EVs.
Meanwhile, Xpeng’s second sedan model, P5, is expected to be a hit. It is equipped with two Lidar sensors, offering urban automated driving capabilities, and is priced competitively, beginning at just RMB 157,900. With P5 deliveries started in October, President Brian Gu expects the company to continue to experience rapid growth in the coming months. Gu projected a monthly delivery target of 15,000 vehicles for the last two months of 2021 during an earnings call last month.
Analysts are bullish on Xpeng’s growth prospects, expecting its monthly sales momentum of 15,000 vehicles will continue in 2022, Chinese media reported in late November, citing Daiwa Securities Meanwhile, Citigroup analysts forecast that Xpeng’s deliveries could nearly double to 175,000 units in 2022.
Considered by many as taking a conservative yet non-mainstream approach in betting on the transitional extended-range technology, Li Auto also had a vintage year in 2021. In the year to date, the company has delivered nearly 80,000 Li One electric crossovers, its first and the only model currently on sale. That number is almost as much as the combined deliveries of Nio’s three SUV models.
Backed by Chinese food delivery giant Meituan, Li Auto pursues greater operational efficiencies than its peers. The strategy paid off, with the automaker reporting an impressive gross margin of 23.3% in the third quarter of this year, compared with Nio’s 20.3% and Xpeng’s 14.4%.
Also, each of Li Auto’s stores makes more money on average than those of Nio and Xpeng. The company in November sold nearly 80 vehicles per showroom, more than double Nio’s figure for the same period. Li Auto planned to expand its sales network to 200 stores by this year’s end. In contrast, both Nio and Xpeng said they will each operate more than 350 outlets by that time.
However, Li Auto’s competitiveness in self-driving technologies has lagged far behind rivals’. For example, earlier this month, it shipped an over-the-air update that includes an automated parking feature—the same feature Xpeng offered its customers three years ago. The company’s vehicles are also unable to cruise Chinese highways on their own while being supervised by active drivers. That assisted driving function, similar to Tesla’s Navigate on Autopilot, is already available to Nio and Xpeng customers.
To catch up with rivals and prolong its upward trajectory, Li Auto will shift its strategies radically in the coming years. Executives said the company would more than triple the annual research and development budget to RMB 3 billion ($500 million) this year. That number will be further increased to RMB 6 billion per year by 2024, financial chief Li Tie pledged to investors during an earnings call in February.
And yet, the EV maker claims that it will maintain a healthy gross profit rate while working on a significant expansion of its product lineup and production footprint over the long term. CEO Shen Yanan last month reaffirmed the plan to launch a full-size extended-range electric SUV next year, followed by the release of its first fully electric vehicle model in 2023. Its second manufacturing plant launched construction in Beijing in October. When production begins there in 2023, Li Auto hopes to double its total annual capacity to 200,000 vehicles.
]]>Nio on Saturday revealed its second fully electric premium sedan model ET5, featuring an automated driving system, a fresh design, and a lower price point, to reach a larger customer base.
Why it matters: Speaking to reporters on Dec. 19, chief executive William Li said he expects the Nio ET5, which is priced 25% cheaper than the brand’s first sedan model ET7, will help the company attract more younger and female buyers.
Details: The new ET5 sports sedan comes with the same hardware package as the ET7, including a dozen ultrasonic sensors, 11 cameras, a Lidar unit, and Nvidia’s Orin autonomous driving processors, which allow the vehicle to detect its surroundings using supercomputing power.
Context: With three existing models, the seven-year-old Nio had so far delivered 80,940 vehicles to customers this year, a 120% yearly growth rate. Nio’s peers Xpeng Motors and Li Auto delivered 82,155 and 76,404 vehicles respectively during the same period.
Chinese electric vehicle maker Xpeng has been ordered to pay RMB 100,000 ($15,710) in fines by China’s local market watchdog for collecting customers’ facial data without consent, Chinese media reported, as Beijing looks to tighten rules over user data privacy.
Why it matters: The latest penalty reflects the Chinese authorities’ goal of tightening data privacy rules following a series of controversies over the use of consumers’ personal data. The moves are changing the way Chinese tech companies operate.
Details: A district office under Shanghai’s market regulator (Shanghai Municipal Administration for Market Regulation) has imposed a fine of RMB 100,000 on an Xpeng subsidiary for unlawfully gathering facial data without customers’ knowledge, state-owned media The Paper reported Tuesday, citing Tianyancha, a Chinese business data inquiry platform.
Context: Xpeng is not the first automaker in China to violate customers’ privacy. German automaker BMW was found using facial recognition technology on customers without their knowledge, state broadcaster CCTV reported in March.
Xpeng Motors confirmed with TechNode on Wednesday that it is facing delivery delays caused by an ongoing supply crunch in lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery packs, as customers of the Chinese electric vehicle maker are reportedly frustrated over months-long waits for their new cars.
Why it matters: Xpeng is the latest Chinese automaker to feel the sting from the supply chain shortage of both semiconductor chips and key battery materials.
Details: Xpeng said that it has apologized to customers who experienced significant delays after ordering its flagship P7 sedan. It is currently ramping up to ensure the lower-end P7 deliveries are made no later than next February, state-backed Shanghai Securities News reported Wednesday, citing a company representative.
Context: Xpeng delivered 56,404 vehicles during the first three quarters of this year, a figure four times higher than the 14,077 vehicles it placed with customers during the same period in 2020. It set a delivery forecast of up to 36,500 vehicles for the last three months of this year.
As tech and auto giants continue to toil on their autonomous vehicle projects, according to one Geely executive, such technology will come to flying cars more quickly than road vehicles.
Despite regulatory barriers and ethical issues, self-flying cars are likely to be ready before autonomous road vehicles, Guo Liang, chief executive of Geely-owned Aerofugia said at the Beyond Expo event held in Macau on Dec. 3. The movements of unmanned aerial vehicles are supervised by aviation authorities, which makes them more coordinated and safer than ground vehicles, according to Guo.
The idea of building an on-demand ride-hailing service for the skies is gradually getting off the ground in China, as eVTOLs, or electric vertical takeoff and landing vehicles, are transitioning from a pie-in-the-sky concept to a maturing technology and promising investment opportunity.
Geely is among a number of companies – from auto majors to venture-backed startups – racing to grab a foothold in this nascent market. In September 2020, the company took a big step into aviation by forming Aerofugia through a merger with Chinese drone developer AOSSCI.
Prior to that, China’s biggest private automaker had invested in German flying taxi startup Volocopter in September 2019. Volocopter in April said it had formed a joint venture with Geely’s Aerofugia, with a plan to bring 150 eVTOL aircraft to China as early as 2024, Reuters reported.
Electric vehicle maker Xpeng Motors also aims to stretch itself beyond just selling cars, in October leading a $500 million Series A investment round in aviation startup HT Aero at a pre-money valuation of $1 billion. Morgan Stanley estimated the global urban air mobility (UAM) market for flying cars and taxis could be worth $1.5 trillion by 2040.
Unlike conventional helicopters or airplanes, electric-powered vertical-lift machines can take off and land without a runway while delivering low-carbon air travel without producing emissions, providing commuters with a new way to speed above crowded streets.
Guo called for a joint effort from industry players to scale up urban air mobility operations with regards to technical standards and route management, among other industry-wide aspects.
A clear regulatory framework and established infrastructure on the ground also need to be in place for the vehicles, noted Jiang Yutao, vice president of Chinese flying taxi startup EHang. Also speaking as part of Beyond, Jiang added that eVTOLs could help the country meet its climate goals.
Nasdaq-listed Ehang expects to obtain approval from the Civil Aviation Administration of China for its autonomous aircraft EH216 “in the next few months,” Hu Huazhi, chief executive told investors during its third-quarter earnings call last week.
Such moves make Guo’s prediction more grounded than it may first appear, with a number of companies seemingly believing that automated flying cars are very much on the horizon in the next decade.
]]>Tesla and General Motors Wuling are the two undisputed leaders of the pack in China’s $49 billion electric vehicle (EV) market, together holding nearly a 20% share this year. But more than a dozen legacy and infant automakers are in hot pursuit. All emerging from rough patches, three US-listed domestic makers—Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto—now comprise the second tier of contenders. Riding on high-growth trajectories, the trio are tipped to be Tesla’s most formidable domestic challengers.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s ongoing premium series on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode subscribers.
Yet with a flood of new money supercharging the industry, third-tier EV makers are coming on as powerful forces as well. Reporting deliveries in significant numbers and backed by a growing list of reputable investors, several pose a real-time threat to the US-listed trio, and speculation is building that some are preparing for listings in Hong Kong.
The third-tier upstarts have been buoyed by strong growth in domestic electric passenger car sales this year. Sales of 321,000 EV units in the first ten months of 2021 represented a 141% year-on-year increase from the same period in 2020, when the overall auto sales slumped 14% from the year before, data from the China Passenger Car Association shows.
Here is our roundup of the four most competitive upstarts emerging in China’s EV space.
Along with Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto, WM Motors was once one of Deutsche Bank analysts’ “Fab Four” of likely candidates to grab the non-Tesla piece of China’s EV market.
Founded in 2015 by Freeman Shen, a former top Volvo executive, WM Motor was one of the earliest EV startups to deliver production vehicles to Chinese customers, reporting a quite respectable delivery number of around 22,000 cars back in 2019. That was a few thousand more than Nio’s numbers that year, and far eclipsing Xpeng’s, which delivered just over 5,000 vehicles. Trailing far behind, Li Auto churned out its first model Li One later that year.
While WM Motor took an early lead in entering initial production, it was quickly overtaken as its sales growth remained virtually flat. Meanwhile, rival Xpeng jacked up deliveries almost five-fold in 2020. Now WM Motor’s delivery numbers of 34,068 vehicles for the first ten months of this year are only half of those of Nio’s and Xpeng’s.
How did WM Motor lose its first-mover advantage in a fast-growing market? There is a consensus that the automaker presents itself as a rather faceless brand (in Chinese): Its cars are functional but middle-of-the-road. Meanwhile, peer Nio is increasingly perceived by customers as a high-quality premium brand with top-of-the-range services. WM Motor has also lagged behind Xpeng in the autonomous vehicle space. Then in late 2020, it was plagued by a recall affecting over 1,000 of its vehicles following several reports of fires within a single month in late 2020.
Nonetheless, many venture capitalists are still anticipating great things for WM Motor. The Baidu-backed EV maker in October said that it was near wrapping up its $500 million Series D funding round led by PCCW, a Hong Kong telecom company owned by the family of local business magnate Li Ka-shing. WM Motor is aiming to launch its fourth production model and first sedan, the M7, by next year. The model will face off against the likes of Tesla’s Model 3, Nio’s ET7, and Xpeng’s P5.
Surpassing Nio and Li Auto in monthly vehicle deliveries for the first time in October, the lesser known Hozon may soon be a rising force to be reckoned with in the Chinese EV market.
With three affordable entry-level cars in its portfolio, the Zhejiang-based automaker handed over 8,107 vehicles to Chinese customers in October, marking a stunning growth of 294% compared to its deliveries in October 2020. Deliveries for the first ten months of this year totaled nearly 50,000 vehicles, closing in on the numbers of Xpeng and Li Auto. Each delivered more than 60,000 units during the same period.
A strong sales recovery in China’s EV market as a whole is a key factor fostering the rise of the likes of Hozon, said Cui Dongshu, secretary general of the China Passenger Car Association, during an online conference last month. China witnessed strong growth in electric passenger car sales, recording a 141% year-on-year increase in October to 321,000 units, when the overall auto sales slumped 14% from a year earlier, data from the industry body showed.
A wave of local but big state companies have noted the uptick in EV sales this year and are rushing to back growing EV startups. The government of Yichun city in central Jiangxi province is Hozon’s largest shareholder, taking a 51.31% stake in the company, The Economic Observer reported (in Chinese). And Hozon in October said it closed an RMB 4 billion ($626 million) Series D1 led by Qihoo 360, representing a major endorsement by China’s biggest cybersecurity firm.
This was followed by an undisclosed amount of investment by CATL, the first publicly known investment in a young EV maker by the battery giant, Yicai reported in November. (CATL also has invested in Zeekr, a premium EV subsidiary of Geely.) Eyeing a capital raise of $1 billion from an initial public offering in Hong Kong next year, Hozon aims to achieve annual sales of 70,000 vehicles this year and increase that number more than sevenfold to 500,000 in five years.
China’s fast-growing EV market has drawn an array of unusual competitors from television makers to real estate firms. Among them is Dahua, China’s second-biggest surveillance equipment maker. Formed in 2015 by Zhu Jiangming, Dahua’s co-founder and former technology chief, Leapmotor is the newest Chinese EV unicorn, having raised over RMB 11.5 billion ($1.8 billion) amid the flood of new money pouring into China’s EV space.
In its most recent funding round, announced in July, the company raised RMB 4.5 billion from heavyweights including state-backed CICC Capital and investment entities led by the municipal government of the eastern city of Hangzhou, where its parent Dahua is headquartered. This was quickly followed with a plan to build a new assembly plant with a production capacity of 200,000 cars annually in Hangzhou, Chinese media reported. The plant is scheduled for completion in 2023.
As with Hozon, the current three Leapmotor models are all budget-minded mainstream vehicles, priced between RMB 60,000 and RMB 200,000 ($9,390 to $31,300). And yet, Leapmotor’s budget mini-electric car, T03, has really gained traction in the market. With a starting price less than $10,000, the four-seater mini-electric car claims a range of 403 kilometers (250 miles) on a single charge and offers assisted driving functions such as lane departure warning and automatic emergency braking.
With T03 accounting for over 90% of the company’s deliveries this year, Leapmotor has declared a wildly ambitious annual target of more than 800,000 deliveries by 2025. That would account for nearly 60% of all EV sales in the country, according to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM). The Hangzhou-based EV maker is reportedly weighing a Hong Kong listing of more than $1 billion as soon as next year.
Born in late 2017, Shanghai-based Human Horizons is unique among a large pool of EV startups in China: It has never raised any outside investor money. That’s in sharp contrast to the likes of Nio and Xpeng which used to struggle to secure funding for their cash-burning businesses.
Founder Ding Lei also has an unusual background. Ding started his career as a quality engineer for the joint venture set up by Volkswagen and SAIC in Shanghai in 1988, then became a vice president of the state-owned automaker in 2007. Yet his most notable experience occurred in 2013, when he became a deputy head of the city’s Pudong New Area for a two-year period. In 2017, he founded both Human Horizon and an investment firm called East Coast Capital.
The company’s premium EV brand Hiphi attracted many eyeballs by releasing what is believed to be the most expensive made-in-China EV model ever: Hiphi X. The limited edition electric sports utility vehicle costs RMB 800,000 (around $125,000). With a driving range of 550 km (342 miles) on a single charge, the luxury vehicle boasts a stand-out performance and an opulent interior to “a degree at which the [Tesla] Model X looks quite conventional,” as one reviewer put it.
Human Horizon’s efforts with the Hiphi X were successful. In September it delivered 641 Hiphi X units, becoming the first locally-made car to top sales in China’s premium EV segment, defined as autos priced above RMB 500,000 ($78,450). Its sales beat both Porsche’s electric supercar, Taycan, and Audi’s sports sedan, E-tron, according to CPCA figures. The company last month announced it would launch a second premium SUV model, the GT-Hiphi Z, next April and start delivery within the year. No price details have been released.
]]>Space travel will only be “a game for rich people” if its cost can not be reduced, said a founder at a Chinese rocket launch startup on Friday.
“If every trip to space costs $1 million, it won’t be a commercial market,” Cheng Wei, founder of Chinese space company Rocket Pi said at the Beyond Expo event held in Macau on Friday. (our translation).
Cheng said that the first step for the commercial exploration of the universe would be sending animals into space.
“We first have to develop the ability to send lifeforms other than humans, like cells or primates, to travel in space to gather data before human exploration can be fully achieved,” said Cheng.
Companies in the emerging market also have to consider regulatory challenges, the entrepreneur said. “This is a long march and we still have a lot of hurdles to overcome,” he added.
Co-founded by Zhuang Fengyuan, an academic at the International Academy of Astronautics, Rocket Pi is among the early movers in the private space exploration sector in China, developing and operating space launch systems for in-orbit experiments for biopharmaceutical studies.
The company is currently on track to launch a biological payload carried by a satellite, called Sparkle-1, later this month, and put several more into orbit next year, Cheng told TechNode. It has set a long-term goal of building a space lab to enable human space travel after 2025.
China has just started constructing its own space station and the country’s research in space life sciences is still at an early stage, Cheng said. He added that there is significant work to be done in helping commercial space travel become a reality, such as reducing the acceleration load for less experienced space travellers so that they can have a safer, smoother ride.
In April, China began building its first permanent space station, Tiangong-1. SpaceX, the aerospace company founded by Elon Musk, made history in September by successfully launching the first orbital flight with four amateur space travelers, marking the first time that an all-civilian crew reached space.
]]>Airbus predicts that the first commercially available flying taxi route will be operational by around 2025, said Philipp Visotschnig, chief financing officer of Airbus China, told the Beyond Expo event held in Macau on Friday.
Below is the full text of Visotschnig‘s speech at the Beyond Expo event. The text has been edited for clarity and brevity:
For half a century Airbus product line of commercial aircraft has transformed the way we live and interact with the world. By truly opening borders, connecting cultures, and changing the way we think and feel about our global neighbors. commercial aircraft have a major role to play in breaking down barriers and uniting people around the world.
Partnering with over 400 operators and customers on flying more than 48,000 routes worldwide, the 12,000 Plus Airbus aircraft in service today connect people each day. Keeping our gaze on the future is in line with our core beliefs. The next challenge for Airbus is to lead the way in making zero-emission commercial aircraft a reality. I will discuss this point and then later.
At Airbus, we are proud of how our products and services contribute to communities around the world every day. Our satellites and tracking systems have made the ocean safer, with solutions that monitor and protect naval roots at maritime assets. Airbus built aircraft instrumental in firefighting, public safety, and maintaining energy services. Airbus products and services are used for some of the most critical missions through human humanitarian aid. We support our partners in times of crisis providing aircraft satellite imagery and other services when relief teams are literally fighting against the clock. Our aircraft help transport patients for urgent medical care and the assistance of relief efforts at sea. That’s what we do.
With the very fast development of his aerospace aviation industry, China’s on track to become the world’s largest aviation market. Today we have more than 1900 aircraft commercial jetliners in service in China and deliveries to this country represent more than 25% of annual deliveries under the annual production volumes of Airbus. What has been making this possible are more than 1900 employees in China that work for Airbus and its joint ventures and commercial aircraft in multiple locations across the country.
Airbus has also been the number one helicopter partner for China for more than 50 years. This is a long-lasting relationship that began in 1967. Today Airbus helicopter is a leader in China with a 40% market share. Traditionally, our helicopters activities are based here in the Greater Bay Area. This is also where our general Innovation Center in Shenzhen is leveraging China’s innovative advantages. Here we are focusing on connectivity, cabin experience, and manufacturing technologies.
At Airbus, we believe that the future of aerospace is autonomous, connected and zero-emission. So our world is changing. And so we are. At Airbus, we want to be known not only for our exceptional products and services but also for the positive impact that we have on the world, our society and on its citizens.
Aviation has given us the possibility to explore all four corners of the world, to connect with friends, and to meet new ones, virtually every day, to feel the thrill of seeing the world, from 30,000 feet above.
But today, we know that the love for travel comes with a price. It comes with a cost. The aviation industry represents today roughly two and a half percent of global human-induced CO2 emissions. But aviation is not the problem, emissions are the problem. So how to address that?
Climate change is the greatest challenge of our generation. At Airbus, we understand that, and we also understand that society expects us to rise to this challenge. This is why we are leading this journey towards clean aerospace. The aviation industry with Airbus at its forefront has committed to industry-wide decarbonization. It includes the following two key targets carbon-neutral growth, and net-zero CO2 emissions by 2050.
We at Airbus expect to make the necessary decisions by 2025 to see what is the best combination of technology. China, being at the forefront of the hydrogen economy will be part of the strategy. More short-term in the development of sustainable alternative fuels. Soft sustainable aviation fuel has the potential to drive significantly down CO2 emissions.
We have seen tremendous activity in the past few years in urban air mobility (UAM). While the industry is still in its early stages, new players continue to enter the market, and the number of UAM pilot projects involving conventional helicopter or aircraft types as electric vertical takeoff, and landing aircraft continue to rise. And until now, almost all vehicles designed for UAM rely totally, or at least partially, on electric propulsion. So that’s one of the trends that we see is electric propulsion.
As more and more operational UAM use cases take to the skies and public publicity increases, you see confidence rising, that’s also important, there’s confidence rising and a higher probability that developers will meet their development targets. As such, we predicted the first commercial UAM routes will be operational by around 2025. They may even start a little earlier.
There is a Chinese autonomous urban air mobility developer that is already operating flights and has received approval from the Chinese authorities to pilot cargo operations. Indeed, the first production facilities and supply chains are already built up for them. Similarly, when we looked at the US, there is also a maker that is already producing or setting up its production site in California with the help of a Japanese auto giant.
Most new models are designed to serve particular purposes. That’s also a trend that we see there’s a design for particular purposes, there are typically city flying taxies, which will fly within very densely populated urban areas covering distances from 15 to 50 kilometers. We see airport shuttles, which will transfer passengers from transport hubs or points of interest to airports within 15 and 80 kilometers. And we see inter- or intra- city flights, which will fly commuters routes up to 250 kilometers.
At the same time, more and more players have entered the wider UAM market. From part suppliers, traffic management providers, infrastructure suppliers and software producers. We see this ecosystem is building up. This is creating an ecosystem with a varied value chain collaboration is becoming an increasingly important aspect. Regulatory authorities must also be involved very heavily.
UAM could become a game-changer for mobility, but there are still many open questions that we need to address. I personally believe that the key to success is collaboration and the right business model.
I think OEMs should build on their experience and find the best fit UAM model. startups need to focus on public acceptance and proof of concept and suppliers and hardware providers to select value chain targets. Then we are there are we on the path to get to this $90 billion market.
]]>China’s tech giant Baidu officially launched an autonomous ride-share service in the capital city Beijing, after receiving the country’s first permit for commercial robotaxi services.
Why it matters: This is the first time that the Chinese government has allowed companies to legally charge Uber-like fees to the public for their robotaxi services, a major milestone for Chinese self-driving car development.
Details: The service, known as Apollo Go (or Luobo Kuaipao in Chinese), ferries passengers around a 60 square kilometer (around 23 square miles) area in the Beijing Economic and Technological Development Zone in the south of the city, Baidu said on Thursday.
Context: Baidu, as well as self-driving unicorn Pony.ai, obtained approval from the head office of the Beijing High-level Automated Driving Demonstration Area to start charging for rides using autonomous vehicles (AVs) in the zone, China Daily reported on Thursday.
Chinese self-driving startup WeRide is partnering with Guangzhou Automobile Group (GAC) to bring autonomous vehicles (AV) onto ride-hailing platform Ontime. It is part of a joint push toward the commercial deployment of robotaxi services, the two companies said on Thursday.
Why it matters: WeRide’s expanded partnership with automaker GAC is the latest example of the startup branching out to work with more companies as it develops self-driving vehicles and related services.
Details: WeRide is working with GAC to integrate its autonomous driving system into the latter’s Aion S electric sedans and make them available for customers of Ontime, a ride-hailing subsidiary of the auto major, according to a joint statement issued Thursday (in Chinese).
Context: Guangzhou-headquartered WeRide has been working since 2018 with GAC, which is Toyota’s and Honda’s Chinese manufacturing partner, to retrofit its software and sensors into GAC’s vehicles such as the Trumpchi GE3 crossover.
Huawei ramped up its involvement in the Chinese electric vehicle (EV) space on Monday, offering in Shanghai the first view of the Avatr 11 sports utility vehicle (SUV) with partners Changan Automobile and CATL. The first model in the Avatr brand, the car features a full suite of Huawei’s autonomous driving technology. Huawei partnered with carmaker Changan and battery supplier CATL a year ago to form the Avatr premium luxury brand of EVs.
Why it matters: The Avatr 11 electric SUV will be the second mass-produced car to get Huawei Hi, a complete automotive hardware and software suite that includes the company’s operating system Harmony OS as well as computing platforms for autonomous driving.
Details: The first EV model produced with Changan and CATL features a supercomputer developed by Huawei and running at 400 trillion operations per second (TOPS). That compares with Tesla’s 144 TOPS for its two-chip full self-driving computer.
Context: Changan, CATL, and Huawei announced their smart EV tie-up back in November 2020. That was followed by the establishment of a joint venture with the state-owned automaker as the biggest shareholder in Avatr.
READ MORE: Huawei begins selling EVs in stores, may offset sinking phone sales: CEO
]]>Self-driving startup QCraft will equip the next generation of its autonomous driving system with Nvidia’s Drive Orin processing chip. The chip can be deployed to both self-driving prototypes and mass-produced vehicles.
Why it matters: Nvidia claims the Drive Orin system-on-a-chip (SoC), unveiled in late 2019 and scheduled for shipping in 2022, is by far the “world’s highest-performance, most-advanced” processor for use in autonomous vehicles (AVs). Its use will allow QCraft to develop driverless vehicles for road testing and partially automated cars for the consumer market.
Details: Nvidia’s Drive Orin chipsets will underpin the hardware suite that will be fitted as standard for QCraft’s next-generation self-driving car fleet, the two companies announced as they unveiled the deal at an event on Tuesday.
Context: Nvidia has also signed a series of deals with Chinese electric vehicle upstarts (including Nio, Li Auto, and WM Motor), supplying their upcoming vehicle models with the chipmaker’s SoCs.
Geely unveiled on Monday an electric semi-truck model. The company said to deliver the model with highly autonomous driving functions in 2024. Such a commercial vehicle from the Chinese automaker could pose a threat to Tesla and other manufacturers.
Why it matters: The launch will allow Geely to expand its presence in the global commercial market, poised for double-digit growth in the coming years, and to compete against Tesla’s long-awaited Semi truck model and similar offerings produced by Daimler, Nikola, among others.
Details: Called the Homtruck, the semi-truck will be available in several power options, including fully electric and plug-in hybrid, and feature a modern sleeper cab interior, which Geely said will give drivers extra comfort.
Context: The Chinese electric vehicle (EV) industry has been on a rebound after a market slump that began in late 2019 and lasted an entire year. Carmakers sold 357,000 EVs in China in September, accounting for more than 20% of monthly new car sales for the first time.
Among a rash of Chinese tech behemoths venturing into the car manufacturing business over the past year, newcomer Xiaomi may pose the most serious competitive threat to other carmakers. With a strong brand name and a dominant position in the country’s consumer electronics market, a Xiaomi car has the potential to turn the automobile and mobility industry upside down in the coming decade.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s ongoing premium series on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode subscribers.
Now the Chinese smartphone giant is saying a Xiaomi car will be coming in the next few years. Speaking at Xiaomi’s annual investor day on Oct. 19, Chief Executive Lei Jun said the company is aiming to mass produce its first electric vehicle model for consumers in the first half of 2024. The company reportedly (in Chinese) has a master plan for its auto business, eyeing a total sales target of 900,000 vehicles within three years of production. That number would be almost equivalent to China’s total EV sales in 2019.
Bottom line: The auto industry has been uncharted territory for Xiaomi, but boss and founder Lei, 51, is setting wildly ambitious goals for the car-making project, which he calls “my last major entrepreneurial project.” A latecomer to the transition from fossil-fueled vehicles to the future of electric and autonomous mobility, Xiaomi is largely unprepared (in Chinese), even compared to newbie entrants such as Baidu and Huawei. To catch up, the company is pouring billions of RMB into the sector and placing some big bets on multiple startups as it attempts to build a complete auto supply chain.
Here’s a look at some of the company’s biggest deals in the auto industry.
Black Sesame Technologies, a five-year-old Chinese auto-chip startup, announced on Sept. 22 that it had raised “hundreds of millions of dollars” from Xiaomi and other investors. Black Sesame became the smartphone maker’s first big bet in auto-chip designing. One of Xiaomi’s investor affiliates, Hubei Xiaomi Changjiang Industrial Investment Fund, led a Series C investment announced the same day as the strategic investment, which valued Black Sesame at over $2 billion.
Already backed by renowned investors including auto major SAIC, Black Sesame is one of the three domestic companies with the potential to develop high-performance central processors for next-generation electric and connected vehicles, an investment manager who declined to be named told TechNode in September. The other two domestic chip powerhouses are considered to be Huawei and Horizon Robotics. China’s consistent pursuit of self-sufficiency in chip manufacturing may be what made Black Sesame an attractive deal for Xiaomi, this person added.
Xiaomi and Black Sesame have yet to share details about any potential collaboration. And yet the Chinese chipmaking upstart in April unveiled its powerful A1000 Pro chipset. The chipset claims to have a processing speed of 196 trillion operations per second (TOPs), which would outperform Tesla’s full self-driving (FSD) computer running at 144 TOPs. Black Sesame also said its four-chip full autonomous driving system will be capable of a range of applications such as highway and urban driving. The system is scheduled for release with mass production vehicles by the end of 2022.
Following the announcement of its own electric vehicles in March, the only acquisition that Xiaomi has publicly made known to date was its $77.37 million buyout in August of Deepmotion, a Chinese self-driving startup with Microsoft roots. Acquiring the team of a well-known but struggling software startup is expected to help Xiaomi to absorb the talent inside of the company and finally discover a path to develop its branded consumer vehicles with autonomous driving capabilities.
Founded by four computer scientists from Microsoft Research Asia, the biggest overseas research arm of the US tech company, Deepmotion in mid-2017 began working on high-definition 3D maps and localization functions for autonomous vehicles (AVs). However, the company never obtained the required license for surveying and mapping from the central government. It later pivoted to develop AI algorithms and software that enable the use of HD maps and camera sensors for vehicles to navigate the roads.
Thus, the hints are strong: Xiaomi will probably adopt a very conventional approach to self-driving technology by using multiple sensors to help AVs navigate, competing head-to-head against players such as Nio and Xpeng Motors in this space.
In separate moves, the Chinese smartphone maker earlier this year invested in Geometrical Pal, another startup that develops software solutions for radar sensors used in AVs, while also backing Zongmu Technology, a company with a specialty in software development for self-parking functions.
Xiaomi in June made news again by co-leading the $300 million investment in a top Chinese lidar supplier, making its first bet on what has been heralded as a crucial component enabling self-driving cars to perceive the world. The company, called Hesai, has long been among the highest funded lidar companies worldwide; its products are used in most Chinese self-driving cars. At least 10 out of the top 15 robotaxi developers worldwide are reportedly (in Chinese) among its clients, including Baidu and Didi.
China’s highest-valued lidar startup, Hesai used to develop mechanical spinning lidar sensors for self-driving prototype vehicles. They were usually perched on car roofs with a set of rotating laser sensors housed in motorized turntables to provide 360-degree vision. Such bulky rotating sensors are too unreliable and expensive for mass production vehicles. Hesai in 2019 therefore launched a more compact, solid-state lidar unit which it claims could spot small, dark objects at a range beyond 300 meters.
Chinese automakers and their lidar partners have been working to include lidar, still an immature technology compared with cameras and radar, in their future production vehicles for accommodating high levels of automation. Hesai said in a June statement that the $300 million war chest would be used to accelerate mass delivery of its solid-state lidar units to multiple auto clients without elaborating further. Xiaomi did not reveal details of a possible deal with the company.
READ MORE: Lidar is hard—but it’s coming soon
Partnering with battery makers has become a critical piece of automakers’ plans to secure enough battery supplies as they produce millions of EVs in the next few years, and Xiaomi is no exception. The smartphone giant has actually invested in four Chinese companies across the battery supply chain. In its most recent bet, the company joined a group of investors to pump RMB 10.3 billion ($1.6 billion) into Svolt, a battery maker formed by automaker Great Wall Motor.
The Series B, led by Bank of China Group Investment with participation by IDG Capital and others, has reportedly (in Chinese) pushed Svolt’s valuation to about RMB 36 billion—some 38% higher than just six months ago. A distant rival to the likes of CATL and BYD, three-year-old Svolt is stepping up efforts to jostle for market share with plans to increase its production capacity to over 200 gigawatt-hours (GWh) by 2025. That would be one-third of the capacity of market leader CATL.
As China’s EV sales continue to grow at an astonishing pace, Xiaomi, like many other automakers, is rushing to build a sustainable supply chain to make sure its future models won’t be held up by a battery crunch. Previously, the consumer electronics company had poured RMB 375 million into Ganfeng LiEnergy, the battery-making unit of lithium producer Ganfeng Lithium, according to a statement (in Chinese) released on Jul. 31. Another Chinese battery maker, CALB, also raised an undisclosed amount of funding from Xiaomi and others last December, reported Shanghai Securities News (in Chinese).
In a matter of months, Xiaomi has rapidly acquired capabilities, ranging from software development to chip manufacturing, which could facilitate the company’s ambitious plan to build a complete supply chain under its control and finally make EVs on its own.
However, the consumer electronics giant, still new to auto making, faces the formidable challenges of pulling together these partners from various sectors, managing an entire auto supply chain, and navigating persistent global supply disruptions. Furthermore, Xiaomi has yet to reveal where it intends to manufacture its EVs, triggering speculations about possible contract manufacturing with carmakers such as Great Wall Motor, while peers Baidu and Huawei moved quickly to partner with Geely and BAIC, respectively.
Previously an investor in both Nio and Xpeng Motors, Xiaomi now finds itself competing against these established EV makers. Nio and Xpeng earlier this year hit notable milestones, each delivering more than 100,000 vehicles to customers. Even farther ahead are the dominant EV market players, Tesla and GM’s Wuling. These automakers are all well prepared to defend their territories from attacks by upstarts like Xiaomi. The race will stretch long into the future.
]]>At least half of the 1,000 surveyed Chinese urban consumers are looking to buy an electric vehicle (EV) as their automotive purchase, an increase of 16% from the 2019 findings, a survey by consultants AlixPartners found. It’s the latest sign of an accelerated transition from gasoline vehicles in the country.
Why it matters: China’s EV market is recovering faster than expected following subsidy cuts by the central government and a shakeout due to the pandemic.
Details: The survey of 1,000 Chinese car buyers in major cities found that 50% are now believers of all-electric vehicles, meaning they are very likely to buy one as their next vehicle; that is double the world average of 25% and the highest share among potential car buyers surveyed in seven countries by AlixPartners.
Context: China’s NEV sales almost tripled to more than 2.15 million vehicles from a year ago during the first nine months of this year, according to CAAM figures.
Self-driving startup QCraft has begun operating an autonomous shuttle bus pilot project in an eastern Chinese city, the latest example of local entrants racing to make driverless transport commonplace in the country.
Two-year-old QCraft, backed by tech giants Bytedance and Meituan, currently operates a fleet of around 70 self-driving mini-buses in several major cities, including Shenzhen and Wuhan, the largest fleet of its kind in China.
Now, the company is expanding its footprint with the launch of a robobus project in the downtown area of Wuxi, a city in the eastern Jiangsu province, which started taking local residents on rides on Oct. 23.
Initially deploying five robobuses for three routes totaling 15 kilometers (9.3 miles), QCraft said its pilot service covers a range of about 10 square kilometers in the busiest portions of the city and connects major shopping centers and subway stations to residential properties.
On Oct. 23, TechNode got a look at the driverless future with a ride on one of QCraft’s Wuxi buses. The electric mini-bus model, called Longzhou One, is equipped with an extensive self-driving sensor suite including five Lidar units, four front cameras, and two millimeter-wave radar units, making it capable of seeing objects from long distances of up to 250 meters.
The self-driving buses still have a driver to reassure passengers and comply with government rules. The driver took control of the vehicle once during a 15-minute ride when a large bus zoomed past it in the overtaking lane.
The buses typically travel between 30-50 km/h (19-31 mph) and are currently programmed on fixed routes. Each bus carries a maximum of nine passengers and has a driving range of up to 200 km (124 miles) on a single charge.
Passengers can access real-time transit information from the company’s app on their phones. The buses operate from 9 am to 6 pm on weekdays, which the company said will meet the needs of nearby residents with their daily commute.
After receiving $100 million from reputable investors, including Meituan and Jack Ma’s YF Capital, QCraft is on track to expand its test fleet to more than 100 vehicles by year-end.
READ MORE: Drive I/O | Meet the Chinese self-driving car startup with Google roots
]]>Xpeng Motors will launch a pilot program for autonomous ride-hailing services in China in the second half of next year, Xpeng’s executives said at an annual tech day event on Oct. 24. The program is part of the company’s latest efforts to offer full-scenario autonomous driving capabilities by the middle of 2023.
Why it matters: Xpeng expects the move to accelerate the development of its advanced assisted driving technology for mass-produced vehicle models. The company claims its upcoming advanced assisted driving technology will cover most traffic conditions.
Details: Xpeng will operate a fleet of vehicles equipped with its advanced assisted driving software in Chinese urban environments in the second half of 2022, Wu Xinzhou, vice president of autonomous driving in Xpeng, told reporters during a media interview on Tuesday.
Context: Compared to robotaxi companies, electric vehicle makers such as Xpeng have chosen different approaches in their quest to achieve fully autonomous driving technology. EV makers are gradually working their technology up from assistant driving to semi-autonomous driving, hoping to arrive at fully autonomous driving.
Chinese electric vehicle maker WM Motor showcased its first sedan model named M7 on Friday. The company boasts that the car has an advanced sensor package and will be affordable as it aims to carve out a place in the country’s competitive auto market.
Why it matters: WM Motor’s first sedan model, the M7, will compete head to head with Nio’s highly-anticipated ET7, Xpeng’s P7 and P5 sedans, and the Zhiji L7, a premium electric vehicle co-launched by SAIC and Alibaba.
Details: The M7 sedan features extensive autonomous driving hardware, with 32 sensors, including three lidar units that use light to create a three-dimensional representation of surrounding objects. The model can provide advanced driving capabilities on highways and urban roads.
READ MORE: Lidar is hard—but it’s coming soon
Context: WM Motor, which is also backed by Hong Kong billionaire Richard Li’s telecommunication firm PCCW, has delivered over 70,000 vehicles, failing to match rivals such as Nio and Xpeng, which have handed over 140,000 and 100,000 vehicles respectively as of September.
Chinese flying car startup HT Aero has raised $500 million as part of a new round of funding as it pushes to popularize its technology.
Why it matters: HT Aero, an Xpeng-affiliated company, said the fund is the largest venture funding round for a startup in Asia’s passenger flying vehicle sector to date, according to a Tuesday press release.
Details: Electric vehicle maker Xpeng Motors led the Series A funding round, along with Chinese venture capitalists IDG Capital and 5Y Capital.
Context: HT Aero in July unveiled its latest electric passenger drone, Voyager X2, featuring a flight time of 35 minutes and a maximum speed of 130km per hour (around 80mph). Yet the company has no plans for mass production of the two-seater flying vehicle prototype, for now, Caixin (in Chinese) reported Wednesday, citing a company representative.
Baidu announced on Tuesday that its highway driver-assistance system will be available to customers for the first time via electric vehicle maker WM Motor. The search engine giant is rushing to lead the race in popularizing partially automated features on consumer cars in China.
Why it matters: Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) technology is increasingly considered a major stepping stone to fully autonomous vehicles. Major Chinese auto and tech companies are looking to seize the growing market potential.
Details: The new WM Motor W6 sports utility model will have 29 autonomous driving sensors and Baidu’s Apollo Navigation Pilot (ANP) software. The vehicle will have semi-autonomous driving capabilities, such as automated lane changes on highways, according to an announcement sent to TechNode on Tuesday.
Context: Market research firm BlueWeave Consulting estimated that the global ADAS industry recorded $25 billion in revenue in 2020, and that number is expected to nearly triple by 2027, according to a Financial Times report.
China’s July crackdown on Didi has had knock-on effects for the wider ride-hailing market, as investors scurry to fund competitors cranking up efforts to steal market share from the ride-hailing monopoly.
Remarkably, this time it is not seasoned venture capital funds but state-owned investors including Citic that are pouring billions of RMB into promising up-and-comers. The leading beneficiaries so far are automaker Geely’s Cao Cao and T3, a ride-hailing service backed by three other domestic automakers. The investments follow more than three months of speculation that Chinese regulators could impose heavy fines, break up the company, or even demand a complete takeover by the state. Didi was listed on the New York Stock Exchange in late June but, less than one week later, cybersecurity regulators forced the removal of Didi’s app from online stores.
Insights is a series of explainers on developing stories in China tech, available to TechNode subscribers.
Bottom line: Venture capitalists are bullish that upstarts can catch up with the longstanding leader in China’s ride-hailing industry because Didi has been losing momentum ever since its app was suspended. However, the challengers still have to tackle the same regulatory problems Didi has faced.
T3 and Cao Cao gained traction: Dominating China’s ride-hailing market with a 90% share, Didi has had no serious competitors for more than five years. But now investors believe that Beijing’s cybersecurity investigation of Didi may put some ride-hailers backed by automakers in a better position to prosper.
Founded by auto majors FAW, Dongfeng, and Changan back in 2019, T3 is being thought of as one of the most promising challengers to Didi.
The multi-million dollar investments are the latest to follow in the Chinese ride-hailing space which is witnessing investor interest running high over the possibility that two or even more companies could thrive after being a winner-takes-all market since Uber left China in late 2016.
Have they solved Didi’s problems? One of the biggest regulatory hurdles Didi has faced is compliance with regulations governing operating permits and licenses for drivers. Didi acknowledged in its initial public offering (IPO) filings that many of its drivers in China had not obtained the license legally necessary to provide ride-hailing services.
Didi’s pain is rivals’ gain: Another competitive advantage rivals have over Didi is that they can accept new app user registrations, while Didi still can’t.
The Didi saga is “a window of opportunity” for rivals, Chen Liteng, an analyst with Hangzhou-based consulting firm 100ec.cn, told TechNode. But Didi still maintains a “significant lead” in China’s ride-hailing market and up-and-comers “would be struggling in their attempts to shake Didi’s position over the short term,” Chen said.
]]>READ MORE: Didi app ban ignites race for ride-hailing market share
A global chip shortage will continue to hurt Chinese automakers in 2022, Chen Yudong, the China head of German auto supplier Bosch, said on Wednesday.
Why it matters: The ongoing global chip shortage has hit Chinese automakers hard. In September, the country’s auto sales fell 19.6% year-on-year to 2.06 million vehicles, the biggest monthly drop this year. Several Chinese electric car makers, including Nio and Li Auto, have slashed their quarterly production forecasts.
Details: Currently, Bosch China can only fulfill 50% of the market demand in China as a result of the chip shortage, an improvement from July when it could only meet 20% of the demand from clients, Chen said during a media briefing in Shanghai.
Context: Bosch is the world’s largest auto parts supplier. The company supplies 70% of China’s electronic brake control systems, Chinese media Yicai reported last month.
QCraft, a Chinese startup co-founded by four former engineers of Google’s self-driving project, is developing a driverless vehicle expected to launch by the end of this year.
Called “Longzhou Space,” the autonomous shuttle will be “a hybrid between robotaxis and robobuses,” Da Fang, co-founder and chief scientist of QCraft, said on Sept. 17 on the sidelines of TechNode’s Emerge 2021 conference in Beijing. The vehicle is one of the two-year-old company’s efforts to expand its autonomous commercial fleet, which now numbers about 70 robobuses operating in six cities.
“It’s going to provide city bus services but, when the demand is not high, it also can fulfill the (function of) ride-hailing,” Da said. He added the latest product highlights the company’s thinking on the future of shared mobility, in which autonomous vehicles (AVs) will be seamlessly shareable among people and can be adapted to carry freight and for other purposes.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s ongoing premium series on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Normally available only to TechNode Squared subscribers, we’re making this issue free as a sample of our paid content.
Da declined to reveal the name of its manufacturing partner. He told TechNode that the company is also developing assisted driving technologies for vehicles larger than minibuses and sedans in separate collaborations with automakers, without revealing further details.
Since its founding in 2019, QCraft has quickly become a rock star self-driving car company in China. Its co-founders include Yu Qian, a former team leader at Google Maps, as well as Da Fang, Hou Cong, and Wang Kun. All four are former software engineers at Waymo, Google’s self-driving unit that is widely considered a technical leader in autonomous driving.
Now employing about 200 in China and the US, the startup in August announced it had closed a $100 million Series A+ from new investors including YF Capital, a private equity firm founded by Jack Ma, and Longzhu Capital, food delivery giant Meituan’s industrial fund. This followed another major funding round of “dozens of millions of dollars” reportedly from TikTok parent ByteDance and other investors earlier this year.
TechNode took the opportunity at last month’s Emerge 2021 conference to interview Da, a former Waymo engineer in motion planning, one of the most challenging areas for autonomous driving. Da obtained a PhD in computer science at Columbia University where he focused on computer graphics and animation, developing simulation methods used in the modeling of liquids.
The following conversation has been edited for clarity and brevity.
TechNode: Behavior prediction is one of the hardest problems in autonomous driving. Companies including Waymo are training their driverless cars using simulated software to handle various unpredictable situations. How does that work?
Da: Behavior prediction is basically trying to model the world, including the agents such as the other vehicles and people, and predict how they are going to behave. The difficulty is that the future is not really certain. If you imagine a pedestrian standing on the side of the road and he is moving towards the middle of the road, a human driver probably knows how to react to it and to brake to let the pedestrian pass first. But there are uncertainties in the humans’ actions. The pedestrian may stop in the middle of the road or accelerate and speed through the road and reach the other side quickly. So your reactions need to change accordingly.
There are other difficulties as well. For example, negotiations. Sometimes prediction is not just about predicting what the other people or vehicles will move, but also about negotiating with them. If you imagine two cars merging into one lane and they approached the point at roughly the same time, one of them has to proceed first and the other has to brake a bit later. So this will definitely involve some negotiations in scenarios like this. Motion prediction is not only about predicting what other vehicles will do or will not do, but also about understanding how our actions will affect those predictions.
TechNode: There has been a significant debate over whether AVs should leverage multiple sensors or purely rely on cameras to navigate the environment. What is your take on that?
Da: Our view is that these different sensors are very complementary to each other. There’s just no reason to not use them at this stage of AV development. We know that right now, the most commonly used sensors are cameras, lidar, and millimeter wave radar. Lidar is really good at measuring distance. You can get lidar points that specifically, accurately pinpoint an object in a 3D space and know how far they are from us. That’s what cameras can’t do. With millimeter wave radar, you get speed measurement as well, but at a lower resolution.
READ MORE: DRIVE I/O | Lidar is hard—but it’s coming soon
There are many advantages to cameras in terms of high resolution. You can recognize textures. You can recognize small objects, like traffic cones and faraway pedestrians. That’s something you cannot do with lidar. But you will get a lot of negative impact in adverse weather like rains, snows, and frogs with both lidar sensors and cameras and that’s where radar sensors really shine. All of these sensors have their strengths and weaknesses. None of them by itself is going to be enough for dealing with all the scenarios. Basically, we have to use all of them together in order to build a really safe vehicle.
TechNode: But which one is better for AVs to detect and react to stable objects such as parked vehicles? That’s one of the major technical issues behind the recent Tesla and Nio crashes.
Da: We know that’s a very challenging problem for radar, mostly because of the low resolution. Radar sensors have reflections of these objects, but they have a difficult time telling them apart from backgrounds like the ground or buildings on the side of the road. Lidar will be much better because of a higher resolution. You can recognize objects directly apart from the background, even though it’s just a stationary point. With cameras, you can do the same, because you have much richer information in both resolution and color. I think right now lidar is proving to be the most important sensor of the three for highly autonomous driving.
TechNode: You and your founding team members worked at Waymo for a few years before setting up QCraft. What have you learned from that?
Da: One of the things that Waymo has done really well that we are trying to replicate here is that engineers do not just try to solve the problems, but try very hard to solve the problems in the right way. So, for example, the computation of the headway.
When you’re controlling the vehicle to follow the vehicle in front in the same lane at a comfortable distance, there’s this headway distance that you want to figure out. If an engineer is tasked with computing this optimal headway distance, how would he proceed? An average engineer will probably say, let’s put up a few driving logs, watch what human drivers have been doing, measure the distances, and maybe do some averages. They will get some numbers like 10 meters, 20 meters, 30 meters, depending on different scenarios, and then just use the numbers.
Obviously, that’s a really bad solution because it doesn’t generalize. Let’s say 20 meters may be good for a reasonably high-speed road, but it’s not good for expressways and urban areas as well. A better engineer would realize that it depends on the driving speed and the circumstances, such as the width of the road, but, most importantly, the speed of the two vehicles.
But that’s not good enough, still. If we have a really good engineer, who’s trying to always go one step further, he will think about when we are driving the car ourselves, why we will pick a different headway distance at different speeds. The answer is probably at a high vehicle speed, if we don’t leave enough room in front of our vehicle when the car in front of us brakes, we will not have enough reaction time.
That’s going straight to this concept called RSS, which stands for “responsibility-sensitive safety.” If we have a really good engineer who’s trying to find the right solution, they will basically discover RSS by themselves by solving this problem. That’s a really important thing that we would value. (Editor’s note: RSS is a mathematical model for AV safety framework developed by Intel’s self-driving division Mobileye.)
]]>Chinese ride-hailing platform T3 is close to securing RMB 5 billion ($775 million) in a funding round led by state-owned financial conglomerate Citic Group, Chinese media LatePost (in Chinese) reported Thursday, citing three unnamed sources.
Why it matters: Didi’s rivals, especially those funded by state-owned enterprises, have received a new wave of investment since the nation’s leading ride-hailer was put under a cybersecurity review in July.
Details: Two sources told LatePost that investment firms are “very enthusiastic” about this new opportunity in China’s ride-hailing market. “Firms have placed investment biddings of more than ten billion yuan,” the sources told LatePost.
Context: Cao Cao Mobility, the ride-hailing unit of Chinese private automaker Geely, raised RMB 3.8 billion from investors led by a group of state-owned enterprises in early September.
]]>READ MORE: Didi app ban ignites race for ride-hailing market share
Creating robotic ride-hail vehicles capable of transporting people is proving a hard nut to crack, so Chinese self-driving companies are exploring other commercially viable paths to achieve mass adoption of the technology.
Robotaxi developers are “evolving into platforms” that enable a variety of vehicles for different user scenarios, Tu T. Le, managing director of consultancy Sino Auto Insights, said Friday during TechNode’s Emerge 2021 conference in Beijing.
“It is very difficult for autonomous vehicle companies to be profitable with the one single-use case of ride-hailing,” Le said. He added that applications in which autonomous vehicles (AVs) operate at low speeds with cheaper sensors and higher utilization rates could be “closer to commercialization en masse.”
Le’s comment highlighted the growing uncertainties surrounding the future of driverless ride-hailing services, or robotaxis. As a result AV players are shifting their attention to more practical applications.
A commercial robotaxi is the “holy grail” of autonomy, because it would address the most complicated traffic scenarios by offering timely and comfortable rides to customers in dense urban areas, according to Da Fang, co-founder and chief scientist of driverless technology startup QCraft.
The sector has been in a trough of disillusionment over the past few years, as Google’s self-driving unit Waymo and General Motors’ affiliate Cruise, both pioneers in AV research, suffered several setbacks in their much-hyped quests to launch a driverless ride-hailing service.
Waymo’s valuation in late 2019 was cut 40% to $105 billion by Morgan Stanley, followed by the departure of its CEO John Krafcik and several other executives earlier this year. The company’s vehicles had traveled autonomously for more than 20 million miles (32 million kilometers) on public roads as of early 2020, but Waymo’s fully driverless robotaxi pilot is still only available in certain areas of Phoenix, Arizona, after a couple of years of rigorous testing.
As capital is being reallocated into research and development of more promising applications, autonomous bus service looks to be one of the more appealing bets. Backed by Chinese big tech firms Meituan and Bytedance, QCraft is one of the early movers in this sector. It has piloted a fleet of around 70 self-driving buses for public passenger transit in five domestic cities including Shenzhen and Wuhan since July 2020.
“There are several scenarios where we think AVs have actually become technologically viable and robobus is one of them,” Da said, adding that autonomous shuttles encounter situations similar to those faced by robotaxis in urban areas, but lower driving speeds and fixed routes reduce crash risks.
Chinese makers of the underlying technology, whether big tech companies or rising startups, are now training their sights on commercial vehicles, including trucks and vans for freight delivery. Toyota-backed Pony.ai has reportedly been testing its self-driving trucking technology in Guangzhou since December, while WeRide, Nissan’s bet in China, earlier this month announced moves to test driverless vans in everyday delivery scenarios.
Then came the news on Sept. 17 of Baidu’s entry into the logistics industry with the debut of Xingtu, the first heavy-duty truck model built upon Baidu’s “Apollo” autonomous driving system. Baidu, viewed as China’s answer to Google, had previously announced a seemingly ambitious target of deploying 3,000 robotaxis in 30 cities over the next three years. But that figure would mean passengers in each city, on average, would have access to fewer than 100 robotaxis.
“A pilot program with multiple model types of AVs also makes sense from a technology point of view. You simply need to collect data as much as possible by testing different types of vehicles in various kinds of scenarios,” said Da.
]]>TechNode has announced the winners of the first OTEC-Emerge Technology Awards. The awards were announced at the OTEC-Emerge Tech Summit held in Beijing on Friday.
Emerge is TechNode’s annual conference about emerging trends in China tech. It presents a strategic and forward-looking view of China’s tech sector in English with voices from experts and representatives of leading companies. The third Emerge conference features the theme of “What’s next for tech in the new normal?” This year, TechNode partners with the Overseas Talent Entrepreneurship Conference (OTEC) to present the OTEC-Emerge Tech Summit.
OTEC-Emerge Technology Awards shortlisted innovative tech startups in three areas of smart mobility, fintech, and e-commerce.
QCraft, a US and China-based self-driving startup, won the Rising Star Award. Hangzhou-based vesoft Inc., a developer of China’s leading open-source graph database Nebula Graph, walked away with the Best Tech Innovation award. The Best Investment Value award goes to Evoke Electric Motorcycles, an electric vehicle maker.
“TechNode has long been an independent and reliable English media outlet focusing on China’s technology innovation. We launched the OTEC-Emerge Technology Awards by discovering startups representing China’s innovation from a professional and neutral perspective,” said Lu Gang, founder and CEO of TechNode.
“Through this rare tech award selected by an English outlet, We hope to help the global tech industry better understand the latest technological innovation trends in China and promote more outstanding tech companies to an international platform by discovering startups representing China’s innovation,” said Lu.
QCraft – Chinese self-driving startup founded by Waymo alumni.
vesoft Inc. – Hangzhou-based startup devoted to developing China’s leading open-source graph database solution, Nebula Graph.
Evoke Electric Motorcycles – developer and manufacturer of light weight electric motorcycles.
AutoX – Alibaba-backed self-driving car company with ride-hailing pilot services in a number of cities.
DeepRoute – Alibaba-backed self-driving startup focused on fully automation technologies for passenger transport and urban logistics.
Evoke Electric Motorcycles – developer and manufacturer of lightweight electric motorcycles.
Hesai Technology – Lidar sensing technologies developer for autonomous vehicles.
Horizon Robotics – startup company developing artificial intelligence chips for smart vehicles.
QCraft – Chinese self-driving startup founded by Waymo alumni.
RoboSense – developer of smart sensor systems incorporating LiDAR sensors, and perception software.
TuSimple – startup that creates autonomous trucks and advanced driverless vehicles.
UISEE – Chinese autonomous driving company focused on providing robot delivery services.
WeRide – Xpeng-backed smart mobility company creates leading L4 autonomous driving technologies.
AKTE – food safety platform leveraging automatic data collection and blockchain-based security technologies.
Hrfax – fintech startup that offers consumer installment loan-related services for financial institutions.
Ice Kredit – fintech company providing risk management solutions to both individuals and financial institutions.
imToken – multi-chain cryptocurrency wallet that allows users to use one identity to manage multiple wallets.
Kingsware – robotic process automation system committed to building an enterprise-level safe robot management platform.
Ningze Fintech – financial technology solution provider that connects banks, loan firms, and online financial platforms.
Nuanwa Technology – health insurance technology company offering customization services and risk control solutions for health insurance companies.
SphereEx – distributed data infrastructure that helps users to manage their fragmented database.
vesoft Inc. – Hangzhou-based startup devoted to developing China’s leading open-source graph database solution, Nebula Graph. The database has been widely adopted in the fintech sector.
XTransfer – fintech company that provides cross-border financial services for China-based small- and medium-sized enterprises.
AiMall – AI company empowering traditional retail businesses by utilizing visual intelligence, emotional intelligence, and deep-learning algorithms to link customers, brands, and stores.
Benlai – Chinese fresh produce e-commerce platform.
Duozhuayu – WeChat-based second-hand book trading platform.
Floral & Life – lifestyle app offering gardening and planting tips.
ImageDT – AI retail solution offering services such as channel management, intelligent network management, and sales forecast analysis for retail and consumer goods enterprises.
Luxnow – Y Combinator-backed peer-to-peer marketplace to access luxury items.
Mmchong – Shanghai-based community group-buy platform targeting higher income groups.
SandStar– artificial intelligence company that applies computer vision technology in the retail industry to enable grab-and-go convenience, autonomous checkout, and big data analytics.
Wellcee – home rental & social platform targeting expatriates and youth in China.
Whale – digital marketing platform.
]]>Deeproute.ai, a Chinese self-driving car startup, announced Tuesday that it had raised more than $300 million in a Series B led by Alibaba.
Why it matters: The investment is perhaps Alibaba’s most significant move in autonomous driving.
Details: Alibaba led the Series B. Other investors include Jeneration Capital, a Hong Kong-based venture capital firm, and an investment fund of Chinese automaker Geely, according to the Tuesday announcement.
Context: Deeproute develops software for self-driving cars and operates several pilot programs to transport people and goods. In September 2019, Deeproute closed a $50 million pre-Series A, led by Fosun RZ Capital, Chinese conglomerate Fosun Group’s investment affiliate. The company secured an undisclosed amount in Series A a year later.
Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated the number of Deeproute’s proprietary test vehicles as 20, not more than 30.
]]>Chinese autonomous driving startup WeRide is testing a self-driving cargo van that can carry out delivery services. WeRide is partnering with carmaker Jiangling Motor Corporation (JMC) and courier firm ZTO Express.
Why it matters: Since the coronavirus pandemic, Chinese companies are seeing accelerated adoption of autonomous vehicles (AVs) for contactless delivery.
Details: WeRide on Thursday announced that it has been working with JMC, a Chinese manufacturing partner of US automaker Ford, to test a self-driving electric van designed for cargo delivery since the second half of last year. Courier company ZTO will purchase an undisclosed number of the vans to test.
Context: Guangzhou-based WeRide began testing self-driving minibuses in its headquarters city in January. It also completed a $310 million Series B, led by Yutong Group, a Chinese electric bus maker.
]]>READ MORE: The Chinese startup bringing robotaxis to the masses
Cao Cao Mobility, the ride-hailing unit of Chinese private automaker Geely, announced Monday that it had raised RMB 3.8 billion ($589 million) from investors led by a group of state-owned enterprises. The move came two months after the country’s dominant ride-hailer, Didi Global, was put under an ongoing cybersecurity review.
Why it matters: It is the biggest funding the company has received in two years, Cao Cao said in a statement (in Chinese) published Monday.
Details: This new round brought Cao Cao’s total funding to around RMB 5 billion. Lead investors include Suzhou Xiangcheng Financial Holding Group, an investment company held by the Xiangcheng district government of Suzhou, as well as Suzhou High-Speed Rail New City Group and three other state-controlled enterprises.
Context: Chinese ride-hailing platforms, either backed by tech giants or legacy automakers, have been rushing to take market share from Didi after regulators ordered the ride-hailing giant in early July to temporarily stop adding new customers.
]]>Read more: Didi app ban ignites race for ride-hailing market share
Nio is enveloped in a public relations nightmare after Chinese traffic authorities last month disclosed the first known fatality involving one of the company’s vehicles using its partially automated driving system.
Called Nio Pilot, the advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) has been a major selling point for the maker of luxury electric vehicles (EVs). Now it stands accused of overselling the capabilities of the technology. There could be more consequences to come as Nio is in advanced plans to enter the competitive mass auto market.
The Aug.12 crash of the Nio ES8, resulting in the death of the 31-year-old driver, has also had repercussions throughout the autonomous vehicle industry, with many fearing the prospect of tougher regulation and the loss of public confidence. Xpeng Motors and Li Auto last month quickly dropped the terms “autonomous” and “advanced” in describing their ADAS systems, respectively.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s ongoing premium series on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode subscribers.
The fatal crash: The accident occurred on a highway in Putian city in eastern Fujian province. The driver, Lin Wenqin, had placed his 2020 ES8 into Nio’s Navigate on Pilot mode, which basically takes control of the car during highway driving. The sports utility vehicle struck a highway maintenance vehicle stopped in the same lane, according to a statement (in Chinese) posted by local police on Chinese microblogging platform Weibo on Aug.18. The cause of the crash remains under investigation by Putian city police.
Shortcomings of ADAS: Pending results of the police investigation, whether the incident was triggered by a software glitch or human error remains an open question. It appears, though, that either Lin or the in-car system failed to recognize the stationary highway car in front of the ES8 and to move to another lane in response.
Nio’s image in tatters: The deadly incident comes at a crucial time for Nio. Having struggled to gain a foothold in the luxury EV segment, the seven-year-old automaker is pushing to roll out its first mass-market car, eyeing a segment of the market where competition is fierce and margins are thin. Now its hard-won reputation as a high-quality premium brand is under threat.
Far-reaching consequences: Nio’s user manual warns that the ADAS system cannot detect stationary objects, including “roadblocks,” nor can it brake for them. Drivers are required to take control of their cars immediately when these situations arise. This means the liability for such accidents will probably lie with drivers themselves.
Xpeng plans foray into the premium market: As Nio moves to the mainstream market, Xpeng Motors is doing the opposite. The Alibaba-backed EV maker, which has maintained a price range between RMB 150,000 ($23,225) and RMB 300,000, is looking to expand in the domestic market by entering the premium-market segment with a high-end model scheduled for release in 2023.
Internet giants doubling down on self-driving tech: Although the arrival of a truly self-driving car remains delayed indefinitely, Chinese tech giants are still betting heavily on self-driving startups with the intention to own a large share of the driverless driving future. Their investments come at a time when the Chinese government is establishing a looser framework with an expanded scope for testing self-driving vehicles, the South China Morning Post reported.
Smartphone giant Xiaomi on Wednesday announced that it is acquiring Deepmotion, a Beijing-based startup that develops digital mapping technology for autonomous vehicles.
Why it matters: The acquisition is Xiaomi’s latest move in its bid to build its own intelligent connected cars. An expansion into China’s auto sector could greatly expand Xiaomi’s mobile ecosystem and create new revenue streams for the company.
Details: Xiaomi has reached an agreement to acquire Deepmotion Tech Ltd in a cash-and-stock deal valued at $77.37 million, according to the smartphone maker’s quarterly results, released Wednesday. The company did not reveal when it expects the deal to close.
Context: Xiaomi has struck several deals to invest in autonomous driving startups in recent months, as the Chinese tech giant ramps up its efforts to develop driverless car technology and mass produce its first EV in the next three years.
Neolix, a startup developing autonomous vehicles (AV) for delivery services, said on Wednesday it has raised “hundreds of millions of RMB” from Softbank Ventures Asia, an early-stage investment arm of the Japanese tech giant, among others. Hundreds of millions of RMB means the total funding amount is between about $15 million and $154 million.
Why it matters: The funding marks the latest bet by Softbank on Chinese startups as the Japanese tech giant seeks to dominate the future of artificial intelligence.
Details: Softbank Ventures Asia and CICC Capital, the private equity unit of Chinese investment banking firm CICC, led a Series B investment round in Neolix that closed earlier this year, a spokesperson of the Beijing-based startup said on Wednesday.
Context: Softbank has been a leading funder of ambitious Chinese companies for decades, but amid a wide-ranging crackdown on tech observers have asked if it is repositioning.
Qcraft, an autonomous vehicle startup backed by several prominent investors, announced on Monday that it had secured a $100 million investment. Investors include YF Capital, a private equity firm founded by Jack Ma, Longzhu Capital, the investment arm of life service app Meituan, and others.
Why it matters: Founded by a group of former engineers at Waymo, a self-driving car company owned by Google’s parent company Alphabet, the funding round serves as a stamp of approval for the two-year-old company. Chinese tech giants are betting big on Qcraft as they move more seriously into the robocar space.
Details: Qcraft has raised a new $100 million Series A+ led by YF Capital and venture capital firm Genesis Capital. Longzhu Capital, a venture capital fund of Chinese on-demand service giant Meituan, participated in the round.
Context: Self-driving car companies are investing more time and energy in autonomous trucks and buses. The trend is driven by the fact that self-driving trucks and buses tend to have more predictable routes and are easier to manage than self-driving taxis.
Li Auto closed down 0.85% on its first trading day in Hong Kong Thursday. The Chinese electric vehicle startup opened at an issuing price of HK$118 ($15) per share.
Why it matters: Li Auto is the latest Chinese tech firm listing in the US to seek a dual-primary listing in Hong Kong. Tech companies increasingly see Hong Kong as an attractive market as they seek to hedge risks when both Chinese and US regulators accelerate regulatory scrutiny.
Details: Li Auto’s Hong Kong debut met with a lukewarm market response. The company’s shares closed at HK$117 ($15.03), 0.85% lower than its issuing price, falling by as much as 2% soon after starting trading.
Context: Backed by Chinese life services giant Meituan, Li Auto first went public on Nasdaq last July. The company is the second Chinese EV maker to seek a Hong Kong listing. Its rival Xpeng Motors raised $1.8 billion in Hong Kong in June.
Read more: Drive I/O | The untold story of Li Auto
]]>A dozen years after it set out to build an industry from scratch, China boasts the world’s largest number of electric vehicles. More than 6 million clean-energy cars and trucks are running on Chinese roads.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s ongoing premium series on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode subscribers.
That’s 6 million electric vehicle (EV) batteries that are going to wear out one day. The oldest electric cars are starting to retire their batteries: More than 200,000 tons of them went offline in 2020, Xinhua (in Chinese) reported in April, citing figures from the China Automotive Technology and Research Center. From 2021 to 2030, the auto industry will shed 7.05 million more tons of EV batteries—about 168 times the weight of Beijing’s Bird’s Nest Stadium, Greenpeace wrote in an October report.
It’s either a huge mountain of toxic waste, or a gold mine of rare metals. It all depends on battery recycling.
There are no public records of how much of the 200,000-plus tons of the EV batteries retired last year got recycled, but it is widely agreed that the current recycling rate is very low. China first authorized EV battery recycling in 2018, but the first batch of licensed recyclers have found it a tough business. With high costs, limited demand, and competition from cheaper pirate recyclers, it will take more carrots and sticks for the industry to take off. The key, experts told TechNode, is likely to be stronger enforcement of rules that make carmakers responsible for disposing of end of life batteries.
If you’ve owned a device with a rechargeable battery, you already know: They wear out. The longer you use a battery, the less charge it holds.
EV batteries are good for eight to 10 years. By the end, they’ll store only 70% to 80% of the charge they held when new. That’s when they reach the end of their useful life in a car.
The battery pack is the most single most expensive component of an EV, accounting for about 30% of the total cost to consumers. It pushes up the cost of an 80.5 kWh battery pack in Tesla’s Model Y crossover to about $9,250, BloombergNEF estimated in a December report. The components may be still useful after batteries reach the end of their first life: A customer recently sold the used battery pack of his EV to an unnamed “highest bidder” and earned more than RMB 10,000 ($1,544), according to a Xinhua News Agency report (in Chinese) in April.
The first five companies got on the white list in July 2018. That was it until December 2020, when the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) certified 22 more companies to recycle EV batteries. While forging alliances with automakers, these little-known companies vary greatly in backgrounds. They are subsidiaries of big battery makers or associates of cell material suppliers, or simply units of traditional scrap recyclers.
A few of these larger players already claim to be profitable. A Shenzhen-based company called GEM is a leader in the industry, with a 10% share of the market and a client list of more than 280 domestic and foreign automakers. The company, which is also the country’s largest battery materials producer, said in its 2020 annual report (in Chinese) that the amount of batteries it recycled more than doubled from 2019, its first year to turn a profit from the practice. It didn’t disclose any numbers, however.
Other recycling companies are still investing heavily to scale up the business. For example, Hefei-based Gotion High-tech, along with the government of the city’s Feidong district, on March 22 announced they would invest RMB 12 billion ($1.85 billion) to build a new facility for the manufacturing and recycling of raw battery materials in the capital of eastern Anhui province. The move came just two weeks after Gotion established a recycling subsidiary with a registered capital of RMB 50 million. The Volkswagen battery supplier aims to ensure annual production of 100 gigawatt hours (GWh) of batteries by 2025, with raw material sourced from used packs.
Yet many of the other white-listed recycling firms are struggling to break even, according to Yang Xulai, a professor at Hefei University and a former research lead at Gotion High-tech. One reason: Not enough spent batteries are being funnelled to proper recyclers, since owners of EV vehicles are not required to turn them over to an MIIT-licensed company.
As a result, over half of spent batteries are probably being recycled by unsustainable, polluting practices, Bao Wei, a general manager at Zhejiang Huayou Holding Group, a recycling partner of BMW in China, told business news site Caixin (in Chinese) in January.
Where did the batteries go? The easiest and most profitable destination is the illegal one: Unscrupulous companies, usually traditional auto scrap yards, strip the electrolyte packs of valuable raw materials like cobalt and nickel, and dump the hazardous leftovers in a nearby landfill or waterway. That’s in violation of environmental regulations but enforcement is lax.
The licensed players thus find themselves competing against lower-cost rivals which can pay higher prices to EV owners for their waste batteries, as they are normally not subject to environmental regulations and have been disposing toxic battery wastes to landfill without proper treatment.
“This leads to a low collection volume of waste batteries for qualified recyclers, and this problem gets further exacerbated by poor consumer awareness of the importance of waste battery treatment,” Chinese and Australian researchers wrote in a paper published in May.
Whether their processes are dirty or clean, recyclers consider the materials in nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) batteries and nickel-cobalt-aluminum (NCA) batteries the most valuable. These two types of batteries are known for enabling a long driving range with a high-energy density. However, the two current mainstream recycling techniques, which recover materials through burning or the use of strong acids, produce extensive chemical waste and greenhouse gases—and at very high expense, experts told Caixin in a January report (in Chinese).
When it comes to the third type of battery, Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP), which offers a shorter driving range but boasts better thermal stability, the outlook is less promising. The key components are too cheap for recycling to be economical. Dismantling one ton of spent LFP batteries for key materials only generates revenue of about RMB 9,300 ($1,440), which is far from covering the cost of recycling, investment advisory firm Guangzheng Hang Seng said in a report in mid-2018.
The potential profit that can be extracted from an expired NMC or NCA battery fluctuates with the fluctuating prices of cobalt and nickel. At the metals’ current prices, the 60-kilowatt NMC811 battery used in a Tesla Model 3 might yield revenue of RMB 6,254.
Nonetheless, the recycling business could take off soon, spurred by the anticipation of a shortfall in cobalt, nickel, and batteries’ other raw materials in the coming few years. Demand for cobalt used in EV batteries will reach 980,000 tons over the decade to 2030 in China, around seven times the global output of the raw material in 2019, in Greenpeace’s estimation.
Read more: Drive I/O | How Chinese EV batteries broke through
There may be alternatives to stripping spent EV batteries for their components. Perhaps they can be converted into lower-quality batteries or used for something other than powering machines.
MIIT in a draft guideline (in Chinese) issued in October 2020 called for recyclers, EV makers, and battery suppliers to cooperate to produce new uses for spent EV batteries. In particular, the guideline encourages companies to repurpose old batteries for backup power systems for utility-scale projects or telecommunication base stations. One such model is BMW’s reuse of EV batteries to power the forklifts in its local factory in northern Shenyang city. Such a forward-looking policy could help “enhance overall electric grid efficiency and reliability,” wrote the regulator.
Other companies such as State Grid, the country’s largest public utility, are hoping to repurpose EV batteries for energy storage. Old packs can be reassembled into a battery energy storage system that can store solar energy power for use during periods of scarcity and provide greater flexibility for grid demand spikes.
However, this storage industry is also having trouble squeezing out profits in the face of technical and commercial challenges. Second-life batteries need to be standardized in performance and safety standards, such as charge capacity, recharge time, and longevity. But the hard reality is: Batteries from different manufacturers vary greatly in design and construction, since they are custom-designed to work with a given car model, consulting firm McKinsey wrote in a 2019 report.
Recyclers need to take battery cells apart for standardization, refurbishing, and reassembly before they can be used in energy storage. Yet the performance limits and health status of these batteries vary greatly and are often not disclosed to recyclers by battery manufacturers and carmakers, according to Bao of Zhejiang Huayou Holding.
Then there are safety concerns, which have led to large energy storage plants recently being banned from using spent EV batteries. Nonetheless, Beijing is still pushing for more trials, including battery storage programs for small-scale commercial and industrial facilities such as 5G base stations.
All these practical challenges combine to form an economic deterrent: It is simply cheaper for energy companies to start with all-new batteries than to use retired packs, according to Zhao Guangjin, an expert with State Grid.
Whether the next stage is energy storage or recycling of materials, the transportation of spent batteries is another steep expense because both the transport vehicles and warehouses need to be customized with safety measures.
A national market foundation has been set, but the government will need to provide a mixture of carrots and sticks to help the market gain scale, Zheng Mingyang, Toxics Campaigner at Greenpeace, said in an interview with TechNode on July 14. For instance, South Korea has made it mandatory for car owners to return EV batteries to designated drop-off sites. “Such mandatory enforcement measures to end users is worth consulting,” Greenpeace wrote in its October 2020 report (our translation).
Greenpeace has proposed incentive and punitive measures to ensure players such as automakers, battery makers, and recycling companies bear their responsibilities and develop new applications for used batteries. For instance, the government should levy higher taxes on battery makers that use original raw materials, while rewarding battery makers that use recycled materials.
Loss-making companies also need an incentive to look for the value that second-life batteries promise. Zhang Tianren, chairman of recycling company Tianneng Group and a delegate to the National People’s Congress, the Chinese parliament, in March called for stimulus policies such as subsidies and tax cuts for certified recycling companies, most of which are struggling to eke out profits.
The vice chairman of China’s biggest battery supplier, CATL, publicly dismissed the idea as “a fake proposal” in late 2018. Huang Shilin said that the company was developing new battery types made for energy storage. In 2020, the Tesla partner sold 2.39 GWh of batteries for energy storage systems, according to its annual report.
The Chinese government has established a policy framework that places responsibility for battery recycling on EV makers, experts warn that it’s not clear how it plans to regulate the sector. Beijing has not specified a clear target for the overall collection of waste batteries, nor a clear definition of the scope of authority among multiple central and local government agencies taking a shared responsibility, according to a paper by Chinese scientists published in May in the Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management.
One murky legal area concerns automakers’ responsibilities. According to regulations issued in 2018, the makers are required to make their dealers buy back spent batteries from auto customers. Direct-sale companies like Tesla, Nio, and Xpeng are responsible for taking back the old batteries themselves. Unfortunately, dealers have little motivation to do so.They still face no penalties for failing to take back batteries. They are more motivated to sell cars than to take back batteries, Caixin (in Chinese) reported in January, 2019 citing Zhang Guofang, a professor at Wuhan University of Technology.
Local governments with significant auto industries may offer a way forward. In a draft action plan (in Chinese) issued by the Guangzhou Municipal Development and Reform Commission on June 22, both domestic and foreign automakers would be required to report the establishment of recycling stations for EV batteries in the city. Meanwhile, Shanghai authorities plan to create a recycling network across the city and an online tracking system to manage the fabrication, sale, and recycling of EV batteries by the end of this year, Chinese media The Paper reported.
For now, the major obstacle to clean reuse remains profitability. Being on the cutting edge of market creation, each stakeholder needs a little more incentive to be part of a sustainable recycling process.
“If there is money to be made, more companies and investments will be attracted,” (our translation) Huang Shan, an industry insider told China National Radio.
]]>Inceptio, a China-based robotruck startup, said it has closed a $270 million Series B on Tuesday. JD Logistics, Meituan, and PAG led the investment round.
Why it matters: It’s unusual for two Chinese tech majors to join the same funding round, signaling that they see Inceptio as a key player.
Details: The funding round is led by JD Logistics, online retailer JD’s delivery arm, life service platform Meituan, and private equity firm PAG. Other investors include express courier Deppon and IDG Capital, Inceptio said in a Tuesday announcement. The investors didn’t provide a valuation for the company.
Context: Both JD and Meituan have invested in autonomous driving, but progress on driverless technology has been slower than many expected. JD appears to be behind schedule on its own self-driving truck project.
At 9 a.m. on a recent Thursday, Sheng Li got out of a Didi ride at his office in downtown Shanghai. The ride-hailing company has had a rough ride recently, but for users like Sheng, Didi is still the first choice when hailing a car.
The 28-year-old office worker says he’s been experimenting with other apps lately. He’s noticed longer wait times as Didi struggles amid a “cybersecurity investigation,” temporary removal from Chinese app stores, and lawsuits from angry US investors.
Sheng told TechNode he doesn’t worry about the privacy and security issues the regulators are investigating. “That’s a matter for the state, not us,” he said. For him, it all comes down to price, service, and wait times.
Still, a Shanghai taxi driver surnamed Wu told TechNode that he has shifted his driving time to other platforms including aggregator Amap (Gaode Ditu in China), as there are now “much fewer orders” from Didi (our translation). Some former Didi users even deleted the app from their phones in a show of patriotism, the Shanghai-based driver added.
Founded in 2012 as Didi Dache, Didi has long been dominant in China’s ride-hailing market. It fended off an early challenge from Uber, buying out the US company’s Chinese operations when it left the market in 2016. The most recent estimates put its share at 90% of the Chinese market.
Now, challengers are racing to take advantage of Didi’s troubles. Like Sheng, millions of Chinese users are trying out other ride-hailing platforms. The rivals have begun a price war, offering steep discounts and subsidies to win over users and drivers.
Didi remains the default for most users TechNode met during rush hour interviews in Shanghai. Although Didi apps are no longer available for download on Chinese app stores, those already on users’ smartphones still work.
Chris Sun, a Shanghai-based video producer did not hesitate when choosing Didi to hail a ride to the city’s railway station for a business trip last week. Speaking to TechNode on July 22, Sun said he had no plans to try other services, adding that he “has got used to” Didi, despite some technical flaws such as inaccurate pin locations from drivers (our translation).
Chen Jie, a recent graduate, is also sticking with Didi. The 23-year-old tried Alibaba-backed Amap last year, but immediately switched back to Didi, frustrated by long waits at peak times.
Shopping and delivery titan Meituan, a longtime rival of Didi, relaunched its standalone ride-hailing aggregator app Meituan Dache on July 13, followed by a WeChat mini-app with the same name last week.
Meituan has offered ride-hailing services since February 2017, but shut down its standalone app in 2019 to cut expansion costs. Since then, it’s been available only as a mini-program within Meituan’s main app.
The company has boosted its subsidies to attract users after the long absence. Using a RMB 10 ($1.54) coupon, TechNode paid RMB 23.4 for a nine-kilometer trip on Meituan Dache on July 16 in Shanghai. A ride on Didi for the same route cost RMB 35 on July 2.
Upstart T3, a joint venture of state-owned automakers FAW, Dongfeng, and Changan, is among the most ambitious contenders. From its base of 21 cities and 15 million users in 2020, the two-year-old ride hailer has set goals to enter 15 new cities and add an average daily order of 1 million rides by the end of July, Chinese media reported, citing a company memo.
Daily downloads of the T3 app on iOS peaked at 60,000 million on July 2, later stabilizing to around 40,000. In June, T3’s app was downloaded just 10,000 times a day, according to data from app-tracking service Qimai. Chinese media report that T3 staff have been working long overtime hours as the Nanjing-based company rushes to expand.
Alibaba-owned aggregator and mapping service Amap, launched in 2018, is also offering massive subsidies to both riders and drivers, including RMB 100 coupons for rides and a one-week zero-commission period to new drivers. Amap downloads on iOS have more than doubled since July.
Meanwhile, Tencent and GAC-backed Ontime is offering 50% off coupons plus a RMB 25 incentive to those who invite a friend to use the platform and take their first trip. Not everyone is joining the price war.
Chinese media reported that management at Caocao Chuxing have decided not to drive down prices,, but the company has adopted the infamous 996 work schedule following Beijing’s investigation into Didi.
Didi could be back on app stores later this month. Regulations specify that cybersecurity reviews should take no more than 45 days, and 45 days after Didi’s review began will be Aug. 16. However, the same regulations authorize regulators to extend the review if they find that the matter is especially complex or serious.
Some observers believe that Didi could face significant threats from smaller ride-hailers that are expanding their presence in China’s growing inland cities.
“Didi is mature in tier-one cities but not in second or lower-tier cities. There is still an opportunity for online ride-hailing in China, and Didi will not have a 90% share in China forever,” Tu Le, founder and managing director of business intelligence firm Sino Auto Insights, said during an online interview on July 6.
Didi controlled more than 90% of China’s ride-hailing market share before the government’s investigation into the company. There might be “double-digit” market share redistribution if the subsidy war meaningfully deteriorates the Didi app or mini-program core experience, according to Michael Norris, head of research and strategy at AgencyChina.
The supply of drivers, who are sensitive to subsidy and platform policy changes, will be key to winning the battle. “Didi’s competitors need to poach drivers to the point Didi’s app becomes unreliable to hail a ride,” he said.
“The competitive landscape depends on how hard Meituan pushes. Recall that Meituan, with one eye on its balance sheet, backed away from self-operated ride-hailing in late 2018. Meituan’s foray into community group-buy, including associated financing activities, have primed investors for big moves.” Norris said.
Meituan declined to comment on the story.
Still, at least one ride-hailer has decided to advance at its own pace. Rather than spending lavish sums for a victory likely to be temporary, Shouqi, operated by the namesake automaker, has publicly stated its goal is high-quality development, focusing on passenger and driver safety along with data security. With a footprint in over 170 Chinese cities, the state-backed company is now the country’s sixth biggest ride-hailer but lags far behind Didi in monthly active users, according to figures published by app tracking firm Aurora Mobile in May.
“China’s ride-hailing market has always been strictly regulated. Looking ahead, compliant, healthy, and sustainable development will be the major path for all the players,” a Shouqi spokesperson told TechNode on July 20 (our translation).
]]>Read more: How did Didi get in trouble with data regulators?
Gotion High-Tech, a Chinese battery maker, will build a battery factory with Volkswagen in Germany, the company announced on Tuesday. Gotion is the latest Chinese battery manufacturer to expand overseas, with its eyes on European automakers embracing electric vehicles.
Why it matters: The new plant will help Volkswagen increase electric vehicle production. By 2030, the automaker wants half of its car sales to be electric to comply with stricter emission rules.
Details: Extending an existing partnership signed in May 2020, Gotion and Volkswagen will partner to build a battery cell factory in the German state of Salzgitter. The factory is scheduled for operation in 2025.
Context: Chinese battery makers are expanding their overseas production capacity to maintain China’s leading position in alternative fuel technology.
“We are now in a golden era for hydrogen,” Robin Lin, CEO of fuel cell producer Refire, declared during a speech at the China Auto Forum in Shanghai last year.
Lin would know. His company made fuel cells before they were cool. When Refire was founded in 2015 it was a small, specialized market.
In Focus: Cleantech is TechNode’s monthly in-focus newsletter looking China’s push to clean up its environment using technology. Available to TechNode Squared members.
But over the past two years, its prospects have exploded. Hydrogen technology is fast gaining attention in China as a viable alternative to the fossil fuels used in vehicles and heavy industries. Fuel cells are a dense, efficient, and clean way to store energy. Among the most popular prospects at the moment are fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs).
To proponents, hydrogen is the future of green fuel. Compared to gasoline, it emits only water. Compared to batteries, it leaves nothing to recycle.
China’s push for hydrogen energy looks much like its ambitions for electric vehicles when they were first set out. The country’s nascent hydrogen drive has led to an increasing number of companies researching and developing hydrogen technologies.
The expanding market has led to a series of hydrogen companies, including Refire, filing to go public. In March, Refire filed to list on Shanghai’s Nasdaq-like STAR Market.
For this week’s newsletter, we profile one of the Chinese companies that stand to benefit most from China’s push for hydrogen.
Hydrogen fuels cells are an efficient, clean form of energy storage. Use electricity to isolate the gas, and then you can deploy it to power a car in a reaction that’s cleaner than fossil fuels and requires less heavy equipment than battery electrics. It even has applications in energy-intensive industries like the steel sector.
The hydrogen used in these fuel cells is rarely found in its pure form, and needs to be extracted from water, coal, or natural gas. But producing it in an environmentally friendly way is currently expensive.
While hydrogen fuel cell technology is less mature than electric vehicle (EV) batteries, it has some advantages over batteries. Fuel cells vehicles can be refueled in a few minutes much like gas-driven cars unlike EVs, which can take up to a few hours to recharge, depending on the grading of the charging pile. They are also more energy dense than batteries.
Hydrogen fuel cells are less energy-efficient than batteries—you need more electricity to deliver the same amount of power when using hydrogen. In a world where renewables like solar and wind are producing vast amounts of surplus energy during off-peak hours, that might not be a problem, but right now most hydrogen comes from fossil fuels.
EVs are around a decade ahead of fuel cell vehicles, given China’s advanced charging infrastructure. For now, hydrogen fuel cell vehicles are confined to testing zones.
Refire is one of China’s largest fuel cell manufacturers. The company produces fuel cell systems, the heart of FCEVs, for commercial vehicles, which require large amounts of power and quick refueling times—both strengths of fuel cells compared to batteries.
Established in 2015, Refire designs and manufactures a range of fuel cell systems for heavy vehicles of up to 49 tons, including mixer trucks, buses, dump trucks, and truck tractors. It’s customers include trucks maker FAW Jiefang, auto manufacturer Dongfeng, and busmaker Yutong.
Refire declined to comment for this story, citing a pre-IPO quiet period.
The company began mass producing its first fuel cell system for light-duty commercial vehicles in 2017, manufacturing 1,000 within 18 months. The company has since launched a new line of fuel cell systems, the most powerful of which can drive heavy-duty vehicles.
While not widely adopted, Refire’s fuel cells have been deployed commercially in 2,700 vehicles in 15 cities across China, and have collectively driven more than 63 million kilometers, according to the company. Refire currently produces around 1,000 fuel cell systems a year, used by automakers in buses and trucks. For comparison, the Beijing government aims to deploy 10,000 fuel cell vehicles on its roads by 2024.
The company has set up two manufacturing plants, one in the southern Chinese province of Guangdong and the other in Jiangsu, in eastern China. Both aim to drastically increase capacity. The company expects to initially build 20,000 fuel cell systems a year at the new Jiangsu plant.
As China starts to promote hydrogen fuel cell vehicles with more fervor, heavy vehicles will likely be the initial focus. China’s policy environment currently favors using fuel cells in commercial vehicles rather than passenger cars, Yuki Yu, founder of consultancy Energy Iceberg, told TechNode in April.
Commercial vehicles have the strongest case for hydrogen fuel cells over electric batteries. These vehicles have higher utilization rates than passenger cars, and can’t spend hours parked while charging.
Commercial vehicles are likely to see pressure to go green. China has ambitious goals to reach peak carbon emissions by 2030, and transportation could become a major focus for lawmakers. In the first half of 2020, trucks made up just 10% of all vehicles in China, but are some of the largest polluters on the road. “Heavy trucks account for one-third of China’s total road carbon emissions,” Refire’s Lin said during the Yangtze Delta Forum in April.
Refire has forged a series of high-profile partnerships to increase adoption of fuel cell technology.
In July 2019, Japan’s Toyota Motor Corp. signed a deal with Chinese commercial vehicle makers FAW and Higer bus, with Refire acting as a local supplier. As part of the deal, Refire ensured that the components of the fuel cell systems functioned together and was responsible for developing fuel-cell powertrains that China automakers could use in hydrogen buses, Reuters reported at the time.
Then, in April, the company partnered with German automotive supplier Schaeffler to “explore the key areas of fuel cell technology” and set up a knowledge base and shared resource platform. Other partners include oil and gas giant Sinopec, which has also invested in Refire.
In early March, Refire filed to list on Shanghai’s STAR Market, with plans to raise more than RMB 2 billion ($309 million).
The company’s valuation has increased significantly over the past few years following several rounds of fundraising. In 2019, motor manufacturer Broad-Ocean announced plans to acquire 20% of Refire for RMB 300 million, valuing the company at RMB 1.5 billion. Broad-Ocean later pulled out of the deal.
The company’s filing comes just months after competitor SinoHytec floated in Shanghai in August.
“Since SinoHytec went public, Refire has been raising funds at a quarterly pace, which shows that the capital market is enthusiastically seeking hydrogen energy companies that are close to IPO,” China-based hydrogen fuel cell research center The Orange Club wrote in a September report.
But Refire losses have expanded dramatically. Between 2017 and 2019, the company’s losses ballooned nearly sevenfold from RMB 35 million to RMB 278 million, narrowing to RMB 150 million in the first nine months of 2020, according to its prospectus
Refire’s losses were primarily driven by R&D costs, which was equivalent to 90% of the company’s operating income between January and September 2020.
While China’s government is laying down the groundwork to commercialize hydrogen ftechnology, there are significant hurdles to unlocking its potential and delivering Refire’s zero-emissions goals.
Unlike electric vehicles which have a vast network of charging stations, hydrogen cars are still in their infancy and refuelling stations will likely be hard to come by in the next few years.
Sinopec has made pledges to address this, and plans to build 1,000 hydrogen refueling stations that also sell conventional fuels by 2025. The company currently runs more than 30,000 gas stations across China.
Meanwhile, hydrogen fuel cells are only as clean as the process used to isolate the gas. Currently, more than 80% of hydrogen is produced using natural gas or coal, meaning that carbon is released during the isolation process. “Green hydrogen,” which is produced using energy from renewable sources, is currently very expensive, though an increasing number of projects are being launched.
]]>It has been a rollercoaster week for Didi Global. Last Wednesday, Didi raised $4.4 billion in a behemoth US IPO. Two days later on Friday evening, China’s cybersecurity regulator announced an investigation into the company. Then on Sunday night, less than a week after Didi went public on the New York Stock Exchange, the regulator asked app stores in China to remove Didi’s app.
The probe of China’s dominant ride-hailer follows other large penalties for Chinese tech majors, such as the abrupt suspension of Ant Group’s giant $34 billion dual IPO listing in Shanghai and Hong Kong in November 2020 and a $2.8 billion antitrust fine for Alibaba in April.
Authorities at the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), a cyberspace watchdog, said on July 2 that they launched a “cybersecurity review” of Didi to “guard against risks to national data security” and “protect the public interest.” Citing national security law and cybersecurity law, they also asked Didi to stop registering new users. Two days later, they ordered operators to pull Didi’s app from all app stores for issues concerning user data protection, saying the app “seriously violated Chinese laws and regulation on personal information collection and usage.”
The app store suspension, although dramatic, hasn’t stopped Didi from operating. Didi’s service is still widely available in China. The ban means new users cannot download Didi’s app and use its service. Yet new users, at the time of this writing, can still register for the service through Didi’s mini-program embedded in apps like WeChat, a popular Chinese messaging app, according to our observations. Also, existing users, which account for most Chinese ride-hailing customers as the company holds 90% of the market share, can still use the service, either through Didi’s app or its mini-program on WeChat.
On Monday, the CAC expanded its probe, announcing that it also launched similar cybersecurity investigations into three other companies and asked them to stop registering new users. All these companies have recently debuted on US stock exchanges. Job recruitment platform Boss ZhiPin debuted on Nasdaq under Kanzhun, a Tencent-backed company, on June 11. Partner transport companies Huo Chebang and Yun Manman went public together on the New York Stock Exchange on June 22 as a single company called Full Truck Alliance.
The actions are a notable step up for privacy regulation. But they come as part of a long-term effort to regulate data use during an ongoing crackdown on big tech, experts told TechNode.
Didi said in a July 4 statement that it expects that the app takedown may have “an adverse impact on its revenue in China.”
According to a 2020 regulation for the review process, a cybersecurity review should be completed within 45 days. However, it can be extended if “the situation is complicated.”
James Hull, analyst and portfolio manager at Hullx Capital, said a suspension of 45 days or longer isn’t “that bad for the company,” because most Chinese users already have the Didi app and could access Didi through WeChat mini-programs. The Chinese version of the app was downloaded about 900,000 times in June, according to SensorTower, or 30,000 times per day.
Michael Tan, a partner with international law firm Taylor Wessing Shanghai Office, told TechNode that he thinks the investigation could take six months. Didi’s stock price is likely to take a hit, but the company is unlikely to be delisted from the US, he added, because Chinese regulators will focus on data security more than the listing.
But Tu Le, founder and managing director of business intelligence firm Sino Auto Insights, told TechNode that he thinks US investors may demand more information. “If I were a US investor in Didi, I’d like to know what Cheng Wei, Jean Liu, and the rest of the management team ‘knew,’ if anything at all, and ‘when’ they knew it.”
“If there was prior knowledge that Cyberspace Administration of China would block new users due to security issues, then it should’ve been disclosed prior to the IPO,” Le added.
Didi shares on the New York Stock Exchange fell 5.3% on Friday, following the CAC announcement of a cybersecurity review of the company. The US market had not opened on Monday at the time of this publication.
Both Le and Michael Tan say Didi’s probe could have broader implications for Chinese data companies planning to raise money in the US.
Le said the Didi probe “should really freak out any data company planning to IPO in the US.” Data companies need to make sure that their data management strategy is bulletproof if they decide to list in the US later this year, he said. “I’d say they’ll still do it, but this should give them pause, if only for a brief moment,” he added.
It’s not entirely clear what got Didi in trouble. The notices refer to national security and to “serious problems with illegal and irregular collection and use of personal data.” Timing suggests that the recent US IPO could also be a factor. All three firms that were penalized this past week have been listed on US markets since early June 11.
The company says that all information related to Chinese users is stored in China, in response to speculation of Didi sharing sensitive data. Company Vice President Li Meng wrote on Weibo Saturday that the company was willing to sue over speculation that it had shared sensitive information during its IPO process.
Tan said that alleged data privacy abuse is the main reason for Didi’s investigation. Didi’s US IPO likely accelerated the probe but didn’t trigger it.
In 2015, Chinese state news agency Xinhua collaborated with Didi’s big data analytics department on a report focusing on commuting patterns of state staff working for different Chinese ministries. “Almost all ministries work overtime,” the report said, “The Ministry of Land and Resources is the busiest. There were 298 rides hailed between 6 p.m. to 2 a.m. in two days,” Xinhua said. China could deem data like this as sensitive.
The investigation targets Didi’s potential privacy breach activities in China, Tan said. “US IPO will result in disclosure of much business-related information to the US markets and other third parties in the US,” he said. “This will inevitably lead to some speculation, such as Didi being investigated due to national security concerns or providing access to sensitive data,” he added.
The investigations are based on a relatively new CAC power called a “cybersecurity review.” This review process was created by the 2016 Cybersecurity Law, but has never previously been implemented, according to the Beijing News. According to the law and 2020 implementation measures, the review system focuses on operators of “critical information infrastructure,” and their purchases of “network products and services that might impact national security.” The Cybersecurity Law, along with landmark laws on privacy and data security, is part of an ongoing effort to regulate the use of personal data by companies in China. Cross-border data transfers are a focus of these laws, but the laws also require companies to implement best practices for collecting and storing data.
“That could cover anything from Didi’s servers to cloud computing to basic network equipment,” said Tiffany Wong, a consultant at research-based consultancy Sinolytics.
Wong said that it’s also possible for companies to get in trouble under these laws due to how they store and process important data. “It could be that Didi hasn’t segmented their personal information to the CAC’s liking, or don’t have good data protection mechanisms in place as required, and the state wants Didi to have full compliance before collecting any more personal information,” Wong added.
Moreover, Xie Maosong, a senior politics and governance researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, told TechNode that he thinks Didi and other internet companies need to develop a better sense of social responsibility in China instead of focusing only on making money. Xie studies Chinese governmental policies and he gave lectures a few weeks ago to the Cybersecurity Administration in Hangzhou on regulating Chinese internet companies.
“In the western society, capital takes priority,” said Xie, “but in China, politics always takes priority. Here, politics doesn’t refer to the Chinese government, and it refers to the interests of the nation, a collective interest, in contrast to the interests of a few capitalists,” he added.
The investigation into Didi came as China widened an ongoing crackdown on tech companies. The crackdown started in November when authorities halted Chinese fintech giant Ant Group’s plans for a mega dual IPO, citing “changing regulatory environment.” Since then, regulators have abandoned their laissez-faire approach to tech firms and put them under the microscope.
In December, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) announced an anti-monopoly investigation into e-commerce behemoth Alibaba. The probe was closed in April as the market regulator imposed a record RMB 18.2 billion ($2.8 billion) fine on Alibaba.
Anti-monopoly has been the most active area of the campaign, hitting tech titans like Tencent, Alibaba, Meituan, and Didi itself, according to TechNode’s Techlash Tracker database. But the campaign also involves privacy protection, data security, and financial de-risking. Over the past year, hundreds of companies have been hit with small fines over privacy and data security violations.
READ MORE: INSIGHTS | Making sense of China’s big tech crackdown
The Didi probe is the first major case in the privacy and data security section of the campaign.
In the past, companies like Tencent, search engine Sogou, and smartphone maker Xiaomi were fined small amounts of money for collecting excessive or unnecessary data from their app users. Those enforcements usually cite China’s 2017 Cybersecurity Law and regulations on how apps should collect and store user data.
The investigation into Didi, however, probably involves national security issues, according to the CAC. In addition to the Cybersecurity Law, the CAC also cited China’s National Security Law in announcing the Didi probe. The 2015 National Security Law has a clause (in Chinese) vowing to “safeguard the nation’s cyberspace sovereignty, security, and interests.”
“The state attaches great importance to cybersecurity and data security. The Cybersecurity Law passed in 2017, the Cybersecurity Review Measures issued in 2020, and the Data Security Law that is taking effect in September are all signs of the government’s determination to protect cybersecurity and data security,” said Qi Aimin, a professor at Chongqing University’s School of Law.
Recent cybersecurity reviews on tech firms, including probes into Boss Zhipin, Huo Chebang, and Yun Manman announced on Monday, proving that “large-scale cybersecurity and data security investigations of internet companies will become a trend,” said Qi.
Dec. 24, 2020: Chinese transport minister Li Xiaopeng pledges to ramp up antitrust enforcement as one of the ministry’s priorities in 2021. The head of Chinese transport watchdog made the comment a month after the release of the draft anti-monopoly guidelines targeting the country’s big tech companies by the SAMR.
March 12, 2021: China’s top market watchdog SAMR fines (in Chinese) Didi Mobility Pte. Ltd., a subsidiary of the Chinese ride-hailing giant, RMB 500,000 ($77,400) for failing to seek antitrust clearance for the establishment of a joint venture with Softbank. In the current antitrust law framework, companies need to receive approval for mergers or acquisitions involving firms with annual revenues of RMB 10 billion and above globally or more than RMB 2 billion in China.
April 30, 2021: Didi is again ordered (in Chinese) to pay a penalty after insufficiently disclosing three acquisitions and investments for antitrust reviews, including a takeover of a Shenzhen-based car rental firm. Chinese gaming powerhouse Tencent and retail giant Suning were also punished for the same reasons, with each fined RMB 500,000, the highest amount stipulated by the law.
May 12, 2021: China’s cyberspace administration issues new draft rules on data collection applying to both carmakers and ride-hailing platforms, stipulating that companies need to gain regulatory approval before providing “important and private data” to foreign entities (our translation). Coming after growing concerns about vehicle cameras and where the car data is going, CAC writes in the announcement (in Chinese) that the rules have been drafted to safeguard national security and the public interest.
May 14, 2021: Chinese antitrust regulators order ride-hailing platform Didi and online services giant Meituan to rectify their ride-hailing practices, reports Bloomberg. The two companies were among 10 online on-demand services ordered to make changes to their operations, including increasing drivers’ commission fees.
June 17, 2021: Reuters reports that China’s market regulator is investigating whether Didi violated antitrust rules. Didi dismisses the report as “unsubstantiated speculation from unnamed sources.” However, the company acknowledged that it has just completed a one-month self-inspection to correct monopolistic practices, along with dozens of other companies, as required by regulators, in its IPO prospectus filed last month.
]]>Chinese ride-hailer Didi went public on Wednesday on the New York Stock Exchange in a much anticipated US IPO, raising $4.4 billion.
Why it matters: Didi is the biggest Chinese IPO in the US since Alibaba’s $25 billion listing in 2014.
Details: The company priced its IPO at $14, the top of the expected range. It opened at $16.65 per share on Wednesday, and closed at $14.14, a modest 1% up from the initial offering price.
Context: Didi performed better than its US counterparts on the first trading day. Uber fell below its initial offering price in its 2019 debut.
READ MORE: The Chinese gaming startup outperforming Tencent overseas
With contributions from Jill Shen.
]]>Tesla said on Saturday it will recall more than 285,000 vehicles in China to address safety concerns in its autopilot system, marking the automaker’s largest recall in the country. Tesla told local news the decision is not linked to previous safety incidents.
Why it matters: The recall raises questions over the carmaker’s future in China. The company’s prestigious image has soured quickly as Chinese Tesla owners this year began blaming the company for car malfunctions, including sudden accelerations and brake failures.
READ MORE: Safety questions and shady sales tactics are chilling the China-Tesla love affair
Details: Tesla will recall 285,520 cars, including Model 3 and Model Y vehicles built between 2019 and 2021. Affected customers can receive fixes remotely through system upgrades, without bringing the cars back to the dealers.
Context: Since early last year, Tesla has faced mounting pressure in China over safety concerns and customer service complaints. The company also faces national security concerns in China.
China’s top energy policymaker released new regulations on Tuesday to ban large energy storage plants from using used automotive batteries following several deadly safety incidents at battery and power plants.
Why it matters: The new rule highlights the challenge of repurposing used electric car batteries.
Details: The National Energy Administration said in a draft policy document (in Chinese) that it would ban “in principle” any new “large-size” energy storage projects that use repurposed lithium-ion batteries. The draft does not specify the criteria for defining “large-scale” projects.
Context: As the world’s biggest electric vehicle market, China is hoping to find a workable solution to recycle used batteries. Batteries from the first generation of electric cars released in the Chinese market around 2009 are now nearing the end of their life cycles. However, several recent safety incidents have increased scrutiny of the battery recycling industry.
Baidu on Thursday unveiled a new robotaxi model, called Apollo Moon, with a manufacturing cost significantly lower than competitors. The Chinese search engine giant hopes to expand its business and commercialize an autonomous ride-hailing service.
Why it matters: The robocar is not being sold, but manufacturing costs are now comparable to the price of a high-end consumer car.
Details: Baidu’s Apollo Moon will cost the company RMB 480,000 (around $75,000) to manufacture. It costs the company less to manufacture than its rivals, but it’s hard to compare with since these are internal costs making.
Context: In mid-2019, Baidu began testing a public ride-hailing service in a downtown area of Changsha, the capital city of central Hunan province, after road testing in suburban areas and closed test sites for six years.
China’s market regulator is investigating Didi on whether it violated antitrust rules, Reuters reported Wednesday night. Didi called the report “unsubstantiated speculation.”
Why it matters: The probe report comes less than a week after the ride-hailing giant filed for a US IPO on Thursday. It remains to be seen whether the news will affect the company’s plan to go public.
READ MORE: The Chinese gaming startup outperforming Tencent overseas
Details: Unnamed sources told Reuters that China’s market regulator, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), is looking at Didi on suspicion of anti-competitive practices.
Context: Didi, dominant in China’s ride-hailing market, has been fined several times this year by market regulators for antitrust violations.
As Chinese automakers pour money into autonomous vehicles (AVs), they’re relying on another emerging technology to be the eyes of self-driving cars: lidar. Chinese carmakers are promising that models with lidar will hit the road in the next six months, likely marking the first time the tech sees widespread commercial deployment.
What is lidar? Well, it’s a lot like radar, but it uses lasers. It can pick out details and see small things better—a small dog crossing the road, a pothole. It can see things other systems, such as cameras and radar, might miss.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s ongoing premium series on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode subscribers.
But established lidar systems are bulky contraptions that are proving hard to integrate into consumer cars. They’re expensive, too, driving up the price of cars that use them for self-driving functions. For now, it’s mostly seen on prototype robo-cars.
Despite the challenges, most Chinese AV contenders are counting on lidar.
Five Chinese lidar startups say that they’re close to making it work. It’s a tough act: the device has to be small enough to fit in a sedan, reliable enough to trust on the road, and cheap enough to fit into the price of a consumer car. While they won’t be the first to deliver road-ready systems, Chinese companies could be the first to do it at a practical price.
In this week’s issue, we’ll meet China’s leading lidar players and see how they’re trying to make the emerging technology work.
Lidar, or “light detection and ranging,” works similarly to radar, except it uses lasers instead of radio waves. Lidar’s range is more limited than radar, but it offers more precision about the shape of detected objects.
Originally used by NASA to track spacecraft and satellites in the 1960s, the technology has been used for archaeological and manufacturing purposes, among others, but is relatively new to the world of autos. It was first utilized in a driverless vehicle race called the DARPA Grand Challenge in 2004.
Compared to radar, Lidar can create a more accurate, more detailed 3D map of the world. Compared to cameras, it works better in low-light conditions.
Lidar is therefore seen by most AV designers as a critical safety layer that will enable AVs to drive in various traffic conditions, in combination with other sensors like radar and cameras.
However, the technology is still immature, meaning high costs and challenges with size and reliability. A minority of AV projects are therefore not using lidar. The most vocal lidar skeptic is (who else?) Elon Musk, who has promised self-driving cars with a camera-only “pure vision” approach. Tesla recently removed radar from its vehicles.
Mechanical spinning lidars are so far among the most commonly used for AV test fleets. These are typically perched on car roofs, with a set of rotating laser sensors housed in a cone to provide 360-degree vision. The technology is too cumbersome and unreliable for production vehicles. Its components are also prone to damage on bumpy roads. As a result, lidar makers are transitioning to so-called “solid-state,” or “lidar-on-a-chip” devices, which are more compact and use fewer moving parts.
Most lidar systems on the road today are mechanical spinning lidar on AV prototype vehicles. You’ve probably seen one—they’re the ones that look like half a jetski, or three portly Alexas strapped to a ski rack. If you saw it in China, it was probably made by Hesai, the Baidu-backed startup that’s the dean of the field.
Hesai has dominated the experimental generation in China, making the systems used on most Chinese and some international prototypes. At least 10 out of the top 15 robotaxi startups worldwide are reportedly (in Chinese) among its clients, including Baidu, Didi, and Pony.ai.
But to address size and durability, lidar makers are now turning to “solid state” sensors that eliminate most moving parts. These can fit the system into a small box, around the size of a lunch box, which fits easily into the grill or tucks under the roof of a car. But miniaturization creates new problems with range, price, and reliability.
In early 2019, Hesai unveiled its latest solid-state device, called Pandar GT and boasting a detection distance of 300 meters, but it is still validating the product and negotiating with auto clients, according to a prospectus filed by the company in January.
So far, Hesai hasn’t found a customer to put its solid state technology into a production vehicle. Baidu, a leader in China AV tech, has skipped lidar for its self-driving package, known as Autonomous Navigation Pilot, despite years of collaboration with Hesai in mechanical lidars for its test fleets. Speaking to Chinese media during this year’s Auto Shanghai expo, Baidu’s vice president Wang Yunpeng said the company is developing a “reliable and affordable” lidar sensor for production cars with partners, without giving further details.
Hesai: Founded in 2014, it supplies lidar to Chinese self-driving players including Baidu, Didi, and Pony.ai. It has raised more than $530 million from investors including Baidu, Bosch, and Xiaomi.
Huawei: The tech giant started making lidars in 2015 and has formed partnerships with Chinese legacy automakers including BAIC and Changan.
Livox: Incubated by drone maker DJI in 2016, Shenzhen-based Livox early this year became a partner to Chinese EV upstart Xpeng Motors. No funding information has been disclosed.
Innovusion: A Nio-backed company was set up by two former Baidu scientists Baidu in Sunnyvale, California in 2016, Innovusion has raised $94 million from investors including Nio Capital and Temasek.
Robosense: A Shenzhen-based company founded in 2014. It has raised $45 million from auto and tech names including Alibaba and SAIC.
Other key names: Major global manufacturers include Velodyne, the company which developed the first spinning lidar sensor specifically for testing AVs in 2005, as well as Valeo, partner of Audi for its A8 sedan, the world’s first production car to be equipped with a mechanical lidar. Several upstarts are also poised to raise money from public markets, including Luminar, a supplier to Tesla, and Israel’s Innoviz.
Five Chinese companies have made real progress on consumer-ready lidar, using a variety of approaches that strike different balances between range, price, and reliability, and reaching deals with major automakers to put their sensors into cars. But they each have difficult technical problems to solve.
Huawei and Robosense, a Chinese lidar upstart backed by Alibaba, are betting on a technology called micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS), which uses a tiny mirror (1 mm to 7 mm in diameter) to steer light. With only this piece of glass moving, the whole unit can be smaller than one that has to rotate as a whole. Robosense is currently making lidar s¯ensors for US electric vehicle startup Lucid Motors.
Both MEMS players are struggling with range: the latest offerings from the two companies only work at distances up to 150 meters.
Experts believe self-driving systems will need to spot objects at least 200 meters away to have enough time to react.
The MEMS solution has proven to be superior in terms of size, speed, and cost over other types of lidar sensors, according to an article published by three University of Florida engineers last year. However, a short detection distance due to the small mirror is a key flaw and, to deal with it, systems will likely need a larger detector, complicating assembly, the paper said.
With its latest offering boasting an impressive distance of 250 meters, Sunnyvale and Suzhou-based Innovusion seem to have solved the range issue. Their solution uses lasers at a wavelength of 1,550 nanometers, rather than more common 905-nm lasers. Considered a “sweet spot” by lidar developers, 1,550-nm light allows longer-range measurement and poses less danger to human eyesight. When using 905-nm lasers, power is usually restricted to avoid blinding people.
But Innovusion has faced challenges with production, for a physical reason: traditional silicon chips can’t detect 1,550-nm light, and therefore developers have to make custom sensors with an exotic material called indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs), which is more costly and more complex to manufacture. Setting up a production line for this less common technology is no easy feat, and the product may not be cheap.
Speaking at an online conference in March, Innovusion technology chief Li Yimin said getting lidars to work well on production cars had turned out to be more difficult than he expected. Nonetheless, he said his staff have been working “day and night” to meet the early 2022 timeline target set by partner Nio. The Chinese EV maker has promised to deliver its first sedan model enabled with its lidar sensors, the ET7, early next year.
“We have to pull ahead the production schedule of many advanced technologies including lidar … This has posed a lot of pressure on our teams and the partners. We are fully focused on achieving this goal and pushing ahead despite all those challenges,” Nio’s chief executive William Li said during an April earnings call.
Xpeng Motors, with partner Livox, claims it will be the first Chinese automaker to deploy lidar on production cars this October. But it is facing other problems. Livox’s sensors boast a unique method of scanning objects in a spiral or flower pattern, rather than in traditional horizontal linear scanning patterns. This helps its sensors create a higher-definition map of the world and could enable more reliable autonomous driving capabilities, the DJI-backed lidar maker has claimed.
However, the unusual scanning style requires the sensor’s motor driver to operate at a high rotation speed of over 6,000 revolutions per minute, more than five times that of sensors made by major French lidar marker Valeo. These speeds pose a big technical challenge for the five-year-old startup to meet reliability requirements for autos, since high rotational speeds usually come along with high abrasion and reduced lifetime for motors.
Livox recently said that it has resolved the issue with manufacturing improvements, based in part on DJI’s expertise in mechanical engineering from making drones, according to a Chinese media report published last week. However, Xpeng CEO He Xiaopeng last month during an earnings call acknowledged that the company is still testing lidars from multiple suppliers and is “very open” to other choices for new models scheduled for launch over the next two years.
“With an all-round sensing performance on our cars and our production capabilities, we’re very confident that we can be complementary to some of the disadvantages of lidar technology,” He added.
Some Chinese automakers and lidar startups are also seeking overseas partners. In addition to the Robosense-Lucid hookup, Chinese legacy automaker Great Wall Motors, a manufacturing partner of BMW, has teamed up with Germany’s Ibeo as its source for lidar sensors on production cars.
After technical barriers, lidar-enable cars will have to leap another hurdle: cost. The sensors don’t come cheap.
China’s low-cost manufacturing advantage appears to apply to lidar, with the offerings of local suppliers usually costing 80% less than international competitors, or below $1,000, French market intelligence firm Yole Développement wrote in a report published last August.
However, lidar cars don’t look cheap. The latest premium electric sedan announced by Huawei and BAIC in April, equipped with three lidar sensors, has a starting price of RMB 388,900 ($60,785), more than 50% higher than that of Tesla’s locally-built Model 3.
R&D and onboard computing could be driving the cost. The Chinese telecom giant in April announced that it will double its annual auto R&D budget for self-driving cars to $1 billion this year, without giving a breakdown of its investments. Apart from three lidar sensors, the hardware stack of the BAIC-Huawei sedan also includes five more cameras, and five more radars than a Tesla Model 3’s. Although cameras usually take significant computing power in the vehicle, the task of combining data from multiple sensors also requires much computing power and a more complex vehicle architecture.
Not everyone agrees that AVs will need lidar. Tesla has been heavily relying on a cheaper, camera-based approach. Nissan and Baidu, are also skipping lidar, relying on cameras, radar, and ultrasonic sensors for AVs.
Most other major players, including Google’s Waymo and General Motor’s Cruise, consider lidar an essential part of developing safe autonomous cars. “Lidar sensors contribute to the redundancy and overlapping capabilities needed to build a car that operates without a driver, even in the most challenging environments,” wrote Cruise CTO Kyle Vogt in a post in 2017.
Chinese EV makers are betting on the lidar-based approach in competing against Tesla, and have gained chances to validate the technology. “At the current stage our top priority is not to secure as many contracts as possible, but to fine-tune our products and hit volume production,” (our translation) a Livox spokesperson told TechNode last month.
But lidar prices are falling. As the sensors get cheaper, the case for them looks more and more tempting. “Lidar guarantees high reliability for self-driving cars when vehicle autonomy is still in its early stage. Such redundancy is worth taking in the name of safety,” (our translation) Paul Gong, a China auto analyst at UBS, told TechNode last month.
]]>Chinese ride-hailing platform Didi filed for an initial public offering on Thursday. The company plans to trade on either the New York Stock Exchange or Nasdaq.
Why it matters: Valued at $62 billion, Didi is among the world’s five highest-valued unicorns. The company’s listing could be one of the biggest IPO this year.
Details: Didi’s IPO filing highlights its quick recovery from the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. The company reported a net income of RMB 196 million ($30 million) in the three months ended March 31, up from a net loss of nearly RMB 4 billion a year earlier.
Context: As part of its rapid expansion plan for the next three years, Didi is expanding into overseas markets and aggressively entering new verticals.
The local government of Beijing on Tuesday granted the country’s first-ever permits for commercial deployment of delivery robots to JD.com, Meituan, and Neolix, allowing the companies to charge clients for driverless delivery services.
Why it matters: Robot vehicles are going into commercial use on Chinese city streets for the first time. It’s not the first time such vehicles will operate on city streets: China has previously granted permits to test passenger and commercial vehicles on city roads, and self-driving vehicles have gone into use in limited circumstances.
Details: Beijing-based tech giants JD.com and Meituan, as well as robotics startup Neolix, have been authorized to operate robot delivery services commercially within designated parts of the city’s Daxing district, state-owned media Beijing Daily reported Wednesday (in Chinese).
Context: The government is pushing automated passenger and freight transport services. Vehicle intelligence is one of the major goals of China’s current five-year plan, running to 2025.
With contributions from Emma Lee.
]]>Huawei’s auto push won’t include making its own cars, the company said Monday. The statement comes on the heels of a series of high profile moves into auto technology by the telecoms giant, and reports that it plans to manufacture its own vehicles.
Why it matters: Huawei’s statement comes amid unease from existing carmakers that Huawei will enter the industry by manufacturing its own cars.
Details: Huawei has not invested in any automakers and is not interested in acquiring majority stakes in car companies in the future, the company said in a statement on Monday.
Context: China’s tech and auto industries have long swirled with rumors of Huawei buying stakes in domestic car companies.
BYD will begin delivering its electric crossovers in Norway during the third quarter of this year, the company announced Wednesday, the latest example of a Chinese electric vehicle (EV) maker pushing into the European auto market.
Why it matters: The move is BYD’s first major foray into Europe’s passenger EV market. Prior to the annoucement, the company’s focus in the region had primarily been on buses.
Details: BYD said on Wednesday it will begin shipping the first 100 of its Tang electric sport utility vehicles to Norway at the end of this month and start deliveries during the third quarter.
Context: Norway, where EVs accounted for more than 50% of car sales last year, has become a testing ground for Chinese automakers eager to tap into the fierce but fast-growing European EV market.
Huawei has appointed the head of its smartphone business to take charge of its young vehicle technology unit, part of a wider management reshuffle as the telecommunications giant tries to break into the fast-growing autonomous and electric vehicle sector.
Why it matters: The appointment is expected to initiate a round of restructuring which will place Huawei’s nascent intelligent automotive solution (IAS) business unit and the team that develops and sell in-car services for automakers under its core consumer business group.
Details: Richard Yu, chief executive of Huawei’s consumer business group, was appointed concurrently CEO of the auto solutions unit. Current head Wang Jun will remain as the president of the unit, a source with direct knowledge of the matter told TechNode on Wednesday. Chinese media first reported the shift, citing an internal memo dated Tuesday.
Context: Huawei has been seeking new growth drivers as its smartphone sales plunged globally last year. The smartphone business is running out of key components from US suppliers while being cut off from Google’s Android by the US sanctions.
Xpeng Motors CEO He Xiaopeng promised Wall Street analysts May 13 that the company would roll out a new generation of autonomous driving (AV) software early next year. The company said recently that its Xpilot 3.5 system will be able to drive autonomously 90% of the time.
Why it matters: Improved AV capabilities could give the electric vehicle (EV) startup a leg up as it faces challenges. Last week, Chinese tech giants set out ambitious targets for their self-driving tech businesses in partnership with legacy automakers.
Earnings: Xpeng on Thursday reported a record RMB 2.95 billion ($450.4 million) in revenue in its first-quarter results, rising more than sixfold from a year earlier, exceeding a consensus estimate from analysts polled by FactSet, according to MarketWatch. However, Xpeng shares fell 4.8% to $23.56 on Thursday following the call.
Race to AV: He was asked about competition from Baidu and Huawei, which last month made public debuts of self-driving systems for city streets. He said the AV solutions provided by some companies are currently for limited driving scenarios or “at a very high cost.”
Context: Chinese young EV makers are feeling the heat as local tech giants strive for self-driving leadership with the launch of their advanced AV solutions during this year’s Auto Shanghai last month.
Traditionally a time for automakers to flex their muscles, the Auto Shanghai expo this year held a surprise: It was China’s big tech firms that took the spotlight, outshining some of the country’s leading EV makers.
Huawei made a big splash, unveiling its complete self-driving car technologies as it gears up to compete as a central player in China’s autonomous vehicle (AV) industry. Baidu, China’s biggest internet search firm, was not to be outdone, proclaiming itself the undisputed AV industry leader. The company said it expected to equip 1 million new cars in five years with its software.
Some of the biggest startup unicorns such as chipmaker Horizon Robotics were also busy, forging alliances with a list of automakers during the event as they work to establish themselves in the booming industry.
Traditional automakers pushing into the smart, electrified vehicle sector was another focal point of this year‘s show. This, along with the tech giants’ foray into the market, has unexpectedly added to pressure to young EV upstarts.
We spoke with industry insiders to get their thoughts on the state of the market. Here are the highlights:
Drive I/O is TechNode’s monthly newsletter on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode Squared members.
Overshadowing traditional carmakers displaying flashy concept models and production-ready cars, Chinese tech giants generated big buzz at Auto Shanghai this year.
Tech giants unveiled advanced connected and autonomous driving solutions along with ambitious growth strategies, generating headlines and lending cachet to lesser-known auto partners. In particular, deep-pocketed Huawei and Baidu showed how they are ramping up aggressive pushes into the industry.
Huawei was one of the biggest draws at the show. Crowds swarmed the Arcfox-branded Alpha S electric sedans on display at its booth, equipped with the telecom giant’s hardware and software and made by automaker BAIC.
After three years of co-development, the two companies said that they are on track to deliver the Alpha S by year-end. According to Huawei and BAIC, the vehicle features “best-in-class” self-driving capabilities for highways and busy streets to customers in China’s four biggest cities. Its other customers that hail from outside of the four cities will get the function via over-the-air software updates within the next two years as Huawei continues to work on its AV mapping.
To reach this target, Huawei has been plowing resources into its new auto business. Its Automotive Solutions unit will beef up headcount 25% to 5,000 employees this year, Wang Jun, president of Huawei’s intelligent Automotive Solution business unit, told Chinese media during the show.
Hands-free driving on busy city streets is widely considered a key milestone for mass AV adoption, one that Tesla has offered in its full self-driving (FSD) package since March. Eager to offset its flagging smartphone sales Huawei has been chasing this capability as it ranks auto among its top-priority businesses, though it is years behind industry leaders. At the company’s global analyst conference a week before Auto Shanghai, deputy chairman Eric Xu announced that Huawei will nearly double its annual auto R&D budget to $1 billion this year.
Lingering questions among industry analysts TechNode spoke with include understanding what progress Huawei has made on the self-driving front so far—a question it has not yet addressed—and how much safer its self-driving cars will be compared with traditional autos. The tech heavyweight faces a significant uphill climb. Many automakers remain skeptical that the “wounded tiger” will manage to make cars itself, these analysts said.
Huawei’s moves into the auto industry present a significant threat to Baidu. Wang Yunpeng, a vice president at the search firm, recently went on the counter-attack in a talk with Chinese media during the auto show, insinuating that even by throwing money at the challenge, competitors stood little chance of quickly catching up.
Baidu, Wang said, is in the same camp as Google’s AV unit Waymo—it’s on the verge of commercializing its technologies. To compare, “companies like Huawei and Didi are probably still at the stage of testing their vehicles on fixed routes,” Wang said (our translation).
Baidu’s robocars have logged 10 million kilometers (6.21 million miles) on public roads, around a third of Waymo’s. During the event, Baidu launched what it boasted was China’s most advanced driver-assist system. Called Autonomous Navigation Pilot (ANP), the technology enables autonomous driving capabilities for vehicles made by Baidu’s automaker partners. The system will be first available to owners of these vehicles in 20 cities by year-end and then over 100 cities by 2023, the company said. Baidu said its self-driving tech will power at least one new model per month beginning in July and equip more than 1 million cars with its software over the next five years.
With blurred lines between vehicles and technology, how much tech is in a Baidu- or Huawei-enabled smart car? Using as an example WM Motor’s W6, the latest crossover from the Baidu-backed EV maker, the tech giant is responsible for most of the digital technology in the car, from the voice assistant to the map navigation in the operating system. WM Motor also sources Baidu’s self-driving software and hardware suite including 12 cameras, 12 ultrasonic sensors, a radar system, and a computing platform, while it independently develops the car’s mechanics, such as the powertrain system.
Chinese carmaker Chery is also clamoring to join Baidu’s friend circle, while BAIC is one of Huawei’s oldest allies in the automotive industry. However, some of the bigger names in auto want full control in developing the next-generation of vehicle architecture. For that reason, China’s biggest automakers, SAIC and Dongfeng Motor, displayed their latest offerings with software developed in-house or by Chinese AV unicorns they have backed.
During the expo, SAIC began to take orders for its first sedan, the L7, under its new premium EV brand IM. Short for “Intelligence in Motion,” SAIC co-launched the brand with Alibaba in November to compete against Tesla. The Volkswagen partner recently raised its holdings in Chinese AV upstart Momenta, aiming to offer urban self-driving capabilities early next year. Meanwhile, Dongfeng announced (in Chinese) that it aims to sell a total of 1 million EVs and master fully driverless technologies within the next five years.
Experts TechNode spoke with were optimistic about Chinese automakers’ moves into smart, electrified cars, thanks in part to local tech giants. Domestic players could account for 70% of auto sales from the current 40% within the next 10 years, Liu Guanghao, an investment director at Shanghai-based venture capital firm BeFor Capital told TechNode. “These driver assistance features are industry-leading, and the car interiors, such as the digital dashboards, appeared forward-thinking. This could help traditional automakers reposition their brands to be more premium,” (our translation) Liu said.
Amid the hubbub from big tech and traditional auto companies, Chinese EV contenders were comparatively quiet, with no mention of new models at Auto Shanghai.
Well-funded Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto are considered emerging EV leaders and the most promising of China’s Tesla challengers. Now, as competition heats up, they are collaborating with smaller tech unicorns—such as Li Auto’s partnership with Chinese chipmaker Horizon and Xpeng’s partnership with DJI’s Lidar unit, Livox—in an effort to maintain their leadership positions in the sector.
But their outlook may be clouding over after internet giants overshadowed them during the expo.
On the first day of the show Nio kicked off a massive expansion of its charging infrastructure, announcing that it would open 100 battery swap stations and 500 supercharging stations in an area spanning eight northern provinces during the next three years. Meanwhile, Nio president Qin Lihong acknowledged to Chinese media on April 19 that big tech’s push into EVs was a challenge for the company considering Huawei’s established retail network, and reaffirmed its goal to expand its sales network by 60% to 366 stores nationwide by year-end.
There has been growing concern over EV upstarts lagging larger players in new product and technology development going forward. Nio CEO William Li last month expressed confidence that it would release the ET7, its next-generation electric sedan, on time, slated for delivery early next year. It would happen, he confirmed, despite steep challenges in advanced technology adoption. The company said it is doubling its R&D budget to RMB 5 billion ($774 million) this year. “Auto intelligence is where this game may be decided,” Li told Chinese media during the auto show.
Li Auto is seen as falling behind its peers in the AV race, having not yet delivered highway self-driving functionalities to its customers. Feeling the heat at the auto show, CEO Li Xiang said April 20 on Chinese social media platform Weibo that its self-developed AV system will be able to compete head-to-head against those by Huawei and Tesla next year. The EV startup in September announced plans to adopt Nvidia’s advanced supercomputer Orin for its second model, scheduled to launch in 2022.
The six-year-old automaker also turned to Chinese AI unicorn Horizon Robotics for help, and the two companies during the show deepened their partnership to an “in-depth cooperation in building upgradable smart and electric vehicles” (our translation). Despite its best efforts, Li Auto may be too late to catch up and gain a competitive advantage, as tech heavyweights venture into EVs, an analyst told TechNode at the show.
Li Auto in February assured investors that it will triple its R&D spending to RMB 3 billion ($464 million) this year. Since December it has raised around $2 billion from a new share offering and bond sales to ramp up in-house R&D capabilities.
Xpeng Motors is ahead of its peers in driverless technologies, but also failed to wow the crowd during the show, despite unveiling its second sedan, the P5, which it displayed at a press event in Guangzhou a week earlier. Touted as China’s first production model equipped with two Lidar sensors, an expensive and essential component for 3D perception, the P5 is expected in the first half of 2022 to self-navigate driving scenarios such as being cut off on busy streets.
However, Xpeng did not release the P5’s pricing information as planned, spurring concern from industry insiders that the company’s best days are behind it. Several insiders and analysts that TechNode spoke with said that the P5 launch fell short of expectations while the cost of the vehicle’s hardware suite has remained high, pressuring Xpeng in pricing the new product, people close to the company told TechNode during the show.
Xpeng fired back on April 22, saying on its Weibo account that it had secured more than 10,000 orders of the P5 in 53 hours after opening orders (with refundable RMB 99 deposits). “The market feedback was beyond our expectation,” (our translation) a company spokeswoman said to TechNode on Wednesday.
Chinese tech giants at the Auto Shanghai 2021 disrupted the already-breathtaking pace of China’s new energy and autonomous driving world by doing what they were there to do: build consumer brand awareness and deliver advanced car technology solutions. The disruption is boosting the perception of Chinese-built vehicles—no longer synonymous with cheap, low quality cars—up the industry value chain.
This disruption is pressuring Chinese EV upstarts’ lead in the industry. These EV firms will have to convince investors that, after notching early wins, they can maintain their momentum in an increasingly crowded playing field.
“Big tech’s entry into the market would inevitably erode the influence young EV makers have in the industry. This has created an alternative regarding the competitive landscape in the next five to 10 years,” (our translation) Paul Gong, China auto analyst at UBS, told TechNode on April 21.
]]>Chinese electric vehicle maker Nio on Thursday announced that it will start delivering vehicles to buyers in Norway in September and will open a flagship store there in the third quarter, in its first overseas foray.
Why it matters: Norway is the first stage of Nio’s ambitious expansion plan for Europe, which holds significant growth opportunities for the EV upstart but may prove to be a challenge.
Details: Nio plans in August to start customer test drives of its large electric crossover, the ES8, in Norway, and start taking orders and delivering cars to customers in September, Marius Hayler, general manager of Nio Norway, announced via livestream during the event on Thursday. Detailed information on pricing was not disclosed.
READ MORE: Chinese EV makers face uphill battle with Europe expansion
Context: Competition in Europe is stiff for Chinese EV makers. Norway is a mature EV market with a number of European brands competing for share.
Hello Inc., the bike rental startup behind China’s ubiquitous blue HelloBikes, has submitted a prospectus to the US Securities and Exchange Commission in preparation for a Nasdaq IPO. This is a rare look into the economics of the bike-sharing industry, as it’s the first time a company in the sector has released extensive financial data.
Why it matters: Hello’s filing is a sign that the once-volatile bike rental industry is moving beyond its growth phase.
READ MORE: The bike rental boom is dead. Long live bike rental
Details: The numbers in the filing reveal that Hello still has a ways to go to reach maturity.
On track for profits? Industry experts weigh in.
“HelloBike was a latecomer to the bike-sharing money wars. Its come-from-behind two-wheel leadership, as well as its growing carpool share, suggest the company is the beneficiary of savvy strategists and operators.”
—Michael Norris
Context: At its peak, 80 companies around China operated in the bike rental industry. But the sector soon became bloated and dozens of these firms went under.
Chinese electric vehicle maker Nio downplayed competition while delivering its first-quarter results on Friday, with chief executive William Li relaying minimal concern about its growing list of challengers in China.
“In the premium market, we haven’t seen any brand having the same level of competitiveness [as Nio] in terms of product, service, technology, user experience and community,” Li said during a call with analysts on Friday. Li added that many traditional automakers are “moving fast as followers” in building direct service channels and user community, but would face pressure in pricing their new products. Such automakers are “lagging behind“ in terms of in-car digital service and autonomous driving capabilities, he said.
“We believe we can solidify our position in the market… our competitiveness will continue to grow and stay strong in the long run,” Li said.
Nio on Friday beat Wall Street expectations for first-quarter revenue, boosted by better-than-expected deliveries despite an ongoing chip shortage that has hammered the auto industry globally. The company reported Q1 revenue of RMB 7.98 billion ($1.22 billion), exceeding the $1.06 billion consensus expectation in a FactSet poll of analysts, according to MarketWatch.
Nio’s Q1 delivery of 20,060 vehicles was a 16% quarter-over-quarter increase, and a fourfold increase on an annual basis. The company in late March lowered its Q1 delivery forecast to 19,500 vehicles from 20,000, citing the chip shortage. Automotive gross margins in the first three months of this year were 21.2%, up from 17.2% in the previous quarter and -7.4% in the first quarter of 2020, which the company attributed to increased adoption of higher-priced options and lowered costs for materials.
Losses attributable to shareholders expanded 183% year on year to RMB 4.87 billion, which the company attributed to the RMB 4.4 billion expense during the first quarter to redeem equity interest from investors of its China entity.
The company will not reduce the price of its cars in order to win market share, Li emphasized, but would increase investment to improve products and services with “a reasonable gross margin” as a long-term strategy. Nio announced last week during the Auto Shanghai expo that it would build 100 battery swap stations and 500 supercharging stations in China’s eight northern provinces over the next three years.
Nio also promised to invest heavily in the research and development of new products and technologies, aiming to gain a long-term competitive advantage as more big auto players move into the booming segment. Li said on Friday that he expected research and development expenses to increase significantly in Q2 as it moves aggressively to mass produce of its first sedan, the ET7, slated to begin deliveries in Q1 2022, as well as new models and self-driving technology development. The company in March announced it would double its R&D budget to RMB 5 billion this year.
Traditional automakers’ recent and aggressive push into electric cars is pressuring Tesla and young Chinese EV makers. In the latest example, state-owned BAIC partnered with Huawei to equip its latest premium sedan, the Alpha S, with customized software and hardware technologies from the tech giant. BAIC said it had secured over 1,000 orders after the debut on April 17. Two days earlier, China’s biggest private automaker, Geely, unveiled plans to deliver the first model from its new premium EV brand Zeekr in October, adopting a direct sales and community strategy similar to Nio’s.
“Competition will definitely heat up in the Chinese electric vehicle market, as not only legacy automakers from China and the globe but also local tech giants are actively joining in the race. The vehicle autonomy and electrification revolution will accelerate as more money pours into the market, but the competition would be very diverse, dynamic, and intense,” (our translation) Paul Gong, UBS’s China auto analyst said last week during an online conference call.
]]>Chinese search firm Baidu is launching a fully driverless, paid ride-hailing service in the outskirts of Beijing beginning on May 2, the company confirmed on Thursday.
Details: Baidu will begin charging passengers for rides with its fleet of 10 driverless vehicles in western Beijing’s Shougang Industrial Park beginning on Sunday.
Context: Baidu in March became the first Chinese company granted permission to offer robotaxi rides to paying customers in Cangzhou, a city near Beijing in northern Hebei province.
]]>Tesla on late Thursday announced (in Chinese) that, earlier in the day, it had mailed to a customer surnamed Zhang the full data logs for the 30 minutes prior to the accident involving her Model 3 sedan. The company also released to the public data of the car for one minute prior to the crash.
In a statement sent to state-owned media China Market Regulation News, Tesla said the vehicle was traveling at 118.5 kilometers per hour (around 73.6 mph) when the driver, Zhang’s father, hit the brake for the final time before the crash. Then the car’s automatic emergency braking system reacted 2.7 seconds later and the crash occurred after another 1.8 seconds.
The US automaker insisted that the car’s brake functioned properly throughout with the car continuously slowing down to 48.5 kms per hour before the crash occurred. The company said that it is currently in negotiation with the owner to set up an inspection of the car by a third-party institution. Tesla pledged to fully cooperate with regulatory departments for more in-depth investigations and accept without reservation criticisms from the public.
Zhang in early March told Chinese media that her Model 3 crashed one late afternoon in February when her father was driving at a speed of around 60 kms per hour on a highway in Anyang, a city in central Henan province. Zhang insisted her father was driving under the speed limit, given that her mother and one-year-old daughter were also in the car and that the road was dense with traffic. She said that the brake failed to respond when her father pressed the pedal.
Tesla’s release comes two days after Chinese authorities asked Tesla to provide data for the crash investigation. On Monday, Zhang had climbed atop a car to protest at China’s premier annual auto exhibition.
Why it matters: For the first time China will officially investigate complaints about Tesla brake failures. Tesla owners in both the United States and China have complained about faulty brakes for years. So far, however, safety regulators have not found evidence for these claims. The company’s reputation in China has suffered in the past year as customers allege safety defects and shady sales practices.
READ MORE: Safety questions and shady sales tactics are chilling the China-Tesla love affair
Details: A branch of the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), China’s top market regulator, in the central province of Henan, on Wednesday ordered Tesla to share “the full range of data” about a crash two months ago to aid its investigation. The owner of the Tesla Model 3 involved, a woman identified only by the surname Zhang, staged a widely publicized protest at Auto Shanghai on Monday. Regulators told Tesla to send the data to the owner “as soon as possible,” according to a Chinese media report (our translation).
Ge Weihua, a customer service manager at Tesla’s regional office in Zhengzhou, the capital of Henan province, told state television channel CCTV on Thursday that the company’s head office had prepared the relevant data and the local office would share it with Zhang by 6 p.m. Beijing time.
Zhang, accompanied by two other female Tesla owners, staged a protest Monday on the opening day of this year’s Shanghai Auto Show, alleging that the brakes on her sedan malfunctioned while her father was driving in Anyang, Henan, in February, causing a crash with another vehicle. The protest was widely reported in Chinese media, with many online commentators siding with the customer.
Tesla responded later that day that the accident was due to excessive speed. Grace Tao, Tesla’s vice president of external affairs in China, told local media that “there is no possibility Tesla will compromise,” Reuters reported.
On Tuesday, national market regulators publicly instructed local market watchdogs in Henan province and Shanghai, where Tesla’s production facility is located, to protect consumers’ legal rights. Later the same day, the company issued an apology (in Chinese) for being slow to respond to the complaint.
In an additional statement, published late Wednesday on the Chinese social media platform Weibo, the US automaker requested Zhengzhou authorities appoint an officially recognized testing agency for the investigation and pledged to “accept the result whatever it might be” (our translation).
Update: Details added April 23 about Tesla’s release of crash data.
]]>Huawei on Wednesday began selling Chinese-made cars equipped with its powertrain system and in-car infotainment solution, a move that the company said could offset a drastic decline in its global handset business resulting from US restrictions limiting its access to crucial technology.
Details: Three electric crossovers fitted with a Huawei’s electric drive and car connectivity system, Hicar, were on display at a Huawei store in Shanghai on Tuesday when the company announced during a press event that it would begin selling cars in its home country via its retail network.
READ MORE: Huawei to begin charging phone makers for 5G patents
Context: With its strong technological capabilities and an ambitious expansion plan, Huawei has quickly emerged as a major force in the Chinese auto industry. It is eyeing the fast-growing intelligent, connected, and electric vehicle sector.
A little over a decade ago, China’s leaders laid out plans to become the world’s biggest market for electric vehicles (EVs). The country was late in producing gas-driven cars, putting it behind the US, Japan, and Germany. In 2009, China introduced subsidies for EVs in the hope that these vehicles could take the lead in the next generation of cars. Now, observers ask if hydrogen is next.
China’s EV push worked—the country is now the world’s largest market for EVs and is home to some of the world’s largest manufacturers of EVs and EV batteries.
Now, the government and some of China’s biggest energy companies are jumping into hydrogen energy. More than 10 state-owned energy companies including Sinopec and State Grid have plans to increase the use of hydrogen energy in the country.
While China has a well-developed EV industry, the country is looking for new ways to cut emissions. The government doesn’t want to “put all its eggs in one basket with battery EVs,” Tu Le, managing director of Beijing-based consultancy Sino Auto Insights, told TechNode.
In September, Chinese President Xi Jinjing revealed plans for China to reach peak emissions by 2030 and hit carbon neutrality by 2060. Hydrogen fuel, which can be used in applications from industrial processes to transportation, could form a linchpin in reaching this goal. The technology could allow China to move away from fossil fuels as the cost of producing clean hydrogen drops.
“Hydrogen is now expected to play a much more important role to drastically decrease [China]’s greenhouse gas emissions over time,” Tu Jianjun, adjunct professor at the School of Environment at Beijing Normal University, wrote in a paper late last year.
Bottom line: China’s hydrogen energy sector could see massive growth in the next 30 years. The country’s commercial vehicle sector is likely to see the biggest benefit from the technology.
What is hydrogen power? Hydrogen fuels cells are a dense, efficient, and clean form of energy storage. Use power to isolate the gas, and then you can deploy it to power a car in a reaction that’s cleaner than fossil fuels and requires less heavy equipment than battery electrics. It even has applications in energy-intensive industries like the steel sector. One of the most popular prospects at the moment is fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV).
The element is rarely found in its pure form and needs to be extracted from water, coal, or natural gas. But producing it in an environmentally friendly way is currently expensive, preventing wider use until the issue is dealt with.
China eyes hydrogen: After being delayed last year, a national plan for hydrogen is expected at some point in 2021. Already, several whitepapers and planning documents have laid out goals to decrease emissions and increase hydrogen energy adoption. Until recently, China’s interest in developing its hydrogen economy was not driven by an ambition to cut emissions.
Localized developments: Despite the lack of a national plan, Beijing has encouraged local governments to develop and fund their own hydrogen industries. But these plans are often far more optimistic in their targets than industry expectations, Yuki Yu, founder of Energy Iceberg, wrote in a report.
“Anytime the Chinese government puts the thumb on the scale, there’s going to be 200 or 300 companies globally that come with their hand out.”
Tu Le, managing director of Sino Auto Insights
Better than batteries? But China has bet big on competing technology. The country spent billions building its electric vehicle industry. Government subsidies led to the rise of some of the biggest EV companies in the world, and made China the world’s number one market for these types of vehicles.
A brief timeline: China’s drive to use hydrogen for power has been years in the making. The country’s ambitions were initially set out as part of its Made in China 2025 plan. There has been a lot of action in the industry over the past few years, and things appear to be picking up pace.
What’s the potential? In China, buses and trucks will likely come first. The policy environment currently favors using fuel cells in heavier, commercial vehicles rather than passenger cars, Energy Iceberg’s Yu said.
Dirty secrets: Hydrogen is only as clean as the process used to produce it. The element is rarely found in its pure form, and typically needs to be extracted from fossil fuels or water. Depending on how it is produced, it can be completely clean or release harmful gases.
Cleanup in aisle H: The industry needs a cleanup to achieve its green potential.
“More than 80% of hydrogen produced in China is grey. But we see a growing number of green hydrogen projects being launched. In 2018, there were probably just one or two projects, but last year, at least 30 were announced.”
Yuki Yu, founder of Energy Iceberg
What next? China has a history of rapidly developing domestic industries after choosing them key development priorities. The country’s EV and solar industries are a testament of this. Hydrogen energy is likely to be next. Development—and funding—will likely accelerate once a national plan is rolled out.
READ MORE: Little mention of China’s EV industry in Five-Year Plan bodes well: experts
Big opportunities: Hydrogen has big potential, but it will take big investments to bring the technology to widespread use. Oliver Bishop, general manager of hydrogen at petroleum giant Shell, told Green Tech Media that China is expected to play an important role in the global hydrogen economy, with large scale deployments meaning cheaper costs around the world.
China’s leadership in the hydrogen economy hinges on whether it can clean up its hydrogen production processes—and convince the world that electric vehicles are not the only way.
“There needs to be private enterprise appetite to diversify out of battery electrics, which are already doing research into batteries and infrastructure,” Tu said.
]]>Geely announced Thursday that it will sell electric vehicles from its new premium brand Zeekr directly to customers, a business endeavor for which it plans to open retail shops and build an online community.
Why it matters: The move is part of a broader plan by China’s largest private automaker to become a frontrunner in the electric and software-based vehicle race.
Details: Zeekr on Thursday laid out plans to join the country’s most competitive mass-premium EV segment by opening two clubhouse-style flagship stores called “Zeekr Centers” and 60 smaller “Zeekr Spaces” in local shopping malls this year.
“It’s an emotional play at the high end where consumers buy EVs because they’re high-tech gadgets with premium experience. That’s been a successful play in China and will continue to thrive without government subsidies.”
—Stephen Dyer, managing director of global consultancy AlixPartners, told TechNode during the panel, “EV: What’s next as the industry recovers” at TechNode’s Emerge event in November.
Context: Volkswagen is one of the traditional auto majors which adopted a direct-sales model, opening its first branded shop in December in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou. It plans to build 40 stores across China over the next year or so, according to a Reuters report.
Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly identified the EV company as Zeeker, not Zeekr.
Update: added the names of the November TechNode event and panel discussion that Stephen Dyer took part in.
]]>When Mi Jiayi was shopping for a car in Hangzhou in early 2020, there was no question in his mind it would be a Tesla. For the 30-year-old legal advisor with a local investment conglomerate, it would be the first car he ever owned.
His respect for Tesla CEO Elon Musk was one factor in the appeal of the brand. On test drives, he was attracted by the design and some of Tesla’s fancy technological features. “The vehicles look so gorgeous compared with some other cars in similar price ranges,” he recalled. “Also, its Autopilot system is good at detecting vehicles and pedestrians on the road,” Mi said (our translation).
Specifically, he was hoping to buy a Long Range Model 3, expected to become available sometime in 2020, which boasted a driving range 50% longer than the Standard Range Plus model. In other words, it could be driven 223 more kilometers (139 miles) without a recharge.
At first, he had no interest in the standard-range version, which had been available for order in China since October 2019. But when he repeatedly asked about the long-range Model 3’s launch date at a local showroom, the sales staff told him it wouldn’t hit the market at least until the end of the year, Mi told TechNode. The sales staff finally convinced Mi and he placed his order in early March 2020, signing up for delivery in May. He was surprised when the vehicle was delivered on March 31, nearly two months earlier than expected.
Mi’s mood soured ten days after receiving his new car, when Tesla announced plans to launch its China-made long-range Model 3 for delivery in June—and priced just 4% higher than its standard plus counterpart.
Mi had just missed out on the newer Model 3: Had he received his car on the date he expected—or just three days later than he did—he could have swapped it for a long-range vehicle under a seven-day return policy. He suspects that the delivery was rushed to him to prevent him from trading up.
Mi used to admire Musk, known as “the Iron Man” among Chinese fans, as “a great, powerful person.” Now, he says Tesla is being “dishonest” and “untrustworthy” (our translation). In December 2020 he filed a suit against the company for deceptive sales practices and is waiting for a court date. He says more than 600 Tesla owners nationwide have similar complaints. On a chat group he helped to form on Chinese messaging app WeChat, hundreds of Tesla owners air a variety of grievances with Tesla and Musk.
So far, none of the lawsuits over alleged promises of sales staff are known to have prevailed in court, but the complaints of people in social media groups have spilled into the mass media. Then there are at least ten recent accidents that Tesla drivers have blamed on mechanical malfunctions, which early this year drew the attention of Chinese regulatory authorities. Some of the accusations of malfunctions are similar to those made by Tesla owners in the US.
Through it all, Tesla executives have appeared little concerned about the tarnishing of the company’s once dazzling brand image in China. Tesla’s rare public responses are often dismissive. The company didn’t reply to TechNode’s numerous attempts to comment on the complaints and charges against it. In short, Chinese consumers’ short but hot romance with Tesla may be cooling off.
Imported Teslas began to arrive in China in 2014, but the first made-in-China vehicles only rolled out of the Shanghai factory in late 2019. Yet today the company dominates the country’s electric vehicle (EV) market. Tesla has boosted Beijing’s prized industry and is a pillar in the plan for it to become a global auto power.
“I’ve lost all my confidence and trust in the company.”
Zhou Wanjun, Tesla model 3 owner
Tesla is seen by many Chinese people as an innovator and Musk as a visionary. On the social media platform Weibo, he has 1.7 million followers. Among China’s status-conscious, middle-class urbanites, Musk quickly became an icon (in Chinese). These Tesla owners see themselves as early adopters at the forefront of a transport revolution and are inspired by the company’s stated mission to fight climate change.
“It seems like you will finally see a Tesla logo everywhere you look in the city,” says William Hu, a human resources expert in Shanghai who had just ordered a Model 3 sedan. To him and his peers, a Tesla is a signifier of social standing and fashion.
There’s another reason why Tesla holds such a rarefied spot in China’s EV market: It offers the most competitive product.
Although the first Teslas made in China, the Model 3 sedans, only began deliveries in January 2020, today the company has a 21% share of the EV market and commands a huge lead over other EV automakers in the country. In 2020, it sold nearly 140,000 of the Model 3. China’s best-selling EV, the Model 3 now has a retail price starting at RMB 249,900 ($38,500), a price made possible by localization of car parts and generous government subsidies. Tesla’s big bet on self-driving technology also made its China-built vehicles a compelling consumer product that few can compete with.
“I am amazed by the superior experience of driving a Tesla,” Wen Wen, a BMW owner said recently after test-driving a Model 3 in the southwestern municipality of Chongqing (our translation). To compare, she told TechNode that she had just taken a “pretty good” ride in an Xpeng’s premium P7 sedan two days before.
Hu expressed a similar sentiment. “Tesla’s self-driving and intelligent capabilities are way more advanced,” he said, comparing the automaker to other luxury EV brands such as Nio.
The brand’s status value in China has bolstered its global bottom line. In January, the California-based company posted its 2020 results, showing its first full year of profitability and record delivery figures. Skyrocketing growth in the Chinese mass market has propelled its market cap as the world’s most valuable automaker. Revenue from the China market increased more than 120% year-on-year, reaching $6.66 billion in 2020 and accounting for 21% of Tesla’s global revenue, the company reported in an SEC filing on Feb. 8.
Tesla is now pumping up production of the Model Y sports utility vehicle (SUV) in its quest to reach a loftier goal: upping the total number of all Tesla deliveries this year by 50% compared to 2020. The Shanghai factory began manufacturing the Model Y only last December, but industry observers predict it will be the best-selling premium EV this year.
The experts also say Tesla is aiming to avoid the kind of mistakes Apple made in China. When Apple opted to strengthen its position in the high-end market, it inadvertently ended up giving cheaper-priced domestic rivals plenty of space to grow. The US carmaker, on the other hand, is using every means—notably a string of price cuts—to seize market share from both premium and mainstream automakers.
But as Tesla ramps up deliveries of the Model 3, it faces lawsuits alleging that it has misled buyers of the model.
The first PR blow-up began last April, just around the time Mi Jiayi believes he was deceived into buying a Standard Range Plus Model 3. Other angry owners also accused Tesla sales reps of tricking them into buying that model shortly before the long-range model they wanted was released at only a slightly higher price. Videos of angry Model 3 owners spread like wildfire on Chinese social media.
Some one-time Tesla superfans have sued the company over what they perceive as shady sales practices. Court action is expensive in China. Mi, who has legal training, is among a relatively small number of unhappy customers forging ahead.
Another dissatisfied customer, who sued Tesla for sales fraud in a Beijing court last summer, is local resident Feng Chao, who told TechNode (our translation), “If I had known the long-range Model 3 would be launched in April, I would definitely have bought it.” The electrical engineer explained. “I frequently commute between Beijing and Tianjin, and don’t have a permanent parking space to install a private charger.” He lost his appeal in September due to insufficient evidence.
As Fang Chaoqiang, a lawyer at Beijing-based Yingke Law Firm, explained to TechNode,
“It is difficult for a customer to win such a case, unless there is sufficient evidence that Tesla made false claims and manipulated customers to make a purchase” (our translation).
According to a December report by Chinese-language media site Sina Tech, Tesla’s management pushed its sales team to sell more of the Standard Range Plus Model 3 cars and rush to deliver them to customers before the end of March 2020. Citing company insiders, Sina Tech reported that China-based Tesla executives hid the imminent launch of the longer-range model from the sales team, and pushed to offload the existing standard models.
Tesla did not respond to TechNode’s requests for comments about this claim.
In fact, Tesla has not responded to a query from TechNode since October 2019. Sometime last year, the company eliminated its California-based global public relations team altogether. US trade publication Electrek got confirmation of the news in October. Musk’s relationship to the press throughout the world is prickly and he has long complained that coverage of Tesla is unfair.
TechNode has been unable to reach Tesla China’s PR team since Head of Communications Cheryl Zhang left the company in late 2019. If someone bears that title now, the information is not publicly available. Meanwhile, the face of the company in China, Grace Tao, whose title used to be “head of public affairs” was changed to “vice president of external affairs,” reflecting some of the title changes at global headquarters.
In chat groups on social media platform Weibo, Tesla’s China leadership is widely viewed as focusing on short-term goals without considering long-term benefits. “[Tesla China’s] business practices, the communication with the public and its brand reputation are getting worse. Maybe it doesn’t matter to them at all,” (our translation) Bill Lin, a Model 3 owner from the eastern city of Xiamen told TechNode.
Tesla is also facing backlash from Tesla owners who, otherwise happy with their cars, are angry that sales people rushed them to make a purchase only to see subsequent drastic price cuts.
These owners say sales staff claimed that the sticker price of the vehicles would remain unchanged for the foreseeable future. For example, a customer surnamed Zhang in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, said a local salesperson promised there would be no upcoming price cuts when she decided to buy her standard-range plus Model 3, about a year ago, according to a report by Henan Television, a state media unit. Less than two weeks after Zhang accepted delivery on April 13, Tesla announced a round of price reductions of nearly RMB 30,000 for the model.
By October, the starting price of a locally made, standard-range plus Model 3 had been slashed four times. In less than a year, the price fell from RMB 355,800 to RMB 249,900—a 30% drop.
Some Model X and S owners have even filed lawsuits alleging deceptive sales practices related to price cuts. According to public records, none have won and some have lost. Perhaps some of the owners won out-of-court monetary settlements from Tesla, as rumors have it, but such agreements do not appear in these records.
Tesla customers regretted buying too soon to enjoy price cuts, and to benefit from a Tesla tax break. When the company won exemption from a 10% tax on imported cars in August 2019, some customers said they should have gotten advance warning.
In a lawsuit filed last April, one sedan owner claimed a Tesla salesperson in March 2019 told him there was no possibility of a tax exemption for the imported cars in the near future. The delivery of his car was completed with the payment of purchase tax in May, just three months before Tesla secured the exemption from the tax, thus reducing the sales price by as much as RMB 69,000.
A local Shanghai court in November ruled in Tesla’s favor in this case due to insufficient evidence, according to a verdict published on China Judgements Online, the official Chinese courts site.
Some complaints and hopes for compensation are more far-fetched. An owner surnamed Ouyang sued Tesla on charges of price fraud in May 2019. She complained of a dramatic price slash of RMB 222,600 nine months after her purchase of an imported Model X in Chongqing. She felt she should have been notified of possible future price cuts. In late 2019, she lost the case, with the court saying that a seller is free to change prices, a court ruling shows.
Customers have also made similar complaints about price changes with the locally-made Model 3, but TechNode does not know if any of these owners have sued Tesla. After a round of price cuts in May 2020, Tesla did respond to the subsequent uproar on social media with a public outreach campaign. In the following two months, top Tesla management visited showrooms around the country and hosted roundtables with owners, requesting feedback on how to introduce price cuts in the future.
Although price cuts dominated the complaints about Tesla in 2020, the first wave of fraud claims concerned what disgruntled Model 3 owners call “hardware downgrading.” Musk publicly stated in April 2019 on the company’s Autonomy Day that all Model 3, S and X vehicles were already being equipped with the hardware foundation for full self-driving software. With the new Hardware (HW) 3.0 chipset, designed in-house, Musk promised that owners would simply have to wait for the company to finish developing its self-driving software and then they could download a patch to get a highly autonomous car.
Early in 2020, multiple Chinese owners of locally-made Model 3’s complained that the chips in their cars’ computers were the older HW 2.5 Nvidia ones, instead of the HW 3.0 chips. Soon after, around 400 owners of imported Model 3’s reportedly complained (in Chinese) that their cars had the older generation chips as well.
Tesla blamed the issue on a supply crunch caused by the Covid-19 pandemic and promised to retrofit all the China-made sedans with HW 3.0 chips. However, the company later made a distinction between the owners of China-made Model 3’s and imported Model 3’s. Even though all owners faced the same problem, owners of imports were denied upgraded replacement chips.
If it seemed strange for a company to alienate customers who had paid RMB 439,900 to be among an elite group of early adopters, legal experts said the undisclosed hardware downgrade for China-made vehicles was also in breach of contract. However, the HW 3.0 chipset was not specified in the contracts with owners of the imports, reported National Business Daily (in Chinese).
Zhou Wanjun, a Shanghai web designer, is one of the owners of an imported Model 3 who believe the company lied to them. He bought his long-range import in late 2019, trusting a Twitter post by Musk in early January 2019 that said the model wouldn’t be produced at all in China. It turned out that Zhou’s purchase took place about six months before the long-range Model 3 began production in China. Zhou and his peers cite Musk’s public statement of April 2019 about the HR 3.0 chips being installed in all new vehicles.
Tesla China later clarified that it would provide the hardware upgrade for free for those who paid RMB 64,000 to subscribe to its “full self-driving (FSD)” function. The company has since maintained that the driving experience for the vehicles enabled by HW 2.5 is essentially the same as those equipped with HW 3.0 for owners who did not buy the FSD feature.
After tolerating quality glitches and feeling cheated by “a lack of transparency” in Tesla’s sales and customer practices for a year, Zhou expressed a profound sense of regret that he ever bought the car when he spoke with TechNode last month.
“I’ve been following Elon Musk on Twitter for a while and, for me, now he is a blowhard and behaves in a brash way with a history of overpromising self-driving cars. You used to see the brand as a tech innovator, however, the sharpness disappears once you have one,” (our translation), Zhou added.
“I’ve lost all my confidence and trust with the company, and my next car won’t be a Tesla,” he said.
Amid complaints about pricing and deceptive sales practices, Tesla also faces more serious accusations: that the safety of its vehicles isn’t up to scratch. The company’s dismissive responses, sometimes blaming the victims, have made matters worse.
In the past nine months, drivers of Tesla vehicles in China have blamed at least 10 accidents on mechanical malfunctions. Dozens more owners have complained about brake failures, battery fires, defective wheels, and unintended acceleration over the past few months, according to multiple Chinese media reports.
For example, a Tesla vehicle in Beijing in January crashed into a car after the driver attempted to prevent the accident by slamming on the brakes. The accident led the driver to question whether her car had a braking problem, according to a recording obtained by Chinese media.
“Armies of exceptionally satisfied Tesla owners customers effectively drown out noises generated by Tesla detractors. Who needs a public relations division?”
Michael Dunne, CEO of ZoZo Go
A Tesla service representative initially insisted that there were no brake problems and suggested that the female driver wasn’t strong enough to hit the brake and prevent the accident.
After the angry driver resorted to local media with her report of the exchange, the social media platform Weibo picked it up and spread it to a much wider audience. Thousands of incensed netizens shared the company’s insulting answer. Tesla later apologized (in Chinese) in a Weibo post for its language, blaming the accident on an icy road. It said the problem had been resolved.
Most recently, a Tesla owner produced what she told a local TV station was video evidence of a repeatable brake failure. As reported by the station, two Hainan residents, surnamed Yu and Meng, said Meng collided with a traffic barrier on March 11 when his brakes failed while driving Yu’s Model 3 in his company’s unpaved parking lot. The pair called a Tesla technician, who attempted to repeat Meng’s actions in a second Model 3, repeating the crash.
Tesla in a March 14 statement (in Chinese) confirmed that a technician had reproduced the accident when driving another Model 3 on the scene, but said, “Our initial findings show it was mainly due to the wet ground and insufficient pressure to brake pedal by the driver and in that case it requires extra stopping distance” (our translation). The video, shot by Meng, does show the technician’s car driving through a large puddle in the dirt parking lot, but seems to show the car failing to stop over at least two car lengths of relatively dry ground. Yu wrote in a March 19 statement that she had reached a settlement with the company and planned to refuse further interviews.
According to the Tesla statement: “We conducted two tests using different braking approaches using another Tesla vehicle at the site in order to find out the cause of the accident. During the first test, we repeated what the driver did when the crash happened, which is pressing the brakes lightly twice and hitting it hard the third time. It turned out the vehicle did skid on the wet road. However, in the second test, the vehicle finally stopped within the safe distance when our employee kept hitting the brakes hard all the time.”
The company reiterated that system data recorded no failures in the vehicle’s acceleration and braking systems, and pledged to “help the customers deal with follow-up issues in an active manner and improve product and service qualities, with safety being its top priority.”
In early February, five government departments responded to mounting owner complaints by calling in Tesla executives to urge them to obey Chinese law and protect consumer rights, according to Reuters and an announcement (in Chinese) by the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR). In a posted response, Tesla pledged to obey Chinese laws, strengthen investigations and to “systematically investigate problems … collectively reported by our consumers.”
Some of the accusations of owners in China echo criticisms of Tesla vehicles made earlier in the US. In response to a petition on behalf of more than 100 US drivers, the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in January 2020 opened an investigation into a variety of issues, including unintended acceleration and brake failures. After examining 127 claims of product faults, however, the federal regulator concluded early this year that there was no evidence to support the complaints.
Tesla had said in a statement that it has been transparent with NHTSA and the claims made by owners in the US petition were “completely false.”
In particular, the US agency found no evidence that a system error could cause the cars to accelerate without the driver’s intention. Tao, the Tesla China vice president for external affairs, cited the NHTSA investigation when she rejected claims by Chinese drivers of unintended acceleration in a Jan. 9 statement on Weibo.
Social media platforms Weibo, WeChat, and Quora-like Zhihu, were then flooded with posts and comments (in Chinese) accusing Tesla of passing the buck. National state media finally weighed in on March 28 in a Xinhua opinion column criticizing the failings of various makers of new energy vehicles (in Chinese). The column singled out Tesla for shifting onto drivers the responsibility for accidents caused by unintended acceleration.
However impersonal or dismissive Tesla’s approach to customer complaints, the causes for most of the accidents in China are still unknown. Most owners give radically different versions of what happened when the errors occurred. And neither SAMR nor any other government authority in China has publicly initiated an investigation.
It sometimes seems like Elon Musk and his company are made of Teflon.
Barring a catastrophe, two China industry analysts say it is unlikely sales will suffer this year. When complaints make an impact, the next quarter’s sales figures drop, said Tu Le, managing director of Sino Auto Insights, yet that certainly didn’t happen to Tesla last year and current sales seem “brisk.”
For all the Tesla owners angry about price cuts they missed out on, “a ton more” who benefited are quite happy with the company, Le said.
Michael Dunne, CEO of ZoZo Go and former managing director of JD Power’s China unit, agreed. “Armies of exceptionally satisfied Tesla owners effectively drown out noises generated by Tesla detractors,” he said. “That has been the reality so far in the US, Europe, and China. Who needs a public relations division?”
The demands for Tesla to address consumer complaints are nonetheless getting louder. In the last year, they have grown from scattered online complaints, to mass media, to official scolding. The March 28 Xinhua column reprimanding Tesla for blaming drivers for its vehicles’ quality lapses shows that top-level official media are paying attention to these consumer complaints.
There is no denying that Tesla has had persistent problems with quality, Le said, and the problems will continue to multiply because the company’s growth is so aggressive. “We will see even more as the Model Y ramps up,” he added. The rapid growth also partially explains the poor quality of service, he said: “Service has yet to catch up with demand.”
Yet when state media produced a list of the past year’s worst offenders of consumer rights on March 15, Tesla got a pass. To the surprise of the public and industry insiders, Tesla wasn’t mentioned at all when the annual televised gala marking Consumer Rights Day reprimanded other tech and auto companies before a national audience. However, Tesla was called out in a local Consumers Rights Day broadcast in Guangdong province (in Chinese).
For the time being, Tesla may have a layer of protection because the company is so integral to the growth of the nation’s EV industry. “There is a symbiotic relationship between the Chinese government and Tesla,” Le said. “Look, Nio wouldn’t be here without Tesla. Tesla is not leading the world in EVs without China. Maybe in five years, it will be different.”
Chinese electric scooter maker Niu Technologies said it is on track to open 10,000 stores nationwide over the next five years, as replacement demand stays robust following the implementation of tougher national standards for two-wheelers.
Why it matters: Nasdaq-listed Niu aims to sell 6 million scooters worldwide in 2025, a tenfold increase from 2020, CEO Li Yan said during a press conference on Wednesday.
Details: The company sees lower-tier markets as key to its growth in China.
Context: Niu reported sales of around 602,000 scooters last year, rising 43% year on year. In the same time period, its store count increased by over 50% to 1,616 shops in China, despite the Covid-19 pandemic. The new shops are mainly in first and second-tier cities.
READ MORE: Scoot over, cars: Niu CEO bets on luxury scooters
]]>After completing a test drive across China’s eastern coastal region, Xpeng Motors said on Wednesday that its driver assistance technology is the top performer in China, using a technology rejected by Elon Musk: high-definition maps.
At a press event in Beijing, Xpeng executives said its Navigation Guide Pilot (NGP) function, which enables primarily unassisted highway driving, surpassed Tesla’s Navigate on Autopilot (NoA) in several key metrics. Specifically, Xpeng said that it had achieved a lower rate of human driver intervention and a higher success rate for automatic lane changing, among others. The 3,600-kilometer (1,864 miles), eight-day road trip, which included members of the media, ended on Sunday.
The road trip included a fleet of 15 P7 sedans traveling a combined total of around 50,000 kilometers on highways and urban streets through major domestic cities including Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou. Xpeng said it logged 0.71 disengagements per 100 kilometers. This means a human driver was forced to take control of the vehicle after traveling in autonomous mode for 140 kilometers on average. In the meantime, Xpeng claimed several Tesla vehicles in tests conducted by local media experienced 1.03 disengagements per 100 kilometers.
The Chinese EV maker also announced its latest version of NGP, scheduled to launch through an over-the-air update in the second quarter, resulted in a 94.4% success rate for lane changes versus Tesla’s 81.3%. Xpeng vehicles successfully self-navigated through tunnels 95.0% of the time compared with Tesla’s 41.8%. Huang Xin, a director at Xpeng Motors, called it “an overwhelming lead” (our translation).
”NGP completely exceeded Tesla’s NoA regarding all the metrics in our tests… and has become the most advanced driver-assist function for production models,“ (our translation) Huang said while calling out challenges from all of its competitors. Huang added that Xpeng will release all the data collected during the trip.
TechNode took one of the Xpeng sedans on a test drive from a hotel in Shanghai to a highway service zone in neighboring Suzhou city, sitting alongside the driver. During the 45-kilometer, 40-minute test ride, the vehicle drove primarily at around 120 kilometers per hour, navigated safely and responsively including changing lanes a number of times. However, at one point, the driver was required to take over the wheel when the vehicle passed an off-ramp on its right while being cut off by a car from the left.
In another test drive made by Chinese trade publication 42How, the P7 disengaged 19 times over 2,000 kilometers of autonomous highway driving compared with 22 driver interventions for a China-made Model 3 on the same route. The article said that Xpeng’s tech provided a better, more localized experience for Chinese customers, including a smoother drive when guiding its car from a highway on-ramp to off-ramp, and normal operation in tunnels or with heavy rain, which caused Tesla’s NoA to stop working.
So far, around 20% of owners of Xpeng’s P7, the company’s first premium model with the hardware necessary for offering advanced self-driving capabilities, have ordered its latest Xpilot 3.0 advanced driver-assist system (ADAS) featuring the NGP function, which launched in January. The Nio Pilot, which has been offering for almost three years, had a 50% take rate. More than 68% of Tesla buyers had reportedly opted in for its Autopilot software back in 2019.
READ MORE: Nio, Xpeng, Li Auto: your cheat sheet to China’s listed Tesla rivals
And yet, Xpeng is considered by many to be a big threat to Tesla in China where vehicle autonomy is concerned. Xpeng has boldly marketed itself as one of few companies capable of developing in-house the entire software architecture for AVs. The P7 currently remains the first and only production vehicle in the market equipped with Nvidia’s Xavier computer dedicated to highly autonomous driving, according to Xpeng’s vice president of autonomous driving Wu Xinzhou.
And now, the Alibaba-backed EV maker is stepping up its challenge against Tesla by working hand-in-hand with Alibaba’s map platform Amap, or AutoNavi. The company is confident that an elaborate, detailed map for real-time self-driving purposes would give it a leg up in luring increasingly savvy Chinese consumers, according to comments during the online press event. Xpeng attributed Amap’s latest high-definition map with providing navigational capabilities in adverse weather conditions or places with poor signal such as tunnels.
“Our vehicles can enter and exit highway ramps automatically and switch highways pretty much all by themselves, because most of the interconnections between highways are mapped by our partner AutoNavi. So we can have a seamless experience when you’re switching highways using NGP,” Wu said during an online conference in late January.
NGP could work properly in benign weather conditions, Wu added, and even under “medium to heavy rains” although it is designed to shut down and require human intervention when the windshield wipers are on the highest setting. Wu acknowledged there are also challenges in snow, which make it difficult for the vehicle’s sensors to detect road lane lines.
The practice of using HD maps for AV navigation has long been criticized by Tesla’s Musk, partly because maintaining an constantly updated HD map was believed to be an arduous and costly effort. Musk in 2018 publicly stated that dependency on HD maps would cause an AV to fail when real world changes are not reflected on the map. Tesla’s vehicles, he said, have sufficient sensors and processors to drive themselves.
Tesla did not respond to TechNode’s request for comment.
However, most other automakers and AV companies including Waymo and GM Cruise, rely on a suite of hardware stacks comprised of cameras, radar, Lidar, and HD maps—usually viewed as “another sensor.” Xpeng is currently the only car company incorporating Amap’s latest map technologies for on-board navigation, a partnership which Wei Dong, a general manager of Amap, commented requires an automaker have a strong proprietary capability in software development, since map data will be aggregated with sensor data to give AVs a sense of their surroundings.
“We do a very careful checking between what the cameras see and what the map is telling you pretty much all the time. And whenever there is a difference, the system will send a warning to the driver and sometimes just downgrade the AV functionality to make sure it’s safe,” Wu told TechNode.
]]>Chinese tech giant Xiaomi is throwing its hat into the red-hot electric vehicle market with a RMB 10 billion ($1.52 billion) investment to set up a fully owned subsidiary for its auto business, to be led by chief executive Lei Jun.
Founder and CEO Lei at a press event in Beijing on Tuesday said Xiaomi had decided to strike out on its own on EVs in an effort to operate an ecosystem that will provide seamless user experience, and will not consider outside funding. Lei said he was aware of the complexities of making cars with extreme capital intensity, saying that the company is now ready to pour money into the project and face losses over a long-term period.
“We look forward to the day when Xiaomi cars will run on roads across the globe… This would be the last startup project in my career and I shall stake all I have to work this out,” the 52-year-old serial entrepreneur said (our translation). In an announcement published Tuesday, Xiaomi said the company plans to invest a total of $10 billion in the project over the next 10 years.
Following in Apple’s footsteps, Xiaomi has pledged to develop high-quality EVs with a “best-in-class” connected device ecosystem for global customers, according to Lei. The world’s fourth-biggest smartphone maker recorded shipments of nearly 150 million units in 2020 with an annual growth rate of 19%. Sales for competitors Samsung and Huawei shrank a respective 14% and 22%, according to figures from Canalys.
Xiaomi also boasted of having one of the world’s biggest Internet-of-Things (IoT) platforms, connecting 325 million smart home appliances as of last year, excluding handsets and laptops. It has also remained the top-selling television set maker in China since 2019, accounting for around 20% of market share, according to data compiled by Beijing-based consultancy All View Cloud (AVC).
However, the Chinese consumer electronics giant is seeking new sources of growth amid a slowing market. Its IoT and consumer products segment slowed sharply to 8.6% annually last year from 41.7% in 2019. The company also missed analyst revenue estimates for the fourth quarter, according to Bloomberg.
In the meantime, the global automotive industry is undergoing a landmark transition, and the shift to battery-electric, self-driving cars from traditional, internal-combustion vehicles has reached a major inflection point. China is expected to maintain its global leadership in EV production and adoption. IHS Markit forecasted that China will regain growth momentum at double-digit rates in 2021 and beyond, as the government continues to push the EV industry forward and consumer demand recovers.
Xiaomi has long been rumored to be plotting a move into the booming, crowded EV market. Last week it denied a Reuters report that it was in discussions with Chinese automaker Great Wall Motors for contract manufacturing. Shunwei Capital, a venture capital firm formed by Lei, invested in Nio in its Series A back in 2015 and became an early investor in Xpeng Motors two years later.
Baidu is also accelerating the push into the market. In January it set up a joint venture with automaker Geely. The Chinese search company has set a goal to launch its first own-brand EV within three years, chief executive Robin Li said during an earnings call last month.
]]>China’s car industry has been among the hardest hit by a global semiconductor shortage, bringing a strong post-Covid recovery to a screeching halt. The shortage has seen Chinese automakers scale back production and adjust their sales targets, as the months-long auto chips drought shows little sign of abating.
It couldn’t have come at a worse time. The world’s biggest car market had taken the lead in the global recovery, posting a mild single-digit decline in sales last year after business disruptions due to Covid-19. China’s auto sales rebounded 364% year-on-year to nearly 4 million vehicles during the first two months of this year, rising from a low base.
The boom didn’t last long. Vehicle production fell by 37% in February, the third decline in the same number of months, and far larger than January’s 16% drop. Global consultancy AlixPartners estimates up to 1.5 million fewer vehicles will be sold in China this year due to the supply crunch, accounting for 6% of last year’s total auto sales.
Automakers are now being forced to go head-to-head with smartphone companies in the search for chips, bringing more uncertainty to a market that has struggled with a slowdown in demand for years.
Bottom line: A worldwide semiconductor shortage has highlighted the fragility of China’s auto supply chain, as well as its heavy reliance on foreign-made critical technologies.
Nipped in the bud: Last April, China’s automotive industry recorded sales growth for the first time in two years. This was followed by months of double-digit rebounds.
What is there a shortage of? Microcontroller units (MCUs), are in particularly short supply. These cheap but essential single-chip computers are used in a variety of car parts including powertrains, chassis, and self-driving systems.
Why is there a shortage? Analysts blame chip supply constraints on disruptions from the Covid-19 pandemic. Automakers pulled back production and cut their component orders amid falling vehicle demand. Meanwhile, a spike in demand for laptop computers and gaming consoles during lockdowns resulted in chip suppliers redeploying much of their capacity to consumer electronics. Auto chips became a low priority.
The chips used in cars are mostly built on 200-millimeter (8-inch) silicon wafers with old fabrication techniques. But chipmakers prefer to expand their capacity to produce more advanced semiconductors using newer technologies, UBS analyst Paul Gong told TechNode earlier this month.
When will it get better?
Can Beijing help? During the annual meeting of China’s legislature earlier this month, Chinese auto giants called on the government to invest more in chip development.
Slow progress: The expanding list of US sanctions on Chinese companies has created a sense of urgency among lawmakers, officials, and businesses. Earlier this month, Beijing pledged to double down on efforts to develop an independent chip industry with incentive policies such as tax cuts, but remained silent on production targets, reported CNBC.
Emerging domestic supply: Some domestic chip design startups, which focus on design and buy manufacturing capacity as needed, have taken an interest in higher-performance processors for intelligent and connected vehicles. But few are capable of taking on established US chip powerhouses such as Nvidia and Intel’s Mobileye.
READ MORE: SILICON | China’s hurdles in making automotive chips
What’s next? As demand for vehicles grows, experts expect Chinese companies to significantly ramp up production of mature semiconductors, including MCUs.
The city of Cangzhou in northern China granted search giant Baidu a permit to begin commercial robotaxi services on some of its streets, the company said on Monday.
Why it matters: Baidu is the first Chinese company with permission to offer robotaxi rides to paying customers, which requires additional permits, and is a strategic milestone for its costly, years-long quest for self-driving cars.
Details: Baidu will be allowed to operate its autonomous ride-hailing vehicles with safety drivers on public roads spanning 229 kilometers (142 miles) in areas including the city’s downtown, the company said Monday in an announcement. The company can also begin testing out trip fares with its volunteers using discounts and coupons, according to a deployment permit issued by the government on Friday.
Context: Cangzhou, the third-biggest city in northern Hebei province, was late to the AV race, lagging Beijing and Shanghai by over a year. However, it is catching up quickly by leveraging its partnership with Baidu, which is accelerating its autonomous transportation initiative.
Last week, China’s market regulator rolled out a set of new rules addressing newer innovations in the e-commerce market. Two of China’s largest “sharing economy” firms filed for public listings in the US. Online housing firm Beike posted its first profitable year, while the parent company of budget cosmetics brand Perfect Diary reported fourth quarter losses despite a jump in revenue.
China’s e-commerce and retail market offers a fire hose of products, choices, business models, rapidly changing content, and more. Here’s what you need to know about China’s online retail market for the week of Mar. 11 – 17.
China’s market regulator introduced on Monday a set of e-commerce laws pertaining to recent developments in the ever-evolving sector, including livestreamed sales, user data privacy, and forced exclusivity. (TechNode)
The value of China’s livestream e-commerce market jumped 121.5% year on year to RMB 961.0 billion in 2020, up from RMB 433.8 billion in 2019, while growth decelerated from 226.2%. The number of shoppers who make purchases via livestream is expected to rise 8.2% to 635 million in 2021, up from 587 million in 2020. (Iimedia Research, in Chinese)
]]>Chinese robotruck startup Inceptio Technology plans to mass-produce trucks with intermediate autonomous driving functionalities as early as the end of this year, the latest stage in the commercialization of self-driving technology.
Why it matters: Commercial vehicles, including trucks and buses, are viewed as a more achievable application for self-driving technology than private passenger vehicles, and the market has been attracting significant investment.
Details: Inceptio‘s two self-driving truck models, co-developed with Chinese automakers Dongfeng and Sinotruk, are in their final stages of development. Mass production is set to begin at the end of this year, the company said at a press event Wednesday in Shanghai.
Context: Inceptio is among several local robotruck startups backed by big auto and logistics names. In 2018 it closed a funding round for an undisclosed amount from Chinese battery maker CATL, and Nio Capital, an investment firm formed by the EV maker, and others.
Chinese bike-rental firm Hello Inc has filed for an initial public offering in the US, Bloomberg reported, citing people with knowledge of the matter.
Why it matters: A survivor of China’s bike rental bubble, the Shanghai-based company is among the largest bike-rental firms in the country. If Hello successfully lists, it would be the first US-listed Chinese bike-rental company.
READ MORE: INSIGHTS | The bike rental boom is dead. Long live bike rental
Detail: The company chose to file confidentially with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, according to sources cited by Bloomberg, exercising an option that is becoming popular owing to the flexibility it allows for timing and pricing.
Context: Hello Inc. launched in 2016, two years after Mobike and Ofo, and quickly gained traction as the first bike-rental app to focus its business on China’s smaller cities.
China’s ambition to become a world leader in electric vehicles was barely mentioned in this year’s annual government work report, presented Friday—a good sign, experts said, that the market is maturing.
After strong policy support over the past several years, the market is now evolving into a demand-driven model amid waning government stimulus, Cui Dongshu, secretary general of the China Passenger Car Association, wrote in a post published Saturday. “We expect auto consumption to grow robustly beginning this year,” (our translation) Cui added.
Growing the adoption of new energy vehicles (NEVs), a catchall term referring to all-electric, plug-in hybrid, and hydrogen cars in China, has been a major agenda item for the country’s annual parliament meetings since 2015. The government had set a sales target of 5 million NEVs in its 13th Five-Year Plan (FYP) ending in 2020 which propelled China to the top spot as the world’s biggest EV market by sales volume in 2015.
Beijing’s next goal is even loftier. It aims for NEV sales to account for 20% of overall new car sales in China by 2025 from the 2020 level of around 5%, according to a policy paper released November as part of the 14th FYP ending in 2025. In the report delivered by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang on Friday, policymakers plan to offer more targeted measures to remove barriers and allow for massive EV adoption in the next five years. Here are the key points.
Li said Friday during the annual meetings of the National People’s Congress (NPC) that Beijing will create a comprehensive regulatory structure for market access of industrial products such as automobiles, including enhanced after-deal scrutiny and cross-functional supervision. The path to reducing red tape is such regulation, Li said, which would benefit market competition.
The main purpose of such regulation is to cool investment in the EV sector and prevent the current supply glut from worsening, Fu Bingfeng, executive vice-chairman of the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) told Chinese media on Saturday. Fu called for “rational development” rather than the stoking of production capacity through investment plans from certain local governments and private investors.
China in April lowered the barrier for entry into the EV market after the Covid-19 pandemic took hold, removing requirements such as design and development capabilities for new entrants, reported China Daily.
China will also continue to help boost consumption via stimulus measures, including growing the number of public charging piles and swapping stations, according to Li. It was the first mention of EV battery swapping facilities in the annual government work report.
Fu expects the initiative will spur demand by providing charging facilities for those who do not have private parking spaces with home chargers, a major pain point that has deterred EV adoption. Prior to that, the central government had announced a RMB 10 billion ($1.5 billion) investment to expand the country’s charging network by 50% to more than 1.8 million public and private charging piles by 2020.
China’s power network for electric vehicles exceeded 1.67 million charging points and 555 swap stations as of December, according to figures from the China Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Promotion Association.
EV battery second-life usage was also a key topic during this year’s meeting. Li noted that China will accelerate plans for a comprehensive recycling and reuse policy for electric vehicle batteries. Policymakers in the 14th five-year-plan pledged to “promote the use of second-life energy resources in less-demanding applications” (our translation).
China began its NEV initiatives in 2009 and most EV batteries are designed to have around a decade of use during the first life phase. Officials from the Ministry of Ecology and Environment had estimated in September that more than 200,000 tons of EV batteries would reach the end of the first life phase by 2020 and that number will more than triple in 2025, according to a Caixin report (in Chinese).
The central government in 2018 had made battery manufacturers responsible for addressing battery end-of-life issues, but the market is largely unregulated, lacking mandatory technical standards to ensure safety during the recycling process. This has also overburdened battery manufacturers, which have struggled to recoup the costs for repurposing batteries.
]]>Nio CEO William Li said Tuesday an industry-wide shortage of electric vehicle batteries and semiconductor chips will continue to hamper production for the next few months. The EV maker is planning a significant acceleration in manufacturing in the second half of 2021 as it gears up for an aggressive sales and service expansion to complete coverage of its home market.
Nio had achieved a production rate of 10,000 vehicles in its Hefei plant during the Chinese New Year in February, Li said during the company’s fourth quarter earnings call on Tuesday. However, the company expects monthly output to remain at around 7,500 units through the second quarter due to “lower-than-estimated” battery supply and a global chipset shortage.
With supply chain restrictions expected to ease in July, Li said the company does expect to have sufficient parts to meet its needs. This, along with a significant expansion of its retail footprint and recharging network, is forecasted to help reach “a much higher sales performance in the second half of the year,” according to Li, who did not further elaborate. Nio guided up to 20,500 deliveries for Q1, compared with Li Auto’s forecasted ceiling of 11,500 units.
READ MORE: Li Auto may have controlled its costs in 2020 too well
“China is a very big market… We are quite confident this should be able to help us to achieve our sales target,” Li said.
Nevertheless, it fell short of generating profits in Q4, reporting a wider-than-expected net loss of RMB 1.39 billion ($212.8 million), double analyst estimates, according to Bloomberg. Aggressive geographic expansion plans this year could limit its positive cash flow from operations in Q4 to a one-off, Jefferies analysts said in a Tuesday report.
Nio is pursuing an ambitious timetable to unlock growth in China’s booming EV market, the world’s biggest. It aims to open another 20 clubhouse-style showrooms called Nio Houses and 120 of its smaller Nio Spaces by year-end. The company is focusing efforts to expand in lower-tier cities where EV penetration is low. “In all the cities where Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Audi have sales presence, we will also be there this year,” Li said (our translation). Nio has operated 226 sales locations across 121 major cities as of February.
The company is planning to more than double the number of its battery swap stations to upwards of 500, along with quadrupling the number of its supercharging stations to over 600 in the same time period. The seven-year-old EV upstart has become Tesla’s most prominent challenger in China, delivering 43,728 vehicles last year using a war chest of around $4.8 billion made by selling additional shares, and scoring a $1 billion cash injection.
]]>Li Auto reported losses of RMB 792 million ($121 million) in its first annual result as a public company, significantly reducing losses from a year earlier, but has drawn criticism for underinvesting in future innovation. Its shares declined 9.8% on Thursday.
Benefiting from rising electric-vehicle demand in China, Li Auto earned nearly RMB 9.5 billion in 2020. Its first model, the Li One, was China’s best-selling electric SUV during the year, according to figures from China Passenger Car Association. However, its delivery guidance of 11,500 vehicles in the first quarter of this year was almost 30% lower than the preceding quarter, which it attributed to the Spring Festival holiday and an uptick of Covid-19 cases in parts of the country.
The company narrowed its loss per share of $0.28, or net loss attributable to shareholders of $121.4 million, a 76% decrease from the previous year. This was partly aided by net income of $16.5 million in the fourth quarter from “short-term investment income” according to CFO Li Tie during the call with analysts. The EV maker also benefited from streamlining its sales operations, spending RMB 1.1 billion on selling, general, and administrative costs for the full year, 40% of what NIO spent on the same expense in the first three quarters of the year.
However, Li Auto’s investment into research and development was substantially less than its peers, raising concern among investors. Company executives had promised investors during an online briefing held a few weeks ago that it will accelerate the launch of new models to ease concern about its transition from EREV to all-electrics, according to a report released by investment bank China International Capital Corporation (CICC) last week.
In a conference call with analysts on Thursday, CEO Li Xiang said it has been on track to expand its range of products as part of a strategic move to prioritize business growth over cost control. The company promised to launch at least one new model every year starting 2022, including its first all-electric model scheduled for 2023.
The goal is to occupy a larger share of the market from mainstream to premium for an annual sales target of “several hundreds of thousands of vehicles” by the end of 2024, Li said (our translation). It also expects to build out a retail network of at least 1,000 stores by that time. The company had 52 stores in 41 Chinese cities as of December; NIO and Xpeng Motors had promised a respective 200 and 150 shops by year end.
The Beijing-based EV maker currently has only one model for sale and mainly focuses on extended-range electric vehicles (EREVs), a technology which features a small internal combustion engine dedicated to recharging the vehicle battery, designed to resolve range anxiety. However, recent policy changes in China is pressuring the company to accelerate its transition to all-electric.
Following Beijing, the Shanghai municipal government early this month unveiled a new policy for new energy vehicles, which excludes new purchases of plug-in hybrid vehicles, including EREVs, from free vehicle registration starting in 2023. Company president Kevin Shen on Thursday reassured investors, saying he expects EREV sales will continue to be strong until then. The company confirmed that it will release its second EREV model, a full-sized SUV with advanced driver assistance capabilities, in 2022.
Li Auto vehicles combine popular features and an affordable price tag, making it a more attractive choice than most internal combustion and electric vehicles in China over the past year. However, the company lags significantly rivals where self-driving technology is concerned— NIO and Xpeng Motor have emerged as major rivals to Tesla. The Li One crossover does not offer intermediate self-driving capabilities, such as navigation from on-ramp to off-ramp on Chinese highways, similar to Tesla’s Navigate on Autopilot and those NIO and Xpeng have both introduced in their vehicles.
CFO Li said the company will increase its R&D investment to at least $464 million this year and it will exceed $1 billion by end-2024, with half of the budget to be used in vehicle autonomy. CTO Wang Kai said that the size of its self-driving team will double to around 600 engineers by the end of this year as it opens its new R&D center in Shanghai with the end goal of 2,000 total employees.
Bigger rivals, including Tesla and a number of Chinese tech giants, pose a real and urgent threat. Wang said 2021 will be “the year of preparation” for the release of Li Auto’s new vehicle architecture next year, powered by Nvidia’s most advanced auto processor, Orin. “Similar features offered by our rivals, along with some brand new features, will also provided to customers for sure,” Wang said.
Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that Li Auto plans to double the size of its R&D team to 600 engineers this year, not that of the self-driving team.
]]>SAIC Motor, the biggest automaker in China, will use processors for its self-driving cars from a domestic chip startup, throwing its weight behind a young upstart as Beijing accelerates plans to replace foreign-made chips with homegrown.
Why it matters: For one of the world’s biggest automakers to gamble a major strategic push on a young and relatively untested chipmaker signals the importance that Beijing places on rapid acceleration of self-reliance in advanced chips.
Details: SAIC, China’s largest automaker and Volkswagen’s manufacturing partner, will use processors and software from Horizon Robotics, a rising Chinese chipmaking startup, for its upcoming car models that include advanced driver-assisted capabilities, according to a joint announcement released Monday (in Chinese).
Context: SAIC is among a list of state-backed automotive majors now shifting towards Horizon Robotics as a domestic source for semiconductors. The chipmaker is considered to be China’s only alternative to global chip-making giants for auto processors.
Correction: An earlier version of this story erroneously stated that the Journey 2 was Horizon Robotics’ first auto chip instead of the company’s first auto chip to reach global stress test standards.
]]>Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi is planning to make electric vehicles, according to a Chinese media report. This move could make it the latest entrant into the country’s exploding electric vehicle market, with founder and CEO Lei Jun reportedly leading the project.
Why it matters: The reported entry of Xiaomi, often dubbed “the Apple of China,” could shake up the entire auto industry. Its success in the consumer electronics market has given it high brand awareness among domestic consumers.
Details: After years of indecision, Xiaomi is about to give its electric car project the go-ahead, Chinese media LatePost reported Friday, citing “people familiar with the matter.” Sources cautioned that the company’s plans are still at an early stage and subject to change.
Context: Xiaomi has made investments in home-grown EV brands before, leading the $400 million Series C of Xpeng Motors as a strategic investor in late 2019. Prior to that, Shunwei Capital, a venture capital firm founded by Lei, backed Nio’s Series A in 2015.
A joint venture between General Motors, Chinese automaker SAIC, and connected car startup PATEO has filed a formal complaint against Tencent for using illegal, anti-competitive tactics to bully its rivals.
Why it matters: The complaint, currently under review by local authorities, marks the first time Chinese auto players have cited anticompetitive practices in a complaint about domestic tech giants that are fighting for share in the automotive sector.
Details: Chinese connected car company PATEO on Tuesday said it has filed a complaint against Tencent, alleging the company pressured automakers to stop using its software which connects smartphones to the in-car system. The app enables users to send and receive messages using WeChat.
Context: PATEO is one of the major players of providing car connectivity software backed by a list of Chinese auto and internet giants. It was also reportedly in talks with Tencent’s rival Bytedance in May about a partnership on in-car software.
Electric vehicle startup Faraday Future is close to finalizing a $310 million round of funding from a group of China’s state-owned enterprises and national funds, as the company is set to go public via special purpose acquisition company in the US.
Why it matters: The new investment will ease near-term cash flow pressure on the embattled EV maker and clear some roadblocks for the company resuming its expansion plan into the Chinese EV market, the world’s biggest of its kind.
Details: Faraday will receive around RMB 2 billion ($310 million) from a consortium of investors led by two Chinese state-owned enterprises, Zhuhai Gree Group and Zhuhai Huafa Group, TechNode has confirmed.
Context: Faraday has struggled for years to secure funds to get its first car, a luxury EV model called FF91, into production, in part due to the debt issues of founder Jia Yueting. The company’s second chance comes as Chinese local governments are racing to back EV startups amidst a Wall Street craze for EV stocks.
Chinese self-driving vehicle startup Uisee has raised around $150 million in a new round of funding led by a state-backed venture capital fund, as the Covid-19 pandemic fuels demand for driverless vehicles.
Details: A national investment fund formed by a group of government agencies and state-owned enterprises led the RMB 1 billion funding round, according to an announcement released Monday. The fund has registered capital of RMB 147.2 billion. The Uisee valuation was not disclosed.
Context: Uisee is benefiting from pandemic-driven demand for unmanned transport, as one of a handful of Chinese AV startups getting a funding boost.
Shares of the electric vehicle unit of Chinese property giant Evergrande surged nearly 50% on Monday after announcing that it had raised $3.35 billion from six investors in an add-on share sale to support its plan to become “the world’s largest EV maker.”
Why it matters: The sale, one of the biggest for a listed electric vehicle maker, are part of a broader trend in global stock markets as investors make big bets on EV players thought to be the next Tesla.
Details: China Evergrande New Energy Vehicle Group closed the sale of 952 million shares at HK$27.3 each, representing a discount of 8.7% to Friday’s closing price of HK$29.9, for a total of HK$26.0 billion (around $3.35 billion), according to a statement released Sunday.
Context: Evergrande’s EV subsidiary said it will start mass production of its electric car portfolio of six models ranging from sedans to crossovers in its Shanghai and Guangzhou facilities by September. It has said that it expects its core business to reach profitability in 2022.
Local fire departments are investigating the cause of a Tesla Model 3 vehicle which caught fire inside of a residential parking garage in Shanghai on Tuesday.
Why it matters: As Tesla’s locally built models take off in the Chinese market, the vehicle blaze, which has attracted a remarkable amount of media coverage, could hamper more widespread EV adoption.
Details: Tesla confirmed to Chinese media on Wednesday that one of its Model 3 vehicles burst into flames in Shanghai on Tuesday night. The owner reportedly drove the sedan into an underground garage, struck a manhole cover at a very low speed, and saw flames coming out of the car’s floorpan after exiting the vehicle.
Context: The vehicle blaze has prompted concern over a possible design flaw or quality issue in Tesla’s locally built cars, with some saying a low-speed collision to the chassis of a vehicle is an unlikely cause of a battery fire.
Updated: additional information about incident added to “Details” section.
]]>China’s electric vehicle market posted unexpected growth in 2020 despite a global health crisis and subsequent economic recession, and the industry is anticipating the momentum to accelerate this year, powered by true demand rather than government incentives.
Sales of new energy vehicles (NEVs), which include all-electrics, plug-in hybrids, and fuel cell vehicles, increased 10.9% annually to nearly 1.37 million in 2020, the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) said on Wednesday, after sales fell 4% the year before. The industry group forecasted sales would accelerate to 40% year on year to 1.8 million in 2021; critically, Beijing’s subsidy program will no longer play a key role in driving demand.
Analysts have also weighed in positively on the growth prospects of China’s EV sector. The world’s largest EV market will likely maintain its upward momentum this year, with consumer confidence in EVs on the rise and with it, a willingness to pay for the technology, Paul Gong of UBS said Thursday during an online conference. The Swiss investment bank predicted China’s EV sales would rebound to more than 1.56 million units this year.
Electric cars are making their way into the mainstream. Tesla recently kicked off production of its popular Model Y electric crossovers in its Shanghai facilities, after churning out Model 3 sedans for a year. The company has managed back-to-back price cuts since it launched its entry-level model, which experts believed not only makes EVs from the US giant an economically viable choice but also boosts overall consumer awareness and excitement about EVs.
That said, analysts warned that the surprise launch of the China-made Model Y, priced 30% lower than its imported version, could be a short-term hit for NIO and Xpeng Motors, Tesla’s most prominent Chinese challengers. The American carmaker immediately sold out of its Model Y in China and has guided delivery windows in the second quarter for new orders. This followed Chinese media reports that a Tesla showroom in Shanghai sells nearly 200 vehicles per day after releasing its new pricing.
Some industry watchers believe Chinese EV upstarts should follow suit and slash their prices in order to maintain momentum. In response, NIO and Xpeng bosses voiced confidence about their sales and no indication that they would discount pricing. NIO has gained traction especially among China’s growing middle-to-upper-class families, and delivered 43,728 SUVs last year. Xpeng, in a head-to-head competition against Tesla with its sedan, recorded deliveries of 27,041 vehicles in 2020.
Chinese carmakers are competing for the same mainstream, luxury customers as Tesla. They are not undercutting prices but rather focusing on value-added offerings—unusual for the Chinese auto industry. From the old guard to young startups, all the major players are racing to use the latest self-driving tech in their EV lineups as vehicle technology undergoes the most significant changes in a generation.
NIO, now emerging as a top contender, last week unveiled a top-of-the-line hardware suite capable of providing high-level autonomous driving functionalities for the ET7, its first mass-production sedan. Prior to that, Xpeng had announced a partnership with Livox, a Lidar maker backed by Chinese dronemaker DJI, in order to equip its 2021 production model with the technology—expensive for mass market use.
Traditional carmakers are gearing up to rapidly follow Tesla’s lead. SAIC, Volkswagen’s manufacturing partner, and BMW’s Chinese ally, Great Wall Motors, announced plans this month to offer self-driving capabilities in 2021, with a hardware stack integrating multiple sensors and high-resolution map data to navigate road safety.
And yet, few have revealed detailed timelines for when their vehicles will be able to navigate driving complexities such as urban Chinese traffic. Tesla meanwhile announced that its fully self-driving system—a beta version of which is being tested by selected users—can handle both highway and urban driving duties. Tesla has so far maintained a significant lead when it comes to software and self-driving, using its vision-based approach which relies on lower-cost cameras and artificial intelligence for navigation and planning.
“NIO’s long-term strategy for self-driving is to be open to and able to utilize the latest technologies and push the industry forward with our strategic partners. The competition will result in several industry alliances and we will make sure to stay on the winner’s side,” (our translation) William Li, NIO CEO told reporters during an interview last week.
As a tipping point for mainstream EV adoption approaches, NIO and its peers are prying open a window of opportunity to beat Tesla. But time is limited, and every company is sprinting to catch up.
]]>Baidu announced Monday that it will partner with automaker Geely to manufacture smart electric vehicles for the Chinese market, expanding from autonomous-driving software to making the cars themselves.
Why it matters: Baidu’s partnership with Geely will deepen the company’s foray into the trillion-dollar EV industry. With internet giants domestic and abroad scrambling for a piece of the burgeoning market, Baidu will be the first Chinese tech giant to manufacture EVs itself rather than merely investing in existing companies—unlike peers such as Meituan, Tencent, and JD.com.
Details: Baidu will provide key autonomous-driving technologies and software while Geely will contribute its expertise in automobile manufacturing. The search giant will hold the controlling share of the joint venture and Geely is currently its sole partner.
READ MORE: Baidu’s AI bet is more than it can afford
Context: Baidu kicked off its autonomous driving project in 2013 but it wasn’t until 2017 that it became a strategic focus for the company, which has seen its search ad revenues decline from competition from short video platforms.
With contributions from Jill Shen.
]]>Electric vehicle maker NIO on Saturday released what the company called “its first autonomous driving model” which could prove a game changer in its competition against Tesla and German automakers in China’s premium auto market.
The company’s first production sedan, the ET7, features a top-of-the-line hardware stack for self driving, including 11 8-megapixel cameras, a dozen ultrasonic sensors, and a Lidar which scans the environment at a range of 500 meters.
All of those sensors will be powered by four of Nvidia’s latest AD processors, the Orin, each offering 254 trillion operations per second (or TOPS), versus Tesla’s 144 TOPs for its hardware version 3.0 self-driving computer. Together, the computing power of NIO’s so-called Adam Super Computer exceeds 1,000 TOPS, the highest for current production models worldwide.
The seven-year-old EV maker is now publicly confident about its chances of beating big auto names with this latest offering. Its sales forecast for the ET7 surpasses those of Tesla’s Model S and BMW’s 5 Series sedans, Chinese media reported Saturday citing CEO William Li. In a separate interview with reporters on Sunday, Li said the ET7 could be a big hit in the Chinese luxury market, and that sales will gradually meet its target after production ramp-up with suppliers.
With a price range from RMB 448,000 to RMB 506,000 (around $61,824 to $78,130) before subsidies, the new offering is expected to further differentiate NIO not just from its Chinese peers, but Tesla as well. The US EV giant this month began selling China-built Model Y crossovers with a starting price of RMB 339,900, a price 30% lower than its imported version, following a 25% reduction on the price of its basic version Model 3 last year.
NIO said that it will not take a similar approach, reaffirming its goal to become a mainstream, premium EV brand in China targeting BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Audi. Tesla is China’s most dominant EV player by sales volume, with deliveries of 113,649 China-made Model 3 vehicles from January to November last year, according to figures from China Passenger Car Association.
Xpeng Motors, another Chinese Tesla challenger, is similarly looking to quickly grow its share of the market. On Thursday the automaker revealed plans to launch in 2021 a new sedan model equipped with a Lidar sensor. The Alibaba-backed EV company has delivered 15,062 of its first sedan, the P7, in six months from late June to December.
Updated: added six-month time frame for Xpeng’s unit deliveries in 2020 in last paragraph.
]]>Volkswagen’s battery partner Gotion High-Tech revealed a new battery cell which it said may significantly reduce the cost of electric vehicles and ease concerns over battery safety.
Details: Gotion on Friday announced that it was the first company to reach cell-level energy density of 210 watt-hours per kilogram (Wh/kg) in lithium-iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, a type of power source known for stability but capable of storing less power than other types of lithium-ion batteries.
Context: LFP batteries began regaining popularity starting last year, thanks to consistent improvement in performance, higher thermal stability, and lower costs.
One of the prime industries slammed by the pandemic-induced economic downturn, China’s ride-hailing market is unlikely to recover its freewheeling, easy money ways.
Even before the coronavirus lockdowns, ride-hailing platforms in China struggled with increasing competition, as their usage slowed significantly in the country’s maturing transportation market.
Although the government has now eased travel restrictions, social distancing practices and public fears of catching the virus continue to weigh on ride-hailing demand. In early 2020, ride-hailing and taxi companies imposed measures including mandatory face masks for drivers and passengers to normalize their businesses.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s monthly newsletter on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode Squared members.
The safety measures may not have been enough. Giant players seek to thrive, not just to survive, in a post-coronavirus world. To ensure growth, they have been introducing low-cost services and entering smaller cities. But the road to recovery of ridership could be slow and bumpy.
Standing at a crossroads, China’s ride-hailing industry faces economic uncertainty, increased competition, and more regulation as the government steps up to offset the disruption caused by Covid-19. Looking ahead, as Chinese taxi companies and automakers ramp up, ride-hailing giant Didi could pay a heavy price to maintain its dominance.
This month, we review what happened in 2020 and what these trends mean for the future of ride-hailing in China.
China’s ride-hailing and taxi sectors are converging after years of clashes, as both sides seek a level playing field and additional room for growth amid a deep economic downturn.
Chinese mobility giants are hoping that expansion in the country’s hinterland will compensate for the steady chilling of the once red-hot markets of major cities.
Chinese automakers are collectively pushing into the ride-hailing market in order to gain a foothold in a world where vehicle ownership would no longer be a preferred choice for customers.
Ride-hailing services face increased government intervention and regulatory uncertainty, as Beijing seeks more control to boost an economy hard hit by the pandemic and its aftermath.
Chinese ride-hailing companies are flocking to mainland and Hong Kong stock markets for IPOs, hoping to build their war chests to weather economic uncertainties and strengthen their balance sheets.
Xpeng-backed self-driving startup WeRide has raised $200 million in a round of fresh funding from China’s biggest electric bus maker Yutong, it announced Dec. 23. The two companies also announced the development of a fully automated minibus with no controls.
Why it matters: The deal comes as Chinese automakers are pushing into the country’s autonomous vehicle industry, and as local authorities are allowing AV testing on public roads in bid to catch up in the global battle for tech dominance.
Details: Yutong put $200 million into WeRide in a solo Series B1 investment, according to a joint announcement released Wednesday. Based in the central Henan province, Yutong is China’s biggest medium and large-sized electric bus maker with more than a third market share in its domestic market, followed by BYD and Dongfeng Motors, among others.
READ MORE: The Chinese startup bringing robotaxis to the masses
Context: WeRide has been testing fully driverless vehicles on open roads in Guangzhou since July. It is the second company in the world to test fully driverless vehicles on open roads, following the US’s Waymo.
Walk into NIO’s joint-venture factory grounds in Hefei, capital of China’s eastern Anhui province, and you might mistake it for a sprawling tech campus rather than an auto manufacturing plant. The factory sits next to a cluster of elegant, low-slung glass buildings, surrounded by a large, well-kept lawn.
The campus has become somewhat of a local icon, attracting interest beyond its employees, partly due to NIO House, the company’s expansive, clubhouse-style retail space and gallery located next to the plant. As customers peruse vehicles in the space or wait for a latte in the showroom’s café, a crossover rolls off the production line every two minutes, with the assistance of more than 300 robots, from assembly lines to painting.
Two weeks ago, TechNode paid a visit to NIO’s Hefei plant to view the production process and understand how it works. The plant itself is a scene of bustling activity—giant robotic arms work on production lines to assemble vehicles, while human employees conduct inspections on the final assembly line. Each vehicle varies in model, color, and configuration.
“Sometimes, in a month, no two vehicles leaving the factory are exactly alike,” (our translation) a company spokesperson told TechNode reporters.
When the EV maker received earlier this year a $1 billion funding lifeline led by the Hefei government, the city—a lesser-known automaking hub known for churning out lower-end sedans and trucks—got a major boost in return. Hefei is readying itself to spearhead China’s goal of becoming the world’s leading EV producer and consumer market and NIO, its best-known EV firm, is poised to ride the wave.
Located minutes from the city’s downtown, the 16-acre joint plant is the size of nine football fields and employs more than 2,000 workers—mostly technicians from its partner, state-owned automaker JAC Motors, as well as several hundred NIO engineers. Much of the landscaping still looks new after three years of operation. The two companies reached an outsourcing agreement in mid-2016.
The factory is well-organized and spotlessly clean. TechNode saw high levels of automation throughout the factory, with robots of all shapes and sizes waving their arms in various workshops. NIO boasts that all major vehicle components are assembled in a completely automated process.
A seamless human-robot collaboration powers the highly flexible, mixed-model production process and a made-to-order car business that allows customers to configure their cars “in a free style.” NIO said there is more than 200,000 different configurations, around 3,000 of which most popular with its customers. “This [customization process] was highly demanding in terms of error proofing… but we finally did it,” (our translation) Victor Gu, general manager of NIO’s Hefei Advanced Manufacturing Center, told TechNode.
After delivering a cumulative 70,000 EVs to customers, the company is preparing an expansion that will increase output by 50% in January, amid rising domestic demand for luxury EVs. “We’ve seen substantial order growth in the second half of this year, sometimes by 30% to 50% in just one month, which is far faster than conventional production acceleration. Normally you need at least two to three months to improve existing production equipment,” (our translation) Gu said.
The company is on track to reach in January a monthly production goal of 7,500 vehicles, Gu added, and has stepped up output by 50% to 30 SUVs per hour starting this month. The Hefei factory has production capacity to build 120,000 vehicles per year with two labor shifts, and is capable of a 25% expansion “without significant investment,” according to CEO William Li during an earnings call in August.
Meanwhile, Tesla has reportedly (in Chinese) planned to more than double the annual capacity of its Gigafactory Shanghai to 550,000 units in 2021. Another Chinese EV maker, Xpeng Motors built its second plant in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou and will be able to produce 350,000 EVs by the end of 2022, according to a Chinese media report.
Carmakers are aggressively expanding production as Chinese EV sales accelerate, with strong momentum expected in the next few years. UBS analysts estimated in a Dec. 11 research note that Chinese EV sales will surge 55% to 1.6 million units next year and maintain double-digit annual growth to reach more than 5.5 million units in 2025.
Analysts are echoing China’s grand ambitions to hold a commanding lead in the global EV market. In a finalized blueprint issued Nov. 2, the central government said that new energy vehicles (NEVs)—namely electric, plug-in hybrid, and hydrogen-powered vehicles—would account for 20% of total car sales in 2025. This is equivalent to 5.15 million units, according to last year’s sales figures, and Hefei is one of several municipalities which has committed to supporting this vision.
Auto production in Hefei accounted for around 3% of China’s auto sales last year. Now, the local government has set a 2025 output target of 1 million NEVs, according to a document released last month (in Chinese). The government has high hopes for local EV makers, which it expects to “gain influence in the global market.” Hefei is also planning to build a local supply chain with at least 10 “hidden champions“—relatively unknown but globally competitive companies, in segments such as battery, powertrain, and Lidar.
While not unattainable, such a goal will require a hard push, and the city is beginning within its own borders. In Hefei’s recent stimulus program, the city will exempt EV drivers from payment in public parking lots and allow them to travel in the city’s bus lanes during off-peak hours. The government is planning to electrify all public transit starting next year, while the taxi fleet will be 100% electrified by 2025.
Historically known for manufacturing display panels and electronics, Hefei is now considered one of the country’s emerging EV capitals, surrounded by major industry players such as Volkswagen and its two manufacturing partners. Moreover, the city has had its own EV darling, with its RMB 7 billion ($1 billion) investment in NIO in April.
Hefei is not the only city with EV aspirations. Guangzhou, capital of southern Guangdong province, in September promised to be listed among the three biggest EV manufacturing bases in the country by making at least 1.5 million NEVs in 2025. As one of China’s auto manufacturing hubs and a foothold for Japanese auto giants Toyota and Honda, the southern gateway city is determined to stay ahead, and recently doubled down on EV startup Xpeng.
More local governments are playing catchup. Xi’an, the capital of northwestern Shaanxi province last week said it will extend government subsidies and tax exemptions on EVs to the end of 2022. Meanwhile, in central China, buyers of fully electric cars in Wuhan have been eligible since May for an additional RMB 10,000 rebate on top of Beijing’s subsidies.
]]>On Dec 10, TechNode Global and TechNode co-hosted five sessions on Day 4 of Singapore’s SWITCH conference.
Jointly organized by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, Enterprise Singapore, and IPI Singapore, the Singapore Fintech Festival (SFF) x Singapore Week of Innovation and Technology (SWITCH) took place from Dec. 7-11.
In line with this year’s theme “People and Talent,” TechNode and TechNode Global spotlighted the faces of the Chinese tech innovation ecosystem, inspiring budding entrepreneurs and innovators.
The following are the highlights of each panel co-hosted by TechNode Global and TechNode:
At SWITCH Connect, Elliott Zaagman, co-host of the China Tech Investor Podcast, moderated a panel discussion with Kay-Mok Ku, Managing Partner for Gobi Southeast Asia, and Yi Pin Ng, Co-Founder and Managing Director at Yunqui Partners.
On the topic of Chinese investments and partnerships in Southeast Asia, the panelists went over several dynamics in the region, including maturity of markets, fragmentation, barriers to innovation, localization, bifurcation, and the future of innovation in the region.
Notable is the difference in maturity of markets between China and Southeast Asia. China is considered to be mature in terms of infrastructure and innovation, while Southeast Asia is host to emerging markets, which are rapidly catching up. This leads to so-called “low-hanging fruits” or markets ripe for innovation, particularly with a fast-growing internet base.
“In Southeast Asia, I see a lot of these startups actually focus more on policy and execution side of technology. So, for example, the infrastructure side, a lot of logistics companies are being funded and more and more private equity will start to come into this market as well,” shared Kay-Mok. “The question is: What are some of those barriers and what are the ones that have been overcome and what are the ones that are still not yet overcome fully.”
China has done all it can to encourage manufacturers and consumers to consider electric vehicles (EVs). EV manufacturers such as Xpeng Motors have been planning to take it a step further and bring their EVs to global markets. In this panel, moderator Simon Hui of Baker McKenzie discussed the current market positioning and different opportunities for EVs in China and unchartered waters with Brian Gu, the Vice Chairman & President of Xpeng Motors.
Hui said that EV sales in China have regained momentum in the past couple of months after suffering a drought earlier this year, and Gu credited this rebound to a couple of different factors that have been in play for a while now.
Over the past couple of years, the Chinese government has offered subsidies and favorable policies for manufacturers and consumers to bring more growth to the EV industry. Players who have entered the industry early on were able to foster the environment, and this has definitely played a big role over the past couple of years in building the infrastructure needed and convincing consumers to make the change.
Even with everything the government has done to push EVs and what the pioneering companies have done to foster a more appealing environment and product, people remain doubtful about making the change from Internal Combustion vehicles to EVs. The two biggest hindrances were range anxiety and the general cost of an EV.
We have seen e-commerce grow and reach places and heights that we would never have imagined. One of the more recent strategies that have been integrated with e-commerce is adding a social aspect to your online shopping. In this panel, Chinaaccelerator Managing Partner Oscar Ramos moderates a conversation on Social Commerce Livestreaming with Pinduoduo Executive Director for Sustainability and Agriculture Impact, Xin Yi Lim.
Pinduoduo is the pioneering interactive e-commerce platform that brings a social aspect to your online shopping experience. They aim to give you a fun experience and with friends as all of you save money together. Founder Colin Huang Zheng said that they want Pinduoduo to be like CostCo and Disney combined: savings and fun put into one package.
Social commerce livestreams open up a channel for consumers to reach merchants. One of the more significant hindrances for people to buy online is not seeing the product in person. This allows the merchant to answer any questions or concerns these consumers may have. Lim brings up clothes as an example, wherein customers are always unsure about what size they should get. Having this livestream channel allows the customer to see how it actually looks and how big a small would look next to a medium.
In the bigger picture, consumers who were foreign to e-commerce were forced to adapt due to the lockdown. The pandemic has brought an entirely new wave of users who rely on e-commerce platforms to get products such as daily essentials from FMCGs and fresh produce, which consumers would usually purchase in physical stores. Lim does not see this as a trend and explains how the sales for fresh groceries in e-commerce have been steadily increasing. This sudden boom in sales for these necessities is most likely here to stay, and some physical stores may have to restructure in the future to include fulfillment of online sales as one of their new services.
Lei Ming was one of the first senior engineers for one of China’s biggest social media platforms, Baidu. He joined the team early on, right after graduating, to work with Baidu’s research and development team. He described his experience back then as very different from his classmates, who decided to join big corporations. With start-ups, you would be learning on your feet and based on experience rather than learning from elsewhere. Fresh from graduation, he was forced to step up and handle teams of engineers and develop products and features from prototypes to final release products. This is where he realized that he was truly an entrepreneur at heart.
With the experience and success under his belt, Lei Ming decided to take on completely new challenges in the tech world after letting go of Kuwo. His next focus was investing in the future and artificial intelligence. Lei Ming is one of the founding partners of AIBasis Ventures. He has invested heavily in artificial intelligence and has multiple incubation and innovation centers focused on developing AI products.
Lei Ming emphasized that the opportunities come with change. One of the biggest game-changers that we have seen is the continuous advancement of the internet. From slow and expensive, the internet has suddenly become fast, cheap, accessible, and reliable. These conditions made opportunities for new businesses ripe for the picking. We have seen how our means of communication have changed from text to voice, to picture, to video, and even live high definition video chats. This is all made possible due to faster internet connections.
When deciding what to do, Lei Ming advised that entrepreneurs consider finding the right thing to do at the right time. You need to make sure that you are addressing a problem, and you need to see whether or not you have missed your window to enter that opportunity. He mentioned that as early as 2005, there were thousands of video streaming and e-commerce sites competing with each other. Unless you can guarantee that your product can deliver the best quality compared to the rest, then you might end up experiencing more problems than you would like.
Healthcare systems are changing really fast. Christopher Udemans, TechNode Senior Reporter, moderated a conversation on innovation in healthcare delivery and how COVID has changed the landscape with Chang Liu, ACCESS Health International Regional Director for Greater China & Southeast Asia.
One of the biggest tools that have been utilized to help ease the burden on the healthcare system is telemedicine. Through these platforms, users or patients can access healthcare by accessing an app and receiving consultations from a doctor remotely. However, it isn’t as simple as just putting up an app. Healthtech, as a whole, has to be applied to the entire system. This means access to essential medicine, proper training, sufficient financing, government support, and health data.
COVID-19 has definitely played a critical role in adding attention and value to integrating technology when it comes to healthcare delivery systems. Liu enumerated three magic ingredients to ensure that health tech will work: social acceptance, government support, and enterprise innovation. Cooperation between private companies and the government needed to come together to generate a holistic solution that would address the problems COVID had brought out.
Liu said that there is a lot that other countries can take note of when it comes to how China, as a whole, has handled the virus so far. Several low/middle-income countries have already studied and adapted systems and protocols that China has already put in place.
]]>Shares of Baidu rose nearly 14% on Tuesday on the news that the Chinese search engine company is planning to build its own electric vehicles.
Why it matters: The search engine leader’s interest in jumping into EV manufacturing is the latest sign that investment in the sector is picking up tempo, as Chinese tech companies are seeking to get in on enthusiasm for EVs amid a sales rebound in their home market.
Details: Baidu has been in discussion with car companies including China’s biggest private automaker Geely, Toyota manufacturing partner GAC, and the state-owned FAW Group for a possible majority-owned venture to build EVs, according to a Reuters report.
Context: Chinese tech giants have backed leading young EV makers aiming for control over the companies and a foothold in the booming segment, and are doubling down as the country’s EV sales started to recover since March.
Read more: DRIVE I/O | The battle for leadership in car software
]]>China Tech Investor is a weekly look at China’s tech companies through the lens of investment. Each week, hosts Elliott Zaagman and James Hull go through their watch list of publicly listed tech companies and also interview experts on issues affecting the macroeconomy and the stock prices of China’s tech companies.
Make sure you don’t miss anything. Check out our lineup of China tech podcasts.
This week, Tu Le from Sino Auto Insights joins the show to discuss the stratospheric rise that electric vehicle stocks have experienced this year, and what those firms will need to achieve in order to justify their share prices. They also discuss the major players on the software side of the EV equation.
Hosts may have interest in some of the stocks discussed. The discussion should not be construed as investment advice or a solicitation of services.
Watchlist:
Hosts:
Guest:
Editor:
Podcast information:
From social media to online shopping, China’s biggest tech companies have gone head-to-head for the attention of the country’s internet users. Now, they’re also fighting for dominance in a new area: car software.
A battle between automakers and tech giants is emerging for control of car software—the foundation for self-driving vehicles and in-car infotainment. Whoever gains the upper hand could see their profits skyrocket, as vehicles become more software-heavy in the leadup to a connected, driverless future.
In one corner, tech powerhouses like Alibaba and Tencent are pushing into automobiles. Now, these companies largely offer their apps and services in vehicles. One day, they might edge out automakers with their in-car information and entertainment systems.
While some car makers—including BAIC and Chang’an—are going along with this offensive, others are pushing back.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s monthly newsletter on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode Squared members.
China’s biggest automaker SAIC, as well as Volvo’s parent Geely, are attempting to reinvent themselves as tech-savvy, next-generation car manufacturers. They select some parts of what the tech companies offer, while ramping up efforts to develop their own in-car software, attempting to elbow tech companies out of the equation.
The global automotive software market is on an upward trajectory. Software subscriptions are expected not only to become an important source of revenue and a more profitable business than car manufacturing, but to drive significant growth of components including sensors and chips to meet the changing consumer preferences for in-car experience.
Chinese tech and auto companies build their infotainment systems or self-driving software stack on base operating systems. These companies generally choose one of three base systems: Blackberry, Linux and Google’s Android.
Considered the most prominent players in the China’s car software market, Alibaba, Tencent, and Baidu have for years competed for passengers’ attention. But they’ve made slower-than-expected inroads into China’s massive automarket, hindered by automakers’ concerns over working with them. Here’s where China’s tech companies stand.
Alibaba: China’s biggest e-commerce group has for years disrupted a slew of brick-and-mortar markets. It hasn’t seen the same success in its pursuit of the auto industry. The company lost its early-mover advantage after two years of in-fighting with its partner, China’s biggest automaker, SAIC.
Baidu: Often touted as China’s leader in artificial intelligence, Baidu has focused on self-driving cars and voice recognition technology for nearly 10 years. China’s answer to Google expanded its reach in the auto industry in July 2018 by releasing DuerOS for Apollo, an Android-based, voice-controlled car operating system. The company has gained some market share in this field since last year.
Tencent: A late starter, the company has adopted a more collaborative attitude than its peers. The tech behemoth launched the first generation of its Android-based OS in a partnership with Chinese automaker Chang’an in late 2018.
Huawei: China’s most contentious tech company is emerging as a dominant player in the country’s auto industry. Huawei aims to become a full-stack hardware and software provider in the booming auto software market. Many industry insiders expect Huawei to eventually compete head-to-head with Bosch as a leading auto supplier.
A number of Chinese automakers have allowed big tech companies to take control of their cars’ screens. Others, though, are not handing over the reins so easily. Instead, these companies have accelerated their push into intelligent, connected vehicles by building their own car software teams. They want to keep selling new services to customers without sharing the margin with tech companies.
Old-school crowd: Industry watchers largely shrugged off these moves, given traditional carmakers are still wedded to old car technologies.
The new kids: Young, tech native US-listed EV makers, including Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto, are more agile and better prepared to respond to changing customer demands than traditional automakers, experts said.
China’s auto industry is quickly evolving into a market led by software development. The shift from traditional manufacturing is growing more urgent: car sales worldwide have plunged into recession since last year.
Legacy automakers are not good at developing software. That will have to change if they want to retain control over a user’s experience of their vehicles and hold onto brand loyalty from customers in the long run.
But as smartphones and car software converge, the opportunity for the BAT trifecta is growing. One thing that China’s tech companies are good at is taking control of screens, and it might just be a matter of time before they’ve taken over car dashboards.
]]>Share prices for electric vehicle makers Nio and Xpeng plunged more than 10% on Tuesday despite triple-digit annual growth in November deliveries. Investors were unimpressed with growth numbers bolstered by a very low base in 2019 when China’s EV sales sank by nearly half after government subsidies were slashed.
On the same day, news broke that Congress is likely to pass legislation this week forcing Chinese companies delist from US stock markets with new audit-oversight rules.
Nio delivered 5,291 electric crossovers in November, more than doubling the number in the same month last year, according to an announcement from Monday. However the EC6 drove growth with a 71% month-on-month rise while the ES8 and ES6 declined slightly from a month earlier. The growth rate slowed to 4.7% on a monthly basis.
The EV maker, backed by the government of Hefei city in eastern China, said that it is expanding the manufacturing capacity of its Hefei plant to meet order growth but did not disclose the number of order backlogs. The company in September reached a monthly capacity of 5,000 units on a single shift and aims to increase the number by 50% by January, CEO William Li said during its third-quarter earnings call.
Xpeng Motors recorded deliveries of 4,224 EVs in November, up by 342% year on year and 38.9% sequentially. A low base in 2019 and a dip in October a result of competition from Tesla’s China-made Model 3 boosted the comparisons. The Guangzhou-based EV maker sold 1,016 G3 sports utility vehicles in the same month a year ago, according to figures from industry group China Passenger Car Association. It forecasted deliveries of around 10,000 vehicles for the fourth quarter.
Li Auto reported November deliveries of 4,646 EVs after market close on Monday, growing 25.8% on a monthly basis. The Beijing-based EV maker, which began vehicle deliveries last December, said the number of deliveries as well as new orders in November surpassed 5,000 units.
]]>READ MORE: Nio, Xpeng, Li Auto: your cheat sheet to China’s listed Tesla rivals
Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei announced on Wednesday a reorganization that granted the head of its consumer business group oversight over its car business operations as the company moves to shore up promising new revenue streams.
Why it matters: Huawei is sharpening its focus to its budding connected car business following US sanctions which have strangled the company’s smartphone unit by clamping down on its access to chipsets.
Details: Huawei’s Intelligent Automotive Solution business unit was moved under the consumer business managing board, currently led by the group’s CEO Richard Yu, according to an announcement (in Chinese) dated Oct. 26 and posted to its online community on Wednesday.
Context: Huawei in May 2019 placed its auto business unit under its information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructure managing board which mainly oversees its carrier and enterprise businesses and is led by rotating chairman Eric Xu.
This article and its headline were revised Friday to include comment from Huawei.
]]>China’s top economic planner has asked provincial governments to submit detailed reports about electrical vehicle firms’ investment and business activities in order to minimize financial risk, according to a notice seen by Chinese media.
Why it matters: The Chinese central government is addressing massive overcapacity in the EV industry in an attempt to head off financial crises in regional economies.
Details: National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) had urged regional authorities in a notice issued Nov. 13 to provide updates on local EV manufacturing projects. Requested details include production progress and the implementation of investments over the past five years, Chinese financial media outlet Yicai reported on Wednesday.
Context: China cracked down on EV overcapacity by suspending new plant approvals in mid-2017, when planned capacity reached 20 million EVs—more than 20 times total sales that year, according to state-owned China Securities Journal.
China’s plan for new energy vehicles (NEV) in the next 15 years aims to promote the transition from a state-led to a market-led industry. In the eyes of the policy makers, Chinese brands should lead the way and control the domestic market. Whether the plan (in Chinese) will succeed hinges on how the government manages the phase-out of purchase subsidies after 2022.
Issued by the State Council on Nov. 2, The Development Plan for the New Energy Vehicle Industry (2021-2035) leaves no doubt about China’s commitment to NEVs, calling it a “major direction in the transformation of the global automotive industry.”
Jost Wübbeke is a director at Sinolytics, a research-based consultancy focused on China, in Berlin.
In China’s state economy and politically-steered markets, these industry-specific plans play the primary role in setting growth incentives, planning regulations, allocating financial resources, and even building markets.
China’s leaders perceive the NEV revolution as the big opportunity to build strong domestic automotive brands that can dominate the home market and compete in global markets. On visits to the factories of China’s oldest carmaker FAW in June, President Xi Jinping stated that “we… have to raise domestic brands.” China’s “quality brands” should be able to compete equally with international peers, the plan states. This refers to brands such as BAIC’s Beijing Electric Vehicle and Nio. The plan stipulates that China should “reach an internationally advanced level in NEV key technology” by 2035.
China’s policymakers have never officially favored a specific alternative fuel or powertrain technology. But it’s been obvious for more than five years that they prioritize battery electric vehicles—think Byton, Li Auto, Nio, or any other all-electric plug-in car brand. Now, they’ve made it official: The NEV plan highlights battery electrics as “the main force of new vehicle sales”.
The related, but less official, NEV Technology Roadmap, as presented in a publication event (in Chinese) shortly before the 15-year plan by automotive experts close to the state, estimates that battery electrics will account for 95% of NEV sales in 2035.
By contrast, these experts see plug-in hybrid electric vehicles as a bridging technology. The roadmap dismisses hydrogen-based fuel cells as not a serious option for passenger vehicles, but concedes that they will have a distinct niche in the commercial vehicle market.
A more challenging element of the plan will be the transition from a state-driven to a market-driven NEV industry.
The growth of China’s NEV fleet over the past five years has been impressive. About 4.9 million battery electrics and plug-in hybrids have been sold since 2015. China aims to sell a total of 5 million NEVs by 2020. However, the recent sales surge was to a large degree only possible with the support of massive purchase subsidies from both the central and local governments. The central government wants to eliminate all these subsidies.
The first attempt to ditch them failed badly. In mid-2019, the central government ordered a complete halt to local purchase subsidies and tremendously scaled back national ones, with a target to fully phase out subsidies by the end of this year.
READ MORE: Money’s too tight to mention for China’s outsized electric vehicle industry
But lower subsidies caused the sales of passenger NEVs to plummet in the second half of 2019 by 30% year on year. It took the market until mid-2020 to rebound. China lost its status as the largest NEV market to Europe in the first half of 2020, a shock that still reverberates in Chinese public discussion. As Covid-19 also wreaked havoc on the auto market, the government extended subsidies until end 2022, and even allowed local governments to provide temporary subsidies once again.
The new plan clearly takes account of this policy failure and is less ambitious when it comes to NEV sales targets. Early drafts of the plan in 2019 estimated that NEVs would account for 25% of total vehicle sales in 2025. The final plan lowers this target to 20%, and does not set any targets beyond 2025. However, the semi-official NEV Technology Roadmap estimates an NEV market share of 50% by 2035.
Despite these challenges, the plan is still set to phase out national subsidies as soon as possible—and for good reasons. They have become a heavy burden on state finances: Between 2016 and 2018, the government handed over about RMB 21.5 billion ($3.3 billion) for vehicle subsidies.
But a lack of subsidies does not mean a lack of state support. Instead, the government is putting its trust in other incentives.
The core instrument to replace the subsidies, as the plan also puts it, is an NEV quota, which has been gradually introduced since 2017. The quota sets a minimum amount of “credits” carmakers have to earn by selling a certain number of NEVs. If they are below the quota, they will have to purchase positive credits from other carmakers that do meet the quota. This puts pressure on carmakers to prioritize NEV sales. The quota is becoming increasingly stringent: NEV credits collected by carmakers must reach 18% of traditional car production and imports by 2023. That will be a challenge for many companies.
The plan also emphasizes a range of local-level benefits such as discounts for battery charging, special parking slots, and special NEV lanes. However, fast NEV registration in first-tier cities is becoming less important as the quotas for registration of traditional vehicles have recently come under fire by authorities and were relaxed by many cities to stimulate car sales.
The experiences of summer 2019 indicate that these demand-oriented incentives and the NEV quota won’t be enough to replace purchase subsidies and create stable NEV market growth. The situation might change as vehicle and battery costs go further down, but the transition to a market-driven demand is still at a challenging stage.
The plan also conceives of substantial consolidation in the coming years.
Following a typical pattern in Chinese industrial policy, the government intensely promoted the growth of the number of industry players during the emergence of the NEV market until 2019. Since then, the government has taken actions to restrict overcapacities and new manufacturing projects. The plan now officially launches the period of industry concentration in a “survival of the fittest” manner, reflecting the government’s ambition to forge national NEV champions.
Climate change and energy consumption
While the plan extensively focuses on industrial development, it puts less emphasis on overarching climate change targets. This is in stark contrast to the active Chinese climate policy and international emission commitments. China has pledged that its emissions will peak before 2030 and that it will reduce its carbon intensity by 60%-65% below 2005 levels by 2030. Recently Xi vowed China would reach “carbon neutrality” by 2060.
The NEV plan neither includes targets for carbon emissions in the automotive industry nor considers life-cycle emissions of NEVs. Nor does it consider targets for the use of green energy in charging. The NEV Technology Roadmap does estimate that the automotive industry will reach its peak emissions by 2028, but this is not a binding target.
While overarching climate goals are missing, existing regulations exert more pressure to reduce emissions, especially through the NEV credits and fuel consumption credits. Energy consumption of NEVs is also increasingly important, especially in the calculation of NEV credits. As battery electric cars are mostly charged with coal power, improving their energy efficiency is one way to reduce their carbon footprint. The plan aims for an average energy consumption of 12 kWh/100km by 2025. This is ambitious by current standards: some Tesla Model S 75 cars consume around 14.6 kWh/100km.
In sum, the thrust of the 15-year plan is a clear commitment to the development of the NEV industry and to battery electrics in particular. Important instruments such as the NEV quota system developed over the past few years and will become more prominent.
Yet a major question mark remains. There is no effective strategy yet for the post-subsidy phase after 2022. How policymakers will handle this sticking point will determine the success of the plan and the pace of NEV development in China.
]]>Chinese electric vehicle maker Nio on Tuesday reported third-quarter revenue that beat Wall Street expectations alongside record delivery volumes and double-digit profit margin, though share prices fell 3.3% by market close on Wednesday.
The China’s most valuable EV maker earned revenue of RMB 4.5 billion ($666.6 million) in the third quarter, up 146% from the same period a year earlier and higher than the consensus estimate of $663.2 million compiled by Bloomberg.
Gross margin improved sequentially to 12.9% from 8.4%, though rival Li Auto outperformed with an impressive 19.8% margin during the same period. Quarterly losses narrowed 11% quarter-on-quarter to RMB 1.05 billion, lower than the RMB 1.15 billion posted by its peer, Xpeng Motors.
Nio in Q3 nearly tripled on an annual basis the number of vehicles delivered to 12,206 units, and forecasted a new high for Q4 of 17,000 cars. Its output growth rate exceeds its peers. However, challenges loom as the company fights for market share amid growing competition from both domestic and international rivals in the crowded Chinese EV market.
During its Tuesday earnings call, Nio attributed gross margin improvement mainly to an increase of RMB 10,000 per unit in average selling price for the quarter as sales for the higher-priced ES8 crossovers rose in Q3. Deliveries of Nio’s first model recovered by September when it sold 1,482 units following the launch of a revamped model after hitting bottom in February at just 36 units.
Significantly cheaper material costs including battery packs boosted margin, vice president of finance Stanley Qu said during the earnings call. A top client of Chinese battery supplier CATL, Nio in March said that it expected battery costs to decrease more than 20% year on year in the fourth quarter.
The Shanghai-based EV maker aims to further drive sales and boost gross profit. It is forming ambitious volume and service expansion plans for the coming months, setting a monthly production target of 7,500 vehicles in January, up 50% from September.
Another initiative for next year is constructing 300 newly designed battery swap stations across the country. The company’s recharging network numbered 158 battery replacement facilities as of September. Each of its swap stations cost RMB 2 million on average to set up, but that number will be decline by half next year thanks to design improvements, CEO William Li Bin told Chinese media earlier this year.
Currently the best-financed Chinese EV startup, Nio’s cash on hand almost doubled to RMB 22.2 billion in Q3. It expects to maintain cash burn at a modest rate looking ahead, Qu said during the call, pledging to ensure service network expansion is well planned and executed. Most of the capital expenditure for capacity expansion will be covered by its manufacturing partner JAC Motors, according to Nio financial chief Steven Feng.
With gross margin shy of double digits, Nio’s may continue to struggle for profits amid internal issues such as production delays. Supply chain partners continue to weigh on production capacity.
Currently, Nio customers have to wait for up to six weeks for deliveries as demand rises and parts remain in limited supply. Nio hopes to reduce that time length to three to four weeks, according to Li. Li said Nio would reach its target capacity of 7,500 units in January, while acknowledging it would not immediately be able to shorten delivery times.
Xpeng faces the same issue, with CEO He Xiaopeng last week acknowledging to analysts that the company was encountering “a temporary bottleneck” in battery supply, which would probably continue for a few months. Still, He said supply chain partners would expand their capacity to meet Xpeng’s needs in the next six to 12 months.
Faced with growing competition from both automakers at home and abroad, both Nio and Li Auto are expected to accelerate spending on research and development to gain an edge in self-driving technologies. Nio’s Li during the call said the firm’s second-generation technology platform, called NT 2.0, equipped with “the most advanced chipset in the industry” and enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities, would be deployed on its first sedan scheduled for release early next year.
The EV maker, backed by Chinese internet giant Tencent, recently released its advanced driver assistance function, Navigate on Pilot, in head-to-head competition with Tesla and Alibaba-backed Xpeng. Li Auto plans to catch up by tripling the size of its self-driving team to 200 scientists and engineers by June, and launching a similar function as early as 2021.
US-listed Chinese EV makers have collectively delivered 70,399 vehicles as of October this year, lagging Tesla’s nearly 100,000 China-made sedans during the same period, according to figures from China Passenger Car Association.
Concerns linger about the company’s profitability after short seller Citron Research last week warned that Nio’s valuation was too high to be justified by market share, along with a possible sales hit by the upcoming launch of Tesla’s locally built Model Y early next year.
Li maintained during the call that Nio targets a more premium consumer segment than Tesla with a higher average selling price. With deliveries in October more than double on an annual basis, it is clearly not affected by Tesla’s most recent price cuts, he said. October deliveries for Xpeng, whose P7 model directly competes with the Model 3, declined 14.4% from a month earlier.
Nio’s share price has surged over 1,000% since January, indicating that a correction may be due along with near-term pressure from Tesla. Still, around 63% of analysts covering Nio have rated its shares “buy.” Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, and JP Morgan on Wednesday raising their price targets on the stock, according to a CNBC report.
“We believe Nio will continue to take share in the premium segment from traditional ICE incumbents, …ultimately emerging a major winner in the China auto market by the middle of the decade,” Deutsche Bank analysts led by Edison Yu wrote in report on Wednesday.
]]>Shares of Chinese electric vehicle maker Li Auto surged 13.9% on Monday following bullish analyst reports on the firm’s robust sales figures reported in its first quarterly results since going public this summer.
Citigroup on Monday upgraded Li Auto to “buy” from “hold” and raised its target price by 68% to $45.6 after the EV maker posted higher-than-expected revenues and a gross margin of 19.8% from 13.7% in the second quarter.
China International Capital Corporation (CICC) also raised its price target to $40 from $21.5 on expectations of further margin upside next year. Li Auto is the first Chinese EV startup to report profits: it earned RMB 16 million ($2.4 million) in non-GAAP net income in Q3, thanks to a reduction in vehicle costs and higher-than-average operating efficiency, CICC analysts wrote in a report on Monday.
The company reported wider net losses of RMB 106.9 million, a 42% increase from the second quarter, attributable to share-based compensation expenses related to employee stock options.
The Chinese EV maker beat analyst expectations of its Q3 revenue, posting a 28.9% quarter-on-quarter increase in revenue of RMB 2.51 billion. Deliveries during the quarter rose sequentially by nearly a third to 8,660 vehicles.
Total deliveries reached 21,852 units for the first 10 months of this year. Its first model, the Li One, was China’s top-selling electric SUV in the past two months, according to data from state-backed China Automotive Technology and Research Center (CATARC).
Li Auto boasts more efficient operations compared with its peers. CICC analysts said the company enjoyed a much higher efficiency with a monthly sales of 100 vehicles on average per store in September, compared with 29 for Nio and 19 units for Xpeng. The Beijing-based EV maker had 35 direct sales stores in 30 Chinese cities as of September, compared with 116 Xpeng stores and more than 160 Nio showrooms. CICC forecasted Li Auto’s net losses would narrow to RMB 190 million next year from RMB 480 million in 2020 as the company continues to ramp up production and control operating costs.
Some analysts said that the speed of Li Auto’s retail expansion would be a key factor in driving sales volume moving forward. However, the EV maker plans expand operations gradually, targeting 50 to 60 stores nationwide by end-year. Each store’s productivity should outperform competitors, as each retail location covers a bigger area including nearby towns, according to Chinese online brokerage Tiger Brokers.
“For some of our peers, their approaches are to quickly expand the number of retail stores to cover more cities, then try to slowly improve their sales efficiency at a later stage. We took a different approach. We implement gradual expansion of our sales network and try to maintain a high of sales efficiency per store,” Kevin Shen, president of Li Auto, said on Friday during the earnings call.
]]>Shares of Chinese electric vehicle maker Xpeng Motors jumped 33.4% to $44.73 on Thursday after the company recorded positive results for the third quarter following bullish analyst comments. Now perceived as a strong challenger to Tesla, the EV upstart is gearing up for an ambitious goal: setting a benchmark for driver assistance technology in China that rivals will have to beat.
In the first report since its August debut on the New York Stock Exchange, the carmaker said it raked in RMB 1.99 billion ($293.1 million) in the third quarter of 2020, making for a 342% year-on-year surge in revenue, boosted by an uptick in vehicle deliveries. Quarterly deliveries grew 266% year-on-year to 8,578 units. That number included 6,210 P7 sedans—the company’s second mass production model directly targeting Tesla’s Model 3.
Xpeng CEO He Xiaopeng said during the earnings call that the company’s goal is to provide “the most advanced” assisted self-driving system in China. The dedication to in-house research and development on autonomous driving, he added, would be the key to build up core competencies and set it apart from its rivals. More notably, more than 98% of all the P7 vehicles delivered were equipped with hardware that supports software upgrades to the latest version of its advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) Xpilot.
The company’s quarterly losses grew to RMB 1.15 billion from RMB 776 million in 2019 but its gross margin shrunk to 4.6% from -10.1% for the same period. Operating expenses climbed 60% quarter-on-quarter, to RMB 1.8 billion. This is even more than the RMB 1.47 billion in expenses that Nio incurred in the second quarter. The rival Chinese EV maker has gained notoriety for its high cash-burning rate.
Boasting of being one of only two automakers in the world to have developed all core self-driving capabilities in-house, Xpeng is the only Chinese automaker taking the same approach as Tesla. However, the cost has been high and the payoff is uncertain, as it has taken much longer than initially promised by industry players to get mature self-driving technologies ready for the road.
How much of an advantage is Xpeng in targeting Tesla in a self-driving race? Here are some of the notable takeaways gleaned from analysts and Xpeng executives, including Wu Xinzhou, vice president of autonomous driving who recently spoke to TechNode.
Xpeng is currently on track to release its semi-self-driving function, called Navigation Guide Pilot (NGP), in the beginning of next year. The feature enables a car to self-drive on urban highways, including navigating from a highway on-ramp to off-ramp, changing lanes, and taking exits.
The NGP technology is expected to handle real-world scenarios on the busy Chinese urban highways, taking a burden off the drivers, enabling users to remain engaged in driving but without their hands on the steering wheel all the time. NGP is similar to Tesla’s Navigate on Autopilot (NOA), that carmaker’s most advanced driver-assisted offering. Nio launched a similar feature in late September.
The company has set a goal to achieve “a single-digit number” of times per 1,000 kilometers (621 miles) on highways that drivers are required to take control of the vehicles, according to Wu.
On city roads, human intervention will still often be needed, as the company’s current ADAS features are unable to recognize traffic lights and handle requests such as lane merging. Still, a “future-proof” hardware and software architecture would allow the company to push forward more advanced features, Wu said.
In reply to an analyst during the earnings call, the CEO said the company plans to launch more driver-assistance features beginning in the second half of 2021. One of these features, called “autonomous following,” will be specifically designed for the complex traffic conditions in major Chinese cities. It will enable drivers to closely follow the cars in front of them to make sure that they are not left behind.
“ADAS is not going to be a major boost to overall sales in the short term. Most consumers are not overly focused on those functions if it’s not standard or part of a luxury package,” said Daniel J. Kollar, head of Automotive & Mobility Practice at consultancy Intralink Group, on Thursday. However, he said the internal focus on self-driving development likely would have long-term benefits as the industry moves towards commercialization of semi- and above-vehicle autonomy.
“China market consolidation will likely favor Tesla and a few surviving EV upstarts,” according to a Thursday report from Chinese online firm Tiger Brokers. The report noted, though, that the release of NGP and continuous roll-out of ADAS functions could “bring a high-margin software revenue stream throughout 2021.”
]]>READ MORE: Tesla’s apprentice: Is Tesla bullying its own biggest fan?
China was once unrivaled in electric vehicle (EV) sales. Now, Europe threatens its dominance.
It has been five years since China surpassed the US to become the world’s biggest EV market. Growth in China’s EV market was swift thanks to heavy government support in the form of subsidies. But this year Europe is set to dethrone China as the global EV sales leader, picking up critical momentum despite widespread disruption from the global Covid-19 pandemic.
Industry leaders in China have voiced concern about their country losing its early lead in the global race for EV dominance. In the first half of 2020, new energy vehicle (NEV) sales, including all-electrics, plug-in hybrids, and hydrogen-powered cars, plunged almost by half compared to the same time period in 2019. Meanwhile, in Europe, deliveries grew by 57% year on year.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s monthly newsletter on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode Squared members.
China, a global manufacturing hub for automobiles, has historically produced entry level, low-priced cars, lagging behind the West in cutting-edge vehicle technologies. Now, facing a battle on two fronts, Chinese EV makers are attempting to shake this image as they gear up to expand abroad. There’s a lot at stake. They’ve already been beaten by overseas auto giants in their home market—or joined forces with them, casting a shadow on Beijing’s ambitions to create homegrown EV leaders.
Analysts expect growth in China’s EV market to recover in the next few years, although only marginally—high price tags and a lack of charging facilities remain key roadblocks to EV adoption. Still, as Europe collectively accelerates its transition towards low-carbon transport, it raises a number of questions. What do China and Europe’s EV markets look like? Will China’s head start in EV technology give it an edge? Can China really fulfill its goal of developing its own EV leaders?
In a big hit to Beijing’s EV ambitions, Europe overtook China as the world’s largest EV market earlier this year. Bolstered by generous cash incentives, Europe reported a massive surge in EV sales in the first half of 2020. Meanwhile, China was trapped in a downward spiral thanks to Beijing’s EV subsidy cuts last year and the economic fallout from Covid-19.
The sudden increase in European EV sales has triggered general unease among some of the biggest companies in China’s EV industry. One of the most outspoken figures is Zeng Yuqun, chairman of battery giant CATL.
Zeng said recently that China could lose its leading position if Europe continues beating China in EV investments over the next several years. Beijing’s investment into its own EV industry was about 30% of that of the EU last year, Chinese media reported (in Chinese) citing Zeng.
The EU’s lead is likely only temporary, say veteran industry observers. “Whatever short term sales advantage might take place in Europe, I don’t see that persisting. I expect China to gain the lead in terms of EV sales over the long run,” Stephen Dyer, managing director of global consultancy AlixPartners said last month during TechNode’s Emerge 2020 conference.
Although EVs only made up 3% of total car sales last year, the continent has aimed high and is forecast to increase that number to 20% by 2030 by German automotive research center, the Chemnitz Automotive Institute (CATI).
Experts see tremendous growth potential in China not only because it remains the world’s biggest auto market, but also because EV adoption is still in the early stages. Last year, only 1.2 million EVs were sold in China compared with the 25.8 million total vehicles sold—still lower than the penetration rate of EVs in Europe. The country also has a far wider offering of EV models ranging from entry level to luxury.
While experts forecast China will regain its position as the world’s largest EV market, sales could be headed for a prolonged period of slow growth until battery technology matures. One of the most obvious signs of a slowdown is that Beijing recently lowered its NEV sales goal to 20% from 25% of total car sales by 2025, as Reuters reported.
After a prolonged market slump which lasted an entire year, China’s NEV sector has managed a U-shaped recovery, reporting double-digit growth since July. Now, the market is dominated by two US automakers: Tesla and General Motors (GM).
Tesla’s locally-built Model 3 and GM’s Wuling-branded mini-EV recently became China’s best-selling EVs, outperforming a slew of China’s biggest automakers. Each dominated one end of the market: the post-subsidy price of standard-range Model 3 starts at RMB 271,550 ($41,195), while a tiny Wuling EV costs only a tenth of a Tesla.
Meanwhile, young, China-founded EV makers such as Nio and Li Auto reported better-than-average deliveries, outperforming traditional auto companies, although their sales made up only a fraction of the total EVs sold.
That’s not what China wants. In an industry development plan released last week, Beijing promised to become a global auto powerhouse, with Chinese car brands becoming “a major competitive force worldwide” in the next 15 years (our translation).
“There’s no way that the Chinese government is going to let foreign automakers lead the EV sector for a long period of time,” said Tu Le, founder and managing director of business intelligence firm Sino Auto Insights in an interview with S&P Global.
Despite Tesla’s lead, China’s young EV makers are becoming an important emerging power. Nio, a major challenger to Tesla in China, this month surpassed GM in market capitalization as the world’s 7th most valuable automaker. Chinese original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)—companies that make cars or car parts for other brands—are now preparing for a big electric push, while more international carmakers are jumping into the fray.
Chinese automakers excel at making entry level vehicles, but competition for the lower tier market is heating up as German car manufacturers—known for leading engineering and technical innovations—begin experimenting with small, affordable EVs. Local manufacturing partners are gearing them up for entry into China’s low-cost EV segment.
Despite an early lead by Tesla and its Chinese peers, experts caution that it is too early to predict whether a domestic or foreign automaker will take pole position next year, given the complexity of the landscape. Still, as the market splits between growth in the entry-level and premium EV markets, whoever wins the customer experience will have a leg up over all the other players, Dyer added.
With only a few thousand vehicles sold each month, Chinese EV makers like Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto have yet to carve out a solid position in their home markets, but they’re looking to drive sales by expanding around the world. Some companies are shifting their initial plans to launch in America, opting for Europe instead given the escalating tensions between China and the US.
Chinese EV makers’ recent push to extend their presence overseas echoes Beijing’s ambition to build a world-class auto industry. However, what matters even more than explosive growth is China’s tech development, and its ability to sustain quality growth. China still needs to do a lot of heavy lifting to become the undisputed leader in EVs.
Despite being home to some of the world’s biggest battery makers, China still lags far behind Western countries in manufacturing crucial EV components such as electric engines and motor controllers.
For example, more than 90% of China’s IGBT modules, a key component in the motor controller for EVs, are sourced from overseas suppliers, as few domestic parts makers have the capability to manufacture them, industry insiders recently told China Automotive News (in Chinese). IGBT devices make up 10% of the production cost of an EV, French market researcher Reportlinker said in a report.
Chinese authorities are aware of the urgency of self-reliance for core technologies from a long-term perspective, with an official at the Ministry of Finance late last year raising the alarm over its reliance on overseas EV technologies during an industry conference. So far, China’s imports of key EV components are mostly from Europe and the raw materials used in manufacturing EV batteries are sourced in Africa, and therefore industry insiders believe the risk of a cut-off is limited.
After 10 years and more than RMB 1 trillion in government incentives, China has finally become a forerunner in the global EV race, but as it grows bigger, the problems it faces in its quest to regain its position as a global leader are increasingly apparent. In its latest industry development plan, Beijing has set the goal to join the global top league in the advancement of core EV technologies by 2035. The question is: can China make another leap this time?
]]>Chinese electric vehicle makers looking to expand to markets in Europe need a localization strategy for the culturally diverse region, although adapting to the various demands of each country could put a strain on their finances, according to an industry expert.
“Europe, like Southeast Asia, is very diverse, and therefore a marketing strategy in Germany might not work in France and Italy. The complexity ramps up significantly for EV makers and that could be a drain on their capital,” said Tu T. Le, founder and managing director of business intelligence firm Sino Auto Insights, on Oct. 29 during the TechNode Emerge 2020 conference.
Chinese carmakers have long sought to expand overseas amid Beijing’s ambition to build a world-class auto industry, and the aspiration has now been passed to young EV makers.
Nio is stepping up its global expansion with plans to begin selling in some European countries in the second half of 2021, according to a Reuters report. A Chinese media outlet reported last week that it aims to open its first overseas showroom in Copenhagen, Denmark and sell 7,000 SUVs within the next two years. Nio declined to comment when contacted by TechNode on Thursday.
Meanwhile, Alibaba-backed Xpeng Motors beat its rivals to the punch with a late-September shipment of 100 crossovers to Norway which were scheduled for delivery in partnership with a local dealer starting this month.
With deliveries of several thousand units per month, Chinese EV makers have yet to carve out a prominent position among traditional automaker giants in their home markets. Flush from US market listings and investments from local Chinese governments, the companies are looking to establish footholds in Europe, a market where even Tesla has faced tough competition.
The California-based carmaker is losing ground with its EV market share falling sharply to 13.5% in Western Europe in the third quarter from 33.8% in the same period a year ago, industry analyst Matthias Schmidt said in a report earlier this week. Meanwhile, local giants Renault and Volkswagen, the two largest EV makers in the region, grabbed market share from Tesla in the first three quarters of the year.
While investor sentiment sends Chinese EV stocks higher, the companies have a long road ahead to succeed in such a market. In an interview in June, Nio president Qin Lihong acknowledged the barrier for entry to Europe is high and its current approach to build a sales network in China may not apply in the West.
“Chinese EV makers really need to focus on individual European countries as opposed to looking at Europe as one big market. Moving forward, what they do with new funding and where they invest could be an important indicator of how successful they’re going to be,” Le said.
]]>China will maintain its leadership in the global clean energy vehicle industry powered by its mass production of cheaper electric vehicle (EV) batteries, according to an industry expert, though it will struggle to surpass technological advances from Asian peers.
“Technically, Chinese battery makers are catching up to the Korean and Japanese battery suppliers. The technology gap is getting smaller, though reliability is still sometimes a question compared with Korean and Japanese batteries,” Stephen Dyer, managing director of global consultancy AlixPartners, said Thursday on the sidelines of the TechNode Emerge 2020 event in Shanghai.
Large Chinese battery manufacturers are among the world’s top producers by volume. However, its low-cost providers still lag Asian peers in technology, resulting in issues such as combustion risk. Beijing has pledged to emphasize quality growth over speed—earlier this month the central government approved a new energy vehicle (NEV) action plan for the next 15 years featuring innovation in key technologies such as EV batteries.
China’s battery improvements are a priority amid safety concerns about EVs catching fire. In the latest example, government-backed WM Motor on Wednesday announced a nationwide recall of 1,282 EX5 SUVs after four reports of battery fires in a month.
The company said that impurities in the battery cell production could cause short circuits and potentially, fires. ZTE Gaoneng Technology, a four-year-old battery supplier affiliated with Chinese telecommunications giant ZTE, later acknowledged it was involved in two of the incidents, while WM Motor has not revealed the suppliers for the other two incidents. The EV company works with multiple battery makers to keep prices low, including Chinese battery giant CATL.
WM Motor is the second Chinese EV maker that has issued a recall due to combustion risk. The move could be very costly and overshadow its plan for a listing on Shanghai’s STAR Market scheduled for early next year. Nio last summer recalled 4,803 crossovers due to a battery pack vulnerability which could result in a short circuit, costing the company RMB 340 million ($49.4 million). CATL is Nio’s only battery pack supplier.
Thanks to government support, China leapt into the EV battery big leagues. Four out of the the top 10 battery suppliers in the world are Chinese, according to figures from market research firm SNE Research.
Chinese firms are also catching up on battery performance, with CATL’s latest battery pack reaching parity with Panasonic’s 2170 batteries used in Tesla’s Model 3, which travels more than 500 kilometers (310 miles) on a single charge.
However, the CATL lithium ion batteries sparked a handful of EV fires this year, followed by reports that multiple automakers were abandoning the technology. Panasonic batteries, on the other hand, are known for reliability and performance, thanks to the company’s vast number of patents which prevent overheating.
Nickel, cobalt, and manganese (NCM) batteries, including CATL’s NCM 811 battery, are naturally more unstable. A growing number of automakers in China are thus turning to lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) batteries from a safety and cost perspective, Daniel J. Kollar, head of Automotive & Mobility Practice at business development consultancy Intralink Group, told TechNode.
Some progress has been made in China. BYD’s newly designed LFP battery has enabled a driving range for its flagship sedan model, the Han, similar to Tesla’s Model 3. The company, however, does not manufacture the batteries for other automakers, signaling production capacity limitations. The average density of LFP battery cells meanwhile are less than half that of Panasonic’s NCA batteries, Reuters recently reported citing a Panasonic executive.
“Great things are happening with LFP for certain applications, but it just can’t compete with NCM with regards to long-range applications,” Kollar said.
Looking ahead, analysts expect NCM battery technology, which accounted for more than 60% of total EV battery demand last year, will remain the dominant battery type in China due to a higher energy density that offers a longer driving range. Chinese makers are looking to innovate the structural design of EV batteries to improve safety without undermining performance and increasing cost. “There is an argument in the industry now about whether this should be done at the cell level or the pack level,” Kollar added.
A cheap battery producer in the past, Chinese battery makers are moving up the industry value chain by building more technologically advanced capacity to replace obsolete facilities. As the country moves toward its goal of becoming a clean energy vehicle powerhouse, a wave of consolidation is expected in the coming years.
With billions of RMB invested in the EV industry, China has dominated the world’s production of lithium-ion EV batteries, accounting for 77% of total capacity this year, according to figures from Bloomberg NEF. However, only 30% of capacity has been utilized, with lower-end battery makers seeing falling demand, Chinese media reported last week citing Zheng Mianping, a member of Chinese Academy of Engineering.
“We’ve seen a lot of companies came in and failed in the Chinese steel and solar industries, and the battery sector is going to follow that trajectory,” Tu T. Le, founder and managing director of business intelligence firm Sino Auto Insights, said during the panel discussion.
]]>US electric vehicle giant Tesla will begin exporting its China-made Model 3 sedans to a dozen of European countries this month as it faces dual pressures of plunging sales in Europe and slower-than-expected growth in China, according to persons familiar with the matter.
Why it matters: Excess inventory at Tesla’s Gigafactory Shanghai is piling up as the EV maker’s brick-and-mortar showroom expansion in China—particularly in lower-tier cities—struggles to keep up.
Details: Tesla will start shipping China-made Model 3 vehicles to a dozen or so European countries including Germany and France on Tuesday with deliveries scheduled for December, as the Shanghai facility’s production has sufficiently ramped up to fulfill local demand, the company said on Monday.
Context: The significantly lower sticker price for the China-made Model 3 is expected to help Tesla gain a competitive edge in the European market.
Chinese electric vehicle startup Byton could be steering itself out of deep financial trouble with the departure of its founder as part of a broader restructuring plan to begin production of its first model next year.
Why it matters: The removal of a formative leader marks a turning point for the once-hyped EV startup that has suspended operations for months after the onset of a massive cash crunch beginning last year.
Details: Daniel Kirchert, co-founder and CEO of Byton, has left the business and the company’s board of directors have approved a restructuring plan, Chinese media reported Wednesday citing persons with the knowledge of the matter.
Context: Byton is not the only cash-strapped EV maker returning from near-death in recent months. Boosted China’s new energy vehicle (NEV) sales figures and local governments scrambling to bail out homegrown young leaders, other Chinese EV firms could rejoin the race.
]]>READ MORE: Nio, Xpeng, Li Auto: your cheat sheet to China’s listed Tesla rivals
With China’s electric vehicle (EV) sector still reeling from a withdrawal of government support, three companies have emerged as viable challengers to Tesla in the world’s largest car market: Nio, Xpeng Motors, and Li Auto.
Despite rising geopolitical tensions between the US and China, all three EV makers are now listed in the US. But their stock market rides have been pretty volatile. Nio shares have been in recovery since April, capped by a 22.57% jump Oct. 14.
Xpeng and Li Auto‘s share prices have seesawed since they went public this year. Both companies’ shares surged more than 40% overnight in their US stock market debuts, and have since lost more than a fifth of their peak values.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s monthly newsletter on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Normally available only to TechNode Squared members, we’re making it free as a sample of our paid content.
The three Tesla wannabes vary in their approaches and development.
Nio is the showiest, led by its charismatic founder, William Li Bin, and boasts the deepest pockets and boldest business plan. The company is known for its grand, customer-centric strategies ranging from a network of luxurious showrooms to a free battery swap service. It was the first of the three to deliver cars to its customers, in June 2018.
Alibaba-backed Xpeng has its targets set on self-driving technology, and began delivering cars just six months after Nio. Led by a former Alibaba executive, its vehicles have been criticized for bearing a close resemblance to Tesla’s—this is no coincidence.
The staid Li Auto is more practical, solving the most urgent issues of early EV adopters, and was the last of the three to begin deliveries, in late 2019.
While EVs may be exciting, investors have doubted the viability of the market as a whole and question Chinese EV makers’ prospects. Even in their home market, these companies are dwarfed by Tesla, whose locally built Model 3 is the country’s top-selling EV. Critics had viewed Nio’s prospects as gloomy, last year speculating that the company was insolvent and wondering if other companies might follow in its footsteps.
But the Chinese government is bolstering a surge in EV adoption and clean energy vehicles are expected to grab a quarter of total car sales by 2025. The state’s efforts to achieve this goal has benefited EV makers, including Nio. The company landed a $1 billion bailout from the government of Hefei, capital of China’s eastern Anhui province. As a result, its shares have rocketed a whopping 470% this year.
Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto have reported surging deliveries that outperform legacy automakers. As investors reverse their attitudes towards Tesla’s Chinese challengers, we wonder whether they are well-positioned to sustain high growth rates into the future, and even more interestingly: which one has a stronger shot at becoming the “Tesla of China”?
Chinese EV makers seemed to be teetering on the edge of collapse earlier this year after Beijing slashed purchase subsidies by half last year to cool the overheated industry. As a result, EV makers saw sales figures sink while cash burn rates stayed high.
Nio—then the poster child for China’s EV industry—saw its cash reserves disappear after years of aggressive spending on its retail strategy, which included building impressive showrooms across China. The market went from around 500 EV companies in early 2019, to fewer than 10 that have managed to deliver cars in 2020.
Then, the EV market quietly began to turn around. Growing consumer demand and extended government support have led to robust sales growth and narrowed losses. As the world’s biggest auto market recovers from the Covid-19 pandemic, analysts expect strong long-term growth for Chinese EV makers, with Nio and Li Auto potentially expanding their lead among the homegrown players.
Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto recorded surging sales over the past two quarters, illustrating their improving performance. Analysts expect further top-line revenue growth in the second half of this year, as Tesla’s success in China draws more funding to help local EV makers grab a share of the market.
As China’s EV makers produce and sell more cars, they have also been able to absorb costs more effectively. In the first half of the year, Nio and Xpeng narrowed their net losses by more than 50% compared with the same period a year ago.
Meanwhile, Tesla’s success in China is good for the company—but also for its competitors. The US carmaker’s growth has local governments scrambling to bail out homegrown competitors.
Tesla’s Chinese rivals have taken vastly different approaches to gaining a foothold in the market. Nio, the most high-profile and best-financed of the three, had a market cap of $29 billion as of Oct. 14, almost equivalent to that of Xpeng and Li Auto combined (Update: These figures are slightly out of date—Nio’s stock jumped 22.57% in trading Wednesday following publication of a favorable report from J. P. Morgan, coming after this article was published in a newsletter). However, analysts are sharply divided over the company’s ability to improve margins because of its big budget, customer-centric business model, which includes offering battery swap facilities around China.
But Nio’s investment in its costly retail and community strategy appears to be paying off. Deutsche Bank said last month that a growing number of consumers recognize Nio as “a high-quality premium brand with best-in-class technology and customer service.” Meanwhile, Credit Suisse reportedly raised Nio’s price target to a new high of $25 when the company guided a record number of orders last month and expanded its monthly production capacity to 5,000 vehicles.
Analysts are generally more positive about Xpeng and Li Auto, which have more conventional business models. These companies are more circumspect about spending, have strong growth potential, and have successfully tightened manufacturing costs.
J.P Morgan said Xpeng could be the potential winner in China with its in-house self-driving technologies and mid-to-high-end positioning. The company expects Xpeng to break even in 2023 and sell 345,000 cars a year by 2025.
While Nio is seen as the higher-tier brand and Xpeng the cutting-edge competitor, Li Auto’s pragmatic approach is viewed favorably. The company has distinguished itself from competitors by offering extended-range electric vehicles (EREVs), a bridge technology that addresses the pain points of owning a standard EV, including range anxiety and charging point bottlenecks.
Bernstein expects Li Auto to reach a gross margin of 13.5% this year and break even between 2022 and 2023. Goldman Sachs in August classed Li Auto as a “conviction buy,” predicting that the company’s stocks would outperform expectations, and estimated an annual sales volume of 445,000 vehicles in 2025.
China’s EV sales have slumped since last year. Beijing’s subsidy cuts followed by the economic shock of the Covid-19 outbreak have left companies reeling.
More analysts have reversed their initially positive outlook for 2020, predicting a 20% drop in sales compared to last year’s 1.2 million deliveries. In August, the country’s top auto industry body, the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM), lowered its 2020 EV sales forecasts to 1.1 million vehicles.
The situation could get even worse for EV companies, as legacy automakers including VW plan to release more EV models from 2022 onwards. This, coupled with Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto’s relative inexperience in manufacturing, could make for a difficult next couple of years.
However, the transition from internal combustion vehicles to EVs is gaining speed. And Chinese firms are riding the wave of Beijing’s push to maintain its leadership as the world’s biggest EV market. Sales of all-electric and plug-in hybrids vehicles have to make up around one-quarter of total auto sales in 2025 in order to reach China’s mandated EV quotas, according to IHS Markit (in Chinese).
Consumer demand for EVs is expected to grow rapidly over the next few years due to increased affordability, with the high-end market seeing a rapid surge in sales. Around 1 million luxury EVs will be sold in China by 2025, according to Bernstein analysts. Half of this total will be made up of sales from smaller EV players like Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto.
“China’s smart and electric vehicle market will enter the fast lane over the next 10 years, and the hand-to-hand fight between homegrown carmakers and overseas giants has started,” Citic Securities wrote in a note in July (our translation).
While many Wall Street analysts have taken bearish views of the field, Asia-based analysts are embracing the notion that young EV makers could co-exist with Tesla and even benefit from its China success. Nio and its peers collectively accounted for 14% of China’s EV sales in June, a significant rise from 7% a year ago, figures from the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) show.
Speed is the key to success for homegrown Tesla challengers to carve out a position in the market and avoid getting squeezed out by established automakers.
Bernstein expects that the pace of sales network expansion will be a “critical determinant” for Li Auto’s performance in the coming year. As of Sept. 30, the company currently has 35 retail stores in 30 cities, only a quarter of those of Nio and Xpeng.
Time is also short for Nio and Xpeng to scale charging service networks, which IHS Markit sees as one of Tesla’s early competitive advantages in encouraging consumers to go electric. Nio last month announced a RMB 100 million ($14.9 million) initiative to build 30,000 fast chargers over the next three years. Xpeng is also ramping up with its lifelong free charging for first-time owners program, which launched on Sept. 26.
As costly projects come to life, Chinese EV makers need to continually raise capital to keep funding their ambitions. Any gaps in financing could mean being left behind.
“The combined market cap of Nio, Xpeng, and Li Auto is $50 billion, far below Tesla’s $450 billion. There is still great room for (valuation) growth,” Chinese media in August reported citing Wang Sheng, deputy head of global investment banking at CICC. (our translation).
Updates: An earlier version of this article incorrectly compared the price of Tesla’s Chinese-made Model 3 to competing autos. Additionally, Li Auto has 35 retail stores as of Sept. 30 according to an announcement released earlier this month, not 30. This article was also updated to reflect a jump in Nio’s stock price shortly after publication.
]]>Nio will release a semi-autonomous technology that allows hands-free driving on urban highways to users in October, as Chinese electric vehicle makers ramp up efforts to combat Tesla’s Autopilot driver-assist system.
Called Navigate on Pilot (NOP), the technology will enable a Nio vehicle to drive from a highway’s on-ramp to off-ramp, merge lanes, and cruise on a highway following a route on the GPS navigation system, Nio said Saturday. It will be released via software update.
The company said that NOP would be the first assisted-driving function using high-definition maps on mass-produced vehicles in China, a practice that few automakers have adopted due to the government restrictions on foreign companies recording geographic information.
Speaking to Chinese media on Saturday during the Beijing Auto Show, CEO William Li said its test vehicles have driven more than 300,000 kilometers (around 186,400 miles) across 30 major cities collecting map data. He added NOP is more fine-tuned to Chinese traffic conditions compared with Tesla’s popular Navigate on Autopilot functionality.
Nio recently hired Ren Shaoqing, co-founder of Chinese self-driving startup Momenta, to enhance its R&D strength in vehicle autonomy. Momenta is currently one of the only 20 or so companies granted a mapping license by central authorities. Nio Capital, a private equity firm formed by the Chinese EV maker, led its $46 million Series B in 2017.
Meanwhile, the Tesla rival is reportedly considering building self-driving technologies in-house following the settlement of a $1 billion bailout, leaving the future of its partnership with Intel’s Mobileye uncertain. Chinese media reported that Nio recently reached an agreement with Qualcomm to test vehicles on its Snapdragon Ride computing platform, scheduled for mass production by 2023. Nio did not respond to a request for comment.
Automakers view high-precision mapping to be an essential component for smoothly functioning self-driving cars, helping sensor perception and path planning with more accurate localization. Tesla is an exception, however—CEO Elon Musk said that its vision-based system, which uses cameras and artificial intelligence, is easier to scale, reported The Verge.
Automakers have mostly resorted to mapping services to gain an advantage in the Chinese self-driving race. General Motors in July launched its hands-free assisted driving system Super Cruise in China by collaborating with Alibaba’s map service Amap, also known as Autonavi. Chinese media reported that the two companies have jointly mapped more than 300,000 kilometers of roads and will refresh map data via software updates every three months, citing a GM spokesperson.
Alibaba-backed Xpeng Motors expects to roll out its latest assisted-driving software, Xpilot 3.0, including a function called Navigation Guide Pilot (NGP), similar to Tesla’s NOA, in early 2021. Meituan-backed Li Auto is planning a similar launch as early as next year. Nio said it will roll out NOP with the version 2.7.0 update of its vehicle operating system Nio OS to users in October.
Nio’s current partner Mobileye last year made a push of its mapping technology Road Experience Management (REM) into China through a partnership with local chipmaker Tsinghua Unigroup. This was followed by an agreement with state-owned automaker SAIC, which will be the first Chinese OEM to provide driver-assisted functions with Mobileye’s mapping technology, according to an announcement released early this year.
Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly identified Nio’s self-driving function as “Navigation on Pilot.” It is “Navigate on Pilot.”
]]>Xpeng Motors said it has reached an agreement securing a $586 million round of financing from a state-owned investment company, as the Chinese electric vehicle maker pursues further expansion with plans to build its second plant.
Guangzhou GET Investment Holdings Co., Ltd, a subsidiary owned by the Guangzhou Economic and Technological Development Zone, part of the city’s municipal government, will inject RMB 4 billion (around $586 million) into Xpeng to fuel its growth, the company said Monday.
As part of the agreement, around RMB 1.3 billion from the financing will be spent on the construction of a manufacturing base, scheduled to kick off production by late 2022, within the development zone.
Xpeng has been mass-producing cars since the second quarter of this year in its first wholly-owned facility located in in Zhaoqing, a city neighboring Guangzhou, according to the SCMP. Previously, the company contracted production to Chinese OEM, Haima.
“With the strong support from the Guangzhou government, we are confident we will execute on our strategic growth initiatives and deliver the highest quality products and services to meet our customers’ needs,” Xpeng CEO He Xiaopeng said in an announcement.
Headquartered in Guangzhou, capital city of southern Guangdong province, Xpeng is accelerating expansion domestically as well as overseas. The company recently kicked off its global sales initiative with a shipment of 100 G3 crossovers destined for Norway. The vehicles will sell at a starting price of 358,000 Norwegian Krone ($37,590). Sales are expected to begin in November, with help from a local dealer.
The EV maker is also attempting to boost domestic sales by offering lifelong free charging, an offer which started Saturday, to individual buyers from 24 major cities, including Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen.
READ MORE: Xpeng, next up in wave of US IPOs, attracts big-name investors
The company plans to expand its free charging offer more than 60 cities by year-end and the number will more than triple to 200 by the first half of 2021. Xpeng is the first Chinese EV maker to offer free lifetime charging, limited to 3,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of charging credits annually, for first-time buyers.
Rival Chinese EV maker Nio has offered a free battery swap service for customers with their first cars, but recently capped the service at six free swaps per month to new owners.
Currently a top seller in the Chinese EV market, Tesla has been capricious with its free supercharging policy. The US EV maker reportedly offered two years of Supercharging for free a year ago in an aim to boost Model 3 deliveries, after it put an end to free unlimited supercharging in 2018, according to a TechCrunch report.
Xpeng has lagged other major EV players in the Chinese market, delivering a total of 4,099 vehicles for the first seven months of this year. Nio handed over 17,702 vehicles to customers during the same period, followed by Li Auto at 12,181 units. Tesla currently dominates the Chinese EV market with 56,762 Model 3 sold during the same period, according to figures from China Passenger Car Association.
]]>For the past two years, ride hailing giant Didi Chuxing has laid low, waiting out a storm of public outrage that followed incidents when two female passengers who used the platform were killed by their drivers.
Now, the days of biding its time are over. The company has launched a slew of new brands and continued its push abroad, going up against Uber in more markets (and entering Russia).
Didi also recently restructured, creating a maze of sub-brands that cover diverse consumer groups in higher- and lower- tier cities across China, most notably launching a low-cost ride hailing service and rebranding its taxi-hailing app.
Since spring, the company has even made a foray into logistics and grocery delivery, in a bid to provide a range of mobility services within a mega ecosystem.
So what prompted this sudden flurry of activity?
Bottom line: Didi, the world’s second biggest tech unicorn, has a problem: growth in China’s ride-hailing market has plateaued, while the company faces price competition from dozens of well-funded smaller rivals willing to subsidize rides. With the company looking forward to a much-rumored IPO, it needs new sources of growth to justify its $56 billion valuation.
After years of double-digit growth, China’s ride-hailing market expanded an anemic 3.42% in 2019, according to figures from China Internet Network Information Center, partly due to a government crackdown on unlicensed drivers.
Didi, China’s largest ride-hailing platform, has been affected. Ride volume fluctuated between 20 and 30 million trips per day from 2017 to 2019, an unnamed Didi investor told Caixin (in Chinese), and reportedly fell to a nadir of 5 million during the Covid-19 outbreak.
However, there are positive signs for the company. In June, Didi said that its ride-hailing business had returned to its pre-pandemic level, still far off its three-year target of 100 million daily orders. The company set a new daily record last month—CEO Cheng Wei announced that total volume surpassed 50 million on Aug. 25, China’s Valentine’s Day.
After years of losses, the company’s ride-hailing business also recently turned a profit for the first time, Didi President Jean Liu said in May.
Didi is a clear winner in China’s ride-hailing market, controlling more than 80% of the market since its 2016 merger with Uber China, but it faces challenges at home.
The company has little control over the price of rides, since it competes with dozens of small players, mostly backed by tech giants and legacy automakers. Many offer generous subsidies to users, including occasional free rides.
Even network effects don’t give Didi as much of an edge as you might think, since apps including Alibaba map service Autonavi, Baidu Map, and Didi’s old rival Meituan all offer ride-hailing aggregation services, leveling the playing field between the giant and its Lilliputian rivals. Earlier this week, Didi entered a partnership with Chinese tech behemoth Tencent, a long-time backer.
Didi’s troubles have also been compounded by increasingly tight rules over hiring after the high-profile murders, leading to a significant shortage of drivers able to operate on its platform.
Nevertheless, there is still a huge space for growth in China’s ride-hailing market. More than 90% of Chinese passengers hail a cab on the streets rather than through ride-hailing apps, according to Didi (in Chinese). Didi currently facilitates 3 million taxi rides each day, just 6% of the country’s daily taxi trips, Latepost reported.
In a bid to capture more of China’s rides, Didi launched a new budget ride-hailing app earlier this year, and rebranded its licensed taxi service to meet varying demands from users in higher- and lower-tier cities across China.
Budget rides: Huaxiaozhu (which literally translates to “flower piglet”) targets users from lower-tier cities with cheap rides. The platform offers cheaper rides than Didi’s core service, and includes gamified social features.
Licensing questions: The pig has been forced to suspend services a dozen cities over a pretty basic issue: regulators say it hasn’t got a license to offer rides, according to multiple Chinese media reports.
Kuaidi New Taxi: Aside from ride-hailing, Didi also rebranded taxi-hailing service Kuaidi New Taxi, and reshuffled to spin off its taxi business unit from its ride-sharing group, with the head reporting directly to CEO Cheng Wei. The move appears to be part of preparation to monetize the service. Currently, Didi offers government-backed taxi-fleets commission free traffic.
Ride-hailing platforms have low penetration in China’s lower-tier cities, and residents in these areas are more accustomed to hailing a taxi on the street than through an app. Not everyone welcomes disruptive innovation—Didi’s success depends on whether it can navigate regulators’ demands in these areas in order to avoid its services being suspended.
In its hunt for growth, Didi has also dived into China’s grocery delivery industry, and started deploying delivery vans in cities around the country.
The company has taken the same approach it has consistently used for ride hailing–offering heavy subsidies to users and drivers to crack the market open. But in these new industries, Didi, a leviathan in ride-hailing, is a small fish.
The company faces relentless competition from dominant companies including Meituan, China’s mega-lifestyle platform, and Kuaigou Dache, the logistics arm of Chinese online classifieds marketplace 58.com.
Delivery vans: In May, Didi started hiring van drivers in the eastern city of Hangzhou and Chengdu, capital of the southwestern Sichuan province. The service targets urban people who are moving homes and businesses that need commercial deliveries. Didi began offering drivers commission-free use of the platform for thirty days.
Delivering essentials: Didi has vied for a piece of the country’s food delivery market since 2018, when it launched Didi Waimai. That service was eventually suspended after a protracted price war with Meituan. Now, Didi is trying again.
Didi has sought to overhaul its app by adding a raft of new services in an ambitious bid to make it an all-in-one app for various mobility demands. But Didi’s approach has been met with skepticism. Industry insiders question whether subsidies can work in a market like intra-city delivery, where users place orders less frequently than hailing a cab.
Third, Didi has stepped up efforts to expand its international footprint, intensifying competition with US rival Uber. Didi so far operates in nine countries including Brazil, Mexico, Australia, and Japan—all of which Uber is already established in. Uber has already pushed its way into 65 nations around the globe, and more than 40% of the US company’s revenue now comes from international markets.
Having seen mixed results across countries, the company is promising a fivefold increase in overseas order volume over the next three years—requiring massive investments to scale.
Betting on new markets: In its fight with Uber, Didi has sought out key markets to drive its expansion. Latin America is expected to be a battleground for ride-hailing platforms, as a populous area without anefficient public transit systems. Market research company Statista estimates the ride-sharing revenue of the region will surpass $1 billion by 2023.
As it heads for an IPO, Didi aims to challenge Uber as the world leader of transportation by expanding in the overseas market. While the company boasts a more tailored approach to individual countries than Uber, it faces regulations as varied as the counties in which it operates. As its home market slows, its global business is expected to drive growth.
Didi has ruled China’s ride-hailing market for years, but has never enjoyed a secure position in its home market, as a result of challenges from numerous smaller players. Now, the company faces its biggest trial yet—justifying a valuation of at least $56 billion ahead of a much-anticipated IPO, while competing with Uber for dominance in the global ride-hailing market.
Didi said it is encouraged by its “strong results so far and remains confident” about achieving its three-year target. “Globally, we see definitely more demand for affordable, safer, and more diversified on-demand services post-COVID,” a spokesperson said.
Didi will likely further expand its dominance in China’s mobility market—but the cost will be huge. As mobility services continue to grapple with the lingering effects of the post-Covid-19 era, Didi could face more bumps on its road toward capital markets.
Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly cited figures from Chinese media relating to the number of van drivers Didi hired at the launch of its intra-city logistics service. Additionally, the story misquoted a Didi spokesperson regarding order volume on the company’s home delivery service.
]]>Chinese electric vehicle maker Li Auto on Tuesday said it will partner with Nvidia Corp to provide its next-generation SUV with a chipset and software platform that can be used for self-driving functions.
Why it matters: The partnership is the latest in a series of Li Auto’s efforts to develop its own autonomous driving capabilities to catch up in a race led by Tesla.
Details: Li Auto is teaming up with Nvidia and its Chinese partner Desay SV Automotive to develop a self-driving platform based on the Orin chipset and software stack for its next large-sized premium SUV which will launch in 2022, the companies announced Tuesday.
Context: After big cash injections from US stock markets, young Chinese EV makers are speeding up efforts to close the gap with Tesla.
Electric vehicle maker WM Motor said it has completed a Series D worth RMB 10 billion (around $1.5 billion), the biggest round of funding closed by a Chinese EV startup.
Why it matters: The investment is co-led by a group of capital funds owned by the Shanghai municipal government including China’s biggest automaker, SAIC. It brings WM Motor’s total funding to more than RMB 33 billion.
Details: Apart from the Shanghai government funds and state-owned SAIC, other investors include Chinese internet giant Baidu, SIG Asia Investments, and a number of equity firms owned by regional governments, including those of central Hubei province as well as eastern Jiangsu and Anhui provinces, WM Motor said Tuesday.
Context: Founded in 2015 by Volvo China’s former chairman Freeman Shen, WM Motor in 2019 delivered 16,876 units of its first production model, the EX5. The entry-level crossover has a starting price of RMB 146,800. Nio delivered 20,565 units in 2019.
China’s biggest search engine Baidu has transported more than 100,000 passengers in autonomous vehicles as part of a robotaxi pilot program, and the number will “soon surge to” more than 1 million, CEO Robin Li said.
Why it matters: Accelerating passenger numbers for Baidu’s self-driving pilot underscore China’s growing efforts to win the global autonomous vehicle (AV) race. It also signals that the Chinese government is lifting restrictions on driverless vehicle tests across the country.
Details: More than 100,000 riders have tried out Baidu’s autonomous ride-hailing service in cities such as Beijing and nearby Cangzhou, as well as Changsha in central Hunan province, and southwestern municipality Chongqing, Li said on Tuesday during the annual Baidu World 2020 technology conference.
Context: Baidu is not the only company in China testing AVs without a trained driver behind the wheel. Weride, a self-driving startup backed by Nissan, Renault, and Mitsubishi, has been testing 10 AVs without a human driver present in the southern city of Guangzhou for two months. Weride earlier this month announced its robotaxi pilot has completed upwards of 90,000 rides.
Chinese tech giant Tencent and ride-hailing platform Didi Chuxing will join a $516 million investment into an electric vehicle business belonging to the country’s biggest property developer, Evergrande Group.
Why it matters: By forging an alliance with tech giants and prominent venture funds, Evergrande is gradually becoming a contender in China’s crowded EV market.
Details: China Evergrande New Energy Vehicle Group, the EV unit of the property developer, said on Tuesday that it aims to raise around HK$4 billion (around $516 million) in a private placement of shares from at least six investors including Tencent and Didi.
Context: Evergrande marched into the automotive industry in mid-2018 with a $2 billion investment plan in the once-promising EV startup Faraday Future. The two companies soon fell into a dispute later that year before ultimately dropping litigation against one another in early 2019.
As it evolves into a demand-driven model, China’s electric vehicle market could regain its ranking as the world’s largest in 2021 after likely losing the crown to Europe this year, an auto association executive said on Tuesday.
The slowdown in EV sales this year will be temporary, a result of reduced purchase subsidies as well as extended production quota mandates, Cui Dongshu, secretary general of China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) said at a briefing.
CPCA said that sales for China’s new energy vehicle (NEV) industry—including all electrics and plug-in hybrids—will fall 17% annually to 1 million units this year. NEV sales in Europe for 2020 through July modestly exceeded those of China, the world’s top market since 2015, Bloomberg reported.
Experts say strong growth in the European market is largely driven by generous government rebates, thus the market bears little comparison to China’s, which is shifting from a state-controlled to demand-driven market with the phasing out of subsidies.
The pandemic has also dealt a significant blow to China’s market. Automakers have been hit hard, and as a result have slowed the expansion of their EV portfolios. The central government in June updated mandated production quotas to give automakers one more year to meet their NEV production targets for the three years until 2021.
Global automakers partnered with Chinese companies are “not fully prepared” to release new EV models to the country’s market, but the pace will accelerate next year, Cai said (our translation). NEV sales only account for about 2% of total car sales for overseas automakers partnered locally, which does not meet requirements set by the Chinese government, according to Cui.
Meanwhile, European countries are playing catch-up with generous subsidies to fulfill their goals to sell only zero-emission cars by the next decade. Germany in June announced a sweeping €130 billion incentive package, including doubling its subsidy of €6,000 ($6,700) for EVs costing up to €40,000. Subsidies for EVs below €45,000 in France were also increased slightly to €7,000.
“To drive an early market, the importance of incentives to overcome the affordability barrier is key,” David Wong, senior manager at the Society of Motor Manufacturers & Traders (SMMT), a UK’s automotive industry body, said on Thursday at London Tech Week.
Meanwhile, the UK is ramping up legislation supportive of recharging infrastructure, which Wong believes will “give a shot in the arm” to the country’s EV uptake.
Following an £1.5 million ($1.9 million) reward to two charging point projects, Wong said that the UK is planning to launch regulations to facilitate the “smart” charging market, including technical requirements for chargers. The government is also seeking to pass laws that require all new homes in England to be fitted with charging points.
Wong expects these moves to help convince people to switch to EVs and drive the market uptake. So far each rapid charger in the UK is shared by as many as 56 EV owners, whereas that number in China is 16, according to Wong.
China’s passenger EV sales rebounded 43% year on year to more than 100,000 units in August, representing the second consecutive monthly increase after a prolonged market slump which lasted an entire year. CPCA said Chinese EV makers have been increasingly recognized by customers especially in the premium segment, and that Beijing’s recent push to build battery swap infrastructure in major cities would be a big boost to EV uptake.
]]>Ye Jieping, the head of Didi Chuxing’s artificial intelligence research team, is stepping down after five years in the role as the Chinese ride-hailing platform sharpens focus on sustainable growth and profitability.
Why it matters: Ye is the latest in a series of departures from Didi this year. The country’s biggest ride-share app is streamlining its businesses to focus on revenue growth and efficiency, and scaling back on non-core projects.
Details: Didi chief technology officer Zhang Bo is taking over to lead AI Labs, a team of around 200 scientists and engineers, from departing director Ye, Chinese media reported Monday citing people familiar to the matter.
Contexts: Rumors linked Ye’s departure with the recent shift in positioning AI Labs as engineering-driven rather than research-led. Previously, the company’s new growth goals for the next three years triggered a series of management departures.
This week, I looked at battery swap technology for TechNode’s Drive I/O newsletter. Two Chinese electric vehicle (EV) companies, Nio and BAIC, are betting big on cars with batteries you can change instead of charging. It’s an ambitious idea—it could solve some of the EV industry’s biggest problems, but there’s no guarantee it’ll work in the market.
READ MORE: Drive I/O | Big bets on battery swap
I wanted to know what drivers think of battery swap, so I visited a Nio swap station in the west Shanghai. As you can see in our video below, the swap process is pretty fast—a little more involved than refuelling a gas car, but faster than changing a tire at the mechanic.
The Chinese Tesla challenger has seen some initial success, completing over 800,000 battery swaps with a nationwide chain of 143 service stations for car owners. The company recently doubled down, establishing a RMB 800 million ($117 million) battery asset management joint venture with several partners, reported SCMP, and plans to build 50 more swap stations next year.
Located in an understated residential area in west Shanghai, the swap station is far less flashy than you would expect.
The facility doesn’t look new and shiny, unlike some of Tesla’s spacious supercharging stations in China’s first-tier cities, but it seems to get the job done. We saw five Nio vehicles pull into the station during our 40-minute stay. Here’s what we found out while we were there.
We spoke to three Nio owners, and all said they own more than one car. All three said they usually drive their ES6 crossovers for daily use.
For years, batteries have been a big turn off for prospective EV owners. They drive up the cost of the cars, making them more expensive than gas autos—and then these costly batteries wear out faster than the rest of the car, causing EVs to lose value faster than gas cars.
On top of that, they’re inconvenient. If you don’t have a special charging pile, it can take 12 hours to charge a car. And many car owners in China’s major cities don’t even have parking at home—let alone a private charging pile. Home charging installations are even strictly forbidden in some old, congested residential communities due to limited parking and power capacity.
Now, two Chinese companies believe they can sidestep these issues with a simple solution: instead of charging batteries, just change them. Think remote control, not iphone.
Other companies have tried before, but battery swap isn’t easy. Companies including Tesla have looked at the scale needed to make the system work, and given up. Automakers, battery suppliers, and service operators need to work together to standardize battery design and swap services.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s monthly newsletter on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode Squared members.
BAIC, a legacy carmaker with a manufacturing partnership with Dailmer, went first. It says it’s the world’s first operator of a commercial battery swap service for taxi drivers, with a network of around 200 swap stations across China.
Meanwhile, Nio is trying a newly-legal model: consumer-facing Battery-as-a Service (BaaS). Under this model, the customer buys a car and then rents a battery to go with it. The company says it can slash the sticker price by a fifth for battery-less cars.
The two carmakers will have to overcome serious challenges—and deploy serious capital—to make the model work, but their swap efforts have one big advantage over previous attempts: support from China’s powerful EV regulators.
In theory, battery swap addresses the biggest problems with EVs:
Despite its advantages, many industry analysts doubt that a battery swap service can work at scale. Companies that have attempted to launch battery swap initiatives in the past have failed dismally.
Tesla quietly closed its pilot project three years after opening its only battery swap station in 2013. Meanwhile, Israeli startup Better Place filed for bankruptcy in 2013, partly due to its ambitious plan to build a nationwide chain of expensive pit stops.
Some of these problems could be easier for fleet-focused companies like BAIC. Scale, and standardization are easier to achieve for taxis, because they deploy thousands of the same car at once.
Since 2009, China has aimed to be at the forefront of global EV adoption. Slowing sales after the government cut purchase subsidies last year and concerns over the range of existing EVs has led Beijing to get interested in battery swap.
The government has pushed an array of policy changes to support battery swap, likely hoping it will help to sell EVs after the country reported its first-ever annual decline in new energy vehicle sales last year.
Legalizing battery-free cars: By far the biggest policy development is a change in regulations allowing EV makers to sell cars without batteries, reversing an eight-year-old rule that required NEVs to come with a battery. This move allows Nio, the only adopter so far, to slash sticker prices.
Incentives: The government also stepped up its support for battery swap initiatives by offering favorable treatment for EVs with swappable batteries. In April, Beijing cut NEV subsidies by 10%, while premium models priced RMB 300,000 and above have also been excluded from a two-year tax exemption and purchase subsidies. However, cars whose batteries can be replaced were exempted, giving them a price advantage.
On equal footing: But the central government stressed in July 2019 that it’s not against non-swappable EVs. Chinese media Caixin reported that there isn’t a plan to force battery swapping, and that the government plans to let the market make the choice, citing MIIT deputy director Luo Junjie.
Nio takes the consumer market: Nio was the first Chinese company to risk a consumer-facing battery swap business. The EV maker in August drastically revamped its service by allowing users to buy a vehicle without a battery, dramatically reducing costs.
Consumers who buy a Nio ES6 crossover, with an original price of RMB 358,000 and above, now get a 20% discount (around RMB 70,000) if they forego owning a battery and subscribe to Nio’s battery rental service.
TechNode visited a Nio battery swap station in Shanghai and spoke with Nio owners—read the accompanying story for their comments on the service and a short video of battery swap in action.
Nio’s battery swap stations appear to be relatively popular. During a visit to one of these stations in Shanghai, TechNode saw five batteries changed in 40 minutes. Three Nio owners at the facility said that they use the service at least five times a month, with one adding that they save him up to RMB 10,000 a year in electricity.
BJEV, the EV unit of BAIC, was the first big player in swap. With a strong presence in the commercial fleet segment, BJEV currently runs a network of 187 battery swap stations in 19 cities around China for its fleet of 18,000 taxis. The company plans to invest RMB 1.2 billion to build 82 new battery swap stations, while looking for partners for further expansion, according to a private placement plan (in Chinese) released last month.
Rest of the pack: China’s biggest automaker SAIC jumped into the market following policy changes, with plans to launch two EV models with swappable batteries for the first time, according to a document released by the MIIT on Aug. 25. Meanwhile, Volvo parent company Geely registered a new trademark for battery swap services in April, and is on track to release an EV model with a replaceable battery later this year.
Beijing doesn’t see swaps as a replacement for charge batteries. Rather, battery swap is poised to act as a stopgap in China’s transition from gas-driven cars to green transportation.
Nio sees battery swapping as complementary to charging, assuming that swap users will also regularly charge their batteries. Each swap station contains only five batteries, said Nio’s William Li during a media briefing in August. Currently, 60% of Nio owners have used the company’s battery replacement services, of whom half swap packs twice per month, and the other half more than twice a month, Li added.
But the company hopes swap will bring in customers who don’t have good access to chargers at home, and reduce losses. CICC analysts say the initiative will narrow the company’s annual loss by RMB 130 million to RMB 4.4 billion over the next year by increasing sales and bringing in revenue by selling battery packs to its joint venture with CATL.
Recycling profits: Meanwhile, both BJEV and Nio have designs to leverage battery swap into a much larger market: energy storage for the national grid.
Providing services will leave both companies with a pile of worn-out batteries—most are retired from car use when they can hold only 80% of their original charge. These 80% batteries are still valuable in an application where you don’t care much about charge per weight—say, providing energy storage to solar farms. Providing reserve energy capacity for public usage with recycled batteries would be more cost-effective and create a second revenue stream with the ownership of used batteries, consultancy McKinsey wrote last year.
A BJEV executive reportedly estimates to expand this emerging business as early as next year, when the first batch of EV batteries on Chinese roads are about to retire. The legacy automaker has deployed a taxi fleet of over 18,000 EVs with swappable batteries in nearly 20 Chinese domestic cities as of May and plans to sell 30,000 more by the end of this year, a company executive told Chinese media.
A big bet: Battery swapping might not be consumers’ first choice for the next several years. But the business is starting to boom as the government jumps behind the technology. For local players, battery swap could be a cash strain for a long time to come, but the technology also paves the way for China’s rebound in EV uptake.
Correction/update: An earlier version of this article, sent as an e-mail, newsletter inaccurately reported BJEV and Nio’s relative sales of swappable EVs and the release date of Nio’s battery rental offering. The article was also updated on Sept. 3 to include comment from Nio on its battery swap business.
]]>Shares for Chinese electric vehicle maker Xpeng Motors climbed more than 40% in its $1.5 billion debut on the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday.
Why it matters: Xpeng’s wild first day of trading reflects a growing demand for EV stocks, as investors become increasingly bullish on Chinese new energy vehicles. However, some analysts warned about the potential for an EV bubble.
Details: The six-year-old EV maker now has a market capitalization of nearly $15 billion, nearing the size of a number of giant Chinese automakers, including Toyota’s Chinese partner GAC Group and BMW’s partner, Great Wall Motor.
Context: Unlike its counterparts, Xpeng lays claim to a strong capability in developing self-driving technology, positioning its automated driving system Xpilot head-to-head with Tesla’s Autopilot.
China’s biggest ride-hailing platform Didi Chuxing said on Tuesday that it has launched ride-hailing services in the Tatarstan Republic, part of the Russian Federation, as it resumes its global expansion following the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Why it matters: This marks Didi’s first expansion into the European market after concentrating global expansion efforts in South America over the past three years. Overseas expansion is a key driver for its business growth given slowing momentum in its domestic market.
Details: Didi has launched a ride-hailing service in Kazan, the capital city of the Tatarstan Republic, through partnerships with local commercial fleets and hiring self-employed drivers, a company spokeswoman said on Wednesday.
Context: Didi is accelerating its overseas expansion. The company set ambitious global targets including 100 million daily trips and 800 million monthly active users as part of its three-year growth plan.
Updated: The story was updated on Aug. 28 to include Didi’s response on the commission rate and comments from Anatoly Smorgonskiy of Gett and Viktor Dima of Aton.
]]>Despite what you may have heard, bike rental is not dead.
The great Chinese bike sharing bubble popped a long time ago. Like a horde of syphilitic conquistadors, some 80 startups (including two unicorns) charged into the jungle in search of a city of bike-share gold, challenging the dominance of the car and bringing mobs of bikes back to China’s major cities. Few ever emerged, and those that did are mostly known by new names.
They got greedy, fighting price wars and spending user deposits on operations, and it brought them down. Ofo, of the yellow bikes, collapsed in a blaze of lost deposits, with CEO Dai Wei placed on a consumption blacklist that prevented him from traveling by train or buying cars. The next two players, Mobike (in orange) and Bluegogo (blue), exited with sales to tech giants Meituan and Didi Chuxing.
But under the wing of deep-pocketed giants, share biking is very much alive. It’s not the Wild West anymore—the sidewalk-blocking piles of bikes are rare, prices are a little higher, and there are rules about parking—but in a major city there’s almost always a bike available. Could this be—wonders—a sustainable industry?
Bottom line: No one ever found El Dorado, but it looks like bike rental is close to breaking even. The three remaining dominant players—Ant Group-backed Hellobike, ride-hailing service Didi’s Qingju, and lifestyle services giant Meituan’s Meituan Bike—have survived the bust by raising prices and looking for ways to develop sustainable businesses.
It was 2016, and bike rental was booming. Startups piled into the market, and by the end of the year, nearly 30 companies had set up shop. Investors followed, and almost overnight, millions of bicycles appeared on sidewalks across China.
At its peak, 80 companies operated around China. In 2018 the industry was worth RMB 17.8 billion ($2.58 billion), up from RMB 1.2 billion in 2016, according to data from Equalocean. But the bubble popped as quickly as it grew.
Consolidation begins: Mounting regulation and costs started to take a toll, and companies began to drop like flies. Ofo, once the darling of the industry, saw its cash reserves dwindle amid mounting lawsuits and a run on deposits.
Now, just three companies dominate the sector—Hellobike, Didi’s Qingju (or Orange), and Meituan Bike.
Two of the three—Qingju and Meituan Bike—are run by companies with deep pockets. Hellobike is backed by Ant Group, the world’s largest fintech company. Their focus has shifted from hyperscaling to profitability.
Attempts at profit: For the first time in the industry’s history, companies are talking seriously about bike rental turning a profit. Hellobike, China’s biggest bike-rental firm, said in September (in Chinese) last year that it was profitable in 200 cities across China. The company claimed 400 million cumulative registrations as of July.
Varying approaches: Platforms have sought novel ways to eke out profits and reduce losses. Hellobike, Meituan, and Qingju charge riders who park bicycles in unpopular places extra to reduce the costs of collecting them. A slew of other fees also exist, including for bikes parked outside designated parking areas.
Appeasing the powers that be: With increasingly strict rules, navigating government regulations aimed at reducing bikes cluttering city walks has become increasingly important.
Increased confidence: As surviving companies learn from the mistakes of their predecessors, confidence among investors has shown signs of rebounding. In April, Didi’s Qingju reportedly raised a whopping $1 billion from Lenovo-backed investment firm Legend Capital and an unnamed international venture capital firm.
China’s bike rental saga is a familiar story. A new field opens up, pundits declare it to be the future, dozens of startups start and investors overheat the sector. Pretty soon, the fire runs out of oxygen and burns out. Finally, tech giants step in to create something modest and sustainable from the ashes.
]]>Xpeng Motors is priming for a public listing in New York where it could raise up to $1.1 billion from a number of high-profile backers, including Chinese technology giants Alibaba and Xiaomi.
Why it matters: Xpeng’s listing is timed to benefit from strong investor appetite for electric vehicle stocks, a spillover effect from Tesla’s massive run this year as it ramped up production of China-made Model 3 sedans.
Details: Xpeng Motors is offering 85 million American depositary shares (ADS) at $11 to $13 each, according to a Friday filing to the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The company said each share will represent two Class A ordinary shares.
Context: Guangzhou-based Xpeng Motors is currently the only new EV maker that has delivered both electric sedan and SUV models to customers in China.
The head of Tesla China urged employees to speak up in defense of the company on social networks amid a public spat with online marketplace Pinduoduo over a discounted Model 3 group-buy purchase.
Why it matters: Tesla’s reputation in China for poor treatment of its customers and arrogant business practices is growing as a result of the public squabble. Pinduoduo’s circumvention of Tesla’s restrictive direct-sales only channel meanwhile threatens to open the door to other third parties looking to gain from the brand’s strong consumer demand.
Details: Zhu Xiaotong, Tesla’s global vice president and the top boss in China, on Monday called for employees to speak up and defend Tesla’s direct sales retail model in cyberspace, Chinese media reported citing persons close to the company.
Context: Along with Chinese car dealer Yiauto, Pinduoduo in July began promoting a group buy flash sale, offering five randomly selected buyers the chance to purchase a Tesla Model 3 at a discount of RMB 40,000 ($5,770), if 10,000 people signed up for the campaign.
Tusimple, a Chinese self-driving startup backed by delivery giant UPS, is reportedly seeking a US listing as early as the beginning of 2021.
Why it matters: If Tusimple does successfully go public in the US, it would be the first self-driving company in the world to do so on a major financial market. The initial public offering (IPO) could also blaze a trail for peers in need of capital.
Details: Based on both Beijing and San Diego, Tusimple is planning to file IPO paperwork for a US IPO in the first quarter of 2021 at a valuation between $3.5 billion and $7 billion, Chinese media reported citing persons familiar with the matter.
Context: Chinese automakers and AV startups have also been experimenting with autonomous trucks in a number of domestic cities in bid to cut labor and fuel costs, but have made slow progress because of testing restrictions.
Vehicle fires involving electric cars from Xpeng and Li Auto are sparking quality concerns a year after a series of blazes involving Tesla and Nio cars drew widespread media attention.
Why it matters: The incidents come just as Xpeng Motors and Li Auto debut on US stock markets, highlighting issues around EV quality control.
Details: An Xpeng G3 crossover caught fire in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou on Tuesday, Xpeng Motors reported on microblogging platform Weibo. Local firefighters extinguished the blaze and there were no injuries.
Context: Xpeng is the latest in a number of Chinese EV makers which have filed for a US initial public offering, following rivals Nio and Li Auto. The Alibaba-backed company is looking to build up its war chest amid a stiffer competition in its home market thanks to Tesla.
Shares for Chinese electric vehicle maker Nio fell 8.6% on Tuesday after the company posted better-than-expected gross profits for the second quarter amid concerns over the long-term scalability of its ambitious battery-swap program.
These second-quarter financial results are an important milestone for Nio, which, for the first time reported a positive vehicle margin of 9.7%, nearly double the 5% company management had guided.
Nio attributed the improvement primarily to a record number of deliveries during the quarter, during which it handed over 10,331 vehicles to customers in the three months ended June 30. Total revenues jumped 146% year on year to RMB 3.7 billion ($526.4 million), beating analyst estimates of RMB 3.49 billion. Losses attributable to shareholders meanwhile narrowed 63.6% year on year to RMB 1.13 billion ($160.1 million).
The margin improvement owed much to a significant cost reduction in battery packs, among other materials. Nio now enjoys a much lower purchase price for battery packs from its supplier, CATL. It now pays RMB 0.8 per watt-hour (Wh) compared with an earlier rate of over RMB 1 Wh, Chinese media reported citing persons familiar with the matter. The six-year-old EV maker became CATL’s biggest battery client in the passenger vehicle segment during the first half of this year, according to figures from Chinese consulting firm GGII.
Nio said it has achieved “profound progress” in its plans for a “Battery-as-a-Service” (BaaS) offering, in which a battery rental service will be sold separately from cars. CEO William Li said Tuesday during the earnings call that it was in the final stages of preparing to launch its BaaS solution offering in the third quarter. All the necessary validation procedures with the government have been completed, he said.
Beijing has traditionally required automakers include a battery pack with each new energy vehicle sold, but the restrictions are now being lifted. A government announcement (in Chinese) last month revealed that Nio will be allowed to sell the EC6, its third mass production model, without a battery.
“We believe this is going to be a very good boost to our vehicle sales… and help us with the gross margin,” Li said. Nio expects a battery-leasing program to considerably lower the price of a Nio-branded premium crossover by one third to around RMB 258,000, for example, when renting a battery pack for daily use.
The Chinese Tesla challenger is betting heavily on battery-swapping technology as part of its broader BaaS strategy, which it hopes will resolve consumer range anxiety and effectively remove the issue as a barrier for EV adoption. The company now has a network of 142 battery swap stations in 63 Chinese cities, and is rapidly expanding the swap infrastructure by opening one station on average per week, Li said last month at a company event.
However, multiple industry people TechNode recently spoke with have expressed doubts about the scalability of such battery replacement service, given a constantly evolving vehicle driving range and the ever-shortening EV recharge time. The difficulty in reaching a shared battery standard among multiple automakers is another hurdle, making battery swap a less economical solution for EVs over the long term, UBS analyst Paul Gong said in June during an online conference.
Nio said that it recently completed 750,000 battery swaps nationwide, highlighting growing adoption from its vehicle owners. It also boasted that each battery replacement took just three minutes, far faster than even the average 15 minute charge time at a Tesla V3 supercharger.
Nio is forging an alliance with giant industry players to minimize its financial burden in the swappable battery program. Li on Tuesday revealed plans to form a battery asset management company with multiple partners, in which Nio will hold a minority stake. The joint business is scheduled to open this month, which CATL reportedly (in Chinese) intends to invest in.
]]>Founded by a titan in China’s entrepreneurial community and backed by a battle-hardened internet billionaire, on July 30 Li Auto became the second Chinese new energy vehicle (NEV) maker to list on an American stock market after its $1.1 billion Nasdaq IPO.
However, until recently, little was known about the five-year-old company. The EV maker has kept a relatively low profile compared to its peers. Li Auto knows it doesn’t have to be well-known internationally—it’s already found its sweet spot in China, the world’s largest auto market.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s monthly newsletter on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode Squared members.
The company’s strategy is uniquely low-key. Instead of pursuing fully electric vehicles, Li Auto is focused on plug-in hybrid vehicle technology. It hopes this will calm customers’ anxiety over vehicle range and reduce the high cost of EV ownership in China.
While competitors Nio and Xpeng have modeled their tactics after Tesla’s flashy approach, Li Auto has fashioned itself in Toyota’s image. It has applied the Japanese automaker’s cost-cutting strategies to the premium vehicle market.
But investors are concerned about the long-term prospects of a company that is built on the technology that drives hybrid electric cars: They are uncertain whether Li Auto can effectively transition into competitive zero-emission electric vehicles.
So far, Li Auto’s approach has paid off. The company delivered 10,000 vehicles—an oft-celebrated figure among the small EV makers—faster than any of its Chinese rivals. It was also the first Chinese EV maker to report a positive quarterly gross margin in the first quarter of 2020, while Nio was still in the red.
Li Auto still has several hurdles to overcome—and the clock is ticking. Its all-electric competitors are lowering prices, and the government is working to provide them with an extensive charging network.
While loss-making rivals jumped into the deep end with pure electric vehicles, Li Auto took a more conservative approach. Dubbed extended-range electric vehicles (EREVs), the cars it markets can be charged by a gas engine when the battery is low. Unlike conventional plug-in hybrids (PHEVs), which use both electric and gas-driven motors in tandem for power, EREVs are always driven by electric motors.
The cornerstone of Li Auto’s approach to its business is cutting costs, just like Toyota. The company aims to bring Toyota’s approach to manufacturing premium SUVs.
In a post on popular messaging app Wechat in June, Li Auto founder Li Xiang described some of the company’s cost control measures when commenting on rival EV maker Byton’s recent collapse.
Despite success in keeping costs low, Li Auto has a long way to go if it wants to build China’s Toyota. The Japanese legacy carmaker is known for making reliable cars. Li Auto has limited experience in vehicle development—and has faced multiple complaints about the quality of its cars.
Li Auto CEO Li Xiang is no stranger to entrepreneurship. In fact, the EV maker is not the first company he’s taken public. In 2005, Li founded Autohome, a recognized Chinese auto portal that listed on the New York Stock Exchange eight years later. The company now has a market cap of around $10 billion, nearly 10 times that of close rival Bit Auto.
As investors’ enthusiasm for Tesla has spilled over to other companies in the industry, Li Auto stock looks even more appealing than its peers. The company’s second-quarter financial details showed a double-digit gross margin of 13.3% and a 128% quarter-on-quarter growth in deliveries. But Li Auto is far from a safe bet.
It is plausible that extended-range technology is a pragmatic solution to key bottlenecks in EV adoption. But there are risks. As the affordability of EVs improves and more charging stations are rolled out, Li Auto will need to scale up fast in order to survive a shakeout in the industry—one that has already taken its toll on dozens of EV startups in China.
Li Xiang in April said he believed the company could achieve profitability with just another $1 billion funding injection. However, the narrow window for EREV technology is closing, fast.
]]>Electric vehicle (EV) startup Xpeng has raised an additional $300 million as part of the company’s Series C+, bringing the total amount raised in the round to $800 million.
Why it matters: The deal reflects growing optimism in China’s electric vehicle market after a disappointing second half of 2019. Sales of electric cars plummeted after China’s government cut purchase subsidies by around 50% in mid-2019.
Details: Based in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou, Xpeng is raising an additional $300 million from new investors including the Qatar Investment Authority, the Middle Eastern nation’s sovereign wealth fund, Reuters reported, citing sources. E-commerce giant Alibaba also contributed to the expanded fundraising, according to CNBC.
Context: US EV maker Tesla has boosted investor sentiment in China’s EV sector, as a result of the company’s strong deliveries and an expected surge in profits.
Who’d have thought the app of apps, the one that defines 2020 in China would be web-based? Now in most Chinese cities, QR code-scan checkpoints are at the entrances of just about everywhere you go. There’s no getting through an ordinary day in China without filling in your information and travel history to get a green code.
Alibaba pioneered the health code idea and implemented it in Hangzhou—where its headquarters is based—on Feb. 11. Luckily, based on TechNode’s findings, it seems like the health code system won’t collect more information than what Facebook can get from you. The new normal is quite easy, with only an extra scan.
There’s a million reasons to hate Wechat: it limits your individual conversations and its group chat system is a mess, the Moments news feed is full of braggarts and fake news. Worst of all, since everyone uses it to chat with both friends and colleagues, it upsets the work-life balance. And don’t forget how it “helps” at work, like when it removes the shared file you want after just a few days without notice, or when you accidentally nudge your boss in a work group. Yet it’s still the number one app you need in China.
If you are a minimalist, there’s only one app for a fulfilled China life. This is it.
English support: Yes
Download: App Store, Google Play
To many expats, Alipay is Paypal on steroids. Most importantly, it’s the key to Taobao, China’s dominant online marketplace.
Traditionally, Alipay has required a local bank account. But last year, the platform opened to tourists in a Tour Pass program, which allows short-term visitors to register a prepaid card service and make cashless payments in Chinese yuan. However, the pass has some restrictions, like a required minimum and mandated maximum top-up amount.
Wechat also announced a partnership with Visa to deploy international card support to Wechat Pay one day after Alipay Tour Pass’s launch.
English support: Partial
Download: App Store, Google Play
In terms of getting what you want, Taobao is the first place most people look. Even the Chinese professional basketball league bought their MVP trophy via Taobao.
JD.com is best known for its fast, reliable shipping and guaranteed authentic goods. Thanks to their in-house delivery network, JD Logistics, an order placed by 11:00 a.m. can be fulfilled the same day in most big Chinese cities.
A bargain-hunter’s paradise, Pinduoduo targets tier-two and -three cities and rural areas within China with affordable unbranded and white label goods using a disruptive social e-commerce business model. Despite its reputation as a counterfeit mall, Pinduoduo has somehow managed to become the “Apple MSRP killer”—every time Apple releases new products, Pinduoduo lists them with a discount. Last year, Pinduoduo chairman and founder Huang Zheng told the press that it sold “over 400,000 latest iPhone models” during the first 11 days of November 2019.
English support: No
Download: App Store (Taobao, JD, Pinduoduo), Google Play (Taobao, JD)
During the pandemic, local delivery services have become even more essential. Alibaba-controlled Eleme and Tencent-backed Meituan are two of the biggest service platforms which help users—from buying groceries to restaurant meal deliveries.
The grocery leaders are Freshippo, Alibaba’s supermarket brand, and JD’s Daojia. Freshippo, known as Hema in China, offers quality goods sent directly from its brick-and-mortar grocery stores without shipping fees (capped at one order per day). Daojia brought conventional supermarkets and local vegetable markets online, and linked them with a crowdsourced low-cost delivery network.
Back in 2018, Freshippo changed the game entirely, allowing flexible shopping options from mobile ordering and cashless self-checkout to home deliveries or in-person dining.
English support: No
Download: App Store (Eleme, Meituan, Freshippo, JD Daojia), Google Play (Meituan)
Over the last few years, Douyin has become one of China’s most influential social networks, with loyal fans ranging from college students to the elderly (like my mom). Tiktok’s domestic version, Douyin offers you a window into Chinese people’s lives, and a chance to see propaganda developing from street banners to viral dance moves and rap songs.
Bilibili was originally known for its anime, comics, and game (ACG) content, but it has expanded widely into more mainstream offerings. Now the video platform has reached 172 million monthly active users (MAUs) and an average daily time spent of 87 minutes per user.
Kuaishou is also a short video service with a large user base outside of China’s tier-one cities. On it users can find lots of Jackass-style content generally associated with rural dwellers similar to the now famous alcohol-chugging Hebei Pangzai.
Iqiyi, Youku, and Tencent Video are China’s three big video-on-demand platforms. These are where fans of Chinese-made TV series go to watch their dramas. Spoiler alert: the “Game of Thrones” finale is still being transferred to Tencent Video’s servers.
English support: No
Download: App Store (Douyin, Bilibili, Kuaishou, Tencent Video, Iqiyi, Youku), Google Play (Bilibili, Tencent Video, Iqiyi, Youku)
Some say that your taste in music reveals your personality—and in China, so does your taste in music-streaming apps. China’s indie music fans prefer Netease Music, while QQ Music pleases the mainstream as it offers the biggest licensed library compared with its competitors. In between lies Alibaba’s Xiami, which once referred to a free premium trial offer as a promotion for “beggars,” sparking a netizen backlash.
One drawback of Chinese music apps: you may find some iconic musicians missing from your local music app’s search results, perhaps because of politics, or simply because they sport too many tattoos. But the good news is that Apple Music and Spotify Premium are both accessible in China.
English support: No
Download: App Store (QQ Music, Xiami, Netease), no Google Play links—look on Chinese Android app stores
In China, ride-hailing and mapping services are all following the same GPS route. Alibaba’s Amap is an aggregator which hails cars through six ride-hailing services (including industry giant Didi, and it will soon include robotaxi services) and offers a price comparison function. The Uber-like Didi has been expanding its product line so you can now rent a car, find a gas station, and get turn-by-turn directions without leaving the app.
English support: Amap (no), Didi (partial)
Download: App Store (Didi, Amap), Google Play (Didi, Amap)
If you visited China a few years ago, you have probably noticed the colors of Chinese rental bikes have changed. What’s also changed are the apps that unlock those bikes. The Wechat-opens-all era is long gone. You need at least three apps in order to unlock all the major bikes: Wechat or Didi for the turquoise Didi bike; Meituan for the yellow; and Alipay for the blue.
Although Mobike once was one of Wechat’s most used mini-programs with 40 million monthly active users, this mini app was pulled after Meituan’s acquisition of the company.
English support: No
Download: App Store (Didi, Alipay, Meituan), Google Play (Didi, Alipay, Meituan)
In China, Google Maps doesn’t work because the app is blocked by the Great Firewall along with other Google apps, and also because its Chinese street maps are outdated by three to four years. This gets you nowhere in a country that changes at the blink of an eye.
Alibaba’s Amap and Baidu Maps are the two biggest players in China’s map service sector, both featuring a clean interface and handy functions such as real‑time transit information and street views.
For English users, though, Apple Maps is a better choice—it is basically an English version of Amap.
English support: No
Download: App Store (Amap, Baidu Maps), Google Play (Amap, Baidu Maps)
Yelp is not available in China, but Meituan’s Dazhong Dianping and Alibaba’s Koubei are. Both apps help users find restaurants, businesses, and services based on your location. Established in 2003, Dianping has built a massive database on your surroundings; Koubei has been catching up since Alibaba and Ant in 2015 poured nearly $1 billion into this startup to tap China’s local services market.
Both apps are in Chinese only, but English users can use Apple Maps to access Dianping’s data, thanks to a collaboration in place since 2015.
English support: No
Download: App Store (Dianping, Alipay), Google Play (Dianping, Alipay)
The beloved Pleco aside, China’s own translation services have exploded in recent years. Baidu, Netease’s Youdao, and Iflytek have all significantly improved translation quality, and European DeepL has also made a major breakthrough in context interpretations, making it easier to understand one another’s languages now. (Avoid WeChat’s in-app translation.)
Download: App Store (Pleco, Baidu Translate, Youdao Translator), Google Play (Pleco, Youdao Translator), Web (DeepL)
]]>Electric vehicle maker Li Auto raised $1.1 billion in its Nasdaq debut on Thursday after pricing above its expected range, becoming the second Chinese new energy vehicle company to list on an American bourse. The company’s share price closed up more than 40% after its first day of trading.
Why it matters: Winners are beginning to emerge in China’s electric vehicle market after a boom in the industry. Several automakers including rival startup Byton have failed to raise funds to hold them over in the aftermath of the Covid-19 outbreak.
Details: Li Auto began trading under the ticker “LI” on Thursday. The company priced 95 million American Depositary Shares at $11.5 per share, higher than the expected range of $8 to $10.
Context: US listings are proving to be popular among Chinese EV makers despite increasing scrutiny of Chinese companies in the US. Nio went public in New York in late 2018 while rival EV maker Xpeng is reportedly also pursuing a US IPO after confidentially filing in June, Chinese media reported.
China’s Didi Chuxing is in the early stages of preparation for an initial public offering in Hong Kong, three sources close to the matter told TechNode on Wednesday, confirming reports in Chinese media.
Why it matters: Didi is the latest Chinese tech behemoth to push ahead with a multi-billion dollar initial or secondary listing in Hong Kong since Alibaba started the trend in with a November 2019 secondary listing. Chinese companies increasingly favor the Hong Kong markets, due in part to the increasingly strained relationship between China and the US.
READ MORE: As China tech stocks surge, a fundraising window opens
Details: Didi is seeking to hire investment banks to advise on a potential IPO in Hong Kong, said people familiar with the matter. They added that changes could occur in details of the plan, since deliberations are at an early stage. TechNode’s sources did not comment on the company’s valuation.
Context: After a difficult year, during which its business was hit first by public outrage over two customers murdered by Didi drivers, and then by the global Covid-19 outbreak, Didi is now looking to make up for losses in core businesses while diversifying its revenue in a bid to boost its valuation.
Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly quoted comments by Didi President Jean Liu from an interview with Bloomberg.
]]>Chinese electric vehicle maker Xpeng Motors on Monday announced it has signed agreements with multiple investment firms for a cash infusion of around $500 million in a Series C+, further signaling a return of investor confidence in the turbulent Chinese electric vehicle market.
Why it matters: The deal reflects a growing optimism from investors that electric vehicles are closing in on competition against gasoline cars thanks to a continuous increase in driving range and lowering ownership costs.
Details: Six-year-old Xpeng Motors that it will receive around $500 million in an extended Series C from institutional investors including Asian equity investment firm Aspex Management, US tech hedge fund Coatue Management, global private equity firm Hillhouse Capital, and Sequoia Capital China, according to a statement sent to TechNode. The latest valuation was not disclosed.
Context: Thanks to Tesla’s strong deliveries and expected growth in profits, investor enthusiasm is now spilling over into Chinese EV upstarts.
Shares in Daimler partner Farasis Energy shot up 76% on its first day of trading on Friday, making it the highest valued electric vehicle battery maker on Shanghai’s Nasdaq-style STAR Market.
Why it matters: The listing has been long awaited as global auto majors increasingly seek out sources of Chinese-made EV batteries in an effort to ensure steady battery supply.
Details: Shares of Farasis Energy surged in their trading debut Friday, opening 114% above the company’s initial public offer price in early trading, to close 76% higher at RMB 27.96 ($3.99). At that price, its market capitalization is nearly RMB 30 billion ($4.3 billion).
Context: Tesla partnered with Chinese battery giant CATL in an effort further reduce the cost of its Model 3 sedan, already the top-selling EV model in China. Established automakers are following suit.
Li Auto on Friday announced it had filed an application with the US regulator to offer shares on Nasdaq, making it the second Chinese electric vehicle maker to list on the US stock market after Nio.
Why it matters: The filing confirms a long-running rumor, and enlarges a gap between frontrunners and losers in a slowing Chinese EV market.
Details: Beijing-based Li Auto Inc. listed a placeholder amount of $100 million for its offering in a Friday filing to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) without a price range for the shares.
Context: Formerly known as Lixiang, Li Auto was founded by internet veteran Li Xiang in mid-2015. Li formed Chinese car-buying portal Autohome.com in 2005 which has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange since December 2013.
Chinese self-driving startup Pony.ai will begin testing self-driving cars in Shanghai as part of a government push for global leadership in the development of autonomous vehicle technology.
Pony.ai will work with city regulators to deploy a self-driving fleet for test drives on public roads in northwestern Jiading district, the company announced Saturday along with the Shanghai municipal government during the annual World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC).
The company did not disclose the number of cars in the fleet or project timeline.
The AV upstart, with headquarters in Silicon Valley and the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou, was valued upwards of $3 billion after securing earlier this year $462 million in a Series B led by Japanese auto giant Toyota. The Pony.ai fleet of more than 100 vehicles has traveled a total of more than 2.5 million kilometers (around 1.6 million miles) in China and the US combined, around a tenth of what Google’s self-driving unit Waymo has logged.
The move will thrust the AV unicorn squarely in the Chinese self-driving race. Mobility giant Didi as well as AutoX, a rival company backed by Alibaba, are piloting autonomous ride-hailing services in Shanghai. The three companies are currently the rising stars in China’s AV competition, and are ranked within the top 10 for self-driven miles in California’s annual self-driving report.
Pony.ai’s Shanghai debut will come just two weeks after Didi began offering rides to members of its early rider program within a geo-fenced area of around 100 square kilometers (39 square miles) in Jiading district.
Still, Chinese AV startups may be a long ways from mass-producing fully automated cars because of costs and technical and regulatory hurdles. Each of Didi’s custom-built Volvos are equipped with nearly 20 sensors including three Lidars, seven cameras, and a bunch of radars, and cost more than RMB 1 million ($143,000) per unit. Didi expects to operate more than 1 million self-driving cars on its platform by 2030, Meng Xing, COO of Didi’s self-driving subsidiary said last month in a webcast.
Weride, an AV startup backed by the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance, kicked off its robotaxi program with a fleet of 20 Nissan vehicles in its home city of Guangzhou late last year. Guangzhou in southern China on Friday gave the green light to Weride to test 10 self-driving cars without safety drivers on public roads. A Weride spokeswoman confirmed to TechNode on Friday that it was the second company worldwide to test fully driverless vehicles on open roads, after Waymo.
Chinese AV startups have accelerated moves to transport passengers via self-driving cars as the government is eager to make inroads in the technology’s development. The Beijing municipal government released China’s first rules for AV road testing in December 2017, while Shanghai issued in September the country’s first permits for AV passenger service pilot programs to SAIC, Didi, and BMW.
]]>US electric carmaker Tesla is expanding its Chinese engineering team to accelerate the launch of self-driving features in the country as it pursues “full vehicle autonomy” by the end of this year, CEO Elon Musk said on Thursday.
“I really want to emphasize that it’s not just copywriting sort of stuff from America to work in China. We will be doing original design and engineering in China,” Musk said in a recorded video speech played on Thursday during Shanghai’s annual World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC).
The electric vehicle giant maintained an earlier statement that its vehicles will be capable of “basic functionality for Level 5 autonomy completed this year,” according to Musk.
Level 5 (L5) autonomy refers to a fully autonomous driving system which can handle all driving tasks without the need for human guidance, according to definitions set by the Society of Autonomotive Engineers (SAE).
Musk also said that Tesla has already produced the hardware needed for full self-driving capabilities, including an in-house designed AI chip known as Autopilot Hardware 3. The company can achieve L5 autonomy “simply by making software improvements,” he said.
Tesla has been ramping up its hiring in China, creating positions in departments from data engineering to server architecture as part of a broader strategy to localize software and user data in the world’s biggest auto market, according to a report from Chinese media. It had 3,200 employees in China as of late last year, Reuters reported citing its chairwoman Robyn Denholm.
The announcement comes as competition for market share with Chinese EV companies has intensified amid slowing growth. Chinese Tesla challenger Nio partnered with Intel’s automotive sensor company Mobileye to jointly mass-produce highly automated vehicles, which are scheduled for release in 2022. Alibaba and Xiaomi-backed Xpeng Motors, meanwhile, released their first sedan, the P7, with an advanced driving-assist platform which the company said was optimized to handle Chinese traffic conditions. CEO He Xiaopeng in April said the company will introduce a highway self-driving function to car owners with over-the-air updates next year.
Traditional automakers are also catching up. Changan Automobile launched earlier this year what it said was China’s first volume-production vehicle model with Level 3 autonomy. The state-owned automaker sourced self-driving chips for vehicle perception from Horizon Robotics, a Chinese chipset startup backed by Intel, Hillhouse Capital, and Sequoia Capital China.
Tesla pulled ahead of local automakers with the delivery of a record 14,954 China-made vehicles last month, a fifth of the country’s total EV market share. Meanwhile, Nio’s June deliveries almost tripled year on year to 3,740 units, while Meituan-backed Lixiang followed with sales of around 2,000 vehicles during the month.
Young Chinese EV makers sold a total of 9,470 units in June, accounting for 14% of the EV segment, compared with a mere 7% market share the same period a year earlier, according to figures from the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA).
]]>2020 is shaping up to be the year Chinese EV batteries broke through, despite the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Global automakers have not always cared for Chinese-made batteries. Japan and South Korea took an early lead in electric vehicle battery technology. LG Chem and Panasonic currently hold more than half of the global market share.
But things are changing. In the battle for electric vehicle supremacy, global OEMs are turning to Chinese-made alternatives as they localize their supply chains to gain first-mover advantages in the world’s biggest EV market.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s monthly newsletter on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode Squared members.
US EV giant Tesla has deepened its ties with China’s biggest battery maker to launch a locally-built Model 3 with an expected 20% reduction in battery cost. German automaker Volkswagen, poised to compete with Tesla in EVs, recently became the first global carmaker to invest in a Chinese battery supplier. Meanwhile, several auto majors have their eyes set on BYD’s new fire-resistant “blade battery.”
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd (CATL): The Fujian-based company unseated Panasonic as the world’s largest battery supplier by sales volume in 2017 and maintained its lead until China’s EV sales were hit by the Covid-19 outbreak. The company is now the third-largest manufacturer by market share. Its clients range from Geely to BMW. However, their partnership with Nio resulted in several car fires, causing the EV maker to recall 5,000 of its SUVs last year.
Build Your Dreams (BYD): Founded in 1995 by Wang Chuanfu, a former government chemist, BYD is often seen as the poster child of China’s electric vehicle industry for its dominant position in the market and reputation as an industry pioneer. It is the world’s second-largest EV maker by sales volume, the sixth-ranked player in the global EV battery market, and the leader in commercial EVs. The company has delivered more than 50,000 e-buses globally, including China.
Gotion/Guoxuan: Based in Hefei, the capital of eastern China’s Anhui province and new home of EV maker Nio, Gotion is a distant third in China’s battery market, coming in after CATL and BYD. The company shipped the equivalent of 3.43 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of lithium-ion batteries last year, around one-tenth of what CATL produced. Chinese automakers Chery and JAC Motors are among its clients.
In these partnerships, lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, which Tesla and its challengers once shunned for their low energy density, are gaining favor for their low price and improved performance.
Batteries are key to the figures that matter in EV competition: price and range. The price tag and energy density of an EV battery largely determines whether or not a vehicle will succeed. Automakers have realized that forging alliances with battery makers ensures they have a consistent supply of a core component at a favorable price.
Chinese battery makers will be a vital ally for global automakers in their pursuit of EV dominance.
Nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC): NMC batteries are currently the most popular type of battery for electric vehicles due to high cell energy density. These batteries made up 62% of the total market in China last year, according to an industry report from JPMorgan.
However, NMC batteries are prone to combusting, an issue that has gained widespread attention in China. These incidents are usually caused by overcharging, physical damage to the battery, a hot environment, or a combination of the above.
Nickel-cobalt-aluminum (NCA): NCA batteries have been widely used in Tesla’s “S3XY” vehicle lineup, but have not been mass-produced in China, nor have they been adopted en masse. A new NCA battery pack recently launched by Tesla and Panasonic has broken performance records. The battery features a cell energy density of close to 300 Wh/kg, the highest among any type of lithium-ion battery.
NCA, along with NMC, accounted for 90% market share in passenger EV batteries last year, as figures from Adamas Intelligence show.
Lithium iron phosphate (LFP): Accidental fires are much less common for LFP batteries because they don’t require cobalt. LFP has a longer life cycle but lower performance, usually resulting in EVs with a shorter driving range.
Market share for the LFP battery in all-electric vehicles fell to a mere 4% in 2019, but the investment bank China International Capital Corporation (CICC) expects a strong rebound of up to 20% this year.
The cost of CATL’s LFP battery packs has fallen below USD 80 per kilowatt-hour (kWh). CATL’s NMC battery packs are close to USD 100/kWh, according to a Reuters report. USD 100/kWh for a battery pack is the level at which EVs reach parity with traditional vehicles.
Volkswagen’s deal with Chinese battery manufacturer Gotion recently made history. Signed in May, it will be the first time in Beijing’s decade-long EV push that a global automaker has taken a controlling stake in a Chinese battery supplier.
VW is known for its ambition to become a world leader in EVs, aiming to leapfrog Tesla by making 1 million electrified cars annually by the end of 2022. More than half of these vehicles are expected to be produced in China.
However, its supply chain has been largely dependent on battery giants. Early last year, South Korea’s LG Chem reportedly threatened to cut off VW from its battery supply after the German automaker sought to partner with LG rival SK Innovation to build a gigafactory in Europe.
Consequently, establishing a supply chain from battery to chargers has become a matter of urgency for VW.
Gotion is China’s third-largest battery supplier. The company is based in Anhui province, where JAC Motors, one of VW’s manufacturing partners, is also located.
Batteries used to be a soft spot in Tesla’s empire.
The company’s Shanghai Gigafactory has rescued it from years of bleeding cash and doubts on Wall Street. After only a few months of operation, the factory now contributes to more than half of Tesla’s global sales.
Now, a deal with CATL is aimed at further reducing costs.
In July, Elon Musk’s electric car company dethroned Toyota as the world’s biggest automaker by market value, and its locally built Model 3 is already the most popular EV model in China. However, the RMB 355,800 purchasing threshold is still too high for most Chinese customers.
Sourcing local parts will be essential for the company to slash prices without sacrificing profits. Analysts expect the Tesla-CATL deal will help expand the American automaker’s lead in the Chinese market.
While Tesla and VW attempt to secure their supply of batteries, one Chinese automaker has been producing them in-house all along.
BYD, once the colossus of the EV battery market, lost its crown to CATL in 2017 due to its slow move into the NMC battery segment. The company chose to stick with the cheaper and safer—but less energy dense—LFP batteries.
BYD produces batteries for its own vehicles but also sells them to other automakers. Approximately 10% of its revenue comes from battery sales.
The company is now attempting to make up lost ground with the launch of its “blade battery,” an LFP battery boasting a 50% improvement in energy density and 30% cost reduction over conventional alternatives. These batteries could take a significant share of the market in the short term, but still come off second-best compared to NCM and NCA batteries.
BYD claims that these batteries are already gaining traction. “Today, almost all vehicle brands that you may know are in discussion with us for future cooperation based on blade battery technology,” said He Long, vice president of BYD, during a press event in March. TechNode was unable to independently verify He’s claims.
Chinese battery makers are now catching up with their overseas rivals. BYD is aiming to increase the energy density of its blade battery to 180 Wh/kg in two years, while Gotion has said it will produce LFP cells with an energy density of 200 Wh/kg by 2021. This is only 30% less capacity than the NCA battery Panasonic currently builds for Tesla. The two Chinese companies are expected to make EVs with driving ranges on par with Tesla cars by improving the organization of cells within a battery pack.
Years of EV subsidies are also finally paying off, according to UBS analyst Paul Gong. An industrial supply chain—from battery materials to charging piles—is emerging after a decade of government support for EV purchases, giving China an early advantage in the global competition, Gong said in a media briefing earlier this year. To pool resources and ensure profits, overseas automakers consider China to be an ideal production base for their global EV businesses, he added.
Chinese battery makers peddling LFPs still have big hurdles to overcome. LFPs still lag behind NMC batteries in energy density. JPMorgan analyst Nick Lai estimates NMC will remain the dominant type of battery in the Chinese passenger vehicles sector, extending its growth “at a solid rate.” In the near- to medium-term, analysts expect automakers to switch to high-performance LFP batteries that also offer the advantage of lower costs.
These battery makers realize that their futures depend on their ability to innovate. Failing to continuously improve technologies could hurt competitiveness given the rapid development of lithium-ion battery technology, CATL wrote in its first-quarter financial report in April. The company has no alternative but to increase investment in R&D of battery technology.
The biggest challenges are yet to come.
]]>China’s biggest automaker SAIC Motor is hammering out a deal for a potential takeover of Car Inc, the Hong Kong-listed car rental company which had shared a chairman with scandal-ridden Luckin Coffee.
Why it matters: If the deal proceeds, Luckin founder Charles Lu and his family will receive up to HK$1.37 billion (around $177 million) likely to be put toward easing the company’s liquidity crisis. The troubled coffee chain now faces a batch of lawsuits from both Chinese and overseas investors seeking to wind down his assets.
Details: SAIC has reached a non-binding agreement with Ucar, parent company of Car Inc, and Amber Gem Holding, its third-largest shareholder, to secure up to 28.92% of the car rental firm’s shares, the automaker said Thursday in a filing (in Chinese).
Context: The potential transaction also means an end to the takeover talks between Daimler’s Chinese partner BAIC and Lu with his auto service group.
Chinese electric vehicle maker Nio set a record for quarterly vehicle deliveries despite disruptions due to the Covid-19 outbreak, sending its shares soaring 16.6% to $9.23 in premarket trading.
Why it matters: Amid an extended slump in China’s EV market, Nio is accelerating into the fast lane following a significant cash injection and new production model coming to the market.
Details: June deliveries for Nio’s two models nearly tripled to 3,740 units from a year earlier, pushing quarterly deliveries to 10,311 units in the second quarter of this year, 191% year-on-year growth, the company said Thursday.
Updates on the EC6: Nio is on track to launch the EC6, its third mass market model, an electric coupe SUV likened to Tesla’s Model Y, with pricing information to be available during the upcoming Chengdu Motor Show later this month, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.
Self-driving startup Tusimple is looking to raise $250 million in a funding round which will support plans to remove safety drivers from its robotruck fleet as early as 2021, a person close to the company told TechNode.
Why it matters: The funds would be critical for the company’s expanding efforts to commercialize its technology. However, its valuation is now so high that most venture capital firms have been deterred, said two people with the knowledge of the matter.
Details: Tusimple is seeking to add $250 million to its war chest, appointing investment bank Morgan Stanley which recently sent proposals to potential investors on why the company is poised to succeed, TechCrunch reported Friday citing people familiar with the matter.
Cash-strapped electric car maker Byton, once seen as a Tesla challenger, will suspend its operations in China starting Wednesday as it files for bankruptcy protection for its US and German business units.
Why it matters: After a fruitless search over the past year and a half for new backers to raise its Series C, Byton is the latest Chinese EV startup to face a cash crisis in a slumping market.
Details: Management and shareholders have decided to suspend business in mainland China on July 1, 2020, Byton CEO Daniel Kirchert announced late Monday, according to Chinese media reports. It currently has around 1,000 employees on the payroll in China.
Context: Financially troubled Chinese EV makers face intensified pressure this year as the global pandemic weighs on the country’s economy, resulting in a shrinking market already impacted by Beijing’s reduction in purchase incentives a year ago.
Correction: This article has been updated to correct two errors: The company promised to pay all unpaid wages to employees who resign voluntarily by July 3, not to pay July wages to employees who resign voluntarily. Layoffs at Chinese EV startup Enovate happened in late April, not July.
]]>Chinese electric vehicle startup Li Auto is about to close a $550 million round of funding led by Meituan Dianping, as the local services giant looks to gain a firmer foothold in the country’s emerging electrified vehicle market.
Why it matters: A second investment in Li Auto, also known as Lixiang, underscores Meituan’s confidence in the plug-in hybrid vehicle (PHEV) maker.
Details: Meituan is working on a deal to invest about $500 million in Li Auto, the majority of the $550 million that the automaker seeks to raise for its Series D, according to a Chinese business news outlet LatePost report last week citing people with knowledge of the matter.
Context: Beijing-based Li Auto is playing catch-up to Nio and Xpeng having only delivered its first mass market model six months ago.
]]>
Weride, a Chinese self-driving startup backed by the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance, is making its autonomous vehicles available for ride-hailing on Alibaba’s map platform Amap, also known as Autonavi. Starting Tuesday, riders in Guangzhou can summon one of WeRide’s self-driving electric cars for a ride through the app, the company said.
Why it matters: Autonavi is currently the most popular mapping and navigation service provider in China and the partnership is expected to enable the AV startup to accelerate the pace to scale up the robotaxi business and make the technology more widely available for public riders.
Details: Customers can hail one of Weride’s self-driving cabs via Autonavi or proprietary ride-hailing app “WeRide Go” in a geo-fenced area of 144.7 square kilometers (around 55.8 square miles) across the Huangpu and Guangzhou Development districts, the company announced Tuesday.
Context: Chinese self-driving startups and mobility giants have been pushing hard to meet the technical and regulatory challenges needed in a journey towards a driverless future.
As Chinese electric vehicle (EV) maker Byton drags its feet on paying up to four months of employee salaries, Chinese media outlets (in Chinese) report that nearly 100 employees gathered in Nanjing on June 23 to demand pay. Meanwhile, the company’s factory and offices appear to be shuttered—although the company claims that’s by choice.
Why it matters: Byton has struggled to close its Series C funding round, which it told Chinese media was “almost in place” as early as September 2019. Its falling behind in wage payments is evidence of deepening financial woes.
Missing pay: According to a report by Future Auto Daily (in Chinese), the company owes RMB 90 million (US$13 million) in wages to over 1,000 employees.
Missing rent? Meanwhile, Chinese language media report that Byton cash crunch has led to office and factory closures, although the company claims the closures are voluntary.
Context: Though Byton’s financial difficulties are especially pronounced, it’s not the only one in the industry struggling—an industry-wide slowdown means that many other Chinese EV companies have their own troubles.
China will gradually raise its mandated production quota for new energy vehicles over the next three years, a move that the top industry regulator said would support its ambitious 2025 sales target.
Why it matters: The Corporate Average Fuel Consumption and New Energy Vehicle (CAFC/NEV) credit program is seen as the key policy stimulus from Beijing to drive EV adoption after a years-long subsidy scheme.
Details: China on Monday continued to build on its NEV adoption initiative with an updated CAFC/NEV regulatory scheme (in Chinese), including quotas for NEV production over the next three years.
Context: Automakers in China produced 9.93 million NEV credits vs 2.91 million CAFC deficits in 2018, according to a report (in Chinese) by think tank Innovation Center for Energy and Transportation (ICET) earlier this year.
China’s biggest private automaker, Geely, announced plans on Wednesday for a listing on China’s Nasdaq-like high-tech STAR market. The list would make it the first overseas-listed Chinese automaker to double list on mainland financial markets for fresh funds.
Why it matters: Geely’s decision comes as Beijing is stepping up capital market reforms to encourage domestic listings. It also continues a trend of overseas listed firms raising RMB war chests in preparation for hard times.
Details: Hong Kong-listed Geely shares were up 5.9% to HKD 12.6 ($1.63) on Thursday after the company announced its board has agreed on a preliminary proposal to sell shares publicly on Shanghai’s science and technology innovation board, better known as the STAR market.
Read more: EV industry grapples with consensus as sales fall further in May
Context: The owner of Volvo in May outperformed industry averages by selling 108,822 vehicles in China, a 20% growth compared with the same period last year. However, Geely’s EV business has been falling at double-digit rates over the past five months.
Chinese ride-hailing platform Didi Chuxing on Monday suspended inter-city transport to and from Beijing only weeks after the service resumed in late May, as the capital banned inter-city ride-hailing amid rising Covid-19 cases.
Why it matters: Didi’s recent move is the latest to stem a second wave of coronavirus infections in Beijing. A rollback in the demand for urban transit including ride-hailing is expected, as authorities re-impose strict bans on travel and public events.
Details: Beijing Municipal Commission of Transport on Monday issued a notice to local ride-hailing platforms to halt inter-city operations immediately, without revealing a date to resume operation.
READ MORE: Didi has resumed late night hours for carpooling service Hitch
Context: The Beijing municipal government on late Tuesday announced it has raised its emergency response level from three to two, re-imposing measures that forbid public gatherings and shut school, as well as applying strict travel restrictions to local residents. The load factor for the city’s public transit was lowered from 100% to 75%.
Correction: an earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that Didi suspended its inter-city service to and from Beijing only a week after resumption in late May. It should have read “only weeks.”
]]>While China’s overall auto sales have rebounded strongly following the Covid-19 outbreak, the electric vehicle market cratered with a double-digit decline in May.
New energy vehicles (NEV) sales dropped 23.5% year on year to 82,000 units in May, according to figures from the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM), while total auto sales leapt 14.5% on an annual basis. The decline continues a nearly year-long dropoff since Beijing announced in July cuts in EV subsidies of up to 60%. The world’s biggest EV market recorded its first-ever annual decline last year, with 1.2 million units sold.
China’s top industry regulator in 2017 set a 2020 goal of 2 million EVs, to reach 20% of new car sales by 2025. Whether China will be unseated as the world’s biggest electric vehicle market seems unlikely, yet bleak auto sales figures are a stark reminder of the chasm between Beijing’s near-term goals and actual sales.
TechNode’s recent conversations with analysts show a sharp divide on that question as well as their views on government subsidies and consumer demand. Let’s look at their estimates first.
China’s EV adoption is strongly tied to government incentives. The central government began slashing subsidies by up to 60%, or RMB 27,000 per unit, on electric cars late last June. The market has been on a roller-coaster ride as a result, from 80% year-on-year growth to falling into a months-long slump.
Beijing in April announced that it will extend EV subsidies until the end of 2022 in an effort to stem further collapse, though they will be 10% lower in 2020 than 2019 levels, 20% lower in 2021, and 30% lower in 2022. This means for an EV with a driving range of more than 400 kilometers (around 250 miles), the qualifying subsidy is RMB 20,000 (around $2,820) compared with RMB 55,000 at the peak in 2016—leaving many to doubt its effectiveness.
China International Capital Corp (CICC), however, sees value even in a downsized subsidy, saying in an April report that it will have a calming effect by “stabilizing consumer expectations” (our translation). UBS analyst Paul Gong agreed, adding that additional financial incentives from local governments would help with market recovery.
Still, CICC recently cut its 2020 EV sales forecast by a third, to fall between 1 and 1.5 million units, on account of the shattering blow Covid-19 has dealt to economies across the globe. UBS estimated annual sales will continue at the 2019 level this year, without giving specific figures.
The NEV sector is still not a market that can thrive without subsidies, global consultancy AlixPartners wrote in a recent report. It pointed to weak overall demand for autos amid the lowest annual economic growth China has seen in decades due to the pandemic.
This holds even more true for the less affordable electric car relative to traditional gasoline engine vehicles. The EV price differential is at least $8,000 more than an equivalent model with a gasoline combustion engine, owing to the expense of the car battery. This difference will probably deter Chinese consumers who are now more price sensitive, pressured by higher mortgages and lower incomes, AlixPartners Managing Director Stephen Dyer told journalists on June 9 during an online briefing.
Meanwhile, Bernstein estimates 67% of car sales in China last year came from models with a sticker price below RMB 150,000, “far below the prices of most EVs excluding subsidies,” analyst Robin Zhu wrote in a March report. Cui Dongshu, secretary general of China Passenger Car Association (CPCA), expects that sliding oil prices will make internal combustion vehicles more attractive to customers.
UBS, however, maintained that consumer demand for all autos is recovering as the virus outbreak shows signs of slowing. According to two surveys by UBS Evidence Lab, around 27% of 1,000 respondents from across China expressed their intent to buy cars in April, compared with 17% in February when the number of cases started climbing.
Such latent demand will boost market growth in the following months, making up for the loss in sales volume in the first six months of this year, analyst Paul Gong said at a media event on June 4. The year-on-year growth rate could be “pretty positive” in the coming months given the low base in the second half of 2019, and as competitive EV models enter the market, he added.
JP Morgan analysts also expect EV market penetration will continue. The cost of compact EVs is expected to reach parity with that of conventional vehicles as early as 2021, and larger EVs with bigger battery packs in 2024.
“All OEMs—foreign and local—are pushing out new models to the market to grab shares in this rapidly growing opportunity and at the same time comply with China’s strict emission requirements,” JP Morgan analyst Nick Lai wrote in a report.
Still, analysts expect Chinese EV brands will face more intense competition as foreign automakers accelerate local production in China. Tesla continues to expand its Shanghai plant and Volkswagen is eyeing the market with two jumbo investments.
Tesla has cemented its position as a market leader by delivering 11,095 China-made Model 3 vehicles in May, making it the top-selling EV model for the month, according to CPCA figures. Tesla challengers Nio and Xpeng Motors countered with new models to be delivered later this year.
Meanwhile, local EV major BYD made a big move, launching in March its new blade battery with 50% higher energy density and a 30% reduction in battery cost. Bernstein and Credit Suisse expect BYD’s profitability will improve on a sequential basis, as the local EV major will soon begin mass production of the battery as well as deliver the “Han,” the first EV model equipped with the battery, in mid-2020.
]]>Ride-hailing platform Didi Chuxing is piloting a new grocery e-commerce project in Chengdu as it looks to diversify its revenue streams.
Why it matters: The e-commerce pilot is Didi’s latest push to expand beyond its core ride-hailing business, which has been hit hard by the Covid-19 epidemic.
Details: Chengxin Youxuan is a fresh produce and grocery “community e-commerce platform” for shoppers who live within a certain vicinity of one another, local media reported.
Context: The company in March launched home delivery service “Paotui,” where users can request couriers to run errands, from picking up laundry to delivering groceries.
It was 2017, and the future of driving was right around the corner: Fleets of autonomous cars would cruise city streets while self-driving buses swerved around pedestrians. Three years ago, tech companies around the world, including Nvidia and Audi, felt confident enough in AVs to predict this driverless future would be a reality by 2020.
Venture capital funds snapped up self-driving startups, plowing cash into dozens of these companies in China and around the world. Pitchbook figures show the global deal count in the AV sector nearly tripled to 127 in 2017.
Now it’s 2020, and my last rideshare was driven by a plain old human. Global deal count in AVs fell to 96 last year, smaller companies were unable to keep up with the high bar for investment, and China’s government has scaled back its ambitious goals for AVs. Most now realize that it will take years to build autonomous vehicles ready for public adoption.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s monthly newsletter on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode Squared members.
The industry had to grow up eventually, and it’s happening now. Small players are leaving the market as it matures around a few success stories; in China, central planners are pushing back targets to match reality. Easier, less flashy applications like delivery-robot autonomous trucks are getting more attention from investors.
Plenty of engineers are still working on the dream of L5 fully automated cars. But for now, we’d better get used to the existing L2 parking-assist features and L3 office park shuttles.
Competition in China’s self-driving market is heating up, driven by a few companies that dominate fundraising.
Only ten Chinese AV startups won investment in the first quarter of 2020, yet these ten startups conquered a third of all investments in 2019, according to an analysis of public records and data from TechNode and Beijing-based consultancy EO Intelligence.
Some of the lesser-known companies winning new war chests claim to control 90% market share in their own domains, a possible sign of maturity among these firms.
As investors realize that the commercialization of AV technology is still a long way off, they are betting larger amounts on more mature companies instead of making smaller investments in a wider range of early-stage startups.
In fact, much of this year’s activity was driven by just two companies: self-driving startup Pony.ai and lidar maker Hesai.
In January, Hesai closed its $173 million Series C, led by German Tier-1 supplier Bosch, among others. A month later, Pony.ai announced it had raised $462 million at a valuation of $3 billion, in what was at the time the biggest-ever funding round in China’s self-driving industry.
Most other companies did not disclose the value of their funding rounds, instead saying they raised “dozens of millions of RMB.” The two exceptions include an autonomous mining startup that claimed to have closed a RMB 100 million ($140,000) round and a delivery robot maker that doubled that number.
China is aligned with global industry trends. Around the world, mobility deal volume and total investment fell while a few late-stage AV companies raised larger sums.
A 2017 government plan anticipated that more than half of all cars sold in 2020 would be equipped with autonomous driving functions—but the installment rate of major assistive driving functions on cars was less than 20% in 2019.
Although investors and innovators are rushing to get L3 vehicles on the road, those cars aren’t ready for real traffic conditions. So far, deploying full autonomy means lowering the speed (to roughly under 40 km/hr) and restricting them to a very limited area, which usually means a local community, a school campus, or a park.
“We’re following special-case AVs very closely,” Qi Lei, the investment principal at Alliance Venture, Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi’s global investment organization, told Chinese media. She brought up parks and old people’s homes as being easier sites for robots to navigate safely.
But the problems of getting L3 passenger vehicles on the road were highlighted by Baidu’s 2017 self-driving minibus model, Apolong. With the high price tag of RMB 1.5 million per unit, Apolong’s market performance fell short of expectations last year. Baidu immediately denied the reports with the release of a second-generation model, without revealing sales and cost details. It is unlikely that Apolong is affordable enough to be rolled out widely.
In the latest blueprint released by the National Development and Reform Commission earlier this year, the top economic planner declined to give a specific goal for AV development, instead by saying the country would need to reach “mass production” of intelligent vehicles with conditional automated driving functions by 2025.
Still, another action plan released late last year by China’s industry ministry shed some light on Beijing’s hopes for the AV sector. The report predicted that sales of intelligent and connected cars are expected to constitute 30% of new car sales over the next five years.
“The national guidelines will drive growth in China’s AV industry … facilitating cost reduction and efficiency improvement as the supply chain will move in the same direction,” according to analysts. However, as China currently lacks legislation governing self-driving cars, analysts expect mass adoption of L3 automation of passenger vehicles will probably happen no sooner than 2021.
The government remains confident enough to start writing rules for these future cars. Beijing promises to finish drafting technical standards for commercial vehicles—including those for driver monitoring systems and automated lane changing—by the end of 2020. Research on regulations on driverless passenger transport and unmanned delivery are also among the priorities, indicating that legislation for unmanned vehicles has been put on the table.
Given the difficulties of building affordable passenger AVs, growing emphasis is now being put on autonomously delivering goods. The COVID-19 pandemic also has driven the need for safe, contactless deliveries.
AV companies are racing to fulfil this niche. Three out of the 10 Chinese AV startups raising funds in Q1 are making robots for grocery delivery, according to TechNode’s analysis of funding data. Meanwhile, six AV companies that secured financing over the past two months claimed that their sensor-based algorithms could facilitate trucking rigs with the capability to drive themselves on Chinese highways.
This trend partially explains why investors have piled into Chinese robot delivery startups during the first three months of this year:
Venture funds are also pursuing self-driving trucks for freight deliveries on Chinese highways, as the Chinese government forced the installation of autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems on commercial vehicles last year.
“Innovators and VCs have been through a learning process over the past several years since 2016. We are having a better sense of the fact that there is a very high ceiling to achieve vehicle autonomy—and that the lifecycle either of the technology per se or of the business operation is a lengthy and complex one.”
—Inceptio CEO Julian Ma, speaking to TechNode
Looking ahead, self-driving companies are still among the primary targets for VCs, but the rise of unicorns means more difficulty for early-stage startups to raise capital. “It’s a race with incentive capital over a very long term,” said Ma. As automakers and startups struggle to find nearer-term solutions to monetize their technologies, they’re hoping that regulators will remove the barriers in their path.
]]>Registered capital for electric vehicle maker Nio swelled to RMB 3.85 billion (around $540 million) from a mere RMB 11 million on Tuesday, as it readies for a long-awaited bailout worth RMB 7 billion from several state-owned investors.
Why it matters: Just a few months ago, Nio was cutting costs to stretch its cash reserves. Now with this capital injection, the EV maker is poised for growth—monthly production capacity will surge 25% from current output to 5,000 vehicles in September.
Details: Nio on Tuesday increased registered capital for Nio (Anhui) Holding Ltd. to around RMB 3.85 billion from RMB 11 million, according to Chinese business research platform Tianyancha.com. It also made a series of moves to restructure its network of legal entities.
Context: In a final agreement reached by the company and a group of state-owned investment firms in late April, investors will inject a total of RMB 7 billion in cash into Nio (Anhui) Holding Ltd., Nio China’s legal entity, for a 24.1% stake.
Bottom line: This may be the struggling EV maker’s turning point.
Updated: includes clarification in the Context section that Nio’s contribution will include a RMB 4.26 billion investment along with RMB 17.77 billion in assets into the new China entity. Added points four through six in the Details section to include additional commentary from the company after publication. Updated headline.
]]>BMW and Chinese power company State Grid on Wednesday announced a massive charging network expansion that would roughly double the number of charging piles for the carmaker’s vehicles in the country as it seeks to resolve a critical bottleneck in electric car adoption.
Why it matters: BMW’s plan follows Beijing’s doubling down on EV power services as a part of its “new infrastructure” initiative to boost domestic spending, including auto consumption.
Details: BMW and State Grid EV Service, a subsidiary of China’s biggest utility company, will jointly provide more than 270,000 charging piles to car owners by year-end, including 80,000 direct current fast chargers, the two companies said on Wednesday.
Context: BMW is not the only major global automaker accelerating its push into electric cars in the world’s largest auto market, as the government continues its policy support.
A federal judge in California on Wednesday rejected a request from US electric vehicle giant Tesla Motors to access grand jury materials related to a former Apple employee charged with stealing trade secrets before joining Chinese electric vehicle maker Xpeng Motors.
Why it matters: The ruling is the latest chapter in the legal battle between Tesla and an employee of Xpeng, a Chinese company that has been involved in two protracted legal disputes in the US over trade secrets.
Details: US District Court Judge Vince Chhabria on Wednesday denied Tesla’s request to access grand jury materials related to Zhang and information related to Zhang’s conduct, saying the relevance of those materials to Tesla’s claims against Cao was “speculative and tenuous.”
Context: Alibaba and Xiaomi-backed Xpeng is running at full tilt to produce and deliver on time the carmaker’s first electric P7 sedan, a model in direct competition with Tesla’s made-in-China Model 3 with assisted driver functions including highway lane-changing and valet parking.
Read more: Tesla’s apprentice: Is Tesla bullying its own biggest fan?
]]>Car Inc may soon have no more formal ties to Charles Lu, founder of Luckin, Car Inc, and Ucar.
China’s Beijing Automotive Group (BAIC) is seeking to buy a stake of up to 21.26% in Car Inc, a Hong Kong-listed car rental company formed by Luckin Coffee chairman Charles Lu. Shares of Car Inc surged 24.4% to close at HKD 2.24 ($0.29) on Monday.
READ MORE: Charles Lu: The man behind Luckin and China’s fastest IPOs
Why it matters: The deal would mean state-backed BAIC is taking over the China’s biggest car rental company in which Luckin Coffee chairman Charles Lu is the controlling shareholder.
Details: Ucar, a Shenzhen-listed auto service group controlled by Charles Lu, on May 31 reached a non-binding agreement with BAIC to buy up to 21.26% of Car Inc, according to a regulatory filing on Monday. Ucar is currently the largest shareholder in Car Inc, with a 21.26% stake.
What’s in a Ucar? Charles Lu formed Car Inc, a car rental company in Beijing in 2007
Context: BAIC, one of Daimler’s major manufacturing partner in China, on April 13 announced “a comprehensive strategic partnership” with Ucar in car procurement, online auto sales, and car financial services.
Shares in Chinese automaker JAC Motors and battery supplier Gotion High-tech surged around 10% on Friday, after Volkswagen announced to invest a combined €2.1 billion ($2.3 billion) in the two electric vehicle partners.
Why it matters: The $2.3 billion funding boost from the world’s largest automaker could exert great influence in reshaping the Chinese EV market and also help the flagging market recover from weak demand after the Covid-19 outbreak.
Details: Volkswagen on Friday announced it will spend $1.2 billion on a 26.47% stake in Gotion, becoming the first foreign-owned automaker directly investing in a Chinese battery maker. Gotion shares closed up by 10% to RMB 29.9 ($4.18) on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange.
Context: Both JAC and Gotion are headquartered in Hefei, capital of the eastern Anhui province. JAC is also a manufacturing partner of Chinese EV maker Nio.
Shares of Nio decreased 8.2% to $3.83 by market close on Thursday, after the company reported a mixed first quarter with revenues that slumped more than half from a previous quarter, and yet slightly beat analysts’ expectations with a narrowed loss.
However, the company says they expect leapfrog growth in the second quarter with an “all-time high in quarterly deliveries” of up to 158% growth quarter-on-quarter in Q2, or around 10,000 cars. The EV maker claimed it has witnessed “a solid recovery” in sales, with deliveries more than doubled to 3,155 units in April from a month earlier.
The Chinese electric vehicle maker opened 44 new franchise stores over the first three months of this year, expanding its sales network of more than 110 stores with some clubhouses across 76 domestic cities.
During the earnings call on Thursday, founder and CEO William Li said the company is confident in further reducing losses to achieve a vehicle margin of 5% by the end of the second quarter. A gross margin of 3% is also part of the plan, which was -12.2% as of March and has remained negative for five seasons.
“We maintain the guidance of double-digit profit margins by year-end and so far we are confident to achieve it,” Li said, adding its series of cost control measures have made significant improvement in operating efficiency, cost of car parts including battery, and production rate since late last year.
Losing more than RMB 11 billion last year on operations, Tesla’s Chinese rival is still bleeding cash to make cars. According to its annual report released last month, Nio has paid a total of RMB 604.4 million to manufacturing partner JAC Motors to compensate for losses over the past two years.
However, it is now poised to expand its business, revealing plans to increase production capacity by up to one-fourth to 5,000 units every month around September, the company said on Thursday. Its joint plant with JAC has a monthly production capacity of 4,000 cars, but, at the moment, only 3,500 cars “at the most”, according to Li, come off the line each month due to a wide disruption in auto supply chain caused by the Covid-19 outbreak.
“Users have been waiting for deliveries . . . and we will strike a balance between order growth and our expansion plan from a long-term perspective,” said Li, who declined to reveal specific growth numbers over the past 30 days, while adding that a series of marketing events including livestreams gave “strong momentum.”
Hanging on by a thread in the absence of major financing for more than a year, Nio highlighted that it has found a financial lifeline that will “be sufficient to support” its operations in the next twelve months.
In a months-long market slump now extended by the pandemic, competition has become increasingly intense in the Chinese EV market. What’s more, as Tesla has been ramping up production of locally-made Model 3 sedans, the offline battle is now being extended to the online space.
The US EV giant last month opened its flagship store in Alibaba’s B2C marketplace Tmall in bid to expand its reach online, and soon secured 2,600 orders for test drive from 4 million viewers in a one-hour webcast by a Chinese livestream celebrity.
Nio fought back immediately with the help of Wang Hang, a national TV personality, in a livestream last week that attracted an audience of more than 20 million. More than 5,000 people signed up for a test drive and 320 made car orders, the company claimed.
Facing multiple consumer lawsuits in an alleged plot to offload sales for new models, Tesla is still dominating the Chinese EV market with deliveries of more than 16,000 vehicles in the first quarter, according to figures from China Passenger Car Association. Local EV startups such as Xpeng have also joined the battle. The company last month launched what it claimed to be China’s longest driving range only priced at a third of a Tesla Model S.
Nio expects to close the $1 billion funding from a group of state-owned investment firms by the end of second quarter, with increased policy support from the Chinese government. It last month became the only premium automaker remaining eligible for the government subsidies on EV purchase due to its battery swapping technologies.
EVs priced at RMB 300,000 and above will be disqualified from the purchase incentives effective starting July 22, but those with swappable batteries will not be affected, Beijing says. Li said the company is accelerating the development of power service solutions in line with the new government policies and expecting a release in the second half of this year, without giving further details.
China will expand the construction of charging and swapping infrastructure to boost EV consumption, Miao Wei, minister of Industry and Information Technology told Chinese media during the country’s annual political gathering on Monday. Credit Suisse last month estimated a 33% year-on-year growth of EV charging stations to 48,000 by end of this year, as both public and private sectors are investing heavily to ease the bottleneck for EV uptake.
Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly said that more than 400 million viewers watched a webcast about Tesla’s made-in-China Model 3 on Alibaba’s online marketplace. The number of views for the livestream was 4 million.
]]>A driver was killed during a fiery crash after rear-ending a school bus with his electric van in the southern Chinese city of Shenzhen on Tuesday, ushering in a new wave of EV safety concerns among Chinese consumers.
Why it matters: A rare loss of human life, the incident is one of the several EVs catching fires over the past month in Chinese major cities, a big blow for the market already going through an extended slump.
Details: An electric van hit the back of a school bus at an intersection in the downtown Futian district of Shenzhen on Tuesday early morning and immediately combusted. The van driver was killed in the incident, Shenzhen traffic police said on Chinese microblogging platform Weibo.
Context: Reports of several electric cars catching fire is once again casting a shadow over struggling Chinese EV.
China’s biggest automaker SAIC Motor has proposed supportive regulations for highly autonomous vehicles among other rules on the sidelines of the country’s annual political event in Beijing on Wednesday.
Why it matters: China’s largest annual political gathering of legislative delegates and political advisers, known as the “two sessions” or “lianghui,” kicked off on Thursday. The suggestions from the country’s top automaker could shed a light on the government road map for AV adoption in the coming year.
Details: SAIC, manufacturing partner to Volkswagen and GM’s, urged the central government to pass legislation that will allow the road testing of Level 3 and above self-driving cars on Chinese highways first in certain areas and then nationwide, Chen Hong, president of SAIC wrote in a proposal (in Chinese).
Robotrucks: The Shanghai-based automaker is also eyeing the adoption of AV in the traditional logistics industry.
Context: Top executives of Chinese auto majors have brought proposals ranging from intelligent cars to vehicle electrification in bid to buck the downward trend in the Chinese markets and drive a new auto technology boom.
Tiktok owner Bytedance is quietly developing an auto infotainment system that will allow users to navigate content on Douyin and news aggregator Jinri Toutiao, becoming the latest tech giant vying to enter the car connectivity market.
Why it matters: Bytedance’s move is expected to further enhance Douyin’s leadership as China’s most popular short video app in the competition for user time spent, but its potential to increase distracted driving risks could compel closer scrutiny.
Details: Bytedance is looking for employees in engineering design and business development to grow its car connectivity system team, Chinese media reported Monday citing people close to the matter.
Context: Chinese tech companies are pushing aggressively into car connectivity amid a rising demand from users for in-vehicle entertainment and real-time communication, as demands from driving ease with improved driver-assistance capabilities.
Didi Chuxing, China’s largest ride-hailing company, is hiring van drivers in two provincial capitals as part of its early push into logistics. This is the latest move into more general mobility services like home delivery and public transit.
Why it matters: Didi’s push to establish itself in the wider mobility market may drive the company’s valuation even higher, but the competition with existing players ranging from Meituan to freight service giant Manbang Group will be intense.
Details: Didi on Monday started recruiting van drivers for its intra-city freight delivery pilot project in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou, and Chengdu, the capital of the southwestern Sichuan province, according to a job posting on Didi’s official account on Chinese popular instant messaging platform Wechat.
Context: Didi has been expanding its presence with a goal of becoming a “one-stop mobility platform” offering 100 million daily trips with 800 million monthly active users globally over the next three years.
On Sunday night, Nio founder and CEO, William Li, appeared on the livestream of Wang Han, a famous TV personality, in front of 20 million people. As part of the sponsored appearance, Li introduced Wang to Nio’s ES6 SUV during his 40 minutes. Over 5,000 people signed up for a test drive and 320 made car orders with non-refundable deposits, the company said Monday.
Why it matters: One of the first Chinese automakers to embrace livestreaming during the epidemic, Nio is ramping up efforts with the help of Wang Han, known for being a veteran host at Day Day Up (one of China’s most-viewed talk shows) just days after Tesla made its debut on Chinese livestreaming platforms.
Details: More than 20 million viewers watched a webcast on Taobao as of Sunday during a 40-minute period session where Nio founder and CEO William Li made his debut as a salesperson for the company’s five-seater electric crossover ES6.
Context: Nio became the champion among Chinese EV startups last year with deliveries of 20,565 crossovers nationwide, several thousand units more than Baidu-backed WM Motor and Guangzhou-based Xpeng Motors. This was, however, only half of its previous annual sales target.
US electric vehicle maker Tesla is facing at least eight civil lawsuits by Chinese individuals and two possible class-action lawsuit over “disputes in sales contracts,” according to information released recently on the Shanghai city court system.
Read more: Tesla’s apprentice: Is Tesla bullying its own biggest fan?
Why it matters: Only five months after delivering its China-made Model 3 vehicles, Tesla has drawn growing criticism that has turned into lawsuits due to lack of transparency, too-often price changes, and alleged deceptive sales pitches.
Details: A local court in Shanghai Pudong New Area will hear eight civil lawsuits filed by eight different individuals against Tesla Motors Sales Service (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., a fully-owned subsidiary by the US EV giant in a month starting May 19.
Context: More legal complaints are probably on the way facing Tesla. More than 600 consumers have collectively expressed their fury against the company last month as its salespersons allegedly pressured them to buy the entry-level Model 3 while hiding the release date of more competitive long range version, with delivery expected to start in June.
Chinese self-driving startup Hongjing Drive on Wednesday announced it has raised “tens of millions of RMB” in its Series pre-A. This is the second venture deal in China’s AV industry in two weeks amid an enhanced national push to drive an automotive technology revolution.
Why it matters: The recent deals reveal a modest recovery of investors’ confidence after government initiatives were introduced.
Details: Hongjing Drive, a Chinese supplier of AV computing platforms, has closed an undisclosed amount of fresh funding led by Silicon Valley venture capital firm BlueRun Ventures. California-based TransLink Capital and existing investor China’s Linear Capital both followed on.
Context: On April 29, Inceptio, a Chinese self-driving truck startup announced it has raised $100 million from Singapore’s Global Logistic Properties Ltd (GLP) among other investors.
Chinese electric vehicle startup Xpeng has never been shy about its Tesla fandom.
“One of the reasons Xpeng was founded was because Elon Musk made Tesla’s patents available. It was so exciting,” He Xiaopeng, the company’s CEO, told Quartz in 2018. These words would return to haunt him.
Back in June of 2014, Tesla invited competitors to learn from its work on EVs by open-sourcing approximately 200 of its patents. In a blog post, Elon Musk wrote that he hoped a “common, rapidly-evolving technology platform” would encourage more companies to make electric cars—and that patent protections often “stifle progress.”
This story originally appeared on Drive I/O, an exclusive newsletter delivering deep analysis of electric and autonomous vehicles. Normally, it’s only for members, but we’re making it free as a preview. Sign up here to get every issue.
Xpeng founder Henry Xia took Musk up on his offer. That same month, he and two friends started their own autoworks in Guangzhou.
Today, Tesla’s attitude has changed. It argues that Xpeng crossed the line from imitation to theft. Tesla is suing its former employee Cao Guangzhi, alleging that the engineer misappropriated code for its Autopilot driving assistance function before leaving to take a job at Xmotors, Xpeng’s US-based sister company. At stake is Xpeng’s reputation, the limits of competition, and the ability of Chinese companies to hire leading engineers from Silicon Valley.
As TechNode wrote last week, Tesla is using the case against a former employee to justify a broad hunt through a competitor’s files to find proof of its IP theft suspicions.
In 2014, Musk wrote that gasoline-fueled vehicles were the company’s main competitors, not rival EV companies.
Neither Xpeng nor Xmotors has been named in the lawsuit, but Xmotors has been listed as a third party in the proceedings. The company has argued that Tesla’s moves are aimed at “bullying and disrupting” it.
Tesla has asked a San Francisco court to allow it access to its competitor’s entire repository of autonomous driving code and clones of its executives’ hard drives—including those of He, its CEO. A hearing on the matter was due to take place on May 7 in a San Francisco federal court, but has been delayed until May 28.
If Tesla wins its motion, Xpeng will have to hand over much of its most sensitive information. Even if Tesla ultimately loses the lawsuit, it would send a message that engineers who switch jobs to Chinese employers are automatically suspected, which could chill recruiting for years.
How did it get so bad?
TechNode reviewed public court documents, spoke to industry insiders, interviewed Chinese lawyers about the case, and attempted to reach Cao’s friends. What emerged was the story of a tragic relationship—a group of Chinese EV enthusiasts who loved Tesla so much they tried to become it, and an American company that went from nurturing competitors to accusing them of theft.
Tesla and Cao’s attorneys did not respond to TechNode’s requests for comment.
To compete in self-driving technology, Xpeng began recruiting engineers from top Silicon Valley companies, including Tesla and Apple, in 2017. For years, Tesla engineers have been sought after as some of the most capable leaders in the future of driverless mobility. These employees have been chased by US tech companies hungry for self-driving talent, as well as by Chinese tech firms with US operations.
When Xpeng hired Gu Junli, a young engineering manager from Tesla, they made her vice president of autonomous driving. The promotion allowed Gu to jump three ranks up from her previous job—equivalent to 10 years in the career of a typical engineer. Xpeng also issued a press release boasting that she was a “leading figure” in Tesla’s machine-learning technology.
But Gu’s Tesla resume did not automatically lead to success. One year after joining the company, Chinese media reported, she was missing her targets. Two persons close to Xpeng told TechNode she was just too inexperienced to build a team that could compete with the giants in a field like self-driving.
In December 2018, Xpeng replaced Gu as head of the team with a hire from Qualcomm, Wu Xinzhou. It was Wu who would later recruit Cao from Tesla.
Gu was given another job as a leader for development of “advanced” technologies, but was later sidelined. She left the company in March.
In 2018, Xpeng launched its first production vehicle, the G3. At the time of launch, the vehicle had a range of around 350 kilometers and shipped with driver assistance features. Observers noticed several similarities between the G3 and Tesla’s Model X and Model S—from the front profile of the car to the interior dash design.
This influence came as no surprise, given how open Xpeng had been about where it had drawn its inspiration.
Xpeng had a lot in common with the Chinese smartphone giant Xiaomi, one of the company’s recent investors. When Xiaomi began operating, it took many of its cues from Apple—so much so that it was often called an Apple clone. The company adopted the same minimalist aesthetic as its US counterpart, but quickly began developing its own signature line of devices, from smart home equipment to computers, clothing, and cookware.
But copying an idea is not against the law. “The reason Apple won’t sue Xiaomi is that, while their products look similar, they don’t necessarily constitute copyright infringement,” Fang Chaoqiang, a lawyer at Beijing-based Yingke Law Firm, told TechNode.
Xiaomi is the poster child for an argument that critics of IP law have made for years—if the Chinese company had not been able to learn from Apple, dozens of innovative products would never have come on the market.
If Tesla took issue with the G3’s similarities to its own vehicles at the time of launch, it didn’t say much. In Musk’s 2014 patent blog post, he wrote that manufacturers of gasoline-fueled vehicles were the company’s main competitors, not rival EV companies. Indeed, the 16,608 vehicles Xpeng shipped in 2019 were a drop in the ocean compared to Tesla’s sales.
But after US-based Xpeng engineer Zhang Xiaolang was arrested by the FBI for stealing Apple IP while switching jobs in July 2018, rumors simmered that the Chinese company was cheating to catch up. Zhang was arrested on July 7, 2018, after Apple accused him of downloading sensitive information before he resigned to take a job with Xmotors in China.
Xpeng leaders deny that they encouraged Zhang to misappropriate Apple’s IP. The company added that there is no evidence Zhang transferred sensitive information from Apple to Xpeng, and that the engineer’s contract has been terminated.
The fallout for Xpeng’s reputation was immediate. Now, the company faces challenges in hiring talent, as US-based Chinese engineers have reportedly distanced themselves from the company.
In the 29 reviews about Xmotors to be found on job search website Glassdoor, three employees addressed concerns that their career prospects might be affected by these lawsuits, since “no one wants to hire someone from a company with all the public news about FBI investigation.”
An Xpeng spokesperson told TechNode that the company has not had trouble hiring new engineers in the US or China.
Cao, then an engineer at Tesla, condemned Zhang, the former Apple employee, in text messages that have since become public in the course of the lawsuit. Zhang’s case would cause a “bad impression on us Chinese,” he said, according to translated message transcripts.
When Wu Xinzhou, Xpeng’s new self-driving team leader, interviewed Cao about a job as “head of perception” in late 2018, the Tesla employee was concerned about how the job switch would look. Cao later told the court that Wu had soothed his worries by saying Xpeng “did not get involved at all” in Zhang’s actions.
Cao was a high-flying computer vision expert and a natural fit for the perception job. With both a bachelor’s and master’s degree in electrical engineering from Zhejiang University—one of China’s top schools, which houses an entire startup accelerator in an ultramodern egg-shaped building at the center of campus—and a Ph.D. from Purdue University, he’d worked on medical applications of computer vision at GE and Apple before working at Tesla.
Cao joined Xpeng in January 2019.
Just two months later, he was in court.
Xpeng’s work on autonomous driving had begun long before Cao joined them. The company was developing its driver assistance technology as far back as 2015, three years before its first mass-produced vehicle was released. Level 2.5 autonomous driving capabilities were included in the G3 upon delivery in early 2019. Xpilot includes assisted lane changing, cruise control, lane centering, and automatic speed limitations.
But in December 2019, Musk aired suspicions on Twitter that Xpeng was copying Tesla’s code. When a Twitter user with the moniker “The Cyber Pope of Muskanity” suggested that Xpeng had stolen Tesla’s software, Musk replied, “That’s certainly our impression.”
When Cao left Tesla in January 2019, the company suspected another engineer, surnamed Zhang. In addition to a shared nationality, both engineers had previously worked at Apple—though Cao has testified that they worked in separate divisions located at different buildings and campuses.
When Tesla found out that Cao had copied files to a personal computer, they decided that he had taken the code for his new employer. In March 2019, the company filed a suit against Cao, formally accusing him of misappropriating code by copying it to his personal iCloud account.
Tesla is trying to paint Xpeng as a repeat offender that poached engineers in order to gain access to IP, said a Chinese lawyer who spoke to TechNode under the condition of anonymity. Successfully linking the cases could have serious reputational implications for Xpeng.
Tesla admits that it can’t prove the theft.
Unlike smartphone design, in the world of self-driving software, it’s difficult to tell if someone has copied your product without actually getting your hands on the code. Tesla claims, in essence, that the fact that Cao had the code when he left Tesla is so suspicious that they should be allowed to rifle through Xpeng’s files in an effort to prove that the Chinese company used it.
As tech giants turn into corporate behemoths, they’ve taken a more possessive attitude to their employees.
Tesla’s case is built heavily on parallels between Cao and Zhang, but the company argues that its document requests will allow it to find proof. Cao has admitted to downloading files to a personal computer, but claims it was common practice at the company.
Other evidence submitted by Tesla is weaker. For example, an edited translation of Cao’s text message exchange about the Zhang case made it appear that Cao was speculating about how much money Zhang had gotten from Xpeng—when in fact this message was sent by his friend. Cao had responded by condemning Zhang’s actions.
Tesla’s case against Cao and the US authorities’ move to indict Zhang are two independent lawsuits, at least for now, said Lin Hang, a lawyer at Guangzhou-based F&P Law Firm. There are different parties involved in each case; moreover, Cao’s is a civil case, while Zhang’s is criminal. Xmotors is a third party in both.
Lin questioned the grounds of demonstrating a pattern of misconduct by Xmotors in its operations and recruiting. “You can’t just say C stole from D because A allegedly stole from B,” he said.
Another counsel, who wished to remain anonymous, was pessimistic about Xpeng’s chances, as the US has increasingly treated all Chinese companies as potential IP thieves. Tesla’s move against Xpeng may trigger more US tech companies targeting Chinese competitors for intellectual property theft, he said.
Whether he wins or loses, Cao’s life has been permanently changed. Xpeng placed him on administrative leave “until further notice” in March 2019, when the investigation began. His position has since been filled by a subsequent hire. The damage to his reputation will likely last much longer.
In 2014, Musk wrote that Tesla’s leadership was defined by its ability to “attract and motivate the world’s most talented engineers.” Nowadays, he’s less willing to compete for talent.
In its complaint against Cao, Tesla cited Xpeng’s pursuit of its engineers as part of a pattern of “copying,” writing that “at least five former Tesla Autopilot team members including Cao have gone to work for Xmotors.” Xpeng, and other Chinese EV startups, are known in the industry for recruiting Chinese employees from US tech giants with highly competitive salaries and stock option plans.
If Tesla wins its suit, it could have broad effects on the market for tech talent, scaring off engineers who had been considering working for Chinese companies.
Hiring away a rival’s staff is a normal part of competition, and Silicon Valley was built on disloyal employees. In the US, California is the only state that bans non-compete agreement—contracts are common throughout the rest of the US—and this fact is often credited with spurring the state’s culture of entrepreneurship.
Nevertheless, as tech giants turn into corporate behemoths, they’ve taken a more possessive attitude in regard to their employees—and the US’s Department of Justice (DOJ) has taken notice. In 2010, the DOJ alleged that companies including Apple, Adobe, Intel, and Google had made a deal not to recruit each other’s employees, limiting competition in the labor market and holding down salaries for coding talent. The measures effectively barred rivals from reaching out to potential employees at competing companies to offer them new positions.
In 2011, the companies settled with the DOJ, promising to end the practice. Subsequently, in 2015, they agreed to pay $415 million to settle a related class-action lawsuit in order to compensate around 64,000 employees.
While tech firms can’t use non-compete agreements to retain their employees, if Chinese engineers who start jobs at rival companies face probes or life-altering lawsuits, they are effectively bound by fear of repercussions from moving to better jobs.
For most consumers, an Xpeng is still just a cheaper version of a Tesla. But as the company fights in court to prove that it’s not stealing IP, it is making moves in self-driving in an effort to find its own identity.
Xpeng has seen several changes in its self-driving team since Tesla began its legal offensive. Gu, the young Tesla hire who previously led autonomous driving, finally left the company this March due to “personal career and family reasons,” after reportedly being idle from any management roles for a couple of months.
Meanwhile, Cao’s position has been filled by Wang Tao, the co-founder of Drive.ai, the self-driving startup acquired by Apple in June 2019, according to Xpeng slides that were shared with the media last year.
Xpeng is forging on. In March, the company launched its first electric sedan model, the P7. The vehicle is equipped with Xpilot 3.0, Xpeng’s latest driver assistance system. The EV startup is attempting to follow the path set by backers Alibaba and Xiaomi—from copycat to Chinese original. It’s promising self-driving technology software and hardware that is different from Tesla, with executives claiming that its systems are optimized to better handle China’s crowded roads.
“I strongly believe that P7 will provide the best driver-assist experience in China,” Xpeng’s He said during the sedan’s launch event last month.
As the legal battle between Tesla and Xpeng heats up, the P7 could allow Xpeng to show that its days of imitating Tesla are over. But the stakes are high. EV leaders expect bankruptcies to dominate the headlines. Li Xiang, the founder of rival EV firm Lixiang, recently warned: “Given the hardship in the Chinese auto market, there is a possibility that only three out of more than 100 EV startups could survive … and I hope Nio and Xpeng can be with us.” It may all come down to a judge in San Francisco.
]]>How should autonomous vehicles (AVs) be programmed to interact with pedestrians? What about non-intelligent vehicles such as other cars and bicycles? While AV technologies themselves—intelligent computing and AI, LIDAR sensors and so on—receive a great deal of government and popular attention, AV technology domestication is an overlooked topic that will influence how fast the industry can develop.
As industry practitioners in China put drones on crowded streets, they’re recognizing something surprising about this problem: when you put robots on the street that are programmed to avoid people, they get bullied. This means that programming AVs based on existing behaviors may not be enough.
Sacha Cody is a business consultant and China Studies scholar in Melbourne, Australia.
Human behavior changes when confronted with new technologies; we slow down at a speed hump, we smile in front of a camera, and we cross the road when the pedestrian light is green. Science and technology studies scholars call this technology domestication; how do people consume, modify, reconfigure, and resist technologies? Technology domestication is user experience writ large.
As a post-doctoral fellow at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, I ethnographically explored this topic in 2019. Over six months, I met and interviewed dozens of people across Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Shenzhen.
My interlocutors worked inside AV and traditional automobile companies as data scientists, engineers, marketers, and strategy advisers, as well as along the supply chain making sensors and other components. I also spoke with industry analysts, journalists, and lawyers.
I did not expect technology domestication to be so top of mind among my interlocutors, but it was. People involved in actually making AVs, as well as those responsible for getting them onto China’s roads, were especially perceptive. In fact, while other countries have been focused on developing AVs that “fit in” with existing behaviors, Chinese researchers are approaching the topic differently.
Yi Zeng, a prominent computer scientist and Director of the Research Center for Artificial Intelligence Ethics and Safety in Beijing, encourages Chinese AI companies to better understand how people will ultimately use and interact with the products and platforms they are creating.
You might think it is the AVs job to fit in with people. A team of social scientists working on AV behavior at Nissan thought just that. They worked hard to develop AVs with “socially acceptable behavior,” defined as behavior that takes into account existing social and cultural practices related to mobility and human-automobile interaction.
Perhaps due to established road rules and ingrained behaviors around Silicon Valley, where the team was placed, Nissan focused on teaching AVs to simulate how a typical driver navigates a vehicle in the presence of others.
Take a pedestrian crossing that does not have traffic lights (i.e., a zebra crossing): even with clear rules of engagement, it is common for drivers to momentarily make eye contact—maybe also using subtle facial gestures—to signal the pedestrian can cross safely. In fact, the pedestrian may let the driver pass first for various reasons; such is the complexity of this seemingly simple human-automobile interaction.
The team proposed that Nissan’s AVs should be equipped with a device that functions analogously to such cultural signaling, alerting pedestrians with a caption that lights up and flashes “I have seen you, you may cross safely.” In this case, the solution ensures that AVs are programmed to behave based on current social and cultural norms.
My interlocutors in China thought differently. After seeing how people treat AVs during testing, they became convinced fitting-in was not enough. Yan Li (a pseudonym), a deep learning (shendu xuexi) engineer at a large Chinese automobile conglomerate developing their own line of AVs, put it pithily when we met in Guangzhou: “Humans bully AVs.”
Also using zebra crossings as an example, Yan Li explained that time and time again during testing, pedestrians crossed the road and payed scant attention to the AV. “They were so confident the AV would stop they completely tuned out.”
This worries Yan Li because outside testing areas in the real world, where traffic is greater and there are more pedestrians, the AV will get stuck. A flashing light alerting the pedestrian they can cross safely is useless. Yan Li explained, “Chinese just won’t let the AV pass. They’ll keep crossing and even loiter, because they know an AV will not harm a human. We need to break the deadlock. But how? That’s our conundrum.”
Yan Li treated the issue matter-of-factly at first; just another algorithm oddity that needed fixing. Over time, however, she came to see the deep social and cultural realities at the heart of the issue. Part of the challenge, she explained, is the sheer variety of users and behaviors on Chinese roads compared to western environments. “What do you do when a chicken crosses the road?” Yan Li asked earnestly. “This is not as uncommon as you think. Chickens move differently to a cat or a dog. We need to think about all these things.”
It’s a fair point; how many chickens roam the roads of Silicon Valley?
Sammy Wang (also a pseudonym), a senior executive at a large Chinese e-commerce company, had similar experiences and concerns. Sammy is part of a team developing autonomous delivery solutions in which an AV travels to the entrance of a residential compound and then dispatches smaller autonomous units to complete delivery to the customer’s door (these smaller units are even capable of riding up and down an elevator). Sammy explained:
During our testing, we had lots of problems. The biggest one was that people would not let the small unit pass them and often ignored it; they just stood there talking or whatever. Even if they noticed it, they didn’t let it pass. It’s a big headache for us.
Engineers were just beginning to recognize this challenge when I spoke to them.
Both Yan Li and Sammy were trying to figure out a way forward: how can AVs operate in such an environment without hurting others? Some people I met believe Yan Li’s and Sammy’s concerns are not relevant, even in China’s unique environment. These interlocutors explained that AVs will anyway be deployed in highly controlled environments as part of China’s smart-city development agenda.
But when AVs eventually share space with pedestrians and non-intelligent vehicles, as is likely, an AV that asserts itself rather than yields may be necessary. But how assertive should it be and what will an assertive AV actually look like?
Will it edge forward and nudge people with a soft yet harmless bumper bar? Will it announce “I am proceeding slowly, please disperse” and move forward? Right now, we just don’t know. It all depends on how people (mis)behave in the future? Yan Li summarizes the challenge nicely: “How can I program an AV to be assertive, yet not endanger others?”
While we’re not sure of the answer to AV technology domestication, at least now we’re asking the right questions.
]]>Sales of Tesla cars tumbled in April by nearly two-thirds from March, according to the country’s industry group. The electric vehicle maker is facing outcry from hundreds of owners who were pressured into paying full price for the standard range Model 3 before the release of a long range version.
Why it matters: Tesla’s revenue and margin are likely to come under pressure in the near term, given the weak April sales in a market expected to be a growth engine for the company.
Details: Sales volume of Tesla’s made-in-China Model 3 sedans tumbled by 64% to 3,635 units in April from a previous month, figures released by China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) on Monday show.
Context: China’s new energy vehicle (NEV) sales fell by 30% year-on-year to 64,000 units last month, as decline was narrowed from 49% in March. The recovery was still less than expected, compared with just 3.6% year-on-year decline in general auto sales last month, according to CPCA figures (in Chinese).
The feast-or-famine financials that have blighted Faraday Future for two years look near a turning point. Its beleaguered founder has secured majority votes from creditors for his personal debt-restructuring plan, according to a US court filing by bankruptcy agency EPIQ on Thursday.
Why it matters: As the agreement with creditors is being reached, it may allow Faraday Future to get new money to launch its long-awaited FF91 in China, the world’s biggest EV market.
Details: In a filing to the California Central District Court on Tuesday, 75 out of around 100 creditors cast ballots on Jia’s bankruptcy plan. 61 of them voted in favor, representing 81.33% of the total amount of debt, while the remaining 15 opposed.
Context: Faraday Future has been looking to raise $850 million since September when former BMW executive Carsten Breitfeld took over as CEO.
In an unprecedented move, US-based electric vehicle maker Tesla has made a request to examine a competitor’s entire repository of autonomous-driving source code and senior executives’ hard drives as part of a lawsuit against a former employee.
The EV giant has escalated its offensive against Cao Guangzhi, whom the company has accused of stealing trade secrets before he moved to XMotors, a US-based sister company to Chinese EV manufacturer Xpeng, in January 2019.
This article first appeared in Drive I/O, TechNode’s biweekly newsletter on autonomous and electric vehicles, on April 29. Didn’t get this in your inbox? Get in touch and we’ll fix it!
Cao served as head of perception at XMotors, though he has been on leave since the investigation began. Tesla alleges that Cao copied Autopilot source code during his time at Tesla, and that the software could have benefited Xpeng.
Now, one year after filing a suit against the Chinese engineer, Tesla is attempting to gain access to a vast array of Xpeng’s internal communications and proprietary code in a push to indict Cao. Court documents reviewed by TechNode reveal that Tesla is taking an extraordinarily aggressive approach to the dispute with its smaller rival.
Tesla argues that Cao’s arrival at XMotors mirrors that of former Apple engineer Zhang Xiaolang, who was arrested in the US on charges of stealing proprietary information related to Apple’s self-driving car project before joining XMotors.
Xpeng is hardening its stance in the escalating legal battle with Tesla in an uncharacteristically public way.
Tesla first filed a civil complaint against Cao in March 2019, claiming the engineer had copied Autopilot-related source code to his personal iCloud account in a nine-month period before leaving Tesla. Neither Xpeng nor XMotors have been charged in Tesla’s suit.
In July 2019, Cao acknowledged that he had downloaded and stored Tesla source code on his personal laptop, but pleaded not guilty to theft charges. The dispute remained at a deadlock.
In November of 2019, Tesla issued its first subpoena to XMotors, seeking a broad array of information, including “all non-privileged” internal communications involving Cao. The request included any correspondence on the popular messaging app WeChat that was related to Tesla and Autopilot.
Tesla also requested Cao’s personal messages to XMotors employees, as well as his compensation and employment terms with Xpeng. XMotors responded to Tesla’s request in December by filing 6,333 pages of documents. An initial investigation found no evidence that XMotors encouraged Cao to exploit Tesla’s source code for its benefit.
After nearly a year of litigation, Tesla issued a second subpoena to XMotors this January, requesting an array of documents as well as XMotor’s entire repository of autonomous-driving source code from before Cao was recruited, to after he was placed on leave in March 2019.
Tesla’s request extended to images of entire hard drives from various Xpeng employees’ work computers, including those of the company’s CEO He Xiaopeng and president Brian Gu. The request also demanded that Xpeng make an employee available for an interview.
Tesla’s latest requests have infuriated the domestic EV startup. This is “just a fishing expedition meant to bully and disrupt a young competitor,” Xpeng said in an announcement released April 24, just two days before the company launched the P7, its first sedan model, which competes with Tesla’s China-made Model 3. The Chinese EV maker said that Tesla’s request to broaden the scope of the investigation is “based on nothing more than sheer speculation.”
Most notably, Tesla asked XMotors for documents related to a case against Apple’s former employee Zhang Xiaolang, looking for a pattern of misconduct by XMotors in its operations and recruiting. What has caused the American EV giant to prolong its campaign against its Chinese rival? Here are some of the key findings revealed in the recent documents filed by XMotors in US courts.
Tesla’s arguments: The US EV giant is seeking to connect a previous employee accused of stealing trade secrets before joining Xpeng and the latest case against Cao. Tesla is also suspicious about the conditions under which Cao left the company.
Xpeng’s testimony: Meanwhile, Xpeng and Cao have contradicted Tesla’s claims, arguing that conversations between the engineer and his colleague had been mistranslated.
In competing with their US counterparts, Chinese companies have long been known to seek shortcuts by poaching their employees. However, it is also true that not every job switch amounts to trade secret misappropriation. At the moment, Tesla’s suspicions remain mostly hypothetical: XMotors has not been named or charged in either the criminal case against Zhang or the civil action with Cao.
“We have engaged in no wrongdoing and we have fully cooperated with Tesla for months, including voluntarily providing our own confidential information. However, Tesla’s latest demands crossed the line, seeking to rummage through our IP on Tesla’s terms,” the company said in an announcement issued last week. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.
In its court filing of last week, XMotors said Tesla’s latest demands are an attempt to “obtain competitive information” in order to make their rival less competitive. On the other hand, Tesla claimed it had no interest in the substance of XMotors’ source code but rather wants to ascertain whether there is anything resembling its intellectual property.
Given Tesla’s dominant position in the Chinese EV market, the argument is plausible. The US carmaker delivered more than 16,000 EVs in China during the first quarter of this year, representing nearly a third of market share—even as domestic EV giant BYD faltered amid the Covid-19 outbreak. Tesla’s first-quarter sales in China are on par with nearly all of Xpeng’s annual deliveries, a margin wide enough to solidify Tesla’s leadership in the market.
Tesla’s dominance could be challenged by companies like Xpeng, which launched its first electric sedan this week. Xpeng claims the P7 is the first “L3 autonomy-ready” production vehicle with the longest driving range in China.
The company also claims that its assisted-driver system Xpilot differs from those of its rivals because it is tailor-made for congested Chinese traffic situations. CEO He Xiaopeng promised to offer the “best user experience” with features that include autonomous lane changing on highways—to be made available via an update next year.
At a third of the price of Tesla Model S, Xpeng’s newest vehicle has elicited strong interest from some Chinese EV enthusiasts. “The P7 could be the most cost-effective EV sedan available in the market,” said one netizen in a WeChat group for EV fans after Tuesday’s press conference.
Although it’s still unclear whether the P7 could be a “Tesla killer” that may also help Xpeng outperform its Chinese rivals, the two companies’ escalating court battle and the fight for pole position in the world’s largest EV market is only just beginning.
Correction: A previous version of this newsletter incorrectly stated that two former Apple engineers joined Xpeng after leaving the US tech giant. Only Zhang Xiaolang joined the company. This text has also been amended to clarify that Cao Guangzhi was placed on administrative leave in March 2019.
]]>Lixiang, a Chinese electric vehicle maker little known outside the country, is quickly catching up to other domestic EV startups by delivering more than 2,600 cars in April, a finish just several hundred units fewer than another Tesla’s challenger, Nio.
Why it matters: The April sales figures from Nio and Lixiang could be an indicator for a V-shaped recovery in the world’s biggest EV market. Automakers in China have been hurt by a months-long pandemic, subsidy cuts, and a broader slump.
Details: Lixiang’s total sales reached more than 6,500 vehicles as of April after it began delivering its plug-in hybrid (PHEV) crossover Ideal One in December, with more than 40% achieved over the past month, the company said last week.
Context: Tesla now has a commanding lead in the Chinese EV market with 11,280 vehicles delivered in March, a number that is 10 times bigger than that of Nio and Lixiang.
The long-awaited bail-out for cash-strapped Nio from an imminent liquidity crisis is finally arriving. The electric vehicle maker announced Wednesday it will receive a RMB 7 billion cash infusion with final commitments from several state-run capital firms, its biggest ever funding round since listing in the US stock market in Sep. 2018.
Why it matters: Nio now can really go toe-to-toe with Tesla, the absolute leader in the market, and enhance its opportunities for more financing.
Details: Nio has signed “definitive agreements” for a RMB 7 billion ($990 million) financing project with strategic investors including Hefei City Construction and Investment Holding (Group) Co., Ltd., State Development & Investment Corp., Ltd, and Anhui Provincial Emerging Industry Investment Co., Ltd.
Context: Nio and the Hefei government signed a framework agreement for an expected RMB 10 billion funding plan in late February. This came at the same time when the company kicked off production of its third electric SUV model EC6, targeting Tesla Model Y, in its joint plant with JAC Motors in Hefei.
Xpeng Motors on Monday launched its first sedan model P7, boasting a range of 706 km (439 miles) and what it claimed the best-performed autonomous driving hardware stack among locally-produced vehicles.
Why it matters: One of the few sedan models launched by Tesla’s major Chinese challengers, P7 is now placed in direct competition against the China-made Model 3. It also brings the company one step closer to the premium market.
“I strongly believe that P7 will provide the best driver assist experience in China.”
—He Xiaopeng, Chairman and CEO during the online press conference
Details: The electric sports sedan P7 is available for order with a price tag of RMB 244,900 ($34,600) after subsidies.
Context: Ranging from RMB 229,900 all the way up to RMB 349,900, the P7 is Xpeng’s second mass production model.
Tesla on Friday slightly increased the after-subsidy prices of two popular China-made Model 3 versions, immediately after Beijing announced a 10% cut in government incentives for electric vehicle purchase.
Why it matters: China’s latest adjustment for EV buying is expected to force Tesla into making tough choices: margins or market share.
Details: The standard range plus version of the made-in-China Model 3 is now rising by RMB 4,500 to RMB 303,550 after-subsidies, while the purchase price of the long range version is up by RMB 5,000 to RMB 344,050, according to Tesla’s website.
Context: With a price range starting at RMB 323,800 before subsidies, the made-in-China Model 3 is currently eligible for the latest incentives over the next three months, but will be disqualified for that once the transitional period closes on July 22.
Byton has been reportedly not paid employees, following a furlough of half its US operation.
Why it matters: The latest setback echoes a long-standing concern that Byton, once considered a serious contender for leadership in the Chinese EV market, is falling behind major rivals.
Details: Multiple employees from Byton’s China headquarter in the eastern city of Nanjing said they have not received March salaries and still don’t know when they will get paid, Chinese media reported on Wednesday citing people familiar with the matter.
Context: Byton is not the only Chinese EV maker struggling to stay afloat in an extended market slump.
After taking a significant hit following the nationwide Covid-19 lockdown, electric vehicle (EV) sales in the world’s biggest market are finally showing signs of recovery.
In February, according to figures from the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA), new energy vehicle (NEV) sales plunged 77% year-on-year to a mere 11,000 vehicles—the lowest since January 2017, when Beijing began phasing out subsidies on electric vehicle purchases.
But the tide is turning. Some automakers are beginning to buck the downward trend after the Chinese government stepped to triage its embattled EV sector, rolling back strict rules on the bloated sector and providing additional support to automakers and EV buyers.
This article first appeared in Drive I/O, TechNode’s biweekly newsletter on autonomous and electric vehicles, on April 15. Didn’t get this in your inbox? Get in touch and we’ll fix it!
China’s biggest automakers have been the hardest hit by the virus. In March, the country’s NEV giants—BYD, BAIC, and Geely—saw their deliveries plummet by two-thirds year-on-year. This marked three consecutive months of decline, in which the automakers saw their deliveries fall by more than half.
Covid-19 had effectively crippled China’s mobility industry. In February, as lockdowns to contain the disease spread across China, the need for transportation services disappeared. Taxi and ride-hailing services—usually cash cows for China’s biggest OEMs—came to a standstill due to weak demand and poor revenue, the CPCA wrote in a March report (in Chinese).
BYD, BJEV, and Geely are the largest players in China’s business EV market. Not only do they supply EVs for mobility services in their home cities, but their vehicles are also deployed in countless cities nationwide as local governments electrify their taxi fleets.
Last year, BAIC reportedly received orders for more than 80,000 EVs from various ride-hailing services, while Geely inked a deal with Chengdu to replace the city’s fleet of 10,000 gas-powered taxis with EVs by the end of 2020. But the economic pressures faced by ride-hailing operators during the outbreak resulted in a “significant number” of new car orders being canceled, said Cui Dongshu, secretary-general of CPCA, on April 9. As infection rates climbed, electrification of these fleets became a low priority. Now, as more than 50 cities resume taxi services after a month-long suspension, China’s auto giants remain in the doldrums.
However, there have been a few winners. Chinese EV darling Nio and the American carmaker Tesla have bucked the trend.
The US EV giant recently reported record-high first-quarter results but did not disclose figures for sales in China. However, according to figures obtained by CPCA, the company delivered 10,160 EVs in China last month. That figure made up over 20% of the country’s all-electric market, and Tesla trailed BYD—one of China’s biggest automakers—by just a few dozen deliveries.
Late last month, Tesla’s Shanghai Gigafactory achieved weekly production capacity of 3,000 Model 3s, and is poised to offload around 150,000 China-made EVs this year.
Nio, which has faced its share of struggles, also outperformed the country’s biggest manufacturers over the past three months. During the first two months of 2020, combined sales of its flagship ES8 SUV and smaller ES6 only decreased around 12% from a year earlier.
The fall was followed in March by a 12% year-on-year increase in deliveries to 1,533 vehicles. “All signs point to a much faster demand recovery in the premium segment versus mass,” Bernstein analysts led by Robin Zhu wrote in a research note on April 8.
This appears to explain Nio’s relatively strong performance in the crumbling market over the past few months. The company has beaten the giants in the Chinese luxury EV sector. Over the past year, sales of its ES6 came out ahead of Mercedes Benz’s EQC and Audi’s e-tron in China, according to official car registration data.
However, Tesla now poses a bigger threat. The China-made Model 3 and Y could take market share from Nio, preventing the Chinese EV maker from improving earnings, analysts at China’s Everbright Securities said in March.
Nio aims to sell 4,000 cars a month this year, which the company says could “basically support its operational targets,” including a double-digit profit margin in the fourth quarter. Bernstein analysts predict Nio sales will rebound in the second quarter as the pandemic fades. “But the threat of competition from Tesla will only become more pertinent over time,” they said.
The turnaround for smaller EV makers can be attributed in part to China’s push to revive its flagging EV sector.
Before the coronavirus outbreak, Beijing had already been fighting to keep its electric vehicle industry afloat. The sector had gone into drastic decline since June of last year, when authorities cut subsidies by up to 50% for EV purchases. The hope was that reductions would spur innovation in a sector many believed had become too reliant on government support.
But in early January, China’s industry minister said the country would suspend further subsidy reductions in order to counter the months-long slump. The announcement came 10 days before China’s economy was turned upside down by wide-ranging quarantines and stay-at-home orders to curb the spread of Covid-19. As infection rates soared, authorities shuttered production plants and closed brick-and-mortar stores. Although February is typically a slow month for China’s auto industry, the shutdowns led to an unprecedented decline in deliveries.
Beijing is now leading a sector-wide bailout of its EV industry by backtracking on plans to completely axe subsidies this year as well as lowering barriers to entry for new EV makers. The government hopes to restore growth in the world’s largest market for electrified transportation in an offensive that, at this stage, seems to be working.
As China moves closer to something resembling normalcy following the drastic disruption to the economy, the State Council, China’s cabinet, made a surprise announcement: Subsidies and tax breaks for EV buyers will remain in place until 2022. The government had originally planned to do away with them completely this year.
The communiqué, which came just two and a half months after regulators decided that no further cuts would be implemented in 2020, represent a dramatic shift in direction. After NEV deliveries slid by nearly 80% in February, authorities ultimately decided to take matters into their own hands instead of allowing the industry to stand on its own two feet.
Postponing further subsidy cuts represents just one of the ways that Chinese authorities are attempting to restore the industry to its former glory and rescue automakers that have been deeply affected by the virus.
The country’s notorious production quota system is also reportedly being temporarily relaxed. The system has been used to drive EV production by requiring domestic automakers to follow strict guidelines on reaching EV building goals.
Bigger automakers—which have been some of the hardest hit in the past three months—may now be allowed to focus on better-selling gas-driven cars and to delay new EV launches in order to improve their dwindling cash reserves.
Local governments are also helping to bail out troubled automakers with massive cash injections. Nio has signed a deal with the government of Hefei, the capital of east China’s Anhui province, worth RMB 10 billion (around $1.4 billion). The long-awaited deal is expected to rescue the company from a liquidity crunch after months of no investment.
Meanwhile, the government of Henan province invested RMB 2.02 billion for a 60% stake in Shanghai-based EV maker Reech Auto. Although the company has yet to start producing vehicles, they have struck a deal with state-owned carmaker Changan to produce its vehicles.
Beijing is also making it easier for fledgling automakers to enter the market by lowering barriers to entry. The government will no longer insist that EV makers be capable of product development, according to draft changes to current policies released on April 7 by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. The measures had previously been put in place to calm a regulatory bubble that had seen nearly 500 EV companies established throughout China.
]]>Volkswagen and its march into the Chinese battery supply chain has once again become the subject of intense speculation. The German automaker is reportedly nearing an agreement to take a majority stake in the country’s third-biggest battery maker Guoxuan High-tech, which was later denied by the battery supplier.
Why it matters: If the deal were made, as reported by local media, the alliance could undermine the monopoly of China’s top electric vehicle battery supplier CATL and change the market landscape now dominated by BYD and Tesla.
Details: As of April. 22, the board of directors has not received any proposed takeover relevant to Volkswagen, as well as any notice over transfer of shares from controlling shareholders and actual controllers, Guoxuan High-tech said late Wednesday in an announcement to investors (in Chinese).
Context: Volkswagen’s deliveries in China declined 35% year on-year to around 613,900 units in the first quarter of this year, a better-than-average result compared with a drop by nearly half in the general auto market.
This article has been updated to include an announcement released on April. 22, 2020, in which Guoxuan High-tech denied a rumored takeover proposal of Volkswagen buying 30% stake of the company.
]]>Chinese automakers are looking for novel ways to reach customers as people in China shy away from going outdoors.
To curb the spread of Covid-19, the new flu-like virus that has rocked the country over the past few weeks, cities across the country have imposed strict rules limiting people’s movement. The epidemic has had a profound impact on China’s auto sector, with numerous manufacturers repeatedly postponing the reopening of their production facilities. Just one-third of Chinese automakers have resumed production, the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) said on Feb. 13.
Beyond production issues, EV makers are struggling to sell their cars. Electric vehicle makers Tesla and its Chinese rival Nio said last week that they expect significant adverse effects on their business as a result of the virus. Cui Dongshu, secretary-general of the China Passenger Car Association, said that only 5% of car dealerships in China had reopened for business last week.
As a result, EV makers in China have moved the battlefield from offline stores to the virtual world in a bid for customers’ attention. What have these companies been doing on Chinese social media and live-streaming platforms to win the favor of potential car buyers? Are these attempts to maintain their presence and boost sales truly effective?
In a step further from traditional auto showrooms and toward contemporary Chinese retail mores, Tesla opened a TMall digital store on April 16. On April 21, Tesla started broadcasting a car-themed EV livestream for an hour a day (one pm to two pm).
From the TechNode archives, we bring you a look at the company’s awkward first steps into livestreaming, during the high lockdown of February. Originally available only as a members’ e-mail newsletter, we’re now making the piece free for all readers. Start your free trial now.
Nio, Tesla’s most high-profile rival in China, has joined the attention economy.
As people hunker down at home to limit potential exposure to Covid-19, the EV maker has started live-streaming an eclectic collection of shows 12 hours a day, hoping to capture the minds and wallets of the country’s upper-middle class. A team of influence peddlers host the shows, including stylish employees and influential car owners.
Nio is not the only EV maker to join the live-streaming battle. Established automakers from BMW to China’s Geely are exploiting the format in pursuit of customers. These automakers have taken to the enormously popular short-video platforms Douyin (known internationally as TikTok) and Kuaishou. These two platforms were among the top five Chinese mobile apps with more than 200 million daily active users during this year’s Spring Festival holidays, according to the latest report by market research firm QuestMobile.
Live-streaming appears to be a perfect fit for auto sales at a moment when fears of the epidemic have left shops bereft of customers and trying to prop up sales during a continuing downturn in the auto market.
For Nio, the move aligns with the company’s ongoing efforts to expand its community and Nio House clubhouses online.
In one live-streamed video, Nio employees can be seen taking an ES6 electric crossover out for a drive on a frigid sunny morning, giving viewers a hands-on experience on what it’s like to use the company’s assisted driver system, Nio Pilot. In another video, a host compares a Tesla with one of the company’s own cars, pointing out differences in design and workmanship.
Nio owners, who pride themselves on their loyalty to the EV maker, are participating in the company’s online crusade. TechNode joined in a nighttime livestream hosted by Wang Zhengyang, a longtime Nio owner who lives in northeastern China’s Heilongjiang province. Within the first 30 minutes of the show, Wang fielded more than a dozen questions from livestream viewers, all from within his parked car. Queries ranged from the possible price of Nio’s recently launched EC6 coupe to the range of electric vehicles in colder climates. Wang also presented tutorials on the basics of driving an EV.
As the first ES6 owner in one of the coldest provinces in China, Wang spent three hours addressing problems of other customers all over the country. His shows have continued for more than 10 days, according to the program lists Nio has published within its app.
What really differentiates Nio from other automakers in this online battle for customers’ attention is the variety of their content, essentially moving leisure activities from the offline world to online. Nio has presented dozens of different reality shows in real time this month. From teaching women about how to apply makeup to sharing secrets for brewing coffee, Nio’s sales officers are constantly seeking out topics of interest for their potential customers.
The move originated with Nio Houses, the company’s exclusive clubhouses for customers in its flagship stores. Prior to the Covid-19 outbreak, Nio owners had organized events and made connections in these spaces, which are equipped with a co-working space, a café, and even a childcare center.
In an online network that is not subject to the restrictions of space, Nio is not only trying to draw the attention of customers with different interests and backgrounds, but also fulfilling an ambitious goal: building connections with its community using a customer-centric strategy. Nio’s customer loyalty is the company’s strength, and it is playing to that strength to solidify its reputation.
Nio is not alone in its online crusade. Tesla has also taken to short videos and live-streaming in China, but unlike its competitor, the American EV maker has suffered from poor planning and unprofessional hosts.
On Feb. 8, just one day after Nio launched its revitalized online marketing campaign, two Tesla stores in the Pudong area of Shanghai opened accounts on Douyin. Tesla stores in other Chinese cities have also set up Douyin accounts.
In comparison to Nio, Tesla’s official Douyin account consistently posts swanky, yet less focused, content that ranges from videos of the Cybertruck and Roadstar 2 to goofy skits. The company’s default policy has been to let its local stores determine what content they post. Tesla has yet to designate a person to develop a central content strategy, two Tesla salespeople said when contacted by TechNode last week.
In one of these livestreams, a young Tesla employee used the last 15 minutes of the show to make small talk with his dozen viewers. These conversations included urging a customer to take out a loan on a new car, adding that a RMB 40,000 (about $5,700) down payment on a car was “quite cheap.” The host went on to make fun of his own hair, saying that he was unhappy with the wavy hairstyle and complaining that salons have remained closed because of the outbreak.
In another livestream, a salesperson wearing a facemask walked around a Model X in a Tesla store, providing detailed information about the car. A female assistant took the camera and occasionally asked questions sent by viewers. The sales supervisor was knowledgeable about EVs and careful in the choice of his words. Faced with a hardball question about the car’s wind noise, he acknowledged that the Model X’s fastback roof and frameless doors make wind noise reduction more challenging than for other cars. However, the distracting spectacle of several employees goofing off nearby spoiled the professionalism of the video. During the 20 minutes that TechNode viewed this livestream, fewer than 10 viewers were watching the show.
One possible explanation for Tesla’s less-focused content is less need—sales have been good since the company began accepting orders for its Chinese-made Model 3. Meanwhile, Nio has warned that it expects deliveries to drop off in February.
EV makers in China have always taken an internet-first approach to their businesses. But the recent virus outbreak has made this modus operandi a matter of necessity rather than just convenience.
As the government has encouraged—and constrained—people to stay indoors, the entire process of buying a car has moved online. Many EV companies are providing “online showrooms” via live-streaming, where potential buyers ask questions and interact with the host just as they would in a physical space.
Interested individuals can book a door-to-door test drive, in which the company brings the car to them and takes them back home after the drive. And if they decide to buy that electric vehicle, they can order and pay online, and have the car delivered directly to them.
A Tesla salesperson in Shanghai told TechNode that if the deposit for a China-made Model 3 is paid now, a test drive can be arranged for March. If the customer feels the vehicle isn’t up to standard, the deposit will be returned.
However, the process relies on piquing the interest of customers, and so far, live-streaming has had mixed results for EV makers.
According to TechNode’s investigation, vehicle-related live-streams do well in audience terms, often drawing more than 100 viewers per show. One Nio video detailing the company’s self-driving capabilities attracted more than 1,000 viewers. However, the company’s lifestyle livestreams typically get many fewer views.
“Everyone cares more about hardcore content,” an EV fan in Xiamen told TechNode, referring to videos about actual cars rather than other topics.
The diverse types of content are directed at different audiences: those who are interested in buying cars and those who are already part of the EV community. Nio in particular is clearly attempting to expand its Nio House concept to the online space by providing non-vehicle-related services and content.
Nevertheless, numerous viewers appear to be less than impressed with some of the livestreams, describing the live shows as “boring” and lacking in informative content. Given that these livestreams have yet to garner many viewers, it’s unclear how successful the format may be in converting viewers to buyers.
If EV live-streaming gains a widespread following, it could potentially allow companies to scale back their presence in brick-and-mortar stores, dramatically reducing overhead.
For now, however, this avenue of sales is all that EV companies really have, as many city governments have enforced temporary closures of nonessential stores to stop the spread of the virus.
“Offline channels are basically blocked,” said a user on microblogging platform Weibo. “Now only those online can be used.”
]]>Baidu has officially expanded its autonomous early rider program to citizens in the central Chinese city of Changsha as rivals accelerate their plans to carry passengers for dominance in the self-driving arena.
Why it matters: Baidu is doing more road tests in a bid to win more favor from Chinese local governments. Beijing has called for local governments to spend more on upgrading their transportation infrastructures.
Details: Citizens ranging from 18 to 65 can hail a self-driving Hongqi, a luxury sedan model from state-owned automaker FAW, with just “one-click” on Baidu’s navigation and search apps, according to our investigation.
Read more: A ride in a Baidu self-driving taxi
Context: Baidu is not the first self-driving company allowing public to hail a robotaxi on Chinese public roads.
Chinese ride-hailing platform Didi Chuxing has reportedly secured a $1 billion round of fresh funding for its bike rental business Qingju, as the company seeks to diversify growth in the Chinese mobility market with a target of 100 million daily trips for the next three years. People familiar with the deal told LatePost (in Chinese) that Didi poached part of the investment away from Ant Financial’s Hellobike.
Why it matters: Already the biggest ride-hailing platform in its home country, Didi is digging a wide yet deep competitive moat around the broader Chinese mobility market. The company sees bike rentals as one of its main growth drivers.
Details: Investors in the round include Lenovo-backed investment firm Legend Capital and an unnamed international venture capital firm, according to LatePost.
Context: Chinese bike rental services have struggled to break even and the recent cash infusion is expected to bring changes to the market.
Beijing is promising big spending on “new infrastructure” amid post-virus stimulus. The government says it will focus on electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure, an upgraded electrical grid, artificial intelligence, 5G networks, improved transportation systems, and data centers to drive the economy towards recovery.
While China has not announced official figures, analysts from China Sinolink Securities, which has produced the most comprehensive and widely cited estimates, expect the total to reach RMB 1 trillion (around $141.3 billion) in 2020.
Bottom line: Don’t count on high-tech infrastructure to overcome a recession—it’s outweighed by traditional projects. But this investment gusher is accelerating deployment of technologies like connected roads, improved telecommunications networks, and electric vehicle charging stations.
A familiar remedy: China has typically turned to infrastructure spending in the face of economic troubles. During the 1998 Asian Financial Crisis, the government issued billions of yuan in treasury bonds to increase investment in roads, utilities, railways, and telecommunications.
Apart from traditional road infrastructure projects, China is looking to build intelligent transport systems that incorporate technologies such as 5G, artificial intelligence, and the Internet of Things. While Beijing has not outlined a budget for connected roads, Sinolink expects (in Chinese) the government to spend nearly RMB 450 billion on supporting technologies.
Read more: China’s AV edge? It’s the infrastructure
Baidu does well: China’s search giant Baidu has become a major beneficiary of China’s recent drive to increase spending on new infrastructure projects that incorporate these sorts of technologies.
A head start in a race to set standards: Early mass implementation of China’s standards for C-V2X could lead to wider adoption around the world, and more money for Chinese companies, as deliberation over opposing systems grows.
The official cliché is that 5G is the “highway of the information age.” The next-generation wireless network is also seen by state media (in Chinese) as the “bellwether” for the seven key areas of the new infrastructure projects.
Some are more equal: While Beijing has repeatedly said that foreign companies have “equal opportunities” to participate in the rollout of its 5G networks, most of the budget will probably go to domestic vendors such as Huawei and ZTE.
At the heart of the national policies for global leadership in technology, electric vehicles were not left out of the big funding boost. Beijing has announced plans to spend RMB 10 billion on the country’s scattered charging network in a bid to increase EV uptake.
Much needed: A charging station buildout could help the struggling EV industry draw in customers.
A tough business: Charging infrastructure could use the help—experts warn that it’s hard for companies to succeed with it in market terms.
Unprecedented support from Beijing could drive a surge of capital flow into technology sectors, however, the impact to shore up the entire economy might be limited.
Tesla opened a flagship store on B2C marketplace Tmall April 16. The store sells accessories and allows customers to schedule a test drive for RMB 1 ($0.14).
Why it matters: Tesla’s move underscores an emerging trend in China, where automakers are relying more on online channels to boost sales.
Read more: Tesla and Nio buck EV sales slump
Details: Tesla and Alibaba on Thursday announced the first batch of car accessories, including cargo mats and tire repair kits, are now available to customers on Tesla’s Tmall store.
Context: This is actually the second time Tesla has partnered with Alibaba to expand its reach to the country’s 800 million internet users.
Pony.ai on Thursday announced it has launched a new last-mile delivery service in California. In partnership with Yamibuy, the company’s autonomous vehicles will deliver daily essentials to customers in Irvine.
Why it matters: This is the first time for the Toyota-backed AV startup do autonomous delivery. As the pandemic keeps citizens from street shopping and public gatherings, tech companies have a chance to experiment with new technology in live commercial operations.
Details: Pony.ai on Thursday began piloting a “contactless” delivery service for customers in Irvine through a partnership with Yamibuy, a California-based e-commerce platform featuring Asian snacks and beauty products.
Context: Pony.ai is the latest AV company navigating use cases for the commercial operation of self-driving vehicles in delivery services.
China’s largest utility companies, State Grid and Southern Power Grid, are planning to spend a combined RMB 4 billion ($570 million) on charging stations this year, the latest move as Beijing calls on technology investment to boost electric vehicle uptake amid flagging sales.
Why it matters: This could mark the beginning of a new round of infrastructure boom in China, with charging stations as one of the key areas.
Details: State Grid on Tuesday announced an “all-in construction plan” of spending RMB 2.7 billion to build 78,000 new charging piles across China this year, according to a report by Chinese media Caixin. On Friday, China Southern Power Grid said it planned to invest RMB 1.2 billion.
Context: China has built the world biggest power network for EVs with more than 1.2 million public and private charging piles across 400 cities as of last year, Cai Ronghua, a deputy director of the National Development and Reform Commission said on Thursday.
China’s push to lead the world self-driving race is making another step forward: Didi Chuxing and AutoX are both about to launch their own autonomous ride-hailing pilot projects on the outskirts of Shanghai in late May, two sources familiar with the matter told TechNode on Tuesday. The projects are separate. The companies started their partnerships with the Shanghai government around the same time.
Why it matters: As Chinese local governments continue to support road testing, Didi and AutoX, among other newcomers, are attempting to elbow further into the crowded race led by Pony.ai and Baidu.
Details: Ride-hailing giant Didi is planning to launch a robot ride-hailing pilot service in Shanghai as early as May and so is AutoX, two persons with direct knowledge confirmed to TechNode on Tuesday.
Context: Shanghai government in September issued China’s first licenses for passenger-carrying self-driving cars in an area of 65 square kilometers to Volkswagen’s partner SAIC, BMW and Didi, followed by AutoX in December.
Chinese electric vehicle maker BYD is supplying face masks to Japan purchased by Softbank, as the country’s manufacturers rush to meet surging overseas demand amid the global spread of Covid-19.
Why it matters: Hit hard by plunging auto sales and core business shutdowns, more automakers are switching to manufacturing face masks.
Details: BYD on Sunday confirmed that it has reached an agreement with Japanese conglomerate Softbank to supply 300 million face masks per month starting May, reported Shenzhen Special Zone Daily (in Chinese).
Context: China reached production capacity of 116 million masks per day on Feb. 29, according to government figures, a figure that shot up more than tenfold in a month when big OEMs swiftly switched to mask production, motivated in part as a way to reopen their car production facilities.
China has pledged to step up efforts to maintain its global leadership in the EV adoption race, planning to invest RMB 10 billion this year to expand the already world largest EV charging network, a top government official said on Thursday.
Why it matters: More investment from government bodies could ease the burden of struggling automakers and reverse the downward trend in sales by making charging more accessible.
Details: China will invest RMB 10 billion ($1.42 billion) to expand the country’s charging network by 50% this year to stimulate EV deployment, Cai Ronghua, a deputy director at the National Development and Reform Center (NDRC) said during a media briefing on Thursday in Beijing.
Context: China has announced a series of policy stimulus, including two-year extension of subsidies and tax breaks on EV purchase in bid to cement its position as the world biggest EV market.
The slump in sales for China’s EVs continued in March, but were still four times better than February. Tesla accounted for over 20% of the total market share, the country’s top industry body said on Thursday.
Why it matters: The latest sales figures show that China’s EV market, hit hard first by subsidy cuts and then by the Covid-19 outbreak, is now on the mend.
Details: New energy vehicle (NEV) sales in March fell 49% year-on-year to around 56,000 units. In February, sales fell nearly 80% year-on-year, the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) said on Thursday.
Context: China last year recorded its first-ever decline on an annual basis in NEV sales to 1.2 million units, as the central government moved to cut subsidies on EV purchases.
Nio stock moved 9% higher on Tuesday after the company announced stronger-than-expected delivery results for the first quarter alongside plans to hand over all-new ES8s, its seven-seater SUV later this month.
Why it matters: Nio’s first-quarter performance was a big relief for investors. It also eased worry over potential knock-on effects from recent Luckin Coffee fraud scandal on other US-listed Chinese companies.
We are pleased to see the gradual recovery of our production in March, with special thanks to the great support from our supply chain partners since the second half of March.
—Founder and CEO, Li Bin
Details: Nio on Tuesday reported an 11.7% year-on-year increase in deliveries to 1,533 vehicles in March. 1,479 vehicles of those were ES6. Its five-seater SUV, the bigger ES8, made up the balance.
Context: Despite a general auto sales slump amid the Covid-19 outbreak, analysts expect the world’s biggest EV market to resume growth. China has made signals it will ramp up support with measures to boost consumption in electric vehicles.
Baidu’s Apollo autonomous driving program has thrust the search giant into the spotlight. Named after NASA’s moon missions, the self-driving program recently enjoyed a series of wins when Baidu came out on top in annual self-driving reports released by authorities in California and Beijing.
But when Baidu unseated Google’s self-driving division Waymo to take the top spot in California’s disengagement report, it was been greeted with widespread skepticism. The utility of the report has been called into question, casting doubt over using the metrics to assess the AV companies’ technologies.
This article first appeared in Drive I/O, TechNode’s biweekly newsletter on autonomous and electric vehicles, on April 1.
Didn’t get this in your inbox? Get in touch and we’ll fix it!
Waymo has said the reports do not provide “relevant insights” or distinguish their company’s “performance from others in the self-driving space.” Kyle Vogt, the CTO of General Motors-backed Cruise, shared similar sentiments. “The idea that disengagements give a meaningful signal about whether an AV is ready for commercial deployment is a myth,” he wrote in a blog post.
Still, much is expected of Baidu’s self-driving efforts. The company has launched autonomous ride-hailing services in Changsha, the capital of Hunan province, as well as in Cangzhou, in north China’s Hebei province, with a fleet of 30 cars. Baidu’s autonomous driving tests have covered more than 3 million kilometers on public roads across 23 Chinese cities.
Where are Baidu’s self-driving cars headed in 2020? What is the outlook for Baidu in autonomous ride-hailing? We will start with our recent experience in a Baidu robotaxi in Changsha and move on from there.
Robotaxis are all the rage. Around the world, startup and tech giants alike are fighting the war for self-driving supremacy, and autonomous taxis have become the new battleground.
Companies including Baidu, Pony.ai, and WeRide have launched robotaxi pilots across China. Baidu, the country’s designated self-driving champion, began offering its robotaxi service in Changsha last September.
Three months later, TechNode arrived in downtown Changsha. Standing outside a well-known culture and arts center on a sun-washed December afternoon, we waited for a Baidu self-driving taxi to pull up.
The trip showed us how companies are taking vastly different approaches to developing their self-driving technologies, and just how difficult it is to create global benchmarks detailing how these vehicles should perform.
Baidu runs its autonomous taxis in and around Changsha’s downtown Xiangjiang New Area. The trial operation is more of a geo-fenced test on public roads; passengers can pick one of three fixed five-kilometer routes, all starting from the city’s grand theater.
The tech giant has partnered with Chinese state-owned automaker FAW Group, which provides the vehicle for its autonomous system. As the luxury Hongqi model arrived to pick us up on that balmy December afternoon, we quickly took one photo before we were told that pictures were not allowed.
Shortly after we got into the car and entered Changsha traffic, Baidu’s approach to its self-driving program became evident. It was like going for a ride with a nervous student driver.
Companies that develop self-driving technology need to consider not only the safety of their passengers but also the comfort of the ride. Baidu places more emphasis on safety than we had expected, resulting in a trip that was less smooth than AV rides we’d experienced from companies that squeeze more efforts to the comfort of their passengers.
“Our top priority is zero accidents on the road,” our vehicle’s safety driver said while we waited at a traffic light. He offered a glimpse into how the company’s safety precautions are meant to protect the trial project from any sort of controversy. “All of us are required to take a 10-minute break for each hour of work,” the driver told us.
During our trip, Baidu’s robotaxi traveled at speeds of around 30 kilometers per hour and stopped by itself every now and then to yield to pedestrians. Traffic was heavy, with cars filling the six-lane Meixi Lake Road, downtown Changsha’s main avenue.
When the vehicle stopped at a red light in the middle of an intersection, we got to see firsthand the safety precautions that our driver had described: After a few minutes of waiting, the human driver had to take over. Situations like these are typically evaluated as “too risky” for the autonomous system to navigate. Baidu says it has reported “zero accidents” in the past few years because of its “safety-first” approach.
The company has requested that its fleet of dozens of vehicles in Changsha log a certain amount of mileage each day, our safety driver told TechNode, without revealing any further details. Meanwhile, working hours are very limited since the company has not been allowed to test during rush hour. Therefore, overtime work during weekends has become common.
Baidu is taking a more conservative approach to its AV road testing, emphasizing safety over comfort, a self-driving car engineer said, commenting on TechNode’s observations of our robotaxi ride.
Slower driving speeds, hesitation when turning or changing lanes, and constant stops when facing dangerous scenarios are among the passive driving strategies that result, the engineer said, who asked not to be named because he was not permitted to speak to the media.
A focus on safety, alongside a goal of fewer human interventions, can be achieved by developing a cautious algorithm, helped by some of the high-performance hardware that acts as the eyes of self-driving vehicles.
For years, safety and comfort have been among the top priorities for robotaxi companies offering driverless experiences. “No doubt safety is the key to getting autonomous cars on the roads,” but a better solution could be a wider range of driving styles with safety guarantees to ensure more comfort for passengers, the engineer said. There should have been some “more decisive driving policies” he said, referring to how the vehicle could have taken proactive measures to avoid dangerous situations, such as changing lanes.
Baidu’s prudence could be part of the reason the company came out on top in the recent self-driving report released by California’s Department of Motor Vehicles.
Baidu beat Google’s self-driving unit Waymo by reporting the least number of disengagements among all companies operating such vehicles in the state. A disengagement is defined as any time a human driver is required to take over from an autonomous system during self-driving tests.
But within the industry, questions over the relevance of such metrics are on the rise, with experts saying that the measure has limits when trying to gauge whether a company’s technologies are ready to be deployed commercially.
AV companies themselves have also highlighted the report’s limited usefulness. In an announcement, Baidu said disengagement is more of an internal reflection of the speed of technical iterations, and therefore comparison between companies is “not that meaningful.”
However, if disengagement rates offer few relevant insights into the technology, what are the measurable metrics that could indicate progress? Two experts that TechNode spoke with gave the same answer: the variety and complexity of testing scenarios in which a robocar can operate.
Keeping within a lane in urban traffic, recognizing traffic signals, or turning left at an intersection without a “green arrow” traffic signal are some of the most typical and frequently seen scenarios identified and tested by AV players.
However, the real difficulty is to get autonomous cars to operate under “edge cases,” or unusual circumstances, such as a nearby vehicle changing lanes abruptly, a motorcycle coming out of nowhere, or drunk driving behavior from other road users.
These scenarios could be used to create a benchmark dataset that enables companies to train and evaluate their algorithms and compare accuracy rates to effectively evaluate their technologies, much like ImageNet, a renowned computer vision dataset of more than 14 million photographs widely used to evaluate the performance of AI systems.
“The more driving scenarios your cars can handle, the more you can prove the safety of the technology,” said one of the experts. Nevertheless, problems persist because the industry has not reached a consensus on standards.
The self-driving industry has now evolved from being driven by research and development of AV technologies to being mostly pushed forward by testing efforts. The development of key technologies, such as environment perception and car control, have mostly been completed; the priority now is to gain experience in as many driving cases as possible and learn how to deal with them, the experts added.
Every new experience helps a self-driving car to learn, and that’s where some of the world’s AV leaders are ramping up their efforts. Last year, Cruise almost doubled its testing and validation miles from the year prior, and “every mile Cruise tested in California was driven in the very complex urban environment of San Francisco,” it said in its individual filing.
The company, which is mainly backed by General Motors, operates a fleet of 228 vehicles that drove more than 831,000 miles last year, nearly eight times that of Baidu. As of last December, the Chinese search giant claimed its vehicles had traveled a total of more than 3 million kilometers (1.86 million miles).
But wider tests in China are coming as more local governments join in the race to open their roads to robotaxi companies, allowing them to collect more data and develop better evaluation methods. We’ll have to wait and see who comes out in pole position.
]]>Gigafactory Shanghai is now the only Tesla production facility making cars following a full-scale shutdown of its factories in California and New York alongside continued job cuts at its Nevada factory, as Covid-19 infections in the US continue to escalate.
Why it matters: Giga Shanghai resumed operations in early February with support from the Chinese government. It has been relatively insulated from the pandemic and its contribution to the company’s annual target of 500,000 cars is expected to rise as a result.
Details: Tesla is slashing jobs for hundreds of contract workers in its vehicle plant in Fremont, Calif. and the Gigafactory factory near Reno, Nev., according to a CNBC report on Friday citing people familiar with the matter.
Context: Tesla on Thursday reported its best-ever first quarter deliveries of 88,400 cars, thanks to earlier-than-planned delivery of its Model Y vehicles in the US and accelerated production ramp-up in its Shanghai facility.
Self-driving startup Qcraft on Friday announced it has closed a round of seed funding running into “dozens of millions of US dollars” led by investment firm IDG Capital.
Why it matters: The deal marks another round of investment fervor around Chinese autonomous vehicle (AV) companies, at a time when municipal governments are nurturing emerging technologies to shore up economic growth.
Details: Qcraft has raised an undisclosed amount of funding in a seed round from a list of investment companies including IDG Capital and Vision Plus Capital, a Hangzhou-based venture capital firm formed by Eddie Wu, an Alibaba co-founder. The startup was founded in Silicon Valley and operates both in Beijing and California.
Context: Qcraft is one of the several AV startups that has recently won a new war chest.
China will keep supporting electric car sales for longer than expected to revive the country’s plunging electric vehicle (EV) market, extending purchase subsidies and tax breaks for two more years, China Central Television reported Tuesday.
Why it matters: By handing cash to buyers, subsidies will continue to boost sales for China’s ailing EV makers. The move could also encourage local governments to add further incentive policies, helping the country keep its status as the world’s largest EV market.
Details: China will extend subsidies and tax breaks for NEV buyers, which include all-electric cars, plug-in hybrids, and fuel cell vehicles, for two more years to stimulate consumption, the State Council said Tuesday. These subsidies were previously scheduled to phase out by the end of this year. Cuts already made will stay in place.
Context: Some European countries have strengthened support for clean energy vehicle adoption, including Germany, which increased cash incentives 50% to €6,000 (about $6,600) for an EV priced below €40,000 in November.
Nio is losing the head of its electric power engineering division, the company confirmed on Wednesday, as it begins another round of consolidation and headcount trimming in an effort to live up to ambitious profitability goals laid out by its CEO last month.
Why it matters: Nio’s executive departures are speeding up again, signaling the start of another round of restructuring in bid to gain profitability.
Details: Nio’s senior vice president of e-propulsion, Huang Chendong, who oversees research and development in powertrain, battery management systems, and car control, will step down on June 30, Chinese media reported Tuesday citing persons close to the matter.
Context: Continuous improvement in operational efficiency has been among the top priorities for the cash-strapped EV maker which recently claimed it has implemented “rigorous measures” in daily operations to fight headwinds from an extended market slump.
China’s Beijing Automotive Group (BAIC) is expanding its partnership with the country’s largest ride-hailing platform Didi Chuxing on a car-leasing platform for consumers, a move aimed to revive business in a flagging market amid the global Covid-19 outbreak.
Why it matters: BAIC’s attempt to embrace shared mobility comes amid weak demand in new car sales—particularly in major cities—after decades of super-charged growth.
Details: Daimler partner BAIC on Saturday announced a car-leasing program in partnership with Didi’s auto service division Xiaoju along with other industry players. The aim is to exceed 100 million car trips using 100,000 vehicles over the next three years.
Context: The novel coronavirus is accelerating an already rapid downward trend in China’s auto sales.
China’s biggest electric vehicle maker BYD on Sunday announced it has started mass production of a newly designed lithium battery which boasts high energy performance and eliminates the risk of spontaneous combustion in EVs.
Why it matters: The new product may help BYD recover ground lost in the EV battery market to CATL, which has been the world’s biggest battery maker since 2017 in terms of kilowatt hours sold.
Details: The mass production of a so-called “blade battery” has started, Warren Buffet-backed BYD said on Sunday, a product which boasts energy density of 332 watt-hours per liter, 50% better than a conventional LFP battery.
Context: China’s biggest EV maker and a major battery supplier, BYD trailed CATL in the EV battery market, reporting sales volume of 10.75 gigawatt hours (GWh) last year, just over a third of CATL’s, according to figures released by China Automotive Battery Innovation Alliance.
]]>Ride-hailing giant Didi has resumed limited nighttime operations of its carpooling service Hitch in some cities across China, while implementing stricter identity checks for drivers and passengers.
Why it matters: Didi suspended Hitch indefinitely in 2018 following two separate incidents in which drivers on the platform raped and murdered their female passengers.
Details: Passengers in cities including Beijing, Shanghai, and Hangzhou will now be able to use Hitch until 11 p.m., Didi said in a post on microblogging platform Weibo on Friday.
Context: China’s ride-hailing industry has faced compounding issues over the past two years. Apart from safety concerns, the Covid-19 outbreak as resulted in flagging demand since the beginning of the year.
Robotruck startup TuSimple has partnered with German auto supplier ZF to develop and commercialize technology for autonomous trucks.
Why it matters: TuSimple aims to begin testing truly driverless trucks—those without safety personnel on board—by 2021.
Details: TuSimple and ZF will work together to develop onboard computers and sensors such as radar and lidar for autonomous trucks, according to a statement released Thursday. The German supplier will also become TuSimple’s “default supplier” when commercializing robotrucks.
Context: Autonomous trucks are expected to reach commercialization before passenger vehicles, presenting huge potential for growth. TuSimple aims to transform America’s $800 billion trucking industry with autonomous rigs.
For the first time in history, a Chinese company has taken the top spot among firms testing autonomous vehicles on California public roads.
In February, Baidu reported the lowest rate of human intervention in 2019 as compared to companies that include Waymo, Cruise, and Pony.ai. When testing these AVs on public roads, these firms are required to submit data: the number of miles their vehicles drove autonomously and how often a human driver was required to take over—incidents that are known as disengagements.
This article first appeared in Drive I/O, TechNode’s biweekly newsletter on autonomous and electric vehicles, on March 18.
Didn’t get this in your inbox? Get in touch and we’ll fix it!
In 2019, Baidu drove 108,300 miles and reported six disengagements across its four vehicles, making for the lowest disengagement rate of all the companies listed in California’s annual report: 0.055 per 1,000 self-driven miles.
Baidu had drastically improved its performance over last year’s report, In 2018, the company reported one disengagement every 205 miles. This year, that number fell to one for every 18,050 miles. In doing so, the company managed to knock Waymo out of its top-ranked position. Baidu attributed the drop to rapid expansion in testing fields over the past three years.
But as the industry matures, disengagements are increasingly being seen as a poor measure of performance, since road and weather conditions, which play a huge role in report results, are not included in the data. Meanwhile, Baidu’s reports contain significantly less information about disengagements than its peers, causing industry insiders to raise questions about the quality of the company’s tests.
According to Baidu’s report, the company’s vehicles required human intervention in certain situations: when surrounding objects were not detected or were misclassified, when a decision made by the autonomous system was not appropriate to the scenario, or when there was a problem with the hardware.
However, Baidu does not provide any additional information about the situation under which these disengagements occurred, only broad categories. Meanwhile, several of its rivals’ reports provide more detail about each incident that resulted in a disengagement.
For example, where Chinese counterpart Pony.ai said of one disengagement: “Driver precautionarily intervened for a reckless neighboring vehicle cutting into vehicle’s lane,” Baidu would simply say “perception discrepancy,” making it difficult to gauge just how well the company’s AV system functions.
To be fair, self-driving startup WeRide also lacked detailed descriptions in its reports. These companies are not required to include comprehensive accounts of every disengagement. However, many well-established players do, including Cruise, Didi, and Zoox.
Other aspects of the company’s testing regime are also absent. The company does not mention in its report where the tests took place. Most other companies’ reports indicate where they are testing and whether they have expanded their operations in California.
Baidu is predominantly running its AVs in Sunnyvale in very simple traffic scenarios, two industry insiders told TechNode, who asked not to be named due to their proximity to the matter.
By contrast, General Motors-owned Cruise conducted all of its tests on urban roads in San Francisco, the third-most congested city in the US, according to Tomtom’s 2019 Traffic Index. Cruise reported a disengagement rate of 0.082 per 1000 miles.
A Baidu spokesperson told TechNode that the company tests in “diverse conditions,” including urban roads and scenarios involving pedestrian avoidance, left and right turns, lane changes, and traffic light recognition.
Road conditions can have a profound effect on disengagements, with more complex urban roads leading to more disengagements. Conversely, highway driving is typically seen as easy for AVs.
“If I wanted to look even better, I’d do a ton of easy freeway miles in California and do my real testing anywhere else,” Bryant Walker Smith, a self-driving car expert, told The Verge.
While Baidu took the top spot in the tests, four Chinese AV startups also made it into the Top 10. AutoX and Pony.ai came in fourth and fifth—right behind GM’s Cruise—with one disengagement every 10,684 and 6,475 miles, respectively.
Meanwhile, Didi Chuxing took the eighth position, reporting 1,535 miles per disengagement, a good result for a relative newcomer. Didi, China’s biggest ride-hailing platform, started testing in California in June 2018.
In addition, China- and California-based WeRide recorded 151.7 miles driven per disengagement, performing much worse than its Chinese peers but ranking higher than companies such as Apple, Mercedes Benz, and Toyota.
Most Chinese companies conducting tests in California revealed no further details about their operations when contacted by TechNode. However, their individual reports reveal a blurred glimpse into their performance.
Pony.ai, AutoX, and WeRide all claimed to have covered a big pool of testing scenarios in various traffic and weather conditions—either sunny days or heavy rain. However, none of them detailed when and where exactly a driver has to disengage the system. These companies gave no indication of whether these incidents occurred in downtown traffic during commutes or on empty highways at night.
In terms of test areas, all the four companies have vehicles being tested in the South Bay, while Pony.ai further expanded to Fremont, where it launched a pilot robotaxi program providing transport services from a train station to two government offices.
However, most of the areas have modest population density, around one-quarter of that of San Francisco, where GM Cruise tested its vehicles in the city’s “very complex urban environment.”
Among the four Chinese companies, Pony.ai reported that its vehicles covered the greatest distance. Its fleet of 22 vehicles logged 174,845 miles in California, the third-largest number in the ranking, although nearly a fifth of that of Cruise.
The Toyota-backed AV startup also detailed their disengagements in more detail than its Chinese counterparts. In the 27 disengagements recorded over the 12 months ending in November 2019, Pony.ai attributed eight of them to reckless driving by other vehicles, and 11 to suboptimal routes planned by software for the car to maneuver. The situations its vehicles encountered vary from insufficient yielding to reckless driving on the part of other road users.
Other AV companies reported disengagements resulting from poor detection of road objects or mapping flaws in different traffic scenarios. Although such details were presented in Didi’s reports, the ride-hailing giant revealed few reasons for disengagements, not categorizing them as planning, mapping or control issues.
Alibaba-backed AutoX referred very generally to the company’s three human intervention cases as localization and planning problems. The low number of disengagements may result from fewer miles driven than other companies. Meanwhile, Nvidia-backed WeRide reduced its miles driven by nearly two-thirds in 2019 from the year before, making little progress compared to last year.
The furor over the reports has led an increasing number of experts in the field to call into question the effectiveness of using disengagements as a metric to gauge how a vehicle is able to drive autonomously.
Disengagement reports provide an opportunity to compare AV performance between companies but discrepancies in reporting make the metric insufficient to measure performance, experts say.
In a series of tweets last month, Waymo asked whether disengagement metrics lead to meaningful insights. The company added that most of its real-world driving experience comes from outside California.
Meanwhile, Cruise Co-founder Kyle Vogt shared similar views, saying in a blog post that the reports are “woefully inadequate” to judge whether an AV is ready to be deployed commercially.
An earlier version of this article quoted a TechNode source as saying that Baidu tests AVs on Bay Area interstate highways. In fact, the company denies that its vehicles have been tested on interstate highways, and a review of interview recordings suggested that we may have misunderstood our sources’ comments.
]]>The made-in-China Model Y may start rolling off the Shanghai Gigafactory production lines of US electric carmaker Tesla earlier than expected. The company has placed a RMB 220 million ($31 million) order from a Chinese auto parts supplier for its compact SUV, TechNode confirmed on Thursday.
Why it matters: Locally sourcing parts and assembling vehicles helps the company slash the prices of its vehicles without cutting profits, therefore boosting sales and improving its balance sheet.
Details: Tesla China recently wrote up an order worth RMB 220 million of electronic controls for Model Y production in its Shanghai plant from Ningbo Joyson Electronic Corporation, an auto parts supplier listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, Chinese media reported Monday citing company insiders.
Context: Joyson, with a subsidiary just a few miles away from Tesla’s Shanghai facilities, has secured orders worth more than RMB 7.5 billion from Tesla for human machine interface (HMI) parts and safety products such as airbags. TF Securities last month estimated all the contracts could contribute revenues of up to RMB 2.5 billion on average each year.
Correction: added text to clarify that the Model 3 price of RMB 210,000 was for a 20% gross margin on a Chinese-made vehicle, not 49% as an earlier version suggested.
]]>Chinese biggest ride-hailing platform Didi Chuxing is planning to expand its presence in public transport sector over the next three years outlined in a set of new growth targets, according to a Chinese media report.
Why it matters: Didi’s recent moves are a signal that it is refocusing on growth and profitability after tinkering with its safety policies after the murders of two passengers by Didi drivers in 2018.
Details: Didi on Tuesday informed employees about a series of targets for the next three years, including daily orders of more than 100 million and monthly active user base of 800 million globally, according to an internal letter obtained by Chinese media Late Post.
Context: Didi launched in July 2015 the “Didi Bus,” an on-demand shuttle bus service in Beijing and Shenzhen, according to TechCrunch. It then formed a RMB 16 million joint venture with state-owned Shenzhen Bus Group in March 2016.
Chinese mobility service provider Didi Chuxing has reportedly been in talks with Softbank for $300 million in fresh funding for its autonomous driving unit.
Why it matters: The investment is a vote of confidence in a Chinese AV startup during a low point in investment activity compounded by the Covid-19 outbreak.
Details: Softbank is expanding its commitment to Didi and is on the brink of reaching a deal to lead a $300 million investment into the ride-hailing startup’s self-driving unit for an undisclosed valuation, The Information first reported Monday citing people with knowledge of the situation. TechNode verified Softbank’s investment in Didi with a person close to the matter on Tuesday.
Context: Softbank has had a rough past several months. It has been sharply criticized over its once-hyped investment strategy, following the downfall of two of its biggest rising stars, WeWork and OYO, which face falling revenues and plunging valuations.
Electric vehicle maker Xpeng Motors is working to secure a production license to deliver its first sedan in July with the recent acquisition of a domestic automaker.
Why it matters: Owning a factory allows Xpeng to retain control over quality and minimizes risks from outsourcing production such as delivery delays and price increases.
Details: Guangzhou-based EV maker Xpeng Motors has fully acquired Friday, a local commercial vehicle and auto parts manufacturer, according to information (in Chinese) released Thursday on business research platform Tianyancha.com.
Context: Several young EV makers have obtained production licenses through investments in smaller, struggling automakers in order to operate their own manufacturing facilities.
Nio, the darling of China’s electric vehicle (EV) industry, appeared to teeter on the edge of bankruptcy for months. With no major investments, the company was set for disaster as global markets began melting down over Covid-19. But Nio turned out to have an ace in its pocket: the government.
The company is not alone. China’s government is fighting an uphill battle to keep its electric vehicle (EV) industry afloat. But authorities are now pulling back from an effort to wean the sector from state support.
EV sales in China have plunged after the central government cut subsidies by up to 50% in June. The impact of these cuts was swift and severe. Sales of new energy vehicles (NEVs) dropped by 7% year on year to 8,000 cars in July following growth of 80% in June, marking the first fall in more than two years.
Overall vehicle sales in the country during peak buying season—known as “Golden September” and “Silver October”—did little to boost deliveries. In January, sales plunged by more than half to 44,000 vehicles compared to the same time a year before.
But things were about to get worse. The government had no way of predicting that in just a few months its already flagging EV sector would suffer another major hit when a new flu-like virus began circulating unabated at the turn of the new year.
The virus, coupled with sink-or-swim measures to drive EV companies to innovate, could have devastating effects on EV makers this year.
Bottom line: The government wanted to remove the training wheels from its electric vehicle industry, cutting subsidies and pulling back support, but its plan has backfired and 2020 could be the industry’s worst year yet.
Playing catch up: China was late to car production, lagging behind the US, Japan, and Germany in building gas-driven cars. But the Chinese government saw EVs as an opportunity to catapult itself into pole position to become the driving force behind electrifying mobility.
To achieve this, authorities created incentives for automakers to produce electric vehicles, eventually leading to a regulatory bubble that bred nearly 500 EV companies in the country.
Poor product: Even with subsidies, Chinese consumers have proved suspicious of electric vehicles. Nio hasn’t been immune despite its legions of loyal fans. The company’s sales are still far from being able to support its business.
And dangerous: Safety questions have further hurt consumer confidence. Nio, the poster child of China’s EV sector, last year recalled nearly 5,000 of its flagship ES8 SUVs over a battery fault. At the time, the number made up around a quarter of all its vehicles sold.
Sink or swim: Seeing these problems, authorities decided that EV companies were not innovating fast enough, instead relying on government support to sell their vehicles. The government started scaling back support last year, hoping that competition would force EV makers to address the public concerns and develop Tesla-beating batteries.
In June, the subsidy system saw dramatic cuts, and, at the time, the government hoped to phase them out entirely. Nio and other EV makers were forced to make a difficult decision—absorb the costs or pass them on to their customers.
The fallout: But the subsidy cuts backfired, and apprehension over buying EVs increased. This, coupled with the economic uncertainty from the US-China trade war meant that the EV market took a dramatic turn for the worse. A month after the cuts, Nio’s sales plunged by more than a third, with ES8 deliveries plummeting by 80% to 164 vehicles.
As if it weren’t bad enough without a pandemic: As China worked to get the Covid-19 outbreak under control, cities were brought to a standstill and whole industries shut down. On Jan. 23, just weeks after the virus was first reported in Wuhan, the city was locked down. The measures quickly spread across the country and authorities extended the Lunar New Year holiday, forcing automakers to shut their factories.
U-turn: The dramatic decline in the electric vehicle market has led the government to rethink its approach. Authorities appear to have realized that scaling back support may have been premature and it was unwise to let the industry go it alone. But for Nio, a little help selling cars wouldn’t save the company—it still loses money per car. It needs investors to make payroll.
Local rescue: As Nio looked bound to fail, a local government stepped in. The eastern Chinese city of Hefei saw its chance to raise its own profile while bailing out the poster child of China’s EV market. The near-complete deal will see Nio moving its China headquarters to the city, where it manufactures its vehicles in a partnership with state-owned automaker JAC.
What’s next? EV makers face compounding issues. Aside from a months-long sales slump, these companies now have to contend with the fallout from Covid-19. The virus not only means that companies won’t hit their production targets, but that Chinese consumers will have less spending power over the next few months as a result of the epidemic.
China won’t allow its electric vehicle industry to fail. The government will continue to adjust its policies to ensure success and support the industry, as well as the companies that represent it. Nio’s bailout is just the tip of the iceberg and recent policy changes could foreshadow renewed government support going forward.
The government is already taking additional steps to aid its ailing EV industry. In a recent guideline issued to boost consumption in the country, the central government underlined its efforts to provide financial support to drive EV adoption, as well as rolling out a wider network of charging infrastructure.
Nio claims that it needs just three months to start making money per car. If it’s right, maybe all it needs is more time to turn things around—but its path to sustainability is reliant on getting people to buy its cars, which right now, might be a hard sell.
]]>China’s biggest internet search company Baidu has won a bid to build public road infrastructure for self-driving cars in southwestern Chongqing municipality, a deal worth $7.5 million.
Why it matters: Baidu is expanding from developing autonomous vehicle technology to offering cloud-based transport infrastructure for car connectivity amid rising 5G adoption in China.
Details: Yongchuan district in Chongqing has offered a RMB 52.8 million ($7.5 million) contract to Baidu to develop cloud data centers for self-driving car testing on city roads, the government said in an announcement released Tuesday (in Chinese).
Context: Baidu has reached partnerships with more than a dozen Chinese governments over the past few years. Some of the biggest deals were those with Beijing and Changsha, to monetize its futuristic AV technologies.
Nio founder William Li predicted that the company will achieve long-awaited per-car profits by mid-year as it reported disappointing earnings for the fourth quarter of 2019 on its Wednesday earnings call.
Nio shares tumbled 16% to $2.43 on Wednesday after it reported a 21% year-on-year decrease in vehicle sales and a worse-than-expected net loss of RMB 2.9 billion ($411.5 million) in its fourth quarter financial results. The electric vehicle maker earned RMB 7.82 billion in full year revenue, also below market expectations of RMB 7.95 billion, while posting another annual loss of RMB 11.3 billion, although that number has more than halved compared with the year prior.
Things look desperate for the high-end electric auto maker, as the disruption to the global auto supply chain brought by the Covid-19 outbreak will probably linger for months. Meanwhile, it is facing tough competition from Tesla, which swept 30% of the country’s EV market last month with a production ramp-up at its Shanghai facility.
To the evident surprise of analysts on the call, Li made big promises to hit a positive vehicle gross margin from the current 9.9% loss and double-digit profit margins by the end of this year. “Gross margin improvement is one of the top objectives for Nio in 2020,” Li said during the call.
With the company’s cash reserves having fallen further according to Q4 filings, it’s on a clock to convince increasingly skeptical investors that its largely unproven business model can be profitable. But a pending deal with the government of Hefei to inject a reported RMB 10 billion could buy it time to fulfill Li’s promises.
Nio’s sales continued to bounce back from the withdrawal of government subsidies which began in June. After reporting a record output of 8,224 cars in Q4, Shanghai-based Nio deserves the title as a top Chinese EV maker with aggregate deliveries of 31,913 cars nationwide over an 18-month period as of last year, the highest in the premium EV segment.
Nio’s sales bottomed out in the second half of last year after July, when it reported its second-lowest monthly sales figure of just 837 cars, an immediate result of the Chinese government cutting EV purchase subsidies by more than half. It later posted double-digit sequential increases in the third and fourth quarters, bucking a broader slowdown in overall car sales.
Investors have long been skeptical about Nio due to its stunning cash burn amid an extended market slump. Losing more than RMB 17.2 billion over three years ending in 2018, the company has only RMB 1.05 billion in cash and equivalents as of December, down from RMB 1.96 billion in Q3. The company said its cash reserves were inadequate for “continuous operation in the next 12 months,” repeating a warning made three months ago.
Li declined to share an annual sales target or to lay out specifics on how the company will achieve double-digit gross profit margin by year-end, but said a monthly output of 4,000 cars would “basically support its operational target.” He added that the company has secured more than 2,100 non-refundable orders over the past month or so, with manufacturing to fully resume after pandemic-related disruptions by the end of April. In late February, Nio also began production of the compact crossover EC6, set for release in September.
Nio cited a variety of favorable trends that support its gross profit goals, including a substantial reduction in cost of production with supply chain optimization, falling battery costs, and economies of scale as it ramps up production. Nio financial chief Feng Wei said a 10% decrease in the cost of raw materials and car parts other than batteries would also be “reasonable” according to the company’s estimates.
Reducing sales and a cutback in marketing will also help cut costs as the company fights to stabilize its cash position.
Nio is reining in a costly marketing strategy that’s included everything from star-studded press events joined by popular singers to the company’s unique club-style showrooms. Known as “Nio Houses,” the 22 elegant showrooms are mostly located in prime urban locations, with footprints of at least 1,000 square meters. The clubhouses offer cafés, meeting rooms, event spaces, and even daycare centers available only to car owners.
Li confirmed that “basically” no new Nio Houses will open this year, while the company will continue plans to open around 200 “Nio Spaces,” a type of smaller and more capital-efficient franchise store by the end of this year. Closure of some “less efficient Houses” is also expected, Chinese media reported earlier this year citing Zhu Jiang, vice president of user development.
Another 30% drop in manufacturing costs may also be achievable by year-end, since the company will pay less to manufacturing partner JAC for operating losses, a result of lower-than-anticipated sales volume.
But these cuts are not enough to keep the company afloat without more cash from investors. Its lifeline is an expected investment from the government of Hefei, the capital of eastern Anhui province. Li confirmed plans to sign the deal by the end of April. The major financing project is “necessary if Nio is to remain solvent,” wrote analysts at Bernstein led by Robin Zhu.
]]>Ride-hailing platform Didi Chuxing said on Monday it has worked with a state-backed industry group to create China’s first nationwide guidelines for ride-hailing platforms dealing to prevent transmission of Covid-19 during rides. The guidelines are closely based on measures Didi has already adopted, promoting a Didi model for safe ride-hailing that includes AI-based mask checks using open source software published by Didi.
Why it matters: The standards, coming at a time when China has brought outbreaks under control, could provide guidance to other platforms and countries now facing the deadly coronavirus outbreak.
Details: Didi, China’s biggest ride-hailing platform, plans to issue recommendations for ride hailing drivers and passengers to avoid and contain the pandemic, working with China Urban Public Transport Association (CUPTA) later this month, the company said in a post on its official WeChat account Monday (in Chinese).
Context: The global ride-hailing market is taking a hit from the coronavirus outbreak.
Electric vehicle maker BYD said that it is now the world’s biggest mask producer and that its products were available to the Chinese public as of Monday, according to a company statement.
Why it matters: China’s largest EV maker, BYD is the first automaker permitted to supply face masks for retail sale by the Chinese government, which took over mask allocation during the outbreak.
Details: Warren Buffet-backed BYD on Sunday announced that it has partnered with six local supermarkets and pharmacy chains to sell a shipment of 15 million disposable masks starting Monday.
Context: BYD is one of a handful of Chinese automakers which responded to the government’s call for industrial manufacturers to manufacture protective equipment during the outbreak to help meet surging demand.
China’s second-biggest automaker Dongfeng Motor has resumed limited operations in Hubei province, the epicenter of the Covid-19 outbreak, as authorities begin relaxing containment measures amid a decline in the number of new confirmed cases in the country.
Why it matters: The resumption of work in Hubei, known as a Chinese “motor city,” could accelerate the industry’s supply chain recovery and help normalize the country’s auto market after the Covid-19 disruption.
Details: Dongfeng Honda, a joint venture between Dongfeng and the Japanese automaker, on Wednesday partially resumed production in its facilities in Wuhan, capital of central Hubei province, according to Reuters.
Context: Previously, Honda had repeatedly postponed plans to restart production in Wuhan, first on Feb. 14, then on Feb. 21, as many regions remained under quarantine.
China’s Changan Automobile on Tuesday unveiled its new flagship sedan with what it said was the country’s first mass-manufactured conditionally automated Level 3 system, as Chinese automakers ramp up to compete in the global self-driving race.
Why it matters: The development could be a prelude to mass deployment of highly automated cars on Chinese roads, but regulatory and technological hurdles remain.
Details: Chongqing-based Changan on Tuesday announced it has developed China’s first mass-production automobile to offer Level 3 autonomy under conditions including highway driving and traffic congestion. The sedan will go on sale in June.
Context: German automaker Audi unveiled in late 2017 the world’s first production vehicle with Level 3 autonomy, a new A8 luxury sedan, but the model will primarily be available domestically over the next several years, a result of strict regulations and consumer concern over the safety of autonomous cars.
China’s biggest ride-hailing platform Didi Chuxing took a 32% stake in Hyundai Insurance China, according to a regulatory filing released Tuesday, ramping up with the move its prospects in the Chinese online insurance market.
Why it matters: The recent deal could help Didi widen its line of auto financial offerings and expand its footprint in the lucrative Chinese online insurance industry, which the country’s biggest technology firms are vying to enter.
Details: The regulator recently approved the RMB 1.1 billion ($158 million) investment in Hyundai Insurance China, the total for four stakes going to Chinese investors, with Lenovo and Didi subsidiary Dirun Tianjin Technology taking the lions share.
Context: Chinese internet heavyweights including Alibaba and Tencent have all been jostling for a position in the country’s online insurance market.
Driverless delivery startup Neolix has raised nearly RMB 200 million ($28.7 million) in Series A+ funding to mass-produce its self-driving vehicles, the company said on Wednesday.
Why it matters: China eased restrictions on delivery robots following the Covid-19 outbreak, resulting in a surge in demand for autonomous deliveries in some of the worst-hit areas.
Details: Neolix’s latest round of funding, which it closed in February and announced this week, is led by electric vehicle maker and existing investor Lixiang. The company is now Neolix’s second-largest shareholder after CEO Yu Enyuan.
Context: While Covid-19 has thrown delivery robots into the spotlight, the technology still faces technical and regulatory hurdles.
]]>
China’s massive ride-hailing platform Didi Chuxing has introduced home delivery options to its app in two major cities amid the Covid-19 outbreak which has weighed heavily on its core mobility businesses.
Why it matters: As many Chinese citizens remain home-bound, Didi’s push into home delivery could expand the company’s existing revenue streams and offset the impact of the pandemic on its disrupted ride-hailing business.
Details: Didi has quietly launched earlier this week a home delivery service, “Paotui,” a word which means running errands. The service is active for dwellers in the southwestern Chinese city of Chengdu as well as Hangzhou, capital city of eastern Hangzhou province, Chinese media LatePost reported.
Context: Didi made its first foray into the lifestyle services market with the launch of its food delivery service in a number of Chinese cities in March, 2018, partly a preemptive measure against Meituan which began trial operations of its ride-hailing services in early 2017.
As China ramped up its efforts to counter the spread of Covid-19, delivery robots have garnered newfound attention.
The novel coronavirus, first reported in late December in Wuhan, has now infected more than 80,000 people and killed nearly 3,000 in the country. The government responded by locking down entire cities. On Jan. 23, the largest quarantine measures in history went into effect in Hubei, the province at the center of the outbreak.
This article was originally published in Drive I/O, TechNode’s biweekly newsletter on autonomous and electric vehicles. It was co-authored by Chris Udemans.
Beijing has since pledged to increase its support to upgrade the nation’s freight delivery systems. The government also asked companies for solutions to contain the virus, including various forms of “contactless shopping deliveries,” as people around the country became afraid to leave their homes.
At this moment of crisis, some businesses saw opportunities for largely unproven technologies. In an effort to protect the public, lifestyle services giant Meituan and e-commerce firm JD.com started using their unmanned delivery technologies in some of the worst-hit areas.
Just 60% of deliverymen have returned to work in Wuhan since authorities cut the city off from the world. The remainder have been unable to re-enter the city since the lockdown began. Worse still, those in Wuhan have been under both physical and mental pressure from the burgeoning workload and concerns over the epidemic.
With drivers locked in and locked down, the companies had no choice but to experiment with the new tech.
JD’s self-driving robot made its first delivery of medical supplies to Wuhan’s Ninth Hospital on Feb. 6. The facility, designated for treating seriously ill patients, is just 600 meters from a JD distribution center. The close proximity put delivery people at risk of infection, Zhou Jianbin, a district manager of JD Logistics in Wuhan, told The Paper.
The majority of deliveries in Hubei include masks, protective clothing, and other medical supplies. However, the process is not completely automated. JD employees need to place orders in the cars before the deliveries begin. Typically, the robots will alert a user that their delivery is ready for collection and wait 30 minutes for them to collect the goods.
The robots are responsible for half of all daily deliveries, around 10-20 orders each day, according to Zhou. Although only two robots are currently being deployed in the city, JD said it is gradually making a shift to serve the nearly Ninth Hospital with fully driverless delivery.
Due to a significant spike in demand for unmanned deliveries in Wuhan and surrounding cities, the commercial launch of JD’s robot delivery service came well ahead of schedule, said Qi Kong, head of autonomous driving and JD Logistics. The e-commerce giant had initially planned to start mass-producing its driverless vehicles by the end of the year, but now expects to roll out more than 50 robots by the end of April.
A week after JD debuted its robots in Wuhan, Beijing-based Meituan began piloting two driverless delivery robots in the city’s northeastern Shunyi district. Running at just 20 kilometers (12 miles) per hour, the pint-sized vehicles deliver groceries to residents of three neighborhoods within a five-kilometer radius of its pickup station. Each robot delivers up to five orders per trip.
The company did not specify how many orders its autonomous fleet delivers per day. According to Meituan, the robots work as an alternative form of last-mile delivery to help alleviate the shortage of delivery drivers.
The company is also piloting robots at restaurants in Beijing that bring food from kitchens to deliverymen or customers waiting for takeaway meals, in an effort to limit contact between people. The company claims that these robots are not “replacing humans entirely,” as the service currently still requires human-robot collaboration.
While the Covid-19 has offered unmanned delivery providers both government support and an unprecedented opportunity to put their technology through its paces, these companies have had trouble driving adoption of autonomous delivery systems, as regulatory and technological hurdles do still present significant roadblocks to companies such as Meituan and JD.
Regulations governing autonomous driving have long frustrated automakers and tech companies, but the situation is even stickier for unmanned delivery services in China.
To begin with, there is no space on roads dedicated specifically for delivery robots, Zhao Bin, head of public affairs at JD Logistics, told Chinese media in February. Before JD launched its Wuhan Ninth Hospital robot delivery service during the outbreak, the Chinese e-commerce giant had to get hasty approval from government agencies to survey the roads and get maps drawn.
Current Chinese laws are not well-equipped to govern self-driving vehicles, which are not legally allowed to drive on public roads. Various pilot programs are able to operate only because the government issues temporary license plates to approved self-driving companies. Without this permission, the use of these vehicles is illegal and companies must bear all liability for accidents.
The Chinese government has given JD and Meituan permission to run robot deliveries, but many more companies can only run their services in geo-fenced areas such as office parks and school campuses.
Meanwhile, other firms are unable to even get their plans off the ground. According to Chinese media reports, one anonymous self-driving company initially planned to use low-speed driverless vehicles to transport meals from a restaurant in Beijing to a nearby hospital for doctors and patients, but the company eventually had to backtrack on its plans.
Even Baidu, the poster child of China’s self-driving ambitions, only gained lackluster support during the outbreak, deploying just two robots for sterilizing the campuses of two colleges in Wuhan, alongside dozens of others in Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou. The company claimed one of its invested startups began delivering meals to medical staff in Beijing Haidian Hospital starting Feb. 14.
The industry also faces technological challenges. These vehicles currently face enormous limits in their abilities to operate under certain road and weather conditions. The unpredictable nature of traffic and pedestrians, especially when these vehicles attempt to navigate congested roads within residential communities, present significant challenges to wider adoption. A lack of road markings and bad weather further compound these difficulties.
As Bob Zhang, CTO and co-founder of ride-hailing company Didi, has previously made clear, self-driving technology has a long way to go before it can navigate a wide range of weather conditions safety.
Propelled by machine-learning algorithms and a package of hardware that includes various sensing technologies, a delivery service robot can be quite expensive, with prices starting at RMB 100,000 ($14,220). Fortunately, the cost has declined significantly over the past several years; in the early years of development, JD said in 2017, the outlay (in Chinese) could be as much as RMB 600,000 per robot.
This price tag contrasts sharply with the pay of delivery workers, which ranges from RMB 5,000 to RMB 8,000 per month, according to public information on Chinese job recruiting platforms.
Covid-19 has revealed the potential value that autonomous deliveries can play in emergency situations. As Chinese citizens avoided infection by engaging in voluntary isolation, legions of food and grocery delivery drivers became a lifeline, providing a fresh supply of food to millions around the country.
However, there were limits. Many migrant delivery workers had made their yearly trek across the country to their hometowns, leading to a dearth of drivers in major urban centers. With fewer drivers available, deliveries that usually took 30 minutes might now be completed in around two hours.
Costs also increased. In Shanghai, for example, Alibaba’s Hema supermarket charged an additional RMB 6 for deliveries that had previously been free of charge.
The coronavirus outbreak also led to fears over close contact with delivery drivers, who had the potential to unknowingly spread infection to an untold number of other people. In response, companies launched “contactless delivery,” in which orders were left at the entrance of apartment complexes. The model had already been in use at office buildings before the outbreak, but quickly became ubiquitous as the outbreak continued.
In Hubei, the center of the epidemic, the government placed restrictions on deliveries to limit people’s exposure to the disease. Residents in small towns had to contact their party committees to get fresh food and supplies.
Delivery robots could provide a solution to these problems, and are poised to play an important role in China’s logistics industry. In less than a decade, autonomous vehicles will deliver 80% of all goods, according to the research firm McKinsey. These vehicles could increase efficiency and cut expenses in an industry where last-mile deliveries can constitute up to 12% of costs.
Xia Huaxia, Meituan’s chief scientist, told TechNode last year that machines can also be used to complement the work of delivery people by taking night shifts or working during extreme weather conditions. If a delivery robot’s lifespan is more than three years, he said, the cost of the machine will be lower than the cost of human labor.
Observers expect China’s food-delivery market to explode in the next few years. Meituan, which employed 600,000 drivers as of late last year, predicts that its daily orders will increase by 200% per day. According to Xia, in the second half of 2019, the delivery giant completed 25 million orders every day.
]]>As doctors in Xinchang County, Zhejiang test patients for Covid-19, they’re using a tool borrowed from the Jetsons: flying robots are helping them move testing samples and supplies faster than they could go on roads.
The semi-rural county offers a preview of a world many expect to live in soon. People have talked about airborne deliveries for years. With the Covid-19 crisis, the players are lining up to make it happen.
When doctors at the People’s Hospital need to send a sample for testing, they go to an Antwork landing pad. At the tap of a smartphone, a heavy six-bladed drone lifts off, carrying a briefcase-sized payload on the approximately 2.5-mile-trip to the local public health testing center.
Antwork, a Hangzhou-based startup, has put its drone logistics system into practice a few months ahead of schedule to deliver nucleic acid testing samples between two hospitals to local public health authorities in Xinchang county.
In the wake of the highly infectious illness, Chinese tech companies, especially takeaway and on-demand service platforms, have proposed a “contactless delivery” initiative, appealing to food delivery drivers or couriers to avoid direct contact with customers.
While “contactless delivery” may avoid potential contagion among people, pickup and delivery service platforms are facing a more serious problem: a workforce shortage.
The epidemic in China has stopped millions of migrant workers, a key source of delivery drivers, from returning to big cities after the Spring Festival holiday. Some companies have started to pilot unmanned technologies to meet the huge demand for food and e-commerce deliveries.
Food delivery platform Meituan rolled out a driverless delivery service in Beijing earlier last month to deliver groceries to customers in the city. JD.com, the e-commerce giant, said it had completed its first delivery of medical supplies via autonomous vehicles in Wuhan last month.
While the two big companies have been talking about drone deliveries also, the Hangzhou startup is the first one in China to send pilotless aircraft to the sky during the coronavirus outbreak.
The system that Antwork has been developing for nearly five years uses airborne drones and autonomous road vehicles to deliver packages in cities. The company plans to use the flying drones for longer trips between a network of helipad drone stations, and earthbound robots for last-mile delivery.
The Xinchang county network, which was first put into use in early February, skips the cars and flies parcels directly to stations placed on hospital grounds.
The company was already planning to start with hospitals. “We were planning to launch the drone logistics system for commercial medical uses later this year anyway, but the epidemic outbreak has pushed us to put it into real-life use now,” Zhao Liang, co-founder and chief operating officer of Antwork, told TechNode.
The company said in a statement (in Chinese) that the system it set up in Xinchang county delivers medical supplies and nucleic acid testing kits between two downtown locations and one satellite town.
The company said in the statement that the initial flights showed that the system saved more than half of the time needed to deliver using ground transport.
In a crisis, bureaucracy acted fast, cutting red tape to get drones in the sky.
Zhao told TechNode that Antwork started to reach out to local governments in different cities after Jan. 23, when Wuhan, where the epidemic started, announced a lockdown. After a short negotiation, the local government in Xinchang county accepted the company’s offer, and the company soon got approval from China’s aviation regulators.
“It took us around one week to get a license to conduct drone deliveries in Xinchang from the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC),” said Zhao. He said that the process usually takes a few months.
Regulators are, understandably, usually very cautious about allowing experimental robots to fly at low altitudes in Chinese cities. Antwork sought permission in 2019 for a trial in Hangzhou, which required it to pass the CAAC’s Specific Operations Risk Assessment, a multi-stage process of risk evaluation for certain unmanned aircraft operations.
Zhao told TechNode in an interview last year that the whole process lasted more than six months because the CAAC was very “cautious and strict” about the assessment. In July, the company was granted a one-year license to conduct urban parcel delivery using drones in Hangzhou.
The crisis got drones in the sky quickly—but will it make a difference to the long term trajectory of the industry? The company says its plans haven’t changed much.
Antwork’s technology was designed to use drones and autonomous vehicles to make deliveries instead of human labor to cut costs in China’s multi-billion food delivery and courier markets. Last year, it completed an experimental delivery for fast-food chain KFC in Hangzhou.
However, the company says it has no present plans to deploy its system to deliver food or packages.
“Compared to the demands of medical supplies in hospitals, people’s needs to order takeaways appears to be a less important matter,” said Zhao.
For now, the company is focused on crisis response. The system used in Xinchang county is free of charge at the moment. The company plans to mass-deploy the technology in different sectors in the future, but, Zhao says, that will need approval from regulators.
“[The one-year] license could be extended under normal circumstances,” he said, adding that the company is still applying to expand the service to other cities.
]]>Electric car maker Nio delivered just north of 700 cars in February, half the number it had produced a month earlier, it said on Tuesday as automakers report plunging sales due to the Covid-19 virus crisis.
Why it matters: Nio is one of many Chinese EV makers that have been heavily affected by both weak demand amid a national health crisis and increased competition from Tesla’s China-made Model 3.
Details: Nio’s car deliveries dropped 55.7% sequentially to 707 units in February, according to an announcement released Tuesday. More than 90% of cars delivered were its five-seater SUV ES6, with the bigger premium SUV ES8 making up the balance.
Context: China’s new energy vehicles sales including all-electric cars and plug-in hybrids plummeted 77% year on year to around 11,000 units in February, marking the eight consecutive month of decline since July, according to figures released Monday by CPCA.
The Covid-19 outbreak suppressed already weak demand in China for electric vehicles and created a scarcity of auto parts which drove a record 77% year-on-year drop in sales for February, according to the latest figures from a Chinese auto industry association.
Why it matters: February marks the eighth consecutive month of decline in the world’s largest EV market since the central government announced a more than 50% cut in purchase subsidies beginning in June.
Details: Sales of new energy vehicles (NEV) in February plunged 77% compared with the same month a year earlier to around 11,000 units due to the Covid-19 outbreak, the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) said on Monday.
Context: After the government began slashing purchase subsidies in June, China’s NEV sales decreased in 4.7% year on year in July to 80,000, falling for the first time in more than two years. This was followed by a double-digit drop each month for the seven months since.
Chinese electric vehicle maker Nio on Thursday announced the sale of $235 million in convertible bonds to fund its operations. Its shares fell 3.9% by market close during a tumultuous week for global markets.
Why it matters: Proceeds from the offering will relieve near-term cash flow pressures. The company continues to operate in the red even as it nears a major investment from a city-level government.
Details: Nio is raising $235 million via convertible notes from several unnamed Asia-based investment funds. The notes will bear zero interest and expire in March 5, 2021, according to an announcement released Thursday.
Context: Nio’s third quarter earnings beat forecasts with a 25% year-on-year increase in revenue and net losses narrowed by 10% from a year earlier.
Autonomous truck startup TuSimple has expanded its partnership with UPS, doubling the number of delivery runs its vehicles make for the American logistics company per week.
Why it matters: The extended alliance between the two companies is a vote of confidence for TuSimple, which aims to transform the country’s $800 billion trucking industry with fully autonomous rigs.
Details: TuSimple will increase the number of trips it makes for UPS to 20 runs per week, adding an additional 10 trips on a new route between Phoenix and El Paso, Texas, the company said in a statement on Thursday.
Context: The logistics industry could see increased efficiency by using autonomous trucks as more people do their shopping online, putting increased strain on freight companies.
Two local-level governments in China have revived subsidies for electric vehicle purchases, a bid to stimulate auto sales already in a slump which is deepening with the novel coronavirus outbreak.
Why it matters: The latest move by the city of Guangzhou and Hunan province in central China could spur other localities to release similar measures aimed at stimulating EV consumption and helping the market to regain its footing.
Details: Guangzhou, the capital of the southern China’s Guangdong province, will offer electric car buyers RMB 10,000 ($1,440) per unit incentives for 10 months starting March, the city government said on Wednesday in a document (in Chinese). The officials did not provide further details.
Context: China’s January sales of new energy vehicles (NEVs) plunged by more than half from a year earlier to 44,000 units. China recorded an annual decline in NEV sales for the first time last year to 1.2 million units, falling 4% from the previous year.
Dozens of Tesla customers have reportedly filed complaints to a Chinese consumer watchdog after discovering older-generation hardware in their domestically made Model 3 rather than the highly anticipated HW3 self-driving computer.
Why it matters: Tesla has become the latest automaker affected by the Covid-19 outbreak. It blamed the hardware “downgrade” to wide shortages in the auto supply chain.
Details: Chinese Model 3 owners last weekend discovered that their vehicles’ self-driving controlling hardware was the older version 2.5, or HW2.5, instead of the latest driverless computer HW3 which was listed on their sales documents, multiple Chinese media reported.
Context: Tesla unveiled its “full self-driving” computer, previously known as Autopilot Hardware 3, in April and began offering retrofits to current owners later that year. The FSD chip was installed in all new Model 3 vehicles at that point, it said.
A total of 77 self-driving cars have driven more than 1 million kilometers on public roads in Beijing and search giant Baidu accounts for the lion’s share, regulators of the China’s capital city said in a report released on Monday.
Why it matters: Beijing’s self-driving report is the only one of its kind made public and recognized by the Chinese authorities, although self-driving tests are conducted in a number of cities including Shanghai and Guangzhou.
Details: Baidu’s autonomous vehicles have traveled more than 893,900 kilometers (555,500 miles) in the city over a two-year period as of December, Beijing’s Innovation Center for Mobility Intelligent (BICMI), the city’s official service agency for AV tests, said Monday in a report (in Chinese).
Context: The Beijing government released China’s first municipal-level regulations for AV road tests in December 2017. It has opened a total of 503.7 kilometers of roads in four districts in the outskirts of the city as of 2019, more than triple the size a year earlier.
Beijing regulatory agencies reprimanded ride-hailing platform Dida Chuxing for resuming inter-city services to and from Beijing as the current novel coronavirus outbreak lingers on.
Why it matters: The spread of the Covid-19 virus has drastically constrained business for Chinese ride-hailing platforms. Regulators halted the service in more than 50 cities after the outbreak.
Details: Beijing regulators reprimanded ride-hailing platform Dida for offering inter-city rides to and from the nation’s capital. Dida has since halted the service, according to a statement from the city’s Commission of Transport and obtained by Chinese media on Friday.
Context: Other than Beijing and Wuhan, the epicenter of the virus outbreak, local governments have started to ease limits on public transit to support the country’s millions of workers returning to work.
Chinese search engine giant Baidu reported the lowest rate of human driver intervention among companies testing autonomous vehicles (AVs) on California public roads, according to the latest batch of disengagement reports released by the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles.
Why it matters: This marks the first time in the report’s history that a Chinese company unseated Waymo, Google’s self-driving arm and an accepted industry leader, for the top spot.
Details: Baidu reported driving 108,300 miles and six disengagements with four vehicles last year, making for the lowest disengagement rate of all the companies listed in the California’s annual self-driving record: 0.055 per 1,000 self-driven miles.
Context: Apart from Baidu, four Chinese companies were among the top 10 on the report in terms of disengagement frequency.
No one ever expected that the face mask could be a strategic material, but now the whole country is looking for them. Many pharmacies have been sold out for weeks. Local governments have been caught fighting each other over shipments of medical materials, and factories have had to delay resuming work because they can’t provide masks to their workers.
China needs more masks.
China reached production of 20 million masks per day on Feb. 3, and that number doubled in just 14 days. However, it is still far from meeting Beijing’s urgent request to produce more than 100 million units per day, which has pushed Chinese premier Li Keqiang himself to stay on top of that, touring mask factories and asking for all-out production late last week.
Companies are answering Li’s call, with automakers in the lead in setting up mask production lines at factories. By the end of this week, automakers are expected to produce 8 million masks per day, adding around 15% to China’s current output, as well as other medical supplies like disinfectant.
In the short term, in-house mask supplies will allow carmakers to get back to business. In the longer view, face mask production may be a good business with small profits but quick turnover for them, as the epidemic is sweeping rapidly around the globe.
Automakers’ quick switch to mask production was originally intended to fit their own needs. The government has banned manufacturers from resuming operations without sufficient precautions and safety measures.
The Shenyang municipal government last week helped BMW resume production by offering the company two masks per each employee per day, after the company made a generous donation of RMB 30 million (about $4.3 million) to local charities. Tesla, as always, got the red carpet treatment from local authorities with a special grant of 10,000 masks for workers in its Shanghai Gigafactory, allowing it to resume production on Feb. 10.
However, a nationwide shortage has forced most automakers to source their own. Many have turned to parts suppliers and subsidiaries to set up mask production.
SAIC, General Motors’ China partner, and its suppliers were among the first to make a move. Guangxi De Fute is based in Guangxi province, less than 100 kilometers from a joint plant formed by SAIC and GM. They normally supply sound absorption materials to SAIC, China’s biggest automaker and its partners. Setting up a total of 14 production lines by the end of this month, the parts supplier expects to reach a capacity of 1.7 million face masks per day, reported Chinese media.
Warren Buffet-backed electric vehicle company BYD made a big bet, setting a more ambitious goal to produce 5 million face masks per day by the end of this month. 5 million masks would be around one-tenth of the country’s current total capacity. BYD, China’s biggest EV maker also announced plans to produce disinfectant, targeting 300,000 bottles each day. State-owned auto major GAC followed suit by starting mask production last week, and the Southern China’s auto giant expected the output to reach 1 million units by the end of this week.
The price of the big shift is actually quite low. For a large manufacturer, it should be easy to set up mask production lines without diverting significant resources from regular business.
The price of equipment is peanuts for large automakers: An advanced production line capable of producing 180,000 regular surgical masks per day is priced at only around RMB 1 million and can be delivered in three days, including a packaging line and a disinfecting system, according to people with knowledge of the industry. Mask production is also highly automated, requiring only a single human to oversee a production line, a mask production equipment supplier told TechNode.
With expected profits of RMB 1 profit per mask, a production line can cover RMB 1 million in set-up costs in under a week. There is a good business case for manufacturers to make the switch, so long as they have assured access to raw materials, a representative of a mask manufacturer told Caixin.
There’s money in masks, and someone is already trying to cash in—but whether it is the companies themselves, rogue employees, or just online scammers nobody knows for sure.
All virus-related medical supplies, including protective clothing, face masks, and goggles have been placed under government control, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology said during a Feb. 2 media briefing in Beijing. While no regulations explicitly forbid automakers to sell medical equipment on the market, each has vowed that production will be “planned and managed” by local governments.
Just one day after the Shenzhen-based OEM BYD announced its mask production on Feb. 8, WeChat accounts began claiming to sell them. A product brochure circulated on Chinese messaging app WeChat and obtained by TechNode, promised that BYD will start delivering goods on Feb. 17 with a minimum starting amount of 10,000 units per order. BYD has disavowed these brochures, warning that customers who attempt to buy masks through unofficial channels will be cheated.
In WeChat messages posted to Weibo, accounts listed in the sales brochures asked for the suspiciously low price of RMB 1.8 per unit. When TechNode called the phone number listed in the brochure, it was answered by a receptionist who claimed to represent BYD but said that masks were available only to the government.
In another “sales notice” shared by netizens, people claiming to represent BYD said they will take orders but “only from big organizations” with a minimal starting amount of 1 million units per order. These numbers which were later confirmed by a company representative to Chinese media Nanfang Metropolis Daily. The person stressed that BYD has not started sales to the public, adding that governments and hospitals are first in line for supplies.
Advertisements claiming to offer BYD masks remain circulating on Chinese social media with prices ranging from RMB 2.4 to RMB 4.2, as of Feb. 28.
While you can’t buy a BYD mask yet, that will likely change as shortages ease. In a statement recently sent to Chinese media, BYD said it is expanding production to with the intention of supplying its supply chain partners, once demand from the government is fully met. “If sales begin in retail markets, we will definitely announce it,” BYD added.
Investments in public service production will probably yield windfall profits soon. According to people familiar with the matter, local governments currently subsidize investment on mask production facilities by at least 50%, and since the price is still going up, investors could cover their costs almost immediately after purchase.
Looking ahead, industry largely expects a massive growth in the mask demand as Chinese citizens will have a much stronger awareness of wearing masks in public spaces for personal health over the long term. Face masks will have an even longer life-cycle if the coronavirus outbreak finally becomes a “global pandemic,” a person close to the matter told TechNode.
CLARIFICATION: An earlier version of this article described De Fute as a parts supplier to SAIC-GM, a JV that is GM’s main presence in China. Representatives of GM have since told TechNode that it is in fact a supplier to SAIC-GM-Wuling, a separate JV formed by the same two companies and a third partner.
]]>Shanghai will become the latest city to roll out real-name registration for commuters taking the subway, following a slew of other metropolises implementing identity checks on public transport.
Why it matters: China has turned to apps to track and prevent the spread of Covid-19, a new flu-like virus that has killed nearly 2,750 people.
Details: Starting on Friday, commuters in Shanghai will be encouraged to scan a QR code in their subway car after boarding. Passengers will then be prompted to confirm their mobile phone numbers, according to Shanghai Metro’s official WeChat account.
Context: The southern city of Shenzhen and eastern China’s Ningbo rolled out similar systems last week, which in some cases apply to buses and taxis. The system in these cities is developed by gaming and social media giant Tencent.
This article has been corrected to reflect that registration in Shanghai is currently not mandatory.
]]>Autonomous vehicle startup Pony.ai on Wednesday announced that it has raised $400 million in a funding round from Toyota Motor Corporation, the first-ever and biggest investment to date in a Chinese AV company by the Japanese auto giant.
Why it matters: The latest investment is expected to help Pony.ai widen the gap between the company and its rivals, as well as boost confidence at a time when some major auto and tech companies have scaled back their AV ambitions.
Details: Guangzhou-based Pony.ai on Wednesday announced that it has secured $400 million in its Series B led by Japan’s biggest automaker and followed by existing investors. The investment is the single largest investment deal in a Chinese AV company, it confirmed, and brings the total amount the company has raised to $462 million.
Context: China’s self-driving sector is weathering a rough period amid a broader downturn in investment activity in Asia.
Update: added specifics on the funding round in Details section.
]]>Cash-strapped electric vehicle maker Nio on Tuesday announced that it has reached an agreement with officials in the eastern Chinese city of Hefei, where the company’s joint manufacturing plant with JAC Motors is located.
Why it matters: The long-awaited funding deal is expected to provide relief for the Tesla challenger from a liquidity crisis, and allow for the launch of its third electric SUV model scheduled for delivery in September.
Details: Nio and the government of Hefei, the capital of eastern Anhui province, signed a framework agreement on Tuesday morning at a plant jointly owned by the company and JAC, according to an announcement released by the government on its official Weibo account (in Chinese).
Context: Rumors of Nio capturing investment from different automakers have been circulating on Chinese media this year, including a reported up to $1 billion financing round from southern China’s biggest OEM, GAC.
BYD, China’s biggest electric vehicle maker and a partner to Toyota and Daimler, on Tuesday announced it had secured the lion’s share of the biggest single order to date for electric buses in the US.
Why it matters: The deal will help BYD further pry open the North American market, and underscores a global acceleration in transitioning public transit from gasoline power to clean energy.
Details: Shenzhen-based BYD will deliver a total of 130 all-electric buses to Los Angeles as part of the city’s initiative to convert its entire public bus fleet to zero-emission vehicles by the start of the 2028 Summer Olympics, the company said in a statement sent to TechNode on Monday. Two of four BYD buses from an earlier deal had already been delivered.
Context: Riding the wave of a global push for bus fleet electrification, BYD has so far delivered more than 55,000 e-buses in 50 countries and regions.
China is postponing plans for massive autonomous vehicle (AV) deployment from its original target by five years as auto and tech companies continue to struggle with the challenges of truly driverless vehicle adoption.
Why it matters: China backing off its ambitious plans underscores the challenging technological leap that self-driving technology has proven to be.
Details: China is postponing its original goal to achieve “mass production” of intelligent vehicles with “conditional” self-driving capabilities to 2025 from 2020, according to a development plan recently released by the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT), among others.
Context: Recent research by business consultancy AlixPartners shows that consumers still have safety concerns about sharing the road with vehicles operating in autonomous mode, as well as limited willingness to pay for the functionality.
The bike rental sector in China is making a comeback after a steep decline as a result of the Covid-19 outbreak as city dwellers returning to work are opting for hiring bikes over other transportation.
Why it matters: The number of daily active users for short-distance transportation apps including ride-hailing and map navigation fell an average of 36% year on year during the Spring Festival holiday as a result of the epidemic after the state imposed lockdowns across much of China, according to data from Quest Mobile. Bike rentals have been rebounding since work resumed after the holiday.
Details: The number of rides on Didi’s bike rental app Qingju surged beginning Feb. 10, the first day back to work after the holiday, compared with rides during the holiday, according to the company. In southern Guangdong province for example, the company’s bike rides on Monday were 30% higher than those on Feb 10. Rides in key areas, including bus stops, metro stations, and supermarkets were higher by around half.
Context: Like its tech peers, Chinese bike-rental firms are contributing to the fight against the virus by donating relief supplies, offering free rides to users, and opening up hiring.
China’s on-demand service platform Meituan Dianping has made its first grocery delivery in the outskirts of Beijing with self-designed autonomous delivery vehicles, as the country’s tech companies push further into “contactless” initiatives spurred by the Covid-19 outbreak.
Why it matters: Tech firms in China are ramping up “contactless” delivery initiatives as conditions surrounding the deadly virus has created an opportunity to test experimental technologies for wider adoption.
Details: Beijing-based Meituan began piloting its driverless delivery service in the city’s northeastern Shunyi district earlier this month, according to an announcement on its official account on messaging platform WeChat released Tuesday (in Chinese).
Context: Meituan began work on driverless delivery in 2016, followed by several pilot projects in geo-fenced areas such as university campuses. It launched its open-source platform for unmanned delivery two years later.
An increasing number of cities around China are requiring commuters to register their identities when using public transport, as the country ramps up efforts to contain the spread of a deadly new flu-like virus.
Why it matters: Real-name registration was previously used for transport between cities. Its expansion to intracity transport is an attempt to track the possible spread of the virus.
Details: Commuters in the southern city of Shenzhen and east China’s Ningbo are required to log their identities by scanning a QR code before boarding various kinds of public transport.
Context: Cities around China have taken stringent measures to curb the spread of the virus while still allowing public transport to run. Transportation in the worst-affected areas has been shut down.
Tesla’s partnership with Chinese battery maker CATL on lower-cost cobalt-free batteries could drive a big shift in the industry, according to one investment bank, which expects China sales of the product to surge more than 50% this year.
Why it matters: The much-anticipated “Tesla effect” on China electric vehicle (EV) sales may be underway. As the EV maker enjoys a surge in Model 3 sales due to lowered prices on its domestically made version, a significant rebound in overall EV sales is expected to follow.
Details: The total sales volume of lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries is set to grow up to 54% year on year to 31 gigawatt hours (GWh) in 2020, compared with an annual decrease of 8% last year, CICC said on Thursday in a report.
Context: CATL’s share price rose 4.4% to RMB 160 ($23) on Thursday on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange after the company confirmed it was partnering with Tesla to supply LFP batteries, according to Chinese media reports.
Didi Chuxing, China’s biggest ride-hailing service platform, on Tuesday said it was launching a RMB 100 million initiative to install protective plastic sheets between driver and passenger seats to minimize the spread of the Covid-19 virus.
Why it matters: The program could help ease widespread fears among Chinese users, who have been avoiding public transportation including ride-hailing amid the outbreak, and assist the company with recouping some of its hugely disrupted business.
Details: Didi is ramping up its response to the virus, investing an initial RMB 30 million ($4.3 million) to install protective plastic sheets in rise-sharing cars, the company said in an announcement released Tuesday.
Context: Didi has implemented a series of measures to support Beijing’s efforts in controlling the epidemic.
Last year, when a leading automotive industry body predicted that a prolonged slump in electric vehicle sales would end in 2020, it had no way of knowing what was in store as China prepared for its Lunar New Year celebrations.
The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) predicted in late December that sales of new energy vehicles this year would be no less than 1.2 million cars, the same number sold last year.
This article was originally published in Drive I/O, TechNode’s biweekly newsletter on autonomous and electric vehicles. It was co-authored by Jill Shen.
Just a few weeks earlier, however, people in Wuhan, the capital of central China’s Hubei province, began falling victim to a mysterious respiratory illness. Cases of the disease, now known to be a new coronavirus—belonging to the same family as SARS, MERS, and the common cold—have ballooned. The virus has since spread to every region in China, but infection rates show no signs of abating.
China’s electric vehicle industry now faces compounding difficulties. As the country attempts to stop the spread of the infection, authorities have taken far-reaching measures that could have an implosive effect on the country’s economy, as well as its already-flagging EV market.
Just days before the Spring Festival, the government took the unprecedented step of locking down entire cities in Hubei province, effectively quarantining more than 50 million people. Similar measures have also been implemented in eastern China’s Zhejiang province.
In addition, 11 of China’s 31 provinces have extended the holiday by more than a week to prevent further infections. (The New Year’s holiday began on January 23 and was originally due to end on January 31.) In the commercial hubs of Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces as well as Shanghai, authorities have announced that non-essential businesses should only return to work on February 10.
“These provinces alone are normally responsible for over two-thirds of vehicle production in China,” IHS Markit said in a note.
The research firm now expects that measures will result in a first-quarter production loss of about 350,000 vehicles, down 7% year-on-year. If quarantine measures are imposed until mid-March, that number could increase to 1.7 million units, IHS said. Beijing has set sales goals of 2 million NEVs this year, up 40% compared to 2019.
Should the second figure prove sound, the overall market decline could lead to a shortfall of around 85,000 NEVs for the year, or around 7% of all NEVs sold in 2019, according to TechNode’s calculations.
“How this plays out will be determined by the even more opaque second-round indirect effects on the economy, income growth, and consumer confidence, and thus on the severity of impact on auto sales in the coming months,” IHS said of the overall auto market.
As various provinces prolong the holiday, factories in a number of cities have yet to open their doors, which could put strain on the global automotive supply chain.
“If this situation continues, supply chains will be disrupted. There are forecasts that predict the peak for infections will drag on until February or March,” Reuters quoted Volkmar Denner, CEO of Bosch, the world’s largest automotive supplier, as saying.
Bosch has 23 manufacturing facilities in China, two of which are located in Wuhan.
Bosch isn’t alone. Since the government announced the measure to curb the spread of the virus, the production of vehicles, both electric and gas-driven, has slowed dramatically. Toyota, which sells hybrid vehicles in China, said all its factories in the country would remain closed until February 9, in line with transport lockdowns.
Meanwhile, Honda and Renault, which both have factories with Chinese automaker Dongfeng, will open their factories in Wuhan on February 10. Both companies offer electric cars in the Chinese market.
Other EV makers, including Tesla and Nio, are no less vulnerable to the effects of the outbreak. The Shanghai government has required that the US automaker shut down its production plant in the city until the end of this week. Nio’s vehicles are produced by state-owned carmaker JAC in eastern China’s Anhui province, which has also extended the holiday over coronavirus concerns.
During an earnings call last week, Tesla CFO Zach Kirkhorn said that the shutdown would have minimal effects on the company’s profitability. Nevertheless, Bernstein analysts said that around 82% of Tesla’s retail volume in China comes from the 40 worst-hit cities, while those cities make up 68% of Nio’s sales.
“The latter looks especially vulnerable to a prolonged slump in EV sales,” the analysts said. “We expect EV sales in China to be worse hit than the broader market. Consumer adoption of EVs in China is highly concentrated in the top cities where license plate restrictions and other policies enforce EV purchases.
As the number of confirmed cases of the new virus surges, global automakers and Chinese OEMs have scrambled to make big donations to fight against the outbreak while also burnishing their images. At the time of writing, more than 45 automakers, Tier 1 suppliers, and large auto dealers have provided donations worth RMB 500 million (about $70 million).
BMW, the top premium car seller in China last year, was the first to act—offering RMB 5 million in aid. Chinese auto giant Geely gave a lavish RMB 200 million, with dozens of minivans for medical transport. Meanwhile, state-owned FAW and GAC ramped up support with follow-on donations of RMB 30 million and RMB 8 million, respectively. Even loss-making EV makers including Nio and Xpeng have joined the ranks of generous donors.
Meanwhile, Tesla found itself riding a wave of public outrage. The company initially “did its bit,” according to Zhu Xiaotong, president of Tesla Greater China, by offering Tesla owners free unlimited access to its supercharging network until the epidemic was over. This, however, generated sharp criticism among both followers and critics.
“No donation from Tesla? … Even Nio, a company near bankruptcy, offered several million yuan … Will Tesla do nothing in China other than making money?” wrote a user with the handle “Sailamborghini,” commenting on a post by Tesla on microblogging platform Weibo.
“[You] might as well donate some US-made face masks,” another user using the handle “Xiele-.” Two days later, the American EV giant announced a donation of RMB 5 million for virus control to mollify public anger.
Donations are a form of relief not just for those stricken with the illness but for the companies themselves, given the possible impact on the domestic and global auto market and supply chain if the situation in China gets worse. Currently, the Chinese government allows businesses to deduct donations from taxable income, without exceeding 12% of their annual net profit. Ren, the Evergrande economist, has suggested removing the restriction to boost donations and stabilize the economy.
]]>Hillhouse Capital, a longtime Nio investor and once its third-largest shareholder, sold off its holdings in the Chinese electric vehicle (EV) firm in fourth quarter after reducing its stake significantly earlier in the year, according to a filing on Friday.
Why it matters: Caution about the EV maker and about the electric car sector in general from a top-ranked private equity firm underscores the industry’s fragility and as well as the uphill battle Nio still faces in attracting badly needed funding.
Details: Asia-focused investment firm Hillhouse Capital Management has sold its entire stake in Nio over the last quarter, the company revealed on Friday in a filing made to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) after market close.
Context: Hillhouse’s filing follows a day after Nio announced another $100 million short-term debt offering in convertible bonds from two unnamed Asia-based investment funds, which is expected to close on Feb. 19. The company had just announced a similar deal to raise $100 million just a week earlier, on Feb. 6.
China reported a double-digit decrease in electric vehicle (EV) sales for a sixth consecutive month in January, and warned that the Covid-19 outbreak was weighing on automakers already under significant pressure.
Why it matters: Already struggling amid a broader downturn which began in late 2018, EV companies in China are more vulnerable than traditional automakers during the crisis surrounding Covid-19, a flu-like virus which has sickened 55,649 and killed more than 1,300 in China as of writing.
Details: January sales of new energy vehicle (NEVs), which include all-electric and plug-in hybrid cars, plunged 54.4% from a year earlier to 44,000 units, the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) said Thursday (in Chinese).
Context: China reported an annual decline in NEV sales for the first time in 2019 to 1.2 million units, declining 4% from the previous year.
As China’s workforce is resuming work and production in the following weeks, one of the top concerns of most people is the number of people on public transportation. As such, with the latest version, Autonavi (known in Chinese as Gaode Ditu or Amap) has launched the emergency search function on its app with full effect in Beijing to check real-time subway passenger flow in each station in order to make travel arrangements accordingly to avoid large crowds. This relevant data of this feature is provided by the Beijing Municipal Transportation Commission and has covered all subway lines and stations in the city. With this function, the public can now check the density level of each subway line, as well as the density of each train.
According to Autonavi, in addition to the real-time traffic flow of subway lines and passengers, it plans to launch more real-time traffic information in the near future to help users make better decisions on their travel arrangements. Previously, Autonavi has launched real-time bus services in dozens of key cities including Beijing. Users are recommended to check the whereabouts of each bus in order to estimate their traveling time and minimize their waiting time.
Editor’s note: This is part of our ongoing Tech for Good series, highlighting how Chinese tech companies are helping fight the impact of the coronavirus. This was originally written by Steven Lee, a writer for our sister site, TechNode Chinese. Read the Chinese version here.
]]>Israeli startup Innoviz is teaming up with a large Chinese truck maker on self-driving container transport on ports, as the country pushes industrial upgrades for freight deliveries using driverless technologies.
Why it matters: The partnership is an important step for Innoviz, which is going to great lengths to drive down costs for Lidar sensors in order to widen adoption in autonomous vehicles (AV), particularly in the hyper-competitive Chinese auto market.
Details: Softbank-backed Innoviz is working on a pilot project with Shaanxi Heavy Duty Automobile, known outside of China as Shacman Trucks, to deploy the Innoviz Pro solid-state Lidar sensor in autonomous trucks on one of China’s biggest ports, the company said in an announcement released Wednesday.
Context: Founded in January 2016 by former members of the elite technological unit of the Israeli Defense Forces, Innoviz has secured total funding of $252 million from investors including Softbank, Tier 1 supplier Aptiv, and China Merchants Capital.
China’s top scientists call for legislation to drive autonomous car industry
Mercedes-Benz recently requested the government to permit its suppliers to resume production in the northern Chinese port city of Tianjin, warning of a major hit to sales if the factory suspensions continue.
Why it matters: The company’s warning reflects the urgency felt by many to restart China’s economy after a country-wide supply chain disruption and labor shortage following the Covid-19 crisis. It also underscores Beijing’s limited options in minimizing risk while tending to the country’s economy.
Details: Mercedes-Benz asked Tianjin’s municipal government late last week to allow its 19 parts suppliers to resume production in the city’s Wuqing district, according to a report from the Economic Observer that has since been removed.
Context: In its latest efforts to restart the economy while curbing the spread of the virus, China has required businesses to deploy workers with sufficient inventory of protective face masks and other supplies among a list of safety measures before reopening their factories.
Electric vehicle maker Nio on Monday posted an 11.5% drop year on year in January sales, outstripping peers during a historically low season for the Chinese auto market.
Why it matters: The likely significant impact of the coronavirus outbreak is beginning to show. In January delivery results, Nio warned of an expected drop in production and deliveries in February after two months of growing sales.
Details: Nio delivered 1,598 electric vehicles (EVs) in January, including 1,493 units of its five-seater sport utility vehicle, the ES6. It only handed over 105 units of its premium ES8 SUV, the lowest on record for the past year and a half.
Context: Chinese biggest EV maker, BYD, on Monday reported EV sales falling by more than three-quarters to 7,133 units in January from the same period last year.
Editor’s note: This post on life inside Wuhan originally appeared in our members’ only weekly newsletter. Sign up so you don’t miss the next one.
As most people stay inside, delivery drivers are on the front lines of the battle against coronavirus in Wuhan. This week, TechNode’s translation column brings you a gripping article profiling the volunteers, translated in full by courtesy of GQ Reports. This article was co-authored by Jordan Schneider.
The 2019 novel coronavirus exposed the fragility of various Chinese institutions. Local government and Wuhan hospitals have found themselves overwhelmed and unable to rise to the occasion.
Private logistics firms, on the other hand, have proven themselves essential. In a state of lockdown, the state has largely turned to the private sector to provide life’s necessities for those under order to stay inside.
A team effort, this article published by GQ Reports profiles the experience and sacrifice of those individuals delivering food, opening their hotels to medical staff people. It describes at a human level the heroism and trauma of those caught in Wuhan. Given the strength and importance of this article, we’re running it at full length.
Liu Chuchu, Ouyang Shilei, Zhang Jiajing, Luo Fangdan, Ge Shurun, Chen Rubing
GQ Reports, Feb. 3, 2020
At the request of interviewees, some of the names in this article are pseudonyms.
Since the city was sealed off, Wuhan has been like a movie playing on mute. Most delivery companies have stopped operation, and a large number of goods from other regions are languishing in warehouses. A small number of Tmall Express, emergency medical services, and Shun Feng delivery workers [Tmall is an ecommerce platform and Shun Feng is a delivery service] are still active. Sometimes one delivery worker has to deliver to two different districts, thus the mountains of accumulated goods are slow to be disseminated from the warehouses.
On Jan. 26, a volunteer named Zhang Che called Xiao Wang, a deliveryman, to help him find a box of surgical masks from Cangzhou, Hebei that had arrived four days prior. Zhang Che promised to give Xiao Wang a bag of face masks in exchange for helping him find the package.
Upon receiving the face masks, Zhang immediately rushed to the hospital. As an individual volunteer, the amount of supplies he is able to get his hands on is limited. From Jan. 25 to 26, he only found 200 sets of protective clothing, 100 masks, and 100 goggles. The limited supply must be divided for a hospital with more than five different departments. No matter how much they get, doctors and hospital staff are very grateful. Each additional item is a lifesaver.
Almost all of the shops in the formerly bustling streets have closed. In the supermarket, most vegetables are gone. Only one convenience store in Wuhan’s main shopping street is open. The doorframe is filled with instant hot pot kits, instant noodles, and other easy-to-cook foods. Many blue-helmeted delivery drivers were at the door, waiting to grab a meal [Trans: Blue helmets are the uniform of delivery service Eleme]. A number of people are not brave enough, or even able, to go out. They rely completely on the delivery workers shuttling throughout the city.
Since becoming a delivery driver, this is the first time deliveryman Wu Bang has been asked by a customer to be added on WeChat. Every few days the customer sent Wu a list of dishes and daily necessities, paying him RMB 20 (about $2.87) for the errands. Wu walks slowly, with a crutch, because of a previous knee fracture. On Jan. 28, Wu Bang spends two hours in the Zhongbai supermarket to buy all the goods the customer needs. That night after returning home Wu Bang is so tired he “couldn’t even keep his eyes open”.
While the city is sealed off, Wu’s errand-running fee does not change. The money he earns in a day is no more than normal. However, different platforms have different policies. According to a report by inSight, a young delivery rider said that delivery fees have risen by at least RMB 12 since Jan. 21. He calculated that he could earn RMB 3,000 to 5,000 in three days. However, many delivery drivers are still afraid to go out, and when the delivery workers who do continue working receive an order to a hospital, few are willing to accept it.
When delivery worker Liu Gang delivered abalone rice to Wuhan University’s Zhongnan hospital, he was surprised at how lonely the hospital was. Remembering a Weibo post stating that New Year’s dinner in the hospital was only instant noodles, Liu decided to make more deliveries to the hospital. Liu felt that to those still working during the lockdown, the motivation to help people others outweighs fear of infection. On Jan. 29, Liu photographed a sanitation worker in orange overalls he encounters on the road, a traffic policeman in a fluorescent green vest under an overpass, a rider eating a meal on the side of the road in a yellow hazmat suit, and a pharmacy still open. “They are superheroes,” he says.
Express delivery within the city is still running. Li Zaigui, a delivery worker with Dada Zhongbao [a crowdsourcing-based delivery company] has been working around the clock for the last few days. Of the original nine delivery workers at his site, three returned home for the New Year holiday, but none of the remaining workers left because of the outbreak. On the third or fourth day of the city being sealed, several unscheduled local colleagues felt bored staying at home and also came out to run deliveries.
Currently, Li delivers goods for Jingdong, daily necessities such as masks, rice, noodles, oil, instant noodles, and mineral water. The platform specifically asked the delivery workers to not come in contact with customers when delivering goods, but instead to let the customers come down and pick them up themselves or place the goods in delivery cabinets.
Every day, Li receives a mask from Jingdong. Sometimes it is an N95 mask [Note: an N95 mask is one that blocks at least 95% of very small test particles], sometimes it is a surgical mask. This is considered very good in the industry. In fact, many of these service workers who are carrying people their life necessities and medical supplies have very little protection of their own. Lin Chen, a video blogger who has been shooting outside for several days, said that most delivery drivers on streets were not wearing masks. Wu Bang, mentioned above, wears a face mask and changes it daily, but doesn’t disinfect his clothes when he gets home even though he often delivers to the hospital.
Some lack access to and screening for the latest outbreak information. On the fourth day of Wuhan’s lockdown, volunteer Zhang Che added a RMB 10 tip to get a driver to accept his request for a rideshare. When he got in the taxi, he found that the driver was wearing no mask but a scarf looped twice around her face. He quickly gave her the mask in his bag. Seeing him so nervous, the driver asked, “Is the current situation dangerous? I heard two hundred people were infected?”
The dark cloud of inadequate supplies hangs over everyone in the city. Every time Zhang went to the hospital to give doctors and nurses supplies, he communicated with the doctors for a very short time, left physical space between them, and repeated one agreement over and over—an agreement he had made with more than 30 doctors: “We will come out to eat together after we are well!” No one dares to think about whether those agreements can be fulfilled. Among Zhang ‘s doctor friends, there have been a lot of people infected.
“The medical staff are fighting for their lives and I want to help them with logistics as much as possible,” said hotel volunteer Wang Hongyun.
When they began to seal off Wuhan’s, so did the battle of logistics to support frontline medical staff. On the second day of the new year, when the city was closed, the hotel industry in Wuhan organized the “Wuhan Medical Hotel Support Group” to provide free accommodation for medical staff.
Wang Huan is one of the leaders in the group, working as the hotel’s “clinical inspector.” In recent days, she felt more and more frustrated. At the same time, bills are piling up, disinfection and protection materials are increasingly scarce, and there is a service personnel shortage. Businesses wanted to help medical workers struggling to get home in the event of a traffic shutdown, but only for a few days. They hoped that a government or charity would take over after that.
It turns out that civilian-originated support will last longer than anticipated. More and more medical staff are checking into these hotels.
Wang Hongyun is the only hotel staff staying at the Aisikai Fine Hotel in Wuchang district. Now employees can’t be found even for three times the pay. He simultaneously serves as receptionist, cleaner, store manager, and manager. Every day, he disinfects public areas every three hours. The rooms are furnished and the sheets are changed by the medical staff themselves—as is the case at most of the hotels in the cluster.
This raises the question: How to disinfect? Lack of sufficient protective equipment for cleaning has become the most serious problem that these hotels face. Wang only wears a mask. He doesn’t have professional disinfection required isolation clothing, isolation shoes, or spray instrument, not to mention an ultraviolet lamp, or an air sterilizer. The medical staff sent him two pairs of disposable gloves, which he still refuses to use.
How the frontline medical staff travel has also become one of the most concerned issues. Zhou Xianwang, the mayor of Wuhan, said the government initially tried to provide three to five taxis for each community to pick up medical workers, but this effort failed.
Currently, some medical workers have solved the commuting problem by staying in hotels near the hospital, while others drive themselves to work. The rest of the medical workers mainly solve the commuting problem through a volunteer team organized by Didi Express and a private volunteer fleet.
After the city sealed-off, Wuhan-based vlog blogger Zhi Zhu Hou Mian Bao joined the volunteer group. He also recorded an instructional video about getting out of a car which describes disinfection processes.
After the lockdown, the number of people going out dropped. For the Wuhan police, the people calling 110 [Note: This is the police emergency number] also dropped. On Jan. 27, the Wuhan public security bureau received 165 calls to the 110 number, down 67.8% from normal.
“There’s no one who wants to start with those trivial issues.” Wang Xing, a Hankou police officer said that in the past the police often had to solve fights that broke out due to trifles. But under the epidemic, there are fewer thieves. On the second day of sealing off, Hankou had zero police alerts. Even accidental deaths are declining, as there are no traffic accidents that used to happen daily.
The police are still on duty. As the epidemic situation took a downward turn, the police took on the responsibility of picking up and dropping off patients.
There are still many problems to be solved in the community. Chronically ill and the elderly are worried about how to go to the doctor on time and how to buy food and supplies. At present, the voluntary fleet of municipal taxis does some of the supporting work for such situations. Yu Huahui, a taxi driver, is one of those who has volunteered to join the 6,000 taxis in the community scheme.
The night before, Yu told his family “If I don’t do this, I’ll regret it for the rest of my life.” His wife and daughter finally showed their support and told him to take precautions.
Every day, the community committee investigates the purpose of travel, location and test results of its residents and informs the drivers. Before getting on the cars, temperatures are checked. Passengers with fevers cannot get on.
A portion of the vehicles go to the hospital, taking pregnant women for physical examinations, dialysis patients to get dialysis, and the elderly for physical examinations. The other portion goes to help old people who have no children to buy things for them. On a regular basis, community workers keep a list of the food and supplies they need and go out with drivers to do their shopping. Sometimes Yu Huahui and his colleagues have to run a few supermarkets and pharmacies to buy what residents need.
The taxi company provided only surgical masks and 84-brand disinfectant for the drivers, while Yu added gloves, disposable raincoats and plenty of Chinese medicine. Mr. Yu felt that the company should do more to keep drivers safe. He suggested to the company that he “can provide as many N95 professional masks as the company needs,” and tried to convince the leader that he “has at least a few hundred in stock that can be used by everyone for the time being.” But the leader ignored him.
Zhang Che decided to have a rest. While volunteering at hospitals to deliver supplies, he thought he had developed symptoms of PTSD. Sometimes when he closed his eyes, he saw thousands of hands looking for a mask, and he had only one bag.
The road used to transport supplies is blocked. Zhang ’s friends from Fuyang, Anhui Province sent more than 1,000 sets of protective clothing and some face masks over. In the middle of the night the car drove to Wuhan entrance gate, but wasn’t allowed to enter as the road was broken with a several meters wide deep hole, the goods could only be sent back to the factory. Zhang didn’t tell anyone close to him he was a volunteer and had to deal with his personal anxieties himself.
This only made Zhang more anxious. A doctor friend at People’s Hospital has been diagnosed with a strong positive infection and is being quarantined. Another doctor friend decided to go back to work when he should have been quarantined because of a shortage of staff.
Zhang never expected to become a volunteer. On New Year’s Eve, he was chatting with a doctor friend who casually said the hospital did not have food for New Year’s Eve. Zhang went to send them food. On Jan. 24, at the height of the panic, huge crowds rushed to hospitals to be tested for infection. Zhang was in the hospital hall and saw all the elderly, some people close to the body, some people not wearing masks, some people wearing cloth masks. Zhang was about to make a detour to leave when a pair of hands seized him, a scarf wrapped around the mouth and nose of a middle-aged woman almost kneeling: “Please sell me the mask.” Then another pair of hands caught him. Soon, Zhang ’s bag of masks was finished.
People getting the masks were ecstatic, and Zhang’s heart clenched as he saw red-faced patients interspersed throughout the hospital. Before leaving, the doctor advised him not to deliver things. He nodded, turned, and drove back up the road, calling contacts to let them know he’d deliver things.
“We want to live, too.” Said Zhou Qinghui, owner of the Yishang Garden Hotel. The cost of rent, water and electricity is about RMB 6,500 a day. “Our current situation cannot maintain long-term free service. It’s not clear how long we can last.” Zhou said. All the hotel staff in Wuhan that Wang Hongyun knew were not comfortable. “Most of the owners are not fully invested, and many of them are simultaneously paying off their loans while operating their stores. They are paying off that money each month.”
In the early morning of Jan. 29, the fifth day after its establishment, the “Wuhan 123 Rescue Convoy” published a “Letter to Drivers,” announcing that due to a shortage of protective resources such as protective clothing and masks, it would suspend order collection. In the past five days, the 123 aid convoy faced the risk of infection to pick up nearly 1,000 medical staff and deliver more than 100 supplies.
On Jan. 30, Wuhan Union Hospital made a post on Weibo asking for help. “We defend Wuhan, we ask you to support us! We just got the news that we’re running out of supplies!” Seeing this message, Zhang decided not to rest and soon set out to find supplies.
They keep rushing around, they keep waiting, waiting for the Huoshen Shan and Leishen Shan hospitals to be built, waiting for the turning point in the epidemic, waiting for the lockdown of the city to end, waiting for the moment this city grows brightly and comes back to life.
[Translator: As of Feb. 8, both of the hospitals mentioned above have been completed. Wuhan is still battling the epidemic.]
]]>As Beijing ramps up efforts to contain transmission of the novel coronavirus, authorities in the northeastern city of Shenyang are launching a real-name registration system for public transit developed by China’s on-demand services provider Meituan Dianping, and many cities are beginning to follow suit.
Why it matters: Real-name registration for public transit is expected to improve the ability to track the spread of the coronavirus, but represents further erosion of individual privacy. China’s campaign to extend real-name registration has expanded from train travel, social media, even some video games, and now to city transit.
Details: The mobile registration system requiring commuters leave their personal information via QR code before taking public transport went live on Thursday in Shenyang, capital of the northeastern Liaoning province, Meituan announced Sunday on its official account on messaging platform WeChat (in Chinese).
Context: China has found itself in a dilemma; while it needs to restart public transport to support its workforce and economy, it may be risking a further spread of the virus despite boosting controls.
Cash-strapped electric vehicle maker Nio has raised $100 million in convertible bonds, relieving immediate cash flow concerns, but now faces delivery delays for its February shipment amid a viral outbreak that has brought much of the country to a standstill.
Why it matters: The cash infusion may temporarily alleviate financial pressures for the troubled EV maker, which had just RMB 2.55 billion ($357.3 million) in cash and equivalents as of the third quarter of last year.
Details: Nio is selling around $100 million worth of convertible bonds, which mature in 360 days with zero interest, to two “unaffiliated” Asian-based investment funds, according to an announcement released Wednesday.
Context: This is Nio’s third convertible bond offering after going public in the US in August 2018.
Update: added comments from Tu Le and the company.
]]>Chinese e-commerce giant JD.com has completed its first delivery of medical aid via autonomous vehicle in the central Chinese city of Wuhan, the epicenter of the current novel coronavirus outbreak.
Why it matters: The coronavirus epidemic may drastically accelerate real-life applications for deliveries via unmanned vehicles and drones in China, which has remained limited despite widespread attention.
Details: JD’s unmanned vehicle delivered medical supplies to Wuhan Ninth Hospital from its Renhe delivery station 600 meters away, according to a company statement (in Chinese).
Context: The noval virus has claimed 637 lives after sickening more than 31,200 individuals on the Chinese mainland as of Friday.
]]>Red carpet treatment in China has not spared Tesla from the effects of country-wide factory shutdowns as fallout from the coronavirus epidemic grinds on. The company said Tuesday that it is delaying the deliveries of its highly anticipated China-made Model 3 vehicles, but is working to keep up with its schedule.
Why it matters: Tesla has been trying to downplay the potential hit to sales from the current novel coronavirus outbreak, but there is growing uncertainty about how it will weather the impact of the epidemic that has had catastrophic effects on local businesses, particularly already-troubled electric vehicle (EV) makers.
Details: Tesla will push back deliveries for its China-made Model 3, which was initially scheduled for early February, Tao Lin, Tesla vice president, said Tuesday on Chinese microblogging platform Weibo.
Context: Tesla expects that the Shanghai Gigafactory will resume production on Feb. 10, in line the with a schedule set out by the Chinese government.
Tesla kicks off trial production in Shanghai, surprises with Q3 profits
China’s ride-hailing platform Didi Chuxing is facing a shortage of protective gear including garments and face masks as the company expands its service for medical workers in Beijing amid a growing coronavirus outbreak in the country.
Why it matters: Didi is one of many firms facing protective gear shortages during the coronavirus epidemic, compounding fears about a deepening economic slowdown and financial strain on enterprises.
Details: China’s largest ride-hailing platform Didi is now running low on protective supplies including garments, face masks, and digital thermometers, company president Jean Liu said in a post on Chinese microblogging platform Weibo on Thursday.
Context: In addition to offering free rides to medical workers, Didi has taken a series of measures to help contain the coronavirus outbreak as the impact causes widespread disruption to various business sectors in China.
Updated: included information on mask requirements and shortages in Details section.
]]>Caocao Mobility, the ride-hailing unit of Chinese automaker Geely, has offered transport services free of charge to residents and medical workers in the central Chinese city of Wuhan in response to Beijing’s call for companies to join the fight against the spread of the new coronavirus.
Why it matters: Caocao‘s service is expected to help solve residents needs, including helping the ill and medical staff shop for basics, see doctors, and commute.
Details: Chinese automaker Geely on Friday said that its ride-hailing service Caocao had established a special fleet equipped with more than 100 vehicles and 300 drivers to provide free mobility services for residents and medical workers in Wuhan.
Context: Caocao is not the only company using the outbreak to burnish its image.
Guoxuan High-tech, a Chinese electric vehicle battery maker, has confirmed it is in discussions with Volkswagen AG about a potential investment, as the German automaker accelerates its shift to electrification in its largest consumer market.
Why it matters: Global automakers’ push toward electric vehicles will drive growth for Chinese auto suppliers like battery and component makers.
Details: Guoxuan High-tech is in talks with Volkswagen over a potential partnership in technology, product development, and capital, but has not signed “a substantive, binding agreement,” the company said in an announcement released Monday (in Chinese).
Context: Volkswagen is making the switch to electric with a goal of selling a combined total of 1.5 million all-electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles per year in China by 2025.
AutoX has raised an undisclosed amount of Series Pre-B funding and has teamed with Fiat Chrysler (FCA) as the self-driving startup looks to ramp up robotaxi services in China and Asia.
Why it matters: The round makes AutoX one of the biggest self-driving companies in Asia and will support the firm’s aggressive plan to deploy robotaxi services in the first-tier cities of Shanghai and Shenzhen.
Details: Shenzhen-based AutoX announced Monday the completion of Series Pre-B funding running into “dozens of millions of US dollars,” led by Jumbo Sheen Enterprises Group, an equity investment fund manager focused on artificial intelligent, fintech and medical services.
Context: Recognizing that the arrival of fully autonomous vehicles has been slower than first thought, global OEMs and Chinese startups are scrambling to team up amid technical, regulatory, and business challenges to remove humans from behind the wheel.
Self-driving startup AutoX wins backing from Dongfeng, eyes China market
Chinese ride-hailing platform Dida Chuxing is seeking up to $300 million in pre-IPO funding from investors including Tencent, Chinese media reported Thursday.
Why it matters: Beijing-based Dida is the second-largest ride-hailing service in China and one of the few to say it is profitable.
Details: Dida is looking to raise as much as $300 million in a last round of funding before filing for an initial public offering in the US, Chinese media reported Thursday citing people familiar with the matter.
Context: China’s ride-hailing market has started to slow, reporting a 6.3% year-on-year decrease in total daily active usage in the third quarter of 2019, the fifth consecutive quarterly decline, analysts at Sanford C. Bernstein wrote in a report citing figures from Chinese research firm TalkingData.
Didi Chuxing unveils holiday measures to boost safety, car availability
The future of autonomous aircraft in cities bears more resemblance to a centralized bus system rather than on-demand vehicles like taxis, Chinese drone maker Ehang said in its first white paper released on Wednesday.
Why it matters: The Beijing-based firm is veering from the flying taxi model adopted by other players in the field, including Uber and Volocopter.
Details: The white paper explored “the potential of [urban air mobility] through insights into UAM applications and commercialization based on practical use cases,” according to Edware Xu, the startup’s chief strategy officer.
Context: Ehang caused a splash in 2016 when it debuted the world’s first electric passenger drone, called Ehang 184, at the Las Vegas Consumer Electronics Show (CES).
China’s Guangzhou Automobile Group (GAC) on Thursday confirmed that it is in talks with Nio regarding an investment of up to $150 million.
Why it matters: A successful deal with southern China’s biggest automaker will help Shanghai-based Nio with its cash flow issue, which has dogged the company for months, and significantly lower costs along its supply chain.
Details: In an announcement released Thursday morning, Shanghai and Hong Kong-listed GAC said it has been discussing a financing proposal with Nio, but had not yet reached a binding agreement.
Context: GAC and Nio forged an alliance in December 2017 followed by a joint venture in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou months later in a bid to nab share of low- and mid-level auto markets and reduce supply chain costs.
Despite a first-ever annual decline in China’s low- and zero-emission vehicle sales in 2019, an analyst from Swiss banking group UBS is positive on the market and expects that it will rebound this year, he said Tuesday.
Why it matters: Beijing’s heavy promotion of EVs over a 10-year span has left many questioning whether there was ever any actual consumer demand amid fears that the widespread EV slump will extend into another year.
Details: Growth of an additional “100,000 units at the very least” can be expected in China’s new energy vehicle (NEV) sales this year, Paul Gong, a China auto analyst at UBS, told journalists during the company’s Greater China Conference in Shanghai on Tuesday.
Context: China’s NEV sales dropped for the first time on an annual basis in 2019, declining 4% year on year to 1.2 million units, the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) said on Monday in a release.
Didi Chuxing is rolling out a number of temporary measures aimed at ensuring an adequate number of cars on the road and passenger safety during the upcoming Spring Festival holiday, following meetings requested by Chinese authorities.
Why it matters: The latest requirements from authorities signal that Beijing is looking to tighten control over local ride-hailing platforms to improve security and broaden its availability to the public, which may drive mounting operating costs.
Details: To entice drivers to continue working through the holiday, Didi will impose a surcharge ranging from RMB 1 to RMB 9 (around $0.15 to $1.30) per trip during the two weeks starting Jan. 21. The surcharge will “go directly” to the driver, the company said in an announcement released Monday.
Didi to ask passengers to pay tips to drivers over Spring Festival
Context: Concerns about the safety issues on ride-hailing platforms have remained a public concern, with news headlines continuing to recall violent incidents inflicted on passengers.
Piano teacher Sun Lei drove her Nio ES6 from her home in Guangzhou to Shenzhen twice per week in December. With a round trip of 5 hours, she had to make sure she had enough time to practice ahead of the big day.
The moment came on Dec. 28 when Sun took to the stage at the annual Nio Day event with 16 other members of the makeshift group “Blue Sky Chorus.” They sang of the virtues of owning a Nio to the thousands of fellow fans in attendance.
“I am a super fan of Nio and everything was worth it,” Sun said. She first volunteered to compose the performance after growing tired of stories in the media bashing the company. Sun wanted to set the record straight and share her positive experiences as a Nio owner. The company was not directly involved in organizing the performance though it did ask for volunteers to take part in Nio Day.
The NEV maker has adopted an Apple-style community strategy seldom seen in the auto sector, forming a tight army of devoted users to promote its cars to potential buyers. Early EV adopters from all walks of life—executives, business owners, and professionals—act as informal sales staff repaying the struggling company for the plethora of “user-centric” services offered.
The efforts started bearing fruit in the second half of 2019. Nio reported a robust 35% month-on-month rise in vehicle deliveries in the third quarter, followed by another 70% jump for the three months after. And, more notably, existing owner referrals accounted for more than 45% of the 20,000 or so shipments last year. Several car owners from the advertising industry even took it on themselves to launch their own local promotional campaigns to help the company in cities including Qingdao and Wuhan, Nio Chief Executive William Li said at the event.
Still, the much-heralded “Tesla of China” continues to bleed money. Cash is tight and it will struggle to see out the next 12 months of operations without external financing, according to its latest earnings report. However, Nio firmly believes that the relentless support of its users constitutes a trump card for the NEV maker ahead of an unlikely comeback.
Thousands of auto enthusiasts descended on Shenzhen, southern Guangdong province, on Dec. 28, to attend Nio Day 2019. Top of the bill at the annual user event was the new EC6 sporty SUV.
This year’s event was smaller than previous incarnations, real estate veteran and Nio devotee Tom Tian told TechNode. The first-ever event at Beijing’s Wukesong Stadium in 2017 drew a crowd of 10,000, all fixed on the eight cars showcased on stage. That year, Nio unveiled China’s first EV recharging service solution, and an in-vehicle smart speaker, alongside its debut mass-produced ES8 model. A performance from US pop-rock group Imagine Dragons rounded off the show.
For many Nio fans, the company has been at the forefront of China’s push to become a global manufacturing superpower. Aspirations of becoming the country’s most innovative NEV maker brought in followers in their droves and they continue to stand by to this day.
Tian, also a go-karting enthusiast, first came across Nio in November 2017 at a test-drive event for the EP9 supercar at a circuit in Beijing. A year later and he was the 4,220th owner of the ES8 SUV model—Nio assigned numbers to the first 10,000 vehicle owners. He already had two cars including a Mercedes GLE, which he now rarely drives.
Tian drives his Nio to work each day in the capital where NEVs are not subject to the same restrictions as traditional gasoline-powered autos. He also does so essentially at no cost, thanks to Nio’s battery-swapping service that switched to a free-for-users model last August.
Tian is not alone. Chang Luqiu went electric at around the same time. Previously torn between Tesla and Nio, he made up his mind after watching the first Nio Day in 2017. Chang gifted his BMW sedan to his mother and now drives an ES8 to work every day. “I feel proud to be a Nio owner,” Chang said.
Nio’s army of loyal fans come mainly from China’s growing middle class. TechNode spoke to multiple owners including business owners and corporate managers. Riding the crest of a wave of China’s phenomenal economic growth over the past 30 years, these educated professionals are well-paid and come from industries such as real estate, technology, and finance.
The country is now home to more than 33 million households with a combined annual income of RMB 200,000 ($29,000), according to a report from Hurun, the research firm behind China’s annual rich list report. Having achieved financial security in the early years, these progressive affluent spenders are globally minded and hard to please. They have grown a refined sense of quality related to global brands and seek emotional satisfaction through this taste.
The Nio Day excitement hit a crescendo as CEO William Li took to the stage. The crowd greeted him with loud cheers and even sobs. Nio fans refer to him as “Brother Bin,” using his first name. While sheer patriotism does explain some of their devotion, there are also other factors at play.
The events of this year’s Nio Day were unthinkable. Some 17 Nio owners formed the “Blue sky chorus,” spending a month of writing and rehearsing a song together to express their love for the brand. Over 150 others volunteered to pick up attendees from nearby airports and train stations before the event.
What’s more, the devotion is transforming into tangible benefits. CEO William Li attributed a 25% rise in Q3 sales to a “thriving and growing” community, adding that nearly half of new orders came from existing owner referrals over the past year. Nio President Qin Lihong told TechNode that offering the best user experience consistently to gain their continuous support is “the only way” to help the company out of its financial predicament.
These affluent customers are repaying the company’s efforts. Li pledged to build a user-centric enterprise and has invested heavily since the beginning of operations in 2014. The company has built 22 clubhouses nationwide featuring bespoke design elements. They offer users a space to hang out, read books and even leave their children for daycare. In the case of property veteran Tian, all eight Nio owners in his neighborhood know each other.
The expensive added-value retail and club strategy has helped the company form its own private social network as well. Nio claimed its users organized and joined in over 16,000 activities last year via its app. These included attending lectures, making dumplings, and playing football. These middle-class Chinese with time, money, and status are able to socialize, show off their talents, become leaders, or just offer a helping hand to like-minded individuals.
Devoting their time and efforts to the community gives them a constant sense of personal fulfillment, a deeper feeling of inner contentment, and strong sense of their own identity. And all of this is backed up by strong patriotic sentiment. “[We] all hope that China can build quality cars on its own,” said Tian.
“Each Nio owner is a part-time salesperson, and that is the cornerstone for Nio to expand its business rapidly in the future,” Bill Lin, an EV enthusiast told TechNode. He said that the community is Nio’s most valuable asset. Anthony Lin, a Nio investor agreed, adding that rivals cannot come close to replicating the success in this aspect.
With that in mind, Nio is now raising the stakes. The cash-strapped EV maker has burned more than RMB 1 billion each quarter in the name of sales over the past two years. This includes fixed investments on brick and mortar clubhouses and expenses for marketing events. President Qin did not reveal the per capita cost of user acquisition, stating that building the community “has nothing to do” with the company’s financial plight.
“The company’s cash balance is not adequate to provide the required working capital and liquidity for continuous operation in the next 12 months,” Nio stated in its third-quarter earnings call, laying bare the grave challenges faced.
Analysts believe a lot of Nio fans may have overlooked the earnings report and fail to realize the significance of the stretched balance sheet. With new investment still far off, users are going to great lengths to help the firm navigate choppy waters and continue to push the NEV sector forward.
]]>Beijing is suspending its plan to completely remove electric vehicle purchase subsidies this year, China’s chief minster of industry said on Saturday, as the government moves to stem further collapse spurred by the large-scale cuts which began in June.
Why it matters: The move is a big positive for the industry, and is expected to calm the market and preempt widepread bankruptcies throughout the EV industry.
Details: China will not make further reductions in its current incentive policy for EV purchases this year to encourage industry players, boost technology innovation, and stabilize the market, Miao Wei, Minister of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT), said on Saturday at a forum.
EV makers under great pressure absent ‘real’ consumer demand: SAIC
Context: Several industry bigwigs during the same forum on Saturday called for the government to hold off with further subsidy reductions in order to steady the market, according to several Chinese media reports.
GAC Nio, a joint venture (JV) between Chinese automaker GAC and the electric vehicle startup, is reportedly seeking RMB 1.5 billion ($216 million) in a fresh round of funding to support expansion initiatives including opening flagship stores and clubhouses across the country.
Why it matters: Signals that GAC Nio is seeking funds externally may mean that interest from its namesake investors is flagging. With it, the possibility of further collaboration between the two companies is vanishing, and hope from some of Nio’s investors that the EV maker could be rescued by GAC is also disappearing.
Details: GAC Nio is seeking to raise around RMB 1.5 billion to finance growth with a pre-money valuation of the same amount, according to a Chinese media report.
Context: With a price range between RMB 200,000 and RMB 300,000 (around $28,900 to $43,300), Hycan is positioned to appeal to the expanding, middle-class market, complementing Nio’s high-end offerings, Nio president Qin Lihong told media during its annual launch event in Shenzhen last month.
Mercedes-Benz has established a joint venture with China’s biggest private automaker Geely to produce all-electric vehicles under the Smart brand, with plans to sell cars domestically and on the global market beginning in 2022.
Why it matters: The move is the latest example of global automakers making inroads into the Chinese market while leveraging its capabilities as a manufacturing and export hub for the world.
Details: Chinese auto giant Geely and Daimler’s Mercedes-Benz on Wednesday announced a 50:50 joint venture in which they will build “premium and intelligent electrified vehicles” under the Smart brand name.
Context: Daimler stopped selling gas-powered Smart cars in North America in 2017 and continued to make the brand all-electric in Europe a year later, as the traditional auto industry takes on Tesla.
Electric vehicle maker Nio reported 25% sequential growth in December deliveries, bringing fourth quarter totals to 8,224 units and in line with the company’s forecast.
Why it matters: Nio has formed a community of devoted users to promote its cars to potential buyers, a marketing approach which has started to pay off.
Details: Nio said on Monday that total deliveries increased 25.4% month over month to 3,170 vehicles in December.
“These results are attributable, not only to our products and services that continue to stand out from competition in quality, performance and pricing, but also to our passionate, loyal and supportive user base. Through favorable word of mouth and referrals, our existing users remain a steady and relevant driver of new orders.”
—William Li, Nio founder and chairman
Context: The December delivery figures surpass the company’s outlook for the fourth quarter of 8,000 units.
Tesla has kicked off the new year with an aggressive bid to expand its presence in the Chinese market, lowering by 15% the price of its domestically made, base version of the Model 3 following months of speculation.
Why it matters: Tesla’s latest price reduction is expected to shake up the Chinese electric vehicle (EV) industry, as the move is likely to grab market share in the short-term from rivals it is undercutting.
Details: Tesla on Friday revealed the long-rumored reduction of its cheapest Model 3 version by dramatically lowering the starting price of the standard-range model by more than 15%. The China-made Model 3 now starts at RMB 299,050 ($42,920), according to the company’s website.
Context: Tesla late last year reported robust 48% year-on-year revenue growth to $2.14 billion in China for the first three quarters. A report by well-known auto market blogger, Chang Yan, said that the company’s sales target in China could increase 500% to 250,000 units in 2020 as a result of the price reduction.
Chinese carmaker Haima Automobile, a manufacturing partner of Xiaomi-backed electric vehicle (EV) startup Xpeng Motors, plans to enter the Indian market amid sluggish industry sales at home.
Why it matters: Haima’s move comes after China’s biggest automaker SAIC launched in the Indian market, racking up 27,000 orders for its MG Hector SUV model in just 45 days.
Details: Hainan-based Haima Automobile said late last month that it is in the process of making its EVs available in India.
Context: Chinese auto sales have slumped since mid-2018, falling 3.6% year on year to 2.5 million units in November.
Nio shares swelled by over 50% overnight after the embattled NEV maker posted a surprise bump in revenue to beat Wall Street estimates for the third quarter, thanks to recovering sales and lower spending.
Why it matters: The latest results suggest Nio has hit a financial turnaround of sorts. Still, the company has yet to reveal new investment plans, and some on Wall Street remain skeptical over whether the rebound is sustainable.
Details: Nio shocked Wall Street with a 25% year-on-year increase in total revenue to RMB 1.8 billion ($257 million) for the third quarter on strong vehicle sales, beating analyst expectations by more than $23 million.
Context: China’s new energy vehicle sales have slid for five consecutive months following subsidy cuts, with November sales falling 37.5% to 95,000 units compared with June, figures from the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) show.
Nio gets mixed reactions with new battery promising longer range
Electric vehicle startup Nio on Saturday announced it will not begin delivery of its third mass-market model until the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2020. The long-rumored compact crossover comes with a new 100 kWh battery pack. Unveiled at a yearly launch event, the battery’s reception was much warmer as details about the new vehicles had already been leaked prior to the event.
Why it matters: With the new battery pack, Nio is hoping to eliminate range anxiety and beat competitors.
Details: Nio fans at the annual “Nio Day” in Shenzhen were ambivalent about the liquid-cooled battery pack.
Nio seeks to allay customer fears over range with new battery swap stations
On-site reactions: TechNode was at the launch event and talked with a few Nio owners.
Context: Nio has bet big on battery swapping technologies as part of a broader “Battery as a Service” strategy. This term was coined by William Li to describe a comprehensive energy ecosystem including battery swapping and valet charging services.
On Thursday, Yan Baocai, the owner of a car fleet company, attempted to commit suicide (in Chinese). In his suicide note, he blamed Didi for putting his company out of business. The note called Didi out for their monopolistic practices and especially their use of unlicensed cars.
Why it matters: After Uber China was bought by Didi, the ride-hailing company controls more than 80% of the market. As with other giants, Didi has become a target for both user and regulatory complaints. Over the past two years, Didi has been shadowed by the murders perpetrated during its rides. Now, this attempted suicide has once again thrust them into public scrutiny.
Details: Yan tried to end his life on December 26 by taking medicine and liquor at home, hoping his death would raise social and governmental awareness of Didi’s problems.
Ride-hailers may face app store delisting over illegal drivers in Shanghai
Context: This is not the first entrepreneur suicide of recent note.
GAC Nio launched its first mass-market model Hycan 007 on Friday. This is the latest move from Chinese automakers to step up their EV offensive in rivalry with global giants. GAC Nio is a joint venture between Chinese OEM Guangdong Automotive Group (GAC) and electric vehicle startup Nio.
Why it matters: GAC and Nio joined forces with the establishment of an RMB 1.28 billion joint venture in April 2018. Both companies have a small presence in the EV market. They expect to change that with the joint venture.
Details: The Hycan 007 beats the Tesla Model X by 100 km with a New European Drive Cycle (NEDC) range of 643 km (400 miles). The batteries are supplied by CATL.
Nio to handle deliveries of new Hycan SUV from GAC joint venture
Context: Before making an alliance with GAC, Nio struck a similar deal with another local automaker Changan in early 2017, followed by the set-up of a JV with equal shares in August 2018 in the eastern Chinese cities of Nanjing.
A little known Chinese electric vehicle startup will likely become the first of its kind to be saved by a government-led buyout. After shelving its plan to invest in struggling EV maker Nio, a county government of China’s eastern city of Huzhou is planning to take over Youxia Motors. Youxia’s chairman, Wei Jun, said in 2017 that the company would be “China’s Tesla,” but the company has yet to deliver a real car after five years of operation.
Why it matters: Chinese local governments have been strong backers of electric vehicle startups, in line with Beijing’s goal to be the world’s leader in clean energy transportation. Now, as the once soaring industry is deflating, some of them are finally biting the bullet with further bailouts.
Details: A fully state-owned urban investment corporation, controlled by the Wuxing district government Huzhou, is planning to acquire land from Youxia Motors. It will also take over its unfinished construction project, the government said in the minutes of a recent meeting published (in Chinese) last week.
Context: Youxia Motors released an all-electric vehicle model in July 2015 after being set up for one year, the first among Chinese companies. However, it also gained a notorious reputation as the so-called “Youxia X” coupon model was almost completely converted from Tesla Model S.
In this episode, the guys welcome Tu Le, Managing Director of Sino Auto Insights, to discuss China’s dynamic electric vehicle and automotive industry. Tu explains how an investment bubble and generous government subsidies led to an explosion in EV startups, but how as the money has dried up, these firms are now under intense pressure to prove that they can actually compete with the large international automakers.
China Tech Investor is a weekly look at China’s tech companies through the lens of investment. Each week, hosts Elliott Zaagman and James Hull go through their watch list of publicly listed tech companies and also interview experts on issues affecting the macroeconomy and the stock prices of China’s tech companies.
Make sure you don’t miss anything. Check out our lineup of China tech podcasts.
Please note, the hosts may have interest in some of the stocks discussed. The discussion should not be construed as investment advice or a solicitation of services.
Get the PDF of the China Consumer Index.
Watchlist:
Guest
Hosts:
Editor
Podcast information:
Passengers aren’t buying a new Didi feature that trades privacy for safety.
Didi Chuxing is piloting mandatory audio recording as a safety feature during long rides on its Hitch service. Hitch is a carpooling service for private car owners and passengers going in the same direction.
Why it matters: Didi has been surrounded by controversy since the relaunch of its carpooling service Hitch in November. It is now struggling to reassure customers with a brand-new service with complex safety rules.
Details: Didi expanded the relaunch of its carpooling service Hitch on Tuesday morning with the new safety feature in five Chinese major cities. The cities include Beijing, Wuhan, and Changsha.
Context: Hitch was reportedly one of Didi’s only two products that had made a profit for a long time, alongside its high-end chauffeur-driven service.
Potential Chinese EV buyers could get a boost of confidence after China’s State Administration for Market Regulation announced new regulations. The regulations will allow customers to return purchased EV for a refund or exchange if they prove to be faulty in major components such as batteries and electric motors. The announcement was made by a government official on Friday in Shanghai.
Why it matters: The Chinese government is trying its best to restore faith in electric vehicles. This comes after several incidents where cars made by Tesla, Nio, and WM Motor self-ignited over the past few months.
EV maker Nio issues massive recall following spate of vehicle fires in China
Details: The update will include battery packs and electric motors under national consumer rights regulations, allowing for refund and replacement. He Xing, a director in the State Administration for Market Regulation, made the announcement on Friday at a conference in Shanghai.
Context: So far, Nio has been the only EV maker forced to make a recall, costing the company RMB 340 million.
Tesla is reportedly planning to slash the price of its made-in-China Model 3 sedan model by at least one-fifth next year, plans that precede any actual deliveries from the US electric vehicle giant’s Shanghai Gigafactory. Analysts see the move as a critical catalyst for the country’s struggling auto market in the coming year.
Why it matters: While Tesla’s China rivals may fear a price cut from the US carmaker, industry analysts believe it could boost the market in the long run.
Details: Tesla may slash the sales price of the made-in-China Model 3 by more than 20% in the second half of next year by increasing local parts procurement to avoid tariffs, according to a Bloomberg report citing people familiar with the matter.
Context: Investment bank China International Capital Corporation (CICC) forecast on Wednesday that China-built Model 3s could boost China’s EV consumer sales by 10% to up to 600,000 units next year.
US chipmaker Nvidia has teamed up with Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing to develop autonomous vehicles for a scalable ride-hailing service, as global companies join forces to accelerate autonomous car deployment.
Why it matters: Due to the immense amount of computing power needed for autonomous driving, automakers and mobility services have been seeking out partnerships with chip makers.
Details: Didi has selected Nvidia Drive, an end-to-end computing platform to develop, train, and validate its driverless technologies, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang announced at its graphics processing unit (GPU) conference in the eastern Chinese city of Suzhou on Wednesday.
Context: Robotaxis are seen as the most likely business application for self-driving technology given the high costs and strict regulations required to mass produce autonomous cars for personal use.
SoftBank-backed Chinese online used car retailer Guazi expects to turn its first quarterly profit in the fourth quarter, its chief executive said Monday, as overall used car sales in China struggle to eke out single-digit growth amid a broader auto market slump.
Why it matters: China has continued to push used car sales as part of a way to get the country’s overall domestic car sales back on track.
Details: Chehaoduo Group, best known for its used car trading platform Guazi, made a profit in November and expects to be profitable in the fourth quarter of this year, its CEO Mark Yang said on Monday in Beijing to Chinese media.
‘Silver October’ offers little respite for China’s declining auto sales
Context: Chinese media reported Chehaoduo has started reorganizing the company with layoffs and store closures in 12 domestic cities starting in September.
The Beijing city government announced Friday that it would begin allowing self-driving companies to transport passengers in autonomous cars, the latest Chinese municipality to do so.
Why it matters: The move signals that nationwide legalization of autonomous vehicle (AV) testing could be forthcoming.
Details: Beijing will allow qualified companies to trial the transport of volunteers in self-driving cars on public roads, according to an updated regulation released by the Beijing Municipal Commission of Transport on Friday.
Context: Beijing became the first Chinese city to green light road tests for self-driving vehicles in December 2017, after which by a set of national policies on governing AV tests was jointly released by MIIT, MoPS, and MoT in April 2018.
China’s new energy vehicle (NEV) sales fell for a fifth consecutive month in November, extending a decline that began with a reduction in government subsidies over the summer, though some in the industry have expressed optimism that the market has bottomed out and will begin to recover next year.
Why it matters: China’s NEV market slump, part of a larger industry downturn, has sparked fears that a government-boosted electric vehicle bubble is bursting.
Details: China’s overall auto sales are expected to decline 2% to 25.3 million units next year, and may post flat growth as early as 2022, CAAM said at a conference in the central Chinese city of Changsha on Thursday.
China’s new NEV plan allows automakers greater autonomy in tech development
Context: Beijing plans to further deregulate the NEV market according to a draft plan unveiled earlier this month, to allow the market to drive demand for NEVs including fully-electric, plug-in hybrid (PHEV), and fuel-cell vehicles.
Nio and Xpeng Motors are joining forces to expand their vehicle charging networks in a bid to address a vulnerability in electric car adoption as struggling Chinese automakers look to boost growth.
Why it matters: The collaboration—aimed at widening the charging pile network—highlights a lack of support for the EV industry from China’s slow pace of public charging facility construction. Low charging facility penetration rates is seen as a significant barrier for EV purchases.
Details: Nio’s recharging service Nio Power and Xpeng Motors have signed an agreement to share their country-wide networks and connect payment processing systems to enhance user experience, the two companies said on Wednesday.
Context: Rather than independently building out charging infrastructure, Chinese electric vehicle makers are collaborating to expand the power network amid a prolonged slump in the world’s biggest auto market.
Baidu announced Friday the reshuffling of its intelligent driving business, including the establishment of a V2X (Vehicle-to-Everything) department. The government is backing V2X to make China a world leader in driverless tech.
Why it matters: The announcement is the Beijing-based search giant’s latest move to kick-start the business amid serious challenges from emerging domestic rivals targetting the full-scale deployment of robotaxi pilot services.
Details: Baidu is expanding its presence in the mobility sector beyond self-driving cars by turning the V2X team into a standalone department to accelerate China’s push for smart mobility transportation, according to a statement on Friday.
Context: Baidu last carried out major restructuring of its autonomous driving business with the establishment of three IDG units—L4, L3, and vehicle connectivity—in March 2017, then led by Baidu COO Lu Qi.
As electric car brands struggle, the government has released a 15 year plan for the industry’s development. Since subsidies were withdrawn in June, industry darlings like Nio and SAIC have seen sales flatten out, as Chris Udemans wrote in July. Some analysts expected this plan to be more targeted in upgrading the industry—so when I saw it was out, I dropped everything to ask experts what it meant.
I thought I was going to write about cars. But after a week of reporting, I’m convinced the real story is tuktuks. Low speed electric vehicles (LSEVs) are taking over rural China without subsidies—in fact, experts are not even asking if they can be saved, but if they can be stopped.
They are “so underrated,” says David Li, Executive Director of the Shenzhen Open Innovation Lab. Li helps international entrepreneurs interested in mobility access resources in China. While people talk of an EV downturn, he said, “go to an LSEV company—they say they are still growing 30 percent per year.”
Bottom line: No rescue line for Nio is in sight. While some new energy vehicle (NEV) brands scramble to keep profit margins, other segments of the supply chain see opportunity from the disappearance of subsidies. The most interesting story in the market may be what Beijing decides to do about golf cart-like low speed electrics on rural China’s roads.
What’s new: The 2021-2035 New Energy Vehicle Industry Development Plan draft doesn’t mention subsidies, but does promise support for the industry.
Life after subsidies: Electric car brands have been relying on subsidies to make their cars cheaper. Without subsides, cars are more expensive to the average consumer who was already hesitant about limited range. But remember, these car brands assemble cars—they don’t make them. Other parts of the supply chain don’t think the future looks all bad.
Forget about cars—think small: While Tesla-likes suffer, there are other EV companies that are doing just fine without subsidies: makers of low-speed electric vehicles, a category that includes everything from a one-person pod on three wheels up to four-seaters only slightly smaller than a standard electric car. Their speeds generally top out around 45km/hr.
Winning in Pinduoduo territory: Go down to China’s third and fourth-tier cities in provinces like Shandong and Hebei, or rural towns. There’s no buses, let alone EV charging poles. “Rural China is not going to spend RMB 200,000 (about $28,000) on an electric car,” says Li. “Elon totally missed the market.” While Tesla and other high-end EV brands fight over China’s well-heeled urbanites, LSEVs are catering to a huge market who are not swapping out their old cars, but keen to buy their first.
Moving violation: Central government wanted China to create Teslas. Instead, they find themselves confronting golf carts, and a terrifying phenomenon—China’s elderly who’ve never taken a driving lesson, on wheels.
But rural China loves them, as do local governments: LSEVs are still “sneaking around,” a father-of-one from Hebei’s provincial capital Shijiazhuang told TechNode. He bought an LSEV for his parents three years ago for RMB 7,000. This consumer segment doesn’t have range anxiety. They just want to be able to pick up their grandkids from school and do some grocery shopping. Also, LSEVs don’t need charging poles: they can be charged on 220V at home.
Local governments are not encouraging LSEVs just because they are anti-carbon crusaders. Their primary concerns are money and jobs. Under the pretext of developing NEVs, some local governments have built industrial parks which are really for LSEVs. They know they aren’t going to get domestic NEVs to set up shop in their jurisdiction and see LSEVs as a development shortcut. It’s no surprise that bans are not enforced harshly as Beijing is asking local governments to kill off a profitable industry, and sometimes their largest taxpayers and employers.
Legitimizing contraband: Industry insiders say the policy they’re watching is not the top-line EV plan, but LSEV technical standards slated for release in 2021. Set too stringent, they could cut away at an industry built on low price points; set too low could mean perpetuating low quality and safety. Reports say some producers are putting off further production until their release.
Overtaking on non-Chinese roads: As John Artman pointed out in this space a few weeks ago, global doesn’t mean US. Li, who works with international entrepreneurs who are looking at sourcing vehicles in China, told TechNode he gets more interest from places like Kenya and India than the global North: “It’s much easier for me to talk to someone from Ghana than London.” The latter, he finds, see EV markets exclusively through the prism of Tesla.
China wants to sell NEVs to the world. LSEVs could find huge, hitherto untapped markets, especially where there is little besides roads in terms of transport infrastructure. If China’s EV tech is to go global, LSEVs may be what really go far along the Belt and Road.
Additional research by Coco Gao.
]]>Chinese electric car maker Nio reported November delivery data figures that were flat to disappointing October numbers, spurring a more than 6% drop in its share price on Thursday.
Why it matters: The November delivery numbers highlight weak sales for the company’s lower-priced five-seat SUV, the ES6, which was expected to be a key sales driver.
Details: Nio delivered 2,528 electric vehicles (EVs) in November, almost flat sequentially to October, when it delivered 2,526 cars. November marked the fourth consecutive month of delivery growth, the company said in an announcement released Thursday.
“Our strong sales performance was also attributable to the competitiveness of our ES6 among all premium electric SUVs and the passionate endorsement by our existing users… As we continue to build more cost-effective NIO Spaces and improve the performance of the existing ones, we are confident in our deliveries going forward.”
—William Li Bin
Context: Nio last month announced it will hold this year’s Nio Day, its annual press event, on Dec. 28 in Shenzhen, without revealing further details.
One year since Google-backed Waymo started picking up passengers for its autonomous ride-hailing service in Phoenix, Chinese startup WeRide has bet big on driverless mobility with its own driverless taxi pilot in Guangzhou.
The backstory: WeRide is one of a handful of Chinese companies to rank highly in last year’s autonomous vehicle trial report released by the Department of Motor Vehicles of California, the world’s busiest testing ground for the industry.
Unique selling point: Different from almost all rivals including Pony.ai, WeRide focuses on making driverless ride-hailing a viable business by meeting the challenges of commercialization, including fleet management, government approvals and marketing. In this way, the company has gained first-mover advantages over its peers.
“We only applied for test licenses in Guangzhou because we want to create a solid, replicable, and sustainable business in our home city first. Our priority is to establish a robust and scalable robotaxi ecosystem here in Guangzhou—algorithms, hardware, and business models, and after that, we can expand into other cities.”
—WeRide COO Zhang Li, speaking to TechNode
The investors: WeRide has brought in a diverse pool of investors, including Alliance Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi, Kai-fu Lee’s Sinovation Ventures, and AI unicorn Sensetime.
Present condition: WeRide is working with local partners to modify dozens of new taxi cabs into highly autonomous vehicles compliant with local rules. The firm will put them into service in some areas of Guangzhou next year.
The landscape: Several Chinese tech giants and AV startups have drawn up timeframes to bring robotaxi services to market. Industry rival Pony.ai has accumulated more than 40,000 rides as of September in Guangzhou and Beijing, as part of an invite-only pilot scheme.
Prospects: WeRide aims to steal a march on competitors by being the first market entrant in the field. However, revenue outlook is unclear given the technical limitations and the unready regulatory environment.
Editor’s note: This article was sponsored by BMW China. We believe in transparency in our publishing and monetization model. Read more here.
If you can’t see the YouTube player above, try watching here instead.
As autonomous driving technology is bringing up reformation of traditional automotive industry, BMW is actively adopting its innovation strategies. Opportunities go together with significant challenges, “The complexity of Chinese road condition is much higher than that of western countries, which requires designated solutions.” Peter Riedl said during an interview at TechCrunch Shenzhen 2019, Riedl heads up the Tech Office China under the BMW China R&D umbrella, which is the biggest R&D footprint outside Germany. Besides, he also mentioned other influence factors such as traffic laws applied by different regions, thorough communications and understanding are certainly needed.
BMW R&D Centers in Beijing, Shanghai and Shenyang structured the biggest research network outside of Germany, BMW’s headquarter. These R&D centers support cutting-edge topics like Electric Vehicle, Autonomous Driving, Connected Cars, etc. BMW Group stepped into Autonomous Driving R&D in the year of 2006. Currently, over one hundred tech experts in Beijing and Shanghai are striving together with their counterparts in BMW HQ and other European R&D teams to guarantee 7/24 efforts on this topic.
BMW Group has become the first foreign OEM to be awarded the license by the Shanghai Government to test autonomous driving cars, which could be spotted in Shanghai International Automobile City. And to fasten the development of autonomous driving technology, BMW works closely with Chinese technology companies. In July, 2019, BMW announced its partnership with ChinaUnicom, Tencent and NavInfo (a leading digital map solution provider).
Except for co-operation with tech giants, BMW Group never stopped seeking the rising stars. Starting from 2015, BMW Group set up the BMW Startup Garage program, which is the venture client unit within BMW to provide startups a gateway into the multi-trillion dollar automotive industry. The BMW Startup Garage looks to become the early adopting venture client of top startups that can make a difference to innovation at the BMW Group. There are now more than 60 startups having become the alumnus of this program with their promising projects.
“The borderline between technology startups and automotive enterprises is blurring.” Said Riedl. He mentioned some of the cases he worked on with tech startups to TechNode reporter, for example the experiment of long-distance remote control under 5G networks with AI technologies.
“China market has always been highly-valued by BMW Group as the biggest single market for us and with its leading position now regarding autonomous driving technologies.” Based on a market forecast research conducted by IHS Markit, China would contribute over 14 million sales volume of autonomous driving cars by 2040, which is about 44% of global market share. China is highly possible to become the biggest market for autonomous driving cars.
“BMW Group always has continued and will continue expand China market and adapt its open innovation strategy here as we always did.”
]]>Chinese self-driving startup AutoX has applied to test autonomous vehicles (AV) without human safety drivers in California, Reuters has reported.
Why it matters: AutoX’s move is the latest example of Chinese autonomous driving companies stepping onto the global stage in the race for dominance in driverless mobility. AutoX is seeking to leapfrog its domestic rivals Pony.ai and WeRide, both of which have reached the 1 million-kilometer fully autonomous test drive mark in November.
Details: AutoX has applied to the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) for a permit to test self-driving cars on public roads without human safety drivers present, the company’s chief operating officer Jewel Li confirmed to Reuters on Thursday.
Context: Founded by Xiao Jianxiong, a former Princeton University assistant professor, three-year-old AutoX announced in September that it had closed its $100 million Series A led by China’s second largest automaker, Dongfeng Motor, in September.
AutoX to launch 100 robotaxis in Shanghai by year-end, challenging Didi
China will minimize government intervention to allow carmakers more freedom to decide the direction of new energy vehicle technology development, according to a plan published Tuesday by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT).
Why it matters: The new plan is regarded as a major policy shift from an earlier initiative which aggressively promoted all-electric vehicle development as part of Beijing’s push for a global leadership in key technologies.
Details: China will allow the market full play in determining product and technology development, MIIT said in a development plan released Tuesday.
Context: China’s State Council mapped out an eight-year blueprint for NEV development in 2012, setting an annual sales goal of more than 2 million EVs by 2020.
Includes contributions from Lavender Au.
]]>Japanese automaker Toyota has started operating a mobility company for car rental and ride services in the southern island province of Hainan in order to capture a piece of the massive Chinese ride-sharing market.
Why it matters: The move comes shortly after Toyota’s $600 million July investment in Chinese ride-hailing unicorn Didi Chuxing to offer car leasing, fleet management, and other vehicle-related services.
Details: Toyota said it will first offer a range of mobility services including car leasing and higher-end ride-hailing services on the island along with two of its local dealers, Zhongsheng Group and Hainan Jiahua Group, according to an announcement released Friday.
Context: Toyota is not the only automaker looking to transform itself into a key player in next-generation mobility.
Hainan to massively expand electric vehicle charging infrastructure
PSA Group and Chinese partner Changan are reportedly ready to abandon their joint venture that produces the French auto group’s upscale Citroen DS-branded cars, with a Shenzhen-based real estate developer rumored to be waiting in the wings.
Why it matters: The decision comes amid China’s worst auto industry collapse in 30 years.
Details: PSA Group is looking for a suitor for its 50% stake in Changan PSA Automobiles in its JV with China’s former top automaker Changan, Reuters cited a spokesman from the French firm as saying.
Context: PSA’s other JV with Chinese partner Dongfeng, known as DPCA, has also lost ground against old rivals, selling 91,000 units in the first nine months in China, a tiny amount compared with sales of top global automakers Volkswagen and Toyota.
Self-driving startup WeRide on Thursday began piloting a robotaxi service using a fleet of Nissan cars in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou.
Why it matters: With the debut of a robotaxi service to the general public in a first-tier Chinese city, the Guangzhou-based company has become a frontrunner in the race to commercialize autonomous vehicles.
Details: The pilot service began operating on Thursday using ride-hailing app WeRide Go available on Android and Apple’s App Store. A fleet of 20 Nissan’s fully electric vehicles (EV) offered rides in an area 144.7 square kilometers (around 55.8 square miles) in the city’s eastern Huangpu and Guangzhou Development districts.
Context: WeRide is one of the several driverless car startups vying for a lead in China’s robotaxi industry.
Didi Chuxing is working with ride-hailing fleets in Shanghai to display ads on tablets attached to the back of passenger headrests as it explores ways to accelerate revenue growth.
Why it matters: The in-car screens are an attempt to expand the company’s existing revenue streams for more sustainable growth, after it pulled back under heavy scrutiny following the murders of two female passengers by drivers of its carpooling service Hitch in separate incidents last year.
Details: Didi is asking local ride-hailing fleets to place tablets inside vehicles as mobile advertising displays in Shanghai part of an extended trial, Chinese media on Monday reported citing several of the company’s partners as saying.
Context: Didi is not the only ride-hailing company looking to make extra cash from ads in a quest for profitability.
Preorders for the premium P7 sedan from Chinese electric vehicle (EV) maker Xpeng Motors have climbed to more than 15,000, the company said, a sedan which it launched to compete directly with Tesla for upscale auto buyers in the world’s biggest auto market.
Why it matters: Xpeng Motors has expanded product offerings targeting both entry-level buyers and higher-end niche customers in an effort to head off competition from Tesla amid a months-long slowdown in the EV market.
Details: The price range of its second mass-market offering, the P7 sports sedan, is between RMB 270,000 and RMB 370,000 ($38,400 – $52,600) for a maximum range of 650 kilometers (403 miles), the company announced at this year’s Guangzhou Auto Show on Friday.
Context: The P7 announcement follows days after Xpeng Motors secured a $400 million Series C from investors including smartphone maker Xiaomi, which valued the company at $4 billion, more than double the size of rival EV maker Nio.
Xpeng brings in Xiaomi as strategic investor in $400 million Series C
Fallout from China’s focus on developing a robust fully electrified vehicle market is placing automakers under significant pressure in the absence of actual consumer demand, an executive from the country’s biggest automaker said on Thursday at a trade event.
Why it matters: China bet big on fully electric vehicles to accelerate clean technology development amid a broader push for global leadership in core technologies. However, sales have cratered following a reduction in government subsidies, a series of vehicle fires, and persisting concern over battery range from consumers, dubbed “range anxiety.”
Details: Automakers are under great pressure as losses have mounted due to a lack of real demand from consumers, Wang Yongqing, a general manager at SAIC-GM said on Thursday at the Guangzhou Auto Show, Caixin reported.
Context: As of the end of 2018, NEVs accounted for only 1% of all vehicles on the road in China. As a result, Beijing is relaxing its existing NEV mandate rules, which required automakers to produce a certain number of NEVs to achieve credits.
China refines NEV mandate policy to boost overlooked hybrid vehicles
If you can’t see the YouTube player above, try watching here instead.
China’s electric vehicle (EV) market has seen a four-month slump in deliveries since purchase subsidies were slashed over the summer. The move has left the industry reeling, while startups battle for funds and investors become increasingly wary.
“The whole industry obviously has seen a significant slowdown after the subsidy cuts,” Brian Gu, Xpeng president and vice-chairman told TechNode at TechCrunch Shenzhen this month.
EV subsidies are expected to decrease by a further 50% next year, and completely disappear in two years. The Chinese government has sought to counter automakers’ reliance on the subsidies to sell their vehicles, hoping the reduction will force these companies to innovate.
Despite mounting troubles in the industry, Xpeng recently closed its $400 million Series C. “We need a war chest to tackle the Chinese consumer market in order to build up our brand,” Gu said. “We have a lot of things planned, and we see this capital as being instrumental in achieving these goals.”
Founded in 2014, Xpeng is one of the few EV makers in China that has begun delivering vehicles. The company launched its first car, the G3 SUV, in 2018, subsequently releasing an enhanced version with a longer driving range. Xpeng also plans to begin deliveries of its P7 sedan in the second quarter of 2020.
Meanwhile, rival Chines companies Nio and Byton have struggled to secure new funds amid a macro-economic slowdown and flagging auto market. Nio has yet to finalize a RMB 10 billion ($1.42 billion) deal with Beijing E-T0wn, a state-backed capital fund, that the company announced in May.
Gu believes that the government’s investment in charging infrastructure and a focus on innovation will help the industry reach an “inflection point,” where EVs become more competitive than gas-driven cars.
“We would like to see the industry become more product-focused, competing on product merit rather than just subsidy levels,” he said.
With contributions from Chris Udemans
]]>Despite waning interest from venture capitalists in China’s electric vehicle industry, a leading figure from WM Motor expressed hope on Tuesday that the carmaker could secure funding of up to $1 billion within six months. Questions remain on whether WM Motor will actually get a deal over the line, and many players in the once-thriving EV battlefield face the same problem.
Chief Strategy Officer Rupert Mitchell said Series D financing could close “hopefully in the next six months,” at CNBC’s East Tech West conference in Guangzhou on Tuesday. The Shanghai-based new energy vehicle maker did not reveal what specific progress has been made since it set out to secure a deal in July. WM closed a RMB 3 billion ($450 million) Series C led by Baidu earlier this year, bringing its valuation to $5 billion.
The four-year-old EV maker is seeking more funds to fuel expansion in the challenging auto market. Mitchell noted that WM aims to roll out one new model annually over the next several years, adding its second manufacturing plant is almost complete. Located in the Huanggang city in central Hubei province, the RMB 255,000 facility will produce 50,000 cars annually, according to a government filing late last year.
Another of China’s NEV new breed Xpeng Motors was granted a temporary reprieve this month after completing a $400 million Series C from investors including handset maker Xiaomi. Xpeng President Brian Gu told TechNode at this year’s TechCrunch Shenzhen that the capital would be “instrumental” in achieving many of its goals, including expanding its sales network and completing a plant in the southern Zhaoqing city, slated for completion this year.
Gu added that the $400 million “war chest” is a powerful testament to its long-term growth prospects as investors felt reassured after the company hit business and financial targets despite economic headwinds, uncertainties in the global market, and government policy changes. Still, the company’s total amount raised to date sits at RMB 17 billion, far short of an ambitious year-end target of RMB 30 billion, first revealed to Chinese media in 2018.
The pair are among a handful of EV makers to have inked capital deals this year, with most other players still struggling to convince new investors. VC investment in China’s EV space has collapsed in 2019. Fundraising slid by almost 90% to a mere $783 million in the first half of the year, compared with $6 billion for the year-ago period, data from market research firm PitchBook shows. FAW-backed Byton has been searching for $500 million in Series C funding since October last year.
The situation is even worse at China’s largest Tesla rival, Nio, where a much-touted RMB 10 billion deal with government-backed capital fund Beijing E-town is yet to materialize. At the time of writing, Nio’s market capitalization has nosedived nearly 80% from last year’s post-listing valuation target of $8.5 billion to only $1.9 billion. The embattled EV maker’s losses widened in the second quarter this year, meaning Nio has leaked RMB 40 billion since 2016.
“There was actually … a sea change among the investor community that almost overnight they decided that they wanted to go from growth at any cost to profitability,” Robert H. McCooey, Jr, senior vice president at Nasdaq’s Listing Services unit said at East Tech West on Monday. Although he disagreed that the China-US trade tensions are holding Chinese companies back from listing in the US, capital market volatility has swelled with some firms such as Uber burning through money to go public.
Investors are waiting for more certainty in the market amid “worries over the ripple effects of the trade war,” McCooey said.
]]>Tesla is closing some of its high-rent retail stores and replacing them with larger, more cost-effective “Tesla Centers” as part of a broader strategy to tighten belts while capturing a wider swathe of China’s auto consumers.
Why it matters: Tesla is consolidating its sales showrooms and service centers, and shifting to areas with lower rent in an effort to boost its bottom line as well as grow its presence in less saturated consumer markets.
Details: Tesla is deliberately allowing leases on some of its retail outlets known as “Tesla Stores” to expire, especially those located in popular, high-rent shopping centers in first- and second-tier cities, Chinese media reported citing a person familiar with the matter.
Context: Tesla is not the only EV maker that is shifting its sales strategy to win an uphill battle in a challenging auto market.
Tesla kicks off trial production in Shanghai, surprises with Q3 profits
Mobike raised its rates for bike rentals in a number of cities across the country on Monday, expanding fare increases that had been implemented in Shanghai and Beijing earlier this year, the company said.
Why it matters: Chinese bike-rental firms are hiking rental fees to bolster profitability following a prolonged period of huge losses and major cash flow constraints in the industry.
Details: Mobike riders will be charged RMB 1.5 the first 15 minutes, up from RMB 1, and RMB 0.5 for every additional 15-minute increment, according to a Chinese media report.
Context: Meituan, China’s food delivery and local services giant, acquired Mobike for RMB 18.1 billion in April 2018.
Mobike will scrap some but not all of its Asia-Pacific businesses
Electric vehicle (EV) maker Nio has appointed a former auto analyst as the company’s new chief financial officer, the automaker announced on Sunday, replacing Louis Hsieh who left unexpectedly in October citing personal reasons.
Why it matters: Hsieh was key in taking Nio public in New York last year, and his resignation led to much speculation about why an important figure would leave the company in the midst of a search for new investment.
“[Feng Wei’s] financial and operational experience in the automotive-related fields, together with an impressive track record in equity research, makes him an excellent choice to lead our finance teams.”
—Nio CEO and founder William Li in a statement
Details: Prior to joining Nio, Feng Wei was an auto analyst at China International Capital Corporation (CICC). His appointment at Nio is effective starting Monday.
Context: Feng’s arrival comes as Nio attempts to keep its head above water as conditions in China’s auto market become increasingly difficult. EV sales continue to slide in the second half of the year after the government did away with subsidies for buyers over the summer.
China’s top ride-hailing platform Didi Chuxing said Friday that nearly one million electric vehicles are registered on its platform, and that it is partnering with automakers to develop EVs designed for smart shared mobility services.
Why it matters: Didi is accelerating adoption of electrified cars on its platform, both in response to Beijing’s core initiatives as well as for its own profit growth.
Details: Around 967,000 fully electric cars have been registered on Didi’s ride-hailing platforms as of end-June, more than a third of the 2.81 million EVs in the country, Chen Yuhong, a researcher at Didi’s research and development institute, said on Friday at this year’s International Smart Shared Mobility Congress in Guangzhou.
Context: Didi is ramping up efforts to meet its goal of registering more than 10 million vehicles on its platform around the globe by 2028, first mentioned by Didi CEO Cheng Wei in April last year.
As demand grows from consumers to stay connected when in their vehicles, Chinese automakers are creating intelligent in-car systems to lead the still-nascent market. The commercial roll-outs of such projects are expected to boost the country’s flagging new energy vehicle sales, auto veterans said at TechCrunch Shenzhen 2019 on Tuesday.
China was again the world’s largest auto market in 2018, with more than 28 million vehicles sold. But less than 4% or about one million of these motors came with connectivity. “We believe the market will be mature once that number rises beyond three million units,” said Yang Dongsheng, general manager at BYD Auto Product Planning & New Technology Research Institute.
The Warren Buffet-backed EV maker launched DiLink, a system solution for connected vehicles, in April last year and later opened it up to app developers. The initiative provides them with access to 341 sensors and 66 controllers on each car to develop remote functionalities. Through a partnership with Baidu, the fully cloud-connected service also offers drivers the ability to monitor power consumption and more conveniently navigate to local charging stations.
“Smart connectivity is where differentiation is created to grasp the changing needs from consumers, and that is the key to leadership in the future market,” Yang added.
This message was echoed by Xpeng Motors, the young EV maker that today secured significant new investment from Xiaomi. The Alibaba-backed EV maker aims to be a frontrunner for future intelligent cars in the Chinese market. “Autonomous driving would completely disrupt the status quo of many traditional industries, … and we are enhancing our R&D capabilities to create greater driving enjoyment and convenience for customers,” said Brian Gu, vice-chairman and president of the company.
Gu added that the Guangzhou-based firm adopts a more cost-effective approach to vehicle autonomy based on an integrated solution involving cameras and radars, rather than a Lidar–based system that is currently not as economically viable on mass-market models. The company is on track to start deliveries of its first sedan model, the P7, at the beginning of the second quarter of next year. The model boasts a range of 600 kilometers (373 miles) and Level 3 autonomy, meaning a car could drive itself under certain conditions.
Hit hard by stalling sales since mid-2018, Chinese EV makers are embracing smart technology as they look for new potential sources of future growth. Auto sales fell again in October, this time by 5.7% year on year to 1.84 million units. The month extended China’s worst-ever prolonged fall in sales. What’s more, NEVs started to edge down since July this year. Consumers have been put off buying NEVs due to higher prices, range anxiety, and insufficient charging infrastructure.
Gu noted the previous industry boom was mainly driven by government support and it will take time to change consumer habits and popularize EVs. But just like in other consumer product tech sectors like PCs and smartphones, the EV industry is expected to hit a tipping point once penetration exceeds 10%.
“For NEV makers, more competitive offerings and better access to charging points are key to drive growth in the longer term,” Gu added.
]]>Xpeng Motors has brought onboard smartphone maker Xiaomi as a strategic investor, as the Alibaba-backed new energy vehicle (NEV) startup announced $400 million in Series C funding.
Why it matters: Xpeng’s hefty haul comes against a macro-industrial backdrop of falling sales after subsidies for electric vehicles were cut over the summer, creating an increasingly difficult funding environment for NEV startups.
“The business definitely needs capital to grow. It is a business that is still very much in the ramping up stage and we have to invest in research and development, in building our sales and services network, and completing our manufacturing plant, which we aim to have built by the end of this year. We have been working closely with Xiaomi on smart devices and they have the IoT leadership in China, and even globally, and smart auto could be a very good extension of the ecosystem.”
—Xpeng President Brian Gu, speaking to TechNode at TechCrunch Shenzhen on Tuesday
Details: Xiaomi is among a group of strategic and institutional investors to take part in the funding round. Xpeng also secured several billions of RMB-denominated unsecured credit lines from Chinese and commercial lenders including China Merchants Bank, China CITIC Bank, and HSBC.
Context: China’s total NEV deliveries are expected to remain flat this year compared with 2018, according to a report from China International Capital Corp.
A verified driver on ride-hailing platform Didi registered in the southern Chinese city of Nanjing stabbed his passenger in the arm following an argument, media outlet JSTV reported.
Why it matters: Didi’s safety measures attracted public outcry and government censure last year after two separate female passengers using the platform were raped and murdered by drivers registered under its carpooling service Hitch.
Details: The incident happened at around 3 a.m. on Nov. 9 after the passenger asked the driver to go faster and the driver refused. The driver told the passenger to leave the car, and the two started to argue outside, which soon escalated into a fight, JSTV reported.
Context: Last week, Didi announced plans to relaunch Hitch later in November, more than a year after suspending the service.
Tesla has started giving media test drives for its first made-in-China Model 3 at its brand-new Shanghai Gigafactory 3, Electrek reported, a mere nine months after breaking ground on the site.
Why it matters: The speed with which Tesla began producing vehicles in its Shanghai Gigafactory 3 signals dedication from Shanghai’s municipal government, which aggressively wooed the company last year.
Details: The news follows a Weibo post by the company last week teasing the car.
Tesla kicks off trial production in Shanghai, surprises with Q3 profits
Context: The Shanghai Gigafactory is China’s first EV production facility wholly owned by a foreign automaker.
The decline in China’s retail auto sales moderated slightly in October to 5.7% year on year for a total of 1.84 million units, extending a slump that has continued for the past year and a half, according to the latest figures from China Passenger Car Association (CPCA).
Why it matters: The latest figures indicate the market has yet to turn the corner despite a historically peak season for China’s auto industry known as “Golden September, Silver October.”
Details: The pace of decline in China’s auto retail sales moderated slightly in October with a 5.7% year on year decline compared with 6.5% in September and 9.9% in August, according to an CPCA report released Friday.
Tesla kicks off trial production in Shanghai, surprises with Q3 profits
As China continues its efforts to lead the world’s electric vehicle (EV) development, late-mover Toyota is formalizing an alliance with Chinese automaker BYD it had announced in July as it aims to capture a wider portion of the country’s still-nascent market.
Why it matters: Toyota is looking to play catch-up in the global acceleration toward electric cars, a segment where the Japanese auto giant had largely kept quiet for years.
Details: Toyota and BYD on Thursday announced they have agreed to form a 50-50 joint venture to develop and produce Toyota-branded battery electric vehicles and related parts for the Chinese market.
“With the same goal to further promote the widespread use of electrified vehicles, we appreciate that BYD and Toyota can become “teammates,” able to put aside our rivalry and collaborate. We hope to further advance and expand both BYD and Toyota from the efforts of the new company with BYD.”
—Shigeki Terashi, Toyota’s executive vice president
Context: Established automakers are ramping up efforts to embrace electric vehicles in China, as the central government signals its support of the industry with the removal of market access for foreign investment.
Ride-hailing giant Didi has backtracked on plans to impose gender-specific operating hours when relaunching its carpooling service Hitch later this month, following public outcry blasting the company for limiting women’s freedoms.
Why it matters: Didi suspended its Hitch service indefinitely last year following two separate incidents in which drivers on the platform raped and murdered their female passengers.
Details: Didi on Wednesday announced that it would relaunch Hitch on a trial basis later this month, more than a year after suspending the service.
Context: Didi has faced scrutiny in the past for allowing sexist practices to creep into its services.
A recent and significant slowing in China’s auto sales will not affect long-term growth potential, which remains robust for the next several years, a senior Chinese official said on Thursday as reported by Chinese media.
Why it matters: After a three decade-long boom, China’s auto sales are facing a prolonged slump. However, October sales figures show a slower rate of decline.
Detail: There is still plenty of room for growth in Chinese auto sales, given the country’s relatively low level of car ownership per capita, said Luo Junjie, a deputy director of China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT), on Thursday at this year’s China International Import Expo (CIIE) in Shanghai.
Context: To introduce leading technologies and promote competition, Beijing is widening market access to overseas automakers with the removal of its foreign ownership restrictions. Limitations were first lifted for all-electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles in April 2018.
Intel’s self-driving unit Mobileye is joining forces with Nio to develop autonomous electric vehicles (EV) technology, drawn by the size of China’s self-driving and ride-hailing markets, and supportive government policies.
Why it matters: The partnership is expected to help offset the burdens of sheer cost and technological innovation required for developing self-driving cars. The announcement follows a string of setbacks for the EV maker in recent months.
Details: Mobileye and Nio on Tuesday revealed plans to jointly develop and mass-produce highly automated vehicles, which will first debut to Chinese consumers and later in other countries.
“We are thrilled by the promise and potential of collaborating with NIO on electric autonomous vehicles, for both consumers and robotaxi fleets. We value the opportunity to bring greater road safety to China and other markets through our efforts, and look forward to NIO’s support as Mobileye builds a transformational mobility service across the globe.”
–Amnon Shashua, president and CEO of Mobileye
Context: Commanding more than 70% market share of the driver assistance technologies, Mobileye had formed a solid alliance with Tesla and jointly developed the initial version of Autopilot, the EV maker’s advanced driver assistance system (ADAS), which was released in 2014.
Ride-hailing giant Didi will resume operations of its carpooling service Hitch on a trial basis this month, the company announced on Wednesday. The relaunch comes a year after Didi suspended the service indefinitely over safety concerns.
Why it matters: Didi halted its Hitch service last year after two separate incidents involving female passengers using the platform who were raped and murdered by their drivers.
Details: Operations of the rebooted service will be limited to seven cities, including Beijing, eastern China’s Nantong and Changzhou, and the northern cities of Harbin and Taiyuan, among others.
Context: Didi has removed more than 300,000 unqualified drivers from its platforms following a government crackdown on the industry in the wake of the murders.
Shares for electric vehicle (EV) maker Nio surged 12.5% after investors welcomed solid delivery figures for October, closing at $1.71 on Monday.
Why it matters: Despite a modest increase in vehicle sales after bottoming in July, Nio has a long way to go to prove it is on the road to profitability following four years of losses.
Details: Nio on Monday reported a unit delivery increase of more than a quarter over September figures, totaling 2,526 vehicles in October including 2,220 of the company’s five-seater electric crossover model, the ES6.
“We appreciate the support from our users and believe in the power of word of mouth as our vehicles and services continuously evolve and optimize. Meanwhile, we will continue rolling out NIO Spaces and expanding our sales network to support our future growth.”
—William Li Bin, Nio’s founder, chairman, and CEO
Context: Sentiment toward the embattled EV maker seem to be shifting in its home country after a Chinese media outlet, Cool Labs, posted an article featuring a profile of Li’s career trajectory.
German auto giant Daimler is launching a ride-hailing service in China in partnership with Zhejiang-based automaker Geely, aiming to join an already crowded market dominated by Didi Chuxing.
Why it matters: Car manufacturers in China hurt by a slowing auto market are looking to shift into the country’s mobility sector to shore up growth.
Details: Geely and Daimler will roll out a premium ride-hailing service called Staride starting in Hangzhou, capital of eastern Zhejiang province, by year-end, said Geely chairman Li Shufu, according to the company’s official WeChat account.
Context: Chinese automakers are looking for ways to tap the ride-hailing market, which is seen as an increasingly important business for traditional automakers.
Nio will provide delivery services for orders of the first Hycan-branded electric vehicle model, part of the NEV maker’s joint venture with state-owned partner GAC Group. Shipments will start in the first half of next year.
Why it matters: The role suggests that Nio is becoming more involved in its GAC partnership. This would serve as another chance for the embattled EV maker to forge out new revenue streams as it deals with capital-intensive sales and service operations.
Details: From April 2020, Nio will offer complete delivery services for the first all-electric crossover model from Hycan, according to a statement on Thursday.
Context: The development comes one month after Nio revealed plans to open 200 Nio Spaces, smaller and more “cost-effective” sales offices compared with flagship Nio Houses, in 100 Chinese cities by the year-end, revealed the then-CFO Louis Hsieh at the second-quarter earnings call.
If you can’t see the YouTube player above, try watching here instead.
Electric vehicle maker Nio is looking to alleviate range anxiety among prospective car buyers by rolling out higher capacity batteries, supplementing its existing network battery swap stations.
Nio is one of China’s most visible electric vehicle makers and is often seen as the poster child for the sector nationally. The New York-listed company has had a tough year, as macroeconomic factors take their toll on China’s auto market, leading to an overall decline in sales.
TechNode tested Nio’s flagship SUV, the ES8, with the company’s newly released 84kWh battery. The upgrade extends the vehicle’s NEDC range from 355 to 425 kilometers. Nio began delivering the ES8 with the upgraded battery option in October. Previously the vehicle came equipped with a capacity of 70kWh.
The company believes the update can improve the competitiveness of the ES8, a vehicle that falls into the premium bracket, according to Nio founder William Li.
We approached the test from a consumer’s point of view, trying to ascertain how the vehicle would fare on a daily basis. Setting a popular culinary attraction on the outskirts of the eastern Chinese city of Suzhou as our destination, we put the new battery, Nio Pilot, and China’s charging infrastructure through their paces.
Nio Pilot functions, including automatic lane changing and automatic braking, worked well on highways and city streets. The system also includes warnings if you get too close to the lane markers, with haptic feedback in the steering wheel. The vehicle requires the driver to take over when it senses pedestrians in the road ahead. Not specific to Nio Pilot, we did at first find it difficult to trust in ADAS and its limitations.
Meanwhile, the battery performed well. The trip included a lot of highway driving, which typically requires more energy than travelling on urban roads.
There were problems, however. At times, Nio’s in-voice assistant required numerous calls to wake it up. While not an issue with the ES8, we also encountered problems with charging infrastructure in and around Shanghai. A number of public charging piles we attempted to use were broken or had cars parked in bays while not being charged.
With contributions from Jill Shen
]]>Mercedes-Benz confirms its EQC electric vehicle model will go on sale in China early next month, as the German company joins the queue of players taking aim at Tesla in the world’s largest EV market.
Why it matters: The arrival of the EQC comes at a time when China’s auto sales are in a 15-month prolonged slump.
Details: Mercedes on Thursday confirmed that the EQC 400, a fully electric sports utility vehicle with a range of 415 kilometers (258 miles), will officially go on sale in China on Nov. 8.
Context: Mercedes-Benz parent Daimler AG accelerated its electrification push in late 2017 when its China head Hubertus Troska revealed a $755 million investment to make battery-electric cars with Chinese manufacturing partner BAIC.
BYD on Tuesday posted a nearly 90% drop in third-quarter profit against a broader economic slump in China while its gasoline-powered car business showed signs of recovery.
Why it matters: Despite falling profit in the third quarter, BYD has remained one of the few Chinese automakers which expanded both revenue and profit in the past nine months, a tumultuous period for the country’s broader auto market after three decades of growth.
Detail: Hong Kong and Shenzhen-listed BYD said late Tuesday that it earned revenue exceeding RMB 31.6 billion in the third quarter this year, declining 9.17% year on year. Net profits plunged 88% to RMB 120 million from RMB 1.05 billion seen the same period a year ago.
Context: Chinese consumer demand for EVs have fallen drastically on concern over safety issues amid a series of self-combusting incidents and increasing promotional efforts from traditional automakers, said investment bank China International Capital Corp in a recent report.
]]>China will no longer force foreign firms to transfer technologies in order to access the market, Wang Shouwen, a vice commerce minister said at a press conference in Beijing on Tuesday.
Why it matters: Forced tech transfer and the unequal playing field conditions on China’s mainland have been issues at the heart of the US-China trade war.
Details: The new measures are aimed to bring about a transparent and predictable investment environment in order to stabilize foreign investment flows, according to Wang.
“Administrative organs may not implicitly or explicitly force the transfer of technology by foreign investors or foreign-invested enterprises.”
—Wei Ye, Commerce Ministry official
Context: Wang’s pledge did not address the joint venture mechanism which forces foreign enterprises to partner with a Chinese company in order to operate in China, frequently creating conditions for unintended tech transfer.
Briefing: European firms say forced tech transfers rising in China
Electric vehicle maker Nio surprised many on Tuesday with the announcement that its CFO Louis T. Hsieh, a key executive responsible for taking the company public, is leaving the company effective Wednesday.
Why it matters: Little was revealed about why an executive seen as the company’s linchpin has resigned as it searches for new investment, amid growing investor concern about an imminent cash crunch.
Details: Hsieh cited “personal reasons” for his departure effective Oct. 30, and the company is presently looking for a replacement, according to the announcement released Tuesday.
EV maker Nio sees 50% revenue decline in Q1, expects continued slowdown
“Why would anyone putting new money in want to replace a CFO who was the conduit through which Nio was able to tap Western capital markets? That makes no sense.”
—a US hedge fund manager to TechNode on Tuesday
Context: Nio recorded RMB 3.46 billion ($503.4 million) in cash and equivalents at the end of the second quarter, less than half what it reported the quarter before, according to the company’s financial statements.
Hyundai Motor Group is partnering with Chinese self-driving startup Pony.ai and US mobility firm Via to launch a commercial ride-hailing service in the city of Irvine in southern California starting in November.
Why it matters: Hyundai is the latest entrant to self-driving vehicles in ride-hailing as global companies take aim at Google’s Waymo, which began trial operations in Arizona a year ago.
Detail: The pilot, called the BotRide, will be introduced to several hundred Irvine residents in the very center of the city starting Nov. 4, the companies said on Friday.
Context: Auto tech companies are stepping up efforts to roll out commercial self-driving taxi service, seen as an important step for the deployment of fully autonomous vehicles because companies can start to recoup the significant costs involved.
Top auto-parts supplier Bosch has formed an alliance with Chinese automaker GAC to adapt its automated valet parking (AVP) system for the world’s largest auto market, with plans to introduce the technology as early as 2020.
Why it matters: The joint project is the first of its kind between Bosch and a Chinese OEM. The German Tier-1 supplier, in line with Beijing’s aggressive vehicle-to-everything technology initiative, bet big on driverless technology to shore up its momentum as China’s auto market declines.
Detail: Bosch on Wednesday announced a partnership with the Chinese automaker GAC Group’s R&D Center to develop a fully automated driverless parking system, without the need for a human driver behind the wheel, as part of a move to woo the country’s early adopters.
Context: Bosch started developing its AVP with German peer Daimler in 2015, combining Lidar, cameras, and vehicle-to-infrastructure communication facilities to detect objects and calculate distances.
Tesla took the markets by surprise on Wednesday with the announcement of third-quarter profits, perking the market up in after-hour trading shored by news that it has started test production in its new Shanghai facility.
Why it matters: The EV maker’s third quarter profit surprise comes in stark relief to that of its Chinese peers, many of which are struggling to stay afloat.
Detail: Tesla on Wednesday reported a quarterly profit (GAAP) of $143 million after two consecutive quarters in the red. Its profits compare with Wall Street analyst expectations of $257 million in losses, and against the backdrop of the $311 million in net profit it booked in Q3 2018—its best-ever quarter—in contrast to which its most recent earnings have fallen by more than half.
No JV for Chinese EV firm Zotye and Ford as pressure mounts in auto sector
Context: The Chinese government has laid out aggressive EV sales targets for 2025 and has offered ample help for Tesla to establish its manufacturing facilities in the world biggest EV market.
The age of autonomous travel is closer to becoming a reality after more and more local governments rubber-stamp robotaxi projects.While the sector has attracted industry heavyweights such as Baidu and Didi, it is Pony.ai, an AV startup based in Guangzhou, leading the pack domestically. The firm even rivals Google-backed Waymo in its achievements.
The backstory: Tech unicorn Pony.ai became China’s first company to test out robotaxis on urban public roads about one year ago, and is now on track to expand its fleet to 100 vehicles by the year-end.
Unique selling point: Pony.ai is the top-performing Chinese player in terms of self-driving tests on open roads in California, a key global test ground. The company has racked up an average self-drive distance (before a human driver took control) of 1,022.3 miles . This figure is nearly five times that of Baidu.
“The focus of work at this stage is still to improve the stability and expandability of the autonomous driving system under the premise of ensuring safety, and to gradually expand the driverless fleet from 100 to thousands. This year, companies that only operate a few cars for demos find it very difficult to survive. The cautiousness and concentration of capital has a great positive impact on the development of an industry.
—Pony.ai spokesperson, speaking to TechNode
The investors: As China’s most valuable AV startup, Pony.ai has secured the backing of top venture firms, including Sequoia Capital China and Legend Capital.
Present condition: Although its self-driving fleet is only available to a limited pool of volunteers in Guangzhou, Pony.ai is trying to lay a more solid foundation for a public commercial launch. A specific timeline has yet to emerge.
“The technical level of Pony.ai as well as WeRide rank among the top smart connected car firms in the world. They are also some of the highest-ranked autonomous driving players in China. Guangzhou welcomes domestic and foreign AV companies to carry out testing work, and the relevant departments of the city will actively provide services.”
—Guangzhou Transportation Bureau spokesperson, speaking to TechNode
The landscape: Local governments are ramping up efforts to lure AV unicorns for the imminent introduction of driverless vehicles.
Prospects: Pony.ai is focused on providing consistently comfortable and reliable rides for all rather than monetizing these early technologies. The company told TechNode in August that it has amassed a wealth of testing scenarios in just one year, a feat that took Waymo 10 years to create, thanks to the variable road situations and complex tropical weather conditions.
Correction: This story has been corrected to reflect that Pony.ai has provided its services to more than 40,000 orders, not passengers, as was originally written in the last paragraph.
]]>After years of expansion, new energy vehicle (NEV) sales in China have stalled. Annual deliveries are expected to remain flat to last year’s, according to a report by a leading Chinese investment bank released on Tuesday.
Why it matters: China has bet big on NEVs as a strategically important industry but prospects for the sector look uncertain after government subsidies were slashed and sales have dropped off.
Detail: CICC has lowered its forecast for China’s 2019 NEV sales by 100,000 units to 1.2 million to 1.3 million.
Context: Some analysts remain bullish on the prospects of an imminent market rebound as the selling season in China’s auto sector kicks in.
Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing is opening up its significant stores of transit data with the release of two major datasets in order to improve understanding of transport patterns and optimize infrastructure investments.
Why it matters: The move is likely to win the company goodwill from city officials after attracting heightened scrutiny from authorities, especially over the past year. Machine-learning applications, largely driven by data sharing, play a critical role in resource utilization and planning safer, smarter transport networks.
Detail: Didi will make available two of its anonymized historical TTI (Travel Time Index) datasets which index urban congestion, gathered from vehicles on its platform, Didi CTO Zhang Bo announced Friday at the China National Computer Congress summit in Suzhou.
Ride-hailers may face app store delisting over illegal drivers in Shanghai
Context: Didi is the not the only company seeking to play an important role in a smart transportation system built around connected autonomous vehicles.
Chinese automaker Zotye has not advanced joint venture (JV) negotiations that began two years ago with Ford China in a deal that has come to the forefront amid media reports last week that it is on the brink of bankruptcy.
Why it matters: The country’s first government-approved EV maker, Zotye is facing possible insolvency. If bankrupt, it will be a stark reminder that one of China’s most strategically important industries is in the midst of a prolonged slump.
Detail: In response to a query about whether respite in the form of a joint project with Ford was underway, Zotye responded (in Chinese) that there was no new development in the negotiations, according to an investor website run by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange on Thursday.
“The Ford Zotye BEV JV has not been established. Ford is working with Zotye to evaluate and track cooperation options given the changes in China’s automotive industry. The detail of the progress is confidential and is subject to external announcement.”
—A Ford spokeswoman to TechNode on Thursday
Context: China’s new energy vehicle sales fell for the third consecutive month, sinking 34.2% in September after declining 15.8% year on year in August, according to figures from the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM).
The government of a city in eastern Zhejiang Province on Wednesday said it has ended talks with Nio about an investment to build a factory in the city, the latest blow to the troubled Chinese electric vehicle (EV) maker.
Why it matters: The statement followed rumors that Nio was in talks with a district government of Huzhou for a RMB 5 billion (around $700 million) investment deal including a factory with production capacity of 200,000 vehicles per year.
Detail: Based on the results of the due diligence assessment, the Wuxing District government in Huzhou has ended talks with Nio based on the high investment risk, the press office of the district government told TechNode on Wednesday.
Context: Nio has hemorrhaged more than RMB 5 billion this year, widening its net losses to an excess of RMB 20 billion (around $2.82 billion) in just four years and reportedly jeopardizing ongoing investments.
Faraday Future founder Jia Yueting has filed for bankruptcy in a US federal court with plans to hand control of the company to his lenders, the firm said on Monday, marking what may be a turning point for the troubled electric vehicle maker.
Why it matters: Faraday Future, or FF, will be no longer liable for Jia’s liabilities upon completion of the individual debt restructuring, which may help the cash-starved company seek new investors to fund mass production of its first model FF91 by its self-imposed September 2020 deadline.
Detail: Jia filed for Chapter 11 on Sunday with a plan to swap his debts for all of his equity in the Los Angeles-based EV startup.
Context: After months of furloughs, layoffs, and pay cuts, FF is struggling to retain relevance in the Chinese EV market.
Tethered to the rise of autonomous driving are the high-definition (HD) maps which function as the backbone of navigation systems for self-piloting cars. Kuandeng, a Chinese mapping solutions provider, announced Monday that it has completed a RMB 100 million (around $14.2 million) round of fundraising as the mapping sector in China heats up alongside new technology vehicles.
Why it matters: HD maps help improve the safety of self-driving cars, an issue which underpins widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles (AV), by providing images of road surfaces and surrounding environments in addition to sensors and cameras.
Detail: Kuandeng announced Monday nearly RMB 100 million in a Series A+ led by a little-known venture capital firm, Yihang Funds.
Context: Unlike traditional mapping service companies which collect data and draw their own maps, Kuangdeng advocates the more cost-effective crowdsourcing approach involving a large number of individual users to collect, contribute, and verify data.
Defying peak seasonal patterns, China’s electric vehicle market gave little indication of a rebound in September as Geely, BYD, and JAC Motors reported dismal sales figures on Thursday, pressured by a reduction in government subsidies and broader economic headwinds.
Why it matters: Flagging sales in new energy vehicles (NEV) is weighing on Chinese players angling to gain a foothold in the world’s largest EV market absent government support.
Detail: China’s largest EV maker BYD reported a notable drop in sales to 13,681 NEVs in September, declining 18% month on month and sinking by more than half compared with the same period a year ago.
Briefing: China will cut subsidies for electric vehicles to spur innovation
Context: Given the continued decline in NEV sales in China, CAAM reduced the annual sales projection 6.3% to 1.5 million in August. The industry has been further affected by several incidents earlier in the year involving vehicle fires, scaring off potential consumers, and China’s trade dispute with the US.
Accenture announced Tuesday that it has agreed to acquire Futuremove Automotive, a Chinese vehicle connectivity solution provider, to bolster its service offerings in the world’s largest automobile market.
Why it matters: As in-vehicle technologies and services become more important to consumers, car connectivity is considered the next frontier for competition between carmakers, particularly in China where automotive technology developments are supported by the central government.
Details: Accenture is acquiring Futuremove Automotive to strengthen its digital consulting in smart connected in-vehicle and mobility services to “meet a rising demand from China-based auto clients,” the company said in an announcement.
Context: Chinese tech companies, including Alibaba and Tencent, are scrambling to secure a piece of the fast-growing auto segment.
After a number of setbacks in the first half of the year, Nio may be poised for a rebound. The beleaguered electric vehicle (EV) maker said on Tuesday that car deliveries in the third quarter exceeded the top end of its guided range.
Why it matters: Nio’s efforts to boost sales of its second mass-produced model, the ES6, is paying off. The company kicked off a series of major promotions beginning in August after it began delivering the five-seat luxury SUV in late June.
Details: Nio on Tuesday said that its Q3 deliveries increased 35.1% sequentially to 4,799 vehicles. It had forecast a delivery range between 4,200 and 4,400 units for the three months ended September 30.
Bottom line: Whether the sales rebound will improve Nio’s earnings for the remaining two quarters of the year is yet to be seen. The company has booked net losses exceeding RMB 20 billion ($3 billion) since 2016.
Xpeng Motors has announced a partnership with TELD, the operator of China’s largest charging network to jointly build supercharger stations nationwide, just days after the NEV maker started deliveries of an updated version of its first mass-market model.
Why it matters: The partnership marks a significant step forward. Xpeng is accelerating plans to run 200 supercharging stations across 30 Chinese cities by the end of this year.
Details: Xpeng car owner will gain access to more than 50,000 TELD charging piles in 183 Chinese cities via Xpeng’s app or in-vehicle platform, the EV maker said in a statement late last week.
“Xpeng Motors and TELD are pioneering a new model and the partnership represents a win-win opportunity, leveraging the strength and capability of frontrunners in the smart vehicle sector and new energy power sector.”
—He Xiaopeng, Chairman and CEO of Xpeng Motors
Context: Beijing is adopting a dual-track approach of both charging and battery swapping facilities as it continues to accelerate the deployment of EV infrastructure nationwide.
Traffic in the capital city of Beijing, China. (Image credit: Flickr/Remko Tanis)
WeChat Pay is integrating its credit scoring system WeChat Pay Points with ride-hailing mini programs. Users whose credit scores meet minimum requirements are eligible to waive ride pre-payments, Chinese tech media PingWest reported.
Why it matters: WeChat Pay is kicking off integrating of its credit scoring service with ride-hailing platforms just before a peak travel period during China’s week-long National Day holiday.
Details: Jisu Dache, the ride-hailing platform backed by a joint venture between automaker Geely, Tencent, and the country’s railway operator, is the first mini program to link with WeChat Pay Points. Riders can waive the payments required for booking a ride. Features for the WeChat Pay Points system can be activated from the mini program.
Context: This January, Tencent began testing WeChat Pay Points in numerous cities around China, basing user scores on spending behavior and personal connections, among others.
Alibaba is launching its mini-app ecosystem for vehicles in a partnership with electric vehicle (EV) maker Xpeng Motors, which will debut in an upcoming sedan as it seeks closer ties with Chinese automakers in the world’s largest auto market.
Why it matters: Alibaba is loosening its in-vehicle software strategy in collaboration with OEMs, offering more flexible business solutions including software development kits (SDK) and access to a variety of third-party mobile services.
Detail: Chinese EV maker Xpeng Motors announced Friday that it will be the first automaker to introduce Alibaba’s in-car mini-app platform into P7, the company’s first electric sedan model set to be delivered in the second quarter of 2020.
Context: China internet powerhouses Tencent, Alibaba, and Baidu are competing to lure automakers to their ecosystems. However, major car companies have already started developing proprietary new technologies in the potentially lucrative internet of vehicle (IoV) market.
Baidu has launched a robotaxi pilot service in the capital city of central Hunan province a year after its much-publicized alliance with Changsha municipality. The company is offering local residents free rides in an effort to gain an edge in the increasingly crowded autonomous driving industry.
Why it matters: The move may mark the start of a turnaround for Baidu, China’s biggest search engine, which has stumbled in its efforts to commercialize its self-driving business.
Detail: Baidu is seeking local volunteers for free rides on certain urban roads west of the city to use in its fleet of 45 licensed L4 driverless electric vehicles produced in partnership with state-backed automaker FAW, which kicked off service on Thursday.
Context: Chinese self-driving companies are quickly expanding fleets with new driverless cars in search of data, a critical component to commercialize the industry. Competition is intensifying as new money pours in.
Electric vehicle maker Nio sought to assuage investor concerns after reporting disappointing second-quarter (Q2) results and canceling an earnings call with investors and analysts.
Why it matters: The company rescheduled the call a day after canceling it. Executives took a cautious tone and focused on Nio’s cost-cutting measures and plans to increase its footprint in the world’s largest EV market during the postponed call on Wednesday.
“We are implementing comprehensive cost control measures across the organization. These measures primarily focus on increasing efficiencies and streamlining operations within our sales and service network and our research and development (R&D) functions, as well as reducing our headcount.”
—Louis Hsieh, Nio chief financial officer, during the company’s earnings call on Wednesday
Details: Nio plans open sales offices dubbed Nio Spaces. These showrooms will be smaller and “less capital intensive” than the company’s flagship Nio Houses—essentially showrooms coupled with high-end clubhouses for Nio owners.
Context: Nio’s shares have fallen around 25% this week, wiping $650 million from the company’s market capitalization.
Deeproute.ai, a Chinese autonomous driving startup, said it has raised $50 million in a fresh round of funding from top Chinese investors, as yet another company bursts into view in the country’s thriving smart mobility market.
Why it matters: The deal may signal that Chinese venture capital funds are once again favoring self-driving startups, as the central government ramps up efforts to surpass the US in leading technologies.
Detail: Deeproute.ai announced Tuesday it secured $50 million in a Series Pre-A led by Fosun RZ Capital, the venture capital arm of the Chinese conglomerate.
Context: Deeproute.ai has not yet revealed its founding team and keeps many of its company details under wraps. However, some evidence indicates it is linked to Roadstar.ai, a once-leader in the Chinese AV industry.
Shares in Nio plummeted in US trading this morning after the Chinese EV maker posted concerning financial results for the second fiscal quarter. The firm continues to bleed money as its net loss widened one-fifth on a quarterly basis to RMB 3.3 billion ($478.6 million) amid a contracting market, intensifying competition, and a spate of car fires.
Despite beating analyst forecasts, revenue slid 7.5% quarter-on-quarter to $206.1 million. The Shanghai-based firm has run up RMB 40 billion (5.6 billion) in losses since 2016, according to company figures.
Often referred to as the “Tesla of China,” the US-listed carmaker’s shares were down 25% at the time of writing, wiping $650 million off the company’s market capitalization. The company delivered 3,553 vehicles delivered in the period, narrowly beating its previous guidance by about 300 units. However, the company lost $0.45 per share for the second quarter, more than double an expectation of $0.18.
Nio canceled its earnings call immediately after the release. A company representative promised further disclosures depending on any future developments when contacted by TechNode on Tuesday.
Company founder and CEO William Li confirmed plans to slash Nio’s global workforce by more than one-fifth today. “We target to reduce our global headcount to be around 7,800 by the end of the third quarter from over 9,900 in January 2019, and aim to further pursue a leaner operation through additional restructuring and spinning off some non-core businesses by year-end,” he said in the announcement.
Nio reportedly internally announced a round of mass lay-offs last month with the aim of cutting 1,200 jobs globally by the end of September with a focus on supporting functions, such as human resources and finance.
Nio consumers flinched after three incidences of the company’s cars self-igniting in less than three months. “It is also struggling to create confidence for customers amid a series of bad news,” said Wei Xuefen, a private investor and Nio car owner.
The once-promising EV maker has taken a series of measures to stay afloat since the turn of the year, including several rounds of layoffs and the divestment of its Formula E racing team. Sales started falling in March and analysts question if the company’s restructuring plan will work.
“There is no amount of cost-cutting that will rescue Nio if it can’t get its monthly sales increased significantly,” said Tu T. Le, managing director of consulting firm Sino Auto Insights. Despite the moves, Nio’s non-current liabilities increased more than fourfold over a six-month period to hit RMB 9.5 billion as of the end of June.
Rising costs are also a critical threat to the firm after operating losses surged 72% year on year to RMB 3.2 billion in the quarter. Nio partly attributed the increased expenses to a recall of more than 4,800 flagship ES8 SUVs in late June. “If the cutting is only towards variable costs as employees are, and the company does not address fixed costs, it could open itself to a ‘death spiral’ situation,” Le added.
Amid an overall cooling in the world’s largest auto market, Nio is betting big on its second production model, the ES6 SUV, which it started delivering in late June. Nio’s most optimistic estimates suggest deliveries could rise 24% sequentially to 4,400 units, while revenue could recover to hit at least RMB1.6 billion in the third quarter.
“We are ramping up the production and deliveries [of the ES6] for the coming months,” said Nio founder Li. “Starting in October, we will begin delivering the ES6 and ES8 with an 84-kWh battery pack, extending their NEDC driving ranges to 510 km and 430 km, respectively,” he added. The EV maker’s deliveries more than doubled to 1,943 vehicles in August and over 90% of them were ES6s.
Nio’s stocks may still have value in the future in the eyes of some investors despite the short-term risks. “What should be noted is that either ES8 and ES6 are made to order and customizable, which usually takes the company to deliver in one to two months,” said Wei who maintains that the company still has a fighting chance thanks to the Chinese consumers’ appetite for premium EVs with good quality and services.
However, the company’s recent developments have raised more concerns about the fate of the Chinese young EV maker. “The most important thing for Nio now is to triple monthly sales at a minimum,” Le said. “Does Nio really know who are its customers, what they want, and what they’re willing to pay for it? Turnarounds don’t happen if all the efforts are on saving costs,” he added.
Nio initially aimed to deliver 40,000 cars this year from its joint plant with Anhui-based automaker JAC Motors. The facility, capable of providing 120,000 units annually, only produced 7,542 motors in the first half.
“Economies of scale is a typical way of lowering costs in the auto sector where a manufacturer can only survive by selling a minimum of 200,000 cars, and that is the case for Nio and its second production model ES6,” said Li Tong, research director at Chinese tech media outlet Huxiu.
Nio announced plans in May to secure RMB 10 billion in funding from an investment firm backed by the Beijing municipal government. There have also been whispers within the industry of a possible acquisition by local OEMs, an industry source close to the company told TechNode. Given the flat sales and huge losses, industry watchers now tend to believe that a Nio’s rescue can only come via a change of ownership.
Major Chinese OEMs are increasingly pursuing “a platform strategy,” integrating young EV makers into their vast networks, said Li Tong, who added that both parties could benefit from more comprehensive coverage of potential customers and better utilization of production, sales, and services.
Wei estimated that consumer confidence could pick up once new funding is in place, though financing is also one of the most significant uncertainties facing Nio. Looking ahead, the company could start approaching OEMs to license its technologies, which would be valuable to other automakers and help to boost revenue, Le said.
“I don’t see them getting out of the hole they’re in without a lot of help,” he concluded.
]]>An electric sports-utility vehicle made by WM Motor caught fire on an urban highway in the eastern Chinese city of Wenzhou on Monday, the carmaker said, after smoke began appearing around the center console and front seats in the vehicle’s interior.
Why it matters: A number of self-igniting car fires this year across the country have sparked public concern over safety issues in China’s electric vehicle (EV) industry and triggered increased government scrutiny.
Details: A car made by WM Motor suddenly combusted on Monday morning while running on a highway in Wenzhou, a city in the eastern province of Zhejiang.
Context: This isn’t the first time news of a WM Motor vehicle igniting has caught the public eye. A year ago, one of the company’s EX5 test vehicles combusted at a research center in the southwestern city of Chengdu.
Electric vehicle (EV) maker Faraday Future is preparing to deliver its first mass-production model, the long-awaited FF91, next September, its new CEO told members of the media at an event in Los Angeles on Thursday.
What to expect: Faraday Future has struggled to stay afloat over the past two years, surviving a cash crunch and mismanagement. Now, with a new, experienced CEO taking over from disgraced founder Jia Yueting, the troubled EV startup is rallying for a comeback.
Detail: Breitfeld said the company is planning to deliver its first batch of “several hundreds” of the FF91 SUV next September.
Context: At the debut of its first consumer model at the 2017 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Faraday Future said the FF91 was able to accelerate from zero to 60 miles per hour in 2.39 seconds, faster than Tesla’s Model S or any other existing EV in the world.
Hainan, China’s southernmost island province, is considering a new set of policies it hopes will drive the adoption of swappable battery technology in the production, sales, and distribution of clean energy vehicles.
Why it matters: The move is the latest in a series of efforts to boost electric vehicle (EV) uptake by the Hainan provincial government, which has been pioneering aggressively pro-clean energy vehicle policies amid China’s rising profile in the industry.
Detail: Hainan is working on a pilot program separating battery costs from electric car sticker prices. The plan is for customers to subscribe to a separate battery rental plan when buying these types of cars, China National Radio (CNR) reported Monday.
Context: EV adoption is impeded by high ownership costs, and selling the cars with removable batteries lowers the vehicle purchase price. However, analysts have cast doubts about whether a battery swapping model could succeed globally given the issues around standardization and commercial feasibility.
Self-driving company TuSimple on Tuesday announced it has secured an additional $120 million in an extended Series D, just seven months after receiving $95 million from Chinese internet company Sina as global investors rush to back startups powering the autonomous driving boom.
Why it matters: Self-driving pioneers, previously focused on developing autonomous passenger vehicles, have shifted gears toward commercial vehicles, which hold promise of a more immediate payoff.
“TuSimple’s technology is at a pivotal point for maturity and it has huge market potential, which is why we wanted to deepen our relationship with TuSimple and become a strategic investor.”
—Jae Chung, CFO of Mando Corporation
Detail: TuSimple announced Tuesday that it has raised an additional $120 million from investors including Chinese private equity firm CDH Investments and Mando Corporation, a South Korean auto parts supplier, to push further into the commercial market.
A battery manufacturer founded by key executives from Weltmeister (WM) Motor may go public via a back-door listing, sparking widespread Chinese media reports that the Baidu-backed NEV maker is looking to raise funds in China’s capital markets in what may be the worst-ever year for the country’s auto industry.
Why it matters: WM Motor has been through a series of changes in capital operations over the past two months as part of preparations for the rumored listing, including a recent shift in its dominant shareholder.
Details: Living Power, a Chinese battery maker led by WM Motor CEO Freeman Shen, will invest around RMB 513 million ($72 million) in Shenzhen-listed Dazhi Technology to acquire a 16.7% stake, according to a statement released to investors by the company on Tuesday.
Context: The move comes two months after Shen said in an interview with Bloomberg that WM Motor was possibly seeking $1 billion of overseas investment. A company spokesman confirmed to TechNode that it is seeking funding overseas. Shen also said during the interview that he expects the company to become profitable next year.
This story was updated on September 26 to reflect additional comments from a company spokesman and the relationship between Freeman Shen and Wang Lei.
]]>Self-driving cars may soon to be a reality in Shanghai. Chinese automaker SAIC along with BMW and Didi Chuxing were the first in China to win approval from regulators to offer robotaxi pilot services in the northwestern Jiading district of the city, a major milestone for Chinese players in the global autonomous driving race.
Why it matters: Shanghai issued China’s first licenses on autonomous vehicle (AV) tests to SAIC and EV maker Nio in March 2018, and is accelerating toward making self-driving vehicle deployment a reality, as other Chinese cities race to catch up.
Details: SAIC, Didi Chuxing, and BMW scored China’s first permits from Shanghai regulators to be included in the city’s autonomous vehicle passenger service pilot program at this year’s World Autonomous Vehicle Ecosystem Conference (WAVE) on Monday.
Context: Shanghai has the largest automobile manufacturing output in China, grossing RMB 683.2 billion ($96.7 billion) last year.
This article was updated to include comments from Didi Chuxing about its app, and to correct the issuing body for the volunteer guideline. It was issued by the city government, not the district.
]]>Electric vehicle maker Byton has pushed back the launch date of its first commercial model to mid-2020 as it re-calibrates following the departure of one of its founders and a major cash crunch amid an auto market slowdown.
Why it matters: Byton’s management and financial woes are emblematic of broader issues in China’s EV industry, which features a number of companies in turmoil. The Chinese-backed EV maker’s troubles were aired to the public when co-founder and then-chairman Carsten Breitfeld surprised many with his appearance at the Auto Shanghai show in April as a representative of rival carmaker, Iconiq.
Detail: Byton showcased a final production version of its first model, a premium SUV called the M-Byte, featuring a maximum range of 550 kilometers (around 340 miles) and an 8-inch touchscreen in the middle of the steering wheel at the 2019 Frankfurt Motor Show on Tuesday.
Context: Chinese EV makers are hunting for funds to stay afloat in the crowded electric vehicle market, which declined year on year in July for the first time in two years, a result of reduced government subsidies.
Sales of Nio’s new ES6 SUV model doubled in August following a lackluster first full month on the market, trade figures show.
Why it’s important: Despite the growth, Nio will almost certainly miss its original annual sales target of 40,000 units as the embattled electric vehicle maker had achieved only 20% of the goal at the end of July.
Details: Nio doubled sales of its ES6 five-seater SUV in August to 2,336 from 1,066 the month before, according to figures from the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA).
Context: The impacts of Beijing’s subsidy cuts are still ongoing in China’s new energy vehicle market, which had maintained long-term high double-digit expansion up until June.
Chinese automaker Geely has taken a €50 million (around $55 million) stake in German flying taxi startup Volocopter, leading the Series C round in a move which increases its presence in Europe while diversifying its mobility portfolio.
Why it matters: Geely, the holding company based in eastern China’s Zhejiang Province, already owns Swedish manufacturer Volvo and British sports carmaker Lotus. The Chinese company bought a $9 billion stake in Mercedes Benz-owner Daimler last year.
Details: Volocopter aims to use the funding to commercialize its VoloCity air taxi within three years.
“Urban mobility needs to evolve in the next few years to meet rising demand … This funding round is allowing us to take great strides towards bringing Urban Air Mobility to life whilst being respectful of our shareholder’s money.”
—Florian Reuter, CEO of Volocopter, in a statement
Context: Ehang, a Chinese startup looking to commercialize flying taxis, hopes to be the first to launch its vehicles in China.
Electric vehicle maker Xpeng Motors has started delivering the 2020 version of its first mass market SUV model, the G3, timed for what experts foresee will be a pickup in Chinese new energy vehicle market at the end of the year.
Why it matters: The delivery of XPeng’s newest model follows a July backlash from consumers over the unexpected release of the G3 2020 version, which features an extended driving range and lower price tag.
Details: Xpeng Motors began delivering its updated G3 model on Friday at a trade event in the southwestern city of Chengdu. The 2020 edition boasts an extended 520 kilometer range meeting New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) standards—a widely used measurement for vehicle emissions and fuel economy—and a self-developed operating system with assisted driving features tailored for domestic road conditions and driving habits.
Context: China’s new energy vehicles (NEV) sales declined in July for the first time since 2017, weakening 4.3% year on year to 80,000 units, but analysts expect that the market could recover in coming months.
Troubled electric vehicle maker Nio is raising new cash via convertible notes from Tencent to help with finances during an acute cash-flow crunch.
Why it matters: The cash infusion from Tencent, a major investor, will provide a much-needed boost for Nio, which has been hit by flagging sales and a massive recall this year.
Details: Nio will issue $200 million in convertible notes to a Tencent affiliate as well as Nio CEO William Li Bin, with each subscribing for $100 million principal amount, according to a company announcement released Thursday.
The subscription from Tencent and Li show confidence from major shareholders about the company’s future performance, and more details will be revealed in the upcoming quarterly results which will be released later this month, the company said in an announcement sent to TechNode on Friday.
EV maker Nio sees 50% revenue decline in Q1, expects continued slowdown
Context: This is the second time the Chinese EV maker has financed its operations with convertible securities after its September 2018 listing in New York.
The Beijing municipal government is developing new autonomous vehicle (AV) testing facilities that will allow robotaxis to run on the outskirts of the city, said a report by The Beijing News, the latest development in a race for leadership in one of the country’s hottest tech sectors.
Why it matters: The announcement followed news from Didi Chuxing and AutoX last week detailing plans to begin testing their robotaxi services in a northwest Shanghai suburb. Competition remains intense between major cities to roll out AV initiatives in support of the central government’s aspirations to assume global leadership in core technologies.
Detail: The government of Beijing’s Shunyi district on Tuesday unveiled plans allowing self-driving vehicle tests along public roads extending 135 kilometers in the northern suburb, reported The Beijing News.
Bottom line: Beijing was an early mover in driverless vehicle technology development with its December 2017 launch (in Chinese) of China’s first municipal-level regulations for AV road tests. The government has opened a total of 123 kilometers in the Shunyi, Haidian, and Yizhuang districts for AV tests, more than any other cities in the country as of August.
The US-based EV maker Faraday Future announced late Tuesday the appointment of veteran auto executive Carsten Breitfeld to the position of CEO, taking over from Jia Yueting, debt-ridden Chinese entrepreneur and CEO.
Why it matters: The appointment may signal the start of turnaround for the embattled young automaker, which has been trying to stay afloat by selling assets, cutting jobs, and reducing debt since 2017.
Details: Breitfeld will assume leadership of FF, push the production of the FF91 model, and finalize development of the FF81, its second mass-market offering, the company wrote in an announcement released Tuesday on its social media account.
“It was when I saw the product, the innovative technology and the many dedicated employees that make up FF that it was clear to me that FF is setting a new standard for intelligent mobility and that I needed to be a part of it. I relish the opportunity to partner with YT, expand upon the vision and forward-thinking that YT started with FF and bring this groundbreaking electric vehicle to full production.”
—Carsten Breitfeld, global CEO of Faraday Future
Context: The executive change comes just days after Faraday Future revealed a restructuring plan, signaling changes to come at the top of the firm.
Autonomous driving startup AutoX announced on Saturday that it will launch a robotaxi pilot in Shanghai, the latest Chinese company to pass this particular milestone in the development of self-driving vehicles and one that comes on the heels of a similar announcement by heavyweight rival, Didi.
Why it’s important: Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi announced Friday that it would launch a robotaxi fleet of 30 driverless vehicles on the outskirts of Shanghai’s Jiading district, the same area that AutoX will be conducting its tests.
Detail: AutoX will deploy 100 autonomous vehicles in a pilot area of 150 square kilometers in Anting Town, which takes up nearly a third of Shanghai’s northwestern Jiading district.
Context: Chinese AV companies are racing to launch robotaxi services in an effort to lure investors in a shrinking investment market.
China’s top scholars are calling for more policies which encourage data sharing and product standards for autonomous vehicles, and advocating for higher levels of autonomy for testing the technology.
“Large-scale production should only be for vehicles meeting the Level 4 requirements, while Level 3, which involves transferring control from car to human cars, should only be applied to research,” (our translation) Li Deyi, a Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE) fellow, said Friday at this year’s World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai.
Level 4 (L4) autonomy refers to a fully autonomous system which can handle emergency situations. L3 still requires that a driver intervene in emergency cases, according to definitions set by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE).
Li’s comment echoes a long-held debate in the industry over whether such handovers are safe for owners. A number of tech giants and automakers argue that a machine should assume full responsibility, including Alphabet’s Waymo, Volvo, and trucking unicorn Tusimple. Others favor a more realistic technology approach for semi-autonomous cars. Chinese automakers GAC Group, Changan, and XPeng Motors plan to produce L3 automated vehicles by next year.
“In China, the public cares more about safety, and so the current problem for cars testing on the road is, what are the safety requirements that should be met?” Li asked. He proposed that the government release safety standards—such as the allowable scope of failure rate and specific autonomy levels for cars permitted to conduct trial runs on public highways—as early as possible to accelerate commercial development for the industry.
Legislation for data management is another pressing need in China’s self-driving industry, experts at the conference said. China needs to formulate a set of unified rules for data processing, transmitting, and sharing, none of which exists under current national cybersecurity laws, said Wang Yao, director of technology at the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM).
Data is considered immensely valuable for developing autonomous vehicles and has become one of the key issues between automakers and tech companies as both sides fight for control. Alibaba, an exclusive partner to SAIC for vehicle operating systems, is barred from accessing most of the state-backed auto giant’s driving data, according to Caixin.
The lack of collaboration points to insecurity, because “automakers are under great pressure as internet giants penetrate the industry,” Wang explained. He added that the Chinese government has started refining the country’s cybersecurity law to build explicit rules for auto-related data, such as car location data, surrounding data, and engine state information to encourage industrial collaboration.
“We hope Chinese automakers will form alliances first to build data-sharing platforms,” Wang said.
]]>Ride-hailing giant Didi will launch a pilot robotaxi fleet in Shanghai, allowing passengers to book rides in autonomous vehicles through its app, the company said on Friday.
Why it matters: Didi is the latest tech firm to announce plans to test a fleet of autonomous taxis in China, following similar initiatives by search giant Baidu and self-driving startup Pony.ai.
“We believe that giving ordinary citizens access to large scale, shared autonomous fleets is key to achieving our shared goal of safety, efficiency, and sustainability for future cities.”
—Didi CEO Cheng Wei in a statement on Friday
Details: The pilot program will feature 30 different models of Level 4 autonomous vehicles—cars that are fully driverless in most scenarios, the company said.
Context: With around 550 million users, Didi is the largest ride-hailing company in China.
China plans to lift restrictions on all car purchases for the first time in the country’s history to stimulate growth, as sales fell for a 13th consecutive month in July.
Why it matters: The easing would mark a significant shift in policy for the world’s largest auto market. The government may look to help the flagging car sector and boost the economy, although this could hamper environmental protection progress.
Detail: In a government statement released on Tuesday, the State Council urged local governments to “unleash the potential” of auto consumption and take actions like relaxing or even removing restrictions on car buying.
Changan Automobile will begin delivering a new version of its best-selling CS75 SUV model equipped with a voice-operated version of WeChat in the third quarter this year, making it the first mass-market passenger vehicle equipped with the ubiquitous Tencent app.
Why it matters: Tencent is accelerating its entry into the connected vehicle sector, readying for what many see as an uphill battle for market share with Baidu and Alibaba.
Detail: After delaying its release for nearly a year amid safety concerns, Tencent unveiled on Monday a voice-operated version of its popular instant messaging app WeChat for drivers as part of its collaboration with Chinese automaker Changan at an event in the southwestern Chongqing municipality.
Context: Changan is pinning its hopes on the partnership to bolster falling sales of its vehicles in a flagging market.
The China-US trade tensions reached a boiling point over the weekend with the Chinese government planning to reinstate a 40% retaliatory tariff on automobiles imported from the US. However, Tesla’s nearly completed Gigafactory Shanghai, supported by the municipal government, may help offset any major impact to the California-based car maker’s bottom line.
Why it matters: The escalating trade war between China and the US is heightening concerns about the impact on American automakers in the world’s largest auto market.
Detail: Tesla is expected to export nearly 35,000 vehicles to China in 2019, according to research firm LMC Automotive. The breakneck pace of its Gigafactory 3 plant construction, which may be completed as early as end-September, may help soften the impact of the tariffs.
Tesla was not immediately available for comment when contacted by TechNode on Monday.
Context: US automakers were hit hard last year when the car sales tanked due to the previous tariffs.
It is dark days for China’s auto industry: New automobile purchases have declined for the past 13 months, while new energy vehicle (NEV) sales fell in July for the first time in two years as Beijing moves to cut subsidies.
China has been the world’s largest electric vehicle (EV) market since 2015 and is also home to around 500 EV startups as municipal governments seek out local EV success stories. However, the demands of delivering to the market—manufacturing, supply chain, retail channels, customers, and safety—is a challenge for startups and only a few companies can survive, Zhang Li, partner of Cathay Capital, said Thursday at the TechNode Tech After Hours Series event in Shanghai.
Young EV makers have been struggling to stay afloat in a shrinking capital market and economic slowdown. Nio, a Chinese EV frontrunner, on Thursday announced it will cut another 1,200 jobs by the end of September. “Everyone should get ready for more challenges and setbacks coming ahead,” (our translation) wrote Nio CEO William Li in an internal memo.
The once-promising Tesla challenger has downsized amid massive recalls and huge losses over the past several months. Still, it is one of the few Chinese EV makers that has actually delivered cars to customers, setting it apart from most of the industry, where many others are on the verge of bankruptcy. So far, only six Chinese EV startups have delivered cars to customers, while more than 50 startups have raised north of $18 billion in total since 2014, according to business consultancy AlixPartner.
“It’s such a capital intensive sector, and only those who are able to pour cash while still innovating products and understanding customers could win at the end,” said Tu T. Le, managing director of Sino Auto Insights.
Rupert Mitchell, the chief strategy officer for WM Motor, said that he would be surprised if more than half a dozen names are still in the game by year-end.
WM Motor is the top seller among all the new EV makers in the first half of this year with more than 8,500 models delivered. One of the key lessons for the nascent Chinese EV industry over the last few years is the lack of focus on the essential goal as a carmaker: get the factory open, start making cars, and get them on the road, according to Mitchell.
Venture capital raised by EV makers in 2019 has plummeted compared with a year ago, forcing new EV makers to be more focused than ever. After suffering a loss of more than RMB 20 billion since founding, Nio, known for its expensive retail and club services, is shifting from lavish and diverse business strategies to a more focused commitment on core business execution.
The carmaker recently scaled back an ambitious goal of building 1,100 battery swapping facilities by next year, and may spin off its recharging service Nio Power in order to seek external financing.
“It’s a smart decision [for Nio]. Infrastructure also involves government, and many subsidies are now switched to the charging infrastructure,” said Zhang.
After a decade of subsidized consumer purchases, Chinese EV makers have to compete head to head with internal combustion engine (ICE) carmakers as subsidies are expected to be halted completely in 2020, according to a government plan. Automakers now need to take a step back and re-focus on customer and product, said Le.
However, why should a customer buy an EV, when a gasoline car still has more performance advantages for long distance trips? How are they competing with bigger OEMs for customers? Mitchell believes for tech-enabled Chinese consumers, it is more about focus on user experience within the cockpit.
“The more interesting shift is the connected vehicle. Beyond the simply electrified powertrain, you’ve got an operating system that could order your white cappuccino automatically as you are 10 minutes away from your office,” said Mitchell.
Zhang agreed. “It’s no longer just a transportation from one position to another. The car is kind of a small room where you interact with others. You don’t want to be disconnected,” she said.
With a new generation of young customers comes a new set of needs, yet traditional automakers are still more focused on product rather than customer. “That is the gap,” Zhang said, adding that the next growth opportunity will come from young Chinese automakers.
“If your use case is moving slowly in urban traffic, you are really not worrying about top speed. The focus will be the comfort. Infotainment and air purification are more important to you,” said Mitchell. Although customers now expect to receive onboard services for free, looking ahead, the former Goldman Sachs investment banker expects consumers could be paying a premium for “that software upgrade experience, which is 100% gross margin” for carmakers.
“It’s those within the cockpit experiences that are going to be key differentiators,” Mitchell said.
If you can’t see the YouTube player above, try watching here instead.
]]>China on Tuesday pledged to speed up its move towards battery-powered transportation, replacing the country’s gas-powered taxis, buses, and trucks with new energy models, as a national ban on fossil fuel cars is still on the agenda.
Why it matters: This comes two years after China’s central government laid out its plans to become a zero vehicle-emissions country.
Details: MIIT continues to promote the development of an all-electric public transport network in some regions while prohibiting gasoline vehicles in designated areas in some cities, the ministry said last month in a written response to a proposal. The response not was released to the public until earlier this week.
Context: Beijing is accelerating the move towards all-electric transportation across the country in a bid to control pollution from vehicles, while also aiming to become a world leader in technology innovation with an upscale EV industry.
In spite of no clear timetable for profitability, ride-hailing companies could significantly reduce costs from investing in electric vehicles fleets, as growth continues to decelerate in China’s mobility market, according to a recent report by management consultants Bain & Company.
Why it matters: After booming for three years, China’s ride-hailing market has entered a sharp and unexpected downturn amid rider safety concerns and growing regulation from local governments. Bain expects the downward trend would continue over the next two years.
Details: Ride-hailing companies could see as much as a 65% reduction in fuel costs by switching to electric vehicles, according to the report.
Context: China’s once red-hot mobility industry is shifting to a lower gear. Ride-hailers are struggling to find ways to break as stiff competition and government control restrict market leaders’ flexibility in pricing.
Electric vehicle (EV) maker Nio reportedly plans to raise cash by spinning off its autonomous driving business while cutting an additional 100 jobs at its Silicon Valley office.
Why it matters: The recent developments renew concerns about the fate of the Chinese young EV maker, as Nio takes more drastic measures to keep the company afloat until new investment comes in.
Details: Nio is reportedly looking to split off its autonomous driving business and combine it with Didi’s self-driving unit, which itself was recently made into a separate business. The two companies have held several rounds of negotiations, according to Chinese media reports.
Context: Consolidation in China’s autonomous driving sector is expected as the hype surrounding the industry begins to wear off.
Cracks are emerging in China’s ride-hailing sector as dominant companies seek to monetize their rivals, a move which could divide the industry as smaller firms are forced to choose sides.
Major mobility players Didi and Meituan have opened up their platforms to competitors by offering aggregation services that allow users to access multiple ride-hailing platforms within a single app.
Meituan launched its aggregation service in April, allowing the company to spread its ride-hailing offering from Nanjing and Shanghai to dozens of cities around the country. The company enables users to book trips using its own ride-hailing services, as well as through Shouqi Limousine & Chauffeur, Caocao Chuxing, and Shenzhou, among others.
Didi followed suit just weeks later, announcing that a number of automakers would be able to provide ride-hailing within its app, deepening its ties with carmakers in the country and further expanding its reach.
The ride aggregation model has sprung up as a result of problems in the market. Companies have been left reeling from the aftereffects of a government clampdown on the industry while facing trouble reaching profitability.
Previously, map providers Autonavi and Baidu had launched aggregation services within their apps—as had the travel services platform Ctrip. Meituan and Didi’s adoption of the model marks the first time that companies whose business involves ride-hailing have made such moves.
The move has sparked concerns. “Smaller companies are going to be forced to take sides,” Tu Le, founder at Sino Auto Insights, told TechNode. “As a small ride-hailing firm you don’t want to be exclusive.”
In the new paradigm, ride-hailing companies are required to pay Didi or Meituan a commission for every ride that gets booked through the tech giants’ apps. While these services give smaller players access to a larger pool of potential customers, costs could quickly escalate as these companies also need to pay their drivers.
“Smaller players will need to consider carefully which open platform to join for them to remain relevant in the market,” Tom De Vleesschauwer, director at research firm IHS Markit, told TechNode in an email.
Experts say these types of partnerships could create additional problems for an already embattled industry. Smaller players will need to balance commission costs with increased scale, which could ultimately affect their bottom line. Meanwhile, companies like Didi and Meituan will be able to benefit from other operators’ rides, but in doing so, have been accused of putting their own interests above their drivers’.
China is home to the world’s largest ride-hailing market. In 2016, the sector was worth more than $20 billion, according to consulting firm Bain & Co. Nevertheless, the industry has seen a series of existential crises that have diminished its supply of drivers, the lifeblood of the ride-hailing sector.
“In downtown areas such as [Beijing’s] Sanlitun or Wangjing, you always have to wait for a ride at night or during the weekend, with at least 55 passengers in line ahead of you,” 25-year-old resident Li Lan told TechNode.
The aggregation mode could help companies like Didi and Meituan address this issue, analysts say. These firms can significantly increase the number of rides within their apps without notable investment, as they are not responsible for paying the extra drivers, a major cost for any ride-hailing network.
China’s driver shortage stems from a government crackdown on the industry following a series of high-profile tragedies last year. In two separate incidents, female passengers were murdered by their drivers while using Didi’s carpooling service Hitch.
Shortly after the incidents, numerous investigations found that passenger harassment was rampant within the industry. Didi suspended Hitch indefinitely but has hinted that the company is looking to bring the platform back online.
Didi, which accounts for 90% of rides in China’s ride-hailing market, responded aggressively to the incidents by implementing security functions and upgrading those that already existed. Safety has now become a priority for the company.
However, Didi and Meituan are not expected to be accountable for the actions of drivers from the other platforms, Le says, meaning liability still falls on the smaller platforms that actually run the rides. It’s unlikely that the new mode will address ongoing safety concerns.
A Didi spokepson told TechNode on Tuesday that it’s open platform will enable the company to share its experience in driver management and safety architecture with its partners. Meituan declined to comment.
In light of the safety concerns, the government was also swift in cracking down on the sector, requiring drivers to hold permits in order to get fares. The cities of Beijing, Shanghai, and Tianjin demand that drivers hold licenses from the city in which they operate; this drastically reduces the supply of drivers, as gig workers often live in cities in which they are not registered.
Other barriers include requiring drivers to register their cars as commercial vehicles and pass an exam to get the necessary paperwork.
Didi has removed more than 300,000 unqualified or fraudulent drivers from its platform since the incidents. The government of Shanghai recently fined the company RMB 5.5 million for allowing unqualified drivers on its platform.
Didi has sought to counter these removals and reduce friction by running training services to help drivers become compliant with the government’s rules. The effects of this program are currently unclear. The company said previously that it is unable to service around one-fifth of the rides on its low-cost Express service due to labor shortages.
“Didi was always going to become a platform for various types of transportation. They just opened it to other ride-hailing companies, so their volume is a lot higher,” Le said.
It is unclear how many drivers Meituan has had to remove, though the number of drivers on its platform is limited when compared to Didi.
Apart from addressing a lack of drivers, aggregating rides from other platforms could help these companies cut costs, according to an expert at a consulting firm affiliated to an automotive industry body; this source was granted anonymity as they are not authorized to speak to the media.
The model will allow more dominant companies to cut their customer acquisition and retention spending, as well as reduce subsidies, the source said.
Ride-hailing companies globally are struggling to make money. In its first-quarter results, Meituan said that it would be taking a “cost-effective approach” to its ride-hailing business, implementing an aggregation model while scaling back subsidies.
The company’s cost of revenue in 2018 increased year-on-year to more than RMB 15 billion ($2.1 billion) from RMB 1.1 billion. Meituan attributed the increase, in part, to expenditure on drivers. The company spent as much as RMB 370 million a month on drivers last year.
Meanwhile, Didi has yet to turn a profit. The company reportedly marked huge losses of RMB 10.9 billion in 2018. Earlier this year, Didi reported that its operating costs were roughly equivalent to 21% of its total fare revenues in 2018. However, its average commission rate was 19% of its fare revenue in the fourth quarter of last year. The 2-percentage point difference was reported as an operating loss.
The company will focus on reducing costs to run its businesses in a “sustainable way,” said Chen Xi, executive president of Didi’s ride-hailing business group, in a statement in April.
Aggregation services allow major players to offer more rides to their users, while not having to spend extra to provide them. De Vleesschauwer says that leaders in the industry see the model as a way to increase scale, and thereby revenue, as no one is in the sector is making money.
Given the increased accessibility, users on microblogging platform Weibo voiced their support of the model, saying that it would make it easier to book rides and cut down on wait times.
“Passengers are free to choose vehicles and vehicle providers,“ said one supporter of the model. “After gathering more drivers and vehicles, passengers can also get a car more easily,” noted another commenter.
However, other Weibo users who appeared to be drivers voiced their concerns, saying that aggregating rides puts the companies and their customers before drivers.
“Drivers are earning less and less,” said one user, commenting on an article about Didi’s aggregation service. “This does not consider the drivers at all,” wrote another.
But the effects of the aggregation mode extend further than just concerns over drivers, pointing to consolidation within the industry. De Vleesschauwer said that smaller ride-hailing companies having to choose between aligning themselves with Meituan or Didi is a “distinct” possibility. No exclusivity agreements have yet been made public.
For smaller platforms, Meituan and Didi’s huge user bases are an attractive proposition. Didi has more than 550 million users across China, while Meituan has around 410 million in its platform, which also includes food delivery and other lifestyle services.
Didi said that its partnerships, particularly those with carmakers, will help users find suitable rides, while giving its partners access to its large pool of passengers, thereby increasing their efficiency and income.
It is unclear how much Didi or Meituan will charge the smaller platforms, but some sources point to a minimum figure of 10%, which could increase costs dramatically for cash-strapped ride-hailing companies.
“Ultimately, whoever controls the platform will hold the power,” said De Vleesschauwer. Smaller companies could effectively become local power bases for Didi or Meituan, he added.
Additional reporting by Jill Shen
This article has been updated to include a response from Didi
]]>Chinese electric vehicle maker Chehejia has raised $530 million in a Series C funding round led by Meituan’s founder and CEO Wang Xing, as the company shifts into high gear for the mass production and delivery of its first SUV later this year.
Why it matters: Also known as CHJ and Leading Ideal, Chehejia has emerged as another potential homegrown rival to Tesla in China and poses a serious threat to Nio’s position in the crowded Chinese EV market.
Details: Wang Xing invested $300 million this round.
Context: Young Chinese EV makers are hungry for cash amid government subsidy reductions and a challenging fundraising environment, which has prompted a reshuffling of the industry.
Nio co-founder Jack Cheng has left his position as executive vice president and will transition to the role of adviser after four years of helping build the company. The development is the latest in a series of blows for the Chinese electric vehicle maker after rapid downsizing, massive recalls, and huge losses.
Why it matters: The management shake-up casts fresh doubts on the EV maker’s future with investors concerned about sustainability amid a 13-month drop in sales in the Chinese auto market.
Details: Cheng left the company on Wednesday, but will hold onto his title of chairman at XPT, a tier-one supplier of electric power solutions and auto parts affiliated to Nio, according to an internal memo obtained by Chinese media.
This article has been corrected to reflect that Zhaung Li took over part of Padmasree Warrior’s responsibilities, and did not take on her role of CEO as previously stated.
]]>Meituan Dianping has started hiring for its new mapping and navigation services unit, a move that could help the services giant to increase its presence in ride-hailing and unmanned deliveries.
Why it matters: Mapping has become strategically important for Chinese life service platforms with ambitions of expanding into mobility.
Details: Meituan posted a batch of new job openings this week specifically targeting digital mapping expertise. Positions cover web development, software testing, and path algorithms.
Context: China’s tech giants are racing to transform into one-stop service aggregation platforms.
Didi Chuxing has been ordered to pay fines totaling RMB 5.5 million ($780,000) for failing to weed out unqualified drivers on its platform in Shanghai, as authorities in the eastern Chinese city harden their stance on the ride-hailing sector.
Why it matters: Shanghai’s local government has adopted a tougher stance on ride-hailers in recent months after years of relatively uncapped expansion. Regulators warned that more severe punishments could come if they don’t comply, including app removals from online stores and business suspensions.
Details: Authorities found that as many as eight out of ten locally registered Didi drivers fail to meet regulatory standards in a series of spot checks last month. Around 15% of Meituan’s ride-hailing drivers were also found to be working illegally. Didi will pay RMB 5.5 million in penalties while Meituan has been fined RMB 1.5 million for leaving illegal drivers on its platform.
Context: China’s transport ministry rolled out a new policy in January requiring drivers to obtain special permits for ride-hailing, in addition to their driving licenses.
Toyota reportedly aims to set up a fourth hybrid vehicle battery plant in China as Beijing has shelved plans to completely do away with combustion engine cars and will look for a more balanced policy.
Why it matters: The move coincides with Chinese government plans to amend its new energy vehicle mandate to boost production of fuel-efficient hybrids.
China refines NEV mandate policy to boost overlooked hybrid vehicles
Detail: Primearth EV Energy, Toyota’s battery-making unit, plans to complete the new plant by 2021 with an annual capacity of roughly 100,000 batteries.
Context: China initially considered releasing an ambitious target completely banning national production and sale of petrol vehicles by 2030 as part of broader efforts to curb air pollution, but later put the plan on hold to avoid a one-size-fits-all approach on fuel vehicles.
Nio is opening battery swap stations in major Chinese cities this week. This is the company’s latest push to allay fears that electric vehicles are limited due to their inefficient range.
Why it matters: Range is often one of the biggest issues consumers have when considering an electric car. Battery swapping is theoretically a quicker, safer and more convenient choice than a fast charge.
Details: Nio owners can use a map function within the app to find 23 swapping stations covering nine Chinese cities, including Beijing, Shanghai, Hangzhou, and Shenzhen.
Context: China has the world largest EV infrastructure network with over 1 million charging piles nationwide but only 1,000 swapping stations.
Tesla is offering a 50% discount on the “fully driverless” version of its Autopilot assistance system in China, part of efforts to boost its adoption in the country.
Why it matters: Increased use of full Autopilot in China will help Tesla to optimize its localized self-driving solution for the Chinese market, which is its second-largest globally after the US.
Details: Chinese Model S and Model X owners who bought the enhanced version of the Autopilot, can spend 50% less on replacing their system with the full self-driving package at RMB 27,800 (roughly $3,950).
Context: Tesla has come under scrutiny following the deaths of at least three drivers when using the Autopilot system globally over the last three years.
Consider all the possible benefits of robotaxis: increased mobility, lower costs, fewer vehicles on the roads, and more free time on daily commutes. Fleets of self-driving cabs are expected to have disruptive effects on transportation in cities around the world.
Despite all this promise, however, international trailblazers are currently scaling back their plans to deploy automated mobility services worldwide. GM’s Cruise is downsizing its plans to deploy robotaxis. Alphabet’s Waymo launched self-driving taxi services late last year, but vehicles are still only available to about 400 test families in the suburbs of Phoenix, Arizona. These cars are also required to have safety drivers behind the wheel in case a human is required to take over in a dangerous situation.
Meanwhile, Chinese self-driving companies are pushing to lead the global race to deploy self-driving taxis. AutoX is expanding its presence, with plans to offer self-driving rides in Europe by the end of 2020. Baidu has set an ambitious goal to roll out 100 self-driving taxis in Changsha by year-end. Pony.ai and WeRide have been testing driverless ride-hailing in Guangzhou for months.
Despite the international setbacks, robotaxis are seen as a possible answer to the regulatory, financial, and scale problems facing AVs. Many believe they could pave the way to widespread adoption of self-driving cars.
Changsha and Guangzhou are the two major Chinese cities aiming to rise above the rest in the country’s AV race.
Drive I/O is TechNode’s monthly newsletter on the cutting edge of mobility: EVs, AVs, and the companies trying to build them. Available to TechNode Squared subscribers.
You’d be forgiven for not having heard of Changsha. The capital of Hunan province, located in central China, has not been called the famed “metropolis of the future,” as Shenzhen has. Nor is it an important political hub akin to Beijing or a commercial center like Shanghai. However, the future of automated driving could be playing out in this city.
Changsha wasn’t the first city to allow AV tests in China. In fact, it didn’t open its first pilot zone for AVs until June 2018, two years later than Shanghai, and also lagging behind Beijing and six other cities in China.
But Changsha strode into the spotlight in late 2018, when the municipal government announced its plan to become the first Chinese city to roll out robotaxis in 2019, and unveiled a partnership with Baidu, the online search and artificial intelligence giant that has been named one of China’s “AI champions.” Baidu declared that Changsha would be second only to Beijing in its goals to put autonomous vehicles on the road.
For a long time, AV companies were only allowed to test self-driving cars in Changsha’s closed pilot zone, located west of the Xiangjiang River, which divides the city in two. The testing zone originally incorporated just 12 kilometers of road networks. But the city has dramatically accelerated its efforts to deploy self-driving cars.
In June of this year, the city government issued nearly 50 permits for road testing, the vast majority of which were granted to Baidu. Officials are also revamping around 200 kilometers of public roads, aiming to add connectivity features for self driving cars. The roads are expected to be put into use in September.
The overhaul will allow safety drivers to oversee autonomous vehicles on 36 urban streets, including highways in several areas around the city. Qiu Jixing, the deputy mayor, claimed at a June press event that Changsha would be home to the largest open-road networks for autonomous tests in the country.
The city now hopes to take the lead in AV deployment, with plans to run 100 of Baidu’s robotaxis on its motorways. Chinese media reported last month that recruitment of volunteers for Baidu’s early rider program will begin in September.
In June, Changsha authorities took deliberate steps towards deployment by stipulating explicit rules for transporting passengers in robotaxis. The regulations state that only AV companies whose vehicles have traveled more than 20,000 kilometers in the city without traffic violations are eligible. First-time applicants must run a maximum of 30 cars for at least half a year before applying to put more vehicles on the road.
Changsha is often referred to as “China’s Phoenix,” drawing comparisons to the Arizona metropolis—neither city was the most prosperous in their respective countries nor were they pioneers when the competition for next-generation smart vehicles started up.
Like Phoenix, now a global hub for the evolution of the driverless vehicle industry, Changsha is expected to play a pivotal role in AV development and deployment, especially given its relatively docile traffic environment, government support, and drive to become China’s AV trailblazer.
Guangzhou was also late to allow AV testing on its streets. The capital of Guangdong province was the last of China’s four first-tier cities—which also include Beijing, Shenzhen, and Shanghai—to issue testing licenses. But that hasn’t dampened the southern city’s ambitions to lead the nationwide AV race.
Guangzhou has gone even further than Changsha. For months, the city has allowed self-driving companies Pony.ai and WeRide to test autonomous ride-hailing platforms. The two startups are also testing their vehicles in the US. Last year, the company ranked fifth out of all autonomous driving companies testing vehicles in California when measuring disengagements, the number of times a human driver is required to take over from the vehicles autonomous system.
Pony.ai reported just one disengagement for every 1,645 kilometers traveled, according to the state’s motor vehicle department.
In December, Pony.ai began testing its autonomous ride-hailing service Pony Pilot in Guangzhou’s urban Nansha District. The test area now covers 60 square kilometers. Pony.ai claims that trips can be made between any two points within the test area, rather than just trips based on fixed routes. The company said the longest possible journey lasts two hours.
Xie Xiaohui, chief of the Commerce Bureau of Nansha District, told state broadcaster China Central Television (CCTV): “Pony.ai can test their vehicles on all the roads with 24-hour access in Nansha.” Thus far, only employees and a limited pool of volunteers have access to the service via an invite-only app. Pony.ai has said it will expand its ride-hailing fleet to 100 vehicles by the end of 2019.
Despite its current limitations, the company has set ambitious goals, hoping to catch up with Waymo. “It would be a great mission for us to challenge the best technology in the world in the next several years,” said Zhang Ning, head of Pony.ai’s Guangzhou research and development center, during a recent interview with CCTV.
For rival WeRide, second only to Baidu in the number of road testing licenses it has secured in China, robotaxis are of the utmost importance. “In Guangzhou, we can apply to offer transport services to the public after driving safely for 10,000 kilometers. This means more to us than California’s robotaxi permit,” the company told TechNode. The company received 20 of the 24 test permits issued by Guangzhou’s government in June.
WeRide is indeed also testing its vehicles in California, reporting 280 kilometers per disengagement, though it hasn’t received a robotaxi license in the US, unlike rivals Pony.ai and AutoX.
Nonetheless, the company has been testing its robotaxi service for eight months on a small suburban island in Guangzhou. They plan to launch the service with taxi operator Baiyun in 2020.
Guangzhou allows companies to test vehicles on 33 public roads totaling 46 kilometers in length, although more than half of the roads have little traffic volume. It is also unclear how many residents the companies could target in these areas and when they will be able to charge for their services.
Still, Guangzhou has grand ambitions of being the global center of the automotive industry in the era of shared mobility. The city aims to take the top spot in terms of auto production in China, planning to produce 5 million vehicles by 2025. Of these, the city hopes 80% will be equipped with semi-automated driving systems, much higher than the 30% target set by the central government.
Formerly known as home to Japanese automakers in China and already the country’s second-largest city in car production volume, Guangzhou is now pushing to pave the road in the smart mobility revolution.
Credit: Jill, Chris
]]>BMW’s joint project with Great Wall Motor to build the new electric Mini model in China has reportedly hit the rocks due to “big cultural differences,” the latest case of collaborative difficulties between global auto giants and Chinese OEMs.
Why it matters: Global automakers have rushed to tap China’s booming electric vehicle industry by partnering local firms after the government brought out its first NEV mandate policy in September 2016. However, they may have underestimated cultural differences in the local market when attempting to bring over their tried-and-tested methods.
Details: German media Sueddeutsche Zeitung reported that Spotlight Automotive, BMW’s first all-electric vehicle project with global partners outside Europe, has reached an impasse due to some fundamental differences in opinions.
Context: Global automakers have increased their EV efforts amid growing demand in China. However, after Beijing laid out plans to remove foreign ownership limits in the sector last year, some earlier-established JVs have been left in an awkward situation.
]]>More than 100 million drivers in China are now equipped with electronic toll collection (ETC) devices to pay automatically when driving on the country’s highways. The system will act as a platform for smart road technology in the future as well as autonomous vehicles.
Why it matters: The role of ETC is beginning to shift from a payment method to a way to connect vehicles amid a broader government push toward a national intelligent transport system for connected cars.
Details: The number of drivers in China using ETC devices is expected to grow a further 40% to 180 million by the end of this year, China’s Ministry of Transport said on Tuesday.
Context: China is working on deploying 5G-enabled C-V2X networks to link vehicles, road infrastructure, and passengers as the technology of choice for the commercialization of smart connected cars.
Didi Chuxing had spun off its autonomous driving unit into an independent company, it announced on Monday. The move may be part of efforts to refine its business structure ahead of a much-rumored IPO.
Why it matters: Didi is sharpening its focus on ride-hailing as well as vehicle-related services, while bringing other money-bleeding units under control following a reportedly RMB 11 billion ($1.5 billion) annual loss.
Details: Didi CTO Zhang Bo will act as CEO to lead the autonomous driving while Meng Xing, former executive director at investment firm Shunwei Captial, will be COO, according to a company announcement.
“The new company looks forward to further strategic collaborations with automakers and industry partners to promote the application of self-driving technologies in people’s everyday lives.”
—Zhang Bo, CTO of Didi Chuxing
Context: Didi is the latest Chinese company seeking external investors to help share the increasing cost of developing autonomous vehicles.
China’s largest search engine Baidu and ride-hailing platform Didi have beefed up their anti-graft campaigns, dismissing more than 40 employees and reporting wrongdoings to the police.
Why it matters: Increasing numbers of Chinese tech firms have launched anti-corruption campaigns as they seek to mimic the Chinese state’s approach to misconduct.
“Any employee who violates the law will not be tolerated. Serious cases will be sent to the public security department.” —Baidu wrote in a leaked email last week. The company confirmed the authenticity of the email to TechNode on Monday.
Details: Baidu dismissed 14 employees that were allegedly involved in 12 cases of internal corruption, the company said in its email. Allegations include bribery and infringing on trade secrets, among others.
Context: To encourage honest work, JD earlier this year went as far as sending employees on a prison tour in Beijing.
New energy vehicle watchers are concerned about the industry. NEV companies have struggled as the central government has pulled subsidies faster that the market was expecting.
In fact, China’s government is committed to developing the industry long-term—and it will support companies that align with its plans to climb the industrial ladder toward high-end electric cars. The current move to end subsidies coincides with the end of a plan for the period 2012-2020. Policy is changing priorities as the state drafts a new plan that will cover the 2021-2035 period.
The electric vehicles industry represents an opportunity to catch up in the automobile sector, which was already mature when China entered world markets. Fully electric vehicles are characterized by an architecture with less kinetic parts and less need for integration, presenting an opportunity for Chinese carmakers to skip phases in the development of automotive technology and directly leapfrog into the newest developments such as batteries and fuel cells.
State planners set out to win this new market by pushing the industry through an accelerated cycle of growth, using state incentives to build companies faster than the market would demand. This plan is continuing, and it will support those who can move to take advantage of coming policy priorities—but it will be a bumpy ride for anyone who doesn’t keep up.
From the planner’s perspective, the broad subsidies of the 2012 plan have done their job.
In 2012, the regulators predicted two stages of development that required different combinations of state and market:
In other words, Beijing always planned to pull subsidies once the industry was ready to stand on its own feet. Right now, there are nearly 500 enterprises in the sector and China is the world’s biggest market for NEVs, with about 50% of the global share. These conditions seem to fit the “maturity stage” described in the plan.
The rush for NEVs has been messy, but a review of the 2012 goals shows that in its own terms the plan has met most of its goals.
[infogram id=”nev-panic-1hxj48jjw1792vg?live”]
Sources: State Council Energy-Saving and New Energy Vehicle Industry Development Plan (2012-2020), Politech Research
However, these NEVs aren’t ready to compete with Tesla. Compared to leading international makers, domestic electric cars have shorter rangers, worse performance—and a nasty habit of blowing up.
State support helped get Chinese NEVs into the market—but now the goal is to get to the top. Expect subsidies to focus on innovation and building out NEV infrastructure.
In February this year the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced the beginning of preparations for the “New Energy Automobile Industrial Development Plan (2021-2035).” The new plan is expected to be much more targeted, promising support only for world-class technologies, and aiming to pursue major breakthroughs.
The 2021 plan is expected to emphasize industrial convergence, especially complete digital integration and leading progress on self-driven vehicles. Lithium batteries are already considered a competitive sector, but fuel-cells will be further subsidized and promoted. Charging infrastructure for full electric cars and hydrogen-powered fuel cells will enjoy boosted support, as well as the utilization and recovery management of power batteries.
During the transition period between the two plans, regulators are trying to address shortcomings from the 2012 plan:
After the rush to get started, and the cleanup from that rush, the next step is overtaking. The government will promote the efforts to create a high-tech integrated automobile industry. Small and not optimized companies and products may end up disappearing with the subsidies, but efforts to climb higher can still count on massive, Chinese-style support.
Following the industry’s leaders, the next steps to keep growing under the government’s umbrella will be integrating and joining efforts with tech giants such as Baidu to develop self-driving vehicles or researching and exploiting new technologies, especially hydrogen-powered fuel cells. Integration in plants and factories will also be encouraged under the “industrial internet” category.
Investors and enterprises have been cautious under the transition’s uncertainties, what means that this moment will benefit those who could read the market. Beijing’s economic plans are there to achieve its goals and are especially resilient of specific economic circumstances. There’s a lot of room to profit by working in their direction. The complete plan will not be released this year, but the drafting meetings and the actions taken by the industry leaders seem to be good measurements of the direction it is taking. The transition will have clear winners and losers, but the industry will continue to grow.
]]>Chinese electric vehicle maker Nio is reportedly cutting up to 40% of employees on its payroll focused on the research and development and marketing teams, while it will also sell its Formula E team as it deals with a liquidity crisis.
Why it matters: Nio has taken a series of measures to keep itself afloat and secured RMB 10 billion ($1.5 billion) in funding from a state-owned investor after it reported a sequential revenue decline and falling deliveries in the first quarter.
A Nio spokesperson on Friday night denied that it is cutting 40% of its staff. The company declined to comment further. Nio President Qin Lihong responded to Chinese media outlet 36Kr by saying the mass layoff reports were untrue, though the company is undergoing a round of restructuring to “improve business efficiency.”
Details: The reported job cuts affect a number of divisions including domestic R&D and marketing, as well as overseas units.
Context: The Chinese electric vehicle market is facing the start of a new era of competition as Tesla’s Shanghai gigafatory is nearly complete.
This article has been updated to include comment from Nio
]]>Didi Chuxing has joined forces with UK energy giant British Petroleum to build electric vehicle charging infrastructure in China, months after a breakdown in cooperation with domestic players.
Why it matters: The partnership marks an acceleration in the Chinese ride-hailer’s efforts to develop services for EV drivers as sales continue to boom.
Details: The two companies will set up a new joint venture in China to offer charging services not only to Didi drivers but to millions of general EV owners as well.
“We look forward to combining our strengths to create a robust EV charging network for China, promote the growth of the new energy automotive industry, and provide a better experience for car owners across the country.”
— Cheng Wei, Didi Chairman and CEO
Context: Didi made a solid entry into the EV charging business by forging alliances with Teld New Energy, Star Charge and iCharge as early as 2016. However, all three companies ended their cooperation in April and left its platform.
Chinese electric vehicle makers are in a strong position to take advantage as the mass adoption of new energy buses takes off worldwide, especially in Europe where half of all new models sold by 2030 will be electric, according to a research note from analysts at UBS.
Why it matters: Rapid growth in the European electric bus market provides a great chance for Chinese makers as they have already gained years of product development and commercial operation experience.
“For years, Chinese automakers have lagged behind in the development of traditional vehicles. However, we believe they have great advantages in the new era of electric vehicles,” (our translation)
UBS China Auto Analyst Shen Wei
Details: Europe posted electric bus sales of about 1,000 units last year, roughly 5% of total sales. UBS estimates the number will increase four-fold next year to make up one-fifth of the total.
Context: Beijing adopted a plan to subsidize its EV industry in 2009 and started the nationwide deployment of electric buses in 2015 with the aim of turning the country into a global leader in new energy vehicles.
Ride-hailing firm Didi and social media giant Tencent will set up a cybersecurity lab to deal with online and offline threats that could potentially affect their operations amid intensified government scrutiny.
Why it’s important: China is home to the world’s largest internet population. As the domestic internet has flourished, so too has an illicit market for personal data, which bad actors have used to conduct fraud, identity theft, and blackmail.
Details: Didi and Tencent announced the partnership on Tuesday, which will focus on information security, business security, and protection for emerging technologies including connected and autonomous vehicles.
Context: The Chinese government is intensifying its push to improve data protection in the country, calling for companies to answer for offenses such as overcollection of personal information as well as data breaches.
Singulato has hired Japanese chassis expert Takaaki Uno to act as CTO for vehicle engineering as the Chinese EV maker attempts to achieve production of its first commercial SUV model, the iS6, by the end of 2019.
Why it matters: Uno is tasked with helping Singulato to achieve what countless other Chinese EV startups have not—deliver cars to customers. Shipments of the iS6 have been pushed back multiple times originally from 2018, now to the end of the year.
“China is the world’s largest auto market and is best prepared in the electrified and intelligent revolutions for traditional automobiles. I am honored to have a new start here and work with Singulato for next-generation autonomous electric cars.” (our translation)
—Takaaki Uno, Singulato CTO Vehicle Engineering, in a statement
Details: The company announced on Monday that Uno will be fully in charge of the vehicle research and development and report to CEO Shen Haiyin.
Context: Uno is not the first Japanese auto expert to join a young player in China’s busy EV sector.
Chongqing on Friday opened China’s first 5G-enabled pilot zone for testing autonomous vehicles (AV) in a suburban area of the southwestern Chinese city, which has been eager to launch highly automated robotaxi services with local automakers.
Why it matters: Chongqing’s pilot zone is the first open-road pilot testing ground for driverless vehicles, a critical next step in the development of the technology and its ability to navigate actual driving scenarios. City governments are increasingly allowing companies test AVs on public roads in an effort to support AV development. A number of local governments including Guangzhou and Changsha have refined regulations to allow AV companies to shuttle passengers and test vehicles on highways.
Details: Chongqing’s 5G networks now only cover a total area 4.3 kilometers in length in the north of the city, and local automaker Chang’an is the first car manufacturer piloting its driverless vehicles, Chinese media reported.
Context: Chinese municipal governments are racing against each other to lead AV development in response to the central government’s push to develop core technologies.
Didi Chuxing on Thursday announced that it has closed a $600 million investment deal from Toyota Motor Corporation to jointly offer auto services for ride-hailing drivers on Didi’s platform.
Why it matters: The deal marks a big step forward for Didi, which seeks closer ties with traditional automakers to extend its dominance in the Chinese ride-hailing market. Other players across mobility and internet sectors, from OEMs to bike-rental firms to lifestyle platforms, are taking aim at the ride-hailing market in direct competition with Didi.
Details: Toyota, Didi, and GAC Toyota Motor will establish a joint venture offering car leasing, fleet management, and other vehicle-related services, said a Didi spokesman. Guangzhou-based GAC Toyota itself is a car manufacturing company formed between automakers GAC Group and Toyota in 2004.
“I am delighted that we are strengthening our collaboration—which utilizes Toyota’s connected technologies and next-generation BEVs—with DiDi … Looking ahead, we will work with DiDi to develop services that are more attractive, safe and secure for our customers in China.”
—Shigeki Tomoyama, Toyota executive vice president
Context: Global automakers and Chinese ride-hailing firms are shifting focus to comply with the central government’s goal of one electric car out of every five vehicles sold in 2025.
T3 Chuxing, a Chinese ride-hailing platform developed by three state-backed automakers, on Tuesday launched its business in the eastern Chinese city of Nanjing, in what many see as the most significant challenge yet to ride-hailing giant Didi’s near-monopoly over the industry.
Why it matters: T3, comprised of FAW, Dongfeng Motor, and Chang’an, are joining the hordes of Chinese car manufacturers flocking to the ride-hailing market, a component of the growing shared mobility sector, in an open challenge to market leader Didi Chuxing.
Details: T3 will expand its ride-hailing service to six major Chinese cities including Chongqing and Wuhan by year-end, and further to most provincial capitals by the end of 2020.
T3 was not immediately available to comment when contacted by TechNode on Tuesday.
Context: The Chinese mobility service market has grown at double-digit rates over the past several years, and is estimated to reach $656 billion by 2030, as is shown in reports from consulting firms McKinsey and PwC.
“If automakers just produce vehicles and don’t offer services to consumers by that time, it would be a huge shock to the entire [auto] industry.”
—Cui Dayong, T3 Chuxing CEO
]]>Didi Chuxing said Monday that it will set up a joint venture (JV) in the Middle East in a partnership with local investors, as the company expands its global footprint.
Why it matters: The deal is Didi’s latest push into countries within the Middle East and North Africa two years after it invested in the Dubai-based online taxi service platform Careem.
Details: Didi will form a JV headquartered in Abu Dhabi in a partnership with Symphony Investment, an Asia-focused investment firm mainly funded by Mohamed Alabbar, chairman of Dubai real estate giant Emaar Properties.
Context: The Chinese ride hailing giant has invested or partnered with seven overseas rivals, including Uber, Lyft, and India’s Ola, since it embarked on its global business expansion in 2015.
Toyota announced Friday that it will work with BYD to jointly develop all-electric vehicles and onboard batteries following an announcement in June about a battery deal with the Chinese electric automaker.
Why it matters: Growth in domestic new energy vehicle (NEV) sales are ramping up, and global OEMs are looking to grab share in the world’s largest auto market. June NEV sales rose 80% year on year to 152,000 as the central government continues to promote mass adoption of electric vehicles to fight climate change.
Details: Toyota and BYD will jointly develop battery electric vehicles (BEVs), including sedans and low-floor SUVs, as well as onboard batteries for the BEVs and other vehicles.
Context: The deal is the latest in a series of recent partnerships between global automakers and Chinese OEMs as the Chinese EV industry accelerates.
BMW will set up a computing center with one of its China allies, online gaming giant Tencent, to push forward the commercialization of driverless vehicles in the world’s biggest vehicle market.
Why it matters: BMW is accelerating the pace of major strategic moves as it draws closer to the mass production of its first L3 autonomous vehicle model in China in 2021.
Details: The computing center will begin initial operations before the end of year, focusing on safety validation of the L3 and early research for L4 technologies before mass production of the L3 vehicle in 2021, the company said in an announcement.
“Over the past year or so, the cooperation between Tencent and BMW has been deepened, which proves BMW’s recognition of Tencent’s technical strength in the fields of cloud computing, big data, security, and AI.”
—Dowson Tong, Tencent Cloud & Smart Industry president
Context: Tencent started its research in autonomous driving in 2016 with a major focus on HD mapping, data centers, and developing a simulation platform.
The government of Hainan Province, an island municipality in southern China, is significantly expanding its electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure network to as part of a larger push for EV adoption across the territory.
Why it matters: Hainan is pushing aggressively into EVs in response to a central government call to grow the total number of electric cars in China to 7 million units by 2025. Developing electric car technology, among other new vehicle innovations, is an major component of a government plan to achieve global leadership in core technologies.
Details: The Hainan government on Thursday announced that it was constructing 2,221 charging piles in an investment deal worth RMB 144 million (around $21 million), according to a Chinese media report.
Context: China leads globally in vehicle-to-charging pile ratio, and is looking to further invest in EV infrastructure. The central government stated in its Made in China 2025 initiative that the fuel consumption of passenger vehicles will be decline to about four liters for every 100 kilometers (around one gallon per 60 miles) by that time, and new energy vehicles should account for 80% of annual output.
Chinese ride-hailing firm Didi Chuxing is reportedly raising up to $2 billion from investors while bike-rental company Hellobike is seeking a $400 million cash infusion, the latest in a series of moves which signal that the two mobility firms are preparing for escalating competition.
Why it matters: Didi and Hellobike are now the biggest players in China’s ride-hailing and bike-rental markets, respectively, and they are increasingly moving onto each other’s turf.
Both Didi and Hellobike declined to comment on funding matters when contacted by TechNode on Thursday.
Details: Didi intends to sell additional shares at the same price as when it raised $500 million from US travel firm Booking Holdings in July 2018, the Wall Street Journal reported citing a person familiar with the matter. Hellobike’s new round of funding totaling $400 million is led by Ant Financial, Chinese media said Wednesday.
Context: Chinese ride-hailing and shared-bike markets are reshuffling as investment capital and regulations tighten. Big industry players are seeking new growth opportunities to increase their presence.
If you can’t see the YouTube player above, try watching here instead.
Chinese innovation investment has continued to shrink as investor fundraising has cooled further this year. Only 271 private equity and venture capital firms in the country raised funds in the first half, down by over half compared with a year ago.
Still, given that a number of VCs raised money in 2018, Jixun Foo, managing partner at GGV Capital, believes the problem is not a lack of money, but where money goes. “There needs to be new innovations that drive new capital deployment,” Foo said at the recent RISE conference in Hong Kong.
Foo honed in on China’s mobility sector, in which GGV has solid experience as an early backer of major player Hellobike.
In the space of just a few years, China’s bike-sharing sector has boomed. The industry still exhibits great growth potential with demand remaining strong among the country’s 1.4 billion people. Mobility players are now also focused on a new race to provide rental services for electric two-wheelers. Hellobike is one of the early movers, having rolled out shared e-scooters back in September 2017 when ofo and Mobike were still battling it out in the shared-bike market.
The Alibaba-backed company took another step forward in June this year, inking a RMB 1 billion ($145 million) deal with Ant Financial and CATL, the country’s largest battery manufacturer, to install battery-swapping stations nationwide for e-scooters. Ride-hailing giant Didi quickly followed suit, forming a two-wheeler business group the same month as it vies for market share.
“We believe China’s bike market goes very deep and is still growing,” (our translation) Fischer Chen, Hellobike’s chief financial officer, said at RISE. With about 250 million two-wheeler motorists nationwide, there are 700 million e-bike rides happening each day in the country, triple that of shared bikes, the company estimated.
China’s bike-sharing bubble has burst with dozens of players going bankrupt over the past years as funding dried up. The market cooled as authorities banned operators from putting additional cycles into circulation on the streets of key cities in late 2017. National technical standards on electric bikes followed and took effect in April this year.
In an interview with TechNode at RISE, Foo maintains that Hellobike could actually benefit from government regulation in terms of its technology and product capabilities.
Unlike ride-hailing, which is a serviced dependent on human drivers, bike-sharing is a business that basically relies on hardware, Foo said. This means it is more suitable for management using technology and rules. Some typical examples include locating bikes more accurately using IoT and educating users more effectively with regulations. One of the key issues is the efficient operation of the bikes, he added.
The Chinese short ride market, populated by shared bikes and e-scooter players, has undergone some key reshuffling. Ofo, once a pioneer in the bike-sharing boom, is now on verge of bankruptcy amid mounting debts and massive layoffs. Mobike has also scaled back expansions since Meituan took over. The city services giant posted an RMB 4.55 billion loss last year after the acquisition. Chen claims that Hellobike has snared more than 60% share of the bike-rental market and for the e-bikes, the share is even higher at around 80%.
In an interview with Chinese media earlier this year, Foo said as investors have returned to a more rational approach and the Chinese investment market is expected to see a higher capital efficiency over the next couple of years.
Efficiency is a constant area of focus throughout GGV’s investment portfolio. Hellobike has broken even in more than 100 domestic cities, CEO Yang Lei announced last October. The average operation cost for each blue and white bike is only RMB 0.3, while other players spend over RMB 1 to keep them in action.
Another GGV-invested company Xpeng Motors claimed a “much higher capital efficiency” compared with rivals, as the NEV startup focuses more on the mid-range market rather than luxury models. The recent nosedive in Nio’s stock price “is a good lesson for the rest of us… to try to be more efficient and more sustainable,” said Xpeng President Brian Gu at RISE. The company, a top seller among China’s EV players, claims it probably only needs to use a quarter of its capital to hit the same shipment numbers as Nio.
Foo maintains that the next wave of innovation is also on the way with the mass adoption of artificial intelligence and 5G across industries like logistics, automobiles, and healthcare.
“Last year we saw a number of IPOs and some of them didn’t do well, but things always go in cycles,” Foo said. “We see short-form videos from 3G to 4G, what will come next with 5G?” The venture capital firm is betting on mobility, electric vehicles, and smart cities going forward. It will invest more than one-third of its $1.88 billion of funding secured last year in the sectors.
With contributions from Wei Sheng.
Autonomous driving startup AutoX and Swedish electric vehicle maker NEVS are working together to deploy robotaxis in Europe by the end of 2020, according to a joint statement.
Why it matters: Chinese self-driving companies are taking an international approach to develop their technologies. In June, AutoX and rival Pony.ai were given the green light to run robotaxi services in California.
“AutoX enables companies like NEVS to become autonomous by creating an AI driver which is tailored to the specific geolocation it is in; adopting local driving styles, while also navigating in urban and dynamic conditions.”
— Xiao Jianxiong, CEO of AutoX
Details: NEVS is currently developing the robotaxi vehicle in Trollhättan, Sweden, and is taking design cues from a concept vehicle it teased at CES Asia in 2017.
Context: Following the partnership, AutoX will be testing its technology on three continents. In June, the company received permission to test its vehicles in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou.
Ride-hailing platform Didi will allow users to book rides operated by other companies within its app, the company said in a statement on Monday. The move follows Meituan’s recent foray into ride aggregation services.
Why it matters: The new service includes cars from platforms operated by state-backed automakers FAW, GAC, and Dongfeng Motors. Didi says that it currently has around 550 million users in the country.
Details: Didi will help auto manufacturers through its artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities and operational experience to build their capacity operating connected vehicles, the company said in its statement.
Context: In May, lifestyle services company Meituan, which runs its own ride-hailing platform, opened its app up to companies including Shouqi Limousine & Chauffeur, Caocao Chuxing, and Shenzhou. Didi was not included in the service.
Electric vehicle maker Xpeng Motors is facing a backlash from customers of its 2019 G3 model after it introduced a lower-priced, revamped version boasting a longer driving range just half a year after the launch of its first commercial model.
Why it matters: The incident is yet another hit to Xpeng’s credibility, following long delays in its production and accusations of intellectual property theft leveled against one of its executives by Tesla, his former employer.
Details: Some XPeng customers had just ordered the older G3 2019 edition days ago, and accused Xpeng sales staff of cheating them by hiding the impending new release.
Xpeng is currently carefully looking into customers’ feedback. If any alleged misleading sales conduct is confirmed, we will take all necessary steps to address any misconduct issues. We will protect the rights of our customers. Our customer service team is actively reaching out to customers to address their concerns and issues.
—Xpeng Motors spokeswoman response when contacted by TechNode on Monday
Context: Backed by big names including Alibaba, Xiaomi founder Lei Jun, and IDG Capital, Xpeng is one of the new EV makers dubbed “Tesla Killers” in China.
Guangzhou’s municipal government unveiled plans to become “China’s Detroit” by setting targets of nearly double current production capacity by 2025 with heavy emphasis on new energy and driverless vehicles.
Why it matters: Switching goals from becoming the world’s vehicle plant to a global powerhouse in smart and electric mobility are in line with the central government’s core initiatives.
Details: Guangzhou is offering strong financial support, including land resources and government funds, to bolster NEV companies clustered around the city, said the municipal government in a file released Wednesday.
Context: Guangzhou first laid out its vision of a “world-recognized motor city” in a government plan released in 2018, and is ramping up efforts reportedly after losing to Shanghai in a competition for Tesla’s first overseas Gigafactory.
Shouqi Limousine & Chauffeur, a ride-hailing service backed by state-owned transport company Shouqi Group, expects to make a profit by the end of this year, CEO Wei Dong said on Wednesday.
Why it matters: If Shouqi’s forecast holds true, China’s second largest ride-hailing service may be the first in the industry to break even.
Details: Shouqi is already profitable in Shanghai and Shenzhen, and its businesses in cities including Beijing and Guangzhou are nearing a break-even point, Wei said Wednesday in a letter sent to employees.
A Didi executive said on Wednesday at that the company has launched virtual banking services to its drivers and passengers in Brazil as the company expands in Latin America.
Why it matters: The Beijing-based ride-hailing giant is expanding its business to international markets such as Southeast Asia, Japan, and Latin America, the major fronts in its competition with Uber.
“In some of the countries or regions, our peers are already there. But there are still many user pain points waiting for us to solve. So we go there and address the local people’s pain points.“
— Zheng Bu, Didi’s chief security officer
Details: Didi said that many people in Brazil don’t have a bank account so drivers and passengers cannot make online transactions with the ride-hailing platform. Zheng said the company offers virtual banking services to drivers by providing them with a MasterCard debit card, called the 99 Card.
Context: In Brazil, the most populous country in Latin America, around one-third of adults were unbanked as of end-2017, according to a World Bank report.
China is working on changing the new energy vehicle (NEV) mandate policy, also known as dual credit policy, in an effort to close an emissions loophole that automakers were exploiting.
Why it matters: Automakers in China piled into the electric vehicle market in response to incentives created by local governments which, in its calculus, weighted the production of electric vehicles five-to-one. By producing EVs instead of developing and producing energy-saving technologies for traditional vehicles, automakers could more easily meet emission targets.
Details: China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) released a modified version of its NEV policy on Tuesday, which stipulates that fuel-efficient vehicles could offset 20% of the credits set for corresponding electric cars.
Context: The central government is adjusting its policy in an aim to balance the country’s overheating EV market.
Didi announced on Monday that it will raise ride fares in the capital city of Beijing beginning July 11 to attract more qualified drivers as shortages become a major concern for ride-hailing services.
Why it matters: Didi’s challenges mount as competition intensifies and regulation remains strict, prompting concerns that it will further cede share to other players.
“The disparity between supply and demand in Beijing has grown severe despite taking a series of measures to ease the situation.”
— Didi announcement
Details: Base fares for Beijing riders will increase RMB 1 to RMB 14 (around $2) during morning and evening peak times, as well as for late night service.
Context: Chinese ride-hailing companies have shifted focus from competing for users to attracting qualified drivers, a limited resource in many cities, according to a Jiemian report citing Wei Dong, CEO of state-owned ride-hailing service Shouqi.
All-electric double-decker buses delivered to London – Mass Transit
What happened: Chinese electric vehicle (EV) company BYD, which partnered with British manufacturer Alexander Dennis Limited (ADL) in the UK, delivered five double decker electric buses to London bus operator Metroline earlier this week of the total 37 purchased. The buses will serve Route 43 which runs nine miles from Friern Barnet to London Bridge. The fully electric, emission-free BYD ADL Enviro400EV bus model is assembled at ADL’s facility in Britain while the powered chassis is built at BYD’s plant in Hungary.
Why it’s important: The alliance between BYD and ADL began in July 2015 when the two companies inked its first deal worth £19 million ($24 million) to build London’s first zero emission fleet of 51 single deck buses, reported Sina Finance. BYD’s iron-phosphate battery technology enables the buses run all day on a single charge using cost-effective off-peak electricity, according to the company. Chinese automakers are stepping up moves into the global market as the domestic auto market shrinks. BYD recently opened its sixth electric bus plant outside China in Canada focusing on assembling buses for the country’s largest public transport operator. Great Wall Motor, reportedly set a goal at the beginning of the year to make its sub-brand Haval the world’s biggest SUV maker within the next five years.
]]>Didi Forms Electric Vehicle Joint Venture With Hainan State Firms – Caixin Global
What happened: Ride-hailing giant Didi and two state-owned firms have set up an electric vehicle services joint venture (JV) in the southern island province of Hainan. The new company, which also includes a subsidiary of China Southern Power Grid (CSPG) and an investment branch of the Hainan government as partners, will lease and sell electric vehicles (EV), and manage charging infrastructure.
Why it’s important: Hainan hopes to become a trailblazer in EV sales and production, even going as far as planning a province-wide ban on fossil fuel-driven vehicles by 2030. Meanwhile, Didi has been forging partnerships to give its drivers access to more charging facilities. CSPG has invested more than RMB 3 billion (around $436 million) to set up 23,000 charging outlets in the region. Another 12,000 are expected to go online by the end of 2019. China leads the world in terms of access to EV charging facilities, according to consultancy firm Alix Partners. The country was home to seven vehicles per charger in 2018, compared with the nearly 20 cars for every pile in the US.
]]>Ofo flew too close to the sun. Their dockless bikeshare model blew my mind when I first moved to China (I snuck a ridiculous quote into the China Times) and for a time Ofo was perhaps the hottest startup in the world. But by 2019, half the Ofo bikes I try to unlock in Beijing are broken, thousands have lined up outside Ofo HQ to demand refunds on their RMB 200 (about $29) deposits, and their CEO is now on a blacklist and barred from leaving the country.
Why was the rise so precipitous? A sexy model and investor FOMO. The model of spreading bikes around cities and allowing users to unlock the bikes with their phones for an upfront deposit and 25 cents per ride at first was incredibly attractive. Financial analyses of the firm “raised the fighting spirits of investors” who worried that if they weren’t able to wriggle their way into Ofo’s cap table, “everyone would know that they weren’t top-tier funds.”
On the WeChat public account GQ Report, Wei Shijie examines the history of the two-wheeled Icarus, concluding that what really doomed the company was its attempt to play Tencent and Alibaba off against each other
Wei Shijie, GQ Report, June 17, 2019
Wei writes that enormous funding rounds (at its height, Ofo raised an Alibaba-backed $866 million round on a $3 billion valuation) combined with a fierce battle for market share with competitor Mobike led, unsurprisingly, to reckless spending.
“Just think about winning the war—don’t worry about money” was the key internal slogan echoing in employees’ ears. Describing that time, one employee said, “It’s like when a poor person wins a million dollars in a lottery, but the requirement is that you need to spend half of it to keep the other half. You don’t know how to spend the cash, so you just blow it.”
So the firm spent tens of millions on Facebook ads alone to spark overseas growth, offered heated toilets and “Google-level” food to attract top talent, and spent extra for rush orders on bikes.
What was the turning point? According to Wei (seconded by a Pony Ma WeChat Moments post), it came down to veto rights.
Experienced entrepreneurs know: Under normal circumstances, do not accept investments from two (or more) of Tencent, Alibaba, or Baidu at the same time. But Ofo CEO Dai Wei allowed the Tencent Department’s Didi and Alibaba’s Ant Financial Service to sit on Ofo’s board of directors. Today, behind every business story, there’s also a capital investment story. It is dangerous to violate common sense.
Balancing investments from internet giants, Wei writes, is a dangerous game in the Chinese startup landscape. While Didi CEO Cheng Wei was able to keep both Tencent and Alibaba somewhat happy, Wang Xing’s acceptance of Tencent money provoked Alibaba to pour billions into Meituan direct competitor Ele.me. In this case, Ofo’s decision to open a WeChat mini-app (which does not accept Alipay) convinced Alibaba that Ofo could no longer be trusted. Ali convinced an early shareholder to transfer his board veto to them, thus enabling them to block potential buyout offers by Didi. Said one investor, “As soon as Ali joined the board, Ofo had no more moves to make.”
Xu Xiaoping, the founder of Zhenfund, said, “Dai was president of the Peking University Student Union [seen as a stepping stone to political success]. Secondly, he went to Guizhou to teach after graduation. This means he’s an idealist. If I don’t invest in this sort of founder, who do I invest in?”
These ideals also led him to fight it out to the last breath. Dai told employees who pushed him to take a buyout that “experience is worth more than money.”
So, Wei writes, Dai went to war. In May 2018, he called a company meeting to release a plan called “Victory Day.”
In front of a hundred colleagues, he recalled the movie “The Darkest Hour,” comparing Ofo to England wavering at the start of World War II. He used Churchill’s example to exhort Ofo to never give up, defend its freedom, and fight until the last RMB.
After taking this stand, there were some small victories. Ofo started selling full-screen video ads that users would have to endure before unlocking their bikes, bringing in over $15 million.
But, Wei writes, the writing was on the wall. With Alibaba vetoing any further cash investment, and Didi having decided to build its own bike-share empire by buying out competitor Bluegogo, Ofo wasn’t able to keep up its service. (In Beijing, half the Ofo bikes this translator tried to unlock were broken.) At some point, customers lost faith that their deposits would be refunded, and a “bank run” of sorts began. Right now, there’s a line of over 10 million users waiting to get their RMB 200 back.
Bicycle graveyards began to proliferate across China. One photographer quoted was most struck by the bikes “weeping.” It took him a moment to realize that this was the sound of the electronic lock failing. “If you only hear this sound once or twice, it sounds like a cicada. But when its one after another, it hits your ears like a tidal wave. These bikes have been treated so roughly, they’re trying to tell us their story with this scream.”
]]>Baidu and a coalition from the automotive industry have released a set of guiding principles for autonomous vehicles (AV), promoting a system of “safety by design” as conversations about self-driving cars go mainstream.
The coalition includes Daimler, BMW, Intel, Volkswagen, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, Audi, and automotive supplier Continental, among others.
“In addition to offering broader access to mobility, [automated driving] can also help to reduce the number of driving-related accidents and crashes. When doing so, the safety of automated driving vehicles is one of the most important factors,” the group said, explaining the motivation behind the principles.
AV proponents have pointed out that the vehicles could end up being safer than human-driven cars. However, the coalition highlights a number of topics that need to be resolved in order to meet this goal.
The nearly 150-page document covers 12 areas including cybersecurity protection, driver-vehicle handovers, data recording, coping with component failures, and awareness of an autonomous system’s limitations. According to the group, balancing safety and availability in Level 3 and Level 4 autonomous vehicles, those that require human interventions in certain scenarios, is difficult to balance.
AV safety will peak when operations are optimized but restricted to certain driving scenarios, the group says. However, if restrictions are too high, safety goals cannot be reached due to limited availability. The same is true when limitations are too liberal.
“Being too risk-averse leads to a system that is overly conservative, and the system availability becomes too low, which in turn will not provide the benefits of a safer and more comfortable customer experience,” the report said.
The principles also highlight the importance of cybersecurity. A slew of possible safety risks arise from malicious actors seeking to take advantage of the connected vehicles, which could possibly allow them to gain access to a car’s controls.
In June, cybersecurity firm Regulus Cyber was able to spoof a Tesla’s GPS system to redirect it off a highway. However, the researchers had to put an antenna on the vehicle in order to launch the attack.
Similarly, in April, Tencent’s Keen Security Lab was able to trick a Tesla into switching lanes. The researches put stickers on the road to fool the vehicle into altering its behavior. Though the attack didn’t require any hacking, it highlights how AVs could be manipulated if safety issues are not thoroughly assessed and resolved.
The principles draw attention to a reliance on data, whether gathered by sensors or provided by maps and GPS, in order for AVs to function properly. “If the integrity or authenticity of this data is compromised, the building blocks of the automated driving functions will use faulty data to maneuver the vehicle, which might result in inaccurate driving or other deviations from correct operation,” it said.
]]>北京计划分阶段将出租车替换为电动车 – Caixin
What happened: Beijing municipal government will replace all gas-powered taxis with electric cars over the next two years, Xu Heyi, chairman of BAIC Motor Corp, said on Tuesday. Speaking at the first World New Energy Vehicle Congress (WNEVC) in the southern Chinese city of Boao, Xu said that gas-powered taxi replacement is ongoing and the new vehicles are equipped with functions such as fast charging and exchangeable batteries. Last month, the city government released a two-year action plan, requiring local taxi operators to deploy a total of 20,000 new EVs over the next two years. BAIC will supply all the new vehicles.
Why it’s important: China is accelerating its pace to develop new energy vehicles as it take aim at the global EV auto race. Electric vehicles are a featured government sustainability initiative along with the tougher vehicle emission standards which took effect in the beginning of the year. Beijing is not the first Chinese city aggressively promoting new energy vehicles: Shenzhen replaced all gas-powered taxis with electric cars in December, and Shenzhen-based BYD was the sole supplier. China’s largest EV maker, BYD sells more than 60% of its pure electric cars for public transport.
]]>Didi will spend another RMB 2 billion ($300 million) on safety improvements this year including driver management and customer service, as it continues to go “all-in” on keeping users safe.
The company “works day and night” to be an open and transparent platform and welcomes public scrutiny, President Jean Liu said at Didi’s first media day since the murders of two users of its carpooling service Hitch last year.
The ride-hailing giant has removed more than 306,000 unqualified and fraudulent drivers from its platform since the incidents and set up a special safety team of more than 2,500 workers. It has also brought in 9,000 customer service staff to handle 300,000 daily calls on average.
In addition, 99% of cars are now equipped with audio recording capabilities and one out of five are monitored with onboard cameras following a trial project. The company plans to increase the coverage to over half by the year-end, and will pay the majority of costs incurred, according to Vice-president Lai Chunbo. The encrypted recordings, only accessible to Didi’s safety team and law enforcement, are deleted with seven days of each fare.
Didi invested heavily following the incidents amid public outcry and intense government scrutiny, making a monumental shift in focus from growth to compliance. The company reportedly suffered a loss of RMB 10.9 billion for last year, amid continued driver subsidies and a clampdown on non-compliant drivers.
China’s ride-hailing landscape has changed greatly over the past year, with dozens of new players, including tech companies and automakers, piling in to get a piece of the potentially lucrative market. Life service platform Meituan began offering ride-hailing in late 2017, followed by Ant Financial-backed Hellobike a year later. Tencent partnered with GAC Group to launch Ontime in late June.
Didi has moved quickly to compete with rivals and introduced third-party ride-sharing services in May. Senior vice-president Fu Qiang said talks with local regulators have also taken place as part of efforts to tackle a driver shortage, as industry regulations are “fairly diverse” across different areas.
Fu admitted that investment in safety will affect business performance in the short-term, but maintained that the drive benefits the company’s long-term development. “More secure services are now being offered and therefore passengers are more content with their trips,” (our translation) he added.
Jean Liu would not reveal a timeframe with regards to when suspended carpooling service Hitch would come back online, but confirmed that it would take onboard public opinion to help revamp the product.
This article was corrected to reflect that Didi will invest RMB 2 billion in safety this year, not next year.
Tesla vehicle fire in Shanghai caused by single battery module – TechCrunch
What happened: Tesla on Friday released its investigation results for a car fire in Shanghai, saying the incident involving one of its cars catching fire in Shanghai was caused by failure of a single battery module in the front of the vehicle. The US EV giant said its investigation team found no defects in the car’s systems after analyzing the battery, software, manufacturing data, and vehicle history. The company issued a software update to protect the battery and improve its longevity in Model S and Model X vehicles. An update to Model 3 vehicles was not provided.
Why it’s important: Tesla said on Weibo that passengers will “have enough time to get out of the car” if its vehicles ignite, and restated that its vehicles catch fire far less frequently than gasoline-powered cars. The statement was poorly received by Chinese netizens. “What is the statement talking about? Teslas safely ignite and should be rewarded?” (our translation) read one comment on the company’s Weibo announcement which received more than 550 likes. Tesla’s statement was released immediately after Chinese EV maker Nio began recalling nearly 5,000 of its flagship ES8 SUVs and apologized, following three incidents of its cars catching fire in two months.
]]>Electric vehicle (EV) maker Nio has lost two members of its management team just days after announcing a recall of more than a quarter of its vehicles in China.
Angelika Sodian, managing director of the company’s business in the United Kingdom, said on LinkedIn over the weekend that she is leaving Nio. Sodian had been with the company for more than four years, with positions in China, Germany, and the UK. Prior to her role as managing director, Sodian was Nio’s human resources director for Europe.
“I have thought about this decision for a long while, but there are certain moments in life when you feel it is time for new priorities, ” she said.
Meanwhile, Zhuang Li, head of Nio’s software team, is leaving the EV company to found a vehicle software company, 36kr reported. Nio’s software teams in Beijing and Shanghai were split prior to Zhuang’s departure, and founder Li Bin will now oversee the business.
Zhuang joined Nio in July 2016 as vice president of software research and development, taking charge of vehicle software design, including digital cockpits and networking services.
Zhuang co-founded internet of vehicle solutions company Meijia Technology, Chinese media previously reported. Public records show that the company was registered in Hong Kong in August 2018. Digital cockpit systems, onboard networking controllers, and voice-enabled in-car operating systems are among its main businesses.
Both Zhuang and Sodian left for personal reasons, a Nio spokesperson told TechNode on Monday.
Their departures come just days after Nio announced a massive recall of nearly 5,000 vehicles as a result of a battery fault that could result in fires. The recall followed three incidents in which Nio vehicles spontaneously combusted, as well as a government order urging Chinese EV makers to conduct checks for potential safety hazards and take necessary precautions, including recalls, to prevent any further incidents.
Nio has faced mounting pressure on its business since the beginning of the year. Apart from a slowdown in the Chinese auto market and economy, the company has fallen victim to government measures to battle overcapacity in China’s bloated automotive sector.
Nio’s share price has fallen by more than 75% since March when it announced that it was abandoning plans to build a production plant in Shanghai’s Jiading District. The move followed a directive from the National Development and Reform Commission, China’s top planning agency. The company will now have to wait until US rival Tesla has reached capacity at its plant in Shanghai, which is expected to be completed later this year, before building its own factory in the city.
The company has reported a steady decline in sales. In the first quarter, deliveries dropped to around 4,000 vehicles, down by 50% compared with the fourth quarter of 2018. Nio has suffered from decreasing government subsidies, a macroeconomic slowdown, and the US-China trade war, CFO Louis Hsieh said during an earnings call in May.
Additional reporting by Jill Shen.
]]>Myanmar entrepreneur buys unused bicycles for poor children – Bangkok Post
What happened: Lesswalk, a nonprofit initiative launched by Myanmar-based tech entrepreneur Mike Than Tun Win, has bought 10,000 unused rental bikes left over from shuttered bike rental businesses including Obike, Ofo, and Mobike from Singapore and Malaysia. Lesswalk donates the bikes to school kids in Myanmar, many of whom lack transportation to and from school. Sponsors of the initiative paid for around half of the estimated $400,000 needed to buy, ship, and refurbish the bikes. Lesswalk covered the balance of the cost.
Why it’s important: As China’s bike rental boom cools, vast piles of abandoned bikes have become a familiar sight in many big cities in China and overseas. Bike rental operators, once hailed as environment-friendly businesses, face increasing criticism for wastefulness. The discarded bikes, some of which are unused, have been languishing due to high retrieval costs. Many bike rental firms are too cash strapped to solve the issue themselves.
]]>Electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer Nio on Thursday issued a recall of more than a quarter of all vehicles sold, saying that it has found a battery flaw that could result in potential safety hazards.
The move follows several incidents in which the company’s cars have self-ignited, as well as a government order calling for EV makers to minimize the risks of battery fires.
Nio said in a statement on microblogging platform Weibo that the recall will affect more than 4,800 of its flagship ES8 SUVs sold between April and October 2018. As of the end of May the company had delivered around 17,500 vehicles. Nio said that in extreme cases the flaw could result in a battery short circuit and that it would issue new batteries for any affected vehicles.
The recall follows three separate incidents in recent months in which ES8s have caught fire. In April, a Nio vehicle ignited while parked at a service center in central China. A month later an ES8 caught fire while parked at the company’s headquarters in Shanghai. A third fire broke out in June in the central Chinese city of Wuhan.
Nio said it had found the flaw following an investigation into the recent incidents. An initial inquiry found that one of the fires had been caused by a short circuit, which the company said occurred as a result of chassis damage. Meanwhile, two of US EV maker Tesla’s vehicles self-combusted in China during the same period. Tesla has not released the results of its investigation.
“We apologize to users and the public for the troubles caused by recent battery safety incidents,” Nio said in its recent statement on Weibo.
Earlier this month, China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology issued an order urging EV makers to investigate the fires and take all necessary precautions to prevent further incidents. The government body said that it would require recalls if any quality issues were found, and checks should include vehicles that had already been sold. The ministry promised to punish companies that intentionally hide problems.
]]>BYD, China’s largest electric vehicle maker, will promote its focus on design to a strategic level following Tuesday’s opening of the company’s global design center in the southern city of Shenzhen, manned by an all-star team of industry veterans from Audi, Ferrari, and Mercedes-Benz.
“Technology is BYD’s hard strength, and design will become the soft strength of the company,” said Wang Chuanfu, president and chairman of the Warren Buffet-backed company, at the opening ceremony. BYD’s product strategies will shift from focusing on technology to also incorporating design, he said, adding that it not only sells cars to business clients, but also seeks a larger presence in the consumer-facing market as well.
The move comes months after BYD brought on-board two renowned designers from Ferrari and Mercedes-Benz. JuanMa López, former head of exterior design at Ferrari, joined as global exterior design director in December, while Michele Jauch-Paganetti, the former design center head at Mercedes-Benz, came in as chief interior design director earlier this year. Wolfgang Egger, previously chief of design at Audi, has been BYD’s head designer since late 2016.
BYD is ramping up efforts to snare customers from premium brands by evolving its utilitarian cars into more desirable models. The carmaker unveiled the E-SEED GT, the first joint effort from the new design team, at this year’s Auto Shanghai industry show in April. The futuristic design concept reflects the sleek lines of the Chinese dragon, and the company plans to feature more Chinese cultural symbols in future models.
The Chinese automobile market moved into a lower gear late last year and there are no signs of a catch-up so far in 2019. The country’s total sales of passenger vehicles slumped 17.4% year-on-year to 1.6 million in May, according to the latest figures from the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM). May sales at top-tier domestic automakers SAIC and Chang’an fell 16.7% and 34.7%, respectively.
Chinese OEMs have also suffered flagging sales of EVs, reporting overall growth of just 1.8% last month, as the government scales back purchase subsidies to cool the overheated market. Sales at Chang’an and BAIC fell 53.5% and 49.2%, respectively, year on year in May in sharp contrast to BYD, which posted a rise of 53.8% to 21,899 units. However, BYD failed to halt sliding gasoline vehicle sales last month as they fell by almost half to 12,021.
BYD says it works with more than 200 designers around the world when coming up with models for local markets, including passenger cars, commercial vehicles, and urban railways. The company opened its first Canadian plant on Tuesday with an initial focus on bus assembly and has secured an order for 10 EV buses from Toronto Transit Commission, the country’s largest public transport agency, with an option for 30 more.
]]>Tencent has aligned with state-backed GAC Group to launch a ride-hailing platform named OnTime in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou this week. Chinese tech companies and automakers are battling to secure a piece of the ride-hailing industry in order to gain a stake in the mobility market of the future.
OnTime on Wednesday announced in a WeChat post that it began a two-day trial in four urban districts in the city, offering rides costing RMB 0.01. The Tencent-backed startup plans to officially launch the service in Guangzhou later this month, expand into the Greater Bay Area region, and then the rest of the country. The company’s namesake app has been available for download starting from Wednesday.
Earlier this year, GAC unveiled its investment plan to set up a RMB 1 billion ($150 million) mobility firm with a list of investors including Tencent and Guangzhou Public Transport Group. GAC and Tencent are the two largest shareholders, owning a respective 35% and 25% of the joint venture. The two companies first partnered in November 2017 when they inked a strategic partnership to explore cloud-based, intelligent, and connected vehicle solutions.
China has become the world’s largest ride-hailing market, and it is expected to double in volume to $70 billion over the next three years, research figures from Bain & Company show. Following entries by Meituan and Hellobike into the market, state-owned SAIC also launched a high-end ride-hailing service Xiangdao in December. The company says it is available in more than 154 domestic cities with upwards of 1.3 million users and 1,000 business clients. Global auto brands are also offering ride-hailing in China, including BMW, Ford, and Daimler.
However, ride-hailing giants worldwide are struggling to keep their cash-bleeding businesses afloat, prompting concerns about their sustainability. Tencent-invested Didi laid off 2,000 employees to refocus on its core business earlier this year, after reportedly losing nearly RMB 11 billion in 2018. Both Uber and Lyft recorded around $1 billion losses in the first quarter of this year and expect the heavy losses to continue in 2019.
]]>Chinese autonomous vehicle (AV) startups, AutoX and Pony.ai, are joining an exclusive group of companies approved to offer self-driving rides to the public in California after receiving approvals from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) on Tuesday.
The certificate, which expires on June 18, 2022, means the companies are approved to transport people in driverless vehicles for testing over the public highways in the state over the next three years under the state’s Autonomous Vehicle Passenger Service pilot. Vehicles must have a trained test driver behind the wheel ready to take over, charge no fees, and provide regulators with quarterly reports for each AV operating in the program.
AutoX said that it was the first carrier to offer robotaxi pilot service to residents in California in a press release sent to TechNode on Thursday. Around 10 Level 4 driverless vehicles will be introduced through a mobile application in some areas of north San Jose and Santa Clara cities.
Pony.ai was not immediately available for comment and so far has been quiet on whether it will roll out the service, reported Chinese media.
CPUC granted the first permit to US self-driving startup Zoox in December last year. The Foster City, California-based company reportedly plans to launch its autonomous ride-hailing service in San Francisco in 2020.
So far, more than 60 companies, including Zoox, AutoX, and Pony.ai, have already obtained permits from the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) for AV testing on public roads, but they need separate permits from the state utilities commission to offer public transport services.
AutoX and Pony.ai have also been among the first batch of recipients for licenses to conduct road testing in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou earlier this month, along with Guangzhou Automobile Group, and Chinese self-driving startups WeRide and Deepblue.
Pony.ai is so far the best-performing Chinese AV company, ranking fifth with 1,022.3 MpD (Miles per Disengagement) in the annual autonomous vehicle testing report released by the California DMV. Its outcome was far higher than its peers including Baidu (205.6), AutoX (190.8), and WeRide (173.5), but still way behind Alphabet subsidiary Waymo which had one disengagement every 11,017 miles.
AutoX, however, reported the largest number of miles traveled among the six Chinese companies at 22,710 miles between Nov. 31, 2017 through Dec. 1, 2018, followed by Baidu, whose vehicles traveled 18,093 miles in the same period.
]]>2.5亿标的无法执行 法院认定ofo“无财产” – Xinhua
What happened: A bike manufacturer in the northern Chinese city of Tianjin has taken bike rental company Ofo to court over a RMB 250 million (around $36.2 million) unfulfilled bicycle production bid. However, the court found that Ofo has no assets, including real estate, investments, or vehicles. In addition, the company’s bank accounts have been frozen by other courts. Since Ofo has no way to pay for the bid, enforcement has been suspended. As of Wednesday, Ofo has received more than 170 enforcements from courts around China. Several of the company’s executives have also been blacklisted, prohibiting them from buying high-class services in China, including first-class air travel and stays in luxury hotels.
Why important: Ofo has yet to refund 15 million users’ deposits, but still claims that the company is operating normally. Following reports of the company’s cash crunch, users have requested their deposits be returned en masse, with the company owing more than RMB 14 billion. In addition, Ofo reportedly owes billions to its suppliers. The latest court appearance draws even more attention to Ofo’s financial issues.
This article has been corrected to change the value of the production bid to RMB 250 million. It originally stated RMB 25 billion.
]]>Chinese electric vehicle (EV) maker Chehejia (CHJ) is planning to restructure into a variable interest entity (VIE) and register an offshore holding company for a possible listing overseas.
According to an announcement released Tuesday by major shareholder Zhejiang Leo Company Ltd, one of its Hong Kong subsidiaries will subscribe approximately 68.6 million shares of Leading Ideal Inc, a Cayman Islands corporation which will be jointly owned by CHJ shareholders.
CHJ will be indirectly controlled by Leading Ideal Inc, after it completes the restructuring using the VIE structure, said Zhejiang Leo. The Shenzhen-listed company, which owns about 7.5% shares of CHJ, said the deal was “in line with CHJ’s reorganizing” and that its ownership stake will be the same under the new structure.
“Public listing is an inevitable choice [for CHJ], as it has been hard for the company to raise funds in private capital markets,” (our translation) reported China Business Journal citing an industry insider. Chinese companies that list in the US mostly use a foreign incorporated company as the listed company. CHJ declined to comment when contacted by TechNode on Tuesday.
The deal comes at the same time as reports that Chinese billionaire, Meituan CEO Wang Xing will lead a $500 million fundraising round in the EV maker, investing $300 million for 10% share. This round will value the company at $2.9 billion. Chinese media reported that Wang previously expressed his appreciation for CHJ founder Li Xiang, a Chinese auto veteran, and optimism about the Chinese EV market.
Bytedance may also invest $30 million in this round, which was to close by June according to a Reuters report. CHJ has raised around RMB 7 billion (around $1.01 billion) from investors including venture capital firm Matrix China, and government-backed Shougang Fund. The EV maker plans to deliver its first all-electric SUV model Leading Ideal ONE in the fourth quarter of this year, and said it expects production capacity of 50,000 units by the end of the first half of 2020.
Chinese EV makers have been struggling to raise funds and scale their capital-intensive businesses following a reduction in government subsidies. Another EV startup, Xpeng Motors, is about to close a roughly $600 million round of funding this year, according to a CNBC report. The Guangzhou-based company announced Tuesday it had just completed production of 10,000 units of its first commercial model G3 SUV, for which it previously set a goal of delivering 10,0000 units by July.
]]>滴滴发内部员工信:宣布整合升级成立两轮车事业部 – Tencent News
What happened: Didi has formed a two-wheeler business group according to an internal letter released late Monday, a person close to the company confirmed with TechNode on Tuesday. The company is ramping up efforts to compete for China’s 300 million motorists with the new group which combines its bike-rental business unit and another team running a platform named Jietu for motor scooter rentals.
Why it’s important: Chinese mobility giants are expanding their businesses from offering ride-hailing services to serving users with two-wheelers for short rides, hoping to diversify revenues. Ant Financial-backed Hellobike, also known as Hello TransTech, is setting up a nationwide battery exchange and charging network for electric bikes and scooters in a RMB 1 billion ($145 million) partnership with the world largest battery maker, CATL. On average, there are 700 million e-bike rides each day in China, triple that of shared bikes, Yang Lei, CEO of Hellobike said at a public event last week. China had more than 250 million electric motor scooters on the streets as of late 2018, and that number is expected to increase to 400 million by 2050, reported China News citing figures from an industry association.
]]>After a number of videos showing car fires involving electric cars have gone viral online in China, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) is urging electric vehicle (EV) makers to launch immediate investigations into the fires, and conduct follow-up checks using “all possible means.”
The ministry is requiring EV companies in a file released Monday to start investigations and report results “in a timely and faithful manner.” Authorities will require recalls if investigations confirm any quality issues, and punishment will be doled out for hiding any problems, the ministry said.
Authorities also urged EV makers to conduct a “complete” safety check on cars including those already sold, including testing key components such as batteries and charging devices and submitting a report by the end of October. Companies will also need to establish 24-hour crisis hotlines to address incidents, notify affected customers, and report to the government when necessary.
The requirements follow shortly after a Nio ES8 caught fire in a parking space on the street in the central Chinese city of Wuhan on Friday. The incident was the third incident involving one of its vehicles combusting in the past two months, the company confirmed. Nio in early May attributed the first reported case of one of its vehicles in April catching fire in Xi’an to a severe chassis impact which caused the car battery to short circuit.
Two weeks later, another of its premium SUV models caught fire in a parking lot near the company’s headquarters in Shanghai. Two of Tesla’s Model S vehicles combusted in separate incidents around the same period. Neither Nio or Tesla have revealed the results of their investigations, prompting broad criticism on Chinese social networks.
“The government should order Nio to immediately stop selling until it figures out the problems and communicates the results,” (our translation) a netizen commented in a Weibo announcement released Friday by Nio.
The impending summer will only bring rising temperatures so self-igniting incidents will definitely continue, another user remarked.
]]>If you can’t see the YouTube player above, try watching here instead.
Two automakers unveiled their visions of the future of driving at CES Asia 2019, with the hopes of improving drivers’ lives through increased autonomy and humanized design.
Hoping to better conditions for truck drivers in China, autonomous truck technology startup Inceptio unveiled its first model—the Inceptio No. 1—at CES Asia 2019 in Shanghai, China last week.
The truck features sensors placed around the vehicle. Using data from these sensors, Inceptio’s autonomous driving software is able to maneuver the vehicle with millimeter accuracy and quick reaction times, the company claims.
“Today, driving a big truck is a manual job. It’s physically challenging and requires high skill levels,” said Julian Ma, CEO of Inceptio. “It’s not a very desirable job for many people because [it means being] away from home with long hours and night driving.”
Ma is also the president of G7 Networks, an Internet of Things startup. He was the corporate vice-president at Tencent prior to founding Inceptio.
Inceptio No. 1 is a Level 3 autonomous vehicle—the truck can monitor the environment and manage most aspects of driving under certain conditions. However, driver intervention is still required when the vehicle cannot navigate some scenarios.
With Level 3 autonomy, Inceptio hopes to relieve truck drivers of grueling periods of concentration and also improve the efficiency of long-haul interstate logistics.
Inceptio says it will enter mass production within the next five years and eventually provide a nationwide logistics service via autonomous trucks powered by the company’s technology.
“By combining the lower labor cost, higher fuel efficiency, and the much stronger network effects, we anticipate that just with our Level 3 technology, the whole logistics industry can reduce existing cost levels by more than 10%,” Ma said.
Unlike Inceptio, Hyundai Mobis presented attendees with their vision of what it could be like to drive in the future.
Mobis showed off two concept vehicles at CES, hoping to attract Chinese consumers with its technologies. By incorporating what the company calls “virtual space touch technology” into the operating system, drivers can control the car through hand gestures.
Communication lighting outside the vehicle can also quickly identify the surrounding environment and interact with pedestrians.
David Cho, general manager of the Interior & Exterior Business Team at Mobis China Sales Center, believes that these technologies will be more mature and cheaper in the future.
“We believe in the [next] five or 10 years you will probably be experiencing those technologies in your vehicles,” he said.
With contributions from Eugene Tang.
]]>王兴欲向理想汽车投资3亿美元 – LatePost
What happened: Meituan’s billionaire co-founder and CEO Wang Xing is planning to invest $300 million in Chinese electric vehicle (EV) maker Chehejia, also known as CHJ. The company is known for its smart electric car brand Leading Ideal. Wang will lead Chehejia’s more than $500 million round which values the company at nearly $2.9 billion. Company founder Li Xiang will contribute around $100 million and existing investors including Matrix Partners, Shougang Fund, and Bluerun Ventures will also participate in the round. A Meituan spokesman declined to comment when contacted by TechNode on Monday.
Why it’s important: News of a potential entry by mega-app Meituan into another hot and capital-fueled industry was a popular topic on Monday, first reported by respected former Caixin reporter Song Wei on her self-published news account on WeChat. Founded in July 2015 as one of the many startups joining China’s EV boom, Chehejia has received lots of industry attention thanks to its legendary founder Li Xiang, a seasoned entrepreneur who has two successful startups, Pcpop.com, and US-listed auto site Autohome.com. Li also co-founded NextEV, the electric car maker looking to take on Tesla. China’s electric car makers are now facing a critical maturity period with more pressure to mass produce and a reduction in government subsidies.
]]>Tesla Denied Tariff Exemption for Chinese-made CPU in the Model 3 – FutureCar
What happened: The U.S. government denied Tesla’s tariff exemption request for the Chinese-made CPU used in its popular Model 3 sedan. In a letter dated May 29, the US Trade Representative’s Office said the component is “a product strategically important or related to ‘Made in China 2025’ or other Chinese industrial programs.” The CPU is manufactured by Quanta Shanghai. A separate exemption request by the supplier of the Model 3’s touchscreen, SAS Automotive USA Inc, was also denied.
Why it’s important: In a securities filing on April 29, Tesla wrote, “our costs for producing our vehicles in the US have also been affected by import duties on certain components sourced from China.” The company previously claimed that choosing a different CPU supplier would have “delayed the Model 3 launch by 18 months.” The 25% import tariff has also affected other US automakers, with General Motors stopping domestic sales of its Chinese-made Buick Envision, which accounted for nearly 15% of the brand’s sales in 2018.
]]>Bike-rental firm Hello TransTech, along with mobile payment platform Alipay and battery manufacturer Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited (CATL), will invest RMB 1 billion (around $145 million) to form a joint venture (JV) focused on electric bicycle batteries.
Hello TransTech announced the new venture on Wednesday at an event in Shanghai. The new company will set up a battery exchange and charging network for electric bikes and scooters countrywide. Terms of the deal have not been made public.
The proceeds will primarily be used to build the company’s workforce, and construct charging and swapping infrastructure, Hello TransTech founder and CEO Yang Lei, said at the event. Yang will also lead the JV as the company’s CEO.
The service is expected to launch later this year. Yang said the company has not yet decided where its battery swapping and charging platform will first be rolled out. Users will be able to scan QR codes in order to open self-service cabinets, allowing them to replace their depleted batteries.
Hello TransTech, which already provides battery exchange services to 2 million e-bikes in its network, will be the main operator of the services. Meanwhile, Alipay will include the service in its app once it is launched. CATL is developing custom lithium-ion batteries as well as battery management systems for electric bikes.
Electric bikes and scooters are widely used in China. However, they have raised growing public concern over potential fire hazards of some rechargeable batteries. The country recently implemented national standards for electric bikes, which specifies stricter technical requirements for fireproofing, charger protection, and tamper proofing.
Battery exchange services could potentially address issues related to improper charging, such as using substandard adapters. Hello TransTech claims the service could also help the more than 500 million riders, as well as over 10 million food and parcel deliverymen. Hello TransTech is already discussing the service’s use by with food delivery platforms like Ele.me, Yang said.
Formerly known as Hellobike, Alibaba-backed Hello TransTech expanded its offering in October to include ride-hailing services. Yang stressed that two-wheel mobility is still the company’s core business, despite moves to diversify into ride hailing.
]]>Baidu is ramping up efforts to install its voice assistant DuerOS into cars in China as the government pushes for world leadership in intelligent connected vehicle technology by 2035.
DuerOS and the company’s internet of vehicle (IoV) platform, Apollo, has been installed on more than 300 car models from 60 auto brands to date, and will be installed in 200 more over the next two years, a Baidu executive said on Tuesday at this year’s CES Asia in Shanghai.
Li Zhenyu, vice president of Baidu’s Intelligent Driving Group, said it had partnered with a number of automakers, including Ford, Mercedes, BMW, and China’s Great Wall Motors. Baidu announced in January that DuerOS has reached over 200 million devices, but did not reveal the total number of vehicles with the software. Alibaba stated in August that its AliOS was installed in more than 700,000 vehicles, mostly SAIC-brand vehicles.
Powered by DuerOS, vehicles from Ford, Chery, and Great Wall Motors are now capable of intelligent navigation and entertainment services including content from video-streaming platform iQiyi and Himalaya FM, an audio content app. He Fei, an executive from telecom operator China Unicom, said the two companies will partner to develop favorable payment plans for in-vehicle applications in the future.
Tencent announced in November its launch plan for entirely voice-enabled WeChat services as part of its Tencent Auto Intelligence (TAI) software. However, the company later postponed the release to the end of this year to address public concern over the safety of its touch screen interface, which the company said it was stripping completely out. “It is a difficult task, especially for natural language processing,” (our translation) Tencent’s Pony Ma said publicly late last year, Xinhua.net reported.
As past of its 2035 goal, the Chinese government plans to complete wireless vehicle communication network (LTE-V2X) buildout, product standards, and regulatory guidelines by 2020, according to a strategic plan released by the state planning department, National Development and Reform Commission, in January 2018.
]]>快看|支付宝上线境外打车小程序,首批覆盖10个国家33座城市 – Jiemian News
What happened: Mobile payment platform Alipay on Monday launched a ride-hailing mini program, allowing users to book rides in around 33 cities in 10 countries worldwide, including the US, the UK, Australia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The mini program can be accessed inside the Alipay app and connects to ride-hailing platforms such as Grab in Thailand, Gett in the UK, and Careem in the UAE. The newly launched system allows users to interact with maps and text drivers in Chinese, call local police, and pay in Chinese yuan. According to Jiemian, the service will launch in more than 100 popular destinations across more than 20 countries this year.
Why important: The mini program is an attempt by Alipay to address issues Chinese tourists face when booking rides outside of China, including communicating with drivers and understanding non-Chinese maps. Mobility giant Uber’s Chinese business was bought by Didi Chuxing in 2016 after a fierce competition for market share. Since then, Didi has taken the top spot in China’s ride-hailing market (in Chinese). Alibaba does not compete directly, but, through cooperation with Hellobike, AutoNavi, Didi, and Fliggy, Alipay’s transportation services cover all aspects of Chinese people’s lives including road, rail, and air travel.
]]>Toyota teams with China’s CATL and BYD to power electric ambitions – Nikkei Asian Review
What happened: In a move to diversify its supply of critical components, Toyota said on Friday that it will buy batteries from two Chinese battery manufacturers: Contemporary Amperex Technology (CATL) and BYD. The Japanese automaker said in the announcement that it is the first time it has sourced critical components from Chinese manufacturers. Toyota also expanded its supplier roster in Japan by making deals with Toshiba and GS Yuasa in addition to its long-term partnership with Panasonic. The company seeks to support its sales goal of at least 5.5 million electrified vehicles to comprise more than half of total sales by 2025, moving what had been a 2030 goal up five years. The company sold around 1.6 million electrified vehicles in 2018.
Why it’s important: Despite its youth, eight-year-old Fujian-based CATL surpassed Panasonic in sales as the world’s largest battery supplier in 2017. It secured a battery supply contract for about 1 million electric vehicles from Honda in February. Toyota is shifting from a more conservative strategy in all-electric cars with the majority of its EV sales reportedly coming from gasoline hybrids. It is accelerating its electrification timeline to capture sales subsidies offered by the Chinese government, which excludes hybrids. CATL and BYD are expected to supply lithium-ion batteries for Toyota’s electric vehicles beginning next year in China, the world’s largest EV market in 2018, according to analysis from auto data consultancy EV Volumes.
]]>Chinese electric vehicle (EV) company Aiways will invest RMB 1.75 billion (around $246 million) in domestic automaker Jiangling Holdings for a 50% stake to shorten the time to market for its first commercial model.
“China’s gasoline vehicle market has shifted to a lower gear. With the introduction of new strategic investor, Jiangling Holdings will speed up heading into the intelligent, new energy vehicle market,” (our translation) shareholder Chang’an Automobile said Wednesday in an announcement.
Shenzhen-listed Chang’an formed a 50-50 joint venture with state-owned car maker Jiangling Group in 2004 in central Jiangxi Province. However, sales of its SUV brand Landwind fell 60% year on year in 2018 on weak demand, according to a Yicai report. Both shareholders will reduce their stakes to 25% after the deal with Aiways, according to the announcement, clearing the way for Aiways to enter the market with a car production license.
Co-founded in 2017 by former Volvo China president Fu Qiang along with Gu Feng, ex-CFO of state-owned SAIC Motors, Aiways has raised around RMB 7 billion in total funding from investors such as Tencent, valuating the company at RMB 10 billion, said Gu in April last year. The company says it will deliver its flagship SUV model U5, released in November, to domestic consumers by year-end, then plans to be the first Chinese EV maker selling cars in Europe next spring.
However, public records show that only 15 domestic electric car makers so far have been granted production licenses by the central government, and untested EV makers including Nio and Xpeng Motors are conspicuously absent. Outsourced production and market entry through an acquisition have become standard industry practices in China. Another EV startup CHJ Automotive acquired a 100% stake in a Chongqing-based automaker Lifan Motors with RMB 650 million late last year.
Chinese authorities are drafting new rules to raise the barrier for entry to prevent the EV market, bolstered by government support, from overheating. According to a regulation released in December by China’s state planner, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), EV companies under the production volume of 100,000 units per year are not permitted to build their own plants.
Nio reported a total of 17,550 vehicles delivered as of May 31 since it began selling its premium electric SUV model ES8 in June 2018, followed by WM Motor which sold around 8,000 of its EX5 model as of end-March. China’s largest EV maker BYD delivered more than 247,800 units in 2018, a 108% increase compared with the previous year.
]]>Scoop: Toyota to lean on Chinese partners for future EVs – Axios
What happened: Toyota will announce a new electrification strategy this week that includes a significant number of partnerships with Chinese parts manufacturers, according to Axios. The plan will include a roadmap for the company’s EV business model, which outlines plans for “personal EVs.” The Chinese partnerships will be focused on batteries and the production of future battery-powered vehicles. Axios says that the plan is not being widely publicized in the US because of “sensitivity to strained US-China trade relations.”
Why it’s important: Last year, Toyota announced plans to produce 10 different battery electric vehicle (BEV) models for the Chinese market, with intentions to bring them to Japan, then the US and Europe next. China’s EV market has experienced continued growth despite an overall slowdown in auto sales. Bloomberg recently reported on possible incoming government regulations regarding EV manufacturing, but the rules seem like they will have the biggest impact on domestic startups looking to outsource production to more mature firms, and will likely have little effect on Toyota’s planned partnerships.
]]>In October, a fight erupted between a passenger and the driver of a Chongqing bus. In the hubbub, the vehicle swerved across the road and through the barrier of a bridge, falling into the Yangtze River. All 15 people on board perished.
The incident sparked widespread indignation across the country as observers largely blamed the passenger for provoking the fight. It also brought to light some 20 other attacks on bus drivers that occurred in China that year, although none with so high a casualty count.
Against the backdrop of the public outcry, officials took action. “[The] government regulations’ requirements are higher now,” Liang Kun, product manager at Xiamen-based surveillance and security firm Reconova, told TechNode. Passenger aggression towards drivers can now be punished by law, and the installation of “active safety” technology is required on commercial vehicles in addition to public transportation. Some of the new measures could prevent tragedies like the one that happened in Chongqing, Liang believes.
Along with the heightening of regulations surrounding road safety, Reconova has seen more demand for its driver surveillance services, which include facial recognition devices that detect distracted driving as well as machine vision technology that surveys and warns of nearby vehicles and pedestrians.
The six-year-old startup, which completed a Series B last May led by Intel Capital, is part of a larger trend towards machine-assisted driving. As applications for fully-autonomous vehicle technology–for consumers, at least–proceed relatively slowly, this particular sector is accelerating, with a growing number of players, including artificial intelligence (AI) giants Sensetime and Baidu, entering the market. As a result, increased surveillance of drivers could significantly reduce the likelihood of accidents; however, it also raises certain security risks as well as potential concerns over privacy.
On a sunny afternoon in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, TechNode joined Liang for a spin in a Reconova test vehicle. Inside five cameras were plastered in a straight line down the van’s windshield, each one able to detect movements by nearby vehicles. Another device above and to the left of the steering wheel was pointed directly at the driver’s face, checking for signs of drowsiness, phone use, or smoking.
At periodic points during the drive, Liang demonstrated how the system reacts to various risky behaviors. Twice, after checking that the road is clear, he closed his eyes for a few nerve-wracking seconds before the system’s speaker barked a reprimand: “Danger, please be careful.”
Holding a phone to the side of one’s face while the van is moving elicits a similar warning, as do too-quick turns and neighboring vehicles that switch lanes without leaving enough space. In the relatively calm mid-afternoon traffic, though, the system is mostly quiet, only occasionally blaring out brief cautions.
According to Liang, camera footage of driver misdemeanors and other safety risks can be automatically uploaded to a company’s platform if the system is online.
“In accordance with Chinese law, the equipment doesn’t collect the personal information of the driver or the person being surveilled,” Liang said in reference to Reconova’s facial recognition technology, which can also verify drivers’ identities.
“We don’t know who is who,” he added. According to him, the system doesn’t cross-check images with ID information, but only checks whether someone’s facial characteristics match companies’ driver records.
This year, a major Chinese logistics company secured Reconova’s services for a part of their delivery fleet. “Our first batch has already been installed and their testing program was excellent,” Liang told TechNode. “If it really is effective,” the client has plans to expand, he said.
The company has also had “successful use cases” in the area of public transportation. Bus company clients, for instance, can install a one-click panic button on their vehicles, allowing drivers to contact police more easily in case of an emergency. Another, optional feature allows buses to be brought to a halt via remote control.
Reconova sales director Morgan Guo told TechNode in an interview that this field has grown rapidly in the last year: from 4,000 orders in 2017, demand soared to 30,000 devices installed the next year. In 2019, Guo predicts, that number could grow another “70-80%.”
In addition to general public safety, increased scrutiny of truck and bus drivers is also good news for companies like Reconova, transportation firms, and insurers. The reaction of the drivers themselves, however, has been mixed.
“Drivers will use things to block this device, or bend the device around so that it’s not effective,” Liang told TechNode while gesturing to the facial recognition gadget to his left. Because employees feel that “there’s something monitoring their behavior,” Liang says, “there will be aversion.”
Hiko Lee, enterprise solution manager of GreenSafety, a startup that supplies similar driver surveillance systems to business clients in Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan, has heard of similar resistance from drivers.
For clients such as electricity supplier China Light and Power Company (CLP), GreenSafety assigned drivers in 50 vehicles grades based on their behavior.
“When the score is high, around 100 marks, then the performance is good” while 50-60 might be the mark of a “bad driver,” Lee told TechNode. Thanks to improvement in driver ratings over time, GreenSafety won the chance to trial their devices for two major bus companies in Hong Kong. Currently, its systems operate on around 400 vehicles in the city.
“Of course at first they really don’t appreciate it,” said Lee of CLP’s drivers. After three to six months of education, however, attitudes slowly changed.
“The Hong Kong bus and taxi drivers may work over 10 hours per day. So we will teach them by training, by lessons, by different methods–maybe talk to the management and help the management to persuade them,” Lee said.
He compares the situation to the widespread adoption of GPS tracking and basic in-vehicle cameras over the last decade. Drivers gradually accepted the initially intrusive technology because “they know that this kind of system can protect them” from liability in accidents.
Five months before the Chongqing bus fell into the Yangtze River, killing 15, another case of driver-passenger violence attracted national attention. In May 2018, a woman using online ride-hailing platform Didi to hitch a ride was murdered by her male driver. Just a few months later, in August, another female passenger using the same service was raped and murdered by the man behind the wheel.
The incidents sparked a nationwide backlash against Didi, and provoked official scrutiny—leading the platform to adopt a series of new safety measures, from an emergency number linkup for passengers to optional video or audio recording of rides.
Asked whether high-tech AI features might soon enter ride-hailing companies’ arsenals, both Liang and Lee said the industry showed potential.
Companies in the field are currently in talks with Reconova over facial recognition solutions to verify drivers’ identities, according to Liang. In both of last year’s high-profile Didi murders, the culprits posed as registered drivers on the app. “This need exists,” said Liang.
Tal Krzypow, vice president of product management at Israeli computer vision firm Eyesight, says China’s ride-hailing market is just as interested in driver surveillance as “any other fleet.”
Eyesight is currently working with original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket partners to provide driving monitoring system solutions to China. “There is a willingness to adopt new technology and going to market quickly is very impressive” in the country, Kryzpow told TechNode.
Using advanced and often expensive technology such as machine learning to analyze video footage, however, may not be on the table for those companies as of yet. Lee pointed out that ride-hailing startups may not be inclined to invest so much in individual cars and drivers. However, with pressure from government as well as popular sentiment, that could change, Liang said.
Lee also foresees a larger shift to the consumer market as driver surveillance technology continues to advance. Once more affordable, accessible devices are released on the market, “maybe the customer can just buy it from the Internet and they can install it themselves very easily.”
In a written statement compiled for TechNode, analysts from international firm BIS Research predicted rapid growth of connected and partially autonomous vehicles in China over the next two years. As a reference, they cited the Chinese government’s prediction that the domestic market for connected auto will grow to $14 billion by 2020.
However, the increasing amount of data will also require cybersecurity upgrades. “Vehicles need protection from threats such as malicious software, unauthorized access, attack on vehicle CAN [controller area network] BUS and ECUs [electronic control units], sniffing of vehicle data, loss of cloud data, and malicious codes in the vehicle, among others,” BIS analysts wrote.
Speaking of another sector of Reconova’s, smart security and surveillance systems for corporate and official clients, Morgan Guo said that “privacy will be protected.” According to Guo, the company itself doesn’t permanently store visual or other information gathered by its software, although he admitted that China’s government is by law allowed to do so.
Currently, more than 200 electric vehicle manufacturers, including Tesla, BMW, Volkswagen, and Nio have been called upon to transmit their vehicles’ location data to government-backed monitoring facilities.
That raises the question of where the data gathered by systems like Reconova’s and GreenSafety’s will be stored, and who will have access to such valuable information. Generally, how the technology is implemented is left up to buyers.
“We do provide guidelines,” said EyeSight’s Krzypow.
As Berkeley professor Alexandre M. Bayen, who directs the university’s Institute of Transportation Studies, told TechNode, however, individual drivers’ data privacy could already be compromised. According to Bayen, the issue “in a sense started 10 years ago.”
He referred to the advent of smartphones, as well as the data-gathering that accompanies their use: “Your phone activity while you’re driving, potentially the onboard car activity if your car is somehow hooked up with your phone to Bluetooth or any other link.” “All that data, it’s already there, it’s already available,” and being accessed by large tech corporations like Google, Bayen added.
“With more data, of course, the problem grows,” Bayen said. But he believes that the ultimate responsibility of protecting that information falls on the government. “To me, the technology is just a means to reveal the data; the real question is the question of policy,” Bayen said.
With additional reporting by Chris Udemans.
]]>China Moves to Stop a Crash in Booming Electric-Car Industry – Bloomberg
What happened: Chinese government is reportedly drafting new rules to cool the country’s overheated electric vehicle (EV) market, which contains nearly 500 companies. According to the rules, companies that want to farm out their manufacturing must have research and development (R & D) investment of no less than RMB 4 billion (around $580 million) in China over the last three years. A record of selling more than 15,000 purely electric passenger vehicles during the past two years is also required. The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, charged with drafting the rules, said the regulations are still being revised.
Why it’s important: After the Chinese government positioned EV as one of the seven strategic industries in 2010 then bolstered the industry with subsidies two years later, hundreds of EV makers have emerged and been welcomed by local investors. China’s new EV automakers such as Nio and Xpeng Motors outsource production by forming alliances with traditional car manufacturers. However, a large number of domestic EV startups have yet to deliver their first commercial models to customers. Chinese authorities have been looking for ways to curb the EV market’s frothiness. It announced in late March it would reduce passenger vehicle subsidies by as much as 60% beginning in the late June, with an aim to “encourage market selection and prevent overheating” (our translation).
]]>Guangzhou has become the first Chinese municipal government to reverse a ban on additional rental bikes, the popularity of which resulted in tangles of broken frames littering major cities. The city announced Tuesday the results of a call for bids from the city’s incoming official bike operators—Mobike, Hellobike, and Didi’s Qingju.
In an announcement released by the Guangzhou Transportation Bureau, Mobike was granted the biggest allotment. It will be allowed to add 180,000 new bicycles over the next three years to six districts in the downtown area. Hellobike won a 120,000 quota and Qingju was granted 100,000 units, first entries into the gateway city of south China for both companies.
“A more efficient, sustainable rental bike market now requires more technology-driven and data-based operational methods,” (our translation) Ren Liangliang, vice president of Hellobike said publicly in Guangzhou in late March. The Ant Financial-backed company pledged to improve city traffic, while Mobike said it would continue to remove damaged bikes to maintain public space.
The announcement also means Ofo may be squeezed out of Guangzhou, according to a report by Renmin Daily. Ofo did not qualify for the auction because it was blacklisted for defaulting on its debts beginning late last year. For companies without access to the city, policy makers now allow a transition period of six months to allow for bike disposal and withdrawal, before authorities start enforcement measures, Chinese media said.
Prior to the invitation for bids, there was no government regulation of bike rental services, meaning the companies ran without licenses. The bidding process procured licenses for the three winners, in addition to the right to add bicycles to the approved districts.
Guangzhou has prohibited the addition of new bicycles into the city for more than a year and a half, then it became the first among Chinese major cities to reopen the market to bike rental startups with an invitation for bids in late April. Beijing authorities also launched a month-long clear-out move, calling companies to remove abandoned bicycles to make way for new ones.
With the exception of Guangzhou, it remains unknown whether other city governments including Beijing and Shanghai will lift their bans, which have been in place for months. Last month, Hellobike and Qingju were censured by Beijing authorities for adding new bikes to the city without permission.
Some have called for a discussion on the issue, saying a more effective and sensible regulation requires the involvement of industry players, not just the government playing a dominant role, reported The Beijing News citing Liu Daizong, an expert from the World Resources Institute.
]]>国资、日企同时注资奇点汽车 – TMT Post
What happened: Chinese electric vehicle (EV) maker Singulato is reportedly closing its latest round of funding for an undisclosed amount. According to Chinese business research platform Tianyancha, the company received RMB 6.33 million (around $920,000) in late May. A list of new shareholders appeared at the same time, including a capital fund backed by the government of eastern Anhui Province, Lenovo’s investment arm Legend Star, and Japanese trading company Itochu. A spokeswoman from Singulato said the financing has “gone smoothly so far,” but did not reveal further details when contacted by TechNode on Tuesday.
Why it’s important: Founded in 2014 by Shen Haiyin, a former vice president of data security company Qihoo 360, Singulato has raised $2.5 billion in funding, including a $600 million investment led by the municipal government of Tongling, a city in Anhui Province, in 2016. However, the company postponed the shipment of its first EV model iS6 to year-end, which it initially planned to deliver in late 2018. Chinese governments have invested heavily in struggling domestic EV startups. EV automaker Nio announced in its first quarter earnings report last month that Beijing E-Town, a capital fund backed by the Yizhuang district government of Beijing, will invest up to RMB 10 billion to help it build a plant in Beijing. The company’s share prices have plummeted 24% to $2.96 as of market close on Monday from May 28, when its earnings results were released, when it disclosed a 50% drop in revenues.
]]>Build Your Dreams (BYD), a Chinese battery and electric vehicle maker backed by Warren Buffett, announced Sunday that it was investing RMB 4 billion ($58 million) to build a battery gigafactory with an annual output value of RMB 13 billion in Guangzhou, the capital of southern Guangdong province.
The new battery plant will mainly develop and produce lithium-ion batteries for consumer electronic devices such as smartphones and laptops, reported Chinese media. Construction will begin late this month and BYD hopes to begin production by 2020, it said. The company began selling batteries to a list of global tech giants beginning in the early 2000s, including Samsung, Dell, Motorola, and Huawei.
BYD was not immediately available for comment.
Founded in 1995 as a battery manufacturer by Wang Chuanfu, a former government chemist, BYD moved into automobiles in 2002 with the acquisition of a state-owned carmaker Xi’an Qinchuan. The Shenzhen-based company launched its first plug-in hybrid in the name of BYD Auto in 2008 and started mass-producing electric vehicles a year later.
Official sales records show that BYD held the lead in global EV sales by a tiny margin in 2018, selling around 248,000 electric vehicles, surpassing Tesla by around 2,000 units. China’s BAIC and BMW lagged far behind, with sales figures of around 158,000 and 143,000, respectively.
However, Tesla surpassed BYD in the global EV battery deployment with 2,889 MWh (mega-watt hours) as of end-March, more than doubling second-place BYD’s 1,387 MWh, according to figures from research firm Adamas Intelligence. This means BYD’s average battery capacity is much lower than Tesla’s. The US EV giant has deployed nearly as many MWh as the next nine automakers on the list combined, including Nissan, Renault, and BMW.
In addition to the battery plant in Guangzhou, BYD has launched two battery production bases for electric vehicles this year in Changsha, capital of central Hunan province, and the southwestern municipality of Chongqing. China’s largest EV maker reportedly aims for an annual cell production of more than 100 GWh (gigawatt-hours) with its five production bases in China by 2020.
Tesla has yet to reveal detailed figures of its Gigafactory 3 that is presently under construction in Shanghai, but Panasonic’s 10 production lines in Tesla’s Gigafactory 1 have an output of 24 GWh per year despite the theoretical capacity of 35 GWh, according to a tweet by Tesla founder Elon Musk in April.
]]>What happened: Following in the footsteps of Mobike and Bluegogo, Ant Financial-owned Hellobike recently doubled the rates for bike rentals in Beijing from RMB 2 to RMB 4 an hour, priced in 15-minute intervals. In at least one other city, Hangzhou, users noticed that its rates rose to RMB 3 per hour from the same original price. In late March, Bluegogo more than doubled its effective price per hour in Beijing to RMB 2.5 from RMB 1, while in early April Meituan-Dianping’s Mobike hourly rates increased to RMB 2.5 from from RMB 2.
Why it’s important: As a CCTV report pointed out on Monday, Hellobike’s new prices now make it more expensive than taking the bus in Beijing, which costs RMB 1 for a 3-kilometer route. This may be a blow to the “shared bike” business model, which originally relied on cash incentives and cheap rides to popularize the service. Far from sustainable, that model spelled disaster for startups such as Bluegogo, which had to be bailed out by ride-hailing giant Didi. Hellobike has avoided some of those major pitfalls in part because it strategically targets second-tier cities and draws from Ant Financial’s substantial base of users. However, impact may be limited because, as a Hellobike staff member told CCTV, a large majority of bike-rental users take short trips and won’t be affected by the incremental price increases. While that softens the impact of the price hike on users, it also raises the question of how much extra revenue the move will bring the company.
]]>It’s rumored (Chinese link) that at a dinner attended by Ant Financial and Hello TransTech (formerly Hellobike) bigwigs, Ant Financial CEO Jing Xiandong cracked open a bottle of Guizhou Maotai, an upmarket brand of Chinese rice wine, Jack Ma had previously gifted him, worth over a million RMB.
What prompted the celebration?
The short answer is, by taking the wheel of Hello TransTech’s Series D and every subsequent funding round after that, Jack Ma-controlled Ant Financial secured a critical component of Alibaba’s mobility ecosystem designs.
Since Ant Financial’s involvement in Hello’s Series D, Hello has raised RMB 7.8 billion (about $1.1 billion) from investors. That’s a truckload of cash, even for China’s shoot-from-the-hip VC scene. To understand Ant Financial’s investment in Hello and what that means for Alibaba, we need to wrap our heads around two things: (1) why on-demand mobility matters for Alibaba; and (2) what pieces Alibaba had in its mobility ecosystem before Ant Financial pounced on Hello.
On-demand mobility was the missing link in Alibaba’s local services and entertainment ecosystem. Alibaba’s restaurant review, venue booking, ticket purchase, and hotel reservation services are all linked to a common theme: going out and having a good time. This requires adjacent services to transport users from home to venue, between venues, and back home again. As such, on-demand mobility closes the loop between the existing services in Alibaba’s ecosystem.
In Alibaba’s ideal world, users look at where they want to go using the restaurant review tool Koubei, find where they need to go using AutoNavi (a mapping service, not too dissimilar to Google Maps), pay for their meal using Alipay, and head home by plugging into an Alibaba-invested or operated on-demand mobility solution. It’s all about keeping the user in the the mesh of apps, services, and affiliates that make up Alibaba’s ecosystem.
Let’s now have a look at what Alibaba’s on-demand mobility ecosystem had under the hood prior to Hello’s Series D funding round in December 2017, led by Ant Financial.
First, there was Alibaba’s mapping service, AutoNavi. AutoNavi is the “quiet achiever” in Alibaba’s ecosystem. It has over 100 million daily active users, which makes it the most used app in Alibaba’s ecosystem outside Alipay and Taobao (Chinese link). That also makes it the most used navigation service in China (Chinese link), ahead of Baidu maps. In April 2018, AutoNavi rolled out (Chinese link) a ridehailing aggregation service. Users input where they want to go, and can cycle through different providers like Didi, UCAR, Shouqi Limousine & Chauffeur, and Caocao Chuxing, comparing prices and wait times. That move brought AutoNavi closer towards Alibaba’s sweet-spot of asset-light marketplaces, and one step closer to a “mobility super-app” that offers users everything they need to get from A to B.
Second, prior to Hello, Alibaba had a smattering of on-demand mobility investments. Alibaba received a minority share of Didi when Alibaba-backed Kuaidi Dache and Tencent-backed Didi Dache merged in 2015. Despite Alibaba’s further 400 million co-investment in Didi with Ant Financial, Chinese sources claim it doesn’t have a much of a voice in Didi’s boardroom (Chinese link). Alibaba also acquired around 10% of Didi competitor UCAR in 2016. Outside ridehailing, Alibaba had also participated in ofo’s $700 million Series E financing, relieving capital pressure on ofo after hopes of a tie-up with Mobike were dashed.
Enter Ant Financial’s investment in Hello. In my previous article, I laid out why Hello looks a little better off than sharebike rivals ofo and Mobike.
But Hello has used Ant Financial’s capital injection to rebrand and expand beyond bikesharing. At the start of the year, it rolled out a carpooling service. That’s the same service Didi was forced out of after the murder of two Didi female passengers and a male Didi driver last year led to suspension of its carpooling service and a “Delete Didi” campaign.
In February, Hello claimed the new service was performing well, with users across 300 cities logging 7 million rides in the first month of operation. That’s a good sign, because setting up the carpooling service didn’t come cheap. Hello has earmarked RMB 500 million to roll out the service, with incentives for drivers and passengers. If Hello’s carpooling service takes off, the payoff could be significant—Didi’s carpooling service facilitated over a billion trips in the space of three years.
Bizarrely, Hello has yet to make the move that’ll really make it an on-demand mobility contender: integration with AutoNavi. At the time of writing, none of Hello’s services are displayed in AutoNavi’s app, instead relying on traffic from its own app and a mini-program in Alipay. It’s still not clear why this integration hasn’t happened more than a year after Hello joined the Aliverse. This state of affairs is far from ideal, especially when you consider that AutoNavi is the country’s leading navigation service.
In fact, getting Hello’s sharebikes and carpooling service on AutoNavi may be critical for Hello’s future fundraising aspirations. It hopes to raise between $500 million to $1 billion in its next funding round. As part of their due diligence, would-be investors will likely examine app traction and integration with third-party navigation apps before committing funds in a relatively capital-constrained environment.
With Hello, the Alibaba ecosystem gains two forms of on-demand mobility: sharebikes and carpooling. Although this is not the whole on-demand mobility pie, Hello will need to pick its fights carefully if it’s to avoid the scrapheap. With Didi’s carpooling service clouded by regulatory uncertainty, expect Hello to push as hard and fast as it can into that area. But it isn’t on course for a head-on collision with Didi over ridehailing just yet.
]]>This could be the first Chinese-brand electric car sold in Europe – Quartz
What happened: Aiways, a four-year-old Shanghai-based EV company, recently told Quartz it plans to start selling its U5 flagship SUV in Germany, France, Switzerland, Norway, and the Netherlands in early 2020. The move would make it the first Chinese EV company to offer its vehicles in Europe. According to Quartz, Aiways plans to sell the U5 directly to customers, and is exploring a partnership with German startup Vehiculum for lease options. The U5 will begin production for China’s domestic market in September.
Why it’s important: Aiways won’t be the only company looking to enter the European market in 2020, Geely’s Lynk & Co is aiming to launch its car subscription service in Europe sometime next year. And as 2018’s fastest-growing car brand with more than 120,000 vehicles sold, Geely seems to have a considerable advantage over Aiways, which only recently secured a license to start manufacturing its flagship U5. Regardless, EV sales have grown in China despite a slowdown in overall auto sales, and as the trade war rages on, the European market could be a solid alternative to the U.S.
]]>Chinese property developer Evergrande announced Thursday that it acquired British in-wheel motor company Protean for an undisclosed sum, as the conglomerate ramps up efforts to become a leader in the country’s increasingly fraught electric vehicle (EV) industry.
Protean is a UK-based automotive technology company that designs, develops, and manufactures in-wheel motors with operations in the US and China. The in-wheel motor vehicle is considered one of the leading technologies in the automotive industry, and refers to electric vehicles (EV) with separate motors installed close to each of the drive wheels, rather than those propelled by a single motor installed in the position of the engine.
In-wheel motor vehicles negate the need for gearboxes or driveshafts, lowering energy consumption and granting superior drive control. The company in December announced it secured 150 global patents for its ProteanDrive in-wheel motor system, which it intends to license in high volume to global auto brands and tier one auto suppliers.
Evergrande seeks to further consolidate its control over in-wheel electric motor technology, enhancing the strategic layout of the full value chain in the new energy vehicle industry, Shi Shouming, chairman of the company, said in an announcement.
The deal is the company’s latest move as part of its EV push after splitting up with Jia Yueting, the disgraced Chinese billionaire founder of US-based EV startup Faraday Future at the beginning of this year. The real estate giant aims to become the world’s largest EV maker, achieving production capacity of up to 1 million units in the next three years, according to a Bloomberg report.
It acquired 51% share of National Electric Vehicle Sweden AB (NEVS), the owner of Saab Automobile, for $930 million earlier this year. This was followed by another RMB 1.06 billion (around $154 million) investment in Chinese EV battery firm CENAT 10 days later, as well as a new EV company with a registered capital of $2 billion in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou around the same time.
Domestic EV makers have been struggling amid huge losses, slowing growth, and Tesla’s accelerated move into the China market. Shares of EV maker Nio sank more than 10% on Thursday to $3.24 by market close, after reporting a 50% sequential drop in first quarterly revenue two days earlier.
China is home to 500 EV manufacturers all fighting for market share, many of which including XPeng, VM Motors, and CHJ which have not yet shipped cars as they grapple with the difficulties of consistent mass production and tight funds.
]]>Toyota mulls $548m investment in Chinese ride-hailer Didi Chuxing – Nikkei Asian Review
What happened: Toyota Motor Corp is planning to invest about 60 billion yen (around $548 million) in Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi, hoping to gain a foothold in the world’s largest auto market. It is also reportedly considering setting up a new joint company with Didi offering mobility services in China. A Toyota spokesman told Reuters that the company continues to evaluate its global business strategies in sharing mobility, electric vehicles, and connected driverless technologies, but has “nothing to announce at this time.”
Why is important: Toyota has made large deals with some other ride-hailing firms in hopes of becoming a “mobility company” rather than just a traditional auto manufacturer. The Japanese automaker struck a $500 million investment deal with Uber in August to work jointly on autonomous vehicles, which will be deployed in the US company’s ride-hailing network. It also invested $1 billion in Grab, the largest ride-hailing service in Southeast Asia last year, in an attempt to co-expand the range of services from ride-hailing to new areas such as food delivery and mobile payment. Didi has worked with Toyota as one of its partners to test e-Palette, a self-driving concept vehicle for on-demand delivery since January last year , alongside Uber, Amazon, and Pizza Hut.
]]>6月起共享单车押金最迟两天退,留给ofo的时间不多了 – 新京报
What happened: At a press conference on Tuesday, a spokesman for China’s Ministry of Transport said that beginning June 1, bike-rental companies and financial institutions will have six months, or until November 30, to implement stricter measures for user deposits. Under the new rules, companies must set up separate bank accounts to store deposits, and return users’ money within two working days of their refund requests. On Tuesday, a BJNews.com reporter noted that close to 14.7 million users on “shared bike” platform Ofo were still waiting for their deposits to be returned.
Why it’s important: The new regulations, first revealed to the public in draft form in March, move to increase accountability for the “shared bike” industry in the wake of bankruptcies and struggling businesses. Bike companies have a longer time for implementation than previously announced due to the difficulty of making the required arrangements, according to the Ministry of Transport spokesman. However, the fact that former investor darling Ofo has even more unpaid user deposits than were reported in December, as well as a growing pile of debt, point toward a less-than-certain future for the field. Even industry leader Mobike is projected to be a loss-maker for its parent company Meituan-Dianping until 2021, although it has partially skirted the issues of refunds by allowing new users to ride deposit-free.
]]>Electric vehicle manufacturer Nio has reported a 50% sequential drop in quarterly revenue as its deliveries during the first three months of 2019 fell sharply.
Revenues reached RMB 1.6 billion (around $231 million) in the first quarter, down from RMB 3.4 billion at the end of last year. Deliveries of the company’s flagship ES8 SUV dropped by half to around 4,000 vehicles compared with the fourth quarter of 2018.
Meanwhile, Nio’s net loss narrowed by 25%, falling from RMB 3.5 billion to RMB 2.6 billion. Still, the company expects second-quarter revenue to decrease by as much as 30% compared the first three months of the year.
Nio also announced that it had formed a joint venture with state-owned investment firm Beijing E-Town International Investment and Development Co., which will invest up to RMB 10 billion in the new entity. E-Town is also expected to help Nio find partners to build a manufacturing plant for its next-generation vehicles. The company’s stock was up 5% in pre-market trading on Tuesday.
Nio has faced challenges from decreasing government subsidies, a macroeconomic slowdown, and the US-China trade war, Nio CFO Louis Hsieh said in an earnings call on Tuesday. Other factors include a seasonal slowdown around Chinese New Year, increased competition, and accelerated deliveries last year, the company said.
Despite beginning deliveries of its second production vehicle, the ES6, in June, Nio anticipates that it will sell just 3,200 vehicles in the second quarter.
“We expect an even more challenging sales environment and anticipate overall sequential demand and deliveries to decrease, as competition continues to accelerate and the general automobile market in China remains muted,” Hsieh said in a statement.
Nio announced earlier this year that it had abandoned plans to build a production plant in Shanghai’s Jiading District, opting instead for a “joint manufacturing” partnership with state-owned automaker JAC. The company has extended its cooperation with JAC to produce the ES6.
Apart from stalling deliveries, the company has faced several class action lawsuits, as shareholders claim the company misled them prior to going public on the New York Stock Exchange in September last year. Investors said that Nio had not disclosed the company would ditch its plans to build a factory and that it had overstated the number of vehicles the company would sell.
Nio is required to pay JAC for every vehicle produced, as well as any losses JAC incurs as a result of building Nio’s vehicles. As of the end of June last year, Nio had paid JAC RMB 65 million (around $10 million) for losses during the second quarter of 2018, according to the company’s IPO filing. The company made losses of $1.4 billion in 2018, despite revenues of $720 million.
]]>Tesla Gets Ready to Reveal Prices of Model 3 in China – Bloomberg
What happened: US electric vehicle (EV) maker Tesla is close to revealing the price of its Model 3 in China, with Bloomberg sources saying that vehicles could be priced between RMB 300,000 (around $43,400) and RMB 350,000 before subsidies. The final number is still being decided upon. The EV manufacturer plans to make an announcement on Friday, according to a post on microblogging platform Weibo, which invites people to guess the price of the domestically made model.
Why it’s important: Tesla already sells Model 3 vehicles in China, but they have to be shipped from the US, subjecting them to import tariffs and disqualifying them from government subsidies. Prices for the Model 3 currently start at RMB 377,000, including taxes and import duties. The company is currently building a factory in Shanghai, which it is counting on to increase sales in China. But competition could stand in Tesla’s way. The country is already home to nearly 500 registered EV companies, including Nio, Xpeng, Byton, and WM Motor. Telsa has also seen its share of controversy, with two of its vehicles catching fire in the Greater China area in the past two months.
]]>Beijing is taking drastic measures to accelerate adoption of electronic toll collection (ETC) devices in the country’s motorway networks by offering drivers who use the system discounts of at least 5%, said the Ministry of Transport in an announcement released Monday.
The policy will come into effect across the country on July 1. Vehicles belonging to government agencies and state enterprises, including police cars and ambulances, will have the electronic payment devices installed by the end of July. China will leverage all resources to ensure that 90% of vehicles are using the ETC system by year-end, Wu Chungeng, spokesperson of the ministry said Tuesday in a media briefing held in Beijing.
Local governments will also be required to report monthly to Beijing about progress meeting goals, including the number of devices installed and usage rates. According to an action plan released earlier this month by the State Council, China plans to remove all expressway toll booths at provincial borders except those at the beginning and end of each highway by the end of this year.
The move is part of a broader plan to establish a connected, manageable national highway network system to reduce public transport and logistics costs, the ministry said. China has become notorious for massive traffic jams that tie up millions of people on highways for hours across the country, especially during holidays.
Congestion is sometimes so severe that the media broadcasts stories of what individuals do during the jams, such as one woman in the southwestern Chinese province of Sichuan who practiced tai chi for an hour on a highway during the week-long National Day holiday in October, reported Xinhua News Agency.
The central government will also speed up implementing lower toll charges during off-peak hours. Additional fees implemented by local municipalities which result in higher tolls and “violate fairness and efficiency” will be eliminated. This part of the new policy is scheduled to launch in the beginning of 2020, with an aim to facilitate travel at different times to relieve traffic burdens around the country.
]]>At a company conference yesterday, Tencent Auto Intelligence (TAI)’s vice president Zhong Xuedan announced that it will launch voice-enabled WeChat services in its connected vehicle ecosystem this year, ifanr reported (in Chinese).
The planned features include only chat, calls, and GPS navigation for now. All aspects will be voice command-enabled, purportedly to reduce driver distraction and risk of accidents.
Using the TAI system, drivers will be able to hear WeChat messages read out loud to them and dictate responses, initiate conversations, and find contacts without taking their hands off the wheel. When receiving calls, drivers will also be able to accept or reject calls with voice commands. In addition, after receiving a GPS location pin from a WeChat friend, drivers will be able to easily launch directions to the place.
In the future, in the hardware department, Tencent also announced that a custom steering wheel will have a button that enables users to turn on WeChat while driving, or switch between different vehicle apps. In addition, using a Bluetooth-phone connection, the car’s WeChat system will be able to switch on and off as the driver enters and exits the vehicle.
As of publication, a WeChat representative had not yet responded to TechNode’s request for comment on the risk that in-car WeChat features pose by distracting drivers.
While the announcement to roll out the features this year is new, Tencent unveiled the concept of TAI last month, with the aim of connecting auto companies, developers, and consumers. According to its official website, the ecosystem has already partnered with major auto brands including Mercedes-Benz and BMW, as well as Chinese companies Nio, BYD, and GAC.
]]>First there was Alibaba, which boasted an IPO bigger than Google, Facebook and Twitter combined. Then there was Ant Financial, spun off from Alibaba, which has raised almost as much cash as all US and European fintech firms combined. Now there’s Hello Transtech (formerly Hellobike), which may be valued at $4 billion if a rumored fundraising round (in Chinese) is successful. It’s the other, other unicorn in Alibaba’s sprawling business empire.
In a two-part series, I’ll lay out how Hello is bidding for profits amid the bikesharing meltdown—and its importance in Alibaba’s battle for mobility.
Hello TransTech started out as Hellobike in 2016. Launched two years after Mobike and ofo started operations, Hello was the first bike-sharing operator to build up its business in China’s smaller cities.
That turned out to be a smart play. TrustData estimates about 72% of China’s bike-sharing users are in China’s second- and lower-tier cities. GGV Capital Managing Partner Fu Jixin also reckons that frequency of use in lower-tier cities is higher, with each bike averaging more than four or five rides per day. (GGV Capital was an early investor in Hello.) That compares to an average of three or less rides per bike in first-tier cities.
These data points, plus a less-crowded competitive bikesharing landscape in lower-tier cities, gave Ant Financial confidence to drop $321 million in Hello in June 2018, minting a new unicorn. All up, Ant Financial has now participated in four of Hello’s seven funding rounds, which have raised a combined total of $1.8 billion.
Bikesharing has earned a bad reputation among investors. A wasteful sharebike investment frenzy sucked up $4 billion of Chinese venture capital in 2017, ending in tears as industry darlings filed for bankruptcy or became albatrosses on the necks of their corporate parents.
In contrast, Hello looks different—in fact, it’s already talking about profit. In late 2018, Hello Co-Founder and CEO Yang Lei announced that the company is profitable in around a third of 300 cities it operates in. Although that doesn’t necessarily answer concerns about bikesharing’s ongoing sustainability or profitability, it’s a far better strike rate than rumored numbers for rivals Mobike or ofo.
So, what’s behind this?
One advantage is a smaller fleet. Although there’s no precise figure, analysts estimate (in Chinese) that Hello operates between five and seven (in Chinese) million bikes, a fleet less than a third the size of larger rivals Meituan and ofo at their peak. The company’s modest, yet growing fleet is less of a burden on the balance sheet, with less bikes to produce, distribute and repair. However, without strict controls, capital and operational expenditure could get out of hand.
Another is volume of trips. Last year, Hello TransTech’s 161 million registered users clocked up around 20 million rides a day. This, Chinese analysts reckon (in Chinese), is more than the combined trip volume of Mobike and ofo.
To those familiar with China’s bikesharing scene, one number stands out: Hello’s users. According to Trustdata, Hello’s standalone app had about 3.7 million active users in May 2018—far less than Mobike’s 9.3 millio or ofo’s 11.3 million. However, Hello claims (in Chinese) its total registered user base has cracked 200 million. If those numbers are accurate, it means almost all of Hello’s users come from Hello’s mini-program in Alipay, not the Hello app. Any of Alipay’s 650 million monthly active users can walk up to a sharebike, scan and ride—without having to download a standalone app or pay a deposit. Alipay, of course, is owned by Ant Financial—Hello’s largest shareholder. Talk about having an investor that’s got your back!
Hello’s lower-tier strategy, smaller fleet and powerful backer make it a safer bet than the ridesharing upstarts that have come before it. Critically, it seems to have sidestepped the key missteps that crippled its rivals—oversupply of bikes and banking on user deposits to finance operations. In my next article, I’ll discuss what Hello is doing in ride hailing, as well as its broader role in Alibaba’s drive to snap up China’s on-demand mobility sector.
Correction: A previous version of this article described Ant Financial as “spun off from but still owned by Alibaba.” In fact, Alibaba does not own a stake in Ant Financial. A deal under which Alibaba would take a 33% share of Ant, announced in 2018, has not yet closed.
]]>Lifestyle services super app Meituan has expanded its aggregated ride-hailing services to an additional 15 cities around China, intensifying competition in the sector and taking direct aim at Didi.
The company initially launched the service, which allows users to access vehicles from several ride-hailing platforms within Meituan’s app, in Nanjing and Shanghai in late April. Users are given the choice of hailing rides using Shouqi Limousine & Chauffeur, Caocao Chuxing, and Shenzhou, as well as its own Meituan Dache. Market leader Didi has not been included in the service.
Meituan has now expanded the scope of the platform to an additional 15 cities, including the eastern cities of Suzhou, Hangzhou, and Ningbo, as well as Xi’an, Chengdu, Wuhan, and Shenzhen.
Meituan isn’t the first platform that allows users to book trips from multiple ride-hailing companies. The firm joins Chinese map apps Autonavi and Baidu Map in offering the service.
Meituan is taking a more cautious approach to improving its customer experience amid increased regulation of the ride-hailing sector and a 57% increase in its operating losses in the fourth quarter of 2018. Aggregating rides allows the company to offer additional functionality without a significant increase in costs.
Teaming up with the likes of Shouqi and Shenzhou also allows Meituan to take on Didi, which currently commands the ride-hailing market in China. Didi has seen increased scrutiny over the past year following two high profile murders of passengers by their drivers using the company’s carpooling service Hitch.
Since then, several smaller players have set up shop, hoping to take a share of the market. Most recently, electric vehicle (EV) maker Xpeng, also known as Xiaopeng, began operating a ride-hailing pilot in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou. Unlike other companies, the EV manufacturer will employ all of its drivers.
Several automakers are looking to offer similar services. In December Mercedes Benz and Volkswagen partnered on a high-end ride-hailing service in Shanghai, while Daimler and Geely set up a joint venture in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou last week, focusing on ride-hailing and car rental services. Tech giants Tencent and Alibaba also seek to gain a share of the market, setting up a RMB 10 billion (around $1.5 billion) mobility venture with state-owned automaker Changan in Nanjing.
]]>首开罚单!哈啰出行在京违规投放共享单车被罚5万元 – People.cn
What happened: Beijing Transport Bureau on Friday announced a RMB 50,000 (around $7,230) fine against Hello TransTech for adding new bikes to the city without permission. It is the first time the Beijing government has penalized a bike rental company. According to a Weibo announcement posted Friday by the government agency, Hello TransTech was originally granted permission to replace 19,000 damaged bikes in suburban areas of the city in December 2017. However, there are more than 50,000 bikes across the city. In addition to the fine, the Ant Financial-backed mobility firm was told to remove the additional bikes within 10 working days.
Why it’s important: Hello TransTech apologized for its mistake in a response released Friday, and explained that the actual demand for shared bikes has been increasing since the spring. Local governments issued injunctions in late 2017 forbidding bike-rental platforms from adding new bicycles to cities including Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Hangzhou. The municipal government reprimanded Didi Thursday for introducing new bikes without permission from the same government agency. A growing number of rental bikes are in poor condition with no indication when authorities will lift the ban, leaving commuters with fewer options.
]]>Chinese bike-rental companies are taking an indirect path to revive their businesses — replacing old bikes with new ones. Didi this week replaced 10,000 used bikes in Beijing with 3,000 new ones in an effort to refresh its brand image while complying with the government’s restrictions. However, it was immediately reprimanded by the municipal government for violating rules.
According to a report by Beijing Youth Daily, 3,000 new Qingju bikes were introduced to Xierqi, an area in Beijing home to the headquarters of Chinese internet giants such as Baidu and Didi.
Didi, which owns bike-rental services Qingju and Bluegogo, said it had removed 10,000 old Bluegogo bikes from the area a month earlier after being granted permission from the Zhongguancun administrative committee to better meet demand and help relieve traffic in the area. Xierqi belongs to Zhongguancun Technology Park.
However, Didi did not obtain approval from the Beijing Transport Bureau, which banned in August new shared bikes. The government body castigated the company in a Weibo announcement released Thursday afternoon for introducing new bikes without permission and promised punishment for violating relevant rules and “disturbing the normal order of the market.”
A Didi spokesman explained in a statement sent Thursday that there is not much service life left in the old bikes and that it is in a negotiation with the local government to offer more choices to local commuters.
The company launched its own bike-rental brand Qingju last January, around the same time it acquired Bluegogo, once the third-largest of its kind, in late 2017.
The move marks the debut of Didi’s own brand in the city’s bike sharing market, a major step following the company’s high-stake investment into Ofo in late 2016. Chinese media reported that Didi was Ofo’s largest institutional investor following several rounds of funding totaling $370 million in early 2017.
Didi’s acquisition of Ofo reportedly did not go smoothly. Ofo management was seen as resistant to the takeover; three Didi executives reportedly stepped down from their posts in November 2017, fewer than five months after being assigned to roles at the startup. Ofo faced reports of mounting debt, office closures, and massive layoffs over the past few months.
Facing friction at Ofo, Didi planned to expand and influence the market using its own brand. It will deliver 2 million new Qingju bikes to major cities in a bid to take on Meituan, which acquired Mobike in April 2018, reported 36Kr. However, it has made little progress due to bans in Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou on bike-rental firms from introducing new bicycles beginning August 2017, as the major cities were choking on the millions of bicycles left over from the bike-rental boom.
Didi is not the first company struggling to retain the market amid tight regulatory control. Hello Transtech replaced some of its bicycles in January 2018 after obtaining transport bureau permission, looking to maintain a presence in Beijing, a vital market where rivals Mobike and Ofo continue to grapple.
]]>Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi’s finalized a strategic partnership agreement with State Grid EV Service for its electric vehicle (EV) initiative today.
State Grid EV Service is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the State Grid of China, the country’s largest state-owned electric utility entity.
Under the partnership, State Grid’s nationwide network of charging stations will be connected to Didi’s open auto-solutions platform, Xiaoju Automobile Solutions, to provide integrated mobility, recharging, and energy-related services, according to an emailed statement from the company. The two parties will also look to cooperate in developing new car service models.
The cooperation will roll out first in key central and southeast provinces including Zhejiang, Fujian, Jiangsu, Shandong, Shaanxi, Hunan, and Jiangxi.
Didi has been attaching more strategic importance to auto-related services as it tries to move beyond its core ride-hailing business. In April 2018, the company invested $1 billion in Xiaoju Automobile Solutions. Through the platform, the company works with automakers, fleet operators, and energy partners to provide integrated automobile solutions to users, such as locating nearby charging stations.
While electric vehicles are going mainstream as an eco-friendly alternative for drivers, Didi is moving on the trend. The company recently set up a joint venture with a unit of state-owned BAIC to work on new energy vehicles and artificial intelligence.
As part of its auto-related services, Didi has explored electronic vehicle charging services in the past. In late 2017, it announced plans for its own electric vehicle charging network. The company now has more than 400,000 electric vehicles operating on its platform.
According to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, China accounts for more than 55% of global new energy vehicle sales thanks to government subsidies in support of the technology.
Meanwhile, the nation is racing to build the infrastructure needed to support those vehicles. China now boasts 808,000 electric vehicle chargers, well ahead of the roughly half a million in the US, according to a report released by Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy. At the same time, global carmakers including BMW AG, Tesla, Volkswagen AG, Ford have launched their own charging ventures with local partners.
]]>Chinese electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer Xiaopeng on Thursday launched a ride-hailing service in southern China, as automakers look to the industry and market leader Didi accrues losses from its operations.
Xiaopeng, also known as Xpeng, launched the trial service, dubbed Pengster, in Guangzhou, where the company is headquartered. The move comes after the EV maker was granted a ride-hailing license by city authorities earlier this week.
Unlike Didi, Xiaopeng will employ all of the “trained, verified and monitored professional drivers” on its platform, the company said in a statement. Xiaopeng is rolling out the service with an initial “several hundred” of its G3 SUVs, though it plans to increase its fleet size to 2,000 by the end of 2019.
The service is currently only available in Guangzhou but may expand gradually to other cities over time, a Xiaopeng spokeswoman told TechNode.
“The Pengster service will allow Xpeng Motors to gain important operational experience from a diversified range of driving scenarios, [and] deeper understanding of customer behavior and preference,” the company said.
Xiaopeng is counting on raising brand awareness by having more of its vehicles on the road, which will effectively function as on-the-road showrooms. Operating a ride-hailing fleet also gives the company access to additional training data that could be used to further develop its autonomous driving system. In April, Xiaopeng delivered 2,200 vehicles in China.
“We are an EV designer and manufacturer,” the spokeswoman said. “We are doing this from a different point of view.”
Tu Le, founder of consultancy Sino Auto Insights, told TechNode that Xiaopeng needs to sell four to five times the number of vehicles the company did in April in order to justify its valuation and build enough working capital to keep the business going.
“They’re perhaps not seeing the demand for their vehicles that they originally forecast,” Le said. “This is another way to get vehicles built, on the road, and in use.”
China’s ride-hailing market has seen upheaval over the past year, as the industry has sought solutions for safety concerns after two passengers were murdered by their drivers last year while using Didi’s carpooling service Hitch. Several city governments have since imposed rules on platforms, requiring that vehicles and drivers register in the city in which they operate.
Nonetheless, these rules haven’t stopped newer entrants, which include automakers, from setting up operations around the country, even as Didi reports it costs more to operate some trips than the company makes in commission revenue.
In December Mercedes Benz and Volkswagen partnered on a high-end ride-hailing service in Shanghai. Meanwhile, Tencent, Alibaba, and automakers including state-owned Changan set up a RMB 10 billion (around $1.5 billion) ride-hailing venture in Nanjing. Like Xiaopeng’s mobility platform, the company’s focus is on electric cars.
Most recently, automakers Daimler and Geely set up a joint venture in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou to provide ride-hailing and car rental services.
But market leader Didi continues to make losses. The company last year reportedly lost nearly RMB 11 billion, almost five times higher than losses in 2017. In April, Didi reported that operating costs accounted for around 21% of total fare revenue from ride hailing in the fourth quarter of 2018, two percentage points higher than its commission rate from fares. Didi also said the company spent one-third of its commission revenue on driver subsidies during the same period.
]]>Tesla issues battery software update after Hong Kong vehicle fire – TechCrunch
What happened: American electric vehicle (EV) maker Tesla is issuing an over-the-air software update to change the battery charge settings in its Model S and Model X vehicles after one of its cars caught fire while parked in Hong Kong. Tesla said the update is being done out of “an abundance of caution,” though it will not be applied to the Model 3.
Why it’s important: Tesla has yet to identify the cause of the Model S fire in Hong Kong, which occurred just weeks after one of the company’s vehicles self-ignited while parked in a Shanghai parking garage. The incidents come as Tesla attempts to deal with flagging sales and challengers in the Chinese market. Chinese EV maker Nio reported a similar incident in which one of its SUVs caught fire while being repaired in central China. Nio said the fire was caused by a battery short circuit as a result of a chassis impact. The incidents have prompted concerns over the safety of EVs, which Tesla said is not an issue as its vehicles are far less likely to catch fire than their gas-driven counterparts.
]]>Ant Financial-backed Hello Chuxing seeks hefty financing that would take valuation to USD 4 billion – KrASIA
What happened: Chinese bike-rental platform Hello TransTech (formerly Hello Bike) is reportedly seeking to raise several hundred million dollars in new financing that would bump its valuation to $4 billion. In December, the company secured RMB 4 billion (around $580 million) in a financing round led by Alibaba’s Ant Financial and Primavera Capital Group, which valued the company at more than $2.5 billion.
Why it’s important: In February, the ride-hailing company launched its carpooling service in a bid to capture a larger share of the mobility market. At the time, the company said it would put RMB 500 million into promoting the new service, which is similar to ride-hailing giant Didi’s Hitch platform which has been suspended since September after the murders of two female passengers. Bloomberg reported last month the cash-hungry company was seeking to raise between $500 million to $1 billion. Co-founder Li Kaizhu said in an interview earlier this year that the company would seek an IPO in the future but did not specify a timeframe.
]]>Chinese electric carmaker Xpeng the latest to jump into ride-hailing despite ongoing losses at market leader Didi – South China Morning Post
What happened: Electric vehicle (EV) maker Xiaopeng is preparing to take on Didi as it enters China’s competitive ride-hailing sector. The company was granted an operating license by Guangzhou authorities on Monday and began advertising jobs for fleet operators and mobility operations specialists on its website in March. Xiaopeng declined to comment on its timetable or expected fleet size, according to the South China Morning Post.
Why it’s important: Entering the ride-hailing market would put Xiaopeng up against market leader Didi, which has been losing money on many of its trips. The company said it was pocketing 19% of each fare in China, two percentage points lower than the cost of the trip. Ride-hailing operators have also seen increased scrutiny over the past year following two high profile murders of passengers using Didi’s carpooling service. Nonetheless, Xiaopeng could be looking for an additional revenue stream as the government cuts its EV subsidies nationwide, putting increased pressure on manufacturers as they either absorb the extra costs or pass them on to their customers.
]]>BYD, China’s largest producer of electric vehicles, says that recently announced cuts to government subsidies for new energy vehicles won’t impact the industry’s long-term growth.
In a filing to the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZSE) on Tuesday, the company said that the reductions will help shift the sector away from being policy driven to one driven by market conditions. BYD filed the disclosure after the company was asked by the SZSE to clarify issues in its 2018 annual report.
“Subsidies will have a short-term impact on demand and the profitability of new energy vehicle makers, but they will not alter the long-term growth trend of the new energy auto industry,” (our translation) the company said.
BYD added that it is difficult to predict the impact of the subsidy cuts on the company’s profits from new energy vehicles.
In March, the Chinese government announced changes to its subsidy structure, saying that automakers rely too heavily on government support to sell vehicles, thereby sacrificing innovation in the sector.
By mid-2019, the government will cut contributions by up to 50% for vehicles with a range of 400 kilometers or more. Meanwhile, those that can travel up to 250 kilometers will not be eligible for an allowance. The cuts mean that automakers will be forced to absorb the costs or pass them on to their customers, both of which could be potentially damaging for their businesses.
The government implemented the subsidy system in 2009 in order to spur growth in the industry. There are now nearly 500 registered new energy vehicle manufacturers in China, prompting concerns that a cull is on the horizon.
“The leading companies are expected to continue to increase market share and achieve faster growth,” BYD said.
The government has also implemented a “cap and trade” system, in which manufacturers producing more than 30,000 electric vehicles per year are required to earn credits equal to 10% of their output. Companies that don’t reach this can be fined. The system aims to ensure traditional manufacturers also produce new energy vehicles while providing a potential revenue stream for smaller players by allowing them to sell excess credits.
]]>Tesla Suddenly Catches Fire in Hong Kong Parking Lot, Times Says – Bloomberg
What happened: A Tesla Model S caught fire in a Hong Kong parking lot on Sunday, requiring firefighters to work for 45 minutes to put out the blaze. No indication as to what caused the fire has been given, and the company did not have an immediate comment on the matter, according to Bloomberg.
Why it’s important: The fire comes less than a month after a Model S spontaneously combusted in a Shanghai parking garage, destroying surrounding vehicles. Just days later, Chinese rival Nio reported one of its vehicles had caught fire while being repaired in the central Chinese city of Xi’an. The fires have sparked concern over the safety of electric vehicles (EVs). Last year, at least 40 new energy vehicles, which include electrics and hybrids, caught fire in China, according to the State Administration for Market Regulation. Tesla has previously claimed that its vehicles are 10 times less likely to combust than gas-driven cars.
]]>Editor’s note: A version of this post was previously published by ValueChampion, a research firm that aims to help consumers make smarter decisions with their money.
Since Lyft’s IPO and the precipitous drop in its stock price, many investors have been quite concerned about Uber’s upcoming IPO. To be fair, Uber has made a number of maneuvers to improve its profitability, and its newly lowered valuation could help appease some of these concerns.
In particular, Uber has famously exited its business in China, Southeast Asia and Russia in order to cut its losses; in return for selling its local businesses, it received equity stakes in its competitors, forming something of an alliance with Didi Chuxing in China, Grab in SE Asia and Yandex.Taxi in Russia. However, recent data suggests that these “alliances” actually may be less friendly than expected. In fact, each of these players are making solid progress expanding their footprints into Uber’s markets. If this trend continues, it may re-heat competition as regional whales encroach into one another’s territory, making profitability even more difficult to achieve than expected as they continue spending on subsidies and promotions to gain market share.
While Uber sold its China business to Didi Chuxing, the leading ride hailing app in China, Didi began competing aggressively against Uber in Mexico, where the latter has been dominant for a long time. In fact, Didi outranked Uber in the app store in November and December. Though Uber took back the top spot since January, Didi has been hot on its tail in Mexico just as Lyft has been in the US.
Yandex.Taxi’s launch into Israel has also been more successful than Uber’s own efforts in the country. While Uber has struggled to grow in this market (only ranked at around 4-8 place in the travel category of Apple App Store in the country), Yandex.Taxi’s Yango has outranked even local leader Gett in downloads since it launched late 2018.
Lastly, when Uber sold most of its SE Asia business to Grab, Uber actually retained its business in few markets where it remained dominant. Hong Kong was one of those markets, where Uber has consistently ranked as the top transportation app in the Apple App Store and Grab does not offer rides. However, Grab strangely began to outrank Uber for the first time ever starting in April despite users being unable to request rides with it, perhaps explained by vacation season as Hong Kong residents prepare for regional travel. The trend that has been continuing in May thus far amidst Uber’s various troubles. Could it possibly signal a new wave of expansion for Grab into regions like Hong Kong, Australia and Taiwan? At the very least, this type of download ranking suggests that Grab has a very legitimate chance of success should it enter the Hong Kong market.
What’s more troubling is that these companies are very big businesses in their own right. Didi and Grab both raised billions of dollars with sky high valuations. Not only that, they also have been facing tough competition from local players like Dida Chuxing and Go Jek. A combination of high valuation, a lot of capital and difficult competition in local markets creates an imperative for these companies to expand into other markets in order to justify their valuations with better growth prospects.
[infogram id=”uber-frenemies-1-valuations-1hnp270j9dkp6gq?live”]
While Uber exited China, Southeast Asia and Russia to cut its losses in those markets and profit from the growth of its “investees,” it’s now apparent that these deals didn’t categorically prevent them from expanding into Uber’s existing markets. That they are beginning to do so successfully is a very worrisome sign for Uber and the ride-hailing industry in general. These mergers and acquisitions were supposed to have rationalized competition by carving out regions for each company. What happens if these multi-billion dollar companies begin to compete in Uber’s markets?
This dynamic further complicates the math for Uber’s investors. Before, it might have been easier for Uber and/or its investors to imagine a scenario where Uber simply exits India by selling its local business to Ola, its primary competitor in the country. However, now they have to wonder if allowing someone else to consolidate India creates just another $60bn competitor that will eventually expand into other parts of the world, just as Didi and Grab might be doing. After all, Ola is already in Australia, UK and New Zealand and rising through the app store rankings quite quickly.
[infogram id=”copy-uber-frenemies-1-valuations-1hmr6gm35xy96nl?live”]
What does that do to Uber’s motivations & plans to compete in India? Will Uber be willing to suffer bigger losses in this market than investors are willing to endure? These are just some of the questions that make it even more difficult for investors to assess Uber’s investment prospects. Interestingly and perhaps coincidentally, we also observed Uber’s download rank in India inching up slightly against Ola’s starting in February of 2019, which isn’t something we observed previously since we started collecting the data in November 2018.
This dynamic also adds an interesting take on Uber’s recent acquisition of Middle Eastern ride hailing app Careem. As we highlighted previously, Careem had been competing very successfully against Uber in the Middle East. What’s notable about this deal was that Didi actually was already an investor in Careem. Given that Didi and Grab are now showing clear intent to and signs of success in encroaching into Uber’s markets, it creates an incentive for each of them to acquire as many of the “local leaders” as possible: Uber wants to make it as difficult as possible for others to expand into new markets, lest it face more Lyfts—large and well funded competitors—around the world), while acquiring a local leader might be the easiest way for those those competitors to find new growth engines, especially in relatively young markets like Latin America and Africa.
This article by Eudora Wang originally appeared on China Money Network, the best data intelligence platform tracking China’s tech and venture capital markets (access requires subscription).
Solid-state batteries will power half of the electric vehicles in 2030, up from practically zero right now, predicts a Taiwanese company. As EV sales are expected to increase in the decades ahead, driven by tighter regulation, solid-state battery makers may become the next rising stars in the renewable energy industry.
“I think overall solid-state battery products will account for a small proportion in the market by 2024 and 2025, because not many market players will have the capability to realize mass production. However, I think solid-state battery products will take up more than 50% market share by 2030,” said Taiwanese solid-state battery maker ProLogium Technology’s founder and CEO Vincent Yang Sinan in a phone interview with China Money Network last month.
Most automakers in the world, including Japanese auto giant Toyota, have set timelines to achieve mass production of solid-state electric vehicle batteries in 2025 and after. ProLogium said it aims to mass produce solid-state batteries in early 2021.
“ProLogium is in the process of constructing a G2 [production] line, which will have one gigawatt-hour production capacity per year. We plan to start to test the new G2 line around the middle of 2020, and then realize mass production in early 2021,” said Yang. “We think ProLogium will take up about 10% to 15% market share by 2025, and then the number will be adjusted to 30% to 35% by 2030.”
ProLogium, which is not yet profitable, plans to focus on delivering solid-state batteries to electric vehicle makers in the next three to five years. Currently, all its solid-state batteries are adopted in wearable devices, internet of things, and other consumer products.
Deloitte’s research shows the pace of global EV adoption rising from two million units in 2018, to four million in 2020, 12 million in 2025, before rising to 21 million in 2030. Most electric vehicles today are powered by lithium-ion batteries, which have a higher energy density, longer life span and higher power density. But they face some issues that greatly restrict their use, such as safety, durability and thermal breakdowns.
These problems can potentially be addressed by solid-state batteries. Many EV producers, automakers and energy storage engineers consider them the future of electric vehicles and pretty much anything else that needs a battery. Theoretically, a solid-state battery should be able to accept a charge at a much higher rate than current battery systems, store much more energy in a smaller space, and perform in a much safer manner since there is no finicky and flammable liquid gel or polymer electrolyte involved.
However, the problem is that no solid-state battery makers are able to mass produce their products and at this point, creating a solid-state battery the size of the common AA battery would likely cost thousands of U.S. dollars.
The Taiwan-based company, once low-profile and mysterious about its fundraising progress, has unveiled that SoftBank Venture Capital was the lead investor in its series A to series C rounds. Claiming to have entered the unicorn club, the company also felt “some reservations” from the investor’s side in pouring money into start-ups during a capital winter since mid-2018.
ProLogium is raising US$150 million in a series D round that is expected to reach the first closing in the second quarter of 2019. The final closing is expected to be in late 2019 or early 2020.
Established by Yang in October 2006, ProLogium has developed four major product pipelines for the production and sales of flexible-type LCB “FLCB,” high capacity-type LCB “PLCB” and high voltage-type LCB “BLCB.” The 13-year-old company said it has obtained 129 patents worldwide in fields like battery design, battery manufacturing technique and equipment, and product applications as of March 2019, with 83 more patents in the application process.
Below is an edited version of the interview.
Q: ProLogium is actively developing solid-state batteries used for new energy vehicles, but we noticed the mass production of such products has not yet been realized; we see that some major automakers set the mass production agenda for 2025 or even later.
What do you think is the current stage of Chinese solid-state electric-vehicle battery industry?
A: ProLogium started to focus on the development of solid-state batteries around 2006 and 2007, compared to our competitors who generally started around 2014, 2015 or even later. The average performance of our solid-state batteries can be even better than the liquid-state batteries, especially in terms of safety, fast-charging capability and high-temperature sustainability. However, based on what we learned from our shareholders, potential investors and customers who are involved in the electric vehicle production, I think Chinese solid-state battery makers cannot mass produce solid-state batteries until at least 2025.
Meanwhile, we have connections with a Chinese central government-level enterprise that provides automotive industrial services, policy research, engineering design and general contracting, and consultation. They want to help draft national regulations for the solid-state battery industry. We found the criteria they are considering can help us evaluate the current industry progress. I think most solid-state battery makers in China have already gone into the engineering stage, in which they need to find and decide the better, or the most optimized, way to mass produce solid-state batteries. Most solid-state battery makers already said they still need five to eight years before mass production.
Q: When will ProLogium realize mass production of solid-state batteries?
A: We already have a G1 line with a production capacity of 40 megawatt-hours per year, and are in the process of constructing a G2 line which will have one gigawatt-hour production capacity per year. We plan to start to test the new G2 line around the middle of 2020, and then realize the mass production in early 2021.
We currently have the G1 production line, which can produce sufficient solid-state batteries to meet the demand of our corporate clients in wearable electronic and IoT (internet of things) industries. The upcoming G2 production line will be used to support the production and construction of EVs, robots, high-speed rail and energy-storage systems.
Currently, all of our solid-state batteries are used to produce wearable devices, IoT and other consumer products. We will focus on realizing the mass production of solid-state batteries used for EVs in the coming three to five years. However, the current production capacity of the G1 line is not large enough to make our products cost-effective for entering and competing in the market.
Q: Has ProLogium started to earn profits?
A: No, we haven’t. However, if we can retain about $2-3 million in monthly revenues, we may reach the break-even point in 2020, when the era of application of solid-state batteries comes—especially applications in high-speed rail, which has a higher margin.
Q: Who are your major clients in the wearable devices and IoT industries? Who are your potential clients in the future?
A: Currently, we have realized the application of solid-state batteries in products like smart helmets, smart insoles, blue-tooth cards, fingerprint cards, vehicle GPS (global positioning system) devices, wireless barbecue temperature sensors and semiconductor testing equipment used in the semiconductor industry.
In the semiconductor field, ProLogium has already sealed cooperations with companies including an America-based capital equipment firm and a Japanese electronics and semiconductor developer, which are both among the world’s top 10 semiconductor companies. We have also entered into agreements with one of America’s “Big Four” technology firms to produce wearable devices. (Editor’s Note: Specific company names are concealed due to non-disclosure agreements between ProLogium and its corporate clients.)
For our potential clients in the future, I think we will have opportunities to work with EV and motorcycle producers after the completion of our G2 production line in 2021. We have connections with around 13 automobile manufacturing companies in Germany, Japan, the United States and mainland China. Some EV makers also knocked on the door to discuss and suggest us to consider transforming from pure solid-state to hybrid-state.
However, European automakers need to take a longer time—about seven years—starting from 2018 to around 2025 for next-generation solid-state batteries to be used in their EVs. I think most European automakers will still use liquid-state batteries until 2024.
In Japan, we have contact with automakers, as well as new-energy motorcycle makers to deliver solid-state battery-powered motorcycle in around 2020 to 2021, and realize the mass production of such model around 2022 to 2023. Certainly, solid-state batteries will be applied in motorcycles in a faster manner.
In mainland China, we have already entered into agreements with a state-owned automotive manufacturing company and new energy start-up DearCC to provide them with solid-state batteries.
Q: You mentioned so many automakers—will the production capacity of ProLogium be able to meet their demand for solid-state batteries?
A: Right now, we have a new business model to license our technology. Many companies who combined have a great demand for solid-state batteries can apply for a license. This can quickly increase production capacity and reduce our costs. We have granted licenses to around 10 to 20 companies, including EV makers and battery producers who became members of our alliance.
Under the license model, alliance members can choose to either pay US$50 million as an upfront fee, or spend a certain amount of loyalty for each solid-state battery they produce. We also charge service fee every time when they get maintenance or upgrade services from us. Meanwhile, we will also sell key materials and core equipment used in the production of solid-state batteries. I understand that our core equipment could be duplicated if we adopt such business model in mainland China, but I don’t think it matters that much because companies outside of the mainland China still need to pay us due to intellectual property protections.
I want to clarify that companies in some niche markets may still be able to use solid-state batteries directly produced by ProLogium in the future. Because one battery system cannot satisfy the varied demands of applications in different products—maybe it’s applicable to the EV industry, but not the wearable devices, high-speed railways or semiconductor applications. This is our combined strategy for the future.
Q: Do you think the license model will become a major source of revenues for solid-state batteries in the future?
A: I think, in the very beginning—probably from 2021 to 2023, we can directly produce solid-state batteries for the construction of high-speed rails or other high-yield products. After around 2023 and 2024, I think there will be more players joining us in the license model. If we assume that most solid-state battery makers can realize the mass production in 2023, I believe the number of market players adopting such license model will rapidly increase in 2024 and 2025, and it will become a main source of revenue for solid-state battery makers in the market.
Q: Solid-state batteries account for a very limited share in the current Chinese battery market. Let’s say if we want to see a market where solid-state batteries take up about 10% of the market share, how long will it take in your prediction?
A: We actually have a development plan measured by market share. We think ProLogium will take up about 10% to 15% market share by 2025, and then the number will be adjusted to 30% to 35% by 2030. If this is the case, I think overall solid-state battery products will account for a small proportion in the market by 2024 and 2025 because not many market players will have the capability to realize the mass production. However, I think overall solid-state battery products will take up more than 50% of the market share by 2030.
Q: Some companies found it hard to raise money during the capital winter in 2018. Was the fundraising of ProLogium also affected?
A: A lot of investors are interested in the technologies, products and business model of ProLogium, but certainly, venture capital investors have some reservations in pouring money into start-ups after mid-2018. SoftBank Venture Capital was the lead investor in our series A to series C rounds. ProLogium is raising US$150 million in a series D round that is expected to reach the first closing in the second quarter of 2019. The final closing is expected to be in late 2019 or early 2020.
]]>Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi is “hot on the tail” of US rival Uber in Mexico, according to a new report, as competition in the sector heats up amid aggressive expansions into new markets.
In November and December Didi was the most popular travel app in Mexico’s Apple App Store, with Uber coming in second. Since then, the Chinese company has ranked second according to an analysis by research company ValueChampion. “Didi has been hot on [Uber’s] tail in Mexico just as Lyft has been in the US,” Duckju Kang, ValueChampion CEO said in the report. Didi launched its services in Mexico in April 2018.
Uber drew attention to the competition with Didi in its IPO prospectus, which it filed on April 11, saying that the Chinese company had “made significant investments to gain or maintain category position in certain markets in Latin America.”
Didi has faced scrutiny in China after two passengers were killed by their drivers on separate occasions last year. The incidents took place on the company’s carpooling service Hitch, which has subsequently been suspended indefinitely. Regulators have since tightened their grip on the ride-hailing sector by imposing stricter rules. Didi has responded by implementing more stringent driver background checks, while various cities require drivers and cars to be registered in the city in which they operate. The result is a decrease in the pool of available drivers.
Didi reportedly lost RMB 11 billion (around $1.5 billion) in 2018, almost five times higher than its 2017 losses of $400 million. The company recently revealed that nearly one-third of its commission revenue was spent on driver subsidies in the fourth quarter of 2018.
To make up for losses at home the company has been expanding aggressively around the world. Didi’s Japanese joint venture with Softbank will expand to 13 cities in the country following its launch in Osaka last year. The company has sought to take on Uber globally, but most notably in Latin America. Along with operations in Mexico, both companies are competing in Brazil. Didi is also seeking drivers in Colombia and has advertised for jobs in Chile and Peru.
“A combination of high valuation, a lot of capital and difficult competition in local markets creates an imperative for these companies to expand into other markets in order to justify their valuations with better growth prospects,” Kang said in the report.
Aside from being Didi’s competitor, Uber is also a shareholder. The US company sold its operations in China to Didi in 2016 in exchange for an approximately 18% stake in the company. According to its IPO prospectus, Uber estimates its holdings in Didi amounted to around 15% as of September 2018.
The conflict between Didi and Uber has not only manifested itself in a battle for market share, but also in investments. In March, Uber acquired Careem, a ride-hailing service that operates across the Middle East. Didi had invested in the service prior to Uber’s acquisition. The move highlights Uber’s intent in making it as difficult as possible for competitors to expand into new markets, according to ValueChampion, thereby cutting off possible new revenue streams.
]]>Morgan Stanley: Tesla is going to need big China sales next year in order to make it – CNBC
What happened: Tesla’s recently announced $2.7 billion capital raise is a “bridge” solution, and the company needs to begin manufacturing and selling lower-cost vehicles in China, according to Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas. However, he said that the electric vehicle (EV) maker’s increased dependency on China and robotaxis undermines its investment story. Morgan Stanley said it doesn’t expect significant deliveries of Tesla’s Model 3 until the first quarter of 2020.
Why it’s important: Jonas’ less-than-optimistic outlook comes after Tesla reported disappointing first quarter results and has attempted to boost slow deliveries in China. The company’s image took a hit last month following an incident in which one of its vehicles self-ignited while parked in Shanghai’s Xuhui District. Chinese luxury ride-hailing platform Shenma Zhuanche has also taken to social media to voice its grievances over the EV maker’s after-sales service and quality issues, saying that 20% of its 280 Teslas have had electromechanical faults. The US company is expected to begin production at its Shanghai plant later this year to provide lower-priced vehicles to the Chinese market.
]]>Nio ES8’s burning incident results from battery short circuit caused by chassis impact – Gasgoo
What happened: Electric vehicle maker Nio said an incident last month in which one of its ES8 SUVs self-ignited at a service center in central China was a result of severe chassis impacts that led to the car’s battery short-circuiting. The company said that it had not checked the chassis as it was not requested by its owner, who asked to have the front bumper and windshield repaired.
Why it’s important: The ES8 fire came a day after a Tesla Model S self-combusted in a parking garage in Shanghai and a few days prior to a BYD igniting in the central Chinese province of Hubei. No one was injured in any of the incidents, according to the automakers. However, the fires have garnered a lot of attention and called into question the safety of the vehicles. EV makers like Tesla have claimed that electric cars are 10 times less likely to catch fire than their gas-powered counterparts. According to China’s top market regulator, around 40 new energy vehicles, which include hybrids and electrics, caught fire in China in 2018.
]]>Clouds are gathering on China’s electric vehicle (EV) front, eroding the allure of the once-attractive proposition for car makers and foreshadowing an industry cull.
China is home to around 500 EV manufacturers battling for a share of the market. But investors are getting cold feet as EV startups struggle with cutthroat competition, shifting regulations, and the need to partner with existing car makers.
Li Xiang, CEO of EV firm CHJ Automotive, warned last month that investors have become more cautious and that a large portion of startups would be forced out of the market. As a result, he said, more than 90% of investors would lose money.
“Everybody is starting to feel the pressure,” Tu Le, founder of consultancy Sina Auto Insights, told TechNode. “There’s less venture capital money to go around.” VCs are having a hard time believing sales forecasts given China’s economic downturn, Le added.
The concern comes as Chinese authorities exert pressure on EV manufacturers that could burst the hypercompetitive bubble.
In March, Nio, an EV manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, abandoned plans to build its production plant in the city. The company said it was opting instead for a government-sanctioned “joint manufacturing” model with a major production partner.
But industry insiders told TechNode at the time that Nio’s ambitions for its plant were quashed by China’s national planner, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), to combat overcapacity in the auto industry.
Meanwhile, rival EV startup Xiaopeng has struggled to sell its cars. Its G3 SUV went on sale in mid-December. The Guangzhou-based company delivered 1,500 EVs in the first quarter of this year, compared to nearly 4,000 from Nio, and 21,000 from industry leader BYD in March.
According to Neil Wang, Greater China President of consulting firm Frost & Sullivan, the next few years will be tough for EV startups, whether or not they have entered the mass production stage.
As few as 10% of China’s roughly 500 EV manufacturers are expected to survive. Three years ago, investment funds flowed freely, creating the situation that exists today. But with China’s economic slowdown and EV market saturation, startups are now having trouble raising funds.
Investor caution manifested itself at Nio’s IPO last year. The company raised just $1 billion of its $1.8 billion fundraising target amid increasing competition and questions about profitability among EV startups. Nio priced its shares at $6.26, the lower end of its $6.25 to $8.25 range.
Before Nio’s IPO, the company warned in its prospectus that costs would increase significantly in the future. Nio said it expected to spend $1.8 billion in the three years after it went public.
Just last month, Carsten Breitfeld, the co-founder of EV startup Byton, left that company with a dramatic flourish—on April 16, he made an appearance representing rival car maker Iconiq at the biggest annual auto industry event in China. His departure was reportedly a result of tension within the company over new funding, which Byton has so far failed to secure.
Byton was reportedly seeking an additional $500 million to fund mass production of its first vehicle, the M-Byte, as well as research and development. Last week, the company announced it would be closing its Series C this summer.
To be sure, these funding challenges aren’t limited to the EV sector. The so-called “capital winter” has affected Chinese startups more generally.
According to market research firm Zero2IPO, venture capital raised in 2018 fell by more than 10% compared to the previous year. But internet firms require far fewer physical assets than auto manufacturers. If an EV startup misses out on investment, it could result in missed production targets, which could have a direct impact on sales and the company’s bottom line.
Being the biggest EV market in the world comes with its own set of problems. Fitch predicts that EV capacity in China will reach 20 million vehicles per year by 2020—that’s 10 times higher than the government’s goal of 2 million.
While sales of EVs in the first quarter of 2019 reached 225,000 units, up 120% year-on-year, these cars made up just 4% of the auto market in 2018. Chinese consumers are not buying vehicles as quickly as automakers are producing them—total car sales dropped by around 15% year-on-year in the fourth quarter of 2018, falling from 5.5 million to 4.8 million units.
To address this, the NDRC in January enacted rules to limit new capacity, including measures to “strictly control” any new production capabilities for new-energy vehicles. But these rules make it significantly harder for EV startups to compete with traditional auto manufacturers—and are said to have motivated Nio’s decision to abandon plans for its plant.
In 2017, Nio had announced plans to build a production facility in Shanghai’s suburban Jiading District. However, its proposal was blocked earlier this year after US rival Tesla broke ground in Shanghai on its first overseas plant, the Gigafactory 3. Nio will now have to wait until Tesla’s plant is complete and has reached capacity before it can build its own factory.
NDRC’s new regulations state that companies are only permitted to build factories if they have an annual capacity of 100,000 vehicles. Firms are also required to have sold 30,000 cars globally or have made RMB 3 billion (around $445 million) in the previous two years.
David Zhang, an independent auto consultant who has worked with China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, said that it is difficult for an automaker to control and optimize its costs if it doesn’t have its own factory.
The regulations could have side effects, compounding monetary issues. In a report earlier this year, ratings agency Fitch warned that the tougher rules are likely lead to a cooling-off in EV investment.
Some EV startups are partnering with state-owned auto manufacturers to build their vehicles, Nio included. But these tie-ups can be expensive for smaller companies.
Nio’s cars are manufactured by JAC in Hefei, the capital of East China’s Anhui province, with the startup paying the state-owned carmaker for every vehicle produced. According to Nio’s IPO prospectus, the company is also required to reimburse JAC for any losses incurred as a result of Nio’s production. As of July 2018, Nio had paid JAC RMB 65 million (around $10 million) for its 2018 second-quarter losses. The company lost a total of $1.4 billion in 2018.
Creating a car brand is no easy task for EV makers, many of whom are newcomers to the industry. In addition, some are constrained by their manufacturing relationships with brands whose image is not strong, if not downright negative. For example, JAC is known for producing lower-cost vehicles, which contrasts with Nio’s luxury brand image. “It is disadvantageous for user perception,” Ming Lih Chan, industry analyst at Frost & Sullivan, told TechNode.
Nio isn’t alone. Xiaopeng has a similar production agreement with Haima, a subsidiary of the state-owned auto manufacturer FAW Group. Haima manufactures Xiaopeng’s vehicles in Zhengzhou, located in Central China’s Henan province. Xiaopeng is not publicly listed, and details of that arrangement were not immediately available.
According to Frost & Sullivan’s Wang, the financial pressures that EV startups face in building their own facilities are made worse by joint manufacturing policies and regulations that create higher barriers to building plants.
China was late to the auto manufacturing game, lagging behind the US, Japan, and Germany in terms of its global footprint. To change this, the Chinese government invested heavily to promote EV production.
In 2009, the government introduced subsidies for EV buyers, hoping to spur growth in the nascent industry. Almost a decade later, China is selling more than half of the world’s 2 million new-energy vehicle passenger cars, according to EV-Volumes.
But authorities believe automakers now rely too heavily on these subsidies to sell their vehicles, sacrificing innovation and vehicle development as a result.
In March, the government made drastic changes to the EV subsidy system. By the middle of 2019, electric cars with a range of more than 400 kilometers will have their subsidies cut by 50%. Meanwhile, EVs that are only able to travel 250 kilometers will not receive an allowance.
EV startups will face a choice: They can either absorb the costs or pass them on their customers. Passing on the expenses makes their offerings less attractive. Absorbing them could be harmful or even fatal to their bottom line.
The subsidy reductions are not unwarranted, but they will have a significant effect on smaller companies. “EV startups usually do not have very strong financial strength; subsidy cuts will significantly affect these companies and are expected to bring much more financial pressure to them,” said Wang.
Authorities have also implemented a “cap-and-trade” system requiring manufacturers that produce more than 30,000 vehicles to earn credits equal to 10% of the company’s output. The move is meant to ensure that traditional gas-powered automakers are also building EVs. Companies that do not earn enough credits can be fined. However, they are permitted to purchase credits from manufacturers that have excess, creating a potential revenue stream for EV startups.
According to Zhang, every point was expected to fetch around RMB 5,000. In reality, they may not be as lucrative as anticipated. “Each point is [now] only a few hundred yuan, which is very different from previous expectations,” he said.
]]>Embattled electric vehicle (EV) maker Faraday Future has received another lifeline in the wake of a dispute with Chinese real estate giant Evergrande—one of the startup’s major investors.
Faraday announced on Monday that it had received $225 million in bridge financing ahead of the company completing a $1.25 billion capital raise, which it expects to close this year. The latest financing, led by US-based asset management firm Birch Lake Associates, is aimed at helping to bring Faraday’s flagship FF91 SUV to market.
Part of the financing seeks to reassure Faraday’s suppliers after the financial turmoil the company has seen since late last year, and to “obtain their commitments” to make sure the FF91 enters mass production. To secure the financing, Faraday had its intellectual property and technology valued, which the company said are worth $1.25 billion.
The financing comes after Faraday set up a joint venture (JV) with once-popular Chinese gaming company The9 to launch Faraday’s V9 EV in China, a vehicle based on the FF91. Both companies will own 50% of the JV, for which The9 pledged $600 million. Faraday expects the JV to reach an annual production capacity of 300,000 vehicles and begin selling cars by 2020.
Faraday was also said to be in talks with EVAIO Blockchain over a possible $900 million in funding last November. The company has subsequently made no mention of the deal.
Faraday said on Monday it has a “growing fleet” of pre-production vehicles to test features for its FF91. The company has yet to enter mass production five years after its launch, mainly as a result of a series of financial issues that have ended in layoffs, unpaid wages, furloughs, and property selloffs. Faraday had previously planned to begin production of the FF91 at the end of 2018.
The company’s troubles began in 2017 but culminated after a fallout with Evergrande. The Chinese real estate giant backed out of a $2 billion investment deal with Faraday at the end of 2018 following an extended dispute over terms. Faraday had requested an advance on a future payment from Evergrande, a plea the Chinese company refused. Faraday then sought arbitration in Hong Kong.
The companies eventually settled the dispute, with Evergrande taking control over Faraday’s operations in China.
Faraday has since sought alternative investment. The EV maker has had to sell its headquarters in Los Angeles for around $10 million to stay above water. Faraday has also put its 900-acre, $40 million property in Las Vegas up for sale.
In the midst of Faraday’s financial issues, the company also lost a number of its senior executives as a result of the “devastating impact” its troubles were having on company employees and the “ripple effect” on its suppliers and the industry.
]]>Guangzhou authorities are inviting Chinese bike-rental companies to bring new bicycles into the city, a positive turn for embattled companies following government bans that have lasted for months.
In an announcement released Monday by Guangzhou Transportation Bureau, the city government plans to release a quota totaling 400,000 bicycles to three local companies. Requirements dictate that at least half of the bikes be new, and space procured to store a specified amount of the company’s new bike inventory. The company with the best proposal will secure permission to add 180,000 bikes for a period of three years to end in June 30, 2022. The other two runners-up can introduce 120,000 and 100,000 units, respectively.
Guangzhou government did not unveil a budget in the bid invitation and has authorized a local consulting firm as an agent. A contact person from the company surnamed Zhao told TechNode on Monday that the companies who win the auction will not receive funding, as the bidding is about market access rather than a government contract.
The bidding comes nearly two years after the city government issued an injunction in August 2017 forbidding bike-rental platforms from introducing additional bicycles in the city. At the time, there were over 800,000 bicycles in operation, exceeding the capacity for public facilities management teams of both the government and service providers, reported 21st Century Business Herald citing a local official.
Shanghai and Beijing authorities issued similar bans at around the same time. Shanghai had more than 1.5 million total bicycles and Beijing, 2.35 million bicycles. Other major cities also followed suit, including the eastern Chinese cities of Nanjing and Hangzhou.
Chinese bike-rental startups were investment darlings back then, competing against each other by placing large numbers of bicycles around cities in a bid to expand their market share. This led to “tons” of abandoned bicycles that either were disposed of as trash or recycled, a Shenzhen-based recycling firm told local media (in Chinese).
The number of bicycles have been reduced considerably over the past two years, which is considered one of the main reasons behind the green light by the Guangzhou government this time, according to media reports. Chinese bike-rental firms including Mobike and Hello Transtech immediately expressed their willingness to enter the bidding via public statements.
“The new bidding was the appearance of a welcome to technological innovation from the Guangzhou government, and we believe this will be important to flourish and promote sustainable development of the industry,” (our translation) said Mobike in an announcement provided by the company on Monday.
]]>Ride-hailing giant Didi will set up a team of 2,000 service staff to increase its focus on offline driver management and support, the latest in a series of attempts to improve safety for both drivers and passengers on the company’s platform.
Fu Qiang, CEO of Didi’s Ride-hailing Business Group, said in an open memo to its drivers that the company aims to “help drivers solve the problems they encounter in their work,” while soliciting their feedback.
“We firmly believe that only by serving the driver well can the driver serve the passenger well,” Fu said.
The company said it would continue providing its drivers with safety training, which Didi hopes will enable them to protect themselves while “providing passengers with safer and better service,” according to Fu. In March, a Didi driver was murdered by a passenger in the central Chinese city of Changde, calling into question the safety of drivers as well as passengers. The incident followed two others in which drivers were targeted in 2017 and 2018.
Didi’s safety work has so far mainly focused on passengers, following the high profile murders of two Didi users on separate occasions in 2018. The company’s safety features include a driver-passenger blacklist function, emergency contacts, an in-trip panic button, and facial recognition systems that link a driver with a vehicle, among others. The company also pledged to spend $20 million on customer service in the wake of last year’s murders.
Didi CEO Cheng Wei said in an internal meeting in February that the company planned to lay off 2,000 employees, or 15% of its workforce, following a restructuring that aimed to improve safety and compliance. Sources told TechNode at the time that Didi planned to hire an additional 2,500 employees following the layoffs, which included headcount for offline driver management.
As Didi faces tougher regulations governing its drivers at home following the murders, the company has sought to expand its footprint abroad. Latin America has become a key battleground for Didi as it seeks to take on international rival Uber. The company has launched operations in Mexico and Brazil, with plans to expand to Peru, Chile, and Colombia.
]]>摩拜、哈罗正从郊区市场撤退 超出范围停车会向用户收取管理费 – IT时报
What happened: Bike-rental startup Mobike, which is owned by lifestyle app Meituan-Dianping, has started to charge Shanghai users an extra RMB 20 (around $3) if they park a bike outside the company’s main “area of operation,” referring to a region largely encompassed by the the city’s Outer Ring Expressway. According to Mobike customer service, the fee can be returned if the bike is brought back to the city proper within 24 hours. Hellobike users are now also charged between RMB 5 and RMB 50 for parking a bike outside the main operating zone, depending on the city.
Why it’s important: In a bid to keep its biking business afloat, earlier this month Mobike raised usage rates for users in Beijing. The move followed in the footsteps of fellow startup Bluegogo, which raised its prices a few days earlier. Bluegogo went bust in a spectacular fashion in 2017 before being acquired by ride-sharing titan Didi. Mobike’s rates have so far remained the same for Shanghai, but the fees show a push to increase revenue in one of its main cities. Although the bicycles used by bike-rental startups are typically designed to be low-maintenance, companies must still hire employees to retrieve faraway vehicles or shift them in accordance with city regulations. The new fees are likely to make “bike-sharing” less appealing and convenient for users in remote urban areas, however.
]]>Ride-hailing platform Shenma Zhuanche has called out US electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer Tesla for quality issues, claiming that problems with the automaker’s vehicles have cost the company up to RMB 6.5 million (around $965,000).
With nearly 280 Tesla vehicles in its fleet, Shenma asserts that it is the largest buyer of the company’s vehicles in the Asia Pacific region. However, Shenma said in a post on microblogging platform Weibo on Friday that 20% of the Teslas it owns have had electromechanical issues.
The company also claimed that Tesla’s after-sales service is “unsatisfactory,” and inefficiency when dealing with complaints has directly impacted its services, with the average disruption time from repairs and maintenance lasting 45 days.
Shenma said Tesla’s after-sale service did not meet its needs because the EV manufacturer does not have enough service stations or vehicle parts available in China.
Tesla refused to comment when reached by TechNode.
Shenma has subsequently posted three ads on the Thompson Reuters building located in Times Square in New York City to draw attention to the issue.
Telsa faced scrutiny in China last week after one of its vehicles caught fire and exploded in a parking garage in Shanghai. Following the incident, the hashtag “Tesla self ignites” (our translation) went viral on Weibo, with related posts viewed 110 million times as of Sunday morning.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk took to Twitter to defend the safety of EVs shortly after the incident, saying there are “over a million combustion engine car fires” a year.
Shenma’s complaint and last’s week’s fire come at a sensitive time for Tesla. The EV company has been working to boost flagging sales in China. Tesla missed its expected revenue for the first quarter, earning $4.5 billion of an anticipated $5.2 billion. The company’s share price fell to $235 by the end of the day Friday from $258 when it reported its first-quarter results on April 24.
Shenma is aimed at the higher-end market and operates a fleet of new energy vehicles, including Teslas and BMWs, among others. According to the company’s website, it offers its services in major Chinese cities including Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou.
Update: This story has been updated to reflect Tesla’s response to Shenma’s claims.
]]>美团打车在上海、南京上线聚合模式 将试点更多城市 – Sina Tech
What happened: Meituan Dache, the ride-hailing arm of Chinese lifestyle services platform Meituan-Dianping, expanded its service offerings Friday using partnerships with a number of ride-hailing peers including Shoqi Limousine & Chauffeur, Caocao Chuxing, and Car Inc. in Shanghai and Nanjing. Under the deal, Meituan Dache users in these two cities are offered an extended range of ride services to choose from, either from Meituan Dache’s own fleet of drivers or those of its partners. The current partnership focuses on improving user experience and won’t involve any subsidy campaigns, according to Chinese media.
Why it’s important: Following a 57% jump in operating losses in the fourth quarter of 2018, the Chinese food delivery giant is exercising more prudence for business areas beyond its core food delivery service this year. The push into transportation, an area that Meituan bet on heavily last year with its Mobike acquisition and ride-hailing services, has slowed. Following the murders of two passengers by Didi drivers last year, Meituan Dache suspended its expansion in September, then Mobike shut down some of its Asia businesses in March. Building an alliance with smaller industry players is a way for Meituan Dache to better position itself against Didi’s dominance. The strategy is nothing new, though. Didi used a similar tactic when it built an “anti-Uber” alliance with Lyft, Singapore-based Grab Taxi, and India’s Ola during its heated battle with Uber.
Correction: This article has been corrected to reflect that the service was first launched in Shanghai and Nanjing instead of Shanghai and Beijing.
]]>滴滴与全球顶级自动驾驶研究联盟BDD达成战略合作 – TechNode
What happened: At a conference on Thursday, car-hailing titan Didi announced that it had formed a strategic partnership with Berkeley DeepDrive (BDD) Industry Consortium, an initiative hosted at the University of California, Berkeley. Through industry-academic linkups, BDD conducts research in the fields of computer vision and machine learning. According to Didi, the partnership will involve research and applications in the field of smart vehicles, training, and academic exchange. BDD has already partnered with Tencent, Huawei, Baidu, and Meituan-Dianping in addition to international auto brands.
Why it’s important: According to its official website, much of BDD’s research is linked to autonomous driving, suggesting that the partnership will support Didi’s ongoing efforts in applying the technology to its business. As of last February, the ride-sharing company was designing its own software and conducting small-scale tests on city roads in China. In July, company CTO and co-founder Bob Zhang also spoke of a mixed model that would allow the company to dispatch self- or human-driven cars as needed. Didi’s ambitions may be held back by its business model, however; in addition to a difficult 2018 following the murders of two passengers, it recently revealed that its spending on driver subsidies may not be sustainable.
]]>An incident on Sunday in which a Tesla vehicle caught fire in a Shanghai parking garage may have been caused by a battery short circuit, a preliminary investigation has found.
Tao Wei, an automobile defect expert at China’s General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection, and Quarantine, who is part of the investigation, told The Paper (in Chinese) that the finding came as a result of an initial check on Wednesday morning, though no data could be recovered as the car’s chip and battery had been destroyed. The evaluation was carried out at a Tesla test center in Shanghai.
In a statement on microblogging platform Weibo, Tesla said no preliminary conclusions had been formed, and that it would announce the results in a timely manner. “Please do not spread rumors,” the company added.
Closed-circuit video footage of a Tesla Model S billowing smoke and catching fire began making the rounds on social media earlier this week. The car was mostly destroyed while surrounding vehicles also sustained damage. Tesla responded by saying it was sending a team to Shanghai to investigate the incident.
The fire comes at a sensitive time for Tesla. The company has been trying to boost flagging sales in China and will report its first-quarter results on Wednesday, in which it is expected to post a loss.
Rival EV maker Nio said it was launching a similar investigation after one of its SUVs caught fire on Monday at a service center in Xi’an, a city in central China. Nio said at the time that no there were no casualties or other property damage as a result of the fire.
Sunday’s incident is not the first time a Tesla vehicle has self-ignited in China. In 2017, a Model S caught fire at a charging station in the city, damaging a vehicle nearby. The company has previously claimed that its vehicles are 10 times less likely to catch fire than gas-driven cars.
According to China’s State Administration for Market Regulation, around 40 new energy vehicles, including electrics and hybrids, caught fire in China last year.
]]>Didi-SoftBank taxi-hailing JV expands to 13 cities across Japan – Reuters
What happened: Didi-Softbank joint venture Didi Mobility Japan has launched its taxi-hailing services in Tokyo and Kyoto and will expand to 13 cities across Japan. The service initially landed in Osaka last year, targeting Chinese tourists and residents alike. The company joined forces with taxi firms as it sought to take on rivals backed by Sony and Toyota.
Why it’s important: Didi has been pushing to increase its presence internationally as it faces regulatory difficulties and driver shortages at home. The company this year plans to focus on internationalization and aims to take on rivals like Uber in international markets. Didi this week began recruiting drivers in Colombia as it pushes ahead with its Latin American expansion plans. However, the situation is different in Japan, where the company cannot offer ride-hailing services, as they are effectively banned. Instead, Didi has partnered with taxi operators.
]]>Ride-hailing giant Didi revealed a glimpse at its commission rates and cost structure on Monday in a question-and-answer post published on its platform to address criticism for its cash-burning business model.
Nearly one-third of its commission revenue was spent on driver subsidies over the fourth quarter of 2018. Operating costs were roughly equivalent to 21% of total fare revenue from its private car hailing business during this time, Chen Xi, executive president of Didi’s Ride-sharing Business Group, said on Monday. Meanwhile, fourth quarter average commission rate was 19% of fare revenue, and the 2% difference was recorded as operating losses.
Chen stressed the continued losses could not last long, promising more efforts on cost reduction in order to “run businesses in a sustainable way.”
Additionally, driver subsidies accounted for 7% of total fare revenue during the same period, the company said, explaining that driver incentives were a critical tool to meet market demand during the peak times.
This was the first glimpse of Didi’s internal finances as questions mount about its fiscal viability as well as safety on its platform. According to an internal file obtained by Chinese media, the Chinese ride-hailing firm recorded a loss of RMB 10.9 billion (roughly $1.48 billion) in 2018, nearly five times the reported $400 million in losses booked in 2017.
Didi had expected 2018 to be a profitable year, according to Chinese media reports in March 2018 citing industry sources. But by October, following the murders of two female passengers in May and August, its priorities shifted to security, according to a corporate executive cited by the Wall Street Journal.
Global ride-hailing giants share a common problem of huge losses despite robust commission revenues, as competition in the worldwide ride-hailing market remains intense. Uber reported $3.03 billion in operating losses in 2018, and has run at a loss for three consecutive years beginning in 2016, according to its SEC filing from earlier this month. Its core ride-hailing business had a 22% commission rate over the past year, and the US ride giant continues to offer subsidies to drivers to gain market share around the world.
]]>China’s Didi recruits Colombian drivers ahead of Bogota launch-Reuters
What happened: Ride-hailing giant Didi is recruiting drivers in Bogota, the capital of Colombia, as it prepares to launch its services in the country. Didi said in a statement that it hopes it can “meet the market’s expectations” as it recruits drivers with “an attractive offer.” The company did not give any indication as to when it would launch its services.
Why it’s important: Didi has identified Latin America as a critical battleground in its attempts to take on international rival Uber. The two companies are already going head-to-head in Mexico and Brazil, where Didi has attracted drivers with higher pay and bonuses. The move also highlights Didi’s efforts to offset issues its faces in China, including stricter policing of its platform. The company has already moved some of its senior executives to Latin America to lead its expansion in countries including Brazil, Colombia, and Peru. Uber is popular in Colombia, but illegal, with drivers risking a 25-year license suspension if they are caught working for the platform.
]]>What if there was a way to deploy autonomous vehicles prior to technological perfection? China may have found a way: build environments where AVs can operate separate from everything else. In this case, the key to success is infrastructure rather than technology.
On the one hand, AVs are not so complicated; OEMs simply bring together various hardware, software, mechanical and other technologies and make them work together. In the words of one industry executive, “It’s relatively easy to manually convert today’s automobile into tomorrow’s AV.” Indeed, universities regularly host competitions, pitting teams against each other to do just this. “The problem,” my interlocutor continues, “is how AVs behave when they are surrounded by less intelligent vehicles as well pedestrians, cyclists and so on.”
The Society of Automotive Engineers lists six levels of driving automation: Level 0 through to Level 5. For Level 0 vehicles, a human must constantly supervise and control the vehicle at all times and in all conditions; any technologies present are purely supportive and only provide warnings or momentary support (e.g. blind spot warnings). At the other end of the spectrum, for Level 5 vehicles, a human does not need to do anything; the vehicle can drive itself under all conditions and in any circumstance.
Today, the industry is focused on Level 4 capabilities; vehicles that can drive themselves but will instruct the human to take over under some circumstances. German automaker Audi’s new Q7, for example, is a Level 4 AV; while in China, software companies such as WeRide.ai and Pony.ai are focused on producing AI-driven Level 4 software technologies.
Transitioning to Level 4 is very difficult because of the fundamental shift in human-computer interaction it necessitates. There are two issues here. First, requiring a human to take control of a highly automated system is problematic. Initial findings from the terrible Boeing 737 Max crashes point to the cognitive limitations of humans trying to respond to automated systems that behave in unexpected ways. When a Level 4 AV asks the passenger to become the driver, there may only be a five-second window; not enough time for most humans to respond effectively.
Second, the problem of mixed equipage. This refers to environmental factors and the very likely scenario of Level 4 and 5 AVs operating in public with other (non-intelligent) vehicles as well as pedestrians. Japanese automaker Nissan takes this topic so seriously they set up a Human Understanding and Design group—anthropologists are among its staff—to answer the following question: exactly what constitutes “socially acceptable” behavior for an AV? Consider a crosswalk: even with clear rules of engagement, very often the driver and pedestrian will make eye contact to decide who proceeds first using subtle facial and hand gestures that AVs cannot currently recognize, let alone interpret.
China has a solution to these conundrums: deploy AVs in controlled environments while AI and software technologies develop. This extends beyond university campus buses and seaport facility trucks. While other nations must retro-fit their road network to accommodate AVs, China is still building cities and roads; it can therefore design them AV-ready from day one. The government of Zhejiang province, for example, built the country’s first “super highway” for AVs, connecting Hangzhou and Ningbo cities. This is just the beginning; China has identified more than 200 pilot cities as part of its Smart City agenda. Moreover, some industry executives are expecting Chinese authorities to implement strict regulations rendering some road lanes—even entire highways—as “AV only.”
These regulations may be necessary given the government’s aggressive targets: 50 percent of new cars must have driver assistance and partial or conditional autonomous driving features by 2020; 10 percent of all new cars must have fully autonomous capabilities, also by 2020; and Level 4 AVs need to be available for purchase as early as 2025. As socially acceptable behavior still has a long way to go for AVs, giving them their own roads seems to be the best solution for now.
Concurrent with technology developments, regulations and standards will also help the transition to full autonomy. But emerging AV standards in China are cause for concern. One standard, for example, requires autonomous buses to automatically break at speeds of 60 km/h when a pedestrian walks in front of the bus (within its 45-degree peripheral vision). This use-case, it was pointed out to me, is utterly useless on AV-only lanes and highways (where pedestrians are unlikely; but then again, this is China) as well as in mixed equipage environments, where speeds are slower and a wider peripheral vision closer to 180 degrees—or even 270 degrees—is necessary.
Nonetheless, while China continues to develop its AV behavior capabilities and experiment with standards, its infrastructure advantage may give it an edge in developing and deploying AVs faster than other nations.
]]>Electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer Nio has launched an investigation after one of its vehicles caught fire on Monday at a service center in central China.
The company said in a statement on microblogging platform Weibo that one of its ES8 SUVs had been undergoing maintenance at a service center in Xi’an when the incident occurred. There were no casualties and no other property damage, the company said.
Posts on Weibo relating to the incident had been read more than 850,000 times as of Monday afternoon. Videos show an ES8 billowing white smoke while Nio staff fight the flames with handheld extinguishers. In another video of the same incident, firefighters can be seen battling the blaze.
The fire comes amid heightened challenges to Nio’s business, including being forced to abandon plans for its own manufacturing plant in Shanghai. The company has seen its stock price fall by as much as 50% since it released its fourth-quarter and year-end results in early March.
The incident is the second in the same number of days in which an EV has caught fire in China. On Sunday, a Tesla Model S reportedly spontaneously combusted and exploded in a parking garage in Shanghai, damaging surrounding vehicles. The US EV maker also said it was looking into the incident.
Last year, a test vehicle for rival EV maker WM Motors combusted at a research institute in Chengdu, a city in China’s southwestern Sichuan province. The incident occurred while the vehicle was being dismantled, the company said at the time. In 2018, more than 40 new energy vehicles, which include electric and hybrids, caught fire in China, according to the State Administration for Market Regulation.
]]>Tesla says investigating incident of parked car exploding in Shanghai – Reuters
What happened: US-based electric vehicle manufacturer Tesla said it is investigating an incident in which one of its vehicles caught fire in a Shanghai parking garage. A video of the incident went viral on Chinese microblogging platform Weibo with the hashtag “Tesla self-ignites.” The Model S burst into flames and exploded, damaging surrounding vehicles. Tesla said it had sent a team to the scene and that no one was hurt.
Why it’s important: The incident comes at an inopportune time for Tesla. The company is trying to revive its sales in China, which have flagged as a result of Sino-US trade tensions. Tesla is also due to hold an investors’ day on Monday focusing on autonomous driving. This is not the first time Tesla’s vehicles have caught fire in Shanghai. In 2017, a Model S self-ignited at a charging station in the city, destroying another Tesla nearby. Similar incidents have occurred in the US, both while stationary and as a result of a crash. The company has said previously that its vehicles are ten times less likely to catch fire than gas driven cars.
]]>Executives at electric vehicle manufacturer Nio are putting a positive spin on the company’s future prospects, despite mounting challenges to its business.
Talking to the media on Tuesday at industry expo Auto Shanghai, Nio co-founder and executive vice president Jack Cheng said he is not going to worry about the company’s sales performance, which has experienced a “greater than anticipated slowdown,” according to the company’s latest financial results.
“We’re a startup company [and] we’re moving ahead with our capacity in our manufacturing partnership,” Cheng said. “There will be a lot happening in the next couple of years,” he added, alluding to the company’s self-driving plans.
At the show, Nio CEO William Li teased a sedan dubbed the ET Preview, a first for the company, which has launched two SUVs. Nio did not provide any additional information about the new vehicle.
Nio has also opened up its charging services to other EV brands for the first time, making them available for car owners through a mini program in popular messaging app WeChat.
But some analysts are not convinced. “Having these ancillary services like the mobile charging, that’s nice and all, but it’s not going to dent Nio’s bottom line,” Tu Le, founder of consultancy Sino Auto Insights, told TechNode.
Nio’s comments at Auto Shanghai come as the company seeks to tackle increasing pressures on its business, including lawsuits for allegedly misleading shareholders, slowing deliveries, and expensive manufacturing partnerships, all of which could hamper Nio’s development.
Still, that doesn’t seem to have inhibited the company from pulling out all the stops at the annual auto show, the largest in China, which alternates location between the eastern Chinese city and Beijing.
Nio’s booth at Auto Shanghai dwarfs those of its competitors, including Weltmeister and Xiaopeng. The display also outdoes some state-owned auto manufacturers. The impeccably designed space features a Nio House—one of many user centers the company has opened around China, an auditorium, and a display area for the company’s vehicles and services.
Nio is trying to give the impression that everything is fine, Le told TechNode. “Under the surface, they’re probably freaking out,” he said.
The company has been struggling to sell its vehicles. Since launching its flagship SUV, the ES8, in June last year, Nio has delivered around 15,000 cars. Nio saw a slowdown in sales in January and February, which it attributed to accelerated deliveries at the end of last year, seasonal holidays, and a slowing auto market in China. The company expects this trend to continue into the second quarter.
According to figures from the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, electric vehicle sales reached more than 225,000 units in the first quarter of 2019, up 120% year on year. Meanwhile, total auto sales dropped more than 10% during the same period.
The majority of these sales were lower cost EVs that were also generally subsidized by the Chinese government, and the figures are not necessarily indicative of deliveries in the high-end market, where Nio is placed.
In the first quarter, Nio delivered nearly 4,000 ES8s, down by half compared to the last three months of 2018. The company launched the ES6, a more budget-friendly SUV, in December. According to its website, Nio will begin delivering the vehicle this quarter.
The company faces the challenge of dealing with costs that come faster than revenues, which is compounded by the fact that it is attempting to build its sales, Nio House, and charging network at the same time, Bill Russo, founder of consultancy Automobility, told TechNode. “This will test the patience of investors and they may need to get fresh capital,” he said.
Nio should be able to tap its deep-pocketed Tencent ecosystem investors for some time until the company can prove its business model can work, Russo added.
But declining sales and ballooning expenses also expose the company to greater scrutiny. “It’s like the emperor with no clothing,” Le said. “And because Nio is publicly traded they have exposure in China, but also internationally. “
Since Nio released its financial results in early March, the company’s share price has fallen by more than 50%. Aside from the delivery slowdown, the company made losses of $1.4 billion last year.
Shareholders have subsequently filed class action lawsuits against the company in the US, saying that Nio provided “misleading” statements that led to losses for investors. These include Nio backing out of plans to build its own factory, instead opting for a “little known” automaker to build its cars.
The company’s vehicles are currently produced by state-owned auto manufacturer JAC in the eastern Chinese city of Hefei.
The lawsuits also allege that the company failed to disclose the impact of government subsidy reductions on sales. Nio has said these claims do not have merit.
Shareholders’ legal actions, in which the company’s tops executives and board members are listed as defendants, could distract management from their core focus on Nio’s development. “Not only are they having problems with sales, but now management’s attention has to be divided between three or four fires that they need to put out,” said Le.
The “joint manufacturing” model with JAC will no doubt continue for over the next few years as Nio has been blocked from building its plant in Shanghai’s Jiading District, as a result of government rules targeting capacity glut. The factory was due to open by the end of 2020.
However, as part of its agreement with JAC, Nio is required to pay the state-owned firm for every vehicle produced. In addition, the company has agreed to compensate JAC for operating loses it incurs as a result of manufacturing the startup’s cars for the first three years of production.
According to its listing documents, as of the end of June 2018, Nio had paid JAC RMB 65 million (around $10 million) for its 2018 second-quarter losses.
]]>The founder of electric-vehicle startup Byton turned up at an auto show—representing a rival – Quartz
What happened: Carsten Breitfeld, co-founder of Nanjing-based electric vehicle startup Byton, has left the company to join competing firm Iconiq, following a report last week by German Manager Magazine about his departure. His new role at Iconiq remains unclear, as does the status of his board chairmanship at Byton. In January, Byton’s board voted to remove Breitfeld as CEO, replacing him with co-founder Daniel Kitchener. At the Shanghai auto show, Breitfeld said, “it’s the passion of pursuing the dream that makes me want to join Iconiq. I have faith in leading the team to realize that.”
Why it’s important: Founded in 2016 and backed by Tencent, Byton has achieved a $4 billion dollar valuation without putting a single vehicle on the road. According to reports in March, the company plans on securing a $500 million-plus Series C fundraising round before commencing mass-production on its production model car in the fourth quarter of 2019. But as evidence of a weakening Chinese auto market mounts amid concerns that the country’s EV industry is facing an increasingly dangerous bubble, Byton and its startup competitors have an uncertain future ahead.
]]>腾讯车联与中国天气网达成战略合作 推动精细化气象数据进车 – Tencent Tech
What happened: Tencent Auto Intelligence, the tech giant’s smart vehicle unit, has entered a strategic partnership with weather.com.cn, a website run by the state-backed China Meteorological Administration to provide location-based weather forecasts to drivers. By providing minute-by-minute and mile-by-mile weather forecasts, the partnership could help car owners to adjust travel plans and make the best travel decisions, according to the company. In addition, the two companies will collaborate on a series of maps that provide information such as flooded areas in cities and popular travel destinations, among others.
Why it’s important: The connected car trend is creating new opportunities for tech companies, data providers, and car manufacturers to provide informational and entertainment services for passengers, as well as assist with road safety. Tencent has been making inroads into the smart mobility domain with a matrix of business that covers all car–related areas from smart car solutions, autonomous driving, and a WeChat-based auto payment system for parking. The tech giant is also working on an in-vehicle version of its messaging app WeChat. Tencent is competing with a series of domestic rivals that are increasing their bets on the sector, such as Baidu and Alibaba.
]]>Exclusive: Toyota sells electric vehicle technology to Chinese startup Singulato – Reuters
What happened: In a deal expected to be announced at Tuesday’s Shanghai auto show, Toyota has licensed the design of its eQ electric microcar to Chinese electric vehicle startup Singulato in exchange for first rights to purchase the firm’s future green-car credits generated as part of China’s new EV quota system. While a Singulato source said acquiring the license cost “several tens of millions of dollars,” official figures are not expected to be released. The company is set to unveil a new concept car based on Toyota’s eQ at the Shanghai auto show.
Why it’s important: According to Singulato CEO Shen Haiyin, the deal proves that his company has what it takes to compete at the highest levels of the industry. Founded in 2014, the startup will debut its first in-house developed electric car amid reports that the Chinese EV market is a bubble close to bursting. The number of EV manufacturers has tripled to 486 in the last two years, and while electric car sales are projected to reach 1.6 million units in 2019, they are unlikely to match the collective manufacturing capacity of the industry’s competing startups.
]]>China’s auto show highlights electric ambitions – AP
What happened: Automotive trade show Auto Shanghai, which opens this week, shows that global car makers are increasingly focused on making electric vehicles (EVs) designed for the Chinese market. Well-funded companies including General Motors, Volkswagen, and Nissan, among others, are looking to take on Chinese rivals BYD and BAIC Group, which have more than 10 years of experience in the low-price segment. At the Shanghai event, automakers are set to display dozens of EVs to compete with their gas-driven counterparts, while the Chinese government promotes electric cars as part of its Made in China 2025 Initiative.
Why it’s important: Chinese automakers account for just 10% of global sales of gas-powered vehicles. However, they are responsible for 50% of EV sales worldwide. According to an analyst interviewed by AP, the government’s push to shift to electric cars presents more of an opportunity than a threat to Chinese vehicle manufacturers. However, the country’s supply of close to 500 EV startups could exceed demand for electric cars even if the country is to reach its 2025 goal of these cars making up 20% of all vehicles on China’s roads. Subsidy cuts also represent a significant threat. Although unlikely to affect well-established traditional automakers, smaller technology-driven startups will no doubt suffer as a result of increased prices for consumers.
]]>China’s Geely launches new electric car brand ‘Geometry’ – Reuters
What happened: Chinese automaker Geely, which holds investments in Daimler and Volvo, has launched a premium electric vehicle (EV) brand as it seeks to boost production of new energy vehicles. Dubbed Geometry, the brand will focus on China but will also take orders overseas, with plans to launch 10 electric models by 2025. According to the company, customers have already placed 26,000 orders for its first model, the Geometry A.
Why it’s important: Geely is pushing aggressively into the EV market. In March, the company took a 50% stake in Daimler’s microcar brand Smart through a joint venture. The two companies will build a factory in China, and the vehicles are expected to go on sale by 2022. Geely is responding to an expected rise in demand for new energy vehicles that comes as China imposes limits on the production of petrol cars to reduce smog. Global automaker spending on EVs is expected to surge by $300 billion in the next five to 10 years. Of that figure, nearly half will target China, the world’s largest auto market.
]]>Ride-hailing operator Didi Chuxing has launched an online financial management system for auto leasing and fleet companies in China, the company announced on Thursday.
“Quanju” allows Didi’s auto partners to manage leasing accounts and financial plans, as well as access risk control and data analytics tools. The ability to monitor a vehicle’s operation, performance, and maintenance in real-time means that risks can be identified and improvements implemented more efficiently, said Liu Xiaoyu, head of Didi financial services operations in China.
Facilitating the operation of leasing and fleet companies will help Didi better manage its overall costs. “Mobility services providers like Didi need to manage the costs for operating the vehicle fleets… to deliver profitability for them and the drivers,” said Bill Russo, founder and CEO of advisory firm Automobility told TechNode.
“If drivers bear the burden of the car payments, insurance, and maintenance as individuals, they will not be able to get as good a price as Didi who can leverage their size to create economies of scale,” Russo added.
Didi expects the new system to serve 1,500 leasing partners in its network by the end of 2019. The ride-hailing operator has been focusing on auto services for the past few years, having set up Xiaoju Automobile Solutions in 2015. It stated in August that it planned on injecting $1 billion into the auto services division. Xiaoju, which provides services including auto leasing, car maintenance, and gas station services, has a gross merchandise value exceeding RMB 60 billion (around $8.79 billion).
However, Didi’s move into ride-hailing finance is relatively new. In January, the company began offering financial services including insurance, automobile financing solutions, and payment services to riders, drivers, and car owners on its platform. Didi has around 550 million users and 31 million drivers on its ride-hailing app, according to the statement.
A move into financial services isn’t uncommon among tech titans in China. BAT (Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent) and JD.com all have been cultivating their own fintech businesses.
Didi’s new found interest in finance may also help to expand its revenue stream, which is especially critical at a time when its main ride-hailing business is facing increasing public and government scrutiny following passenger murders last year.
]]>Bike-sharing start-up Mobike close to management buyout in Europe – The Telegraph
What happened: Citing an email sent from Mobike to investors, The Telegraph reported that the company’s European arm is in the final stages of a management buyout from Meituan-Dianping, the bike-rental startup’s Chinese owner. Regional General Manager of Mobike Europe Paul Zhu and other senior executives are leading the initiative, sources said. While it has not yet been confirmed, the sale is expected to be worth $100 million. Mobike Europe is also reportedly planning on branching out into e-bike and scooter rentals in the region. Meituan is expected to keep a stake in the company after the sale.
Why it’s important: Talk of a sale for Mobike Europe has been circulating since December, as the company faced an investigation for a possible violation of European data protection regulations. In addition, since its acquisition by lifestyle services hub Meituan-Dianping in May, Mobike has reduced its international presence in accordance with its parent company’s core market. In March it announced it would withdraw from some of its Asia-Pacific markets, including India, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, and Australia. The company faces the same loss-making conundrum as fellow bike-rental companies, which analysts at Tonghai Securities predict will last through 2021.
]]>Chinese electric vehicle (EV) startup CHJ Automotive has starting taking pre-orders for its first electric SUV model, Leading Ideal ONE, with deliveries slated to begin in the fourth quarter.
The mid-to-large sized all-electric SUV features a range-extending system, which uses gasoline to power long-distance drives. Its New European Driving Cycle (NEDC) range is 800 kilometers (around 500 miles), said the company, almost double that of its rival, Nio’s premium model ES6, which purportedly has a maximum range of 300 miles.
Priced at RMB 328,000 (around $48,850) after government subsidies, the model ONE comes in slightly lower than the ES6’s $52,000 price tag. The Leading Ideal ONE is now available for pre-order with a deposit of RMB 5,000, the company said at a press event on Wednesday in the eastern Chinese city of Changzhou, where its production is based. Models will be available for test drives in the third quarter.
“The next few months will be the most crucial period for the company. Vehicles cannot be fixed immediately like apps if something goes wrong… We have only one chance,” (our translation) Sina Tech cited Li Xiang, founder and CEO of CHJ, as saying. Prior to his work in EV, Li founded the country’s largest car information portal, Autohome, in 2005, which went public on the New York Stock Exchange in 2013. The Chinese auto veteran, who is also one of the Nio investors, requires employees above director level to be among the first buyers to provide feedback.
Backed by Changzhou government funding and investment firm Matrix Partners China, CHJ has raised RMB 5.7 billion over the past three years.
Nio is one of the few Chinese EV makers that has actually delivered cars to customers, though it recorded massive losses in 2018 to the tune of RMB 9.6 billion. So far, a total of 15,337 Nio ES8 vehicles have been delivered, according to a Weibo announcement released Apr. 2. Baidu-backed WM Motors has delivered 4,085 of the 100,000 EX5 models it targeted as a goal for 2019. XPeng Motors only shipped 522 cars in 2018, and Chinese consumers have stated that they have been “waiting as long as three months to get a real car,” according to media reports.
Beijing’s massive subsidies in the domestic EV market has raised concerns that manufacturers are too reliant on government funding, holding them back from developing better technology and vehicles. “Even mainstream manufacturers have encountered quite a few problems in their first electric models,” (our translation) He Xiaopeng, chairman of XPeng Motors, told local media, explaining that Chinese EV makers need time to improve the quality and build up mass production of their vehicles.
]]>Chinese video streaming company LeTV may lose its listing on the country’s stock market after accumulating significant debt, as major shareholder Jia Yueting pursues his dream of producing electric cars.
In its first 2019 shareholders meeting held on Tuesday in Beijing, Bai Bing, LeTV’s secretary of the board, warned that the company’s public listing is at risk of being suspended if it records negative net assets in its audited 2018 financial results.
The Shenzhen board-listed company reported total unaudited debt of RMB 12 billion (around $1.8 billion) in 2018, of which RMB 3.4 billion is owed to its suppliers. It also warned that it would be forced to delist after a year “if its 2019 annual report fails to meet regulatory demands,” (our translation) according to a notice released Monday.
“We have been negotiating with the controlling shareholder (Jia Yueting) and his related parties about the repayment plans,” (our translation) Chinese media cited Bai as saying. He added that the company “never gives up” and will continue to ask Jia to return the money by cash or other assets, such as the shares in his electric vehicle (EV) startup, Faraday Future.
Previously, US media reported in December that Jia’s 33% stake in Faraday was temporarily frozen by a federal judge. The embattled EV maker was also forced to put its properties in Los Angeles and Las Vegas up for sale, prior to forming an alliance with Chinese gaming firm The9, which pledged $600 million for the mass production of its luxury V9 model.
As of Apr. 4, Jia, the chairman and founder of LeTV’s parent company Leshi Holding, owned around 932 million shares of the video streaming company. His 23% stake has been frozen by Chinese law enforcement bodies due to unpaid debts, the company stated in the notice.
In a bid to raise cash, LeTV sold a controlling stake of smart TV subsidiary Leshi Zhixin, a major revenue source, to Chinese property developer Sunac in late 2018. In 2017, LeTV earned RMB 2.5 billion from selling internet-based TV sets, comprising 42% of the company’s total revenue. However, its revenues sank 90% to only 245 million for the first half of 2018 after the company found itself unable to pay suppliers.
After the spin-off, the TV maker re-launched as Lerong Zhixin in Shanghai in March, with plans to launch a new smart TV product by year end, alongside a sales collaboration with online retailer JD.com, reported Chinese media.
]]>Jia Yueting, CEO of embattled electric vehicle (EV) startup Faraday Future, has teased the company’s new car on social media shortly after partnering with a Chinese gaming firm on its production.
Jia posted a picture of the silhouette of the V9, which is based on the company’s FF91 SUV concept, on microblogging platforms Weibo and Twitter. He said that the new vehicle “blends design, AI, and seamless cabin connectivity.” The post marks the CEO’s return to Weibo after a two-month hiatus.
Late last month Faraday announced a deal with Chinese gaming company The9 to form a joint venture (JV) for the production, marketing, and sale of the V9 in China, with both sides holding equal control of the new firm. The9 pledged $600 million to the project, which is expected to reach an annual production capacity of 300,000 and begin selling the cars by 2020.
“That $600 million only gets them started on production,” Tu Le, founder of Beijing-based consultancy Sino Auto Insights, told TechNode. “They’ll need to sell a lot at the beginning to keep funding production.”
Faraday has yet to mass produce any vehicles. The company’s FF91 model was slated to begin production in December last year.
Faraday’s partnership with The9 comes among mounting financial trouble for the EV maker following a fallout with an investor, Chinese real estate giant Evergrande. The EV startup was forced to sell its headquarters in Los Angeles for around $10 million to stay afloat. The company has also put its 900-acre property in Las Vegas up for sale for $40 million.
Evergrande backed out of a $2 billion investment deal with Faraday at the end of 2018. Since then, Faraday has been seeking alternative investment. The breakup followed a months-long dispute over terms after Faraday requested an advance on a future payment from Evergrande. The Chinese company refused, and Faraday sought arbitration in Hong Kong. The companies eventually settled the dispute, with Evergrande taking control over Faraday’s operations in China.
Faraday’s new partner The9 was the second Chinese gaming company to list in the US, following Shangda Group. However, its business has mostly stagnated since it lost the rights to operate massively multiplayer online role-playing game “World of Warcraft” in China to NetEase in 2009.
“It’s two companies that need each other,” Le said of the deal between Faraday and The9.
]]>In a post on microblogging platform Weibo Tuesday evening, troubled bike-rental company Ofo denied reports of impending bankruptcy and maintained that the company is “currently operating normally.”
“Related debts are in the process of being litigated or negotiated. Fake news seriously endangers Ofo’s operations…” the statement read in part. Ofo added that it’s already offered up “evidence” to authorities and reserves the right to pursue legal action.
Chinese media originally reported on Tuesday an entry on the national bankruptcy disclosure e-platform, which showed that an individual named Nie Yan filed a bankruptcy application for Beijing Baike Luoke Technology, Ofo’s domestic operator. The application to the People’s Court of Beijing’s Haidian District is dated Mar. 25.
On Wednesday evening, an Ofo representative told TechNode that the company has not entered bankruptcy proceedings, but that an Ofo user had filed the court application. The company “communicated” with the Beijing court today, and maintains that operations across supported cities are proceeding “normally.”
According to an industry source cited by domestic outlet Yicai, an application for bankruptcy doesn’t necessarily mean that the company has begun legal proceedings. By law, a debtor is allowed seven days to raise objections after being notified of the case by the court.
But even if Beijing Baike Luoke Technology isn’t facing bankruptcy, the bike operator must still surmount a mountain of debt. In February, a Tianjin court froze RMB 1.45 million (about $220,000) of its assets after a supplier sued the company. In January and February, Ofo’s offshore operator Dongxia Datong Management and Consulting also failed to pay legal fines for close to 50 payment default cases, according to business intelligence platform Qichacha.
For months now, Ofo has been plagued by bankruptcy rumors and the all-too-real problem of returning millions of user deposits. That set the scene for a tongue-in-cheek post on one of Ofo’s Twitter accounts on April 1: “Everyone is getting their money back.”
An Ofo representative said that the apparent April Fool’s joke wasn’t the work of the company. When asked on April 2 whether the account had been hacked, she said that the company was still looking into the matter. The tweet has since been deleted.
Update: This article was updated on Wednesday, Apr. 3, to include a response from an Ofo representative.
]]>Chinese bike-rental companies are taking action to bolster profitability amid huge losses and major cash flow constraints. Mobike announced on Monday that it will raise prices for bike rides in the capital city of Beijing, following a similar move by Bluegogo just days earlier.
According to a notice dated Monday released on Mobike’s mobile application, Beijing riders will be charged RMB 1 (around $0.15) for a trip up to 15 minutes, and RMB 0.5 for every additional 15 minute increment. This is double the going rate, RMB 1 for a 30-minute ride.
The new rates, which go into effect Apr. 8, will help the company operate sustainably, according to the statement. Mobike also said the price increase will not apply to users who bought into its discount program, which charges flat rates for unlimited rides for one, three, and six months.
Bluegogo announced its new rates on Mar. 21 with the same prices. The Didi-backed bike-rental platform had unveiled a set of punitive measures days earlier to combat misbehaving riders, who in serious cases could be banned from the service for up to 90 days.
Although neither platform has launched the new rates in cities other than Beijing, the rise in prices reflects a small but significant shift in the Chinese sharing economy sector, where most players have been struggling for the past year. Research from equity firm China Tonghai Securities show that after accounting for losses of RMB 4.6 billion to its parent company Meituan in 2018, Mobike will be loss-making until 2021.
Other bike-rental companies are considering raising prices, as warmer weather brings a likely rebound in trip numbers. A company spokesperson from Hello TransTech told TechNode on Monday that the platform is maintaining its original pricing but “does not exclude the possibility of a price increase in the future,” as it has been a growing trend in the industry (our translation).
Ofo, another once-promising startup, has stumbled repeatedly in the past several months as headlines about debts and layoffs plague the bike-rental company. It announced in March eight corporate corruption cases reported to local police in a period of three months. These includes a former employee surnamed Su illegally selling Ofo bicycles worth a total of RMB 2 million in China’s southeastern Fujian province, according to an internal company letter obtained by Chinese media.
]]>Chinese automaker Geely will purchase a 50% stake in Daimler’s Smart car division, as the German manufacturer seeks to promote electric vehicles and recover its losses from the flagging micro car business.
In a statement released Thursday, the two companies said they would form a 50-50 globally focused joint venture to “own, operate and further develop Smart … as a leader in premium-electrified vehicles.” The new firm’s board will include an equal number of executives from the Chinese and German companies.
The move comes as Daimler seeks to recoup some of its losses from the Smart brand. According to investment research firm Evercore ISI, Smart has been losing up to €700 million (around $790 million) a year. The joint venture also follows an agreement last year in which the two companies partnered on ride-hailing services to take on industry giant Didi.
Geely owns Swedish vehicle producer Volvo and British sports car maker Lotus. The company bought a $9 billion stake in Daimler at the beginning of 2018.
Geely chairperson Li Shufu said in the statement that the companies plan to “further push the introduction of premium electric products to give a better mobility experience.” The new company will target both the Chinese and international markets.
Daimler and Geely will build a factory in China and expect to sell their small electric cars by 2022. The vehicles will be designed by Mercedes Benz, which is owned by Daimler, and engineered by Geely. Before the launch of the new Smart models, the current generation will continue being produced at Daimler’s plant in France.
Daimler has increased its presence in China over the course of the past few years. The company was granted a license to test autonomous vehicles in Beijing—the first non-Chinese automaker to be given such permissions. Daimler has also forged ties with internet giant Baidu. The two companies signed an agreement last year to deepen a partnership on vehicle connectivity services. As part of the deal, Daimler planned to integrate Baidu’s services into Mercedes Benz’s infotainment system.
]]>上海电信预计上半年可提供首批5G能力 – Shanghai Securities News
What happened: China Telecom’s Shanghai branch announced on Tuesday that the company is going to test its gigabit 5G networks in three spots in Shanghai in the first half of this year, including an industrial park, the city’s financial district, and a hospital. The next-generation wireless networks will be applied to different scenarios in these areas, including a cloud-based intelligent manufacturing system powered by high-speed 5G networks at the Shanghai Lingang Industrial Park, and an overall healthcare solution based on 5G technologies at the Yueyang Hospital. In the Lujiazui financial district, the company will provide 5G connectivity to financial institutions such as the Shanghai Stock Exchange to “explore the application of 5G to the financial industry.”
Why it’s important: This rollout marks the latest development in the 5G tests the Chinese government has been “guiding” with the three major mobile operators in various cities. A report by the Internet Society of China said that the first step of China’s 5G commercial deployment would be supporting applications such as connected cars and the industrial internet. It’s also believed that 5G will boost the internet of things since it was designed to connect billions of devices and sensors at a lower cost than older technologies.
]]>China Scales Back Electric-Car Subsidies to Spur Innovation – Bloomberg
What happened: China will cut electric vehicle (EV) subsidies as it aims to spur innovation and counter manufacturer reliance on government assistance to drive sales. China’s Ministry of Finance said in a statement on Tuesday that, among others, subsidies for vehicles with a range of more than 400 kilometers would be cut by half to RMB 25,000 (around $3,700). The ministry is also recommending that provincial and city governments cut their subsidies for EVs.
Why it’s important: Financial assistance for purchases has led to the rapid growth of China’s EV sector. However, this support has also led to concerns that manufacturers are too reliant on the government, which is holding them back from developing better technology and vehicles. The cuts have already had a negative impact on some smaller automakers. Shanghai-based Nio saw its share price fall by more than 5% following the announcement. The company previously said it would not reduce prices to offset lower subsidies, which means a higher price tag for prospective buyers.
]]>Beijing gave its biggest electric-vehicle maker $1 billion in help toward a single year of sales – Quartz
What happened: An analysis by Quartz of data from China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) shows electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer BYD received approximately $1 billion in subsidies on the 100,000 vehicles it manufactured and sold in 2016. Despite this government support and increased sales in the world’s largest EV market, BYD saw profits decline 31% in 2018 from a year earlier. Additional analysis of MIIT data suggests that between local and central governments, at least $60 billion was spent on the EV industry from 2009 to 2017.
Why it’s important: With 400-plus companies jostling for a share in China’s crowded EV market, this insight into the extent of the government’s efforts to drive growth sheds some light on the overall health of the industry. It also reflects China’s institutionally backed efforts to cut carbon emissions, although a Finance Ministry announcement of planned subsidy cuts has some manufacturers bracing for losses. But with public transportation displacing huge amounts of fossil fuel demand and foreign companies like Tesla looking to expand their presence in the country, China’s EV scene continues to mature.
]]>美团买菜在京推测试服务站 定位“手机菜篮子 – Huanqiu
What happened: Chinese on-demand service Meituan-Dianping is testing a new grocery delivery feature in Beijing. Two service centers were set up in residential districts of the capital city, providing 30-minute delivery times to residents living within 1.5 miles of the station. Around 1,500 items in the categories of vegetables, seafood, meat, dairy, and snacks are available through the Meituan app.
Why it’s important: Restaurant delivery is still Meituan’s core business, but the Tencent-backed tech giant aims to become an all-encompassing platform for local life services, of which grocery shopping is an important part. Entry to the new business would put the company in direct competition with incumbents in the fresh food e-commerce segment like JD’s online grocery and delivery platform JD Daojia and smaller players such as FreshMarket and Dingdong. Like restaurant delivery, grocery delivery is yet another subsidy-fueled battle for the company which posted operating losses of RMB 3.7 billion (around $557 million) in the fourth quarter of 2018 due to rising costs in its delivery and bike-rental businesses.
]]>China’s Evergrande Health aims to build production capacity for up to 1 million EVs in 3 years – Reuters
What happened: Evergrande Health aims to build production capacity for 1 million electric vehicles (EV) in the next three years. Its parent company, the real estate conglomerate Evergrande Group, said last week that it had plans to begin producing vehicles as early June.
Why it’s important: An ugly breakup with EV startup Faraday Future has further motivated Evergrande in its ambitions to produce electric cars. Amid a broader government push, the company aims to become the world’s largest manufacturer of new energy vehicles (NEVs), including EVs and hybrids, in the next five years. In January, the property juggernaut set up an NEV company with $2 billion in registered capital. Prior to this, it pledged $930 million for a 51% stake in National Electric Vehicle Sweden through Evergrande Health. Evergrande has also invested more than RMB 1 billion (around $150 million) in EV battery manufacturer Shanghai CENAT New Energy.
]]>Mobike, the bike-rental arm of Chinese food delivery and services platform Meituan-Dianping, will continue to be loss-making through to 2021 and be a drag on overall company profitability, a recent research report from equity firm China Tonghai Securities said.
The bike rental-subsidiary, which the company acquired for RMB 18.1 billion ($2.7 billion) in April 2018, contributed RMB 4.6 billion, or over half of the company’s adjusted net losses in 2018.
In addition to these persistent bike-rental related losses, mounting competitive pressures in its core food delivery segment, as well as tightening margins caused by cost overruns, mean it will take longer for Meituan to turn its fortunes around, the report added.
Fiercer competition from Ele.me is going to worsen Meituan’s position, analyst Esme Pau, who co-authored the report, told TechNode in an emailed interview. Ele.me CEO Wang Lei announced in 2018 the company’s strategy to raise its market share to 50% from 35% in 2018.
Meituan is essentially a price-taker in its core food delivery business, given that merchants and users are price-sensitive, the March 19 report said.
Meituan relies on subsidies and incentives to retain users and merchants. The turning point would be when Meituan acquires price-setting power in a monopoly or duopoly market, which in Pau’s view, would not occur this year given Ele.me’s determination to grab market share.
Around 85% of food delivery users have a habit of comparing price on different platforms before placing an order, according to a 2018 survey by consultancy ZPartners.
In its 2018 financial report, Meituan promised to take a more prudent approach in the exploration of new opportunities in 2019.
Given the circumstances, Pau said Meituan’s best short-term strategy would be to direct the user traffic on the company’s apps to other profit-making business such as its online hotel and travel-booking services in order to break even at the company level.
]]>After a series of furloughs, pay cuts, and a plant closure, embattled electric vehicle (EV) maker Faraday Future (FF) appears to have seized on a second life. A Chinese gaming company plans to invest millions of dollars to be the sales agent for its upcoming vehicle model V9.
According to an announcement released Sunday by Faraday, the company has signed an agreement with Shanghai-based internet company The9 Limited to form a joint venture, with both sides owning 50% of the new company. The joint company will manage the manufacturing, marketing, and sale of Faraday Future’s new V9 in China, a flagship luxury EV model designed and developed by Faraday.
The9 is putting $600 million into the JV, but Chinese media is reporting rumors that Hong Kong-based financial firm AMTD Group and US investment bank Maxim are also involved in the deal, citing a person familiar with the deal. The JV is expected to reach an annual production capacity of 300,000 units and roll out the first batch of V9 vehicles for order in 2020.
“We believe our alliance with FF provides us with a great opportunity to pursue the fast-growing market of electric vehicles in China,” Zhu Jun, CEO of The9 said in the announcement, mentioning Faraday’s “leading technology” and “world-class talents.” Zhu recently visited Faraday’s US headquarters after meeting its founder Jia Yueting several times, The Paper reported on Friday citing an investment bank employee as saying.
The9 was the second Chinese online gaming company listing on the US stock market after the Shanda Group, going public on Nasdaq in 2005. This was one year after it formed a five-year partnership with US game developer Blizzard Entertainment for the exclusive operation of hit title World of Warcraft in mainland China. The company’s business has stagnated since 2009 when Blizzard moved to Netease.
The partnership with Faraday comes three months after the electric vehicle company settled a months-long spat with its former investor, Chinese real estate giant Evergrande, in December. Before that, the US-based startup has been dealing with mounting debt, massive layoffs, and unpaid wages for months. It has announced that it will sell its 900-acre property located in Las Vegas, as well as its headquarters in Los Angeles earlier this month, as it seeks to raise more funds for the mass-production of its vehicles.
]]>Investors in electric car manufacturer Nio are taking legal action against the company for deception and alleged violations of US securities laws. They are also saying that the firm made little effort to follow through on its plans to build a production plant in Shanghai.
Multiple law firms have launched investigations into the company for “injuring investors,” following the release of Nio’s fourth-quarter results in early March. The law firms said that reports of a greater than expected slowdown in Nio deliveries led the company’s stock price to fall by nearly 20%, thereby resulting in losses for investors.
Nio was not immediately available for comment.
A class action lawsuit has also been filed on behalf of investors, though it is yet to be certified. Los Angeles-based Schall Law Firm said in a release the damages were a result of Nio making false or misleading statements, including those relating to its now-defunct factory plans.
“Nio made no effort to build a manufacturing facility for its electric vehicles, instead relying on an obscure manufacturer owned by the Chinese government, JAC Auto, to build its products,” the law firm said.
Nio recently abandoned plans to build a manufacturing plant in Shanghai, opting instead to focus on “joint manufacturing” in the long term. The company’s vehicles are currently produced in the eastern Chinese city of Hefei by JAC. Nio is required to pay the auto manufacturer for every car built. Nio previously planned to complete construction on its Shanghai plant by the end of 2020.
Industry sources told TechNode earlier this month that China’s top economic planning agency blocked Nio from building the factory to enforce new rules aimed at combating overcapacity in the auto sector.
According to its listing documents, Nio is also required to compensate JAC for any operating losses it incursduring the first three years of production. By the end of June 2018, the company had paid JAC RMB 65 million (around $10 million) for the auto manufacturer’s 2018 second-quarter losses.
Nio expects its slowdown to continue, projecting that deliveries of its ES8 SUV will fall by more than 50% compared to the previous quarter, according to its latest financial results.
]]>A Didi driver has allegedly been murdered by a passenger in the central Chinese city of Changde, once again drawing attention to safety standards on the ride-hailing platform.
The incident occurred early Sunday morning when a 19-year-old suspect stabbed the driver, surnamed Chen, before disembarking, according to law enforcement in the city.
Police said that the suspect turned himself in shortly after committing the crime.
“We have formed an emergency response team to fully cooperate with police while sending representatives to visit the family of the vicitim,” Didi said in a Weibo announcement (in Chinese). A Didi spokesperson told TechNode that the driver worked for the company’s Express service.
The incident follows Didi’s increased focus on safety after it experienced public outcry and government censure after two passengers were killed by their drivers on separate occasions last year. Those occurrences took place on Didi’s carpooling platform Hitch, which has subsequently been halted indefinitely.
This is not the first time a Didi driver has been killed by a passenger. In 2017, a driver surnamed Ao was killed by 22-year-old passenger Li Qingbing in Foshan, a city in the southern province of Guangdong. Li later appeared in court and pleaded guilty to the crime. A year later, another driver was killed in Guizhou province after being robbed of more than RMB 2,000 (around $300). His body was later found under a bridge.
Didi has implemented a number of safety upgrades, including a panic button for passengers and a driver-passenger blacklisting function. According to an announcement last week, nearly 140 million people have added an emergency contact to their Didi app. However, most of the focus has fallen on passenger safety.
Additional reporting by Jill Shen.
]]>Chinese automaker Changan has tied up with internet giants Tencent and Alibaba to form a RMB 10 billion ($1.45 billion) joint venture to invest in the country’s mobility sector.
Changan’s RMB 1.6 billion investment in the Nanjing-based company, tentatively dubbed Lingxing, gives the automaker just over 16% control of the newly established firm. State-owned First Automotive Works (FAW) and Dongfeng Motor plan to contribute the same amount.
Meanwhile, Chinese internet giants Tencent and Alibaba will spend RMB 2.25 billion together with three investment companies, while retail conglomerate Suning’s investment totals RMB 1.7 billion. Lingxing will establish a mobility firm, which aims to be “the most reliable shared mobility service enterprise” and focus on the deployment of connected new energy vehicles, Changan said in an announcement. Tencent and Alibaba declined to comment when contacted by TechNode.
In a national movement towards a high-value and sustainable economy, Beijing is vigorously promoting electric vehicles (EV) with government subsidies. Each domestic vehicle model with a range of 250 kilometers could be granted subsidies of up to RMB 110,000 in 2016, which was more than halved two years later, though, according to state-owned Securities Daily.
This partly contributed to the boost in sales of EVs, which reached over 1.2 million in 2018, up 60% from the previous year. This number is expected to reach 1.6 million in 2019 as China seeks to gain expertise with home-grown technologies in auto manufacturing and new energy sectors with more resource input.
A number of large Chinese companies are also eyeing the market. Real estate giant Evergrande set up a new energy vehicle company with a registered capital of $2 billion earlier this year. The move came shortly after it split up with embattled EV startup Faraday Future.
Meanwhile, Nanjing-based Suning seeks better ways to expand its ecosystem and be more competitive by collaborating with other parties in mobility, internet, and financial sectors, according to a company response sent to TechNode on Friday.
]]>More than 500 individuals have been arrested for using Didi’s ride-hailing platform for fraudulent activity using stolen personal data.
In a work report released Thursday on WeChat (in Chinese), Didi confirmed Chinese police apprehended suspects in 25 cases during 2018, the latest in a series of measures to ensure compliance on its platform. “Security, rather than growth, has been the most crucial target for Didi,” the company said in the report.
The perpetrators allegedly took advantage of a system that Didi uses to pay its drivers prior to receiving payment from customers. The suspects registered for Didi user accounts with stolen personal information, including mobile phone numbers that weren’t tied to an ID and fake payment credentials. They then posted ads online offering Didi trips at reduced prices. Internet users respond to their postings and paid the fraudsters for the trip, though no money ever reached Didi.
The arrests follow Didi’s claims that it removed nearly 140,000 fraudulent driver accounts from its platform in 2018. The ride-hailing giant said the unqualified drivers had posed “severe threats to users’ safety.” Previously, Chinese media reported that individuals with criminal records could register to be drivers on the platform using fake driver’s licenses and IDs, which could be bought for RMB 1,000 (around $150).
The cleanup forms part of a larger move as Didi seeks to go “all-in” on security. The company has revamped its platform following the murder of two passengers using its carpooling service Hitch last year. Since the incidents, Didi has faced mounting public pressure and government scrutiny and halted its Hitch service indefinitely.
In response to the concerns, Didi launched or upgraded a host of security features, including a panic button and driver-passenger blacklisting function. Didi’s mobile application has been updated 15 times since September. By March, more 138 million people had added an emergency contact to their app, Didi said.
Correction: This article has been corrected to reflect that the suspects used stolen personal data to register for Didi accounts. They did not sell Didi user data as was previously reported.
]]>Tesla accuses self-driving startup Zoox and former employees of trade secret theft – The Verge
What happened: On Wednesday, Tesla filed two lawsuits in California courts. One accuses Guangzhi Cao, a former member of Tesla’s Autopilot 40-member team, of sharing source code for its driving assistant feature with Chinese electric vehicle maker Xiaopeng Motors (XPeng). The company claims that Cao moved 300,000 files and directories related to Autopilot, some of which were copies of Autopilot-related source code. He then abruptly announced he was moving to a job at XPeng on Jan. 3 and tried to delete his browser history. XPeng responded by saying that it “was not aware of any alleged misconduct by Mr. Cao.”
Why it’s important: Experts and media reports found that XPeng’s electric SUV G3, which was released in December 2018, oddly similar to Tesla’s Model X. Many of the features were the same, but the price tag was much lower. As Tesla is trying to enter the biggest automobile market in the world, even building a Gigafactory in Shanghai, competition from Chinese manufacturers can be detrimental to its success. In the past, high import taxes prevented Elon Musk’s ambitions from spreading through China. By cutting such costs, it hopes for a competitive price tag in the Chinese market, in which case, proprietary technology will be crucial to its edge.
]]>Chinese Electric Buses Are Making a Much Bigger Impact on Oil Demand Than All Those Teslas – Jalopnik
What happened: China is leading the way in environmentally friendly mass transit, with 300,000 electric buses in operation compared to the US’ 1,600. By the end of this year, electric buses will have cumulatively displaced three times more diesel demand than all the world’s passenger electric vehicles (EVs) combined. Although Tesla holds about 12% of the global EV market and is looking to make waves in China, the brand’s impact is far smaller than that of China’s massive army of electric buses.
Why it’s important: With China having taken up a leadership role in tackling climate change, it is making strides toward reducing carbon emissions on both a provincial and national scale. With EV technology becoming more efficient and affordable, electric-powered transit—both personal and public—is on the rise. Electric vehicles made up 7% of new vehicle sales in China last year, and internal combustion engine vehicle sales decreased by 20% between 2017 and 2018. Paired with world-leading developments in mass transit technology, China is poised to continue down the path of pollutant-free transportation.
]]>滴滴发布违规使用单车惩罚措施,相关账号将被冻结5-90天 — Jiemian
What happened: Mobility company Didi is taking more severe punitive measures against misbehaving rental bike riders. Rule-breaking such as locking and/or hiding bikes for private use, damaging bike parts, and pasting will be targeted. Offenders will be forbidden from using the service for a maximum of 90 days. The company warned that repeat offense of certain actions such as theft would be reported to the police. The measures went into effect on Wednesday on Didi’s bike-rental platforms Qingju and Bluegogo.
Why it’s important: User misconduct has been one of the big costs for struggling Chinese bike-rental firms. Hong Kong-listed Meituan recorded an RMB 11 billion ($1.6 billion) operating loss in 2018, nearly triple the previous year. That company partly blamed its poor performance on depreciation of plant and equipment from Mobike, which it fully acquired in April 2018. In August, a Chinese media report citing an Ofo spokesperson said that around 1,500 Ofo bicycles were found broken on average each day in the eastern Chinese city of Hangzhou. Didi, which made a $370 million investment in Ofo, appears to want to strengthen management and increase efficiency on its self-owned bike-rental platforms.
]]>Faraday Future just sold its headquarters to help keep the company alive – The Verge
What happened: Embattled electric car startup Faraday Future has sold its headquarters in Los Angeles in an attempt to refill its bank account. Faraday reportedly sold the property for around $10 million, though the figure could be higher given the company took out a $17 million loan against its headquarters in May last year. Faraday bought the property in 2014 for $13 million.
Why it’s important: The sale is the latest in a series of moves aimed at keeping Faraday afloat following an investment dispute with Chinese real estate conglomerate Evergrande. The investor backed out of a $2 billion deal at the end of 2018, while Faraday has sought alternative shareholders. On March 14, Faraday announced that it was putting a 400-acre property in Las Vegas up for sale for $40 million. The site was originally earmarked for a manufacturing plant. Faraday’s cash crunch also resulted in it not bringing back hundreds of furloughed employees in early March. The company hasn’t been able to start production, save for a few prototypes, as a result of its clash with Evergrande.
]]>Chinese bike-rental companies face more stringent scrutiny as the central government cracks down on misuse of user deposits, an issue that has recently sparked public concern on Chinese social media.
In a draft rule released Tuesday by the Ministry of Transport, customers will be provided with personal bank accounts specifically for their deposits, while the companies are tasked with safeguarding the funds. The law defines how customer deposits should be handled, clarifying a legal gray area. It includes specific procedures for authorities to address companies that are not in compliance with the law. Created jointly by the transport ministry and the country’s central bank, the document will be opened for public review on Apr. 3.
“The new rules will improve consumer right protections and help control public risk,” Chinese bike-rental company Mobike said (our translation) in a statement given to TechNode on Wednesday. The company said that it has allowed users to rent bicycles without a deposit since July.
The law comes as concern mounts about the financial stability of a number of mobility firms in the rental economy sector. As rumors of bankruptcy circulated, more than 10 million users requested their deposits returned from struggling bike-rental firm Ofo in December. Hundreds of users later descended on its Beijing headquarters, demanding refunds.
An Ofo spokeswoman told TechNode on Wednesday that user deposits are being returned by order in which they were received, without providing further detail. Other companies caught in the same user refund debacle include Didi rival Yidao and Togo, the first car-sharing company using the same GPS-based model as Ofo and Mobike, according to Chinese media.
The Chinese government is working on tightening regulatory control over the mobility segment of the rental-economy industry, which has been hit hard by shrinking capital investment and a public opinion crisis. Government figures show that investments in the mobility rental sector shrank to RMB 41.9 billion (around $6.2 billion) in 2018, a 61% decrease compared with the RMB 107.2 billion in 2017.
In a press conference following the central government’s Two Session meetings on Mar. 15, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang said the government had allowed the development of new businesses with cautious intervention over the past year, but that it has a bottom line. He also stated that more prudent regulations would be introduced into China’s rental economy.
]]>Electric vehicle maker Faraday Future (FF) is looking to sell its 900-acre property in the Apex Industrial Park located in north Las Vegas, according to an announcement (in Chinese) posted on the company’s official WeChat account.
The listing is a result of FF’s ongoing operations optimization and business strategy to better integrate its China and US businesses and resources, the company said. It is asking $40 million for the partially improved property including 700 fully graded acres, according to the listing by US real estate company Cushman & Wakefield.
FF intended to build a manufacturing plant at the Apex site and begin manufacturing vehicles as early as 2017. The company broke ground on the facility in April 2016, but construction stopped in November. In July 2017, the EV carmaker announced that it was going to scrap its original plan and move the location of its manufacturing facility for its flagship FF 91 model to Hanford, California.
FF was deep in financial troubles by that point. Around the same time, Shanghai High People’s Court seized over $180 million of FF owner Jia Yueting’s assets.
The company’s financial problems worsened in 2018 when it battled a major financial backer, Chinese real estate giant Evergrande, over its funding, forcing the company to cut wages and place hundreds of employees on unpaid leave. In late 2018, Faraday Future finally agreed on new terms with Evergrande, ending their months-long feud.
However, the nightmare isn’t over for FF. The Verge reported in February that 11 new lawsuits were filed against the company by suppliers and contractors, which total nearly $80 million in back payments, damages, and fees.
The priority now is to bring the FF 91 to market as soon as possible and prepare for the mass-production of its second model FF 81, the company said in its statement. “FF is seeking to raise enough capital in 2019… So far, a number of global investors have expressed interest in investing in FF.”
]]>Operating losses at Chinese food delivery and services platform Meituan-Dianping surged 57% year-on-year to RMB 3.7 billion (around $557 million) in the fourth quarter of last year, amid rising costs for its core food delivery business and as a foray into shared bikes via Mobike took its toll.
While the company’s overall revenues almost doubled compared with the same period in 2017, food delivery revenue slumped in the fourth quarter, declining 1.5% quarter-on-quarter due to broader macroeconomic pressure and growing competition, according to the financial statement from Meituan.
The cost of food delivery in the December quarter increased 53.6% year-on-year to RMB 9.5 billion, which management attributed to the mounting salary costs for its delivery fleet.
In February, Meituan delivery drivers went on strike in several major cities across the country, with Chinese media reporting that conflicts become violent at times. The company denied any link between narrowing profits and striking delivery staff.
Tencent-backed Meituan expanded its services in 2018 to include ride-hailing and bike-sharing, boosting annual active users 29.3% to more than 400 million in 2018 compared with 2017. But the new businesses weighed on profits: Bike-rental subsidiary Mobike contributed RMB 4.6 billion in losses for the year since its acquisition in April.
“We can conclude fairly safely that Mobike has been a disaster for [Meituan] in every sense of the word,” said Michael Norris, strategy and research manager of AgencyChina and TechNode contributor. “Sooner or later, someone at Meituan will have to make the call as to whether or not the company should persist with its transportation play.”
On Friday, 15 full-time employees in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, India and Australia were given notice, while many more contract and third-party workers were reportedly affected by the layoffs. Meituan later denied that the closures are part of a broader move to withdraw from international markets.
Revenue from Meituan’s hotel booking and travel business—another key pillar for the company—increased to RMB 15.8 billion in 2018 from RMB 10.9 billion in 2017, pushing Meituan to describe itself as the leading provider in China for domestic room night bookings, thus overtaking Ctrip, China’s biggest online travel agent.
Ctrip does not segment out its room night booking volume for domestic hotels.
In the explanation of its financials, the company stressed more than once that it would exercise prudence in certain aspects of its business strategy in 2019, including new retail opportunities for non-food delivery.
Norris, the consultant, said such sentiment is testament to a profound change in the company’s approach in just 12 months. “Last year it seemed that there was no end to the expansion opportunities for a super app such as Meituan,” he said. “Turns out there are limits. The mobility-induced blot on Meituan’s balance sheet has taught it a valuable lesson.”
With additional reporting from Colum Murphy.
]]>Baidu, Chery launch electric car with face-scanning payment, AR navigation features – South China Morning Post
What happened: Search giant Baidu has launched a production model electric vehicle (EV) with car manufacturer Chery Automotive, featuring an AI operating system that supports facial recognition payments, augmented reality navigation, and control of home devices while in transit. It also provides personalizations such as driver-specific greetings and automatic seat and light adjustments.
Why it’s important: Chery is looking to attract younger customers by incorporating more advanced technologies into its products, while Baidu accelerates its involvement in the auto sector amid slowing search advertising revenue. The search giant is already well known for its Apollo autonomous driving system and has been named one of China’s AI Champions by the government. It has also increased its investments in electric vehicle startups, most recently leading a $450 million funding round in WM Motor. The company previously invested in Shanghai-based EV maker Nio.
]]>Bike-rental startup Mobike owned by lifestyle services company Meituan confirmed Monday that it is shutting down some of its Asia businesses, but denied that the closures are part of a larger exit strategy.
On Saturday, TechCrunch reported that Mobike had given notice to 15 full-time operations staff employed across Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, India, and Australia, citing numerous sources. The move was also said to affect “many more” contract and third-party workers employed by Mobike’s businesses across the Asia-Pacific region. Two TechCrunch sources said the layoffs were part of a company plan to eventually shut down all of its foreign operations.
However, a Mobike representative told TechNode on Monday that the company currently has no plans to “adjust” businesses outside of Asia.
The company released a statement Monday that it would close only “some” of its Asia businesses while exploring other opportunities. It also stated that an effort to “optimize” its foreign operations would affect “over 10 local employees” in Asian countries. “At the same time we will continue to evaluate businesses in other countries and regions. Those that don’t meet operational efficiency standards will be shut down or operated through strategic partnerships.”
A Meituan spokesperson declined to comment for this article. The company acquired Mobike in April for $2.7 billion, and reportedly shouldered an additional $700 million in debt. The internet giant announced in January that it would rebrand Mobike as Meituan Bike and completely replace its standalone app with an in-platform service.
Mobike’s expansion into international markets began in 2017 during a red-hot rivalry with Alibaba-backed Ofo that contributed to cash flow problems for both. Meituan, by contrast, has mostly focused its efforts on China. In December, speculation also arose over Mobike potentially selling off its $100 million operations in Europe as it faced inquiries over breaching data laws there.
A source told the Financial Times that at the time, “Meituan has no international division of any shape or form and probably doesn’t want one, and when it acquired Mobike, it acquired the international arm.”
Additional reporting by Emma Lee.
]]>Electric vehicle maker Weltmeister Motor recently closed its RMB 3 billion (around $450 million) Series C led by Baidu, which seeks to increase its self-driving advantages in the country’s EV consumption boom.
The investment will be put primarily toward delivering an enhanced driving experience, including the research and development (R & D) of an intelligent cockpit, according to WM Motor founder and CEO Freeman Shen, in a statement sent to TechNode.
WM Motor has raised nearly RMB 23 billion total in all of its fundraising rounds. Along with Baidu, Series C investors include state-led asset management company Taihang Industrial Fund, as well as Shanghai-based venture capital firm Linear Venture.
Baidu has been backing the homegrown EV maker for years, leading an earlier round of funding totaling $1 billion in December 2017. The two companies announced a joint R & D autonomous driving venture at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas earlier this year, after WM Motor joined Baidu’s self-driving open source platform Apollo a year ago.
According to Chinese media, Shen said the partnership will accelerate self-driving capabilities in its electric vehicles. The China-based EV firm plans to ship self-driving car models in 2021 with Level 3 automation, a rating from the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) for cars that self-drive under certain conditions with full control of safety-critical functions.
Baidu has been upping its efforts in driving technologies that have application potential in public transport. In January the company announced that it would launch 100 self-driving taxis in Changsha, the capital city of central Chinese province Hunan, by year-end. The vehicles will operate on 130 miles of city roads equipped with its V2X (vehicle-to-everything) technology.
Baidu CEO Robin Li stated during the company’s fiscal year 2018 earnings call in February that its autonomous driving platform, Apollo, had been granted a license for driving tests in more than 50 provinces and municipalities in the country. “Apollo has garnered over 135 OEMs, Tier 1 parts suppliers, and other strategic partners to date.”
]]>China’s top economic planning agency has blocked homegrown electric vehicle maker Nio from building its own manufacturing facility in Shanghai, as enforcement of new rules aimed at curbing overcapacity in the auto sector kick in.
The decision not to allow Nio to follow through on previously announced plans to build its own car factory in Shanghai effectively means Nio may have to wait in line until rival Tesla’s plant in the city reaches capacity.
An industry source told TechNode that the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) stopped Shanghai authorities from approving the plant. The city will have to wait until Tesla, which recently began construction on its own factory in Shanghai, has reached production capacity before it can approve other manufacturing sites, according to the source.
Another source at a rival EV company also alluded to the government’s influence on the fate of Nio’s plant.
A Nio spokesperson told TechNode that the company has halted its construction plans as it can increase production capacity with its current manufacturing partner with relatively little investment. The company added that the government has allowed companies like itself to apply for relevant permits through existing manufacturers.
In its financial results released earlier this week, Nio said it had decided to terminate plans for its Shanghai plant, adding that it was instead opting to focus on “joint manufacturing” in the long term. Nio CEO William Li said in an earnings call that the cooperative mode is endorsed by the Chinese government.
Nio’s stock price had fallen by around 30% as of the close of markets on Thursday following the release of its latest earnings earlier in the week.
Tesla broke ground on its plant in January, with four main workshops to be completed by September and its power system workshop is expected to be finished by March 2020. As a result, it will likely be a matter of years before Nio gets approval to build a Shanghai-based factory. Tesla said on Thursday that it had secured a $500 million loan from Chinese lenders to fund the plant.
China is the largest automotive market in the world, despite a recent slowdown. The country has highlighted the EV sector’s crucial role in developing the economy by including it in its Made in China 2025 industrial plan. Apart from Nio, companies including Byton, Xiaopeng, and WM Motor, among others, are looking to make gains in the industry. Byton hopes to open its factory in the eastern Chinese city of Nanjing in May.
New regulations governing China’s automotive sector, which came into effect in January, show that the government is determined to combat overcapacity and phase out cars that use fossil fuels.
The NDRC said it would not approve any new independent companies wishing to build regular vehicles that use internal combustion engines while promoting the “healthy” development of new energy vehicles, which include hybrids and EVs.
The government is also encouraging partnerships between companies working on vehicle research and development and manufacturers with existing plants, aiming to use capacity at already built factories rather than constructing new ones, in a move that combats industry glut.
Nio’s EVs are currently produced in partnership with state-owned auto manufacturer JAC Motors in the eastern Chinese city of Hefei. Nio previously hoped to finish construction of its own site in Shanghai’s Jiading District by the end of 2020.
Some analysts TechNode spoke to believe the move has less to do with regulatory issues and more to do with Nio’s cash flow constraints and its struggle to sell cars. Its manufacturing costs can’t be helping: According to documents submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission before Nio’s IPO, the company pays JAC for each vehicle produced at its plant.
At the time of the filing, Nio had begun delivering its flagship SUV, the ES8. The company said it could enter into similar manufacturing agreements for other vehicles. Since going public, Nio has launched another vehicle, the ES6.
“It costs them money to produce at JAC, and they would definitely prefer to control their own production process,” the industry source said.
The company has agreed to compensate JAC for any operating losses it incurs during the first three years of production. As of the end of June, the company had paid JAC RMB 65 million (around $10 million) for losses during the second quarter of 2018, according to Nio’s IPO filing.
Nio made losses of $1.4 billion in 2018, despite revenues of $720 million. The company expects its deliveries to witness a quarterly drop of more than 50% in the first few months of 2019, attributing the decline to macroeconomic factors, accelerated deliveries before subsidy reductions in 2019, and seasonal holidays. Nio predicts that the slowdown will continue into the second quarter.
]]>What happened: On Thursday, Tesla announced it secured a loan for up to RMB 3.5 billion ($521 million) to fund its electric car plant in Shanghai, the first Tesla factory outside the US. The funds will be available for 12 months and comprise about a quarter of the $2 billion estimated total necessary to build the factory. Construction started in January and, according to Shanghai authorities, it is expected to be completed in May.
Why it’s important: CEO Elon Musk’s car-making dream has faced headwinds during the US-China trade war. The company has had to reduce prices for cars manufactured in the US but sold in China and faces fluctuating import tariffs. Chinese consumers who bought the car before the price cut were dissatisfied. A factory in China precludes the company’s domestically produced vehicles from such issues, allowing Tesla to enter the Chinese automobile market without interruptions. The stakes remain high, as Musk has been a cause for concern among investors and consumers after retracting his promise of profits in the first quarter of 2019.
]]>瓜子二手车确认收购PP租车 更名为“瓜子租车” – Netease Tech
What happened: Chehaoduo, the parent company of Chinese used-car selling platform Guazi, recently closed on its acquisition of Beijing-based car rental company START, whose previous name translates into “PP Car Rental,” for an undisclosed sum. START’s online sharing platform will be rebranded as “Guazi Car Rental” and relaunched in 12 Chinese cities including Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Hangzhou.
Why it’s important: The deal marks Chehaoduo’s newest move: car sharing, which further diversifies its business units. The news follows on the heels of the company’s $1.5 billion financing round from Softbank Vision Fund on Thursday. START’s last fundraising event was in March 2016 when it raised around RMB 500 million (around $75 million). China’s rental economy sector has been cooling over the past year as financial troubles have hit some of the largest companies in the vertical. A Tianjin court froze RMB 1.45 million in assets belonging to bike-rental operator Ofo for payment default in late February. Figures (in Chinese) from The State Information Center show that investments in the mobility rental sector shrank to RMB 41.9 billion (around $6.2 billion) in 2018, a 61% decrease compared to the RMB 107.2 billion in 2017.
]]>ofo悄悄试水折扣商城,也许还能抢救一下? – 36Kr
What happened: Bike-rental firm Ofo is testing an in-app discount store whereby users can convert deposits to virtual coins to buy daily items, including coffee, tissues, and even wine. A RMB 99 deposit can be converted into 150 virtual coins, and a RMB 199 deposit for 300. A bottle of French wine, for instance, priced RMB 160 on another e-commerce platform, costs 85 virtual coins plus RMB 75 in cash on Ofo’s platform. For now, the store is only available for Ofo users who haven’t reclaimed their deposits.
Why it’s important: Such efforts once again highlight Ofo’s cash crunch and its struggles to refund the reportedly millions of users who are still waiting for their deposits back. In November, the company urged its users to transfer their deposits to an online lender PPmoney for deposit-free rides or refunds, prompting broad criticism. Meanwhile, Ofo’s legal troubles continue to pile up, with a Tianjin court recently freezing assets worth RMB 1.45 million (around $220,000). Several court verdicts uploaded on Feb. 20 also indicate that Ofo’s parent company owes two suppliers close to RMB 150 million (around $22 million) as of November.
]]>Ride hailing platforms under spotlight as China’s transport watchdog slams ‘one sided’ pursuit of traffic, subsidies to achieve growth – South China Morning Post
What happened: Chinese vice minister of transport Liu Xiaoming criticized ride-hailing companies’ “one-sided pursuit” of platform growth and investor funding at a briefing on Thursday. He pledged industry overhauls and the promotion of “healthier development” to better protect the interests of passengers and drivers. Liu also denounced prioritizing rapid growth over sustainable business models. In response to a question about industry leader Didi, he said authorities have “taken note” of the company’s workforce reorganization, as well as its attempts to improve both user safety and service.
Why it’s important: After two Didi carpool passengers were murdered last year, China’s transportation ministry undertook industry-wide inspections. Didi took action as well, implementing a slew of safety measures and suspending its popular carpool service indefinitely. These setbacks no doubt contributed to the major losses Didi suffered last year. CEO Cheng Wei has acknowledged (in Chinese) the company’s inability to achieve profitability, and the company is planning a large-scale reorganization. While Liu appeared to approve of Didi’s latest efforts, his comments also indicate his caution towards the industry in general. For the near future at least, official scrutiny and regulation of China’s ride-hailing industry will continue.
]]>Singtel, China Mobile in network-sharing IoT deal – The Straits Times
What happened: Singapore-based telecom company Singtel is partnering with China Mobile to improve the Internet of Things network infrastructure across the Asia Pacific region. The agreement will make the operation of IoT devices seamless across the two companies’ networks. Singtel’s head of IoT Diomedes Kastanis said the partnership will “generate economies of scale, allowing enterprises to accelerate the expansion of their IoT footprints in the two countries.” China Mobile will also make available its NB-IoT products to Singtel customers, expanding its market for the low-cost, low-power tech often used in infrastructure and health applications.
Why it matters: The unification of networks is crucial in achieving a truly connected IoT. If companies develop separate and unbridgeable platforms to manage IoT devices, it will difficult for customers to integrate disparate services. Such partnerships promise to make application management easier for end users. Singtel has also teamed up with Microsoft to launch an AI-powered IoT cloud network which serves the same purpose. However, the more devices are that connected, the more fearful consumers are for the safety of their personal data. A study by the Internet Society found that 90% of respondents want a security standard to be implemented across all IoT manufacturers and service providers.
]]>Faraday Future says hundreds of furloughed employees won’t return to work next week – The Verge
What happened: Hundreds of Faraday Future employees who were placed on furlough in December won’t return to work on March 1, according to an internal email obtained by The Verge. The workers were put on unpaid leave following a series of pay cuts and layoffs last year.
Why it’s important: Faraday was embroiled in a months-long dispute with Chinese real estate company Evergrande, the electric vehicle manufacturer’s largest outside shareholder. The spat came after Faraday asked the Chinese firm for an advance on a future installment that formed part of Evergrande’s investment. Evergrande refused, but the two companies came to an agreement in January, in which Evergrande terminated the deal and permitted Faraday to look for new investors, though it still holds a non-controlling stake in the electric vehicle startup. A number of executives, including co-founder Nick Sampson, left the company in the midst of the dispute. However, Faraday hasn’t been able to secure further investment, exacerbating its cash crunch and delaying its plans to bring back furloughed employees.
]]>Ride-hailing platform Didi is cutting employee perks as it seeks to limit internal spending, a move that comes shortly after the company’s CEO announced plans to lay off around 2,000 employees.
Didi is slashing meal subsidies at its cafeterias, while increasing the prices of some goods. In addition, gym benefits and late-night snacks have been canceled, and funding for staff clubs is being cut. Workspaces at the company are also being made smaller. The policy came into effect on Monday.
News of the cuts began circulating on Chinese media over the weekend, detailing the extent of the reductions in a screenshot of a document that was sent to employees. In the internal memo, the company said the new policy is being implemented to “better save on internal expenses.”
A Didi spokesperson confirmed that the company had recently “made adjustments” to its employee perks, adding that it has “no plans to make any major cuts.”
The cutbacks come shortly after Didi CEO Cheng Wei told employees in an internal meeting that the company this year intends to lay off 15% of its workforce, amounting to around 2,000 people. Cheng said that the layoffs were a result of a reorganization plan announced in December and a performance review. He also said that Didi intends to an additional 2,500 employees in 2019 to focus on safety, compliance, offline driver management, and internationalization.
The news followed rumors that Didi lost nearly RMB 11 billion in 2018. In September, Cheng said that the company had “never achieved profitability.” Three months later, the company slashed its employees’ year-end bonuses in half, citing the firm’s poor performance in 2018.
According to Chinese media, Didi is offering generous severance packages, amounting to an employee’s annual income divided by 12 plus two months’ salary. Anonymous Didi employees posted on Chinese professional networking platform Maimai that “everyone wants to be fired after they became aware of the scheme.” The posts were widely shared on microblogging platform Weibo.
Didi has faced increased scrutiny following incidents in which two female passengers were murdered by their drivers while using the company’s carpooling platform Hitch. One of the two drivers was sentenced to death in early February, while the body of the other alleged murderer was found in a river following the incident.
An investigation by Chinese authorities at the company’s headquarters found that Didi’s Hitch service had “serious safety hazards.” The service has been suspended indefinitely.
]]>Editor’s note: A version of this post was previously published by ValueChampion, a research firm that aims to help consumers make smarter decisions with their money.
Ridesharing companies are starting to come to the public market in 2019. With Lyft planning an IPO in March, and Uber and Didi also preparing for an IPO this year, it’s important for interested investors to understand the competitive dynamics in this industry around the world.
A number of major players around the world have raised billions of dollars to compete fiercely in their respective regions, a dynamic that has resulted in heavy losses for every company involved. For example, Uber reportedly lost $1.8 billion in 2018, while Didi also lost about $1.6 billion in China largely due to rider and driver subsidies, drawing concern about whether these businesses will ever generate enough profit to justify their high valuation.
We believe there are two main factors (outside of self-driving cars) that will determine the profitability of ride-sharing apps around the world. First, the competitiveness of each company’s market will heavily impact their profit levels. If markets are maturing and a clear leader emerges, profitability will gradually improve as smaller players find it more difficult to compete on subsidies alone due to scale differences.
Secondly, the funding environment will also determine how aggressively these companies can spend to compete. If funding is readily available, companies will not shy away from spending to grow and capture market share; if funding becomes scarce, they will conversely have to be more conservative about the way they subsidize rides.
To help interested investors to assess where each of the major players lie regarding these two factors, we surveyed each app’s popularity in 28 different markets to assess whether the extremely competitive ride hailing industry has begun to mature.
After a series of deals between Uber and its Asian counterparts, the ridesharing industry has become more mature in developed markets, with one player emerging as the clear winner in each region. For example, Uber has consistently ranked as the top travel app in the US and Canada, while Lyft has not been able to contest the number one spot. Similarly, Uber has solidified its leading position in most of Europe, Australia, Hong Hong, and Taiwan, with very distant number twos like mytaxi, BlaBlaCar, and Cabify in each region. This bodes especially well for Uber, as it is becoming the de facto leader in most of its major markets.
In many parts of Asia, we saw a similar trend. Ola comfortably maintained its top position in the App Store’s travel category, ahead of Uber for the past four months (though it is struggling to gain traction elsewhere), while Uber continues to lead markets like Taiwan and Hong Kong. In South Korea, Japan, and Russia, markets that have been extremely difficult for foreign companies, local apps like KakaoTaxi, JapanTaxi, and Yandex.Taxi have consistently reigned as ridesharing champions.
In many emerging markets, the picture isn’t as clear yet. For example, although Grab acquired Uber’s Southeast Asia business in eight countries and has been maintaining dominance in markets like Philippines, Vietnam, and Thailand, it is now facing stiff competition from Go-Jek, an Indonesian company backed by Tencent. In fact, their download rankings in each other’s home markets (Indonesia and Singapore) are neck and neck already, suggesting vicious competition between the two firms.
Also, Didi Chuxing in China has been facing difficulty in fending off competition from Dida Chuxing. In fact, Dida’s download ranking in the Apple App Store has surpassed Didi’s for most of the past few months. This is rather surprising, given that Didi has already consolidated the market significantly after merging with Kuaidi and acquiring Uber’s China business.
This seems to be largely driven by Didi’s series of PR disasters related to murders of its customers by drivers, a problem similar to the one that Uber experienced when its PR problems resulted in tougher competition from Lyft few years back. While Didi should be able to maintain its dominance if it solves this quickly, Dida could be a thorn in its side if it is able to exploit this opportunity to raise a large amount of capital.
In other regions around the world, Uber is still facing stiff competition from companies like inDriver (Colombia), Beat (Peru), Didi (Mexico), Taxify (South Africa and Nigeria), and Careem (Saudi Arabia and Pakistan), though it has been able to dominate some of big emerging markets, such as Brazil and Argentina.
Meanwhile, the VC market has shown an increasing appetite for mega deals. For instance, both total VC funding and average deal size nearly tripled from fourth quarter 2016 to fourth quarter 2018, according to Pitchbook, driven by massive financing rounds ranging in the hundreds of millions. Essentially, while availability of funding still seems ample overall, we’re seeing the rich get richer among successful startups. In other words, investors show clear signs of preferring leading companies over their competitors.
For ridesharing companies, this means that the winners will find it easier to raise money than their smaller competitors. With a bigger war chest, leaders can more easily tolerate losses while waiting for their smaller competitors run out of money, and could even consider acquiring them.
For Uber, our findings are quite positive. It doesn’t have a real challenger in most of its major markets, and the dynamics of VC market is also favorable to the biggest player in the world. In such circumstances, it could potentially start reducing subsidies to increase its profitability; if it does, its smaller competitors (i.e. Lyft) have incentives to follow the leader, especially if they are concerned about their own finances. After all, even the US is now essentially a two-player market where one is significantly larger than the other.
This also helps to explain why Lyft is in a hurry to complete its IPO before Uber. Investors prefer the biggest player in an industry, so Lyft’s best bet might be to be the only publicly available stock in the space before Uber also becomes public. One possible implication of this rationale is that Lyft’s goal may not be to spend its newly raised capital aggressively to compete.
For other ride sharing companies, the future is still somewhat unclear. Grab and Go-Jek seem to be having a knife fight, funded by immense pockets (Tencent invested in Go-Jek, while Softbank invested in Grab). In India, Uber is still a close number two to Ola, creating uncertainty for the leader due to Uber’s stronger finances. However, the rumor that Uber is in talks to sell its UberEats business in India suggests it may pull out of the country as it has previously in China and SE Asia, leaving the market to Ola. Even in China, where Didi still has the biggest market share and war chest, Dida’s sudden rise suggests it may be able to capitalize on Didi’s 2018 PR disasters.
]]>A civil suit from a supplier has once again highlighted bike-rental startup Ofo’s plight, with a Tianjin court recently freezing RMB 1.45 million (about $220,000) of its assets. The order was released on February 23 against Beijing Baike Luoke Technology, Ofo’s domestically-registered operator, Beijing Business Today reported (in Chinese). The report cites data from Chinese business intelligence platform Tianyancha.com.
Just last week, TechNode reported that recently uploaded court verdicts show that Ofo’s offshore-registered operator Dongxia Datong Management and Consulting owed two suppliers close to RMB 150 million (around $22 million) as of last November. Over the past two months Dongxia has also failed to pay legal fines for 48 cases of payment default, according to the website Qichacha.com.
The February decision against Baike Luoke came from yet another supplier, Tianjin Kelin Bicycle Co., Ltd. Tianyancha records show that Kelin first applied for the case on January 20, 2018. The judgment was delivered on Saturday, immediately freezing RMB 1.45 million in bank funds or property of equivalent value belonging to the Ofo operator. Baike Luoke can apply for reconsideration within five days of the ruling, although its assets will remain frozen until the request is approved.
Failures and opportunities: A pivotal moment for China’s mobility industry
As of Monday, the verdict had not yet been uploaded to an official national online database for court judgments. Ofo could not be reached for comment on this article.
While Ofo’s legal troubles continue to pile up, millions of users are reportedly still waiting for their deposits of RMB 99-199 to be returned. Once a leader in the bike rental field, Ofo began withdrawing from its ambitious overseas operations last year due to a cash crunch. In December 2018, CEO Dai Wei was also placed on a government blacklist for defaulting on debts. Subsequent rumors that potential investors such as Didi planned cash injections have since been shot down.
Ofo’s former main rival Mobike, meanwhile, was bought up by online services titan Meituan Dianping in April 2018, and will be rebranded as Meituan Bike according to a January announcement. Co-founder Hu Weiwei stepped down from her position as CEO last December, reportedly saying that she had “fulfilled” her mission.
]]>US car manufacturer Tesla on Friday began delivery of the first batch of its popular Tesla Model 3 in China, one month after its Shanghai plant, the first production base outside the US, started construction amid a prolonged US-China trade war.
According to The Paper (in Chinese), over one thousand US-made Tesla Model 3 arrived in Shanghai Pudong Waigaoqiao Port before dawn on Friday. Chinese media cited a local customs official as saying vehicle inspection would be finished over the coming weekend, before Chinese customers could pick them up as early as next month.
Tesla announced the role-out of Model 3 in China in one of its Beijing stores on Friday morning, with a starting price of RMB 433,000 (roughly $64,440) for the rear wheel drive model. It was first launched in US in July 2017 and became the best-selling deluxe model in North America in 2018.
Tesla had sent Model 3 vehicles in a total of three vessels to China, and the last one is expected to land in the port of Tianjin in northern China by Sunday morning, according to the Beijing News. Analysts believe Tesla is rushing to complete the shipments by the end of this month, as China would probably end its temporary 15% tariffs on US-made cars in March.
China has levied heavy tariff rates of over 40% on imported American vehicles since August 2018 when the US-China trade war escalated. This was halted by central government in December with the replacement of 15% for the period of three months.
In a recent visit to China, Tesla CEO Elon Musk expressed his affection for China to the Premier Li Keqiang, with Li responding by saying Musk could be granted permanent residency. Musk said on Twitter earlier this year that its Shanghai Gigafactory will start low-volume production by the end of 2019.
]]>Last year was a rough one for the rental economy and mobility industries in China. With long lines of disgruntled customers outside Ofo’s Beijing office looking for refunds, sexual and physical assaults inside Didi’s cars, and the veil pulled away from Mobike’s numbers, 2018 saw the rubber hit the proverbial road.
No longer could marketers, PR armies, and executives continue to paint rosy pictures about the future of private transportation in China’s cities. For anyone on the ground, many of the claims had already inspired a mix of awe, confusion, and incredulity. If 2018 marked a breakdown in the industry, then 2019 is the year in which we’ll see if their attempts at repair will actually work.
Both Ofo and Mobike have been around for some time, but it wasn’t until the ride-hailing war was resolved that the industry was able to pick up speed.
Before 2012—when Didi and Kuaidi were both founded—getting around in a Chinese city was not easy. The intrepid intracity traveler had various options: bus, subway, cab, or unlicensed and illegal private cars (heiche, literally “black cars”). None were convenient.
Back then, the subway was less developed and stations were sparse. Deciphering bus maps required intimate knowledge of the city and its neighborhoods. Hailing a cab required a certain finesse as well as an utter lack of regard for other commuters as everyone jockeyed for position on the road; cab drivers, for their part, cared little for fairness, only concerning themselves with the direction and duration of the ride. Black cabs were even worse: overpriced and potentially dangerous. The demand for transport was exponentially higher than the supply and the suppliers knew it.
One night, as my wife and I were leaving a bar at Chaoyang Park’s west gate—a formerly hip and happening place—we discovered it had snowed quite heavily while we were inside. The subway was too far away by foot and most buses had already stopped service. Cab drivers in Beijing are notorious for abandoning the roads during inclement weather. We were stuck. It wasn’t until a good Samaritan gave us a ride to a busier road that we were able to find a cab home.
With the increasingly ubiquitous mobile internet—Xiaomi had launched their first smartphone in 2011, one of the first affordable ones in the country—the mobility industry was ripe for disruption. Unlike Uber, however, both Didi and Kuaidi started not as disruptors of regulation. In countries like the UK and France, Uber’s biggest challenge lay in regulatory frameworks that protected cab drivers but disadvantaged passengers. The American company became notorious for flouting their disregard for regulators and developed a reputation for being hard to deal with. In China, however, Didi and Kuaidi disrupted the cab market by working with cab drivers directly, then signing agreements with cab companies—some of which were state-owned—and then only later launching their private car-hire services.
Fast-forward to 2015: Didi and Kuaidi together controlled much of the market, but after a protracted subsidy war—offering discounts for riders and extra cash for drivers—the companies combined forces in order to face off against the foreign invader, Uber, who had entered China in 2014. After yet another subsidy war, subsequent fraud by drivers, new laws requiring government access to data, increasing compliance costs, and the rising barrier of regulatory approval, Uber raised the white flag in 2016 and sold their China operations to Didi.
Founded in 2014, Ofo launched in 2015 as a bike-sharing company on Beijing’s Peking University campus. China’s universities tend to be quite large and inconvenient to travel through. Ofo created a platform where students could share their idle bikes—for a fee—with classmates who needed to get across campus.
Mobike, on the other hand, launched in Shanghai in 2015 as a one-sided rental platform. Unlike Ofo, which had been co-founded by students, Mobike was established by seasoned professionals, including a former executive at Uber China.
After the ride-hailing war had been decided, investors and tech giants alike were looking for the next mobility play, with media dubbing both Ofo and Mobike as the “Uber of bikes.” The money poured in and, just as with any boom cycle in China, both companies competed fiercely for users, suppliers, and mindshare. Unlike in previous booms, however, these products were all offline and required significant investment to manufacture, deploy, and maintain. This didn’t stop both companies from claiming stellar numbers for both user numbers and rides. They remained coy, however, about the number of bikes on China’s streets, in order to conceal the true cost of their operations and to avoid potential dust-ups with municipal regulators over the externalized management costs.
We now know that these numbers were actually quite far from the truth. In 2018, Meituan Dianping went public in Hong Kong. As they had just purchased Mobike in April of the same year, we got a glimpse of the real story: Mobike’s previous claims were 70-75% higher than what was reported in Meituan Dianping’s IPO prospectus. We don’t have that kind of visibility into Ofo’s operations because they are not a public company and have chosen to remain opaque, but we can assume that they are much worse.
The year 2018 was also a rude awakening for Didi. Established players from other industries began encroaching on the market. Local governments began making noise about the company’s effective monopoly. Worst of all, the public lost most of its trust in the company. The first murder of a Didi passenger was a tragedy but widely seen as a fluke for a company with few previous problems. The second was a wake-up call.
The mask was pulled off to reveal a company completely unequipped to deal with safety issues, especially for female passengers. Not only did they outsource all customer service—with the safety-reporting mechanism between the call center and Didi operations a complete failure—but the service where both murders occurred had been advertised as a place for male drivers to pick up female passengers, literally and figuratively. The former head of Didi Hitch, the carpooling service which saw the most problems, even went on record as calling it a “sexy application scenario.” On top of that, investigations revealed that assaults by drivers on Didi’s platform were much worse than previously thought.
Chinese companies, in a regulatory environment where many rules go unenforced, do not have a good track record of protecting their customers. In order to eke out margin, stay competitive and grow, companies in both tech and traditional sectors have skimmed and cut as much as possible. For a company like Didi, this degree of negligence has pushed them to the brink. As of now, the company is rumored to face losses of RMB 11 billion (around $1.6 billion) for 2018 and looks to be laying off up to 2,000 people. However, unlike Ofo, they actually have a chance to pull out of their current nosedive.
Didi claims to be implementing strategies that will allow it to do a U-turn and get out of the dead-end in which it finds itself. The company has announced that not only will they hire an additional 2,500 people for core business units, but that they will also increase their efforts in South America and bolster their efforts to improve rider safety. They’ve even gone so far as to call it an “existential” moment for them, one that could make or break the entire industry— referring to themselves, one would assume, since they make up most of the ride-hailing industry in China.
Being on top definitely does have its perks: better access to talent, funding, and regulators. However, it also means bearing the brunt of criticism, scrutiny, and the cost of reform. Didi, like other “sharing economy” startups, did not take safety seriously until it was too late, and even then the problem proved to be much deeper than we thought. Didi’s leadership, a pedigreed bunch of Alibaba, Goldman Sachs, and Uber alumni, have shown they know how to weather serious storms. We’ll just have to wait and see whether they make it through this one while also protecting the public at the same time.
]]>Following the reports of lay-offs and heavy losses, ride-hailing company Didi is rumored to be offering downsized employees large paychecks, sparking a scramble to be fired.
Tencent Tech (in Chinese) cited anonymous employees as saying the package is N+2, which equals to the amount of an employee’s annual income divided by 12 plus two monthly salaries. The actual reward was said to be “far more than three monthly salaries,” as not only basic salary but annual bonus was also included in the calculation of annual income.
Update: A Didi spokesperson told TechNode that the company rigorously follows regulations governing employment practices.
Rumors about Didi’s compensation schemes first came out of Chinese professional networking platform Maimai on Thursday and immediately spread through microblogging platform Weibo (in Chinese), with anonymous employees commenting that: “everyone wants to be fired after they became aware of the scheme.”
“Didi is the most genuine and generous employer I have ever been [employed by],” said an unnamed leaker, posting to Maimai as “a Didi Chuxing employee.” He added downsized employees were even allowed to remain in the company to the end of March to allow them time to look for new jobs.
In a nationwide public outcry and government scrutiny, Didi has faced mounting pressure to improve the safety of both drivers and passengers on its platform since the second half of 2018. This contributed to record-breaking losses of over RMB 10 billion (roughly $1.48 billion) in 2018, as the company invested more money to promote compliance by recruiting qualified drivers with subsidies to offset labor shortage.
Didi took a further step recently to lay off 15% of its employees this year, amounting to around 2,000 people, as the company announced non-core businesses would be re-evaluated and curtailed if necessary.
Meanwhile, Didi rival Hello Transtech announced on Weibo (in Chinese) on Friday that it had launched its carpooling service in over 300 cities across the country. The Shanghai-based mobility firm has been backed by e-commerce titan Alibaba since late 2017. It received nearly RMB 4 billion in the latest funding round led by Primavera Capital Group and Ant Financial in September.
Didi’s carpooling service Hitch has been suspended since September following the murder of two female passengers by drivers last year.
Update: This article has been updated after a Didi spokesperson provided comment on Feb. 26.
]]>Chinese ride-hailing firm Yidao Yongche has delayed the relaunch of an online cash withdrawal mechanism that would allow its drivers to get paid, breaking an earlier pledge to do so by Feb. 22.
“We have encountered a lot of unexpected incidents as the capital market cools down,” The Paper (in Chinese) cited Yidao as saying.
The news represent the latest in a series of financial woes for the company under its current backer, Taoyun Capital. Beijing-based investment company Taoyun took over Yidao from disgraced Chinese entrepreneur Jia Yueting’s technology conglomerate LeEco in June 2017. Jia is also the CEO of struggling electric vehicle startup Faraday Future. Taoyun is one of the main creditors asking Jia to pay off his debts.
Yidao sent a notice to drivers on Thursday evening, saying Taoyun had “provided billions of money” to keep its operations going.
Taoyun’s president, Wen Xiaodong, announced earlier in January that Taoyun was looking for people to buy Taoyun’s shares in Yidao for half their listed value because, after Taoyun had helped resolve Yidao’s debt crisis to the tune of RMB 6 billion (roughly $900 million) over a two year period, Taoyun was struggling to keep Yidao running.
Yidao was reportedly forced to move out of the building where it is headquartered in Beijing on Tuesday, and the rumors about its going broke began circulating on Chinese media since then. Yidao dismissed the bankruptcy rumors, claiming it is looking for new offices in Beijing and that it would let drivers know immediately the location of the new offices.
Yidao said in December it hoped to relaunch the online withdrawal mechanism to drivers on Jan. 25. This was followed by another statement on Jan. 26 that delayed the date of such withdrawals to Feb. 22, as the company had been “assisting” its main shareholder Taoyun to solve the debt issues with its former owner LeEco.
]]>Beijing court records published online yesterday show that last November, rental bike company Ofo owed two suppliers almost RMB 150 million (around $22 million) after defaulting on payments.
The former investor favorite has been struggling to pay off its debts, and the recently unveiled rulings hint at the magnitude of what it owes. Both cases—one leveled by Tianjin’s Fulande Bicycle Group and the other by Shanghai-based Phoenix Bicycle—were accepted by courts in June 2018, which ruled on the cases on Nov. 13 of the same year. The courts’ decisions were publicized online on Wednesday, instructing Ofo to repay its creditors.
Ofo’s parent company, Dongxia Datong Management and Consulting, was ordered to deliver late payments, as well as a fine for breach of contract, to bike parts supplier Fulande within 10 days. The repayments total more than RMB 70 million, and the fine almost RMB 8 million. Phoenix, which sold bicycle frames to Ofo, also won its case against the rental bike operator. Dongxia Datong was required to pay back RMB 68 million in addition to interest, also within the same time frame.
This year alone, Ofo’s parent company has failed to pay court-mandated fines for 48 cases of payment default, according to Chinese enterprise intelligence platform Qichacha.com. TechNode was not able to confirm this number due to the lack of availability of online court records.
Both Ofo and its CEO Dai Wei were blacklisted by the government last December for defaulting on debts. Dai is prohibited from purchasing high-end goods and services, including various types of airline and railway travel, among others.
Meanwhile, millions of users are still waiting to be reimbursed for deposits totaling between RMB 99 and RMB 199 per person. As of last December, more than 10 million users had applied for refunds. In February, an Ofo user who applied for a refund in mid-December claimed his queue number was still over 6.98 million, a Shandong province TV channel reported (in Chinese).
]]>Exclusive: China ride-hailing giant Didi plans Chile, Peru launches to take on Uber – Reuters
What happened: Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi intends to launch its services in Peru, Chile, and Colombia, according to job listings and a company official. The company has already moved senior executives to South America to lead its expansion in the region. Didi has begun looking to fill positions relating to advertising, crisis management, marketing, and business development.
Why it’s important: The move escalates the competition between Didi and its international rival Uber. The two companies are already battling for market share in Brazil and Mexico. Didi CEO Cheng Wei said at an internal meeting last week that the company will focus on internationalization in 2019. At the same meeting, Cheng announced plans to lay off staff in China, as the company deals with increasingly strict regulation following the murder of two female passengers using its platform last year. It also reportedly faced record losses in 2018, amounting to nearly RMB 11 billion (around $1.6 billion).
]]>街头共享单车数量明显少了 “禁投令”该不该放松 – Tencent Tech
What happened: Alibaba-backed bike rental company Hello Transtech was summoned by the Shanghai government in January for illegally placing new bikes in downtown areas like Jingansi District of the city while the ban to place more bikes in the city is still in place. The company has been ordered to suspend the move and withdraw the illegally placed bikes. Hello Transtech said the reason for the “misplacement” of the bikes was the company’s unfamiliarity with the locations in question by the company’s operations and maintenance staff. The company said it will cooperate with government departments in the future.
Why it’s important: To curb the negative side effects of rental bikes on local transportation management, Shanghai placed a halt on new bikes in the city in August 2017. But as the bike rental boom cools down, industry insiders are starting to ask how well this yearlong ban fits with current circumstances. Back around the time the rules were introduced there were more than 1.7 million shared bikes in the city. But the figure dropped significantly to around a quarter of that as financial challenges at bike rental giants such as ofo and Mobike grew, the Tencent Tech story noted. Like Shanghai, all major Chinese cities like Beijing, Shenzhen halted bike placement at the prime time of China’s bike rental boom. It could be the need for a policy adjustment is a countrywide thing.
]]>Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi will this year lay off 15% of its employees, amounting to around 2,000 people, a move that follows rumors the company made record-breaking losses in 2018.
Sources close to the company told TechNode that Didi CEO Cheng Wei made the announcement at an internal meeting on Friday, saying that the ride-hailing giant would cut headcount and that some non-core businesses would be re-evaluated and cut back if necessary.
Didi declined to comment when contacted by TechNode.
The move comes shortly after Didi was rumored to have made a loss of nearly RMB 11 billion (around $1.6 billion) in 2018. In December, Didi slashed its employees’ year-end bonuses in half, while executives received nothing, due to the company’s poor performance last year. Cheng said in an internal memo in September that Didi had “never achieved profitability” since its establishment.
Also in December, Didi announced a reorganization plan to improve passenger safety, while appointing two new executives to oversee emergency management. It also merged its car-hailing services into a single business to promote compliance.
At the meeting on Friday, Cheng said the layoffs are a result of the reorganization and a performance review
Sources said that the company plans to hire an additional 2,500 employees to focus on safety, compliance, offline driver management, and internationalization, among others. Didi is expected to end 2019 with around 13,000 employees in China, roughly the same as at the end of 2018.
The company has seen increased government and public scrutiny in the aftermath of two high profile safety incidents on its platform last year, in which two female passengers were murdered by their drivers while using Didi’s services. One of the drivers was sentenced to death earlier this month, while the body of the other alleged murderer was found in a river shortly after the incident.
A national-level investigation at the company’s headquarters following the incidents found that there were “serious safety hazards” in its carpooling service Hitch—the platform the drivers used to target their victims. The service has since been suspended indefinitely.
At the meeting, Cheng said that the entire ride-hailing industry had a long way to go before it achieved its security goals.
]]>Chinese ride-hailing firm Didi is rumored to have lost of billions of yuan in 2018, as the company shifted focus from revenue growth to legal compliance, reports 36Kr (in Chinese).
According to an internal file obtained by 36Kr, the Chinese mobility giant recorded an annual loss of RMB 10.9 billion (roughly $1.48 billion) in 2018. It had also reportedly given to drivers subsidies totaling RMB 11.3 billion for the whole year.
Didi was not immediately available for comment when contacted by TechNode.
Previously, Chinese media reported in September that Didi founder and CEO Cheng Wei acknowledged its poor finance in an internal letter, saying Didi “never achieved profitability” since its founding 6 years ago.
Following the murders of two female passengers and a number of other safety incidents last year, China’s largest ride-hailing operator has been the subject of public outcry and government scrutiny. It has since removed non-compliant cars and drivers while also investing more money to recruit qualified drivers to offset the labor shortage.
Didi was once thought to be pursuing “a multibillion-dollar IPO” in the first half of 2018, Wall Street Journal reported April last year, citing an anonymous person close to the company. A company executive told Chinese media in October that “Didi now cares about nothing except security problems.”
]]>Shanghai taxi driver Yuan Wei isn’t concerned about being replaced by autonomous vehicles (AVs). “No one will be able to afford an unmanned car,” he says. “It must be expensive. Maybe RMB 1 million (around $150,000) or RMB 2 million.” Yuan may be right about the price of a driverless car—at least given today’s technology—but the threat to his livelihood may be closer than it appears.
The middle-aged cabbie was driving around Anting Town, the hotbed for automobile innovation that lies 40 kilometers northwest of downtown Shanghai. In Anting, charging stations for electric vehicles line the streets and electric taxis seem to outnumber their gas-guzzling counterparts. As Yuan pulled over to pick me up, a sign overhead drew my attention: “Intelligent Connected Vehicle Test Road,” it read. Unbeknownst to Yuan, he had stumbled upon one of two government-approved testing areas for self-driving cars in the city.
“There are driverless cars here?” he asked later. “I haven’t seen any.”
China has set ambitious goals for AVs. By 2020, half of all new cars on the country’s roads are expected to be autonomous or semi-autonomous. For now, they’re still restricted to driving on designated roads, but that will change. The number of these vehicles is expected to reach 8.6 million by 2035.
Self-driving cars and several related industries are crucial to China’s long-term plan to upgrade its economy by shifting away from traditional manufacturing. But autonomous vehicles are especially important. Their success is underpinned by the country’s artificial intelligence (AI) prowess, for which the national government has set formidable goals. The State Council, China’s cabinet, wants to be a world leader in AI by 2030, making the country’s self-driving development even more pressing.
A number of forces are driving China to take the AV wheel faster than other countries, but widescale adoption will be challenging. Legacy vehicles and self-driving cars will share the roads for some time, and traffic infrastructure will have to be drastically rethought. For better or worse, the transportation experience and the shape of our cities will be significantly shaped by the model and pace of AV adoption.
To keep up with the United States, China laid out national guidelines for testing self-driving cars in April last year. City governments have followed suit. Beijing, Chongqing, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou, in addition to Shanghai, have opened their roads to AVs.
Tech giants and startups are taking advantage of the government’s favorable regulatory environment. Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent are all developing platforms for self-driving vehicles while partnering with vehicle manufacturers.
Shanghai-based electric vehicle startup Nio is developing a self-driving car dubbed Eve, expected to be released in 2020, while Byton, which plans to open a vehicle factory in the eastern Chinese city of Nanjing this May, is developing its autonomous K-Byte model for launch in the same year.
In the parlance of AVs, most cars currently on the road are considered Level 0 vehicles—wholly dependent on their drivers. At the other end of the spectrum, Level 5 systems are entirely independent of human intervention in all situations.
Most Chinese autonomous driving companies are currently focused on Level 4 autonomy—fully independent within certain conditions. Level 3’s conditional automation systems are often seen as too dangerous for public use, as drivers are slow to take back control of the vehicle if a problem arises; companies like Google are opting to skip this level entirely. However, some companies, including Beijing-based Autobrain, are looking to take Level 3 vehicles to market by 2020.
At around 120 cars per 1,000 people, China’s rates of vehicle ownership pale in comparison to Europe and the US, says Bill Russo, ex-Chrysler executive and founder of consultancy Automobility. According to World Health Organization data, there were 830 vehicles per 1,000 people in the US in 2015, six times higher than in China. In the European Union, that number totaled just over 500.
“China … is starting at a different place and is perhaps willing to experiment in different ways, not just because the government wants it to, because the market is different, and because people don’t have deeply rooted [car ownership] habits,” Russo said at an industry event in Shanghai.
With low rates of car ownership and high demand for mobility, China has become the biggest ride-hailing market in the world. According to market research company Statista, the number of people in China using mobility services increased by 16% in 2018, reaching nearly 260 million. The number is expected to rise to more than 290 million this year.
In 2017, Didi Chuxing, China’s largest ride-hailing firm, facilitated more than 7 billion rides, according to the company, compared to Uber’s global total of 4 billion. Last year, the Chinese giant operated around 30 million rides a day.
While Didi dominates the market, other players are seeing increasing growth. Dida Chuxing became the second largest ride-hailing platform in China in October, jumping to 10 million daily active users. Other players include Meituan and Banma.
Just as the maritime industry served as a catalyst for public adoption of radios in the early 1900s, ride-sharing networks will act as a forerunner in AV adoption, using the data they collect to improve their self-driving abilities, while paving the way for more widespread adoption.
Still, nobody envisions a full-scale shift to driverless ride-hailing services anytime soon. Level 4 self-driving cars may be capable of functioning autonomously, but certain weather conditions pose a significant challenge to these vehicles’ self-driving capabilities. Consequently, mobility services would be well-equipped to handle such limitations by deploying AVs when road conditions are right, but continuing to use human-driven cars when their driverless counterparts can’t operate.
Those same limitations would make private ownership of self-driving cars less practical, at least in the initial stages of development.
On the tip of the eastern peninsula of Shanghai’s vast Pudong District, hugging the Yellow Sea, lies the almost perfectly circular Dishui Lake. Although the name translates to “Water Droplet Lake,” when seen from above, this man-made lake would seem to have been created with a hole punch.
Concentric roads surrounding the lake spread out like ripples. Similar to Anting, the area has been designated for autonomous vehicle testing. To a casual visitor, however, the sparse lanes feature more street sweepers than vehicles of the future. It looks much like any other developing part of Shanghai.
Throughout the 20th century, urban development around the world has been inexorably shaped by cars as highways feed sprawling low-density suburbs.
“The car has dictated major city developments in China,” Vicky Chan, founder at Avoid Obvious Architects, told TechNode. “It’s quite dramatic. Many cities are home to big company headquarters, which are meant to be appreciated from the highway.”
Private ownership of AVs, which is expected to become viable in a decade, could exacerbate urban sprawl. Imagine a scenario in which you could sleep or work in your car en route to the office. You could choose to live further away from work. But if everyone decided to do so, traffic congestion would rise commensurately.
Some have argued that in the next 10 to 20 years, AVs could become even cheaper to own and maintain than legacy vehicles, with their simpler electric engines and lighter bodies. The cost of manufacturing could also be reduced by removing driving interfaces—the steering wheel, the dashboard, and foot pedals.
The increased affordability and convenience of owning a car could make driver’s licenses an anachronism in an automated world, further increasing the number of vehicles on the roads.
“It can’t be that everyone is alone in their own capsule in their own vehicle,” said Tom Kirschbaum, founder at European public transport technology solutions provider Door2door.
“It’s clear that by only making vehicles autonomous you won’t win in terms of effects on congestion,” he said.
Research shows that the knee-jerk reaction of building more roads to alleviate congestion doesn’t work. A study by the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine found that every 1% increase in a highway’s capacity results in a 0.7% traffic increase in one to two years and a 0.3%-1.1% rise after five years.
The question, then, is whether networks of autonomous vehicles can provide a feasible alternative to the appeal of privately owned cars. According to Henry Liu, vice president of Didi, the future of transportation is not hailing a vehicle, but instead a seat in a car, making driverless fleets a smaller version of public transportation.
To Kirschbaum, blurring these lines is vital: “The gold standard in mobility would be a scenario where the user has a very seamless way of using a variety of transportation modes.”
The challenge lies in pushing cities to factor in technological innovation when making long-term policy decisions. “They try to figure out the impact for the next 10, 15, or 20 years. At times when things are changing so fast, and technology is changing so fast, this is a big clash,” he says.
]]>Jia Yueting, founder of Chinese tech conglomerate LeEco, will likely be forced to pay off his debts by selling shares of LeVR, another affiliate of LeEco, the latest amid a series of financial woes following local judges freezing his stakes in Le.com.
According to a Jiemian report (in Chinese) on Friday, a Shanghai regional court just ruled that LeEco-owned LeView Mobile Ltd must pay debt of RMB 530 million (roughly $78 million) to the Shanghai-based private equity firm Leyu Fund. The creditor is also allowed to sell 39.63% shares of Leshi Chuangjing Technology owned by LeEco, if LeView Mobile refuses to comply. Both Jia himself and LeEco were ruled to bear joint liability by the court.
Records show Leyu Fund signed a loan contract with Jia and his companies in May 2015, offering an amount totaling RMB 410 million with a 15% interest rate over the period of three years. It filed a lawsuit against LeView Mobile Ltd as well as its parent company LeEco to Shanghai Senior People’s Court in July 2017, as the debtors failed to fulfill its obligations after the due date.
“Everyone was competing to get shares of investments back then,” Chinese media Caijing Magazine reports, citing an anonymous person from Leyu Fund’s limited partners. The source went on to say that there was not much room left for negotiating on the price, since Jia has the most voting rights on the terms of the deal. LeView Mobile Ltd was one of the Chinese home-grown smartphone makers as early as 2015 with an ambitious plan to the global market. It reportedly laid off over 80% employees in the mid 2017.
Leshi Chuangjing Technology is one of the main investors backing LeVR, one of LeEco’s affiliates founded in 2015, with a special focus on developing consumer-faced virtual reality (VR) products. The company unveiled its first VR headset LeVR COOL 1 in December 2015 and completed its Series A at a valuation of RMB 3 billion in the next year, becoming the most valuable VR startup in the country at that time.
LeVR was later dismantled in 2017, after its parent company LeEco suffered mounting debt since late 2016. LeEco’s Shenzhen-listed subsidiary Le.com publicly announced an amount of debt totaling RMB 6.7 biilion in August 2018.
In a Weibo post (in Chinese) on his personal account on Wednesday, the disgraced entrepreneur called on his employees at Faraday Future to “work hard as always for the future of a sharing and intelligent mobility ecosystem.”
]]>Former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick said to plot China comeback with “shared kitchen” business – SCMP
What happened: Travis Kalanick, former CEO of Uber, is reportedly planning to bring US-based shared kitchen business CloudKitchens to China. Kalanick invested $150 million last year in CloudKitchens’ holding company. He made the investment through his 10100 investment fund, which he set up after stepping down as Uber’s CEO. Kalanick has been working with Zhang Yanqi, the former COO of embattled bike-rental company Ofo, for the past few months on the shared kitchen project.
Why it’s important: The concept of shared kitchens started gaining traction in China in 2016, riding the wave of the sharing economy’s popularity. CloudKitchens, also referred to as the “kitchen version of WeWork,” could face competition from Chinese counterparts like Panda Selected and Jike Alliance. The shared kitchen company would be Kalanick’s latest attempt to enter the country after Uber China was acquired by Didi in 2016.
]]>China sentences to death driver who killed passenger of ride-hailing firm Didi – Reuters
What happened: A Chinese court has sentenced 28-year-old former Didi driver Zhong Yuan to death for murdering and raping a passenger in the eastern coastal city of Wenzhou last year. The court made the announcement on microblogging platform Weibo. Zhong pleaded guilty earlier this month.
Why it’s important: The murder was the second high-profile incident perpetrated by Didi drivers last year, resulting in fierce criticism of the company by both the Chinese government and public. Didi has since moved to remove noncompliant drivers from its platform and restructured in an effort to increase the safety of its services. Following a series of government investigations, Didi was found to have “serious safety hazards” in its carpooling business Hitch, the same platform the drivers used to target their victims. The service has been suspended indefinitely.
]]>Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi is rolling out a feature on its bike-rental platform allowing its users to report each other for “uncivilized” behavior.
The feature enables users to blow the whistle on others who have damaged or vandalized bikes, used a bike for a prolonged period, or parked improperly. Didi told TechNode that it started rolling out the reporting function gradually in early December.
Once reported, the severity of punishments depends on factors including the seriousness of the damage to the bike and the willingness of the offender to cooperate after being caught. The company said it sends out text messages and in-app notifications to alert users before issuing punishments. In more severe cases, offenders would be handed over to the police.
So far, more than 1,000 user accounts have been frozen for periods ranging from five to 90 days, according to Chinese media reports. Since Jan. 1, the platform has received more than 30,000 complaints from users. The company did not elaborate to TechNode on further punishments.
Didi first introduced its bike rental platform to major Chinese cities including Beijing and Shenzhen in January 2018. The platform is integrated into its main ride-hailing app and features the company’s bike rental brand Didi Bike, as well as others including Ofo.
Chinese bike rental operators such as Ofo and Mobike have also introduced measures to discourage the misuse of their bikes to shake their reputation for crowding city streets following the bike-rental boom in 2017.
Mobike implemented a credit scoring system last February, in which users can earn and lose points for good and bad behavior. Negative behavior includes “riding bikes in an unsafe manner and ignoring traffic rules.” In June, the company started requiring riders to park in designated zones. Recently, Ofo said it was considering a similar measure on its platform.
The Chinese government has imposed stricter regulations on the country’s bike-rental companies. Last year, authorities banned operators from deploying more bikes in major cities like Beijing by capping the total number of bikes permitted on the streets.
]]>Didi Chuxing Mulls Layoffs – The Information (paywalled)
What happened: Chinese ride-hailing company Didi is reportedly mulling layoffs. While the move has not been finalized and figures may change, the company is looking to cut headcounts in some departments by as much as 20%. Staff from support departments including human resources and marketing will be the worst affected. The company currently has more than 10,000 employees around the globe.
Why it’s important: Didi, along with other ride-hailing and ride-sharing services in China, has had to deal with increased regulation following two high-profile murders of passengers that were using its platform. The company has since imposed and enhanced a number of safety features, but the incidents caused government and public backlash. As a result of tightening regulation, the pool from which the company can select drivers has shrunk. Didi has also fallen victim to China’s slowing economy. In December, the company cut its employees bonuses by 50% following its poor performance.
]]>China’s Didi, BAIC set up joint venture to work on NEV projects – Reuters
What happened: Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi has set up a joint venture (JV) with a unit of state-owned BAIC to work on new energy vehicles (NEV) and artificial intelligence. The JV aims to develop the next generation of connected car systems amid a shift by BAIC to move away from gas-driven cars by 2025.
Why it’s important: The market for NEVs in China is growing rapidly while the wider auto market cools. Sales of fully or partially electric vehicles jumped by nearly 62% to 1.3 million units in 2018. That number is expected to reach 1.6 million units in 2019, according to China’s Association of Automobile Manufacturers. Didi said there are already 400,000 NEVs operating on its platform through partnerships with auto manufacturers including BYD. NEVs and autonomous vehicles also form a central part of China’s Made in China 2025 initiative, in which Beijing seeks to move to a more high-value economy.
]]>China created a unicorn every 3.8 days in 2018 – South China Morning Post
What happened: According to the Hurun Report, which also releases an annual ranking of China’s richest individuals, 97 new unicorns were formed last year. In total, 186 startups were valued at $1 billion or over in China. Tech giants dominated the list: Alibaba’s Ant Financial, worth RMB 1 trillion (about $148 billion) alone, ranked first, followed by Bytedance’s news app Jinri Toutiao at around half of that value. Didi Chuxing, priced at RMB 300 billion, was third. Combined, the three companies made up over one-third of Chinese unicorns’ combined valuation. In addition, the Hurun Report chairman said that “more than 70%” of the 24 unicorns that went public last year beat their pre-IPO valuations.
Why it’s important: Given the sheer number of Chinese enterprises valued at $1 billion or more, the term “unicorn”—meant to indicate such companies’ rarity—no longer seems to apply. But while it may no longer be a measure of exceptional growth, it does show that the trade war and an economic slowdown hasn’t stopped top companies from getting even bigger. In addition, live-streaming platforms like Douyin, known as Tiktok internationally, and Kuaishou, as well as the on-demand service sector as a whole, expanded at above-average rates. Despite the disappointing returns on companies like Meituan and Xiaomi after hot IPOs last year, there may be bright spots yet for China’s tech sector in 2019.
]]>Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi will impose higher fares over the Spring Festival, as passengers will be required to tip drivers amid a nationwide driver shortage exacerbated by the national holiday.
In an open letter to its passengers, Didi has asked users to pay a “special Chinese New Year fee” to drivers when they book their trips between Jan. 28 and Feb. 10. The holiday tips range from RMB 1 ($0.15) to RMB 9, varying depending on location and date, and will be given in full to the platform’s drivers.
Didi is already short of drivers in major cities amid increasingly stringent regulations. However, it anticipates a further shortage driven by the Chinese New Year, when most drivers will take a holiday break amid increased demand.
The tip system will be applied to its major ride-hailing services—Express, Premier, and Didi-owned Uber China—in nearly 268 cities across the country.
Users in Beijing will pay the highest premiums, which will reach up to RMB 9 per trip from Feb.4 to Feb. 6. Shenzhen and Shanghai follow with highs of RMB 8 and RMB 5 respectively. Didi expects that the longest queues will occur between Chinese New Year’s Eve and first two days of China’s first lunar month (Feb. 4 to Feb. 6). The company said drivers will also be given additional subsidies, from RMB 2.8 to RMB 100 per trip, as a reward for working during the Spring Festival.
“We expect the request response rate [from drivers] to drop by 20% across mainland China as the nation goes into festival mode,” the company said in the letter. It added that users will be able to check average response rates from the previous day and peak hours for specific areas from Jan. 28.
In spite of the mounting pressure from authorities and the public following the murder of two female passengers by its drivers last year, the Chinese ride-hailing remains a dominant figure in China’s mobility sector.
Still, Alibaba-backed Hello Transtech is taking on them, planning to provide carpooling services in 10 cities by the end of January.
]]>Chinese bike-rental company Mobike will rebrand as Meituan Bike as it abandons its standalone app to be included in internet giant Meituan’s platform as an in-app feature.
The Chinese bike-rental firm will also become a distinct business group within the lifestyle services company. Wang Huiwen, Meituan’s senior vice president and co-founder, made the announcement in an internal memo to employees on Wednesday morning. A company spokesperson later confirmed the news to TechNode.
Chinese internet services giant Meituan Dianping bought Mobike in April 2018 for $2.7 billion. Since then, most of the members of the founding team have left the company. Most recently, founder Hu Weiwei stepped down as the company CEO, declaring that her mission had been “fulfilled.”
Meituan’s app will be “the only access” to Mobike’s bike-sharing services in China. The company gave no indication when the change would take place.
Wang said in the letter that he would lead the new group. Meituan upgraded its app on Jan. 16 to include a “Ride a bike” button to access Mobike’s services as an in-app feature, an apparent first step toward full integration.
Earlier this month, WeChat removed Mobike’s services from within its app following “the expiry of a partnership” between Mobike and Tencent, a Mobike spokesperson told TechNode at the time.
The bike-rental unit will also be part of Meituan’s location-based services platform, its cross-business unit technology-infrastructure service set up to improve its capabilities in providing location-based services. Also included are ride-hailing and unmanned delivery, according to a restructuring plan released by the company in October.
The organizational upgrade came following Meituan Dianping’s listing publicly in Hong Kong in September. The company seeks to build a one-stop super platform, which covers multiple on-demand life services including food delivery, hotel reservations, and public mobility.
]]>A report on state broadcaster China Central Television (CCTV) on Sunday highlighted the costs of acquiring and maintaining vehicles in the car rental economy, and said that industry’s high entry barriers mean startups are struggling to make good on their investments.
While car sharing companies face the danger of cash crunches, they also fill a certain niche in the transportation market. For distances between 10 to 50 kilometers, they can be more cost-efficient than ride-hailing services. In addition, despite the growing adoption of personal cars in China in recent years, buying and maintaining a vehicle remains, as one CCTV interviewee in Sunday’s report put it, an “unrealistic” goal for students and others under a certain income threshold.
In the same program, Tan Yi, CEO of car startup Gofun, told CCTV that the average daily uses for their electric cars was under three in 2017. He added that the company has sought to upgrade their fleet to “high-endurance” type vehicles, and has “passed the profit-loss balance line.”
For 2019, Tan said, the company aims to “dispose of” its remaining, lower-quality models as soon as possible.
Unlike Gofun, however, other startups haven’t managed to break even. A separate CCTV report in late December showed users of the car rental app Togo standing outside its Beijing headquarters, preparing to join a months-long waiting list to get their RMB 1,500 ($221) deposits back.
A Togo user told reporters at the time that the enterprise was only refunding 15 deposits a day. That user expected his deposit to be returned to him in May 2019. The company’s policy, according to its in-app user agreement, is to refund deposits in seven to 15 business days, given that at least 20 days have elapsed since the customer’s last rental.
Since China’s rental economy boom, automotive ‘sharing’ companies like Ezzy or Uu have gone bust, leaving users complaining that their deposits weren’t returned. The scenes of formers customers impatient to get their deposits back echoes the troubles of bike rental startups like Bluegogo, Coolqi, and most recently, Ofo.
]]>What happened: Evergrande Health has purchased a 51% stake in electric vehicle manufacturer National Electric Vehicle Sweden (NEVS), marking its second foray into the electric car industry. The $930 million deal saw the company pay $430 million on Tuesday with the balance due by the end of the month. NEVS is Chinese consortium is owned by the municipal government of Tianjin—a city in northern China, among others.
Why it’s important: NEVS already has two vehicles that meet standards for mass production in China. The investment bolsters Evergrande’s plans to diversify its business to include electric vehicles, a move that hasn’t been without difficulties. Evergrande Health recently resolved a spat with Faraday Future, another electric vehicle company in which it has invested. The months-long conflict, which included arbitration in Hong Kong, came to an end after it agreed to restructure its pledge to the electric vehicle maker.
]]>Ride-hailing giant Didi has hinted at the next possible upgrade to the company’s security features: requiring passengers to register their real names in order to use the platform.
“At-risk users cannot be identified and targeted immediately without a real-name system,” the company wrote on its WeChat account on Tuesday. Didi also said that without such a system there is little recourse for drivers if a passenger refuses to pay for their trip.
In a WeChat poll, the company invited netizens to share their views about whether real-name verification should be applied to passengers. As of 4 p.m. on Wednesday, nearly 90% of the 160,000 respondents indicated that they believe the feature should be extended to include the platform’s passengers.
The poll, which opened on Tuesday and will close early next week, also has more than 600 comments and thousands of public “likes.”
Didi has enforced real-name verification for its drivers since 2016, but this is the first time it has hinted at extending the measure to its passengers. Drivers are required to upload their driver license and vehicle registration when applying to use the platform. Nonetheless, unqualified drivers still spring up on the platform with the help of counterfeit licenses and fake IDs, according to Chinese media.
The company insists that drivers and passengers are strictly forbidden to access one another’s personal information. Still, some voters voiced concerns over privacy, worrying that their identities could be leaked or misused by drivers.
Didi created its online discussion platform in November 2018 as part of an initiative allowing the public to provide input on various topics. Past polls have included whether drivers should be able to refuse drunk passengers and if the owners of lost goods should pay fees to reclaim their items.
Following a poll, the company began testing a feature in the southern Chinese city of Shenzhen allowing drivers to cancel the trips of drunk passengers should they threaten the safety of the drivers or themselves.
“Users will receive messages which remind them to check if the drivers they meet are consistent with the license information,” a Didi spokesperson told TechNode. All drivers on its platform are required to pass a facial recognition each day before they start picking up passengers.
The company implemented the measure to enhance safety following the murder of 21-year-old flight attendant Li Mingzhu by a Didi driver in May 2018. The incident was followed by another murder in the eastern Chinese coastal city of Wenzhou in August.
]]>What happened: Chinese autonomous driving startup Pony.ai has launched a WeChat mini-program allowing users in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou to hail autonomous taxis. The app was quietly released in late December. It allows passengers to hail the self-driving taxis from a pre-set location in the city’s Nansha District to other areas including Pony.ai’s offices and residential buildings, all of which are set by the company. Currently, only Pony.ai’s employees and a few VIPs can use the app.
Why it’s important: While rides are free, the company collects data during every trip, which helps to further enhance the capabilities of its autonomous driving systems. Pony.ai hopes to grow its fleet of vehicles from 20 to 100 in 2019, thereby further increasing its data collection capabilities. The company eventually want to scale the platform to create a new revenue stream—a move that could put it in competition with ride-hailing giant Didi.
]]>A film documenting the experiences of Chinese tech founders including Ofo’s Dai Wei and Smartisan’s Luo Yonghao has turned out to be a box office flop.
Titled “Startups” in English and “Ignition Point” in Chinese (our translation), the movie premiered on Jan. 11, making just RMB 530,000 (around $80,000) on its first day. The film recorded RMB 2.8 million in ticket sales as of Tuesday afternoon. Male moviegoers made up more than 60% of the audience, while around 30% of all views were between the ages of 20 and 24 years old.
“White Snake,” an animated film also released on Jan. 11, made in excess of RMB 57 million by 1 p.m. on Tuesday.
The disappointing results coincide with the recent fall from grace of two leads in the film. Both Ofo’s Dai and Smartisan’s Luo were in the prime of their entrepreneurial journeys when the documentary was filmed in 2017. However, their situations changed dramatically last year.
With the bike-rental at its peak, Ofo was an investment darling in 2017. The company received huge amounts of funding, raking in more than $700 million in its Series E led by Alibaba in July 2017. Since then, Ofo has experienced a dramatic turn due to a cash crunch.
The company retreated from international markets last year and received millions of deposit refund requests as reports of its cash crunch intensify. Dai was put on a government blacklist in December for not fulfilling his payment obligations, banning him from the purchase of higher-end goods and services.
Smartphone manufacturer Smartisan suffered a similar fate. In November, the company confirmed it was having cash flow issues, leading to layoffs and trouble paying employees’ salaries. Last month, the company stripped 10 top executives of their directorships and had its bank account frozen by Beijing court.
The documentary also features other prominent figures, including Fu Sheng, founder of mobile internet giant Cheetah Mobile; Xu Xiaoping, founder of Zhen Fund; Papi, a Chinese viral video blogger; and Tang Yan, founder of social dating app Momo.
]]>
Chinese bike-rental firm Hello TransTech will launch a carpooling platform later this month, our sister site TechNode Chinese reports, marking its latest expansion into China’s increasingly regulated mobility sector.
The company is currently recruiting drivers for the service. Applicants are required to submit information including their identification number and drivers license. Hello TransTech has promised prospective drivers that the approval process will not exceed 48-hours and that they can make RMB 2,000 ($300) a month.
The company announced its recruitment plan earlier this month on its WeChat account (in Chinese). This was followed by another announcement saying its carpooling service will be available in 10 cities—including Shanghai, Hangzhou, and Guangzhou—by the end of the month.
The move comes amid increased scrutiny of the mobility sector. Ride-hailing giant Didi faced mounting pressure from authorities to improve the safety of both drivers and passengers following the murder of two female passengers by its drivers last year. The company was forced to suspend its carpooling service Hitch following an investigation by regulators.
“It is the company’s top priority to ensure the safety of passengers and drivers,” a spokesperson from Hello TransTech told TechNode, adding that the company will provide 24-hour hotlines and full-time customer care for emergency situations.
Formerly known as Hellobike, Hello TransTech merged with state-owned public bicycle operator Youon Technology in October 2017. Two months later, it raised $350 million in a round of fresh funding led by Alibaba-affiliate Ant Financial. In September the company received nearly RMB 4 billion in a funding round led by Primavera Capital Group and Ant Financial.
In a bid to expand its operations, Hello TransTech partnered with Didi-rival Dida Chuxing in October, aiming to provide ride-hailing services to its users from within Hello TransTech’s app.
]]>If you can’t see the YouTube player above, try watching here.
On any given Beijing street, look near the cars and taxis and buses, among the motorbikes, and you may notice a commuter on a scooter with a glowing white circle.
That distinctive logo belongs to one of China’s hottest smart electric scooter brands, Niu Technologies, a Beijing-based company that bets luxury electric two-wheelers will be the future of urban transportation—in China and beyond.
Li Yan, the company’s CEO, said Niu was founded upon the premise that cars are not the future of Chinese urban transit. The founders’ daily life served as inspiration, Li said, pointing to the snarling traffic jams and crowded public transportation in the Chinese capital. “We actually got frustrated in terms of commute living in the city,” he said.
Startups around the world are jumping on the so-called “micro-mobility” trend, which refers to non-car transit options such as bike-sharing, e-bikes and standing scooters like Lime and Bird. They all aim to solve the “last mile” problem, tackling the lack of transit options in the short distance between a user’s home and the nearest available public transit stop.
Niu scooters, like Tesla cars, use lithium-ion batteries. Niu—not to be confused with Chinese electric carmaker Nio—says it leads the Chinese lithium-ion powered scooter market in terms of sales volume with 26%.
China’s lithium-ion scooter segment is projected to grow rapidly, but currently accounts for a small portion of China’s $7.7 billion electric scooter market. Most Chinese e-bikes use lead-acid batteries.
In China, a conventional scooter sells for around RMB 2,500 (about $369) but Niu’s scooters sell from RMB 3,000 to as much as RMB 10,000 (about $443 to $1,478). Niu believes urban riders will upgrade their lead-acid powered scooters to more expensive but more stylish, more energy-efficient, cloud-connected smart scooters.
Niu’s competitors include Taiwanese startup Gogoro and China’s leading e-bike producer, Yadea, who also sell stylish, high-end bikes targeting affluent consumers.
Niu has been a subject of interest in Chinese media due to its famous founder, Li Yinan, the former Huawei vice president and Baidu CTO who was in 2015 convicted of insider trading at private equity firm GSR Ventures. Niu’s growth hit a speed bump during Li Yinan’s time behind bars, though he remains Niu’s largest shareholder. CEO Li Yan said that Li Yinan will remain only a passive investor in the company.
Niu reported RMB 1.05 billion (around $155 million) in net revenue in the first nine months of 2018, 9.1% of which came from overseas markets.
Li said urban transit solutions in China—once known as a “bicycle kingdom” due to its affinity for the two-wheeler—can be translated to Europe, where Niu has turned its attention. The company is eyeing countries that are ready to switch to lithium-ion batteries, and in Europe, Li said, the market is ripe.
“The European guys are on a much, much faster pace on this one, so that’s why we’re doing very well in Europe,” Li said. Unlike in China, European scooter drivers tend to use gasoline, so a switch to lithium-ion batteries could give consumers greater cost savings.
Niu has also become a provider for six scooter-sharing schemes in Europe, New Zealand and Mexico. Li said Niu is well positioned to supply to sharing operators because the company’s cloud-connected scooters can be managed through a Niu API.
Niu made its New York debut with a rocky October IPO. The downsized $63 million they fetched in fundraising is less than half of the highest target noted in their initial listing plan. Niu closed its first day of trading at $8.65. On Friday, shares closed at $7.74.
Still, Li said, the IPO was an opportunity for worldwide publicity. “We’re not that well-known in Europe or the US or Southeast Asia or those countries that we want to be in,” he said.
Correction: This article previously misstated Niu’s 2018 net revenue. The figure has been corrected.
]]>Super messaging app WeChat has removed bike-rental firm Mobike from its in-app wallet feature, a significant source of users for the mobility firm, reports Chinese media.
“Riders can still access to Mobike’s services using WeChat’s QR code scanning function or by searching for the mini-program within the messaging platform,” a Mobike spokesperson told TechNode. The company said the removal is due to the expiry of a partnership between the two firms. The move increases barriers for WeChat users who want to access the mobility platform’s services.
The Chinese bike-rental startup signed a partnership with Tencent in March 2017, allowing riders to access its platform in WeChat’s wallet feature, known as WeChat Pay, our sister site TechNode Chinese reported at the time. Mobike was added to WeChat Pay’s interface as a third-party service. Still included are e-commerce giant JD’s marketplace and Didi’s ride-hailing platform, among others.
At the time, WeChat’s 900 million-strong monthly active users (MAUs) were a boon for the bike-rental company. With the massive volume of traffic coming from WeChat, Mobike said it saw a quarter-on-quarter MAU increase of over 200% in May 2017.
In the same month, the company’s executives also claimed that 50% of newly-registered users originated from WeChat.
Mobike was one of the first companies to adopt mini-programs, which allow users to access services from different companies on WeChat without having to download a separate application. According to data service provider QuestMobile, in September 2018, Mobike had more than 55 million MAUs on its mini-program, double that of its own app.
Tencent used to be one of Mobike’s principal shareholders until April 2018, when the bike-rental firm was fully acquired by Meituan-Dianping, the company behind the mega lifestyle app of the same name, according to Chinese media reports. Mobike co-founder and former CEO Hu Weiwei announced her departure from the company for “personal reasons” last month.
]]>Didi Employees Involved in Over 60 Internal Corruption Cases Last Year – Caixin Global
What happened: Ride-hailing giant Didi said it dismissed more than 80 employees last year after its compliance staff found in excess of 60 cases of internal corruption. The employees were laid off for alleged “severe violations” of the firm’s rules, which involved cases of fraud, bribes, or information security breaches. The company handed over the former employees to police for suspected illegal behavior.
Why it’s important: Chinese tech companies have stepped up internal investigations in an attempt to stamp out corruption within their ranks. Tencent, Baidu, Xiaomi, and JD have all launched similar initiatives. Recently, super lifestyle app Meituan sent 90 of its and its partner companies’ employees to the police for suspected wrongdoing. Last year was a difficult one for Didi. The company faced increased public and government scrutiny following the murders of two female passengers who booked rides on its carpooling service Hitch. The company restructured and updated its safety systems in response.
]]>ofo海外部门解散,员工被要求转岗或离职 – China Entrepreneur
What happened: Chinese bike-rental startup Ofo is reportedly dissolving its remaining overseas businesses. On Tuesday, group head Jeremy Chen gave international staff three options: Transfer to a domestic team at half pay, leave without compensation before Thursday, or neither leave nor transfer voluntarily and receive half pay for December and nothing for January.
Why it’s important: At the end of 2017, the bike-rental firm operated in 50 cities around the world and claimed to have facilitated more than 10 million rides outside of China. However, it started backpedaling shortly after rumors of a cash crisis began to proliferate, shutting down operations in countries including India, Australia, and seven other markets. It also scaled back operations in locations including Singapore, where its provided 10,000 bicycles. Since then, more than 10 million domestic users have applied to have their deposits refunded, amounting to more than RMB 1 billion (around $145 million). Ofo CEO Dai Wei has also been put on a government blacklist for failing to pay the company’s debts.
]]>Node Worthy is the official podcast of TechNode. Each episode features conversations with our reporters about the interesting stories they’ve written, interviews of people in the TechNode community, or edited audio from one of our live panel discussions.
Make sure you don’t miss anything. Check out our lineup of China tech podcasts.
We’re joined this week by Vijay Govind, former IT and technology strategist at Ford based in China. We cover a lot of ground, including working in China for an American company, dealing with the fast pace of change for a traditional automotive company, as well as the EV and AV markets and Tesla’s future in China.
Links
Guest
Podcast information
Zhong Yuan, a 28-year-old driver for Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi, has pleaded guilty to the murder and rape of a female passenger in August last year, according to Beijing Youth Daily (in Chinese).
Zhong appeared in court in the eastern Chinese city of Wenzhou on Jan. 4. The trial was not open to the public and the court has yet to say when its decision will be made public.
The victim, a 20-year-old woman surnamed Zhao, went missing in Wenzhou’s Yueqing County in late August 2018, after hailing a ride on Didi’s Hitch. A friend reported to local authorities that she sent her a message pleading for help. Zhao’s body was found in a mountainous area nearby, and Zhong was arrested by police, later admitting his involvement in the crime.
When contacted by TechNode, a representative from Didi refused to comment on the case.
Last year, two high-profile murders by Didi drivers caused a nationwide outcry. Government officials also launched a series of investigations into the company’s safety mechanisms. The firm was found to have “serious safety hazards” in its carpooling business Hitch—the platform that the drivers allegedly used to target their victims.
In a separate case, a 21-year-old flight attendant Li Mingzhu was raped and killed in May 2018 after she booked a ride through Didi’s Hitch service. Li booked the trip at Zhengzhou Airport in China’s central Henan province. After the crime, the suspect, Liu Zhenhua, abandoned his vehicle and drowned himself in a river, according to police.
The company has since started to remove non-compliant drivers and vehicles from its platform and restructured to focus on improving passenger safety and promoting compliance.
According to court documents, Zhong was charged with rape and homicide. Prosecutors said he robbed Zhao to pay back gambling debts he had accumulated after lending money from online peer-to-peer loan platforms. Zhong also pleaded guilty to threatening another female passenger during an earlier ride. The passenger had filed a complaint with Didi.
]]>Electric car startup BYTON on track to complete China factory by May – TechCrunch
What happened: Chinese electric car maker Byton is on track to complete the construction of its factory in the eastern Chinese city of Nanjing by May, a company executive said at a consumer electronics trade show in Las Vegas over the weekend. The new plant, which is being built on the site of its other Nanjing prototype manufacturing plant, is expected to churn out 300,000 vehicles per year.
Why it’s important: There are plenty of ambitious electric car companies in China, but only a few have successfully delivered vehicles to customers. Founded in 2016 by former BMW and Infiniti executives, Byton promised to launch its first car, the M-Byte smart SUV, by mid-2019 and begin mass production by the end of the year. The company is currently testing its vehicles in China, Europe, and the US. It previously revealed plans to bring its cars to the US by 2020.
]]>Chinese ride-hailing firm Didi has launched a series of financial service products, highlighting its efforts to diversify its business lines amid increased government scrutiny.
The in-app features, which include access to funds for critical illness protection, are now available to all users across China. Users who join the program can access as much as RMB 500,000 (around $70,000) in protection from life-threatening conditions, including cancer, leukemia, and paralysis, Didi claims. Other services include wealth management, personal credit, and lending.
This is the first time Didi has showcased its financial services business to everyone on its platform. It previously announced the fintech business group at the beginning of 2018 after it was granted a payment license by fully acquiring a Beijing-based online payment enterprise back in December 2017 (in Chinese).
A Didi spokesperson told TechNode the products are set up to focus primarily on “gig economy workers” and their families. App users can pay around RMB 20 each month for medical insurance, which is provided by ZhongAn, a Hong Kong-listed Chinese online-only insurance company.
The company now also offers automobile financing solutions, including purchasing, leasing, trading, and financing services for new energy vehicles. Didi said the beta versions of these services were previously only available to Didi drivers and car owners.
Following the murders of two female passengers and a number of other safety incidents last year, China’s largest ride-hailing operator has been the subject of continued public and government scrutiny. Stricter regulations have forced Didi to remove from its platform both cars and drivers that don’t meet the required approval criteria. It recently announced that it would slowly decrease the number of orders served to non-compliant drivers.
In December, the company slashed its employees’ year-end bonuses by 50% due to less-than-satisfactory performance over the course of 2018, while executives received nothing. The company also restructured to focus on improving passenger safety and indefinitely suspended its carpooling service, Hitch.
]]>Faraday Future gets a lifeline as it settles months-long battle with Chinese investor – The Verge
What happened: Electric vehicle startup Faraday Future (FF) has reached a deal to end a months-long dispute with its main investor, Evergrande Health. Evergrande announced on Monday that it has agreed to restructure its $2 billion investment in FF and that both parties have agreed to drop all litigation against each other. Under the new agreement, Evergrande will control a 32% stake in FF, down from the previous 45%. The company will also take control of FF’s efforts in China.
Why it’s important: At the end of 2017, Evergrande agreed to bail out FF, which was said to be nearing the brink of bankruptcy, and promised to invest $2 billion in the company. Evergrande made a payment of $800 million to FF in early 2018. However, FF had used up the cash by July and asked for a $700 million advance on the remaining the $1.2 billion. Evergrande initially agreed, but later backed out of the agreement claiming that FF’s founder Jia Yueting, who has been placed on a blacklist in China for defaulting on debt, failed to distance himself from the company, as the companies had previously agreed. In October, FF took the matter to an arbitrator in Hong Kong and accused Evergrande of breaching funding obligations.
]]>哈啰出行完成近40亿元新融资,春华资本、蚂蚁金服联合领投 – Jiemian
What happened: Hello TransTech investors have revealed recently that the Chinese bike-rental firm closed a funding round of nearly RMB 4 billion (around $580 million) in September, sources said. The funding was led by Primavera Capital Group and Alibaba affiliate Ant Financial. A company spokesperson confirmed the funding to TechNode today, though no details or figures were provided. Backed by Alibaba since 2017, Hello TransTech is now one of the main players in China’s bike-sharing market. It was formerly known as HelloBike.
Why it’s important: According to Hello COO Han Mei, the company operates bike-sharing services in over 300 cities in China, with nearly 24 million orders per day. The company says it holds more than 50% market share in terms of numbers of orders. China’s bike-sharing industry has faced troubles recently. Ofo is reportedly on the verge of bankruptcy while rumors of layoffs at Mobike proliferate. Focused on expanding in second- and third-tier Chinese cities, Hello TransTech plans to push into car-sharing services and even ride-hailing.
]]>滴滴收购ofo文件曝光?滴滴李敏:10月9日就辟过谣了 – Sina Tech
What happened: Didi Vice President Li Min has denied rumors that the company planned to invest $500 million in bike-rental firm Ofo’s Series F in August, calling the comments “foolish.” Min made the remarks on popular messaging app WeChat after the claims began circulating on various Chinese media websites, citing anonymous sources and publishing alleged financing documentation.
Why it’s important: The Chinese bike-sharing firm has been teetering on the edge of bankruptcy following retreats from international markets and rumors of layoffs. As Ofo’s story has gone viral on Chinese social media, the public is looking for answers relating to what killed the failing unicorn. Pony Ma, CEO of Tencent, commented on one of his employee’s WeChat posts, indicating that one significant reason for the company’s failure was veto rights. Ofo’s investors, mainly Alibaba and Didi, have subsequently been suspected by netizens of standing as barriers to the management of the company by using their veto rights.
]]>Mobike founder Hu Weiwei quits chief executive role at China’s leading bike-sharing firm – SCMP
What happened: Mobike co-founder and CEO Hu Weiwei has resigned for “personal reasons.” The 36-year-old entrepreneur announced her departure in an internal letter to the company’s employees on Sunday. She said that she had completed her mission at the bike-rental firm and had decided to move on. The letter was quickly uploaded to Chinese social media. Mobike’s current president, Liu Yu, will succeed her as CEO.
Why it’s important: Hu’s resignation comes at a tumultuous time in China’s bike-rental industry. Rival firm Ofo has been in crisis mode after more than 12 million users requested their deposits be returned to them, potentially putting the company in more than RMB 1 billion ($145 million) of debt. Mobike was acquired by Chinese lifestyle app Meituan Dianping earlier this year, though the company has experienced sustained financial losses. Hu decided to stay amid the sale. However, how much she earned from the deal has not been disclosed.
]]>Meituan Dianping Gets Green Light for Ride-Hailing Service in Beijing – Caixin Global
What happened: Meituan Dianping, a Chinese group-buying website for consumer products and retail services, received a permit to provide ride-hailing services in Beijing. Licenses were also given to two other businesses, namely Sogood and SH-ABC. This will add to the eight already operating ride-hailing platforms in the city. Meituan launched its mobility service in Nanjing late last year and later expanded to Shanghai.
Why it is important: Dominated by Didi, the ride-hailing industry has become increasingly saturated. Yet, Meituan’s expansion could mark a change in the power dynamic of the industry. As the company ventures to take on Didi in Beijing, there may be a renewed subsidy war between the established firms and the incoming company, resulting in a potential shift in users, whether it be temporary or permanent. Beijing’s attitude is welcoming of a competitive market, particularly given the Chinese government’s investigation into Didi over alleged monopoly allegations.
]]>More than 10 million users of bike-rental firm ofo have requested deposit refunds, with the company possibly owing in excess of RMB 1 billion ($145 million) to its riders.
Yesterday, an ofo user posted a screenshot on microblogging platform Weibo informing them that they were number 10,000,001 on the refund waiting list. The screenshot was picked up by Chinese media outlet AllWeather TMT. As of 4 p.m. today, more than 11 million people have requested their money back.
An ofo spokesperson refused to confirm to TechNode the number of requests the company had received.
Riders’ deposits amount to either RMB 99 or RMB 199, with earlier adopters paying the lesser of the two amounts. However, earlier this year the company attempted to get all users to upgrade to the RMB 199 tier. If all users request just RMB 99, the company would owe around RMB 1 billion.
The en masse requests follow users flocking to the company’s headquarters in Beijing to get their money back. Yesterday, more than 100 people lined up outside ofo’s office. They were instructed to leave their personal information, including banking details, and promised refunds within three days.
The company then issued an emergency statement, saying all applications, either online or offline, would be collected and processed in order.
“There is no difference between on-site waiting or online application,” ofo said in the announcement.
Users subsequently began refreshing their position in the online refund queue and posting the screenshots to Weibo.
Last month, the company said its system for refunding users’ deposits was operating as normal, though the waiting period had been increased from 10 to 15 days. The company also encouraged users to transfer their RMB 99 deposits to online lender PPmoney to continue getting deposit-free rides. It later withdrew from the partnership.
Shortly after, users reported issues withdrawing their deposits in the ofo app, though the company denied the claims.
]]>Chinese ride-hailing firm Didi will over time remove drivers and vehicles that do not meet the company’s safety requirements, the latest in a series of safety measures following an investigation by China’s transportation authority.
The company made the announcement last night as part of a new round of plans to increase safety on its platform. Didi said it would gradually reduce orders dispatched to non-compliant drivers until they no longer received any passengers.
The safety upgrades follow a high-profile investigation by China’s Ministry of Transport, which claimed that the company had “lost control” of its drivers and vehicles after a series of safety issues. It said Didi’s carpool service Hitch lacked adequate safety measures, which could result in significant hazards. The ministry vowed to fine Didi executives.
Last week, a former Didi driver was sentenced to death for the 2016 murder of a passenger in Shenzhen.
The company plans to report its progress in removing drivers and vehicles in the future as it is setting targets to meet compliance standards, which vary between regions and cities.
Didi said that it would also increase the amount of data shared between it and the government. Regulations stipulate that data including driver information, car locations, and routes should be shared. The country’s police database is already used for driver’s background checks.
The new mechanism will also involve the police for handling emergency issues, with a 24-hour hotline for law enforcement to gain access to information from Didi should a safety issue arise. Data mining and machine learning will be used to identify abnormal behavior, such as route deviations, order canceling, and cars pulling over.
The company has faced increased scrutiny this year following the alleged murder of two female passengers by Didi drivers. The incidents caused public outcry, forcing the company to overhaul its services, implement new safety measures including stricter background checks, and appoint a team in charge of emergency management.
It has also previously implemented a blacklist feature, enabling passengers and drivers to block each other, and piloted a function to cut down on bad behavior by drunk passengers.
]]>Volkswagen China and Mercedez Benz have partnered to launch a premium ride-hailing service in Shanghai, signaling mounting segmentation in the crowded ride-hailing sector and increased competition in the high-end market.
Passengers in Shanghai can book one of 50 Mercedes Benz E200L vehicles via Volkswagen’s ride-hailing app, official WeChat account, and the company’s hotline. Volkswagen owns the three booking channels.
According to Chinese media, drivers wear suits while cars are equipped with WiFi, iPads, drinks, and umbrellas. The iPads double as a screen for displaying passengers’ names during airport pickups.
The companies have selected 50 drivers who previously served government officials and guests during events including the 2010 World Expo and Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum (APEC).
The Volkswagen-Mercedes Benz tie-up is an aggressive step into the high-end ride-hailing market eyed by global luxury car manufacturers. On Dec. 14, BMW launched its ReachNow service in Beijing and Chengdu. Shenzhou, Shouqi, and Didi Premium are existing players in the high-end field.
The move also highlights the growing trend by manufacturers to seek new revenue models. By the end of October, car sales in the world’s second-largest economy had dropped by 23% year-on-year. Meanwhile, September sales of Volkswagen’s joint ventures with First Automobile Workshop (FAW) and SAIC Motor dropped 5% and 9% year-on-year respectively.
Volkswagen was also reportedly in talks with Didi in April to manage a fleet of the Chinese ride-hailing giant’s for autonomous vehicle projects in the future.
In response the Volkswagen-Mercedes Benz partnership, Didi told TechNode that the company welcomes more players to the ride-hailing industry to provide diversified mobility services to users, without elaborating.
]]>Frustrated Shared-Bike Riders Go to Ofo in Search of Refunds – Caixin Global
What happened: More than 100 users of cash-strapped bike-rental platform ofo gathered outside the company’s Beijing office yesterday to demand deposit refunds. The users had paid up to RMB 199 (around $30) to register on the platform. The company allowed batches of people into the building every 10 minutes to make their cases. However, even after showing up users couldn’t immediately get their money. They were asked to write down their personal information and promised refunds within three days.
Why it’s important: ofo users have become increasingly frustrated by the company’s deposit refund policies, which have increased to the initial wait time of three days to 15 days. Even so, some users have reported waiting up to a month for their money to be returned. The company has been in the grips of a cash crunch, retreating from international markets amid rumors of layoffs and a possible acquisition by ride-hailing giant Didi. Most recently, ofo has been partnering with online lenders, promoting the companies’ products within its app as it seeks additional revenue streams.
]]>Employees of Chinese ride-hailing firm Didi will receive only half of their year-end bonuses, while executives receive nothing, the company’s CEO Cheng Wei announced at an internal meeting on Saturday, The Paper reports.
The bonus cuts come as a result of the company’s less-than-satisfactory performance over the course of the year, The Paper cites Cheng as saying, adding that most of the blame is held by its executives. The company’s annual bonuses can vary between two and six months salary, depending on an employees performance.
A Didi representative refused to comment on the matter when contacted by TechNode.
“Everybody is frustrated,” a company employee told The Paper. “We used to work overtime for a bonus. After the decision was made, we just didn’t care about [appraisals anymore].”
Didi has faced government and public scrutiny following high profile safety incidents on its platform.
Last week, a former Didi driver was sentenced to death for murdering a passenger in Shenzhen in 2016. The company refused to comment on the ruling.
Earlier this year, two female passengers in their 20s were allegedly raped and killed by Didi drivers while using the platform’s carpooling service, Hitch. The murders occurred in the capital of China’s central Henan province, Zhengzhou, and Wenzhou, a coastal city in the southeastern province of Zhejiang.
The murders led to users boycotting the service while the company temporarily shut down seven late night services for a week while it implemented new safety measures. The company’s app fell 53 places in the Chinese Apple App Store in the course of a week.
In September an inspection team consisting of 10 national ministries and commissions began an investigation at the company’s headquarters. The investigation found that there were “serious safety hazards” in its Hitch business. The service was suspended indefinitely.
Earlier this month, the company announced a reorganization plan for improving passenger safety on its platform. The company merged its car-hailing services into a single business unit to promote compliance, while appointing two new executives, including a chief safety officer and chief security officer, to oversee its emergency management.
]]>NIO Officially Launches NIO ES8 Battery At NIO Day 2018 – CleanTechnica
What happened: Chinese electric carmaker NIO launched its second vehicle, the ES6, over the weekend. Resembling the previously launched ES8, the more affordable ES6 is now available to order for Chinese buyers. The company will begin delivering in June 2019. The vehicle will be priced from RMB 358,000 (around $52,000) to RMB 448,000 before government subsidies.
Why it’s important: The Chinese Tesla rival has been selling its only model, the ES8, since June and has delivered more than 9,700 vehicles in China so far. NIO is one of the few Chinese electric car makers that has delivered cars to customers. NIO has extended its battery swapping program to ES6 owners, previously reducing the upfront price of the ES8 by RMB 100,000. The company recently went public in the US, selling 160 million shares at a price of $6.26. The IPO brought in roughly $1.2 billion for the company, lower than the $1.3 billion expectation.
]]>A court in the southern Chinese city of Shenzhen has sentenced a former Didi driver to death. Pan Tujin was found guilty of robbing and murdering a passenger in the city on the night of May 2, 2016. His female victim, identified only by the surname of Zhong, was reportedly a teacher.
According to the official court notice, in April 2016 Pan set out to find victims to rob via Didi’s ride-hailing services. He bought “tools“ including stickers to disguise his license plate number, a knife, a mask, and sedatives.
A Didi representative told TechNode that the company has no comment on the ruling, adding that to date, police had cracked 100% of major criminal cases perpetrated via Didi’s platform.
The company also cited a report by China’s Supreme People Court that the crime rate of taxi drivers (including assault, smuggling, and driving dangerously) in 2017 was over 10 times that of ride-hailing drivers.
In early May, he picked up Zhong in Shenzhen’s Nanshan District. According to the court, Pan saw his opportunity in the lone female passenger apparently living in a high-end residential area. Local media reports he pulled over and forced Zhong to transfer him RMB 7,000 (around $1,000) via WeChat and Alipay. When Zhong struggled, Pan killed her and stole her belongings.
He was reportedly caught only 12 hours later by police and brought to trial in March 2017. Due to the defendant’s nervous breakdown, the hearing was adjourned to a later date.
Pan’s crime took place well before two high-profile murders of female passengers this year by male Didi drivers. Those incidents caused a national uproar and forced Didi to overhaul its services, implement a series of new safety features including more stringent background checks for its drivers, and undergo a corporate restructuring.
Days after a driver was robbed and murdered by his passenger, Didi also rolled out safety upgrades for drivers. China’s ride-hailing giant is being watched closely by both government as well as the public, and its actions may set a precedent for the rest of the industry.
China’s transport ministry said last month that the ride-hailing giant had “lost control” of its drivers and vehicles. It added that the company’s carpool service Hitch lacked adequate safety measures, which could result in significant hazards. It vowed to fine Didi executives after an investigation.
]]>小鹏G3正式上市,上市首日24小时销量1573辆 – NetEase Tech
What happened: Chinese electric vehicle (EV) startup Xiaopeng Motors has officially launched its first vehicle, the G3 SUV, costing between RMB 230,000 (around $33,000) and RMB 260,000. The company revealed that around 1,600 cars were sold on the day of launch (Dec. 13). Xiaopeng Motors has raised over RMB 10 billion from more than 50 investors. Its competitors include NIO, Byton, and WM Motors.
Why it’s important: China’s auto market has slowed over the past five months amid an economic downturn and public fear of a trade war between the US and China. The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers reported last month that compared to last year the sales of gas-driven SUVs, sedans, and minivans decreased by 16% to just under 2.2 million. However, the EV industry has seen growth. The year-to-date sales of gasoline-electric hybrids and electric cars and SUVs soared 68% to over 1 million over the same time period. The boom comes amid moves by the Chinese government to promote the industry with subsidies and sales quotas.
]]>Zhihu, China’s Quora-like knowledge sharing platform is reportedly laying off over 300 staff, around 15% of its workforce.
“This morning I was fixing bugs, then in the afternoon I got the news,” one Zhihu employee said in an anonymous post on Maimai, a Chinese professional networking platform.
A Zhihu spokesperson told TechNode that the information circulating online about job cuts is a rumor, adding that the process is part of a performance evaluation the company uses to make staffing adjustments and structural optimizations.
Headhunters told Chinese media 36Kr that its unlikely the rumored layoffs are purely fiction, though they shouldn’t raise a red flag about Zhihu’s operations. Many Internet companies, including bike-rental firms ofo and Bluegogo, were forced to cut jobs because their operations or funding ran into serious problems.
In August, Zhihu raised $270 million in series E funding—the biggest round in the company’s history. With a valuation of $2.5 billion, the eight-year-old company is the fourth-largest social media platform in China, with around 180 million registered users.
The company has started commercializing its services, and has been focusing on advertisements and paid content. In the first half of 2018, its revenue increased by 340% compared to the same period last year.
On top of the job cuts rumors, there has also been speculation about the company’s leadership shuffle. Multiple reports suggested that Zhihu is bringing a new CFO on board (in Chinese), which—along with “structure optimization”—hint that the company could be preparing for a public listing.
The company told TechNode it hasn’t started an IPO process and does not have a timeline.
]]>Mobike prepares to spin off European arm – Financial Times
What happened: Chinese bike rental company Mobike is reportedly preparing to sell off its $100 million European operations. Chinese tech giant Meituan, whose business is almost entirely focused on the Chinese market, acquired Mobike earlier this year. A source told the Financial Times that Meituan that this focus may be the reason behind such a move. The company plans to maintain a minority stake in the European business.
Why it’s important: Mobike and ofo pedaled into the international market at the beginning of 2017. But as the bike-rental craze cools down, so do their ambitious globalization plans. Mobike withdrew from locations in the US and UK earlier this year. The company is under investigation by data regulators in Germany over suspicions it may have breached EU data laws. Its competitor, cash-strapped ofo, has pulled back from a series of overseas cities in South Korea, Germany, Australia, and India, while both struggle to maintain momentum in the Chinese market.
]]>Chinese bike-rental company Mobike is under investigation by data regulators in Germany over suspicions it may have breached EU data laws, reports Tencent Tech.
The Berlin data protection commissioner aims to investigate whether the company and other car and bike-sharing firms have violated the region’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
“At the moment, we have not been notified by regulatory authorities, as we have strictly complied with GDPR and standards around Europe, so as to protect user data from being violated,” Mobike told TechNode, saying it would work to cooperate on any possible inquiries from relevant departments.
Since GDPR came into effect in May, non-compliant businesses can be fined up to €20 million ($ 22.74 million) or 4% of their total annual turnover.
Mobike’s service is so far available in 23 European cities, including London, Paris, and Milan. The company reached 48.1 million users, with roughly RMB 128 million ($18.5 million) of monthly revenue recorded as of April 2018, when it was acquired by Chinese tech giant Meituan Dianping.
In September, Bloomberg claimed the firm had previously inflated its numbers, only toning them down when its parent company filed for an IPO. Mobike responded by saying that the numbers in Meituan Dianping’s IPO prospectus are active users rather than registered users, resulting in a discrepancy between previously released data.
Chinese bike-rental companies have faced fierce competition over the past few years, with rival ofo coming off second best. The company retreated from international markets amid rumors of a cash crunch. It has also been embroiled in disputes with suppliers, who have taken the firm to court. Most recently, the company has been accused of refusing to refund deposits.
]]>Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi has rolled out a series of features aimed at curbing bad behavior among drunk passengers, marking the latest security enhancement aimed at both users and drivers.
Drivers are permitted to report drunk passengers and cancel their trips should they threaten the safety of themselves or the driver. However, they must complete the journey if a drunk passenger’s behavior isn’t perceived as being dangerous.
The company implemented the policy in the southern Chinese city of Shenzhen’s non-premium services as a pilot project yesterday (Dec. 10). It will be soliciting feedback from drivers and passengers at the same time.
The company is also encouraging sober passengers to accompany drunk friends to reduce risks. A user’s emergency contact uploaded to their Didi profile will be contacted if needed. Drivers can also apply to have a passenger pay a cleaning fee should they throw up in the car.
Didi said the driver complaints and service charge applications would be stored for reference in future disputes.
The implementation of the new policy comes after a conference the company organized last month to discuss safety protocols, which included the opinions and proposals of 269,000 netizens. Before the rollout of the policy, Didi’s internal management team received around 30,000 drunk passenger complaints and reports from drivers nationwide daily, the company told TechNode.
The Chinese government and public lambasted Didi in the aftermath of the murder of two passengers. The company then scrambled to implement a number of updated safety features, including a voice recording function to keep in-car communication on record for dispute resolution, a blacklist function allowing passengers and drivers to block each other for 12 months, and an in-app panic button.
The company has also been increasing the stringency of its background checks for drivers. In Beijing, rules require that drivers and cars be registered in the city. Compliance with the policy has reduced Didi’s available workforce and led to some driver shortages.
]]>China takes a step closer to unveiling a new stock market inspired by Nasdaq – SCMP
What happened: Shanghai Stock Exchange’s technology innovation board, China’s answer to the Nasdaq, will begin accepting IPO applications as early as March 2019, with listings planned for June. Unprofitable companies will likely be permitted to raise funds, but only those focusing on core technologies, including computing, software, and pharmaceutical drug development, will be welcomed.
Why it’s important: The plan was first laid out by Chinese President Xi Jinping in November in order to make Shanghai an appealing international financial center. Regulators are reportedly considering dramatic steps to make the bourse more attractive, including the removal of profit requirements, loosening foreign-exchange controls, and offering a flexible trading system. Currently, unprofitable companies are prohibited from raising funds on the country’s stock exchanges. However, there will be limitations. Blockchain companies, bike-rental services, and other unproven online platforms will be excluded from listing.
]]>ofo将于本月10日推新版用户停车规范,用户须在指定区域停车 – PingWest
What happened: ofo released a somewhat vague notice on Thursday (Dec. 6) saying it would begin regulating users’ parking habits across China. In response to government requests to reduce the “negative impact on society” of improperly parked bikes, ofo will begin enforcing new rules in select cities beginning Dec. 10. In accordance with cycling data, the company will designate commonly used spots as parking areas. In addition, government departments will choose certain locations to serve as parking sites. Leaving one’s bike elsewhere will be considered “non-standard” behavior, with more specific rules—and presumably consequences—to be released in the future.
Why it’s important: Despite cash flow problems and a shrinking of overseas operations, ofo remains one of the most high-profile bike-rental startups in China today. As such, it’s been subject to government attempts to better regulate the industry, which have resulted in abandoned “bike graveyards” as well as crowded city sidewalks. ofo’s move to designate parking spots may point towards a new trend in the bike-rental industry, with more players following suit. It may result in fewer headaches for local city governments, although it also spells more restricted mobility for China’s many bike-rental users.
]]>Tesla Shanghai Plant to Start Partial Operations in Next Year’s Second Half – Yicai Global
What happened: American car manufacturer Tesla will begin partial operations at its Shanghai plant—its first factory outside the US—in the second half of 2019. Leveling at the site is already complete, and the plant is set to move on to the next phase of construction. The factory will integrate research and development, manufacturing, and sales.
Why it’s important: The plant is significant for Tesla and Shanghai. According to Mayor Ying Yong, it is the largest foreign investment-funded industrial project in the city’s history. In line with the country’s “Made in China 2025” plan, the city is moving towards advanced manufacturing and emerging industries. As part of the broad strategy, China aims to promote the country’s high-tech development by focusing on the manufacture of chips, robotics, new energy vehicles, and aviation equipment, among others.
China’s Didi restructures key units to improve safety following passenger deaths – TechCrunch
What happened: Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi announced on Dec. 5 a series of structural reorganizations to improve safety following the murder of two users. The company will merge Didi Express, Premier and Luxe, its car-hailing offerings into a single business unit. Its bike rental, designated driver, and public transport units are moved to a single entity. Two senior positions, a chief safety officer and a chief security officer, will be added to oversee its emergency management.
Why it’s important: The murder of two passengers in May and September has exposed Didi and China’s ride-hailing industry to increased scrutiny, both from regulatory authorities and the public. Didi Hitch, the carpool service the victims used will “remain suspended indefinitely” as the company revamps security measures. The reshuffle also allows the company to explore retail opportunities including car sales, maintenance, and loans to provide its drivers with extra services and support.
]]>Electric carmaker Faraday Future (FF) is placing another batch of employees on leave, citing the company’s “very tight cash flow.” The move comes as founder Jia Yueting comes under pressure from another ailing company he founded that wants him to use FF assets to repay it.
“This was an extremely tough decision to make, and we recognize the emotional stress and financial strain this puts on people’s personal lives,” FF said of the temporary layoffs in a statement posted to Twitter.
It added that it takes its relationships with its suppliers “seriously,” and hopes it will receive support from its partners.
Some 250 more Faraday Future workers may have been placed on furlough, unnamed sources told The Verge. The company says it now has 1,000 workers globally. Before this past October, however, it employed 1,000 people in the US alone. That month, Faraday lost its co-founder Nick Sampson and other staff after a series of furloughs, layoffs, and pay cuts.
Faraday’s admission of more furloughs comes after developments in its ongoing dispute with its main shareholder, a subsidiary of Chinese property conglomerate Evergrande. The cash-starved EV startup wrangled permission to seek $500 million in emergency funding, pending Evergrande’s approval. However, it failed to loosen the company’s hold over its assets, which include intellectual property.
In its recent Twitter announcement, Faraday repeated its claims about Evergrande breaching contract, making it difficult for the startup to find funding. Although it will file another application for emergency relief with its Hong Kong arbitrator, it expects the “ruling may be delayed by two to three months.”
Faraday Future: How a “Tesla-killer” became a zombie company
Evergrande rescued Faraday from its financial straits in December 2017 with a promised $2 billion investment, to be paid out over time. The two companies then became linked through a network of offshore companies and Evergrande Health gained a 45% stake in Faraday.
The two have since quarreled over a promised $700 million advance, which Faraday claims Evergrande has not fulfilled. Evergrande says Faraday’s co-founder and main backer, debt-ridden Chinese tech tycoon Jia Yueting, has not held up his side of the bargain by stepping away from the company’s China operations.
Faraday has also been accused of withholding money from “key suppliers,” with numerous contractors filing lawsuits against it.
The company says it is still “receiving interest from investors from around the world.” No mention was made of an earlier claim by a blockchain EV startup that the two were negotiating a $900 million security token offering.
Despite the cash crunch, Faraday also doesn’t mention any changes to plans for its first vehicle, the FF91. The company previously promised to begin production in California by the end of 2018.
The electric vehicle startup’s main backer Jia Yueting is facing pressure from debt-ridden Leshi Internet, the Chinese streaming giant he founded, reports the Securities Daily (in Chinese).
At the end of October, around the same time, Faraday experienced a cash squeeze, and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange froze Jia’s roughly 25% stake in Leshi due to unpaid debts. In June, the former company head was banned from luxury travel for a year after reneging on loan payments.
With over RMB 90 million (around $131 million) of its assets now frozen, the company insists Jia pay up using assets or equity from Faraday, if necessary.
Leshi Internet, also known as Le.com, faces a lawsuit by Tianhong Innovation. According to Tianhong, which was a Series B investor in streaming service LeSports, the company’s original shareholders had agreed to repurchase their stakes if LeSports failed to IPO by the end of 2018.
]]>In the latest ofo debacle, some users of the Chinese bike rental firm found that they were unable to apply for deposit refunds within its app.
ofo users told the Beijing Youth Daily (in Chinese) that the return deposit button had been grayed out and was unclickable. The users also said their ofo account balances couldn’t be withdrawn and the customer service line was unavailable.
ofo responded by saying that a gray-colored gray deposit return button is normal and is used to ensure user retention, but that accusations of the button being unclickable were untrue.
According to users TechNode and others talked to, the gray button is still active, but the refund collection process is complicated and slow. So far, there have been no accusations against ofo for misleading users through its app design.
Due to the recent intense reporting on ofo’s bankruptcy and rumors of an acquisition by ride-hailing giant Didi, users have rushed to get their deposits back, putting increased pressure on ofo, which is already battling cash issues and severe liquidity problems. This has forced ofo to extend the promised 15-day deposit claim processing time, which was increased from the initial three-day wait.
“Users can call us should they encounter any deposit claim problems. Due to the high volume of calls we receive every day, a user might have to call several times to successfully reach out to us,” ofo told a reporter from China Central Television (CCTV).
As the company’s cash crunch has intensified, ofo has sought new revenue streams through partnerships with online lenders. Last month, the company began urging its users to transfer their deposits to P2P lending platform PPMoney. The two companies eventually halted the promotional offer, but the tie-ups continued.
ofo then inked partnerships with nine other online lenders, allowing them to gain access to the company’s users through promotional content within the apps “Wallet.” ofo reportedly signed the deals at 10% to 20% below the market price for new user acquisition.
]]>In a bid to ease its cash strain, Chinese bike rental firm ofo has entered into partnerships with nine online loan platforms, allowing them to acquire more users by listing their services within its app.
The company has been setting ups deals with lenders including Wanda Puhui, Xiaoheiyu, Daishangqian, and Xiaobai Laihua since the summer. As part of its agreements, the bike rental firm has granted these platforms access to its users by displaying promotional content within the app’s “Wallet.”
Partnerships with online loan platforms are a double-edged sword for the firm. While they bring in much-needed cash, the tie-ups also bring trouble for endorsing players in the country’s online lending sector, which has a tainted reputation for scams and fraud.
Last month, the company drew criticism for urging its users to transfer their existing deposits to P2P platform PPmoney. The pair then removed the promotional offer, adding that it was a typical market activity and that there was no obligation for users to invest.
ofo reportedly inked the recent deals at 10% to 20% below the going price for acquiring new users, according to industry insiders.
In its early days, ofo was cautious about monetization moves that could hurt user experience. However, it was forced to make compromises as its cash pressure intensified in its fight for independent development.
Its first monetization attempts came in May 2018, when it started selling ads on its bikes and in apps. It then launched a news aggregation channel for future monetization possibilities in June, adding five-second short video ads to its main app in August.
ofo’s image has itself been tainted since the beginning of the year. The company has been taken to court by suppliers for unpaid debts, pulled out of international markets, and moved its headquarters in Beijing amid rumors of an acquisition by ride-hailing firm Didi.
]]>Electric car maker Faraday Future (FF) says a recent arbitration decision against the company is not final, and full resolution of the issue is pending consideration.
FF is accusing its investor Evergrande Health of misleading the public on the matter.
On November 29, the Hong Kong International Arbitration Center (HKIAC) ruled against electric car maker Faraday Future’s motion to waive its joint-venture partner Smart King’s right to use Faraday Future’s corporate assets as financing guaranty, Evergrande Health said in a public announcement (in Chinese).
Smart King was established in November 2017 by Hong Kong-based Shiyin Corporate and Faraday Future shareholders including Jia Yueting. Jia is founder of Faraday Future and Le.com.
Evergrande Health became Smart King’s largest shared holder in June after completely acquiring Shiyin.
Before the arbitration, Evergrande Health froze its assets in Smart King due to disputes over financing.
On October 25, HKIAC said before the announcement of any final arbitration resolution result, the joint venture may process financing of amount no greater than $500 million.
An article in Chinese media National Business Daily cites an anonymous person close to Evergrande as saying the company is happy with the outcome and that Jia Yueting would have to pay for its own and Evergrande’s legal and arbitration fees—an amount the article puts at HKD 8.3 million (under $1.1 million).
Faraday Future said in a response (in Chinese) to the arbitration decision, that the company was “confident” that it would have the final victory. The company added that the mass production of FF 91 is in progress, with the help of investment bank Stifel and global investors.
]]>In China, your car could be talking to the government – Associated Press
What happened: More than 200 electric vehicle manufacturers with cars on China’s roads transmit position data, as well as 60 other data points, including mileage and battery charge, to the Chinese government to comply with Chinese laws. The regulations apply to both domestic and international alternative energy vehicle manufacturers. An investigation by the Associated Press found that, generally, car owners are unaware the data is being collected.
Why it’s important: Chinese authorities have defended the move, saying the data is used to improve public safety, promote development and infrastructure planning, and prevent subsidy fraud. Critics argue that collection exceeds what is required to meet these goals. Gathering such information is commonplace around the world, but the flow usually stops at the manufacturer, and requests for data by the government and law enforcement are typically required to go through the courts. Currently, electric cars produce limited data, but Chinese authorities could be setting a precedent for when autonomous vehicles, which have much broader data processing abilities, are commonplace on the country’s roads.
]]>银隆新能源北方基地调查:天津银隆内停有几百辆客车 河北银隆运营正常–每日经济新闻
What happened: Battery and electric vehicle manufacturer Yinlong Group has been the subject of media reports claiming that factories in Tianjin and Handan, Hebei, halted production earlier this year. In October, its parent company Jiangmen Kanhoo Group Industry Co. Ltd. said that operations at Yinlong’s Tianjin and Chengdu sites had been “not normal.” When a reporter checked out the sites in Tianjin and Hebei, however, workers said only that manufacturing was continuing as usual, although a request to tour one factory was denied.
Why it’s important: In 2016, Yinlong’s entry into Handan was hailed as a big move. That December, the company received $432 million in funding in a round that included both JD.com and Wanda Group. Local media has questioned whether the company’s northern manufacturing bases has met their production targets this year, however, and anonymous online comments from alleged former employees say the company has withheld salaries and medical insurance. The company’s difficulties may lie in the difficulty of establishing a network of charging piles as well as funding shortfalls, according to comments by its Tianjin general manager. That roadblock may stem the ambitions of Yinlong, which already supplies electric vehicles for Tianjin, despite China’s continued emphasis on dominating the EV market.
]]>Amid rumors of bankruptcy and acquisition, Chinese bike rental firm ofo has said that its system for refunding users’ deposits is functioning normally, despite increased processing times.
The company initially handled requests for refunds in up to three days, later increasing the waiting period to 10 days, and then eventually to 15 days.
“Because of the recent change of office address, some of ofo’s servers need to be migrated, resulting in a temporary extension of the deposit refund period. After the relevant work is completed, the refund deposit period will return to normal,” the company told local media.
ofo recently moved its headquarters to the Internet Finance building in Beijing, 15 minutes away from its previous office space. The company said that its rental term had expired.
ofo’s ability to pay back users’ deposits has been questioned. On Friday (November 23), ofo users who had not upgraded their deposit from its RMB 99 tier to RMB 199 tier system were presented with an in-app pop up allowing them to transfer their deposits to online loan platform PPmoney. These can then be converted to an investment within the lender’s ecosystem while allowing users to ride without a deposit. The move was criticized, with commenters saying that the company is attempting to avoid paying back deposits and selling its users to a different company.
Rumors of ofo’s cash crunch have been circulating for some time. Most recently, the company was reportedly preparing for bankruptcy after accumulating more than RMB 6.5 billion ($935 million) in debt, RMB 3.65 billion of which included users’ deposit and RMB 1.02 billion was owed to its suppliers.
ofo founder and CEO Da Wei in September removed himself from his position as the company’s legal representative as a result of mounting lawsuits from unpaid suppliers. The company has also denied that it is laying off employees en masse and that it is unable to pay its workers. Earlier this year, it halted its ambitious global expansion plan, saying it intends to focus on what it deems to be priority markets during the retreat.
]]>Bike rental firm ofo today (November 23) began urging its users to transfer their existing deposits in the app to online loan platform PPmoney as part of a commercial agreement with the lender, our sister site is reporting.
ofo last year increased its deposits for new users from RMB 99 ($14) to RMB 199, though existing users were not affected. Now, riders who have not upgraded to the new deposit tier have been presented with an in-app pop up prompting them to convert their RMB 99 deposit to a RMB 100 asset in the PPmomey ecosystem in order to enjoy deposit free rides. Users who do not want to take part can refund their deposits, according to the company.
PPmoney then has a 30-day lock-in period in which users don’t have access to their money. However, the company claims that once the time has lapsed, users can withdraw the deposit with interest.
ofo has been criticized for the move, with commenters saying it is selling its users and attempting to avoid paying back deposits. ofo responded by saying that it is a typical market activity and that it is limited to riders who have paid RMB 99 deposits. Users are also required to submit their ID information when opening new PPmoney accounts. ofo added that its current refund process could take up to 15 days.
Several ofo users told local media that despite the company’s 15-day refund policy they have been waiting for a refund for up to a month.
PPmoney defended the partnership by saying that the companies have many overlaps in their user base.
Rumors of ofo cash crunch have been circulating for the better part of a year. The company has been pulling out of international markets and having its global assets sold. It has faced lawsuits from suppliers claiming the company has yet to pay its debts and has been rumored to be in the midst of a takeover by ride-hailing giant Didi.
]]>Tesla cuts China car prices to absorb hit from trade war tariffs-Reuters
What happened: Tesla is cutting the price of its Model S and Model X cars in China by 12 to 26% respectively to absorb the impact of the US-China trade war on Chinese consumers. In response to the trade tensions from the United States, China imposed extra tariffs on U.S. imports into the country. The move hurts Tesla’s China business, which imports all the cars it currently sells in the market.
Why it’s important: Automobile is one of the industries that suffered the most from the China-US trade tension. Tesla has adjusted its pricing strategy in China several times this year. Lowering price at the cost of the company underlines intensifying competition in China, the world’s largest car market where electronic vehicles are rising fast. But local experts believe that the company has more space for lowing the price of its Model 3, which is going to be manufactured by its Shanghai-based Gigafactory by 2020.
]]>The city of Chengdu in southwestern China may have found a solution for keeping its sidewalks tidy and free of shared bike clutter. The so-called “underground intelligent bike parking system” located in downtown Chengdu near the entrance of Niushikou Station will go into service by the end of the month, according to the municipal traffic commission.
According to local media reports, the shared bike-only parking garage, which takes up only 6.8 square meters on the ground level, is connected to a 50 square-meter vault 9.6-meter deep into the ground. The eight-story parking facility has a capacity to store 224 bikes—the number of bicycles that usually takes up 300 square meters of space.
Users can order or store a bike via an LED screen. The whole process is automated and takes less than a minute. Tianjin Yuanzhuo Tech Development, the designer of the parking system, claimed that it takes only half a yuan (around $0.01) worth of electricity to store and fetch a bike.
Ever since China bike sharing industry took off last year, brightly colored bikes have plagued sidewalks and streets across Chinese cities, becoming an urban management nightmare by causing traffic jams and parking difficulties.
The city of Chengdu reported having over 1.8 million bikes (in Chinese) in August. In October, the city cleaned up more than 126,000 bikes over a five-day period.
Other cities in China have also been trying to manage and regulate the oversupply of shared-bikes. In August, the Beijing Commission of Transport decided to cap the number of shared bikes in the city to 1.91 million.
]]>特斯拉上海工厂启动最新招聘 开放岗位达30个–北京青年报
What happened: Tesla will be one of more than 100 companies recruiting at an upcoming job fair in Shanghai next week, according to official publicity. Positions advertised include production manager, assistant production manager, and production director. On an official WeChat account called “Tesla recruitment,” more spots appear to be available in a variety of departments such as public relations, human resources, recruitment, customer support, and store management.
Why it’s important: Tesla has reportedly been recruiting personnel for its planned Shanghai Gigafactory since August, but industry insiders say the scope of recruitment is now broader than before. The company only struck a deal with local government in July, following up with the purchase of a plot of land in mid-October. The first overseas Tesla plant is expected to cut production costs in the long run; however, it’s also adding to a significant debt load that Business Insider reports is holding the company back. At least in the realm of recruitment, however, Tesla appears to be charging ahead with plans for its new Shanghai branch.
]]>BMW to offer ride hailing services in China from December-Reuters
What happened: Germany’s BMW has obtained a ride-hailing license in Chengdu, the capital of Sichuan Province, through its wholly owned subsidiary in China. This makes BMW the first global automaker to launch ride-hailing services in the country. The company plans to push out the service in December.
Why it’s important: After the fierce competition witnessed by China’s ride-hailing industry since 2013, Didi has established itself as the largest player in the battlefield, holding between 90-95% of the market. However, Didi has never been short of new challengers, such as Meituan and BMW. More companies are entering the market in the belief that there’s room for growth in China’s ride-hailing industry. Consulting firm Roland Berger estimates that 40% of China’s taxi demand is unmet.
]]>Mayor pulls the plug on electric bus deal – Albuquerque Journal
What happened: Albuquerque, New Mexico Mayor Tim Keller has announced the city’s plans to reject and return all 15 of the electric buses manufactured by the US subsidiary of Shenzhen-based automaker BYD, also known as Build Your Dreams.
Although the city cited a number of quality and safety concerns ranging from electrical issues to brake failure, the chief issue seemed to be with the vehicles’ batteries. The contract with BYD calls for buses to operate for 275 miles, yet according to city officials, the buses are unable to go more than 177 miles before they need recharging. Mayor Keller also referenced problems with the batteries overheating and having inadequate fire protection.
Why it’s important: This isn’t the first time that BYD’s buses have run into quality issues. An investigation by The Los Angeles Times in May of this year revealed similar problems with the automaker’s buses, causing headaches for the mass transit system of the second-largest American city. The Times investigation also revealed evidence of official corruption and mistreatment of employees at BYD’s Southern California plant. In August of this year, reports out of Cape Town claimed that the city’s newly-purchased buses would stall when going uphill.
]]>Beijing is investigating the merger between Didi Chuxing and Uber China regarding potential monopoly charges. This is likely to allow new comers to join the game, and foster legislation progress in the industry.
“We are now carefully looking into the case according to related law and regulation… Ride hailing is a new industry…which shows complicated and fast-changing competition,” Wu Zhenguo, head of China’s Anti-monopoly Bureau said during the State Council Information Office’s meeting with media (in Chinese) on November 16.
Wu added that China’s Anti-monopoly Law, which has been implemented for ten years, treats all parties equally regardless of nationalities and market status.
Criticism on the merger deal’s being monopoly has long been haunting the ride-hailing market in China, but there has been little substantial investigation.
On August 1, 2016, Didi formally announced their acquisition of Uber China. The deal lifted Didi’s total value to around $36 billion, but soon got the company into legal trouble for having “failed to declare the transaction.” Beijing then announced that this would activate anti-monopoly investigation.
After two years, in September, 2018, as no legal progress has been made, the Ministry of Transportation openly pointed out that the merger could be a monopoly. According to data cited by Yicai (in Chinese) in September, Didi Chuxing, after the merger, was dominating the ride-hailing market with more than 90% market share. As a result, Didi responded that the company welcomes more players to join the competition, as Didi alone cannot satisfactorily serve the huge market.
A possible reason for a delayed investigation, said lawyers close to the Anti-monopoly Bureau (in Chinese), could be the absence of proper legal definition of ride-hailing in China, which could help clarify nature of the services, and then accurately allow existing legal frameworks to come up with fair and lawful judgement.
Didi has not given any immediate response to TechNode’s inquiry by the publication of the article.
]]>About one hour’s drive south of Guangzhou, in southern China’s Guangdong Province, a vast plain of upturned soil is dotted with a few concrete-loaded trucks and a handful of piling rigs. The faint clanging of construction echoes through the air.
Here, electric vehicle startup Faraday Future (FF) is building its much-anticipated China factory.
One truck driver, who looks like he’s in his twenties, stops pacing outside his vehicle and removes his spotless white earbuds. He’s been working on-site for a month now, he tells TechNode, ferrying in concrete tubes for the groundwork-laying phase.
As he speaks, he mispronounces Faraday’s Chinese name (法拉第, faladi) as falaji. Spoken quickly, the last two syllables sound almost like laji, meaning “trash.”
His mistake is telling, hinting at the deeper confusion and uncertainty surrounding Faraday—its production plans for China and the US, as well its broader strategy and leadership.
The electric vehicle’s startup may have begun with high hopes for futuristic concept cars, but its narrative has since turned into a saga of ugly corporate wrangling and unbridled ambition gone awry. Faraday Future offers a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of charging full speed ahead into China’s alluring yet still developing electric and autonomous vehicle industries. It’s also a story of how Chinese investment paired with US tech talent can go terribly wrong.
From the outset, the company was a California startup with an international outlook. It brimmed with ambition. Employees were recruited from Tesla, BMW, Apple, and other top companies, with more than 100 former Tesla employees making the switch to Faraday.
Chinese tech tycoon Jia Yueting was among the founding members and also its majority shareholder, tying Faraday’s fortunes together with those of his conglomerate LeEco. Later, he also became Faraday’s chief executive officer.
In the beginning, Faraday planned to expand into autonomous driving and other fields, registering 380 patents in the US and China related to batteries, connected vehicles, self-driving cars, and more.
In addition, Faraday is one of 60 companies—including China’s Baidu, Didi Chuxing, Nio, and Pony.ai—with a permit to test-drive autonomous vehicles in California.
Faraday hasn’t been the only promising cross-culture company with a mixed bag of investors. EV startup Nio, which went public in the US this past September, has received funding from both Baidu and Tencent, which are each developing their own autonomous driving initiatives. Although Nio is headquartered in Shanghai and outsources manufacturing to a state-owned company, its design and self-driving team members are spread out across California and Europe.
However, the fact that Faraday’s CEO specialized in producing content, not cars, may have affected its prospects. In 2004, Jia Yueting founded streaming platform LeTV (now Leshi or Le.com). Eventually, Le.com became the basis for a sprawling tech empire that produced televisions, smartphones, and—even as Jia was still supporting Faraday—an electric vehicle branch that has since stalled.
As LeEco’s expansion efforts overloaded the company with debt, Faraday too began seeing its cash flow cut short. But the problems started even before that. In early 2015, The Verge reported that when company executives wanted to build a small factory to produce 50,000 vehicles a year, Jia insisted on a much larger, more expensive facility like Tesla’s.
The plan to construct a $1 billion plant from the ground up in North Las Vegas, Nevada, eventually fell through. Instead, Faraday opted for the considerably less flashy option of renovating a former Pirelli tire factory in Hanford, California.
Jia, who ranked 37th on Forbes’ 2016 Rich List, saw his personal fortune plummet, and was placed on a national blacklist last year for defaulting on payments. When Chinese authorities ordered him to return to the country by the end of 2017, he didn’t comply, saying that he needed to stay in the US to oversee Faraday.
But Bill Russo, founder and CEO of advisory firm Automobility, said that choosing to manufacture in the US contributed to the Faraday’s ongoing cash crunch. In an already “capital-intensive” industry, Faraday should have first chosen a country with cheaper component supply chains where “more than half the world’s EVs” are already built—China.
New energy vehicles and equipment are one of 10 priority sectors highlighted in Made in China 2025, the comprehensive road map for development laid out by President Xi Jinping’s administration three years ago.
Production of electric and hybrid vehicles have since surged phenomenally thanks to a combination of subsidies, quotas, and tax breaks. By 2020, the government predicts, the country will be producing 2 million vehicles annually, by which time there will be 5 million electric vehicles on Chinese roads.
Yet while the stakes are high, Faraday could lose out on the opportunity. Russo describes the current company as belonging to “the walking dead of the EV startups.”
“They’re still animated but there’s no way to determine whether there’s a pulse,” says Russo.
Based on news headlines over the last two years, it seems miraculous that Faraday is still alive.
Late last year the California-based company appeared to have reached the end of the line. Facing suits from unpaid suppliers and forced to scrap plans for its Nevada factory, it announced a last-minute cash infusion in November from what was then an unnamed benefactor. The investor has since been revealed to be a unit of the Chinese real estate conglomerate Evergrande.
In return for $2 billion to be paid out over two years, Evergrande Health acquired a 45% stake in FF through a network of offshore holding companies. The deal also extended to at least some of Faraday’s “technical assets,” and in August, a new company named Evergrande FF Intelligent Automotive (China) Co. Ltd. was established to handle the startup’s new operations in China.
Prior to the announcement Evergrande, like LeEco, had little to do with electric cars. In a statement published this past June however, the real estate giant announced it was “diversify[ing] its businesses” by entering the “fast-growing new energy automotive industry.”
Evergrande has a history of holding a diverse investment portfolio in apparently unrelated companies and industries. It has, for example, invested in mineral water, milk powder, and agriculture, as well as high-tech areas such as aerospace and AI. Evergrande set an industry record for first-half profits this year, suggesting that the company’s strategy is successful—its gigantic debt pile notwithstanding.
The EV investment also gave the real estate giant a chance to acquire extra land, a prized commodity in China. The 99-acre construction site near Guangzhou, which was leased for $58 million via a Faraday affiliate in April of this year, was part of a local government initiative to attract tech companies.
Yet since their deal was struck, Evergrande and Faraday’s relationship has rapidly deteriorated. On October 7 Evergrande filed a statement on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange claiming Faraday was attempting to get out of their arrangement. It alleged that less than a year after their initial agreement, Faraday had already spent $800 million and requested an advance of another $700 million, to be paid out over seven months.
In a suit filed on November 8, FF said that that advance came with a price. In return for the money, Evergrande demanded that Jia step down from the country’s China operations. The real estate giant never delivered on the first installment of the $700 million, however, citing Jia’s continuing influence over the company as well as his status as a debtor.
On that basis, Faraday filed for arbitration in Hong Kong. In a fiery official statement, the company declared its biggest shareholder intended to gain control and ownership over Faraday China and all of its intellectual property.
Evergrande “shouldn’t be permitted to withhold the funding and simultaneously prevent FF from accepting alternative financing or investments,” Faraday asserted.
On November 14, a suit filed by three Faraday employees also claimed that Evergrande took advantage of the situation to assume control over the car company’s China operations, The Verge reports. In addition it allegedly withheld money from “key suppliers,” contributing to FF’s financial straits.
While the arbitration case is still ongoing, in late October Hong Kong’s International Arbitration Centre allowed for FF to receive up to $500 million in emergency funding pending Evergrande’s approval. Both sides claimed it as a victory.
Yet with Faraday facing financial uncertainty and Evergrande’s investment in jeopardy, the issue seems far from resolved. Neither Evergrande nor Faraday Future representatives responded to requests for comment from TechNode.
Faraday’s troubles are once again spinning out of control, with a “serious and unexpected cash shortfall” resulting in downsizing and pay cuts, a press statement from Faraday in late October said.
Five days later, Faraday’s senior VP of product strategy Nick Sampson resigned. On LinkedIn, he wrote that the troubles of the company he helped found are having a negative “ripple effect on lives throughout our suppliers and the industry” and a “devastating impact on lives of our employees, their families and loved ones.”
His departure followed those of three other key employees earlier in the month. (Last year, a similar exodus took place, with two former executives setting up electric car competitor EVelozcity.) On November 1, FF manufacturing manager Hector Padilla even created a GoFundMe campaign to help team members affected by “lay off[s] or mandatory furlough.” So far 40 contributors have raised $21,172 in donations, but the campaign is still $28,000 short of its goal.
Blockchain electric car startup EVA.IO says it’s currently in negotiations with Faraday over a $900 million investment over the next three years through indirect security token offering, or STO—a form of funding viewed as less vulnerable to fraud than ICOs. But even if it were successful, it wouldn’t address Evergrande’s apparent claims over at least some of Faraday’s operations and intellectual property.
Despite, or perhaps because of, all the drama surrounding it, Faraday has yet to deliver on its smart, “autonomous-ready” luxury electric SUV, the FF91. The company still promises to begin production at its California plant by the end of this year.
In July, local media outlet the Hanford Sentinel published a piece on Faraday taking over the former Pirelli factory. The cover image shows a beaming Jia Yueting in an orange hard hat shaking hands with a local senator. The article cites Hanford Community Development Director Darlene Mata saying that Faraday employees were collaborative and even “gracious” in their dealings with city government.
More recently, Mata told TechNode that Faraday officials “haven’t told us they aren’t moving forward,” adding: “We are not involved in the daily operations of Faraday Future.”
Faraday hasn’t released an official statement about its operation plans for China, but work is clearly underway and local community members are being relocated because of the new plant.
Elderly lifelong resident Fang Gundai says that last April, authorities informed her that she’d have to move away. That’s also the month that a Faraday affiliate bought up the neighboring land. She’s reluctant to leave her home and says the district government isn’t offering fair compensation for her family’s property.
Her neighbor, who lives in a two-story tiled building across the street from the construction, echoes Fang’s opinion. From her backyard, the construction equipment being used to build the new plant can be seen in the distance. She says that the noise doesn’t bother her very much, but she doesn’t want to move away from her vegetable patch and the clean air.
The local neighborhood committee secretary, who gave only his surname, Liang, tells TechNode that “of course people who grew up here won’t want to move.” But most of the 500 or more residents there understand the need, he said. Many younger residents have already left, searching for work closer to Guangzhou’s city center or other urban hubs. “All of Guangdong is developing,” he said.
In line with that goal, authorities in the district have reportedly been recruiting new energy vehicles and other high-end tech enterprises, offering preferential policies for companies who open up shop. Even if Faraday and Evergrande’s efforts fall through, new facilities for building connected cars or advanced IT equipment may rise in their place, laying the groundwork for the area’s future.
Additional reporting by Alysha Webb. With contributions from Tristin Zhang.
]]>Electric cars and blockchain, two of the hottest concepts in the tech world, have been brought together. Faraday Future, the electric car startup aiming to challenge Tesla, may secure a $900 million funding package from EVAIO Blockchain, releasing the company from exacerbating cash pressure.
The funding will be invested over three years via indirect STO (security token offering), according to Patrick De Potter, CEO of EVAIO Blockchain, who first broke the news on LinkedIn. “FF and EVIAO will now start up the discussion for details of the plan,” he noted.
EVAIO said they were aiming to build a blockchain for electric vehicles and successfully completed EVA token private sale earlier this year. Most of the team members of EVAIO are ex-Tesla managers combined with specialists in crypto and blockchain.
De Potter, a former Tesla EMEA leader, says his team has been following Faraday Future and finds FF91 “one of their favorite EVs.” He further expounded: “If this cooperation is successful, Faraday Future may be able to obtain support from the crypto world in the next few years.”
The funding comes at a time when it’s most needed. Faraday Future’s weeks-long dispute with its main investor Evergrande Health is pushing the company to it the edge of bankruptcy. More than 60 Chinese employees of Faraday Future say they have not received salaries in October. Meanwhile, the company is reportedly planning for layoffs and 20% pay cuts. Nick Sampson, Faraday Future (FF) co-founder and senior vice president of product strategy, has resigned amid layoffs.
The company finally obtained an emergency relief from the Hong Kong International Arbitration Center against Evergrand Health in late October. Faraday Future considered itself winning the battle because the relief allowed it to proceed with financing, although under stringent conditions. But Evergrande Health thinks otherwise.
The funding would gain the troubled company more time in mass-producing and commercializing its electric cars. Faraday Future has signed a contract earlier this month with US investment banking firm Stifel, Nicolaus & Co as it explores strategic options, including debt and equity financing.
]]>SoftBank to invest in Chinese bike-sharing firm Hellobike: sources–Reuters
What happened: On Wednesday, The Information published a report that Japanese conglomerate SoftBank is in talks to invest in Hello TransTech, formerly known as HelloBike. Reuters has since released a follow-up article stating that, according to inside sources, SoftBank and Chinese company Primavera Capital will take part in a new round of funding for the bike-rental startup. The goal of the fundraising is supposedly to raise another $400 million for the unicorn, which a spokesman said is currently valued at over $2 billion. However, representatives of Hello TransTech, SoftBank, and Primavera have not provided comment on the news of potential investments.
Why it’s important: To outside observers, it may seem surprising that SoftBank would want to invest in the increasingly cutthroat field of Chinese bike-rental. However, Hello TransTech has so far managed to muscle out competition by targeting smaller cities and they recently diversified by launching a ride-hailing service in September. Along with the support of high-profile investors like Alibaba, that may be enough for Hello TransTech to avoid the pitfalls of cash-strapped competitors like ofo, which it’s currently in talks to acquire.
]]>Alibaba is developing a voice-driven version of its enterprise communication and collaboration app DingTalk for vehicle use, local media is reporting, citing people familiar with the matter.
The service is expected to be integrated into Banma System, the AliOS-enabled operating system for connected cars which Alibaba developed with its strategic partners Banma Network Technology—a joint venture between Alibaba Group and SAIC Motor Crop. The system is installed in over 600,000 cars so far, and thus may facilitate the adoption of the new DingTalk version when it’s being released.
“Making sure that drivers can keep their eyes on the road and hands on the wheel are the bottom line for in-vehicle interaction, but the challenge is huge,” the source added.
It’s interesting to note that Pony Ma announced earlier this month that Tencent is also planning to bring its social networking app WeChat to cars by leveraging voice-control technologies.
As the world’s fastest-growing automotive market, China is experiencing an increase in connected in-vehicle infotainment roll-outs. Developing plans for in-vehicle versions for both WeChat and DingTalk, the default instant massaging tools for personal and professional communications in China, is in line with the trend.
Chinese internet giants have been expanding aggressively to car-related technologies from electric cars to autonomous driving, and connected cars are one of the sectors that’s become highly competitive. In addition to Alibaba, Baidu has its DuerOS and Tecent just launched TAI Smart Car System this week.
Apart from in-house development, Alibaba also partnered with the world’s top automaker like BMW, Honda and Ford, helping them leverage new technologies of artificial intelligence, big data, cloud computing, the Internet of Things.
Most of the smart-car service providers only do a re-developing of the mobile apps in an attempt to duplicate the smartphone ecosystem for the automotive industry. But the car-targeted services need a custom design due to the huge interaction differences for smartphones and cars.
]]>Image credit: Tencent Video
According to Chinese media, Nanjing is home to a “car graveyard” of close to 1,000 vehicles. The brand-new cars are being stored in an industrial park as companies wait for the lifting of a local ban on certification for new rental and ride-hailing vehicles. Although not all the cars belong to ride-hailing platforms, photos and videos show that some sport the logos of Didi and Meituan.
Nanjing’s government first announced a temporary ban on new rental car licenses on April 19, but news of the restriction leaked two days beforehand, AI Finance & Economics reports. That led to a rush to buy and register vehicles, as Nanjing mandates that all additional ride-hailing cars must be new.
However, in August of this year, Nanjing leveled an additional restriction on the industry, stalling the processing of rental car certification for three months. Until that regulation ends on November 16, close to 1,000 new cars have been left idle in the Nanjing industrial parking lot.
Image credit: Tencent Video
Nanjing has been the site of fierce ride-hailing competition, boasting an unusually high ratio of some 20,000 cars for a population of around 8.3 million residents. Meituan launched a pilot “ride-share” program there this past February, heightening the competition among the seven platforms that once occupied the city.
The secretary of Nanjing’s local taxi association, Ling Qiang, told AI Finance & Economics that ride-hailing platforms’ tactic of offering discounts drove down demand for taxis significantly.
Meituan has since slowed its ride-hailing ambitions, and Nanjing government regulations have temporarily ceased the entry of new cars into the rental ecosystem. But the fight may not be over just yet. This past May, Didi’s number one competitor Dida Chuxing entered a strategic partnership with Nanjing’s taxi association. All of the city’s taxis can now be booked via Dida’s platform, with modest RMB 1-2 discounts available for online users. Dida doesn’t operate any non-taxi ride-hailing services there, however.
Although not a true “graveyard,” the Nanjing lot of unused cars brings to mind images of the sites around China where thousands of rental bikes have gone to die. The boom of the bike rental market has led to oversupply in many cities, as well as vandalism. Ride-hailing has yet to go the same way, although Nanjing’s limits on the number of rental cars may be a harbinger of things to come.
]]>特斯拉中国工厂建设加快 国产化利好国内供应商 – Sina Tech
What happened: Electric carmaker Tesla is planning to make 3,000 Model 3s each week in its Shanghai plant, according to a document filed to the SEC on Friday. The US-based EV startup also plans ramp-up investments on factories and equipment to up to $6 billion over the course of the next two years. The company said it will start transferring part of the Model 3 production to China in 2019, and the vehicles produced in its Shanghai factory will only be offered to consumers in China.
Why it’s important: In October, Tesla secured a plot for its mega factory in the world’s largest EV market. The new facility will be Tesla’s the first factory outside of the US and is expected to significantly boost its overall production. In July, Tesla was forced to raise its prices in China due to rising import taxes that came in the midst of the on-going US-China trade tension. Having a manufacturing plant in China would help Tesla avoid these import taxes.
]]>In late September, news leaked that Ofo workers had deserted en masse their Beijing office, which once hosted the likes of Sina and Baidu. The bike-rental company responded afterward that their rental term had expired, but that employees were still working as usual. Now, local media has confirmed that ofo’s Beijing operations have moved to a nearby location.
Yesterday, Beijing News reported that a fifth-floor sign for “ofo little yellow bikes”(“ofo小黄车”) was posted at the new spot, the Internet Finance building. According to a Caijing report earlier that day, employees began packing up to move last Friday. On a visit, two floors of the old office space appeared to be empty of workers. After Ofo’s rental contract expired, employees were reportedly moved to another two floors in the same building before being shifted to the new location.
According to Caijing, the current site of Ofo’s headquarters previously housed the company’s overseas operations and the Beijing branch.
Ofo has had a hard time in recent months. In November, ofo denied that it was preparing bankruptcy reorganization plans, saying that it would pursue legal action against defamation. In addition, ofo has faced reports of mass layoffs and being unable to pay its employees, both of which it has also denied. In late October, however, the cash-strapped company did acknowledge that its founder and CEO Da Wei was stepping down from the position of the legal representative as lawsuits from unpaid suppliers increase.
Despite its money problems, bike-rental and ride-hailing startup Hello TransTech has confirmed that it’s considering acquiring the yellow bike company. The deal could be a boon for Ofo, which has withdrawn from its overseas ambitions over recent months.
Ofo’s biggest rival, Mobike, was acquired by food-delivery platform Meituan-Dianping for $2.7 billion this past spring, bolstering the startup’s prospects in a highly competitive field.
]]>Over the past few months, rumors of ofo’s mounting debt, lawsuits, and potential mergers have been making the rounds in local news headlines.
The latest one, surfaced yesterday, alleged that the Chinese bike rental firm is preparing for bankruptcy reorganization plans. The news was first reported by local media Jiemian.com, who claimed to have obtained a company financial statement from six months ago. The document indicated that, at the time, ofo’s debt was about RMB 6.5 billion, including RMB 3.65 billion of users’ deposit and RMB 1.02 billion owed to its suppliers. A brokerage company has reportedly started a proposal for ofo’s bankruptcy plans.
“Judging by the status quo, [ofo] might have been involved in lawsuits… Otherwise, it wouldn’t have filed for reorganization”, said Chen Shizhong, a lawyer at Beijing Jinsh Law Firm.
However, ofo has refuted the claim saying that the bankruptcy reorganization rumor was a “false report”. In a statement, ofo said it is still operating independently and it is businesses are advancing as usual. “The false report has seriously damaged ofo’s brand and reputation and a malicious defamation against the company.” The company said it will pursue legal action to protect its interests.
Chinese cut-throat bike-rental industry is taking its toll on the big players, namely Mobike and ofo.
In September, ofo employees claimed that the company continues to lay off staff in the midst of the company’s downsizing efforts. Although ofo denied the layoffs, co-founder You Xin signaled earlier in May that the company would undergo significant downsizing as it retreats from international markets. In late October, news reports surfaced suggesting ofo might withdraw its current operations from Japan. In the same week, its founder and CEO Da Wei removed himself from his position as the company’s legal representative in the midst of mounting lawsuits from unpaid suppliers.
There has also been a number of rumored acquisitions underway. In August, Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing was reportedly closing an acquisition deal with ofo. In mid-October, Hello TransTech, previously known as Hello Bike, was also reported to be in talks with ofo about a potential merger.
]]>Just over one year ago, when Chinese bike rental company ofo first rolled out its services in Washington D.C., the company said it was “thrilled” to be in the American capital, a city it described as a “great candidate” for bike sharing.
By summer, the company had announced it was scaling back its US operations as part of a broader retreat from international markets.
In late August, Velocity Bicycle Cooperative, an American cycling co-op posted a sales ad for brand-new ofo bikes at $100 a pop. The Mobike competitor’s withdrawal from the city had left behind “limited quantities” of its trademark yellow vehicles. Velocity did not respond immediately to a request for comment from TechNode.
While rental bike companies tend to quickly announce news related to their withdrawals from certain markets, there’s not much disclosure surrounding what happens to the bikes they leave behind. This partly explains why it can take time for such details to trickle down.
Among other things, the Velocity post highlighted features like “26” airless tires that never deflate” and “front and rear lights that turn on automatically” without charging.
The advertising worked, according to the Facebook event page: around 200 people showed up before the event, eager to purchase 170 bikes. But unfortunately for ofo, which is stuck in the middle of a long and painful cash crunch, the proceeds went to the local co-op.
Image credit: Velocity
While the bike sale in DC, which was not directly orchestrated by the company, offers a fresh twist in China’s so-called “shared bike” story, it wasn’t the first such case of an overseas setback for ofo.
In June of this year, the company held a warehouse selloff in Singapore, retailing excess bikes for around RMB 240 (or $36) as it downsized local operations. Based on some 2017 figures, that’s as much as 30% less than the original RMB 335 purchase price.
According to Japanese media, local government recently received notice from the company of an imminent withdrawal there as well.
The dock-less “shared bike” saga has come a long way from its beginnings, of course. Once hailed as a largely positive, health-conscious movement, the bike-rental industry’s reputation has since been marred by news coverage of abandoned “bike graveyards,” creative acts of vandalism, and occasionally, bicycle hoarding.
In its home market of China, the yellow-bike startup recently faced lawsuits from allegedly unpaid suppliers as well as rumors of a takeover by Didi (which ofo has denied).
Even a proposed deal with bike rental and ride hailing startup Hello Transtech, which could provide a welcome safety net, isn’t certain. At this point, ofo may have difficulty proving its valuation despite having received a cumulative $1.4 billion in funding.
ofo recently extended its timeframe for returning user deposits from 1-10 work days to 1-15 days, according to China National Radio. Multiple netizens complained online that they’ve been waiting to get their deposit for even longer than the new deadline, however.
The news is reminiscent of Bluegogo, the once-promising bike-rental startup that went bust late last year, leaving employees without backpay and users without deposits. Didi has since rescued the company, paying for months of employee wages, offering coupons in exchange for deposits, and cooperating in launching bike-rental services.
]]>China’s Youon, UK’s Cycle.land to Start Bike-Sharing in Tandem in London-Yicai Global
What happened: Chinese bike rental company Youon Technology signed a cooperative framework agreement with UK-based counterpart Cycle.land. Under the deal, the two parties will set up a UK-based joint venture to target at the European market. The first batch of 1,000 Youon dockless bikes will be deployed in London in March next year. On the other hand, Cycle.land will take charge of distribution and maintenance of Youon’s bikes.
Why it’s important: As China’s bike rental boom cools off, Youon is one of the few companies that are still expanding overseas. Cycle.land is Youon’s fourth overseas partner after those in Russia, India and Malaysia. Cash-strapped ofo has pulled back from a series of overseas cities in South Korea, German, Australia, and India. Mobike withdrew from of Washington DC and Dallas in the US earlier this year.
]]>China’s Evergrande Health is considering a suit against electric vehicle start-up Faraday Future for “misleading” the public after the latter claimed a “decisive victory” against its investor through arbitration, local media is reporting.
Instead of dissolving the weeks-long dispute between Faraday Future and Evergrande Health as expected, the emergency arbitration result released by Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre last week only adds another conflict point between the two parties as both claim to have “won” the case.
The arbitrator rejected Faraday Future’s request to deprive Evergrande Health its right to withhold its consent to FF’s future financing, but allowed the EV startup to proceed with financing under stringent conditions: the valuation of any equity financing shall not be lower than post-money valuation; Season Smart (Evergrande Health affiliate which owns 45% of the joint venture that controls FF) continues to enjoy pre-emptive rights and, pending the outcome of the final arbitration, Faraday Future can obtain financing at a capped amount of $500 million, according to a statement made by Evergrande Health on Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
Faraday Future later contradicted this in a Weibo post, accusing Evergrande of misleading the public. Withholding Evergrande’s right to consent of Faraday Future’s financing has never been the company’s goal for the arbitration. But its application to seek $500 million in financing is supported by the arbitrator, the firm claimed.
In response to Faraday Future’s announcement, Evergrande subsequently counterattacked that Faraday Future will be legally responsible for their announcements as a listed company. “In view of the fact that Faraday Future founder Jia Yueting has confused and misled the public in the statement, Evergrande is currently working with a team of lawyers and considering suing Faraday Future and Jia Yueting,” according to the company.
The electric vehicle startup announced earlier this week that it plans to cut salaries by 20% for all staff as well as a round of layoffs to reduce its operational cost.
]]>Chinese EV startup WM Motor raising at least $288 million from Baidu, others: sources —Reuters
What happened: Chinese electric vehicle maker WM Motor (Weltmeister Motor) is planning to raise at least RMB 2 billion ($288.33 million) in its latest funding round which will likely be lead by Baidu, according to Reuters’ sources. The new funding should put the company’s valuation at over 20 billion yuan. WM Motor’s investors include Baidu, Tencent, Sequoia Capital China and government-backed investment firm China Chengtong Fund. WM said the size of the latest fundraising would exceed RMB 3 billion.
Why it’s important: WM Motors has placed itself among the promising “Teslas of China,” which include recently IPO-ed NIO—who counts Tencent as one of its investors—and Alibaba-backed Xpeng. WM Motors has had some bad press this August when a test vehicle spontaneously combusted at its Chengdu research institute, just one month before a mass delivery of the cars to customers. The company aims to deliver 10,000 vehicles by the end of this year with targeted deliveries of another 90,000 units in 2019.
]]>ofo有意退出日本市場–日經中文網
What happened: The Chinese-language edition of Japanese outlet Nikkei is reporting that ofo plans to withdraw from its current operations in Japan. The bike-rental giant is currently stationed in three Japanese cities: Otsu, Wakayama, and Kitakyushu. The local governments of all three have received notice from the company of its plans to withdraw. ofo reportedly told officials in Otsu, where it has operated for only seven months, that it would end their partnership by the end of October. The company has not yet responded to government requests for confirmation, however. Nikkei reports that fierce competition at home and disorderly parking problems are the main suspects behind ofo’s decision.
Why it’s important: If confirmed, ofo’s plans to withdraw from Japan would fall in line with recent trends for the company. In August, ofo’s Japan marketing director, country manager, and PR manager all left after a reportedly rough six months of operations. And just two days ago, ofo’s founder and CEO stepped down from the position of company legal representative amid an increasing number of lawsuits from allegedly unpaid suppliers. A potential merger with bike rental startup Hello Transtech was a rare bright spot in recent news for the company; although if that falls through, it’ll be a rough road ahead for the cash-strapped, “shared-bike” leader.
]]>China’s EV maker Faraday Future plans lay-offs, 20 percent pay cuts —Reuters
What happened: Electric vehicle startup Faraday Future headed by Jia Yueting, former boss of troubled LeEco, has announced a 20 percent salary cut for all staff and an unspecified number layoffs. The news comes briefly after reports that 60 Chinese employees of FF did not receive their salary on time. The reason behind the delay was contract revisions from FF’s main investor Evergrande.
Why it’s important: FF is currently seeking arbitration to terminate a deal to sell a 45 percent stake to China’s Evergrande Health Industry Group. FF is claiming that the Evergrande is deliberately holding funding and is set on grabbing intellectual property from the company. Faraday Future added in its announcement that it was looking for new investors. Local reports have suggested that besides deteriorating work conditions, equity rights may have been another point of dispute between Evergrande and FF employees in China.
]]>共享单车“退烧”!全国多地共享单车投放量下降—Tencent Tech
What happened: Chinese bike rental firms are reducing bike placements in major cities including Beijing, Guangzhou, Hangzhou, Xiamen, and Kunming, local media is reporting. The cities are following Beijing’s example. The capital city now has 1.91 million bikes operated by nine companies, down nearly 20% compared to the peak number.
Why it’s important: Although proposed as a greener option for transportation, the sizzling development of the bike rental industry over the past two years has been shadowed by environmental concerns. Since 2017, Chinese major cities have issued bans that prevent companies from cramming new bikes onto the already crowded sidewalks. In addition to external government pressure, the current reduction in bike placement is also a result of a cooling market in which it is increasingly difficult for bike rental firms to get funding to support team operation and expansion.
]]>Ofo founder replaced as bike-sharing firm’s representative amid rash of lawsuits —SCMP
What happened: Founder and CEO of bike-rental platform ofo Da Wei has removed himself from its position of legal representative of the firm. The role was taken over by Chen Zhengjiang, head of the firm’s hardware supply department. The move comes amid mounting lawsuits from unpaid suppliers including Shanghai Phoenix Bicycles and Tianjin Flying Pigeon Cycle Manufacturing. The former is suing ofo for a total of $10 million.
Why it’s important: Ofo has been in a lot of trouble for the past few months, retreating from international markets amid a cash crunch. This previous month has seen a number of rumors about its acquisition. Hello TransTech, previously known as Hello Bike, has confirmed that the company is indeed in negotiations to merge with ofo. However, according to unnamed sources, ofo will find it difficult to prove its valuation despite the $1.4 billion funding it has received so far. Both ofo and Hellobike are backed by Alibaba’s Ant Financial.
]]>What happened: Chinese ride-hailing company Banma Kuaipao (斑马快跑) is now rebranded as “Banma Ride-hailing” (斑马网约车). Banma recently completed a new round of funding, raising RMB 300 million from QJY Capital. The company also signed a strategic partnership agreement with Zotye Auto, under which Zotye Auto will provide Banma with new energy and gasoline vehicles. The company plans to move its R&D and operation headquarter to Beijing from Wuhan in the near future for the purpose of recruitment.
Why it’s important: Banma has obtained 125 licenses in China—more than Didi Chuxing and many other competitors have. The company said it has been focusing on obtaining licenses in second and third-tier cities, while other competitors like Didi Chuxing, Shenzhou, Shouqi focus on first-tier cities. Banma is currently the fifth largest ride-hailing platform in China.
]]>Dida Chuxing Turns Into China’s Second-Largest Web Driver as Cabs Come Back —Yicai Global
What happened: Ride-hailing platform Dida Chuxing has recorded a jump to 10 million daily active users (DAU) making it the second most popular service following market leader Didi Chuxing. Dida operates taxi hailing and carpooling services. After Didi’s safety scandals including two murders and a number of assaults on female passengers, Chinese are again turning towards taxis.
Why it’s important: Although the number of Dida users is still low compared to the 550 million users that Didi claims to serve, the rise of Dida shows that users have genuine fears over ride-hailing. Last month, China’s Ministry of Transport has discovered a string of safety issues with multiple ride-hailing platforms including weak emergency mechanisms. Didi has also found itself under scrutiny for its monopoly. On the other hand, Dida’s reach is rising. The company recently reached a partnership with Hello TransTech (ex-Hello Bike) allowing its users to hail taxis in 81 cities countrywide.
]]>哈啰出行打车业务81城同步上线 接入嘀嗒打造多元出行平台-Sina Tech
What happened: Hello TransTech, formerly known as Hello Bike, has entered partnership with Dida Chuxing, an up-and-coming competitor of Didi Chuxing, to speed up its foray into the ride-hailing industry. The tie-up would allow Hello TransTech users to hail taxis in 81 cities countrywide, including Shanghai, Nanjing and Chengdu, the three cities where the company start piloting taxi-hailing service on October 11.
Why it’s important: China’s transportation industry is experiencing a swift change of power in both two-wheeled and four-wheeled mobility services. As Mobike being acquired by Meituan and ofo stuck in cash strains, Alibaba-backed Hello TransTech rise quickly to gain market shares through deposit-free services and integration with Alibaba’s online food delivery service Ele.me. The bike rental startup now tries to pivot into four-wheeled mobility through a partnership with Dida Chuxing. As the second-largest ride-hailing company in China, Dida’s daily active users ballooned to 10.2 million while Didi is suffering from scandals about rider safety and industry monopoly.
]]>Bike rental and ride hailing startup Hello TransTech, previously known as Hello Bike, is reportedly in negotiation to acquire ofo, a person close to the matter said to leading local finance outlet Blue Whale TMT (in Chinese) this morning.
The person said the on-going acquisition negotiation is now focusing on price and share exchange rate. A suggested plan is to set the rate between the range 1:5 to 1:2.5, meaning that one share of ofo will be sold to Hello TransTech at a price equivalent to that of 0.2 to 0.4 shares.
According to Blue Whale TMT, some data the two parties are still calculating for the final decision include due diligence analysis of Hello TransTech and ofo’s operational data. Revenues, online bike orders, and daily bike use frequencies of the two companies are under comparison for acquisition price confirmation and planning.
The person also said that according to an internal document, ofo will find it difficult to provide a “valuation under an assumption of continuous operations”, suggesting that the company can no longer prove its value regarding the accumulated $1.4 billion funding it has received in total so far.
In the meantime, on October 18, Hello TransTech was reportedly (in Chinese) seeking new financing from Ant Financial by proposing equity pledge for an undisclosed amount. Ant Financial led ofo’s E2-2 round of financing worth hundreds of millions US dollars completed in September.
TechNode reached out to Hello TransTech to confirm the deal, and to see whether the new financing plan is largely due to the acquisition deal. “The board of directors of ofo invited Hello group to cooperate with them, but at this stage, we reckon the priority should be improving our own capability and better serving our users,” Hello TransTech told TechNode, giving out no further information. In a response (in Chinese) Hello TransTech gave to local media, the company denied the deal directly.
If the deal is true, Hello TransTech will take over ofo’s business in major cities, an area Hello Bike found reluctant to enter due to fierce competition and sophisticated policy environments.
It was widely suspected that Didi Chuxing was in talks with ofo for. Both Didi Chuxing and ofo denied firmly, and ofo said that independent operation status is crucial to the company. Hello TransTech’s entering the deal may suggest a failure or hardship of ofo’s attempt to raise money from other sources.
Nevertheless, Hello TransTech’s financing request implies a general cash-burning situation in the bike rental industry, and players in the filed are cultivating new sectors and partnerships to hedge any further loss risks. The company launched its taxi-hailing business earlier this month, soon after it rebranded from a bike startup to a transportation tech enterprise and after it announced a partnership with Alibaba’s Ele.me for food delivery membership in August.
]]>According to a Weibo announcement on October 10, Didi will test out a new blacklist feature on its ride-hailing app today (October 18). It’s part of an update that also includes improvements to existing options like the “one-click” panic button, emergency contacts, and warning against underage passengers. But unlike previous safety upgrades, which have mainly focused on passenger safety, the blacklist feature can also be accessed by drivers.
The option will be accessible from multiple pages within the app, from trip cancellation to complaint submission to reviews. After a passenger or driver adds someone to the blacklist, Didi will prevent them from being paired up again for 12 months.
As a staff member of Didi’s public safety department told China National Radio, being added to a blacklist can also affect other aspects of one’s in-app experience. Drivers who are featured on multiple passenger blacklists and are also the subject of complaints, for example, may be punished by the company. Meanwhile, passengers who are added to more than one list will have access to fewer drivers’ services in the future.
In its current stage of development, a blacklist status cannot be reversed.
As of writing time, a Didi PR representative had not yet responded to TechNode’s request for further information. The concept of a blacklist and its negative aftereffects, however, may sound similar to social credit systems that have sprung up across China in recent years.
In fact, the vice-director of the Research Center on Communications Law at China University of Politics and Law, Zhu Wei, told CNR that the “blacklist feature is an important component of creating a credit system” (our translation) among drivers and passengers. According to Zhu, both parties will be incentivized to avoid negative behaviors.
Fudan University’s Professor Zheng Lei, on the other hand, said that the measure has limits. While it punishes wrongdoers, the blacklist may fail to prevent crimes before they happen.
The feature is only the latest addition in a long line of safety features churned out by Didi after the murders of two passengers earlier this year. Past updates have included more rigorous background checks and a mandatory daily safety knowledge test for drivers, as well as an audio recording option for Express and Premier trips.
More recently, on October 16 Didi announced that it was recruiting 1,000 Party members to join the ranks of its customer service team. According to the company, it’s part of an effort to reduce response time for emergency situations, as well as improve the reporting of complaints to police.
]]>Tesla has secured the plot for its mega factory in Shanghai, local media is reporting (in Chinese). The US electric car maker and Shanghai Urban Planning and Land Resource Administration Bureau today signed the contract for land use right transfer.
Elon Musk’s EV company reached a preliminary agreement with the Shanghai government to build a factory capable of producing 500,000 vehicles a year. The new facility is expected to significantly boost Tesla’s production in China, the world’s largest electric car market. The company previously said the first vehicles would roll off the Shanghai production line two years after the construction of the new facility begins.
After registering a new company in Shanghai on May 10, which is owned by Tesla Motors HK, it took Tesla only another 3 months to secure a plot for its first factory outside of the US. While the price has not been confirmed, earlier this month Bloomberg reported that the auction price is around RMB 1 billion yuan ($145 million).
The company recently increased the registered capital for its China unit by almost 46-fold to RMB 4.7 billion in a bid to widened the business scope to include car parts and prepare to roll out its first products in China by 2020.
Unlike, other foreign automakers, Tesla has no production and no partnerships with local companies in the country. Exporting its vehicles to China means sky-high import taxes. In July, the EV maker was forced to raise its prices in China because of the ongoing US-China trade tension, the Chinese government raised the tariff on Tesla to 40%
Tesla is likely to face another difficulty in the Chinese market. During September, China’s car sales fell the most in nearly seven years leading to concerns that the world’s biggest auto market could contract for the first time in decades. Aside from the economic slowdown, deleveraging, and pollution issues have led to the 11.6 percent slump, according to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM).
The 864,885 square-meter (213.7 acre) property is located in the Shanghai Lingang Industrial Zone in Pudong New Area. With the government’s push, Lingang has become a popular spot for auto assembly and equipment plants. The Shanghai authorities recently opened up 26.1 km of public roads in Lingang area for testing smart connected vehicles.
]]>More than 60 Chinese employees of electric car maker Faraday Future say they have not received salaries this month and they are blaming their new boss Evergrande. Faraday Future (FF) staff in China had expected their salaries from August 20th to September 21st to be paid out on October 15th.
According to an FF employee quoted by Tencent News, on the evening of the 15th, some workers inquired about their salaries in an online chat group of 500 Chinese FF workers. Evergrande Faraday executives did not reply. Half an hour later the company employee group was disbanded.
Following the move, 60 FF employees formed their own group to discuss a collective application for labor arbitration.
Evergrande has responded that it has not stopped salary payments, saying that the 60 employees had not signed a revised labor contract with Evergrande Faraday and that the salary payment date had changed.
According to the report, Evergrande asked FF employees to carry out a second round of contract renewal (the first one was in May when Evergrande took over). However, the employees claim that the contract was not being renewed, it was being changed. Evergrande requested the employees to move to Guangdong, a province in southern China, and offered 50% of their original salary as wages and 50% based on performance.
In addition to deterioration of work conditions, equity rights may have been another point of dispute between Evergrande and the 60 employees.
The clash is not a good sign for FF and Evergrande who are currently in the midst of their own dispute. Founded by former LeEco boss Jia Yueting—who himself is embroiled in a number of legal controversies—FF secured a major investment from the healthcare division of Chinese real estate group Evergrande at the end of 2017 that saved the company from the brink of disaster. In June, Evergrande announced it would buy Season Smart which owns 45% of FF agreeing to spend a total of $2 billion.
Last week, however, Reuters reported that FF is seeking arbitration to terminate a deal to sell a 45 percent stake to China’s Evergrande Health Industry Group. The arbitration in Hong Kong was initiated by Jia who claims that payment obligations from Evergrande were not fulfilled.
Evergrande has accused FF of trying to scrap the original stake sale deal after spending the initial investment of $800 million.
FF shifted its headquarters to China in August under the name of Evergrande FF Intelligent Automotive China and named a new chairman—Peng Jianjun, vice chairman of Evergrande Health and vice president of Evergrande High-Tech Group.
FF’s China workers are not the only ones claiming to be waiting for payments from the company. According to reports, some FF’s suppliers and vendors have not been paid during August since Jia Yueting already spent Evergrande’s money.
This month FF lost two US staffers in one week: Tom Wessner, the senior vice president of FF’s global supply chain, and Pontus Fonateus, the principal of interior design and brand.
]]>Tired of seeing heaps of rental bikes piling up on the sidewalk and blocking traffic, the Chinese city of Foshan wants to punish inconsiderate bike riders through the local social credit system.
Users of ofo, Mobike, and other bike rental platforms that park their bicycles disorderly will be blacklisted with offenders registered at the city’s public credit information management system, according to the guidelines draft published by the Foshan local government on October 15. The blacklist will be provided to the local authorities by the bike rental companies themselves in order to “promote the construction of a personal credit system,” Southern Metropolis Daily reports.
Foshan, a city in China’s Guangdong Province, has over 7 million inhabitants and 4 million bike rental users, according to the report. The city now hosts 400,000 shared bicycles on its roads and like many Chinese cities, it has been struggling with the influx of bikes and poor parking manners since the rise of the bike rental trend.
Companies themselves have tried to introduce new measures to encourage proper parking and prevent theft. Mobike introduced an internal credit score in February which charges renters who misuse their bikes up to RMB 100 for 30 minutes of cycling.
However, bike rental platforms seem reluctant to punish users over parking violations as they still compete for market share. Integrating bike rental blacklists into social credit systems is a novel solution for cities. In April 2017, major bike rental companies signed, however, an information sharing agreement with China’s National Development and Reform Commission and the State Information Center.
Although the social credit systems have earned a bad (and somewhat misguided) reputation abroad, they are currently being trialed in several provinces and cities with each area deciding its own rules. The ultimate goal is to lay out foundations for an encompassing Social Credit System by 2020 which will integrate not only individual, but also government, legal, and enterprise scoring. Blacklists of debtors and law breakers are to become an important part of the system.
China’s Social Credit System: AI-driven panopticon or fragmented foundation for a sincerity culture?
In June this year, Mobike, HelloBike and other bike rental companies announced deposit-free rides in Foshan. The draft encourages enterprises to provide more bikes without deposit by using social credit scoring instead. HelloBike is already offering deposit-free bike rentals nationwide after integrating its platform with Alibaba’s Sesame Credit.
The draft of “Foshan’s Guiding Opinions on Encouraging and Regulating the Development of Internet Rental Bicycles” does not specify if the blacklisted bike rentals will face any repercussions if included into the Municipal Public Credit Information Management System. According to the draft:
Enterprises should establish and improve the credit evaluation system and management system of renters and implement incentive mechanisms for trustworthiness and punishments for dishonesty.
The draft also brings other guidelines for standardization of bike rental services, including managing deposits through the Foshan branch of China’s central bank People’s Bank of China and working with the local transportation department’s information system.
In the future, bike rental companies in Foshan will have to mark parking zones in their mobile phone apps according to the city’s requirements and enable geo-fencing. The city is prepared to fulfill its end of the bargain by designating parking spaces and optimizing bike lanes.
Users will also be given more payment options aside from WeChat and Alipay—the two main mobile payment systems—including QR code payments, local bus cards, and even NFC at a certain point.
]]>The Tesla of China surges after deliveries beat (NIO) – Markets Insider
What happened: Nio, also known as the Tesla of China, announced that it has delivered 3,268 ES8 vehicles in the third quarter, exceeding its own target of 2,900 to 3,000 vehicles. The Tencent-backed EV maker’s shares jumped as much as 8% on Monday.
Despite the production line being shut down for 10 days for routine maintenance, the company ensured that is still on track to hit the target of delivering 10,000 vehicles for the second half of 2018.
Why it’s important: In September, Nio became the first Chinese-backed EV startup to go public in the US. Although there are plenty of other EV makers, like Faraday Future and Byton, who wish to emulate Tesla’s success, Nio is one of the few that has delivered vehicles to customers. The company said it plans to launch its second vehicle, the 5-seater SUV ES6, in June or July 2019.
]]>滴滴美团称在南京已清退近20万辆违规网约车 – Xinhua
What happened: According to figures provided to the Nanjing authorities, Didi Chuxing and Meituan Dianping reportedly have removed 161,151 and 38,000 vehicles, respectively, from their fleets. The two ride-hailing platforms combined have removed nearly 200,000 vehicles that fail to meet standards.
The Nanjing authorities have increased supervision of 7 ride-hailing firms operating in the city earlier this month. Both companies have agreed to remove all non-compliant vehicles in Nanjing before October 18.
Why it’s important: China’s ride-hailing industry has been under great pressure to revamp its operations after the deaths of two Didi Hitch passengers. In an effort to ensure safety, the transport ministry announced early September that it would conduct checks on ride-hailing companies and work with the police to remove vehicles and drivers that fail to meet standards by the end of the year. Meituan Dianping started piloting its ride-hailing service in Nanjing earlier this year but announced last month that it would halt its expansion into ride-hailing due to the ongoing passenger safety crisis.
]]>哈啰出行回应上线打车业务:正与合作伙伴试点 – Tencent
What happened: Hello TransTech (Hello Chuxing in Chinese), formerly known as Hello Bike, has started piloting taxi-hailing service in China working with partners in Shanghai, Nanjing, and Chengdu. The company did not reveal when and where it will officially launch the new taxi-hailing service.
Why it’s important: Chinese bike sharing company, HelloBike, rebranded itself as “Hello TransTech” in September in a bid to expand its operations to other mobility services. The Ant Financial-backed company is not the only one trying to take a piece of China’s lucrative ride-hailing market. Earlier this year, Chinese on-demand food delivery service operator Meituan Dianping started piloting ride-hailing service in Shanghai and Nanjing but announced last month that it would suspend its expansion into ride-hailing amid passenger safety crisis at Didi Chuxing.
]]>CORRECTED-Auto firm Faraday Future wants to scrap stake sale to Evergrande Health – filing–Reuters
What happened: According to a statement from Chinese firm Evergrande Health yesterday, American electric vehicle startup Faraday Future wants to call off a major sale of its stake. In June, Evergrande Health allegedly agreed to buy Season Smart Ltd., which owned 45% of Faraday, for a total of $860.2 million. In addition, the healthcare company agreed to pay the car startup another $1.2 billion over the next two years. On Sunday, however, Evergrande claimed that despite agreeing to pay $700 million in advance of their agreement, Faraday founder Jia Yueting had begun an arbitration process against Evergrande for failing to fulfill their side of the deal. Jia’s intention is to cut off the agreement, taking away Evergrande’s say in future financing plans, according to the statement. Faraday Future has not yet released an official response.
Why it’s important: In August, Faraday Future announced it had begun assembling its flagship model, the FF91, in the US (the company’s operating headquarters, meanwhile, are in China). But although things may be looking up for the startup, walking away from such a large deal with Evergrande may result in the company once again facing money problems. It certainly wouldn’t be a new situation for Faraday co-founder and majority stakeholder Jia Yueting, who previously headed troubled tech conglomerate LeEco.
]]>滴滴出行举行乘客意见征求会 顺风车仍持续无限期下线 – Tencent Tech
What happened: On the afternoon on October 6, Didi invited driver and customer representatives to an internal discussion on ride-hailing safety, service, and driver management. The company decided to continue the suspension of their carpooling function. The discussion centered around safety issues on the drivers’ side – allowing only cars with video recording equipment to pick-up drunk passengers and setting up special report mechanisms were two possible solutions discussed. Didi’s CEO Cheng Wei, President Liu Qing, CTO Zhang Bo, and other high-level officers attended the discussion.
Why it’s important: Public safety pressure and carpooling service suspension will reduce Didi’s passenger absorption capability, and add an extra burden to any profitability plans. Meanwhile, the situation could force Didi to give up sizeable market share and allow competitors to fill the service vacuum, considering the large ride-hailing market. However, criticism concerning safety has raised the market-entry threshold.
]]>Uber Is Back in China: But for Making Bikes, Not Ride-Hailing —Bloomberg
What happened: After selling its ride-hailing operations to Didi in 2016, Uber is coming back to China but not to compete for the market again. The company is ordering bikes and scooters for its bike-rental business back in the US. Uber has no plans to bring the scheme to China but it is considering other Asian countries.
Why it’s important: After a period in which ride-hailing companies were investing in bike-rental (Didi into ofo, Grab into Singapore’s failed platform oBike), integrating mobility services is all the rage. Didi kicked off the trend by taking over troubled bike-rental platform Bluegogo in January. Uber bought electric bike-rental platform Jump in April, around the same time that Didi bought its second service Mobike. Indian Ola started its own bike-rental service back in December 2017. Looking forward, we are likely to see more mobility services added to one single platform.
]]>自己无法满足数亿民众出行需求 欢迎更多企业投入 – Tencent Tech
What happened: Ride hailing giant Didi published a public announcement last night, admitting that the company itself cannot satisfy the whole Chinese ride hailing market’s demands. The company also stressed that it would strictly follow related regulations, and continue strengthening safety management. Didi also said that it has increased the number of safety supervision staff by 300%.
Why it’s important: The announcement signals Didi’s tacit gesture to admit a dominant (even a monopoly) position in China’s ride hailing market. Welcoming new players show Didi’s open attitude to comply with the government and Chinese market’s demands of a healthier and more balanced market, despite that the company’s user base and market influence are still dominantly powerful in the country. The announcement may also be interpreted as a confident reply which suggests Didi’s irreplaceable leading role in the industry.
]]>You may recall that, following the second murder of a Didi carpool passenger in four months, China’s transportation ministry promised industry-wide inspections.
The initial stage has concluded and results are now in, with inspectors finding nine major issues with the country’s ride-hailing and carpool service providers.
At a press conference held today, ministry spokesperson Wu Chungeng listed the following problems (available in Chinese here):
Together, the nine issues paint a picture of China’s ride-hailing industry in fairly broad strokes. They were gathered over the course of a government-led inspection that began on September 5. And although the last point seems aimed directly at industry giant Didi, the survey of ride-hailing companies was a comprehensive one, covering competitors Shouqi, UCAR, Caocao, Yidao Yongche, Meituan, Dida, and more, CCTV reported.
The resulting report was compiled from a combination of on-site inspection, data collection, inquiries, and analysis of the companies. The inspection team also put together initial suggestions on how to address the ride-hailing industry’s issues.
The next steps, Wu told reporters, will be to submit the report and direct relevant departments to act in order to eliminate “hidden dangers” in China’s carpooling and ride-hailing businesses.
The government initiative, while somewhat vague, may be welcomed by Chinese consumers, many of whom were left deeply uneasy after the murders of two Didi Hitch passengers. Didi responded to public sentiment earlier this month by enacting a series of safety upgrades across its services, including more background checks, a daily safety knowledge test for drivers, and an upgraded panic button for passengers.
It seems that even more changes may be coming up in the near future, however, impacting the industry as a whole.
]]>China’s ride-hailing giant is revving up to service Japan, starting with its second biggest city – Osaka. A press release states that Didi launches taxi-hailing service today in Osaka and the Senshu area, including Kansai International Airport.
Didi Japan, a joint venture with Japanese conglomerate SoftBank, seeks to cater to the country’s taxi market, the third biggest in the world with 1.6 billion annual passengers. Osaka alone has 8.8 million residents and will be the biggest international city Didi has tackled so far.
The launch comes just ahead of China’s fall Golden Week holiday, which begins on National Day (October 1) and ends October 7. According to the press release, Didi Japan’s taxi-hailing service will accommodate travelers from mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, who can hail taxis in Osaka, access Chinese-Japanese text translation, and get “bilingual customer support” via their apps.
Didi’s entry into the local taxi market will mean increases in efficiency as well as income for Japanese drivers, according to its statement. Japan is one of the ride-hailing giant’s “core overseas markets,” in addition to Australia and Mexico.
The launch seems especially timely in light of recent news: Ctrip.com reported that for the first time, Japan is the number one choice for Chinese travelers over the upcoming Golden Week holiday, despite a recent earthquake and typhoon. A total of 7 million travelers from the mainland are expected to go abroad this year.
After Osaka, Didi Japan plans to enter Kyoto, Fukuoka, Tokyo, and other cities in the “near future,” Didi’s press release states. It also quoted company president Jean Liu’s commitment in July, when Didi Japan first launched, to “[develop] extensive collaboration with all industry players to assist in smart city programs across Japan and Asia.”
The recent announcement is a bright spot amid news coverage of Didi over the last couple months. Almost two weeks ago, the company finished adding significant safety upgrades to its Chinese ride-hailing services following public outrage over the murders of two carpool passengers.
]]>A future where electrified vehicles are more commonplace than combustion engines might not be too far off. The tipping point could be as soon as 2040 and this is a conservative estimate. That’s according to Justin Sim, CEO of QiQ, and Maneesh Tripathi, CEO at Sevak Limited, speaking at a panel on urban mobility at TechNode’s ORIGIN at SWITCH (Singapore Week of Innovation and Technology) 2018.
The industry is set to see an S-shaped curve sometime during the next 10 to 20 years, very much like the television and microwave ovens when they first came out but unlike these household appliances, there’s a specific reason why this boom will happen only in the distant future.
“The transformation from fossil fuel-based vehicles to electric vehicles is slow because whole mobility industry is heavily invested in an economy built on fossil fuels, to the tune of trillions of dollars over decades, and even centuries,” said Tripathi. “Change will only come once players in the economy decide that they have reaped enough returns from fossil fuels and have identified the new money-makers in the clean energy sector.”
Sim set a somber tone for the panel saying that the against a backdrop of optimism and a ‘clean image’, the EV industry has to deal with a looming crisis.
As more electric vehicles hit the road, the batteries ironically become the roadblock to widespread adoption. Current battery technology is heavily reliant on lithium, a rare-earth mineral. However, if the predicted demand for lithium spikes the same way we expect the EV market to spike, the question becomes “Do we have the infrastructure in place for sustainable governance of this limited resource?”
Sim believes the answer is no, and he predicted that Earth’s lithium reserves will run out in 10 to 17 years.
“This issue is the greatest disruptor we have to face and our solutions to this impending problem will shape how the EV industry develops in the near future,” he said.
We also need to consider if the clean energy that we use is truly clean.
“EVs in our minds is always connected to green energy and yes, it’s true that it produces less pollution but that doesn’t mean that there’s no pollution,” Tripathi noted. “As we consume more electricity, we’re just converting the point of pollution inside cities to somewhere out of sight and out of mind. Until we solve this issue, EVs are just a better solution relative to carbon emission vehicles.”
Implementing EVs in the near future will change the way we travel and transport goods. The “global passenger economy” alone could be worth $800 billion by 2035 and $7 trillion by 2050. However, in order to reach those milestones, the industry needs to be able to solve the current challenges. Sim likens it to a chicken-and-egg question: should consumer behaviors be changed before infrastructural support be given? Or is it the other way round?
Broadly speaking, there are 3 ecosystems living within the EV industry, according to Sim: infrastructure, product (technology), and business models. Each segment has its own challenges, but both Sim and Tripathi agreed that the tech is largely mature and ripe for commercialization. Finding that sweet spot is still proving elusive and major players such as Tesla, NIO and others have also yet to crack that puzzle.
Both Sim and Tripathi were optimistic about the future though when asked about the direction the industry is heading. Sim has high hopes for QiQ’s Infinite Variable Transmissions (IVTs) that were in progress, while Tripathi also mentioned the “Vehicle-2-X” (V2X, where X is a variable) that they are already implementing.
“The community is at an inflection point. This is just the beginning of the road for the EV industry,” Tripathi said adding that we should not view players in this space as competitors but as colleagues for innovative technical collaboration.
In the words of Sim, “we’re all just motorheads who keep on developing stuff and someday hope that our work can be implemented in reality.” Amidst a backdrop of a large potential market and an optimistic industry outlook, there is still much work to be done and we hope that our motorheads are up to the task.
]]>Troubled bike rental platform ofo has denied media reports claiming that it used a digital currency called GSE (Global sharing economy) for fundraising.
The Chinese company issued a statement on September 25 saying that the reports are grossly untrue and the relationship between the bike rental company and GSENetwork, the company behind the GSE token, is only a market cooperation. The new round of financing for which ofo used GSE is “completely non-existent,” ofo wrote on its Weibo account.
The company behind the sea of yellow bikes teamed up with GSENetwork in March to offer its users the possibility to mine currency while riding bicycles. The “Ride and Earn” scheme was first launched in Singapore, not surprising considering China’s strict stance towards initial coin offerings or any cryptocurrency trading.
At the time of the launch, Singapore-based GSENetwork was rumored to be actually set up by ofo staff. More recently, the duo started offering the program in Japan and South Korea (although the future of the South Korean project might be dim since ofo just pulled out of the market).
Chinese news outlet Bianews published that ofo used the GSE cryptocurrency for fundraising in July, one month after GSENetwork listed on cryptocurrency trading site Gate.io. According to the sources quoted by the report, an ofo official reached out to GSENetwork and subscribed for a share of tokens worth 600ETH through The Token Fund, a digital assets investment platform. Token Fund employees also participated in the fundraising project.
The source also told Bianews that a The Token Fund senior official described the fundraising as a fraud: since ofo does not have any money, this was a way to scam out some cash and ofo did not give back tokens as promised.
Ofo’s recent money problems have been well publicized. The company has been pulling out of the international market which aside from South Korea, include the US, United Kingdom, Spain, India, and Australia. The company is also said to have problems in paying its employees while rumors of investments or acquisitions are appearing almost every week.
Rumors of ofo using cryptocurrency for fundraising are also not new. Ofo has been exploring blockchain technology for some time. Founder and CEO of ofo, Dai Wei, personally invested into blockchain and cryptocurrency platform TRON.
]]>Chinese bike-rental company Mobike has responded to reports of exaggerated user numbers. A Bloomberg article headlined “Meituan IPO fact-checks Mobike’s fanciful numbers” found that the operation details of Mobike in Meituan Dianping’s public filings were significantly more toned down than the flamboyant numbers that the company had previously released. Mobike was acquired by the recently IPO’d Chinese food delivery platform Meituan Dianping in April.
The prospectus shows that in the four months ended April 30, 2018, Mobike had 48.1 million active bike users and 7.1 million active bikes. However, the company’s press release in December claimed that it had amassed over 200 million users globally and earlier this year the company also touted to have deployed 9 million bikes worldwide.
The public filing also shows that over 1 billion rides were completed during the four-month period, averaging 8.4 million rides per day—which is also significantly lower than the 30 million rides that the company claimed back in October.
In response (in Chinese) to the concern over the discrepancy in the numbers, the company said globally it has 232 million “registered users” and is registering up to 30 million rides per day. The company told TechNode in a separate response that the numbers in Meituan’s prospectus describe “active users” rather than “registered users”, which might have caused the confusion in the first place. The company also stressed that the number of bike rides varies significantly with seasons, weather and other factors.
The company representative said after Mobike dropped its deposit fee policy in July, it saw “a big surge” in usage. However, the spokesperson claimed that even though the overall bike deployment has been scaled down, the company is still seeing a steady increase in revenue.
The representative confirmed to TechNode that the number of active bikes has dropped from 9 million to 7.1 million largely due to the sustainability initiative Mobike launched in July, in which it pledged not to add any new bikes to their fleet in cities that have already reached capacities. The company also recently began recycling batches of older bikes that are in poor conditions. Recent government regulations also aim to curb the number shared-bikes.
]]>China’s Waymo challenger Pony.ai hits the accelerator to speed up to a robotaxi fleet of 200–South China Morning Post
What happened: At the World Artificial Intelligence Conference in Shanghai yesterday, autonomous driving startup Pony.ai announced that it plans to expand its fleet of self-driving taxis to 200. The company aims to have around 100 vehicles each in China and the US by early next year. Company co-founder and chief executive James Peng didn’t provide a specific date, but the expansion would be a significant step up from its current 20 taxis. According to Peng, Pony.ai’s current goal is to “build a fleet” and “achieve scalability.” Additional vehicles would help provide more data, and push the company further towards commercialization.
Why it’s important: Alphabet’s Waymo currently leads the autonomous taxi pack, and in March ordered 62,000 more minivans for its fleet. Although Pony.ai still lags far behind, Peng showed confidence in the company’s ability for “fast iteration” in a field with vast potential for development. But it may be a rough road ahead – Pony.ai has to contend not only with international competitors, but also startups like Jingchi as well as Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent.
]]>Starting September 8, Didi suspended seven late-night services for a week as it rushed to implement a host of new safety features, including audio recording on Express and Premier trips, a mandatory daily safety test for drivers, and an improved panic button to contact police. The upgrades followed widespread public outrage over two high-profile murders of Didi passengers in recent months.
Despite the improvements, China National Radio called out the ride-hailing company for potentially misleading users about its emergency button. Although the feature is branded as “一键报警,” usually interpreted as “one click to call the police,” it actually prompts passengers to tap at least twice to contact authorities.
According to the Didi app, clicking the button brings passengers to a page with information about their car, driver, and location. From there, users must tap again to text or call the police, with either action automatically sending their trip information to all emergency contacts via text. At the same time, users will receive an identical message on their own phones.
When asked whether the apparent misnomer could pose a safety risk for passengers in emergency situations, a Didi representative referred TechNode to materials stating that the vast majority of users “test” the function by tapping once but don’t follow up by initiating an emergency call or text. According to the statement, Didi also has more improvements planned for the button.
“We are exploring ways to tackle external constraints and have the trip information sent to police automatically through partnerships with law enforcement agencies.”
Another document shared with TechNode compared safety features of multiple ride-hailing services. It showed that Didi’s new daily facial recognition checks and plans to cooperate further with Chinese police now set it apart from its competitors.
]]>Go-Jek aims to raise $2 billion for Southeast Asia expansion: sources —Reuters
What happened: Indonesian ride-hailing firm Go-Jek is seeking to raise about $2 billion from existing investors, including Tencent and JD.com. Go-Jek is preparing an offensive against its main rival Singapore-based Grab, which is considered to be close to Tencent’s main rival Alibaba.
Why it’s important: The two Chinese tech giants have already made steps into the Southeast Asian e-commerce market after Alibaba acquired a majority stake in Lazada and invested in Tokopedia. Tencent, for its part, invested in Singapore’s Sea which operates Shopee, while JD, which is backed by Tencent has been making investments in smaller e-commerce platforms in the region. The ride-hailing market seems to be next. Both Go-Jek and Grab are raising billions of dollars and investing hundreds of millions of dollars in the race to gain dominance in Southeast Asia.
]]>Bike rental, ride-hailing, and logistics services in China’s Guangdong province were suspended as Typhoon Mangkhut made landfall over the weekend, according to local media.
Chinese mobility services including those offered by ride-hailing giant Didi and Meituan-owned bike rental firm Mobike were temporarily stopped.
The typhoon, which is one of the region’s most powerful in decades, also caused the suspension of transportation services in Guangdong and Hong Kong, where train services were halted and flights were canceled.
Didi suspended numerous offerings—including taxi hailing, Express, and bike-rental, in seven cities including Zhuhai from 4 am to 5 pm yesterday. However, in Shenzhen, the company’s Premier service was exempt from interruptions. It’s designated driver service, which allows drunk drivers to be transported home in their own cars, will be suspended until the morning of September 18.
Mobike’s service suspension lasted from the early hours of September 16 until this morning (September 17).
Courier services were also affected by the typhoon. SF Express suspended services in Guangdong, Hainan, and Hong Kong in order to protect employees and goods. The company said it would resume operations as soon as it could.
Take out services were also interrupted. Alibaba-owned Ele.me said that users in Guangdong would not be able to make use of its delivery service. The company said the timeframe of its closure would be dependent on weather conditions.
Mangkhut is not traveling inland and is expected to hit Guizhou, Chongqing, and Yunnan later today. It remains to be seen whether similar suspensions will be imposed there. Over 2.5 million people were evacuated from southern China. Before battering Hong Kong and Guangdong, the typhoon made landfall in the Phillippines, killing at least 33. Mangkhut is expected to be downgraded to a tropical depression as it moves toward the interior of the country.
]]>哈罗单车品牌升级“哈啰出行” – The Beijing News
What happened: Hellobike has renamed itself as Hello TransTech (or Hello Chuxing in Chinese) CEO Yang Lei announced in a letter to his staff on the company’s 2-year anniversary. According to The Beijing News, the bike-rental company started registering a series of trademarks under categories including travel, logistics services, insurance, finance and real estate in April.
Why it’s important: Hellobike is one of the few that survived China’s brutal bike-rental industry. Last October, the company merged with rival Jiangsu You’on in order to better compete against industry giants ofo and Mobike. Since then, the bike-sharing firm has been targeting fourth and fifth tier cities in China. It is clear that the company is making its forays into a variety of businesses including the competitive ride-hailing industry.
]]>China has become addicted to debt. Now, its tech industry is hooked too.
It started innocently enough. Back in 2008, when the fallout of America’s own debt binge was giving the whole world a hangover, China engaged in a decisive and robust economic stimulus, injecting RMB 4 trillion into key sectors of its economy. Banks, mostly state-owned in China, were directed to lend more, particularly to other state-owned firms. As a result, China recovered quickly from the global financial crisis, even as the US and Europe struggled to get back on their feet.
However, even as the Chinese economy recovered, the banks continued to lend, and Chinese companies continued to invest, most notably in infrastructure projects. Not only did they invest, they invested A LOT.
China’s lending firehose has injected more cash into the economy than the quantitative easing measures of the US Federal Reserve, European Central Bank, and Bank of Japan combined. While this lending has kept the economy growing, it has had detrimental side effects as well. Here are just a few of the most notable:
As often happens when credit is too readily available, borrowers have tended to be less prudent about the feasibility of their investment projects. The necessary, practical roads and bridges may get built, but so do inefficient and wasteful projects like 100-story skyscrapers and the hundreds of “ghost cities” across the country, massive residential districts where houses are purchased, but few actually live.
When money flows freely, it becomes easier for business or political leaders to cut a few pieces off for themselves. This is not necessarily a bad thing. Corruption becomes more of a problem, however, when it incentivizes unproductive investment. After all, the companies must pay back the loans that they took out for the project in the first place. The corrupt executives and government officials keep their money, but the company is left with the bill.
As high-productivity projects have become scarcer and the heyday of China’s infrastructure boom is in its past, more and more companies have found themselves with far more capacity than they can reasonably use, so they borrow money to stay in business, or to complete unproductive projects. When those projects do not yield the returns they were hoping for, they borrow more money, to embark on another project, or simply to keep the lights on, or service the interest of their existing debt. Once that money is spent, they have to borrow more, and the cycle continues.
The level of total debt in China is now officially approaching 300% of GDP, with the bulk of that coming from ballooning corporate debt, although household debt is rising sharply as well. Considering the cost at which these loans are being taken out, servicing the debt alone takes up roughly 18% of GDP. That’s almost three times the country’s official GDP growth rate.
With all that lending to unproductive companies (usually state-owned enterprises), the banks need to find other sources of returns.
With the state-owned companies underperforming, but with monetary expansion placing inflationary pressure on the economy, both investors and banks demand higher returns on their investments. So the banks sponsor “trusts,” off-balance-sheet entities which make higher-risk/higher-reward loans, securitize them, and then sell them to investors as wealth-management products (WMPs).
These shadow banking institutions include hedge funds, VCs, private equity, and other entities that are not required to comply with the same strict regulations as China’s traditional banks. Chinese shadow banking has expanded rapidly over the last decade into a massive, $10 trillion ecosystem that connects financial institutions with companies, local governments and hundreds of millions of households.
With all that money sloshing around the Chinese economy, looking for high returns, the result has been a surge in asset bubbles. Most notable is housing, where apartments sit empty, held as investments, while—as a ratio of the average wage to average apartment price—China’s major cities have some of the least affordable housing in the world. We’ve also seen asset bubbles in liquor, Tasmanian lavender bears, and even illicitly-traded animal products like ivory and rhino horn.
Shadow banking in China has created an economic environment where not much genuine value is created, although GDP keeps going up. Wages and living standards do not particularly increase, but prices for assets do. Most people and companies are unable to build wealth in the traditional way, so many do so by bringing on debt, and investing it in speculative ventures, usually based around asset bubbles. In this environment, “working” is something that suckers do, because no matter how much a worker saves, they will struggle to make as much money as those playing financial games. As long as these bubbles keep inflating, the irresponsible gamblers get rich, while prudent, hard-working people see others pass them by.
China’s speculative bubble-riders, like those from anywhere in the world, move in stampede-like herds. “Hot money” rushes into assets on one day, and then out again just as quickly the next, most evident in the financial roller-coaster rides that are China’s stock exchanges.
This phenomenon becomes even more extreme when the government gets directly involved. By investing aggressively in the technology sector and strongly emphasizing innovation, the Chinese government has been injecting cash both directly and indirectly into tech ventures.
“Much of the VC money in China is government money, from state-owned companies or institutions,” explains Christopher Balding, Bloomberg contributor and former associate professor of business and economics at the HSBC Business School in Shenzhen. “The government is pumping money into the tech sector. They are directing the herd, but also part of the herd as well.”
The result has been a historic surge in venture funding. In Q2 2018, China accounted for up 47% of global venture capital, surpassing even North America. However, it is unclear how the reality on the ground can support this level of investment. China certainly has strong engineering and technical talent but is unlikely to be currently on par with that of North America. The same goes for managerial talent, venture investment expertise, corporate governance, or access to global consumer markets.
An economy full of asset bubbles seems to have created quite a large one in its tech sector, to both the benefit and detriment of its tech firms. But as with just about any major bubble, there are some common characteristics which stand out.
China’s tech industry is seeing more than its fair share of Ponzi schemes, although branded in different ways. This has become evident through the recent collapse of China’s P2P (peer-to-peer) lending industry.
As Martin Chorzempa thoroughly explained, peer-to-peer lending should theoretically be very difficult to suffer a run and collapse. After all, if the lending is truly peer-to-peer, a P2P lending platform simply serves as an intermediary between a borrower and a lender. That, however, is not what these platforms actually were. As Chorzempa put it:
True P2P lending means lenders are only paid if and when borrowers repay the loans. For example, investments in a 12-month loan cannot be withdrawn after three months if the investor panics, because it is not yet due, and the lender cannot ask the platform for reimbursement if the borrower stops making payments. A “run” on P2P platforms that precipitates its failure should therefore not be possible. These attributes are critical in distinguishing a P2P platform from a bank. The credit risk and maturity mismatch of bank loans means they tend to be more strictly regulated.
Sadly, a “run” on P2P platforms is happening anyway. In practice, P2P platforms in China provide guarantees, meaning that investors get no hint that risk is piling up until suddenly the platform cannot meet its obligations and goes offline. These platforms also issue wealth management–type products that have maturity mismatches, putting them at the risk of a run if spooked investors pull out their investments. The China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) issued rules in August 2016 making these practices illegal, but the turmoil over the last two months indicates that numerous platforms have ignored them.
P2P platforms, unfortunately, are not the only Ponzi startups out there. As excitement has risen over the potential of blockchain technology, fraudsters have taken advantage. In May, police in Jinan, Shandong province arrested a gang of more than ten suspects involved in a $47 million scam under the guise of a “blockchain” project.
Cases of blockchain or cryptocurrency-related fraud have skyrocketed, according to a government report released in July, and although Chinese authorities have taken decisive action to limit such fraud (they banned ICOs, and have even cracked down on cryptocurrency discussion forums). However, it is a tricky balancing act, since they would also like to encourage the development of blockchain technology, and many legitimate projects need to fund themselves through ICOs. The problem is, therefore, how to discourage the fraudsters without alienating the legitimate actors.
While there are some con artists out there, scheming to defraud investors out of their money, there is a far more frequent, and possibly more harmful phenomenon. In this scenario, entrepreneurs often begin with a legitimate idea for a startup. However, with funding so readily available, and valuations soaring based more on speculation than tangible results, entrepreneurs are perversely incentivized to spend their time, effort, and funds building hype rather than focusing on the core of their business.
The result is an epidemic of cash-burning and “2VC” business models, in which a startup’s operations are oriented towards the pursuit of funding, rather than delivering value to its users. In these situations, a startup may ostensibly hold on to an original mission or purpose, while in essence, the financial model is very Ponzi-esque. We can call these startups “Ponzi-lite.”
One of the clearest examples of this is what has occurred in the bike-sharing industry. With an appealing concept and strong support from the Chinese government (branding them as one of China’s “four new great innovations”), bike sharing exploded, and funding poured in. The flood of cash prompted a race for market share, with millions of bikes hitting the streets of China’s cities in an attempt to acquire users, as more users would mean higher valuations, and garner more investment.
The combination of access to capital as well as the urgency and competition to get more market share and funding created a perverse incentive structure, in which those in charge of the companies developed unrealistic expectations for what was possible, and made decisions which placed their firms and stakeholders in unsustainable situations.
ofo’s young founder and CEO, Dai Wei, was known to have been particularly detached from reality. He stated an ambition to turn the company into the “next Google,” and feuded with investor-appointed managers at the company. A long-time acquaintance of his, in the summer of 2017, observed a disturbing loss of humility in the young entrepreneur, saying “his ego is out of control.” A former ofo employee recalled being astonished by the flippancy of his decision-making, saying “there seemed to be no rhyme or reason to the company’s strategy, it was just doing everything at once, based on his whims.”
As access to capital allowed bike-rental firms to expand, their costs ballooned as well, requiring even more investment. One method of attracting investment was through highly-publicized global expansions, which in many instances seemed to be more of a form of marketing to VC funds, as opposed to actually serving overseas users. One manager appointed to run a Chinese bike-sharing expansion in the US shared a case in which they were pressured to deploy bikes on a prestigious university campus, despite not receiving approval from campus authorities. “[The managers in China] didn’t seem to care if all the bikes were removed the following day. They just wanted to get a photo of the bikes at [the university] and publish some PR to promote that they were there. They didn’t care about building a business, just scamming some investors out of more funding.”
As the flood of cash in bike-sharing has dried up, and the firms have returned to reality, some have faced harder landings than others. Bluegogo’s bankruptcy left investors angry and users unable to get their deposits back. Rumors have also been swirling that ofo is on the verge of bankruptcy, as they pull out of international markets, place bikes for sale, are unable to pay vendors, and are laying off workers. While the future is still not entirely certain for Mobike, they have attempted to stabilize their business, after being acquired by Meituan-Dianping, eliminating the requirement for user deposits, and emphasizing a renewed focus on “responsible growth.”
As the bike-share frenzy dies down, many are now expressing concern over the expansion practices of long-term housing rental platforms like Ziroom and Danke. These platforms take advantage of collateral-free loans offered by state banks to renters, which can be as high as RMB 1 million (approximately $150,000), which renters can pay back over a maximum of ten years. The platforms act as an intermediary between homeowners and renters, providing some management services as well, and take the entirety of the loan amount from the renter, and take a percentage for themselves before paying the homeowner.
One way that Ziroom and others have raised funds for expansion is through selling asset-backed securities, based on rental income. As they expand and compete for market share, they aggressively offer homeowners attractive terms to lease their homes, which many have claimed is driving up rental prices in some of China’s largest cities. What’s of greater concern, however, are the risks that these companies pose to renters and state banks.
Like the bike-rental companies, they are rapidly expanding, and dependent on external funding. If they cease to be able to raise money from the sale of securities or are unable to make good on paying back investors, they could experience the same fate as Bluegogo and ofo. However, the results, in this case, could be far more severe for the users. While users of a failed bike-rental company may lose a deposit of few hundred yuan, the users of a failed long-term rental platform would be forced to find new homes, but still be on the hook to repay the entirety loan they’ve taken out, which could be years’ worth of salary. In many cases, the banks would have to write off those loans and add them to an already-massive stack of bad debt.
As genuine value growth in China’s economy has slowed and consumers are squeezed, financial games are seen by many startups as the only way to ensure that they stay in business. Even for China’s most established names in e-commerce, much of their growth seems to be coming from financial services, rather than core business.
“When looking at the growth from the e-commerce world [Alibaba, JD, VIPshop], my brief point of view is that actually, it’s banking, it’s not the sale of goods. . . [I]t’s investment-driven, but the key motivation of these companies is to aggregate capital using these payment systems that they control, and the ability to move that capital into investment vehicles,” explained Anne Stevenson-Yang, Co-founder of J Capital Research, at a 2015 event for the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
This trend seems to have largely continued since then, as the crown jewel of the Alibaba ecosystem over recent years has been Ant Financial, which reached a valuation of $150 billion in an April funding round. For many of these companies, the bright spots are coming through financial services based on asset valuations, while their core businesses struggle. Once asset values slump, these firms are likely to struggle as well.
With weak consumption, government restrictions of real estate investment and outbound capital flows, and promotion of its tech industries, China’s traditional firms are finding themselves with few other options than to get into the tech venture investment business. Real estate conglomerates like Wanda and Evergrande have sizeable VC funds, and it seems just about every other real estate giant in China has as well. However, one must wonder as to the productivity of the investments that they are making, as the highly-tangible business of real estate development operates by very different principles than that of tech entrepreneurship. Real estate developers in China are often known to be synonymous with corruption and waste as well, but when there is corruption and waste in the real estate business, apartment buildings and malls still get built. When there is corruption and waste in the tech sector, there is often nothing but vaporware and broken promises in the end.
To be sure, there are many legitimate tech firms in China that produce valuable products and services. However, in a cash-bloated environment full of investors looking for safe places to park their money, these companies often are valued at higher levels than is justified. Take Xiaomi, for example. The smart-device maker, known as “China’s Apple,” was expected to be this year’s star Chinese tech IPO. The company, as well as some bullish analysts, expected them to go public with a $100 billion valuation. At the time of IPO, however, Xiaomi shares hit the markets with a total capitalization of only $50 billion. At the end of last month, the shares were trading below the IPO price.
This gap between inflated private valuations and weak performance on public markets, according to many analysts, stems from the gap between what Xiaomi bills itself as vs what it is. Its bulls invested in it with images of a Chinese version of Apple, with excellent hardware margins, an addicted and wealthy user base, and robust revenues from internet services. However, at this current point in time, Xiaomi’s hardware is mostly low-margin, its “Mi fans” are minuscule in size, loyalty, and spending power compared to the “cult of Mac,” and it has failed as of yet to achieve strong monetization from its internet services. It claims that it will one day become Apple, but at the current moment, it bears a stronger resemblance to Lenovo.
Xiaomi is not the only overhyped tech firm to experience a rough return to reality when going public. After hitting the market with a share price of over $26 in late July, social e-commerce start-up Pinduoduo has spent most of its time trading under $20 after reports surfaced of ubiquitous counterfeit products on its platform. EV-maker NIO, after announcing an IPO earlier this summer, has seen Japan’s SoftBank, who had earlier planned to buy 200 million USD worth of its shares, back out. News aggregator Qu Toutiao, who plans to IPO in the US this month, recently announced that it was cutting its financing volume by nearly 50%. All three of those companies are backed by Tencent.
As debt levels in China approach a crisis point, its central bank has been attempting to curtail lending, walking the precarious tightrope of tightening credit while avoiding a major economic collapse. However, as the cash is getting increasingly difficult to come by, tech firms are starting to feel the pain.
Other vulnerabilities are also showing. After accounting for 60% of the world’s AI investment since 2013, many once-promising start-ups in the field may soon find that their days are numbered, with one of China’s top venture investors predicting that 90% of Chinese AI start-ups will encounter “great difficulty” over the coming two years, as the tightening of funding becomes “especially obvious this year”.
The growth of China’s tech industry over the past few years has truly been impressive. As liquidity begins to dry up, it can serve as a corrective mechanism, allowing the underperforming and irresponsible firms to fail while the strong, well-managed ones can thrive. However, given the vulnerabilities in the rest of the Chinese economy, it may not work out so neatly or fairly.
In the financial crisis of 2008, imprudent homebuying and real estate investment decisions of families and firms, coupled with highly-leveraged financial institutions, were the guilty parties. While some irresponsible homebuyers lost homes that they never should have had in the first place, and investment banks like Bear Sterns and Lehman Brothers collapsed as a result of poor management, there were many for whom justice was not served. Many of the banks who caused the crisis were bailed out, while countless hard-working people lost their savings or their jobs for no fault of their own. As China’s tech bubble bursts, there are likely to be many good companies—and good people—who suffer as well.
]]>Ofo Denies Reports It Can’t Keep Up With Salary Payments – Yicai Global
What happened: Bike rental firm ofo has denied claims that it was not able to pay all of its staff salaries last month. The company rebutted rumors by saying that it had paid all employees as required and that it holds the right to counter libelous claims. Reports circulated yesterday (September 11) that the company is battling a mountain of debt, and, as a result, had not made payments to employees.
Why it’s important: The latest rumor comes after claims that the company has taken out a loan from Alibaba to the tune of RMB 60 million. Whether this is true or not is not known, as conflicting reports proliferate. However, ofo has been facing financial difficulties for most of the year. The company has retreated from international markets, saying that it is focussing on areas that are of a high priority. In order to increase its revenue ofo began selling advertising on its bikes. However, this effort was thwarted by local governments in some areas. Most recently, it began selling advertising in the form of five-second videos in its app.
]]>Chinese Tesla rival Nio trims IPO target: now aims to raise up to $1.5B —TechCrunch
What happened: Chinese electric vehicle startup NIO has lowered its expected fundraising at the NYSE from $1.8 billion expected in August to $1.518 billion. The company plans to sell 184 million shares between $6.25-$8.25. Existing investors have committed to investing $250 million into the IPO, according to NIO. So far, the company has been backed by Tencent, Sequoia Capital, Hillhouse Capital, and a private equity fund established by Baidu.
Why it’s important: Some are blaming the price lowering on China-US trade tensions while others believe that the poor financial performance of Tesla is spooking investors. But there may be other factors involved. Last week, the Chinese Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) required 30 EV makers to stop production and invited greater supervision. Although NIO was not listed among them, this was not a good advertisement for Chinese EV makers. The MIIT announcement came shortly after WM Motor’s engine spontaneously combusted just one month before a mass delivery of the cars to customers.
]]>
Rumors started Tuesday morning that China’s tech giant Alibaba has lent bike sharing company ofo RMB 60 million to help them pull through a cash crunch. Later at noon, local media reported both Alibaba and ofo denied the rumor.
On September 5, local media reported an unconfirmed “millions of dollars” worth of fundraising for the yellow bike-rental company led by Ant Financial and followed by Didi Chuxing. Didi and Ant Financial declined to comment while ofo said it was unclear on the issue.
The rumors show further speculations of the company’s operations and reveal continued doubt about how the company would fulfill its ambition to stand alone.
Word has been circulating for a while that ofo was to be acquired by Didi, with decreasing valuation each time. However, Yu Xin, co-founder, has denied the rumors several times. Amid acquisition rumors, the bike-rental company based in Beijing has withdrawn from several overseas markets, including South Korea and Australia.
Ofo’s most recent confirmed financing happened on March 13 when they raised $866 million from Alibaba, Haofeng Group, Tianhe Capital, Ant Financial, and Junli Capital. In February, data from the National Enterprise Credit Information System showed that they pledged more than four million bikes in exchange of two loans totaled RMB 1.77 billion from Alibaba affiliates.
Earlier this year, the company was said to be delaying payments to bike manufacturers and logistics companies. The total payments were worth more than hundreds of millions of RMB. Shanghai Phoenix, a domestic bike manufacturer, has sued Dongxia Datong, a child company in charge of operating the bikes, for delaying payments.
The bike-rental company has been trying to explore methods of commercialization and improve efficiency this year, including increasing ads on bikes and inserting advertisements when a user unlocks a bike. However, these methods haven’t seemed to relieve ofo from its stressed financial situation.
]]>Embattled Tesla Bolsters Its Investment in China Unit Over 40-Fold to Make a Car —Yicai Global
What happened: Tesla’s China unit, the first one overseas, has lifted its registered capital to RMB 4.7 billion ($682 million) from RMB 100 million which is a 46-fold increase. The high-end EV maker also widened the unit’s business scope to car parts and plans to roll out its first products by 2020.
Why it’s important: Tesla has been facing heavy losses in the second quarter of this year. The company’s CEO Elon Musk announced taking Tesla private in August but apparently abandoned the plan. Musk’s strange behavior during the past month has attracted attention. Tesla’s stock has taken a hit falling 6% after Musk smoked a joint and used a flamethrower during a live broadcast of a radio show on Thursday. Despite the circus surrounding its stocks, Tesla’s plans for China seem clear. Musk previously announced an investment of $2 billion or higher into its first Gigafactory in China, which will have an annual capacity of 250,000 vehicles. The factory will enable Tesla to avoid high tariffs and ensure a steady supply for the world’s largest automobile market.
]]>摩拜将在深圳置换4万辆新车 称废旧单车100%回收再用 – Sina Tech
What happened: Mobike plans to replace 40 thousand old bikes in Shenzhen in an effort to improve user safety and the condition of the bikes. The company is doing so under the authorities’ supervision. According to the company, all parts of the decommissioned bikes will be 100% recycled.
Why it’s important: The Beijing-based bike rental company recently began recycling batches of older bikes that are in poor condition. In compliance with recent government regulations that aims to curb the number shared-bikes, the company is withdrawing old bikes before introducing new ones. China’s bike rental sector has pumped out more than 20 million bikes in the past two years, which has led to serious environmental problems. Similar large-scale recycling effort is taking place in Shanghai as well.
]]>滴滴消失的第一夜:出租车漫天要价,强行拼车拒载,黑车暴增–AI财经社
What happened: Starting from September 8th, China’s most popular ride-hailing app suspended seven late-night services for a week as it implements new passenger safety measures. Not surprisingly, the temporary suspension led to a surge in taxis and illicit “black cabs” trying to make up the difference. This past weekend in Beijing’s busy Sanlitun neighborhood, taxis were hard to come by and other ride-hailing apps faltered under the large volume of passengers. Social media users in other cities also complained of price-jacking, sometimes to three or four times the normal fare.
Why it’s important: Despite public backlash over the deaths of two passengers this year, Didi remains the country’s biggest ride-hailing company. Its popularity has also helped to supplant or counter phenomena like black cabs and unscrupulous taxi drivers, making life easier for city dwellers. Much as non-Chinese consumers were unsure if they could drop Facebook following the data breach scandal, PRC residents may now be wondering if they’re ready to live in a world without Didi, or another ride-hailing equivalent.
]]>程维内部信确认滴滴巨亏:永远不会为利润放弃安全 —QQ Tech
What happened: Cheng Wei, founder and CEO of China’s biggest ride-hailing platform Didi, sent an email to employees, responding to the murder of a female passenger on August 24. The letter was released to the press on Friday. According to the letter, Cheng said the company would never trade passengers’ safety for profit. In the letter, Cheng Wei revealed that Didi has not profited for the past six years. In the first half of 2018, Didi’s net loss reached RMB 4 billion.
Why it’s important: The reveal of loss of revenue comes amid the accusations that Didi has prioritized profit over safety issues. According to the letter, the costs of promotional campaigns, drivers’ subsidization, and other operations alike were more than RMB 1.2 billion.
]]>What happened: Bike rental operator Mobike has withdrawn bikes in Manchester after one in ten of their bikes were stolen or vandalized. The customers in the city will have their deposits and credit refunded in the next few days. The bikes will be transported to other cities the company is operating in, such as London, Oxford, Cambridge, and Newcastle.
Why it’s important: Chinese bike rental giants Mobike and ofo have launched aggressive global expansion plans since the beginning of last year. But as the market cools, both of the companies choose to retrench their overseas operation. Cash-strapped ofo has pulled back from a series of overseas cities in South Korea, German, Australia, and India. Mobike withdrew from of Washington DC and Dallas in the US earlier this year. In most cases, the pull-outs were the result of the company’s operational problems. But Manchester, Mobike’s first operation outside Asia, is the first withdrawal due to exterior reasons of antisocial behavior. Other dockless bike rental firms like ofo and oBike encountered similar problems in the city.
]]>Meituan Dianping to halt ride-hailing expansion in China amid crisis at industry leader Didi – SCMP
What happened: China’s on-demand service platform Meituan-Dianping said it would halt further expansion into China’s ride-hailing market as Didi Chuxing has been deeply strained over the murder of a passenger in late August. Meituan said the decision was made after evaluating “the synergistic value” of car-hailing services and the current market dynamics.
Why it’s important: Meituan started pilot ride-hailing operations in Shanghai and Nanjing earlier this year and had expected to expand to at least five cities. Meituan is seeking initial public offering in Hong Kong, and the further regulation and possible risks of running the ride-hailing business made Meituan shy away. According to analysts, Meituan’s retreat from the market will not affect Didi much since Meituan only operates in two cities.
]]>Chinese bike rental company ofo is said to complete an E2-2 round of fundraising worth hundreds of millions US dollars led by Ant Financial and Didi Chuxing, 36Kr reported quoting insiders (in Chinese). The report did not specify if Ant Financial and Didi are the only two investors.
TechNode reached out to ofo but has not heard back by the publication of the article. Chinese local media also reported that no official announcement has been made regarding the news.
The news comes amid renewed rumors that ofo will be acquired by ride-hailing giant Didi after the bike rental platform withdrew from several global markets amid a cash crunch.
“If you don’t want to fight to the end, you can leave the company right now,” said ofo CEO Dai Wei during an internal conference this May. Dai has been insisting that ofo has to be independent, and asserted that the Didi taking-over news is false. Same has been repeated by co-founder Yu Xin in August.
Dai, however, has been rumored to be looking into blockchain projects along with other ofo veterans—a sign that could mean that he has partially given up hope on the bike rental business. Dai is known to be connected with Justin Sun (Sun Yuchen), one of the country’s biggest crypto billionaires and founder of TRON.
Although the company has repeatedly denied rumors of acquisition, it is quietly taking every possible opportunity to boost revenues. On August 22, ofo activated a commercial advertising scheme which provides five-second ads on the platform’s app.
The sharing economy and transportation markets have been criticizing ofo’s management. The company completed an E2-1 round of financing worth of $866 million also led by Alibaba in March. Despite of that, rumors on ofo’s bankruptcy are growing.
On August 31, China’s well-known bike manufacturer Shanghai Phoenix Bicycle sued ofo for owing the company RMB 68.2 million. Another ofo partner, smart logistics solution provider Yunniao Technology, is now in tough negotiations for an overdue payment which is said to be around RMB 110 million.
Local media reported on September 4th that ofo has been letting go of workers across the board.
Ofo’s main rival Mobike was bought by Meituan-Dianping in April this year. The company has been taking an aim at ofo by allowing riders to use Mobike without deposits. The same perk is offered by Hellobike, another bike rental rival which is focusing on smaller cities.
]]>Didi upgrades panic button and adds audio recording after riders killed–CNN
What happened: Starting this Saturday, Didi will suspend seven late-night services for a week as it implements additional safety measures. Upgrades include an improved emergency button that allows users to instantly call the police, a new function that will record audio on Express and Premier trips, more background checks, and a mandatory daily “safety knowledge test” for drivers. The measures follow widespread public anger over two passenger murders in the last four months and arrive just in time as Chinese authorities begin their inspections of ride-sharing companies today.
Why it’s important: Didi has been on the scramble to make up for a significant drop in public trust following the two high-profile murders, as well as a string of sexual assaults that have taken place in recent years. Following a public apology from company founders last week, this appears to be the ride-hailing giant’s latest attempt to appease angry users.
Correction, Sept 1: This post originally stated that Didi suspended services beginning last Saturday.
]]>China’s second largest e-commerce platform JD.com has entered the ride-hailing business.
Jiangsu Jingdong Information Technology, a subsidiary of JD.com, quietly updated its information on China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Public System in late August. The update added online taxi booking, used automobile sales and public transportation services.
JD.com didn’t respond to the inquiry made by local media Monday.
Jiangsu Jingdong Information Technology mainly focuses on JD.com’s delivery services. It obtained the delivery certificate from the State Post Bureau of China in 2010 and has 298 branches in provinces across China including Shandong, Shaanxi, Zhejiang and Sichuan. According to local media, experts were quoted that it’s possible that JD wanted to build a Didi for freight because of the company’s expertise in logistics. Statistics show the market value of freight is worth RMB 1.2 billion, ten times more than the online ride-hailing market.
JD can also take advantage of the network it has built on deliveryman to expand into the online personal ride service if it intends to.
China’s ride-hailing business is undergoing a new wave of shifts and regulations as the public was blaming Didi for the murder of a female passenger on August 25 while she was using Didi’s carpooling services. The public accused Didi of lacking safety measures. Governments agencies across the nation have also launched investigations against Didi.
Former founder of Kuaidi Dache, Chen Weixing, announced his coming-back Thursday with a new blockchain based ride-hailing app VV Go that seeks to improve passenger safety and increase the income of drivers.
]]>Ofo to Cull Yet More Staff This Month, Insider Says–Yicai Global
What happened: According to an unnamed employee, troubled bike rental giant Ofo has been letting go of workers across the board, with plans to downsize further this month. Reportedly, only around 750 now work in the company’s Beijing headquarters due to Ofo’s current cash crunch. A company representative denied the most recent layoffs, but co-founder You Xin stated earlier in May that Ofo would downsize to 8,000 from 12,000 as it exits foreign markets. Yicai’s anonymous source also claimed that the bike-rental company has been using tactics such as purposefully neglecting employee growth in order to avoid handing out severance pay.
Why it’s important: Speculation of big layoffs at Ofo have been making the rounds since earlier this year. The company is certainly facing the heat from its main bike supplier, which has filed a suit against it for RMB68 million of unpaid debts. Ofo has attempted to supplement its income by selling advertising on its app and bikes, with mixed results; whether or not the latest reports are completely accurate, the company certainly faces rough times ahead.
]]>Tencent-Backed Tesla Rival Forms NEV Ride-Hailing Firm– Yicai Global
What happened: Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer Nio has set up a new car-rental and ride-hailing subsidiary in the country’s southern island province of Hainan. The report points out that the new firm could be related to the company’s partnership with China Automobile Technology and Research Center and several other companies inked on August 21.
Why it’s important: Nio’s newly founded subsidiary is obviously part of China’s ride-hailing resurgence. Apart from Nio, the burgeoning sector witnessed the entrance of several big name players over the past year, including Meituan, state-owned SAIC Motor, mapping company AutoNavi, and more. New players in the field could pose a series threat to Didi Chuxing’s current dominance, especially at a time when the ride-sharing giant is under public backlash due to passenger murder scandals. NIO has filed to list on the New York Stock Exchange this August.
]]>The death of a 20-year-old woman who was raped and murdered while using ride-hailing firm Didi’s carpooling service last week has triggered renewed outrage. The company suspended its Hitch service on Monday following the death of a second female passenger within the past four months, saying it would only resume operation after all safety issues were addressed.
On August 24, the passenger surnamed Zhao was on her way to a birthday party in southern Zhejiang province. During the trip, her Didi driver navigated to a secluded mountainous area, coerced her into transferring around RMB 9,000 to him, and then forced himself on her before taking her life.
While safety issues are a sector-wide problem, the murders have drawn the ire of government officials and the public alike for creating an environment in which harassment and killing are possible. Most notably, the company’s customer service staff have faced scrutiny for their poor handling of this case and others.
After realizing something was amiss, Zhao contacted her friends, pleading for help. They, in turn, notified Didi’s customer service team, repeatedly asking for information about the driver. Their requests were met with assurances that the case had been flagged, but nothing more. After the police got involved, they too were made to wait. It took them over two hours to get information about the driver.
A day before Zhao’s death, another passenger, surnamed Lin, allegedly almost suffered a similar fate at the hand of the same driver. However, she grew suspicious and got out of the car, eventually threatening to call the police. Lin took a photo of the car and submitted a complaint to Didi’s customer service department. Staff promised to get back to her but never did.
The failures of the customer service team have garnered increasing amounts of attention. But it is also Didi’s lack of contingency plans if one party cancels a trip that is worrying.
In both cases, the trip was canceled shortly before or after it started, a common practice that allows drivers to pick up more passengers en route. In Zhao’s case, police reported that she had, for unknown reasons, canceled the journey in the app one hour after the trip began. Didi initially claimed she was never in the car and refused to give any further information. Similarly, Lin canceled her journey at the driver’s request after he said he would be late. Lin agreed because she thought this was common practice among Hitch drivers.
The company launched safety functions like Emergency Help Button with real-time sound recording feature and Itinerary Sharing in July 2016, and the Emergency Help functions were updated in June 2018. However, these features are not available unless a trip is active.
Apart from technical and other shortcomings, the problems are also institutional. The platform has repeatedly been criticized for breeding a culture of sexual harassment. Hitch, which was previously likened to a social network, allowed drivers to view the age, gender, and occupation of the passenger. More worryingly, it also permitted reviews of the passengers which often made lewd references to female passengers’ looks and body types, which had been taken down after the murder of the flight attendant. The objectification also extended to its advertising campaigns, in which the company made use of innuendo to attract drivers at the expense of female passengers.
But general macroeconomic factors also need to be considered. China’s slowdown is also affecting jobs and increasing the difficulty of finding employment with adequate income. This is especially true among the younger generation. Despite a record number of graduates leaving university, China’s economic growth fell to 6.7% in 2017, with unemployment in this bracket reaching as high as 30%.
When an air hostess who was also using the company’s Hitch service was murdered in May, Didi’s facial recognition system failed to alert the company that the driver was unauthorized to use the platform. Didi’s vetting practice for drivers is again being called into question. The company claims it collects vehicle and identity information from drivers, and information relating to criminal records every three months from the police. It says those with severe violations of “public safety, public security or traffic safety, or a history of mental illness,” will not be allowed to use the platform.
For Didi, the murders mark a severe breach of trust, exemplified by the increased downloads of apps that facilitate video calls to police. Following the latest apology by the company, in which it promised to devote more time and resources to customer services and develop better contingency plans, internet users questioned whether it was another perfunctory public relations stunt.
Users also began documenting their departure from using the platform on social media, prompting the use of the hashtag #BoycottDidi. As a result, the company’s app fell from 9th to 61st place in the Chinese Apple App Store. It is unclear whether the incidents will cause the company to delay its $80 billion IPO, which is rumored to take place this year.
But Didi is not just going to have to answer to its customers. China’s National Development and Reform Commission has announced plans to extend the country’s nascent social credit system to the transport industry following the latest murder. This is bound to have far-reaching effects on companies in the sector, which could face extensive cross-departmental punishments for infractions. Officials have called for greater general oversight of the ride-hailing sector, which has had a turbulent few years, with accusations of sexual harassment as well as price wars between major players.
The Ministry of Transport has also weighed in with a list of demands. “These two vicious incidents that have violated the life and safety of passengers has exposed the gaping operational loopholes of the Didi Chuxing platform,” it said in a statement and ordered the company to improve its driver vetting process, among other demands.
The murders are affecting the industry as a whole. Most notably, mapping company AutoNavi suspended its carpooling service shortly after news of the killing went public. Didi rival Dida also made changes to its service after the last Didi passenger was murdered in May by removing a social networking component from its app.
There is likely to be pushback from local governments around the country. Didi has already been summoned by authorities in ten cities around the country, which require them to address its security loopholes, integrate vehicle and driver data into a government-supervised system, and implement an “emergency SOS” button its app.
However, it is clear that local governments expect compliance by the industry as a whole, and they are seeking greater supervision of ride-hailing platforms. Didi is not the only company that has been summoned after the latest murder. Up to eight other firms are being caught in the net of government supervision.
With additional reporting from Chris Udemans
]]>The speed at which Chinese tech companies are burning cash is disturbing. In order to maintain its dominating position, China’s massive service platform Meituan has spent over $4 billion in the past seven years. But O2O is not the only field that witnessed a fierce land-grabbing battle. Similar subsidy-fueled wars are going on in virtually every emerging market from ride-hailing to bike rental.
The prevailing model for a startup to prosper in the Middle Kingdom is to snap up market shares as fast as possible, often luring customer by providing massive subsidies and extensive marketing campaigns. Once they build their brand and clear up major competitors, they will have a final say in monetizing its users.
Before reaching a critical mass, in Didi’s case over 95% of China’s ride-hailing market, these companies are largely funded by venture capital and private equity firms, along with larger internet companies like Tencent and Alibaba. The rise of a raft of emerging tech verticals draw capital in and billion dollars investments are constantly hitting the headlines of local media.
Spoiled by abundant capital, the entire marketing strategies of some companies are formed around losing money. “2VC model” was jokingly coined in the craziest days of China’s fundraising extravaganza. Like customer-targeted business is shorted as 2C or ToC business, 2VC is a term created for cash-burning startups that survive only by raise funding from venture capitalists instead of a sustainable profitability model.
However, two recent scandals surround China’s tech tycoons show that “VC welfare” is coming to an end in some of the more mature fields. Ultimately, users are going to pay for the tech unicorn’s sprawling growth.
Renting a home in China’s megacities like Beijing and Shanghai are becoming increasingly costly. The possible roles Chinese online real estate brokerage platforms have played in driving up the skyrocketing home prices sparked national outrage recently.
A Beijing landlord surnamed Cheng recounted his experience on a Chinese bulletin board about how Ziroom and Danke, another operator, had engaged in a bidding war for leasing out his apartment in the Beijing suburbs. While Chen had planned to rent out a 120-square-meter apartment for RMB 7,500 ($1,098) per month, the price was eventually raised to RMB 10,800 after the competitive bidding.
As one of the proptech unicorns in China, Ziroom takes out long-term leases of existing homes from individual landlords. The houses are then sublet to tenants, coupled with weekly cleaning, wifi, and other services. The company raised a whopping RMB 4 billion ($622 million) in January at an RMB 20 billion valuation. Its parent Lianjia, a residential brokerage, reportedly received RMB 2.6 billion in January 2017.
With abundant capital, Ziroom easily got a larger budget in striking deals with landowners in a bid to gain a larger market share. As the company gradually gain supremacy in the sector, however, they are under increasing pressure to show its profitability capacity. That means raising rents, but this will put the costs on the shoulders of their users.
Hu Jinghui, the former vice chief executive officer of another real estate agency Woaiwojia criticized competitors like Ziroom for acquiring apartments at above-market-value prices and then renting them out at even higher prices, Sixth Tone reported.
Ziroom denied its role in rising home prices in Beijing, claiming that the rental apartments only account for less than 5% of the rental market. It promised to put an additional 120,000 apartments on the market in an effort to stabilize prices.
In more extreme cases, the VC-backed fast growth and hasty monetization approach not only cost money but also lives. China’s ride-hailing giant Didi comes under fire recently after a second female user was being raped and murdered within four months. To worsen the case, a local report shows that there are at least 50 sexual harassment and assault incidents by Didi drivers over the past four years. The public backlash against Didi peaks when angry users called for the mass to delete Didi’s app.
“We raced non-stop, riding on the force of breathless expansion and capital through these few years, but this has no meaning in such a tragic loss of life. Throughout the company, we start to question if we are doing the right thing; or even whether we have the right values. There is an enormous amount of self-doubt, guilt, and soul-searching,” said Didi CEO and founder Cheng Wei and president Liu Qing in an apology released four days after the incident, admitting the company’s misstep in pursuing fast expansion and return while partially sacrificing user benefits.
Controversies about Didi’s measures to achieve profitability are nothing new. Earlier this year, the company was accused of charging higher prices to customers who it thinks will be willing to pay more, a kind of personalized pricing, or price discrimination, targeting at premium members.
But the company refutes price discrimination claim, saying that “Didi has never used its big data capabilities to disadvantage or bully regular passengers and will never allow price discrimination.”
While lots of China’s emerging markets are quickly maturing and vertical dominators are reaching the critical point to monetize. The experiences of Ziroom and Didi serve as cautionary tales for why we need to balance profitability and public goodwill.
]]>滴滴出行 App Store 下载排名从第 9 滑落至第 61 名 – 动点科技
What happened: Didi Chuxing’s app downloads have taken a nosedive following the second passenger murder that sparked nationwide outrage. According to data from mobile insights and analytics firm App Annie, the ride-hailing app was ranked the 9th on Apple’s iOS app store in China on Aug 20th, but slipped to 61st in just 9 days.
Why it’s important: Didi Chuxing, China largest ride-hailing company, is now facing intense pressure from both the public and authorities to improve passenger safety. The company has since suspended its Hitch carpooling service as it examines its practices. In May, a young flight attendant was found murdered by her Hitch driver, which prompted Didi to suspend the carpool service for six weeks as it adds new features to improve the safety of passengers.
]]>SoftBank Pulls Plug on Plans to Invest in Chinese Tesla Rival – The Wall Street Journal
What happened: SoftBank has decided not to invest in the initial public offering of Chinese electric-vehicle maker NIO after months of talks over a possible investment. The report didn’t specify for the reasons why the Japanese tech giant walked away from the investment.
Why it’s important: Electric cars are more expensive than their oil-fueled counterparts and making electric vehicles is even more costly. NIO is among a horde of Chinese EV companies who are seeking capital to fund aggressive research and development efforts as the industry rapidly expands. The company filed for a $1.8 billion US IPO on August 14, but the move raises concerns about its early IPO. Local media expressed concerns whether the amount would be enough to cover NIO’s spending. The company further lowered its IPO goal to $1.51 billion on August 28.
]]>Another incident is shaking up China’s ride-hailing industry after multiple ride-sharing drivers were caught live-streaming themselves and even harassing their female passengers. Since the discovery, several live streaming platforms have announced tightening streaming rules.
News of drivers live-streaming passengers on popular Chinese streaming site Huya without their knowledge broke out on August 29. The news came only several days after China was shaken by a rape and murder of a young woman by a driver who picked her up through ride-hailing platform Didi Chuxing’s carpooling service. The murder, which was the second one on Didi’s platform in only three months brought China’s ride-sharing and ride-hailing industry under close attention by the authorities.
The drivers—suspected of belonging to the carpooling service of a smaller-scale Didi competitor Dida Chuxing—exhibited disturbing behavior such as allowing audiences to choose their next fare based on user profile photos and directly harassing women with vulgar language in order to boost their popularity
Audience members were reported to post crude comments during the live streaming sessions. According to a Beijing Youth Daily report, once a female passenger boarded the car, the audience could soar up to 34,000. One drive reportedly made RMB 700 in a single day by streaming female passengers.
Live streaming platforms including Kuaishou, Huya, YY, and widely popular ByteDance’s short video site Douyin promised to tighten rules and supervision in order to ensure privacy according to The Paper.
Huya, who hosted the reported broadcast, said that the live-streaming was against regulations and that it will carry out special rectification against the violations. The live streaming site banned broadcasting from any type of ride-hailing or ride-sharing vehicle and suspended the two accounts that were reported to be live-streaming passengers on August 29.
The live streaming incident is just another part of China’s ride-hailing crisis, the brunt of which is carried by Didi—the country’s largest platform. According to reports, over the past four years, media and relevant authorities reported at least 50 sexual harassment and assault incidents by Didi drivers. Didi was summoned by authorities in 10 Chinese cities while the Ministry of Transport said the incidents exposed gaping operational loopholes of the Didi Chuxing platform.
The company has issued an apology after the murder that took place August 24 and once again suspended its carpooling service, a move which was soon followed by Alibaba-backed AutoNavi which also operates a carpooling service.
]]>
Chinese electric vehicle Weltmeister Motor (WM Motor, 威马汽车) had one of its EX5 test vehicles spontaneously combust at its research institute in Chengdu, according to local media.
The news comes at a bad time for the Chinese electric vehicle maker—the explosion occurred on August 25, just one month before a mass delivery of the cars to customers.
The vehicle, which was an early test model that had recently been subjected to multiple rounds of destructive testing, allegedly ignited during dismantling procedures. The company said that the process was not completed after circuit protection devices were removed, causing a short circuit.
A company insider claims that employees at the research institute violated regulations by charging the test vehicle during the end-of-life process causing it to catch fire. According to the individual, the people responsible have been punished.
Customers are questioning the official and unofficial statements, resulting in the cancellation of orders. Concerns were raised over whether the battery played a role in the fire. The company has denied these allegations.
Weltmeister is one of many companies that have been described as China’s answer to Tesla. Competition within the premium EV space has been heating up, with players like NIO, Xpeng, and Byton securing funding and pursuing IPOs.
Weltmeister has received a total of $1.2 billion in funding, with its latest round being completed in December 2017. The company is backed by both Tencent and Baidu, giving it access to the content and connectivity of both companies.
The market for electric vehicles in China has grown enormously over the past few years. In 2017, over 770,000 units were sold, up 53% compared to 2016. This number is expected to reach one million during 2018 compared to 400,000 in the US. Both the private and public sectors are investing in electric vehicles. As of July, the total of number charging piles for new energy vehicles in China exceeded 660,00 with 275,000 of them built by the government.
]]>Chinese EV maker NIO expects to raise $1.32 billion in IPO —Reuters
What happened: Chinese EV startup NIO said it expects to raise as much as $1.32 billion in its upcoming initial public offering in September. The company is planning to sell 160 million shares at $6.25 to $8.25 each, which would bump its valuation to about $6.4 billion to $8.5 billion.
Why it’s important: Founded in 2014, NIO began generating revenue this year, reporting $6.7 million from vehicle sales and $7 million in total revenue.
NIO is among a horde of Chinese EV companies who are seeking capital to fund aggressive research and development efforts as the industry rapidly expands. The central government has been promoting alternative-power vehicles in recent years to reduce pollution and the country’s dependence on imported oil.
]]>顺风车司机直播女乘客牟利–Beijing Youth Daily
What happened: Multiple drivers were caught live-streaming passengers, apparently without their knowledge, on live streaming platform Huya. The drivers are suspected of belonging to the carpooling service of Dida Chuxing, a smaller-scale Didi competitor. Drivers exhibited disturbing behavior such as verbally harassing female passengers, or allowing audiences to choose their next fare based on user profile photos. Audience members were reported to post crude comments during the live streaming session. One driver claimed he had made RMB 700 in a single day by streaming female passengers. A Huya representative said the platform is currently investigating the accounts under suspicion.
Why it’s important: In the wake of an alleged murder of a Didi Chuxing passenger, safety and privacy violations are surfacing with a vengeance and multiple companies are under scrutiny. Going forward, the demand for corporate accountability will likely continue to grow.
]]>Xpeng has made quite a few ambitious announcements recently, including plans to secure a total of RMB 30 billion by the end of 2019 and that it is expecting its first model, the “G3”, to hit the market by the end of the year. However, signs are pointing to a more negative outlook.
Latest local media reports suggest that Xpeng might still be at least 6 months away from actually delivering the G3 to the hands of Chinese car owners and that the startup has not placed an order for the specific spare part since March.
An auto parts supplier told 36Kr (in Chinese) that Xpeng’s last order of parts is only sufficient for manufacturing 95 G3 vehicles, hinting that it is a long shot for the new model to go into mass production anytime soon.
The source revealed that Xpeng signed an exclusive contract with the supplier for producing the specific parts. According to the usual timeline for order and delivery, G3’s mass production will start no earlier than October. The G3 is reportedly still in the inspection phase—manufacturing the vehicle in small batches solely for examining and testing purposes. The process from inspection to mass production usually takes up roughly 6 months. Xpeng recently announced at its brand day on August 15 that the G3 will announce its final configuration and price in November, and then it will “soon” take delivery.
The source also revealed that Xpeng has more production plans ahead. According to Xpeng’s bidding documents, the “next model” is scheduled to go into mass production next year.
Xpeng today responded (in Chinese) reaffirming that the G3 has completed the trial assembly phase and will go into mass production in time for launch before the end of the year. The company said it is now allocating orders among its suppliers, noting that the production of “non-core components” is usually shared by multiple suppliers for security reasons. The company said the production of Xpeng’s next model is going smoothly, adding that the quantity of delivery will be “determined by market conditions.”
Earlier this month, Xpeng announced that it secured RMB 4 billion ($587 million) in a fundraising round, valuing the four-year-old startup at close to RMB 25 billion. Xpeng’s ambition to take on Tesla in China’s lucrative electric vehicle market is obvious, however, it is also no secret that the startup disassembled Tesla vehicles to aid the development of its own vehicles. Despite impressive fundraising results, Xpeng’s relative inexperience in car manufacturing often draws public skepticism over its ability to deliver and meet its plans.
]]>Three days after the second murder in 3 months on their platform, Didi has been summoned by local authorities in Chongqing, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Wuhan, Guiyang, and Haikou, following meetings demanded by Beijing, Tianjin, and Nanjing on August 27th.
“These two vicious incidents that have violated the life and safety of passengers has exposed the gaping operational loopholes of the Didi Chuxing platform,” the Ministry of Transport said in a statement, ordering the ride-hailing company to improve its driver vetting and education process among other demands.
Local authorities across the country also released a list of requirements following the central government’s criticism towards Didi.
The Shenzhen government warned that if Didi refuses or fails to address its security loopholes by the end of September, the company will face possible punishment including revocation of business license and removal of the app from app stores.
The Chongqing government also listed 11 demands including integrating data of all vehicles and drivers into a government-supervised platform.
Wuhan’s public security bureau and the transport committee summoned Didi and 8 other ride-hailing platforms, urging online rental services to instate a stricter the training and education process for drivers and demanding Didi’s active cooperation with the security departments.
Guiyang transport authority also called in Didi, Shouqi, Shenzhou, Shenma and other online rental platforms for questioning. Authorities ordered Didi to stop accepting unauthorized vehicles and drivers onto its platform, and ride-hailing apps to implement an “emergency SOS button” feature in apps.
On August 24, a gruesome murder of a 20-year-old woman by her driver on Didi Chuxing’s popular carpool service Hitch stunned the Chinese public. This is the second murder in three months after a flight attendant was killed in May by a driver using the same Hitch service.
Since the incident, Didi has come under fire from the media, the public, and government authorities. Local authorities across ten cities in China have called out on Didi demanding the ride-hailing giant to take immediate actions.
After the incident, Didi apologized for making “disappointing mistakes” and fired two of its top executives. The Hitch carpool service is currently suspended.
]]>Updated 10:45 am 29 August 2018: Didi CEO Cheng Wei and president Liu Qing have issued an official apology to the public on August 28. The post is updated to include the information.
Didi’s latest scandal involving the death of a 21-year old girl murdered by her Didi Hitch driver put the China ride-sharing giant under severe public scrutiny. An investigation by local media shows deeper problems.
Over the past four years, at least 50 sexual harassment and assault incidents by Didi drivers were reported by local media and relevant authorities, according to a report by local media Southern Weekly. Of the 50 drivers, at least 3 of them have previous criminal records, but they managed to pass Didi’s driver identity check procedure. All of the 53 victims are female and seven of them were drunk at the time of the incident, the report added. Beijing, Jiangsu, Guangdong, and Zhejiang are the areas that recorded the most cases.
TechNode has reached out to Didi for comment and will update accordingly.
Although Didi’s safety problem first drew widespread public outrage when a 21-year-old flight attendant was raped and murdered in May this year, a former fatality that involves the death of a 30-year-old passenger could be dated back one year earlier to May 2017.
Regardless of its efforts, Didi’s security risks still run deep. Company CEO and Funder Chen Wei said in Didi’s annual meeting held on February this year that safety is Didi’s top priority and the rates of security incidents have dropped 21%. Cheng’s exclamation is controverted shortly as Didi investor Zhang Huan calls for stricter regulation after a Didi driver assaulted him.
In addition to public ire, local authorities have joined to push the Chinese ride sharing giant to react in a more responsible way. China’s Ministry of Transportation published a commentary article, lambasting Didi for its failure to offer effective preventive measures as well as urgent help during the incident, and only try to solve the problem with pricy settlements. The article further pointed out it’s important to discuss whether Didi’s executives should take legal responsibility in cases like this. Xinhua News also suggested Didi should face legal repercussions if it doesn’t improve its safety record.
Following last week’s murder, Didi fired two executives: the general manager for Hitch and the company’s vice president of customer services. But neither CEO Cheng Wei nor president Liu Qing has extended a personal apology to the public after the repeated tragedies.
[Update] “We see clearly this is because our vanity overtook our original beliefs. We raced non stop riding on the force of breathless expansion and capital through these few years, but this has no meaning in such a tragic loss of life. Throughout the company, we start to question if we are doing the right thing; or even whether we have the right values. There is an enormous amount of self-doubt, guilt and soul-searching.” said Cheng and Liu in an apology released on August 28.
The incidents may put a dent in the valuation of the company, which is rumored to head for an IPO in the second half of 2018. The tech giant recieved $4 billion funding at $50 billion valuation in December last year.
]]>China’s Mobike plans big push in India as rival Ofo pulls out —Nikkei Asia Review
What happened: Mobike is considering moving into 10 more Indian cities within the next 18 months. Mobike has been in Pune since May. Although Mobike’s parent company, Meituan Dianping, did not reveal how much it plans to invest, the Indian market is a major focus according to Mobike’s Indian CEO Vibhor Jain. The company is also considering manufacturing bikes in India in addition to using bikes made by Taiwan’s Foxconn.
Why it’s important: Mobike’s Indian expansion plans come after as its rival ofo started pulling out of the country in June. Ofo has already left or is in the process of leaving India, Germany, the US, Spain, Australia, and South Korea. It will be interesting to see if Mobike’s expansion plans will follow ofo’s departure in other markets. The company has already made moves to strengthen its market position in China by allowing users to ride without deposit fees. Ofo’s last chance might be an acquisition by ride-hailing giant Didi which already owns bike-rental platform Bluegogo. Rumors about the acquisition have already begun to circulate but for now, ofo seems intent to remain the only Chinese independent bike rental company.
]]>What happened: Following the second murder of a female passenger in three months, Didi said it would suspend its carpooling service today. The company also said it had failed to investigate a complaint by another passenger that related to the driver that was allegedly responsible for the rape and murder in Wenzhou, Zhejiang province on Friday (August 24).
Why it’s important: The incident has caused public outrage. Posts on social media relating to the case have been reposted or read nearly one billion times. Didi’s inability to respond to customer complaints has also been called to attention. Prior to the murder, another female passenger reported the driver for harassing her. She claimed the driver attempted to drive her to a secluded area before she was able to get out of the car. Didi has responded to the second murder by firing Huang Jieli, general manager of its carpooling business, and Huang Jinhong, deputy president of the company’s services department. Despite the company revamping its service and including mandatory facial recognition for all drivers, many users have chosen to delete the app and cease using the company’s services.
]]>Mapping company AutoNavi (高德地图) has suspended its carpooling service across China following the rape and murder of a female passenger by Didi Hitch driver.
Didi’s case set its local counterparts on alert for the security risks of their carpooling services. As part of China’s ride-hailing resurgence, AutoNavi launched a carpooling option in March this year, presenting it as a public service aimed at reducing traffic. Four months later, the Alibaba-backed company rolled out a mobility aggregation platform to further tap into the sector. The hitchhiking service on Dida (嘀嗒), another popular Didi rival, operates normally now, but the company removed its social networking feature after Didi’s passenger murder case happened in May.
A 21-year-old female passenger was murdered by her driver when using Didi’s carpooling service on August 24th in the eastern city of Wenzhou. The incident sparked on an online backlash against the company over its safety problems. In response to the incident, the ride-hailing giant suspended its carpooling service and promised to address “many deficiencies” with its customer service.
But the raging public seems to have lost patience with the company as the current drama comes barely three months after a similar one in May. Didi suspended its carpooling services upon the May incident, but they soon resumed it after security enhancement. Limiting late-night rides, same-sex drivers and audio-recording every single ride are some of the solutions the tech giant proposed.
However, the effectiveness of these measures is questioned since sexual offenses by Didi drivers never ceased to catch public attention. It’s not clear how long Didi’s current suspension will last, but nothing short of sweeping improvements could win back the increasingly dubious customers. Other ride-hailing services are suffering from similar safety problems with carpooling services. They chose to suspend the service before coming up with effective solutions.
]]>ofo上线5秒短视频广告业务 合作伙伴包括可口可乐等– Tencent Tech
What happened: Troubled Chinese bike rental giant ofo just added 5-second short video ads to its main app. Nicknamed “视听风暴,” the video ads will be displayed after users scan a QR code and before they can get a code to unlock the bike. Coca-Cola and Chips Ahoy! are among the first group of brands that are using the service.
Why it’s important: In order to keep its independent status, the cash-strained bike rental giant has been exploring various means to increase its revenue. The current video ad business comes shortly after they launched bike-body ads (Shanghai, however, has banned the ads on ofo bikes) and banner ads in the main app. Different from the previous businesses, the short-video ad appears in the process for riders to use a bike, thus taping into the core business of bike rental giant. It’s clear that the ad service will sacrifice part of the user experiences. It has also drawn ire from users since they have to use their own mobile data to load the ad.
]]>滴滴开始在墨西哥城招募司机 10月份正式运营 – Caijing
What happened: Didi has started recruiting drivers in Mexico City for its upcoming launch in October. Earlier this year, the ride-hailing giant began offering its services in Monterrey and Toluca and was reportedly preparing to launch in Guadalajara, the second largest city in Mexico.
Why it’s important: The Chinese ride-railing giant’s move into Mexico City means that it is going head-to-head with Uber, the largest ride-hailing service provider in the region. It appears that Didi has been picking up its pace in the expansion into Latin American markets. Its expansion strategy outside of China has been focusing largely on investing and working with local partners. However, in Mexico, Didi will operate under its own brand. With a population of over 21 million, Mexico City is similar to Shanghai and Beijing in terms of scale and market demand.
]]>China’s ride-hailing company Didi Chuxing earned the title of “Uber Slayer” in 2016. By selling its China business to its rival, Uber confirmed that the Chinese market was not only full of potential but peril. These days, however, things are changing with new arrivals challenging Didi’s dominance.
Meituan Dianping, the Tencent-backed O2O service platform which is now eyeing a Hong Kong IPO, has gotten the most headlines locally, but there is also China’s largest travel agency Ctrip and Alibaba-owned AutoNavi. As Didi and Meituan start offering ride coupons once again, many are watching closely for signs of another subsidy war on the scale of Didi’s battles with Uber—a rivalry that led to billions of dollars of losses on both sides.
Didi now holds between 90-95% of the market, according to most often repeated estimates. However, China has room for more—consulting firm Roland Berger estimates that 40% of China’s taxi demand is unmet. And compared to the US, China is facing a much different ride-hailing landscape with greater bottlenecks in supply than demand, Vice President of Didi Stephen Zhu explained at a recent Goldman Sachs conference.
“If China ever gets to the car penetration level as the US, China will have well over 1 billion of cars with a population of 1.4 billion,” Zhu said noting that the current car ownership in the country stands as just 180 million.
However, Didi’s plan is to reach the future middle-class before they decide to buy their own vehicle—a task which may not be too hard considering the high costs of vehicles, license plates, parking, as well as driving restrictions in certain Chinese cities.
“The game in China is different from the US. Where a US player in ride-sharing has to convince people to get out of the car that they already own and to use their ride-sharing services,” said Zhu. “In China, on the consumer end, it’s all about persuading a fraction of the people who have the affordability and the intention to buy a car, to not buy it and stay with our services.”
The size of China’s market is just one part of the story. Companies are reinventing themselves into mobility platforms or offering Mobility as a Service (Maas). According to Roland Berger’s strategic advisor Johan Karlberg, the first wave of ride-hailing brought us platforms such as Uber, Lyft, and Didi which act as matchmakers between drivers and riders.
“Didi won Mobility 1.0—it’s over. We are now seeing the emergence of Mobility 2.0 in China, and it’s a very different ballgame,” Karlberg told TechNode. Mobility 2.0 represents the second generation including not just getting from point A to point B but also value-added services.
Alibaba’s mapping and navigation platform AutoNavi has taken a different approach to ride-hailing—it aims to become a one-stop mobility aggregation platform, a representative told TechNode. Its platform Gaode Yixing integrates not only bike-rental options from ofo and Mobike, but also Alibaba’s travel platform Fliggy, and more. After launching a car-pooling service in March, it now offers ride-hailing services from different companies. Similar to Didi and Meituan, it is now also throwing subsidies at users.
Didi, for instance, is looking into lowering the cost of ownership for of its vehicle fleet. Last week the company announced it will invest $1 billion its platform Xiaoju Automobile Service (XAS) which offers drivers in Didi’s network car lease and sales, cheaper gas at partner gas stations, repair services, and more.
Didi has also partnered up with more than 30 car makers and plans to roll out its own car model D1 specifically tailored for ride-hailing and car-sharing during the next 3-5 years. With its alliance, Didi wants to become the biggest operator of electric vehicles in China. And Didi is not the only one teaming up with manufacturers: cars made for on-demand mobility is likely to become a trend among automakers.
With D-Alliance, Didi plans to overturn car ownership and manufacturing worldwide
“For mobility 2.0, the line-up in China will be more diverse—for example, many domestic OEM’s are investing heavily in mobility services,” said Karlberg.
A case in point is ride-hailing service Caocao Zhuanche. Chinese car manufacturer Geely owns 90% of its stake and most of its car fleet consists of Geely’s electric cars. As Caocao’s chairman Liu Jinliang told local media, manufacturers have to enter online car booking because there will be significant changes in the automotive industry in the future.
“Nowadays, cars are a transportation tool. In the future, cars will be intelligent mobile terminals just like mobile phones,” said Liu, noting that “car makers that are not entering the travel market are blind.”
Caocao is now present in 25 cities but unlike Didi, Meituan, and AutoNavi, it decided not to bother with subsidies since they no longer serve to foster the market and “will only stimulate demand bubbles,” according to Liu.
Geely is not the only Chinese carmaker that is learning from Daimler’s, General Motor’s, and Toyota’s investments in ride-hailing and car-sharing. Three Chinese automakers—FAW, Dongfeng Motor, and Changan Automobile—have teamed up to launch T3 Mobile Travel Services in July to explore ride-hailing services and autonomous driving.
All of this signals traditional car manufacturers are in trouble—many of them might end up as just device manufacturers. According to estimates from Roland Berger, by 2030, demand for individually owned cars might decline by almost 30%. At the same time, car-sharing and peer-to-peer mobility would increase until around 2025. However, it is expected they will then be replaced by autonomous vehicles.
In the future, autonomous driving may be able to cure car accidents much like how antibiotics cure diseases, according to Didi’s Zhu. The company, which won the right to test self-driving vehicles in California this May, is just one of China’s players hoping to develop a shared autonomous vehicle.
“I think there are two ways to commercialize autonomous driving technology,” Didi CTO and co-founder Bob Zhang told attendees at this year’s RISE in Hong Kong. “First, enter into a ride-share network to provide services to passengers. Second, to sell self-driving cars to consumers. The second way will not happen on a very large scale in the next ten years.”
Didi is also likely to face competition in that area. Alibaba has been testing AVs since April while earlier this year it invested in electric carmaker Xiaopeng (Xpeng). Many believe that the reason behind its purchase of AutoNavi was mobility data. AutoNavi, however, was reluctant to talk about the data behind the platform and there is plenty—the map has 60 million active users.
Ride-hailing platform Shouqi has announced cooperation with Baidu on AV with the search giant providing its Baidu Map to Shouqi for high-precision maps.
Meituan—a major player in China’s food delivery industry—launched an autonomous food delivery system called MAD (Meituan Autonomous Delivery). The presence of Waymo China, electric car maker Chery New Energy, and automaker BAIC new energy vehicle department BJEV at the launch hinted that Meituan has more plans in AV.
Meituan’s autonomous delivery general manager and scientist Xia Huaxia told TechNode that getting driverless cars on roads would be a hard task to complete in five years, especially considering China’s complex traffic situation—it could take 10 years to reach higher levels of autonomous driving. Meanwhile, there are other user scenarios to explore.
“At this stage, we would like to focus on unmanned delivery,” said Xia adding that Meituan will reconsider in the future.
Chinese players are approaching mobility from more aspects than just machines. Traffic management platforms is another way self-driving could evolve in the future as opposed to each vehicle driving by itself, Karlberg explained.
Didi has been working on its Didi Brain that collects traffic data in order to improve transportation. After creating an LBS cloud platform in 2013, Alibaba and AutoNavi have created their own City Brain which leverages AutoNavi’s abundant transport data with Alibaba Cloud. Even Huawei has launched a mobility-focused platform called Smart Transportation Solution.
Robotaxis and driverless cars, however, are still far in the future and that future needs to be built on swathes of data. Many Chinese companies are looking into developing AVs but the legislation has been slower and more cautious compared with the US, Karlberg noted.
“The endgame—Mobility 3.0, the RoboCab–is still many years away in China.”
]]>小鹏汽车计划到 2019 年底融资约 300 亿元 – 动点科技
What happened: Chinese EV startup Xpeng is planning to raise RMB 30 billion in funds next year, Gu Hongdi, president of Xpeng, has revealed. The purpose of the mega-fundraising is to prevent the company from pursuing a public listing at an unsuitable timing due to funding pressure, Gu explained. In November, Xpeng will announce the retail price of new vehicles, which will be ready for delivery soon after launch.
Why it’s important: China, the biggest EV market in the world, accounted for over half of the global EV sales last year. Investors have high hopes for the still rapidly growing sector. Xpeng, also known as China’s Tesla, is among the slew of EV startups that have sprung up in recent years after the government began granting special manufacturing permits to help Chinese EV manufacturers. Earlier this month, Xpeng raised RMB 4 billion in a funding round at RMB 25 billion in valuation.
]]>Two Chinese EV sharing platforms in $730 million push to fuel growth: sources —Reuters
What happened: Ride-hailing platform Caocao Zhuanche, backed by Chinese automaker Geely, and EvCard, an electric vehicle rental service under state-owned SAIC Motor, are about to raise significant funds, according to Reuters sources. Caocao which uses Geely’s electric cars is aiming to raise up to RMB 3 billion ($437 million) at a valuation of about $3 billion, while EvCard might raise RMB 2 billion ($292 million). The names of the investors have not been published. The companies are yet to confirm the news.
Why it’s important: The new funding can be seen as support for both the electric vehicles market and ride-sharing and ride-hailing services. EV startups NIO, WM Motor and Xpeng Motor have all raised billions of dollars from investors including Alibaba, Baidu, and Tencent. But ride-sharing has also seen steady investment despite Didi’s dominance in the Chinese market. Caocao raised $156 million in January this year, while its competitors Shouqi and Ucar have also raised hundreds of millions of dollars within the past year.
In the latest IPO news, Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer NIO has filed to list on the New York Stock Exchange. The company hopes to raise up to $1.8 billion.
The company issued its filing to the US Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13. The IPO is being underwritten by JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs, among others. According to previous reports, NIO had plans to file for a US-based listing in September, with the company refusing to comment at that time.
A successful IPO could boost the company’s valuation to around $37 billion, according to previous estimates.
NIO first started generating revenue this year, reporting $6.7 million from vehicle sales and $7 million in total revenue. The company made losses of $759 million in 2017 and more than $500 million in the first six months of 2018. “We have negative cash flows from operation, have only recently started to generate revenues and have not been profitable, all of which may continue in the future,” the company warned in its filing.
NIO began making deliveries of its first batch of ES8 electric cars in June 2018 and is expected to add a second model to its portfolio in 2019. The company plans to launch new models every year in the future.
As of July 31, NIO had delivered just 481 ES8s, with unfulfilled reservations for a further 17,000. Nonetheless, approximately 12,000 of these were made up of orders for which a refundable deposit of RMB 5,000 ($726) had been paid.
Before filing, the company had received a total of $2.1 billion in investment from Tencent, Baidu, Sequoia Capital, and Joy Capital.
The company’s ES8 is touted to be a direct competitor to Tesla’s Model X, which retails in China for around RMB 900,000 compared to the ES8’s price tag of RMB 500,000. Despite the lower cost, NIO lacks the brand name and tested performance behind its US competitor. The company acknowledged this shortcoming in its filing, saying as a new entrant to the industry the company faces significant challenges.
]]>ofo is reportedly pulling its operation in South Korea after less than a year in the country. The Korea Herald first broke the news that ofo has begun retreating from the market and has already suspended most of the employees, which is regarded as part of a general layoff process.
“Though it has yet to completely terminate its business here, ofo Korea is in the process of letting go of most of its workers, putting them on a ‘task suspension,’” an unnamed source told local media. As of Tuesday, the ofo app was still functioning and available for download in Korea’s Google Play store, the bikes were also available for rental.
The Chinese bike-rental company forayed into Korea this January, launching a small-scale pilot in Busan, the country’s second-largest city, and deploying around 2,000 bikes across the city. However, the company has not expanded its operation into Seoul, the capital city, which it would have faced fiercer competition with the established public bike rental system in place.
ofo’s exit from the Korean market appears to be part of the scale-back in the international market as the company rethinks its global expansion strategies. ofo has been retreating from multiple countries and cities that have proven to be more difficult to operate in and less profitable. Instead, it has been shifting its focus on priority markets.
Earlier this year, ofo scaled back its deployment in the US and United Kingdom, and axing its operations in Germany, Austrailia, Israel among other countries. Last month, the company pulled out from a number of cities in Spain, shifting its focus to other “key markets.” The company said then that different arrangements will be made for each market based on its own evaluation of the market.
]]>北京共享单车上限定为191万辆 – iResearch
What happened: The Beijing Commission of Transport has announced new plans to keep the number of rental bikes in check. The new limit on rental bike deployments is capped at 1.91 million bikes. Beijing also plans to launch an online monitoring platform for bike-rental services later this year.
Why it’s important: Last September, Beijing ordered a suspension on the deployment of rental bikes, which capped the number of bikes at 2.35 million. There are currently 9 bike rental companies operating in Beijing, down from 15 in 2017. As the overheated market started showing signs of cooling, the government is able to get a better grip on regulating the industry.
]]>Xpeng Raises USD588 Million to Start EV Production, Build Charging Network -Yicai Global
What happened: Chinese electric carmaker Xpeng Motor has secured RMB 4 billion ($588 million) in B Plus round from Primavera Capital Group, Morningside Venture Capital and Chairman He Xiaopeng at an RMB 25 billion valuation. The latest round follows an RMB 2.2 billion round received earlier this year, bring the company’s total fund raised to over RMB 10 billion.
Why it’s important: China’s booming electric vehicle industry has attracted attention not only from entrepreneurs but also the investors. Top internet giants and venture capitals all bet on the trend. Other leading players in the field such NIO and WM Motor all passed the RMB 10 billion funding milestone. With abundant funding, the next goal for these companies is to ship products at scale. Xpeng’s new funding is going to be invested for production and sales of the G3, which is scheduled for first deliveries at the end of this year.
]]>According to the local media, an error is displayed within the app when scanning an ofo bicycle’s QR code. The message says that the problem has been partially repaired, but Didi cannot resolve it entirely without ofo. TechNode verified the inability to access the company’s bicycles and found it to be true.
Didi told TechNode that ofo’s service is still available through its app, though some users are encountering errors when trying to access ofo’s bicyles. “The company is working with the relevant parties to solve the issues at the soonest to ensure all the users can enjoy our services,” a Didi spokesperson said, without specifying the cause of the difficulties.
The lack of access to ofo bicycles on Didi’s platform comes at a curious time. Didi is rumored to be closing a deal to acquire the bike rental company, with the two parties still negotiating a price. ofo is said to be valued at around $1.5 billion—almost half the price of Mobike.
Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing is reportedly closing an acquisition deal of ofo, the last remaining major independent player in China’s bike-rental industry, local media reported citing people familiar with the matter. The source disclosed that Didi already sent due diligence team to ofo over the past two to three weeks.
The two parties are still bargaining on ofo’s valuation, the report added. Local media once reported Didi’s offer for ofo is only around $1.5 billion, that’s around half of Mobike’s valuation and far lower than the company’s expectations. As ofo’s cash strain becomes worse, Didi is gradually lowering the price, said the source to local media, adding that price offered by Alibaba is even lower.
Ofo denied the rumor in an official statement, adding, “As a top and the only major independent bike-rental company, ofo pioneered the growth of the bike-rental industry. We will continue to serve the users and contribute our efforts to solve traffic congestion and air pollution problems in cities.”
Rumors about a possible takeover of ofo have been around for a while since Meituan acquired ofo’s largest rival Mobike, or even before that. But ofo’s founding team led by co-founder and CEO Dai Wei has been fighting tenaciously for the company’s independent status.
After rebuffing an offer from Didi this May, Dai Wei once likened ofo’s status to the film “Darkest Hour” at an internal meeting and called for the employees to fight till the end of the war.
But now, ofo’s “Darkest Hour” seems getting even gloomier. The troubled company has been under a series of negative attention over the past two months.
Its attempts to monetize through selling ads on bikes and apps hit roadblocks as several regional municipalities, such as Shanghai, put bans on placing commercial ads on bikes. The company is drawing back from several overseas markets, such as Australia, the US, Spain, Germany, India.
Competition from rivals is fiercer than ever. Old rival Mobike removed deposits for all users in China in an effort to standardize its deposit system. Alibaba-backed Hellobike is quickly catching up with focus on lower-tier cities.
]]>Didi, recently in the swamp of passenger safety concerns, is testing in-car video recording.
Reported by local media iyiou.com (in Chinese), passengers may find an in-app notification asking whether to activate in-car recording for safety protection. According to Didi’s response to iyiou.com, the function is not yet widely used, and not all Didi vehicles are equipped with a device.
Didi told TechNode that the recording trial started from the beginning of this year. Some vehicles in 5 pilot cities including Shenzhen and Nanjing are adopting the recording solution as the government’s compulsory demand. Further future plans are still under the company’s internal discussion. The use of recording devices is also likely to provide evidence for regular service disputes.
“Due to privacy concerns, the recording function will only be activated once a passenger confirms from their app. They can end it anytime during her ride,” Didi explained to us.
Prior to the video recording test, Didi made several safety upgrades to alleviate users’ safety anxiety. The company shut down its hitch service from May 12 to May 19, after a 21-year-old female passenger were killed by a driver late in the night in Zhengzhou. Didi’s available safety protection mechanisms include virtual contact number, in-car SOS dial, and several identity verification rules applied to drivers didn’t prevent the tragedy from happening.
Also in May, there were already experts suggesting initiating video recording or CCTV for passengers’ safety protection. Li Junhui, a researcher at China University of Political Science and Law, said (in Chinese) installing in-car cameras would be more practical than solutions such as audio recording.
According to Didi’s latest operation data, its platform processes over 30 million rides daily in China alone.
]]>What happened: Bike rental firm Mobike is prohibiting riders from parking outside of specified operational areas. The company has set a boundary that determines how far away from the city center users can park their bikes. If they park outside this zone, they will be alerted by text message. Repeated offenders of parking violations will be fined an unspecified amount, and those who comply will be awarded coupons.
Why it’s important: The move to limit where bikes can be parted comes at a time in which the Chinese government is seeking to regulate bike sharing companies and limit their footprints within major cities. Local governments in numerous cities around the country have banned companies from introducing more bikes in order to counter sidewalks crowded by parked bicycles/ Additionally, some cities have created rules concerning the lifespan of individual bicycles and stopped companies advertising on the bikes and within apps.
]]>In ofo’s latest retreat from the international market, the company is scaling back its operations in the United States after laying off 70% of its staff in the country.
Additionally, three executives from ofo’s US business have resigned in the past two weeks, a source told TechNode. The layoffs were announced internally on July 18, with the company planning to halt operations in numerous US cities. However, exact areas were not specified.
The company has also shuttered its businesses in Germany, India, Australia, the Middle East, and parts of the United Kingdom.
The company was operating in 30 cities across the US, with plans to serve more than 100 by the end of 2018. In April, it announced that it had facilitated more than one million rides in the US during its first three months of operations.
The future of ofo’s e-scooter plans is also unknown, with sources saying it is uncertain whether they will be launched after everyone is gone.
However, a company spokesperson said the company is focussing on what it deems to be priority markets in order to move towards profitability. “We are communicating with our local markets about plans going forward,” ofo said, without specifying on which markets the company plans to focus.
Nonetheless, talk of ofo’s financial woes has been circulating for the past few months. In June, a source told TechNode that the company had laid off nearly half of its 60 employees at its Singapore office. Additionally, ofo co-founder Yu Xin denied claims that the company was retrenching 50% of its staff in China due to cash trouble. The company countered news of the layoffs by sending lawyers letters to media companies involved in writing what the company referred to as slanderous and defamatory articles.
After Australia, ofo exits Germany amid push into priority markets
Interestingly, Xu also denied that its international operations were being shut down following the departure of COO Zhang Yanqi. However, in early July ofo announced that co-founder and CEO Dai Wei would begin overseeing its global business.
In addition, ofo’s Chinese business began selling advertising on its bicycles and in its app in May. This, however, was short-lived as some cities moved to ban placed ads on bikes. This, along with a limitation on the number of bicycles allowed on city streets and an imposed lifespan on bicycles, has made the bike-rental industry a difficult one to make profitable.
]]>China-based global ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing has launched Didi Mobility Japan, a joint venture with Japanese conglomerate SoftBank.
As ride-hailing is prohibited in Japan, Didi is focussing mainly on taxi operations. Its entrance into the local market will center on tech infrastructure support, which eyes technical and big data, and related driver and user experience optimization. A new ride-matching app for riders, drivers, and taxi operators will be available in major cities including Osaka, Kyoto, Fukuoka, and Tokyo. Didi says services will be launched within the next few months.
The joint-venture, though launched between two private enterprises, implies an expectation of national economic gains. In 2017, Japan hosted roughly 29 million foreign visitors, around 50% of whom were from Greater China (in Chinese).
Further, according to Didi, current users in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan will soon be able to use real-time in-app Chinese to Japanese instant message translation when hailing taxis in the country.
Didi, which absorbed Uber China in 2016, tends to cooperate with existing local ride-hailing and other transport service providers when entering a new region. In 2015, Didi invested in Southeast Asian ride-hailing platform Grab, US platform Lyft, and Indian platform Ola. Cooperation with local players reduces operational costs, including asset investment and recruitment expenses.
In April, Didi launched in Mexico with its own ride-hailing service. This was Didi’s first direct operation overseas. To grab market share and attract drivers, the company said it would not charge commission fees from drivers until June 17.
This time in Japan, Didi is neither cooperating with local ride-hailing enterprises nor operating alone. The company told TechNode that its strategy of partnership building continues. Didi is offering a commission-free plan which currently specifies no expiry date.
“In the early stage of our business, we plan to focus on market cultivation and user base building. We aim to create an inclusive platform to integrate taxi enterprises around Japan. Therefore, at the moment we are having no plan to charge Japanese partner taxi companies any service fee or commission fee,” a Didi spokesperson said when asked about its cooperation model in the country.
Additionally, what’s usually ignored is SoftBank’s role. The active investment giant is doing more than just bringing tech to its home country. As Ken Miyauchi, President & CEO of SoftBank, said, “Combining Didi’s outstanding innovation with SoftBank’s extensive business base including advanced network infrastructure, I believe the joint venture can provide new value to both the consumers and taxi companies in Japan.”
Considering Japan’s power in innovation, it would not be persuasive to say the leading tech power in Asia lacks the research and production capabilities to produce and operate any Didi-like platforms. Having invested $5 billion in Didi, SoftBank will have to form close ties with Didi.
Besides, SoftBank has also invested $750 million in Grab, $250 million in Ola, and $100 million in Brazilian ride-hailing platform 99. The giant investor cares more about its global ride-hailing landscape, not simply Japan and Didi.
]]>Germany has become the latest market from which Chinese bike-sharing firm ofo will make an exit. The company, which has been plagued by rumors of a cash crunch over the past few months, has adjusted its overseas operations in line with its plans to focus on priority markets.
ofo has begun scaling back its international operations in numerous regions around the globe, including Australia, the Middle East, India, and the United Kingdom.
The company had placed 3000 bicycles in the German capital of Berlin. These will be transferred to other areas in Europe, according to reports. However, ofo said it had not ruled out the option of returning to the country in the future.
ofo previously announced operations in the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia, Austria, the Czech Republic, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Thailand, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Russia, Singapore, Spain, Portugal, Israel, Hungary, India, and France.
However, in early July, the company said in a statement that it would be focussing its attention on markets that it deemed to be priorities. The company also announced that co-founder and CEO Dai Wei would oversee its global business.
Ofo fires staff in India, winds down operations in the country
Interestingly, in June, fellow co-founder Yu Xin denied reports the company would be closing its international business following the departure of COO Zhang Yanqi. Yu also rebutted news that the company was facing a cash shortage and it had laid off 50% of its staff.
However, news of the company leaving numerous countries around the world again calls attention to the claims that the company is in financial trouble.
The bike-sharing market in China is extremely competitive, with the two biggest players—ofo and Mobike—battling for market dominance. Amid increasingly tight rules in Chinese cities which restrict the number of bicycles allowed on their streets and, at times, prohibit advertising on the bikes themselves, bike-sharing firms are finding it more and more difficult to achieve profitability.
]]>Only one month after ride-hailing platform Didi resumed its Hitch service during night time after a murder of a female passenger by its driver led to its suspension, another assault has rocked the company’s reputation.
Police in Huai’an city in Jiangsu province have arrested a driver named Liu for the suspected rape of a female passenger, local media is reporting. The driver confessed on July 13th and is waiting for legal processing. The woman surnamed Ma called a driver after a night out with a friend surnamed Chen who exited the car when she arrived at her destination. The driver assaulted the woman while she was drunk and sleeping.
Didi has responded TechNode with a statement saying that the company is in touch with all the parties involved and has provided the police with information on the suspect’s rides and history which was used in the case. Didi also said that the detection rate of criminal offenses on the platform is one hundred percent.
After verification, Liu’s registration certificate information was revealed as true and accurate. There was no record of complaints and no violent criminal record. We strongly condemn this crime. Liu’s behavior has seriously violated the relevant rules of the platform, and the platform has permanently banned him. At present, Chen is detained by local public security organs.
Didi’s last scandal involved a 21-year old flight attendant who was apparently murdered by her Didi Hitch (顺风车) driver who then proceeded to kill himself. The incident revealed flaws in the car-pooling service which was previously viewed as a social media platform. It allowed drivers to comment on the passengers’ personality and physical attractiveness, many of which were disrespectful towards female passengers. Another issue was that drivers could avoid verifying their identity.
Didi publicly apologized for the incident and reinstated new measures to ensure driver safety. After shutting down the service entirely on May 12, the company decided to suspend the night-time road sharing service on May 16. It also announced that it will introduce background checks of ID, driver’s license, and vehicle registration as well as face recognition for each driver every day.
Among other measures, Didi decided to make its emergency help button more prominent and offer the choice to dial the police, an ambulance of traffic emergency hotline as well as Didi’s emergency hotline. Pressing the button already starts a recording of what’s happening in the vehicle and prompts the Didi call center to call the passenger and share an emergency contact.
After this newest assault, Didi appealed to drivers and passengers to “jointly safeguard the security environment of the platform, do not indulge in impulsive behavior and do harm to others.”
]]>US electric vehicle maker Tesla Motors has set up a technology innovation center in Beijing, Ren Yuxiang, Vice President of Tesla Motor, revealed in an interview with The Beijing News (in Chinese). The Tesla Beijing Technology Innovation Center was registered last October in Beijing.
Ren told reporters that China is the world’s largest new energy car market, and Beijing is the first stop and headquarters of Tesla’s entry to China as well as one of Tesla’s largest markets in China.
“Beijing is a very important market in China for Tesla, we have to especially thank the Bejing government’s vigorous support and promotion of new energy vehicles,” Ren said, adding that Beijing has set an example for many cities around the world.
It is obvious that Tesla has big plans in China. On Tuesday (10 July), during his three-day visit to China, Tesla CEO Elon Musk signed an MOU with the Shanghai authorities to build Tesla’s first factory outside the US in Shanghai, making Tesla the first wholly foreign-owned car maker in China. The upcoming China factory is said to be capable of manufacturing 500,000 vehicles annually.
With my team after a profoundly interesting discussion of history, philosophy & luck with Vice President Wang in 中南海紫光阁 pic.twitter.com/pHd52YTZD2
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 12, 2018
However, amidst the excitement, Tesla’s recent announcements was a mixed bag. According to this week’s reports, Tesla has raised its prices in China to offset the significant increase in import tax, which in order to sidestep these taxes is to manufacture the vehicles locally. What’s more is the intensified tension between US and China over trade and technology.
In 2013, Tesla opened its first store in China in Beijing. Since then the company has opened 7 experience centers and 6 service centers in the city. In 2017, Tesla sold 103,000 vehicles globally, nearly 20,000 of which is sold in China.
The new innovation center will focus on electric vehicles R&D—spare parts, battery, energy storage equipment, information technology, and more—which future product developments will be eligible of filing patent applications and cross-license patents in China.
]]>As the ride-hailing market in China heats up again, Alibaba-owned AutoNavi (高德地图) also known as Amap has announced that its ride-hailing service Gaode Jiaoche (高德叫车) has gone online, TechNode’s Chinese sister site reports.
The move is just another small step for AutoNavi towards building its one-stop mobility aggregation platform. The ride-hailing service is integrated into AutoNavi’s platform Gaode Yixing (高德易行平台) along with other mobility options. The platform was launched in July 2017 and includes ride-hailing services from Didi, Shenzhou (神州专车), Shouqi (首汽约车), and Caocao (曹操专车). The platform also connects with China’s biggest bike rental companies ofo and Mobike as well as Alibaba’s travel and booking platform Fliggy (飞猪旅行), and other mobility services.
In March this year, the company launched a carpooling option presenting it as a public service aimed at reducing traffic. The company said it will not collect commissions from its drivers, allowing them to earn the full amount a passenger pays for the trip and promised not to subsidize the service.
The reason behind this move is data. Alibaba and AutoNavi have recently launched its City Brain platform which leverages AutoNavi’s abundant transport data and Alibaba Cloud’s cloud computing technologies to improve public transport systems.
Founder of Alibaba Cloud says smart cities can’t solve problems caused by China’s rapid urbanization
Many believe that the additional data could provide Alibaba with the edge to succeed in the race to develop the autonomous vehicles. The tech giant has been testing driverless cars since last year along with its rivals Baidu and Tencent. In addition, the ride-hailing service is likely to become another way for Alibaba’s payment service Alipay to expand.
Alibaba bought digital map and navigation solutions provider AutoNavi back in 2014 in a deal worth $1.5 billion. The purchase was meant to improve Alibaba’s data collecting abilities. In 2015, AutoNavi announced the launch of LBS+, a platform that provides location-based service solutions to businesses in car rental, O2O, and smart devices. Its partnership with Didi (in which Alibaba also holds a small stake) started long ago in 2013.
Alibaba is not the only one looking at improving its strengths in mobility and challenging Didi’s position. Meituan Dianping launched its ride-hailing service in February this year and bought bike rental company Mobike in April. According to Meituan’s CEO Wang Xing, expansion into mobility as just another way to serve its users. In April, travel platform Ctrip also announced it will be launching a ride-hailing service.
]]>Bike rental company Xiaoming has officially begun bankruptcy proceedings becoming China’s first bike rental company to do so. The decision of the Intermediate People’s Court of Guangzhou, which was in charge of the case, was announced yesterday, July 10th, the Paper reports.
Xiaoming (小鸣单车) was part of a big wave of bike rental companies that started to fold and experience troubles with deposit returns at the end of last year. By November 2017, six bike rental companies in China have shuttered, including Coolqi. Once China’s third largest player in the bike-rental space, Bluegogo, found itself in deep debt and was taken over by ride-hailing giant Didi. Meanwhile, thousands of discarded bikes were left on the streets.
Since its founding in July 2016, Xiaoming has managed to deploy 430,000 bikes across more than 10 cities, including Guangzhou and Shanghai. The total amount of user deposits reached as high as RMB 800 million.
As the bike rental firm started to falter, users could not get their deposits back, prompting them to file the court case against Xiaoming’s parent company Guangzhou Yueji Information Technology Ltd. at Guangzhou’s intermediate court. Xiaoming has faced more than 110,000 claims from users, as well as 28 claims from suppliers. In addition, the total number of employees’ claims reached 115.
Xiaoming’s case was complex since it involves a large number of creditors scattered over a dozen large and medium-sized cities throughout the country, said Wu Xiaoping, vice president of the Guangzhou intermediate people’s court.
Another hurdle was that the majority of users were registered through the mobile app and paid deposits through mobile payment apps such as Alipay and WeChat. All the user data was stored in a cloud and had to be analyzed.
Thirdly, Yueji’s main property are bikes which, of course, are scattered across cities and challenging to deal with. The cost of recycling is too high, and the disposal is also difficult because of the excessive dispersion.
Meanwhile, the winners of the bike rental war in China—ofo, Mobike, and HelloBike—are still fighting for their markets both in China and abroad. Ofo recently announced that it will withdraw from Australia and has winded down operations in India announcing a new focus on more lucrative markets such as France.
]]>Chinese electric vehicle startup Xiaopeng Motors (Xpeng) is reportedly in talks with Alibaba and other investors to raise $600 million to $700 million, our sister site is reporting (in Chinese). The investment would put Xpeng’s valuation close to $4 billion. Xpeng’s spokesperson declined to comment on the company’s fundraising plans.
In April, He Xiaopeng, co-founder of Xpeng, revealed in an interview at Boao Forum for Asia that the company expects to raise over RMB 10 billion this year and that it will be announcing fundraising plans soon. He said the future investment will be devoted to three main areas: first, team expansion and R&D; second, production base and supplier partnerships; third, branding, market, sales, and after-sales services.
Xpeng is planning to expand its team from the current 700 to 3000 by 2019. The startup also recently opened a research center in Mountain View after setting up a US-based R&D team last December to focus on autonomous driving technologies.
In January, the four-year-old startup raised a total of RMB 2.2 billion ($350 million) in a Series B funding round led by Alibaba, Foxconn, and IDG. After the completion of the fundraising, Xpeng has raised over RMB 5 billion from the capital markets.
Xpeng, often compared with Tesla, is hoping to build a quality low-priced smart vehicle for young buyers in China who can’t afford a Tesla. The car manufacturer is among the slew of Chinese EV startups that have sprung up in recent years after the government started granting special manufacturing permits to help electric car manufacturers in China.
According to BloombergNEF forecast, more than half of all new car sales will be electric by 2040. Having poured billions of dollars into Chinese electric car manufacturers, investors have high hopes for the EV sector in China—the world’s largest auto market.
However, also according to Bloomberg, China is considering further cutting EV subsidies next year in hope to push the innovation front of domestic EV industry rather than having car manufacturers rely on fiscal policy.
]]>Bike rental firm ofo has asked its staff that formed part of its Indian operations to leave, a move that further draws attention to the company’s rumored cash crunch. Individuals with knowledge of the matter told TechNode that the company is winding down operations in the region and that most of the company’s staff have been laid off.
In June, a member of ofo’s senior management informed local managers that he would be visiting to discuss the company’s roadmap in the region. He instructed employees to retrieve the company’s bicycles under the pretense that the company would be starting to charge for trips, which were free during its first few months of operation. However, employees were then informed that they would be required to leave.
Ofo has now stopped operating in all cities but Pune, in the western state of Maharashtra. The company launched its city operations in the region in April. ofo promised that it would provide staff, the majority of whom were employed as consultants, with official offer letters. It also said employees would be shown an operational roadmap for the next few years. These didn’t materialize, and individuals were not given the option to relocate to other areas in which the company operates after they were fired.
The company’s website states that ofo has bikes in Bengaluru, Dehli, Chennai, Pune, Ahmedabad, Coimbatore, and Indore. It initially launched pilot programs in gated communities, university campuses, and hospitals. It partnered with Indian mobile wallet and e-commerce company Paytm to facilitate payments.
An ofo spokesperson responded by saying that the company’s rapid expansion in the last year gave it a better understanding of its international business. “Our focus now is on our priority markets and moving towards profitability. We are communicating with our local markets about our plans moving forward,” the spokesperson commented. The company said that it had no intention to deceive its employees during the bike collection process, and was trying to optimize its operations in a period of uncertainty, adding that it aims to exit the market responsibly.
This is not the first time there has been news of layoffs at ofo’s international offices. In June, a source told TechNode that the company had slashed nearly half of its 60-strong team in Singapore. Ofo co-founder Yu Xin denied claims that it was laying off 50% of its staff in China due to cash trouble and that the company’s international operations were being shut down following the departure of chief operating officer (COO) Zhang Yanqi. The company countered news of the layoffs by sending lawyers letters to media companies involved in writing what the company referred to as slanderous and defamatory articles.
ofo recently started selling advertising on its bicycles and in its apps, attempting to boost revenue amid increasing cash strain. Talk of the company’s cash problems has made news in the past few months. People close to the matter said that the company has paid off just 20% of its RMB 3 billion debt. ofo also mortgaged its bicycles for an RMB 1.77 billion loan from Alibaba.
The bike rental industry has become increasingly frenzied in the past few months. Some local governments in China, which is the company’s biggest market, have gotten involved by imposing rules that prohibit advertising on bikes, banned new bikes being brought into cities, and also stipulated the lifespan of bikes in some instances.
Update July 10, 2018, 15:44: Added an additional response from ofo.
]]>Meituan-owned bike rental firm Mobike has removed deposits for all users in China in an effort to standardize its deposit system.
In May, the company began trialing deposit-free rides in Hefei, Hangzhou, Dongguan, and other cities. The trial area was then extended to one hundred areas around the country, including second and third-tier cities. However, a number of first-tier cities were excluded from the trial.
Deposit-free rides will now be standard across the country. Existing users can apply to have their deposits refunded. According to a Mobike representative, if a warning appears in the app when you try to use the platform after being refunded, you will need to update the app. If it is up to date, the server is giving an old message, and it will work nonetheless.
The move could make the company more competitive in the battle for market share against its main rival ofo.
Deposit systems within bike rental applications have been a contentious issue over the past few years. Before being taken over by Didi, Bluegogo’s vice-CEO Hu Yufei admitted that the deposits had formed part of the company’s operating budget. Additionally, Coolqi also ignited fears shortly before going under. The company said it would no longer refund deposits through WeChat, and required users to visit an office in Chengdu, Sichuan to get their money back, causing the government to step in.
Mobike has also announced bike rental integration into the Meituan platform, a new fleet of e-bikes to extend transportation range for its users, and a program to recycle components from retired bicycles.
The waste created by out of service bicycles has been a cause for concern in recent months. Thousands of retired bicycles can be seen on the outskirts of cities. It was also revealed that bikes had been deliberately damaged in some cases. In May, a bicycle graveyard was found in Chengdu containing hundreds of broken ofo bikes.
]]>In recent years, the internet has become more and more integrated into finding transportation, leading to revolutionary new industries like online taxi-hailing, bike and car rental, and e-buses. At the same time, AI technology like smart traffic lights and autonomous vehicles continues to develop and reshape the transportation industry.
At the upcoming TechCrunch International Innovation Summit, these industry leaders and visionaries will gather together and discuss the future of intelligent transportation.
As co-founder of Hellobike, Han Mei was COO of Alibaba Group Holding Limited, moving from top of business operation to management; from B2B supplier to Alipay; from Alibaba to entrepreneur. With 10 years of experience in marketing, operation management in a large-scale internet company, she was responsible for Alipay’s national services of overseas bank accounts from 2011-2014; and served thousands of companies during her time in B2B business from 2004-2011. Hellobike received $350 million for its D1 round of funding at the end of last year, led by Ant Financial, Deep Ventures Fujitec, and Weimar Automobile.
While the two giants of bike-rentals fought, Hellobike broke into the industry, shocking the world. Bike-rental had been a vertical with a period of fast growth but had finally slowed down with Mobike and Ofo dominating. It wasn’t long, however, before both companies began struggling with internal issues. After Meituan bought Mobike, major overhauls were done throughout their staff, limiting their ability to watch their competitors. Ofo was also plagued with rumors of layoffs, executives resigning, and whether they were even making a profit.
Hellobike has an entirely different strategy. Instead of focusing on putting bikes in large Tier 1 cities, where Mobike and Ofo make most of their money, Hellobike is focusing on Tier 2 cities. By avoiding their only other competitors, Hellobike hopes to succeed. Through analyzing big data on city operations, they determined that a single bike-rental model won’t meet the transportation needs of a modern city.
So they decided to come up with a new strategy. When they introduced it to their audience, Ant Financial took an interest. With no deposit required, they supported Hellobike in pursuing any sustainable strategies they could think of, flying in the face of how things had been done in the industry thus far.
These factors are what allowed Hellobike to flourish as a bike sharing company. At TechCrunch, CEO of Hellobike Han Mei will speak about how Hellobike is taking over the industry as the dark horse in the race that nobody saw coming.
Victor Tseng is responsible for investor relations, international public relations, and international business development. Over the past 17 years, he has acquired a wealth of experience in the internet and TMT fields. Most notably, he is the CFO of China’s largest real estate chain, helping them raise about RMB 6 billion in Series B financing. He has also served as CFO of Anjuke, China’s leading online real estate platform, which helped and promoted the $267 million M&A deal with Nasdaq.
Ten years ago, he was vice president and chief officer of Deutsche Bank in Hong Kong, as well as a Chinese internet analyst. Victor graduated from Tsinghua University School of Economics and MIT Sloan School of Management.
Two months ago, Ctrip announced that its car services have gotten permission to operate from the Tianjin Transport Administration Commission, which will allow it to operate across China. Online ride-hailing has become a hotly-competitive market once again, especially as Didi now faces another rival alongside Meituan and Amap.
While they are launching a taxi service, they are more oriented to serving tourists. They cover pickups and dropoffs to and from airports, train and bus stations, and scenic spots. This allows them to avoid competition with alternative and more popular online ride-hailing services, like Didi. Interest from hotel chains indicate that if Ctrip can refine its business and prove it will be successful, they could build an entire ecosystem for tourists.
At TechCrunch’s main stage, Victor Tseng, Vice President of Ctrip, will speak about how smart technology has made traveling and tourism easier.
Shen Haijun has a bachelor’s degree in automation and industrial management from Shanghai Jiaotong University. She has nearly 20 years of experience in the Internet industry. In hardware, search, advertising, games, and e-commerce, she has even more. She oversaw the research, development, and manufacturing of China’s mobile internet-connected electric smart car.
In March 2016, China released the first electric smart car that had any anticipation and launched a whole new car brand: Singulato. A little later that year, in November, Sentinel announced the construction of an electric smart car with a 200,000 capacity battery in their base in Tongling. April 2017 saw Singularity announce the first production model, the Singulato iS6. Sentinel USA R&D and Innovation Center was established in January 2018, with the first experience room in Beijing.
In March 2018, Sentinel CEO Shen Haiyu announced they would be partnering with Suzhou City, Xiangcheng District, and High-Speed Rail New City to invest 15 billion yuan in the next 5 years to build Sentinel’s global R&D Center and Singulato Suzhou Production Base, and establish a joint venture with 100 Billion’s electric smart car industry investment fund. At 2018’s Beijing International Auto Show, they announced that they will cooperate with BAIC New Energy to produce the first electric smart SUV. The iS6 is expected to launch in the second half of 2018.
There are few things that have disrupted people’s lives in the modern era like AI has. It’s showing up in every aspect of our lives, and now, that includes the auto industry. Making cars “smart” has become a trend among auto companies, and this is being seen as the perfect opportunity to integrate internet connectivity to our vehicles as well.
Singulato has a vision: to make every trip a beautiful memory. They are dedicated to bringing smart cars and services to their users, making sure that they always offer a personalized and memorable experience. As Co-Founder of Singulato Haiyin Shen said, “It’s difficult to build cars, but it’s even more difficult to build them well. Without a good foundation and support of solid technologies, success wouldn’t last.”
Additionally, Singulato and BAIC will start collaborating with a shared vision of smart technology, eco-friendliness, safety, and convenience, and they are dedicated to pushing the development of China’s new electric smart cars forward. Haiyin Shen will speak at TechCrunch Main stage on how Singulato will take advantage of new resources in order to always craft smart cars on the cutting edge of what technology can offer.
At TechCrunch Hangzhou, we’ve set up a side stage dedicated to leaders in the autonomous driving industry to talk about their revolutionary projects. From developing chip algorithms to designing sensors, drawing accurate maps, coding applications and forecasting capital gains, everything you want to know about the past, present, and future of autonomous driving will be right here!
]]>In the fast-paced tech space, it is essential for startups to keep innovating and catching up with the latest trends. While the blockchain frenzy is still in full swing, it is inevitably becoming a new direction where entrepreneurs are turning their focus.
In addition to the general tendency to shift towards what’s popular in the market, the blockchain craze is fueled by its distributed nature, find opportunities where trust is a key factor. After years of technical innovation, developers are now looking to scale its application to power a range of different industries.
The idea that shared ledgers can incentivize users to secure digital relationships has triggered wild imagination from something as mundane as finance and rental economy to poultry breeding and dental care. Shanghai-based Chinaccelerator graduated its 13th Batch to offer its distinctive applications of the technology.
With the globalization of talents, more and more startups rely on freelancers. Dream leverages blockchain-based verification of identity, work history and professional networks against real-time data of project outcomes to scope projects and connect the right talents with exciting teams. It learns from the outcomes of past projects to build freelance teams with the right skills and fit.
Company CEO Richard Foster is an entrepreneur who founded a financially regulated payments startup and successfully raised funding for it. He has 10 years’ experience consulting as a network architect in the finance and energy sectors in London and has been following and investing bitcoin, blockchain, and altcoins since 2014.
Globally, over 67% of small and medium-sized enterprises have indicated a need for liquidity. LiqEase digitizes assets using blockchain technology with the goal to reduce payment terms for SMEs in B2B trade and provide investors with the opportunity to profit from such a new asset class.
Sellers and buyers can manually or automatically upload their project-related information, such as invoice, contracts, and others. Both parties have to sign a transaction on a blockchain node with their individual private keys. After that, a token is automatically issued and listed on the marketplace. The sellers get the cash liquidity from the investor and transfer his account receivable as a token to the investors. The investor can trade or hold this claim to other investors against the buyer until the maturity date of the token. Upon the maturity date, the buyers are required to settle the payment.
LiqEase CEO and founder Tobias Pfutze worked as a business consultant at mediaman Shanghai. He holds a degree in Business Administration and has a strong expertise in Fintech.
While China’s demand for DJ music is rising, being an DJ requires costly training and sophisticated software that could demand tens of thousands of dollars. Nusic is an app that allows anyone to create original music content and share with friends. Nusic’s mashup technology processes multi-channel audio in real-time for the drum, the melody, etc., giving users the ability to create great-sounding mixes and mashups. The app is under internal testing and will be launched later this year.
“First and foremost, we use blockchain technology to secure the digital rights. I was a student studying media technology. When I first heard of blockchain, I thoughts that it’s a much more sophisticated way to ensure the digital rights could have a record. In addition, we have an in-game economy. We are looking to offer the credits and the currencies inside the game, where users could use and trade outside of the platform as well,” Nusic CEO Adam Place told TechNode.
Aam Place is a serial entrepreneur, musician and talent agent from the UK who has been working at the intersection of music and technology.
]]>Amidst signs of a serious cash crunch, ofo claims that its B2B business has made over RMB 100 million in revenue.
In an interview with local media, Shao Yi, the head of ofo’s B2B business division, revealed that “ofo B2B business is going smoothly. As of now, its revenue has passed the RMB 100 million mark. At the same time, ofo’s B2B business in over 100 cities in China has managed to turn profits.”
Ofo’s B2B division was formed 2 months ago, its business ranges from include bike-body ads, in-app ads and the corporate green card (a scheme for companies who want to place their ads in the ofo app).
Shao stressed that people who use ofo are predominantly high-frequency users with inelastic demand. “Tens of thousands of ofo bikes are being ridden around cities, and so O2O ads get more exposure. In addition, ofo user traffic can be directly diverted to advertiser’s online or offline channels. Advertisers value ofo’s integrated O2O marketing resources and user conversion capabilities.”
China’s cash-burning bike rental companies are increasingly looking to profit from advertisement as it is difficult to generate decent revenue purely from rides. ofo started selling ads on its bikes and apps in May with plans to launch custom-designed bikes and the bike-body ads on bike wheels, saddle, and baskets. Yet, monetizing from ads isn’t as smooth as ofo made it out to be. Several regional municipalities including Shanghai and Beijing have issued bans on putting ads on bikes.
]]>CES Asia, one of the world’s largest trade shows, kicked off in Shanghai on June 13. Over 500 companies from around the world are taking part in the three-day show, generating buzzes in artificial intelligence, autonomous driving, electric vehicles, and more.
TechNode team is going to be live blogging from the event to bring the latest trends. Check back for regular updates!
]]>Mobike is extending deposit-free, credit-free bike rentals to a hundred cities. After launching the deposit-free system in Hefei, Hangzhou, Dongguan and other cities in May, it will now spread to a hundred areas–including second and third-tier cities–covering more than half its China cities. The first tier cities of Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen will not be part of the new scheme, labeled a trial by Mobike.
Competition is intensifying after new entrants have shaken up what had become a two-horse race between Mobike and ofo. Removing deposits could prove effective in poaching existing customers of a rival who don’t want to fork out another hefty deposit.
Read our report: As bike rentals cool, ofo chooses to stand alone
The deposit has been one of the company’s few controls on user behavior. Despite the February 2018 rollout worldwide of a new, stricter system to penalize poor behavior by users, and court cases against the company from a property management company burdened with the costs of dealing with abandoned bikes, not to mention government pressure, a release today from Mobike stated that for the China market:
“The deposit had a certain effect as a guarantee, but with the deepening of a common understanding of all parties involved, increased governmental supervision, individuals’ self discipline and positive intervention by enterprises, the new order of the sharing economy has been preliminarily established.”
The release also states that by applying to have one’s deposit refunded, a user will then be able to still ride Mobike bikes, but the TechNode team has found that the deposit-free scheme is only for new users currently in first-tier cities.
Current deposit-paying users will not be able to apply for a refund and then sign up again for deposit-free. Mobike’s global communications manager Luke Schoen told TechNode that the app uses its geolocation function to determine where the user is for this.
Ofo has previously launched deposit-free but credit-based rental in 25 cities before canceling the scheme in all but five, with only Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Xiamen and Hangzhou keeping the credit-only system.
]]>Ofo is one of 12 companies including Lyft and Uber applying for licenses to run an electric scooter hire scheme in San Francisco. Ofo’s protracted application for a permit to run the city’s first bike share scheme was rejected by authorities, meaning the US scooter craze could be the bike company’s chance to have a visible (bright yellow?) presence in the tech center.
The quality of the Chinese unicorn’s bicycles is much derided and although the company does not yet have a scooter design, it would launch thousands of scooters in via its new scheme in summer 2018 if granted a license, as wells as e-bikes across the US, according to the head of ofo North America.
Ofo faces tough competition and an even tougher local authority. Five companies will be picked by San Francisco’s transport agency to join a year-long pilot, according to PitchBook. In the first six months there will 1,250 scooters on the streets and, if deemed successful, the number could be doubled for the rest of the year.
Scooter heavyweights Bird, Spin and Lime which already run e-scooter hire schemes in the city have applied as have car ride-sharing firms Lyft and Uber (via Jump, the scooter brand it bought). The other companies are Scoot, Skip, Razor, Hopr, USSCooter and Ridecell. Companies already running schemes in San Francisco were ordered to remove their scooters from sidewalks by June 4.
Jump already operates a dockless electric bike share in San Francisco after winning the city’s only permit to operate a pilot in January 2018. Ofo, which has its US HQ in San Francisco, had worked with the city’s authorities for six months to try to secure a place in the pilot and complained about the process.
Chris Taylor, head of ofo North America took to Medium to declare ofo’s plans: “We’re about to kick things into an even higher gear in the US — literally and figuratively — with the introduction of tens of thousands of e-scooters and e-bikes in the summer of 2018.”
Taylor explains how the e-scooters and bikes that can be pedaled with a battery boost will fit into the range:
“While our traditional bike will remain the backbone of our dockless fleet, our pedal assist e-bikes and e-scooters serve different needs. Our traditional bikes are versatile and easy to ride; our e-scooters will be terrific for shorter, zipier trips around cities; and our e-bikes are ideal for longer trips and hilly terrains. The expanded ofo lineup will be the largest, best-built, and most reliable for consumers in the industry.”
The image accompanying Taylor’s announcement shows a typically yellow e-scooter with ofo branding, and also a clear Segway logo. Segway was acquired by China’s Ninebot in 2015 and is backed by Xiaomi. Ninebot is already making the scooters for Bird, Lime, and Skip.
Ofo is bullish about its US future. According to Taylor, the company is “now serving more than 30 US cities, with the aim to be in at least 100 by the end of this year.” Meanwhile, our reporting in Singapore finds signs that ofo is struggling to pay the bills and a warehouse may be selling off ofo bikes.
]]>More signs show that ofo’s cash crunch not only affect its domestic business but also its global expansion plans. The troubled bike hire giant has launched a warehouse sale of its bikes to downsize its operation in Singapore, a source with knowledge of the matter told TechNode.
The ofo bikes on sale are sold brand new from a Singaporean warehouse that’s owned by local logistics service provider Bok Seng Group, according to a poster shared by the source. TechNode team visited the venue finding that stacks of unpacked parcels with ofo’s logo on it are stored in the warehouse.
The poster shows that bikes are priced at S$50 or RMB240. If true, the company is selling their stocks at a 30% discount when compared with the original price of RMB 335 per bike. Shanghai Phoenix, a bike maker partner of ofo, has recorded revenue of RMB 596.72 million in 2017 by shipping 1.78 million bikes to ofo, according to Q4 2017 financial report of the company. Based on that, the cost of ofo bikes is RMB 335 per bike.
Read more: As bike rentals cool, ofo chooses to stand alone
The bike rental company responded that the arrangement was made by local freight and logistics partners for ofo’s failure to pay for relevant freight and logistic fees.
“Ofo has an ongoing business arrangement with a freight forward/logistics provider in Singapore and ofo has agreed to pay relevant fees for services. Ofo considers the actions taken by the service provider to be unduly aggressive given ofo’s ongoing dialogue with the relevant service provider. Ofo is considering its legal options but at the same time working in good faith to avoid a sale of ofo property. In ofo’s view, such a sale is being unreasonably pursued to gain leverage in completing ongoing commercial discussions. ofo looks forward to resolving the matter out of court but is reserving all of its rights in the meantime,” said a company spokesperson.
To make matter worse, another source told us that ofo has slashed nearly half of its 60-member team in Singapore. The company did not reply to our inquiries on the matter directly.
The news comes with a series of negative media coverage on the company initiated by a story by local tech blog Huxiu. Although ofo countered the rumors with a lawsuit, the current case shows the company is definitely suffering from a cash shortage.
The Huxiu post claimed the company has dismissed the entire overseas department and supervisor Zhang Yanqi allegedly resigned. The company’s co-founder Yu Xin denied the rumor saying said that the revenue from their Singaporean office alone is higher than rivals combined and it would be unreasonable to dismiss it.
Facing a saturating market, ofo and its competitor Mobike have been expanding aggressively overseas in seek of larger markets since the beginning of 2017. Ofo is operating in many foreign countries, like the US, UK, Russia, Italy and Netherland, but Singapore is its first and probably the best overseas market.
]]>Another state-owned automotive company has joined the already crowded ride-hailing market, after Shanghai-based Saic Motor set up a new department and started exploring ride-hailing business
FAW Group Corporation is partnering with Didi Chuxing, China’s largest ride-hailing platform, to hire drivers in Changchun, where FAW Group is based. According to a hiring manager with FAW, the company only provides one car model for now. The Corolla Hybrid is a new energy vehicle produced by FAW Toyota Motor Sales, a joint venture between FAW and Toyota.
Drivers first need to register with Didi, rent the Corolla Hybrid cars and then start providing the service. The rental business uses the rent-to-own model. Drivers need to make a down payment of RMB 20,000, a RMB 4,300 monthly payment for 3 years and a remaining balance of RMB 15,000. The rates of compensation and withdrawal commission will subject to Didi’s policy which hasn’t been settled yet.
Because of stricter controls on ride-hailing business in China’s first-tier cities, FAW will focus on the markets of second to third tier cities, the manager said.
FAW neither participates in the operation of the ride-hailing business, nor is responsible for how many orders the drivers take. This makes the deal more like boosting sales of the car model.
FAW, founded in 1953, was China’s first automotive manufacturing company. For Didi, the agreement guarantees a stable supply of cars and since many of the manufacturing companies are producing more policy-favored new energy cars, car plates will be easier to obtain. For FAW, not only the value of ride-hailing market is expected to grow to RMB 23.8 billion in 2020 from RMB 700 million in 2018, but also cooperating with tech companies can help these legacy auto manufactures expand their online business.
Before this, Didi signed a strategic agreement with 31 automotive manufacturing business, including FAW, in April on corporate cooperation and developing new energy cars. The deal tries to unite FAW’s manufacturing capacity and Didi’s data and technology in smart transportation.
]]>China’s bike rental industry has experienced a roller coaster over the past 3 years. At its height, there were nearly 80 bike rental startups in the market, brightening the streets with a rainbow of bikes.
But in the fast-paced tech world, trends come and go quickly. Within a year, over 20 bike startups failed, including once-big names in the field, such as Bluegogo,Coolqi, and Xiaoming. A cooling of the availability of capital, intense competition, uncertain profit models, a saturating market, and tightening regulation all contributed to swift market consolidation.
While the smaller companies were wiped out, prominent players such as Mobike and ofo came to dominate the streets and mindshare. The two bike rental giants together account for 90 percent of the market, according to research firm Cheetah Global Think Tank. For Mobike and ofo, however, this is just the beginning of another battle, only this time they are not only fighting their bike rental peers, but also with investors who once had their backs.
In 2017 alone, both schemes made it onto the top fundraising list in China: Mobike pocketed billion-dollar level funding and ofo secured $1.15 billion. But as the market prospects become clearer, investors who poured millions of dollars into the industry, have grown impatient. This change in investors’ mindset created a rift between investors, dividing those who want a quick exit either through a merger or acquisition, and the founding teams, who prefer independent development.
A merger between Mobike and ofo has been one of the most speculated possibilities for China’s bike rental market since the second half of 2017. Actually, investors from both companies have been pushing for a merger between the two, but founders from both of the companies stood firmly against the choice. Coupled with the complex investor relations, a merger was ruled out.
Investor sentiment change could be best illustrated in the changing attitudes of Zhu Xiaohu, ofo’s early-stage investor from GSR Ventures. In 2016, the out-spoken investor claimed that China’s bike rental war would end within three months with ofo coming out on top. As the market matured, he began to put pressure behind an ofo and Mobike merger in June last year and finally sold his ofo shares to Alibaba in January this year as the possibility of a merger fell through.
For both Mobike and ofo, their last largest funding injections were in July 2017. Both suffered from different degrees of cashflow strains resulting from a fierce subsidy war launched upon receiving their respective massive fundings.
Despite the cooling capital market, their dubious monetization model hasn’t proven sustainable. The original pay-by-per-ride approach proved to be difficult given the high maintenance costs resulting from high damage rates. What’s more, the fierce competition, fueled by capital inflow, established subsidy as a new normality in the industry, making it even harder for the companies to generate gains.
China’s largest O2O platform Meituan-Dianping announced its purchase of Mobike for $2.7 billion on April 4th. When commenting on the deal, many local media argued that it’s difficult for bike rental firm to seek independent development given the monetization model, and in-depth integration with existing tech powerhouses is their only way out.
Facing a similar, but more complex situation stuck between Alibaba and Didi, ofo’s founder Dai Wei is more tenacious in maintaining the company’s independent status. In an internal speech given in May, the co-founder sought to rally the company by comparing its current status to Winston Churchill and wartime Britain. Ofo’s dark time would seem to refer to acquisition talks held with Didi at the end of April.
However, the bike rental titan seems to be coming under fire, with swirling negative publicity and rumors of their impending demise. In an article published on June 5th, local Chinese tech blog Huxiu cited many sources who disclosed that ofo would launch its largest-ever job cut, with up to 50% losing their jobs. Along with the cut, the sources said several top execs of the company including Nan Nan, SVP of public relations, have left their positions. Shortly after the post, thousands of posts featuring almost identical bearish views on ofo’s prospects appeared across China’s social media.
Ofo told TechNode that the rumors are totally false and the company is running perfectly normally. In response to the speculation, ofo also filed a lawsuit against relevant media, saying “No company has ever failed because of rumors!” in a WeChat post.
Sources in Singapore, however, tell TechNode that they’ve gone from 60 staff to less than half that. They did not specify over what time period the attrition occurred.
Ofo secured $866 million in March this year. While the funding came at a crucial time, the method of the fundraising underlines their cash constraints. Of the total, RMB 1.77 billion ($280 million) was secured from Alibaba by using ofo bikes as collateral, a rare case in the industry.
Given the difficulty in generating revenue from rides, the company has sped up its monetization by selling ads on bikes and apps. But the attempt hit roadblocks as several regional municipalities such as Shanghai have issued bans on putting commercial ads on bikes. In addition, the company has been slowing down their orders from bike makers and even cancelled its deposit-free policy in over 20 cities across the country.
Soured investor relations have also brought more drama. Through investment and embedding ofo’s service in its main app, Didi tightened its tie-up with ofo during the very early days of the hire bike battle. But as Didi has tried to get a bigger voice in ofo, cracks emerged between the two companies. Ofo’s supervisors assigned by Didi were removed shortly after they took positions last November. Didi then launched its own bike rental service in cooperation with Bluegogo, combining with its own manufactured rental bikes while owning about 30% of ofo.
To some extent, the latest bike rental drama reflects how difficult it is for startups to survive the heated proxy battles between Tencent and Alibaba in China.
Since the early days of the Mobike and ofo battle, each of the two companies was backed by a tech giant. Tencent has chosen Mobike as its largest investor. Meituan-Dianping’s acquisition only consolidated Mobike’s status as a Tencent ally since the tech giant is also an investor in Meituan.
Alibaba and its financial affiliate Ant Financial have picked ofo. However, ofo is not Alibaba’s only option. The e-commerce giant increasingly favors Hellobike, which landed RMB2.06 billion ($321 million) from Alibaba’s financial services arm Ant Financial on June 1 at a valuation to $2.3 billion, on par with Mobike’s $2.7 billion. Ant Financial has joined almost every round of Hellobike’s fundraising spree since the beginning of this year.
“Independent development or being acquired, that’s a decision to be made under different situations. We are now more focused on improving user experience, cost control, and precise operation,” said a spokesperson from Hellobike in response to our inquiry about how the industry is developing.
“Dai Wei could have walked away with huge personal wealth. His persistence is rooted in the belief that the true value of shared bikes lies in itself as an easy and green method to change our transportation, rather than as a payment method or way of gathering data,” an ofo employee told TechNode.
“Entrepreneurs in China never can avoid the forces of local tech giants. Frankly speaking, independent development would bring huge possibilities as well as challenges for Mobike. But there’s nothing I can do now, investment institutions have their own judgments. Rules are rules. I hope people won’t regret making this decision,” Mobike CEO Davis Wang told local media after shareholders voted for the Meituan acquisition.
]]>Chinese bike rental giant ofo has started selling advertisements on its bikes and apps (in Chinese) in an attempt to boost revenues amid increasing cash strain. The company will launch custom-designed bikes and the bike-body ads will appear in bike wheels, saddle and baskets for clients to reach the public with their messages.
Rumors of ofo’s failure to pay bike manufacturers have been around for a while. According to local media reports, insiders say that ofo has now paid only 20% of its RMB 3 billion debts ($470 million). In line with that, the bike rental company has been slowing down orders from bike makers during the past year. In an earlier sign of financial distress, ofo has mortgaged its own bicycles in order to receive two loans worth RMB1.77 billion (US$280 million) from Alibaba.
Ofo’s CEO Dai Wei has rebuffed an acquisition offer from Didi, South China Morning Post is reporting. The co-founder sought to rally the company by comparing their current status to Winston Churchill and wartime Britain as portrayed in the drama Darkest Hour, the report added. Facing a similar situation, ofo’s competitor has chosen another path. Mobike was sold to Meituan this April. Three weeks later, company co-founder and CEO Davis Wang, who was against the acquisition, resigned while co-founder Hu Weiwei takes his place.
]]>China’s ride-hailing market might be in for another stir. Former chairman of Baidu’s food delivery platform Baidu Waimai, Gong Zhenbing, is moving on to become the CEO of ride-hailing platform Yidao Yongche, The Paper is reporting (in Chinese).
Yidao went through a rough period in April and May last year after a cash squeeze that led to protests from its drivers over payments. Three of Yidao’s co-founders left the troubled company at the time. The company’s founder and former CEO Zhou Hang blamed its controlling shareholder LeEco diverting to other purposes an RMB 1.3 billion fund originally earmarked for the firm.
The arrival of Gong Zhenbing is a part of a wider restructuring of Yidao both in terms of leadership and ownership. This is the first time a CEO has been selected since last September when former CEO Peng Gang left. In June of last year, Taoyun Capital reached an agreement with LeEco on acquiring a majority stake in Yidao Yongche. Taoyun Capital has also backed bike-rental platform Mobike and JD.com financial services arm.
The restructuring could make Yidao a viable competitor to Didi which now rules the ride-hailing market and Meituan Dianping which is currently trying to snatch a piece of it.
Before joining Yidao, Gong served as the company’s advisor. According to him, Yidao will focus on the ride-hailing service itself. The company is able to offer cheaper prices for luxury vehicles. Yidao also has a different cost structure from Didi and other services because it doesn’t invest in maps, unmanned vehicles, and other services. This will enable them to give more funds to the drivers, he said.
“I’m very optimistic about the prospect of Yidao’s new model, that’s the main reason why I chose to join Yidao,” said Gong.
Gong was part of Baidu’s team since 2014. Baidu’s takeaway service was sold to its rival Ele.me in August 2017. Gong left the company in March this year.
]]>Ofo, a leading bike rental company in China, has set up a research institute to tackle urban bike sharing management problems with blockchain technology, the company announced May 17. According to its press release, ofo’s blockchain research institute aims to use blockchain technology globally to further facilitate big data and IoT (Internet of Things).
“This aims to better bind multiple parties including enterprises, governments and users, in order to find solutions to problems in bike sharing operation such as bike deployment, redistribution, parking and maintenance, help build smart urban transportation globally.”
The move is geared towards solving the mounting problems of left-behind bikes on China’s streets. Last year, regulators issued parking guidelines (in Chinese) to encourage bike users to park in an orderly manner, but the guidelines were not strictly imposed.
Local governments had already imposed bans on hire bike companies adding more bikes. Back in August 2017, Shanghai banned any more hire bikes (and by November 2017 ofo was reported to be deliberately making new bikes look dirty and old to sneak them onto the streets). In May this year, Beijing started reinforcing electronic fences for bike rentals.
Bike rental companies have been struggling to keep cities orderly. An investigation by Q Daily in December 2017 revealed that bike rental companies have been avoiding collection of bikes impounded by city authorities to avoid costs. Q Daily journalists learned from the Hangzhou Municipal Commission of Urban Management that the labor cost of retrieving a single bicycle is RMB 9.6.
Another issue is dumping unused bikes. Thousands of bicycles can now be seen on the edges of many cities in China. Their sheer scale and waste have been making headlines worldwide. It was also discovered that rental bikes are deliberately being damaged. Last week, a whole graveyard of bikes was discovered with unlocked ofo rental bicycles buried under construction waste in Chengdu.
]]>DiDi has announced a range of measures to improve passenger safety, days after the ride hail platform suspended its intercity car-pooling service Hitch (顺风车) after the alleged murder of a passenger by her driver. As well as new features such as daily and per-trip facial recognition approval of drivers, Didi is consulting the public on the possibility of recording every single journey.
The company took the Hitch product down for a week of “rectification” on May 12 following the gruesome murder of a young female passenger in Zhengzhou on May 6, apparently by her Hitch driver. The suspected killer has reportedly since been found dead. China’s Ministry of Transport announced on May 11 plans to tighten regulation of the ride-hailing industry.
In a statement shared with TechNode, Didi has outlined several updates. The company said the changes will come into effect “in the coming days” and be implemented before Hitch resumes.
In addition to the Hitch changes, Didi is planning new ways to improve all its services in addition to existing background checks of ID, driver’s license and vehicle registration.
Anecdotally, one of the most persistent problems when using Didi is that the car that turns up does not match the license plate provided in the app for that booking. This is confusing when trying to identify the car booked, but also shows the flaws in the system.
The company is now opening a public consultation on whether to audio record every single ride. Users would have to consent in the app before this happening and the recording would be encrypted and stored on Didi servers, not phones, then deleted after 72 hours.
Didi is also asking the public whether people with spent criminal convictions unrelated to personal safety or public security should be given the chance to become Didi drivers.
Update: Did suspended its Hitch service after midnight, meaning May 12, not May 11 as reported.
]]>Bike rental company Mobike has announced complimentary rides and deposit-free use of its bicycle network in Anhui province’s capital of Hefei, local media is reporting.
Unlike other bike rental platforms, users would not need to use Sesame Credit to sign up or use the bikes without paying a deposit. Existing users in the city who have already paid a deposit can be refunded within the app.
Hefei is the first city in China to benefit from the new system but its not clear if or when it will be rolled out to the rest of the country.
Deposits create substantial cash flows for bike rental companies. Mobike had 4.21 million weekly active users in January, resulting in an accumulation of RMB 1.26 billion. While they are supposed to be held as collateral, deposits have been a contentious issue in the bike sharing industry. Numerous companies, including Bluegogo, highlighted the danger of paying deposits when these platforms fail. Before being partly taken over by Didi, Bluegogo Vice-CEO Hu Yufei admitted that the deposits had formed part of the company’s operating budget.
Coolqi also ignited fear shortly going under. In an announcement, it said that it would no longer refund deposits through WeChat, and required users to visit an office in Chengdu, Sichuan to get their money back. The news caused the government to step in. In a meeting between transport representatives from 17 provinces in November 2017, officials got together to discuss how to handle the deposit and refund system better.
Mobike made global news in April following its acquisition by Meituan. The company then announced a reshuffle in upper-management. Mobike CEO and co-founder Davis Wang stepped down from his position, while fellow co-founder Hu Weiwei took over the top spot.
]]>Ofo only ordered over 80k bicycles from its manufacturing partner Shanghai Phoenix so far this year. This is far short of the anticipated 5 million bikes per year the two companies have planed one year earlier, local media is reporting.
The two companies reached a 5-million-bike deal in May last year, at the peak of China’s bike rental battle. The purchase order promised to bring a profit of about RMB 40 million ($5.79 million) for Phoenix, but the company’s announcement shows that only 37.23% of the order is completed.
Update: Ofo has responded to our report: “Ofo aims to promote the sustainable development of bike rental as well as the whole supply chain of this industry. Some cities have placed a ban on putting more new bikes and ofo is going to cooperate with these local governments. But as existing bikes are entering the three-year retirement period, there will more demands for bike replacement, which will form a sustainable and long-term growth for the industry.”
Shanghai Phoenix is just one of ofo’s partners. Flying Pigeon, another reputable bike brand in China with over 80 years of history, had also expected to churn out around 5 million bikes per year for ofo, the company told TechNode in May of last year. The Beijing-based startup also inked a strategic partnership with bike producer Fushida for a 10 million bike per year deal earlier this year.
China’s bike manufacturing industry, which has seen a continuous decline in the past two decades, recorded a quick surge thanks to the country’s tough bike rental war. Since the number of bikes on streets is a critical factor in winning the bike-rental battle, companies raced to form partnerships with bike makers. At the heyday of the competition, makers could churn out 10 bikes in 16 minutes.
]]>The Chinese capital is reinforcing electronic fences for bike rentals. The designated parking zones will prevent bike users parking haphazardly, according to Xinhua report (in Chinese).
Last year, regulators issued parking guidelines to encourage bike users to park in an orderly manner, but the guidelines were not strictly imposed. Now, regulators are enforcing the guidelines throughout multiple districts in Beijing. Users who park outside of the designated parking zones would not be able to end the ride, accumulating owed payments until the bike is parked properly. Each designated parking station is equipped with an electronic device to monitor bikes via GPS tracker on the bike.
On May 2nd, the Tongzhou Transportation Bureau announced that 759 electric fences for share bikes have been set up throughout the district. The bureau is asking all bike-rental operators to fully implement “in-zone payment” by this year.
Outside of Tongzhou, a number of districts in Beijing have been reinforcing the parking guidelines and testing electronic fences, including Dongcheng, Xicheng, Haidian, Chaoyang, and Daxing.
Beijing started implementing new guidelines and electronic fences since last April to tame the city’s oversaturated bike rentals.
]]>Faraday Future, the EV startup funded by wheeler-dealer LeEco founder Jia Yueting, seems to have begun construction work for an electric vehicle plant in Guangzhou’s Nansha district through its newly-formed affiliate Ruichi Smart Car. The move could prove controversial as Jia and his business network are highly indebted in China and his assets frozen here.
The plot of land designated for construction in a part of the free-trade zone dedicated to smart equipment and new energy vehicles was bought by Ruichi Smart Car on April 8th. However, the source of the funding for the RMB 364 million plot is unknown. The Paper visited the site of the plant (in Chinese) to find construction workers preparing the fertile farmland for building. Other workers at the site denied it was for Ruichi.
Faraday Future is Jia Yueting’s attempt to take on Tesla with luxury smart EVs that are autonomous-ready. After hemorrhaging cash, the venture has been bailed out by unknown investors in Hong Kong to the tune of $2 billion. Following complex stock rearrangements, about 45% of Faraday Future now belongs to a range of companies in the Cayman Islands and British Virgin Islands, according to The Verge. The company’s IP is being used as collateral meaning Jia and Faraday Future is in a precarious position. Jia is the founder and CEO of the company but the ownership of Faraday Future is unclear.
The cash injection has allowed Faraday Future to restart its failed attempts at establishing a factory in the US and could enable it to reach its goal to start production in China. A document seen by The Verge shows that Faraday Future had planned to make 10,000 cars in China by 2019.
The Paper found that Ruichi Smart Car (睿驰智能汽车广州有限公司) was founded in February 2018 as a “Hong Kong, Taiwan, Macau sole proprietor” type limited liability company with a registered capital of $300 million. Its legal representative is Wang Zhigang whose personal address was provided and happens to be in the same Shanxi village as where Jia Yueting is from. Ruchi Smart Car has already founded two separate limited companies. The reporter also found that Ruichi Smart Car staff appeared to have moved into its registered office in the same building as the Nansha Development Zone Bureau.
The Paper inquired as to the approval of the Nansha land purchase by the Faraday Future affiliate. A Nansha District official replied with:
“The 40 hectars of land that the Ruichi Company acquired in Nansha will be used to invest in the R&D and production bases for fully electric vehicles. Ruichi Smart Car is a foreign-invested enterprise established in accordance with regulations in Nansha District. It is an affiliate of Faraday Future and has no legal relationship with LeShi Holdings, a company controlled by Mr Jia Yueting. It is operated completely independently.”
According to a security guard, the staff on the newly-occupied floor did not want people to go up to the offices. Previously, The Paper visited the construction site of a previous LeShi car plant scheme at Moganshan to find it all but abandoned.
Jia Yueting and the LeEco group have proved increasingly controversial. Jia and his affiliates owe RMB7 billion to mainland debtors according to a stock filing, reported the Financial Times. Since his assets have been frozen and the authorities have called on Jia to address the debt problem, he has remained in the US and even sent his wife back to China to do his business.
]]>After Xiaomi’s organizational shuffle, bike rental platform Mobike has announced some shifts in its staff too. Mobike’s founder Hu Weiwei is set to become the new CEO of the company taking the place of Davis Wang.
Wang co-founded the bike rental platform in 2015 after serving as General Manager of Uber Shanghai. In an internal letter, Wang said that he is retreating from the company to spend more time with his family. Wang will remain a personal advisor to the company. The internal memo from Mobike states:
We wish to specially thank Davis. Over the past two years, we have served more than 200 million Mobikers and entered more than 200 cities and 15 countries. This is very much a credit to his leadership. We look forward to his continual support of the development of Mobike in his new role.
The news comes not a month after China’s largest O2O platform Meituan Dianping announced its purchase of Mobike for $2.7 billion on April 4th. The acquisition was mired with rumors. News that Mobike’s management team is exiting the company soon broke out but were swiftly denied by Meituan’s CEO Wang Xing. In an internal letter, Wang Xing said that the company would continue to operate its own brand and work independently with no changes to leadership. TechNode’s Chinese sister site also learned that Mobike staff would receive a salary increase, presumably to prevent losing their personnel.
It’s no secret that Davis Wang was against Mobike’s acquisition by Meituan Dianping and it is widely believed that this is one of the reasons for his departure. According to media reports at the time, Wang wanted to keep the company independent. However, he was also aware how hard it is for a Chinese startup to avoid big players.
“Financing and acquisitions have never been the focus of my consideration,” Wang told local media at the time. “My attitude has always been to insist on the company’s independence. But in China, I am afraid you can only be independent if you have a $10 billion valuation.”
As for Meituan Dianping, the management change is just the beginning of the journey.
“I do not want the relationship between Meituan and Mobike to play out like Didi Chuxing and ofo,” Meituan’s CEO Wang Xing was quoted saying.
Another news is that Liu Yu is now the president of Mobike reporting to the CEO. Liu has previously served as a special advisor to the company and has worked as General Manager of Alibaba’s language service platform (阿里语言).
Mobike also announced setting up a new intelligent transportation laboratory. The department will be headed by Mobike’s CTO Joe Xia who will report to Wang Huiwen, Senior Vice President of Meituan-Dianping.
Updated April 29, 2018 to include more details about Davis Wang’s departure.
]]>Didi Chuxing is launching a program to alter the very nature of car ownership and shake up the automobile manufacturing supply chain in China—and beyond. The company masterminded a shift to “car operation” announcing the move at a glitzy event in Beijing attended by auto industry top brass.
“In the future, software, hardware, and user services will be integrated,” said Cheng Wei, Didi CEO. “And we will be the service provider.” He has hopes that China will become a great automotive nation (汽车强国) in the next five to ten years. This involves Didi becoming the biggest one-stop solution to transport worldwide, to manage the car operation platform and be the world leader in smart transportation.
Didi will also be involved in the design of a car specially developed for ride-hailing with a predicted market of 10 million units in 10 years’ time with the help of the D-Alliance. The alliance, also called Didi Auto Alliance or Torrent (洪流联盟), is a platform that brings together 31 auto partners. The name in Chinese (hongliu or “torrent”) comes from the water drops in the characters for Didi (滴滴 or “drip drip”) as the company sees its drivers and vehicles coming together as droplets to form a torrent.
The platform includes some of the biggest players in China’s automakers and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)—FAW, BYD, Beijing Automotive Group (BAIC), and Guangzhou Automotive Group (GAC). Didi is already working with BYD to develop the “D-1,” the first car developed specifically for ride-hailing. According to the figures, the D-Alliance would let DiDi control 50% of the transport needs of 2 billion people.
The platform would mean car manufacturers become car operators in an end-to-end chain from car manufacturing to refueling/recharging to maintenance. Private individuals would not need to own their own cars, nor would Didi. Instead, the ride-hailing giant would be involved in car design and would coordinate the entire system, making the vehicles available for ride-hailing or short-term hire. The platform will even look into ways of providing financing.
As the biggest provider of transport both in China and the world, Didi is well positioned to lead such an alliance—and take a cut in more areas of transportation than just rides. The company has 30 million rides per day and envisions a user base of 2 billion people worldwide.
Ride-hailing by Didi is based on private car owners in countries such as China. However, in markets where private car ownership is low, a new model is needed. Didi has tried leasing vehicles to drivers, but it was not cost-effective. The current solution could be to do away with private ownership and, eventually, with leasing.
“No cars have been designed specifically for sharing [ride hailing] as they are all owned by drivers,” said Cheng, “Manufacturers should provide more customization of vehicles that are used for sharing.”
Safety, efficiency, and emissions reduction are three of the goals of the Alliance. 260,000 electric vehicles—almost a third of all electric vehicles in China—are currently taking passengers for Didi. The company has China’s largest fleet of EV numbering around 15,000 at present via a joint venture with BYD, with the aim to be “operating” over a million by 2020, said Didi VP Jesse Yang Jun.
Didi has already been working with BYD for two years, including on the D1—the first car to be designed for sharing. “The data from our hundreds of millions of journeys show the importance of safety,” said Yang. The model, expected to be ready within five years, will incorporate AI features to enhance traffic safety, passenger safety, and battery safety.
Efficiency modifications focus on city-wide traffic congestion, but also on the cost per kilometer for operating the vehicles. The aim is to reduce the overall running cost of a vehicle by half, in part by utilizing the company’s big data.
“We want Didi to become the incubator for the whole chain,” said general manager Chen Xi referring to the manufacturing to maintenance model of “car operation.”
Members of the alliance shared their opinions in a panel hosted by Didi president Jean Liu who shared that it was a Didi requirement that senior management all learn to drive so they can experience it for themselves. Xu Heyi, chairman of Beijing Automotive Group, said the D-Alliance supports the call of Chinese President Xi Jinping and the central government to embrace innovation.
The general consensus among manufacturers was that attention would shift from the exterior design and appeal of cars to the interior. Xu Heyi said the car constitutes the third most important place in people’s lives after the home and the office.
]]>In its first major statement since being acquired by Meituan, bike rental giant Mobike is to stop adding new bikes to cities considered to be already saturated with bikes, will share its big data with the government for improved city planning, and put RMB100 million into improving its user credit system, the company announced at a press conference held in Beijing on Earth Day, April 22. The company is changing its focus from rapid to responsible growth.
Despite being awarded a Champions of the Earth award by the UN in Nairobi last December for its advancement of low carbon transport, Mobike acknowledges that its rapid growth has not been without issue, creating some particularly visible “side effects.” Speaking at the event, Mobike’s founder and president Hu Weiwei said the company recognizes the problems caused by their bikes being parked in the wrong places or simply being abandoned by users. The bikes get in people’s way, lead to traffic congestion and even spoil how cities look.
No new bikes will be added to cities which are considered to already have enough bikes. No list of cities has been provided yet. Bikes will be replaced and upgraded, but no additional ones will be left on the streets of these cities.
Local governments had already imposed bans on hire bike companies adding more bikes to the streets. Back in August 2017 Shanghai banned any more hire bikes (and by November 2017 ofo was reported to be deliberately making new bikes look dirty and old to sneak them onto the streets).
The data generated by Mobike’s operations will be shared with the government on the proviso that user data is secure. Mobike generates over 30 TB of data globally per day from its 8 million bikes. The data share is intended to help the government ensure safer cycling by planning better cycle lanes and parking areas.
Many major roads already have separate cycle lanes, though cars also use them and park in them. Mobike’s data is also used for predicting demand which helps them relocate bicycles in advance.
We know from previous data releases just how detailed Mobike’s data can be. Its Magic Cube AI system can track how users cycle differently on different days and even who they’re cycling with.
The third measure is to tighten their credit system with an RMB 100 million overhaul. The system is intended to reward good users and penalize those who misuse the bikes by leaving the bikes in off-limits areas such as inside buildings. Mobike recently brought in new changes to its user credit system which would hike rental rates to RMB 100 for half an hour for persistent offenders and dock points for “riding bikes in an unsafe manner and ignoring traffic rules”. Details of the changes are yet to emerge but will focus on safer cycling and better parking.
After the announcement, co-founder Hu Wei put out her own more heartfelt message on her LinkedIn profile:
“I was ecstatic to see how popular we had become; but noticed that for some in the public, our brand did not represent the sense of environmental and social responsibility that we hoped it would. I was proud of our growing team and company culture, but at times felt we did not practice what we preached. As our expansion intensified and our priorities multiplied, it was not always easy to distinguish the most import ones from those that were simply ‘urgent’.”
The changes to the credit system could be global, hinted Hu: “We must also continue to engage local communities and institutions, both in China and abroad, to create meaningful systems which reward responsible ridership while disincentivizing negative behavior.”
]]>Nanjing is reported to become the first city in China to put temporary controls on the number of vehicles that can be hailed online, according to Jiemian (in Chinese), to regulate the sector, protect rights, curb illegal practices and reduce risks in the taxi industry. By stopping the issuance of new licenses, Nanjing will put the brakes on the turf war fought there between Didi and Meituan, and will have a mixed effect on traditional cab drivers.
Nanjing’s local government has issued a document titled “Opinions on Strengthening the Regulation of the Taxi Market”. It states that from April 20, 2018, there will be a temporary block on any new taxi capacity. The PSB’s traffic department will suspend the registration of taxis for online booking and the local branch of the Ministry of Transport will temporarily stop processing taxi licenses.
Traditional taxis will also be impacted as traditional cab drivers will not be able to apply for additional licenses for picking up fares from online hailing platforms, but may benefit from the blocking of new drivers registering as Didi and Meituan drivers.
The report states that Nanjing has 8,000 taxis in active operation and 3,000 inactive. However, there are 12,000 vehicles which are licensed for online ride-hailing (both the vehicle and driver), and a further 6,000 vehicles licensed for ride-hailing but still waiting for license plates. Car leasing companies have until April 20 to get as many cars approved as possible.
Ride-hailing is having a deep impact on China’s taxi drivers. Nanjing’s move follows a recent report about taxis in the city by The Paper (in Chinese). A reporter found fleets of abandoned taxis around Nanjing, including new vehicles still well within their 7-year lifespan. The Nanjing Taxi Association told The Paper that due to intense competition for passengers and drivers by ride-hailing platforms, the number of inactive taxis rose from 1,000 to 3,000 in the past year. Taxi drivers were getting around 40 fares per day before January 2017 which fell to around 20 a day by 2018 despite still working 12-13 hour shifts. The subsequent pressure on wages saw drivers’ previously monthly take-home pay falling from RMB 5-6,000 to RMB 3-4,000 per month, dropping below the minimum wage.
]]>Chinese bike rental companies Mobike and ofo expanded to more than 30 countries last year. While attending the SeedStars Summit 2018 in Lausane, Switzerland, we asked people from 5 different countries what they think about Chinese bike rental startups’ expansion into their home countries.
Recent data from Cheetah shows that China’s active users of bike rental service increased six fold in 2017. In China, ofo ranked number 1, Mobike came second, dominating 90% of the Chinese market, and Hello Bike is in third place. Didi also just launched their rental bikes in Chengdu and Shenzhen.
Cheetah Mobile is optimistic about bike rental companies’ global expansion, predicting that the number of bike rental users in the world will increase to 306 million in 2019 and there will be 5 to 10 times more room for expansion in the overseas market in the next 2 years.
In Europe, many cities tried to roll out docked bike sharing, as “dockless bike-share companies” launched in Europe in 2017.
Last August, ofo said it planned to operate 6,000 shared bikes in Bangkok by the end of September. However, when we interviewed one investor from Thailand whether he had tried ofo in Bangkok, he said he has never seen ofo bikes in Bangkok.
“Bangkok doesn’t have bike lanes, so it’s not so safe for bicycles to pass. We mostly commute to work with cars, or maybe train,” he said.
Mobike officially announced its launch in Rotterdam, the country’s second-largest city, last November, after a successful trial period in the Netherlands. They couldn’t enter Amsterdam, the capital since the city decided in August to temporarily clear up all sharing bikes, as the bikes occupied the city’s scarce public space.
In January this year, Mobike and nine other dockless bike-share companies agreed to work together on API integration, excluding Ofo and oBike.
Everybody owns a bike in Amsterdam, even more than one. People would rather rent a car. So, the idea of renting bikes could work for tourists. I rented a car twice recently, and I think a car sharing model has a better market fit. I haven’t seen Mobikes in Amersterdam.
Mobike kicked off its operations in Berlin, Germany in November 2017, meeting its goal of expanding to 200 cities globally by the end of 2017. After other bike rental companies also launched in German cities, transport authorities in Munich and Frankfurt have limited the maximum number of bikes to be left at particular public locations, while Cologne has introduced designated parking zones for bikes.
Mobike’s arch rival Ofo is hiring people in Germany right now.
There’s a grey [Deezer] and a yellow [oBike] bike startup with bike stands, where you can put them. There’s a debate around these bike rental startups. Everybody’s hating them. Because they are standing around, thrown everywhere, but nobody’s picking them up. Berlin is a bike stealing hotspot. You cannot let it stand there for two minutes, so it makes sense to use bike rental startups. But I prefer racing bikes, especially from the 70s. Rental bikes are not very fast. Besides, everyone I know owns a bike. I don’t see any people driving around on rental bikes. But if there’s space in the local market, why not? Someone might be needing a bike or a car.
[Bike robbers] have specialized gear to break the locks, so some people use two locks with different lock systems since not many robbers carry gear to break two kinds. One of the reasons for robbing bikes is because there is a big second-hand bike market. They deconstruct the bike, put the parts together differently and resell. A lot of them go to Poland. In Germany, we use car-sharing companies. There are two moped–little electric scooter sharing companies–Emmy and Coup.
Paris has three bike rental players including, Singapore’s oBike, with about 1,800 grey-orange bikes, and two major Chinese firms: Ofo, with about 1,000 yellow bikes, and Mobike, with several thousand orange bikes.
I have seen Mobike and ofo in Paris. The problem with it was the vandalism and it doesn’t make a good picture in the city. Expanding to Copenhagen and Netherlands would make more sense in general. Bike sharing models in Europe were adopted because of its traction gained in Asia.
BMW is running electric scooter business in Paris and Berlin has electronic scooters for inner city transport. So people there don’t need to own the transport.
Co-pace is the startup program of Continental. Our main purpose of launching co-pace is to help mature enough companies and to advance with them. In products, maybe we want the companies to generate more stream of revenues in various ways. Investment is only one part. Working together and understanding each other is much more important. Continental’s co-pace is looking for startups in mobility that is reducing the communication problem. We are looking for startups who are available in data analytics, has knowhow upfront and how that will work. For example, we can take away the cars and replace them with shuttles. This needs a mixture of intelligently and efficiently working transportation.
Italy was the second European city that Mobike expanded to, following the UK. The a fleet of orange bikes were launched in both Florence and Milan last July, followed by ofo’s yellow bikes. Mobike charges €0.30 cents for the first 30 minutes, then €0.50 for each additional 30-minute period. Ofo charges are lower — starting at €0.20 cents for the first half hour, €0.30 for the next and €5 for a full day pass.
Italy is also seeing bike theft and vandalism. The police in the Quarto Oggiaro district in Milan used Ofo bikes’ geolocation to find 20 bikes locked within a private residence.
BoostHeroes is a venture capital company with a portfolio of 55 companies with a sector-agnostic view. I invested in Hong Kong-based bike rental startup GoBee bike. GoBee bike was started by a French CEO in February 2017. GoBee bike expanded to Rome, Florence, Turin in Italy and Paris, Lille in France, since the founder of GoBee had major contacts in those cities. However, they encountered vandalism and theft, and the service didn’t work out. The rate of the bikes stolen or thrown away was higher than expected in their business plan. In February, they shut down the operation in Paris.
In some cities, they tested the model earlier than Mobike and ofo. GoBee bike didn’t launch in Milan as there were more ofo bikes.
Mobike and ofo are doing pretty well in Europe. Many are complaining about their service. I’m not sure if they’ve reached break-even point or not. Education of customers is necessary. You don’t want to be the first company to launch, because the bikes will be subject to vandalism and theft, and you don’t want to be the first one to make mistakes in the market.
Note: On April 13th, SCMP reported that ofo plans to take over the operations of Hong Kong-based GoBee Bike.
Singapore is one of the first countries that ofo and Mobike have expanded to, in early 2017. We previously reported that ofo and Mobike aren’t doing so well in Singapore due to its local player oBike.
I use Mobike in Singapore, and I like it. In Singapore, you can link your credit card to Mobike and pay. It’s helpful. But it’s more useful in China, because of the number and easy access to bikes. But in Singapore, there are much fewer bikes.
These bikes, however, make streets messy. In China, it’s acceptable to some extent. They are hiring people to tidy up the streets. In Singapore, the rules are much stricter. Users are expected to park the bikes in the parking zone. So it’s quite inconvenient because you can only pick up a bike from where it’s parked properly. From both perspectives, it’s less accessible, and not easy because there aren’t many bikes. On the other hand, it cost too much to keep it organized since we don’t have many parking places. So it’s hard to make it more organized in Singapore.
In Singapore, we normally use MRT and bus. Lazy people like me use a taxi. I reached certain income range to own a car, but it’s too expensive. So using taxi costs less for me. I use taxi-hailing apps like Grab taxi.
I think the idea of ofo and Mobike is not that innovative, there were such ideas before. Mobike and ofo could bring it to volume for the masses, and make wide use of it. Acceptance of such innovation in the community is impressive. So it’s more about the community who are open to change and innovation. When it comes to innovation, in a big city like Singapore there is an obvious difficulty of implementing it.
]]>TechNode has been organizing the annual “China Bang Awards” since 2011. Over the past few years, TechNode has witnessed a large number of emerging startups grow into unicorns. For the upcoming ChinaBang Awards 2018, TechNode has started a special report to review the history of China Bang Awardees.
Startups abound in a broader context of innovation. But what is a successful startup? The startups of the year for ChinaBang must be those who have changed the world
Travel is one of the most fundamental human needs. However, this need, particularly for short trips within cities, has not been well met until the advent of bike-rental. The concept of bike-rental has made it simple for everyone in cities to travel in short distances with affordable prices, and significantly improved the problem of “the last kilometer” that vexed people for so long. Those bike-rental firms have adopted innovative ideas, integrated with internet technology, redesigned their bikes and locks, and made it much easier to travel with bicycles.
In March 2017, “ChinaBang Awards”, which aims at “discovering the power of innovation in China and has been actively seeking the most promising and valued innovative projects across the country, awarded the “Startup of the Year” to Mobike. In the whole burgeoning bike-rental industry of 2016, Mobike was the best.
Mobike officially launched its service in Shanghai on April 22, 2016. By then, bike-rental startup ofo had been operating its business for almost a year.
In December 2016, the number of monthly active users of Mobike reached 3.135 million. Mobike took a lot of thought and care about user experience in exchange for a good reputation among users.
In 2016, Mobike had three upgrades, launching two models—the Classic Edition and the Light-Bike edition—in 23 cities across the country. According to the data from the bike-rental report, “Insights on users and future of ofo and Mobike,” the percentage of ofo users’ reporting vehicle breakdowns was significantly higher than that of Mobike, with 39.3% and 26.2% percent. The quality issue of Ofo’s first edition of bikes along with the subsequent problems caused a lot of troubles for the users.
In three months, Mobike raised four rounds of financing:
Mobike’s success in the market and secure financing capabilities indirectly attracted more bike-rental companies to jump on the bandwagon. In the first half of 2017, bike-rental became an attention-gobbling topic. As competitors increased, Mobike had to compete with ofo while held up its market share and stymied the challenge from other competitors.
To maintain its leading role, Mobike was quite busy in 2017. In 2016, the company put a lot of efforts in improving the user experience and took its strategy further in 2017. In addition to escalating user experience, Mobike also improved its brand content and explored its market opportunities.
Regarding content operations, Mobike in 2017 focused on building its soft power. In its sprawling advertising coverage, Mobike continued to emphasize ideas such as “Bring bikes back to the city” and “Ride to change the city”, reinforcing the brand’s image among users. Also, Mobike not only released the industry’s first “Parking to Civility” proposal but also helped users to create bright parking spots for their bicycles. The use of scientific and technological methods to assist users and also reward those who park correctly
The most apparent transformations were seen in both the overseas cities—12 in total by the end of the year—and domestic small counties. Mobike has made its existence in 130 cities at home and abroad. More recently, it has also made a foray into the Korean market.
Meanwhile, Mobike, which has put considerable effort into the market, continued to receive capital in 2017, when it completed several new rounds of financing, including two consecutive Tencent investments. The E-round investment, led by Tencent, was worth up to $600 million, making it the highest amount of financing in the industry at the time.
However, at the end of November 2017, both Mobike and Ofo were revealed to be “starved of funds and have begun to divert user deposits to fill the gap.” Both companies denied the news. But it is true that in 2017, Mobike and Ofo are both burning money. To seize the market, on June 29, 2017, Mobike announced that it would send out 10 million cards for one month.
Last July, Mobike launched an RMB 2 monthly card and an RMB 5 quarterly card. One month later, Ofo started an RMB 1 monthly package for users to ride for 30 days.
By the end of 2017, the dramatic competition in the bike-rental industry was winding down.
Earlier this year, Mobike and Ofo remained while other bike-rental companies ended up being acquired, with vanishing in the air for the worst. On the one hand, Ofo recently announced that it had received $866 million in E2-1 financing from Alibaba. On the other hand, Mobike was just purchased by Meituan for $3.7 billion.
Recently, the Alibaba-backed Hellobike announced a “national no-deposit strategy” that represents a challenge to Mobike and Ofo. In response, Mobike released car-sharing businesses, and its first version of shared cars are all new energy electric vehicles. What this means is Mobike is still moving fast, and it remains to be seen what kind of surprises it can give us in the future.
—Translated by Carol Peng
]]>We are moving into a new era where technology is radically changing transportation. People not only have more options when traveling from A to B, their journeys are becoming more intelligent and digital. Against this backdrop, traditional carmakers, once the bellwethers in mobility innovations, are busy catching up with new changes in the market.
Global automobile manufacturer Ford took the wraps off five new models this Tuesday in Chongqing, where its joint venture with local partner Changan is located. In addition to a brand new automobile lineup, the company has been laying out in several new initiatives that pave to the way to better days for Ford, including bigger plans for electric vehicles, connected cars and autonomous vehicles.
It’s no secret that Ford is developing a special focus in China. This week’s event, what the company called its first global launch in China, is part of Ford’s plan to introduce over 50 new or redesigned Ford and Lincoln vehicles in the country by 2025. Of the total amount, 15 will be electric vehicles.
“China is already the largest market in the world for electrified vehicles, even though it’s very young. All the nameplates assembled at Chang’an Ford, for example, will be available for electrified options by 2015. That’s for both Ford and Lincoln brands and we are going to launch a third joint venture in China Zotye-Ford for exclusive engineering, assembly, and marketing of a new range of small electrified vehicles. They will be sold under a new local brand and won’t carry the Ford brand,” Peter Fleet, president of Ford Asia Pacific, told TechNode.
China’s electrified vehicle market grew rapidly over the past decade. Sales of new energy vehicles (NEVs) in China may jump as much as 50 percent to more than 1 million units in 2018, according to China Association of Automobile Manufacturers. Government support plays a significant role in propelling the development of this industry.
As the market evolves, however, the state is planning to raise the barriers for new-energy vehicle makers to access subsidies and will phase out financial support by 2020. This could further raise the price of new energy vehicles (NEV), which are already pricier than traditional cars.
But for Mr. Fleet, this won’t bring as significant an impact to the NEV market as predicted. “As the incentives progressively come off, the cost of technology comes down,” he pointed out.
What’s more important is that the premium driving experience of electrified cars will offer users more possibilities while driving. “The vast majority of customers have zero experience of what an electric vehicle is like to drive, although they may have formed some value about it. I really believe it has nothing to do with these incentives,” he said.
“When I spend a day driving these vehicles, the first thing that strike me is the silence of the vehicle. The customers at the moment are used to that a car would make noise. In the future, they can have a car that is virtually silent. It means that you can have a wonderful quality conversation in your car or listen to high-fidelity audio in you car. You want to have a crystal clear telephone conversation over the hand-free system, you can do that.” Peter added. “Secondly, customers don’t have experience, and have no idea about performance feels of electric cars. If you calibrate the motor and calibrate the regenerative braking in a certain way, you can get a very direct driving experience where you are virtually controlling the car.”
In a localization move, Ford has partnered with lots of Chinese tech companies. Some of the cooperation goes beyond the core aspects of a vehicle.
“These are some of the lessons we have learned in China. When Ford started in China maybe it was a little bit of a view that you can do everything by yourself because we are a global corporate. We increasingly understood that success in China comes through multitude partnerships,” Fleet reflected.
In addition to joint ventures with Changan and Zotye, Ford has built a strategic partnership with Chinese tech giants such as Alibaba, Baidu’s Apolo Project for autonomous vehicles, and eDaijia for car maintenance.
Ford’s most recent test drive program in Guangzhou is a practical example of partnership with local companies. In the test-drive pilot launched in Guangzhou, Ford puts a thousand customers in three-day test drives in a kind of fun and innovative way. The interesting and dynamic part of the pilot is that they partnered with Alibaba’s big data to qualify the customers to make sure they have the ability and desire to buy cars, according to Fleet.
Although Chinese electric vehicle market is quickly growing, it’s crowded with lots of competitors, be it Chinese automakers, or internet giants.
In order to build its strength in the sector, Ford said they are planning to provide a comprehensive range of clean energy solutions in China – hybrids, plug-in hybrids and full battery powered EVs – this will cover 70 percent of all Ford nameplates sold, including the full range from Changan Ford.
With competition heating up, electric vehicle companies start to get in that game of who will have the biggest range. Lot of startups are talking about 400km, 500km or even more. Fleet believes users’ driving experiences should still be the top priority.
“We announced our first global hybrid electric vehicle, which will be assemble in China.We are talking about a range of 450km and look at driving patterns of Chinese customers, that’s more than enough. Our electric vehicle through Zotye Ford will have a significantly larger range because they are targeting younger urban city dwellers or maybe lower city drivers,” Fleet told us.
]]>China’s quality control authority conducted an extensive investigation into the quality of dockless rental bikes and uncovered startling results. Some of the bicycles we rent every day are not as safe as we thought.
Of the total 24 batches of bikes that are sampled in the test, three batches of bikes run by Mobike, Ubike and a smaller startup named Quancheng Qiyou (全城骑游) failed to meet standards. The results show that the overall defect rate is 12.5%, higher than that in previous years, which is 10% and 11.5% in 2016 and 2017 respectively.
Given the market share, Mobike (37.5%), ofo (25%) and Hellobike (20.8%), the three top bike rental brands account for a combined 83.3% of the sampled bikes. The test was run on 14 items such as brakes and pedals. Distance between pedals and bike reflector are where the companies failed.
The high defect rate of Mobike is particular striking given the company’s high-end positioning which boasts a focus on design and greener lifestyle. Mobike has even won an award from one of the most prestigious design competitions, iF Design Awards
Mobike’s products were sampled in six cities in Tianjin, Wuxi, Wuhan, Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Dongguan. The failed batch was collected from Guangzhou.
“Mobike apologizes to all the users and will tighten quality control of our products. The company promptly called back all 1,240 affected bikes after remotely locking them the day we discovered the issue. No incidents were reported from these bikes. We will launch a deeper investigation into all bike models and has submitted rectification report to relevant authorities,” a Mobike spokesperson told TechNode.
The news comes just days after Mobike is being acquired by China’s tech giant Meituan.
]]>Last night (03 Apr 2018), Mobike shareholder meeting voted in favor of the Meituan acquisition, The Beijing News has reported (in Chinese). The Chinese group buying site Meituan agrees to acquire the bike rental company Mobike for 35% in equity and 65% in cash, of which $320 million will be used for future liquidity needs. Details revealed A- and B-round investors and the Mobike founding team is exiting the company with $750 million in cash. A source at Meituan has confirmed the purchase to TechNode. According to the Beijing News, some founding team members did not want to sell and were forced to leave the company.
In a WeChat post, Hu Weiwei, Mobike’s co-founder and president, wrote: “There is no such thing as being ‘voted out,’ from my perspective everything is a new beginning.”
Yesterday, rumors and unconfirmed details about Meituan acquiring Mobike for $3.7 billion were circulating on Chinese social media. Later in the evening, local media reported that Meituan was in talks with Mobike to buy a large share of the bike-rental business. However, the Mobike team denied the validity of the rumor (in Chinese) in the media chat group.
Meituan CEO Wang Xing released an internal statement today (04 Apr) confirming the Mobike acquisition. Wang added that Mobike will maintain an independent brand and will continue to operate independently.
Later in the day, the two released a joint statement to officially announced the Mobike acquisition. Mobike CEO Wang Xiaofeng said in the statement that the two companies share the same vision of promoting a healthy lifestyle. “In the future, Mobike and Meituan will continue to focus on creating user value and experiences that surprise the users.” According to the statement, Wang Xing is named the new chairman of the Mobike, but there will be no other change to the company’s management team — Wang Xiaofeng will remain CEO of the company and Hu Weiwei, the President.
It is worth noting that Didi and Softbank intended to become a shareholder in Mobike but the deal eventually fell through. Meituan recently entered the ride-hailing ring and become a fierce rival to Didi, whether the bike-rental business is the extension of the ride-hailing war it is much speculated about.
Update 04 April 12:30 pm: Now includes confirmation from Meituan CEO Wang Xing.
Update 04 April 2:40 pm: Now includes the official statement from Meituan and Mobike.
]]>Chinese mapping company AutoNavi (高德地图) has launched a ride-hailing service in Chengdu and Wuhan and is hiring drivers in Beijing, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Hangzhou, with plans to launch in these cities, local media is reporting.
The company, owned by Alibaba, will not collect commissions from its drivers, allowing them to earn the full amount a passenger pays for the trip. Other operators, including Meituan and Didi, charge their drivers up to 10% the total cost of the trip. However, AutoNavi doesn’t provide its drivers with subsidies like other ride-hailing companies.
Alibaba could make use of the data it collects to enhance its location-based services capabilities. In 2015, AutoNavi announced the launch of LBS+, a platform that provides location-based service solutions to businesses in car rental, O2O, and smart devices.
It previously highlighted that it planned to monetize its platform through third-parties that use its data and trading user data.
The company is entering an already competitive space, with Didi and Meituan battling for their piece of the market. Most recently, Meituan launched its ride-hailing service in Shanghai, hoping to further challenge Didi.
]]>Editor’s note: Rumors are rife in China, especially so in a hotly contested area like transportation and O2O services. This news is unconfirmed and the veracity of Mobike’s financial and operational situation as outlined is unclear.
Update 10:02 04 Apr 2018: The purchase has been confirmed by multiple sources. Follow our coverage here.
Rumors of Chinese e-commerce and ride-hailing company Meituan-Dianping’s plan to acquire bike rental firm Mobike are circulating on Chinese social media.
Sina Weibo CEO Wang Gaofei, under the moniker Laiquzhijian (来去之间, lái qù zhī jiān), forwarded the news on microblogging platform Weibo, lending it credibility among local pundits. There has been no official statement from either company so far.
He claimed that Meituan plans to buy the bike rental company for $3.7 billion, including US$1.2 billion in cash, US$1.5 billion in equity, and US$1 billion in debt. Local media have reported unconfirmed details of Mobike’s internal financial statements that show the company owes up to RMB 6 billion in user deposits and another RMB 1 billion to suppliers, totaling more than $1 billion.
According to local media reports, the company has supposedly seen its number of daily rides decline over the past few months resulting in the need for operating expense and asset investment of up to RMB 810 million a year. In January the company’s total rides fell to less than 10 million per day while its daily trips per bike have decreased to one, say local media.
“Mobike reaffirms our smart bike sharing platform has over 200 million registered users, supports over 30 million rides every day, and operates over 9 million Mobikes connected through IoT technology,” a spokesperson for Mobike told
Mobike was thought to be merging with competitor ofo, speculation that was later denied by company CEO Davis Wang, saying that a “merger is not an option for the company.” Rumors also spread suggesting it was entering a round of funding led by Meituan. However, this was later repudiated by both parties.
Meituan is seeking a Hong Kong IPO with a valuation of US$60 billion. It recently launched its ride-hailing service in Shanghai after a trial in Nanjing. However, shortly after operations began, the company was summoned by city authorities for failing to link the data of vehicles and staff to the city’s supervision platform.
Update 04 April 7:05: Now includes official statement from Mobike.
Update 03 April 18:25: Caixin is reporting that Meituan is in talks with Mobike to buy a large part of the bike-rental business. A source has said that the final figure has not been agreed upon and the deal is being brokered by Pony Ma, CEO of Tencent.
]]>Meituan, China’s group-buying website and e-commerce giant, rolled out ride-hailing service in Shanghai on Wednesday but was soon summoned by Shanghai city authorities (in Chinese) on the same day and warned to adhere to local regulations.
To further take on Didi, the dominant ride-hailing player, Meituan has employed low pricing policies and advertisements as it prepares to enter the sector by triggering a pricing war. It has placed advertisements with wordings like “hail a ride for only one yuan.”
Shanghai city authorities, however, are not so tolerant regarding the matter. The city’s public transport, police, and pricing supervision authorities warned Meituan on Wednesday that the firm failed to link the data of vehicles and staff to the city’s supervision platform of online ride-hailing businesses, as reported by local media. Also, local regulations require all registered vehicles and staff to obtain relevant licenses issued by Shanghai city authorities.
On top of that, the authorities also warned Meituan to employ a proper pricing strategy and must specify the pricing. The firm must not operate with lower-than-cost pricing, and advertisements must not include wordings like “hail a ride for one yuan” or “hail a ride at a low price.” Meituan was also prohibited from adding “thank you fees,” tips that add onto the regular charges.
TechNode reached out to Meituan but they declined to comment. Currently, Meituan’s ride-hailing service is still in operation.
Shanghai is the second city for the company to launch its ride-hailing service after rolling out in Nanjing last December. Other cities that Meituan are potentially launching include Beijing, Hangzhou, and Chengdu.
It’s worth noting that Didi, Meituan’s major rival in the ride-hailing sector, has been planning a foray into Meituan’s home turf—food delivery services—as early as last December. It has reportedly been engaged in the R&D of food delivery service.
]]>Chinese O2O and e-commerce giant Meituan is going to launch its long-rumored ride-hailing service tomorrow (21 March 2018) in Shanghai, Chinese media iFeng is reporting. The report says they have confirmed the news with Meituan’s customer service staff.
As a latecomer in a highly consolidated sector, Meituan is diving in with huge subsidy plans. In a previous marketing campaign, Meituan said they would launch ride-hailing service once a city gets 200k votes on its online poll. Under the rule, the first 200k passengers to register can get ride coupons.
The customer service staff confirmed with iFeng that first 20k Meituan drivers in Shanghai can enjoy commission free service. For the rest of drivers who have made their votes, Meituan would collect an 8% commission fee and an information fee of RMB 0.5 for each ride.
Drivers who worked over 10 hours from 6:00 to 24:00 and processed 10 orders or more could get a basic income of RMB 600. If the daily turnover exceeds RMB 600, drivers will get an extra bonus of RMB 200.
Shanghai will be the second city for the company to launch this service after rolling out in Nanjing last year. Other cities that Meituan are launching Beijing, Hangzhou, and Chengdu.
While Meituan is spearheading forays into a sector that’s dominated by Didi, the ride-hailing giant is also working toward the launch of a food delivery service—one of Meituan’s core businesses, with aggressive food delivery rider recruitment plans. It’s a no-brainer that this would be a cash-burning battle between two of China’s most heavily-loaded tech titans. Meituan raised a $4 billion C round last October and Didi just announced its plans to raise $1.5 billion in funding using asset-backed securities (ABS).
]]>Chinese electric car startup Xiaopeng Motors, also known as XPENG, is expected to receive a specialized license plate today for its electric models from the traffic regulator of Guangzhou, local media is reporting. This is the first time for a Chinese municipality to issue an official plate to electric cars made by a tech firm.
Chinese internet firms are racing to the automobile industry that’s been dominated by traditional car makers like GM and VW. But while some of the pioneers in this trend plan to move into mass production, a regulatory gap has put them at an inferior position when competing with traditional competitors because there’s no precedent in the country to issue plates for electric cars made by tech firms. This leads to very practical problems that might hinder these electric cars from hitting the road.
For all the in-use electric cars that made by XPENG, NIO, and WM Motor, they run with a temporary paper plate, the report cited people with knowledge of the matter. The current news means that Chinese tech companies are finally gaining an equal footing with their traditional competitors in the electric car manufacturing market.
China’s nascent electric sector is booming quickly with the emergence of several unicorns such XPENG, NIO and WM Motor. The government is also quickly adapting to new mobility technologies. NIO, a Chinese electric vehicle startup, and the state-owned automaker SAIC Motor just received the licenses for road tests of driverless vehicles.
]]>Chinese taxi hailing company Didi’s bike rental service, Didi Bike (青桔单车, meaning green tangerine bike in Chinese), was suspended for one day for not obeying the local law, Chinese media Shenzhen News is reporting.
Bike rental companies hugely spread out last year, filling the Chinese streets with rental bikes. In order to manage rental bicycles, Shenzhen City Transportation Committee has previously issued the “Implementation Plan for Shenzhen Internet Rental Bicycle Regulatory Management and Renovation Action Plan” (our translation, 深圳市互联网租赁自行车规范管理整治行动实施方案) clearly requiring that, from August 23, 2017, there should be no new shared bicycles put on the streets of Shenzhen.
However, in the early morning of March 17, the Shenzhen government claims Didi illegally placed Didi Bikes. Didi staff were notified by various departments and they were required to immediately remove its bikes. The launch sites included Futian, Baoan, Longhua and other districts, with the number of bikes reaching approximately 20,000 units. Didi’s own-branded bikes Didi Bikes are temporarily shelved, but riders can still rent ofo and Bluegogo bikes in Chengdu and Shenzhen using DiDi app.
“We are in constructive communication with Shenzhen authorities and hopeful of finding a way to serve the city with more convenient and eco-friendly mobility options,” a spokesperson from Didi told TechNode.
Didi Bike was formally launched in Chengdu on January 25 this year, replacing Bluegogo bikes. Didi’s own branded bikes were gradually launched in five cities in China including Chengdu, Dongguan, Foshan, Nanchang, and Hefei. They are second or third-tier cities that has room to grow since first-tier cities are dominated by Mobike and ofo bikes. On January 17, Didi announced that its bicycle rental platform will land in Beijing and Shenzhen, and said that its sponsored Bluegogo will be on the road again.
This is not the first time that Didi received a red card from Shenzhen’s transportation authorities. Previously, Didi launched and operated bicycle rental service in Shenzhen under the name of Bluegogo, and was suspended.
]]>Chinese dockless bike rental titan ofo announced a new $866 million financing led by Alibaba Group, with participation from Haofeng Group, Tianhe Capital, Ant Financial and Junli Captial. The round marked a new funding record in the bike-sharing industry, the company claimed in an official statement.
ofo uses a combination of debt and equity financing for this round, the company noted. Rumors circulate in Chinese media earlier this month that ofo has secured RMB 1.77 billion ($280 million) funding from Alibaba through chattel mortgage financing. ofo declined to comment on the relation between these two pieces of news.
Dai Wei, founder and CEO of ofo said:
As the global leader in the bike-sharing sector, ofo has been transitioning from a phase of rapid growth to a stage of high-quality development. ofo will continue to put our customers first and lead the bike-sharing industry with technological innovation and efficient operations.
The funding comes at a time when it’s most needed while ofo is reportedly scrambling for cash. As a top player in China’s bike rental industry, ofo has been a darling of venture capitalist since its establishment. But its fundraising momentum slowed a bit since last July after receiving a $700 million Series E and that puts huge pressure on the company, which is entangled in cash-driving competition with Mobike.
The most popular theory behind ofo’s financing dilemma is that Didi is standing in the way, but Didi and ofo denied the accusation. Either way, it would be still interesting to know what changes this financing would bring to ofo’s board.
ofo reiterates its determination for independent development in an emailed announcement. “Ofo will drive long-term success independently with the continuing support of leading investors,” said the firm.
While the local market saturates, both ofo and Mobike are accelerating their expansion to overseas markets, which is expected to become a major driver for the industry.
]]>Cheetah Global has come out with freshly-minted statistics on the state of the bike rental economy in the world. Public bicycles were first started in Europe but have seen their biggest success in the East starting from China’s dockless bike systems ofo and Mobike.
According to the global distribution of active users gathered by Cheetah Big Data, Asian regions dominated by China and Singapore are the most popular areas for renting bicycles. European and the US market are beginning to see bikes pick up.
There is much more room to grow in the international market. Bike sharing started its globalization in March 2017 with ofo and Mobike spreading their wings. Since then they have recorded a whopping weekly penetration rate of 2440%.
Cheetah expects that the number of bike rental users in the world will increase to 306 million in 2019. The research also forecasts there will be 5 to 10 times more room for expansion in the overseas market in the next 2 years. Chinese bike operators will take most of the cake.
In China, ofo ranked number 1, Mobike comes second and Hello Bike is in the third place. The top two players dominate 90% of the Chinese market. Ofo’s weekly active penetration rate is ahead of Mobike for most of the time with a 1.3-percent advantage on average.
Ofo has an edge outside of China too. Ofo is so far present in more than 250 cities in 21 countries while Mobike has entered 11 countries.
When it comes to the biggest market outside of China—Southeast Asia—ofo is the dominant player, followed by Mobike, oBike, Gobee, and Limebike. Singapore is by far the most active country for bike rental. 78% of ofo’s and 85% of Mobike’s overseas active users are in Singapore. Their biggest rival in the country, oBike, only reaches one-tenth of their numbers. Thailand is another country where bike rental is big.
Europe is also embracing bike rental with the market dominated by ofo. The company is No. 1 in Europe’s most active markets—Italy, France and the UK. The US, however, has its own champion, Lime Bike which overs 20 cities and campuses across the US, with a total of more than 10,000 bikes. The second favorite among Americans is ofo.
Right now, China’s market is transforming from explosive to a more steady growth. Chinese bike rental operators are carefully calculating their moves: they face different policies and different competition in every country they enter.
Another interesting point: bike rental is not the only source of revenue for bike rental companies. There is body advertising, big data services, and some are even experimenting with e-commerce and blockchain, arguably the most popular buzzword of the year. Taxi services and bicycles are increasingly infiltrating each other which is what DiDi is trying to do with ofo in China. Ola, India’s taxi company, launched Ola Pedal, their own bike sharing service. Southeast Asian Grab partnered with oBike to launch Grab Cycle.
]]>Didi announced on March 7 they have signed a strategic cooperation agreement with BAIC Group to build new energy vehicles, which will be used to run a car rental business that Didi is preparing to launch in the first half of this year, according to the press release.
Didi will stack the car rental operator with intelligent car rental business management capabilities, drivers, fleet operations and management capabilities, and provide personnel training, financial solutions and other system operations programs.
At present, Didi’s “rent a car and drive for yourself (自驾租车)” has entered the adjustment phase (Chinese source), and no car is available at the moment. The spokesperson from Didi said the new car rental service will be based on an hourly fee.
On February 7, Didi announced that the company has reached a cooperation to jointly build new energy sharing car service with 12 automakers including BAIC BJEV, BYD, Chang’an Automobile Group, Chery Automobile Group, Dongfeng Passenger Vehicle, First Auto Works, Geely Auto, Hawtai Motor, JAC Motors, KIA Motors, Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi, and Zotye Auto.
Existing car rental platforms include Gofun, Card2go, Evcard, GreenGo, PandAuto, TOGO. This requires investing a lot of capital in the early stage, and managing high operating costs, thereby difficult to profit in a short-term. Didi has chosen a lighter model to operate the service; By diversifying the property rights, vehicles can come from car manufacturers, leasing companies and other partners.
Didi has not yet announced the details of hourly car rental fee. Recently, Shenzhou launched a car rental business with pricing of 0.19 RMB per minutes and 0.99 RMB per km. From Suzhou Bridge in Beijing to Sihui East, it is 23 km, about 40 minutes driving. To compare the price, the taxi price is RMB 69, GoFun Chery EQ price is about RMB 38.5 yuan, and Shenzhou’s price is RMB 27.4. To compete with pioneers in the car rental market, Didi would have to consider better price strategy for their car rental service, while keeping the operating cost low.
]]>China issued on Thursday the first batch of licenses for road tests of driverless vehicles to NIO, a Chinese electric vehicle startup, and the state-owned auto maker SAIC Motor.
The licenses would allow the two auto makers to test the vehicles (in Chinese) on a 5.6-km public road in Jiading District of Shanghai, as reported by state media Xinhua.
Based in Shanghai, NIO is a smart automobile maker backed by Baidu, Tencent, and Xiaomi. SAIC Motor, a partner of Alibaba and manufacturing partner of GM, has obtained permits for one of its smart car models—the MG iGS.
“We are honored to have received the permit from the Shanghai Municipal Government,” said Lihong Qin, NIO co-founder and president, in the company’s statement. “Their decision to grant us this permit shows their faith in NIO’s autonomous driving R&D technology and testing. We will now be able to further the development of our autonomous driving technologies,” he said.
“We’ll open more roads for test-driving smart vehicles,” said Huang Ou, vice chairman of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Economy and Informatization, according to Xinhua.
Baidu’s founder Robin Li tested the firm’s autonomous cars (in Chinese) last July in public roads in Beijing, which then stirred controversy as the firm violated regulations for road testing an autonomous car without obtaining a permit. Shanghai government’s move reflects not only the needs from Chinese automakers but the authorities positive attitude toward the technology.
]]>Meituan’s ambition to reignite the ride-hailing war is getting serious. The Chinese O2O and e-commerce giant is rumored to launch on-demand car service in seven cities on 16 March, Chinese media TechWeb is reporting (in Chinese). Major cities of Beijing, Shanghai, Chengdu, Hangzhou, Wenzhou, Fuzhou and Xiamen are included in the list.
After launching ride-hailing service in Nanjing last year, the company announced plans to enter more cities like Beijing and Shanghai. Shortly after its announcement, however, the company was beset with setbacks for its legal status in running ride-hailing services in these cities, where separate permits from different local municipalities are needed.
Meituan Dache announced that it would roll out in Beijing on January 12, but order from Beijing authorities has forced the firm to postpone its launch. The company announced in January that it has obtained local permission in Nanjing and Shanghai.
A company spokesperson denied the rumor without giving any details.
Even though there are still uncertainties, Meituan has been successful in piling up anticipations for the new feature. Last December, the firm has rolled out a registration page where users can vote for their cities. At the time, Meituan said they would launch the service once a city gets 200k votes.
On top of that, Meituan also leveraged subsidies, the most effective way to secure users in a field where Didi Chuxing dominates. Under its rule, the first 200k passenger registers can get ride coupons and first the 50k (Beijing) or 20k (Shanghai) drivers can enjoy commission free service.
Chinese upstart tech firms may boom from a certain vertical, but there’s a general trend for them expand into an all-inclusive platform. This trend inevitably results in business overlap between major companies, especially in red-hot verticals like ride-hailing. Similarly, Didi is reportedly working toward the launch of a food delivery service—one of Meituan’s core businesses.
]]>Ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing has inked a strategic partnership with Chinese online used-car trading marketplace Renrenche to offer comprehensive solutions for vehicle supply and maintenance services.
The move comes five months after the on-demand car company invested a hefty $200 million in Renrenche, a classified site that allows car owners to sell directly to other consumers. The four-year-old company covers over 100 Chinese cities.
In addition to used-car trading, the partnership will also bring the duo to new car trading and after-sales business. This year, Didi’s after-sales unit plans to set up car maintenance stores across the country where Renrenche users will be supported as well.
“Creating a one-stop platform for passengers and drivers is the top priority for Didi,” said Didi CEO Cheng Wei. “Didi looks to build a close long-term partnership with Renrenche,” Didi spokesperson told TechNode.
Didi is well on its way to expand beyond core business in ride hailing to all smart transportation-related services in a bit to create new growth momentums. The partnership with Renrenche reveals its greater auto ambition and the logic behind this tie-up is a no brainer–Renrenche’s auto resources could easily lower the operation costs for Didi drivers by giving easy access to a quality vehicle supply.
Under the same initiative, Didi is partnering with automakers to build a car-sharing platform and has expanded to charging and gas business. Gas business is now profitable, according to a spokesperson from the firm. Other sectors the company is looking at include autonomous driving, bike rental, and auto financing.
]]>China now has 772 million internet users according to a report published by the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) today (in Chinese).
Growth rates of internet users have remained steady. During 2017, a total of 40.74 million new netizens were added with a growth rate of 5.6%. Internet penetration rates have reached 55.8% in China, more than the global average (51.7%) and the average rates for Asia (46.7%).
The number of mobile phone users in China has reached an impressive 753 million. Unsurprisingly, mobile phone use was up while everything else was down including desktop computers, laptops, and tablets. One small exception was television which saw a minor increase in usage. The proportion of internet users using mobile phones rose from 95.1% in 2016 to 97.5% in 2017.
However, the most interesting trend in China’s internet in 2017 was mobile payments. Although there has been a lot of talk about the rise of mobile payments in China, CNNIC’s numbers show that this rise has been slower during 2017. Since the end of 2016, the proportion of internet users that pay with their phones rose from 50.3% to 65.5%. Most new users come from rural areas.
There was another number that went up at an impressive rate. The number of internet users buying internet financial products in China has reached 129 million, up 30.2% from the same period last year. The trend reflects China’s growing fintech sector in which P2P lending made a mark during 2017 before stricter regulations were brought in.
Another notable trend was online entertainment. The growth of live-streaming users was impressive reaching 22.6%. Among them, 53.1% followed gaming live streaming.
Bike rental users have reached 221 million in the first half of 2017 prompting Chinese bike rental companies to spread their wings abroad in 22 countries.
60% Internet users said they use online government services with the number in China reaching 485 million, according to CNNIC.
]]>Didi announced today that it is expanding its cooperation with Bluegogo. “Beginning [today], in addition to repairing and redeploying some Bluegogo bikes, Didi will start replacing a certain number of broken Bluegogo bikes with its own, Didi-branded bikes in Chengdu, China’s most bike-friendly city,” the company said in a press release.
The ride-hailing giant announced the cooperation with the bankrupt bike-rental startup Bluegogo early in January. Once China’s third largest player in the bike-rental space, Bluegogo, found itself in deep debt towards the end of last year. Poised to enter the country’s already crowded bike-rental market in China, Didi has bought up a part of Bluegogo’s business. Just last week, Didi announced the launch of its bike rental platform in Beijing and Shenzhen.
Under the agreement with Bluegogo, Didi will launch a comprehensive, multi-brand bike-rental platform within its app, which integrates ofo, Bluegogo, and other partners, as well as Didi’s own-branded bike-rental service. Didi users can use Bluegogo bikes on the app with no deposit required. Users also have the option to convert Bluegogo deposits, privileges and app top-up values into Didi bike and car ride coupons.
Although Didi has partly takeover Bluegogo’s operation, “the Bluegogo brand name, deposits, debts and other related properties are retained by Bluegogo.”
]]>It seems that Didi’s take-over of Bluegogo’s bike-rental business hasn’t been smooth sailing. Transportation authorities in Shenzhen and Guangzhou have been in talks with Didi, saying that operating a bike-rental business under Bluegogo’s name is against regulations due to Bluegogo’s unsolved deposit issues and operation problems.
Didi announced last week that it has launched its own bike-rental platform after it bought up Bluegogo’s bicycles and took over a part of its business. That being said, some of Bluegogo’s blue bikes—which are maintained by the company—are returning to the streets.
However, just a few days later, Shenzhen’s transportation regulator pointed out that the city has banned placement for new bikes (in Chinese) and that Didi is not allowed to operate Bluegogo’s bike-rental business before helping sort out the deposit issues. There have been reports earlier saying that Bluegogo’s users can’t get a refund for deposits.
On top of that, Guangzhou transportation authorities also told local media that it has talked to Didi and warned that it’s not allowed to place new bikes on the streets and Didi should take care of the remaining issues (in Chinese) Bluegogo left behind.
“Didi will actively cooperate with the government to push forward relevant business and provide residents more convenient services,” Didi told TechNode but didn’t specify more details about its approach.
Didi users can now ride Bluegogo’s bikes with a deposit waiver if providing their their Sesame Credit score operated by Alibaba’s financial arm Ant Financial. As for users’ deposits, Didi provides another option for Bluegogo users—exchanging them into coupons for rides with Didi—in addition to their original pursuit of a deposit refund from Bluegogo.
]]>Updated 23 Jan 2017: TechNode Chinese has reached out to Hellobike, Fosun Capital and Hellobike’s early-stage investor GGV, but neither has confirmed the news.
Chinese bike rental firm Hellobike (哈罗单车) is going to complete $1 billion worth of round from Ant Financial (an affiliate company of Alibaba Group), Fosun Capital, and some other existing investors, people familiar with the matter told Tencent Tech. New heavyweight investors also joined this round, the source added.
If true, this would add to another milestone round to the firm’s fundraising frenzy. In last December alone, Hellobike has announced two hefty financing deals in Series D1 and D2 rounds, securing a combined nearly RMB 3.3 billion from Ant Financial and Fosun Capital. Hellobike merged with a major competitor Yongon in October 2017, and Hellobike’s team is leading the new company.
As of January 20, the firm is operating in 160 cities, providing service to nearly 100 million users with a daily order of 10 million, according to the firm.
After all the fanfare in China’s bike rental industry over the past two years, various industry insiders have their own predictions on the future landscape of this sector. Some see Mobike and ofo sharing the market after beaten all the small competitors. But few expect the industry would enter a tripartite confrontation with the quick rise of another heavyweight player who has potential to gear up to face off against ofo and Mobike.
Different from the two bike rental giants, Hellobike has been focusing on the market in the second- and third-tier cities in China. But as the markets in large cities saturate, the competition among them could become fiercer with more cash burning battles.
It is also interesting to note the role Alibaba plays in the bike rental battle. The e-commerce giant is a lead investor in ofo. At the same time, its financial affiliate Ant Financial has invested in Hellobike. Despite the possible confrontations in sharing the same investor with an arch competitor, partnering with Alibaba is sure attractive. Both ofo and Hellobike were supported by Alipay for the scan-and-ride function. The deposit-free service supported by Sesame Credit also gained huge traction among rental bike riders.
Editor’s note: Chinese news is rife with rumor. TechNode does not vouch for the accuracy of other media reports.
]]>Caocao Zhuanche(曹操专车) an electric vehicle sharing company backed by Chinese automaker Geely, has completed a RMB 1 billion ($156 million) series A round from various investors, at a valuation of over RMB 10 billion ($1.6 billion), Sina Technology is reporting. Investors in the round were not disclosed. With the new funding, the company plans to expand in cities such as Shenzhen and Chongqing.
While Didi Chuxing still dominates China’s ride-sharing market after the acquisition of Uber’s China operations, there is still room for other players to grow. In last December, Didi Chuxing’s market penetration rate was 11.4%, followed by Yidao Yongche (0.9%) and Shenzhou Zhuanche (0.7%), according to Jiguang Data. Caocao Zhuanche, taking the 7th place in the list, showed an explosive growth rate 512.7% in December.
Three things seemed to have contributed to Caocao’s high valuation. Firstly, Caocao Zhuanche uses only electric vehicles from Chinese automotive manufacturing company Geely, who is also a strategic investor to the company. Unlike other ride-sharing companies, Caocao Zhuanche owns all the vehicles used in its service and trains their drivers and gives certificates to them. On top of taxi hailing services, the company also offers car rental services and private car hailing services which user can also have a tour guide option.
Launched in 2015, Hangzhou-based company claims that it now operates in 17 cities with over 12,000 drivers, and fills roughly 150,000 daily orders. It is named after Caocao(曹操), one of the central figures of the Three Kingdoms period.
Expanding to car-hailing business seems like a new movement for Chinese companies. Chinese O2O ecommerce company Meituan-Dianping set up its ride-sharing unit, and chauffeured car service provider Yidao Yongche also launched its taxi-hailing service. The two companies are currently having a subsidy war to attract more users to their services to win over Didi’s market dominance. Earlier this month, bike rental startup Mobike also expanded to car hailing service by partnering with Shouqi Limousine & Chauffer (首汽约车) to battle its arch rival having their bike rental service on Didi Chuxing.
]]>Yesterday Chinese media 36kr is reporting that Didi vetoed Alibaba’s funding to Chinese bike rental startup ofo. However, Didi’s spokesperson told TechNode that this is not true.
“We didn’t veto any such plan. We are partners with Alibaba in ofo,” Didi spokesperson told TechNode.
In July, ofo announced its Series E of financing worth $700 million led by Alibaba and other investors including Didi. According to 36kr, at the end of last year, ofo reportedly has reached an investment agreement with Alibaba to accept the $1 billion in financing. However, neither ofo nor Alibaba announced the details of the financing.
Speculations arose last week, with rumors that ofo investor Zhu Xiaohu (also known as Allen Zhu) from GSR Ventures has sold his shares in ofo to Alibaba for $3 billion.
On January 14, Jia Jinghua, an influencer on Baidu Baijiahao, said that during the new round of financing, many ofo shareholders had already agreed and signed the investment agreement. Only one shareholder was so unwilling to sign it. 36Kr has confirmed with many parties and the shareholders who are reluctant to sign was Didi, who launched its own bike rental platform this week.
An ofo insider said that part of Alibaba’s financing is being used to buy some of Didi’s shares in ofo.
Didi launched its own bike rental service in cooperation with Bluegogo, combining with its own manufactured rental bikes while owning about 30% of ofo.
]]>Didi Chuxing has announced that it is launching its bike rental platform today in Beijing and Shenzhen. The platform will be integrated into the ride-hailing giant’s original app and will include both ofo’s and Bluegogo’s bicycles. The company plans to offer its platform in other parts of the country in the future.
The announcement came after DiDi said last week that it plans to take over the bike rental business from troubled Bluegogo. The ride-hailing firm plans to inject Bluegogo with cash to pay out late wages for staff. However, when it comes to users’ deposits, Didi said it will settle the matter by exchanging them into coupons for rides with Didi.
According to the company’s press release, Bluegogo’s blue bikes will gradually return to the streets of Beijing and Shenzhen. Users will be able to ride Bluegogo’s bikes without paying a deposit by submitting their Sesame Credit score, operated by Alibaba’s financial arm Ant Financial, local media has reported.
“By launching its bike-sharing platform, DiDi will upgrade its short-trip mobility strategy and provide various mobility options and better travel experiences for travelers on the ‘last three kilometers,’” Fu Qiang, Didi’s senior vice president said in a statement.
The launch of Didi’s new bike rental platform has yet again prompted speculations on Alibaba’s investment in ofo. In July, ofo announced its Series E of financing worth $700 million led by Alibaba and other investors including Didi. According to sources quoted by 36Kr, the majority of ofo’s shareholders have signed the investment agreement of this round of financing. However, one of the shareholders declined to sign and that one is Didi.
Editor’s note: Chinese news is rife with rumor. TechNode does not vouch for the accuracy of other media reports.
]]>This week we talk about most the biggest tech fails in China, including LeEco, bike-rentals, and bitcoin exchanges. We also talked about the most expected IPOs for 2018.
Links
Podcast information
Ofo investor Zhu Xiaohu (also known as Allen Zhu) from GSR Ventures is rumored to have sold his shares in ofo to Alibaba for $3 billion (in Chinese). The source is Zhu’s brother-in-law Ou Chengxiao who revealed Zhu’s plans at a public event a few days ago.
According to a transcription of Ou’s speech circulating online, Zhu sold out shares in ofo to Alibaba for $3 billion with ofo’s valuation at $10 billion. In July 2017, ofo completed its Series E financing round led by Alibaba with an estimated valuation at $3 billion. That is to say, if Ou’s remarks were accurate, ofo’s market valuation has surged threefold over half a year.
TechNode has reached out to ofo who responded with “no comment,” and GSR Ventures also told TechNode’s Chinese sister publication that “there are no comments.”
Zhu Xiaohu, an early stage investor of ofo, said in September 2017 that only a merger could make both Mobike and ofo profitable, which was soon being translated as a statement that investors are pushing the merger. Mobike and ofo, however, both denied the merger. Later in December 2017, Zhu told local media that it would be unlikely for the two bike-rental players to merge.
On top of that, Didi was also said to be the driving force to push the merger forward. However, cracks have reportedly emerged in DiDi and ofo partnership. Didi is building its own bike-rental business which will be added in its app along with Bluegogo’s and ofo’s services. The merger, in this case, is seemingly unlikely to happen in the near future.
]]>Chinese ride-hailing behemoth Didi is beta-testing its electric bike rental service in South China, a person with knowledge of the matter told TechNode. Didi is said to have won the initial support of at least three cities.
The firm is expected to develop its own bike rental brand, or potentially a separate app, with an access point from within Didi’s main app. Didi plans to launch the electric bike rental product in at least three cities within future months, the source added.
Entering the electric bike sector might seem a brand new effort for the ride-hailing firm, but the business logic behind this move can be seen from its recent layouts. As a dominating player in China’s ride-hailing industry, Didi is on the path towards a greater ambition to address every transportation problem, as shown in the term it defining itself: “a world-leading transportation platform.” This positioning put it conveniently in expanding beyond ride-hailing to the sectors that address short distance trips.
Didi’s foray from four-wheel (long distance) to two-wheel (short distance) sector started years back. Through a series of investments starting in September 2016, Didi tied up with ofo and then embedded ofo’s service into its main app in April last year. Just one day ago, Didi announced it is building a bike-rental platform that integrates ofo, Bluegogo and potentially its own-branded shared bikes.
“Compared to bikes that are usually used for 1-3km trips, electric bikes have a mobility radius of 2-8 km, making it a more versatile vehicle for smaller cities and urban districts,” the source noted.
In the prime of China’s bike rental boom, electric bike rental also surged, but only as a complementary niche service for a small group who have serious mid-distance travel demands. But as bike rental market reaching saturation and startups scratched for new development directions, the electric bike rental became a convenient extension, where people expect to duplicate the bike rental success.
Bike rental giants like Mobike are also tapping longer trip businesses through car-hailing partnerships and the launch of in-house electric car rental platform. Local media reports that Mobike is also launching its e-bike project. Similarly, ofo and Hellobike are said to be mulling e-bike services.
Even for a former niche market, the tech giants would face a ton of startup rivals. The existing electric bike startups inlcude Xq Chuxing(享骑电单车), No.7 E-bike (7号电单车) , Relight, MeBike (小蜜单车), Mango Chuxing (芒果电单车) and Banma Bike (斑马电车).
Smart transportation firm Yongjiu Chuxing (永久出行) have launched a combined 100K e-bikes in Shanghai and Hangzhou since last May. “The war among bike rental firms is entering a vicious circle where competitors are vying for users by providing deposit-free service. In a case like this, companies need product differentiation that can bring revenues. Electric bike, thanks to its capabilities to cover longer-distance trips, can partially replace private cars and metros, and therefore easier to form payment habit among users,” Yongjiu’s CEO Zhou Wenming told local media.
However, China tech giants’ path to achieve the grand vision could be bumpy. After a bitter-sweet relationship, Chinese government has shown cautiousness about supporting bike rental. The cautious atitude even affected electric bike rental. The Ministry of Transporation issued a policy in August, making it clear that the government will not support the development of electric bike services. Regional municipalities in Beijing, Shanghai and Tianjin also released similar policies for security and environmental concerns.
But it would be too early to be bearish about the whole prospect of electric bike industry. Observers believe there is a chance of allowing major market players with solid operational record to explore these new businesses. Given the craze of tech giants and government’s “laissez-faire” attitude towards tech innovations, e-bike rental does have a chance to beat the odds.
]]>Faraday Future had a test driving event on Monday to show off the prototype of its flagship FF91, exactly a year after they unveiled the electric luxury car at last year’s Consumer Electronics Show (CES) 2017 in an overly hyped-up reveal.
According to local media (in Chinese), only a handful of journalists and guests were invited to the exclusive event that was located not far away from the Las Vegas Convention Center, where CES events are held. Representatives from Lenovo and Haier, as well as Fang Xingdong—the founder of ChinaLabs embroiled in controversy lately—were reportedly on the guest list
The electric vehicle startup had a tough year in 2017, to say the least. Bad news seems to haunt the automaker non-stop, including FF’s main financial backer Jia Yueting being knee-deep in financial woes and the departure of three top executives as its manufacturing stalls. Much has been written about the company’s struggles and empty promises ever since it debuted the FF91.
At the test drive event, an FF executive said the company’s financial problems have been alleviated and 75% of its suppliers have resumed their operation. However, the representative refused to comment further on the source of funding.
The FF91 has gone through some modifications since its debut last year, including the replacement of the interior and exterior rearview mirrors with a display screen and cameras. The FF91 is kitted out with sensors that enable full level 3 autonomous-driving capabilities and partial level 4 autonomous-driving features.
According to the reporter who got to test drive the FF91, the test drive went smoothly for the most part, but there were a few minor hitches including tire burnouts and a rear door malfunction. The company’s corporate communication executive told local media that “The funding issues did hold up the production, but now we are doing series of testing including engineering verification tests. For example, we are testing the vehicle on extreme road conditions to ensure its reliability… We are planning to deliver a small batch by the end of this year…”
The official price of the FF91 has yet to be released, but it is rumored to start at $120,000. “We are not matching Tesla’s price point,” the company said. Adding that they are comparing themselves to luxury car brands like Bentley and Rolls-Royce, but with a significantly lower price.
]]>The year 2017 was great for many tech firms in China. Tencent briefly outdid Facebook in market valuation reaching a $500 billion valuation mark. Toutiao shot up from obscurity on the international scene with its parent Bytedance buying Musical.ly. Alibaba spread its wings further into Asia, Didi started its global expansion, Huawei overtook Apple as the second largest smartphone seller.
There were those who did not have such a good year. Many companies that jumped on China’s sizzling “sharing economy” trend folded in a matter of months. Fintech companies were hit by regulatory constrictions with e-commerce and financial platform Qbao found itself accused of running a Ponzi scheme.
And then there were those who just wish 2017 never happened. Here are the top tech fails in China for 2017.
We could say that LeEco has had a rollercoaster year… if that rollercoaster suddenly fell apart in the middle of the ride and all the passengers started jumping out in panic. LeEco’s early signs of trouble started in October 2016 when it started running out of cash, partly because of its hyped-up overseas expansion. As one of LeEco’s previous employees explained, the company failed on multiple fronts of its quest for globalization. But the troubles likely began earlier with the company shuffling funds between subsidiaries to cover losses and present itself in a good light.
In between, there was a series of dramatic twists, including the troubles of ride-hailing company Yidao which was relying on LeEco’s financial support to subsidize rides. In October, LeEco’s listed arm changed its name to New Le Shi to distance itself from its founder Jia Yueting. Meanwhile, the panel who approved the listing in the first place was put under investigation.
The latest news from YT Jia, who has been blacklisted in China, is that he has refused to come back to Beijing to deal with debts sending his wife and brother instead. Interestingly enough, in a social media post explaining his decision not to come to Beijing, Jia has blamed his financial woes on a bank that has sued LeEco for being “just two weeks late on an RMB 30 million interest payment.” Jia has also transferred controlling shares of Faraday Future to his nephew Jiawei Wang in order to keep the company from potential legal action.
Bike rental hit China 2017 with a bang. Suddenly, China’s entire urban population became hipster overnight with colorful gearless bicycles becoming a popular mode of transportation. But the autumn saw the death of many bike rental companies, including Bluegogo.
The company made its name on the international scene after its failed attempt to expand overseas at the beginning of 2017. Since then, the company was followed by a string of bad luck resulting in Bluegogo’s users worrying over lost deposits, its workers worrying over their jobs and, finally, the sale of the company to ride-hailing giant Didi.
Bluegogo wasn’t the only one that bit the dust—at least six other bike rental businesses shuttered during the big bike rental explosion. While China’s two biggest players in the field ofo and Mobike occupied the 1st tier of the bike rental market according to user numbers, Bluegogo belonged to the 2nd tier of Chinese bike rental companies. Along with Coolqi, which has suffered a nearly identical fate as Bluegogo, other members of the tier were Youon and Hello Bike.
Unlike their failed competitors, this duo decided to overcome difficulties by merging. The tactic seems to have worked: Hello Bike just announced a round of financing worth RMB 1 billion. This may be the reason why ofo and Mobike, are under pressure to join forces.
Chinese regulators have watched bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies explode in the country with the kind of enthusiasm reserved for emails from Nigerian princes. The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) started cracking down on cryptocurrency as early as January 2017 when it started investigations into China’s three largest exchanges: OKCoin, Huobi, and BTCC. This continued in February when the exchanges were forced to freeze bitcoin withdrawal for four months.
In September, initial coin offerings (ICO) became the next victim of regulation after a spike in scammy ICO schemes that would put Ponzi to shame. Bitcoin exchanges got their final verdict the same month when they were forced to close shop. In response, many Chinese traders have resorted to peer-to-peer exchanges on the private over-the-counter market but they too have recently met with a crackdown. PBOC’s latest move was to dampen incentives for bitcoin mining this week although the practice has not yet been banned.
The future of cryptocurrencies in China is not completely bleak, however. Cryptocurrency trade has earned a reputation of an element of instability and a tool for siphoning off money out of the country but the PBOC it also recognizes its potential. The central bank has already tested its own digital notes exchange platform while blockchain has become a fixture in the government’s development plans.
OKCoin, Huobi, and BTCC have moved trading to their international divisions with Huobi announcing it will expand its cryptocurrency exchange business with the help of Japanese financial institution SBI Group. BTCC’s CEO and co-founder Bobby Lee has recently stated that it’s only a matter of time before China lifts its crypto exchange ban. Maybe not such a bad year after all?
]]>Updated January 9, 2018: This article was updated to include a statement from Didi.
Details have been released on the Didi Chuxing and Bluegogo tie-up. According to sources quoted by Pingwest (in Chinese), negotiations between the two mobility firms have been completed but Didi will only take over a part of Bluegogo’s business. Didi plans to buy up Bluegogo’s bicycles as a part of its quest to enter the bike rental market. The company has issued a statement regarding its next move.
Didi Chuxing announced today that it will soon launch a comprehensive bike-sharing platform within its APP, which will integrate ofo, Bluegogo, and other potential bike-sharing partners, as well as DiDi’s upcoming own-branded bike-sharing service. DiDi will also introduce deposit-free arrangements to support a better user experience.
Meanwhile, DiDi today officially reached an agreement with Bluegogo on cooperation arrangements on the latter’s bike-sharing business. Users will be able to use Bluegogo bike through DiDi’s APP with no deposit required.
The ride-hailing firm will inject Bluegogo with cash to pay out late wages for staff. However, when it comes to users’ deposits, Didi will not pay them out directly. Instead, it plans to settle the matter by exchanging them into coupons for rides with Didi. As for supplier arrears, the payments will be left to Bluegogo’s team.
According to industry rumors, Didi plans to fully take over Bluegogo after the latter has paid out its dues to suppliers and staff, and the deposit issue has been settled. Didi is already the largest shareholder of ofo.
Despite the mess created by Blugogo’s implosion, its business is still valuable, according to Pingwest. Most of the major cities in China have restricted the number of shared bikes after bikes started pilling up on public roads as companies competed for the market. Bike rental operators without licenses are now restricted by the local government. Bluegogo has a license to operate in every city except Shanghai.
Didi’s foray into bike rental makes sense for the company since bicycles are the biggest competition for ride-hailing when it comes to shorter trips. This is why Didi has made hefty investments into ofo beginning with September 2016. On the other hand, Mobike has made similar moves by launching its own electric car rental platform.
Bluegogo once ranked 6th among the top 10 bike rental startup list by Cheetah big data. Since June, the company has been in trouble with its overseas expansion to the US halted by city authorities and its planned B Series financing round never materializing. In November 2017, Bluegogo’s founder Li Gang announced that the company has reached a strategic cooperation with Guangzhou-based Green Bike-Transit (拜客出行) which was fully authorized to operate its bikes.
]]>China’s pioneering into electricity-generating roads has taken a step back after a section of the road was stolen just five days after it opened, local media has reported (in Chinese). This setback comes just as China announced record solar electricity generation.
The world’s first solar panel paved highway opened in Jinan in Shandong on December 28 last year. But on January 2 a routine daily inspection found that a stretch of the solar panel surface was missing and the police were called.
The Qilu Evening News reported that a piece 15cm by 185cm was removed with damage to surrounding panels. The report quoted road staff as saying that the incident was clearly not simply damage or a rough job, but a planned and carefully executed plan.
The one kilometer stretch of road forms part of Jinan’s ring road and is billed as the world’s first photovoltaic solar panel road. It’s made up of 10,000 panels in a three-layer construction. It consists of a photovoltaic center, above and an insulating base and transparent concrete covering. According to state media, the surface is safer than traditional road coverings.
There are also electromagnetic induction coils set beneath the surface which in future should allow the wireless charging of electric vehicles as they drive overhead. In winter months the road can be switched so that the solar power is changed to heat to melt snow and ice.
Sensors embedded in the road will also collect data on the traffic passing over it which can be used by road and traffic management companies.
On the same day as the theft of panels was detected, Chinese media reported a 72% year-on-year increase in the country’s photovoltaic capacity for the first 11 months of 2017. China’s capacity has broken the 100 million MWh mark to reach 106.9 million MWh.
]]>Meituan, China’s leading O2O and e-commerce platform, is triggering a subsidy war as it is making a foray into the ride-hailing sector, offering users an average RMB 20 ($3) subsidy per order, local media reports.
Offering subsidies may be the easiest and the most effective way for Meituan to secure a larger user base as it expands in the field where Didi Chuxing pretty much dominates the market. Meituan has already started its subsidy policy. In December 2017, users who had completed eight orders could be rewarded RMB 60 ($9.22), and those completing 13 orders could receive RMB 100 ($15.37). Meituan also offers some other subsidies during peak hours.
Meituan is ambitiously expanding and has announced in December 2017 that the firm had a team of over 200 employees to run its ride-hailing business. After its first testing in Nanjing that began in February last year, Meituan plans to roll out the service in seven other cities, including Beijing, Shanghai, Chengdu, Hangzhou, Fuzhou, Wenzhou, and Xiamen.
On top of that, in order to recruit more drivers, Meituan will give a three-month fee waiver for the first 50,000 drivers in Beijing, saying that the platform will not draw a portion from the drivers’ earnings.
All of these moves from Meituan reflect its determination to take on Didi. The war in the ride-hailing industry was assumably settled after Didi acquired Uber’s China operations in August 2016. Now with Meituan entering the battlefield, Didi’s position might be shaken. In October 2017, Meituan landed a $4 billion Series C round of financing led by Tencent and was valued at $30 billion.
]]>Mobike, China’s major bike rental company, announced today that it will roll out its first ride-hailing service in Guizhou, marking the firm’s official attempt to expand outside of the bike rental business.
The first batch of the “shared” cars are all new energy vehicles and will be placed in Guian New Area and Guiyang City through a partnership with Xinte Motors (新特电动汽车, our translation). Mobike will add a car-hailing feature in its app, so users won’t need to switch between different apps to use the bike and car rental services. Users can rent a car, lock it, and make payments all within the app.
In October, Mobike partnered with Shouqi Limousine & Chauffer (首汽约车) to provide Mobike users a ride-hailing service operated by Shouqi. In November, Mobike reached a strategic partnership with another ride-hailing service Didapinche with Mobike adding a “Pinche (ride sharing)” feature in the app linked to the service.
Mobike isn’t the only bike rental player that is looking to provide ride-hailing services. In April, Didi Chuxing announced that it’s partnership with ofo and added ofo’s bike rental service in its app. Mobike’s move also shows that ride-hailing and bike rental services can naturally come together under one roof.
]]>Updated 28 December, 2017: This article has been updated to correct the statement that Hello Bike completed its Series D1 financing round on December 12th. The financing was completed on December 4th.
Despite the spectacular demise of bike rental companies such as Coolqi and Bluegogo, the market is still alive and kicking. Hello Bike (哈罗单车) announced today the completion of RMB 1 billion worth Series D2 round of financing led by Fosun Capital, GGV and other investors.
Less than a month ago, on December 4th, Hello Bike completed its Series D1 financing round worth $350 million.
Fosun Group Vice President and Managing Director Cong Yonggang said that there is much room for growth for the shared bicycle sector with the potential global demand of bikes reaching more than 70 million and the potential domestic demand more than 23 million bikes. He noted that China’s third-tier cities, in particular, have space for growth.
“Hello Bike is deliberately avoiding the fierce competition of the first- and second-tier cities,” said Cong in a statement for local media. “By using the tactic of encircling big cities with rural areas it will focus on the huge potential markets in third-tier cities and below.”
Fosun’s representatives also noted that Hello Bike will be integrated into an ecosystem covering big data, financial tourism, real estate, and more.
]]>Most startups launched are destined to fail and it looks like another ambitious project in China has run out of luck. Inspired by motorcycle ride-hailing services such as Grab, Lude Chuxing or Donkey Ride (our translation) launched an app enabling residents to drive passengers on electric and gas-fueled motorbikes and three-wheeled electric cars known as “sanlunche.”
According to media reports, the app was downloaded more than 5000 times in its first day of operation. The app known as Didi for bikes was developed by a company in the Chinese city of Nanning and during its short stint, residents could see drivers in bright green vests driving passengers around the city.
However, the local transport authorities did not condone the entrepreneurial spirit of the drivers and Donkey Ride’s services were halted on December 18th due to violations of local transport services rules. According to regulations, owners of electric motorbikes should apply for registration which includes submitting the drivers’ identity card, vehicle certifications, insurance and other documentation.
Nanning’s residents were polarized around the new service. Some praised Donkey Ride as a dirt cheap and environment-friendly solution for avoiding traffic jams but others warned that many drivers were driving too fast and disregarding traffic rules.
Nanning in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region in southern China is known as the “city of electric bikes.” The number of registered electric motorbikes reached 2.51 million units in July 2017, the highest number in China, meaning that the likelihood of traffic accidents is even higher.
Renting electric bikes has also come under scrutiny with several cities in China including Nanning, Shanghai, Hangzhou, and Zhengzhou banning the practice.
]]>After the capital winter of 2016, tech startup deal activity in China turned strong again in 2017 but in a more rational way.
This year’s list of top funding rounds in China features quite a few familiar names. It’s fair that more established companies would get the largest funding rounds but there seems to be excessive attention to such companies, whereby a small portion of leading startups end up getting more money while the majority remain in a funding shortage, as explained by Li Jingwang, CEO of Chinese tech startup database IT Juzi. So much so that tech behemoths like Didi, ofo, and Mobike managed to raise two or more billion-level rounds in the span of one year in a more risk-averse funding environment.
Sector-wise, the sharing economy, artificial intelligence, and video were some of the hottest verticals in China. Check five of China’s largest tech firm investments for this year.
After topping last year’s list with a $7.3 billion round, Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing is still the most sought after Chinese tech startup this year. Following a $5.5 billion round in April, the firm announced another $4 billion plus equity funding in December.
If 2016 was when the firm started to dip its toes in overseas markets, 2017 is the year when Didi put its globalization plans in execution. In March, the firm launched its office outside of China, dubbed Didi Labs, in Mountain View, California. After extending to Europe and Africa, it’s pushing harder in the US through a partnership with Lyft. The firm’s international approach was also demonstrated by the launch of a more expat-friendly version in the domestic market and new support for Apple Pay.
Diversification of product lines is another major aspect of Didi’s ecosystem development strategy. Investments in ofo and their partnership made it easy for Didi to embed ofo’s bike rental service to its main app. Food delivery and payments are some of the other projects on its plate.
iQiyi, the YouTube-style service backed by Baidu raised $1.53 billion from the sale of convertible notes to investors. Investors in the round include Hillhouse Capital, Boyu Capital, Run Liang Tai Fund, IDG Capital, Everbright-IDG Industrial Fund, and Sequoia Capital. Baidu also invested $300 million into the service. One company representative told TechCrunch that the monster round would likely be spent on acquiring content.
In a market where content is the king, video streaming websites are investing heavily in quality content, both self-generated content and exclusive partnerships with other platforms.
For Chinese bike rental firms, funding size should not be measured by single rounds but by the total amount raised over a certain period of time. So we put ofo and Mobike, two leaders in the sector, together due to the nature of the fundings, and also the similarity of their business.
Soon after nabbing a $450 million D round in March, bike rental platform ofo completed a series E financing round of more than $700 million on July 6th led by Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba, Hony Capital, and CITICPE. In the middle of these two rounds, the company received another nine-digit dollar funding in April. Ofo’s business surpassed the $1 billion valuation mark earlier this year when it announced its $450 million Series D round in February. It is aiming to raise new funds at a valuation of about $3 billion, Bloomberg reported this July.
Ofo’s arch-foe Mobike is no less capable of sweeping up capital, although the firm didn’t specify its funding sizes for each round. Over the past year, Mobike has announced four financing rounds: nine-digit dollar fund in January and February, $600 million E round in July and an undisclosed amount in November. Wall Street Journal reported that the firm’s $600 million round was raised at $3 billion valuation.
The bike rental battle in China is going feverish pitch as competitions expand beyond the national boundary. On the other hand, the industry is witnessing its first group of casualties. There’s a rumor about a possible merger between ofo and Mobike, two top players in the field, but both of the companies say it’s not an option despite pressure from investors.
Koubei, an Alibaba affiliate company focused on enabling local commerce, closed a $1.1 billion financing round in January this year from investors include Silver Lake, CDH Investments, Yunfeng Capital and Primavera Capital. It is interesting to note that the current round marks the first money from external investors.
Koubei is a joint venture founded in 2015 by Alibaba and its mobile payment affiliate Ant Financial to tap into China’s rising O2O initiative. Both put RMB 3 billion (worth around $480 million at the time) into Koubei when it was created. The idea behind it is to generate business for local retailers by bringing them online, while also offering new commerce opportunities for consumers.
The service fights fierce competition from domestic competitors like Meituan-Dianping, Ele.me, etc.
Chinese news reading app Toutiao secured $ 1 billion in a series D round financing in April from investors including returning backer Sequoia Capital and CCB International, the investment arm of China Construction Bank. Reuters reported this August that the firm is planning to raise another $2 billion at a valuation of over $20 billion.
A relatively young startup, Toutiao has grown quickly in the past few years, widely considered as a competent candidate to replace the countries tech incumbents of BAT. Flush with cash, the firm is making investments of its own, such as Flipgram, Musical.ly, and more.
Despite the growth, it has a controversial reputation since its boom. People’s Daily, the official newspaper of Chinese Communist Party, name-checked Toutiao in an op-ed denouncing algorithm-driven news distribution platforms for the echo chamber they potentially create.
]]>Didi Chuxing, China’s dominating ride-hailing giant, today announced that it has raised over $4 billion in a new equity funding round. Now having $12 billion in cash reserves, Didi has a valuation of more than $50 billion, making it one of Asia’s largest startups.
The new funding will be used to support Didi’s AI capacity-building, international expansion, and new business initiatives, including the development of new energy vehicle service networks, according the company’s statement.
Meituan, China’s leading food delivery platform, is determined to take on Didi, as Meituan is planning to expand its ride hailing service to seven major cities in China (in Chinese).
After testing the car-hailing business in Nanjing since February, Meituan is taking a step forward to challenge Didi’s dominant position in the sector by planning to roll out the ride-hailing service in seven cities, including Beijing, Shanghai, Chengdu, Hangzhou, Fuzhou, Wenzhou, and Xiamen, as reported by local media Caijing.
The war in the ride-hailing industry was assumably settled after Didi acquired Uber’s China operations last August, making Didi the dominator in the sector. However, with Meituan entering the battlefield, Didi’s position might be shaken. In October, Meituan landed a $4 billion Series C round of financing led by Tencent, and was valued at $30 billion.
It’s worth noting that Didi is reportedly working toward the launch of a food delivery service—one of Meituan’s core businesses. Meituan has a large scale of offerings, including food delivery, group buying, hotel booking, and even movie ticket sale, while Didi’s business has mainly been revolving around ride-hailing service.
]]>Despite the transport commission’s demands that impounded bikes be collected by hire bike companies, the cost of doing so, potential per-bike fines when coming forward, and increasing regulation means the firms are staying away, according to an investigation by Q Daily (in Chinese).
Piles of thousands of bikes can be seen on the edges of many cities in China. Their sheer scale and waste has been making headlines worldwide (though the companies are still being awarded for their environmental work). The hire companies themselves are not forthcoming with data for the number of bikes or the cost of dealing with them. But Q Daily discovered information from the Hangzhou Municipal Commission of Urban Management that the labor cost of retrieving a single bicycle is RMB 9.6. This is based on the commission spending RMB 220,000 on human labor costs to deal with 23,000 abandoned bikes belonging to nine hire companies in July this year.
Apply this to the Xinhua estimate of 30,000 bikes in Shanghai’s Hongxing Road bike cemetery and you’re looking at RMB 288,000 in labor costs alone at that one site. Nanjing Urban Management Bureau told the Yangzi Evening News that they have put a fine of RMB 50 per abandoned bike in the city’s bike graveyard and have notified the hire companies.
Cities such as Shanghai and Beijing also have requirements that 95% of bikes in circulation have to be in full working order, which means retrieved bikes would have to be checked and repaired. Q Daily calculated that wages for bike repairers add around RMB 3.3 to 6.7 per bike. This would put the per-bike retrieval cost at over RMB 60. That’s RMB 2 million for the Hongxing heap.
Even after this, further regulation in certain areas means further costs. Hangzhou requires a member of maintenance personnel for every 80 bikes. Since October, Shanghai requires five staff per thousand bikes. The 30,000 pile would need 150 staff it the bikes were back on the streets. Q Daily calculates monthly wages at RMB 5,000 to 8,000 per worker or a recurring monthly cost of RMB 750,000 for all, on top of the RMB 2 million for clearing the pile.
]]>We are seeing Asian startups expanding globally. This year, most notably Chinese bike rental companies Mobike and Ofo have expanded to Asian, North Americna and European markets. Chinese smartphone manufacturers Huawei and Xiaomi have been also successful in expanding to Southeast Asia and India. So what are the keys for Asian startups to go global?
At Startup Festival 2017 held in Seoul on November 30th, four panelists discussed the difficulties for global expansion and advice for Asian startups to expand their service globally. The panelists were Bryan Chang, Principal at Collaborative Fund, Judy Sindecuse, CEO & Managing Partner at Capital Innovators, Lu Gang, CEO at TechNode, and Michael Chow, General Partner at Radiant Venture Capital. The panel was moderated by Matt Shampine, General Manager at WeWork.
As a part of efforts to bring in global startups, VCs, and media to South Korea, the first Startup Festival 2017 was hosted by Ministry of SMEs and Startups, and organized by 500VOLT TWO and Brandcook in COEX, Seoul for three days.
These are the three things that we learned from the panel.
“Going global is happening right now. Startups should think about how to globalize using their technology, and business model. China is already a massive market, but China’s BAT (Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent) are making the most investment in the US and Southeast Asia. Mobile phone manufacturers are also going global aggressively,” said Dr. Lu Gang, CEO at TechNode.
Even though it’s mostly China’s unicorns that are making steps outside China’s border, Dr. Lu mentioned that startups from smaller countries have an opportunity for global expansion too.
“Israel doesn’t have a big market, but Israeli startups have shown good success cases. You should think about going global from the beginning and think about it every day,” he added.
About the advice to go global, Lu mentioned the importance of localization. Many foreign tech giant companies such as Google, Facebook failed to operate their service in the Chinese market, and even those foreign startups trying to take a piece of China’s booming O2O market such as Uber and Delivery Hero also had to change their direction. Uber’s China operations were purchased by Didi, while Berlin-based Delivery Hero had to exit China market amid hectic competition.
“Internet business is a reflection of the local culture. There are many failure cases of international companies trying to enter China market. They put a very strong marketing effort, but China’s ecosystem is totally different,” he remarked.
“To give ofo and Mobike as an example, it’s too early to say that they have succeeded in the global market. We cannot say they are a success story at this point, and startups should take care of their local market first,” he said.
As one of the strategies for global expansion, startups consider fundraising in the country they are expanding to, in a hope that the local investor will help them on the groundwork for local business operations. The panelists discussed the contrast venture capital environments in China, South Korea, and the US.
“Interacting with Korean VCs, the biggest difference of South Korean VCs and the outside is the focus on the profitability given lack of capital or relatively small amount of money available in Korean VCs. Most startups are pushed to profitability much faster than Silicon Valley startups and that changes the whole growth projection,” said Bryan Chang, Principal at Collaborative Fund. “All in all, I’ve seen more startups in Korean and Asia that have a focus on the growth side and sacrifice profitability with the capital coming out of Asian market. So, it’s good to balance both.”
Judy Sindecuse, CEO & Managing Partner at Capital Innovators, gave a broad explanation of how investors from different regions in the US have a different focus when investing in startups. Depending on your focus—whether you are a startup with a long-term vision to attract as many users as you can, or with a firm business model making money from the day one—startups should be aware who they are talking to. She also mentioned that a foreign company willing to fundraise in the US should have a US entity, otherwise US investors wouldn’t consider investing.
“If you’re an early stage startup, you should think about the region. We’re in the mid-west of US. Investors in east coast want to see profitability. Investors in Silicon Valley are trying to find the unicorn. Investors in the mid-west are trying to find B2B startups with practical ROI, and we are open to invest in smaller businesses. I think startups should break into these sectors, and learn about the differences between those markets,” said Judy.
Many foreign startups have expanded to China market, and South Korean startups are certainly one of them. E-commerce startups trying to take advantage of the boom of Korean dramas and K-pop in China, child education startups, technology-based hardware startups largely stepped into China. With political tensions beginning last year, the boom cooled down. On October 31, as China and Korean government reached an agreement to mend relations, the situation is getting better. However, given the overall political matters and economic relationships between two countries, Lu mentioned that the failure of China market expansion is the matter of being aggressive and competitive in the market.
Recently, China-based Legend Capital has invested in several Korean companies including cosmetics company Mediheal, Big Hit Entertainment, who owns and operates South Korean boy band BTS, a clouding company, and a film special effect company.
“We see more interaction and more and more communication between China and South Korea,” said Lu. “But we are not seeing many successful cases. Chinese startups are more aggressive to go global. Chinese look at Southeast Asia as a whole, but South Korea is too small a market and not that attractive for Chinese startups to expand to.”
“Korean startups are good at design and technology, but they are not that aggressive. They are afraid about Chinese startups are aggressive on copying the idea, and copyright issues in the Chinese market,” Lu pointed out. “Korean games were hugely successful in China. That’s an exception I think.”
]]>Alibaba Group and the Ford Motor Company have signed a Letter of Intent today to collaborate on connectivity, cloud computing, AI, and mobility services. The main thrust of the agreement seems to be on ways to sell the new electric vehicles Ford will be manufacturing in China.
Details so far are slim, but a release from Alibaba states the three-year agreement will aim to “redefine how consumers purchase and own vehicles, as well as how to leverage digital channels to identify new retail opportunities”. This suggests the agreement is less on the core aspects of a vehicle, and more about how to keep selling services to owners, a business model familiar to Alibaba.
“Our data-driven technology and platform will expand the definition of car ownership beyond just having a mode of transportation and into a new medium for smart lifestyle,” said Alibaba Group CEO Daniel Zhang in the release.
“Collaborating with leading technology players builds on our vision for smart vehicles in a smart world to reimagine and revolutionize consumers’ mobility experiences,’’ said Jim Hackett, Ford’s President and CEO.
Four of Alibaba’s business units are involved in the collaboration: AliOS, Alibaba Cloud, Alimama and Tmall. The first project will see Ford and Alibaba conducting a pilot study on digital solutions for retail. These will include pre-sales, test drives, and financial leasing options.
The announcement follows Tuesday’s news that Ford is planning to introduce 15 electric and hybrid car models in China by 2025. The Chinese government has been actively promoting the development of the electric vehicle industry with consumer incentives. The 10% tax rebate has fueled rocketing demand in China. The government is also allowing foreign manufacturers to set up plants without establishing joint ventures.
The government if so firmly focused on an electric future that is has also committed to establishing a timetable for banning internal combustion engines. For domestic manufacturers, they will also have to develop electric vehicles to be able to go on selling traditional cars. VW, GM and Daimler are all committing to enter the electric vehicle fray in China.
The agreement with Ford brings Alibaba further into a government-backed industry. Meanwhile it gives Ford access to Alibaba’s retail prowess.
Speaking in Shanghai on Tuesday for Ford’s announcement, Ford’s chairman, William C Ford summed up the company’s stance on China: “When I think of where EVs [electric vehicles] are going, it’s clearly the case that China will lead the world in EV development.”
]]>Ford outlined the next phase of its China expansion strategy today, focusing on SUVs, electric and connected vehicles, a streamlined business structure and closer connections to Chinese customers. Jim Hackett, CEO of Ford Motor Co mentioned that the speed of decision making is much faster in China than the US, and said Peter Fleet, Group Vice President & President, Ford Asia Pacific and Jason Luo, Chairman and CEO, Ford China are now fully in charge of China market.
“The evidence is that [our] Chinese organization is run in China,” Hackett said at the press conference held in Shanghai.
“China is not only the largest car market in the world, it’s also at the heart of electric vehicle and SUV growth and the mobility movement,” said Bill Ford, Executive Chairman of Ford.
Here are six things that we learned about Ford’s plan to bring more smart vehicles into China by 2025.
By the end of 2019, 100 percent of new Ford and Lincoln-branded vehicles in China will be connected through either embedded modems or plug-in devices. Ford’s company leaders also said they are working on broader infrastructure opportunities to improve future mobility experiences. Ford’s investment in electrified vehicles is to date $4.5 billion.
Ford plans to offer more than 50 new Ford and Lincoln vehicles in China by 2025, and at least 15 new electrified vehicles from Ford and Lincoln. And the new Zotye-Ford joint venture will deliver a separate range of affordable all-electric under a new brand, pending regulatory approvals.
Ford said that they will contain structural cost in the region throughout 2018 to grow its China revenue by 50 percent by 2025 versus 2017.
Ford is one of the founding members of the Board of Baidu’s Project Apollo, building on the agreement signed earlier this year.
In 2014, Ford developed a China market-targeted SmartDeviceLink, an open-source voice commander, together with leading Chinese mapping service providers Baidu and AutoNavi. Last year August, Ford and Baidu jointly invested $150 million in Velodyne LiDAR, a company that makes sensors for autonomous cars’ mapping, localization, object identification, and collision avoidance.
The Apollo Open Platform accelerates the development, testing and deployment of autonomous vehicles. The TechNode team actually had a chance to try out their autonomous cars in this July, when Baidu released their autonomous driving ecosystem Apollo 1.0 with their 50 partners, including Ford.
Ford’s participation supports the company’s robotics and artificial intelligence research efforts and provides an opportunity to contribute to a platform that will be key to developing autonomous vehicles in China.
“We are responding to the rapid pace of change by delivering increased connectivity and working to improve and simplify mobility for everyone,” Hackett said. “This builds on our commitment to deliver smart vehicles for a smart world, helping people around the world move more safely, confidently and freely.”
Starting in 2019, the company plans to locally assemble five more vehicles in China for Chinese customers including a Lincoln premium SUV and the company’s first global all-electric small SUV. The expanded product portfolio reflects an even stronger emphasis on SUVs. As Chinese families start to have two children after putting down one-child-policy last year, SUVs will be a more attractive option for Chinese consumers.
“From luxury Lincolns to Ford cars and SUVs, to an all-new electric vehicle brand, we will meet the growing desire and need in China for great new energy vehicles,” said Jason Luo, chairman and CEO of Ford China.
Ford said Lincoln, Ford’s luxury brand in China, will maintain its separate dealer network to offer its one-size-fits-one customer experience.
Ford is strengthening ties with its joint venture partners Changan and Jiangling in 2018, establishing one distribution services division responsible for the marketing, sales, and services associated with all Ford vehicles sold in China.
“Now is the time to deepen the partnerships we have with Changan and Jiangling Group and present one Ford brand in China,” Fleet said. “The new distribution services division will enable us to offer an enhanced experience for our customers and more closely connect with our dealers and the community.”
“All of the actions outlined today reflect an unprecedented commitment to focus on the needs of consumers in China through a more fit and streamlined Ford,” he added. “They are proof of our dedication to grow our business in China.”
In 2019, the company will start producing five additional Ford and Lincoln models in China to further tailor vehicles to more closely meet the needs of Chinese customers.
“Some of our most advanced manufacturing and innovation facilities are here in China,” said Fleet. “Producing more vehicles for China locally allows us to improve the benefits for our customers, our partners, and our bottom line.”
Ford last month opened the Nanjing Test Center, which includes close to 80 different types of real road surface conditions, a three-kilometer test track and a sophisticated emissions testing facility, to speed development of new products, services, and technologies to meet the unique driving requirements of Chinese customers. Jason mentioned that there are 2,000 engineers working in Nanjing.
The company also launched Quick Lane, its customer service provider in Nanjing and Chongqing this month, offering routine vehicle maintenance and light repair services. Ford plans to open 100 new outlets next year.
]]>It’s that time of the year again. Tech executives and government officials from around the world are gathering in the historic water town of Wuzhen in east China for the state-run World Internet Conference (WIC). Meetings and keynotes aside, Ding Lei, the founder and CEO of the twenty-year-old tech conglomerate NetEase, has reportedly been hosting an exclusive dinner gathering the industry’s biggest names since 2014. This year was no exception and Richard Liu of the retail giant JD.com and Wang Xing of the O2O service platform Meituan-Dianping added their own banquet. Chinese media and tech watchers study these dinners closely as they act as indicators of the industry—who’s still relevant, and who’s whose ally. There are three things we can learn from the two dinners this year.
As usual, Ding served the non-GMO black pork harvested from the NetEase Weiyang Farm to his precious guests. Some tech bosses were new to the dinner, such as Gong Yu, founder and CEO of the video streaming platform iQiyi, Cheng Wei, co-founder and CEO of the ride-hailing company Didi-Chuxing, as well as Richard Liu. These new additions, insiders reckon, reflect rising trends in China’s booming tech industry. For instance, JD.com’s presence signals the importance of the new consumer business; iQiyi, the content and pan-entertainment industry; and Didi-Chuxing, the sharing economy.
Ding’s dinner has expanded from nine attendees in 2014 to twenty this year. The gathering first started with tech veterans of the PC era like Robin Li, founder and CEO of Baidu, Pony Ma, founder and CEO of Tencent, and Charles Zhang, founder and CEO of Sohu. The addition of Lei Jun, the man behind the smartphone manufacturing giant Xiaomi, along with Wang Xing last year, spoke of China’s sprawling mobile-first, mobile-only market.
According to local media, a few leaders excused themselves from Ding’s banquet and hurried to the next one hosted by Richard Liu and Wang Xing. Insiders see this second dinner as a celebration among Tencent’s friends: most of the companies present are affiliated with the social network and gaming giant. In a leaked photo of the dinner crowd, Pony Ma sat between the hosts Liu and Wang, a sign of Ma’s prominence for Tencent holds a stake in both JD.com and Meituan-Dianping. Most of the remaining guests also fall into the Tencent camp, including Didi-Chuxing, China’s Craigslist 58.com, the Q&A platform Zhihu, and the bike-rental startup Mobike.
Toutiao, a rising star in content distribution, was also curiously present although it has been regarded a competitor to Tencent’s own news aggregator app Tiantian Kuaibao. Toutiao is also one of the only Chinese tech giants that has not received any fundings from the BAT trio of Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent. Toutiao is, however, invested by another important presence at the dinner, the preeminent venture capitalist Neil Shen, founding managing partner of Sequoia Capital China.
This is the fourth year that Jack Ma, founder and executive chairman of Alibaba, has attended WIC, though he has been to none of Ding’s private banquets. Neither did he attend Richard Liu’s this year, which was unsurprising given the heated competition between Alibaba and JD.com. As for Ma’s absence from Ding’s table, insiders point to a lesser known history between Alibaba and NetEase. When eBay first entered China back in 2004, it had signed exclusive advertising rights with major portals including Sina, Sohu, and Netease in an attempt to thwart its China rival Taobao—which had launched just a year earlier. There has never been an official statement on Jack Ma’s noticeable absence from the “big bro’s” dinners. What we know is that Mr. Ma has been trying his hand in the entertainment industry, including a recent debut film with martial arts master Jet Li and a duet with the Chinese diva Faye Wong.
]]>Didi Chuxing, China’s ride-hailing giant, has ended its US experiment and has halted its app service in the US. Instead, Didi says that the company encourages users to download Lyft—Didi’s strategic partner in the US.
Didi has shown its ambition to expand globally after it invested $100 million in Lyft, Uber’s major rival in the US market, in September 2015. Since then, Didi has worked closely with Lyft, and in April 2016 rolled out the “Didi Haiwai” service—an experimental service where Chinese tourists in the US could hail rides operated by Lyft on Didi’s app and pay with Alipay or WeChat Pay.
Didi has confirmed with TechNode that American users are currently unable to use the app in the US and “are encouraged to download and use the app of our partner [Lyft].”
“From the feedback we collected, the service indeed made it more convenient for frequent travelers between China and the US, and we saw huge market needs here,” Didi told TechNode. “It has been a great cross-border experiment, where we’ve earned some precious experience that’ll serve as a good reference for our future cooperation with Lyft and other partners.”
It’s no secret that Didi is ambitiously looking to expand globally. The firm in March launched a self-driving research lab in Mountain View, California. Additionally, Didi has built a global partnership network covering almost every major player around the world, including Ola in India, Grab in Southeast Asia, Lyft in the U.S., 99 in Brazil, and Taxify in Europe and Africa. The network, according to Didi, now covers over 1,000 cities in the world and reaches 60% of the world’s population.
“DiDi would like to take a more active approach to internationalization. It is planning to land in other markets independently or through partners,” said Didi.
Most recently, Didi landed $5.5 billion in its latest round of financing in April, marking a step forward for the company to tap into the global market.
]]>Despite the rumors and speculation surrounding a possible merger between Mobile and ofo, Mobike co-founder and CEO Davis Wang has made it clear again at TheYearAhead Summit that a “merger is not an option for the company,” local media is reporting.
Similarly, ofo founder and CEO Dai Wei also expressed previously that the company would not consider a merger.
Rumors about Mobike and ofo merger have been around for a while. It can be dated back to months ago when we joked about the same issue with our April Fool’s joke. Different reactions from the two companies sparked speculation about what was the real sentiment internally.
Half a year has passed and the current situation has made a merger more likely as more companies go out business and investors are looking for an exit.
What’s more interesting, the attitude of investors behind these companies are growing more favorable towards a merger to end the costly competitive battle and create a single dominant player, like the case in the merger between Didi and Kuaidi, and then Didi and Uber China.
Zhu Xiaohu, an early stage investor of ofo, said in September that the landscape in China’s bike rental industry has been settled with Mobike and ofo accounting for 95% share of the market. Both firms still need huge operation investments and only a merger could make them profitable. This statement is largely translated as investors are pushing the merger. Bloomberg reported that the investors of the two firms are in talks.
While we need to wait to see who wins this debate, but the situation sure reflects the conflicts between entrepreneurs and investors. Entrepreneurs prefer independence, but investors place profitability as their top priority.
]]>Visitors to TechCrunch Shanghai were greeted with a sleek silver high-performance car at the entrance. This is EP9 produced by NIO, the Chinese electric carmaker with over $2 billion in investments from the likes of Tencent, Baidu, IDG and more. However, it’s not about looks: NIO’s VP of User Development Izzy Zhu sat down with TechNode Senior Writer Wang Ping to talk about the role user experience plays at the company.
Founded in 2014 and formerly branded as NextEv, NIO just celebrated its 3rd birthday last week. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, with the product design coming from Munich, Germany and its autonomous driving research and development team based in San Jose in the US.
“The automotive industry has entered a key turning point, both in terms of technology and consumer adoption,” Zhu said when asked about why several new electric vehicle companies in China have formed in that time period, for example, Youxia Motors and Singulato.
Having worked for BMW, Lexus, and Amazon, Zhu has gained experience in how traditional carmakers operate and also how a (relatively) new internet business works. He believes that NIO is a company that encompasses all of these aspects.
“I believe NIO will make a car that is not only good in terms of performance but also in software. But [sales] quantity will not be the driving force behind the [electric vehicle] industry, it’s the user experience,” Zhu said at TechCrunch Shanghai. “No matter the product hardware, nor the software, the user experience must be the focus.”
NIO’s focus on user experience includes both small and big. At their first Beijing user experience center, staff there are not called salespeople but rather “fellows”: they are your companions, not just salespeople. At the strategic level, Zhu explained the traditional car industry sales model was distributor centric; carmakers usually did not have a direct relationship with customers. NIO will be taking back most, if not all of the functions, that distributors used to perform, from sales to the long-term maintenance of the vehicles.
“It’s definitely capital intensive,” Zhu said in an interview at TechCrunch Shanghai when asked about the NIO business model. “But we think that it is a worthwhile investment.”
And NIO has cash to burn. It has gone through four rounds of funding, receiving a total of $2.1 billion according to CrunchBase. However, for all the investments, the only noticeable result so far comes from NIO’s racing arm. The company has been involved with Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile or FIA Formula E (the international championship for electric vehicles) from their inception in 2014. In the 2014-2015 season, the driver for the NextEv (NIO’s former brand name) branded China team Nelson Piquet Jr. emerged as the champion driver.
NIO will soon be tested by the market with the launch of ES8, its first mass-production SUV model. The ES8 retail price is estimated to be around RMB 500,000 (neither confirmed nor denied by Zhu at TechCrunch Shanghai.) The ES8 will be targeting the same customers of Tesla’s Model X, which currently retails in China starting from RMB 894,000. While the ES8 may have a price advantage, it lacks the brand and the tested performance of Tesla cars.
For Zhu, he’s concerned with something more basic than NIO’s well-established competitors. With China as the largest electric vehicle market and a potential ban on fossil fuelled vehicles, there is plenty of room for multiple players. Improving customer confidence in electric cars is the most pressing issue.
“More importantly, the biggest obstacle for today’s consumers to [electric vehicles] is the problem of charging,” Zhu said at TechCrunch Shanghai. “Currently, it’s very inconvenient to charge, which is determined by the state of national infrastructure. [In the future,] NIO will provide cloud computing and data to connect our charging substations, the nation’s fast charge stations, and a service team that provides a mobile charging vehicle into a complete service system.”
]]>Insiders from ofo have confirmed to local media that ofo’s executive chairman, Chief Financial Officer, and other senior executives went on a “vacation” in July this year. A rift between ride-hailing giant DiDi and bike rental mammoth ofo might be the reason behind the event, Bianews has reported.
ofo has since published a statement denying the claims.
ofo’s goal is to become the world’s largest bike-sharing platform with two billion users. As an important investor and partner of ofo, DiDi has been assisting ofo in many respects, such as network traffic, talent acquisition, and strategy development. DiDi and ofo will continue to deepen their cooperation. It is standard practice for employees to take vacation for personal reasons. ofo will use all legal means to refute false media reports, and to firmly safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the company.
According to the report, tensions began in April when young ofo founder and CEO Dai Wai was reportedly accused of wasting funds because of its lack of management experience and internal management problems. In July, ofo announced that senior vice president Fu Qiang will become ofo’s new president. On July 26th, ofo executives went on vacation. There are no specifics about the tensions between the two partners or what the “vacation” means.
The report states that DiDi has become the largest shareholder of ofo, accounting for more than 30% shares. Ofo first announced it will receive tens of millions of dollars in investments from DiDi at the end of September last year. In March, ofo published that it completed its D round with $450 million with DiDi as one of its investors. In July, ofo announced its Series E of financing worth $700 million led by Alibaba and other investors including DiDi. The news has brought into question whether the financing will take actually place. No official statement has been issued so far on the matter.
It is worth mentioning that on Wednesday Tencent held a startup event during which ofo investor Zhu Xiaohu (also known as Allen Zhu) from GSR Ventures once again stressed the need for the two bike rental leaders ofo and Mobike to merge. Founder of Mobike Hu Weiwei was also present at the event.
Updated, 24 Nov 2017: Now includes a response from the company.
]]>At least six bike rental companies in China has shuttered during the last five months. After Bluegogo and Coolqi, the latest to close shop was Xiaoming (小鸣) which followed a similar scenario. Staff is claiming that the company’s controller Deng Yonghao has misappropriated funds and is nowhere to be seen. The company’s CEO Kai Lushi has already left and workers are waiting for wages since September. Reports state 99% of them have been laid off.
The bike rental industry is facing a bitterly cold winter and users are worried what will happen to their deposits. Estimates published in August put total deposits for rental bikes at RMB 10 billion, according to data from the China Internet Network Information Center. There is now a higher number of complaints connected to bike rental deposits than e-commerce disputes. Although the first national guidelines were issued in August there are no clear requirements regulating deposit returns, Xinhua has reported.
Former CEO of Coolqi Gao Weiwei has suggested that the price of their bikes (RMB 650) will be enough to cover the cost of user deposits (RMB 298)
“In the worst scenario, we will allow debtors to ride our bikes home,” said Gao.
Startup database IT Juzi has analyzed the reasons behind the online bike rental industry’s demise.
Compared to the first half of this year when the average number of financing deals per month was 3.7, the third quarter has brought a significant decline putting the average number of deals at 1.3 a month, IT Juzi’s data shows.
Father of Bluegogo’s founder Li Gang has admitted during a meeting with suppliers and investors on Thursday that the failure to sustain its capital chain was the reason behind the bankruptcy. Coolqi likely has the same problem.
Bike rental companies are still using venture capital to finance their operation while they set up their brand. However, data shows that rent is only enough to cover maintenance costs. Even with huge deposit funds, it is still difficult to cover all the costs.
Mobike and ofo occupy nearly 95% market share of the bicycle rental industry, other companies have to carve up the remaining 5%.
According to incomplete statistics, as of now, a total of 14 cities across the country have stopped adding new rental bicycles. Expansion is a difficult task for latecomers.
Once the market is saturated the capital flow will stop. IT Juzi says that companies should help each other through mergers to avoid losing their opportunity.
]]>多部门商讨共享单车押金监管举措 from NetEase (our translation):
“Nov. 6 to 8, the Ministry of Transport, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, PBOC and other departments called representatives from the transport agencies of 17 provinces as well as Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou to a meeting in Chengdu to discuss the regulation of the bike rental industry. An important topic of discussion was the management of deposits paid to bike rental companies by users.”
What happened: Following the recent company closures of Coolqi and Bluegogo which led to many users waving goodbye to their deposits, various government departments from 17 provinces convened in Chengdu to discuss regulating the management of deposits for bike rental companies.
Why it’s important: How bike rental companies are managing users’ deposits have been a concern since day one but little has been done to protect users. With the much-publicized collapse of Coolqi and Bluegogo and the loss of many users’ deposits, it seems that the government is finally taking some action. A lawyer interviewed by NetEase says that currently, a major shortcoming is that mismanagement of the deposit does not have any associating punishment.
Sign up for the Daily Briefing for more like this straight to your inbox.
]]>Founder of Bluegogo, Li Gang authored an open letter on November 16th stating that the Bluegogo has reached a strategic cooperation with Chengdu-based Green Bike-Transit (拜客出行). Green Bike-Transit will be fully authorized to operate the Bluegogo.
About the unpaid salary to Bluegogo employees, Li Gang also said, “Owing to everyone’s salary, I will try my best to solve it as soon as possible.”
Li Gang is not only the co-founder of Bluegogo but also the founder of SpeedX (野兽骑行). After Li Gang’s first smart performance bike SpeedX received RMB 150 million series B funding in November 2016, Gang established bike rental startup Bluegogo.
TechNode interviewed with Li Gang last year May when he was fully focused on SpeedX’s development. After setting the record for the most highly-funded bike on Kickstarter’s crowdfunding website, Gang was the first one to mention ‘bike innovation’ from China and was optimistic about Chinese bike’s global expansion. There was zero coverage about ofo and Mobike at that time, and after few months, China indeed made noise with its bike rental companies going global. However, the bike innovation story for Li Gang himself now stops here, as he admits his mistakes in managing the troubled bike company.
“I never denied my mistake. My heart is full of suffering and I am in trouble for months,” Li Gang said in the letter.
From June, Bluegogo has gone through a handful of problems, where Li Gang puts in his letter as “it seemed as if the Bluegogo was cursed.” Both Bluegogo and SpeedX had deteriorating financial positions, and the orders have been delayed. At present, Bluegogo has reportedly defaulted property costs up to RMB 200 million and owes nearly RMB 200 million from more than 70 suppliers. Most Bluegogo and SpeedX employees have left the company.
Bluegogo ranked 6th among the top 10 bike rental startup list by Cheetah big data and belonged to iResearch’s second tier bike rental company along with Hellobike and Youon, as they come in with an average Monthly Active Users number of more than 100 million.
In January this year, Bluegogo completed a RMB 400 million Series A, valued at RMB 1 billion. But since then, financing information has not been announced. The company is about to complete Series B in March, but did not get any sum of money in the end.
As Green Bike-Transit takes over Bluegogo’s operations, China’s bike rental market is witnessing consolidations. Previously, Hellobike and Youon bike merged to survive in the China’s bike rental red ocean. Wukong bike (悟空单车) and 3Vbike have halted its operation, while Machi-cho bike (町町单车) failed to refund the deposit.
]]>This week we look at the Double 11/Singles Day shopping orgy, follow Bluegogo and Coolqi as they implode, and look at a gay WeChat KOL going to Taiwan for Gay Pride.
Links
Podcast information
It’s been a bad day for bike rental schemes in China. After Bluegogo’s devastating disintegration, the bike rental company that made its fame with “tuhao” gold bicycles Coolqi has its head office surrounded by users (in Chinese) unable to withdraw deposits from their mobile phone app. Coolqi has set up an offline refund office which is guarded by security personnel in Beijing’s Tongzhou District.
According to the report, one university student has come all the way from Hebei province in order to queue in front of Coolqi’s office, spending RMB 130 in order to get back his RMB 298 refund. The student stated that he has used the service since September but in October saw news reports on Coolqi. However, since the app was not responding, the student took a day off to come all the way to Beijing for his deposit. The RMB 160 that he will receive is enough to cover half a month of his living expenses at school so the treck was worthwhile, he said.
Coolqi’s trouble started in September when users first started gathering in front of its Tongzhou office. At the time Coolqi founder and CEO Gao Weiwei told TechNode’s Chinese sister site that the company is not bankrupt, but that he has been removed as CEO (in Chinese). The company’s WeChat payments have been frozen and it is seeking the guidance and support of the government while it is talking with another company for a potential RMB 1 billion acquisition.
Bluegogo is having its own troubles with refunds with staff waiting for late salary payments and its Vice President confirming that he left the company months ago.
In August, the Chinese Ministry of Transportation released the country’s first national guidelines for online bike rental. The draft states that companies collecting deposits and prepaid funds from users should strictly distinguish between the users’ and the enterprise’s own funds, set up a special account for users’ funds and employ risk management.
Coolqi, which received RMB 900 million in investment and has 1.5 million registered users and 1.4 million bikes, has so far stated that the specific deadline for refund has not yet been determined.
]]>Bluegogo is going bust. Staff from the bicycle rental company broke the news yesterday that the company is dissolving and salary payments will be delayed until February 10, 2018. TechNode’s Chinese sister site has confirmed that the salaries are indeed delayed and that the company is in a poor state (in Chinese).
Even more shocking is that the head of Bluegogo’s market operation department, Vice President Hu Yufei, revealed during a telephone call with TechNode Chinese that he has been gone from the company for several months now, adding that they should “ask people from Bluegogo about the specifics.”
Another employee from the company’s marketing department has said that he has already left his job in Bluegogo and that his former colleagues have been waiting for their salaries for months. Another senior manager revealed that he has already left the company and that there will be another team to take over the Bluegogo brand. He disclosed that other teams refer to outside companies.
The paradox is that in September while Bluegogo’s staff was waiting for wages, Hu Yufei told TechNode Chinese reporters that “too many rumors on the market are not true, I hope you don’t believe them.” He also announced a big media event for National Day holidays in October which never happened while Bluegogo CEO Li Gang offered the same rhetoric. According to media reports, Li has been in an unknown foreign country for some time.
The bad news just kept piling up from then. In October, the company denied rumors that it is trying to solve its cash flows issues by selling its business. Reports at that time documented a number of complaints from Bluegogo users that have not received refunds for their deposits within deadlines. The bike rental then promised a new deadline for refunds: November 10th.
The deadline has passed but many Bluegogo users have yet to receive their deposits. And while Chinese users are certainly angry to lose their RMB 100 deposits ($15), for US-based users the situation is even grimmer—they stand to lose a $100. In addition, the company still owes RMB 400 000 to suppliers. Media has reported that around 70 vendors have gathered in front of its Beijing office.
We can likely track the beginning of Bleugogo’s woes back to the beginning of the year. The company shipped hundreds of bikes to San Francisco just to have the local government issue regulations that would make it almost impossoble to operate in the city. The company announced its Series B round of financing in March and then moved that date to June but the money never came through. The company also discussed an acquisition with ofo and Mobike but was refused.
]]>Mobike tries to catch up with China arch-rival ofo by announcing it will launch in Australia in January 2018. The company will put around 2,000 bikes onto the streets around Gold Coast, Queensland, but the bikes will have to be left in designated areas.
The bikes have been designed for Australia with gears, a larger frame and larger wheels, according to a release from Mobike. The internal three-speed gears and 26-inch wheels will no doubt be more useful in the less urban landscapes of the Gold Coast region. Taking the adaptation to a whole other level, some of the bikes have racks that allow a surfboard to slotted alongside the bike.
To end a journey, the rider will have to cycle to a designating parking area (no details of number, location or capacity) before closing the locks.
Gold Coast, with a population of over 600,000, is Australia’s sixth largest city. 2,000 bikes may not make a huge impact, but as temperatures will be pushing 40ºC when the launch begins, the supply might meet the demand of local early adopters.
The city sees the arrival of Mobike as part of its sustainable development, especially as it will be hosting the 2018 Commonwealth Games. Gold Coast Mayor, Tom Tate, said, “The bikes will be rolled out strategically and increase availability to meet demand, and we are delighted they will be on the streets in time for Gold Coast 2018 Commonwealth Games.”
The launch is in collaboration with Transit Australia Group, one of the country’s largest mass transit companies, and Good Cycles, a local social enterprise. Transit Australia Group CEO, Michael McGee, said:
]]>“While bike sharing is in its infancy in Australia, we are excited to showcase how the Gold Coast’s unique approach can enhance mobility with digital disruption while supporting positive social outcomes for the community through a social enterprise model. This is a true collaboration between Council and industry that offers a forward-thinking yet methodical approach to introducing bike-share to a major city.”
Meituan-Dianping is to discontinue its power bank rental scheme in restaurants just three months after announcing its launch, according to an internal announcement (in Chinese), which also stated that the group was discontinuing its Squirrel convenience stores. This follows days after LeDian unplugged its own power bank equipment and took it away.
This was supposed to be the next rental economy super sector after bike rentals, with money pouring in right, left and center. Significant numbers of charging stations began appearing early in 2017. In a ten-day period in April, over RMB 300 million was poured into power bank rental schemes. Cafe and restaurant tables might have a base station with an array of cables dangling out. Some were in the form of lockers users would leave phones in, the rest were large units in shopping centers and cinemas where users left a deposit to eject a portable power bank that they would take away to charge their phones on the go. All formats let phone users charge their phones for just a few cents (if they had enough battery to make the mobile payment first).
Meituan-Dianping was a relative latecomer, launching its scheme of table-top chargers in August, following investments by Tencent and Alibaba in other schemes. With a user base of over 600 million, the restaurant recommendation app with 4.5 million listed restaurants that could host the equipment was thought to have a good chance of making a success of it.
Hangzhou-based LeDian ceased operations and removed charging equipment from its 300 locations in mid-October, around the same time as Xiaobao, which operated table-top charging stations, and Hema Charging (河马充电, not to be confused with Alibaba’s 盒马鲜生 new retail supermarkets) also folded.
iiMedia Research released a report which predicted over 100 million users (in Chinese) of shared charging devices by the end of 2017, but that restaurants saw the lowest frequency of use of its categories that also include public transport stations, shopping malls, airports and KTV venues.
]]>Ofo appears to be infringing on the ban on new bikes being put on the streets of Shanghai according to some investigative reporting by the Liberation Daily. The paper has provided a timeline of new model ofo bikes turning up in rows on the streets of the city yet seemingly muddied up with dirt to give the impression the newly-formed ranks are all old-time Shanghai veterans. A delivery driver told the paper that the depot they bring them from has over 10,000 new bikes.
In mid-August, Shanghai’s transport authorities said no to any more new hire bikes being dumped on its streets due to sheer numbers and the chaotic abandoning of the bikes. After tip-offs from the public about bikes starting to reappear, with some of the plastic wrapping still on the components, Liberation Daily reporters went on patrol and found trucks coming into town and offloading bikes like the heady days of July all over again.
According to a public statement by ofo, the company has always followed local regulations after the local ban on new bikes. The bikes in question were replacement bikes for older models they wanted to bring out of service in Shanghai. The statement also said that since Shanghai is a logistics hub, many of the bikes reported on were to be sent to surrounding areas outside Shanghai.
After a few failed attempts at locating the alleged contraband bikes (they kept being hired and ridden away), the reporters were told of a consignment in a less cycle-friendly part of town—Pudong Beicai—and headed over to find 14 bikes still there. They had been daubed with a bit of mud, but all the components were brand new, there were no signs of the bikes being adjusted by users or showing any wear and tear. And the plastic wrapping and “L” and “R” stickers were still on the pedals. The bikes could be unlocked and used with the ofo app.
Reporters then made contact with delivery drivers only to be told that they were indeed bringing in new bikes and the depot they were bringing them from had over 10,000 bikes. To verify the claims, reporters found the depot and spied on the situation, seeing trucks and large quantities of ofo bikes being moved. A reporter sneaked in to check and found that they were indeed new bikes.
Apart from the sea of new bikes, the reporters saw a heap of old bikes which appear to have been mixed in with the new in their rows. They also witnessed workers taking brooms and dipping them in muddy ponds and deliberately dirtying the new bikes. Following the delivery trucks, they witnessed the bikes being put on the streets.
Updated, 02 Oct 2017: Now includes response from the company.
]]>As smartphones have become more and more accessible, China has seen a vibrant mobile app scene, ranging from gaming and shopping to dating. In the third quarter of 2017, smartphone users in China downloaded 34 apps on average and used the apps for an average 3.7 hours per day, according to a report from the Chinese mobile data research firm Jiguang.
Jiguang recently put together a data report on the overall ranking of the mobile apps across verticals in the third quarter of 2017. Here are some of the highlights.
Sogou (搜狗) dominated the keyboard input method vertical with a high penetration rate at 41.2% in September, boasting 150 million daily active users (DAU). Baidu came in second with a 25.7% penetration rate, and saw 49 million daily active users. The third largest player went to iFly (讯飞) with its penetration rate at 13.6%. It has 34 million daily active users.
The e-commerce sector remains a very hot and very competitive vertical. Taobao (mobile), unsurprisingly, topped the list with the penetration rate at 51.3%, while JD (mobile) followed behind with an 18.4% penetration rate.
However, it’s worth noting that JD saw a higher quarter-on-quarter growth rate than Taobao, where the former secured a 5.1% growth rate and the latter saw 1.0% growth. Following closely with JD, VIP (唯品会, formerly known as Vipshop.com) came in third with the penetration rate at 15%.
With “New Retail” strategy becoming a buzzword in the retail sector, more and more retailers are looking to online-to-offline development–delivery fresh produce to consumers’ homes. Among the players, JD topped the chart with its Daojiao app with the penetration rate at 0.29%.
Closely following JD was the Tencent-backed Miss Fresh (每日优鲜) with its penetration rate at 0.26%. It’s important to underline the fact the Miss Fresh’s business has been burgeoning and has seen a 33.9% quarter-on-quarter growth. Initially starting out with offline fresh produce sales, Pagoda (百果园) came in third with a 0.09% penetration rate.
Didi Chuxing, China’s leading car-hailing service, remains the largest player with an 11.3% penetration rate. UCAR (神州专车) came in second with the penetration rate at 1.16%. UCAR may appear to fall a lot behind Didi; however, it’s important to underline the fact that UCAR saw a 44.4% quarter-on-quarter growth, reflecting that the UCAR is a player which we shouldn’t overlook.
It didn’t come as a surprise that the top two players in the bike-rental vertical are Mobike and ofo. As more players have either gone out of business in the bike-rental sector in the third quarter this year or were revealed to have issues with deposit withdrawals, it’s clear that Mobike and ofo have both secured stable spots in the industry.
Mobike held a 5.6% penetration rate, and ofo saw its penetration rate at 5.2%. In terms of DAU, Mobike surpassed ofo and had 5 million daily active users in September.
Honors of King saw the most traffic among apps in the gaming sector, with its penetration rate at 23.9%. Its DAU number, however, has slightly declined from 7.1 million in July to 6.8 million in September.
Kaixin Xiaoxiaole (开心消消乐) came in second with a 12.7% penetration rate, and Fight the Landlord (欢乐斗地主) secured the third place with the penetration rate at 8.7%.
]]>In recent years, a raft of Chinese entrepreneurs have been going around pitching and fundraising for their electric vehicle startups, but consumers haven’t seen much of those promises materialize until recently. On October 12, XPeng Motors unveiled its first pre-production run of 15 electric cars in China’s east-central city of Zhengzhou, where XPeng’s OEM partner—local automaker Haima Automobile’s subsidiary—is located. This batch, XPeng claims, are the first mass-market EVs born from a Chinese internet car company.
The term “internet car” was coined to loosely refer to cars that are either an IoT connected device, uses the lean startup approach of rapid iteration and shorter product development cycle, or has a top management team hailing from the internet industry. The cars are also, of course, electric.
China’s rush to EVs is made possible by a flood of big-name venture capitalists looking for the next big thing. Among XPeng’s early investors are tech bosses such as He Xiaopeng, founder of Alibaba-owned browser UCWeb; Li Xueling, founder of Nasdaq-listed streaming platform YY Inc; Wu Xiaoguang, former vice president of Tencent; Yao Jinbo, founder of China’s Craigslist equivalent 58.com; Fu Sheng, CEO of Cheetah Mobile; and David Zhang, founding managing partner at Matrix Partners, says the automaker. Chinese tech giant LeEco has had a well-funded electric car project but is struggling to keep it up following the company’s recent fall from grace. LeEco’s new-energy automaker partner Faraday Future has already steered away from their initial plan to build a $1 billion new energy plant in Las Vegas.
“The mobile space has already been divided up amongst the country’s behemoths and to some extent, monopolized. Cars and homes are the two spaces where there still exist opportunities,” Foo Jixun, Managing Partner at GGV, also a backer of XPeng, assured He Xiaopeng as the two conversed in a fireside chat at the venture firm’s “Evolving Lifestyle” conference in October.
The Chinese-Silicon Valley mashup Nio (formerly NextEV), whose first mass-market model is slated for December 16th, has a similarly impressive lineup of backers (in Chinese): Pony Ma, founder of Tencent; Lei Jun, founder of Xiaomi; Richard Liu, founder of JD.com; Li Xiang, founder of Autohome Inc.; and Zhang Lei, founder and CEO of Hillhouse Capital Group.
The Chinese government is also keen to electrify the nation’s cars. For one, the combustion engine accounts for about 30% of the country’s air pollution, said Yang Chuantang who served as China’s Minister of Transport from 2012 to 2016. But Beijing might be more wary of its national security. In 2014, China surpassed the US to become the world’s largest net importer of petroleum and other liquid fuels with imports accounting for 60% of oil supply in 2015. The electrification push is, in fact, part of Beijing’s ambitious “Made In China 2025” policy, which seeks to transform the nation from a low-cost world factory to a high-tech global power. As such, Beijing has shelled out massive subsidies and made favorable rules for the sector. The latest boost came in September when Beijing set a deadline of 2019 to impose sales targets for EVs and hybrids cars.
Cool-headed industry observers, however, worry that China’s capital- and subsidy-fuelled electric carmakers are about to blow a bubble.
“From concept design, prototyping and testing, iteration, selection of parts supplier, production line setup, to mass production—the lifecycle of a car usually takes 3-5 years or even longer,” Tony Cheung, a student from Tsinghua’s Department of Automotive Engineering told TechNode. Automotive startups of the last decade—BYD and Geely for example—had a good 20 years to spend on trial and error. The new wave of EV startups are unlikely to enjoy the same luxury as venture capitalists expect faster returns.
On a summer day in 2015, Huang Xiuyuan, the 28-year-old founder of Youxia Motors, emerged onto the stage at Beijing’s upscale Taikoo Li shopping area. He proudly showcased the design of a high-performance electric sedan, only to be immediately mocked by car veterans for being a shameless Tesla copycat and unrealistically setting a deadline of 482 days for mass production—and with only 50 employees. Youxia indeed failed to meet its ambitious deadline, and a term was coined to describe the fad—powerpoint-made cars: Be all talk and no action.
“Cars are a special product. Their structure is complicated, their lifecycle is long, use cases vary greatly, and they demand safety, comfort, and luxury all at once,” Cheung tells us. “These features and requirements remain the same for the so-called internet cars, and their competitive advantage is not so obvious. I think a better solution for them is to work with conventional automakers.”
This might partly explain why XPeng Motors, who wanted to make cars from scratch at their Guangdong-based factory (which it poured 10 billion RMB into), launched their first mass-market model with Haima. But contract manufacturing is nothing new. “Many OEMs, especially premium brands, such as BMW would occasionally turn to contract manufacturers (Magna is a big one) for production of certain models,” writes Dave Cai, Principle of Digital Venture at the Boston Consulting Group, in his blog.
This reverence for conventional automakers is echoed by Nio’s founder William Li Bin, who was founder of New York-listed BitAuto (and Chairman of Mobike). “We don’t think a new startup can replace an established company with decades of experience in hardware manufacturing,” Li said in an interview with local media. “A lot of things operate according to fundamental rules, and we need to respect these rules instead of trying to disrupt them.”
]]>China has just seen its first merger in the burgeoning bike-rental sector. Youon (永安行), the Changzhou-based bike-rental startup which went public in August, announced yesterday the merger of Hellobike, another bike-rental player in China.
Youon posted a statement on its website, announcing its sister company Youon Ditan (永安行低碳科技) merging with Shanghai Jun Zheng Network Technology (上海钧正网络科技) which operates Hellobike. The new firm is co-owned by Youon, Ant Financial, and Shanghai Jun Zheng, and will be operated by the original Hellobike team (in Chinese), local media reports.
Founded in 2016, Hellobike has been focusing on the market in the second- and third-tier cities in China, and has placed about 3 million bikes with over 30 million registered users. After the merger, Youon has great potential to gear up to face off against the country’s largest bike-rental players ofo and Mobike.
Ant Financial, the second largest shareholder of Youon Ditan, will play a crucial role after the merger, pushing forward more collaboration among Ant Financial, Youon, and Hellobike in the bike-rental sector.
Youon was founded in 2010, and its major businesses include the sale of public bikes, the operation of a government-funded public bike-rental service with docking stations, and the dockless bike-rental service funded by private investors.
It’s worth noting that Youon removed a huge amount of its bikes from China’s streets a month after its IPO. The merger, however, marks Youon’s ambition to bring up its dock-less bike-rental business to full strength. Yang Lei, Hellobike’s CEO, said in an internal email (in Chinese) that he will serve as the CEO of the new company after the merger, local media reports.
Correction: This post originally stated that Youon acquired Shanghai Jun Zheng.
]]>Ofo is taking over another global city: after conducting a pilot program in Adelaide in South Australia, the company is putting their small yellow bikes in Sydney. Ofo also announced that it will double its fleet in Adelaide.
On the other hand, its Chinese rival Bluegogo seems to be facing difficulties. The company has denied recent rumors that it is trying to solve its cash flows issues by selling its business to Changzhou Youon Public Bicycle System Co. Recent reports also documented a number of complaints from Bluegogo users that have not received refunds for their deposits within deadlines. The bike rental promised a new deadline for refunds: November 10th.
Unlike ofo and Mobike which are currently spreading worldwide, a number of bike rental companies have closed shop in recent months. The last victim is Coolqi, the maker of dazzling golden bikes equipped with phone charging equipment. The market is seeing oversaturation and so are Chinese streets which are crowded with bicycles of every color.
To prevent bikes from piling up and parking in illegal areas in Australia’s cities, ofo plans to use a GPS-enabled geofence which will ensure that bikes are properly maintained, distributed, and parked and that they have helmets—something that’s notably missing from any of China’s bike rental services.
]]>After bike sharing, power bank sharing, and sleep sharing (previously known as “hotels”), car sharing might be another area which is nearing bankruptcy. News broke out that car sharing company Ezzy has been disbanded and stopped service. The worst part is that users are currently unable to withdraw their RMB 2000 deposit, according to user accounts posted on Weibo, China’s Twitter-like social platform. The company has yet to address the public.
Built on electric vehicles, Ezzy was known as the Mobike of cars. Last year, the company ventured into the higher end of the ride-share market by purchasing a fleet of BMW i3s and Audi A3s. The company allowed users to try its services before purchase through the Ezzy app in order to tap into younger costumers. Users could pay a monthly fee of RMB 1,200 or become VIP members by paying an RMB 2,000 deposit.
With the growth of China’s sharing economy, car rental and time-sharing companies have jumped on the new trend. But for this industry, winning the market while remaining profitable has remained a challenge. In March this year, car rental service Youyou announced that it will have to stop operations due to losses amounting to RMB 2 million.
Car sharing has higher thresholds compared with bike rentals. Companies not only have to make significant investments in vehicles, they have to cover fuel, electricity, and insurance, and ensure parking spots—a difficult task in China’s crowded cities. Cars are also more complicated to rent: users must ensure cars are in good condition and return them to designated areas.
China’s largest shared car service is currently GoFun Chuxing, an electric vehicle sharing platform under state-owned car-rental and taxi firm Beijing Shouqi Group.
]]>Group-purchasing, ride-hailing, VR/AR, shared spaces, bike-rental… New trends or verticals continue to emerge in China’s tech world. Some will blossom, some will perish, but everything could happen really fast. Unfortunately, startups that are targeting at China’s “dama” (大妈) fall in the second category. Only three or four firms are still in the business while a majority of their peers either shift focus or collapsed, local media reported.
The apps for square dancing, the unarguably favorite pastime of Chinese dama, began to flourish in 2015. Over the past two years, over 60 startups entered this field. At its peak, apps that boast hundreds of thousands of downloads like Tangdou, Jiuai (就爱) and 99广场舞 began to emerge. Most adopt various means to commercialize the business, from ads, travel, e-commerce to offline events. The live streaming boom also penetrated square dancing app sector, but it’s difficult to keep the users due to sophisticated operations.
A CNNIC report shows that Chinese netizens aged above 60 years totaled 36 million, accounting for 4.8% of China’s 751 million internet users.
Despite the great target user base, square dancing apps still find that a huge portion of their audience is still out of reach for generating revenues. First, it’s hard to encourage a usually suspicious older generation to spend online. In addition, the penetration of online or mobile payment among Chinese seniors is not high although the situation is gradually changing with extensive promotions from Alipay and WeChat Pay.
]]>Say goodbye to Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram and welcome your new favorite apps. Here is everything you will need to navigate your China life.
The app to rule them all, WeChat is the very definition of indispensable in China. This is where you will connect with your friends, communicate with your boss (forget emails), make business deals, flirt, and much more. Just don’t expect too much privacy!
WeChat also makes shopping easier. Its wallet function, WeChat Pay, is so widespread that many are already speculating that China could go completely cashless. You can even use it to pay your bus fare or while traveling abroad.
Unfortunately, the mini apps WeChat are so well known for do not work so well in the English version, but the app has other great features, including a myriad of subscription accounts to keep you updated on events and news. Go forth into the world and scan those QR codes!
Available in English
We’ve got your communication needs settled, now it’s time for some food. Food delivery in China is an impressively dynamic and tech-driven industry which means that users have a variety of choices. Both Baidu Waimai and Ele.me also offer supermarket delivery (京东到家 is great for that, too)—you will never have to leave your home again!
English-friendly alternative: Jinshisong (锦食送) app, also known as JSS.
On Apple: Ele.me, Baidu Waimai
On Android: Ele.me, Baidu Waimai
Your plan for staying home forever failed? Worry not, DiDi has your back. The ride-hailing app that swallowed Uber China offers regular taxis, a private car service called Premier, and the Express option for carpooling.
Available in English
So you tried to get a taxi and got stuck in one of those traffic jams of epic proportions for which Chinese cities are known. Enter bike rental apps. Mobike and ofo are the biggest players on the market but there are many other options such as Bluegogo and these dazzling golden bikes equipped with phone charging.
Ofo’s partnership with DiDi means that users can also search for bikes using DiDi’s app. Mobike has a similar deal with a ride-hailing company called Shouqi (首汽租车) but the cities covered by the partnership is still limited. The company also has a mini app integrated with WeChat’s wallet.
Available in English
To use all of most of these great apps, you will need to set up your Alipay wallet. The difference between Alipay and its arch-nemesis WeChat Pay is that the former one is a standalone app. Among other features, Alipay offers bill payments, hospital registration, and even international money transfers. Unfortunately, the last option is available only to Chinese nationals or foreigners with a Chinese green card.
Alipay also comes with integrated services like Taobao, Airbnb, and Uber and right now it is testing its own mini-apps.
Available in English
Go to the next page for more indispensable apps!
Crowds of people descend on the Coolqi bike hire scheme’s head office in Tongzhou to get their deposits back as Coolqi founder and CEO Gao Weiwei (高唯伟) tells our sister site that the company is not bankrupt, but that he has been removed as CEO (in Chinese). The company’s WeChat payments have been frozen and it is seeking the guidance and support of the government while it is talking with another company for a potential RMB 1 billion acquisition.
Coolqi (酷骑单车, literally “cool ride bike” in English) was at one point the number three hire bike company and brought us the bold gold model earlier this year to great fanfare (and mockery). It received RMB 900 million in investment, has 1.5 million registered users and 1.4 million bikes in use across China.
However, a blog, 北京人不知道的北京事儿 (which translates as The Beijing Things Beijingers Don’t Know), posted pictures of near-deserted offices said to be the Tongzhou headquarters just outside of Beijing and a crowd of people who are apparently trying to get their money back or are there on behalf of friends. The deposit is RMB 299. According to other local media, large crowds had gathered outside by yesterday evening.
The company’s last Weibo announcement was August 30th to announce that when the new CTO starts any issues will be ironed out. However, distribution and maintenance staff at the Xi’an division have reportedly already been laid off.
Founder and CEO Gao Weiwei spoke to our sister site last night and explained that although the company has been facing huge difficulties, it is not bankrupt and is seeking a buyer to take on the whole company. The company is seeking guidance and from support from the government and is trying to negotiate with WeChat which has blocked its payments account. Gao said the company had RMB 40 million, which it intends to return to users but that WeChat is not allowing this. “I’ve no way of giving a specific time for when these problems will be solved,” Gao told TechNode.
A possible merger or sale to another company is on the cards with talks already underway with one for an RMB 1 billion sale of Coolqi, which is “currently at the stage of due diligence,” Gao told TechNode.
The company is already losing and laying off workers. Staff at the Tongzhou HQ were given a letter on September 22 which has been reposted online. Part of it reads:
The current financial situation is extremely tight, to the extent it is affecting our ability to operate. Staff wages will be issued as normal so as not to affect workers’ normal life, and the company is offering everyone the opportunity to make a one-off voluntary choice:
1. To stick with the company live or die
2. To seek other job opportunities elsewhereWages will be paid until September 30 2017….. If you stick with the company, thank you for your loyalty, but we must warn you that in future wages may not be paid on time.
Coolqi set up in November 2016 with green and then dazzling golden bikes with phone chargers supplied by Haier. The app is still operational and available to download, and, perhaps tellingly, was last updated two weeks ago with an “improvement” to the deposit return page.
The phone number given on the company website now gives the “Sorry, this number does not exist” message. Though the number for soliciting investment cooperation is permanently engaged, so perhaps Coolqi’s future is still golden.
]]>Mobike, China’s major bike-rental company, today launched a new model of its smart bike called “New Lite.” It features a minimalist design, longer lifespan, and lighter weight.
The all-new model comes with a stronger bike frame which is 50 percent stronger than European standards and weighs 15.5 kilograms, making it the lightest mainstream bike rental model on the market, according to Mobike. The new model also has an internal chain transmission that guarantees the chain will neither fall off nor catch the users’ pants.
Beijing city’s transportation unit this week announced new regulations, stating that all bike rentals must be replaced or discarded after three years in use (in Chinese). Mobike’s new model also reflects the new rule.
“Our new models can last for at least three years,” Hu Weiwei, Mobike’s CEO, told TechNode after the launch event in Beijing, adding that the team initially designed the model for a four-year lifespan. “I particularly appreciate the design [of the new model] which is not designed for the market but for everyday life.”
While major cities in China have seen an overwhelming amount of shared bikes invading the streets, many local governments have halted new bike placement.
“Volume control is a good thing, in my opinion. It makes everyone more rational,” said Hu.
Mobike also revealed another new concept bike model that comes with a white body but has yet to release to the market. It’s designed by the Japanese industrial designer Naoto Fukasawa who also designed the classic MUJI CD player. It remains unknown when this model will be placed on the streets.
Launched in April 2016, Mobike has since deployed in 180 cities around the world and operated more than 7 million bikes. The company this week just landed in Washington D.C., their first US city. Besides the company’s home turf, Mobike has so far expanded to Singapore, US, UK, Italy, Japan, Thailand, and Malaysia.
]]>It is almost two years since Mobike co-founder Hu Weiwei put around 50 bicycles on the streets of Shanghai and drove away. Ofo had a similar beginning, spreading out shared bikes on Beijing’s university campuses. This is how China’s dockless bike rental economy was born—from moves that could easily be branded as crazy.
Today, bikes are so bountiful that they are literally blocking the streets of Chinese cities. Although both companies have been hesitant to release numbers, the latest iResearch’s data (in Chinese) show that Mobike has 8.65 million daily active users while for ofo that number climbs to 9.65 million. During 2017, Mobike has raised $1 billion and Ofo $1.15 billion, according to their own data.
The meteoric rise of the bike rental market has drawn much attention, not just for its disruptive business model, but also because it is one of the first tech trends coming from China that has swept the entire world.
The two bike rental giants have taken very different roads to success in China. Ofo took the fast route by quickly spreading cheap bikes from campuses to the streets of Chinese cities. It then worked on its technology with the help of investors China Telecom and Huawei by adding GPS tracking and upgrading its locks.
Mobike was more meticulous in planning: the company first set up its own factory to produce sturdy bikes integrating GPS and QR code authentication and then moved on to expanding their business.
As Grace Gu, principal at one of ofo’s backer ZhenFund, explained during this year’s ChinaBang Awards, ofo showed a typical Northern China style of expansion, while Mobike has the Southern China business style.
“In short, Southern style is bottom-up with a ready product, and Northern style is top-down strategy and later do optimization,” said Gu.
The two companies have transplanted their styles into the global arena. Ofo is following its co-founder’s Austin Zhang’s credo “rapid spread, yellow will cover the world” and has ambitious plans to cover 200 cities by the end of 2017. Half of that goal is already fulfilled, mostly in China. Besides Chinese cities, the little yellow bikes can currently be seen on the streets of UK, US, Singapore, Thailand, Austria, Malaysia, Kazakhstan, and Japan. On September 22nd World Car Free Day the company announced it will be launching in a cluster of four European countries of Russia, Czech Republic, Italy, and Netherlands.
Ofo also went beyond the simple yet effective marketing tactic the two companies have been using in China. With their flashy colors, the bikes market themselves; all they had to do is offer free rides and the good word was spread by the users. Now, ofo is taking a more vocal approach: it has teamed up with UNPD to offer grants for green projects and has announced smog-filtering bicycles by the end of the year. It has even gotten Rihanna on board by sending bikes to schoolgirls in Malawi through the singer’s foundation.
Mobike, on the other hand, has been behaving in the Southern Chinese fashion—slow and cautious. According to the company’s Head of Global Partnerships Florian Bohnert, the company is now focusing on raising their efficiency through technology and strong support from the local government.
Mobike has set the same target as ofo for this year—200 cities. Besides China, the company has so far entered Singapore, US, UK, Italy, Japan, Thailand, and Malaysia.
But Mobike has been compensating for its lack of speed by investing in AI data monitoring platform Magic Cube which will help operate its bikes and fight illegal parking. The company has also partnered up with tech giants such as Foxconn, Qualcomm, Vodafone, AT&T, Cisco, and Ericsson.
“These partners help us in a number of different fields (chip intelligence, telecoms, IoT, and more) to always improve the service: more accurate location of the bike, more precise data research, more reliable components, etc. This plays in line with the fact that Mobike is at heart a technology company, unlike any of its peers,” said Bohnert.
But ofo is catching up on the big data game. In Japan, ofo is cooperating with SoftBank C&S’s division for IOT, robotics and the cloud. It was also the first bike rental company to announce implementing near-field communication (NFC) locks which will enable users to unlock bikes even faster.
The two companies have geared up to fight for the global market, but the road ahead will be slippery. As Brian Chaitoff from research company 7Park Data explained in an earlier interview with TechNode, bike rental will face unique growth dynamics in different markets.
“The success of expansion into other markets will be in part based on these factors–including population density (i.e., high capacity utilization and high availability), economic factors, conducive environments for safe biking (i.e., physical layouts, base rates of crime, etc.), and state/government regulations that do not hinder growth,” Chaitoff said.
One of the bigger issues is gaining the trust of local governments. Bluegogo’s example reminds us that not all cities are willing to take the risk of flooding its streets with shared bikes. The company shipped hundreds of bikes to San Francisco just to have the government issue regulations that would make it unfeasible to operate in the city.
Even when the cities agree to welcome shared bikes, there are other factors to consider—factors that make us think “This is why we can’t have nice things.” Many still recall the notorious case of Paris docked bike-sharing scheme Vélib which reported half of its bikes were stolen, some of them being discovered as far away as Romania. And while vandalism and theft are not rare in China, bike sharing companies in foreign markets will be left without the possibility of quickly replacing stolen and damaged bikes.
Finally, both ofo and Mobike will have to face local competition. US companies are joining the race: LimeBike already covers nine cities and it is taking on ofo in Seattle along with Spin, while Vbike is starting is growth in Dallas. Even regulation-obsessed Europe has welcomed its first homegrown dockless bike rental scheme Urbo. Recent news from Singapore—both Mobike’s and ofo’s first foothold abroad—has shown that the Chinese bike rental giants could lose out: local company oBike is currently the most popular bike renting option and it is making its way to London.
The previous version of this article published on September 22nd, 2017 stated that LimeBike is present in eight cities in the US. The latest news from LimeBike states that it has covered nine US cities and eight universities.
]]>Mobike, a major Chinese bike-rental company, has just placed their first batch of bikes in the capital of the United States as part of its ambitious global expansion plan.
Closely following its largest rival ofo’s footprint, Mobike chose Washington D.C. as the first city in America to start running its business, whereas ofo just a month ago launched services in Seattle (in the state of Washington) with 1,000 bicycles for rent at $1 per hour.
As local governments of major cities in China have halted more bike placements, it’s no secret that the two bike-rental companies from China both vie for market share overseas, following their success in the domestic market which has seemingly been saturated.
“We are thrilled to call Washington D.C. Mobike’s first home in North America,” said Hu Weiwei, CEO of Mobike, in the company’s press release. “Mobike is committed to developing a global bike share culture by collaborating closely with cities, and the US capital is key in achieving this. We look forward to working with more cities across the nation to make cycling the most convenient, affordable, and environmentally friendly transportation option for residents and tourists alike.”
To better serve the local riders, Mobike has partnered with US telecom giant AT&T and Qualcomm. With the internet-of-things (IoT) partnership along with Mobike’s app, local users are able to locate, unlock, and pay.
“We are working with a number of cities across the country and are confident this successful pilot will be the first of many partnerships, allowing us to make cycling the most convenient and affordable choice for transportation all around America,” said Rachel Song, General Manager of Mobike US, in the statement.
Prior to the United States, Mobike has debuted in Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Japan, Italy, and the UK, while ofo has also launched its dockless bikes in Singapore, Thailand, Kazakhstan, Austria, Britain, and the US.
]]>After WeChat sees some success with its mini programs, its major rival Alipay is in no place to fall behind. Alipay, run by Alibaba’s spin-off Ant Financial, announced on Wednesday its own mini programs for regular users to beta test after opening up to developers a month ago.
Simply by searching “小程序” in Alipay, users are able to get to the page where a slew of built-in instant apps show up. Here’s what the mini programs look like in Alipay.
Both ofo, China’s leading bike-rental company, and UrWork, China’s co-working space unicorn, have developed their own Alipay mini programs.
Mini Programs are a slew of various light-weight apps that sit inside the apps, often incorporated with WeChat’s and Alipay’s mobile payment methods. Just like WeChat, Alipay doesn’t require users to download anything.
However, something that makes Alipay stand out is its various built-in features. Alipay comes naturally with its Sesame Credit system, identity certification feature and financial tools affiliated with Ant Financial, which the mini programs can make use of.
It remains unknown when Alipay is going to officially launch the service.
]]>On a scorching night in August, thousands of Chinese youngsters filled a grand stadium in Nanjing to celebrate the four-year anniversary of the Chinese boyband TFBoys. Those who couldn’t attend—118 million of them—spent a no less memorable night by watching the shows aired over the internet. Screams became a waterfall of real-time comments, called danmu, rolling across the live video. Regrets over not making it in person materialized into 340 million units of virtual gifts sent through the live streams, all of which were run by Tencent that night: QQ Zone, QQ Video, QQ Music, WeSing, Kuwo, KuGou, and KuGou Live.
None of these products, except KuGou Live, were designed specifically to live stream. That’s the point. A user of the social network QQ Zone, for example, wouldn’t have to switch over to KuGou Live to watch her idol TFBoys. Tencent—the Chinese tech giant that has revolutionized how people communicate, pay for, and play video games—is now ready to redefine the ways music is consumed.
To start with, Tencent has been able to dominate almost the entire market. Last July, its flagship music streamer QQ Music merged with competitor China Music Corporation (CMC) to form Tencent Music and Entertainment Group (TME). Together, Kuwo and KuGou—formerly owned by CMC—and QQ Music, control a whopping 75% market share, according to a report by the Data Center of China internet (DCCI).
That dominance alone, however, doesn’t equal a lucrative business. For decades, Chinese people have gotten used to getting music for free in a piracy-unhampered country. “Our number of monthly active users accessing music is actually over 600 million, which means, at 15 million [paying subscribers], our conversion to subscription is still less than 3%,” says Vice President of TME Andy Ng in an interview with International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI). He adds that in more mature markets, the percentage is around 20-30%.
But Ng is optimistic: “We see a huge opportunity and potential for growth.” The numbers are no doubt promising. In 2016, recorded music revenue in China grew 20.3 percent driven by a 30.6 percent growth in streaming alone, according to IFPI. And the music giant is looking to lure Chinese people into paying something that used to be so easily free.
While licensing fees can easily eat up the bulk of revenues, Tencent knows that in the long run, a firm control over copyright will give it an edge over competitors. In May, TME signed with Universal Music Group (UMG), the last one of the “Big Three” record labels to strike an exclusive licensing deal with the Chinese music giant. With the added roster of major Chinese labels through the CMC merger, Tencent’s streaming rights in China is unrivaled.
The music giant also sub-licenses this content to competitors. One of them is NetEase Cloud Music, the music subsidiary of Nasdaq-listed NetEase Inc. Over the past two years, QQ Music and NetEase Cloud Music have been aggressively suing each other over copyright infringement, hoping to snag users once certain music became exclusive on their own platform.
The copyright bloodbath is happening against a backdrop of China’s tightened regulation over online music. In July 2015, the government finally stepped up to order all internet music providers to delete their pirated content. Samuel Chou, CEO of Sony Music Entertainment China and Taiwan, went as far as calling 2016 “the first year of a new era for music in China”.
Adding more legal gunpowder, however, is not enough. “Music was considered a free commodity in China for so long that it will take time to change people’s perception,” reckons Simon Robson, President of Warner Music Asia. “We’re talking about a situation where about 90% of the market was piracy.”
To help smooth the transition, Tencent charges little. QQ Music has a three-tier monthly fee at RMB 8 and 12, and 15 ($1.22/$1.83/$2.18). In comparison, Spotify Premium is priced at $9.99 a month. But this is nothing new to Chinese users, who have long been beneficiaries of the constant price wars between internet companies heavily subsidized by investors. The bike-rental battle is a sobering example. Kuwo, KuGou, and NetEase Cloud Music all offer similar price points as QQ Music.
Just as Tencent’s WeChat goes beyond a messaging app to permeate every aspect of the Chinese service economy, TME is building an ecosystem of value-added services around music streaming to make music pay. Basic tactics include perks for premium users like concert tickets, professional sound quality, and game credits—a luxury from having a parent company with a global dominance in online gaming.
QQ Music also tested out what it’s called the “digital album”. When the platform released a high-profile album, it will take the album out of the streaming pool and offer it for a one-off fee. After two to three months, QQ Music will then migrate the album back to its streaming service.
The model has seen some initial success. When the original soundtrack of Fast and Furious 8 came out on QQ Music, it sold over one million digital copies within a week. “[Chinese young people] are happy to spend a few dollars supporting the artists they truly admire,” said Ng to IFPI. According to the DCCI, over 90 percent of QQ Music’s users were born after 1990.
Lastly, Tencent has looked beyond the audio and tapped into arguably the hottest buzzword swirling around the Chinese internet circle since 2016: video live streaming. A recent report by iResearch puts the market at an estimated RMB 20.8 billion (around US$ 3 billion). Audiences fixated on their screens toss virtual gifts over the virtual stage to their idols—be they established star under the spotlight or farmers toiling in the potato field from a small town. The online fervor for TFBoys proves that there is still room for Tencent in the crowded space.
Tencent certainly hasn’t overlooked Chinese people’s obsession with karaoke. WeSing, an app that lets users sing karaoke on the phone and share the recorded work with friends and strangers, has surged to become the biggest player in the vertical totaling 460 million users (in Chinese). When the live streaming wave hit, WeSing naturally bolted the function onto the platform, and virtual gifting has, in 2016, gained popularity on the app as highlighted in Tencent’s annual report.
With an array of business models surrounding music streaming, TME is giving some revenue boost to its parent company. In 2016, Tencent’s social networks revenues increased by 54 percent to around $4 billion (though still dwarfed by the its $10 billion gaming revenues). That increase mainly reflects growth in digital content services, which include Tencent’s music business and virtual item sales. According to someone familiar with the matter, a significant amount of TME’s live streaming revenues came from KuGou Live, in which Tencent has a controlling stake via the CMC merger.
Over in the west, Spotify has yet to reach profitability despite having 20 million paying customers; much of its revenues go to licensing. But QQ Music has reportedly turned profitable (in Chinese), CEO of TME Cussion Pang claimed in an interview conducted in mid-2016. Like Spotify, the biggest source of revenues for the Chinese music app is monthly subscriptions followed by advertising. Any new licensing deals can easily tilt the balance, however. This is likely why TME plans to sell a small equity to its label partners in a new round of funding, for it will help secure content deals, Bloomberg is reporting. As TME is on course for IPO at a $10 billion valuation, the world will be listen closely to how it makes its numbers sing.
]]>China’s leading bike-sharing startup ofo is coming up with a new solution to unlock their bikes—near-field Communication (NFC) locks. Ofo announced today that their new NFC-enabled locks have been put into mass production (in Chinese) and will be placed on the streets most likely in October.
With the first electronic locks that support NFC, users can pay for and unlock a bicycle within seconds simply by bringing their smartphones near the bikes. This means that ofo riders will no longer have to solely rely on QR codes which are insecure and easy targets for scammers.
Wireless NFC technology has been widely implemented in China. Just last week, Beijing Metro announced that all Beijing subway lines are supporting NFC-enabled mobile phones. Passengers no longer need to purchase transport cards or tickets but can simply swipe their phones to enter the station.
Near-field communication (NFC) is a set of communication protocols that allow two electronic devices—one of which is usually a mobile device—to establish communication by bringing them within about 4 centimeters of each other.
The bike-rental startup’s new smart locks are expected to lower friction by reducing the number of steps and actions from users. NFC-powered locks allow riders to get access to the bikes simply by bringing the phones close to the locks, skipping that little bit of the hassle.
Apple users, however, will have to wait. Just as with the Beijing metro, iPhone users will have to stick with the QR code scans to unlock bikes for the time.
So far, ofo has placed over 8 million bikes in eight countries, and has over 25 million daily orders, according to local media.
]]>Shanghai transportation authorities jointly announced on August 18 that no more new bikes should be placed in the city, taking a firmer stand in its moves to crack down on bike rental services, our sister site TechNode Chinese is reporting.
“Upon the announcement of this regulation, all bike-rental companies should place a halt on introducing any new bikes in Shanghai. Violations will be booked in Enterprise Credit System as a severe breach,” according to the statement.
The bike-rental schemes may have provided a greener alternative to China’s clogged public transportation, but they have also created serious headaches for local transportation management institutions. Given that most cyclists opt for whichever bike that’s most accessible on the street, the war between the competitors mainly takes the form of dumping more bikes on the street. As the land-grab battle heats up, however, the overwhelming number of bikes has paralyzed existing bike parking and management. The situation is worsened by illegal parking on the sidewalk or street by careless riders.
This is not the first time for Shanghai authorities to crack down on the bike rental companies. Six leading bike rental companies including Mobike and ofo were asked to suspend bike placement in the city’s central districts early this March, shortly after the government seized over 4,000 illegally parked bikes.
As of February this year, over 30 bike rental startups placed a combined a combined 450 thousand bikes, the country’s largest rental bike fleet, in Shanghai. Now the number more than tripled to 1.5 million, far exceeding the saturation point of 500k bikes, according to Guo Jianrong, secretary of the Shanghai Bike Association.
The disparity in distribution also contributed to the situation. Although bikes have become a nuisance in some downtown areas, it is hard to find them in some rural areas in the city, at least when you want to use them. Bike rental firms are relying on AI to solve this problem. In April, Mobike launched “Magic Cube”, an AI data monitoring platform that’s able to make accurate forecasts of supply and demand for its bike-rentals and provide guidance to bike dispatching, scheduling, and operation.
Shanghai is not a single case. Several first- and second-tier cities such as Beijing, Tianjin and Hangzhou also launched or are preparing to issue similar regulations to control the negative side effects of the bike rental boom.
]]>China’s burgeoning bike-rental industry has witnessed its first-ever IPO as Changzhou-based startup Youon went public today. Shares of Youon started trading this morning on Shanghai Stock Exchange at the initial offering price of RMB 26.85 ($4.02) per share.
Despite all the glory in bearing the title of the “first listed bike-rental firm in China”, Youon’s way towards IPO was bumpy with a series of twists and turns. After a failed application in 2015, the firm filed again for listing this March. But the IPO procedure took a halt two months later due to an IP infringement lawsuit filed against the company by Jiangsu business man Gu Tailai, who claims Youon did not have the authorization to use his dockless bike patent.
Founded in 2010, the company’s main business includes the sale of public bikes, the operation of a government-funded public bike rental platform (docking stations required), and that of dockless bike-rental services funded by private investors.
Strictly speaking, Youon is more about dock-based public bike business than the dockless bike-rental platform. An overwhelming 99.8 percent of its revenue comes from the sale (RMB 239 million) and operation (RMB 533 million) of public dock-based bicycles in 2016.
As of 2016, the firm operates public bike systems in over 400 cities, of which roughly half are tier-three and lower-rung cities. It now claims 20 million users and around 7.5 million are registered through Youon’s online platform.
]]>China’s O2O giant Meituan-Dianping has joined the heated competition of power bank rental by placing a few devices for testing in Qingdao and Shijiazhuang, local media reports (in Chinese). The company told the Beijing Business Today that “Meituan has just started to develop our power bank rental business” (in Chinese). However, it remains unknown which cities will welcome the first official batch of Meituan’s power banks.
Power bank rental has triggered a spending spree over the past few months. Five startups in the sector received a combined RMB 30 million (US$ 43 million) financing in less than ten days. Over 20 investment institutions have gotten involved; even China’s tech behemoths Alibaba and Tencent have also joined the game. Xiaodian, one of the major players, in April received its Series A financing led by Tencent (in Chinese), and Alibaba has also joined hands with AnkerBox (in Chinese) for a strategic partnership.
Just last month, power bank rental startup Enmonster announced a Series A of RMB 1 million, while AnkerBox, Laidian, and Xiaodian have settled with the largest shares of the market (in Chinese). As a late comer, Meituan-Dianping’s don’t seem worried. “Only if Meituan invests hundreds of millions of yuan to run it—that’s what would make an impact [on the industry],” said Laidian’s CEO Yuan Bingsong to Caijing.
The company’s offline resources can be its biggest driving force to help it stand out in the fierce competition. According to iResearch, Meituan-Dianping boasts 600 million users with over 12 million daily orders and nearly 4.5 million offline local business partners—places where power banks are mostly put for rent.
“Our power banks are provided free of charge for local businesses, while users pay for the service,” an anonymous source told Beijing Business Today.
]]>After several tragic deaths and countless headaches for municipal authorities caused by the bike rental boom, the first guidelines for regulating bike rental for the whole of China have officially been published (in Chinese). The “guiding opinions on encouraging and regulating the development of bicycle rental” were signed by 20 state departments after the draft was submitted to the public for review by the Ministry of Transportation in May.
The guidelines aim to rein in the disorderly expansion of shared bikes by major companies such as ofo, Mobike, Bluegogo, and others. The most recent case in the media (in Chinese) was in Zhengzhou, Henan province, where the local police brought in representatives from Mobike, ofo and Coolqi to give them a lecture on how to manage their bikes. Apparently, the 390,000 bikes in the city caused chaos on the streets both for pedestrians and other vehicles. Bicycles were piled up in front of subway exits, bus stations, and other highly frequented areas, leading to safety hazards.
The new state-level guidelines aim to change this by setting out responsibilities for municipal governments and bike rental companies. Among other duties, the main responsibilities of the city will be improving the bicycle transportation network and traffic, securing more parking spots, setting up technical guidelines and encouraging the development of online bike-rental systems.
Securing parking for bikes will not only be left to the city. Bike rental operators will need to adopt measures to supervise and regulate user behavior and clean up illegal parking. Companies will need to secure that users register with a real name and set up standards for billing, complaints, and insurance. Children under 12 will not be allowed to use rented bikes.
The guidelines also address the issue of deposits which has previously caused concern among bike rentals users. Bike rental companies will now need to set up a special account for deposits which will be supervised by government bodies. The guidelines also encourage companies to waive deposit fees.
]]>After a period of silence, the power bank rental industry has brought more financing news. On July 27, power bank rental startup Enmonster announced a Series A of RMB 1 million, Chinese media Sina Tech is reporting. However, more competitors don’t seem to be a problem for these companies. AnkerBox, Laidian, and Xiaodian have already staked their claims and now have the biggest shares of the market (in Chinese).
Powered by over 20 investment institutions, these companies are ensuring that new competitors have a hard time entering. Funding amount for more than 10 shared power bank rental startups, including Shenzhen-based AnkerBox (街电), Shenzhen-based Laidian (来电), Xiaodian (小电), HIdian (HI电), Mobo Power (魔宝电源) amounted to more than RMB 300 million ($43 million) this year.
The problem with these power bank rental business is that it doesn’t assure high returns. At a recent panel of sharing economy at RISE in Hong Kong, investors of sharing bikes were also unsure about power charger businesses. However, AnkerBox, Laidian, and Xiaodian say that they are not so much concerned about heating up power bank business.
“Competition in the industry is only a small part of it. Most of the companies are doing win-win cooperation,” Xiaodian’s representative Fang Shulong said at power bank rental conference held on July 28th. “The power bank industry cannot be done by one or two companies because we need to build up consumers habits to use the power bank, and all together, we need to form an economy of scale.”
Ankerbox, on the other hand, is now working to enhance the user experience by introducing foldable power banks and providing fast charging as well as MFi certification for Apple users.
“Ankerbox is mainly focusing on spreading out in the market so that users can find a power bank around 500 meters within their location,” Ankerbox vice president He Shun said.
Laidian, the first player to enter the power bank rental industry, also said power bank itself is only a part of what they are trying to do.
“What we want to do is not only providing battery charging services but a complete set of solutions. We hope to cover the needs of the offline business merchants, and connect them with the users.” Laidian’s COO Huang said.
]]>China’s ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing announced today a strategic partnership with Taxify, a leading ridesharing company in Europe and Africa.
Under this partnership, Didi will invest in and collaborate with Taxify, according to a company statement. But the firm did not disclose the specific amount involved. Taxify will utilize the funding to expand its presence in core markets in Europe and Africa, the statement noted.
Launched in Estonia in 2013, Taxify is the fastest-growing ride-hailing company in Europe and Africa, offering taxi- and private car-hailing services to over 2.5 million users in major hubs across 18 countries, including Hungary, Romania, the Baltic States, South Africa, Nigeria, and Kenya.
The tie-up marks a new addition to Didi’s anti-Uber alliance along its global expansion initiative, only that the new deal spread the rival geographically to new markets in Africa and Europe.
“We’re definitely going global,” said Didi Chuxing president Jean Liu in a previous interview. And the company is moving fast towards that direction, each partner/region at a time. Didi invested 100 million USD in Lyft, Uber’s main competitor in the U.S. market, in September 2015. The battle has also expanded to Southeast Asia through investments in Ola and Grab and to Brazil through investment in local ride-hailing leader 99.
Cheng Wei, founder and CEO of Didi Chuxing, said: “Taxify provides innovative, high-quality mobility services across many diverse markets. We share a strong commitment to harnessing the power of mobile technology to satisfying rapidly evolving consumer demands and revitalizing traditional transportation industry. I believe this partnership will contribute to cross-regional smart transportation linkages between Asian, European and African markets.”
According to data from the company, Didi offers now provides service to over 400 million users in more than 400 cities.
]]>Chinese bike-rental major ofo confirmed that it has named Fu Qiang, former senior vice president of Didi, as executive president of the company. Fu will report directly to company CEO Dai Wei upon appointment.
According to a company statement, Fu will leverage his deep industry experience to help ofo improve operating efficiency and upgrade user experiences.
This appointment comes in line with a tighter link between ofo and Didi, which is a large investor in the company. As a returning investor, the ride-hailing giant has been part of nearly every financing round of ofo since its first investment in Series B Plus in September 2016. Didi added ofo’s service into its main app this April, allowing users to book the bikes directly via the Didi ride-hailing app.
The tie-up between the two makes a tone of sense for their joint initiative in solving China’s transportation problems, but there are concerns that ofo’s founding team or even the startup itself is losing ground to Didi as an independent entity.
Usually, it’s uncommon to see big companies hiring high-level execs from outside, let alone in an executive position that oversees the daily operation of the unicorn. Local media (in Chinese) pointed out executives from Didi have take two of the eight places on ofo’s board. Ofo’s financial vice president was reportedly (in Chinese) replaced by a new recruit from Didi. Moreover, rumors that ofo’s CEO and founder Dai Wei is taking a backseat in company operation have been circulating for some time.
The company’s share structure shows Didi-related influence is gaining the upper hand in ofo. Dai Wei still holds a 36.2 percent stake in ofo’s shares with Didi coming a close second with 25.32 percent. However, the easy alliance between Didi and its early-stage investors like GSR Ventures and Matrix Partners, which are also major investors in ofo, would mean combined share holding would surpass those of ofo’s entrepreneur founding team.
]]>Despite their immense popularity, bike rentals in China are giving daily headaches to local governments for users’ illegal parking, vandalism, and traffic violations. But bike-rental is seeing some hope in fixing its battered reputation. A report co-published by Amap, Tsinghua University, Alibaba Cloud, ofo and other industry researchers shows that traffic congestion across the nation is in decline during Q2 of 2017 (in Chinese), thanks in part to bike sharing and ride-hailing.
77% of the 100 cities included in the research showed improved traffic conditions with short-distance driving (within 5km) declining from 57.1% in June 2015 to 34.7% at the time of the report. Reduced traffic is particularly salient in the famously congested capital of Beijing, with 60% of the roads around subway stations experiencing an improvement. Throughout the city, there has been a YoY 4.1% reduction in congestion. Of the 20 cities that ofo has most heavily targeted, 19 of them have seen a significant decline in traffic congestion.
New regulations on the equally popular ride-hailing services have also contributed to the positive shift, says the report. Last July, China’s central authorities formally legalized online ride-hailing services, followed by over 100 local municipalities’ efforts to regulate the industry starting last October.
The bike-rental industry, dominated by ofo with 65% of the market share followed by Mobike, is crowded with 30 or so profit-minded startups who want a slice of the booming market. With the promise of reduced urban congestion, local governments might grow even more keen to work with these startups, bringing the car-clogged China back to the kingdom of bikes.
]]>Bikes, bikes, and more bikes. China’s streets have been invaded by bike rentals of every hue. More and more Chinese entrepreneurs are sparing no effort to jump on the sharing bandwagon.
Now, when you walk around the streets or hang around shopping malls, there’s a high chance that you’ll come across a slew of shared items—bikes, cars, umbrellas, basketballs, power banks, karaoke booths, washing machines, nap capsules, massage chairs and, oh yes, refrigerators. The sharing economy fad has taken China by storm over the past year, and people in the business are making everything “shareable.”
However, it’s not really sharing… it’s more or less rental businesses. Users rent these items for a short period of time at a low and affordable price. For instance, the bike-rental startup Mobike charges users RMB 1 for a single half-hour ride. Also, most of the power bank rental startups charge nothing for the first hour of rental, and charge RMB 1 per hour or so after that. This is nothing like the ride-hailing business where people use their private car to ferry around passengers; these are companies exchanging use of their assets for money.
Shared refrigerators are actually not so much different from vending machines. These fridges are mostly placed in office buildings. Customers scan the QR code on the top of the refrigerator to pay for the items they want and open the door to get the food. The problem is that there’s no lock installed on the fridge, meaning that anyone can easily get the food without paying. A “fridge-sharing” company Xianmiao told local press that the fridges are now in testing phase and they plan to install electronic locks (in Chinese) in the near future.
There is another type of shared fridge that does some public good by encouraging local residents and enterprises to donate and share spare food to help those in need. People don’t share the fridge itself but the food in it. Simply by inserting a card linked to the fridge and key in the numbers associated with the items, users are able to get access to the food. These fridges were set up in Beijing’s outskirt areas by community-based non-profit organizations that give out cards for people in need (in Chinese), most of whom are migrant workers.
Popular in Japan for quite some time, China is now seeing a similar solution for sleep-deprived office workers to take a nap during the mid-day rush.
Xiangshui Space (享睡空间), a Beijing-based start-up in May launched nap capsule services in Beijing and has opened up in Shanghai and Chengdu as well. With a mobile phone scan, users can book a nap in a white capsule for just RMB 10 ($1.50) for half an hour. However, the space is now temporarily closed for renovation to abide by local regulations (in Chinese) such as fire-control permissions.
Founded in March 2017, the basketball rental startup Zhulegeqiu (猪了个球,literally “pig a ball”. “Zhu” sounds like “zu”, the word for rent) offers sports lovers another way to gear up and spare some hassle. The company places rental machines beside basketball courts and landed RMB 10 million in pre-Series A in May.
Competition in this vertical has gotten fierce.
Earlier this year, the power bank rental startup Laidian received $20 million in Series A from SIG and Redpoint Ventures China. The startup rents out portable power banks that allow users to take away and return at designated stations through the rental service’s app. Another power bank rental startup, Ankerbox, in April raised eight-digit RMB in Series A funding, and later in May, Jumei acquired a 60% stake for RMB 300 million.
It may seem absurd that people would actually rent a power bank. It’s not really a hassle to carry around your own power banks. But Chinese investors are not afraid to bet big in the sector. The investors in China have poured in RMB 1.2 billion ($174 million) worth of funds into power bank rental startups within 40 days, local media reported (in Chinese).
The expanding rental economy in China is exemplified by the success of bike-rental companies such as Mobike and ofo. Mobike just raised over $600 million in Series E financing led by Tencent last month, and in the same month launched its first business outside of Asia in Manchester, U.K.
As investors and founders of these rental enterprises seem optimistic about the future of the sector, they are also giving themselves an out, exemplified by Jumei CEO’s recent statement on Weibo: “If [the startup] fails, let’s just say we’re serving the public,” wrote Jumei’s CEO Chen Ou in a Weibo post. Chen became the chairman of Ankerbox, a power bank rental startup, after making a huge investment in the company. Yuan Bingsong, the founder of another power bank rental startup, Hidian, has also claimed that the business can still do good to society even if it fails.
However, the funding frenzy powered by the angel investors and venture capital firms might still last for a long while. China’s rental economy is expected to grow about 40% this year to 4.83 trillion yuan ($705 billion). By 2020, it could account for about one tenth of the country’s gross domestic product. At the end of the day, these investors might be just looking at setting their feet in the Internet of Things (IoT) industry and hope to become the first-movers in having everything in the public space being connected.
]]>A total of 13,615 people in the southern Chinese city of Shenzhen will be temporarily banned from using shared bikes due to traffic violations, according to media reports (in Chinese). This is the first batch of traffic offenders that will be punished according to the new rules on shared bicycle users’ behavior issued by the Shenzhen police. The regulation was trialed for one month and went into effect on July 1st.
Out of the 13,615 traffic violations perpetrated by non-motorized vehicles, 3261 involved violations by bicycle riders. More than half of the violations–1717 in total–were perpetrated users riding bikes from Mobike, ofo, Bluegogo, and other bike-renting companies. The majority of the violators were riding Mobike’s bicycles at the time of the incident.
According to the new rules, violators are forbidden to use bike rental services for at least one week. The police have already notified bike-renting companies to deactivate violators’ user accounts from July 17th to 23rd.
The main reasons for the punishment are driving non-motorized vehicles in the motorized vehicle lane and occupying lanes for other vehicles. Statistics show that most perpetrators were men (71.29%) aged between 20 and 30.
Shenzhen is the first city in China that began implementing rules for rented bikes in December last year. The push for regulation began after several fatal accidents involving bike rental users.
The multitude of rental bikes has also caused headaches for city authorities which have been trying to implement rules for parking bicycles. For illustration, this is how the Shenzhen Bay Park looked like during this year’s Qingming Festival in April when many residents decided to spend their holiday on the beach front.
]]>“Are there areas where you see there is too much hype?” Elzio Barreto, a Reuters correspondent asks three veteran China-focused venture capitalists on stage at RISE Conference in Hong Kong. He cites a recent incident where an umbrella sharing company in Nanchang, the capital city of Guangxi Province, lost all its 30,000 umbrellas within a few weeks from its launch. As the investors chuckle, they come to the consensus that China’s sharing economy is overhyped.
“The sharing economy, the entire thing where you can scan a QR code and pay one RMB for something, is being overly hyped up in China,” says Harry Man, Partner at Matrix Partners China. Man oversees investments for the China branch of Matrix, whose notable early-stage investments include Apple and SanDisk.
In the last few years, the “sharing economy” has become a warm and fuzzy word for Chinese entrepreneurs who dream of facilitating the community sharing of everything, from umbrellas, orange juice machines, stand-alone KTV booths, massage chairs to the most recent buzz around power banks. At the beginning of this April, five power bank rental startups received a combined RMB 300 million ($43 million) financing within ten days with 20 investment firms involved. The Chinese government has also jumped on the sharing trend, expecting the sector to grow about 40% this year to 4.83 trillion yuan ($705 billion) and account for around one-tenth of GDP by 2020. Most of these sharing promises, however, will never take off to the extent that car and bike sharing did.
The most successful startups under the sharing economy umbrella are those that have network effects and barriers of entry, states Helen Wong, Partner of Qiming Venture, an early investor in China’s popular bike rental company Mobike whose 3 million MAU (in Chinese) have probably inspired the boom of the sector. “The last mile transportation in China is still an issue, so bike sharing is a good way to solve that problem,” she adds. China also has a big number of densely populated cities, where 128 cities have more than a million population, so the demand is big enough.
“We are a believer in bike sharing, but we are not sure about umbrellas or power chargers,” says Wong.
“For VCs, we just need to look into the real numbers,” Man concurs. “Whether there is a big enough market for them to sustain at least for us a multi-billion-dollar company creation.” Instead of platforms that would inspire the collective good and create less waste, a lot of startups in this space have become, Man argues, purely rental businesses “. . . which are workable, but not sexy.”
Another rising trend that has made entrepreneurs and investors excited is artificial intelligence.
“AI is the next mobile,” claims Hans Tung, Managing Partner at GGV, affirming that AI has a real demand and the potential to take off. According to a report put out by NetEase and Wuzhen Think Tank (in Chinese), in 2016, China came second in terms of the amount of investment in AI companies on a total of $2.57 billion, after the US which invested seven times as much. In Q4 of 2016 alone China saw 173 investment deals in AI, a record high season in the past five years.
“AI is going to be happening. It will happen like what happened to PC and the internet. It will trickle down into every vertical industry. But how fast would that be and how much opportunities are there going to be created is still waiting to be seen,” says Man. According to the NetEase-Wuzhen report, 81.4% of the companies are early stage (in Chinese), which means the AI industry is in its infancy.
“How AI is different from mobile is that there is the whole B2B area like customer relationship management,” Man observes. “There are fewer opportunities on the B2C side and even when there are, the big companies like Alibaba, Tencent and Baidu are going to have an advantage.” Last week, Baidu was speeding ahead with its first AI conference in Beijing where it announced an open platform for autonomous cars.
How do small startups compete with the big companies in AI? Tung provided the solution with the example of a GGV-backed startup. Liulishuo, powered by voice recognition and AI, helps people speak accent-free English by recording what the learners speak, build machine learning on top of that voice data, and give tips on improving pronunciations. Today the app has a total of 45 million registered users. The key for a small startup to succeed concludes Tung, is to find specific, targeted areas where startups can bring innovation with a strong, creative team.
Tung observes that startups are spending too much time on building AI infrastructure. “Whoever is creating the internet doesn’t make any money.” The ones who are going to make billions of dollars, he argues, are the ones who are “creating an application on top of the internet and is disrupting the market.”
]]>Bike rental platform ofo announced the completion of more than $700 million series E financing on July 6th. The current round of financing was jointly led by Chinese eCommerce giant Alibaba, Hony Capital and CITICPE, followed by existing investors Didi Chuxing and DST, with China eCapital as the financial adviser of the current financing.
Alibaba investment in ofo is quite worthy of attention. Prior to the new funding round, ofo had already struck a strategic cooperation deal on April 22nd with Sesame Credit, the social credit scoring system developed by Ant Financial, allowing Shanghai ofo users with a Sesame Credit score of 650 or higher to register on the app without making the RMB 99 deposit. This is considered an important sign of Alibaba’s entry into ofo.
Ofo’s founder and CEO Dai Wei said: “Ofo is committed to providing users with convenient, efficient, green and healthy travel services to the world. In the future, we will further promote the user experience upgrade, accelerate the strategic layout at home and abroad.”
Alibaba as the leading investor in the current round was very optimistic about the future development prospects of ofo. Alibaba Group Executive Vice Chairman Cai Chongxin said: “Ofo redefines the short-distance travel so that more people can join the low-carbon life, and deliver a real positive value to the community. We are delighted to be working with ofo to unlock the industry’s greater potential.”
]]>Baidu has launched an autonomous driving ecosystem with 50 partners at its first AI developers conference in Beijing. At its heart is the US-developed code for controlling the vehicles, but the scope of Apollo 1.0 is to create an entire ecosystem encompassing research universities, components makers such as NVIDIA, navigation developers such as TomTom, and car manufacturers including Ford, Daimler and FAW (Volkswagen’s joint venture partner in China).
The federation approach is radically different to that of the traditional manufacturers and is expected to allow more companies to participate. “It even allows a range of different business models to operate within the ecosystem,” said Baidu COO Lu Qi.
The code for Apollo 1.0 is completely open-source and will be available on Github. Documentation will be updated weekly and the code fortnightly with overhauls planned for September and December—when fully autonomous urban driving is expected to be achievable.
Baidu co-founder and CEO, Robin Li, introduced the new ecosystem via a live link up to his driverless car as he headed to the conference along Beijing’s fifth ring road. The 4- to 5,000-strong audience was also shown a world-first: a video of two autonomous cars driving in the same test pen (which we later experienced for ourselves).
Another important part of the plan is Apollo’s Simulator Engine. The program uses real data about roads and junctions to create a simulation for virtual cars running on Apollo. A demonstration at the conference showed a simulation of a car crashing at an intersection and then how the code would be fixed and uploaded for the Apollo team to check before being added into the overall source code. This way “. . . Apollo can be tested over millions of kilometers every day,” said Lu, who estimated around 10 billion kilometers of testing is needed for an autonomous vehicle system, meaning Apollo’s R&D will soon accelerate beyond that of the competition.
“We partnered with Baidu through a mutual client of ours in Silicon Valley and Baidu talked to us about creating the base platform for the Apollo project,” Josh Whitley, a software engineer at California-based AutonomouStuff who had come to Beijing to install his company’s software on the vehicles at the conference, told TechNode. “The Lincoln MKZ that they have here, the computing platform, they’re all provided by AutonomouStuff.”
Whitley managed to install the software on the Lincoln’s drive-by-wire system and test and tune it in just three days, a process that would normally take a dozen workers six months.
“The Apollo software is very flexible, made to accommodate different vehicles very easily. The feature set is mainly for recording a GPS-based route. [Apollo] is definitely better at a specific set of things [than other platforms],” said Whitley. “Part of the core infrastructure is a safe run-time environment—a real-time operating system—that won’t skip any commands or be delayed waiting for vehicle catch up.”
“The intent, for the Chinese market and eventually for other markets, is to make it a unified software platform for all the Chinese automakers and then others to use,” added Whitley.
“China is very much about one solution in general. Think of WeChat – there’s one solution. Didi – one solution,” Lei Ma, a senior product manager of autonomous driving at Baidu, based in Silicon Valley, told TechNode. “We’re hoping that Apollo becomes that one solution for autonomy.”
According to Ma, Baidu will make no claim on any use of its source code, however, it is used: “People are free to take Apollo, modify it or not, put it on a car and say ‘we’re selling autonomous vehicles’. Baidu does not lay claim to revenue, data, intellectual property. They can take it and commercialize it, anywhere in the world… Of course, if you work with Baidu, we can make things move a lot faster.”
The nature of establishing an ecosystem rather than a closed garden set up means the system is expected to accelerate, according to Lu Qi: “In 3 to 5 years China will lead the world in autonomous driving.”
Baidu’s AI operating system, DuerOS, will be fundamental to the application of Apollo 1.0. “DuerOS means that Apollo could be compatible with different cars from different manufacturers, or you can build your own,” explained Lu.
Ma explained the ecosystem’s development within the China context. “Back to the ‘one solution,’ whoever creates that ecosystem—the biggest, the fastest—is going to be the single player. I personally think it’s going to be a winner takes all solution. There’ll be a first place, a second perhaps, and maybe only a very different third.”
Speaking of Didi as a ‘one solution,’ the ride-hailing company’s logo was absent from the display of partners at the launch, so we asked Ma if we can expect to hear anything soon. “I think Didi is interested, but they’re taking a wait-and-see approach. A lot of companies are. The companies we announced today are not the only companies we talked to.”
The two Lincoln MKZ’s running on Apollo 1.0 were available for us to take a ride. But before that, we took a spin in a Haval running on Baidu’s software- and hardware-based advanced driver assistance system (ADAS).
The ADAS is Level 3 in terms of autonomy, which means it’s assisted driving rather than a fully autonomous Level 4 system such as Apollo 1.0. The Haval SUV had been programmed to run a particular route through the tires but when a helper put a sign in the middle of the road it changed course. The ride was jiddery, as though to take a bend the car breaks the curve into a series of short segments.
“Comfort is, of course, going to be a very important factor in terms of commercialization, but it’s not the biggest priority [at the moment],” explained Lei Ma.
“There are limits to what the car will let us do. Going forward we’re hoping to work with a lot of car makers and have access to their drive-by-wire interfaces so we can calibrate those controls and make things comfortable, basically the same as a human driver,” said Ma.
“Put your seatbelt on,” said the otherwise redundant human driver when we switched to the Lincoln MKZ. Running on Apollo 1.0, the difference to the ADAS was palpable. It felt much more like a human was driving, though the car still went into corners at quite a pace like the Haval (perhaps we’re just more cautious on the corners).
“We’re trying to smooth out all the movements,” explained the engineer in the back, who explained he was there “to press the start button.”
The other MKZ made its own loops in the test pen and we can happily report that the two vehicles, though driving around the same tracks and coming close together, did not even come close to any sort of collision.
]]>Amazon has promised the retailing world something amazing when it released its cashierless store last year. However, the “everything store” still has yet to make it available to the greater public, but Chinese startups aren’t sitting on their laurels. Already, a few have ready-to-go products with comparable features.
“Staffless,” or automated stores, are nothing new, but internet companies have managed to reinvigorate it with the latest technology, like bike-rental have done recently. They appeared in the earliest form of vending machines, which can be found across the globe. In Japan, where automation has been raised to almost sacred levels, there’s approximately one vending machine for every 23 people, booking annual sales that total more than $60 billion. Several reasons contributed to the huge popularity of automated stores in Japan from a lower cost of labor, expensive real estate, and more.
Unlike its neighbor, vending machines have yet to fully blossom in China. But the factors that propelled vending machine’s huge popularity in Japan have begun to take root in China.
After decades-long economic growth fueled by the demographic dividend, China is now in a position very similar to Japan where an aging society has made labor scarcer and more costly. High population density and expensive property in urban areas also make automated sellers and stores a more favorable choice when compared with renting pricey spaces.
Apart from demographic changes, China’s newly-minted obsession with tech innovations is making it a whole lot easier for the country to adapt to “something new.” Also, the combined forces of ubiquitous mobile payment and O2O services have made the Middle Kingdom ready for tech-enabled retailing solutions.
In fact, several Chinese companies in the sector have been growing rapidly in the past few years, even before Amazon launched Amazon Go in last December. Vending machine vendors like Ubox and Gump Come are known for their pioneering O2O efforts in operating interactive vending machines, which enables customers to make purchases through their mobile app.
And of course, the automated trend not only affects grocery shopping, but also the whole “New Retail” industry which covers automated coffee machines, fresh juice machines, and even mini karaoke and mini fitness kiosks.
As the first significant venture funding in this field, China’s automated convenience store manufacturer BingoBox announced Monday that it has received RMB 100 million ($14 million) in a Series A led by GGV Capital with participation from Qiming Venture Partners, Source Code Capital and Ventech China, our sister site TechNode Chinese is reporting.
Originated in Guangdong’s Zhongshan City, BingoBox has developed fully-automated, 24/7 convenience stores. With full integration with WeChat, users enter and exit using WeChat’s scanning feature.
Through partnership with global retailors like Auchan, BingoBox stores have over 200 types of products including daily necessities such as drinks, groceries and over-the-counter medicine. Shoppers can pay via WeChat or Alipay while remote service staff can be reached through real-time video in case of malfunctions or when other help is needed. The company is also developing its own supply chain brand called Beibianli (倍便利).
Scanning each item and paying with your phone may be less futuristic than Amazon Go, but it’s here now; it’s no exaggeration to say speed is everything in China’s highly crowded tech sector.
After launching a pilot test in Guangzhou’s Zhongshan city in August 2016, the firm rolled out in Shanghai earlier this month and plans to reach 5,000 stores by the end of this year, Chen Zilin, founder and CEO at Bingobox, told TechNode.
Data from the startup shows that the number of items at a 15 square meter BingoBox is on par with a 40 square meter convenience store, offering far lower operation costs.
Similar to bike rental service which has been troubled by bike thefts and damages, however, BingoBox’s staff-less service model may easily fall victim of the same problem. BingoBox has an RFID security system in place to ensure that everything has been paid for.
The company told local media that they have completed over 50,000 transactions without any theft or damage recorded. This could be explained by the stores’ locations in high-end areas, 24-hour video control and Chinese government’s efforts to push real-name registration for online services.
Although the sector is still gaining momentum, BingoBox is not without competitors. Chinese rival GUMP COME is expanding from vending machines to self-service convenience stores. Another automated shop, Moby Mart, has taken the concept further with a cashier-less mobile store.
]]>Volkswagen, Toyota, Alibaba YunOS and BYD displayed their connected cars at the World Mobile Conference Shanghai on June 28, 2017, showing the audience how their cars can integrate with our smarter world.
The global connected car market is expected to garner $141 billion by 2020. Senior Vice President of Alibaba Cloud, Hu Xiaoming, said they expect to put 700,000 connected cars powered by YunOS on China’s streets in 2017.
Comparing the apps that Volkswagen, Toyota, Alibaba YunOS and BYD are using for their connected cars revealed that all companies except for Alibaba YunOS had Ximalya FM integrated. Volkswagen and Toyota were using QQMusic, while Alibaba YunOS, of course, had an array of apps from Alibaba’s ecosystem – Alipay, Xiami, AliTravel, and Taobao.
“The key functions or applications that should be in the car include navigation and FM radio. The AMap (高德地图) and Ximalaya FM (喜马拉雅) applications are currently embedded in third-party cars. We use them because they are the most popular app in each category,” Loic Lee, senior product planning manager at Huawei told TechNode at Volkswagen’s booth.
So are these apps really the most popular app in their category? According to 2016 China App Rankings released by Cheetah Lab, the answer is yes. Ximalaya FM ranked first among China’s audio content apps with three times higher active penetration rate than No. 2 on the list. QQ Music ranked second on the music app ranking, following Kugou; both apps are owned by Tencent. In the navigation category, Amap ranked second, following Baidu Maps. Amap, however, has a higher number of weekly app openings.
Volkswagen’s newest SUV Tiguan R-line can connect with Huawei P10, iPhone, and Samsung phones. For example, an owner of Huawei P10 can connect to the car’s cloud via a USB cable. The car’s head unit display and the phone keep the same interface and experience. To control the car remotely from their phone and to call someone from the car’s head unit, users need to have a SIM card in the phone.
German car maker Volkswagen’s connected cars work with several device interoperability standards that offer integration between a smartphone and a car’s infotainment system, including Baidu Carlife, Apple Carplay, Android Auto and Mirror Link. In China, Volkswagen supports connection with Huawei’s P10, P10 Puls, Huawei Mate 9, and Mate 9 Pro.
“Samsung also supports Mirror link, but Huawei, as a Chinese company, has the power to ask third-party apps to work with them. That way, we can provide more applications,” Loic Lee, senior product planning manager at Huawei told TechNode.
Originally created by Ford, SmartDeviceLink is an open source platform that connects smart devices with a car’s on-board system. Toyota has included five apps that come with the car, including QQMusic, Ximalaya FM, Zuimei Tianqi (最美天气 literally, “the most beautiful weather” in English), Japan Travel Information app made by KDDI, and a four-dimensional navigation app. Toyota says it plans to launch SDL-powered connected cars in 2018.
Toyota and Ford launched the SmartDeviceLink Consortium earlier this year to help car manufacturers and app developers create integrated driving experiences. Members of the SDL Consortium also include Subaru, Mazda, and Suzuki.
BYD’s Qin (秦, referring to Qin Shihuang, China’s first emperor) comes preloaded with BYD’s own app stores, supporting connection with any Android or Apple phone. The Qin also comes with features made specially for the Chinese market: a Dual Mode that allows drivers to switch between full-electric and hybrid as well as an air filtration mechanism.
“BYD’s Qin model has an app that monitors the PM 2.5 levels inside and outside the car. When PM 2.5 reaches a certain level, the car can purify the air in 5 minutes,” said a BYD staff member at the exhibition.
On March 2017, Alibaba Group’s YunOS released YunOS Carware intelligent vehicle operating system. The software supports applications for the car itself as well as a HUD (head-up display), driving camera, and an intelligent rearview mirror. Cloud-based data services enable YunOS Carware to anticipate user needs and recommend appropriate music, radio programs, or car services.
On top of that, YunOS Auto’s engine is able to process and analyze data about how people drive. Since August last year, the connected car gathered 11.7 billion data points on driving behavior. The data will be used to encourage drivers to change their driving habits, saving fuel and making cities smarter.
Currently, 23 mobile phones are using the YunOS cloud system, including DOOV, SOP, China Mobile, Xiaolajiao (小辣椒) and Meizu.
In July 2016, Alibaba’s joint SAIC officially launched the mass-produced connected car Roewe RX5. Chinese automaker SAIC (上汽) has several connected cars in the market with YunOS Auto integrated, including Roewe RX5 (荣威RX5), Roewe eRX5, Roewe ERX5 pure electric version, Roewe i6, Roewe ei6, 名爵ZS, andChase D90 (大通D90). The top selling model is Roewe RX5’s with orders exceeding 100,000 in March and average monthly sales of over 20,000.
]]>The public spat between Tencent’s CEO Pony Ma and GSR Ventures managing director Zhu Xiaohu over who is the most popular bike rental platform has added fuel to China’s already heated bike rental industry. The discussions between investment moguls make it difficult for onlookers to dig up into the correct figures in the burgeoning market. Even the companies themselves found this a challenging task.
7Park Data, a research firm based in New York, recently released its observation together with insights on China’s bike rental market. According to 7Park Data, ofo is leading the race with a 65% market share.
Modern bicycle sharing systems are effective and convenient in solving the “last kilometer” problem in urban China, which has witnessed a decade-long recession of bicycles as a means of transportation due to the popularity of private cars. The bike rental boom is reigniting users’ passions for bicycles while both companies claim to operate an average of 20 million daily rides. The report pointed out that riders are spending an average of around one hour on both ofo and Mobike as of May 2017 – up from an average of 25 minutes earlier this year.
Ofo is growing at a breakneck speed of 386% in weekly active users from Q4 2016 to Q1 2017, whereas Mobike is growing at a slower but still impressive 180% over the same period of time, the report shows.
Shanghai leads the world with 450,000 shared bicycles, nearly all of which began operating in 2016. Ofo and Mobike have each signed manufacturing deals in a battle for market share (reminiscent of the driver supply turf war between Uber and Didi Chuxing). Ofo owns a majority share in eight of China’s 14 Tier 1 provinces and municipalities with Mobike leading in the remaining six.
In addition to the local market, both companies have begun to expand outside of China. Ofo began operating its service in Singapore in early 2017 as the first Chinese bike rental company to operate overseas in a bid to scale. The Beijing-based startup is now operating in five countries. In a similar initiative, Mobike is also tapping overseas markets in Singapore, UK and more recently Japan.
Localizing products for new markets is the most important thing to get right and bike rental is no exception.
“The dynamics which support the growth of bicycle [rental] are unique in different markets. The success of expansion into other markets will be in part based on these factors – including population density (i.e., high capacity utilization and high availability), economic factors, conducive environments for safe biking (i.e., physical layouts, base rates of crime, etc.), and state/government regulations that do not hinder growth,” 7Park Data’s director of insights, Brian Chaitoff, told TechNode. “As with ridesharing, access to capital for new entrants is critical to help foster and support growth in new markets.”
Although the two incumbents are still under the pressure to offer free rides in order to maintain market share, there are some early signs of market consolidation in the sector. Chongqing-based bike rental startup Wukong Bike announced that it is shuttering earlier this month. Shortly afterward, people with knowledge of the matter disclosed that Mobike has recently completed the acquisition of smaller player Unibike.
“As in ridesharing, we expect markets in the long-term to be winner-take-all. This is due, in part, to the benefits realized by riders by having one winner, such as greater access to bikes,” said Brain.
Air pollution, driving restrictions, and devastatingly long traffic jams are an everyday nuisance for many Chinese commuters. Some traffic jams in China are so bad, they’ve even earned their own Wikipedia entries. But companies such as Didi, ofo, and other local innovators are using big data to bring us into the era of smart commuting.
One of the companies on the forefront of urban travel innovation is bike-rental company ofo. With 6 million bicycles in 120 cities across five countries and plans to expand to 200 cities worldwide, ofo is collecting tons of information about user behavior.
“When it comes to city construction and planning, especially when it comes to what role bicycles will play in the process, there has been a lack of data”, said ofo co-founder Austin Zhang during last week’s TechCrunch event in Shenzhen. “Through the development of bike sharing, our own data from ofo, the growth of everyday use of our product by tens of millions of people on city streets, through our own back-end, we can see what are the peak hours at the most demanding places, what places are less demanding, which areas are congested and which are not. This can serve as a reference for future urban planning.”
But ofo is not the only Chinese company changing urban transportation in China. It is currently collaborating with ride-hailing giant Didi to transform public transportation. The two companies are designing more efficient bike-bus transfer options for short-distance travelers. ofo’s bike-routing analytics will help develop AI-powered algorithms for DiDi’s real-time bus tracker.
Didi is also developing its own public transportation solutions with support from city governments. Its Smart Transportation Feature Team, which was established last year, is using the enormous amount of data generated by its 400 million users across 400 cities to upgrade transportation in nearly 20 Chinese cities. In Shenzhen, Didi has gained access to the city’s urban bus, subway, taxi, bicycle and road infrastructure data and plans to build a data-driven smart transportation system for the city using the company’s AI technology. In other cities, the company is already working on reducing congestion by adjusting traffic lights and adding smart traffic screens with an ETA forecast.
Didi’s vision of future transportation is shared, electric, and automated. With more people sharing their vehicles there will be fewer cars on the streets and those cars will be more efficient than ever. And the key to all of these advances is AI and machine learning.
“Looking forward to the next 10, 20 or more years, intelligent machines will become more and more important; machines will in many aspects do things better than humans, ” said Vice President of the US-based DiDi Research Institute and Head of DiDi Labs Dr. Fengmin Gong during last week’s TechCrunch Shenzhen.
Other companies in China are also looking to make their transportation solutions intelligent. Electric car makers such as Singulato (奇点汽车), smart e-scooter manufacturer Niu (小牛) and transportation robot designer Ninebot hope to bring AI to China’s streets. These companies are developing different transportation solutions for all kinds of travelers: smart cars for long distance, e-scooters suitable for traveling up to 5 kilometers, and short-distance unicycles.
But the biggest changes to our commute will be brought by self-driving. In the future, autonomous vehicles could also completely change our urban landscape. Assistant to the President at Singulato, James Gao told the audience that he can imagine a world where streets will disappear underground, making our cities look and feel completely different.
“If we imagine a world with self-driving, everything is going to be changed, the infrastructure will be totally unlike today’s,” said Gao.
However, when it comes to automated vehicles, big data will not be enough. Putting self-driving cars on the street will require legal frameworks, a transition period and a degree of caution, Dr.Gong noted.
“This is precisely the biggest challenge,” said Dr.Gong. “On Didi’s side we have done a lot of research, and we also took advantage of our big data platform. We believe that this is the most central thing.”
]]>China is likely to become the next leader in new energy vehicles, said Ian Zhu, a partner at NIO Capital, founded by NextEV and VC firms. Zhu spoke at a panel called “The Car the Internet Made” during TechCrunch Shenzhen; he pinpointed some of the advantages of the Chinese electric vehicle market such as motor and battery technology, a large market, and advances in the field of AI.
He also introduced NIO’s plans for a unique concept in the autonomous vehicle market called Eve. According to the company, NIO Eve is not just a car, it is a companion.
“The company’s focus is designing the car that is more tailored to the users,” said Zhu in an interview with TechNode.
The NIO Eve is all about direct contact and getting to know its users. According to Zhu, the personalized car industry has just started and in the future it will offer great possibilities for sales, raising profit margins after the purchase of the car.
“Unlike traditional cars, once users enter the car they will track who and how is using the car,” said Zhu.
The concept car is planned to be launched in 2020. Many of the car’s features have been designed but the actual user experience will depend on the market, Zhu explained. NIO sees Eve not only as a mobility solution but also as a personal space. According to announcements, the car will be equipped with a table, a screen, and reclining seats where passengers can sleep. NIO’s main targets are commuters and families.
“You can spend a lot of time in a car if it is driven autonomously, you could do a lot of things, ” said Zhu.
NIO Capital was co-established by electric vehicle designer NIO, previously known as NextEV, Sequoia Capital, and Hillhouse Capital. NIO’s headquarters are in Shanghai, but it also has offices in Munich, Beijing, Hong Kong, London, and San Jose, California.
NIO’s most famous product so far is the electric supercar NIO EP9 which broke an electric vehicle lap record at Nürburgring Nordschleife and costs around USD$ 1.2 million to make. NIO is one of the competitors at the all-electric Formula E race series and is capable of accelerating from 0 to 124 miles (200 kilometers) per hour in 7.1 seconds.
Its second product, the all-electric SUV NIO ES8 was unveiled at the International Automobile Industry Exhibition in Shanghai in April this year. The 7-seater will be available on the Chinese market next year.
For production, NIO plans to rely on an innovative supply chain which means that the company will focus on the design and leave the manufacturing to partners such as JAC and Changan. The move will help the company mitigate some of the high costs associated with setting up automobile production. NIO’s main task will be to enhance user experience and sales, Zhu explained.
]]>With the rise of mass innovation in China, money is flooding into startups, especially those in the latest emerging verticals. Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun puts it more colorfully: “Even a pig can fly if it is in the middle of a whirlwind.”
Despite the sector-wise differences, history is repeating itself in China’s internet industry. Nearly every whirlwind sector is going through a similar path. A certain hot industry attracts a swarm of startups, then a large amount of capital dives in to fuel the extravagant cash burning war for players to snap larger market share. Finally, the battle ends in a merger between the industry leaders, like the case in Didi and Uber China.
But at least one thing is different now: the speed at which the entrepreneurs and investors are reacting to the rise of a new vertical. From the first boom of taxi-booking service in early 2013 to the final merger between Didi and Uber in late 2016, it takes around three years for Didi to establish its sole dominator position in China’s ride-hailing market.
For the bike rental boom, it takes only two years for the industry to witness the creation of its first unicorn. For the on-going rise of power bank rental industry, things are going even crazier. In less than 2 weeks earlier this April, a combined RMB 300 million (US$ 43 million) financing from over 20 investment institutions was thrown into the industry.
“The fast rise of ride-hailing and bike rental industry is taking the country in a big way. Even internet behemoth like BAT are afraid of losing market share in the latest emerging industries,” said Yuan Yuan, CEO of Ankerbox, at TechCrunch Shenzhen today. Ankerbox recently sold a 60% stake to Chinese online retailer Jumei for RMB 300 million.
The fast reaction from capital is pushing companies into the whirlwind even faster.
“As an entrepreneur, we are feeling the cut-throat competition in this industry. The capital is shortening the industry growth cycle from a few years to one year or even less. Take Xiaodian for example, we are now operating in 33 cities around the country, but if you asking me about this figure next month, it’s probably over 140,” said Tang Yongbo, CEO and founder of Tencent-backed Xiaodian which landed a combined RMB 450 million funds this year.
With so much capital flowing in, we have to wonder if the cash burning battle is imminent for power bank rental? The answers from founders of Xiaodian and Ankerbox, China’s top two power bank rental startups, varied, but they echoed in that subsidy-driven strategies is just means for customer education.
“Price war is just a means to educate the customers for them to adopt to the new kind service more quickly”, said Mr. Yuan. “When I was working for Taopiaopiao back in 2015, China’s online sales of movie tickets account for only 20% of the total box offices in China. After the subsidy war, over 80 percent of the tickets were sold through online channels now.”
Yuan further emphasized that the core problem would be how to enhance the user experience in terms of service accessibility, security, and more. “Subsidy is just a method, not the final goal.”
Tang shared Yuan’s opinion but adds more details. “From June 20, Xiaodian will partner with WeChat Pay and mini app to launch pilot testing power bank rental service which a fee of 1 fen (USD 0.014) from users. Through aggressive marketing plans, we want to have more users to know and try out this service.”
Xiaodian and Ankerbox represents two of the mainstream power bank rental service models in China. Xiaodian features fixed charging stations, which are placed in public places including restaurants, billiard rooms, KTVs, and subways. On the other hand, AnkerBox allows users to rent portable power banks which users can take with them and return to other power stations.
“Different models have their own advantages and would find their most suitable application under different scenarios. Still, I think the core problem still lies in the user experience issues I talked about earlier,” said Yuan.
]]>Shenzhen’s rainstorms didn’t dampen the enthusiasm of students, designers and coders from all over the world participating in the 2017 TechCrunch Shenzhen hackathon, co-hosted by TechNode.
In teams of 4 or 5, the participants took on challenges posed by sponsors Dianrong, Mobike, Meet Magento Association and Segway Robotics. Dianrong is China’s premier peer-to-peer lending platform while Meet Magento is an association that connects businesses all over the world. The tasks ranged from e-commerce to using blockchain in investment schemes for Mobike and developing new uses for Segway’s Loomo robot.
The teams got to the tasks right away and many came prepared with ideas. Team 20, Basement Hackers, worked on a smart service platform for blind users incorporating the Segway Loomo. They started testing a prototype early on, with makeshift canes and DIY fixtures.
“There are 1.3 million people with vision disabilities in China,” Zhang Junheng explained the pain point their team was trying to solve. “A guide dog costs around RMB 20,000 to 40,000 and needs one month to train.”
The Shenzhen-based software developer teamed up with his friends Kishor Maharjan and Li Zhenjunrao for this hackathon. They placed 7th overall.
The teams had around 24 hours to develop and test their products. During the night, some went home to work but some decided to stay behind. Team 6, Do You Dare, was developing a social app that focused on sharing challenges within a community of users. This was the biggest hackathon in which the friends have participated.
“We didn’t stay last night, we went back to the hostel,” Yuki told TechNode. The team’s members all come from Singapore and were in China to participate in an exchange program at Shanghai’s Fudan University. They heard about the hackathon and decided to come down to participate.
“It’s a good experience for our first TechCrunch event,” said team member Felicia. Do You Dare placed 9th overall.
On the second day, the teams presented their hard work to the audience and a panel of judges. Given the short amount of time the teams had to develop their project, getting the products to work correctly on stage and presenting a well-rehearsed pitch proved challenging. Several teams could not get their Loomo to work as intended and the real-time demo had difficulties due to a spotty connection.
“We were testing it and 8 times out of 9, it was working,” Kishor Maharjan from Basement Hackers told TechNode. At the presentation, the team’s Blind Guide Rodog had trouble with control and kept zooming ahead too fast. At the last try, the team got Rodog to perform a short guide route where it warned if there was an obstacle approaching or when turning.
Team: Mobike Go
Members: Calpa Liu, Hok Yiu; Feihu Tang; Martin, Tsang Chi Ho; Simon, ZiRui Guo; Angus Chow (Chow Tsz Shing)
Anthony Ha from TechCrunch thanked all the participants and sponsors of the event and Dr. Lu Gang from TechNode presented the prizes to the top three overall teams. Third Place Overall went to Mobike Go.
The team invented a smart seat lock that enables a peer-to-peer bike-sharing network. Those with unused bikes can contribute the bike to the scheme by installing the seat lock. The solution adds value to providers by allowing them to monetize their bikes.
“It’s quite different from hackathons in North America,” Simon Guo, a 16 year-old studying in Canada and participating at his first hackathon in China, told TechNode. “People are really friendly, my teammates are awesome. Mobike [and others], these are companies you don’t see in the U.S. So it’s pretty exciting for me.”
Team: Fun Tech
Members: Andy Zhao, Michael Xie, Huan Zhang, Aaron Liu, Pak Chen, Guo Yiteng
Runner up went to Fun Tech, a community Mobike investment scheme that utilizes blockchain technology. Their solution allows everyone to become an investor who can invest in individual Mobikes. The return of each Mobike will be dependent on its usage and corresponding revenue will be redistributed back to the investor.
“We wanted to work with blockchain [for the hackathon] right from the beginning,” Michael Xie told TechNode. “Blockchain is a very hot technology right now. This was the first time we’ve worked the technology. So this was a good [opportunity] for us.”
Team: Roadshr
Members: Li Hosan, Liu Jie, Peng Huijian, Li Mengbing, Lv Weixin
The team stood out for its idea and smooth presentation. Roadshr devised a new offline retail model where their LoomoMart robot became a personal shopping assistant that takes care of tasks such as quickly providing pricing, product location in the store, personal recommendations and automatic checkout. Roadshr’s real-time demonstration on stage helped seal the victory for the team.
“We were really nervous about the demo,” Li Hosan told TechNode. “We installed a lot of software, especially TensorFlow [an open source software library], which had a huge file size. We were scared that it would crash. Also, it was noisy at the venue, which would have affected the voice recognition of [LoomoMart]. So we rehearsed a lot.”
The efforts paid off. On stage, Hosan activated LoomoMart’s follow-me technology by saying “Let’s go shopping.” Then a product barcode was scanned and the robot was able to immediately tell Hosan the price. LoomoMart also led Hosan to the location of a product that he was looking for. The demonstration successfully showed the future of offline retail that Roadshr has envisioned.
Mobike and Dianrong Challenge Winner: Fun Tech
Meet Magento Association Challenge Winner: Easy Key
Segway Robotics Loomo Challenge Winner: Roadshr
]]>Mobike’s recently-announced data sharing strategy has just made a prominent appearance: Mobike – and Ofo – bikes are now visible and unlockable via the Baidu Maps app. The latest update of the app allows users to log in with their mobile numbers to hire bikes from the two main hire companies.
The latest version of Baidu Maps, v9.8.5, has a bike and ride logo in the top left which, when tapped, reveals bikes from both Ofo and Mobike in the area of town shown. There is the choice to filter just one type or see all.
The unlocking process is simple and having bikes from both main companies now available in one place is definitely a step forward for customer ease of use, which was part of Mobike’s data strategy. Branding is kept to a minimum except on the bike map and filter page.
Bike rentals are starting to be included in the map’s journey-planning functions, as they were with Shenzhou Zhou ride-hailing. This does not yet appear to be fully operational in this first release, but the bike rental option is available to toggle on/off within walking and cycling journeys. Previous reports on bike usage show that rides in combination with public transport are hugely popular with 1 in 5 rides being to make a bus or subway connection, so this function is expected to be warmly welcomed.
Last month Mobike announced its “Mobike+” open platform strategy which covers the three areas of “life circles” (our translation of “生活圈”), big data and Internet of Things. Shenzhou Zhuanche and Baidu Maps were announced as being in the first batch of integrators, along with China Merchants Bank, UnionPay and China Unicom.
China Unicom lets users unlock bikes via its app and users can apply their loyalty system user history as credit for the deposit needed for joining the bike scheme; they can also use Wo points for free rides or to earn free data. China Merchants Bank is expected to offer the bike unlocking function soon via its app. UnionPay’s increasing global reach and its move into instant payments could help with Mobike’s global expansion, as are other recent updates by the bike company.
The fitness app Yuedongquan (悦动圈) also integrates with Mobike and collects ride data, even allowing users to compare their riding stats with those of their friends.
Opening up has proved a highly successful move so far for Mobike. In March this year they integrated with WeChat, the most pervasive of all social media apps. After this, the signup rate of new users grew by over 200% with over half of new users joining the scheme through the WeChat system.
The benefits go beyond new signups. Working across more apps offers allows the company to collect more data and being more readily accessible to users means more bikes being used. In terms of appearing on the same map as Ofo bikes, that could mean more effort put into bike redistribution or just another battle in the bike numbers war.
]]>Mobike today announced that it has raised over US$600 million in Series E, the largest ever financing round in the bike-rental industry.
This landmark round, putting the company at a valuation of between US$2 billion and US$3 billion (in Chinese), was led by existing investor Tencent and joined by Sequoia China, TPG, and Hillhouse Capital, among others. New investors in this round included leading banks BOCOM International, ICBC International, and global institutional asset management firm Farallon Capital.
Davis Wang, CEO and Co-founder of Mobike, said Mobike has three clear targets for the coming months: First, they will accelerate the pace of global expansion with a new target to be in 200 cities by the end of this year; second, they will increase investment in R&D of their IoT network and new technologies; and, third, they will invest in building a superior technology infrastructure to support their innovations in the field of AI and intelligent hardware.
Mobike claims it is now active in more than 100 cities globally and operates more than 5 million bikes around the world.
Since its official establishment last April, Mobile has secured an aggregate US$ 1.1 billion through eight financing rounds (in Chinese). Among its investors, Tencent, the lead investor in this round, has become the company’s largest investor, following its participation in the company’s Series C+ and Series D.
Alongside its role as a strategic investor, Tencent has also formed a strong business partnership with Mobike. Mobike bike-rental feature was added to Tencent’s WeChat Wallet in March. In addition, WeChat users can utilize Mobike’s bike- rental service by searching for the mini-app on WeChat, which has been available since this January.
The backing from Tencent, China’s most valuable public company, will undoubtedly fuel the growth of the bike rental startup. Chinese tech giants are joining in on the bike rental bandwagon either financially or technically, in an attempt to share in the boom sweeping all over the country.
Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing has injected hundreds of million USD in three financing rounds of ofo, Mobike’s arch-rival. Besides, Didi has added bike-sharing service from ofo to its app. Alipay, the online and mobile payment platform operated by Ant Financial, has partnered with six bike rental firms to allow users to rent bikes through the app’s new ‘scan and ride’ function.
Artificial intelligence-obsessed Baidu, though having not made any investment in either of the bike rental startups, has recently teamed up with Mobike and ofo by integrating bike rental services on its Baidu map service. After downloading Baidu map app version V9.8.5 and registering via Baidu, users can use the rental service. The tie-up is expected to be a win-win strategy for the parties involved, which will not only improve utilization of the bikes but will bring more traffic to Baidu map and provide big data insights to it.
Ofo, the only bike-rental firm on the global unicorn company list released in May by CB Insights, is said to be seeking a US$ 500 million new financing round at a valuation of about US$3 billion.
]]>The streets of China are covered with gold…. gold bicycles that is. The new bikes are a product of cooperation of Beijing-based bike sharing company Coolqi (酷骑单车) and Haier, a well-known consumer electronics company from Qingdao.
Besides the golden paint accentuated with royal blue details, the biggest novelty offered by the bikes is the onboard phone charger. Unlike Coolqi’s regular lime green colored bikes, the deluxe golden edition is equipped with Haier’s phone holder and Micro-USB, USB Type-C, and Lightning charging cables.
Chinese media have already branded the new entrant to China’s bike-rental market as “tuhao” (土豪) bikes, a term denoting China’s nouveau riche with a taste for tacky, over-the-top accessories and vehicles. Chinese netizens have been equally cruel, calling the bikes ugly and expressing fears of going blind due to excessive bling. Some have even turned to Haier’s account on microblogging platform Weibo to ask whether the company was worried about affecting road traffic safety. Haier, in turn, stated that the color is “festive.”
According to media reports (in Chinese), founder and CEO of Coolqi Gao Weiwei said that installing charging equipment on shared bikes means taking a different approach.
“The Golden Edition shared bikes is a subversive move,” he said.
The shiny new approach to bike-rental reflects the aggressive competition in China’s market. After receiving hundreds of millions of dollars of funding, around 30 bike-rental startups have flooded China’s cities with hundreds of thousands bright-colored bikes. Bike-rental companies have been operating with extremely low or non-existent profit margins in order to keep prices down and beat the competition. The biggest players Mobike and ofo have even resorted to giving cash and free rides in hopes of winning riders.
The bicycles are currently available in five cities: Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Hangzhou, and Xi’an. The deposit will set you back RMB 298 while a half an hour ride costs RMB 1.5, slightly higher than other brands of shared bicycles on the market. Haier and Coolqi plan to install 10 million sets of charging equipment worth up to RMB 1 billion on their “24-carat” bikes (in Chinese). Perhaps this will become the new gold standard for bike-rental.
]]>The bike rental war between Mobike and its rival ofo is still ongoing in China, with no end in sight. The pair has been waging an all-out war in terms of bike quantity and technology on and beyond their home turf. Now they set their sight on user experience.
Mobike announced yesterday that it has teamed up with Apple to allow iPhone users to make payment with Apple Pay and unlock Mobike bicycles by scanning QR codes from their iOS 11 iPhone camera, as part of its efforts to enhance user experience and stay ahead of its nimble rivals.
This is the third payment mode accepted by the Chinese bike rental firm after Alipay and WeChat Pay. After upgrading the Mobike app on their mobile phones to the latest iOS 5.0 version, domestic users can make deposits and top up their Mobike accounts with Apply Pay in-app.
The addition of Apple Pay will reinforce Mobike’s globalization drive, as the mobile payment service enjoys great popularity around the world (except in China where it has been relegated to pipsqueak status and did not even make it to the top ten in the country’s Q1 2017 mobile payment market).
In addition, the introduction of QR code support by Apple enables Mobike users to scan and unlock a bike without even opening their Mobike app. Such handy and fast way to unlock a bike is expected to help increase user base and engagement and speed up the bike rental firm’s growth.
Mobike said its MAU has doubled month-on-month and nearly half of its new users came from WeChat since its tie-up with the popular messaging app in March that has enabled users to access Mobike’s cycle-rental feature within the wallet function of WeChat.
Mobike’s rival ofo sides with Alipay, which supports the “scan-and-ride” function for six bike-rental apps including ofo. In addition, ofo’s bicycle-rental feature has been accessible to users within ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing’s app since April. Didi is a major investor of ofo and has shelled out hundreds of million US dollars (in Chinese) in the firm’s three financing round.
]]>Starting from June 1, users in Southern China’s city of Shenzhen will be forbidden to use bike rental services for at least one week if they are found to violate road traffic regulations.
The new rules, which will be trialed this month and come into effect in July this year, are the latest efforts by local authorities to deal with the growing problems emerging with the bike-rental boom, such as illegal parking, traffic offenses, and bike accidents.
Shenzhen traffic police will share data on non-motor vehicle traffic violations with bike rental firms in the city beginning June 1, and these firms will suspend bike rental services to the road traffic regulation violators within five working days of receiving the data. A bike rental user with one traffic offense within a year will not be allowed to use the rental service for one week, two traffic offenses for one month, and three offenses for half a year.
Shenzhen has been active in implementing rules to regulate the bike rental industry. As the first city in China to introduce bike rental regulations, it unveiled the draft rules as early as last December when bike rentals have yet to take shape in the country.
Now it has taken a further step to team up with bike rental firms to regulate the use of bikes among users, as there have been 15 traffic accidents related to bike rentals in the city since the beginning of this year, with eight people killed and nine injured, according to Shenzhen traffic police.
While there may be bicycle hardware problems such as failed brakes causing the accidents, users have themselves to blame for the consequences of their improper actions such as running the red light or the misuse of bikes.
Some just disregard rules, although there have been regulations in some cities including Shenzhen, Shanghai, and Tianjin, banning users less than 12 years old from riding rental bikes. In one deadly lesson, an 11-year-old Shanghai boy riding a rental bike died at a hospital after colliding with a bus at road intersections in March.
With Shenzhen taking the lead to discipline bike rental user behaviors, other cities are expected to follow suit. Bike rentals will still be favorable to people in the long haul as long as regulators step in and users discipline themselves.
]]>The best success stories often begin with failures. What we see are the hefty funding rounds, skyrocketing valuations; what we overlook are the embarrassing first efforts, setbacks and radical change of directions. Ofo, the first company bike rental company to gain unicorn status in the emerging sector, meets nearly every definition we have for a successful startup now. However, they too had their own growing pains.
Dai Wei, the 26-year-old CEO and co-founder of ofo, shared at the MTA Festival a few of their first clumsy steps on its road to success as well as the lessons he learned from those first failures.
Ofo started as a student project by alumnus of China’s prestigious Peking University. Sharing a common passion for cycling, Dai Wei and fellow students decided to found their own project in 2014. But how to achieve this goal was not clear
The now-household name “ofo” was born on February 15, 2014 when Dai was working as a volunteer teacher at Qinghai Province. The team thought of several options and finally named the firm ofo as the letters look like a bike. (Finally, we understand why the company’s name is all in lowercase).
Having a good name in place is a good beginning, but for the one year and seven months after that, ofo’s team suffered the growing pains that most startups have encountered in pushing past the initial launch. In retrospect, bike rental was the right path to take, but entrepreneurship is not only about finding the right road but also the right direction.
2014 saw the online food delivery industry take off. Based on Ele.me’s model, ofo’s founding team developed a platform where bike stores can rent out their bikes to travelers. “It was a total failure. Not a single order was received in five months,” Dai said.
The startup’s second try was a second-hand bike-trading platform targeting university students. This direction didn’t gain much traction either.
In the wake of the surge in student microloan sites like Fenqile and Qufenqi, ofo shifted to micro-loan platform for higher-end bikes and scooters. “We sold out a dozen bikes, but six of them were purchased by our friends,” Dai recalled. Fortunately, Peking University alumni injected around RMB1.5 million funding gradually, which gains them enough time to try out new directions.
“We seemingly found a possible exploration point in cycle tourism at the beginning of 2015. The whole online tourism industry was taking off, backed by a whopping RMB 3 trillion market size. We thought it was a trend we can capitalize on,” Dai said. This direction witnessed an uptake, allowing the company to book profits for the first time.
“When we had RMB 1 million in our account, we made a terrible mistake. When the subsidy war in the ride-hailing industry was getting started, we decided to buy customers by burning money,” he said. Ofo managed to record remarkable user growth at first, but their model failed to gain further support from VCs and the money they have soon burned out.
In April 2015, the team only had RMB 400 in their account. The impasse forced ofo to rethink what’s the key problem that leads to previous failures. “We found that all our previous efforts want to link bicycle with some hot market and overlooked whether the product is addressing real pain points of the users,” said Dai. “Then we tried to solve the bike theft problem of college students by offering shared bikes.”
Everyone knows the story that follows this shift. In around two years, ofo has grown into a leading bike-rental company, which operates in nearly 100 cities globally. The company is rising at a dizzying speed with valuation that has hit more than US$2 billion.
Few entrepreneurs can go against the trend and resist the temptation to follow the herd into an emerging hot market. However, those who resist this pressure and reflect deeply on whether their product fits the market are most likely to succeed.
]]>Bike rental startup ofo is filing a lawsuit against social networking platform Maimai (脉脉) for slander and defamation after a user on the website claimed ofo staff were engaged in graft.
An expose of the so-called ofo internal corruption practices was first found in early May on Maimai, where a post of one user talking about his work at a bike-rental firm was unexpectedly followed by a comment from a supposed current ofo employee claiming that “a regional operator in ofo can siphon tens of hundreds yuan every month and a university operator can take tens of hundreds yuan or more.”
In response, ofo released an open letter saying they have zero tolerance towards corruption, and that these accusations from the anonymous source are full of personal emotions but lack specific details.
Now the bike-rental startup is taking further action by bringing to court Beijing Taotianxia Technology Development (北京淘友天下科技发展有限公司), the operator of the social networking platform, for slander and defamation.
Ofo said that the allegations by the anonymous Maimai user with unconfirmed identity are fabricated, groundless and have defamed the company’s reputation, according to the indictment it filed with Beijing Haidian District People’s Court on May 19. Ofo claims that Maimai did not verify and delete the comments in a timely manner after the comments were made and sparked discussions, causing the slander to be widely spread on the Internet and damaging ofo’s goodwill. Ofo thus demands that Maimai delete the post and comments in question, provide the user contact and address, issue a statement of apology and pay RMB 1 million in compensation.
In response to the defamation charges, Maimai said it has not yet received any notice from the court yet. Today, the company a statement saying that it has taken technical means needed for prevention of reputation infringement, and has provided reasonable remedy measures for the infringed.
Maimai said in the statement that it always discourages its users from spreading rumors, malicious slandering, and infringing on others’ legal rights and interests.
Maimai also said that protecting users’ privacy information is its obligation as much as is legally possible, and it has no right to reveal the user’s private information to others until clearly requested by judicial authorities.
Beijing Haidian District People’s Court has reportedly accepted the case.
In another similar case, co-founder of ofo’s rival, Mobike, is suing Quora-like Zhihu, both adding to a lengthy list of litigation cases in the tech industry that has seen players attaching great importance to the protection of their legitimate rights.
]]>As China’s domestic market continues to develop, many of the country’s internet giants are beginning to look elsewhere for future growth prospects. As growth slows and the market becomes saturated, companies including Tencent, Alibaba, and many others are eyeing not just Southeast Asia, but also Israel, the US, and the EU.
To learn more, we talked with Hagai Tal, CEO of Tel Aviv-based mobile advertising company Taptica. He has invested, led and developed companies for growth, continued investment, and IPO/disposal, including Kontera, Amadesa, Payoneer, BlueSnap (formerly Plimus), and Spark Networks (NYSE: LOV). He is a Fellow of the third class of the Middle East Leadership Initiative of The Aspen Institute and a member of the Aspen Global Leadership Network.
We have an office in Beijing with around 10 people already. We are serving clients like Cheetah Mobile, Tencent and other big guys, like Alibaba. We help them first of all to find a channel for us to form a relationship with customers outside of China. So our biggest asset value will be helping those companies to figure out what to do when it comes to companies in the West. Sometimes we get involved in the content as well.
But the majority of our help is to help them to figure out which market is the right market for them. The Chinese market is an interest for us because we see the mobile proliferation in China. We see companies in China that have a lot of potential to grow.
In recent years, most of them are trying to grow outside of China, either through just distributing their content or buying companies outside of China. So we’re seeing a lot of activity coming from the Chinese market. And I have to say that in the recent years, also there’s some sort of matureness in the Chinese market, where in the past it was more a jungle, you know, everyone was trying to do different things. Now it’s becoming much more organized and there are more standards.
And there’s much more interaction between China and Western countries, so also the way of doing business and communication between both sides are becoming better and better. Payment terms are better, legal stuff is becoming easier to run.
Most of the companies we are dealing with are public. So I think the public market already gave them a high valuation and they’re all trying to find ways to continue to increase the growth or the keep the growth they have. They all understand that it’s probably outside of China that will be the best way for them to do it.
They all seem to hire people who have the language, buy companies who can give them the bridge to get those countries invested in money in order to try to market their products and fit their product to different market. When we go to the contracts, we see a lot of people knocking on the door and asking questions about how to get to users outside of China.
There are different ways of different stock markets around the world. You know, there’s NASDAQ everyone is looking at. We are a public company on London stock exchange. There’s also Chinese companies going public in China. Currently, there’s sort of an arbitrage between the valuation the company gets in different markets and different markets have different ways to measure a company. In London, if you have the EBITDA, then you can get the valuation whereas in China if you have the net profit, you can get the valuation. So there’s a big focus on the net profit.
Now, at the same time, the net profit of many companies, especially those in the gaming sector, in China is very high. It’s much higher than other places. So there is an arbitrage between the different markets. It means that on the mobile client, China is very high to companies in my space, that if we get approached by companies from China, we need to adapt or we need to see the same way that the Chinese are looking into the companies. And they do look at the net profit and because of that, we need to think about how to present the company in the net profit as well.
The Chinese, because of what we mentioned before, they need to keep the growth that they have. They need to buy companies. They need, if a Western company wants to be bought by the Chinese, they need to understand how the Chinese are looking into it. They can’t just compare with the EBITDA where they do it in London Stock Exchange, they have to look at the net profit.
It’s not so bad because the Chinese are looking at cash. Really how much money you’re generating, where the rest of the players are looking at the stories around it and the future potential.
They’re not just looking for companies to buy, they’re also looking for management or people who can manage for them.
They’re not necessarily coming into the company and saying, “We know how to do it better than you, you’ve got to do whatever we tell you.” They see it a different way, they say, “We don’t understand all this. We want you to continue running the business.”
They want the management to stick around, they build the contracts around the composition of the management if they stick around. They have no interest in getting involved in the daily running of the business.
I don’t think that statement is relevant anymore to the future. I think the Chinese are becoming innovators. You know, I saw these new bike-rental companies. I think this is great. This is innovation. I think the Chinese maybe have been copying in the past few years, but I think in the recent year or two, the Chinese have become more innovative.
You know, for us, we can’t be innovative only for the people who live in Israel because the market is too small. But for the Chinese, they don’t need to go so far. They need to look at their local history they have. And then if you look at the mobile devices in China, it’s innovative already. You know, I’ve gone to the conferences, I do think there’s been design in China already happening.
The culture gap between China and the west is getting smaller and smaller and we’ll see much more innovative people. I see Chinese starting to grow mostly in the US. They come back now to China. They can be a good group of people that can lead innovation in China.
In ten years’ time, we’re all going to be on the same standard. Whoever is not operating on the same standard will be left behind. Because Chinese companies need to compete globally, and not just with other Chinese companies, they will have to change how they communicate.
]]>For China’s increasingly picky bike renters, ease of access is one of the key determinants when choosing from a rainbow of similar bikes. After all, there’s no user experience to speak of if the service isn’t available. Because of this, speed is everything for bike rental companies as they scramble to stake their claim.
As one of the advocates of this principle, Chinese bike-rental unicorn ofo has been known for its aggressive expansion at home and abroad. The company’s trademark bright yellow bikes flooded the streets almost overnight, but have you ever wondered where these bikes come from and how they are produced?
TechNode got a chance to visit a Flying Pigeon factory in Tianjin, one of the largest bicycle manufacturing hubs in China.
Youku
Flying Pigeon is a reputable bike brand in China with over 80 years of history. The company began working with ofo just as the emerging business was taking off and has manufactured over 800,000 bikes for ofo in the four months from December last year to March this year. Its production line for ofo is expected to churn out around 5 million bikes per year, says Huang Shuo, marketing manager of Flying Pigeon.
Not all of the 5 million bikes are produced in Tianjin, according to Huang. “Ofo’s order is featured by cross-regional demand that varies every week. We have regional plants or partner factories across the country to meet ofo’s demand for local production. Of course, all bikes we produce meet the same standards, regardless of factory location.”
“Ofo’s orders account for one-third of our whole production capacity. The rest of our production line include higher-end bikes, sports bikes, and more,” Huang says.
Five million bikes is not a small deal, but that only ranked Flying Pigeon as one of the top-ten bike partners of ofo, according to ofo’s SVP Nan Nan. Apart from Flying Pigeon, the Beijing-based startup also inked a strategic partnership with bike producer Fushida for a 10 million bike per year deal earlier this year.
Ofo’s robust hardware demand underlines a larger market surge in the bike manufacturing industry, boosted by a string of bike-rental services that include ofo, its arch competitor Mobike as well as smaller players such as Bluegogo and HelloBike. It’s safe to say that the bike-rental boom has injected new vigor into flagging bike manufacturing industry.
Although manufacturers are scrambling to raise their production capacity, there’s limited automation and technology in the factories. The components for the bicycles are mostly assembled by manual labor: In the factory we visited, there were 70 to 75 workers on one assembly line.
The market surge may be able to pull in enough hot money to boost an overheated industry in the short term, but they can’t support the sustained development when the market craze cools off.
The bike availability principle that ruled at the beginning of bike-rental boom is losing its charm now when lines of dockless bikes become the cause for mounting pressures on urban management, especially in big cities.
Compared with aiming for higher production capacity, the problems of how to put the right amount of bikes at a place where it is most needed, how to lower the damage rate, and how to repair damaged bikes more efficiently are more pressing problems.
18:20 June 2, 2017: This post was updated to clarify some bike production numbers.
]]>Virtual reality is spectacular for creating engaging and immersive experiences. However, the experience is deeply personal and what clicks for some people won’t work for others, especially the people watching: onlookers would find you rather dumb while being tethered to a computer and fumbling around, blind and deaf to the outside world.
This highlights a notable problem in VR communication and promotion: how to translate the feeling of being in a fully interactive virtual environment for a large audience. When you can’t even share your feelings with people in the same room, how can you expect to allure those on the other side of the planet.
This is why Chongqing-based IVREAL came together. The Chinese startup was founded in 2016 by Tao Shu and Li Rui to address the promotion and communication problems in VR. The team decided the way to do that was to draw upon MR.
“Scientists and researchers would divide them into specific fields of VR, AR and MR, but in a real application, there’s no clear boundaries and more complementary integration among the sectors,” said Tao Shu, founder and CEO of IVREAL.
Taking the first-person footage from the headset display is the traditional and the easiest method to create a promotion trailer, however, it never provides the viewers the same degree of presence that’s been experienced by the VR players. To solve this problem, IVREAL adopts a 3rd person view to combine the players and the virtual environment.
“It would be super useful for developers to make the live demo and promotion videos,” said Tao. Instead of trackers, the platform would spice it up a little bit by rendering the trackers to something really cool, such as guns or bats.
While the 3rd person approach has been adopted by several players in this sector, such as YouTube’s Space Studio, there’s still many technical problems to be solved and device set up is one of them, introduced Tao.
“It usually takes five hours or more to install the whole set of devices which involves the green screen, headset, tracker, virtual cameras and reality cameras. “Through double-pairs-fixing technology, we can reduce the installation time greatly to 1-5 minutes. This would reduce the operational cost for VR live streaming service platforms, for example.”
IVREAL now supports both Unity and Unreal, two largest VR game engines, which means its solution is available for more than 95% of the VR contents now, Tao Shu noted.
Tao is a serial entrepreneur and a former professor at Sichuan Fine Arts Institute. With employees from Baidu, GE and Microsoft, the startup has received an undisclosed angel round. They are going to launch the next funding round later this year.
“Offering a model that you can find successful benchmark cases in the past is everything you need for fundraising in China. Investors keep telling you that technologies, patents, none of these matters as long as you have a sound and proven business model,” said Tao.
Believe it or not, Tao’s remarks is reflecting a popular mindset of Chinese investors. A proven business model is the secret recipe for every business and you could copy-and-paste it to everything. Just look at all the frenzies for “sharing-economy”, or shared rental to be more exact. The success of house and bike sharing spawned lots similar startups from power bank to basketball and even umbrella rentals.
While investors are throwing money at these verticals, they are unwilling to take risks and turning a cold shoulder to innovative models and technologies. “China’s moving to a new era for true innovation and our investors should shift to a new mindset to embrace this change too,” Tao commented.
]]>This week we switch up the format a bit to do our very first interview!
Continuing our discussion of bike sharing, we invited Florian Bohnert, Head of International Expansion at Mobike, to talk about Mobike, bike sharing, and their plans inside and outside China.
New fundings in China on May 10, 2017
News Break, a 2-year-old, Beijing-based news and information mobile application targeting English speakers, has raised tens of millions of U.S. dollars in Series B funding led by NetEase (网易), with participation from IDG Capital Partners (IDG资本) and ZhenFund (真格资本).
Meiwei Shenghuo (美味生活), a 3-month-old intelligent vending machine brand, has raised eight-digit RMB in an angel round led by Light-up Capital (点亮基金), with participation from Lieying Venture Capital (猎鹰创投) and several senior executives from the internet sector.
Boyun Vision (博云视觉), a 1.5-year-old, Beijing-based tech startup that focuses on research and applications of visual search and analysis, has raised tens of millions of RMB in an angel round led by undisclosed investors.
Dongdianweixiao (东电微校), a 1-year-old, Beijing-based early childhood education cloud platform, has raise RMB 15 million in Series A backed by Yinhe Fund (中泰银河基金).
Jutubao (聚土网), a 2-year-old, Chongqing-based rural land transfer and trading online platform, has raised tens of millions of RMB in Series A+ funding led by JD Finance (京东金融).
New fundings in China on May 11, 2017
Chinac (华云数据), a 7-year-old, Wuxi-based cloud computing service provider, has raised RMB 500 million in Series D funding backed by Tongkong Investment (通江资本) and Haitong Innovation Capital Management (海通创新).
CareerFrog (职业蛙/凯洛格科技), a 6-year-old, Shanghai-based online platform providing job-hunting training for college students, has raised tens of millions of RMB in Series B funding led by Huatu Capital (华图资本).
KnowLeGene (知因智慧), a 1-year-old, Beijing-based fintech startup committed to providing financial firms with risk control technologies based on machine learning, has raised tens of millions of RMB in Series Pre-A funding backed by Marathon Venture Partners (远毅资本).
KNX (肯耐珂萨), a 9-year-old, Shanghai-based O2O human resource solution provider, has raised hundreds of millions of RMB funding from investors including Oriental Fortune Fund (东方富海), Everbright Securities (光大证券), Shenwan Hongyuan Securities (申万宏源证券), and Morgan Stanley Private Equity Asia (摩根亚洲基金).
Qicaibike (七彩单车), a 1-month-old, Shenzhen-based bike-rental startup, has raised RMB 10 million in an angel round led by an undisclosed investor.
]]>Ofo, a leader in China’s burgeoning bike-rental market, has found itself embroiled in corruption allegations this week.
The new first broke out on Maimai, a real name registered social networking platform for professionals, where one user was asking about working at ofo. However, the answers that followed took an unexpected turn towards internal corruption allegations.
A person claiming to be a former employee laid bare their own experiences, saying that there’s an overtime culture in the company.
“996 (means the workday starts at 9 am, finishes at 9 pm, with an extended 6 day week), is the standard work practice here. The internal management is chaotic there’s no mechanism to speak of. Corruption is everywhere from the executive to grass root levels,” they wrote.
But then, a supposed current ofo employee confirmed the corruption allegations by adding that “a regional operator can steal tens of hundreds yuan per month, even a university operator can take tens of hundreds yuan or more.”
According to the exposure, the corrupt employees are ripping off the firm through two means: creating phantom workers (fake positions forged by corrupt staff who put the salaries in their own pockets) or soliciting kickbacks from manufacturing suppliers.
The phantom workers are usually in bike maintenance positions. If the rumors are true, this could partially explain why there’s such a high degree of damage to ofo bikes. Although ofo positioning itself as a connector rather than a maker of bikes, it’s a fact that most of its bikes are made by suppliers rather than contributed by end users. Local media cites a person familiar with the matter as saying that a supply chain leader purchases old tires from friends as pawns them off as new components for manufacturing. Needless to say, there must be some kickbacks involved in a case like this.
In response to the anonymous allegations, ofo has released an open letter to emphasize its zero tolerance attitude towards corruption. We have the open letter translated as below:
The broader picture is that this is not a single case. China’s tech landscape is filled with unsavory practices. Internet giants from BAT to medium-sized firms like Meituan-Dianping and JD have all launched campaigns to clean out corruption.
]]>Bike rental company Mobike has released a report of its user data from the Labor Day holiday weekend, providing one of our first pictures that can be built from bike rental data and an idea of how the company wants to reveal what it knows.
“May 1st Little Long Holiday Cycling Report,” generated by the Mobike Big Data Artificial Intelligence Platform or “Mofang” (魔方 “Magic Cube”) for short, shows users were indeed acting differently over the holiday weekend (April 29 to May 1) compared to normal weekends and commuting.
The data falls roughly into two different categories – national trends and behavioral change, or places vs people.
Overall use was up 17.2% nationally from the weekend before, with the largest spikes seen in tourist destinations rather than first-tier cities – up 51% in Xiamen, 47% in Hangzhou – with Tianjin seeing the biggest jump among the big cities at 36%, down to 26% for Shanghai which was fifth on the top city list.
Chengdu had the highest proportion of female riders at 47.7% followed by 45.7% in Beijing, 43.3% in Shanghai.
There is no mention of the locations which had either very small increases or falls which allow the national average of a 17.2% increase, but Mofang provides further interpretation of the figures.
The top five places whose Mobike users love to travel are listed as Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Chengdu.
The report includes the “Top 5 hottest tourist destination sites” for visitors who have registered in other parts of China: Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Chengdu, and Xiamen. This is where the user tracking starts to become more apparent.
The report outlines trends of who is going from which city to where: Beijing and Shanghai users head to Chengdu, while Guangzhou and Shenzhen city folk head to Haikou and Xiamen for a change of pace.
Then whether users stay in their hometowns or travel to another location, they’re tracked as they head to scenic spots (in their tens of thousands in some cases) and their behavior monitored: they cycle longer than normal, later in the day, visit more places, and in larger groups.
Superficially the data shows the impact the bikes are having on leisure time. The lifestyle advertising seems to have made headway as touristy areas thronged with cyclists. By revealing the data behind the trend, Mofang demonstrates how applying AI to massive amounts of data is going to create a valuable resource for Mobike as it builds a more detailed picture of its users’ lives.
Selling targeted data to travel companies (or setting up your own) is one thing, but the fact the company is showing that when you head out for a holiday cycle, it knows who you’re cycling with and when, where, at what speed, and whether you’ve traveled together from somewhere else. All this hints at just what else that Magic Cube might glean from its database.
]]>Didi Chuxing, the Chinese ride-hailing giant that swallowed Uber China, has announced the beta launch of bilingual functions on its app.
The service is now only available in the country’s three top metropolises of Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou, where most foreigners live and travel, but the firm disclosed it will be available in other cities later. Starting today, users in the three cities will gradually have access to an English interface.
While the company plans to make the app 100% bilingual, it is first starting this feature for core services of Taxi (出租车), Premier (专车)and Express, including ExpressPool (快车and顺风车). The app also enables real-time, in-app instant text messaging translation between English and Chinese to facilitate rider-driver communication. Users will also have access to bilingual customer service support via email and phone.
Before this, the most prominent ride-hailing service in China was Mandarin only. When the company discontinued the English interface of Uber China last year, there was an outcry among China’s laowai (老外, a colloquial term for foreigner) community, who felt abandoned in the upgrade.
In addition, the Didi app is also making improvements in payments with support for major international credit cards. Users can sign up with mobile numbers registered in 12 regions of the world, including the Chinese mainland, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Thailand, the Republic of Korea, Japan, the United Kingdom, France, Australia, Canada, the United States and Brazil.
The move comes amid Didi’s globalization push. While the company is expanding progressively to overseas markets, it considers the “internationalization of mobility services in China . . . a crucial link in Didi’s broader global strategy.”
As an international economic and cultural hub, China increasingly attracts inbound foreign tourists, business travelers, and expatriates. According to Chinese tourism authorities, over 28 million international tourists visited the country in 2016, up 8.3% year-on-year, with over 1 million working and living in China.
]]>Update, 08 May 2017, 1530: Yidao announced today it has obtained the online car-hailing license from Beijing Municipal Committee of Communications. Good news for Yidao as well as its users and drivers, as the acquisition of the license may help quicken the company’s fundraising pace since policy roadblocks have been cleared up.
The financial turmoil affecting ride-hailing service Yidao Yongche (易到用车) is still ongoing, although Yidao chairman He Yi noted that the company has achieved breakthroughs in financing and promised that Yidao will be able to let drivers withdraw payment through the app by the end of May.
Yet the cheerful message from the company chairman still failed to assure anxious drivers. There have been large crowds of drivers seen lining up at Yidao’s Beijing and Shanghai office eager to cash in their payment every workday since Yidao founder Zhou Hang made public a spat with company shareholder LeEco one month ago. There were reportedly more than 300 drivers rushing to Yidao’s Beijing headquarters on April 18 alone.
There have also been rumors that Yidao would consider asking its users to top up membership fees of the company controlling shareholder LeEco’s video streaming unit with the remaining funds in these users’ Yidao accounts if the company failed in its financing endeavors.
Yidao has also said that their telephone hotline is no longer available. They said that users can contact customer service online and wait for a call-back.
While the company has been teetering following the recent cash squeeze and the departures of the company’s three co-founders, there have been concerns that the implementation of the upcoming new industry regulation will deal the firm another blow.
According to regulations on ride-hailing services released last December by the Beijing and Shanghai governments, drivers for ride-hailing services must have local household residency, and vehicles they use must be registered with local car plates. Beijing has given affected companies a five-month grace period set to expire soon.
While competitors including Didi Chuxing (滴滴出行) and Shenzhou Zhuanche (神州专车) have obtained their online ride-hailing licenses in succession, Yidao has yet to get its own to date.
In addition to difficulty in paying drivers, Yidao has also defaulted on payments to third-party suppliers including car-rental companies and app promotion partners.
Although Yidao claims that it has applied for a license with Beijing transportation authorities in March and expected it to be approved soon, it is unknown whether the besieged ride-hailing service can obtain the license, given its current cash strain.
In contrast, ride-hailing service giant Didi Chuxing recently has finalized a funding round of over US$ 5.5 billion, pulling further ahead of cash-strapped Yidao.
]]>The spending spree on the power bank rental sector (estimated to be worth more than RMB 10 billion) continues. U.S.-listed Chinese online retailer Jumei recently acquired a 60% stake in power bank-rental startup Ankerbox (街电科技) for RMB 300 million, adding another case to the string of Chinese firms that are rushing to the country’s budding power bank rental market.
Under the deal, Jumei CEO and founder, Chen Ou, will take up the chairman position at Anker.
Ankerbox is a Shenzhen-based startup growing from an incubation project two years ago by Hunan Oceanwing E-commerce (海翼), the company behind power bank brand Anker. Oceanwing was founded by a few ex-Googlers in 2011 and engages in research, development, and sales of smart device peripherals.
Ankerbox allows users to rent power banks for a fixed fee. Unlike some other power bank startups, Ankerbox’s power banks are portable and can be dropped off at any Ankerbox location. Users can pinpoint nearby Ankerboxes through the rental service’s app and scan a QR code to rent a power bank.
Ankerbox earlier raised eight-digit RMB in Series A funding from investors including IDG Capital Partners and Sunwoda (欣旺达).
Jumei revealed that it plans to inject additional several billion RMB in Ankerbox in the next three months, viewing the 2-year-old power bank rental startup as a leading player in the country. The power bank rental market has become increasingly crowded, as more investments are pouring in it.
The investment is also seen as Jumei’s renewed efforts to reverse the company’s slide after it was hit by the declining performance and a failed privatization proposal. The company’s privatization efforts fell through last February after it met resistance from small investors, who complained that the offer was unfairly low.
According to the H1 2016 results released last December, Jumei’s net profit fell about one-third year-on-year to RMB 141 million. Listed in the US three years ago, the online retailer saw its share price plummet to US$3.07 on Thursday’s market close from its peak of US$ 39.45 in 2014, with its market cap slumping to US$ 552 million.
Jumei has been adjusting its business model in the wake of complaints two years ago that its third-party vendors sold fake cosmetics products. The company has expanded its online make-up and skin-care retailing business into more categories including mom & baby products as well as apparel and accessories. They have also launched a cross-border cosmetics e-commerce platform, allowing customers to buy products directly from overseas.
In addition, Jumei founded its film and television unit and launched its own air purifiers last year, as part of its effort to seek new growth driver.
]]>If you’ve been paying attention to China’s internet industry, then you are surely aware of the term “BAT”, an acronym that’s used to refer China’s IT triumvirate Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent. For a long time, this term is the only one you need to understand China’s digital market.
As pioneers of China’s internet boom, BAT are often dubbed as the first generation of Chinese tech companies. When they began, they each had their own distinct focus: Baidu for search, Alibaba for e-commerce and Tencent for social networking and games.
Different from the U.S. and Europe, where internet companies focus on one sector and try to be the best at it, Chinese companies start by focusing on and solving one problem, but their ultimate goal is to build huge companies that can attack all different parts of the market.
As the most typical example of this mentality, BAT have been spreading quickly to each other’s core businesses and whatever is trendy in the market. The presence of BAT kingdoms are so visible in China. They are the powers behind nearly ever emerging sectors from ride-hailing, bike-rental, m-health, online education, AI, cloud and big data.
While the kingdom of Tencent and Alibaba have continued their upward run, Baidu, which comes first in the acronym, is gradually lagging behind. Many have started to doubt whether the internet giant is qualified to remain in the term.
Market capitalization is perhaps the most direct means of evaluating the size of a company. Tencent just reached US$ 302 billion market cap this week. After all the fanfare about its historic IPO in 2014, Alibaba came close to breaking the US$ 300 billion barrier on April 24 with a market cap of US$ 286.6 billion. That number does not include Alipay’s operator Ant Financial, which has been seeking an individual listing in the near future.
Regardless of stock price fluctuations, the market cap of Tencent and Alibaba linger around US$ 300 billion. In comparison, Baidu closed at around US$ 178 per share with approximately US$61 billion market cap at the time of writing. That’s only around one-fifths of its peers.
The NASDAQ-listed company has seen its market cap drop constantly after reaching a historical high of US$ 249 per share on November 10th, 2014. In terms of revenue and profits, the gap between Baidu and the other two companies is also widening due to Baidu’s lack of long-term growth momentum.
BAT are trying their best to diversify their businesses in order to construct an ecosystem that would facilitate synergy effect among different units. Tencent and Alibaba are no doubt the bellwethers in creating their business ecosystems.
For example, you can’t really define Alibaba as an e-commerce company anymore. In addition to its core business, its revenue source is quite diversified with significant growth from cloud computing as well as digital media and entertainment. Its business covers sectors including entertainment, m-health, mobile payment, B2B services and cloud computing. Tencent is doing something very similar but with a slightly different focus. In addition to core messaging tools like WeChat and QQ, Tencent saw positive returns from Tencent Video, Tencent Music, and investments in Dianping and Didi.
However, Baidu is highly reliant on its search service and has few successful investment cases to boast about. Alibaba and Tencent’s startup investment strategy looks like a trawler net fishing, while Baidu seems to be going for precision strikes. However, precision takes time and the search company has been consistently derided for coming late to the game. For that reason, it has missed chances to capitalize on several waves of tech trends.
China’s ride-hailing market really heated up at the beginning of 2014. At that time Tencent and Alibaba were competing through proxy by investing in Didi and Kuaidi respectively. Baidu joined the battle almost one year after at the end of 2014 through investment in Uber. Something similar happened to Baidu when it’s transitioned to mobile and O2O. Sure it’s the safest to enter the arena when the scene is maturing, but it would also generate the least return.
Press coverage about Baidu has trended somewhat negative in the past few years along with a series of scandals.
One of the most scandalous events that sparked public outcry was the death of a college student named Wei Zexi, who blamed Baidu for promoting untrustworthy hospitals that failed to cure his cancer. Baidu’s paid listing practice has long been questioned by the public for selling listings to bidders, especially medical institutions, without adequately checking their claims. In January 2016, it was revealed that Baidu had sold the management rights to a popular online message board on hemophilia to a private hospital in Shaanxi province.
In addition to the incidents themselves, Baidu’s slow and ill-received responses lead the company to a larger PR crisis. The fiasco created a popular meme in the tech circle: “This session of Baidu PR sucks.”
In order to stay focused, Baidu has sold the mobile gaming business that was shaped out of 91 Wireless, acquired for US$ 1.9 billion, and axed several businesses with mediocre performance including their mobile health department, Baidu Future Store (an e-commerce platform), and Baidu Shuoba (a social networking unit).
Now, they are focusing on AI and autonomous driving, especially after Lu Qi, former Microsoft exec, took office as the company’s COO at the beginning of this year. But the company suffered a server brain drain as several top execs in AI unit left the company last month, led by Andrew Ng, the man behind Google Brain.
Baidu, who put forward the concept of Baidu Brain back in 2016, surely enjoys some first mover advantage this time and it’s continuing it through home-grown R&D and investments. In the past one-year period, it has announced acquisition or investment in five startups related to the businesses, including AI service xPerception, electric car manufacturer NextEV, Alexa-like Raven Tech, Velodyne, Lidar for self-driving cars, and fintech company ZestFinance.
In a recent article, The Economist pointed out that Baidu is becoming the Yahoo of China, “a once-dominant search giant that sank owing to lack of innovation and a series of management blunders” and that AI is probably the company’s last resort to restore its former glory.
Currently, however, no matter if it’s Baidu Brain or autonomous driving, Baidu’s AI businesses are more in the R&D stage. They still need more application scenarios to apply these cutting-edge technologies before making profits from it. Even if they were the first, this advantage is slowly diminishing as both Tencent and Alibaba have announced their own AI projects.
Baidu just open-sourced its self-driving technologies and services through Project Apollo, a tentative commercialization drive of its auto drive technologies, as company COO Lu calls it.
Robin Li also disclosed last month that the company is going to accelerate the commercialization drive for its AI products. We still need time to see what changes this strategic change will bring to the search giant.
]]>Bike-rental startup Mobike and China’s largest thin-film solar cell manufacturer Hanergy Holding Group (汉能) announced yesterday a strategic partnership that will see the latter’s thin-film solar panels integrated into the body of a Mobike bicycle so as to meet the electricity demand of its smart locks.
The tie-up will give the bike-rental service a bigger edge against its rivals in terms of technology and cost-saving in the long-term.
Under the agreement, Mobike will set up a joint lab with Hanergy Holding’s unit Hanergy Mobile Energy for the research of mobile energy and internet of energy fields. And any product, technology, and solution co-developed by the parties should be used on a priority basis for the product and market that is independently operated by each party or jointly operated by the parties.
Thin-film solar panels developed by Hanergy, which are flexible, bendable, lighter than the crystalline silicon solar cells and can charge the rechargeable battery on a bike body using the sun, can help Mobike address its bike lock power demand, as the bike-rental service adopts smart locks with satellite positioning and mobile communication functions.
Higher costs have somehow restricted thin-film solar products from wide application, compared with crystalline silicon solar cells. The big-ticket collaboration is also a boon to Hanergy, helping boost the sales of thin-film solar cells.
Hanergy is China’s largest thin-film solar cell manufacturer. It has acquired foreign firms including Solibro, MiaSolé, GSE and Alta Devices to consolidate its R&D and production of thin-film solar products since it ventured into this sector in 2009.
“Hanergy can utilize its global R&D resources to provide comprehensive technical support for Mobike, and discuss with Mobike on technical details later to make its bike more compliant with industry standards,” said Hanergy chairman Li Hejun.
“In addition, Hanergy’s leading thin-film solar products, whose exports are exempt from anti-dumping duties, will help assist Mobike in exploring overseas markets”, Li added.
Mobike has been moving down a path of technology since its establishment. It has launched its artificial intelligence data monitoring platform dubbed “Magic Cube“, in addition to the introduction of its IoT platform in collaboration with China Mobile and Ericsson.
In this chaotic bike-rental market with cutthroat competition, financial and tech strength will decide who will win out over the long haul.
Mobike’s arch rival ofo, which does not want to be left behind in technology, also announced an IoT partnership with China Telecom and Huawei in March, apart from a tie-up with China’s GPS BeiDou for smart locks last month.
]]>Bike-rental startup ofo has been ordered to be pulled out from east China’s Nantong city by local chengguan (城管; refers to “city management” departments) for cramming onto the sidewalks, only one day after they placed roughly 500 bikes on the streets, local media is reporting.
This is not the first time that bike-rental services have been put on hold at the local level. Similar cases have happened in cities of Zibo, Tai’an, Shaoxing, and Deyang over the past few months, as competition among bike-rental firms has been expanding from Tier 1 to Tier 2 and 3 cities.
Bike-rental firms recently found their bikes temporarily seized or their operations suspended by local authorities as they put their bikes into service without obtaining approval.
Nantong Chengguan Bureau held urgent talks on April 29 with a general manager in charge of ofo’s east China operations, pointing out some of the problems associated with ofo’s services such as no approval from local authorities, no satellite positioning function installed on its bikes, as well as no availability of maintenance, dispatching and technical staff.
An officer at Nantong Chengguan Bureau said they welcome bike-rentals in the city, adding that ofo can resume their bike-rental services in the city as long as they go through all the formalities required.
As the draft guidelines for the bike-rental sector in Tier 1 cities such as Beijing and Shanghai require that rental bikes should be equipped with smart locks and the satellite positioning system, ofo, which originally did not plan to use such locks on their bikes, has been gearing up to replace its old combo lock with a new BeiDou smart lock on its old-version bikes in Beijing and Shanghai. In this case, ofo seems to pin their hopes on putting its old-version bikes in some lower-rung cities in an effort to save on lock replacement costs.
According to an industry insider, the launch of bike-rental services in a new city involves multiple links including the local chengguan bureau and other departments such as urban construction bureau, transportation authorities or even water conservancy administrations. And it has not been defined as to which department should manage the bike-rental services since most of the local cities have not come up with measures for the emerging sector.
TechNode has reached out to ofo for comment, but did not receive a reply before publishing. We will update when we get a response.
]]>Alipay, the online and mobile payment platform operated by Ant Financial, has teamed up with six bike-rental apps to allow users to rent 6 million bikes in 50 cities across China directly through the app’s new “scan and ride” function.
Users can unlock any ofo, YouonBike, Bluebike, hellobike, Ubike or funbike vehicle simply by scanning its QR code through the Alipay app starting from today, the company announced.
Bike-rental has exploded in China over the past year, with tens of millions of users taking millions of rides every day across the country. However, users are facing with an increasingly bothering problem of choosing between a “rainbow” of different bike rental services. For users, new service eliminates the need to download individual apps for each service. For the companies on the other hand, the partnership helps both parties to drive more traffic.
Bike-rental apps are no longer the only place where urban commuters can borrow a bicycle. Behind the heating competition, there’s an increasing presence of internet giants, who are entering the battle field through capital injection or product line-up, or both.
Mobike’s service was integrated this March into WeChat, a popular messaging app developed by Mobike’s investor Tencent. Didi also added ofo to its app earlier this week in a similar move.
Although Alipay’s cooperation comes a bit late, it has certain advantages. The sheer number of partners, which indicates more bikes, is a plus in a market where bike availability is the top priority for users. When Alipay users scan the QR code, no user registration for separate bike-rental apps is needed for renting the bike. In addition, any user that rents a bike through Alipay automatically receives comprehensive accident insurance.
“Bike-sharing is transforming lifestyles across China, providing a healthy, convenient and affordable way to get across town. Integrating Alipay with these apps will make life even easier for users and help the industry continue its tremendous growth.”
~ Chen Long, Chief Strategy Officer of Ant Financial
Before this product tie-up, Alibaba has already tapped the market through its credit rating system Sesame Credit. Ofo and YouonBike allow users with qualifying scores on Sesame Credit to rent bikes without a deposit.
]]>WeChat recently announced a new feature called “store mini-app” (门店小程序), in its latest efforts to promote the application of its “mini-apps” (小程序).
The new feature will allow merchants to quickly create their own store mini-app on WeChat Media Platform (微信公众平台) while dispensing with the necessity of complicated app development.
The store mini-app feature is now available to official accounts registered by enterprises, media agencies, government organs and other organizations, while those registered by individuals cannot use the feature for the moment.
After official account owners fill in information on the WeChat of their business or stores, a mini-app akin to “shop name card” will be quickly generated. And store information will be displayed such as store name, store introduction, business hours, contact information, geographical location and images.
The mini-app feature was officially launched by internet giant Tencent in January, enabling users to access mobile services directly in-app. The innovative feature had a mediocre showing due in part to the feature’s limited use cases. It is time for the mini-app feature to shine as the introduction of the new store mini-app is set to increase more use scenarios.
This store mini-app can not only help merchants save costs (no need to hire third-party app developers again) and create an online display platform in a short period of time but is convenient for users to find merchants quickly.
In addition, the new function will promote the formation of a benign business path in which official account owners publish store information on WeChat while users buy services or goods offline guided by the feature. This will effectively connect online and offline channels, an uplift to the current mini-app feature which is more limited to online services.
WeChat, boasting a vast user base of 889 million MAU, has gained a significant amount of traffic through its tie-ups with third-party services such as Mobike, Didi Chuxing, JD.com, and Meituan.
With WeChat’s edges in user base and traffic, this new feature may help change the offline business landscape.
]]>After weeks of rumors, Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing announced today it has added bike-sharing service from ofo to its app.
DiDi users will have direct access to ofo’s bright yellow bikes in the app.
As a major investor of ofo, DiDi has poured a combined hundreds of million USD in three financing round of the bike-rental company. The product link-up is a major step towards more extensive collaboration between the two.
The cooperation comes shortly after Mobike integrated its service into WeChat, a popular messaging app developed by Mobike’s investor Tencent. Mobike and WeChat’s tie-up has proven quite successful for both parties. The weekly utilization rate of Mobike surged by 100% after it’s integration, the company disclosed. On the other hand, WeChat’s mini-app program, which witnessed lukewarm reception, also received lots of boost from Mobike.
Obviously, the partnership would help ofo to gain more traffic, giving it more edge in a tightening competition with multiplying rivals. But, similar to Mobike-WeChat’s case, ofo isn’t the only one that would benefit from the cooperation. Didi Chuxing has been suffering from a drop in active users since last year after the company called off a previous generous subsidy program. Likewise, ofo, which claims over 10 million orders per day, would also drive Didi’s performance.
Together with the announcement, DiDi disclosed that its bus service will enter into an enhanced partnership with ofo. ofo’s bike-routing analytics will help refine the AI-powered algorithms in DiDi’s real-time bus tracker to better respond to users’ differentiated short-distance mobility needs and design more efficient bike-bus transfer options.
]]>The Beijing government is soliciting public opinion on draft guidelines aimed at reining in the disorderly expansion of the city’s bike-rental sector, local media is reporting (in Chinese).
The draft guidance provides that rental bikes should meet national and industry standards, and requires rental bikes should be equipped with smart locks and the satellite positioning system.
Most of bike-rental startups in the country such as Mobike (摩拜单车 in Chinese), Bluegogo (小蓝单车 in Chinese) and Xiaoming (小鸣单车 in Chinese) have adopted smart locks on their bikes, while ofo, which originally did not plan to use smart locks on their bikes, said it has been gearing up to replace its old combo lock with a new BeiDou smart lock on its old-version bikes in Beijing and Shanghai.
In addition, the draft guidance requires that bike-rental firms should open special bank accounts in the city. This may help regulators to supervise the safety of user deposits in these firms’ accounts. There have been concerns about the safety of such capital with some even speculating that bike-rental companies are using these deposits to fund their expansion, but both Mobike and Ofo claimed users’ deposits are secure and they keep their operating funds separate from user deposits.
The draft guidance urges government at district-levels to cap the number of bikes allowed onto the streets to manage the bike sprawl. According to Beijing’s transportation regulators, various bike-rental firms have put into service 700,000 bikes in the city since last August, saddling the city with a heavy burden of traffic and space.
Dreams of making a fortune from the rental boom may have been shattered for electric bicycle-rental services such as E-zebra (电斑马 in Chinese) and Mebike (小蜜电单车 in Chinese) and Number-7 (7号电单车 in Chinese), since the Beijing draft guidance discourages the development of electric bicycle-rentals in the city, citing reasons of safety, parking, and road conditions.
Under the new regulation only those boasting strong financial strength and extensive channels of cooperation can have opportunities to acquire more resources to enhance innovation and ultimately dominate the market, an industry insider maintained.
As mounting problems have been emerging with the bike-rental boom, such as the inundation of bikes, illegal bike parking, slow deposit refunds and bike vandalism, local governments have started to mull rules to regulate the bike-rental sector.
Shanghai’s regulations, expected to be introduced next month, requires bike-rental firms to have three-year-old bikes scrapped off the road and bans users less than 12 years old from riding rental bikes, to name just a few. Shenzhen and Tianjin have same rules for user age as well.
]]>John and Matthew talk about bike sharing. Since the middle of 2016, China’s streets have explosions of yellow, orange, blue, and green as the bike sharing wars take off. Who are the big players? Why is it taking off in China? Will the Chinese government intervene like they have with ride-hailing?
China Tech Talk is a TechNode x ChinaChannel co-production.
]]>The funding spree continues in China’s bike-rental sector. Bike-rental startup ofo announced over the weekend that it raised an undisclosed amount in its Series D+ from Alibaba’s financial arm Ant Financial.
Under the deal, ofo cooperate with Ant Financial in the fields of e-payment, credit system and globalization process.
The announcement came less than two months after the bike-rental startup secured a US$450 million series D in March, which the company said was the largest amount in a single funding round in the sector.
Prior to the new funding round, ofo had already struck a strategic cooperation deal last month with Sesame Credit, the social credit scoring system developed by Ant Financial, allowing Shanghai ofo users with a Sesame Credit score of 650 or higher can register on the app without making the RMB 99 deposit.
Ant Financial CEO Jing Xiandong said the company will set an example for the bike-rental sector through this cooperation with ofo, and fully unleash their potential in the mobile platform, credit management, online payment, risk management and safety control.
It is no wonder ofo chooses to team up with Ant Financial, which is the operator of Alipay and other Alibaba-backed financial services, while ofo’s arch rival Mobike has worked closely with WeChat (Mobike’s bike-rental feature was added to WeChat Wallet last month). In China’s third-party online payment, Alipay and WeChat Payment remain the top two players, each with a 54.1% and 37.02% share in the fourth quarter of 2016.
Dai Wei earlier revealed the company is worth US$ 2 billion, takes in over RMB 10 million in revenue a day, and will hopefully turn a profit this year.
]]>The race is still on in China’s bike-rental sector. Bike-rental startup ofo and the world’s largest bicycle producer Fushida recently entered into a strategic partnership that will see the latter manufacture 10 million bicycles for ofo every year, local media is reporting (in Chinese).
Fushida chairman Xin Jiansheng expected the company’s annual production capacity to top 20 million this year, representing a fifth of the global manufacturing output.
In addition, the two companies will build together a global bike R&D center and conduct cooperation in supply chain, overseas market development and other areas.
Ofo and its arch-rival Mobike are well-matched in terms of bike quantity.
Mobike earlier told TechNode that their current annual production capacity is over 10 million bikes, and that they do not need to compete for production capacity as they have set up their own production factory and partnered with over 100 production partners and suppliers.
Ofo CEO Dai Wei said the company now reaped over RMB 10 million in revenue a day and will hopefully turn a profit this year. He also revealed that the company, which had secured US$ 450 million in its Series D this March, will have two new financing rounds in the near future (in Chinese).
In a recent interview with CNBC, Dai said that ofo is worth US$ 2 billion.
]]>While the buzz surrounding China’s bike rental industry has yet to cool off, power bank rentals, another vertical under the rental economy business model is causing. What happened previously to the trendy sector is repeating itself again in the Middle Kingdom.
The carnival surrounding power bank starts with the influx of massive funding. Five startups in the industry have received a combined RMB 300 million (US$ 43 million) financing in less than ten days since the beginning of April with over 20 investment institutions entering the arena. Apart from the ones already secured funding, there are over a dozen similar ones looking at this emerging sector. Here’s a list of the major players in the field.
Mobile smartphone charging schemes are nothing new in China. Coin operated charging stations appeared at shopping malls and transportation hubs as early as 2013, but low profitability forced the companies to provide free charging services and monetize through promotion services and advertising. However, the business never really took off. On the contrary, it drew a lot of criticism for forcing customers to download apps that could potentially leak user information.
The current concept of power bank rental has evolved a little bit and falls into to two categories. Represented by Xiaodian, the first category features fixed charging stations, which are placed in public places including restaurants, billiards rooms, KTVs, and subways. They are smaller in size as compared with their predecessors. The other category, represented by Laidian and AnkerBox, allow users to rent portable power banks which users can take with them and return to other power stations. Both of the models support mobile payments.
The rise of the new business is due in no small parts to the boom of bike rentals, where people see the possibility to create another hot vertical under the buzzword–“sharing-economy”. But to what degree the two businesses are comparable to each other and whether the success of bike rental can be duplicated remains another question.
The last-mile problem has been a long-term pain point for urban transportation. The possibilities to solve this problem through technological innovation are small in the short term. In addition, not everyone owns a bike, so bike-rental is a relatively high-frequency service addressing real headaches for customers.
On the other hand, power banks are more affordable and portable. The selling point is they spare users from the hassles of taking their own power banks with them, which means that the service itself is dispensable to some extent and is of much lower frequency because people can easily carry their own mobile charger wherever they go.
One of the factors contributing to the success of dockless bike-rental is its mobility, however, this is missing in the power bank businesses. In either case of the power bank models, uses are attached to some fixed location.
The battery life of most smartphones supports one charge per day now. With the development technologies, the battery of mobile devices will have larger capacities, which means power banks as a device categoy could die out in foreseeable the future.
]]>Zhou Hang, founder and CEO of ride-hailing service Yidao Yongche (易到 in Chinese), admitted yesterday in a statement that the firm has cash problems. He blames this on its controlling shareholder LeEco diverting to other purposes an RMB 1.3 billion fund originally earmarked for the firm, our sister site TechNode Chinese is reporting.
Zhou made the statement in response to a stream of negative publicity about the firm’s troubled operations recently.
Rants and complaints against the ride-hailing service have kept growing over the past few months. Drivers of the ride-hailing service feel aggrieved for being unable to receive their payments from the car-hailing platform, while passengers grumbled that there are often no cars available even if they opt to pay higher fees for their trips, and found it difficult to have their prepaid funds refunded.
Yidao was the runner-up with a mere 3.6% share in the ride-hailing market last year (in Chinese) dwarfed by the 94.6% share of marker leader Didi Chuxing (滴滴出行 in Chinese).
To fend off intense competition from rivals and expand its own presence, Yidao had to resort to a strategic investment from outside investors to fund its subsidy campaigns, a common practice seen in the car-hailing market in the past few years. In October 2015, internet giant LeEco’s automobile unit LeSEE bought a 70% stake in the firm, becoming its controlling shareholder.
As of the end of last June, the firm had attracted a whopping RMB 6 billion in deposits from 6.53 million customers in its 227-day 100%-rebate campaign (in Chinese).
Yet the high subsidies offered to drivers and customers have led to a strain on the cash flow of the firm, and the situation has gotten even worse when its majority shareholder LeEco itself has faced a big cash flow squeeze since last year suffering from excessive expansion.
There have been reports that LeEco delayed payroll for its U.S. employees this month and scrapped its planned US$2 billion acquisition of U.S television maker Vizio Inc, signs that the technology giant has been embroiled in a cash crunch.
Although LeEco has recently managed to secure an RMB 15 billion funding program from real estate titan Sunac, it seems the beleaguered internet titan still has trouble getting their arms around the mess of the car-hailing service.
What Yidao is facing is not a mere creditor’s rights dispute, but may be a mass incident hampering social stability, Zhou warned.
Zhou has gradually faded out from the management since the firm was controlled by LeEco and recently rumored to have left the firm to Shunwei Capital, a VC firm set up by Xiaomi co-founder Lei Jun.
In response to Zhou’s statement, Yidao and LeEco have refuted the cash diversion charges in a joint statement last night and said they have injected roughly RMB 4 billion in the car-hailing platform to bolster the firm’s development.
According to LeEco, the RMB 1.3 billion in debate is part of an RMB 1.4 billion syndicated loan to Yidao, which LeEco pledged its real estate LeEco Mansion as collateral. The parties have agreed to use the loan for daily capital turnover of LeSEE and Yidao. Of the total amount, RMB 100 million will use to fund Yidao’s business, while the balance goes to LeSEE. LeEeo considers Zhou’s remarks to be a smear, as Zhou has had knowledge of the matter, and signed up to the contract.
While the loan specifics remain to be confirmed from banks, an industry observer advised that LeEco should act swiftly to head off the war of words and help Yidao out, whether through new external financing or its own capital injection.
]]>Editor’s note: This originally appeared in our weekly newsletter. Sign up here to get our updates straight to your inbox.
This week’s briefing starts off a bit personal. I’ve been in and out of Chinese media and tech since 2010. Since I joined TechNode last November, I’ve told many people the same thing: There’s no bad time to get involved in tech in China. The rate of change and adoption of this change is so high that no matter when you start, you’re not going to be too late because there’s always going to be something exciting and creative coming down the pipe. The three trends I’m talking about today are great examples of this
Much of what we see happening in China now is directly enabled by the number of people using mobile payments (mostly Alipay and WeChat). Taking cash and physical credit cards out of the equation have not only reduced purchase friction but also allowed internet technology to become embedded in our everyday life. It started off slowly with WeChat’s hongbao and the pre-Uber subsidy war, both requiring users to link their accounts. Fast forward to today and China has become the world’s number 1 place for mobile payments.
Technology is quickly addressing some of the major problems that China has faced for some time. For consumers, that problem is convenient access to goods and services. Even before mobile payments took hold, China’s entrepreneurs were looking for ways to solve this very painful problem, from tuangou and food delivery to cleaning services and at-home manicures. While mobile payments certainly reduced the friction and chances of fraud, these O2O services could still work because there was still someone who could receive money.
The newest O2O business models work because they fundamentally do not require any person-to-person interaction, much less the exchange of physical money. Instead, I can scan a QR code, register, pay a deposit, and start enjoying the benefits of, let’s say, renting a bike or a power bank. While this is what is being called the “sharing economy”1, this is actually laying the ground work for an IoT economy and the increased implementation of artificial intelligence.
There is no bad time to get into tech; you just have to make sure you’re ready to keep up.
Bike-rental startup Mobike announced yesterday the launch of its artificial intelligence (AI) data monitoring platform dubbed “Magic Cube”, in its renewed efforts to fight against its rivals, our sister site TechNode Chinese is reporting.
This is the first time that AI has found its application in the bike-rental sector.
“Magic Cube” is able to make accurate forecasts of supply and demand for its bike-rentals, and provide guidance to bike dispatching, scheduling and operation, said Yin Dafei, chief scientist at Mobike’s big data department. The AI platform is also assisting in Mobike’s deployment of geo-fencing to address the illegal parking issue plaguing the bike-rental firm.
At the moment, Mobike and its competitor ofo are fighting a pitched battle in the bike-rental sector, taking their clash to bike quantity and technology fronts. Mobike has taken the lead to introduce its IoT platform in collaboration with China Mobile and Ericsson, also the first of its kind in the world’s bike-rental sector.
Powered by NB-IoT, Mobike can provide users with accurate positioning and convenient bike unlocking solutions. In contrast, its rival ofo, which announced a partnership with China Telecom and Huawei in late March, is playing catch-up as they originally did not plan to leverage IoT technology on their bikes. In addition, ofo recently announced a strategic partnership with China’s GPS BeiDou Navigation for smart locks, trying to overcome its defects in bike positioning.
Locked in a fierce race, Mobike and its rival are also currying favor with government-backed institutions, as they look for ways to win government support and cope with regulation issues.
Mobike, apart from the launch of the AI platform, announced yesterday the creation of a city travel research institute with 11 government-backed research institutions and NGOs, to explore sustainable city travel solutions and promote the construction of smart, low-carbon and health cities.
Mobike also published the Bike-Sharing and Urban Development White Paper (in Chinese) yesterday, pointing out bike-rentals have become the fourth important way Chinese people travel, after cars, buses, and subways. Since the emergence of bike-rentals, there has been a 55% fall of car trips (private cars, taxies, and cars providing online ride-hailing services included) and a 53% reduction of the use of “black” motorcycles (黑摩的 in Chinese) – private motorcycles illegally carrying passengers for money, according to the white paper.
]]>Power bank rental firm Xiaodian (小电科技 in Chinese) announced yesterday a series A worth roughly RMB 100 million, led by Tencent and Hangzhou Vision Capital Management, local media is reporting (in Chinese).
Other investors include CDH Investments, GSR Ventures, DT Capital Partners and In Capital.
Founded last December by former Alibaba employee Tang Yongbo, Beijing Yidianyuan Network Technology (北京伊电园网络科技有限公司 in Chinese), the company behind Xiaodian (in Chinese), developed this in-house smart wireless charging device, according to public data from its official website.
The Xiaodian power bank can be placed in public places including restaurants, billiards rooms, KTVs, and subways. With the Xiaodian app installed on their phone, or by scanning a QR code with WeChat, users can rent the power bank and charge their smart devices for RMB 1 per charge, with no deposit required.
Currently, Xiaodian has partnered with more than 1,000 restaurants in Beijing and plans to expand its presence into more Chinese cities with the newly-secured funding.
“Sharing-economy” appears to be the great buzz word of the past two years in China, covering the rental of everything from cars, bikes, electric vehicles, to apartments and more.
According to a report at the 2016 Summer Davos Forum, China’s sharing economy is estimated to top US$ 300 billion and may grow by 40% every year in the next five years (in Chinese).
The booming sector has also drawn the interest of internet giants such as Tencent, which has invested heavily in bike-rental startup Mobike in the startup’s series C and series D financing, apart from its funding in car-hailing giant Didi (in Chinese).
]]>Ofo has announced a strategic partnership with BeiDou Navigation, a Chinese government-backed sattelite positioning system, that will see ofo bikes equipped with Beidou-enabled smart locks, our sister site TechNode Chinese is reporting.
Under the agreement, ofo’s bikes furnished with the BeiDou-enabled smart lock will be first launched in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei province. In addition, users will be notified of available and legal parking areas inside ofo’s app.
The new lock will help ofo users find a bike easily even in remote areas. Unlike its rival Mobike, whose bikes have GPS-enabled smart locks, ofo uses a low-tech combo lock with no positioning function, which has not only caused their staff great trouble in bike dispatching, but is inconvenient for users to the pinpoint the position of a bike: they cannot use one unless the bike is right before their eyes.
Ofo did not reveal whether it will install the “BeiDou smart lock” on its next-gen yellow bike fleet or just replace the old combo lock with the new one on its old-version bikes.
The government-backed BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS), on par with the US’ GPS, Russia’s GLONASS and the EU’s Galileo, has been gaining traction since its launch at the end of 2011. The BDS system has a total of 23 satellites in operation, as of June 2016. And it was generating US$31.5 billion in revenue for companies in China, including China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation and AutoNavi.
The tie-up comes after the Shanghai government issued draft guidance (in Chinese) last month for the bike-rental sector, requiring each rental bike to have a satellite-based positioning function and is the latest in ofo’s efforts to comply with government regulations and remove roadblocks for its future development (in Chinese).
Ofo claims to have more than 2.5 million bikes in services in 47 cities across the world, brokering more than 10 million rides every day.
]]>Editor’s note: A version of this post first appeared on Yicai Global, the English-language financial news service of Shanghai Media Group. Yicai Global is one of just two dedicated Chinese news feeds connected to the Bloomberg terminal.
Ofo, one of China’s many bike-rental brands, will be incorporated into Didi Chuxing, the world’s largest ride-hailing platform, according to media reports. The move comes shortly after ofo’s chief competitor, Beijing Mobike Technology Co., integrated with WeChat, a popular messaging app in China.
Ofo’s founder, Dai Wei, confirmed the claims were true, Tech.163.com reported. There will not be a merger in bike-rental akin to the combination of Didi and Uber last year, he added.
Didi had previously invested in several rounds of ofo financing, although neither firm confirmed the financial details of the deals.
Mobike also received funds from Tencent Holdings Ltd., WeChat’s creators. The bike-sharing firm said it would be available on the social platform, which has over 900 million monthly active users, at the end of last month. This allows WeChat users to simply scan the QR code found on Mobikes to ride them, without needing the Mobike app.
]]>Ah, it’s that time of year again: when the unsuspecting are caught unawares by the unstoppable forces of time. April Fool’s has become a time-honored tradition for those in tech, a time for everyone to flex their humor muscles and devise sometimes silly, sometimes outlandish, and sometimes very believable news stories and announcements.
The best April Fool’s jokes fall just inside the realm of the believable. In order to fulfill their purpose, they must play upon the audience’s expectations. Today, we here at TechNode decided to run our own April Fool’s story about something believable and relevant: two of China’s largest bike-rental companies merging. However, we were not as original as we thought. Turns out that iFeng Tech not only beat us to the punch (in Chinese), but they also did a much better job of crafting a believable story! It was so believable, in fact, that many Chinese language news portals picked up on it and, it would seem, actually believed it even though at the bottom, it says “愚人节快乐!” (“Happy April Fool’s Day” in English).
Perhaps because of the title (“Mobike, ofo in talks to merge; Tencent biggest winner”), perhaps because of the seriousness of the article, ofo was decidedly displeased. When asked by a reporter for our sister site TechNode Chinese for comment, a spokesperson for ofo said (my translation):
“In response to iFeng’s irresponsible behavior, ofo is asking that they stop publishing false stories, apologize, and recognize their responsibility to seriously report the news. In addition, we hope that other media will not reprint this story or other related information. Ofo retains the right to resort to legal means.”
When asked for comment by TechNode English, a spokesperson for Mobike said that TechNode was the first media, Chinese or international, to ask them about this. They also pointed out that it was obviously a joke.
The different responses from China’s largest O2O bike-rental companies have left many wondering what was going on internally to trigger this knee-jerk reaction from ofo. Needless to say, both Chinese media and tech companies will be on their guard next year.
]]>China’s telecommunications, media, and technology (TMT) industry remained the apple of investors’ eyes in the second half of 2016, maintaining rapid growth in both value and volume. A total of 1,478 PE/VC deals were recorded during the period, with a total value reaching US$ 25.02 billion, according to an industry report recently released by PwC China (in Chinese)
According to the report, PE/VC investments in the TMT sector remained dynamic in the country in the latter half of last year, representing more than half of the whole industry investments by value, with the highest single deal worth US$4 billion.
The total value of investments that had a single deal value over US$ 100 million accounted for nearly half of the TMT total investments during the reporting period, while a large number of investment deals were below US$ 100 million in terms of single deal value.
Gao Jianbin, PwC China’s technology industry leader, says that there is a lag in the investment decline for the TMT industry compared with overall industry, but the industry is still attracting far more investments than other industries. The polarization in investments reflects a fact that the high valuations of unicorns have deterred new investments.
Internet was the best performer in the TMT sector, in terms of deal value and volume. The sub-sector saw total investment value hit US$18.19 billion in H2 2016.
Some new business patterns such as O2O bike-rentals and live streaming have attracted huge investments. In addition, investment in entertainment and media subsector was on the rise, with the number of deals reaching a record high of 108.
IPOs have become a major form of exit for investors. A total of 58 Chinese TMT firms have raised RMB 33 billion in the second half of last year.
During the reporting period, the two largest tech IPOs in the country belonged to Meitu and China Film Corp. Photo editing and sharing app developer Meitu raised roughly RMB 4.2 billion through its Hong Kong IPO last December, recording the largest technology listing in Hong Kong in a decade. China Film Corp listed in the country’s A-share market, raising RMB 4.17 billion.
]]>In a surprise announcement, China’s largest bike-rental companies, Mobike and ofo announced plans to merge last night, local media is reporting. For the time being, both companies will operate independently until the merger is complete. Unlike other recent mergers in China’s sharing economy, the merger will see the creation of a new company, to be called Mofo.
“After deep consideration and encouragement from friends and allies, the founders felt they were wasting too much investor money. In addition, their parents were worried about their health,” said a person familiar with the matter.
The move from both companies comes as a shock as many expected the competition to continue for some time. Indeed, the typical cycle in China’s hot sectors has historically been burning cash to capture users and market share until a winner emerges.
“They considered all the possibilities and decided that they didn’t want to keep fighting. There’s actually more value in combining forces. This merger will allow them to better beat back other smaller players. In addition, they can now focus on the future of transportation: autonomous riding,” said the person.
As part of the announcement, the companies also said that once the merger is complete, they will begin to invest in autonomous riding research. Autonomous driving is a high-interest area for companies around the world, with ride-hailing company Didi also exploring this.
“The future is autonomy. Cars will soon be self-driving. Why can’t bikes be self-driving as well?” said the person.
]]>Users are able to access Mobike’s cycle-rental feature within the Wallet function of popular messaging app Wechat, our sister site TechNode Chinese is reporting. The Mobike bike-rental feature now appears on the WeChat Wallet interface.
This marks a further tie-up after the pair made an announcement last month that users can unlock a bike by scanning a Mobike QR code using WeChat’s scanning function on their cellphones.
The new feature is the eighth one added under the “Third-party Service” column inside WeChat Wallet, following other in-app features such as Didi ride-hailing, Meituan takeout, and JD e-shopping.
In addition, WeChat users can utilize Mobike’s bike- rental service by searching for the mini-app on Wechat, which has been available since this January.
Mobike said the mini-app had several million visits on the first day of its launch on Wechat and the number of new users registered through the mini-app has grown by more than 100% every week.
]]>Bike-rental firm Youon submitted today an updated initial public offering prospectus to China’s securities regulator, seeking a listing in the country’s A-share market, local media is reporting (in Chinese).
If successful, it will be the first bike-rental IPO in the country.
Youon Public Bicycle System Co., Ltd. (“常州永安公共自行车系统股份有限公司” in Chinese), the firm behind bike-rental service Youon, is filing for an IPO to raise RMB 598 million for purposes of research and development, business operation and bank loan repayment, according to an online statement issued last Friday by the China Securities Regulatory Commission.
“Bike-sharing” is the highlight in the updated prospectus, compared with the version filed in June 2015, according to the firm’s prospectus (in Chinese).
In late February, the firm’s subsidiary Youon Low Carbon Technology (永安行低碳科技有限公司 in Chinese), the operator of bike-rental service Youon, announced it had secured an undisclosed amount of series A funding from investors including Ant Financial (the financial affiliate of Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba), IDG Capital and Shenzhen Capital Group.
In March 1, Youon Low Carbon inked a capital increase deal to sell minority stake to its investors including Ant Financial and Shenzhen Capital Group.
However, the firm terminated the agreement with the aforementioned investors on the eve of the IPO application, as it took into account the recent public concerns towards the chaotic operation and management of the bike-rental sector.
The firm stressed that they made the decision out of a responsible attitude towards investors and in the principle of prudent investment. And the firm’s investors said they will continue to support Youon in its efforts to expand the bike-rental service and will resume the investment negotiation again when timing is ripe.
Ant Financial still has a say in the firm, as its wholly-owned subsidiary Shanghai Yunxin Venture Investment remained the firm’s third largest shareholder by holding an 11.11% stake in the firm.
A BD director from Ant Financial had also taken a seat on the board.
The firm put the capital increase deal on hold after recent setbacks during their rollout of the dockless bike-rental service in tier-2 and tier-3 cities, where their bikes were frequently confiscated by chengguan staff (“城管”in Chinese; refers to “city management” departments) for illegal parking.
According to the prospectus, Changzhou-based Youon Public Bicycle System was established in 2010. The company’s main business includes sale of public bikes, operation of a government-funded public bike sharing platform (docking stations required), and that of dockless bike-rental services funded by private investors.
The firm has seen an annual compound annual growth of 28.27% from 2014 to 2016. Last year, the firm derived the majority of its revenue from the sale (RMB 239 million) and operation (RMB 533 million) of public bicycles, with the two businesses combined accounting for 99.8% of its total revenue.
In contrast, revenue from its bike-rental service reached RMB 368,000, representing a mere 0.05% of its total revenue last year.
Unlike ofo and Mobike which are fighting at close quarters in tier-one and tier-two cities, the firm mainly focuses on tier-three and lower-rung cities, with the operation of government-funded public bicycles as its business core. According to its financial results, up to 85% to 90% of its revenue came from tier-3 and lower-rung cities. This has helped the firm to fend off competition from the new rivals.
Riding the bike-rental boom, Youon kick-started its mass launch of the dockless bike-rental service last December, but was deterred amid the cutthroat competition, where top two players ofo and Mobike have claimed overwhelming market shares.
]]>Editor’s note: This was originally a two part report by Li Siyi and Jiang Xiaochuan for Tencent Finance. It has been translated and further edited for clarity and style by Linda Lew.
In winning the bike-rental “arms race,” the number of bikes on the street has become the critical factor. China’s largest bicycle manufacturing hub has become a strategic battleground in the escalating war for users. Any Mobike, ofo or other bike-rental bicycles are very likely to have been manufactured by a factory in Tianjin.
The heyday for Tianjin’s bicycle manufacturing industry was 20 years ago when there were several hundred bicycle factories and the profit on producing a bicycle was over RMB 10. However, in recent years, fierce competition and reduced demand have seen the number of factories decrease to a few dozen and the profit margin on a bicycle has fallen to RMB 1 or 2.
The industry looked to continue its decline until one day in 2015, two young men walked into Tianjin Fushida Corporation CEO Sun Hao’s office to place an order of 50,000 yellow bicycles. Fushida is the world’s largest bicycle producer with a manufacturing capacity of over 10 million bicycles per annum.
“Two very young looking guys,” Sun Hao described to Tencent Finance (in Chinese) the first time he met Chen Zhengjiang and Wang Gen from ofo, who were managing procurement at the time. “In the early days when we first took on the order, we weren’t so sure about it.”
Now the number of bicycles that ofo orders from Fushida have ballooned over 200 times. In 2017, the Tianjin Dongli district based factory received the largest order for manufacturing the bikes to date – 10 million units.
The production line of a large bicycle manufacturer can churn out 1,200 units each day. This was confirmed by Tencent Finance reporter’s observations: one of Fushida’s ofo production line assembled 10 bicycles in 16 minutes. Based on this, Fushida is estimated to produce over 5,000 ofo bikes each day.
However, the factories still have limited technology. The production lines do not have much automation: components for the bicycles are assembled by manual labor. In the assembly section, the level of noise was high but most of the employees did not wear protective gear. Nor was there gear to protect from the pungent chemical smells found in some quarters of the factory.
Another large bicycle manufacturer Tianjin Aima Sporting Products Limited received an order for 5 million Mobikes in 2017. Most of Aima’s production lines are assigned to producing Mobikes. Starting from this year, those working on Mobike production lines need to work two shifts each day, according to one staff member. However, staff on other production lines do not have enough work.
While the sudden increase in bicycle orders has reinvigorated the bicycle manufacturing industry, this has also generated an immense demand that bicycle manufacturers are finding difficult to fulfill. Bicycle manufacturers are scrambling to raise their production capacity.
Fushida has introduced a reward for current employees to encourage successful referrals. If a new hire referred by a current employee stays beyond the first month, then the referee can receive an RMB 500 cash reward.
A temporary staff member told Tencent Finance that the wage for a day’s work is RMB 130 with working hours between 8 am to 9 pm, six days a week. There is an hour break each for lunch and dinner with food provided by the company. According to this rate, one month’s wage comes to be about RMB 3,000. In the job posting from Aima, the monthly wage for assembly and paintwork staff is RMB 3,500 – 4,000, welders RMB 4,000 and cargo operation staff RMB 5,000 – 6,500. Food and accommodation are provided for all of these postings.
In addition to a shortage of staff, bicycle components and raw materials are also in high demand. The existing manufacturing capacity is limited and also factories in the Northen China region face temporary manufacturing bans from time to time to reduce smog. These inevitably lead to the pricing of bicycle components skyrocketing.
Tianjin Jiufa Bicycle Company manufactures bicycle frames and its main raw material is steel. In 2015, the upstream frame raw material price was RMB 4,000 per ton. In September 2016, the price rose to RMB 5,300 per ton.
“Last year, when negotiating with raw material suppliers, it used to be possible to drive the initial pricing down by around a few dozen kuai,” Jiufa Bicycle General Manager Zou Suqing told Tencent Finance (in Chinese). “Since the end of last year, there was no longer any room for negotiation. It was either take it or leave it.”
The bike sharing boom’s immediate invigoration of the bicycle manufacturing industry is evident. However, the long-term effects remain to be seen.
“Now everyone focuses on the short-term profits,” Bicycle supply chain middleman Zhang Bei (name has been changed to protect his privacy) told Tencent Finance (in Chinese). “When this bike sharing war ends and in the post-bike sharing age, will the revival of traditional bicycle manufacturing still continue?”
]]>Ofo’s bicycle-rental feature is expected to be accessible to users within ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing’s app in April, signaling the bike-rental startup’s another step in an escalating race with competitors for market supremacy, our sister site TechNode Chinese is reporting (in Chinese).
Didi Chuxing declined to comment when contacted by TechNode. Ofo has not responded to requests for comment.
Such a tie-up is not unprecedented. Ofo’s arch-nemesis Mobike made a similar move in February when it made an announcement with popular social messaging app WeChat that users can unlock a bike by scanning a Mobike QR code using Wechat on their cellphones.
Ofo’s every move will have major consequences for Didi Chuxing, as the ride-hailing service now holds more than 30 percent stake in ofo after three rounds of funding, becoming the bike-rental firm’s largest shareholder.
Didi has made a hefty investment in ofo starting from the latter’s B+ round in September last year worth US$ tens of millions. The ride-hailing giant also participated in ofo’s US$ 450 million Series D financing this March, led by Moscow-headquartered DST.
Didi’s travel portfolios include car-pooling, car-rental, Didi Kuaiche (“快车” in Chinese; private cars charging lower prices) and Zhuanche (“专车” in Chinese; private cars, but higher fees and focusing on high-end travelers).
The availability of ofo bike-rental feature in-app can help fix Didi’s failings in the field of short-distance travel. On the other hand, the tie-up can help ofo attract massive traffic to its bike-rental feature and broker more rides thanks to the popularity of Didi app.
Ofo is in a close race with Mobike, and both claimed to be the country’s No. 1 bike-rental platform, are bleeding money sending out freebies to win users.
Ofo CEO Dai Wei earlier revealed that the company aims to expand to 200 cities and cover tier-four cities this year, and may turn a profit by the end of this year.
]]>Ofo, China’s latest bike-rental unicorn that Apple CEO Tim Cook paid his tribute to during China visit, is looking beyond the borders of the middle kingdom.
“The act of bike-sharing could someday become a lingua franca, connecting people around the world,” said Dai Wei last week at Boao Forum for Asia.
The company’s bold global expansion initiative comes as arch local competitor Mobike and a group of smaller players are looking at the overseas market. However, it’s still not clear whether it’s a smart move for the new upstart company to open a new battlefield in comparatively developed markets while it’s still entangled in a tough war with domestic players.
Amid hot local competition with Mobike and a slew of smaller rivals, ofo has expanded strategically since the end of last year.
Companies have their own expansion styles, so it didn’t surprise us when ofo rolled out its service in Singapore earlier this year as the first Chinese bike-rental company to operate overseas.
Up to now, ofo Singapore has launched thousands of bicycles, attracted tens of thousands registered users, according to the company. They also say they have been running trials in San Diego and London area.
“Ofo chose those areas because of the strategic locations for further expand into the US, Europe, and South East Asia,” said a spokesperson.
Founded by Peking University alumni, ofo was born out of a project to address campus transportation problems and gradually developed into a cycle-rental platform for urban residents. The Beijing-based startup takes closed or semi-closed areas like the office parks and college campuses as their entry points for overseas market.
However, it is widely believed expanding beyond small communities and schools would be difficult for the company in the U.S. or other foreign countries, given they are far less populated than China and have higher car penetration rate. Furthermore, people would consider bike cycling more of a lifestyle or recreation than a transportation means.
“Surprisingly, the demand for bikes are quite high in many cities in foreign countries. The demand for short-distance commute is high in a lot of places, people are not biking mostly because of the lack of convenient means,” said the spokesperson. “Most bike-sharing programs in foreign countries are the ones with docking stations, usually expensive and do not have wide coverage.”
Bike sharing is nothing new for the US nor the UK. But in old bike-sharing programs, like New York City’s Citibike, the expensive cycles are borrowed from and returned to docks in inconvenient locations. Citibikes, at $163 dollars a year, are also prohibitively expensive for many. The Chinese company is having an edge with a much cheaper alternative of 1 RMB ($0.15) to the crowded metro or the gridlocked highway.
The company plans to adopt localize in accordance with regional laws and regulations, as well as the preferences of local users. For example, ofo’s signature yellow bike is larger in the US and UK markets to better fit the figures of local cyclists. The company has also added lights to its bikes to stay compliant in the US.
“The challenge is to adapt to the local market, not just from an operational angle, but also culturally. We don’t see it as an obstacle but a challenge which any services would face when going to a foreign country,” said the spokesperson. “Ofo believes with its experience and values, more markets will see the potential of our value and services.”
“Ofo is working with municipality management and help with making rules and regulations which will contribute to a more orderly city planning in the places we operate in,” they added. “The countries we have started our pilot programs are very supportive of ofo’s operation plan.”
]]>Tencent rolled out Thursday a new feature called “WeChat Index”, a Google Trends equivalent, on its popular messaging app Wechat, local media is reporting (in Chinese).
The Chinese internet giant says the new feature is a mobile indexing based on WeChat’s large data analysis. Currently, the index allows users to track the dynamic change of keywords in 7 days, 30 days and 90 days.
WeChat claims that its in-app index can not only help users capture popular words and get acquainted with search trends, but help the government and businesses acquire timely public opinions and make responses effectively. In addition, the new feature can help marketers generate customer insights for accurate marketing.
TechNode tested the new function with searches on WeChat for “Andrew Ng”, former head of Baidu’s AI department, and the following appears.
As can be seen, the index peaked on March 22, when the Chinese-American AI expert announced his resignation from the Chinese search giant.
To use the new feature, users should first click the search icon on their WeChat app, then enter Chinese words “微信指数” (WeChat Index in English) into the search bar. Tap on “Search”, and the “微信指数” icon will appear, then you can search whatever topics you are interested.
In short, we can find out what the most popular searches are on the WeChat. Take the most popular bike-rental startups ofo and “摩拜” (Mobike) for instance. The index may provide a glimpse of the popularity of the two bike-rental giants among Wechat users. It appears that the number of searches for “摩拜” is higher.
Tencent’s two competitors Baidu and AIibaba have also introduced similar index tools before. Baidu launched its PC terminal-targeted Baidu Index 1.0 beta version as early as in July 2006.
Taobao Index (“淘宝指数” in Chinese) was launched at the end of 2011 to allow users to grasp the shopping trends on its Taobao marketplace but went offline last March after Alibaba said they wanted to better integrate data platforms.
According to Tencent’s 2016 annual results, WeChat gathered 889 million monthly active users, a rise of 28% year on year.
WeChat Index may overtake its Baidu rival to become the most credible trend indicator, as it can collect more user behavior data thanks to such a colossal user base and the fact that user activities are getting immersive on WeChat, with the launch of more and more functionalities such as the “mini-apps” (“小程序” in Chinese) and WeChat payment.
]]>Mobike announced yesterday (in Chinese) that their app will now include the option to ride for hongbao (红包 or “red envelopes” in English). Similar to Pokemon GO, users can “hunt” for Mobike red envelope bikes (摩拜红包车). After riding one of the “Bonus Bikes,” as the company calls them, for at least 10 minutes, users are then eligible for two rewards: a free ride if under 2 hours and the chance to open a hongbao worth between RMB 1 and RMB 100.
With no limits on how often a user can receive a hongbao, the funds received from the hongbao will be separate from the regular Mobike account. In addition, any hongbao balance greater than RMB 10 received from the can be transferred to the user’s Alipay account. The company says that they plan to add a WeChat transfer option in the near future. The Bonus Bikes are currently available in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Chengdu, Nanjing and more, and will be rolled out in the next few days to all the 33 cities across China in which Mobike operates.
“The Bonus Bikes are a fun way to engage more users. Also, since our bikes all come with GPS enabled locks that connect with Mobike’s IoT platform, we can also use this as a way to incentive use of certain bikes in certain areas,” a spokesperson for the company told TechNode. “For example, during rush hour, we can pinpoint where bikes are needed and incentivize users to ride there, or encourage users to take bikes that are underutilized to more high-demand locations. This enables us to further lower operating costs and further improve efficiency – and also helps us to educate users about parking more responsibly for the convenience of the next user.”
The move is unexpected and yet not surprising. Both Mobike and competitor ofo claim to be the #1 bike-rental platform, but the jury is out: some 3rd party data shows that ofo is leading in overall market share while other’s (shown below) show that Mobike is clearly ahead; the Shanghai government claims that Mobike has more bikes on the road. And hongbao are a proven way to get more users.
This year, without any marketing, WeChat was able to beat out rival Alipay and cousin QQ with 14.2 billion red envelopes sent out over New Year’s Eve. Indeed, not only was WeChat the first to introduce digital red envelope, but they did so to attract more users to their payment service. Combined across WeChat, TenPay, QQ, Tencent now boasts 600 million registered users for its payment services.
“Digital hongbao is the new native coupon for social networks in how they incentivize users to start and keep using services. Their power comes from how they are the closest digital equivalent to ancient Chinese tradition,” Chance Jiang, CEO Chatek and Director of Startup Grind Guangzhou told TechNode. “For Mobike, this is probably more a defensive move to keep users than to attract them.”
Whether for defense or offense, Mobike is clearly hoping that gamifying their platform will help fend off other players and allow them to better Both companies are following the now-typical pattern for potentially huge markets: lowering barriers to entry and buying users through free or cheaper service. Historically, this has continued until the company goes out of business, gets bought, or becomes the dominant player. In the case of bike-rental, it’s still too early to tell.
16:20 March 24, 2017: This post was updated to include comments from Mobike, screenshots of the new function, and clarify some data about market share.
]]>Five bike-rental firms made it clear that users can get back their in-app balance, following their statement weeks ago that bike-rental deposits are secure and are totally refundable, local media is reporting.
Bike-rental firms including Mobike, ofo, Bluegogo, and UniBike made the statement at a conference hosted in Beijing yesterday by the China Consumers Association (CCA). Growing problems emerging with the bike-rental boom has caught the attention of the consumer rights watchdog, such as failures in contacting customer service and slow deposit refunds.
Currently, however, users cannot apply for the refund directly through the app. Instead, they must contact customer service either over the phone or through the feedback interface inside the app.
In response to the deposit safety issues, bike-rental firm representatives present reiterated that all the deposits are kept in banks under third-party supervision and in separate accounts from their operating budget.
Mobike and ofo earlier have said they have sped up the process to enable real-time deposit reimbursement. TechNode has confirmed this and received the refund shortly after submitting the application.
But for the in-app balance refund, TechNode found it is still slow and inconvenient to get back refund.
Governments are formulating rules to rein in the reckless expansion of the bike-rental sector, and are expected to introduce the rules in May at the earliest.
]]>In his recent visit to China’s capital, Apple CEO Tim Cook went to bike-rental company ofo’s offices on Tuesday, fueling speculation about whether the American technology giant may invest in the Chinese bike-rental startup, our sister site TechNode Chinese is reporting (in Chinese).
Accompanied by ofo CEO Dai Wei, Cook visited the startup’s headquarters in Beijing yesterday morning and tried out a yellow two-wheeler.
Up to this point, Apple has not shown any direct interest in ofo. However, Apple is a major investor in Didi Chuxing (US$ 1 billion in Didi in May 2016) and Didi has invested heavily in ofo starting from their B+ round in Septemeber last year worth US$ tens of millions. The ride-hailing giant also participated in ofo’s US$ 450 million Series D financing this March, led by Moscow-headquartered DST.
With bike-rental services going viral in major Chinese cities in less than one year, a fledgling bike-rental market like China may be of great interest to Apple, which has been proactive in seeking new growth engines as iPhone sales are flagging.
Ofo has registered 20 million users with the number of its yellow fleet bikes topping 1 million since June 2015. The bike-sharing startup has leapt to the top spot in the sector with a 51.2 percent share, followed by its arch-rival Mobike with a 40.1 percent share, according to data released in February by third-party research firm BigData-Research (in Chinese).
The scramble for market supremacy between ofo and Mobike has expanded outside their home turf. While ofo has expanded its footprint in Singapore, the U.S. and the U.K., Mobike announced yesterday the launch of its bike-sharing service in Singapore, marking its first foray into foreign markets.
As one of the largest technology firms in the world, how to maintain sustained growth is now the biggest problem Apple is facing, and the formation of a sound app eco-chain has become a top priority.
Mobile fitness app Keep has also attracted Cook’s attention. He paid a visit to the startup’s Beijing office the same day, illustrating the attention Apple is giving to iOS app development (in Chinese).
The mobile fitness app was on the 2015 Best of App Store list and is preinstalled on Apple devices in all Apple franchise stores.
Keep has snapped up five funding rounds worth US$47 million since it went online in February 2015 (in Chinese).
]]>Months after dropping a hint for taking its services to overseas market, China’s top bike-rental startup Mobike announced today the launch of its hugely popular bike-sharing service in Singapore, the first stop of Mobike’s global expansion.
Mobike’s operation in Singapore features its typical scan-and-go service. Singapore residents can now ride a Mobike by downloading the Mobike app and unlocking any Mobike near them by scanning a QR code on the bike.
To soft landing the service in the island state, Mobikes will initially be deployed at selected high demand areas around the city such as MRT stations, industrial parks, and universities such as National University of Singapore, Singapore Management University, and Republic Polytechnic, according to the company.
Despite (or because of) their huge popularity, Chinese bike-rental companies have had a tricky time with local municipalities for the management problems caused by their sprawling growth. In its global expansion, Mobike has been very cautious about complying with the local regulations.
“Mobike plans to work closely with a number of partners in Singapore to identify ‘Mobike Preferred Locations’, areas of high convenience around the city where users can start and end their cycling trip, in addition to existing authorized bicycle parking zones. The company will also work with its partners on activities to educate users on good cycling habits, and where to park bikes,” the firm emphasized in an official statement.
“We are determined to commit time up-front to really understand how each city operates and how Mobike can help. Singapore’s government has been very proactive to support cycling as a viable last-mile transport solution, from the “Walk, Cycle, Ride” scheme to the Park Connector Network. We are confident that Mobike can play a key role in achieving Singapore’s vision of a truly integrated and environmentally friendly transport system with cycling at its core, and we are excited to get started.” — Davis Wang, co-founder and CEO of Mobike
Singapore has got a whole lot of pedal power recently thanks to its friendly public cycling infrastructure. Ofo, Mobike’s arch-competitor in China, also entered the market earlier. But for Mobike, there’s another reason for it to select Singapore as the first overseas market: Singapore-based Temasek is among the few overseas venture capitalists that have a stake in the bike-rental company.
Mobike, which now operates across 33 in China, has entered a land grab battle with local competitor ofo. Now the competition is expanding overseas. Till now, ofo, which now operates in Singapore, U.S and U.K., seem to have one leg up ahead in the global market. However, it is still too early to say that. In Mobike’s defense, this may just another evidence to their different entrepreneurial style.
Going global as appealing as it sounds isn’t easy especially when you have to address different user habits, regulations, a group of established similar projects, like Citi Bike, as well as a rising number of peer startups looking at the global market, such as Bluegogo and LimeBike.
TechNode has reached out to Mobike and ofo for additional comment on their globalization strategies but has not heard back.
]]>Next time when you meet a Chinese person, ask where they are from.
The geographical boundary between northern China and southern China is not precisely defined, but there are rough and approximate stereotypes on Northerners and Southerners’ height, language, and what they eat.
At the annual ChinaBang Awards this year, Grace Gu, principal at ZhenFund (backer of ofo), said: “I think ofo showed a very typical Northern China style of expansion and the Mobike is the Southern China style of expansion.”
According to her, Southern style is more detailed in planning before execution and building the business model, then dare to expand the business. In contrast, Northern style is very swift in execution, first to expand wide to win the market share, and then slowly do optimization of their service.
“In short, Southern style is bottom-up with a ready product, and Northern style is top-down strategy and later do optimization,” Grace says.
Beijing-based ofo’s founder 25-year-old Dai Wei is from Taixing county in Jiangsu province, the east part of China. Born in 1992, Dai Wei is a post 90s founder, the tech-savvy generation who dominates online shopping in China. The Peking University Ph.D. dropout started ofo with four other students to solve his own problem of getting around the campus.
An interview with Bloomberg explains well his Northern way of doing business.
“In the early stages of a company, expanding is more important than defending,” says Dai, mentioning the insights from his mentor Cheng Wei, founder of Didi. “The faster you use your money, the more efficient, the more money you raise, the stronger you become. Then you control the market.”
Officially launched in September 2015, ofo (named because the word looks like a bicycle) made quick expansion across the campuses in China. Soon seven universities around China had adopted ofo. However, ofo lacked the technology. Their bikes don’t have GPS, so users will have to walk around to seek for ofo bikes to use one. It only has an app that tells you the static combination for a 4-digit lock. That’s why investors like Huawei and China Telecom are helping ofo to optimize the technology of the bikes. Didi Chuxing, ZhenFund, and Xiaomi founder Lei Jun have also backed the company, with a total funding amount of US$ 580 million. Now the yellow bike company sits in Zhongguancun, the top destination for entrepreneurs in Beijing. Apple CEO Tim Cook had just visited ofo’s office to try out their yellow bike for himself.
Hu Weiwei, the 34-year-old founder of Mobike was born in Dongyang county of Zhejiang province, the southern part of China. Graduating Zhejiang university, she worked as a journalist at the Daily Economics newspaper (每日经济新闻) mainly covering automobile news, which later helped her form Mobike’s founding team. After leaving the company, she went to The Beijing News and Business Value to report about technology news, which inspired her to start a business on her own. In December 2015, she formed a team from her automobile industry networks and established Mobike in January of 2016.
Mobike developed on top of technology and high-end branding. The bikes are built on top of GPS and QR code-based authentication system, which allows people to track the bikes using satellite navigation and the company to create a pool of data. Mobike also established its own factory to produce identical orange-silver bikes.
After thorough planning, Mobike launched in Shanghai in April 2016 and launched in Beijing in September. The Shanghai-based company’s growth picked up when it spread within Beijing. The orange bike raised US$ 325 million in total from Singapore’s Temasek, Foxconn, Tencent, Hillhouse Capital, Sequoia Capital and Vertex Ventures.
Currently, Mobike runs in Shanghai, Beijing, Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Chengdu in China and Singapore, and aims to put its bicycles across 100 cities before the end of 2017.
]]>On March 17, investors in both Ofo and Mobike took the stage at ChinaBang Awards 2017 to discuss the future of the bike-rental industry. Grace Gu, principal at Ofo-investor ZhenFund, and Xu Ying, Executive Partner of Mobike-investor Vertex Ventures talked about where they see the bike war heading.
“We cannot say if there will be a merger between these bike sharing companies, ” Xu Ying said. “But in this bike sharing craziness, anything can happen.”
Grace Gu said that bike-rental companies will gear up this year to take a bigger share of the market, but was skeptical on further funding rounds on these bike sharing companies, and said it might come to an end this year.
“Certainly, we’ll see even more bikes on the street this year. About the financing, because the investments have gone through to the main players to the later stage, financing might come to aconclusion this year,” Grace Gu said.
The good news is that the bike sharing companies’ operation cost is much smaller than that of ride-hailing hailing companies like Didi and Kuaidi, the famous taxi hailing competitors back in early 2015, throwing loads of money to win over the customers. Grace said that the number of bikes will increase, and the relevant bike management services will be upgraded to a higher level.
Both investors agreed that there is still a potential market for this bike-rental red ocean.
“I believe bike sharing companies will need some strategy to bring in the new group of users who never used the shared bicycle before. It is also very worth looking forward to these companies expanding to other cities,” Grace remarked.
“What we consider now is not about how many kilometers people ride these bikes, but the new market of small children and old people to use these bikes,” Xu Ying says. “In this case, everyone has a certain competitive strategy. You can expand to the lower tier cities, or expand to the cities abroad, so the potential market is very, very large.”
Vertex Ventures, the lead investor Mobike’s series B+, has since invested in orange bike’s series C and a US$ 215 million sized series D round, led by Tencent and Warburg Pincus in January 4th this year.
“Mobike started out from Shanghai, but the breakout period of Mobike is in Beijing. The reason why we were interested in this Shanghai-based startup was that we were also concerned about the travel duration time, not just concerned about bike sharing model,” Xu Ying says.
The Vertex Ventures briefly mentioned the possibility of Mobike’s bike sharing model to be applied to an electric bikes or scooters.
“We have some electric bikes, including some scooters and other hardware, and we wanted to talk and see how the Mobike can be combined with them to provide a good solution. So we made the investment in the Mobike,” Xu Ying says. ” I remember that time Ofo mainly focused on the campus, so we considered it more appropriate to invest in Mobike, since they started from the cities.”
ZhenFund, the well-known early stage investor in China has invested in Ofo, but has also invested in Bluegogo (小蓝单车, meaning ‘a small blue bike’). The speculations were that these two companies could compete against each other under the same investor. Grace remarked that the market will decide the winner.
“For any one of the entrepreneurs, you have to face the market competition. And as we invested in their early stage, it is difficult to tell which company will last to be part of our family,” Grace says.
Founded in April 2014, Ofo has received its latest funding of a US$ 450 million series D round from DST Global.
]]>It’s that time of the year again: the festive weekend for Chinese techies, startup entrepreneurs and investors alike. ChinaBang Awards, an annual ceremony recognizing the best startups in China, is on the go.
To continue last year’s initiative in finding out the amazing startups nationwide- not just 1st tier cities, this year’s ChinaBang Award ceremony takes place at Changzhou of Jiangsu Province which sits at the center of China’s highly developed Yangtze Delta region.
After a few additions and changes, there are more than twenty award categories for this year from “VC of the Year” and “Entrepreneur of the Year” to “Best Startup” to honor the achievements they’ve made in the past year.
To guarantee the justice of the awards, the award process combined the results of an online poll with judgments from a specialist committee, taking into consideration aspects such as the startups’ innovation, growth potential and market influence.
Here comes the winners, congratulations to you all!
VC of the Year
Yu Lifeng (V Star Capital), Li Feng (FreeS Fund), Elton Jiang (Northern Light Venture Capital), Matt Cheng (Cherubic Ventures)
Entrepreneur of the Year
Hu Weiwei, Mobike
Hu is the founder of Mobike, a leading bike-rental company in China. Using specially designed bikes equipped with GPS and proprietary smart-lock technology, Mobike enables users of its smartphone app to find a bike near them and unlock it using their smartphones. The company is operating in more than 20 cities in China.
Han Kun- Yixia Technology
Han is the founder of Yixia Technology, one of the leading video app developers to have ridden China’s video and live-streaming boom. The company’s core products include Miaopai, a leading video clip editing and sharing app which claimed over video-dubbing app Xiaokaxiu and live streaming platform Yizhibo.
Startup of the Year
Mobike
Emerging Startup of the Year
Zero Zero is the producer of Hover drone cameras.
Pear Video is a live streaming startup.
Philm is a video-editing app that enables users to convert video clips into animated art.
Gago’s cloud-based platform helps farming companies to realize real-time monitoring and make smarter decision-making by leveraging visualized agronomic data.
Uisee: a smart driving technology company
Best Hardware
Xiaomi Mix – Xiaomi’s highly popular flagship smartphone.
Zero Zero
Insta360 is a manufacturer of panoramic cameras. User can attach the cameras to a smartphone for 360 degree panoramic video.
Deepfar Ocean Technology is primarily engaged in the research and development of underwater vehicles for military uses.
Best Apps
Fenda is a knowledge sharing service that enables users to pay to ask celebrities questions and get voice responses from the celebrities.
Flipboard China– the Chinese edition of the magzine-format social networking agreegation app.
Xianyu, meaning an idle fish, is a second-hand e-commerce platform. Customers can use their smartphones to run their stores and add promotional voice recordings to sell their products, making the app more like a social app.
Best Technologically Innovative Product
Yunzhou-Tech is a professional company focusing on USV development and offering USV solutions for water environment sampling & monitoring, hydrographic survey, oceanographic survey, nuclear radiation monitoring and water surface cleaning, etc.
Sougou is the owner and developer of Sogou search engine, Sogou Input and Sogou browser.
Shadow Creator is an VR/AR solution provider.
Best Enterprise Service
Zhipin is an online recruitment platform.
Shimo is a cloud-based productivity suite that combines chat, documents, spreadsheets, and more in a simple interface.
Tezign is an online platform connecting creative professionals with projects efficiently. Tezign engage creative individuals in three areas: graphic design, user interface design and illustration with a variety of organizations with design requests.
Daydao creates one-stop business management cloud platform in China.
Biaoqing Yun provides sticker and emoticon solutions.
Best E-commerce Platform
Aihuishou is an online gadget recycling platform. The company has received an RMB 400 million series D in December last year.
Beibei is an infant care online retailer.
YOHO! is a fashion e-commerce platform.
Best AI Product
Aispeech: a speech recognition and analysis start-up
Microsoft Xiaobing: Microsoft’s chatbot
WestWellLab is a commercial lab specialized in neuromorphic engineering.
Best Online Education Startups
Genshuixue is a website and mobile app that allows users to search for courses, both local and online, in a variety of subjects from piano to SAT prep.
Zuoyebang: a K-12 online education startup.
Haifeng Education: an online education platform
BOXFiSH: an online English training class
Best Fintech Startups
Paymax, a Shanghai-based startup in China’s growing mobile credit field, aims to provide micro loan service that specifically targeted at the country’s working class.
Okcoin: a Chinese crypto-currency trading platform
Maizi Jinfu: an online financial platform
Best VR|AR Startup
7D Vision: a startup engaged in computer vision, graphic and video processing
Hiscene: a AR service provider
uSens is principally engaged in designing gesture recognition and hand-and-head tracking technologies and 3D ‘Human Computer Interaction’ system design.
Chingmu, a developer of infrared optical position tracking system
Whaley: a smart TV startup.
Best Expats Startup
Hatchery: a food and beverage incubator based in Beijing.
MoneyLocker is a startup that shows advertisements on phone unlock screens and rewards users for viewing them,
The Carevoice is a Shanghai-based review-based social platform dedicated to healthcare sector, bringing trusted ratings and recommendations on top quality medical providers. The platform evolved by launching a SaaS solution for insurers and employers to improve the healthcare choices and experiences of their insurance members and employees.
Italki started as a language learning community in 2007. The site evolved into an online teaching platform by creating a marketplace that brings students and teachers together for paid lessons.
tataUFO is a social networking platform for youth.
Most Popular Starutps
Airvisual, Daxiangrenshi, Yaomaiche, Hongdou Live, Tupu Tech, Knowbox, Visionertech, APUS
Startup Service Institution of the Year
Microsoft Accelerator, DayDayUp, INNOSPACE+, URWork, Bigbang Coffee, P2, plug and play, Bay West, Genisis Ark, Q+makerspace
VC Institution of the Year
ZhenFund, Gobi Partners, Vertex Ventures
Best After-invest Service
Yunqi Partners, Cherubic Ventures, Cyanhill Capital
Best Startups from NodeSpace (TechNode’s incubator)
marketin, Easy Travel (轻旅星球), Easylinking (生意帮), Yitu8 (易途吧), Meiheyoupin (美盒优品), Huanxing (幻行科技), Robsense (若联科技), Jianghun (匠魂网), Aide Information (艾锝信息)
Best Startups from Changzhou常州创业新锐
Wbne Group (江苏万帮德和新能源科技有限公司), Ston Robotics (金石机器人常州股份有限公司), Maymuse (江苏美淼环保科技有限公司), Volitation (天峋(常州)智能科技有限公司), Changzhou AMT (常州阿木奇声学科技有限公司), Cudatec (江苏赞奇科技股份有限公司), BeStar Sensor (常州波速传感器有限公司), Jingang Technology (江苏金刚文化科技集团股份有限公司), Very Cloud (常州云端网络科技股份有限公司), Changzhou Marine Cable (常州船用电缆有限责任公司), Final11 (兔几科技).
Annual Media Award
]]>Chinese bike-rental company Ofo announced on Thursday (in Chinese) a strategic cooperation deal with Sesame Credit, a social credit scoring system developed by Ant Financial Services Group. Ant Financial is a subsidiary of Alibaba and operator of Alipay and other Alibaba-backed financial services.
Under the deal, new Ofo users with a Sesame Credit score of 650 or higher can register on the app without making the RMB 99 deposit. According to data released by Sesame Credit, the majority of Sesame Credit users have a score of 650 or higher.
Currently, the free deposit service is only available in Shanghai.
“In a city with excellent credit like Shanghai, Ofo’s free-deposit practice can benefit even more people,” said Ofo co-founder Zhang Siding.
The “deposit free” function was added to the Ofo app on March 16. After successful registration on the app, a “deposit payment” interface will pop up with two options at the bottom saying “No deposit necessary if Sesame Credit score higher than 650” and “Make the deposit.”
To verify the credit score, users must open Alipay and verfify their identity.
Ofo claims to have 20 million registered users (in Chinese), putting their total deposits at around RMB 1.98 billion. There has been speculation that China’s bike-rental companies are using deposits to fund their expansion, but both Mobike and Ofo say they keep their operating funds separate from user deposits.
Users can also use the deposit free service directly from the Alipay app, including the ability to scan an Ofo QR code to get the combination. Other bike-rental startups have also teamed up with Ant Financial Services, including Youon (永安行), U-Bicycle (优拜) and Qibei (骑呗)
]]>You won’t need to depend on the navigation anymore because the AR-powered Head-Up Display (HUD) of the car will show you holographic display directions to get to your destination. This will be powered by WayRay, a Swiss developer of a holographic augmented reality technology for internet-connected cars, freshly invested by China’s e-commerce giant Alibaba.
Topping up to its effort made in connected cars in the recent years, Alibaba Group has invested US$ 18 million in WayRay’s series B along with its existing investors, announced on March 14th. With the funding, the Swiss company has entered into a partnership with Banma Technologies to develop a new AR car infotainment system which capable of delivering contextually relevant information to drivers and engaging entertainment for passengers.
“WayRay’s making the windscreen a new medium for information. The futuristic in-car infotainment system is the first to use color holographic technology (they were previously only green). Furthermore, the system provides a smart driving assistant that collects your driving stats and patterns, offering up a gamified system of rewards,” said Mary Lapuk, head of communications at WayRay’s R&D base in Russia told TechNode.
WayRay has its own R&D center and prototyping factory and specializes in the development and production of transparent holographic displays based on HOE (holographic optical elements). Navion, WayRay’s first AR navigation system is the key to bringing this AR system. It is a standalone unit that uses holography to visualize timely and useful driving information directly in front of the driver’s eyes.
“Navion eliminates the need to look away from the road while driving, refocusing your eyes and helps to reduce distraction while driving, making your trip safer,” Mary says.
In 2017, the company plans to release a consumer version of Navion and to sign contracts with major global car manufacturers to implement their infotainment system. The company refused to disclose the mark and the model of the car which will be developed in partnership with Banma. However, the company mentioned that the retail sales of smart driving assistant “Element” will start within a couple of months in the US and China to analyze different driving styles.
“WayRay is a pioneer in transparent HOE of such large sizes, which act as virtual optical elements (diffraction gratings). This allows the creation of optical systems that deliver ‘true AR’ virtual images that appear in the distance – all within a small optic footprint,” Mary adds.
The company has also invested in research and development to further its material science expertise – creating materials for ultra-thin films, for example – and created software for the design of optical systems to record the diffraction patterns inside polymers.
Ultimately Alibaba wants to get into future cars to enable you to “open sesame!” your car, that is, to voice control your car. And this effort is done through Banma Technologies, an independent startup invested by Alibaba Group and China’s largest automaker SAIC Motor, dedicated to making developments in internet-connected cars.
WayRay will work closely with this consortium to create an advanced AR HMI that integrates augmented reality navigation, driving assistant notifications, a virtual dashboard, and much more. The new system will be built into one of Banma’s 2018 car models, turning it into the world’s first vehicle in production with a holographic AR HUD display.
The global connected car market is expected to reach US$ 180.3 billion by 2022, and Alibaba is making steady efforts to get the grip of the market.
Alibaba revealed their YunOS-powered Roewe RX5 car November last year. Three models of Roewe cars have been launched in conjunction with Banma, committed to empowering the vehicle via data, computation and innovative mobility services. At the Single’s day event held in Shenzhen, Alibaba demonstrated how their connected cars listen to driver’s orders to turn the music or air conditioning on and book movie tickets. It can also direct a drone to navigate the running car and film the scenery around it.
The video below shows their smart car demo, starting at 2’33”.
Youku:
Shanghai is mulling rules to regulate the sizzling yet reckless development of the city’s bike-rental sector, local media is reporting (in Chinese).
The new rules, expected to be introduced in May and come into effect in June or July this year, are the latest government efforts to deal with the growing problems emerging with the bike-rental boom, such as illegal parking of bikes, failures in contacting customer service and slow deposit refunds.
Under the new regulation, bike-rental firms are requested to have three-year-old bikes scrapped off the road, for quality and safety considerations. In addition, firms should return the deposit or prepaid expenses within seven days upon users’ request.
In addition, bike-rental firms should have 24-hour customer service hotlines available, and resolve any complaint received within 48 hours.
In case any malfunction or damage occurs, bike-rental firms shall arrange maintenance staff to fix problems on the scene or tow the bike in question away (if can’t fix them on-site) within 48 hours.
According to Xu Daoxing, chief engineer at the Shanghai Bicycle Association, the city has 4.5 million registered users (in Chinese). Mobike makes up almost 51% of the total 435,000 dockless rental bikes (in Chinese) on the street. Ofo makes up almost 35%.
Bike rentals are certainly getting popular. A recent online survey of 1,300 people found that over a quarter of respondents use bike-rental services every day. More than 66% are willing to use rental bikes to travel in their city.
]]>China’s booming bike-sharing business has been disrupting the country’s traditional bike industry landscape, while also being acclaimed by city travelers for playing its part in cracking the hard nut of the last kilometer of their journey.
After receiving multi-billion RMB investments from 30-some institutional investors, major bike-sharing services Mobike, Ofo, and their competitors have been embarking on a manufacturing land grab, reaching out to medium and large-sized bicycle makers. They hope this will give them an edge in terms of production capacity, quality and design, for closer cooperation.
In the race for market share, bike-rental startups are pinning their hopes on putting into use more and more bicycles. Ofo has been expanding their cooperation with bicycle manufacturers such as Flying Pigeon, Phoenix-Bicycle, and Fuji-ta Bicycle, while its arch rival Mobike’s recent partnership with Foxconn is supposed to double the number of bicycles it plans to make this year to 10 million.
The influx of capital has brought in a surge of bicycle orders, invigorating the moribund bicycle making industry, which has suffered a decline in sales in recent years due to poor channel marketing and brand protection.
According to the China Bicycle Association, roughly 15 to 20 bike-sharing startups have emerged in the country since 2016, placing on the streets more than 2 million (in Chinese) bicycles in total in over 30 cities. In 2017, the total count may approximate 20 million. The figure may be even higher given that the actual production capacity of Mobike and Ofo each is estimated to reach 15 million (in Chinese) bicycles this year.
China makes around 80 million (in Chinese) bicycles every year, around 25 million of which are sold at home, according to the China Bicycle Association. That means the production capacity of the two bike-sharing startups could surpass the domestic demand (in Chinese) for 2017, and an industry glut may be around the corner.
In addition, the tie-up with bike-rental businesses can be a double-edged sword: sure, they’re getting more orders, but this could lead to a marginalization of the brands, a reduction of the bike categories, and a chaotic reshuffle of the current industry leading to the closure of smaller companies.
According to Mobike, they have the advantage because they do not need to compete for production capacity.
“We are the first company to set up our own factory producing Mobikes, and collaborating closely with over 100 production partners and suppliers. We also partner with Foxconn, the world’s largest high-tech manufacturer. Our current annual production capacity is over 10 million bikes, which is far greater than anyone else in our industry,” the company has told TechNode.
Updated, March 10, 2017 to include comment from Mobike.
]]>It’s no secret that Chinese ride-hailing behemoth Didi Chuxing is planning something big for overseas market, but as of present all of its moves are achieved through partnership and investment in regional players of these markets. The company has yet to build an offline existence beyond its home country. But the case won’t be long.
The firm, which acquired Uber’s China operations last year, today officially announced the launch of its first bricks-and-mortar office outside of China, dubbed DiDi Labs, in Mountain View, California.
Through a series of partnerships and investments, Didi has built a global ride-summoning network that’s covering every major player around the world, including Ola in India, Grab in Southeast Asia, Lyft in the U.S., and 99 in Brazil. Given Uber is in competition with each and every of them in different regional markets, many jokingly referred this network as the “anti-Uber alliance”.
However, this latest move is of more strategic meaning than just gaining the upper hand. Focusing primarily on AI-based security and intelligent driving technologies, the new lab underlines the company’s efforts into a new field—self-driving. It’s worth to note that the lab’s Mountain View setting puts it in the backyard of leading self-driving companies as well as a pool of the world’s top talents.
Didi Labs will be led by Dr. Fengmin Gong, who became Vice President of Didi Research Institute after his company AssureSec was being acquired by Didi last year.
Dozens of leading data scientists and researchers have joined the team. Among them was Charlie Miller, who made his reputation as the world’s top automobile security experts in testing, in which he and Chris Valasek hacked remotely into the operating systems of a Jeep and took full control of the car.
The lab’s current projects span the areas of cloud-based security, deep learning, human-machine interaction, computer vision and imaging as well as intelligent driving technologies.
Meanwhile, Didi Labs will work in tandem with the broader Didi research network to advance its global strategy, apply research findings to products and services, and help cities develop smart transportation infrastructure. Didi expects to rapidly expand its US-based team of scientists and engineers over the course of the year, the company noted.
The launch of Didi Labs formalize the startup’s effort towards self-driving cars, but that’s only part of Didi’s plan to transform into the world’s leading mobile transportation platform. A source close to the company has told TechNode that Didi is also developing electric cars and they are looking to have more on the road in the future as a more economical and environmentally friendly option for drivers.
Cheng Wei, founder, Chairman and CEO of Didi Chuxing, said:
]]>“Sweeping changes are taking place in the global transportation and automobile industries. As the world’s leading mobility platform, Didi has invested in five industry leaders around the world. Building on rich data and fast-evolving AI analytics, we will be working with cities and towns to build intelligent transportation ecosystems for the future.
As we strive to bring better services to broader communities, Didi’s international vision now extends to building the best-in-class international research network, advancing the global transportation revolution by leveraging innovative resources. The launch of Didi Labs is a landmark in creating this global nexus of innovation.”
Beijing authorities recently ordered a halt to electric bicycle-sharing service E-zebra (in Chinese), citing safety and legitimacy concerns. In addition, users of the service were first notified yesterday (March 7, 2017) and then again today about an interruption in service due to maintenance. Customer service representatives have not able to confirm when the service will be back up.
This is not the first electric bicycle company to catch the attention of the Beijing authorities. According to local regulations, electric bicycles without license plates should not be allowed on road. In addition, the E-zebra-branded electric bicycle travels at 35 kph, much faster than the maximum allowed speed of 20 kph.
Dianbanma, the startup behind the E-zebra electric bicycles, was founded in 2015. After making a hefty investment in the electric bicycle startup in December of the same year, the country’s largest two-wheeled electric vehicle maker Yadea purchased a majority stake in the startup and now provides customized e-bike making service to it.
With the app installed on their phone, users can rent the electric bicycle for RMB 8 per hour plus RMB 1 per ride, with no deposit required.
With around 700 electric bicycles (in Chinese) already available in Beijing, E-zebra plans to put into use an additional 2,000 ones in the city by the end of this year.
Riding the momentum of the bike-rental boom in China, electric bicycle firms are itching to get their hands on the lucrative rental transport market.
In addition to E-zebra, a swath of electric bicycle services began to mushroom in major Chinese cities, such as Liabar (“猎吧” in Chinese), Zeebike (“租八戒” in Chinese), Xiao Lu Dan Che (“小鹿单车” in Chinese) and BeeFly (“小黄蜂” in Chinese), intensifying the already fierce competition in the bike-sharing market, where major player OFO and Mobike are locked in a tight battle for market supremacy.
]]>Editor’s note: This originally appeared on Analyse Asia, a weekly podcast hosted by Bernard Leong, dedicated to dissecting the pulse of business, technology, and media in Asia. The podcast features guests from Asia’s vibrant tech community.
Horace Dediu from Asymco & Clayton Christensen Institute is back with the second Asymco trilogy on our podcast to discuss the major topics that dominate the world of business and technology: modular revolution, startup strategy, Apple & cars. In the final part of the second trilogy, Horace discussed whether traditional companies such as Toyota and VW Group can tackle disruption coming from technology companies, the perspective of Tesla as an energy company but not an automotive company and what the iPhone equivalent of the car will look like.
Listen to the episode here or subscribe.
TechNode does not necessarily endorse the commentary made in this program.
]]>The truce between Didi Chuxing and Uber China seemingly left the Chinese ride-hailing titan the sole dominator in China’s highly lucrative market. However, it has opened up new opportunities for other surviving local ride-hailing companies. It would seem that there’s no way for a single company to gobble up the entire Chinese market as a whole, even if it’s Didi.
UCAR, a prominent rival of Didi in China, announced this week that it raised RMB 4.6 billion in new funds from four investors including China’s interbank network, UnionPay. The company already boasts investment from high-profile players, including Warburg Pincus and Jack Ma.
Different from Didi that relies on private cars and crowd-sourced drivers, UCAR offers its services with an in-house fleet and licensed drivers. These drivers offer UCAR a way to potentially increase margins and avoid government questions about their legal status.
The firm currently operates four product lines: Car. Inc, their Hong Kong-listed car rental arm, Shenzhou Zhuanche, the chauffeured car service as well as an online car marketplace and a car loan service. Lu disclosed that the company is considering to explore new fields given all of its businesses are going to record profits this year, adding that car manufacturing is a possible option.
It’s worth nothing that the funding announced this time is only half the size of the firm’s RMB 10 billion private placement plan announced in last October.
However, board chairman Lu Zhengyao told local media (in Chinese) that more funding will follow and the total financing will be over RMB 7 billion RMB (around US$ 1.02 billion). He added that the funds will be used for marketing, recruitment, offline outlets, and fleet procurement.
Like many Chinese tech startups, UCAR is listed on the Chinese over-the-counter (OTC) market. It was the first of its kind when it was listed in in September last year and is now valued at RMB 40.93 billion. Didi is still preparing for its IPO and no specific timetable has been announced.
Despite the fierce competition and government constraints, local companies keep fighting their way into to China’s ride-hailing market. LeEco-backed Yidao is also targeting the gap that’s being left by Uber’s retreat.
In addition to the old players, new entrants continue to flock to the sector. China’s top O2O titan Meituan added a car-hailing function into its app to complement the existing services from food delivery to ticket booking. Chinese car manufacturer Geely has also expanded its ride-summoning services Caocao Zhuanche to more cities.
When Didi and Kuadi merged, and again when Didi merged with Uber, many predicted that the battle in Chinese ride-hailing industry was coming to an end. As things are now, the market is more mature, but the war may not be over.
]]>Kala Danche (卡拉单车) is back in business. As you may recall, last week we reported that the company had lost over 75% of their bicycles in less than 20 days of operation. Because of that, their only investor made a quick exit, taking all the user deposits with him and triggering a cascade of questions about user deposits on China’s leading bike-rental platforms.
However, according to the Legal Weekly(in Chinese), they may be back in business. As Lin Bin, the founder of Kala tells the story, after the news went viral, many of the residents of Putian, a Tier 4 city in Fujian where Kala’s failed launch took place, started looking for the bikes and gave the company information about where they were located. Since then, they claim to have recovered 70% of the total number of bikes with only 5% damaged. The founder even claiming that investors from Beijing, Shenzhen, and other big cities are now approaching him.
It’s no surprise that Kala’s story has taken off. O2O bike-rental is super hot right now, with local media covering every possible angle, from the guy who was put in administrative detention for 3 months and fined RMB 1000 to needles being put into bike seats and bike-rental being the “magic mirror that reveals goblins” ( 照妖镜 zhaoyaojing) of Chinese society. However, Lin Bin is quick to point out that, for Kala, their problem was management and lack of consumer education.
Many people in Putian did not put them back properly, attached their own locks, took them back to their home in the suburbs, or decided to “vent their anger”. Lin Bin chalks this up to a lack of proper management on the founding team, not necessarily an inherent problem with Chinese character. This offers some lessons, but also raises many questions.
The lessons are obvious: understand what you’re getting into before launch, do your research, understand the market, and be prepared to address possible problems quickly. However, the questions about this story are a bit more troubling: if the problem was indeed management, why are investors showing so much interest? Could this all be a publicity stunt on the part of Kala or other stakeholders?
Publicity and PR stunts are no strangers in China where the relationship between media and businesses is usually transactional and exists in what many Western journalists would consider very gray areas. Whether or not this is one such case is yet to be seen, but we here at TechNode are taking this entire saga with a very big grain of salt.
]]>Chinese bike-sharing firm Ofo announced today that it has secured US$ 450 million (around RMB 3.1 billion) in its Series D financing, a move that is heating up the already cut-throat competition in this nascent market, our sister site TechNode Chinese is reporting.
The round is led by Moscow-headquartered DST, and other investors in this round include Didi Chuxing, Coatue, Atomic, MatrixPartners China, and CITIC Private Equity Funds Management.
“Ofo is committed to becoming a leading company with worldwide impact. We will lead the whole industry towards a rapid and sound development, and provide convenient short-distance travel services for global users,” said Ofo founder and CEO Dai Wei.
The US$ 450m round is just part of its Series D funding; there will be follow-up financing to be announced in the future, Dai added.
Dai attributed Ofo’s success to the firm’s young team who understand the needs of Chinese youth as well as the rapid expansion strategy it pursues. Ofo aims to expand to 200 cities and cover tier-four cities this year.
Ofo may turn a profit by the end of this year, Dai revealed.
Ofo has registered 20 million users with the number of its yellow fleet bikes topping 1 million since June 2015. The bike-sharing startup has leaped to the top spot in the sector with a 51.2 percent share, followed by its arch-rival Mobike with a 40.1 percent share, according to public data released by third-party research firm BigData-Research (in Chinese).
Mobike has raised US$ 300 million in funding since this January, attracting investments from renowned investors such as Temasek, Hillhouse Capital Group, to name just a few.
Ofo and Mobike have waged an all-out war against each other in terms of funding and subsidization, trying to outdo each other. Although both are far from well-established and it is too early to tell who has the last laugh, it’s likely that the competition in this sector will become even fiercer as the market matures and more investors get involved.
]]>After a slow start, Apple Pay is now dominating its home country, the United States. Data from Boston Retail Partners shows that Apple Pay is now accepted by 36 percent of merchants in the United States, becoming the most popular mobile payment method in the nation. However, it’s only recording lukewarm or even cold reception in China, which is estimated to be the world’s largest mobile payment market.
When Apple Pay first landed in the Middle Kingdom one year ago, the smartphone giant was expected to make a serious dent in China’s highly consolidated mobile payment market; more than 30 million bankcards were added to Apple Pay during the first day of its official launch.
After one year of operation in China, however, it seems that Apple Pay has failed to become a real threat to the dominance of Alibaba’s Alipay and Tencent-backed Tenpay (operator of WeChat Pay), two leading payment tools in the country.
In Q3 last year, Alipay and Tenpay took 50.42% and 38.12% of China’s mobile payment market, data from research institution Analysys showed. With the two leading payment tool taking monopoly, the rest of the players only recorded single-digit shares of the market. Apple Pay did not even make to the top-ten list with shares so small that can be overlooked.
Here are some of the pitfalls that stood in the way of Apple Pay in China.
Technologically speaking, NFC, used by Apple Pay, enjoys many advantages over QR code with its touch-and-go approach and built-in security. But QR code payment has become the widely adopted and deep-rooted practice for Chinese users. Once these habits are formed, they prove difficult to change.
China UnionPay, Apple Pay’s Chinese partners and a long-time proponent of NFC, even succumbed to the QR code pressure and launched its own solution late last year. This is an even bigger surprise given that UnionPay has already partnered with smartphone makers Huawei and Xiaomi to push NFC adoption in China. However, as we can see, this hasn’t changed users habits.
In addition, NFC’s reliance on NFC-equipped smartphones and NFC-compatible POS terminals are also roadblocks for its wide application.
As a third-party payment services, both Alipay and Tenpay are cross-platform services that are open to users regardless of operating systems and smartphone brands. Hundreds of millions of people are using their smartphone apps to pay both offline and online. Alipay claimed a whopping 450 million users, with Tenpay coming in at a close second.
In comparison, Apple Pay, which only works with Apple hardware, automatically excludes a majority of the China market that only use Android-based phones. What’s more, Apple Pay only supports iPhone 6 or higher. Couple this with iPhone’s slowing sales in the country and it is no surprise the payment option isn’t doing so well.
In just one day of shopping in China, you will come across legions of Alipay and WeChat Pay logos adorning storefronts and cash registers in department stores, boutiques, and even the small shop down the street.
On the other hand, Apple Pay has much less offline presence due to the limited support. It is usually only available in larger chain brands like Starbucks, Costa Coffee, Carrefour, and 7-Eleven. Even then, many of these stores will also accept both Alipay and WeChat.
Furthermore, Alipay and Tenpay’s offline presence are fueled by their heavy-subsidized expansion plan. Although it’s clear that subsidized expansion is not sustainable, this model has proven a successful way to attract users in many verticals, including ride-hailing, bike-rental, group buying, and other O2O services.
]]>Yesterday, Ofo has announced a partnership deal (in Chinese) with China Telecom (中国电信) and Huawei. The partnership will see China Telecom providing wireless data access, Huawei providing NB-IoT chips (PDF), and Ofo providing the bikes. The announcement emphasized a big pain point for the company: their technology.
At this point, it’s fairly clear that Mobike and Ofo are not part of a “sharing economy”, rather they are an O2O solution to a notoriously difficult transportation problem. However, what isn’t so clear is whether they are technology companies.
O2O ride-hailing services like Uber and Didi must create and optimize their software and underlying algorithms to reduce friction and ensure that customers are satisfied through short wait times, easy payments, as well as a sense of trust between driver and passenger. Bike-rental, on the other hand, is much simpler. Mobike, through GPS and QR code-based authentication systems, at least has a way to keep track of their bikes and create a pool of data. Ofo, however, has an app which tells you the static combination for a 4-digit lock.
This lack of technology has been Ofo’s greatest weakness. Without GPS, Ofo users have no way of finding a bike unless they are looking at one nor can the company accurately locate bikes that need pick-up or servicing. With a static combination, indefinitely borrowing any given bike is a piece of cake. Indeed, around the same time as the announcement yesterday, The Paper released a video showing just how easy it is to unlock an Ofo bike. On top of that, there have been reports of people collecting combinations and selling them online for as little as 3 mao (US$ 0.04).
The partnership between Ofo, Huawei, and China Telecom brings obvious benefits to Ofo: first, they can better protect their investment in their fixed assets; second, they now have the ability to gather data about users and transportation patterns (something that Mobike has already been doing), giving them a better chance of success.
The bike-rental certainly is not over and shows little signs of cooling down. Even with smaller players still expanding, Mobike and Ofo have such a lead that it is hard to imagine them slipping to third or fourth place.
]]>You must have noticed the boom bike-rental companies in China as an increasing array of rainbow colored bikes mushrooming on streets across the country. Endless financing rounds from big names like Tencent, Didi, and Foxconn have been injected into one or another of the startups that involved in a heating field.
Despite the initial “wows” on the changes that bike sharing or, to use a more mundane term bike rental, have brought to our lives, the development of this sector has long been shadowed by pitfalls such bike vandalism and illegal parking.
While these issues are still unsolved, the recent news that investors of Kala, a bike-rental startup operating in Putian of Fujian Province, walking away with all users deposits has sparked public concerns about the safety of their capital. With this question in mind, let’s walk through some of the facts and problems with bike-rental deposits.
In addition to a few firms like Qibei, which provides deposit-free services to Alipay users with high Sesame Credit scores, most of the companies require users to pay a deposit before using the service. The deposit varies: RMB 299 (US$ 43) for Mobike; RMB 298 for Ubike; RMB 199 for Xiaoming Bike; and RMB 99 for Ofo.
Bike rental companies promise that these deposits are totally refundable since the sum will be used solely as collateral; users will only be charged for each ride through a separate prepaid account.
As the user base grows, the deposit is creating huge cash flows for the companies. Reports from BigData Research (in Chinese) show that the weekly active users of Mobike and Ofo stood at 4.21 million and 4.36 million respectively in mid-January this year. For the two largest players, that’s a billion yuan-level cash pool taking form (1.26 billion RMB for Mobike and 431 million RMB for Ofo).
Paying a deposit for using bike rental services sound quite natural for us all. But have you ever given it a second thought? An investor walking away with is certainly rare, but there are other concerns.
Both Mobike and Ofo have stated many times that all the deposits are kept in separate accounts from their operating budget. They promised users could get their deposit back whenever they choose. However, it still takes several days before users can actually receive the reimbursement; this has been complained about by many (in Chinese), especially given that real-time transfers have become standard practice.
In response, inspections conducted by Shenzhen authority (in Chinese), Mobike cited third-party payment tools as the reason for delayed reimbursements. Currently, Mobike supports payment through Alipay and WeChat Payment.
Mobike users receive their deposits within 2-7 working days after applying for the refund, while it takes Ofo riders 1-3 working days to receive it. During this period of time, the users of both companies can not use their services.
In traditional rental services, be it real estate or bikes, deposits are usually refunded to the customers once they have handed back the rented property. But with bike-rental apps, the reimbursement application has to be submitted manually. Most people wouldn’t do so due to the hassles involved unless they plan to delete the app for good.
Despite the huge capital size, the monitoring for bike rental deposits is still a blind spot. As an emerging sector that has registered a large group of users, proper monitoring process should be involved early on to avoid what’s happened with P2P lending industry in China.
“The way for bike-rental platforms is to make the flow of deposits public and receive monitoring from the mass,” local media cited an industry analyst. “At the same time, bike-sharing is a part of urban transportation. Relevant authorities should strengthen the monitoring of startups, including the management of deposits.”
-------
In response to public concerns, both Mobike and Ofo have said they have sped up the process to enable real-time deposit reimbursement. TechNode has tested this and have received the refund shortly after submitting the application.
This post was updated at 18:52 on February 24 to clarify that the Mobike and Ofo have implemented real-time reimbursement.
]]>Chinese tech media is aflutter this morning after news last night that Kala, an O2O bike-rental company, went out of business after only 19 days of operation. In those 19 days, the company, in cooperation with the Putian government (a Tier 4 city in Fujian province), were only able to recover 157 of the 667 bikes they had put around the city for use. Now, they are saying that, due to an agreement with their investor, they are not able to refund any outstanding deposits.
Founded in October 2016, Kala (卡拉单车) planned to operate in Tier 3 and Tier 4 cities (in Chinese) to avoid head-on competition with bike-rental leaders Mobike and Ofo. However, it took them 2 months to find investment, after being turned down by 30 different investors.
Once they were able to get funding, they planned to expand with 5000 bikes to other Tier 3 and Tier 4 cities, but after the startling losses of their only real asset, their investor (not disclosed) invoked a clause in their value adjustment mechanism (VAM) agreement. This allowed them to take all desposits as recompense for an initial over-valuation of the company.
According to the company, they have returned as many deposits as they can, but have already ran out of money from their initial bank loan.
The news that an investor was able to walk away with all the deposits has raised many eyebrows (in Chinese) around the country. Both Mobike and Ofo have stated many times that all the deposits are kept in separate accounts from their operating budget; users can conceivably get their deposit back whenever they choose.
This outstanding failure, however, does not seem to have dampened investors enthusiam for O2O bike-rental. Mobike announced yesterday that have received post-series D funding from Temasek, a Singapore-based investment company. This puts the total amount of money Mobike has raised this year over US$ 300 million, according to the company.
]]>Editor’s note: A version of this post by Charles Liu first appeared on the Beijinger, a leading source of English-language lifestyle information on the city of Beijing.
Beijing’s sharing economy has taken a huge step forward with the recent announcement that some 5,000 electric cars will be available to rent on a time-sharing basis in the city within two years.
By using the Gofun app, Beijing residents will be able to rent an electric car at a rate of just RMB 1 per hour.
With some 1,100 cars already available in Beijing, Gofun will add another 2,000 cars by the end of this year, and another 3,000 by the end of 2018.
Making this car-sharing service especially practical is that they will be available in the capital’s central district. 40 to 50 locations along the Second and Third Ring Road are planned to be converted into retrieval and parking locations for the electric cars.
These locations, which will make use of vacant space under overpasses and bridges of the ring roads, will also be equipped with electric car recharging stations in order to broaden the recharging network for Beijing’s growing electric car user base.
Renting an electric car using Gofun is very similar to the Ofo and Mobike online-to-offline (O2O) services that have taken off over the past few weeks in Beijing.
After downloading the app, Gofun users will register on their phone using their personal identification and driver’s license. After authentication, which takes just one hour, users will be given GPS-based directions on how to locate their rental car, which will honk upon their arrival.
Previous plans called for a payment rate of 1 yuan/1 kilometer. Additionally, users were offered a flat fee payment option of 10 yuan that would free the user of having to pay any car damages in case of accident of up to 1,500 yuan.
Gofun’s big emergence comes after last year’s merger of heated Chinese ride-sharing competitors Uber and Didi Chuxing. Meanwhile, some analysts are predicting that the current competition between Ofo and Mobike will also result in a merger.
Gofun currently operates in four Chinese cities and has future plans to extend its Beijing network outward to include neighboring Tianjin and parts of Hebei.
For a city as polluted as Beijing, any initiative to promote alternative energy comes as a breath of fresh air. City authorities have encouraged electric car use by lifting licensing quotas for electric car users.
It’s not clear if this service will be offered to expats living in Beijing.
]]>Didi and Uber’s billion-dollar merger completed last August was assumed to have finally settled the ride-hailing war with Didi as the sole dominator in the Middle Kingdom. However, the peace brought by the truce between world’s two largest ride-summoning services is short lived as well-grounded local rival Meituan has announced they are entering the battlefield.
On Tuesday, China’s top O2O titan Meituan added a car-hailing function into its app, which now features a wide variety of services from food delivery, film tickets, hotel reservation and flight/train tickets.
After finding the ride-hailing service in Meituan’s home page, users in Nanjing can book their trips in an interface and operation process very similar to Didi’s. Payments can be made with bank cards, WeChat or QQ Wallet.
Meituan’s entrance into the ride-hailing industry is quite unexpected given that the internet giant is mainly focused on local lifestyle services. The company has kept a low profile when talking about the new service, only explaining to local media that the feature was added to fulfill rising demand from users.
Meituan has plans to spread the service to more cities, but hasn’t released a timetable for the expansion.
Meituan, now more commonly known as Meituan-Dianping after its merger with once competitor Dianping, has some tricks up its sleeves in competing with the already established players led by Didi.
Meituan-Dianping now claimes to be the third largest e-commerce platform in China, next only to Alibaba and JD. The company has registered over 600 million users with monthly active mobile users hitting 180 million, a company rep told TechNode. This huge user base is expected to bring traffic to the service.
Additionally, nearly all the services that Meituan provides is directly related to intercity transportation services. This could enable an easy transition from one service to another within the app.
Last year, Meituan’s legendary CEO and Chinese internet opinion leader Wang Xing, put forward a proposition that Chinese internet is entering the “Second Half”, believing that “. . . only deep integration can lead to full transition [from the first to the second half].”
Integrating ride-hailing services could be considered in line with the proposition to penetrate other related services. In addition, the company has acquired Qiandai, a third-party payment startup, to make inroads into online payment sector.
This post is updated on 13:48 February 15th to change some of the operation metrics of Meituan-Dianping.
]]>This is the third post in our series: Discover China’s Next BAT, where we will go over the potential tech giants that are leading China’s IT industry. Previously, we looked at the next BAT and their founders. Stay tuned to keep updated on the next BAT.
iiMedia Research Group, a leading research institute in China, has released a list of leading mobile internet companies based on the findings of a corporate judging panel consisting of global industry experts, influential investors, and public voting with over a million ballots cast.
From that list, we have chosen eight companies we believe will dominate their markets. Here are the first four:
Xbed provides self-service hotels rooms. Here, self-service means a literally no service staff, no front desk, or security personnel. Using Xbed, users can rely completely on Xbed mobile app (or its WeChat account) for the whole stay from reserving the hotel room and checking in and out to opening and locking of the room door and payment.
Founded in May 2015, Xbed is said to bring a sharing economy model into the accommodation industry as it allows people who have worked in accommodation industry to be part-time workers to help with the cleaning.
Founded in 2014, Douyu TV is one of the earliest live-streaming platforms among more than 200 Chinese streaming platforms that have popped up. The market is estimated to be worth US$ 5 billion (RMB 34.4 billion) in 2017.
Attracting investment from gaming giant Tencent, it has been dubbed the Chinese Twitch.tv with many top streamers playing MOBAs (multiplayer online battle arenas) similar to League of Legends. This has fueled the game’s continued popularity with the company now claiming over 100 million registered users, including 15 million daily active users (Twitch, for comparison, claims 100 million monthly users).
Last year, it secured more than RMB 2 billion yuan (about US$ 13.7 billion) in funding. The round reportedly pushes Douyu TV’s valuation above US$1 billion, making it yet another Chinese unicorn.
Although its strength is still in game broadcasting, it is also producing its own content.
According to the Cyberspace Administration, in November there were more than 300 live streaming companies in the mainland. The China Internet Network Information Center reported in June that there was a total of 325 million live streaming users in China, comprising 45.8 percent of the total internet user population. Inke is a live-streaming app where users earn money from their content.
Inke has a quite interesting way of monetizing. Viewers can send virtual gifts to hosts through in-app purchases. The host receives 30 percent of the gift’s value, which encourages them “to produce high-quality content”, while also keeping the platform profitable. Hosts can also “enhance the viewing experience” by adding interactive stickers.
By its entertainment promotional efforts, for instance, broadcasting live shows for a popular South Korean band called Big Bang, Inke’s downloads and revenue started to ramp up and even made it to the seventh spot on App Annie’s worldwide revenue rankings of iOS and Android apps in April 2016.
In 2010, before there was a Didi or Uber entered China, Yidao was the first to start ride-hailing business. Six years later, it is not first in terms of market share, but Yidao still provides car services in 74 cities in China and 24 cities in the United States, has 1.35 million active users and a market value of US$ 15 billion.
After Didi announced its acquisition of Uber’s operations in China last year, there was even a joke that Yidao had finally jumped from third to second place in the market. Although the pioneer of the market, Yidao had always struggled with the rise of Didi and Uber China, which became popular on the back of heavy subsidies and cheap prices.
In fact, new regulations in the ride-hailing business after Chinese authorities finally legalized car-hailing apps in July 2016 might be a good news for Yidao. The new regulations by the government stipulated that unfair competition—giving heavy discounts and subsidies for services at below-cost price—should stop. In other words, Didi may not be so cheap as it always had been for many consumers, while affect on Yidao is probably minimal as Yidao targets on offering premium services at higher prices.
]]>As the ride-hailing wars have disappeared, the latest war is bike-sharing (more like bike-rental), with Mobike and Ofo leading the pack.
In case you weren’t sure how exactly they are different, WakeMeChat has made this handy infographic:
Mobike’s technology seems to be a bit better, but how either company is actually making money is still a big question mark.
]]>China’s O2O market has seen quite a few companies doing interesting things, some succeeding, some failing. The latest hot vertical is bike-sharing.
According to the China’s bike sharing industry mini-report by China Channel, Mobike (backed by Tencent and Foxconn) and Ofo (backed by Didi and Xiaomi) are clear market leaders amongst growing competitors. Founded in January 2015, the orange Mobike boasts about 400K Tencent Android app store downloads, mostly in Shanghai. The Beijing-based yellow Ofo bike, on the other hand, lags behind with about 170K Tencent Android app store downloads.
Both companies have their apps, but Ofo lowers friction by linking the app to WeChat without having to download a separate app. The users can either register their mobile phone or log in via WeChat account and unlock bikes on the streets at their convenience.
While many business analysts predict how the two rivals will merge eventually, Jeffrey Towson, consultant and professor at Guanghua Peking University, thinks otherwise. He explains why bike-sharing is nothing like ride-sharing of Didi and Uber. The professor compares the bike-sharing economy to a vending machine business than a ride-sharing one.
“Unlike ride-sharing, bike-sharing does not have a network effect,” he says. “The ride-sharing experience is a two-sided network, in which additional riders increases the networks’ value to the drivers and each new driver increases to value each rider. Through customer rating and recording of wait-time, the service gradually improves as its user population grows.”
“The problem with bike-sharing, however, is that there is no second population of drivers using the platforms and providing the bikes,” he adds. “The bikes are constantly replenished by companies themselves as opposed to each rider adding any value to the other riders. It seems that bike-sharing isn’t really part of the sharing economy.”
Bike-sharing (or more accurately, bike-rental) is simply a traditional merchant B2C service. It’s the size of the company that helps (seeing Mobike and Ofo’s leads) but does not prevent other competitors from joining the market (i.e. Bluegogo, Unibike, Ubike, WeBike, etc). Ofo and Mobike should thrive as they are in the short-term by providing innovative new service. However, unless they come up with some means to actually share, it’s hard to predict the long-run.
Another question bike-sharing companies face is their compatibility to other modes of transportation. Bike-riding isn’t the only cheapest way to run around the city. The most affordable new bike costs about 200 RMB, less than the cost of the Mobike deposit (299 RMB). The value of bike-sharing limits itself to convenience than replacement of traditional means of transportations.
Bike-sharing is a welcome change from the usual transportation problems. The business had substantial contributions to the way people commute, reshaping the dynamics of the city. As Chinese urban population grows, there will be demand for more innovative ways to commute. Only those who adapt in the most creative and fastest ways will survive.
]]>In the tech industry, new innovations are constantly supplanting old ideas and seemingly stable companies can find themselves facing unexpected challenges.
However, the trends we saw started in 2016 posed questions that have yet to be answered. Here are eight of them we think will be answered in 2017.
1. Can Alipay effectively deter the aggressive rise of WeChat?
Considering that Alipay has been trying hard to make Alipay a something more than just payment platform; a social community, what kind of strategies will actually attract users to use Alipay for engaging with other users?
2. How will competition between China’s bike-rental platforms, Mobike and Ofo, play out?
Which one will become more dominant? Around the end of 2016, Ofo had officially entered Silicon Valley while Mobike entered Singapore. We’ve talked a lot about these two companies and bike-sharing (actually bike-rental) in 2016. Will they be able to gain a meaningful presence in foreign markets? Will they actually survive until the end of 2017?
3. How will LeEco’s car business develop?
LeEco is probably the most argued-about company in China, especially regarding its financial status. Starting off with its reconfirmation of partnership with Faraday Future and introduction of brand-new electric cars, LeEco is expected to make lots of things clearer in 2017. The latest news is fresh funding of 16.8 billion yuan ($2.4 billion) from real estate developer Sunac . How that will impact the company’s transportation plans is still unclear.
4. Will WeChat’s newly-launched mini-apps replace actual apps in China?
It is not impossible considering the fact that websites were replaced by WeChat official accounts. Also, it is expected that before long, the number of mini-apps will sky-rocket. However, there is already a backlash occurring as users question their use and relevance. Will these mini-apps actually replace their bigger brethren?
5. How will Alibaba push the envelope on this year’s Singles Day?
Granted, this is still some time away, but Single’s Day is always something to be excited about. In 2016, Alibaba created an AR game similar to Pokemon GO where users could find hongbao (红包 or lucky money in English) by capturing the Tmall cat mascot. It seems that every year we ask if they’ll be able to top last year and every year they do. We’re already getting excited to see what they have planned for this year.
6. Will Baidu be able to catch up to Tencent and Alibaba?
With the stunning successes of Tencent and Alibaba over the past few years, Baidu seems to have lost much of its steam as its services are replaced by big and small competitors alike. However, rather than position themselves as a leader in consumer technology, Baidu is refocusing on developing proprietary technology such as AI and AR.
7. Will Didi overcome troubles caused by unexpected regulations imposed by municipal government?
New rules late last year may hamper Didi’s China operations. Big cities, including Beijing and Shanghai, now require that all drivers have a local hukou (户口 or household registration in English) and that the vehicles be locally registered. According to Didi, these new restraints could eliminate nearly 80% of the company’s Shanghai vehicles and potentially put the breaks on Didi’s ride-hailing business.
8. How many more global acquisitions will Chinese companies make?
In 2016, notable cases were Tencent acquiring Supercell, a Finnish game publishing company and C-trip acquiring Skyscanner, a British travel information website.
]]>Chinese internet company LeEco announced Sunday that it landed 16.8 billion RMB (2.4 billion USD) in fresh funding led by China’s real estate titan Sunac China Holdings Ltd. Sunac will become the company’s second-largest shareholder after the deal.
The company disclosed that Sunac will contribute 15 billion RMB of the total funding broken into three parts:
Hua Insurance and Leran Investment, a state-backed venture capital firm, were also part of the deal, injecting 400 million RMB and 1.43 billion RMB in the company, respectively.
The financing comes at a vital timing for the company, which has experienced two most troubled months after Jia confirmed November that it’s facing a major cash shortage due to overly aggressive expansion plans.
Jia, the 43-year-old tech mogul, has built his reputation as a capital-raising machine in China’s internet industry. Local media Yicai reported that the company has already raked in a whopping 80 billion RMB funding as of November 2016, bankrolling a variety of businesses from smartphone, television, film production to cloud services.
Will the new funding solve the cash squeeze?
This hefty round would definitely ease the capital pressures the company has faced and to rebuild confidence in its investors, but is it big enough to fill in LeEco’s funding gap to the fullest? Jia’s answer for this question is affirmative.
“Apart from LeEco’s electric car business, the 16.8 billion RMB funding is well enough to address all our needs to drive a smooth transition of the LeEco system strategy from the first stage to stage two,” said Jia.
The transition would mark a shift from taking an all-out approach into every business on a shared loop ecosystem on the global level to achieving true eco chemistry between the seven sub-ecosystems.
In the second stage, creating revenues will be a key goal for the listed as well as the unlisted entities. China, the U.S., and India will be the primary focus of the company, said Jia in an internal letter released last November.
LeSEE launches A round financing
According to the funding plan, LeEco’s electric car division, SEE Plan (Super Electric Ecosystem Plan) also the biggest cash-burner, is not included in the current financing round. Jia said last week that they could put their cars into production with a further 10 billion RMB round, adding that more funding is still needed since the project is larger in scale.
LeSEE already raised 1.08 billion USD round in September last year from investors include Yingda Capital Management, China Communication Construction Ltd., and China Aerospace Science & Industry Corp, among others.
Together with the funding news, Jia announced the launch of its funding plan for LeSEE. “We are really looking forward that more investors with visions could join the LeSEE ecosystem. Some progress has been made recently and hopefully we could share more good news within one month,” he said.
]]>Half a year after Didi and Uber struck a truce in the Chinese market, another land-grab between the two is looming, only this time the battle is for the global market.
Didi Chuxing announced on Wednesday that it has made a strategic investment in 99 (formerly 99Taxis), an Uber competitor in Brazil market. The company didn’t specify the investment size or number of shares involved in the deal.
Under the terms of the partnership, Didi will assume a seat on 99’s Board of Directors and will provide strategic guidance and support, including in the areas of technology, product development, operations and business planning, according to a company statement.
Founded by young Brazilian entrepreneurs in 2012, 99 offers an app-based on-demand private car and taxi-hailing services across 550 cities in Brazil, the world’s second fastest-growing internet market. 99 has over 140,000 registered drivers and more than 10 million user downloads. They maintain a leading position in Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, and other tier-one cities across Brazil.
Peter Fernandez, CEO of 99, said, “We welcome Didi to Latin America. Didi’s financing, state-of-art technology, and operations knowledge will play a key supporting role as 99 actively expands our network and services in Brazil and reshapes the competitive landscape in Latin America.”
Uber retreats from China, Didi goes global
Didi is the dominant player in China’s ride-hailing market with close to 400 million users in over 400 Chinese cities. However, the Chinese company won’t stop at conquering its home country, as Didi’s president Jean Liu said at a Vanity Fair event last October— “We are definitely going global”.
In line with its globalization drive, the heavily-loaded company has already reached a strategic partnership or invested in several regional ride-hailing leaders across the globe.
Didi invested 100 million USD in Lyft, Uber’s main competitor, in the U.S. market in September 2015. The tie-up generates several avenues of cooperation, such as allowing users to summon rides through each other’s network. Didi is also expanding aggressively in Southeast Asia with investment in Ola and Grab.
Didi’s global expansion puts it in direct competition with Uber; their partnership between the four companies is widely considered as an anti-Uber alliance. With the latest investment in 99, the alliance has expanded to Latin America.
For a time, Didi’s acquisition of Uber China cast the alliance into doubt. However, after the taking solid control of the domestic market, global expansion is now a top priority and consolidating the alliance makes more sense for the company.
In Wednesday’s announcement, Cheng Wei, founder and CEO of Didi Chuxing, highlighted thei cooperation with more global partners:
“China and Brazil are the world’s foremost emerging markets with enormous opportunities for our rideshare industry. Partnering with 99, the local market leader, Didi will begin sharing capabilities and products with more diverse communities and innovators. . . . We look forward to working with more global partners in creating better mobility services and more work opportunities for our cities, as we reshape together the future global transportation system.”
Image credit: Shutterstock
]]>Correction (January 4th, 19:27): An earlier version of this article incorrectly stated that Faraday Future is backed by LeEco. Jia Yueting, founder of LeEco, is an investor in Faraday Future. LeEco and Faraday Future are strategic partners.
Faraday Future, the electric car startup backed by LeEco’s billionaire founder Jia Yueting, has revealed its first production vehicle, the FF 91, at an exclusive event prior to CES 2017.
Built upon the company’s proprietary powertrain system Variable Platform Architecture (VPA), FF 91 features 130 kWh of battery energy, which the supports a range of 378 miles, the company claims. Peak motor power is 783 kW, equating to 1050 HP, allowing the vehicle to go from 0 to 60 mph in a blink of 2.39 seconds, quicker than Tesla’ Model S P100D, which can reach 60 mph in 2.4 seconds.
Through their partnership with LeEco, Faraday Future wants the FF 91 to be a smart and connected vehicle. It is capable of remembering drivers’ personal preferences, such as seating positions, favorite music and movies, ideal temperature, and driving style settings to ensure users have a consistent experience. Facial recognition technologies are also integrated to auto-prompt car settings.
The company says that production of the FF 91 is planned to start in 2018; they are now accepting reservations.
Despite the exciting specs and sleek design, many remain skeptical about whether the company can actually deliver the car on schedule or if they’ll be able to ship at given recent troubles.
The carmaker has been drowning in a raft of bad press as of lately with reports of senior employees leaving and factory delays in Nevada due to unpaid bills of millions of dollars. Similarly, LeEco, the Chinese company that’s bankrolling Faraday Future, is also experiencing its own troubles amid a cash crunch and layoffs.
Image credit: Faraday Future
]]>Like computing, changes in transportation accelerate every year. China, the world’s largest automobile market, is recording a spectacular growth of the New Energy Vehicle (NEV) with 200-plus companies in the industry.
Tom Tan, Vice President of BorgWarner Inc. and President of BorgWarner China, recently talked with us to share his thoughts on the rise of NEV in China and on current trends in the automobile industry. The following are edited excerpts from the interview.
What will be the prospect for China’s automotive industry in the coming ten years?
China’s auto industry will continue to grow over the next decade, albeit at a much slower pace than the double-digit growth of the last ten years. Overall growth in the low single digits is to be expected.
There are four important trends at work here: 1) China’s population is the largest in the world and urbanizing rapidly; 2) The nation has an ever-increasing middle-class, with growing purchasing power and changing lifestyles; 3) Air pollution is becoming a serious issue; 4) The government has announced an energy strategy that will cap oil importation at the current 60+% level and gradually reduce it.
The first two trends are certainly supporting the continued growth of the automotive industry in China, while concerns about air quality and foreign oil dependency are prompting the government to establish more rigorous fuel and emission standards. Taken together, these four trends provide a major motivation for the government to accelerate the development of New Energy Vehicles (NEVs) such as electric vehicles (EVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), along with highly efficient low-emission combustion engines.
In recent years, China’s government has made a huge effort to promote NEVs, largely to reduce oil importation. As this effort continues, we will see the overall auto market gradually increase, but with HEV and EV growing at a much faster rate, with HEV dominating in the next five years and EV in the five years after that.
It is believed there will be a shift from combustion to electric propulsion systems in the near future. What is your view on this?
I expect that the market for traditional combustion vehicles will be flat over the next seven years. The growth rate for pure EV will be much higher, but we’re starting from such a small base and the current cost is high, as is user inconvenience, so I expect that the market share will be less than 2% worldwide.
The story could be different in China, though. With strong government incentives and policy guidance, pure EV and plug-in hybrid EV will likely achieve 4%-5% of the total China market, which could be well above one million units a year in five to seven years’ time. We understand that there are now more than ten new companies in China dedicated to building EVs, and most claims to have raised capital of more than $1 billion in first-round financing. We should see the first EVs from these companies in the 2018 to 2020 period.
Due to the advantages of HEVs in terms of technology, cost, and CAFE achievability, we will see hybrids take off faster and on a larger scale in China. The most aggressive forecast is that HEVs will reach 20% market share in 10 years.
How long before we have fully autonomous vehicles on the road? What are the challenges of product innovation?
When we talk about fully autonomous vehicles, we really mean the ultimate SAE Level 5 self-driving car with no steering wheel, pedals, or human driver….it may take another 10 or more years before we see fully autonomous vehicles on the road in any meaningful number.
There are many challenges to overcome including the navigation systems (using radar, lidar, GPS, sensor, vision, laser, or satellite mapping) and the vehicle-to-vehicle (v2v) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (v2i) communication systems that allow vehicles to communicate even under extreme conditions, such as city chaos or heavy snow.
It has been said that over time, as self-driving cars as well as ride-hailing and on-demand service becomes more prevalent, that the demand for car purchases will decrease. Do you agree?
Yes, to some extent I do agree. A certain number of people will choose to not own a vehicle when self-driving cars and ride-hailing services become mainstream. However, I believe that the majority of people will choose to own their own vehicle for quite a long time.
Certainly, there will be a lot more vehicle-sharing options on the market when self-driving vehicles become mainstream. We will likely see some reduction in private vehicle ownership, especially in cities where parking is problematic and expensive. Car ownership will carry some inconvenience in the future, but this will not necessary mean that most people will want to give up the enjoyment of driving their own vehicle. There is a social meaning to car ownership that won’t quickly change.
Image credits: BorgWarner
]]>It’s finally 2017. While the capital winter has spooked China’s internet industry since the beginning of 2016, many have still managed to score new funding and hope that this year will be better than last.
Overall, social networking, biotech, electric cars were some of the hottest verticals in China. Contrary to what we believed before we started looking at our traffic data, funding stories of small and medium-sized startups, rather than BAT (Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent), grabbed the top spots in the list. This indicates a shift in interest from China’s internet behemoths to the more innovative startups coming from China.
Here’s the list:
1. Chinese Tinder-Like ‘Tantan’ Rakes In 32 Million USD
China’s Tinder-like dating app Tantan raised a 32 million USD series C funding from a group of investors, including LB Investment, Vision Capital, and DST Global. The two-year-old app claimed 2.5 million active users, around 80% of which are part of China’s post-90’s generation.
2. Chinese Startup Connecting College Students And Part-Time Employers Raises $8.5 Million Series A
Chinese startup Qingtuanshe completed a 55 million RMB (about 8.5 million USD) round of series A funding this April. Qingtuanshe’s student-facing app connects university students with part-time jobs, such as shopkeeping at a hamburger joint, live streaming on an app, and even “liking” a company’s social media posts. On the other side, companies can download Qingtuanshe’s free corporate app and post job opportunities and track applications.
3. iCarbonX Becomes China’s First Biotech Unicorn
iCarbonX, a six-month-old biotech startup, raised a 1 billion RMB (about 154 million USD) round of Series A funding, boosting the Shenzhen-based company to unicorn status with a valuation of $1 billion USD.
4. Used-Car Trading Platform Guazi Seals 200 Million USD Funding
C2C used-car trading platform Guazi.com completed a 200 million USD financing round in March 2016. Guazi.com was established by online classifieds site Ganji.com, which later merged with rival online classifieds site 58.com.
5. Diabetes Management Platform Weitang Raises Series B From Yidu Cloud
Diabetes management platform Weitang raised tens of millions USD in series B round of funding led by Yidu Cloud Technology Company Ltd. The app helps patients to track their blood sugar levels, food intake, exercise, and medication using the app, generating a real-time medical record. Based on the data, doctors can then provide customized management plans for patients.
6. Online Education Firm VIPKID Secures $100M From Yunfeng, Sequoia Capital
Education platform VIPKID closeda 100 million USD series C from existing investor Sequoia Capital and new investor Yunfeng Capital, the VC firm co-founded by Alibaba founder Jack Ma.
7. SoftBank, Foxconn Commit $30M To Chinese AI And Cloud Startup
CloudMinds, an AI and cloud computing startup, raised a 30 million USD round of seed funding, led by SoftBank International.
8. NextEV Co-Founder Lands $120M For Consumer Electric Vehicle Company
Chinese electric vehicle company Chehejia has raised a combined 780 million RMB (120 million USD) in series A funding at a valuation of 2.98 billion RMB from seven investors.
9. Alibaba’s Cainiao Logistics Confirms First Financing At $7.7B Valuation
Alibaba-backed logistics company Cainiao has sealed their first-ever funding round, worth over 10 billion yuan (1.54 billion USD), from a consortium including Singapore’s Temasek Holdings and GIC Pte Ltd, Malaysia’s Khazanah Nasional Bhd, and China’s Primavera Capital.
10. This Startup Wants To Disrupt China’s Floral Business
FlowerPlus, a subscription flower delivery service, raised a 70 million RMB (10 million USD) series A round led by New Margin Ventures in May. As an early entrant to the field, FlowerPlus is among a series of no-frills flower delivery services that targets China’s rising middle class. Other similar services include AmorFlora, EasyFlower, and Floral & Life.
Image credits: Shutterstock; TechNode
]]>Editor’s note: This originally appeared on Analyse Asia, a weekly podcast hosted by Bernard Leong, dedicated to dissecting the pulse of business, technology, and media in Asia. The podcast features guests from Asia’s vibrant tech community. This week is our very own Wang Boyuan.
Wang Boyuan from Technode & TechCrunch China joined us in an interesting discussion the LeEco Group. He began with the vision, mission, and team behind the company and break down the intriguing web of business structures within the group. Last but not least, he also discussed whether the LeEco can survive their ongoing crisis and offer his perspectives whether LeEco is truly disrupting the industry or a house of cards.
Listen to the episode here or subscribe.
Here are the interesting show notes and links to the discussion (with timestamps included):
Here’s the structure of LeEco Group from their 2015 annual report (and it’s written in Chinese)
References:
TechNode does not necessarily endorse the commentary made in this program.
]]>Didi has suffered a bolt from the blue, as Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen each rolled out specific regulations for the car hailing business on Saturday. The rules are harsh, to say the least, and has brought the ride hailing behemoth to its knees, arguing for possible remedy from the authorities.
The newly published draft interpretations from the three largest cities–all with tremendous migrant populations–have stipulated that drivers must of local Hukou, or family register. This is a heavy blow for Didi, as it eliminates more than half of the drivers in Beijing and Shenzhen, and dispels an overwhelming majority of Shanghai drivers from the platform.
The draft laws from these cities also raised the bar for cars in the business. Didi bemoaned that the higher standards would disqualify more than 4 out of 5 existing vehicles.
Artificially holding down supply would “more than double prices”, and the waiting time for rides would increase from the current 5 minutes on average to a whopping 15 minutes, warned Didi.
It also threatened of the adverse effects of droves of unemployed drivers, which could pose a “mass risk”and become a “social unstable factor”. Naturally, in a state of desperation, the company pulled out its trump cards– “innovation” and the “sharing economy”, both espoused by the premier himself, and predicted that such measures would brutally crush the buds of the sharing economy.
“Didi sincerely urges local governments and authors to give citizens with and without local Hukou equal employment rights. We should not let citizens lose heart and passion in innovation and entrepreneurship”, appealed the company after the new regulations rolled out.
Perhaps the most fatal of blows is the rigid Hukou specifications. “Of the 410 thousand registered drivers in Shanghai, only 10 ten thousand have a Shanghai Hukou” bleated Didi in a statement. However, these figures may be exaggerated for its own convenience, creating a victimized image and implying more severe consequences. Only 30% of Shanghai drivers were nonlocal, according to Didi’s“Mobile Transportation Employment Promoting Report” published last month, as it congratulated itself on the ability to attract local drivers who are better acquainted with roads.
More than 65% of the drivers in Shenzhen and more than 50% of that from Beijing do not possess a local Hukou, the report found.
Once the guidelines, which are still in an opinion solicitation phase, kick in, cars on the platform must have a vehicle age under 2 years, a wheelbase longer than 2700mm, and an engine capacity of more than 17.25L–specs that mid-high end cars are more likely to meet. On the bright side, this means there were be fewer creaky manual-windowed surprises pulling up when you hail a ride.
Unlike the desolate future which Didi fears, with all but luxury sedans plucked from the platform, Technode has found that it’s possible to get qualifying Chinese models that cost as little as 80 thousand Rmb.
Just how much leeway do these local draft regulations leave before they are set in stone? That remains a question. The company has proved that it carries a lot of clout–surprise, some of the top executives in the company like Zhang Bei come straight from the government bureau of transportation– Didi’s outspoken objections to the national draft for car hailing led to an eventual version which are largely in favor of the company. Didi’s recent buyout of Uber China has been (so far) exempt from anti-monopoly investigations, again attesting a solid relationship with the authorities.
But these local interpretations have clearly come as a shock, or at least a case of failed lobbying on the local level. Will the law be in favor of Didi in the China’s mega cites? Though Xinhua has published an commentary proposing that draft laws should leave “windows for revision” and emphasizes that even “provisional guidelines” are subject to modifications, the window of opportunity this time is short. Suggestions and objections to the draft must be made within one month, while Beijing left merely a week-long opening for rants and complaints. Didi had better start pulling some strings, or hold its peace–at least for the time being.
]]>Didi-Uber, China’s newly minted transportation tycoon, has revealed intentions to append a bike sharing service to its hefty platform, as it pours tens of millions of U.S dollars in strategic investment into dockless smart bike company Ofo.
The ride sharing company has no trouble divining a future where bike sharing becomes the latest installment on its platform, already laden with everything from buses to chauffeur services. Among cooperation in urban rideshare, Didi also plans to be “offering quality bike-sharing experience on Didi’s platform,” said the company as it announced the investment.
Ofo claims to be world’s first dockless bike sharing services–unlike many public bike systems that set aside a multitude of procured bikes for common use, the company founded by 5 Peking University students is attempting an Uber-like light asset approach. Users are encouraged to donate their personal bikes to Ofo in exchange for unlimited access to bikes in Ofo’s pool.
Yet Ofo seems less than prepared for a full blown presence on Didi’s platform. The company’s conspicuous yellow bikes are currently available only in select university campuses, only accessible after registration with a student ID, and once students are done pedaling, the bikes have to end up within university gates. A spokesperson from the company said that there were no definite plans to expand their system to outside campuses, and that a deliberation to do so depended on “range of factors”.
It’s not hard to see why Ofo is getting cold feet, even as a flood of capital from the impatient investors prods this utopian model forward to enter the real world.
For one, Ofo’s going rate is 0.01 yuan per minute and 0.04 yuan per kilometer, (hence a 5 hour, 5 km ride would cost 3.2 yuan, or less than 50 U.S. cents), even cheaper than Mobike’s 2 yuan or 0.30 USD per hour, which has already been subject to skepticism over its ability to turn a profit.
In the past months that bike sharing has been in the limelight, reviews have been not at all encouraging: unadjustable seats, system errors unlocking the bikes though QR codes, the sheer difficulty in locating a bike within walking distance, and the fact that they are downright heavy if you need to carry them up a flight of stairs. Users’ patience is becoming threadbare, so say the least.
Though we have to give Ofo credit for cutting procurement costs by pooling together bikes, in a less than idealistic society, their model could end up as a textbook example of Gresham’s law: who want to trade in their multi gear mountain bike to ride around on creaky old two-wheelers, considering they only cost about 2 yuan per ride? Even the cheapest bike costs around 500 yuan ($75 USD) today, so when users do the math, would it really pay off to swap a personal, albeit used bike for “lifetime membership” for bicycle collectives?
Not to mention the amount of or wear and tear or malicious vandalism that the bikes undergo. It is distressing and hard to believe that with China’s per capita GDP of nearly 8000 USD, some of these bikes have had their QR codes scratched out, other padlocked, and others still collected to be sold as scrap metal. As tech savvy as these bikes may be, they’ve not yet cracked the code to poor citizenship behavior.
]]>Didi and Uber have pioneered the sharing economy in China, and with their all-out competitive melee finally resolved, they can focus on doing what they haven’t yet been able to: turn a profit using one of the world’s newest and most exciting business models.
But how disruptive is the ride hailing business in China really? Agreements with rental companies, dual-user accounts and predatory loans all point to a less impressive reality: Didi and Uber are struggling to build a profitable ride-hailing model, and now they’re playing a big role in rebuilding the industry they set out to disrupt.
The idea is this: a driver who wants a car signs a two or three year contract with the company to receive a vehicle lease, and in return the driver will pay a three to four thousand monthly fare–termed a ‘revenue sharing arrangement’ (sharing is still the magic word here). Sound oddly familiar? As the contract ends, the drivers, who are considered Didi employees, close with a one-off payment, before the car (but not the license) is theirs for keeps.
What started as a pilot program launched several select cities is spreading it own wings, and in many localities, car dealerships are introducing their own packages, offering an account registered under the dealership, a handful of models to choose from, an option to bail out at any time, and possession of the car in two to three years (according to our math).
Mr. Shen, a car dealer in Zhejiang province told Technode that such programs are more like final call for anyone who wants to join the Didi bandwagon.
“As the regulations roll out, Didi’s business has to be more standardized, more and more like a taxi company, they won’t allow just anybody with a car to join, the vehicle has to be registered under [a company like] us.”
Sign on plans advertised in driver chat groups pitch the same: “for 4888Rmb a month, this is the best deal you can get before regulations fall into place.”
According to Mr. Shen, it doesn’t actually matter if you take passengers on Didi or Uber, as long as you pay the monthly installments. “Several cities have come out with quotas for online cars. Better secure a slot early so you at least have the choice (to drive for the platforms), ” he said, referring to different local interpretations of the recent draft regulations.
Didi spins this initiative as a way to lower thresholds for drivers without a private car to work for the platform, creating jobs and enabling fair access to opportunities. The drivers who have signed on don’t see it that way, especially as subsidies dwindle.
“I signed up for a 3 year deal, but with the kind of subsidies I’m getting these days, I don’t know how I’ll cope…I’m paying 4500 a month. ” grumbled Didi driver Mr. Li, in Beijing, behind the wheel of his rented black BYD sedan. He’s making 8,000 yuan (1198 USD) monthly before gas and rental fees, a stark downgrade from the 16,000 yuan he was making three months ago when he first joined and the subsidies were lush. “I’m working 12 hours a day just to make ends meet”, he sighed.
A sense of exploitation is mirrored in Uber’s Xchange car leasing program, which launched last year in the U.S.. In a Bloomberg report, auto finance experts said that the plan was “predatory” and that the terms were more about profiting off drivers than increasing the number of Uber vehicles.
When Uber froze Chen Shuai’s account, he had reason to fidget: he was paying 8000 Rmb a month to rent his Roewe 550, and each day he wasn’t taking on passengers, money was going down the drain.
Mr. Chen’s attempts in the following month to reason with Uber staff was fruitless, with customer service replying that it was up to advanced back-end teams. Out of desperation, he turned to his car rental company, eHi car services, as a last resort, and to his relief they seemed to have a solution.
“The ‘driver manager’ said eHi had friends in high places, and they could contact Uber to reactivate the account, for a price: 700 yuan”, recalled Chen.
Later, the manager came back with the diagnosis–there were multiple drivers sharing one account, a breach of Uber’s rules. Miraculously, his account was reactivated a few days later, only to be deactivated again. This time his rental company shrugged off his predicament, though another rental company approached him to offer help – for 700 yuan.
Though both Didi and Uber have denied that car rental companies have any access to manage accounts from the back end, Another driver in Shanghai, Mr. Ye, corroborates Chen Shuai’s story. “There are people who specialize in this”, said Mr. Ye, speaking from his personal experience, “all I need to do is holler in the chat groups about my frozen account, and people will approach me with a price and offer to help me out.” He also had his account unfrozen by his rental company, though he says its unclear what these people had in association with the platform.
When Didi announced an official entrance into the car rental business on Friday last week, reiterating its light asset approach, eHi was mentioned as a case in point, in other word, they would be renting eHi’s cars.
The platform said it would collaborate with rental companies in vehicle sources and management. With uncertainties in local regulations, Didi and Uber’s most reliable partners are car rental companies, who owe much of their revenues to platforms.
It seems that in a few years, most of the Didi or Uber drivers on the roads could be employed through a rental company- they already seem to be very much managed by them. In that sense, wouldn’t that just be putting the disrupted taxi scene back together again?
In the age of car hailing, that should be a no-brainer. Your driver’s personal details should be stowed safely away in a server someplace, and some of those details should be at your fingertips: his phone, license plate and part of his name. Or is it?
In some cases, there’s a significant chance that the person behind the wheel is not registered with the platform – untraceable should they commit a crime, and impossible to lodge a complaint against.
Both Mr. Chen and Mr. Ye, for instance, both admitted to sharing an Uber account a few months back. “eHi had us covered, they registered our accounts for us, and we would be paired up with another driver taking shifts, ” said Mr. Chen.
“But that was before the platform had explicit rules against it,” he added.
According the Mr. Ye, both the drivers and car rental companies have every incentive to bend the rules. The cost of renting a car in Shanghai ranges from 6500 to 8000 yuan, that’s a lot for one driver pay off alone. If getting two people to share one vehicle and one account means that rental companies can rent out more cars, they will hand you the keys with a wink and a nod.
With lowered subsidies, for many local drivers, it no longer pays off to stay in the game. Mr. Li told us that over half the people in his driver WeChat group were pursuing better paying work. But a 6000-8000 yuan monthly salary is still attractive for those from surrounding second and third tier cities. For drivers with out-of-town plates, a local plate and matching identity is just a few hundred kuai away.
Mr. Ye introduced Technode to an account ‘scalper’, who charges around 700 yuan for a Shanghai license-plated account, no additional paperwork needed. However, this scalper declined to reveal the origin of his accounts.
If you’re not as resourceful as this scalper, Taobao runs rampant with pseudo account services, which guarantees a swift and and solid solution to difficulties across the board: insufficient driving experience? Driving a dated model? Is the platform giving you lower pecking order because of your out-of-town license? All that can be taken care of within a few hundred yuan, and with a pseudo identity, you could be an ex-convict for all that the these troubleshooters care.
Didi’s acquisition of Uber China lifted the curtain for the ride company’s post-unicorn era., and it deserves credit for many things: gobbling up its fiercest competitor, building a better government relationship (including snagging a ministry of transportation officials to become their vice president), and successfully lobbing for a nationwide green light on their business model.
But what it has yet to do, like many others before, is come up with a solution that is substantially beneficial to all parties -drivers, passengers, rental companies, taxi businesses and local gov’t all without relying on cash as fuel.
Based on an original article from Technode Chinese site.
]]>Footage revealed on Wednesday by Chinese state media revealed what may be the earliest ever fatality in a Tesla car using the autopilot function.
A dashcam video recorded the Model S slamming full speed into the back of a road sweeping vehicle on an expressway 450 kilometers south of Beijing.
The collision occurred on January 20th this year, killing the 23 year old driver Gao Yaning immediately. If autopilot was in part responsible for the tragedy, this would mean that first autopilot fatality took place in China, 4 months before the deadly Tesla Model S wreck in Florida on May 7 this year, which until now was believed to be the first driver death related to Tesla’s autonomous driver assist system.
The video was not made public at the time of the accident as the family lacked evidence that autopilot was functioning up until the crash. The electric car was reduced to scrap metal, destroying the logs which are necessary to determine whether autopilot was on.
Gao Yaning’s grieved father refuses to believe that his son, who had been driving for more than 5 years and had a perfect record driving heavy trucks during military service, could crash into a vehicle that had been in full view for more than 10 seconds without even an attempt to brake or dodge.
The driver had years of experience driving military trucks
He consulted various experts and other Tesla drivers, all of whom agreed that car appeared to be using cruise control. The footage showed that Gao’s car drove at a constant speed and remained at a fixed distance from the road line for nine minutes.
One minute before the crash, Gao hummed a few lines from a song. His father recalled that Gao Yaning was enthusiastic about Tesla’s autonomous driver assist function, and showed phone videos of his son demonstrating the cars’s autopilot function.
The family of the deceased is pressing charges against their Tesla dealer for misleading users, and is demanding 10 thousand yuan ($1500 USD) in compensation. Their lawyer says that the amount is irrelevant, but they hope to warn the public that autopilot is still an immature technology that should be tried with discretion.
“We want to remind Tesla to be more prudent in their marketing terminology, and not to make autopilot a selling point appealing to younger users. Tesla repeatedly tries to impress upon users that they need to trust autopilot, but meanwhile, the fine print in their manual they say you have to keep your hands on the steering wheel, this is self contradictory”, said Gao’s lawyer Wang Beibei.
Last month, on August 2nd, Tesla changed the “autopilot” function on their Chinese official website to read “autopilot automatic driver assist system”, following the first related accident in China.
Tesla claims that like the autopilot function on aircrafts, autopilot can be used to assist drivers under certain conditions. However, the driver must have both hands on the wheel and maintain control over the vehicle. This is not specified under the description of the autopilot function on Tesla’s Chinese site.
]]>Audi, the luxury car brand by Volkswagen, has signed an MOU with China’s three largest tech names, Alibaba, Tencent and Baidu, as they seek to expand their China-based connected car research.
The agreement, inked on Sunday in Shanghai, involved the three tech giants along with Audi parent company FAW-Volkswagen, and lays out plans for future cooperation on connected car technology.
“China has become an important lead market for digital technologies. Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent are strong innovators,” said Joachim Wedler, President of Audi China in a release.
Audi’s China operation, Audi China, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Audi AG, has an R&D operation that focusses on connected cars, new energy driving, digital services and piloted driving, according to the company. It’s their biggest research facility outside of Germany.
Audi says they are already working with Alibaba on mapping technologies, including real time traffic data and high-resolution 3D Maps.
The automaker plans on integrating Tencent’s WeChat MyCar services, an auto-focussed feature based off the highly popular social messaging service WeChat, that will adapt location and music sharing services for cars.
Audi also committed to a 2017 launch of Baidu’s ‘CarLife’ in its latest models, an in-vehicle digital platform designed for using Baidu applications.
None of the parties have disclosed financial details of the cooperation, or specific details on how the tech giants’ competing services, such as mapping technology, would be mediated in future partnership activities with Audi.
The deal is significant because it marks the first open collaborative partnership between an automaker and China’s dueling tech tycoons. While many traditional car companies are hedging their bets across internet companies, none have made overt attempts to simultaneously integrate cross-platform technology from multiple Chinese tech companies of this size.
]]>Baidu is hoping to take its autonomous car project to the next level through a partnership with high performance chip maker Nvidia.
Baidu CEO Robin Li and Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang spoke together on stage at a Baidu event in Beijing last week. According to a blog post by NVIDIA, Baidu will contribute their cloud platform and mapping technology while NVIDIA will offer their self-driving computing platform and HD mapping solutions.
The partnership also renews the Chinese search engine’s competitive edge against local internet firm LeEco, which has been working on a similar cloud-based ecosystem for autonomous cars.
“We’re going to bring together the technical capabilities and the expertise in AI and the scale of two world-class AI companies to build the self-driving car architecture from end-to-end,” said NVIDIA in the blog post.
Together, the pair are hoping to develop autonomous parking and ‘level three’ autonomous vehicle control, which is the last level before fully autonomous (there are five levels all together).
Baidu has been rapidly expanding their testing grounds for autonomous cars both locally and abroad. The tech giant plans to establish ten local testing locations in China by the end of the year (current locations include Beijing, Wuzhen and Wuhu cities). Baidu recently received the go ahead from motor vehicle authorities in the U.S. to test vehicles alongside Google’s autonomous cars in California.
It’s not the first time Baidu and Nvidia have joined forces. According to Nvidia, the chip company has contributed components for other projects undertaken by Baidu’s artificial intelligence research unit, which is headed by Andrew Ng and based in the U.S.
Baidu recently joined automaker Ford to invest $150 million USD in detection technology for autonomous cars by Velodyne LiDAR Inc., as they continue to leverage partnerships in their goal to sell fully autonomous cars by 2018.
]]>It’s one of the biggest tech deals in China’s history, and now it’s being investigated by the country’s antitrust authorities.
China’s commence ministry has launched an investigation into Didi Chuxing’s milestone acquisition of Uber, because the Chinese ride-hailing company failed to declare the transaction.
The recent deal bring’s Didi’s total value to approximately $36 billion USD, however they failed to declare the deal to antitrust authorities because their revenue is below the threshold required for a review, the Wall Street Journal first reported.
It highlights the challenging regulatory space that tech companies occupy. Like Uber, Didi has been engaged in an aggressive campaign to increase their market share by massively subsidizing ride prices, so much so that neither company has turned a profit.
The tactic proved successful for Didi which eventually outpaced Uber to win the market through the acquisition. The resulting company’s high valuation and low revenue pose a complex question for regulators.
It’s not the first time the ride-hailing model has attracted regulatory attention in China. Until July, ride hailing was not officially legal in the country, creating uncertainty for companies like Uber and Didi who were attracting billions from investors, including state-backed institutions.
The latest antitrust review could potentially set a precedent for assessing companies in the fast-growing on-demand sector in China, including AirBNB-style startups and food delivery startups (of which there are many).
While the Didi-Uber deal is still expected to go through, the structure of the resulting company will be scrutinized by China’s Ministry Commerce. The ministry’s antitrust unit has already held two meetings with Didi officials, according to a ministry spokesperson.
]]>Qihoo 360, a Chinese tech company best known for its anti-malware software, is turning over a new leaf in product development.
Following the lead of other Chinese tech giants, Qihoo 360 launched its own AI research institute and is looking at developing smart driving applications.
“We have a very clear and long term target,” Shuicheng Yan, the Chief Scientist at Qihoo 360’s AI research institute, told TechNode. “Definitely it’s for smart driving. […] From product’s perspective, I consider smart driving as a major focus on the whole research institute.”
Leveraging Dr. Yan’s academic background in computer vision and deep learning, Qihoo 360’s AI research institute will primarily focus on image and facial recognition. While strengthening Qihoo 360’s existing IoT portfolio is the institute’s priority, Dr. Yan’s team is also looking at using AI to improve driver safety.
Qihoo 360 will start at the “zero level” of autonomous driving, he says, with advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), including a rear-view mirror that helps people drive more safely. The company also plans to develop products that monitor driver behavior and assess the environment around the vehicle.
The company is also taking advantage of their own strengths in security.”If you have various connections within the car [or] if you want to connect [your entertainment system] to the internet, definitely you will have the security threatened,” says Dr. Yan.
Qihoo 360 plans to develop security software reminiscent of the company’s “Safety Bodyguard” [our translation] anti-malware mobile app. However, whether or not Qihoo 360 will go as far as to develop their own fleet of autonomous cars, similar to that of Baidu or Google, is still under discussion. The company also plans to conduct their own research on voice and speech recognition, but under a separate research organization, says Dr. Yan.
Qihoo 360’s smart driving plans are part of the company’s overall goal to focus on connected devices. At the Second World Internet Conference last December, Zhou Hongyi, chairman and CEO of Qihoo 360, dubbed IoT the best business opportunity in the next five years. In many ways, the company’s AI research institute will be an extension of its IoT product development unit.
“We mainly support the two major lines of products of the company,” says Dr. Yan. “One is smart devices, IoT. Another line is the livestream[ing].”
Dr. Yan’s team is improving the facial recognition features of Qihoo 360’s smart home security camera, “Small Water Droplet” (小水滴, our translation). For Qihoo 360’s livestreaming platform, Huajiao (花椒), the research institute will enhance face tracking features, such as beauty and face swapping filters. At the moment, fundamental research is not a priority, says Dr. Yan.
IoT and AI could generate new revenue streams for Qihoo 360, whose main source of revenue comes from advertising on platforms like 360 Search and 360 Mobile Assistant, Qihoo 360’s mobile app store. Last year, online advertising services accounted for 67.1% of the company’s total revenue. In contrast, revenue from smart hardware and IoT devices was about 3% of Qihoo 360’s 2015 revenue, 88% of which was cost.
Qihoo 360 will also face steep competition from more established players. Other domestic tech giants, such as Alibaba and Baidu, started investing in AI years ago, either through partnerships, such as Alibaba’s partnership with facial recognition company Face++, or their own proprietary research labs, such as Baidu’s Institute of Deep Learning.
As the new kid on the block, Qihoo 360 will not only have to boost AI capabilities of existing products to survive, but develop cutting edge applications of its own.
Disclaimer: Although Qihoo 360 provided no editorial control over this post, the company covered the travel expenses involved in interviewing Dr. Shuicheng Yan.
]]>When Uber and Didi Chuxing orchestrated their market-shifting alliance last month, it put Lyft in a very tough position.
The U.S.-based ride-hailing service that aligned themselves strongly with Didi both financially and strategically, now has to come to terms with the fact that their largest ally is now in cohorts with their largest competitor, Uber.
It’s a trying time for the U.S.’s second-biggest ride-hailing company, and Lyft is now trying to do what one might expect: shop around for a buyer.
According to sources who spoke to the New York Times, Lyft has approached Didi Chuxing in hopes of selling the company, as well as high-profile Didi investor Apple. The company has also been in discussions with General Motors, Google, Amazon and even Uber itself, the same people said.
The acquisition of Uber’s China operations by Didi Chuxing effectively flipped the ride-hailing market upside down overnight. Before, the competitive pressure point lay between Uber and Didi, along with their network of loosely affiliated strategic partners, including Lyft, India’s Ola Cabs and Singapore’s Grab.
In the wake of Uber and Didi’s armistice, the weight of competition has shifted to the market between Uber’s global operations and the number of independent hailing services that now find themselves on the periphery of the empire, including Lyft.
It’s still not clear what the future of Lyft and Didi’s relationship will look like. With Uber and Didi retaining separate apps in the China market for now, Lyft still acts as Didi’s trans-pacific partner, with Didi users able to hail Lyft cars in the U.S. through the Chinese app and vice versa.
Prospects for the U.S. company are tightening. Lyft has neither the stashed funds or investor prospects to even consider taking on the Uber-Didi alliance, meaning their easiest bet is to broker a sale with one of their own strategic investors, which includes G.M. and Didi.
Lyft is reportedly working with Silicon Valley-based banking firm Qatalyst Partners to manage the sale, and as of January is valued at $5.5 billion USD.
]]>As tech giants like Baidu and Google refine the technology to make fully autonomous cars feasible, one important barrier still stands between research and mass production: affordability.
On Tuesday, Baidu and Ford announced a $150 million USD joint investment in Velodyne LiDAR, Inc., a Silicon Valley-based company that develops laser-based LiDAR (Light Imaging, Detection, and Ranging) sensors, which are used for mapping, localization, object identification, and collision avoidance. According to Velodyne, the latest round of funding will go towards cost-reduction and scaling the company’s technology.
“This investment will accelerate the cost reduction and scaling of Velodyne’s industry-leading LiDAR sensors, making them widely accessible and enabling mass deployment of fully autonomous vehicles,” stated David Hall, founder and CEO, Velodyne LiDAR, in a press release.
In LiDAR technology, lasers bounce light waves off nearby objects to measure their distance from sensors. It’s faster than radar, which uses radio waves. As a result, LiDAR sensors can collect more data and produce more detailed 3D maps of the sensor’s surroundings. In the context of autonomous cars, LiDAR sensors help cars ‘see’ the road.
Currently, Velodyne’s latest generation of sensor, the Velodyne Puck, costs about $8,000 USD. That’s cheap compared to older generations of Velodyne sensors, which cost more than $80,000 USD. In developing the Velodyne Puck, the company scaled down the number of lasers per sensor from 64 to 16, significantly lowering its cost. Still, the company’s sensors will have to become even cheaper in order to scale to the mass consumer market.
“Baidu is developing autonomous vehicles with the intention to increase passenger safety and reduce traffic congestion and pollution in China,” stated Jing Wang, Senior Vice President and General Manager of Autonomous Driving Unit of Baidu, in a press release.
“Our investment will accelerate our efforts in autonomous driving with what, in our view, are the best LiDAR sensors available today and advance Velodyne’s development of increasingly sophisticated LiDAR sensors,” he stated.
Baidu’s investment in Velodyne marks another milestone in the tech giant’s ambitions for its autonomous driving unit. Two months ago, Jing Wang announced Baidu’s plan to mass produce autonomous cars and have them on the road within the next five years. The Chinese tech giant also launched an autonomous car driving zone in the Anhui province earlier this year and signed an agreement with the Wuzhen Tourism Bureau in July to let tourists book Baidu self-driving cars.
Baidu is also expanding its R&D resources for its autonomous car technology. In April, the company announced the formation of a 100-person R&D team based in the Silicon Valley.
Image credit: Shutterstock
]]>Chinese internet giant LeEco announced Wednesday that it’s going to invest 20 billion yuan ($3 billion USD) to build an automotive plant as well as an ‘eco automotive experience’ complex in China’s Zhejiang Province.
The park, which will be 2.87 square kilometers, will include an electric car plant which has an annual production capability of around 400,000 cars. The investment in auto manufacturing facilities totals 12 billion yuan, the company says. Phase 1 investment capital is set at 6 billion yuan and will result in an annual production capacity of 200,000 cars. Phase 2 is scheduled to begin within two years of Phase 1.
Jia Yueting, CEO and founder of the company, said that the plant would host China’s first high-end car (D-class) assembly line with independent intellectual property rights.
The rest of the capital will go into a automotive theme park, which will supposedly allows customers to experience concept auto projects and other related technology.
According to the plan, all vehicles used in the “automotive eco-town” will be electric, shared, and driven autonomously. In addition, LeEco will also use content resources, such as music, sports and film etc. in the town.
LeEco, previously known as LeTV, started as a video streaming service provider in 2004. The company has diversified rapidly with into smart devices, cloud computing and film production.
LeEco’s electric car project “LeSee” was launched in 2014. The company has partnered with Aston Martin and GAC Group. In April, the company unveiled LeSee, an all-electric concept car with autonomous vehicle capabilities.
LeEco founder Jia Yueting is also an investor in U.S. electric car startup Faraday Future, which promised last year to spend $1 billion USD on a factory built near Las Vegas.
]]>Josh Horwitz from Quartz joined us to discuss the Uber and Didi deal in China and analyzed the fallout that will impact the anti-Uber alliance. We discussed possible reasons why Uber decided to sell their China business and operations to Didi and made the deal to let each other invest in one another. We also talk about investor intervention, the battle over the Asia market from India to Southeast Asia, and self-driving cars. Last but not least, we looked at the future of on-demand ride-hailing apps in the next 1 to 2 years.
Download MP3 here (27.7 MB) or Subscribe via RSS
Analyse Asia with Bernard Leong is a weekly podcast dedicated to the pulse of technology, business & media in Asia. They interview thought leaders and leading industry players and gain their insights to how we perceive and understand the market. Analyse Asia is a content partner of TechNode.
Notes:
Here are the interesting show notes and links to the discussion (with time-stamps included):
Didi Chuxing, the leading ride-hailing service in China, has reached a deal to acquire Uber’s China operations in a merger that could be worth up to $35 billion USD.
Didi will take over Uber’s China business, while the U.S. company will become Didi’s largest shareholder. The news comes days after Chinese regulators announced the upcoming legalization of ride-hailing services in the country.
According to sources who spoke to Bloomberg, investors in Uber China, which includes search giant Baidu, will take a 20 percent stake in the newly merged entity, and Didi will make a $1 billion USD investment in Uber Global at a $68 billion USD valuation to kick off the partnership. Uber will maintain management of their app in China for the time being.
[Update: Didi confirmed the acquisition in a statement, noting that Uber Global will take a 5.89 percent stake in the newly merged entity with a preferred equity interest worth 17.7 percent economic interest in Didi. Chinese shareholders, including Baidu, will receive a 2.3 percent stake in Didi.
Uber founder Travis Kalanick will join the board of Didi while Didi founder Cheng Wei will join the board of Uber.]
The deal marks the end of a grueling rivalry between the two services, which saw both companies shell out billions in marketing and subsidies. Uber also set a new benchmark for U.S. tech companies with their China entry, opening an entity financially distinct from their parent company, Uber Global.
The landmark consolidation brings together a host of the country’s top investors, with Baidu now joining Alibaba and Tencent, who oversaw investments in Kuaidi Dache and Didi Dache respectively before the two ride services merged in early 2015.
State-backed Chinese insurance giant China Life had already invested in both companies, investing $200 million in Uber in 2015 before injecting $600 million in Didi last month, raising suspicion that the ride sharing companies were in merger discussions.
According to an internal blog post by Uber CEO Travis Kalanick on the subject of the deal, “Uber and Didi Chuxing are investing billions of dollars in China and both companies have yet to turn a profit there. Getting to profitability is the only way to build a sustainable business.”
]]>For those living in China, using ride-hailing apps Didi Chuxing and Uber has become a part of daily life. Which is why it might surprise some to hear they were illegal until a few days ago.
The services finally left the legal grey zone on Thursday, when a group of regulators announced new laws which will make ride-hailing legal under as of November 1st.
Until now, the services could’ve been shut down without notice, despite a fielding billions of dollars in investment, some from the Chinese government’s sovereign investment fund itself. While a blanket ban would’ve been unlikely, the government did use the legal distinction to periodically arrest drivers and stop the companies speaking at industry events.
The legalization comes with some draw backs for the companies. When the law comes into effect later this year drivers will have to have a recent car, three years’ driving experience, no criminal record and a license from a local taxi-regulator. It’s a comparatively soft set of regulations compared to earlier proposals, but it still raises the entry barrier for new drivers.
Both Uber and Didi Chuxing have poured billions into their China expansion efforts. Didi Chuxing sealed a $1 billion USD investment from U.S. tech giant Apple in May, following several large rounds from state and private investors. Uber’s China operation has committed over $1 billion USD a year to the market, engaging in an aggressive subsidies war with Didi.
]]>Baidu-backed ride-hailing service Yidao has lashed out at Tencent’s messaging service WeChat for blocking the ride service on their platform.
Founder of Yidao, Hang Zhou, penned an open letter to Tencent CEO Pony Ma on his public Weibo account this week accusing the social media platform of periodically blocking users from accessing the Yidao site through the social platform for competitive reasons.
Yidao competes directly with Tencent-backed Didi Chuxing, the country’s most popular ride-hailing service.
Users were unable to access the Yidao app from WeChat from July 13th. Following Mr. Zhou’s open letter, the ban was briefly lifted before being reinforced on July 14th. The ban appears to have been lifted again at the time of writing.
“I just do not understand why WeChat blocked the application,” he said, “Moreover, Uber and Shenzhou [UCAR] type apps have also been blocked, Didi is the only exception.”
Yidao recently introduced a feature that allows users to compare the cost of an Yidao ride with other rides.
Tencent released a public statement within hours of Mr. Zhou’s open letter saying that Yidao had been blocked by the site for asking users to share promotional material in return for cash rewards.
The scuffle highlights the fierce competition between China’s current top ride-hailing apps, which have been fighting a two-year long war of attrition fueled by subsidies and aggressive marketing campaigns.
In December WeChat blocked Uber on the platform, citing ‘malicious’ marketing tactics. The social platform has a range of rules that apply to businesses who wish to use the platform to market brands. Companies must have over 100,000 followers before they are able to advertise, and must also submit a relevant license.
WeChat claims Uber failed to submit the license, Uber fired back saying that they had the appropriate regulatory approvals but had never been asked to submit them. Baidu is a prominent investor in both Uber and Yidao.
Being blocked on WeChat is a serious blow for any company in China. The app, which boasts over 750 million total users with over 90% coverage in tier-one cities, has become a major marketing and communication tool for companies in China. The app not only supports public accounts, but a highly popular payment service, WeChat Pay.
]]>Tencent-backed Future Mobility Co. has officially joined the club of Chinese auto concepts with a production deadline of 2020.
The auto startup, which is also counts Foxconn and Chinese car dealer Harmony New Energy as investors, plans to sell highly automated, electric cars globally within the next four-and-a-half years, the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday.
As a country of early adopters with an appetite for luxury vehicles, China has produced a number of electric, autonomous and connected car concepts, all hoping to reach production at an accelerated rate.
Baidu, China’s largest search engine, has committed to a 2018 release date for their autonomous concept, with a 2020 deadline for production and distribution. Likewise, LeEco, in partnership with Faraday Future, has set a similar 2020 deadline for their electric vehicle, claiming to have shortened the development stage by two years.
Future Mobility Co., which is just four months old, will close a funding round “soon,” according to CEO Carsten Breitfeld. He told the Wall Street Journal that the company is seeking to compete with major luxury car dealers Audi, Mercedes and BMW, which make up the lion’s share of China’s luxury vehicle market.
Mr. Breitfeld formerly worked on the development team for BMW’s i8 plug-in sports car.
Future Mobility Co. isn’t Tencent’s only bet in the autos industry. The social and gaming giant also invested in NextEV Inc., which has also attracted funding from Sequoia Capital and Joy Capital.
]]>Alibaba has officially launched their first connected car in collaboration with Chinese automaker SAIC. It’s the fruit of a two-year long relationship backed by a joint investment of $160 million USD.
The RX5, a sport utility vehicle, is now available for pre-order through Tmall at 148,800 yuan ($22,000 USD), with the earliest models expected to ship in August, according to a blog post by the internet giant.
The car’s system is built on Alibaba’s on YunOS operating system, which has already been rolled out on other connected devices including smartphones and tablets.
Alibaba joins a slew of Chinese connected car projects that are seeking to dominate the realm of connected cars. Tencent, the social and gaming giant behind WeChat, released their own custom vehicle OS in September 2015, while LeEco released their auto operating system in January 2015. Like the aforementioned operating systems, Alibaba plans to open the platform to third-party developers.
“We believe in the future that 80 percent of the car’s functionality won’t be related to transportation,” said Alibaba CEO Jack Ma at a launch event in Hangzhou.
His comments echo LeEco CEO Jia Yueting who recently said he considers the car a “smart mobile device on four wheels.” Similarly, Baidu CEO Robin Li forecasted an “aggressive” spend on autos as “the next major computing platform,” during the company’s last earnings call.
According to Alibaba, the operating system will serve as a platform to connect the company’s existing e-commerce infrastructure, including Alipay. The car will also feature “360-degree detachable cameras for recording trips—and selfies.”
]]>Just two months after Baidu announced the launch of a autonomous driving zone in China’s Anhui province, the search giant is now planning to test their cars on tourists in one of the country’s most popular travel destinations, according to state media.
Baidu is reportedly developing a deal with Wuzhen tourism Co., a travel agency in Wuzhen, which is famed for its quaint historic houses built atop a network of canals. The popular tourist destination is sometimes dubbed the ‘Venice of China.’
Wang Jin, the head of Baidu’s autonomous driving division, told Xinhua News that they are currently working with the local tourist agency to develop possible routes, as well as settling details including costs and the number of vehicles. The plan has not yet been finalized and a launch date has not been set, according to he report.
Baidu unveiled the autonomous car at the World Internet Conference in Wuzhen last year, before completing a series of tests on the outskirts of Beijing. In March the company announced they would soon begin testing the vehicles in the U.S., where they have a dedicated AI research base.
Wuzhen is approximately 100 kilometers southwest of Shanghai in Zhejiang province, which neighbors Anhui province, where Baidu announced an official testing ground for the autonomous cars in Wuhu city earlier this year. Baidu has said previously that they intend to launch a total of ten testing locations in China throughout 2016.
The company has said publicly that they intend to have their cars on the road within the next five years, in a challenge to U.S. tech giant Google, which is currently testing autonomous models on public roads.
Technode reached out to Baidu to confirm the details of the project and we will update with any further information.
]]>When hailing a ride, Uber users in China keep the app open for an average of 90 seconds once they get in the car, according to the company.
A minute and a half doesn’t seem like much, but in the word of mobile content it’s very valuable. Which is why Uber is hoping to make serious bank on that minute and a half.
In May, the company first announced their UberLIFE initiative for China, which involves a curated mesh of content including recommended cultural, sporting and dining options based on collected travel data.
Uber China VP and General Manager of Central China reiterated that commitment at TechCrunch Shanghai on Monday, which was co-hosted by Technode, saying that the company wants to be a service “understand the lives” of their users, not just their riding habits.
It’s just one of the latest initiatives the company is trialling as part of an aggressive attempt to maintain customers while attempting to lower subsidies. However while the company has launched several new ride-related services in China, UberLIFE represents their first foray into a much more risky area: content. As U.S. tech companies Apple, Google and Linkedin know all too well, even the most innocent content curation can attract the ire of the Chinese government.
Uber is backed by Baidu in China, the country’s leading search engine, but even they have come under fire from the government recently over content issues. Regulators recently released a ruling requiring Baidu to clearly identify ads on their platforms.
For now, Uber’s goal is to just keep users in their app during that first 90 seconds, and possibly longer. The company implied the recommendations within the app would be driven by data collected on where consumers were going when using the app, though the potential for advertising is very obvious.
It’s worth noting that in taxi services in Beijing, riders can read a similar, physical lifestyle and events magazine that is often offered in the backseat pocket of taxis. Popular examples include 慢步, which is like a localized in-flight magazine for Beijing, so UberLIFE could be picking up on an existing behavior in some cities.
]]>Shanghai could be the production hub for a $9 billion USD Tesla hub, according to sources who spoke to Bloomberg.
A company owned by the Shanghai government, Jinqiao Group, has reportedly signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding with the U.S.-based electric vehicle maker, said the source.
The deal would involve an investment of 30 billion yuan ($4.5 billion USD) from both Tesla and Jinqiao, totaling $9 billion USD. A majority of Jinqiao’s investment would be in securing the land for the facility, according to the report.
Jinqiao’s listed entity, Shanghai Jinqiao Processing Zone Development Co., saw their stock jump almost 10 percent following the news, before trading was suspended.
Tesla released their Model X for distribution in China just last week. The country hasn’t been an easy market for Tesla, though it’s expected to be the largest global market for connected, autonomous and electric vehicles. Several home-grown competitors have inched into the space, including NextEV and internet company LeEco, which is backing Faraday Future.
Bloomberg’s source claims that several cities are vying to partner with Tesla on the project, including Suzhou in Jinagsu province and Hefei in Anhui province. Recently Baidu announced that they would be testing their autonomous vehicles in Anhui province, due to the varied landscapes and favorable government conditions.
]]>The time has come for our annual TechCrunch Shanghai event, and it’s shaping up to be bigger than ever.
Join us from June 25th to the 29th at the West Bund Art Center for the Chinese tech industry’s top international conference, where we will bring together speakers from the country’s biggest tech companies and startups to discuss what the future of Chinese technology will look like.
TechCrunch China has made some impressive advances over the past three years. The event attracted over 3,000 attendees at TechCrunch Shanghai in 2013, rising to over 6,000 at TechCrunch Beijing in 2015.
In 2016, TechCrunch China is unstoppable as one of the top industry events in the Chinese tech ecosystem, and this year – for the first time, TechCrunch Shanghai will be held over five days.
On June 25th, hundreds of programmers, developers and business minds will join us to kick off the TechCrunch Shanghai Hackathon, a 24 hour intensive brainstorming event designed to bring out some of the best in Chinese tech innovation.
From the June 27th to the 28th, international entrepreneurs, VCs, startups and other industry professionals will take the stage for two days of cutting edge talks and panels covering the hottest topics in technology today, including internet finance and artificial intelligence. There will be also a sub-venue focusing on Fintech.
At the same time, TechCrunch Shanghai will feature a VC Meetup, giving attendees the chance to pitch product face-to-face with more than 100 of China’s top angel investors and venture capitalists. This year, TechNode will help more than 1,000 entrepreneurs talk to VCs through intensive ten minute sessions.
Some of the country’s best young startups will also have a chance to show off their product in our Startup Alley, with more than 250 startups expected to take the floor over two days. Our Alley startups, hailing from different regions and countries, will have a chance to present themselves to top-level domestic and foreign venture capitals and media.
On June 29th, TechCrunch China will hold our first-ever Asian virtual reality and augmented reality summit in collaboration with Formation Group, all the way from Silicon Valley. We’ll also invite industry-leading entrepreneurs and top Chinese device companies and content producers, including Oculus, HTC, Samsung, and NextVR. Participants will exhibit their latest products and discuss the hottest trends in VR and AR hardware, content, and capital.
At TechCrunch Shanghai 2016, you can expect to experience a range of Chinese innovation and entrepreneurialism with unprecedented scope at one incredible event, so join us from the 25th to the 29th of June to get a true glimpse of our future!
To sign up for TechCrunch 2016 Shanghai, please click here.
For Startup Alley booth registrations, please click here.
For further information on planning events with Technode, please email event@technode.com.
Image Credit: TechNode
]]>Following a series of high-profile investments, Didi Chuxing, the company behind China’s top ride-hailing app, has announced the closure of their $7.3 billion USD round.
Earlier this week Didi announced a $600 million USD investment from state-backed insurance company China Life, which followed a $1 billion USD investment from Apple in May. We now have a more comprehensive overview of investors in the round, with some of the top names listed below:
With the exception of Apple and China Life, which is also an Uber-backer, the final list of high-profile investors doesn’t reveal any surprises as they are previous investors. Alibaba and Tencent were investors in Kuaidi and Didi respectively before they merged to make Didi Chuxing. Interestingly, this is the first investment in the ride-hailing firm by Alibaba’s finance arm Ant Financial.
The $7.3 billion USD injection is made up of $4.5 billion USD equity investment, with the remaining $2.8 billion made up of strategic financial arrangements from the round’s two significant state-backed investors. China Life committed to a long-term debt investment of 2 billion yuan (about $300 million USD), while China Merchant’s Bank agreed to become the lead arranger for a syndicated loan worth $2.5 billion USD.
The round values Didi at approximately 25 billion USD, and the company claims to have $10.5 billion USD in disposable funds now in their arsenal. This is a significant tool for the company which continues to run an extensive subsidies program in their battle against Uber in China.
Didi founder Cheng Wei said in a statement this morning that he was “inspired” by the support form the new investors. The company says they will use the proceeds of the round to upgrade their big data operations, improving user experience and exploring new business lines.
]]>Chinese insurance giant China Life Investment Holding Co. has officially joined the ranks of investors behind the country’s largest ride-hailing app and Uber’s biggest global competitor, Didi Chuxing.
The Chinese startup confirmed on Monday that they have received a $600 million USD strategic investment from the life insurer, which includes a $300 million USD equity investment and a further $305 million USD long-term debt investment.
The latest investment also brings to light an interesting twist: China Life has previously invested in Uber. In April 2015 we reported that China Life had invested about $200 million USD in the U.S. ride-hailing app.
The competition between Uber and Didi Chuxing has reached a feverish pitch on the mainland as both companies have publicly disputed each other’s market share data, as well throwing barbs over the ongoing subsidies war driving their local expansion.
It’s not the first time a investor has backed the China-ride-hailing-horse both ways. China-based investment firms Hillhouse Capital and Tiger Global Management have both invested capital in the two competing ride-hailing companies, though the scale of China Life’s dual commitment is unprecedented.
China Life’s investment is part of the same round that Apple participated in when they recently committing $1 billion USD to the ride-hailing app. The closure of the current round would value Didi Chuxing at over $25 billion USD.
China Life is now joins a list of common investors that reads like a who’s who of influential China tech investors. Didi has attracted significant investments from the country’s biggest tech firms, including Alibaba and Tencent, as well as the venture capital arm of fellow insurer Ping An.
China Life also adds to the number of state-backed investors who now have a stake in the ride-hailing company. Chinese sovereign wealth fund China Investment Corporation invested in Didi as part of a $2 billion USD round in August 2015. State-owned China Merchant’s Bank is also a backer of Didi.
]]>Baidu has led a $300 million USD investment in one of China’s biggest auto trading and marketing platforms, BitAuto, revealed the search giant on Monday. It’s the latest company to join Baidu’s growing auto investment portfolio.
Baidu is joined by several previous investors in BitAuto, including internet services giant Tencent and e-commerce company JD.com. The three companies each purchased $50 million USD worth of newly issued shares from BitAuto at $20.23 each. BitAuto listed on the NYSE in November 2010.
The new round of funding comes as China’s burgeoning tech autos market undergoes a fresh round of new strategic partnerships between ride-hailing services, online service platforms, and autonomous and electric car projects.
Baidu, which is also a strategic investor in Uber, has been building up their deep learning and AI capabilities to support their autonomous vehicle project, tipped to be revealed in 2018. Tencent is a major investor in Uber’s top China rival, Didi Chuxing, which recently secured a $1 billion USD investment from Apple as part of a larger strategic fundraising effort.
Bitauto is also an investor in ride-hailing services. The company lead a $20 million USD B series in Didi chuxing competitor Dida Pinche, which in May 2015 raised a further $100 million USD from China Renaissance Capital Investment, TBP Capital and IDG Capital Partners among others.
Bitauto CFO Andy Zhang reportedly met with Uber CEO Travis Kalanick in March last year to discuss a possible partnership between Dida Pinche and Uber. While there has been no evidence that the two have since worked together, the Baidu’s strategic investment now puts them in the same investment family.
Bitauto, which predominantly serves as a trading platform for new and used vehicles, says they have already begun leveraging Tencent and JD.com’s respective strengths in social media, big data and e-commerce.
“Through our new partnership with Baidu, we expect to leverage its leadership in mobile and desktop online search, big data and transaction services platforms for additional strategic advantages,” said William Li, CEO and Chairman of Bitauto in a statement.
]]>Digging up the correct figures on China’s ride-hailing market can be a challenge for onlookers, though it’s apparently also a struggle for the companies themselves.
According to Liu Zhen, the Senior Vice President of Strategy at Uber’s China division, the U.S.-founded company will overtake Didi Chuxing to become China’s top provider of private-car ride hailing services within 12 months.
“Last year we were only operating in eight cities with only a 1 percent market share,” she said at a Wall Street Journal conference on Friday, noting that the company has since accelerated to take over a third of the market.
True to the fierce competition in China’s ride-hailing market, Uber’s statistics are at sharp odds with how much of the market Didi Chuxing believes they own.
Just two days earlier, President of Didi Chuxing, Jean Liu, casually announced that Didi owns almost 90 percent of the country’s private-car ride-hailing market. “They’re [Uber] actually in the industries we are in which is the private car service, where we have [an] 87 percent market share,” said Liu in a conversation with Recode’s Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg.
Didi Chuxing originally found dominance in securing the ride-hailing market for taxis, a market it now claims to own “almost 100 percent.” Taxi services aside, the two companies compete directly in virtually every other aspect.
The confusing myriad services run by both companies in China has further muddied the distinction between which company owns what in a landscape of varied ride-hailing options. Both companies operate carpooling services alongside private car and black car services. However each company is also working on a handful of initiatives, from Didi’s foray into bus services to Uber’s latest route-oriented carpooling service.
It’s also important to note that drivers in China are not necessarily loyal to neither service, using whichever option is most busy or profitable on the day. One Didi driver told Technode that while she earned more using Uber’s service per ride, she found herself often driving Didi passengers because they were more frequent, swapping between the two apps.
The two companies also disagree on another factor that lies at the heart of a successful China campaign: their relative abilities to phase out subsidies. Both companies have relied heavily on subsidized services to expand rapidly on the mainland, and the race is now on to see which service can successfully transition into a more sustainable model.
On Friday Ms. Liu noted that UberChina will break even in China “soon”, spending 80 percent less per trip it did a year ago. In March this year Uber CEO Travis Kalanick noted that UberChina will break even within two years, and that they are spending roughly a billion USD per year in the market. Didi Chuxing claims to be profitable in 200 of the 400 cities they currently operate in, noting that less mature markets receive higher subsidies than some of the company’s more mature markets.
Both companies continue to fundraise at a breakneck speed, funneling funds into subsidies as well as technology. Recently Uber’s global operation received a $3.5 billion USD boost from a Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment fund, some of which would be spent on UberChina’s operations Liu Zhen confirmed on Friday. Last month Didi Chuxing sealed a 1 billion USD investment from U.S. tech giant Apple as part of a larger fundraising effort.
]]>Josh Horwitz from Quartz joins us in a discussion on Apple’s recent decision to invest in China’s largest ride hailing app, Didi Chuxing and the implications for Uber in their plans to conquer China and the rest of the world. We move beyond the obvious reasons, such as managing their diplomatic relations with the Chinese government, and dive into Apple’s preparation for their entrance into China similar to other automotive makers. In this episode, Josh also takes us through the intricacies of the Chinese government’s regulations of the transportation industry. Last but not least, we also discuss the power players behind Didi and Grab and how traditional “old” money are boiling into technology startups in Asia.
Download MP3 (30.1 MB) or Subscribe via RSS
Analyse Asia with Bernard Leong is a weekly podcast dedicated to the pulse of technology, business & media in Asia. They interview thought leaders and leading industry players and gain their insights to how we perceive and understand the market. Analyse Asia is a content partner of TechNode.
TechNode does not endorse any commentary made in the program.
Notes:
Sameer Singh from Tech-thoughts.net analyzed the recent Apple Q1 2016 earning and challenged the notion whether Apple’s Asia (India and China) and their rumored car strategy will bring them back to growth. Through the lens of the Apple’s rumored car strategy, we dove deeper into a conversation on artificial intelligence and autonomous vehicles from the China to the U.S.
Download MP3 (32.6 MB) or Subscribe via RSS
Analyse Asia with Bernard Leong is a weekly podcast dedicated to the pulse of technology, business & media in Asia. They interview thought leaders and leading industry players and gain their insights to how we perceive and understand the market. Analyse Asia is a content partner of TechNode.
TechNode does not endorse any commentary made in the program.
Notes:
Sameer Singh from Tech-thoughts.net joined us to reflect on major themes that have been ongoing in the technology space from messaging apps to self-driving cars. In the first part, we discussed Facebook’s recent F8 announcements on their new chatbots platform and video livestreaming. From there, we analyzed the implications of Facebook’s announcements and examined how it will impact Asia from video advertising to messaging apps, thus foreshadowing an upcoming showdown between Asian messaging apps, such as WeChat and LINE. Finally, we dissected the different business models behind artificial intelligence companies and how they will play a role in the technology space from the US to Asia.
Download MP3 (25.2 MB) or Subscribe via RSS
Analyse Asia with Bernard Leong is a weekly podcast dedicated to the pulse of technology, business & media in Asia. They interview thought leaders and leading industry players and gain their insights to how we perceive and understand the market. Analyse Asia is a content partner of TechNode.
TechNode does not endorse any commentary made in the program.
Notes:
Fresh off the back of a $1 billion USD injection from Apple, Didi Chuxing is now considering a 2017 IPO, according to sources who spoke to Bloomberg.
The Chinese ride-hailing giant is eying a New York listing as soon as next year in a bid to outpace Uber, their top global competitor, said the source. Didi is in the process of sealing a $3 billion USD round which could value the company at around $26 billion USD.
Didi Chuxing “does’t have any such plan or schedule,” according to a statement from the company today referring to the IPO rumors.
An IPO could add significantly to the company’s war chest as they seek to expand globally in markets already dominated by Uber. The company’s new involvement with Apple could also fast-track the company’s U.S. entry, which previously relied on a strategic partnership with Lyft.
The potential IPO could also be the biggest China tech listing in the U.S. since one of Didi’s core backers, Alibaba, listed on the NASDAQ for $25 billion USD in late 2014. Since 2014, enthusiasm for U.S. listing among Chinese tech companies has dwindled, with several high-profile Chinese companies choosing to de-list in favor of local markets, including Qihoo 360 and Momo.
According to Bloomberg’s sources, the timing of Didi’s IPO could ultimately still depend on how their battle with Uber plays out. Uber CEO Travis Kalanick has said publicly in the past that the U.S. ride-hailing company will hold off plans for an IPO as long as possible.
]]>Didi Chuxing, China’s biggest ride-hailing app and Uber’s top global competitor, has confirmed today a $1 billion USD investment from Apple.
The funding is part of a larger $2 billion USD investment round that the Chinese ride-hailing service is hoping to close soon, potentially valuing the company at around $25 billion USD.
Didi Chuxing, formerly known as Didi Kuaidi, has been expanding aggressively both locally and abroad in a services war with Uber. Didi currently dominates China’s ride-hailing market, and has partnered with complimentary services in other countries as part of a global strategy, including Ola Cabs in India, GrabTaxi in Singapore and Lyft in the U.S. Didi counts Chinese tech giants Alibaba and Tencent among their core strategic investors.
“The endorsement from Apple is an enormous encouragement and inspiration for our four-year-old company,” said Didi founder and CEO Cheng Wei in a statement.
“DiDi exemplifies the innovation taking place in the iOS developer community in China,” said Apple CEO Tim Cook. “We look forward to supporting them as they grow.” Tim Cook was in China last week for meetings with the Chinese government.
Neither company have divulged what the strategic partnership could potentially involve, though the pairing invites Apple into a coveted ecosystem of well-connected mainland investors. Aside from Alibaba and Tencent, the Chinese government is also an investor in Didi Chuxing via their sovereign wealth fund, China Investment Corp. Apple has maintains a relatively positive relationship with the government, though they experienced several upsets recently including a ban on Apple’s content services: iTunes Movies and iBooks.
A strategic partnership with Apple could help Didi realize their global expansion goals. Didi recently launched a dual service through their Lyft partnership, meaning Didi users traveling in the U.S. can use the local Chinese app and payments systems while Lyft users can use the U.S. app in China.
Though Didi maintains a strong lead over Uber in the Chinese market, servicing over 400 cities, they are still a long way off from competing with Uber globally.
Didi Chuxing were not available for comment at the time of publishing.
]]>Jean Liu, the president of ride-hailing startup Didi Chuxing, will represent China as an Olympic Torchbearer for the Rio Olympics 2016 Torch Relay, according to an announcement made by Coca Cola on Monday.
“A face of the young and modern China, [Jean Liu] will represent her country when carrying the flame along the Iguaçu route,” stated a press release from Didi Chuxing.
According to Didi Chuxing’s press release, Jean Liu was chosen through a popular vote organized by Coca Cola, one of the global partners for the Rio Olympics 2016 Torch Relay. The relay traces through all five regions of Brazil, totaling a distance of 20,000 kilometers by road and 10,000 miles by air.
Ms. Liu will join 12,000 other torchbearers for the 95-day relay, which concludes on August 5th during the opening ceremony. Specifically, Ms. Liu will participate in the Iguaçu route, named after Iguaçu Falls, a major tourist location in southern Brazil. Eight other Olympic Torchbearers will run the same route, including Lang Lang, a Chinese concert pianist, and Chinese actress Jiang Yiyan.
The relay, which began on May 3rd, features participants like Hanan Khaled Daqqah, a refugee from Syria, and Fabiana Claudino, a two-time Olympic volleyball champion. Even though Didi Chuxing is one of China’s largest ride-hailing startups – the company is valued at a staggering $20 billion USD – Jean Liu is a strange choice for the Olympic Torch Relay. It’s unclear how Coca Cola’s voting campaign was organized, or who the other choices were, but if anything, the result demonstrate China’s influence as a tech growing tech powerhouse – not to mention synergies with Brazil’s own thriving tech demand.
A spokeperson from Coca Cola could not be reached in time for comment.
Founded in 2012, Didi Chuxing competes with a number of ride-hailing startups in China, most notably Uber. In December 2015, Didi Chuxing signed partnerships with Lyft, Grab Taxi, and Ola Cabs to form an ‘anti-Uber’ alliance. Last month, Didi Chuxing launched a new version of its app with U.S roaming capabilities, leveraging Lyft’s driver network and expanding Didi’s service to the U.S. In May, Uber signed a global partnership with Alipay, enabling Alipay as an international payment option for Chinese users of the app.
]]>Uber has announced a global expansion of their partnership with Alipay, the dominant Chinese online payment service, allowing mainland users to use their native payments internationally. Previously Chinese users would have to link their account to a dual currency credit card.
Its a major move for Uber, who have been running a multi-billion dollar campaign to boost their services in China. They can now potentially monetize on the 120 million outbound trips made by Chinese tourists every year, a larger population than some of the countries that Uber operates in.
It’s also created a significant new foothold for Uber in their effort to outpace Chinese ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing.
Through mutual investors and direct investment, Didi has created a formidable network of international ride-hailing partners, including U.S.-based Lyft, Singapore’s Grab Taxi and India’s Ola Cabs. Didi has already begun leveraging this network to capture the market of traveling consumers. This year they announced that Lyft drivers could be hailed in the U.S. through Didi Chuxing’s Chinese app, while Didi drivers can be hailed in China by Lyft users.
By expanding Alipay to the 400+ global cities and 68 countries that Uber is currently working in, they have essentially matched the potential payment advantage offered by Didi’s global network.
Through the partnership with Alipay Uber has also forged a strategic partnership with PayTM, a leading Indian payments company that is backed by Alipay’s parent company Ant Financial.
“Alipay’s collaboration with Uber reflects a step forward of Ant Financial’s global strategy,” said Ant Financial President Eric Jing, “and the collaboration also extends to the Alipay’s strategic global partners like Paytm in India.”
Alipay’s parent company, Ant Financial, recently raised a $4.5 billion USD funding round, setting a global record for the largest-ever single funding event for a privately owned tech company. Alibaba is the largest shareholder in Ant Financial, which spun off from Alibaba in 2014.
Interestingly, Alibaba is also a major shareholder in Didi Chuxing, which goes to show that when it comes to extending their international payment network, Ant Financial has no qualms crossing the lines of loyalty laid out by their biggest shareholder.
]]>Chinese electric vehicle company Chehejia has raised a combined 780 million RMB (US$120 million) in series A funding at a valuation of 2.98 billion RMB from seven investors, according to company founder Li Xiang.
Founded in July last year, Chehejia is backed by a group of seasoned entrepreneurs. Li Xiang has launched two successful startups, Pcpop.com and US-listed automobile site Autohome.com. He is also a co-founder of NextEV, the electric car maker looking to take on Tesla. Li Xiang and Li Bin, another co-founder of Autohome.com launched NextEV last year to go after the top-tier electric vehicle market.
Unlike NextEV which is currently developing high-end concepts and supercars, Chehejia provides smart transportation solutions for mass market users. The ten-month-old startup is developing two smart car models: an SEV for short-distance urban transportation and a more powerful SUV for long-distance journeys.
According to Li, the two models will cover over 90% of the transportation demands of urban citizens, adding that Chehejia’s vehicles will be less dependent on charging piles.
Li has been seeking funding to support his vision since November last year and the current round will increase the company’s total funding raised to 2.5 billion RMB. He noted then that it will take US$200 million and four years for product development and marketing before the Chehejia vehicles are available for mass production.
LEO Group leads this series with a 350 million RMB in exchange for an 11.74% stake in the Beijing-based startup. Other investors include Source Code Fund, Changzhou Wujin Industry Fund and Future Capital.
The latest injection of capital will be used in R&D and the construction of production bases, according to the company. The firm disclosed that the construction of an aluminum production plant and a battery manufacturing factory located in Changzhou Wujin High-Tech Park has begun.
]]>LeEco CEO Jia Yueting took aim at traditional car manufacturers and U.S. tech companies, claiming they were “outdated.”
The company is currently seeking to condense five years of car development into three to release an Aston Martin electric supercar by 2018.
In the meantime LeEco launched the ‘LeSEE’ electric car concept last week. The company aims to eventually sell vehicles that cost less than Tesla, generating revenue primarily through LeEco’s connected car ecosystem.
Related: LeEco CEO Jia Yueting Takes Aim At “Outdated” Car Manufacturers, US Tech Giants
]]>Baidu earned a neat three percent bump in stock prices on Thursday after they recorder higher-than-expected revenues. One project that they’ll be spending the cash on is their driverless car unit, a research and development effort spanning between the U.S. and China.
“We believe that the automobile is the next major computing platform,” said CEO Robin Li during a call with analysts, forecasting an “aggressive” spend on the project.
Mr Li’s comments come just a few days after LeEco CEO Jia Yueting said that he considers the car “a smart mobile device on four wheels.”
Like Baidu, LeEco has invested heavily in their auto projects, which involve electric and self driving concepts as well as their connected car ecosystem.
The two also share another interesting feature: deadlines. LeEco has committed to releasing their Aston Martin electric sports car by 2018, while their strategic partner Faraday Future aims to have autonomous electric vehicles on sale by 2020.
Similarly, Baidu has set a 2018 release date for their autonomous concept, and a 2020 production deadline.
The ‘shoot-first, monetize later’ model has become a feature of Baidu’s expansion beyond their core search business.
The company is also embroiled in an cash-burning war over the O2O space with competitors Alibaba and Tencent. The search giant doubled down on investment in the area, including a $3 billion USD commitment to their group-buying site Nuomi. The company is now applying the same tactics to their autonomous driving unit.
“We are aggressively beefing up research and development in this area both here in China and our U.S. R&D center in Silicon Valley,” said CEO Robin Li in a post-earnings conference call. “We will worry about the business model later on.”
LeEco CEO Jia Yueting has also brushed off concerns about his company’s potential to make good on their massive valuation, as they continue to welcome new funding.
Mr. Jia claims LeEco’s electric cars will retail for less than Tesla rivals, but will profit from the connected ecosystem, drawing close parallels with smartphones. He has even gone as far as to suggest that the cars themselves could ultimately be free.
LeEco and Baidu join a raft of other Chinese entrants looking to capitalize on cars as a computing platform, similar to smartphones. Tencent-backed Next EV is planning to release an electric vehicle concept that is half the price of a Tesla by 2017.
]]>Eva Xiao from TechNode joined us for a two parter discussion on one of the BAT companies: Tencent. We dived deep into the holding company behind the two successful messaging apps in China: QQ & Wechat. In this first part of 2 episode arc, we discussed the vision, mission & corporate structure of Tencent, how the company built up their business structures and revenue streams, and the state of QQ, their desktop messaging app and its relevance to the Tencent’s portfolio today.
Download MP3 (19.3 MB) or Subscribe via RSS
Analyse Asia with Bernard Leong is a weekly podcast dedicated to the pulse of technology, business & media in Asia. They interview thought leaders and leading industry players and gain their insights to how we perceive and understand the market. Analyse Asia is a content partner of TechNode.
TechNode does not endorse any commentary made in the program.
Notes:
Chinese search engine Baidu Inc. announced on Friday the formation of a team in Silicon Valley focused on R&D for autonomous cars. The team will be part of Baidu’s newly-created Autonomous Driving Unit (ADU).
With the announcement, Silicon Valley becomes Baidu’s home turf for both their self-driving car team and Baidu Research’s Silicon Valley AI Lab (SVAIL). Baidu has been working on self-driving cars since 2013, and aims to have them on the roads by 2018.
“Baidu is fully committed to making self-driving cars a reality,” said Jing Wang, SVP of Baidu and General Manager of Baidu’s Autonomous Driving Unit in a statement. “Autonomous vehicles will save lives and make transportation more efficient. Baidu’s Silicon Valley car team will play a significant role in building the car of the future.”
The newly-created Autonomous Driving Unit will add over 100 researchers in the next year, according to a release from the company.
Baidu wants the autonomous car to be like a ‘human driver’, said Baidu’s chief scientist Andrew Ng, stressing the importance of the company’s AI developments.
Baidu’s self-driving cars will be tested on roads in the United States as early as next month. In China, Baidu already has government support from a number of local Chinese governments, who are working with the company on autonomous bus routes. The company has also tested the autonomous BMW 3-series cars extensively on Beijing roadways.
LeEco is also looking to crack the autonomous vehicle industry with Silicon Valley research facilities. The company has their own driverless car unit, and are looking to develop super cars with Silicon Valley’s Faraday Future, the so-called ‘Tesla killer’. Chinese carmaker Great Wall Motors also opened a research center in Silicon Valley.
Image Credit: TechNode
]]>LeEco’s auto projects are extremely ambitious. The company hopes to squeeze five years of vehicle development into three to release their electric Aston Martin super car by 2018, at the same time they are racing to release their own consumer vehicles with a view to surpass Tesla.
They are goals that CEO Jia Yueting isn’t afraid to rub in the face of his competitors.
In an interview with CNBC, Jia Yueting said traditional car companies, like BMW and Mercedes Benz, “cannot fundamentally change themselves” to meet the requirements of the modern auto industry.
He also singled out Apple, calling their ecosystem of individual apps “outdated”, and pointed to the company’s faltering sales in China.
“Having separate apps just means great obstacles in the user experience. We hope to break down these obstacles,” said Mr. Jia.
LeEco, formerly known as LeTV, is often compared to Netflix in western media, though the company has expanded heavily into other internet-enabled verticals, including electric and connected cars. Mr Jia said that LeEco’s current model is the “ultimate combination of Tesla, Uber, Apple, Amazon and Netflix.”
Mr Jia’s comparison did not stretch to involve Google, who are leading US developments in autonomous driving technology. Last month the CTO of Autolink, LeEco’s auto ecosystem project, told Technode that the company is “working closely” with Google, and have been invited to trial their technology.
When asked about LeEco’s hearty appetite for funding in the pursuit of their auto projects, Mr. Jia said he was confident that their autos ecosystem would reap dividends for those “visionary” enough to invest in it. He also said that the capabilities of LeEco cars would exceed Tesla rivals, but would remain a cheaper alternative, monetizing through the resources gathered from their internet ecosystem.
Mr Jia’s comments follow last week’s public unveiling of the LeEco LeSEE, their highly-anticipated electric sedan. The company said the car was built with autonomous technology in mind. The company’s other flagship project, an electric supercar being developed with Aston Martin, is slated for release in 2018. LeEco is working closely with Faraday Future, the secretive electric vehicle company in which Mr. Jia is a personal investor.
]]>While some onlookers believe a capital winter could be just the medicine China’s young tech community needs, established startups are seeking more capital than ever. From real estate to fintech and on-demand services, no one appears to be shying away from a heavy cash burn-rate in 2016.
Here are three multi-billion dollar deals that have come to light over the past week, worth a combined $6 billion, which show just how fearless China’s VC environment is in 2016.
Ant Financial, the Alibaba-backed finance giant behind Alipay, is looking to raise a round of at least 20 billion yuan ($3.5 billion USD), bringing the company’s total valuation to around $60 billion USD. Ant Financial’s 2015/2016 investment portfolio is incredibly diverse, and includes everything from Indian payment platform, PayTM, to the China’s Postal Savings Bank. The company raised $1.9 billion USD in their first round last year. The latest round could be the foundation for a highly-anticipated IPO.
Homelink Real Estate Brokerage Co., a Beijing-based property broker founded in 2001, is seeking to raise around $1 billion USD with interest from internet giants Tencent and Baidu, valuing the company at near 40 billion yuan ($6.2 billion USD). While demand for new property has dwindled over the the past 18 months, internet companies are still clamoring to take a bite of the market. Online companies in the industry including Soufun and Fangdd have surged ahead with new funding in the past six months as the country eases restrictions on home ownership.
China’s leading ride-hailing service Didi Kuaidi could see their valuation top $20 billion USD if the company is able to settle their $1.5 billion USD funding target. The company has been locked in an aggressive spending war with Uber, which currently values their China arm at near $7 billion USD. Uber currently claims to hold an estimated 30 percent share of private car services in China, versus Didi Kuaidi’s claim of 86 percent. The actual metrics vary depending on which aspects of the business you measure. The latest injection of funding into the Alibaba-Tencent-backed Chinese service shows that the cash-burning on-demand wars of 2015 are well and truly set to continue into 2016.
]]>Uber’s largest global city by volume may seem surprisingly obscure. Chengdu, a central Chinese metropolis straddling the border between first and second-tier status, has the most active Uber population by sheer numbers, and it’s produced a testing hotbed for the company’s global services. Chengdu was the world’s first city to test Uber Commute,the service designed to curb peak hour traffic. It was also the first city outside of the US to trial Uber Pool, the carpooling feature that now spans several countries.
Chengdu isn’t just a big city for Uber, it’s also at the heart of the Chinese subsidy war. The country’s tech giants have initiated a spending spree, injecting huge amounts of cash into a subsidization program they hope will help them claim an early market share in an increasingly competitive market. Uber’s primary rival Didi Chuxing (formerly Didi Kuaidi) is no stranger to this cash burn. The company has raised upwards of $3 billion USD in the past 6 months to fuel their campaign, slashing costs for users.
Uber China, which has a comparatively small pool of funding, is now looking for ways to slash costs on subsidies, and Chengdu, one of the country’s biggest test markets, could hold the key to helping them do that. Last month Uber CEO Travis admitted that Uber China is losing $1 billion USD a year, but that they re aiming to achieve profitability within two years.
“We’re in the middle of a subsidy war and this is not a secret here,” said Tiger Fang, Uber General Manager based in Chengdu. “If we get more people into lesser cars we can lower the price for everybody, we can using technology to lower the price not money that we burn to help lower the price and that’s how we win China.”
According to Mr. Fang, Chengdu is a hotbed for the innovations he hopes will save Uber from being swallowed up in a subsidies war. “ I certainly think that Chengdu has done a great job as a [test] market, we have the volume and we have really smart people and a market of customers that want to try new things.”
This week the company is once again rolling out a world-first pilot program in Chengdu, essentially combining the Uber Pool and Uber Commute programs. The new service marks a significant behavioral shift in what Uber is asking of their users in China. Drivers will be able to pick up passengers during their peak hour commute, much like Uber commute, but the service encourages multiple pick ups, similar Uber Pool.
Tiger says the main issue with rolling out the service was figuring out how to reduce the “inconvenience factor” barring drivers from signing up, which is why the service is built on central arteries and roads, rather than random user-selected routes. Passengers will have to walk to a busy street to meet their driver, mimicking a small scale public bus service. “You’re inconveniencing yourself a little bit so more drivers can join this program,” Mr. Fang told Technode.
The new service is at the heart of what Uber is trying to achieve: a wide scale cost-cutting program that can help them remain competitive in the face of mega-sized competitors like Didi Kuaidi. “We’re spending a lot of money here [as part of the subsidies war], we’re spending a billion dollars a year, so this initiative is part of that savings program.”
“More butts into less cars, and it will be better for the whole city, if this is successful we will push this out to other main roads and to other main cities,” said Mr. Fang.
Uber, like Didi, also has the luxury of targeting a problem that the Chinese government is also desperate to fix: traffic congestion. In Chengdu, the city requires drivers to take their cars completely off the road for one out of every seven days. It mirrors policies across China, including peak event days in Beijing when drivers are required to stay off the road on alternating days depending on whether their numberplate ends in an odd or even number. In Chengdu, Uber offers one free ride a week to drivers who have offered a ride to another passenger at least once during the week, in an attempt to spur more drivers into the program.
The company is also working with the Chengdu government to share data. “I want to be able to show the government some data,” says Mr. Fang, referencing the latest pilot program, “like this is how many people are using this [service], and we think the average speed on this road improved by [this much].”
The latest program will be tested out of Chengdu for an unspecified time, though they are hoping to expand it across China and potentially spur the creation of specialized lanes across China. “If this is really successful then we should make pool lanes in all of the major highways, in all of the major arteries in China, we don’t have that right now,” says Mr. Fang.
]]>Speculation over the LeEco-backed Aston Martin electric super car has been building since the two companies announced in January their intention to release the vehicle by 2018.
While the US has led the development of connected, autonomous and electric vehicles, China is playing a hasty catchup game, backed by the country’s cashed-up tech giants.
According to Rao Hong, the CTO of LeAutoLink, part of LeEco’s Super Electric Ecosystem (SEE) Plan, development on the super car has been shortened from a five-year project to a three year project, with an indirect partnership from electric vehicle startup Faraday Future.
Technode sat down with LeAutoLink CTO Rao Hong to discuss what’s next for the LeEco car project from the software side:
The typical car development cycle is about 4-5 years, and are trying to shorten the development cycle, our estimation is about 3 years. We are going to have some announcements next month at the Beijing auto show but that’s still [the] very early stage of the prototyping.
Aston Martin is a traditional car manufacturer and Faraday Future is a new startup company building electric cars, so its fits our overall strategy. Our partnership with Aston Martin is to bring in the internet of vehicle technology, autonomous drive technology as well as electrical power systems and transmission systems.
[Faraday] are new, they have leadership coming from Tesla so they know how to build electric cars. We are helping with the internet of vehicle aspect and we also work with them on autonomous driving . This is the beauty of [the partnerships]. We can look at it from the traditional car industry, and from the internet technology perspective.
Internally there is still a lot of fighting from cultural and background perspectives. We have people from the car industry saying we should go one way and the internet people saying another way, but it’s part of the challenge, a challenge comes up and then we can work on something new. The process is challenging but it helps us understand different cultures and backgrounds. The good thing is we all have the same goal: we want to change the car.
We have people locally in the US, and we try to let them manage themselves, we are just here to facilitate their activities…It’s their area of expertise, so they go ahead, we just ask what they need. When it comes to the internet and autonomous driving, both sides have to collaborate. There will be a lot of arguing and fighting [Laughs].
We work closely with Google, they’ve invited us to see their demo system. The industry is at the dawn of change, [in regards to] people, the car industry and the IT industry. It’s a big industry compared with some other LeEco industries.
We have a strong presence in China… Google apparently they are leading in autonomous driving, they have very good maps in the US, but not that good in China, they have some government issues. Our goal is to deploy cars globally. China is the biggest market for the car. We believe we have the advantage. China and the US are the two biggest markets. They are together probably one third of the global car market.
China is picking up, we believe that in the near future we will be a lot better than we are today. China has always played a catchup role, but when it comes to electric cars the advantage the traditional car companies have is not that big, electric cars in China are already leading in some ways…we are also in a good position when it comes to telecommunications.
A lot. [We are] talking with a quite a few companies, our goal is not just to be in connected cars, we want to build the internet of cars ecosystem. So we are talking with pretty much everybody. We are still very young as a startup company, trying to figure out how and when to collaborate.
See Related: LeEco, Aston Martin To Release Electric Vehicle By 2018
Image Credit: Technode
]]>The National People’s Congress (NPC), China’s unicameral parliament, convened last Saturday to kick off its annual meeting which runs until March 16th. It’s a lot of pomp and circumstance, with the NPC widely dismissed as a “rubber stamp” parliamentary for the Chinese Communist Party.
Nevertheless, the meetings offer valuable insight into the Chinese government’s priorities and ambitions for the year, many of which shape the country’s business environment. This year’s gathering is especially important as delegates will draft and complete China’s 13th Five Year Plan.
Unsurprisingly, Premier Li Keqiang’s annual work report underlined the government’s continued commitment to “innovation-driven development”, in the form of investment, tech and innovation hubs, and “platforms…for crowd innovation, crowd support, crowdsourcing, and crowdfunding.” Other buzzwords, like the sharing economy, internet-of-things, and big data, were also scattered throughout the report.
For entrepreneurs, this year’s NPC gathering can hint at other opportunities as well, besides the general support for entrepreneurship expected from the government. Using the Premier’s annual report, we’ve identified three areas that entrepreneurs can take advantage of:
The Chinese government’s commitment to environmental conservation and reducing pollution and emissions was reemphasized in Mr. Li’s annual work report. For example, the government plans to reduce “water consumption, energy consumption, and carbon dioxide emissions by 23%, 15%, and 18% respectively” per unit of GDP over the next five years.
The report also sets reduction targets for air pollutants, such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide, and specifically mentioned secondhand cars and electric vehicles as markets the government is interested in supporting.
Already, China has made a number of serious commitments to environmental conservation. In 2014, China spent $4.3 billion USD on its smart grid market. During the Paris climate talks in 2015, the Chinese government committed to producing 150 to 200 gigawatts of solar energy by 2020.
Conserving energy and the environment will be a growing imperative for China as the environmental consequences of rapid urbanization and development take their toll. For entrepreneurs in the green tech sector, the next five years could be see even more support from the government, in terms of policies, funding, pilot projects, and more.
According to Mr. Li’s report, the Chinese government wants to connect more of the country’s rural population to the internet.
“Fiber-optic networks will be developed in a number of cities and 50,000 administrative villages will be linked up to fiber-optic networks, thus enabling more urban and rural residents to enjoy a more digital way of life,” stated Mr. Li in his report.
In addition, the government aims for 60% of China’s population to be urban residents by 2020, or about 780 million people. The government also plans to build and upgrade 200,000 kilometers of rural roads around China.
More rural residents online could hold a number of opportunities for entrepreneurs. Startups such as Emubao, which connects users to sheep farmers, are already targeting China’s rural population. As more rural residents connect to the internet and rural infrastructure improves, we expect more opportunities for startups in the O2O and e-commerce industry.
This year, Chinese government will make a strong push to grow China’s tourism industry.
“We will ensure people are able to take their paid vacations, strengthen the development of tourist and transport facilities, scenic spots, and tourist sites, and recreational vehicles parks, and see that the tourist market operates in line with regulations,” stated Mr. Li. “With these efforts, we will usher in a new era of mass tourism.”
Currently, many of China’s travel agencies are or belong to tech giants, such as Alitrip and Qunar. However, opportunities for startups in tourism services, hospitality, and social media – such as sharing moments from trips – are plenty and we expect them to increase.
The push for tourism comes in the context of China’s slowing economy. The Chinese government will strive to maintain a GDP growth rate of 6.5% for the next five years, according to the Premier’s report. To move China’s economy to a more domestic-consumption-based model, the government is not only supporting tourism, but online shopping, personalized fashion, health services, cultural and sports services, and elderly care, according to Mr. Li’s report.
Image credit: Shutterstock
]]>Didi Kuaidi, China’s most popular ride-hailing app and Uber’s top global rival, is seeking to close a further $1 billion USD in funding, valuing the company at more than $20 billion USD.
The round, initially reported by the Wall Street Journal who cited unnamed sources, has not yet been finalized and no potential investors were disclosed, though they did note that the round is oversubscribed.
The latest addition to Didi’s coffers will give them more leverage in their war against Uber as well as smaller Chinese ride-hailing services. Didi Kuaidi is the dominant player in the Chinese market, and also a strong competitor in the private car hailing market. The company currently claims to be working in more than 400 cities.
The latest discussions come just four months after the company raised $3 billion USD in September. Uber’s China arm ‘UberChina’ raised $1.2 billion at a valuation of over $8 billion to fuel their expansion in the same period.
The latest potential injection highlights continued investor confidence in China’s runaway on-demand unicorns, despite a slowing economy and an increasingly wary local VC climate. Chinese competitors have struggled to compete in the increasingly consolidated space. In October two of the country’s most popular ‘chauffeur’ apps eDaijia and UCAR entered a strategic partnership to share resources.
Didi Kuaidi has also been eying international markets through strategic connections to US-based Lyft, India’s Ola Cabs and Singapore’s Grab Taxi. Lyft recently revealed that users of the Lyft app will be able to use it to hail Didi cars in China and vice versa within a matter of months.
]]>Uber is packing this year with charity campaigns aimed at winning over China’s white collar workers.
“In our more established cities, we plan on doing charity campaigns pretty much every month,” says Zhiyuan Meng, a marketing manager at Uber. Incorporating charity into its campaigns is partly an appeal to Uber’s existing user base, which is mostly white collar, says Mr. Meng. If a campaign is too commercial, it will be “challenged.”
In particular, the company will focus its campaigns on the app’s carpooling feature, or People’s Uber, which was launched last August in Beijing. Carpooling can be considered a kind of “charity” or non-profit activity, and campaigns around carpooling are more likely to be approved by Uber management, says Mr. Meng.
For example, Uber will launch a charity campaign around carpooling and books later this week in Hangzhou. The company is partnering with Seed, a Shanghai-based startup that encourages Chinese users to read and discover English content through its app. The campaign will incentivize Uber users to exchange books while they carpool by offering them a chance to win a book recommended by a celebrity, like Chinese actress Song Jia, as well as a signed bookmark, if they upload a photo of their book exchange to Weibo. At the end of the campaign, users can also donate secondhand books to the Shanghai United Foundation.
Seed was able to seal a co-marketing campaign with Uber because of the ridesharing aspect, says Zoe Zhou, the COO of Seed. “Uber wanted to focus more on ridesharing, which clicked with our proposal,” she says.
This isn’t Uber’s first charity campaign around books. In April 2015, the company put “moveable libraries” in Uber cars in Shenzhen, Wuhan, Chongqing, and other cities for World Book Day, in partnership with reading app Green Tomato (our translation of 青番茄).
“We want to do this type of library project every year,” says Mr. Meng. “We want our cars to become ‘cultural spaces.’ ”
It’s a different tactic from the “money-burning” campaigns by Uber’s Chinese competitors, like Didi Chuxing (滴滴出行 ) and Yidao Yongche (易到用车). Last year, billions of dollars poured into the ride-hailing sector in China, as different companies used ride subsidies to try to dominate the market. In 2015, Uber faced a number of setbacks as it battled its domestic competitors, like having all of its Wechat accounts blocked by Tencent last December.
Leveraging more charitable or “cultural” marketing campaigns might be a way for Uber to differentiate itself in a crowded market while digging into China’s white collar and younger demographic. According to Mr. Meng, Uber’s users are typically between 18 and 40 years old. By targeting its marketing towards this younger group, Uber also hopes to gradually reach parents and grandparents via word of mouth.
2016 is set to be an ambitious one for Uber. Yesterday, the company announced its plans to expand to 15 new cities in the Sichuan province before Chinese New Year, which is part of a larger goal of reaching 100 cities in China by the end of 2016.
]]>Here in Asia, we’re the first to see the sun rise. We’re the continent with the most people and some of the oldest civilizations in human history.
We’re also home to some of the most innovative hardware startups in the world. From “Startup Nation” Israel to high-tech Japan, Asia is a hotspot for exciting hardware, and it’s about time we had our own hardware competition.
At TechNode, we’re delighted to invite you to this year’s Asia Hardware Battle in Chengdu, where the top 15 hardware startups in Asia will present their products.
Most people know Silicon Valley as the heart of technological innovation, but what most don’t know is how more and more Valley tech giants are buying up technology from Asia. For example, in 2015, Apple acquired Israeli imaging company LinX and their 3D scanning technology, PrimeSense. The year before that, Google acquired an information security company called SlickLogin, also from the “Startup Nation.”
China is starting to see innovative hardware across all verticals: wearables, virtual reality, smart transportation, artificial intelligence, and more. And despite headlines of a winter in the Chinese economy, various tech industries in China are continuing to receive generous financing.
In the virtual reality industry, Noitom Ltd., a motion capture solution provider, and ANTVR, a VR hardware company, received $20 million USD and $300 million RMB in rounds of Series B funding, respectively.
China’s artificial intelligence industry got a nod from Google last October when the tech giant invested $75 million USD in Mobvoi, a speech recognition and natural language processing startup based in Beijing.
China’s UAV industry was especially well endowed with financing in 2015, as DJI, YUNEEC, and EHang all received millions of dollars in funding. Guangzhou-based startup Ehang also wowed everyone at this year’s CES in Las Vegas with their autonomous helicopter drone. Of course, investment money is just the start – what hardware startups do with it will determine their future.
If you’re an early stage, pre-Series A funded startup with an exciting product, we’d love to have you at this year’s Asia Hardware Battle. Not only will you meet hardware startups from all over Asia, you’ll also have the chance to meet investors from top-tier VC firms, like Sequoia Capital, Silicon Valley Bank, GGV Capital, and others.
Online applications are open until the end of February. We look forward to seeing you in Chengdu!
(Note: Due to visa processing, the timelines for Chinese startups and overseas startups are different)
Click HERE to apply!
]]>A 30-kilometer route along Beijing’s northern outskirts has become the testing ground for China’s first fully autonomous car.
Chinese search giant Baidu revealed today that they have completed a series of driving tests in the city, as the company seeks to launch an individual business unit dedicated to developing China’s first commercially-available autonomous cars.
In June, Baidu revealed they would would partner with BMW in a bid to release the concept car by the end of 2015.
The modified BMW 3 series completed comprehensive tests on the 30-kilometer route from Baidu’s headquarters in the northwest Beijing, continuing through the outskirts of the city. According to the company the car was able to make u-turns, change lanes, overtake other vehicles and merge on and off highway ramps.
Until now the autonomous driving project has been run by Baidu’s Institute of Deep Learning. The company will soon launch the Autonomous Driving Business Unit, headed by senior vice president Wang Jing.
“Fully autonomous driving under mixed road conditions is universally challenging,” said Mr. Wang. “With complexity further heightened by Beijing’s road conditions and unpredictable driver behavior.”
In an interview with the Wall Street Journal Mr. Wang also revealed that Baidu will launch a shuttle service made up of autonomous vans or cars that would be available for shared public use in designated urban areas. The company has not yet set time frame for when the vehicles will be commercially available.
Baidu’s ‘AutoBrain’ highly automated driving (HAD) technology has been under development since 2013, and has the ability to “record 3D road data to within a few centimeters of accuracy of vehicle positioning.” The company expects a majority of China’s roadways to be mapped with the technology by 2025.
Google’s autonomous driving project, founded in 2009, is now in advanced development stages. The company is currently employing their deep-learning technology to mimic more advanced human-like maneuvers including cutting corners and crossing double lines.
This September Chinese vehicle manufacturer Yutong Bus Co. revealed a prototype self-driving bus. The company claimed the bus completed a 33-kilometer test drive including lane changes, 26 traffic signals and a passing maneuver.
Baidu’s contemporary tech giants have taken different routes, choosing to invest instead in electric and smart car technology. In March Alibaba revealed a $160 million USD fund to develop internet-enabled cars with China’s largest automaker SAIC Group.
Tencent joined forces with Shanghai-based electric car maker Next EV to build an electric supercar with an expected release date in 2016. LeTV revealed a partnership with Aston Martin this year, and has committed to releasing their first electric sports car in April 2016.
]]>Didi Chuxing, the $16 billion USD ride-hailing service dominating China, has appointed Yahoo Inc co-founder Jerry Yang to its board, strengthening a network of existing investment relationships between Didi Chuxing, Alibaba Group Holdings Ltd, SoftBank Group Corp and Yahoo.
Both Alibaba and Yahoo received early investment from SoftBank. Alibaba then backed Kuaidi, which merged with Didi in early 2015 (later rebranded under Didi Chuxing). Mr. Yang is also an investor in Alibaba, and sits on the e-commerce company’s board alongside Jack Ma and SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son.
Didi isn’t the only ride-hailing operation seeking to consolidate management across foreign investment partners in China. In September search giant Baidu appointed Uber CFO Brent Callinicos to their board. Baidu is a core investor in Uber’s China-side service.
Softbank is also an investor in India’s Ola Cabs and Singapore’s GrabTaxi, two of the companies within the consolidated network of ride-hailing companies that now also includes Canada’s Lyft.
Didi has aggressively sought to increase their market share in 2015. Earlier this week the company’s other core investor, Tencent, oversaw a ban on private Uber accounts within their highly-popular messaging service WeChat.
Mr. Yang is taking the seat as Yahoo is seeking to spin off their $30 billion USD stake in Alibaba.
]]>Uber is learning a tough lesson about what happens when you go head-to-head with China’s tech giants on their own turf.
Tencent, the tech company that oversees the China’s most popular chat app WeChat, has has blocked all Uber accounts on its social platform, affecting the service across more than a dozen cities.
Tencent-backed Didi Dache is the country’s biggest ride-hailing service and Uber’s largest competitor in the Chinese market.
According to Tencent CEO Ma Huateng [Pony Ma], the recent ban was due to marketing violations by a series of companies, though some were punished more harshly given the severity of the violations, he says.
China Business Network (CBN) CEO Zhou Jiangong confirmed to Technode that Mr. Ma made the comments on a social media post within their personal network.
Mr. Ma explained that public accounts of a certain size have the ability to “incite”, and that Chinese national regulations require businesses of a certain size to hold an Internet Content Provider license (ICP).
“The platform treats everyone equally,” said Mr. Ma, “Didi also violated the rules,” he noted, saying that in the past Didi had also been subject to restrictions.
As of Monday Uber is the only ride-hailing service that has been formally banned from the WeChat platform.
It’s the latest blow in an escalating war for market supremacy between California-based Uber and their Chinese equivalent Didi, backed by the country’s two biggest tech companies Alibaba and Tencent.
China’s largest internal ride-sharing war came to an end with the merger of Alibaba’s Kuaidi Dache with Tencent’s Didi Dache in February 2015. The landmark merger was the beginning of a global ride-hailing empire that includes Singapore’s GrabTaxi, India’s Ola and Canada’s Lyft. The coalition now poses a formidable front against Uber’s expansion, especially in Asia where the U.S. company has been seeking to expand.
Uber’s accounts were previously blocked on WeChat from mid-March. At the time local media reported that the the issues were due to policy violations, and later technical glitches.
According to Mr. Ma the latest bans are part of a platform-wide cleanup effort to remove accounts that are marketing their products by malicious means.
The loss of their public WeChat accounts is a big blow for the China-side operations of Uber. WeChat is a significant consumer outreach platform for businesses on the mainland, with over 10 million public accounts.
]]>Chinese auto manufacturer Geely Holding Group is planning to enter the ride-hailing market with an ambitious upmarket rental service called ‘Caocao’.
The service will compete with both Uber and Didi Kuaidi, who have expanded extensively into the more pricey black car domain. Caocao will focus on rentals and ride-hailing, with a selection of add-on services.
In an interview with Reuters. Geely spokesperson Victor Yang said “we can provide driver, we can provide a translator, we can provide a body guard,” alluding to some of the potential add-on services.
Geely has officially established the subsidiary responsible for the new service. News of the Caocao was first reported by state media outlet Xinhua, though no information on the project’s funding was disclosed.
Competition in China’s ride hailing market has stiffened in 2012, with a series of coalitions forming. The year kicked off with a merger between Tencent-backed Didi and Alibaba’s Kuaidi, which went on to settle a $3 billion USD funding round over the summer.
Uber has consolidated its place in the market through a strategic partnership with Baidu. The U.S. based company confirmed a 1.2 billion USD funding round in September.
Geely is seeking to differentiate Caocao by catering to a high-end market. Other ride-hailing services have also attempted to avoid sharing turf with Didi Kuaidi and Uber. eDaijia, a designated driver app that provides chauffeur services, recently cut 20% of their staff in order to stay competitive as Didi launched a similar service.
eDaijia also entered a strategic partnership with similar chauffeur service UCAR, consolidating resources in the face of rising competition.
Technode reached out to Geely for comment on Wednesday evening and will update with any new information.
]]>Chinese designated driver app eDaijia is cutting one fifth of their staff in an attempt to stay competitive, as market giants Didi and Uber expand aggressively.
According to multiple Chinese media outlets who cite an internal letter from the company’s CEO, Yang Jiajun, the company will be laying off approximately 20% of their staff to curb spending in the face of rising competition.
The source claims that eDaijia’s personnel have quadrupled since the beginning of 2015 as part of an all-out attempt to compete with market leaders. However the CEO now feels that their numbers are “bloated”, and that the company will have to streamline personnel in order to stay competitive.
2015 has seen China’s ride-hailing market become increasingly focussed on core players Didid Kuaidi and Uber China. Both companies secured multi-billion USD funding rounds over the summer in an attempt to grab an early market share in China. eDaijia’s latest funding round totaled $100 million USD in May, with an estimated market cap of around $800 million USD.
When eDaijia launched in 2011 they differentiated from large competitors by marketing themselves as a chauffeur service. Didi has since encroached on the space, by launching their own designated driver service this July called ‘Didi Chauffer’. At the time of the launch Didi claimed they would have the service running in more than 100 cities by the end of 2015.
In October this year eDaijia joined forces with UCAR, also known as Shenzhen Zuche, in a strategic partnership that allows them to share resources including chauffeur teams, databases and marketing costs. The recent round of layoffs has sparked debate as to whether the two companies are planning a complete merger.
According to the internal letter cited in media reports, eDaijia is working on comprehensive compensation for the redundant employees, most of whom are in the technology business development portions of the business.
China’s O2O and on-demand services have seen increasing rounds of consolidation in 2015, beginning with the merger of ride-hailing giants Didi Dache and Kuaidi Dache. The country’s largest tech names Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent have expanded aggressively into the area, heavily subsidizing their services as each hopes to dominate capital-rich sectors. For companies like eDaijia, having minimal cash reserves could spell disaster in a market that favors early acquisition tactics.
Image Credit: Miro Vrlik Photography / Shutterstock.com / eDaijia
]]>One of the most highly anticipated partnerships between Chinese O2O services could see a full rollout before the year’s end, with Didi Dache and Ele.me reportedly settling on partnership plans this week.
Ele.me CEO Zhang Xuhao confirmed to Chinese press that the two companies had reached an agreement on a “strategic program” between the two companies, though no financial details have yet been released.
Ele.me is China’s leading O2O food delivery service. Founded in 2009, the Shanghai-based company employs a wide network of two-wheel delivery drivers in partnership with restaurants all over China to provide on-demand food delivery through their namesake app ‘Ele.me’, Which in Chinese translates to ‘Hungry?’. Didi is the country’s largest ride-hailing service and is valued at over $16 billion USD.
In September Zhu Xiaohu, Director at GSR Ventures, the company that backed Ele.me’s A series, confirmed that the companies were pursuing a strategic relationship, but that they had yet to enter formal financial discussions. At the time Didi noted that the partnership in discussion would not involve any direct investment.
The latest plans involve a program that utilizes both two-wheeled and four-wheeled distribution systems for food delivery. The same source said that a trial has begun in Beijing, which will extend to a fully-fledged service before the end of December.
A partnership between Ele.me and Tencent has long been rumored, considering both companies exist within Tencent’s strategic investment ecosystem. Both companies are well-and-truly equipped with enough capital to pilot the cooperative project, Ele.me closed a $630 million USD funding round in August, on top of a $350 million USD E round in January led by Tencent. Didi nabbed a whopping $3 billion USD investment over the summer, fueling their fight for market share against Uber and a handful of other ride-hailing companies.
The program resembles ‘UberEATs’, the food delivery service run by Uber. Uber has also been expanding aggressively in China since establishing an independent China operation to take on Didi. However despite offering periodic promotional food services, they are yet to launch an UberEATS style service on the mainland.
]]>This past week we had the pleasure of welcoming Stephen Zhu, the VP of Strategy and Head of Taxi Services at Didi to join us onstage at TechCrunch Beijing, cohosted by Technode. The article summarizing his talk can be found here.
]]>As Didi and Uber go head to head to conquer the Chinese market, Stephen Zhu, VP of Strategy and Head of Taxi Services at Didi has said it’s a much harder task to master China’s cities than comparable markets like San Francisco.
“Of course it’s more difficult, because Beijing has 20 million people. When you compare the difficulty level it’s like comparing calculus with algebra”, said Mr. Zhu onstage at TechCrunch Beijing on Tuesday, an event co-hosted by Technode.
“The traffic system is more complicated here,” he continued, saying that matching the thousands of passengers with cars within Beijing’s convoluted traffic network was an ongoing challenge, with the company processing over 50 terabytes of data each day.
Referring to markets like San Francisco, where their largest foreign rival Uber is based, Didi has been “dealing with countless other problems every day compared to companies who’ve only been solving algebra problems,” said Mr. Zhu.
According to the company, Didi facilitates approximately 7 million rides a day in China, with private cars accounting for about 4 million rides, taxis 2 million and other services including hitch and carpooling making up the remaining 1 million.
Didi has been expanding aggressively out of their core taxi-hailing business, which now only accounts for 28.5% of their total rides, according to the company’s own estimates. They launched their private car service 14 months ago, which has gone head to head with Uber’s expanding China operations.
Mr. Zhu also commented on the company’s expanding investment portfolio, noting that they were already emerging their local counterparts to cross promote rides through the corresponding apps.
“For example, [when] all the passengers who use didi in China go to South East Asia, where we work with Grab Taxi, when they turn on Didi… they can hail a car through the network,” said Zhu. Didi recently revealed that the same cross-platform service would be available for Lyft users by early next year.
Mr Zhu. also said that the company would be spending an increasing amount of money on innovation investment. Currently they are only legally registered for certain services in Shanghai, including their ‘Hitch’ service, which is similar to Uber’s original ride-sharing model.
This past week we had the pleasure of welcoming Stephen Zhu, the VP of Strategy and Head of Taxi Services at Didi to join us onstage at TechCrunch Beijing, cohosted by Technode. You can view the full video here.
]]>The race for market supremacy in China’s ride-hailing market has taken a distinctly legal turn.
Chinese mobile transportation platform Didi Kuaidi today announced that it has received a license from the Shanghai Municipal Transportation Commission (SMTC) to run private-car-booking services in the metropolitan city. It comes on the same day as U.S. rival Uber announces the official registration of their China subsidiary in Shanghai’s Free Trade Zone, also hoping to snag a license.
Didi Kuaidi has said that the license makes their services the first legally-authorized online private car booking platform in China.
Operating under the new license, Didi Kuaidi have promised to maintain the quality of vehicles and drivers registered on its platform by providing necessary training, as well as conducting rigorous screening of potential drivers.
The new license requires mandatory insurance, third-party liability insurance, carrier’s liability insurance and passenger insurance, which provide coverage up to 6 million RMB per annum per vehicle. Didi Kuaidi will also add dedicated customer service channels to ensure passenger protection.
The company earned the newly-issued private car license by meeting all criteria set by the SMTC, this includes the requirement for all drivers to hold a public driver license along with other qualifications. Their servers must also be located in China, allowing the government to control and access data centers. As part of Uber’s announcement today they also revealed they would be seeking to meet this requirement in order to get the same license.
Regulatory issues have long been a headache for China’s booming car-hailing companies. All major companies in this arena have been taking steps to obtain legal status.
As the first company to acquire such a license, Didi Kuaidi is moving one step ahead of its arch competitor Uber in obtaining government backing. Uber China announced the are “actively preparing relevant documents and materials, and ready to apply for internet-car-hailing platform permits following designated procedures after the new regulations come out.”
When responding to whether the SMTC is issuing the license to more companies in the near future, Sun Jianping, director of the commission, expressed that “we have set out certain criteria for car-haling companies and the license is open to all companies that could meet these requirements”. He disclosed that Uber is one of the companies seeking this license.
Together with the licensing news, Didi Kuaidi also announced some key metrics for the platform. Originally a taxi-hailing app, Didi Kuaidi has now expanded its service, including taxi hailing, premium car, carpooling and bus sharing, to 360 cities in China through its mobile apps, servicing 200 million people in total.
The company currently processes approximately 3 million private car orders and 3 million taxi rides each day, representing over 80% of the private car service market and over 90% of the taxi hailing service market in China, according to the company.
]]>NextEV, one of China’s most promising electric car innovators, has already raised half of the $1 billion it is seeking to take on U.S. rival Tesla. It comes as a handful of Chinese companies are investing heavily into the electric vehicle industry.
The Shanghai-based company’s latest round has been joined by Sequoia Capital and Joy Capital, with Chinese media reporting that they have raised $500 million USD so far. NextEV already has offices in Silicon Valley, as well as Munich and London.
NextEV isn’t the only Chinese effort that has made moves to expand its operations globally either. Last week Chinese state-owned automaker BAIC Motor Corp, announced an R&D centre in Silicon Valley. They also revealed that they have taken on a majority stake of California-based electric car maker Atieva, and will begin developing electric cars.
LeTV, a Chinese video streaming company that has since diversified into smartphones, also announced that they are working on an electric vehicle with an R&D centre in Silicon Valley, which will be released in the first half of 2016.
Despite their international outlook on R&D, it’s likely the Chinese companies will look to gain early traction in their home market, rather than starting up overseas. Despite their global presence, all three of the aforementioned electric vehicle projects strongly favor Chinese investors.
NextEV is looking to release their first project, an electric supercar, by 2016. It’s tipped to have over 1000 horsepower and have the ability to accelerate from 0 to 100km/h (62 mph) in less than 3 seconds.
To learn more about the project check out Four Hi-Tech Car Concepts From Chinese Internet Companies You’ll See Within A Year
]]>Lyft, the San Francisco-based ride-hailing company with a pink mustache, has announced a partnership with China’s largest player in the industry, Didi Kuaidi. It comes at a time when Didi’s presence in the market is intensifying, and mutual rival Uber attempts to gain traction.
Didi Kuaidi has confirmed that it contributed $100 million USD to Lyft’s latest $530 million USD round in May. The North American startup is now valued at 2.5 Billion USD.
It’s a very advantageous partnership for Lyft, who have now entered the biggest ride-hailing funding family in Asia. Didi Kuaidi recently landed a $3 billion USD funding round from a variety of high-profile investors. They also have received funding in the past from China’s sovereign wealth fund, CIC, which is widely seen as a tick of approval from the Chinese government.
For Lyft, being a Didi Kuaidi-approved company could help them avoid some of the legal issues that Uber has faced during the establishment of their China-side operations.
Didi Kuaidi also shares investors with Singapore-based Grab Taxi and India’s Ola Cabs. The Chinese giant is reportedly in talks with both of the later companies about possible future partnerships, but have kept tight-lipped on any details.
In a conference held in New York on Wednesday, Didi confirmed that Lyft and Didi Kuaidi users would be able to use each others’ services in their contrasting markets, meaning that Lyft users will be able to seamlessly hail Didi Kuaidi services in China and vice versa. It is possible that Didi Kuaidi has a similar model in mind for Ola and Grabtaxi.
]]>Ola Cabs, the Indian ride-sharing app that shares a major investor with Alibaba, has sealed $225 million USD of a planned $500 million investment round in what has been the most generous season on record for Asian ride-hailing apps.
The latest round of funding brings Ola’s valuation to approximately $5 billion USD, and is currently led by New York-based Falcon Edge Capital. Early this year they had pulled in $400 million led by Russian billionaire Yuri Milner’s fund, DST global. Before that Ola had sealed $210 million from SoftBank, the Japanese company that owns over 35% of Alibaba.
It caps off a truly spectacular eight weeks of funding among Asian ride-hailing apps. Last month Singapore-based Grab Taxi raised $400 million USD with the help of sovereign wealth fund, China Investment Corporation (CIC). The same fund had previously supported Chinese star ride-hailing app Didi Kuaidi, who just days ago confirmed a whopping $3 billion USD in funding.
Ola, Didi Kuaidi and Grab Taxi all share a mesh of similar investors, presenting a strong front in the increasingly competitive market. Despite this, Uber has kept its spot in the ring so far, announcing $1.2 billion USD in fresh funding from previous backer Baidu.
Uber has committed to multi-billion dollar localization efforts across China and India over the next year, though they have met with a series of setbacks so far, the largest of which is strong local competition. Ola currently claims to be operational in five times as many cities as Uber within India, while Didi Kuaidi currently holds over 90% of China’s ride-hailing market.
]]>While the Internet Of Things frenzy is in full swing in China, local tech giants are expanding their interests in connecting cars.
Chinese internet giant Tencent unveiled its internet-of-vehicle (IoV) open platform Tencent Automotive Services yesterday with the launch of an IoV ROM, an IoV app as well as API MyCar.
Powered by the Android system, the new IoV ROM sports multiple smartphone-like capabilities, such as navigation, instant messaging, news, security services and weather applications. Tencent Map and Didi Chuxing provide navigation data to the system. Its WeChat and QQ integration allow speech input and real-time location sharing. The system, which is still under trial, is now compatible with some Volkswagen cars.
The IoV app is mainly designed for in-vehicle systems without internet access. After connecting your smartphone and car through USB or WiFi, users can browse all the information on Tencent’s infotainment platform via the on-board system. The app supports the connectivity protocol of Apple’s CarPlay and Android Auto, and a full range of car brands including Ford, BMW, and Mercedes.
MyCar enables car owners to monitor your vehicle on smartphone, share music and locations, and check car conditions.
The company emphasized that Tencent Automotive Service is an open platform providing a standardized access for segmented automotive systems by using its rich resources in content, social networking and security.
Tencent has been quite active in IoV sector since last year with the launch of IoV plug-and-play gadget Lubao Box and investment in mapping company NavInfo. Tencent-NavInfo cooperation also brought up WeDrive, a comprehensive IoV solution.
Researchers have released quite promising projections for China’s IoV potential, expecting the whole market size to hit 150 billion RMB ($23.55 billion USD) by 2015. It is estimated that 90% of the automobiles will have wireless-internet connectivity as of the end of 2020, a sign indicating that car will become another internet access point after the smartphone.
Along with the growth of China’s IoV dynamics, Chinese internet companies have started to explore the booming sector. Baidu launched an infotainment platform CarLife at the beginning of this year. Alibaba’s partnership with automaker SAIC Motor Corp gives its homegrown system YUN OS wider application to cars in line with the company’s attempt to expand beyond their e-commerce business. Chinese video company LeTV also released a custom OS for the company’s electric car project unveiled last year.
Image credit: Sohu Tech
]]>It has been a popular year for Chinese companies announcing plans to develop electric vehicles, and the spree has continues.
Chinese state-owned automaker BAIC Motor Corp, announced an R&D centre in Silicon Valley yesterday. They also revealed that they have taken on a majority stake of California-based electric car maker Atieva, and will begin developing electric cars, and later, self-driving cars.
Atieva was co-founded in 2007 by former Tesla executive Bernard Tse. The company is based in Silicon Valley’s Menlo Park. BAIC’s new research and development operations will be run at a separate centre that is currently employing 20 staff.
BAIC is planning to up its production to 200,000 electric cars by 2020, hoping to export 30% of them outside China.
Earlier this week we reported on four high tech car concepts from Chinese internet companies that we can expect to see within a year. Among them was the Tencent-backed NextEV electric supercar and the LeTV Aston Martin electric sports car.
Both NextEV and the LeTV electric car teams have research teams also based in Silicon Valley. LeTV said this year that it would be releasing its first concept car in April 2016 at the Shanghai Auto Show, while NextEV, who announced their Tencent investment just last week, remain tight lipped on a release date, but have committed to a 2016 concept launch.
The electric vehicle market in China is attracting a lot of attention from high profile tech and auto investors, with the Chinese-backed electric vehicle concepts looking to challenge Tesla both globally and in China.
It’s been a rough year for Tesla’s China-side team, with reports claiming that the U.S. company had laid off 30% of its staff on the mainland in reaction to slowing sales.
Last month the company urged the U.S. government to put pressure on China during Xi Jinping’s upcoming visit, hoping to lift restriction of foreign automakers.
Currently Tesla is not able to manufacture in China without establishing a Chinese joint venture. The Chinese government has been openly supportive of developments in the electric vehicle field, but has not budged on laws restricting foreign companies.
Image Credit: Shutterstock
]]>Uber has confirmed a $1.2 billion USD funding boost from previous backer Chinese search engine giant Baidu. It comes as Didi Kuaidi, their primary competitor in the market, is reportedly about to close a round of around $3 billion from its own investors.
It’s now become an all out war for market share as investors show they are not afraid to subsidize services in order to take a bigger piece of the Chinese ride-share pie.
Uber CEO Travis Kalanick told Chinese tech media site Sina.com that the financing round is still not finished, and that finding a suitable partner in the Chinese market was more important than the funding itself.
Bloomberg reported on the same day that Didi Kuaidi’s latest injection from had increased the company’s valuation to $16.5 billion. While the full number of investors have not been disclosed, current investors in this round include SoftBank, China Investment Corporation, Alibaba Group, Tencent and Ping An Insurance.
Didi Kuaidi’s $3 billion investment surprised onlookers, surpassing the expected values. The company had revealed in July that they were planning $2 billion in funding, with President Jean Liu saying at the time that the company would only look to raise an extra “few hundred million dollars”.
Recent figures show Uber’s valuation is potentially $8 billion as of the latest round, though that amount could fluctuate depending on who the San Francisco-based company chooses to round out its series.
Uber has made agressive moves to localise in 2015 with their ‘Uber China’ arm, hoping to make it their biggest market globally. Earlier this year Kalanick said the company would be investing $1 billion in the Chinese market before the end of the year, and the company has been on the hunt for funding since, though given their large cash reserves it’s likely the $1 billion is not being sourced fom new investment. CEO Travis Kalanick is in Beijing this week to speak at the Baidu annual corporate conference.
The new funding injection has only upped the stakes for the two highly-valued startups, who are vying to establish market share in China. Didi Kuaidi now reportedly has a 95% share of the ride-hailing market, though it’s important to note that they operate in the taxi-hailing vertical, unlike Uber. When comparing Uber’s numbers with Didi Kuaidi’s non-taxi services the share is much more even.
Related Articles:
Image Credit: Shutterstock
]]>It’s the year of four wheels for China’s internet giants, and the country’s tech companies are racing to get their concepts ready by 2016. Cars in the connected, remote and electric fields are under development right now with a focus on high-profile foreign partnerships.
Hi-tech cars have been the domain of western progressive tech companies in the past, including Tesla, Apple and Google, but with R&D at an all time high among China’s tech companies, many are taking the opportunity to extend past traditional fields.
The government has also become a backer of hi-tech car solutions recently, amending rules to allow non-automotive companies to invest in car projects. Here are some of the latest hi-tech car concepts to come out of China’s internet powerhouses.
What can produce over 1,000 horsepower and accelerate 0 to 100 kilometers (62 miles) in less than 3 seconds? Tencent’s latest partnership with Shanghai-based electric car maker NextEV.
While it’s not Tencent’s first foray into the car industry, their latest partnership with NextEV is snagging a lot of attention. NextEV is a company working on electric cars, and is considered on of the prime competitors to Tesla in the region. Tencent and Uber-backer Hillhouse Capital put up and undisclosed amount to take NextEV global, according to a NextEV spokesperson.
The first model that will be launched under the partnership will be an electric supercar. While it’s not exactly a consumer-ready concept, it aims to show its muscle in the industry by outperforming combustion engines in the same class. A spokesperson told Reuters that the car would produce over 1,000 horsepower and have the ability to accelerate to 100 kilometers within 3 seconds, making it competitive in its range.
NextEV’s deep-pocketed investors helped secure former Ford Motors Executive Martin leach to head the effort, which is expected to see a first release in 2016.
In March this year, Tencent had partnered with Foxconn and top Chinese luxury auto dealer China Harmony Auto Holding to begin exploring the electric car industry.
Chinese search engine giant Baidu inked a partnership with BMW to release an autonomous car, potentially before the end of 2015. The two companies revealed they were working on the project together in April 2014, but had kept things under wraps until the announcement this June that the car would see daylight before the end of the year.
Frequently compared to Google, Baidu lived up to its name, looking to beat the U.S. search giant to market with its autonomous car. Unlike Google’s effort however, the Baidu car will not be fully autonomous according to reports, instead it is going to employ a driver assisted system.
While they don’t exactly rub shoulders with Baidu, Alibaba or Tencent, LeTV is a budding internet giant in its own right. The company, which began as an internet video streaming service, has since extended its reach into smartphones, releasing a series of controversial ads to challenge Apple in the Chinese market.
They are now expanding into electric Sports Cars too, joining forces to create a concept car with the James Bond of British Car Brands; Aston Martin. The company released a series of concept drawings at this year’s Shanghai Auto Show, depicting a very sleek concept with many of the Aston Martin design features. Aston Martin and LeTV have been reportedly working together on the electric car at an R&D centre set up in Silicon Valley.
In January, LeTV released a custom OS for electric and connected cars, which is expected to feature in the upcoming design. They are expected to release the car at the same show in April 2016.
In March this year Chinese tech giant Alibaba revealed that it had made a $160 million USD investment in partnership with China’s largest automaker group SAIC group to create a fund aimed at developing internet-enabled cars. Unlike others in the field, Alibaba and SAIC have remained tight lipped on their upcoming projects, giving almost nothing away since the initial announcement.
According to an announcement on SAIC’s website, we can expect to see the first project released in 2016. Besides funding, Alibaba is expected to contribute the cloud computing technology, digital entertainment, maps and financial data.
Related Articles:
Image Credit: Shutterstock, NextEV, LeTV
]]>If you were wondering what LeTV and Aston Martin might have been working on since they announced their partnership in April, wonder no more.
The Chinese video streaming company, often dubbed the Netflix of China, has released a series of concept images for their upcoming electric car, and it’s looking very sleek.
The iconic British car brand announced its partnership with LeTV at the Shanghai Auto Show this year, and for those eager to see the final product, they’ll have to wait until the same show next year. LeTV has set a timeline to release the car in April 2016.
The two companies have only been publicly linked for four months, but according to Chinese media reports they have been working together for a year now on the latest design. LeTV has already debuted a concept UI that can link smart devices and cars.
The Chinese company set up an R&D centre in Silicon Valley, with a specific team dedicated to developing their electric car. While they may have been working on the design for much longer, LeTV began seeking a license to manufacture them in December 2014.
Connected and electric cars have been a hot investment among Chinese internet companies over the past 18 months. Baidu, China’s answer to Google, confirmed it would be launching its first driverless car in the second half of 2015. Tencent inked a deal this year with luxury car dealer China Harmony Auto and iPhone manufacturer Foxconn to reportedly manufacture electric cars with smart technology. not to be outdone, Alibaba has also joined forces with China’s largest automaker SAIC Motor to establish a $160 million USD und aimed at developing connected cars.
San francisco-based Tesla is also currently working in China, though sales have been steady. According to the China Automotive Technology and Research Centre, the company has an approximate 80% share of imported plug-in hybrid or electric cars, selling 2,147 in the first 6 months of 2015.
Related Articles:
Image Credit: LeTV
]]>